TITLE in-addition

Texas Building and Procurement Commission

Request for Proposals

The Texas Building and Procurement Commission (TBPC), on behalf of the Department of Family and Protective Services, announces the issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) #303-7-10912. TBPC seeks a five year lease of approximately 5,248 square feet of office space in Lockhart, Caldwell County, Texas.

The deadline for questions is January 8, 2007 and the deadline for proposals is January 17, 2007 at 3:00 p.m. The award date is February 1, 2007. TBPC reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals submitted. TBPC is under no legal or other obligation to execute a lease on the basis of this notice or the distribution of a RFP. Neither this notice nor the RFP commits TBPC to pay for any costs incurred prior to the award of a grant.

Parties interested in submitting a proposal may obtain information by contacting TBPC Purchaser Myra Beer at (512) 463-5773. A copy of the RFP may be downloaded from the Electronic State Business Daily at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us/bid_show.cfm?bidid=68562 .

TRD-200606899

Ingrid K. Hansen

General Counsel

Texas Building and Procurement Commission

Filed: December 27, 2006


Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner

Notice of Rate Ceilings

The Consumer Credit Commissioner of Texas has ascertained the following rate ceilings by use of the formulas and methods described in §§303.003, 303.005, and 303.009, Texas Finance Code.

The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for the period of January 1, 2007 - January 7, 2007 is 18% for Consumer 1 /Agricultural/Commercial 2 /credit thru $250,000.

The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for the period of January 1, 2007 - January 7, 2007 is 18% for Commercial over $250,000.

The monthly ceiling as prescribed by §303.005 3 for the period of January 1, 2007 - January 31, 2007 is 18% for Consumer/Agricultural/Commercial/credit thru $250,000.

The monthly ceiling as prescribed by §303.005 for the period of January 1, 2007 - January 31, 2007 is 18% for Commercial over $250,000.

1 Credit for personal, family or household use.

2 Credit for business, commercial, investment or other similar purpose.

3 For variable rate commercial transactions only.

TRD-200606898

Leslie L. Pettijohn

Commissioner

Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner

Filed: December 27, 2006


Texas Education Agency

Request for Applications Concerning Texas High Schools that Work Enhanced Design Network Grants, Cycle 2

Eligible Applicants. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) is requesting applications under Request for Applications (RFA) #701-07-105 from eligible school districts or open-enrollment charter schools. A school district or open-enrollment charter school may apply on behalf of an eligible campus, which includes: (1) a campus serving students in Grades 9 - 12 (A campus serving Grade 9 or Grades 9 - 10 may combine with a senior high school campus to submit one application on behalf of both campuses.); (2) a campus that is not a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program campus or a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program campus; (3) a campus that is not a recipient of: (a) a Texas High School Redesign and Restructuring Grant, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, or Cycle 3; (b) a Comprehensive School Reform (CSR)--Texas High School Initiative grant; (c) an Early College High School grant; (d) a Middle College/Early College High School Expansion grant; (e) a Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Academy Startup or Implementation grant; or (f) a Redesign, Early College High School, or T-STEM grant from the Communities Foundation of Texas or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; (4) a campus that is not a recipient of a 2006-2008 Texas High Schools That Work Enhanced Design Network Program grant (SAS-A432-06); and (5) a campus either: (a) within a district with a Stage 3 or Stage 4 intervention level for Career and Technology Education under the 2006-2007 TEA Performance-Based Monitoring System; (b) with a final rating of Academically Unacceptable in 2006 under the state accountability rating system; or (c) that participated as an official member of the High Schools That Work (HSTW) statewide network during the 2005-2006 school year.

A school district or open-enrollment charter school applying for this grant must be financially viable as determined through fiscal review by the TEA Division of Financial Audits. Additionally, to maintain eligibility for this grant, both the school district or open-enrollment charter school and the campus under the school district or open-enrollment charter school must be in compliance with all intervention requirements as established by the TEA Division of Program Monitoring and Interventions. An open-enrollment charter high school campus shall become ineligible for grant funding (or if a campus has applied for and received funding for this grant, will have its grant funding placed on hold) if the commissioner of education notifies the campus' charter holder of the commissioner's intent to revoke or non-renew such charter under Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 12, or to close the campus under TEC, Chapter 39, for any of the reasons set forth in either statutory provision. If the commissioner of education ultimately revokes or denies renewal of an open-enrollment charter or closes a campus that has been awarded funds under this grant program, grant funding shall be discontinued.

Description. The purpose of the Texas High Schools That Work Enhanced Design Network Grants, Cycle 2, is to support under-performing high schools in the use of the HSTW school improvement design as a framework to improve academic and career/technology instruction and overall student achievement. The primary goal of this grant program is for high schools to implement the following HSTW key design principles: (1) a challenging curriculum for all high school students, including four credits of mathematics, four credits in a career/technology concentration, and four credits in an academic concentration, with at least one of those credits being Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), or dual credit; (2) schoolwide literacy goals across the curriculum; (3) intervention strategies for equipping under-prepared students for challenging high school work; (4) programs to reduce the failure rate at ninth grade; and (5) links to postsecondary. Applicants will be required to demonstrate how school district resources, including in-kind resources, will be dedicated toward the project; how the campus will use the HSTW school improvement consultants and incorporate identified professional development into their campus improvement plans; and how the program will be sustained using other funding sources, including federal, state, local, or private funds, beyond the life of the project period.

Dates of Project. The Texas High Schools That Work Enhanced Design Network Grants, Cycle 2, will be implemented during the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 school years. Applicants should plan for a starting date of no earlier than May 1, 2007, and an ending date of no later than May 31, 2009.

Project Amount. A total of approximately $900,000 is available for funding Texas High Schools That Work Enhanced Design Network Grants, Cycle 2. Each high school campus will receive a maximum of $60,000 to implement HSTW key design principles. This project is funded 100 percent from general revenue funds appropriated by Rider 59, General Appropriations Act, 2005.

Selection Criteria. Applications will be selected based on expert reviewers' assessment of each applicant's ability to carry out all requirements contained in the RFA. Reviewers will evaluate applications based on the overall quality and validity of the proposed grant programs and the extent to which the applications address the primary objectives and intent of the project. Applications must address each requirement as specified in the RFA to be considered for funding. The TEA reserves the right to select from the highest-ranking applications those that address all requirements in the RFA, contain a comprehensive plan that will fundamentally change and improve the high school campus, and demonstrate an ability to sustain the changes after the grant period ends.

Technical Assistance. Through the Region 5 Education Service Center (ESC), the TEA will provide pre-grant support and guidance in the development of plans that address both campus needs and grant requirements. Through the Region 5 ESC, the TEA will also provide direct training, on-going regional training, and networking activities to those high school campuses that receive the Texas High Schools That Work Enhanced Design Network Grants, Cycle 2.

The TEA is not obligated to approve an application, provide funds, or endorse any application submitted in response to this RFA. This RFA does not commit TEA to pay any costs before an application is approved. The issuance of this RFA does not obligate TEA to award a grant or pay any costs incurred in preparing a response.

Requesting the Application. A complete copy of RFA #701-07-105 may be obtained by writing the Document Control Center, Room 6-108, Texas Education Agency, William B. Travis Building, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701; by calling (512) 463-9304; by faxing (512) 463-9811; or by e-mailing dcc@tea.state.tx.us. Please refer to the RFA number and title in your request. Provide your name, complete mailing address, and phone number including area code. The announcement letter and complete RFA will also be posted on the TEA website at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/disc/index.html for viewing and downloading.

Further Information. For clarifying information about the RFA, contact Karen Harmon, Division of Discretionary Grants, TEA, (512) 463-9269. In order to assure that no prospective applicant may obtain a competitive advantage because of acquisition of information unknown to other prospective applicants, any information that is different from or in addition to information provided in the RFA will be provided only in response to written inquiries. Copies of all such inquiries and the written answers thereto will be posted on the TEA website in the format of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/disc/index.html.

