Texas Department of Agriculture
Request for Qualifications: Intellectual Property and Copyright/Trademark Counsel
The Texas Department of Agriculture (the Department), an agency of the
state of Texas, is publishing this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeking
to employ an Intellectual Property and Copyright/Trademark Counsel to assist
the Department with legal services in the intellectual property and copyright/trademark
areas of law in the implementation of programs under Title III of the Texas
Agriculture Code.
The Department was granted by the Texas Legislature the authority in Title
III of the Texas Agriculture Code to promote various products and commodities
associated with Texas enterprises through marketing programs that include
the use of copyrighted material and registered trademarks owned by the state
of Texas. The Department is also authorized to establish programs to promote
economic development in rural Texas and has also utilized registered trademarks
for those programs.
The Department may implement design marks which are registered trademarks,
as well as other copyrighted material, in the implementation of product promotion
programs such as: the GO TEXAN Partner Program, the Texas Oyster Program,
the Texas Shrimp Marketing Assistance Program, TAP, Taste of Texas, Vintage
Texas, Texas Grown, Naturally Texas, Texas Wine Marketing Assistance Program,
and its Food and Nutrition Program and other programs pertaining to the promotion
of healthy foods. In addition, the Department may implement registered trademarks
for its rural economic development programs.
Statement of Duties for the Counsel.
The counsel's responsibilities for intellectual and copyright/trademark
work will include, but will not be limited to, securing state and federal
trademark/certification registrations, advising the Department on protection
of property rights while registrations are pending, and advising or assisting
with any matter directly related to securing registration and protection of
the Department's interests in the property.
With respect to intellectual property and copyright/trademark issues, counsel,
in consultation with the staff of the Department, will prepare all legal documents
required by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Texas Secretary of State's
Office, Comptroller of Public Accounts, Attorney General, or outside parties;
protect Department interests in such property and obtain registrations and
certifications from the appropriate authorities; and review actions and render
opinions on the legality of pending, existing or proposed copyrighted material/trademark.
The counsel shall also perform other legal services, if requested by the
Department, that do not come within the functions of registration or certification
of copyrighted material or trademark, but are needed for the implementation
and administration of such copyrighted material and trademarks within the
context of the Department's promotional, nutrition and rural economic development
programs. Such services shall include, without limitation, the following:
consultation concerning planning and development of copyrighted material and
design marks for programs of the Department; review of design mark applications
and registrations; advice and services concerning legislation affecting such
programs; and advising on, and upon request of the Department potential claims
against other parties by the Department in relation to copyrighted material
and trademarks programs.
Proposal Contents.
Responses to this RFQ should include, at least, the following: a thorough
description of your firm's ability to represent the Department in the stated
job duties; a description of your firm's past experience as intellectual property
and copyright/trademark counsel for other state agencies; a description of
your firm's past experience as counsel to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office,
the Texas Secretary of State's Office, and other similar agencies in other
states; a designation of the individuals who might be assigned to the work
of the Department; examples of similar programs in which your firm has assisted
as legal counsel; a quotation of your proposed fee structure based upon the
certification and registration of trademarks and counsel of clients; a statement
addressing the effort made by your firm to encourage and develop the participation
of women and minorities in your firm; affirmation that the firm does not,
and shall not during the term of the contract, represent any plaintiff in
a proceeding seeking monetary damages from the State of Texas or any of its
agencies; and a statement of willingness to comply with policies, directives,
and guidelines of the Department and the Attorney General of the State of
Texas.
Statement of Evaluation Process.
Responses to this RFQ will be evaluated and ranked according to the information
provided, and summarized for the Commissioner of Agriculture's review. Staff
will rank the proposals and make a recommendation to the Commissioner. The
Department intends to select the proposal that demonstrates the highest degree
of competency and the necessary qualifications and experience in providing
the requested legal services at a fair and reasonable price.
Proposal Requirements.
A duly authorized representative of the firm must execute the submitted
response. An unsigned response will not be accepted. Issuance of this RFQ
in no way constitutes a commitment by the Department to award a contract,
or to pay for any services incurred either in the preparation of a response
to this RFQ or for the production of any contract for services. All communications
with the Department concerning this RFQ and the selection of counsel should
be directed to Ashley Harden, Acting General Counsel, on behalf of the Department.
Proposal Submission.
All proposals must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., August 1, 2006.
Proposal responses, modifications or addenda to an original response received
by the Department after the specified time and date for closing will not be
considered. Each firm is responsible for ensuring that its response reaches
the Department before the proposed due date. Firms should
submit one unbound original and three (3) copies of their proposal to:
Ashley
Harden, Acting General Counsel, Texas Department of Agriculture , P.O. Box
12847, Austin, Texas 78711, Street Address: 1700 N. Congress, Stephen F. Austin
Bldg., 11th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701.
Please mark the envelopes containing proposals with the following note
in the lower left-hand corner:
IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL
REQUEST: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT/TRADEMARK COUNSEL.
All
proposals become the property of the Department. Proposals must set forth
full, accurate and complete information as required by this request. Oral
responses, instructions or offers will not be considered. The Department reserves
the right to reject any and all responses.
Term of the Agreement.
The contract term shall be for the period beginning September 1, 2006,
through August 31, 2007.
Terms of the Agreement.
The contract issued under this RFQ will be in the form prescribed by the
Office of the Attorney General for Outside Counsel Contracts.
Proposal Modification.
Any response may be modified or withdrawn even after received by the Department
at any time prior to the proposal due date. No material changes will be allowed
after the expiration of the proposal due date; however, non-substantive corrections
or deletions may be made with the approval of staff of the Department. The
Department reserves the exclusive right to review proposals and make an appropriate
selection from such proposals. The Department is not bound to accept any proposal
by virtue of this RFQ.
Cost Incurred in Responding.
All costs directly or indirectly related to preparation of a response to
the RFQ or any oral presentation required to supplement and/or clarify the
RFQ which may be required by the Department shall be the sole responsibility
of, and shall be borne by your firm.
Release of Information and Open Records.
All proposals shall be deemed, once submitted, to be the property of the
Department. Information submitted in response to this RFQ shall not be released
by the Department during the proposal evaluation process or prior to the awarding
of a contract. After the Department completes the process and a contract is
awarded, proposals and information included therein may be subject to public
disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act.
TRD-200603258
Dolores Alvarado Hibbs
General Counsel
Texas Department of Agriculture
Filed: June 14, 2006
Request for Qualifications for Environmental Assessments
PROJECT: U.S. EPA Brownfield Hazardous Assessment Grant
ISSUER: ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (ATCOG)
PROJECT CONTACT: Elizabeth Layman, Environmental Resource Planner
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: 5:00 P.M. June 26, 2006.
