TITLE 30.ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Part 1. TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Chapter 114. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES

Subchapter H. LOW EMISSION FUELS

2. LOW EMISSION DIESEL

30 TAC §114.318

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission or TCEQ) proposes an amendment to §114.318.

The amendment will be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the state implementation plan (SIP).

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULE

In April 2000, the commission adopted rules establishing requirements for low emission diesel (LED), and requiring that only LED be sold for on-road and off-road use in the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) nonattainment counties as part of that area's ozone attainment demonstration SIP. These new diesel fuel standards were to go into effect May 1, 2002. In December 2000, the commission adopted amendments to the LED rules expanding their coverage to the entire state and made the diesel fuel content limits for sulfur more stringent than federal diesel fuel regulations for on-road vehicles. The commission submitted, as part of that SIP revision, a waiver in accordance with 42 United States Code (USC), §7545(C)(4)(c) for the on-road portion of the rules. The EPA granted the waiver on November 14, 2001 (66 FR 57197), as part of EPA's approval of the SIP revision. Subsequent to this adoption, the 77th Legislature, 2001, passed House Bill (HB) 2912, Article 15, which amended the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §382.039(g) - (i) to restrict the commission from requiring distribution of LED as described in the revised SIP prior to January 1, 2005, and to allow the commission to consider, as an alternative method of compliance with LED standards, fuels to achieve equivalent emission reductions. In September 2001, the commission adopted amendments to the LED rules implementing the changes required by HB 2912, Article 15, and included new rules allowing the use of alternative emission reduction plans (AERPs) to demonstrate compliance with the LED control requirements. At the direction of the EPA and in order to reduce nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions necessary for the Houston/Galveston/Brazoria (HGB) area to demonstrate attainment with the one hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), these amendments also limited the coverage area of the LED rules from statewide to those counties previously included in the regional air pollution control strategy for the HGB nonattainment area. On March 9, 2005, the commission adopted revisions to the LED rules, extending the initial compliance date for LED from April 1, 2005, to October 1, 2005, and also strengthening registration requirements and improving the rules' enforceability, and submitted them as a SIP revision to the EPA on March 23, 2005. This action was in response to an August 2004 petition by the Texas Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association for rulemaking to extend the compliance date for LED to October 1, 2006, and to June 1, 2007, for the ultra low sulfur requirement. Subsequently, the EPA raised concerns with certain provisions of the revised rules that were problematic in regard to EPA's approval of the rule and SIP revision. Under the LED rules adopted in March 2005, the AERPs were required to be approved by both the executive director and the EPA. The EPA had determined that the commission must submit the AERPs in the form of a SIP revision in order to obtain EPA approval, requiring public review of each AERP. However, many of the diesel fuel producers considered their AERPs to be confidential business information. Furthermore, the commission would also be required to submit a new SIP revision any time a producer amended its AERP. On April 26, 2006, the commission adopted revisions to the LED rules to address the EPA's issues with the rules adopted in March 2005, including the issues raised by EPA regarding its consideration of AERPs as allowed under §114.318. The April 2006 revisions amended §114.318 to establish a method by which all AERPs could be approved by the executive director and the EPA without a SIP revision and specified that all previously approved AERPs would expire December 31, 2006. Producers wishing to use an AERP for compliance with the LED rules were required to submit an AERP under the new protocol by no later than November 15, 2006, to be approved before December 31, 2006. In February 2006, the executive director also approved an AERP for biodiesel producers allowing them to blend biodiesel with LED compliant diesel fuel in the 110 central and eastern Texas counties affected by the LED regulation until December 31, 2006. The AERP for biodiesel producers was issued to provide biodiesel producers sufficient time to complete the testing of their biodiesel blended formations that is necessary to be approved by the executive director in accordance with §114.315 as alternative diesel formulations for LED. Under the current LED regulations, only those biodiesel blended formulations that were approved by the executive director as an alternative diesel formulation for LED in accordance with the testing provisions specified under §114.315 could be used for compliance with the LED regulations after the December 31, 2006, expiration date. As of December 8, 2006, the executive director has not yet received testing documentation sufficient to approve a biodiesel blended alternative diesel formulation for compliance with the LED regulations.