Deadline for Receipt of Applications. Applications must be received in the Document Control Center of the TEA by 5:00 p.m. (Central Time), Thursday, March 1, 2007, to be considered for funding.

TRD-200700011

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Filed: January 3, 2007


Request for Applications Concerning the State Engineering and Science Recruitment (SENSR) Fund, 2007-2008

Eligible Applicants. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) is requesting applications under Request for Applications (RFA) #701-07-104 from organizations that qualify for exemption from federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code, 501(c)(3), and that do not distribute net earnings to any private shareholder or other individual. The organization must serve groups of women or minority group members who, considering their percentages of the Texas population, are underrepresented at institutions of higher education in programs of engineering and applied sciences.

Description. The purpose of this program is to allocate funds to eligible organizations to establish or operate educational programs. The programs will support the recruitment of women and members of ethnic minority groups to assist them in preparing for, or participating in, programs leading to an undergraduate degree in engineering or applied science from an institution of higher education. Funding shall also be used to disseminate information concerning career opportunities in engineering and science, as well as information about these programs that are funded under Texas Education Code, §§51.601 - 51.608, and Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act, Article III, Rider 18, 79th Texas Legislature, 2005.

Dates of Project. The State Engineering and Science Recruitment (SENSR) grant will be implemented during the 2007-2008 school year. Applicants should plan for a starting date of no earlier than June 1, 2007, and an ending date of no later than May 31, 2008.

Project Amount. Funding will be provided for approximately 16 projects. Each project will receive a maximum of $25,000 for the 2007-2008 school year. For the first year, this project will distribute a total amount of approximately $394,920 subject to the availability of funds and approval of the commissioner of education. Project funding in the second year will be based on satisfactory progress of the first-year objectives and activities and on budget approval by the commissioner of education.

Selection Criteria. Applications will be selected based on the independent reviewers' assessment of each applicant's ability to carry out all requirements contained in the RFA. Reviewers will evaluate applications based on the overall quality and validity of the proposed grant program and the extent to which the application addresses the primary objective(s) and intent of the project. Applications must address each requirement as specified in the RFA to be considered for funding. Preference shall be given to projects that emphasize the development of mathematical and scientific competence. Projects in the social sciences will not be considered. The TEA reserves the right to select from the highest ranking applications those that would serve the most participants who are women and underrepresented minority group members in the objectives specified. Other project quality indicators are specified throughout the RFA. To be approved for funding, projects offered by eligible organizations must meet the following guidelines: (1) use professional volunteers at each level of instruction; (2) require parental involvement; (3) coordinate with public schools' preparation for scientific and mathematics careers; (4) coordinate with post-secondary educational institutions; (5) involve organizations of women and minority group members; (6) provide demonstrated professional leadership in educational activities for women and minority group members; and (7) be compatible with state and federal laws governing education.

The TEA is not obligated to approve an application, provide funds, or endorse any application submitted in response to this RFA. This RFA does not commit TEA to pay any costs before an application is approved. The issuance of this RFA does not obligate TEA to award a grant or pay any costs incurred in preparing a response.

Requesting the Application. A complete copy of RFA #701-07-104 may be obtained by writing the Document Control Center, Room 6-108, Texas Education Agency, William B. Travis Building, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701; by calling (512) 463-9304; by faxing (512) 463-9811; or by e-mailing dcc@tea.state.tx.us. Please refer to the RFA number and title in your request. Provide your name, complete mailing address, and phone number including area code. The announcement letter and complete RFA will also be posted on the TEA website at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/disc/index.html for viewing and downloading.

Further Information. For clarifying information about the RFA, contact Kathy Mihalik, Division of Discretionary Grants, Texas Education Agency, (512) 463-7322. In order to assure that no prospective applicant may obtain a competitive advantage because of acquisition of information unknown to other prospective applicants, any information that is different from or in addition to information provided in the RFA will be provided only in response to written inquiries. Copies of all such inquiries and the written answers thereto will be posted on the TEA website in the format of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/disc/index.html.

Deadline for Receipt of Applications. Applications must be received in the Document Control Center of the Texas Education Agency by 5:00 p.m. (Central Time), Tuesday, February 27, 2007, to be eligible to be considered for funding.

TRD-200700012

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Filed: January 3, 2007


Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Notices of District Petition

Notices issued December 20 and December 21, 2006

TCEQ Internal Control No. 05152006-D02; Texas National Municipal Utility District of Montgomery County has applied to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for authority to adopt and impose an annual uniform operations and maintenance standby fee up to $84 per equivalent single family connection per year for calendar years 2007-2009, on unimproved property within the District. Also, the District will allow a maintenance tax rate not exceeding $.75 per $100 taxable valuation. The application was filed pursuant to Chapter 49 of the Texas Water Code, 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 293, and under the procedural rules of the TCEQ. The TCEQ may approve the annual standby fees as requested, or it may approve a lower annual standby fee, but it shall not approve an annual standby fee greater than the amount requested. The standby fee is a personal obligation of the person owning the undeveloped property on January 1 of the year for which the fee is assessed. A person is not relieved of his pro-rated share of the standby fee obligation on transfer of title to the property. On January 1 of each year, a lien is attached to the undeveloped property to secure payment of any standby fee imposed and the interest or penalty, if any, on the fee. The lien has the same priority as a lien for taxes of the District. The purpose of standby fees is to distribute a fair portion of the cost burden for operations and maintenance costs and debt service of the District facilities to owners of property who have not constructed vertical improvements but have water, wastewater or drainage facilities or services available. Any revenues collected from the operations and maintenance standby fees shall be used to supplement the District's operations and maintenance account.

TCEQ Internal Control No. 06212006-D01; Northeast Uvalde Partners, Ltd., Land Development Company, Ltd., and Sowell Equities-Forestwood, L.P. (Petitioner) filed a petition for the creation of Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 421 (District) with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The petition was filed pursuant to Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the State of Texas; Chapters 49 and 54 of the Texas Water Code; 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 293; and the procedural rules of the TCEQ. The petition states the following: (1) the Petitioner is the holder of title to a majority in value of the land to be included in the proposed District; (2) RFC Construction Funding Corporation is the only lien holder on the property to be included in the proposed District, and has signed the petition evidencing its consent to the creation of the proposed District; (3) the proposed District will contain approximately 229.978 acres located in Harris County, Texas; and (4) the proposed District is within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Houston, Texas, and no portion of land within the proposed District is within the corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction of any other city, town or village in Texas. By Ordinance No. 2004-1276, effective December 21, 2004, the City of Houston, Texas, gave its consent to the creation of the proposed District.

TCEQ Internal Control No. 12072006-D05; FRM/MRA Holdings #1, Ltd., (Petitioner) filed a petition for creation of Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 424 (District) with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The petition was filed pursuant to Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the State of Texas; Chapters 49 and 54 of the Texas Water Code; 30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 293; and the procedural rules of the TCEQ. The petition states the following: (1) the Petitioner is the owner of a majority in value of the land to be included in the proposed District; (2) there are no lien holders on the property to be included in the proposed District, (3) the proposed District will contain approximately 316.45 acres located within Harris County, Texas; and (4) the proposed District is within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Houston, Texas, and no portion of land within the proposed District is within the corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction of any other city, town or village in Texas. By Ordinance No. 2006-339, effective April 18, 2006, the City of Houston, Texas, gave its consent to the creation of the proposed District.

INFORMATION SECTION

The TCEQ may grant a contested case hearing on this petition if a written hearing request is filed within 30 days after the newspaper publication of this notice. To request a contested case hearing, you must submit the following: (1) your name (or for a group or association, an official representative), mailing address, daytime phone number, and fax number, if any; (2) the name of the Petitioner and the TCEQ Internal Control Number; (3) the statement "I/we request a contested case hearing"; (4) a brief description of how you would be affected by the petition in a way not common to the general public; and (5) the location of your property relative to the proposed District's boundaries. You may also submit your proposed adjustments to the petition. Requests for a contested case hearing must be submitted in writing to the Office of the Chief Clerk at the address provided in the information section below. The Executive Director may approve the petition unless a written request for a contested case hearing is filed within 30 days after the newspaper publication of this notice. If a hearing request is filed, the Executive Director will not approve the petition and will forward the petition and hearing request to the TCEQ Commissioners for their consideration at a scheduled Commission meeting. If a contested case hearing is held, it will be a legal proceeding similar to a civil trial in state district court. Written hearing requests should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC 105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087. For information concerning the hearing process, please contact the Public Interest Counsel, MC 103, at the same address. For additional information, individual members of the general public may contact the Districts Review Team, at (512) 239-4691. Si desea información en Español, puede llamar al (512) 239-0200. General information regarding TCEQ can be found at our web site at www.tceq.state.tx.us.