The Ark-Tex Council of Governments (ATCOG) expects that the selected contractor
will:
Prepare and maintain schedules and budgets for assessment activities
Conduct and oversee site assessments and prepare technical reports including:
Review of historical records and due diligence
Onsite sample collection and analysis
Evaluation of cleanup options and costs
Quality Assurance Project Plan in compliance with US EPA Regulations
Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment and reports
Provide status and financial information
Attend meetings of ATCOG advisory committees
Prepare presentations regarding project progress
Develop a budget which includes plans for cleanup and reuse
The ATCOG consultant selection process will include:
Soliciting Requests for Qualifications
Reviewing qualifications and selecting consultants to present Oral Presentations
45 minutes in length.
Negotiating a contract with a selected consultant to begin work immediately
SUBMIT ELEVEN (11) COPIES TO:
Elizabeth Layman, Environmental Resource Planner
ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
P.O. Box 5307
Texarkana, TX 75505-5307
No electronically transmitted proposals will be accepted.
TRD-200603100
L.D. Williamson
Executive Director
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
Filed: June 8, 2006
Notice of Settlement of a Texas Water Code Enforcement Action
Notice is hereby given by the State of Texas of the following proposed
resolution of an environmental enforcement lawsuit under Texas Water Code §7.110.
Before the State may settle a judicial enforcement action under Chapter 7
of the Texas Water Code, the State shall permit the public to comment in writing
on the proposed judgment. The Attorney General will consider any written comments
and may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed agreed judgment if the
comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements
of the Code.
Case Title and Court:
Harris County, Texas and The State of Texas v. The Lubrizol Corporation,
Cause
No. 2006-07009, in the 215th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.
Nature of Defendant's Operations: Defendant, the Lubrizol Corp., owns and
operates a chemical plant specializing in the production of lubricant additives
in Deer Park, Harris County, Texas. Harris County's petition alleges that
during February and July of 2005, Defendants emitted into the atmosphere a
highly reactive volatile organic compound from their site and illegally discharged
industrial and/or other waste into Patrick Bayou in violation of regulations
issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. These air emissions
and waste discharges were unauthorized and were in violation of the Texas
Clean Air Act, the Texas Health & Safety Code §§382.085(a) and
(b), 30 Texas Admin. Code §§116.115(b)(2)(G) and (c), Air Quality
Permit No. 22046, Special Conditions 1 and 2, and the Texas Water Code §26.121.
Proposed Agreed Judgment: The proposed agreed judgment contains civil penalties
and attorney's fees. In the proposed settlement, Defendants agree to pay a
civil penalty of $12,000 to be divided evenly between Harris County and the
State. The proposed judgment awards attorney's fees of $2,000 to Harris County
and $1,000 to the State. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for monetary
awards in the judgment.
For a complete description of the proposed settlement, the complete proposed
Amended Agreed Final Judgment should be reviewed. Requests for copies of the
judgment, and written comments on the proposed settlement should be directed
to Laura E. Miles-Valdez, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Texas
Attorney General, P.O. Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548, (512) 463-2012,
facsimile (512) 320-0052. Written comments must be received within 30 days
of publication of this notice to be considered.
For information regarding this publication, contact
Lauri Saathoff, Agency Liaison, at (512) 463-2096.
TRD-200603163
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 12, 2006
Notice is hereby given by the State of Texas of the following proposed
resolution of an environmental enforcement lawsuit under Texas Water Code §7.110.
Before the State may settle a judicial enforcement action under Chapter 7
of the Texas Water Code, the State shall permit the public to comment in writing
on the proposed judgment. The Attorney General will consider any written comments
and may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed agreed judgment if the
comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements
of the Code.
Case Title and Court:
Harris County, Texas and The State of Texas v. Gulf Bayport Chemicals, L.P.
, Cause No. 2006-19028, in the 152nd Judicial District Court, Harris
County, Texas.
Nature of Defendant's Operations: Defendant, Gulf Bayport Chemicals, L.P.,
owns and operates the chemical plant located at 9700 Bayport Blvd., Pasadena,
Harris County, Texas. Harris County's petition alleges that on September 24,
2005, the defendant Gulf Bayport, L.P., illegally discharged glycerin/soybean
oil into the water of the State, specifically into Harris County Flood Control
ditch A104-04-00 and Taylor Bayou, in violation of Texas Water Code §26.121.
This discharge was unauthorized and was in violation of Texas Water Code §26.121.
Proposed Agreed Judgment: The proposed agreed judgment contains civil penalties
and attorney's fees. In the proposed settlement, Defendants agree to pay a
civil penalty of $8,000 to be divided evenly between Harris County and the
State. The proposed judgment awards attorney's fees of $1,000 to Harris County
and $1,000 to the State. Defendant is liable for monetary awards in the judgment.
For a complete description of the proposed settlement, the complete proposed
Amended Agreed Final Judgment should be reviewed. Requests for copies of the
judgment, and written comments on the proposed settlement should be directed
to Laura E. Miles-Valdez, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Texas
Attorney General, P.O. Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548, (512) 463-2012,
facsimile (512) 320-0052. Written comments must be received within 30 days
of publication of this notice to be considered.
For information regarding this publication, contact
Lauri Saathoff, Agency Liaison, at (512) 463-2096.
TRD-200603178
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 12, 2006
Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Requests for Consistency Agreement/Concurrence Under the Texas Coastal Management Program
On January 10, 1997, the State of Texas received federal approval of the
Coastal Management Program (CMP) (62 Federal Register pp. 1439-1440). Under
federal law, federal agency activities and actions affecting the Texas coastal
zone must be consistent with the CMP goals and policies identified in 31 TAC
Chapter 501. Requests for federal consistency review were deemed administratively
complete for the following project(s) during the period of June 2, 2006, through
June 8, 2006. As required by federal law, the public is given an opportunity
to comment on the consistency of proposed activities in the coastal zone undertaken
or authorized by federal agencies. Pursuant to 31 TAC §§506.25,
506.32, and 506.41, the public comment period for these activities extends
30 days from the date published on the Coastal Coordination Council web site.
The notice was published on the web site on June 14, 2006. The public comment
period for these projects will close at 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2006.
FEDERAL AGENCY ACTIONS:
Applicant: Galveston County Municipal Utility District
No. 12
; Location: The project is located within the subdivisions of
Omega Bay and Bayou Vista, off Highland Bayou, located northwest of the Highway
6 and I-45 intersection, Galveston County, Texas. The project can be located
on the U.S.G.S. quadrangle map entitled: Virginia Point, Texas. Approximate
UTM Coordinates in NAD 27 (meters): Zone 15; Easting: 311765; Northing: 3245703.
Project Description: This permit application was initially coordinated via
a public notice, dated 30 December 2005, under Permit Application No. 24013.