The commission is proposing in this rulemaking a revision to Chapter 114: Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles, Subchapter H: Low Emission Fuels, Division 2: Low Emission Diesel, §114.318. Specifically, the commission is revising §114.318(c) to extend the December 31, 2006, expiration date for all AERPs approved by the executive director prior to December 16, 2005. This proposed revision will extend the expiration date by one year to December 31, 2007, in order to provide biodiesel producers additional time to complete testing necessary to ensure compliance with the LED regulations under Chapter 114, Subchapter H, Division 2. The commission is not soliciting comments on other subsections of §114.318, unless otherwise specified in the SECTION DISCUSSION section of this preamble.

SECTION DISCUSSION

The proposed change to §114.318(c) amends the expiration date of all AERPs approved by the executive director prior to December 16, 2005, by extending the expiration date by one year from December 31, 2006, to December 31, 2007, and applies this new expiration date to all AERPs approved by the executive director prior to May 17, 2006. The May 17, 2006, date is the effective date of the LED regulations adopted by the commission on April 26, 2006. This proposed change will provide biodiesel producers additional time to complete the necessary testing to ensure compliance with the LED regulations. In addition, the proposed change will also provide diesel producers additional time to finalize AERPs as well. The proposed change to §114.318(c) will also remove the exception that allowed a producer operating under an AERP that was attempting to obtain verification under the EPA's Environment Technology Verification Program and EPA's Office of Transportation and Air Quality's Voluntary Diesel Retrofit Program to continue to operate under their AERP for a limited time beyond December 31, 2006. The proposed one year extension should provide sufficient time for producers that had met the exception conditions specified under §114.318(c)(1) - (4) to complete the EPA verification process.

FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Assessment, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed rule. The proposed rulemaking would amend the LED rules by extending, to December 31, 2007, the expiration date of AERPs approved by the executive director prior to May 17, 2006.

The proposed rulemaking would amend §114.318 by extending the expiration date for AERPs approved by the executive director prior to December 16, 2005. This proposed rule will extend the current expiration date of December 31, 2006 by one year to December 31, 2007 in order to provide biodiesel producers an additional year to complete testing necessary to ensure compliance with the LED regulations under Chapter 114, Subchapter H, Division 2. Extending the expiration date will not have fiscal implications on any producer or supplier of biodiesel or diesel fuel who may choose to change fuel formulations to meet LED standards for NO x emissions.

PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS

Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the changes seen in the proposed rule will be support for further development of methods by which biodiesel fuel producers can continue to provide alternate fuels to a tight fuel market and ensure that they meet required emission standards. Public health and environmental safety will be safeguarded by the development of AERPs that result in equivalent reductions in NO x emissions. This proposed action will also provide citizens with economic flexibility to utilize non petroleum based fuels when it is cost effective.

Extending the expiration date of AERPs is not anticipated to have any fiscal implications for producers or suppliers of biodiesel, but the proposed extension should give these producers and suppliers more time to comply with LED regulations.

SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT

No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses as a result of the proposed rulemaking. The proposed rule, which extends a deadline, is not anticipated to have a fiscal impact on those producers, but it will give these entities more time to comply with LED regulations.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT

The commission has reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rule does not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect.

DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking considering the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined that the rulemaking does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule." A major environmental rule means a rule, the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. The specific purpose of the proposed amendment to §114.318 is to provide biodiesel producers additional time to complete the necessary testing to ensure compliance with the LED regulations. In addition, the proposed change will provide diesel producers additional time to finalize alternative emission reduction plans as well. The amendment does not specifically protect human health or the environment. Therefore, the proposed rulemaking does not constitute a major environmental rule, and thus is not subject to a formal regulatory analysis.

In addition, the proposed amendment to Chapter 114 is not subject to the regulatory analysis provisions of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(b), because the proposed rulemaking does not meet any of the four applicability requirements. Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, only applies to a major environmental rule, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law; 2) exceed an express requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law.