TRD-200606900

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: December 27, 2006


Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Default Orders of Administrative Enforcement Actions

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Default Orders (DOs). The commission staff proposes a DO when the staff has sent an executive director's preliminary report and petition (EDPRP) to an entity outlining the alleged violations, the proposed penalty, and the proposed technical requirements necessary to bring the entity back into compliance; and the entity fails to request a hearing on the matter within 20 days of its receipt of the EDPRP or requests a hearing and fails to participate at the hearing. Similar to the procedure followed with respect to Agreed Orders entered into by the executive director of the commission, in accordance with Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075, this notice of the proposed order and the opportunity to comment is published in the Texas Register no later than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period closes, which in this case is February 12, 2007 . The commission will consider any written comments received; and the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of a DO if a comment discloses facts or considerations that indicate that consent to the proposed DO is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes and rules within the commission's jurisdiction or the commission's orders and permits issued in accordance with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to a proposed DO is not required to be published if those changes are made in response to written comments.

A copy of each proposed DO is available for public inspection at both the commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A, 3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional office listed as follows. Written comments about the DO should be sent to the attorney designated for the DO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087, MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on February 12, 2007 . Comments may also be sent by facsimile machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The commission's attorneys are available to discuss the DOs and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone numbers; however, §7.075 provides that comments on the DOs shall be submitted to the commission in writing .

(1) COMPANY: Alex, Inc. dba Brothers II Cleaners; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0908-DCL-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN100687896; LOCATION: 3939 Boat Club Road, Lake Worth, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: dry cleaning drop station; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §337.11(e) and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §374.102, by failing to renew the facility's registration by completing and submitting the required registration form to the TCEQ for a dry cleaning and/or drop station facility; PENALTY: $955; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mary Hammer, Litigation Division MC 175, (512) 239-2496; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(2) COMPANY: Ali Bukhari dba Honey Stop and Sue Bukhari dba Honey Stop; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1803-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102716024; LOCATION: 401 East Avenue, Baytown, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs); PENALTY: $1,090; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shannon Strong, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0972; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(3) COMPANY: Dennis A. Holmes; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0265-WTR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103372447; LOCATION: 4525 Brookside Drive, Vidor, Hardin County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §30.381(b) and THSC, §341.034(a), by failing to operate the facility on a contract basis without an adequate license or registration issued by the commission; PENALTY: $313; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shawn Slack, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0063; REGIONAL OFFICE: Beaumont Regional Office, 3870 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.

(4) COMPANY: First Gatesville Venture, Inc. dba Amigos 3; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1246-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102357019; LOCATION: 3102 South Presa Street, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; and 30 TAC §334.22(a) and Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.702, by failing to pay UST fees for TCEQ Account No. 0062750U for Fiscal Year 2005; PENALTY: $3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Xavier Guerra, Litigation Division, MC R-13, (210) 403-4016; REGIONAL OFFICE: San Antonio Regional Office, 14250 Judson Road, San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.

(5) COMPANY: Jim B. Clemons; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0470-OSI-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103390274; LOCATION: 302 North Scruggs, Corsicana, Navarro County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: unlicensed on-site sewage facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §285.61(1), TWC, §37.003, and THSC, §366.071(a), by failing to obtain a license prior to installing an on-site sewage facility; and 30 TAC §285.61(6) and THSC, §366.004, by failing to meet the minimum criteria for an on-site sewage facility; PENALTY: $1,125; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shawn Slack, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0063; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(6) COMPANY: Kyo M. Chung dba VIP Cleaner; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0768-DCL-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104097753; LOCATION: 1729 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: dry cleaning facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §337.11(e) and THSC, §374.102, by failing to renew the facility's registration by completing and submitting to the TCEQ the required registration form for a dry cleaning facility; and 30 TAC §337.14(c) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay dry cleaner registration fees and associated late fees for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 24002135 for Fiscal Year 2005; PENALTY: $1,185; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0019; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(7) COMPANY: Marti M. Carder dba Pier 57; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1683-PWS-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104393004; LOCATION: 27446 Farm-to-Market Road 457, Sargent, Matagorda County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: restaurant with a public water supply system; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(2)(A)(i) and §290.122(c)(2)(B) and THSC, §341.033(d), by failing to collect routine water samples for bacteriological analysis for the months of August and September 2004, and February 2005, and by failing to post public notification of those sampling violations; and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay the Public Health Service fee for Fiscal Year 2004 for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 91610042; PENALTY: $1,118; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0019; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(8) COMPANY: North Bengal, Inc. dba Dry Clean Super Center; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0870-DCL-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104091012; LOCATION: 1301 North Main Street, Euless, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: dry cleaning facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §337.11(e) and THSC, §374.102, by failing to renew the facility's registration by completing and submitting the required registration form to the TCEQ for a dry cleaning and/or drop station facility; PENALTY: $1,185; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mary Hammer, Litigation Division MC 175, (512) 239-2496; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(9) COMPANY: OK Concrete Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1140-AIR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN101302479; LOCATION: 319 South Avenue C, Olney, Young County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: concrete batch plant; RULES VIOLATED: THSC, §382.0518(a) and §382.085(b), by failing to obtain authorization to operate a concrete batch plant; PENALTY: $1,340,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shannon Strong, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0972; REGIONAL OFFICE: Abilene Regional Office, 1977 Industrial Boulevard, Abilene, Texas 79602-7833, (325) 698-9674.

(10) COMPANY: Robert (Bobby) Barton McCans, Jr. dba Aaron Irrigation and Landscaping Co.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2002-0695-LII-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN103457198; LOCATION: 1417 Broke Spoke Court, Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: landscape irrigation systems; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §§30.5(a) and (b), 30.125, and 344.4(a); Texas Occupational Code, §1903.251; and TWC, §37.003 and §37.006, by installing landscape irrigation systems without a valid license; PENALTY: $3,125; STAFF ATTORNEY: Alfred Oloko, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8918; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

TRD-200700005

Mary Risner

Director, Litigation Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: January 3, 2007


Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Settlement Agreements of Administrative Enforcement Actions

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Agreed Orders (AOs) in accordance with Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075. Section 7.075 requires that, before the commission may approve the AOs, the commission shall allow the public an opportunity to submit written comments on the proposed AOs. Section 7.075 requires that notice of the opportunity to comment must be published in the Texas Register no later than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period closes, which in this case is February 12, 2007 . Section 7.075 also requires that the commission promptly consider any written comments received and that the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of an AO if a comment discloses facts or considerations that indicate that consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes and rules within the commission's jurisdiction or the commission's orders and permits issued in accordance with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to a proposed AO is not required to be published if those changes are made in response to written comments.

A copy of each proposed AO is available for public inspection at both the commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A, 3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional office listed as follows. Written comments about an AO should be sent to the attorney designated for the AO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087, MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on February 12, 2007 . Comments may also be sent by facsimile machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The designated attorney is available to discuss the AO and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone number; however, §7.075 provides that comments on an AO shall be submitted to the commission in writing .