The original permit application included dredging and ecosystem restoration
within the Bayou Vista Channels and Omega Bay Channels. The applicant, with
concurrence from the City of Bayou Vista, has requested the permit application
be split into two separate applications. This permit application, No. 24216,
will reflect the request for dredging and ecosystem restoration within the
Omega Bay Channels. The dredging and ecosystem restoration of the City of
Bayou Vista Channels will be processed under Corps Permit Application No.
24013. The City of Bayou Vista Channel dredging and ecosystem restoration
will be publicly coordinated under a separate public notice. The impacts associated
with this project have not increased since the public notice dated December
30, 2005. The applicant proposes to perform maintenance hydraulic dredging
within the existing canals in the Omega Bay Subdivision to maintain recreational
navigation. Approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged from
Omega Bay. The canals will be dredged to a maximum depth of 8 feet below mean
lower low water. The canals vary from 75 to 100 feet wide. The surface area
of the canals to be dredged would be 4.5 acres. The dredge material will be
utilized to restore up to 8 acres of emergent saline marsh. To address the
concerns raised during the initial public notice, the applicant has moved
the majority of the ecosystem restoration area to along the I-45 frontage
road. The marsh restoration area will be located west and north of Omega Bay,
adjacent to and within the existing marsh restoration area associated with
Corps Permit No. 22473(01), and will be called the Omega Bay Mitigation Area.
CCC Project No.: 06-0303-F1; Type of Application: U.S.A.C.E. permit application
#24216 is being evaluated under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899 (33 U.S.C.A. §403) and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. §1344).
Note: The consistency review for this project may be conducted by the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality under §401 of the Clean Water Act.
Applicant: Galveston County Municipal Utility District
No. 12
; Location: The project is located within the subdivision of
Bayou Vista, off Highland Bayou, located northwest of the Highway 6 and I-45
intersection, Galveston County, Texas. The project can be located on the U.S.G.S.
quadrangle map entitled: Virginia Point, Texas. Approximate UTM Coordinates
in NAD 27 (meters): Zone 15; Easting: 311765; Northing: 3245703. Project Description:
This permit application was initially coordinated via a public notice dated
30 December 2005. The original permit application included dredging and ecosystem
restoration within the Bayou Vista Channels and Omega Bay Channels. The applicant,
with concurrence from the City of Bayou Vista, has requested the permit application
be split into two separate applications. This permit application, No. 24013,
will reflect the request for dredging and ecosystem restoration within the
City of Bayou Vista Channels. The dredging and ecosystem restoration of the
Omega Bay Channels is now being processed under Permit Application No. 24216,
which is being coordinated under a separate public notice. The impacts associated
with this project have not increased since the original public notice. The
applicant proposes to perform maintenance hydraulic dredging, for 10 years,
within the existing canals in the Bayou Vista subdivisions to maintain recreational
navigation. Approximately 35,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged from
the Bayou Vista canals. The canals will be dredged to a maximum depth of 8
feet below mean lower low water. The canals vary from 75 to 100 feet wide.
The surface area of the canals to be dredged would be 14 acres. The dredge
material will be utilized to restore up to 8 acres of emergent saline marsh.
The marsh restoration area would be located south of Bayou Vista, within the
Saconas marsh, and will be called the Bayou Vista Mitigation Area. CCC Project
No.: 06-0304-F1; Type of Application: U.S.A.C.E. permit application #24013
is being evaluated under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33
U.S.C.A. §403) and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. §1344).
Note: The consistency review for this project may be conducted by the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality under §401 of the Clean Water Act.
Pursuant to §306(d)(14) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
(16 U.S.C.A. §§1451-1464), as amended, interested parties are invited
to submit comments on whether a proposed action is or is not consistent with
the Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies and whether the action
should be referred to the Coastal Coordination Council for review.
Further information on the applications listed above may be obtained from
Ms. Tammy Brooks, Consistency Review Coordinator, Coastal Coordination Council,
P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, or tammy.brooks@glo.state.tx.us.
Comments should be sent to Ms. Brooks at the above address or by fax at (512)
475-0680.
TRD-200603245
Larry L. Laine
Chief Clerk/Deputy Land Commissioner
Coastal Coordination Council
Filed: June 13, 2006
Local Sales Tax Rate Changes Effective July 1, 2006
TRD-200603272
Martin Cherry
Chief Deputy General Counsel
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Filed: June 14, 2006
Notice of Rate Ceilings
The Consumer Credit Commissioner of Texas has ascertained the following
rate ceilings by use of the formulas and methods described in §303.003
and §303.009, Tex. Fin. Code.
The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for
the period of 06/19/06 - 06/25/06 is 18% for Consumer
1
/Agricultural/Commercial
2
/credit through
$250,000.
The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for
the period of 06/19/06 - 06/25/06 is 18% for Commercial over $250,000.
1
Credit for personal, family or household
use.
2
Credit for business, commercial, investment
or other similar purpose.
TRD-200603264
Leslie L. Pettijohn
Commissioner
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
Filed: June 14, 2006
Enforcement Orders
An agreed order was entered regarding YJK Inc. dba Granger Food Store,
Docket No. 2003-0257-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,800 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A default order was entered regarding Lakhani Investments, Inc. dba Alamo
Food Mart, Docket No. 2003-1070-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in
administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Courtney St. Julian, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0617, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Steve Henricus Byl dba Dutch Cowboy
Dairy, Docket No. 2002-1299-AGR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,640 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Justin Lannen, Staff Attorney at (817) 588-5927, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Shawn & Shawn, Inc., Docket No.
2003-0897-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,200 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Dana Shuler, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2505, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Mirage Stop, Inc., Docket No. 2003-1443-MWD-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,900 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Courtney St. Julian, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0617, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Docket
No. 2003-1470-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $80,444 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Alfred Okpohworho, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8918, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An order was entered regarding JNS & Samir Corporation, Docket No.