Specifically, this rulemaking action, which is designed to extend the expiration date of approved alternative emission reduction plans, does not exceed an express requirement under state or federal law. Furthermore, there is no contract or delegation agreement that covers the topic that is the subject of this action. Finally, this rulemaking action was not developed solely under the general powers of the agency, but is authorized by specific sections of Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 382 (also known as the Texas Clean Air Act), and the Texas Water Code, which are cited in the STATUTORY AUTHORITY section of this preamble, including Texas Health and Safety Code, §§382.012, 382.017, 382.019, and 382.202. Therefore, the proposed rulemaking does not exceed a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement of state law, exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement, nor is adopted solely under the general powers of the agency.

Based on the foregoing, this rulemaking action is not subject to the regulatory analysis provisions of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(b). The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis determination.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Under Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5), "taking" means a governmental action that affects private real property, in whole or in part or temporarily or permanently, in a manner that requires the governmental entity to compensate the private real property owner as provided by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution or §17 or §19, Article I, Texas Constitution; or a governmental action that affects an owner's private real property that is the subject of the governmental action, in whole or in part or temporarily or permanently, in a manner that restricts or limits the owner's right to the property that would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental action; and is the producing cause of a reduction of at least 25% in the market value of the affected private real property, determined by comparing the market value of the property as if the governmental action is not in effect and the market value of the property determined as if the governmental action is in effect.

The commission completed a takings impact assessment for the proposed rulemaking action under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of these revisions is to extend the December 31, 2006, expiration date for all AERPs approved by the executive director before May 17, 2006, by one year to December 31, 2007, to allow biodiesel producers additional time to complete the necessary testing to ensure compliance with LED regulations and thus help bring this area into compliance with the air quality standards established under federal law as NAAQS for ozone. The proposed amendment will not place a burden on private, real property in a manner that would require compensation to private real property owners under the United States Constitution or the Texas Constitution. The proposal also will not affect private real property in a manner that restricts or limits an owner's right to the property that would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental action. Therefore, the proposed amendment will not cause a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007.

CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

The commission determined the proposed rulemaking relates to an action or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as amended (Texas Natural Resources Code, §§33.201 et seq .), and the commission rules in 30 TAC Chapter 281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency with the Texas Coastal Management Program. As required by 30 TAC §281.45(a)(3) and 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2), relating to actions and rules subject to the CMP, commission rules governing air pollutant emissions must be consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the CMP. The commission reviewed this action for consistency with the CMP goals and policies in accordance with the regulations of the Coastal Coordination Council and determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable CMP goal expressed in 31 TAC §501.12(1) of protecting and preserving the quality and values of coastal natural resource areas, and the policy in 31 TAC §501.14(q), which requires that the commission protect air quality in coastal areas. The proposed rulemaking will ensure that the amendment complies with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 50, National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards, and 40 CFR Part 51, Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans. This rulemaking action is consistent with CMP goals and policies, in compliance with 31 TAC §505.22(e).

ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARINGS

The commission will hold public hearings on this proposal at the following times and locations: February 15, 2007, 2:00 p.m., Arlington City Hall Council Chambers, 101 W. Abrams Street, Arlington; February 20, 2007, 2:30 p.m., Council Chambers, City Hall Annex, First Floor, 900 Bagby Street, Houston; and February 22, 2007, 10:00 a.m., Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Building E, Room 201S, 12100 Park 35 Circle, Austin. The hearings will be structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Registration will begin 30 minutes prior to the hearings. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. A time limit may be established at each hearing to assure that enough time is allowed for every interested person to speak. There will be no open discussion during the hearings; however, commission staff members will be available to informally discuss the proposal 30 minutes before the hearings.

