ATTORNEY GENERAL Under provisions set out in the Texas Constitution, the Texas Government Code, Title 4, sec.402.042 and numerous statutes, the attorney general is authorized to write advisory opinions for state and local officials. These advisory opinions are requested by agencies or officials when they are confronted with unique or unusually difficult legal questions. The attorney general also determines, under authority of the Texas Open Records Act, whether information requested for release from governmental agencies may be held from public disclosure. Requests for opinions, opinions, and open record decisions are summarized for publication in the Texas Register. The Attorney General responds to many requests for opinions and open records decisions with letter opinions. A letter opinion has the same force and effect as a formal Attorney General Opinion, and represents the opinion of the Attorney General unless and until it is modified or overruled by a subsequent letter opinion, a formal Attorney General Opinion, or a decision of a court of record. To request copies of opinions, phone (512) 462-0011. To inquire about pending requests for opinions, phone (512) 463-2110. Open Records Decision ORD-631 (RQ-589). Request from Robert Giddings, The University of Texas System, Office of General Counsel, 201 West Seventh Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2981, concerning whether a consultant's report concerning a university's overall faculty hiring and retention policies is excepted from required public disclosure by the Government Code, sec.552.111 (formerly Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6252-17a, sec.3(a)(11)). Summary of Decision. The Government Code, sec.552.111 may apply to information created for a governmental body by an outside consultant when the outside consultant is acting at the request of the governmental body and performing a task within the authority of the governmental body. Information created by an outside consultant for a governmental body may constitute an intra-agency memorandum that may be withheld under sec.552.111. Under sec.552.111, a governmental body may withhold information that relates to the policymaking functions of the governmental body. This information includes advice, recommendations, and opinions regarding administrative and personnel matters of broad scope that affect the governmental body's policy mission. TRD-9501597 Opinions DM-313 (RQ-606). Request from Honorable John T. Montford, Chair, Finance Committee, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas 78711, concerning whether a county is required to accept warrantless arrestees from a municipal police department, and related questions. Summary of Opinion. If a city police officer arrests a person for violating a state statute and a magistrate issues a commitment order for the prisoner, the county is required to incarcerate the prisoner. A municipal court judge is a proper magistrate to issue such an order if he holds office in the proper county for venue purposes. Should the sheriff refuse to take custody of the prisoner, the county is responsible for the prisoner's maintenance. TRD-9501598 DM-314 (RQ-663). Request from Rebecca Lightsey, Interim Commissioner of Insurance, Texas Department of Insurance, P.O. Box 149104, Austin, Texas 78714-9104, concerning whether the Department of Insurance may, pursuant to Insurance Code, Article 3.50-6A, license noninsurance entities that offer viatical settlement agreements, and related questions. Summary of Opinion. Article 3.50-6A of the Insurance Code is null and void because it violates the separation of powers required by sec.1 of Article II of the Texas Constitution in that it provides neither standards nor a discernible objective in its delegation of regulatory authority to the Department of Insurance. TRD-9501599 DM-315 (RQ-718). Request from Honorable W. Keith Oakley, Chair, Committee on Public Safety, Texas House of Representatives, P.O. Box 2910, Austin, Texas 78768-2910, concerning interpretation of sec.80.001 of the Human Resources Code, which concerns the duty of local law enforcement officials to perform fingerprinting services. Summary of Opinion. Human Resources Code, sec.80.001 obliges state and local law enforcement agencies to provide free fingerprinting services to the public upon request and without additional conditions. TRD-9501600 DM-316 (RQ-714). Request from Honorable Garry Mauro, Commissioner, General Land Office, 1700 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701-1495, concerning whether the state may enter into contracts to pay consideration for information about property recoverable by the permanent school fund under sec.403.0195 of the Government Code. Summary of Opinion. The state may not enter into contracts under sec.403.0195 of the Government Code to pay consideration for information about property recoverable by the permanent school fund. TRD-9501601 DM-317 (RQ-712). Request from Honorable Gerald Alan Joy, Potter County Auditor, 601 South Taylor, Amarillo, Texas 79101, concerning whether a county may pay travel expenses of an applicant for the position of county forensic pathologist. Summary of Opinion. Article III, sec.52 of the Texas Constitution requires that expenditures by a county be for a public purpose. The determination that such purpose is being served by an expenditure of public funds or an extension of credit rests with the governmental entity's discretion, subject to judicial review. In some cases, Article III, sec.52 may not preclude a county from paying the travel expenses of an applicant for the position of county forensic pathologist. Attorney General Opinion M-223 (1968) is overruled to the extent that it conflicts with this decision. TRD-9501602 DM-318 (RQ-719). Request from Honorable Lynn Ellison, District Attorney, Atascosa County Courthouse, Circle Drive, Number 5A, Jourdanton, Texas 78026, concerning whether Articles 2.12 and 2.13, Code of Criminal Procedure, authorize peace officers to enforce city ordinances. Summary of Opinion. Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 2.12 and 2.13 do not in themselves authorize peace officers to enforce city ordinances. TRD-9501603 DM-319 (RQ-669). Request from Honorable O. H. "Ike" Harris, Chair, Committee on State Affairs, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas 78711, concerning whether the Local Government Code, sec.395.011(c) authorizes a municipality to contract to provide capital improvements to an area outside its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction if the area lies within the boundaries of another municipality and related questions. Summary of Opinion. The Local Government Code, sec.395.011(c) authorizes a municipality to contract with another municipality to provide capital improvements to an area inside the corporate boundaries of the second municipality. Section 395.011(c) authorizes the municipality that wishes to provide the capital improvements to charge an impact fee within the corporate boundaries of the municipality that wishes to receive the capital improvements if the municipalities have contracted accordingly and the providing municipality complies with chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. Section 395.011(c), in conjunction with the definition of "capital improvements plan" in sec.395.001(2), authorizes a municipality that contracts to provide capital improvements to an area outside its corporate boundaries and extraterritorial jurisdiction to include the area in the municipality's capital improvements plan. TRD-9501604 Requests for Opinions (RQ-770). Request from Todd K. Brown, Executive Director, Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, 4000 South IH-35, Austin, Texas 78704-7491, concerning purchase of liability insurance for state officers and employees. (RQ-771). Request from Sandra C. Joseph, Open Records Counsel/Disclosure Officer, Comptroller of Public Accounts, LBJ State Office Building, Austin, Texas 78774, concerning construction of sec.154.073 of the Civil Practices and Remedies Code. (RQ-772). Request from Ann Diamond, Assistant District Attorney, Office of the Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney, Justice Center, 401 West Belknap, Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0201, concerning whether sec.51.14 of the Family Code authorizes disclosure to a juvenile's attorney of records concerning the juvenile and the injuries he received while detained at the juvenile detention center. (RQ-773). Request from Honorable Debra Danburg, Chair, Committee on Elections, Texas House of Representatives, Capitol Extension, E2.144, Austin, Texas 78768, concerning applicability of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 8890, sec.22a the Veterinary Licensing Act, to municipal corporations. (RQ-774). Request from Larry A. Farrow, Executive Director, Texas Funeral Service Commission, 8100 Cameron Road, Suite 550, Austin, Texas 78754-3896, Attn: Wayne L. Goodrum, General Counsel, concerning whether the Open Records Act governs a request for records pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum. (RQ-775). Request from JoAnn S. Wright, School Attorney, Arlington Independent School District, 1203 West Pioneer Parkway, Arlington, Texas 76013-6246, concerning whether a school district can deny a request for education records under the federal Family Educational and Privacy Act without seeking a determination from the attorney general under Government Code, sec.552.301, and related questions. (RQ-776). Request from Janice Caldwell, Ph.D., Executive Director, Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, 701 West 51st Street, Austin, Texas 78714-9030, concerning whether electronic mail ("e-mail") transferred between public employees is a "public record" subject to the provisions of the Texas Open Records Act. (RQ-777). Request from Charles E. Griffith, Deputy City Attorney, City of Austin, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767, James Showen, Senior Assistant City Attorney, City of Tyler, P.O. Box 2039, Tyler, Texas 75710, concerning whether a request for all offense reports on a particular person held by a city police department implicates the common-law privacy interests of the subject of the offense reports under the Government Code, sec.552.101. (RQ-778). Request from Honorable Rodney Ellis, Chair, Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, 905 Sam Houston Building, Austin, Texas 78711, concerning applicability to state and local governmental bodies of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related questions. (RQ-779). Request from Leonard W. Peck, Jr., Assistant General Counsel, Legal Affairs Division, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 99, Huntsville, Texas 77342-0099, concerning effect of the final judgment in Ruiz v. Estelle on the public availability of Department of Criminal Justice internal affairs investigative reports regarding allegations of employee misconduct against prison inmates and related questions. TRD-9501596