2004-0241-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $14,400 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shannon Strong, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0252, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding McCulloch County, Docket No. 2004-0827-MLM-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $31,250 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Laurencia Fasoyiro, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8914, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A default order was entered regarding Aarish Investments, Inc., Docket
No. 2004-1235-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,050 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Kari Gilbreth, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1320, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Jeffy's, Inc., Docket No. 2004-1253-PST-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,280 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Feroz Ali Jivani dba MC Food Store
2, Docket No. 2004-1666-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Rebecca Combs, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-6939, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Lanxess Corporation, Docket No. 2005-0006-AIR-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $17,955 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Laurencia Fasoyiro, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8914, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding BP Products North America Inc., Docket
No. 2005-0224-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $336,556 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Terry Murphy, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5025, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding The Premcor Refining Group Inc.,
Docket No. 2005-0585-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,860 in administrative
penalties with $1,372 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Jaime Garza, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6030, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A default order was entered regarding Harvey Gillespe, Docket No. 2005-0628-MSW-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $7,350 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A default order was entered regarding Gary Don Stahlheber dba Oak Hollow
Mobile Home Park, Docket No. 2005-0655-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,260
in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding City of Teague, Docket No. 2005-0673-MWD-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,080 in administrative penalties with $2,016
deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Rose T. Wong and Mitchel Wong, Docket
No. 2005-0785-EAQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,250 in administrative penalties
with $450 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Audra Ruble, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3126, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Transportation,
Docket No. 2005-0922-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,875 in administrative
penalties with $375 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Special Camps For Special Kids, Docket
No. 2005-0969-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,680 in administrative penalties
with $1,336 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding TXI Operations, LP, Docket No. 2005-1061-IWD-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $91,502 in administrative penalties with $18,300
deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Laurie Eaves, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4495, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding City of Floresville, Docket No. 2005-1066-MWD-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $12,120 in administrative penalties with $2,424
deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Mac Vilas, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2557, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding A B C Concrete, Inc., Docket No.
2005-1071-WQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,350 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shana Horton, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1088, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A default order was entered regarding Curtis Shupak dba Village WSC, Docket
No. 2005-1120-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,010 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shawn Slack, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1877, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Houston Fruitland Inc., Docket No.
2005-1169-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,083 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation,
Docket No. 2005-1254-IWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $14,100 in administrative
penalties with $2,820 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Catherine Albrecht, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3672, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Firoz A. Kurjee dba Wee Mart, Docket
No. 2005-1346-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,650 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Jaime Garza, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6030, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding William Dewitt dba 45 Kwik Stop,
Docket No. 2005-1377-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative
penalties with $1,000 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Public Safety,
Docket No. 2005-1465-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,500 in administrative
penalties with $500 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Nadia Hameed, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3629, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding A & K Enterprises, Inc. dba Country
Food Store, Docket No. 2005-1484-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,040 in
administrative penalties with $808 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding WTG Fuels, Inc. dba Plaza Self Serve
150322, Docket No. 2005-1547-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,500 in administrative
penalties with $900 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shontay Wilcher, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2136, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding The Lubrizol Corporation, Docket
No. 2005-1554-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $53,400 in administrative penalties
with $10,680 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
John Muennink, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3423, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding J. D. Abrams, L.P., Docket No. 2005-1561-PST-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,100 in administrative penalties with $420 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Jason Kemp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5610, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Wafia Hanif dba Super Stop Texaco,
Docket No. 2005-1573-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $8,500 in administrative
penalties with $1,700 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shontay Wilcher, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2136, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Sabine Cogen LP, Docket No. 2005-1658-AIR-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $11,040 in administrative penalties with $2,208
deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Jorge Ibarra, Enforcement Coordinator at (817) 588-5890, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding H. E. Butt Grocery Company, Docket
No. 2005-1688-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative penalties
with $1,000 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Trina Grieco, Enforcement Coordinator at (210) 403-4006, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Gulamali Bharwani dba Texfra, Docket
No. 2005-1716-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,900 in administrative penalties
with $380 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Kent Heath, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4575, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Timberlane Estates Property Owners
Association, Inc., Docket No. 2005-1717-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,040
in administrative penalties with $208 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Tel Croston, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5717, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding John Daugherty dba John Daugherty
Homes, Docket No. 2005-1756-WQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Shana Horton, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1088, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Chevron Phillips Chemical Company
LP, Docket No. 2005-1769-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $31,875 in administrative
penalties with $6,375 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Miriam Hall, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1044, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding National Oilwell Varco, L.P., Docket
No. 2005-1770-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $23,000 in administrative penalties
with $4,600 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation,
Docket No. 2005-1774-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,550 in administrative
penalties with $910 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Kathleen Decker, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-6500, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Exxon Mobil Corporation, Docket No.
2005-1792-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,675 in administrative penalties
with $1,335 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
John Muennink, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3423, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Enbridge Pipelines East Texas L.P.,
Docket No. 2005-1809-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,100 in administrative
penalties with $1,220 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Amy Burgess, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2540, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Centauri Technologies, L.P., Docket
No. 2005-1817-IHW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $25,949 in administrative penalties
with $5,190 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Joseph Daley, Enforcement Coordinator at (817) 588-5928, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Buda/Kyle Church of Christ, Docket
No. 2005-1841-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Elvia Maske, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0789, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Public Safety,
Docket No. 2005-1847-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,625 in administrative
penalties with $525 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding United Petroleum Transports, Inc.,
Docket No. 2005-1851-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,020 in administrative
penalties with $204 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Docket No. 2005-1896-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $13,750 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Audra Ruble, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3126, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Gulbrandsen Technologies Inc., Docket
No. 2005-1927-IWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $9,900 in administrative penalties
with $1,980 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Jon-Lin Corp., Docket No. 2005-1947-MLM-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative penalties with $1,000 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Laurie Eaves, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4495, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Hope Agri Products of Texas, Ltd.,
Docket No. 2005-1979-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $16,000 in administrative
penalties with $3,200 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding City of Robert Lee, Docket No. 2005-1988-MSW-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,950 in administrative penalties with $990 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Anita Keese, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6034, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Bell County Water Control & Improvement
District 1, Docket No. 2005-2002-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,450 in
administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Sandy VanCleave, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2670, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding We Are Crazy, Inc. dba Country Pantry
10, Docket No. 2005-2019-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,675 in administrative
penalties with $535 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Kent Heath, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4575, Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Regent Coach Line, Ltd., Docket No.
2005-2036-MLM-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,500 in administrative penalties
with $900 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lynley Doyen, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1364, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Maverick Tube, L.P., Docket No. 2005-2049-AIR-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,075 in administrative penalties with $1,015 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Sherronda Martin, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3680, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Eagle Railcar Services, L.P., Docket
No. 2005-2059-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $9,450 in administrative penalties
with $1,890 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Sherronda Martin, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3680, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Central Freight Lines, Inc., Docket
No. 2005-2060-MSW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,000 in administrative penalties
with $600 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Lyondell-Citgo Refining LP, Docket
No. 2005-2073-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,000 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Kimberly Morales, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 422-8938, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding KBC Services, Inc. dba Marina Bay
Harbor Yacht Club, Docket No. 2005-2076-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,050
in administrative penalties with $210 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Delek Refining, Ltd., Docket No.