(1) COMPANY: Chilton Water Supply and Sewer Service Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0887-MWD-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102285814; LOCATION: approximately 0.7 miles east of State Highway 77 and one mile south of the City of Chilton, Falls County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment plant; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1); Texas Water Code (TWC), §26.121(a)(1); and Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. 10811-001, Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Nos. 1, 2, and 4, Operational Requirements No. 1 and Permit Conditions No. 2.g., by failing to prevent the discharge and accumulation of solids in the receiving stream and unauthorized discharges which occurred around the influent bar screen and aeration basin; 30 TAC §305.125(1) and (5) and TPDES Permit No. 10811-001, Operational Requirements No. 1, by failing to ensure that all systems of collection, treatment, and disposal were properly operated and maintained; 30 TAC §§305.125(1), 319.4, 319.7(a) and (c), and 319.11(b) and TPDES Permit No. 10811-001, Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Nos. 2, 3.b. and 3.c., by failing to have records available for review by a TCEQ representative during the investigation; 30 TAC §305.125(1) and (9) and TPDES Permit No. 10811-001, Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Nos. 7.a. and 7.c., Section III. Requirements Applying to All Sewage Sludge Disposed in a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill, and Paragraph G., by failing to report exceedances which deviated from the permitted limit by greater than 40%, failing to report an unauthorized discharge, and failing to submit an annual sludge report; and 30 TAC §317.4(a)(8), by failing to conduct the required annual testing of the drinking water backflow prevention device; PENALTY: $22,750; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mark Curnutt, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0624; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.

(2) COMPANY: Eutemia Medina dba O.A. Gingrich; DOCKET NUMBER: 2002-0488-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: 46358; LOCATION: 121 North Vineyard, Sinton, San Patricio County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with four underground storage tanks, that formerly dispensed gasoline for retail sales; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate the required financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases from the petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs); 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and (2)(A) and TWC, §26.3475, by failing to monitor USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once per month (not to exceed 35 days between monitoring), and by failing to monitor the piping connected to the UST system in a manner designed to detect releases from any portion of the UST piping system; 30 TAC §334.7(d)(3), by failing to amend, update, or change the UST registration information in order to reflect current operational status within 30 days of the date on which the owner and/or operator became aware of the change; 30 TAC §334.49(a) and TWC, §26.3475, by failing to provide corrosion protection for the UST system; and 30 TAC §334.22(a), by failing to pay the required outstanding annual UST facility fees for Fiscal Years 1994-2001 (UST facility Account No. 0050099U); PENALTY: $7,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shawn Slack, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0063; REGIONAL OFFICE: Corpus Christi Regional Office, 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.

(3) COMPANY: General Dynamics OTS (Garland), L.P.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1672-AIR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102660909; LOCATION: 1200 North Glenbrook Drive, Garland, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: ordnance production facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.115(b)(2)(F); Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §382.085(b); and New Source Review (NSR) Permit No. 51412, General Condition No. 8, by failing to comply with permitted Maximum Allowable Emission Rates for the plaforization system at emission point number 7-PLAF-PRETREAT for volatile organic compounds; 30 TAC §116.115(b)(2)(E) and (c); THSC, §382.085(b); NSR Permit No. 51412, General Condition No. 7 and Special Condition Nos. 11B, C, and D, by failing to maintain records and data to demonstrate compliance with the permit in a readily available form for TCEQ; 30 TAC §106.433(8)(B), (8)(C), and (8)(D) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain and make permit by rule (PBR) records for a surface coating facility immediately available to TCEQ staff; and 30 TAC §106.8(c); THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain records containing sufficient information to demonstrate compliance with PBR requirements; PENALTY: $86,775; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(4) COMPANY: South Texas Chlorine, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0142-MLM-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN100843044; LOCATION: 8600 East Harrison, Harlingen, Cameron County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: chemical repackaging plant; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.115(c), THSC, §382.085(b), and NSR Permit No. 21286, Special Condition No. 8, by failing to properly monitor the concentration of the scrubbing solution at least once per shift as required by the permit; 30 TAC §116.115(c), THSC, §382.085(b), and NSR Permit No. 21286, Special Condition No. 25, by failing to maintain the maximum allowed bleach production limit of 120 batches per year; 30 TAC §116.115(c), THSC, §382.085(b), and NSR Permit No. 21286, Special Condition Nos. 26(A), (D), and (F) - (H), by failing to meet the record keeping requirements; 30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and §335.4; Multi Sector General Permit (MSGP) No. TXR05H669, Part III, Section A(3)(a) and (b); and TWC, §26.121, by failing to identify and obtain a permit for non-storm water discharge; 30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and MSGP No. TXR05H669, Part III, Sections A(4)(a), (b), and (c), by failing to include items in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3); 30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and MSGP No. TXR05H669, Part III, Section A(5)(b), (f), and (h), by failing to include a detailed description in the SWP3; and 30 TAC §335.62 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §262.11, by failing to complete a hazardous waste determination of the two water waste streams generated as a result of the washing of compressed gas cylinders and the one-ton containers in the scrubber tanks; PENALTY: $5,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Laurencia Fasoyiro, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8914; REGIONAL OFFICE: Harlingen Regional Office, 1804 West Jefferson Avenue, Harlingen, Texas 78550-5247, (956) 425-6010.

(5) COMPANY: Teer Plating Co., Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-2109-IHW-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN100585520; LOCATION: 6111 Wyche Boulevard, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: electroplating and metal finishing facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §335.69(f)(4)(A), and (a)(2) and (3) and 40 CFR §262.34(d)(4), by failing to keep hazardous waste closed during storage; and 30 TAC §335.4 and TWC, §26.121, by failing to prevent the unauthorized discharge of waste or pollutants into or adjacent to waters in the state; PENALTY: $35,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: James Sallans, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-2053; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(6) COMPANY: Uppal Bros., Inc. dba Save Way Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2003-1165-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102035367; LOCATION: 6620 Brentwood Stair Road, Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.49(a) and TWC, §26.3475(d), by failing to install a method of corrosion protection for the UST systems; 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and (d)(1)(B)(ii) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to monitor USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once every month (not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring); 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for the UST systems; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C), by failing to ensure that a legible tag, label, or marking with the tank number was permanently applied upon or affixed to either the top of the fill tube or to a nonremovable point in the immediate area of the fill tube according to the UST registration and self-certification form; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(4)(A)(vii) and (c)(5)(B)(ii) and TWC, §26.346(c)(3), by failing to timely renew the delivery certificate by submitting a properly completed UST registration and self-certification form at least 30 days before the expiration date of the delivery certificate; and 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(A)(i) and TWC, §26.3467(a), by failing to make available to a common carrier a valid, current TCEQ delivery certificate before accepting delivery of a regulated substance into the petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $35,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shawn Slack, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0063; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

TRD-200700004

Mary Risner

Director, Litigation Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: January 3, 2007


Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Request for Proposals for Comprehensive Classification and Compensation Study

This RFP Notice Includes Revisions to the Due Date Listed in the Original Posting in the December 29, 2006, Issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 10958).

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board is soliciting proposals from interested, highly qualified, and experienced consulting firms to design, conduct, and assist in the implementation of a comprehensive classification and compensation study of the agency's positions staffed by full-time and part-time employees. A Request for Proposals (RFP), which includes instructions for its completion, is available on the Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) at: http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us/bid_show.cfm?bidid=68527

Respondents to this RFP shall submit completed proposals in a sealed envelope, clearly marked with "Proposal for THECB Classification and Compensation Study" and the name of the bidder.

Seven (7) copies of the proposal must be submitted by 12:00 p.m., Central Standard Time, on January 22, 2007 to the following address:

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

ATTN: Anthony O. Tegbe

1200 East Anderson Lane, Room 2.177

Austin, TX 78752

If you have any questions about the RFP, please submit your inquiries in writing, preferably via e-mail to:

Betty Sharp

Director of Personnel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

1200 East Anderson Lane

Austin, TX 78752

Email: betty.sharp@thecb.state.tx.us

TRD-200700003

Bill Franz

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Filed: January 3, 2007


Texas Department of Insurance

Company Licensing

Application for incorporation to the State of Texas by WELLCARE OF TEXAS, INC., a domestic health maintenance organization (HMO). The home office is in Austin, Texas.

Application to change the name of HOMEWISE PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY to ATLANTIC & GULF STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign fire and/or casualty company. The home office is in Tampa, Florida.