Persons planning to attend the hearings, who have special communication or other accommodation needs, should contact Jennifer Stifflemire, Air Quality Division, at (512) 239-0573. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087; or faxed to (512) 239-4808. Electronic comments may be submitted at http://www5.tceq.state.tx.us/rules/ecomments/ . All comments should reference Rule Project Number 2007-007-114-EN. The comment period closes March 2, 2007. Copies of the proposed rule can be obtained from the commission's Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/nav/rules/propose_adopt.html . For further information, please contact Morris Brown of the Air Quality Division at (512) 239-1438.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The amendment is proposed under Texas Water Code, §5.103, concerning Rules, and §5.105, concerning General Policy, which authorize the commission to adopt rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the Texas Water Code. The amendment is also proposed under Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.002, concerning Policy and Purpose, which establishes the commission's purpose to safeguard the state's air resources, consistent with the protection of public health, general welfare, and physical property; §382.011, concerning General Powers and Duties, which authorizes the commission to control the quality of the state's air; §382.012, concerning State Air Control Plan, which authorizes the commission to prepare and develop a general, comprehensive plan for the control of the state's air; §382.017, concerning Rules, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the Texas Clean Air Act; §382.019, concerning Methods Used to Control and Reduce Emissions from Land Vehicles, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules to control and reduce emissions from engines used to propel land vehicles; and §382.202, concerning Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program, which authorizes the commission to establish vehicle fuel content standards after January 1, 2004, as long as distribution of LED as described in the SIP is not required prior to February 1, 2005.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Water Code, §5.103 and §5.105, and Texas Health and Safety Code, §§382.002, 382.011, 382.012, 382.017, 382.019, and 382.202.

§114.318.Alternative Emission Reduction Plan.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) All alternative emission reduction plans approved by the executive director prior to May 17, 2006 [ December 16, 2005 ], will expire on December 31, 2007. [ December 31, 2006, with the following exception. The executive director may allow a producer operating under an alternative emission reduction plan approved by the executive director prior to December 16, 2005, to continue to operate under that plan for a limited time beyond December 31, 2006, if all the following conditions are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the executive director: ]

[ (1) the producer's alternative emission reduction plan relied on the use of an alternative diesel formulation that has not been approved by the executive director under §114.315(c) of this title (relating to Approved Test Methods); ]

[ (2) the producer has submitted an application to the Air Pollution Control Technologies (APCT) Center, a center under the EPA's Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program, and the EPA's Office of Transportation and Air Quality's Voluntary Diesel Retrofit Program to pursue verification of this alternative diesel fuel formulation to demonstrate that it will achieve at least a 5.78% reduction in NOx emissions when compared against a base diesel fuel with fuel properties within the ranges as described for nationwide average fuel in EPA's Verification Protocol for Determination of Emissions Reductions Obtained by Use of Alternative or Reformulated Liquid Fuels, Fuel Additives, Fuel Emulsions, and Lubricants for Highway and Nonroad Use Diesel Engines and Light Duty Gasoline Engines and Vehicles (Revision No. 03, September 2003); ]

[ (3) the producer has a contract with the APCT Center to perform the verification testing that is signed by both parties and paid in full by September 1, 2006; and ]

[ (4) the emissions testing as specified under an ETV test plan approved by both the APCT Center and EPA is completed before December 1, 2006. ]

(d) - (f) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 11, 2007.

TRD-200700103

Robert Martinez

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 25, 2007

For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087


Chapter 115. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Subchapter C. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND TRANSFER OPERATIONS

4. CONTROL OF VEHICLE REFUELING EMISSIONS (STAGE II) AT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING FACILITIES

30 TAC §115.247

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) proposes an amendment to §115.247.

The proposed amendment will be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the state implementation plan.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULE

For facilities used exclusively for the initial fueling and re-fueling of vehicles equipped with onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) equipment, Stage II is an unnecessary expense because refueling emissions are captured via vehicle ORVR instead of the Stage II dispenser. The EPA estimates it costs about $40,000 to install a vacuum-assist system and $4,100 per year to maintain it. ORVR systems capture vapors otherwise vented to the atmosphere. ORVR systems are passive systems that force gasoline vapors displaced from a vehicle's fuel tank during refueling to be directed to a carbon-canister holding system and ultimately to the engine where they are consumed. EPA phased in ORVR systems for automobiles starting with model year 1998. All automobiles manufactured after 2000 must be equipped with ORVR. Phase-in of ORVR for light-duty trucks began in model year 2001, and by model year 2003, all new light-duty trucks were required to have ORVR systems.