2006-0028-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,264 in administrative penalties
with $853 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Samuel Short, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5363, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Continental Carbon Company, Docket
No. 2006-0039-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,100 in administrative penalties
with $1,020 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Cari-Michel LaCaille, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1387, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Monument Inn, Inc., Docket No. 2006-0058-MWD-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,450 in administrative penalties with $1,290 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Lynley Doyen, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1364, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding H.R.N. Inc. dba Collins Food Mart,
Docket No. 2006-0059-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,300 in administrative
penalties with $1,260 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Enterprise Products Operating L.P.,
Docket No. 2006-0100-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,500 in administrative
penalties with $500 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Scott Barnett, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3523, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Hueco Quarry, Inc., Docket No. 2006-0109-AIR-E
on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,020 in administrative penalties with $204 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Harvey Wilson, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0321, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Trany Inc. dba MS Express 722, Docket
No. 2006-0116-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties
with $630 deferred.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Beacon Estates Water Supply Corporation,
Docket No. 2006-0129-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,340 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Michael Limos, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5839, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
A Filed Citation was entered regarding Tina Lee, Docket No. 2006-0344-PST-E
on May 31, 2006 assessing $1,750 in administrative penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
David Van Soest, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0468, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
An agreed order was entered regarding Mehdi Maredia dba AA & RL Kountry
Store, Docket No. 2005-1578-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,200 in administrative
penalties.
Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting
Robert Mosley, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0627, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.
TRD-200603268
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 14, 2006
AGENCIES: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, Texas General Land Office, and United States Fish and Wildlife
Service of the Department of the Interior (collectively the Natural Resource
Trustees).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of a proposed Draft Amended Restoration
Plan and Environmental Assessment for injuries to natural resources from releases
of hazardous substances at the Koppers Texarkana National Priority List site
and a 30-day period for public comment on this document beginning June 23,
2006.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a proposed Draft Amended Restoration
Plan and Environmental Assessment (Amended Plan), to be used in the resolution
of the Natural Resource Trustees' claim for natural resource damages at the
Koppers Texarkana National Priority List site (the Site), is available for
public review and comment. The Trustees have developed an Amended Plan to
address unforeseen events which have made it impossible to implement the preferred
restoration alternative originally selected. This document has been prepared
by the Natural Resource Trustees in cooperation with Beazer East, Inc. (Beazer)
to address injuries or potential injuries to natural resources and the services
they provide as a result of releases of hazardous substances at or from the
former Koppers Texarkana Wood Preserving Facility in Texarkana, Bowie County,
Texas. The Amended Plan describes revisions to the originally approved Restoration
Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft Plan), which was released for public
comment on October 18, 2002. The Draft Plan described potential injuries related
to the Site and presented a preferred restoration alternative. The previously
proposed restoration project would have provided compensation through the
preservation of at least 56.5 acres of riparian and wetland habitat along
Howard Creek, in Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas. The Trustees and Beazer have
since determined that the property is no longer viable as a restoration alternative.
The Trustees and Beazer have concluded a search for alternative restoration
projects. The search evaluated a range of projects within the Days Creek watershed
in and around Texarkana, Texas and found no suitable or available properties
in the area. The Trustees and Beazer then began a regional search for suitable
restoration properties that met the criteria presented in the previously approved
Draft Plan and that had identified title and conservation easement holders.
After completing this search, the nearest suitable property was located within
the Nature Conservancy's Lennox Woods Preserve in Red River County. This project
would preserve a minimum of 76 acres of bottomland woodland and wetland habitats
in perpetuity through a conservation easement held by the Natural Area Preservation
Association, and the fee title of the property being held by the Nature Conservancy
of Texas. The Trustees and Beazer are therefore presenting the Lennox Woods
Preserve project as the amended preferred restoration alternative for the
compensation of natural resource injuries at the former Koppers Texarkana
Wood Preserving Facility in Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas.
The opportunity for public review and comment on the proposed Amended Plan
announced in this notice is required under Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. To receive a copy of the proposed
Amended Plan, interested members of the public are invited to contact: Charles
Brigance, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Remediation Division
MC 142, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, (512) 239-2238 or
The Amended Plan may also be reviewed on the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality Natural Resource Trustee Program Web site at:
www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/nrtp/index.html
.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on
July 24, 2006, to Charles Brigance of the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality at the address listed in the previous paragraph. The Natural Resource
Trustees will consider all written comments prior to finalizing the proposed
Amended Plan.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Site is a former wood treatment facility
that began operation in 1910. It is located approximately one mile west of
downtown Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas. Waggoner Creek is located immediately
adjacent to the Site and forms its western boundary.
On April 16, 1984, The Texas Department of Water Resources (now the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality) recommended to the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) that the site be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL).
The EPA concurred and the Site was proposed for placement on the NPL on October
15, 1984. The site was subsequently added to the NPL on June 10, 1986.
The Natural Resource Trustees determined that a natural resource damage
assessment was appropriate due to potential injuries to aquatic and biological
natural resources, as a result of surface water runoff and groundwater discharges
into Waggoner Creek and an on-site pond. A cooperative assessment of injuries
or potential injuries to natural resources was jointly performed by the Natural
Resource Trustees and Beazer.
The cooperative assessment determined that the release of hazardous materials
at or from the Site resulted in injury or potential injury to natural resources.
The Draft Plan described the compensatory restoration project initially proposed
to compensate the public for lost ecological services identified in the cooperative
damage assessment. Details of the injury assessment and the review of potential
restoration options were outlined in the Draft Plan. The Draft Plan was released
for public review on October 18, 2002. The document described the assessment
procedures used to define the natural resource services losses and to scale
the restoration action. It also identified a preservation property preferred
to compensate for those service losses caused by the natural resource injuries
at the Site. The Trustees did not receive public comment concerning the Draft
Plan.
The originally approved preservation property was located south of the
City of Texarkana in Bowie County, Texas. The property was a 56.5-acre parcel
located on Howard Creek, approximately 1.8 miles south of the Koppers Texarkana
Site. The property was bordered by residential development to the north, west
and southeast, and undeveloped woodlands along most of the south and east.
The property contained extensive wetlands, ponds and riparian hardwood forests,
as well as upland pine forests. The habitat supported numerous species of
bird, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians.
The property and habitat were to have been preserved in perpetuity through
the transfer to a public or private entity and/or use of appropriate conservation
easements, deed restrictions, or other legal instruments to ensure the ecological
integrity of the site. Numerous public and private organizations were contacted
and presented the opportunity to either hold fee title or easement rights
on the Howard Creek Preservation property. However, with increasing development
in the area and the completion of the new Highway 59 corridor near the restoration
project, many of the entities viewed the property as a potential liability
and felt that preserving the ecological integrity of the site would be extremely
difficult. After two years of attempts to work through these issues and with
continued development in the area it became obvious that the property would
not attract a fee title or easement holder. The Trustees and Beazer have since
determined that the property is no longer viable as a restoration alternative.