Application to change the name of NORTH AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS to NORTH AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a domestic life, accident and/or health company. The home office is in Austin, Texas.

Application to change the name of ACE AMERICAN REINSURANCE COMPANY to R&O REINSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign fire and/or casualty company. The home office is in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Any objections must be filed with the Texas Department of Insurance, within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the Texas Register publication, addressed to the attention of Godwin Ohaechesi, 333 Guadalupe Street, M/C 305-2C, Austin, Texas 78701.

TRD-200700008

Gene C. Jarmon

Chief Clerk and General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: January 3, 2007


Third Party Administrator Applications

The following third party administrator application has been filed with the Texas Department of Insurance and is under consideration.

Application of NORTHWEST DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC IPA, LLC, a domestic third party administrator. The home office is HOUSTON, TEXAS.

Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice is published in the Texas Register , addressed to the attention of Matt Ray, MC 107-1A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.

TRD-200606901

Gene C. Jarmon

Chief Clerk and General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: December 27, 2006


Texas Lottery Commission

Instant Game Number 801 "Break the Bank"

1.0 Name and Style of Game.

A. The name of Instant Game No. 801 is "BREAK THE BANK". The play style is "key number match with auto win".

1.1 Price of Instant Ticket.

A. Tickets for Instant Game No. 801 shall be $2.00 per ticket.

1.2 Definitions in Instant Game No. 801.

A. Display Printing - That area of the instant game ticket outside of the area where the Overprint and Play Symbols appear.

B. Latex Overprint - The removable scratch-off covering over the Play Symbols on the front of the ticket.

C. Play Symbol - The printed data under the latex on the front of the ticket that is used to determine eligibility for a prize. Each Play Symbol is printed in Symbol font in black ink in positive except for dual-image games. The possible black play symbols are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, $1.00, $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $10.00, $20.00, $50.00, $200, $1,000, $3,000, $30,000, and MONEYSTACK SYMBOL.

D. Play Symbol Caption - The printed material appearing below each Play Symbol which explains the Play Symbol. One caption appears under each Play Symbol and is printed in caption font in black ink in positive. The Play Symbol Caption which corresponds with and verifies each Play Symbol is as follows:

Figure 1: GAME NO. 801 - 1.2D

E. Retailer Validation Code - Three (3) letters found under the removable scratch-off covering in the play area, which retailers use to verify and validate instant winners. These three (3) small letters are for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The possible validation codes are:

Figure 2: GAME NO. 801 - 1.2E

Low-tier winning tickets use the required codes listed in Figure 2. Non-winning tickets and high-tier tickets use a non-required combination of the required codes listed in Figure 2 with the exception of ∅, which will only appear on low-tier winners and will always have a slash through it.

F. Serial Number - A unique 13 (thirteen) digit number appearing under the latex scratch-off covering on the front of the ticket. There is a boxed four (4) digit Security Number placed randomly within the Serial Number. The remaining nine (9) digits of the Serial Number are the Validation Number. The Serial Number is positioned beneath the bottom row of play data in the scratched-off play area. The Serial Number is for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The format will be: 0000000000000.

G. Low-Tier Prize - A prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $8.00, $10.00, $12.00 or $20.00.

H. Mid-Tier Prize - A prize of $50.00 or $200.

I. High-Tier Prize - A prize of $1,000, $3,000 or $30,000.

J. Bar Code - A 22 (twenty-two) character interleaved two (2) of five (5) bar code which will include a three (3) digit game ID, the seven (7) digit pack number, the three (3) digit ticket number and the nine (9) digit Validation Number. The bar code appears on the back of the ticket.

K. Pack-Ticket Number - A 13 (thirteen) digit number consisting of the three (3) digit game number (801), a seven (7) digit pack number, and a three (3) digit ticket number. Ticket numbers start with 001and end with 250 within each pack. The format will be: 801 -0000001-001.

L. Pack - A pack of "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game tickets contains 250 tickets, packed in plastic shrink-wrapping and fanfolded in pages of two (2). Tickets 001 and 002 will be on the top page; tickets 003 and 004 on the next page; etc.; and tickets 249 and 250 will be on the last page. Please note the books will be in an A - B configuration.

M. Non-Winning Ticket - A ticket which is not programmed to be a winning ticket or a ticket that does not meet all of the requirements of these Game Procedures, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), and applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401.

N. Ticket or Instant Game Ticket, or Instant Ticket - A Texas Lottery "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game No. 801 ticket.

2.0 Determination of Prize Winners. The determination of prize winners is subject to the general ticket validation requirements set forth in Texas Lottery Rule 401.302, Instant Game Rules, these Game Procedures, and the requirements set out on the back of each instant ticket. A prize winner in the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game is determined once the latex on the ticket is scratched off to expose 19 (nineteen) play symbols. If the player matches any of YOUR NUMBERS play symbols to any of the 3 LUCKY NUMBERS play symbols, the player wins the prize shown for that number. If the player reveals a "moneystack" symbol, the player wins the prize instantly. No portion of the display printing nor any extraneous matter whatsoever shall be usable or playable as a part of the Instant Game.

2.1 Instant Ticket Validation Requirements.

A. To be a valid Instant Game ticket, all of the following requirements must be met:

1. Exactly 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must appear under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket;

2. Each of the Play Symbols must have a Play Symbol Caption underneath, unless specified, and each Play Symbol must agree with its Play Symbol Caption;

3. Each of the Play Symbols must be present in its entirety and be fully legible;

4. Each of the Play Symbols must be printed in black ink except for dual image games;

5. The ticket shall be intact;

6. The Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be present in their entirety and be fully legible;

7. The Serial Number must correspond, using the Texas Lottery's codes, to the Play Symbols on the ticket;

8. The ticket must not have a hole punched through it, be mutilated, altered, unreadable, reconstituted or tampered with in any manner;

9. The ticket must not be counterfeit in whole or in part;

10. The ticket must have been issued by the Texas Lottery in an authorized manner;

11. The ticket must not have been stolen, nor appear on any list of omitted tickets or non-activated tickets on file at the Texas Lottery;

12. The Play Symbols, Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be right side up and not reversed in any manner;

13. The ticket must be complete and not miscut, and have exactly 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket, exactly one Serial Number, exactly one Retailer Validation Code, and exactly one Pack-Ticket Number on the ticket;

14. The Serial Number of an apparent winning ticket shall correspond with the Texas Lottery's Serial Numbers for winning tickets, and a ticket with that Serial Number shall not have been paid previously;

15. The ticket must not be blank or partially blank, misregistered, defective or printed or produced in error;

16. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must be exactly one of those described in Section 1.2.C of these Game Procedures;

17. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols on the ticket must be printed in the Symbol font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; the ticket Serial Numbers must be printed in the Serial font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and the Pack-Ticket Number must be printed in the Pack-Ticket Number font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;

18. The display printing on the ticket must be regular in every respect and correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and

19. The ticket must have been received by the Texas Lottery by applicable deadlines.

B. The ticket must pass all additional validation tests provided for in these Game Procedures, the Texas Lottery's Rules governing the award of prizes of the amount to be validated, and any confidential validation and security tests of the Texas Lottery.

C. Any Instant Game ticket not passing all of the validation requirements is void and ineligible for any prize and shall not be paid. However, the Executive Director may, solely at the Executive Director's discretion, refund the retail sales price of the ticket. In the event a defective ticket is purchased, the only responsibility or liability of the Texas Lottery shall be to replace the defective ticket with another unplayed ticket in that Instant Game (or a ticket of equivalent sales price from any other current Instant Lottery game) or refund the retail sales price of the ticket, solely at the Executive Director's discretion.