SECTION DISCUSSION

The proposed amendment to §115.247, Exemptions, would add paragraph (3) for individual dispensers used exclusively for the initial fueling and/or re-fueling of vehicles equipped with ORVR equipment.

ANTI-BACKSLIDING DEMONSTRATION

The Stage II program was initiated as a volatile organic compound (VOC) control strategy for certain ozone nonattainment areas. Stage II vapor recovery equipment must be certified by EPA to achieve 95% control efficiency for VOC emissions. Furthermore, EPA states in their Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems-Options Paper dated February 7, 2006, that ORVR controls achieve 95% control efficiency. Therefore, exempting facilities that refuel only ORVR-equipped vehicles from the Stage II program will not result in increased VOC emissions.

FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Jeff Horvath, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Assessment Section, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state or local government as a result of the administration or enforcement of the proposed rule.

The proposed rule would provide an exemption from Stage II vapor recovery requirements for facilities used exclusively for the initial fueling and/or re-fueling of vehicles equipped with ORVR equipment. The amendment is needed because Stage II controls are an unnecessary expense for facilities used exclusively for the fueling of vehicles equipped with ORVR equipment. Refueling emissions are captured via vehicle ORVR instead of the facility's dispenser. The proposed amendment is expected to have no effect on the amount of emissions released into the atmosphere at any facility affected by the proposed amendment. Further, it is estimated that the proposed rule will only affect one facility, a General Motors manufacturing plant in Arlington. The agency inspects automobile manufacturing plants for compliance with agency rules once every three years at a maximum and every five years at a minimum. Any cost savings for the agency due to any reduced inspection time is not considered significant.

PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS

Mr. Horvath also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the changes seen in the proposed rule will be more efficient control of vehicle refueling emissions with continued protection of public health and the environment.

Some minor fiscal implications are anticipated for the General Motors manufacturing plant due to the implementation of the proposed rule. There may be other facilities affected by the proposed rule, such as large car rental businesses, but at this time agency staff are unable to identify other businesses or individuals that could be affected by the implementation of the proposed rule.

It is estimated that GM could save approximately $45,000 each year if they are exempt from having to use the current Stage II vapor recovery equipment which is no longer needed. The estimated cost savings include maintenance, parts, service, and energy costs. It is anticipated that if there are any other facilities affected by the proposed rule, similar cost savings would be realized.

SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT

No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses as a result of the proposed rule. No small or micro-businesses are expected to be affected by the proposed rule.

LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT

The commission has reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rule does not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect.

DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in the act. A "major environmental rule" is a rule which is specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. The intent of this proposed rulemaking action is to provide an exemption from Stage II vapor recovery requirements for facilities used exclusively for the initial fueling and/or re-fueling of vehicles equipped with ORVR equipment because use of both provides no net environmental benefit. The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis determination. Also, the amendment is proposed to continue to meet the requirements of 42 United States Code, §7511a(b)(3) and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §382.019 and §382.208, but in a less financially burdensome manner on owners and operators of gasoline dispensing facilities.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The commission evaluated the proposed rule and performed a preliminary assessment of whether Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007 is applicable. The commission's preliminary assessment indicates Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007 does not apply to the proposed amendment because this action discontinues Stage II vapor recovery requirements for specific regulated activities. Promulgation and enforcement of the proposed amendment would be neither a statutory or constitutional taking of private real property. Specifically, the proposed amendment does not affect a landowner's rights in private real property, because this rulemaking action does not burden, restrict, nor limit the owner's rights to property or reduce its value by 25% or more beyond that which would otherwise exist in the absence of the proposed regulations.

CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

The commission determined that this rulemaking action relates to an action or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as amended (Texas Natural Resources Code, §33.201 et seq .), and the commission rules in 30 TAC Chapter 281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency with the CMP. As required by §281.45(a)(3) and 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2), relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Coastal Management Program, commission rules governing air pollutant emissions must be consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the CMP. The commission reviewed this action for consistency with the CMP goals and policies in accordance with the rules of the Coastal Coordination Council, and determined that the action is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The CMP goal applicable to this rulemaking action is the goal to protect, preserve, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity, functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas (31 TAC §501.12(1)). No new sources of air contaminants will be authorized and the adopted revisions will maintain the same level of emissions control as the existing rules. The CMP policy applicable to this rulemaking action is the policy that commission rules comply with federal regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), to protect and enhance air quality in the coastal areas (31 TAC §501.14(q)). This rulemaking action complies with 40 CFR Part 51, Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans. Therefore, in compliance with 31 TAC §505.22(e), the commission affirms that this rulemaking action is consistent with CPM goals and policies.

EFFECT ON SITES SUBJECT TO THE FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAM

Chapter 115 contains applicable requirements under 30 TAC Chapter 122, Federal Operating Permits; therefore, owners or operators subject to the Federal Operating Permit Program must, consistent with the revision process in Chapter 122, revise their operating permits to include the revised Chapter 115 requirements for each emission unit at their sites affected by the revisions to Chapter 115.

ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARINGS

Public hearings will be held in Austin on February 27, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Complex located at 12100 Park 35 Circle in Building F, Room 2210, and in Arlington on February 28, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. at the City of Arlington Council Chambers located at 101 West Abrams Street. The hearings will be structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. A time limit may be established at each hearing to assure that enough time is allowed for every interested person to speak. There will be no open discussion during the hearings; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearings.

Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who are planning to attend the hearings should contact Jennifer Stifflemire, Air Quality Division, at (512) 239-0573. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. Electronic comments may be submitted at http://www5.tceq.state.tx.us/rules/ecomments/ . All comments should reference Rule Project Number 2006-049-115-EN. The comment period closes March 15, 2007. Copies of the proposed rulemaking can be obtained from the commission's Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/nav/rules/propose_adopt.html . For further information, please contact Koy Howard, Air Quality Planning, at (512) 239-2306.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The amendment is proposed under Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.103, concerning Rules, and §5.105, concerning General Policy, which authorize the commission to adopt rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the TWC; and under THSC, §382.017, concerning Rules, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the Texas Clean Air Act. The amendment is also proposed under THSC, §382.002, concerning Policy and Purpose, which establishes the commission's purpose to safeguard the state's air resources, consistent with the protection of public health, general welfare, and physical property; §382.011, concerning General Powers and Duties, which authorizes the commission to control the quality of the state's air; §382.012, concerning State Air Control Plan, which authorizes the commission to prepare and develop a general, comprehensive plan for the control of the state's air; and §382.208, concerning Attainment Program, which authorizes the commission to develop and implement transportation programs and other measures necessary to demonstrate attainment and protect the public from exposure to hazardous air contaminants from motor vehicles.

The proposed amendment implements THSC, §§382.002, 382.011, 382.012, and 382.208.

§115.247.Exemptions.

The following are exempt from the requirements of this division (relating to Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions (Stage II) at Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facilities):

(1) gasoline dispensing equipment used exclusively for the fueling of aircraft, watercraft, or implements of agriculture; [ and ]

(2) any motor vehicle fuel dispensing facility for which construction began prior to November 15, 1992, and which has a monthly throughput of less than 10,000 gallons of gasoline. For the purposes of this paragraph, the monthly throughput shall be based on the maximum monthly gasoline throughput for any calendar month after January 1, 1991. To maintain a facility's exempt status under this paragraph, the owner or operator must submit the facility's monthly gasoline throughput on an annual basis no later than January 31 of each year to the executive director or designated representative ; and [ . ]

(3) any motor vehicle fuel dispensing facility used exclusively for the fueling and/or refueling of vehicles equipped with onboard refueling vapory recovery equipment.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 11, 2007.

TRD-200700105

Robert Martinez

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 25, 2007

For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087