The Trustees have identified an alternate preferred restoration alternative
that would compensate for potential injuries to water quality and aquatic
habitats through the preservation of a 76-acre parcel of bottomland hardwood
habitat and aquatic resources located along Pecan Bayou within the Nature
Conservancy of Texas' Lennox Woods Preserve, in Red River County, Texas. The
parcel has a substantial aquatic habitat component. The property is located
within an area that represents high quality old-growth bottomland hardwood
forest and contains extensive wetlands, backwaters, and riparian hardwood
forest, which support numerous species of aquatic fauna, birds, mammals, reptiles,
and amphibians. The ecological services provided by the property will be preserved
in perpetuity through the placement of a conservation easement.
TRD-200603229
Mary Risner
Director, Litigation Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff
is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Default
Orders (DOs). The commission staff proposes a DO when the staff has sent an
executive director's preliminary report and petition (EDPRP) to an entity
outlining the alleged violations; the proposed penalty; and the proposed technical
requirements necessary to bring the entity back into compliance; and the entity
fails to request a hearing on the matter within 20 days of its receipt of
the EDPRP. Similar to the procedure followed with respect to Agreed Orders
entered into by the executive director of the commission in accordance with
Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075, this notice of the proposed order and
the opportunity to comment is published in the
Texas
Register
no later than the 30th day before the date on which the public
comment period closes, which in this case is
July 24,
2006
. The commission will consider any written comments received and
the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of a DO if a comment discloses
facts or considerations that indicate a proposed DO is inappropriate, improper,
inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes and rules
within the commission's jurisdiction, or orders and permits issued in accordance
with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to
a proposed DO is not required to be published if those changes are made in
response to written comments.
A copy of each proposed DO is available for public inspection at both the
commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A,
3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional
office listed as follows. Comments about the DO should be sent to the attorney
designated for the DO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087,
MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be
received
by 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 2006
. Comments may also be sent by facsimile
machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The commission's attorneys are
available to discuss the DOs and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone
numbers; however, comments on the DOs should be submitted to the commission
in
writing
.
(1) COMPANY: Big Chipper of Texas, Inc. dba Big Chipper Parker Road Recycling
Facility; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1521-MSW-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104497790; LOCATION:
1629 Parker Road, Carrollton, Denton County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wood
recycling facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §330.4(f)(1)(B), by failing
to obtain a permit or registration prior to the storage, processing, removal,
or disposal of municipal solid waste; 30 TAC §37.921 and §328.5(d),
by failing to demonstrate financial assurance for closure of the facility;
PENALTY: $4,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Robert Mosley, Litigation Division MC 175,
(512) 239-0627; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel
Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.
(2) COMPANY: Bob Perry dba Amistad American Camp Ground; DOCKET NUMBER:
2006-1827-PWS-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102676715; LOCATION: Highway 90 West, Del
Rio, Val Verde County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULES
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(2)(A)(i) and Texas Health and Safety Code
(THSC), §341.033(d), by failing to collect routine bacteriological samples
at a frequency based on the population served by the facility; 30 TAC §290.122(c)(2)(B)
and THSC, §341.033(d), by failing to notify persons served by the facility
of the failure to collect routine bacteriological samples by direct delivery
or by continuously posting the notice in conspicuous places within the area
served by the facility; PENALTY: $1,980; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation
Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Laredo Regional Office,
707 East Calton Road, Suite 304, Laredo, Texas 78041-3638, (956) 791-6611.
(3) COMPANY: Jerry Barger dba Barger Salvage Yard; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1665-WQ-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104458294; LOCATION: 497 Apache Street, Kempner, Lampasas
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: automotive salvage yard; RULES VIOLATED:
30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §122.26(c),
by failing to obtain authorization to discharge storm water associated with
industrial activity; PENALTY: $5,350; STAFF ATTORNEY: Robert Mosley, Litigation
Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0627; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801
Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(4) COMPANY: Jon A. Friend dba Besaw's Cafe; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1487-PWS-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN101191484; LOCATION: 3506 Battleground Road, Harris County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(2)(A)(i)
and §290.122(c)(2)(B) and THSC, §341.033(d), by failing to perform
routine monthly bacteriological sampling of the public drinking water supply
and failed to provide public notification of the failure to conduct monthly
bacteriological sampling during the months of May through August 2003 and
November 2003 through April 2005; 30 TAC §290.51(a)(3) and TWC, §5.702,
by failing to pay all Fiscal Year 2005 Public Health Service fees, including
all late fees, for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 31011039; PENALTY:
$12,925; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512)
239-0619; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite
H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(5) COMPANY: Milton Doss; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1584-MLM-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS:
26819 and RN104601877; LOCATION: 5500 -5490 Greenforest Lane outside of Texarkana,
Bowie County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: property; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §330.4(a)
and TWC, §26.121(c), by failing to dispose of municipal solid waste,
scrap tires, five-gallon plastic buckets, air conditioning refrigerant bottles,
refrigerators, sofas, mattresses, carpet, carpet pad, construction debris,
trees, and brush at an authorized site and failed to prevent an unauthorized
discharge into or adjacent to waters in the state; 30 TAC §111.219(7)
and THSC, §382.085(b), by burning unauthorized materials including scrap
tires, construction debris, plastics, railroad ties, shingles, freon cylinders,
and municipal solid waste at the site; 30 TAC §330.4(a) and TWC, §26.121(c),
by failing to dispose of municipal solid waste, scrap tires, construction
debris, trees, and brush at an authorized site and failed to prevent an unauthorized
discharge into or adjacent to waters in the state; PENALTY: $5,400; STAFF
ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0619; REGIONAL
OFFICE: Tyler Regional Office, 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701-3756,
(903) 535-5100.
(6) COMPANY: Nelco Distributing Company dba Nelco Corner; DOCKET NUMBER:
2005-1223-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104557921; LOCATION: 1045 South State Highway
359, Mathis, San Patricio County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store
with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and
(b), by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective
action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage
caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of underground storage
tank (UST) systems; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and §334.128(a) and TWC, §5.702,
by failing to pay UST fees for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005
and aboveground storage tank fees for 2003, 2004, and 2005; PENALTY: $4,200;
STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0078;
REGIONAL OFFICE: Corpus Christi Regional Office, 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200,
Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(7) COMPANY: Price Construction, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0295-AIR-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 907901D and RN102743747; LOCATION: one mile east of University
Avenue on North Loop 289, Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY:
hot mix asphalt plant; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.110(a)(2)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b),
by failing to submit a registration for the installation of a pollution control
device; 30 TAC §116.115(c), New Source Review Air Permit 7901, Special
Condition 3, and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to use only the fuel specified
by the permit; PENALTY: $5,500; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rebecca Davis, Litigation
Division, MC 175, (512) 239-5487; REGIONAL OFFICE: Lubbock Regional Office,
4630 50th Street, Suite 600, Lubbock, Texas 79414-3520, (806) 796-7092.