2.2 Programmed Game Parameters.

A. Consecutive non-winning tickets will not have identical play data, spot for spot.

B. Non-winning prize symbols will not match a winning prize symbol on a ticket.

C. No duplicate Lucky Numbers on a ticket.

D. There will be no correlation between the matching symbols and the prize amount.

E. The auto win symbol will never appear more than once on a ticket.

F. No duplicate non-winning play symbols on a ticket.

2.3 Procedure for Claiming Prizes.

A. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $8.00, $10.00, $12.00, $20.00, $50.00 or $200, a claimant shall sign the back of the ticket in the space designated on the ticket and present the winning ticket to any Texas Lottery Retailer. The Texas Lottery Retailer shall verify the claim and, if valid, and upon presentation of proper identification, make payment of the amount due the claimant and physically void the ticket; provided that the Texas Lottery Retailer may, but is not in some cases, required to pay a $50.00 or $200 ticket. In the event the Texas Lottery Retailer cannot verify the claim, the Texas Lottery Retailer shall provide the claimant with a claim form and instruct the claimant on how to file a claim with the Texas Lottery. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, a check shall be forwarded to the claimant in the amount due. In the event the claim is not validated, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly. A claimant may also claim any of the above prizes under the procedure described in Section 2.3.B and 2.3.C of these Game Procedures.

B. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $1,000, $3,000 or $30,000, the claimant must sign the winning ticket and present it at one of the Texas Lottery's Claim Centers. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, payment will be made to the bearer of the validated winning ticket for that prize upon presentation of proper identification. When paying a prize of $600 or more, the Texas Lottery shall file the appropriate income reporting form with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and shall withhold federal income tax at a rate set by the IRS if required. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

C. As an alternative method of claiming a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize, the claimant must sign the winning ticket, thoroughly complete a claim form, and mail both to: Texas Lottery Commission, Post Office Box 16600, Austin, Texas 78761-6600. The risk of sending a ticket remains with the claimant. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

D. Prior to payment by the Texas Lottery of any prize, the Texas Lottery shall deduct a sufficient amount from the winnings of a person who has been finally determined to be:

1. delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the Comptroller, the Texas Workforce Commission, or Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;

2. delinquent in making child support payments administered or collected by the Attorney General; or

3. delinquent in reimbursing the Texas Health and Human Services Commission for a benefit granted in error under the food stamp program or the program of financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resource Code;

4. in default on a loan made under Chapter 52, Education Code; or

5. in default on a loan guaranteed under Chapter 57, Education Code.

E. If a person is indebted or owes delinquent taxes to the State, other than those specified in the preceding paragraph, the winnings of a person shall be withheld until the debt or taxes are paid.

2.4 Allowance for Delay of Payment. The Texas Lottery may delay payment of the prize pending a final determination by the Executive Director, under any of the following circumstances:

A. if a dispute occurs, or it appears likely that a dispute may occur, regarding the prize;

B. if there is any question regarding the identity of the claimant;

C. if there is any question regarding the validity of the ticket presented for payment; or

D. if the claim is subject to any deduction from the payment otherwise due, as described in Section 2.3.D of these Game Procedures. No liability for interest for any delay shall accrue to the benefit of the claimant pending payment of the claim.

2.5 Payment of Prizes to Persons Under 18. If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of less than $600 from the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deliver to an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian a check or warrant in the amount of the prize payable to the order of the minor.

2.6 If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of more than $600 from the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deposit the amount of the prize in a custodial bank account, with an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian serving as custodian for the minor.

2.7 Instant Ticket Claim Period. All Instant Game prizes must be claimed within 180 days following the end of the Instant Game or within the applicable time period for certain eligible military personnel as set forth in Texas Government Code Section 466.408. Any prize not claimed within that period, and in the manner specified in these Game Procedures and on the back of each ticket, shall be forfeited.

2.8 Disclaimer. The number of prizes in a game is approximate based on the number of tickets ordered. The number of actual prizes available in a game may vary based on number of tickets manufactured, testing, distribution, sales and number of prizes claimed. An Instant Game ticket may continue to be sold even when all the top prizes have been claimed.

3.0 Instant Ticket Ownership.

A. Until such time as a signature is placed upon the back portion of an Instant Game ticket in the space designated, a ticket shall be owned by the physical possessor of said ticket. When a signature is placed on the back of the ticket in the space designated, the player whose signature appears in that area shall be the owner of the ticket and shall be entitled to any prize attributable thereto. Notwithstanding any name or names submitted on a claim form, the Executive Director shall make payment to the player whose signature appears on the back of the ticket in the space designated. If more than one name appears on the back of the ticket, the Executive Director will require that one of those players whose name appears thereon be designated by such players to receive payment.

B. The Texas Lottery shall not be responsible for lost or stolen Instant Game tickets and shall not be required to pay on a lost or stolen Instant Game ticket.

4.0 Number and Value of Instant Prizes. There will be approximately 25,200,000 tickets in the Instant Game No. 801. The approximate number and value of prizes in the game are as follows:

Figure 3: GAME NO. 801 - 4.0

A. The actual number of tickets in the game may be increased or decreased at the sole discretion of the Texas Lottery.

5.0 End of the Instant Game. The Executive Director may, at any time, announce a closing date (end date) for the Instant Game No. 801 without advance notice, at which point no further tickets in that game may be sold.

6.0 Governing Law. In purchasing an Instant Game ticket, the player agrees to comply with, and abide by, these Game Procedures for Instant Game No. 801, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401, and all final decisions of the Executive Director.

TRD-200606902

Kimberly Kiplin

General Counsel

Texas Lottery Commission

Filed: December 27, 2006


Public Utility Commission of Texas

Announcement of Application for Amendment to a State-Issued Certificate of Franchise Authority

The Public Utility Commission of Texas received an application on December 22, 2006, to amend a state-issued certificate of franchise authority (CFA), pursuant to §§66.001 - 66.016 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA).

Project Title and Number: Application of Time Warner Cable for an Amendment to a State-Issued Certificate of Franchise Authority, Project Number 33677 before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Information on the application may be obtained by contacting the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989. All inquiries should reference Project Number 33677.

TRD-200606904

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: December 28, 2006


Notice of Application for Waiver from Requirements

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas of an application on December 21, 2006, for waiver from the requirements in P.U.C. Substantive Rules §26.54(b)(3) and (4)(C).

Docket Title and Number: Application of Big Bend Telephone Company, Incorporated for a Temporary Extension of Waiver from Requirements in P.U.C. Substantive Rules §26.54(b)(3) and (4)(C); Docket Number 33676.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 33676.

TRD-200606903

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: December 28, 2006


Notice of Application to Amend a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for a Proposed Transmission Line in Randall County, Texas

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) an application on December 20, 2006, to amend a certificate of convenience and necessity for a proposed transmission line in Randall County, Texas.

Docket Style and Number: Application of Southwestern Public Service Company to Amend a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) for a Proposed Transmission Line in Randall County, Texas. Docket Number 33602.

The Application: The application of Southwestern Public Service Company (SPS) for a proposed transmission line is designated as the Amarillo South Interchange to Spring Draw Substation 115-kV Transmission Line Project. These facilities include approximately 5.41 miles of new 115 kV transmission line.

Persons wishing to intervene or comment on the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll-free at 1-888-782-8477. The deadline for intervention in this proceeding is February 5, 2007. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free) 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 33602.

TRD-200700009

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: January 3, 2007


Notice of Petition for Expanded Local Calling Service

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas of a petition on November 22, 2006, for expanded local calling service (ELCS), pursuant to Chapter 55, Subchapter C of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). A summary of the application follows.

Project Title and Number: Petition for Expanded Local Calling Service from the Mirando City Exchange to the Exchanges of Bruni, Hebbronville and Laredo, Project Number 33530.

The petitioners in the Mirando City exchange request ELCS to the exchanges of Bruni, Hebbronville, and Laredo.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than January 26, 2007. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2789. All comments should reference Project Number 33530.

TRD-200700007

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: January 3, 2007


Office of the Secretary of State

Correction of Error

The Office of the Secretary of State adopted new 1 TAC §81.60, concerning Voting System Certification Procedures. The adoption notice appeared in the January 5, 2007, issue of the Texas Register (32 TexReg 41).

Due to an error in Figure 1: 1 TAC §81.60(1), a sentence on page 107 reads: "Acknowledge which ITA has been notified to send 4 copies of the software and source code and expected delivery date to our office." As corrected, this sentence should read as follows:

"Acknowledge which voting system test laboratory has been notified to send a copy of the software and source code and expected delivery date to our office."

Due to an error in §81.60(2) on page 41, the rule text reads that the applicant must deliver four copies. In fact only one copy is required. As corrected, the paragraph should read as follows.

''(2) The applicant must have the nationally accredited voting system test laboratory deliver a copy of all nationally qualified software/firmware and source codes for the system and/or system components requested for Texas certification, directly to the Secretary of State no later than 45 days prior to examination.''

TRD-200700010


Texas Department of Transportation

Aviation Division - Request for Proposals

The Airport Sponsors, through their agent the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intend to engage aviation professional engineering firms for services pursuant to Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive proposals for professional aviation engineering design services described below:

Airport Sponsor: City of Corsicana, C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana Municipal Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.:0718CORSI. Scope: Provide engineering/design services to design and construct fueling pad; install supplemental windcone; repair hangar access taxiway; and install cyclone fencing at the David C. Campbell Field Airport, Corsicana, Texas. The DBE goal is set at 5%. TxDOT Project Manager is Charles Graham. Grant Manager is Edie Stimach. Six completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550 must be received by TxDOT Aviation Division at 150 E. Riverside Drive, 5th Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than February 6, 2007 , 4:00 p.m. Electronic facsimiles or forms sent by email will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms to the attention of Edie Stimach. The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government members.

Airport Sponsor: Aransas County, Aransas County Airport. TxDOT CSJ No. 0716RCKPT. Scope: Provide engineering/design services to Reconstruct Taxiway "A" from Taxiway "B" to Runway 18 end; Reconstruct Taxiway "D"; Rehabilitate Taxiway "E"; Overlay Taxiway "B"; Overlay Taxiway "A" from Taxiway "C" to Runway 14 end; Overlay Taxiway "C"; Construct Partial Taxiway to Runway 14-32; Install/Replace Signage and Install Erosion/Sedimentation Controls. The DBE goal is set at 11%. TxDOT Project Manager is John Wepryk, P.E. Grant Manager is Sheri Quinlan. Seven completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550 must be received by TxDOT Aviation Division at 150 E. Riverside Drive, 5th Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than February 6, 2007 , 4:00 p.m. Electronic facsimiles or forms sent by email will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms to the attention of Sheri Quinlan. The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government members.

Interested firms shall utilize the latest version of Form AVN-550, titled "Aviation Engineering Services Proposal". The form may be requested from TxDOT Aviation Division, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483, phone number, 1-800-68-PILOT (74568). The form may be emailed by request or downloaded from the TxDOT web site, URL address http://www.dot.state.tx.us/forms/aviation/550.doc . The form may not be altered in any way. All printing must be in black on white paper, except for the optional illustration page. Firms must carefully follow the instructions provided on each page of the form. Proposals may not exceed the number of pages in the proposal format. The proposal format consists of seven pages of data plus two optional pages consisting of an illustration page and a proposal summary page. Proposals shall be stapled but not bound in any other fashion. PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN ANY OTHER FORMAT.

ATTENTION: To ensure utilization of the latest version of Form AVN-550, firms are encouraged to download Form AVN-550 from the TxDOT website as addressed above. Utilization of Form AVN-550 from a previous download may not be the exact same format. Form AVN-550 is an MS Word Template.

For more information on these Request for Proposals go to the Aviation Consultant Contracts web page at http://www.dot.state.tx.us/business/avnconsultinfo.htm or contact the project specific Grant Manager for any procedural questions and the Project Manager for technical questions at 1-800-68-PILOT (74568).

TRD-200606895

Bob Jackson

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Filed: December 22, 2006


Request for Proposals - Highway Safety Performance Plan

In accordance with 43 TAC §25.901, et seq., the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is requesting project proposals to support the goals and strategies of a traffic safety program to reduce the number of motor vehicle related crashes, injuries and fatalities in Texas. These goals and strategies form the basis for the Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08) Highway Safety Performance Plan (HSPP).

The authority and responsibility of the traffic safety grant program derives from the National Highway Safety Act of 1966 (23 USC §401, et seq.), and the Texas Traffic Safety Act of 1967 (Transportation Code, Chapter 723). Traffic Safety is an integral part of the Texas Department of Transportation and works through the department's 25 districts for local projects. The program is administered at the state level by the department's Traffic Operations Division. The executive director of the department is the designated Governor's Highway Safety Representative.

The following are the 2008 HSPP Program Areas for which projects may be submitted: Planning and Administration; Alcohol and Other Drug Countermeasures; Emergency Medical Services; Motorcycle Safety; Occupant Protection; Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety; Police Traffic Services; Speed Control; Traffic Records; Driver Education and Behavior; Railroad/Highway Crossing; Roadway Safety; Safe Communities; and School Bus. Eligible organizations are state and local governments, educational institutions, and non-profit organizations.

The Request for Proposals for Fiscal Year 2008, as well as the on-line eGrants proposal application system, is available on the TxDOT website at the following location: http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/traffic_operations/traffic_safety.htm .

Proposals for FY08 must be completed using the eGrants system.

The new eGrants system can not presently accommodate Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMV) projects. Therefore, at this time, Selective Traffic Enforcement Programs (STEP) CMV proposals must be submitted in writing. Forms and instructions for STEP CMV are available at the same link listed above. In the event that STEP CMV is added to the eGrants System during the proposal period, then a proposing agency may either submit proposals electronically or in writing.

Proposals submitted using the eGrants system must be submitted no later than 5 p.m., March 9, 2007 . The eGrants system will not allow proposal submission after this date and time. Proposals targeting STEP CMV in writing must be submitted to the nearest TxDOT district office, Attention Traffic Safety Specialist, or mailed directly to Terry Pence, Traffic Operations Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78702. Written STEP CMV proposals must be received by TxDOT no later than 5 p.m., March 9, 2007 . Proposals received after this due date will not be accepted.

Video Conference training on submitting proposals for the new web based grants management system, eGrants, will be offered at various TxDOT locations across the state. Please contact Traffic Safety Specialists in your area or send a note to eGrants@dot.state.tx.us to learn about locations near you.

Potential subgrantees may attend eGrants proposal submittal training on one of these dates:

January 17 and 18, 2007

February 14 and 15, 2007

If you have questions please contact Ms. Susan Warren at (512) 416-3177 or at swarre1@dot.state.tx.us in the TxDOT Traffic Operations Division, Traffic Safety Section.

TRD-200606897

Bob Jackson

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Filed: December 22, 2006


The University of Texas System

Award of Consultant Contract Notification

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHSC-Houston)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston ("University"), in accordance with the provisions of Texas Government Code , Chapter 2254, entered into a contract for consulting services (the "Contract") with Chrisman Group Public Relations ("Consultant") as more particularly described in the IFO 744-6035-COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT (the "Invitation"), published in the September 18, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 8301).

Project Description:

In accordance with the Invitation and Consultant's response thereto, Consultant shall provide University with an institutional communications audit that will measure the effectiveness of internal and external communications vehicles throughout the University.

Scope of Work

In performing the Communications Audit, Consultant must:

(1) determine the degree of effectiveness of all communications within the University and the usefulness in supporting and advancing the University's strategic objectives,

(2) assess the overall effectiveness of the University's current marketing and communication efforts and recommend an approach for more efficient and productive collaboration and teamwork at the University,

(3) identify strategic issues facing the University that must be addressed to enable effective marketing for the UTHSC-H Medical School Physicians Practice Plan and the Memorial Hermann Healthcare System (MHHS), and

(4) make recommendations to the University that will allow a more integrated and strategic marketing unit to contribute significantly to the overall advancement of the University.

Consultant will provide the University with a final report for the Communications Audit, which must include, but is not limited to:

(1) an executive summary that identifies the degree of effectiveness among all of the University's internal and external vehicles of communications,

(2) current strengths and challenges in the current communications and marketing processes in place at the University,

(3) findings from interviews and research conducted by Consultant among the target audience for such interviews and research that is determined by the University and Consultant, and

(4) recommendations for new marketing and communication initiatives to enhance University effectiveness, which must be aligned with strategic goals of the University.