(8) COMPANY: Sohail Afridi dba Lumberton Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1449-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102353554; LOCATION: 2346 Highway 69 South, Lumberton, Hardin
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline;
RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all UST records
at the station and make them available for inspection to commission personnel
upon request; 30 TAC §115.245(2) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing
to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment at least once every 12
months; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing
to monitor USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once every month (not
to exceed 35 days between each monitoring); 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing
to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for
all USTs involved in the retail sale of petroleum substances as a motor fuel;
30 TAC §334.22(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay UST fees for
TCEQ Financial Assurance Account No. 0060267U and associated late fees for
fiscal year 2005; PENALTY: $8,925; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mark Curnutt, Litigation
Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0624; REGIONAL OFFICE: Beaumont Regional Office,
3870 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.
(9) COMPANY: Dexter Simpson dba Overton Road Chevron; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1971-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 75267 and RN102835766; LOCATION: 3926 East Overton Road,
Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing
to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action
and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused
by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY:
$3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rebecca Davis, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512)
239-5487; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel
Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.
(10) COMPANY: Judy Davis dba Judy's Kountry Kitchen; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0063-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102260767; LOCATION: Highway 75 and Farm-to-Market Road
315, Poyner, Henderson County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store
with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and
(b), and Agreed Order Docket No. 2004-1480-PST-E, Ordering Provision No. 2.a.,
by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective
action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage
caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs;
30 TAC §334.50(a)(1)(A) and (b)(2)(A)(i)(III); §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii);
and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to provide a release detection
method capable of detecting a release from any portion of the UST system which
contained regulated substances including the tanks, piping, and other underground
ancillary equipment; 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective
manual or automatic inventory control procedures for all USTs involved in
the retail sale of petroleum substances as a motor fuel; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(4)(A)(vii)
and (c)(5)(B)(ii), by failing to timely renew a previously issued UST delivery
certificate by submitting a properly completed UST registration and self-certification
form at least 30 days before the expiration date of the delivery certificate;
30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(A)(i) and TWC, §26.3467(a), by failing to make
available to a common carrier a valid, current TCEQ delivery certificate before
accepting delivery of a regulated substance into the USTs at the facility;
30 TAC §334.22(a); Agreed Order, Docket No. 2004-1480-PST-E, Ordering
Provision No. 2.b.; and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay outstanding UST
fees for TCEQ Account No. 0054411U for fiscal years 2003, 2004, 2005, and
2006; PENALTY: $21,450; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division,
MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Tyler Regional Office, 2916 Teague
Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.
(11) COMPANY: Pak Convenience Store, Inc. dba One Stop #15; DOCKET NUMBER:
2005-1154-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102402179; LOCATION: 8460 Denton Drive,
Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1),
by failing to monitor the UST system at a frequency of at least once every
month (not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring) in a manner which would
detect a release; 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective
manual or automatic inventory control procedures for the UST system; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(4)(A)(vii)
and (c)(5)(B)(ii), by failing to timely renew a previously issued delivery
certificate, and failed to make immediately available upon request by TCEQ
staff a current TCEQ delivery certificate for the USTs at the facility; 30
TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain on the premises of the facility
all required records, and failed to make those records immediately available
for inspection upon request by TCEQ personnel; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and
TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay, at the time and in the manner required,
outstanding annual facility fees for TCEQ Account No. 0052830U for fiscal
year 2006; PENALTY: $6,222; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division,
MC 175, (512) 239-0019; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office,
2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.
(12) COMPANY: Tajammal Incorporated dba Super Stop 18; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1493-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102382058; LOCATION: 5480 College Street, Beaumont, Jefferson
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline;
RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.242(9) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing
to post operating instructions conspicuously on the front of each gasoline
dispensing pump equipped with a Stage II vapor recovery system; 30 TAC §115.242(3)(A)
and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain the Stage II vapor recovery
system in proper operating condition as specified by California Air Resources
Board Executive Order(s), and free of defects that would impair the effectiveness
of the system; 30 TAC §115.246(7)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing
to maintain all required Stage II records for review upon request; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A)
and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to monitor tanks for releases at
a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC § 334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III)
and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test line leak detectors at least
once per year; 30 TAC § 334.50(b)(2) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing
to test product piping at least once per year; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(9)(A)(iv)
and §334.72, by failing to notify the commission within 24 hours of a
suspected release when statistical inventory reconciliation analysis results
were "Fail" or "Inconclusive"; 30 TAC §334.74, by failing to conduct
release investigation and confirmation steps within 30 days of discovery of
a suspected release; 30 TAC §115.245(2) and THSC, §382.085(b), by
failing to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment at least once
every 12 months; PENALTY: $20,800; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation
Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Beaumont Regional Office,
3870 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.
TRD-200603248
Mary Risner
Director, Litigation Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff
is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Agreed
Orders (AOs) in accordance with Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075. Section
7.075 requires that before the commission may approve the AOs, the commission
shall allow the public an opportunity to submit written comments on the proposed
AOs. Section 7.075 requires that notice of the opportunity to comment must
be published in the
Texas Register
no later
than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period closes,
which in this case is
July 24, 2006
. Section
7.075 also requires that the commission promptly consider any written comments
received and that the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of an AO
if a comment discloses facts or considerations that the consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes
and rules within the commission's orders and permits issued in accordance
with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to
a proposed AO is not required to be published if those changes are made in
response to written comments.
A copy of each proposed AO is available for public inspection at both the
commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A,
3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional
office listed as follows. Comments about an AO should be sent to the attorney
designated for the AO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087,
MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be
received
by 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 2006
. Comments may also be sent by facsimile
machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The designated attorney is available
to discuss the AO and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone number;
however, §7.075 provides that comments on an AO should be submitted to
the commission in
writing
.