Consultant must complete the Communications Audit within the eight (8) to ten (10) consecutive calendar week period starting on the Effective Date.

Specifications

The Consultant shall provide the following services:

(a) Collect and review all internal and external communications within the University and conduct interviews with:

(1) University's senior administrators,

(2) selected members of the University's Development Board,

(3) University's academic deans,

(4) University's faculty,

(5) University relations department heads,

(6) University's department marketing managers,

(7) University's marketing, communications, and publication staff, and

(8) University's students

in order for the Consultant to provide the University with an in-depth analysis to determine if :

* the University Communications Program is increasing constituents and support for the University. Consultant will take inventory of the University's communications-internal and external, print, email, and web. Consultant will evaluate inventoried items for purpose, audience, usefulness, frequency, quality, consistency, goal attainment, and cost effectiveness, both individually and in combination with one another, in positioning the University and increasing University support.

* the Media Relations Program is increasing constituents and support for the University on a statewide and national level. Consultant will evaluate the usefulness, goal attainment, and cost effectiveness of media relations in positioning the University and increasing University support.

* the Marketing and Community Relations Program is increasing constituents and support for the University. Consultant will evaluate the purpose, audience, usefulness, quality, consistency, goal attainment, and cost effectiveness of marketing communications--including publications, signage, and graphic standards-in positioning the University and increasing University support.

* the University-wide organizational structure for the areas responsible for marketing communications are adequate. Consultant will evaluate staff competencies, responsibilities, and compensation; and determine if University's resource allotment/expenditures achieve University's communications goals and objectives.

(b) Conduct research of University communications and marketing messages from UTHSC-Houston, its schools, and its other units. Using qualitative and quantitative research, Consultant will provide University with Consultant's opinions about the usefulness, frequency, quality, consistency, and effectiveness of the University's communications and messages. Consultant will propose a market research plan with specific goals and objectives using methodologies that may include, but are not limited to:

* focus groups,

* surveys, and

* in-depth interviews.

(c) At all times during its performance of the Communications Audit, Consultant will provide weekly progress reports to Charles "Bill" McClain, Assistant to the President of UTHSC-Houston and Dr. Randa Safady, Vice Chancellor for External Relations of the University of Texas System.

(d) At the conclusion of the Communications Audit, Consultant will provide the University with a Final Report and Recommendations , which will include Consultant's conduct of an oral presentation to the University's Executive Leaders (i.e. President, Vice President(s), Vice Chancellor for External Relations, Academic Dean(s), etc.) in addition to Consultant's preparing and providing a written report to the University, both of which will contain:

* an executive summary;

* detail of the scope of the work performed by Consultant in performing the Communications Audit, including the methodologies used by Consultant in perform the Audit;

* Consultant's major findings resulting from the Communications Audit , including Consultant's findings and recommendations for what the University's expectations, measures and benchmarks should be for the communications and marketing program at the University, an academic health science center located in the largest medical center in the world and in the fourth largest city in the United States;

* conclusions based on the Consultant's findings resulting from its performance of the Communications Audit;

* recommendations with budgetary estimates, implementation plans, a proposed University structure, and metrics that the University can employ to monitor its future success and progress toward strategic communication and marketing goals.

Delivery Schedule of Events and Time Periods (the "Timetable"):

Week 1:

* As soon as possible following the Effective Date, the University will assemble and provide to Consultant copies of all communications and marketing materials, research, reports, paper system, and other documents and publications it believes will be important for Consultant to review and analyze.

* Consultant and the University liaison will meet to confirm specific details of the Communications Audit. Once confirmed, such specific details will be recorded in writing by Consultant and University and executed by authorized officials of both parties. Once so executed, this detail document will be incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes.

* Together, Consultant and the University will finalize details of the Audit and agree to or modify this Timetable. Specific duties and assignments will be outlined and appropriate deadlines will be assigned to University and Consultant, and a detailed written Work Plan will be created and executed by authorized officials of both parties. Once so executed, this Work Plan will be incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes.

* Contractor will draft and provide the University a list of potential questions to be included in the Management Interviews and Surveys . The University must approve the Management Interviews and Surveys (including all questions to be used by Consultant) before Consultant uses such Management Interviews and Surveys in its performance of the Communications Audit. Furthermore, Consultant will not use any questions in its performance of the Communications Audit except those documented in the Management Interviews and Surveys .

Week 2:

* Consultant will begin reviewing and evaluating University research, publications, review industry issues.

* Consultant will begin interviews of selected University administrators, members of the Development Board, academic deans, faculty, and staffers for the Management Interviews section as well as Surveys .

* Consultant and University will document in writing the requirements that Consultant must meet in conducting focus groups in the course of its performance of the Communications Audit. Once completed, such focus group documentation will be executed by authorized officials of both parties and thereby be incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes. Such focus group documentation will include the questions that Consultant will ask the participants in such focus groups. Consultant will create and submit a draft of these questions to the University; however, the University must approve in advance all questions that Consultant uses in conducting the focus groups.

Week 3:

* Consultant continues to review and evaluate University research and publications.

* Consultant continues to conduct Management Interviews , Surveys .

* Consultant begins transcription and evaluation of Management Interviews .

* Consultant works with University liaison to begin coordination of Focus Groups.

Week 4:

* Consultant continues Management Interviews .

* Consultant begins transcription of Surveys results.

* Consultant begins Focus Groups, facilitated by Dale Chrisman.

* Consultant begins draft of Final Report and Recommendations on effectiveness of University publications, communications, and marketing tools.

Week 5:

* Consultant continues Management Interviews , begins drafting the Management Interviews section of the Final Report and Recommendations.

* Consultant continues Focus Groups.

* Consultant continues draft of Final Report and Recommendations on publications, etc.

Week 6:

* Consultant completes and begins final edits to transcriptions of Focus Groups.

* Consultant completes editing of the sections of the Final Report and Recommendations on Management Interviews and Report on publications.

Weeks 7 and 8:

* Consultant begins work on first draft of Final Report and Recommendations .

* Consultant meets with the University liaison to review first draft of Final Report and Recommendations.

Week 9:

* Consultant edits Final Report and Recommendations, begins printing, binding of Final Report and Recommendations .

Week 10:

* Consultant presents and delivers Final Report and Recommendations to University's Executive Leaders (President, Vice President(s), Vice Chancellor for External Relations, Academic Deans, and whomever else the University chooses.

* Consultant will also deliver a copy of the Final Report and Recommendations to:

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

1851 Crosspoint, OCB 1.160

Houston, Texas 77054

Fax: (713) 500-4710

Email: Samantha.B.Lai@uth.tmc.edu

Attention: Samantha Lai, C.T.P.

Name and Address of Consultant:

Chrisman Group Public Relations

3409 Executive Center Drive, Suite 120

Austin, Texas 78731

Total Value of the Contract:

The total value of the Contract will not exceed $33,000.00.

University's standard payment terms for services are "Net 30 days." Chrisman Group Public Relations agrees that University will be entitled to withhold thirty-three percent (33%) of the total Services Fees due under this Agreement until after the University's acceptance of the Final Report and Recommendations provided by Consultant. In addition, Consultant provides the University with the following prompt payment discount on all early payments that the University makes under this Agreement:

Prompt Payment Discount: 5% 10 days/net 30 days.

Contract Dates:

The Contract was executed by Consultant on December 29, 2006, and by University on December 27, 2006, and dated effective January 1, 2007.

Due Dates for Contract Products:

Final Report and Recommendations related to the Communications Audit shall be completed and delivered to University the week of March 26, 2006, and no later than March 30, 2007 at 5:00 PM CST.

The term of the Contract shall terminate on March 30, 2007.

TRD-200700006

Francie A. Frederick

General Counsel to the Board of Regents

The University of Texas System

Filed: January 3, 2007