(1) COMPANY: Highness Enterprises, Inc. dba All Time Food Store; DOCKET
NUMBER: 2005-1571-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN101798361; LOCATION: 29719 Brook
Chase Drive, Spring, Montgomery County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience
store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.246(1),
(3), (4), (5), (6), and (7)(A) and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §382.085(b),
by failing to maintain records onsite at the station ordinarily manned during
business hours, and make immediately available for review upon request; 30
TAC §115.245(3) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to provide written
notification to the appropriate TCEQ Regional Office at least ten working
days in advance of the testing date and who will conduct the test; 30 TAC §115.242(3)(A)
and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain the Stage II vapor recovery
system in proper operating condition including the absence or disconnection
of any component that is a part of the approved system; 30 TAC §334.10(b),
by failing to maintain the underground storage tank (UST) records as required;
30 TAC § 334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to
ensure that all tanks are monitored in a manner which will detect a release
at a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2) and
TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to conduct proper release detection for
the piping associated with the UST system; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III)
and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test the line leak detectors on an
annual basis for performance and operational reliability; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii)
and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to conduct monthly reconciliation
of inventory control records in a manner sufficiently accurate to detect a
release which equals or exceeds the sum of 1% of flow-through plus 130 gallons;
30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic
inventory control procedures for all UST systems at the station; PENALTY:
$5,680; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512)
239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite
H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(2) COMPANY: Hunters Creek Business Park, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1873-EAQ-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN104590567; LOCATION: within the Edwards Aquifer recharge
zone, at the southwestern corner of Highway 46 and Oak Run Parkway near New
Braunfels, Comal County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: tract of land; RULES VIOLATED:
30 TAC §213.4(a)(1), by failing to obtain commission approval of an Edwards
Aquifer Protection Plan (EAPP) prior to commencing clearing activities, including
clearing trees from the land or the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone; PENALTY:
$15,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512)
239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: San Antonio Regional Office, 14250 Judson Road,
San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.
(3) COMPANY: Larry Beakey dba BBT Investments; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0381-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 21226 and RN102821758; LOCATION: 824 South F Street, Harlingen,
Cameron County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: petroleum storage tank facility;
RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective inventory
control for the underground storage tank (UST) system; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A),
(b)(2)(A)(i)(III), and (b)(2), and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing
to monitor the USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once every month
(not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring), by failing to monitor the
piping associated with the UST system for releases, and by failing to test
the piping for performance and operational reliability at least once each
year; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C), by failing to permanently tag, label, or
mark the UST system with an identification number that is identical to the
UST registration and self-certification number; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by
failing to maintain records for the UST system; PENALTY: $5,185; STAFF ATTORNEY:
Shana Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE:
Harlingen Regional Office, 1804 West Jefferson Avenue, Harlingen, Texas 78550-5247,
(956) 425-6010.
(4) COMPANY: Madat Hirani dba Circle J Food Store; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0041-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102405768; LOCATION: 12310 Cullen Boulevard, Houston, Harris
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail fuel sales;
RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.49(a)(2) and (c)(4)(C) and TWC, §26.3475(d),
by failing to properly maintain and test the cathodic protection system for
adequacy of protection once every three years; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A)
and (b)(2)(A)(i) and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to monitor
the USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once per month, not to exceed
35 days between each monitoring and failed to equip the regular unleaded product
line with an automatic line leak detector; PENALTY: $4,500; STAFF ATTORNEY:
Deborah A. Bynum, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1976; REGIONAL OFFICE:
Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486,
(713) 767-3500.
(5) COMPANY: Metroplex Sand & Gravel, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-2094-WQ-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103959144; LOCATION: 10000 Trammel Davis Road, Fort Worth,
Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: sand dredging operation; RULES VIOLATED:
30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §122.26(a),
by failing to obtain authorization to discharge storm water associated with
industrial activity to water in the state through an individual permit or
the Multi-Sector General permit; PENALTY: $5,700; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen
Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort
Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817)
588-5800.
(6) COMPANY: Rudolphs, Inc. dba Cuero One Stop dba Lantz Shell and dba
One Stop 5; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1514-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN101872679,
RN101882694, and RN102235249; LOCATION: 710 North Esplanade Street, 102 East
Broadway Street, and 101 Industrial Boulevard, Cuero, Dewitt County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience stores with retail sales of gasoline; RULES
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all required UST
records at the Cuero One Stop Facility and make them available for inspection
upon request by commission personnel; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to
maintain all required UST records at the Lantz Shell Facility and make them
available for inspection upon request by commission personnel; 30 TAC §334.10(b),
by failing to maintain all required UST records at the One Stop 5 Facility
and make them available for inspection upon request by commission personnel;
PENALTY: $3,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175,
(512) 239-0619; REGIONAL OFFICE: Corpus Christi Regional Office, 6300 Ocean
Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(7) COMPANY: Shawn & Sameer, Inc. dba Lawn Minit Mart; DOCKET NUMBER:
2005-1664-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102382827; LOCATION: 6448 United States
Highway 84, Lawn, Taylor County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store
with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by
failing to have records immediately available for inspection upon request
by the TCEQ investigator; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2) and TWC, §26.3475(a),
by failing to monitor piping associated with the USTs for releases; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III)
and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test the line leak detectors at least
once per year for performance and operational reliability; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii)
and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to conduct inventory control reconciliation
on a monthly basis sufficiently accurate to detect a release as small as the
sum of 1.0% of the total substance flow-through for the month plus 130 gallons;
30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C), by failing to ensure that a legible tag, label,
or marking with the tank number is permanently applied upon or affixed to
either the top of the fill tube or to a non-removable point in the immediate
area of the fill tube according to the UST registration and self-certification
form; 30 TAC §334.49(c)(2)(C) and (c)(4) and TWC, §26.3475(d), by
failing to test the cathodic protection system for operability and adequacy
of protection at a frequency of at least once every three years, and failing
to inspect the rectifier at least once every 60 days; PENALTY: $6,100; STAFF
ATTORNEY: Mark Curnutt, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0624; REGIONAL
OFFICE: Abilene Regional Office, 1977 Industrial Boulevard, Abilene, Texas
79602-7833, (325) 698-9674.
(8) COMPANY: The Estate of Robert Walker; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0418-AGR-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103022364; LOCATION: 5048 Father Anders Loop, Cistern, Fayette
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: hog farm; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §321.47(c)(1)
and TWC, §26.121(a)(1) by failing to locate, construct, and manage the
control of facilities and land management unit of an animal feeding operation
in a manner that would protect surface and groundwater quality; 30 TAC §321.47(c)(2)
by failing to prevent nuisance conditions and minimize odor conditions in
accordance with the requirements of 30 TAC §321.31(b) and 30 TAC §321.47(d)(8)
by failing to equip the Retention Control Systems with either irrigation,
evaporation, or liquid removal systems; 30 TAC §321.47(f)(19)(A) by failing
to restrict animals from coming into direct contact with surface water in
the state; PENALTY: $6,300; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division,
MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Austin Regional Office, 1921 Cedar
Bend Drive, Suite 150, Austin, Texas 78758-5336, (512) 339-2929.
(9) COMPANY: Toko Foko Inc. dba MSM Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1785-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 49985 and RN102029402; LOCATION: 6013 North Farm-to-Market
Road 565, Baytown, Chambers County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store
with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §§115.246(6),
115.244(3) and 334.10(b)(1)(B); and THSC, §382.085(b) by failing to maintain
a record of the results of the daily and monthly Stage II inspections conducted
at the station and failing to maintain UST records pertaining to spill and
overfill control records and corrosion protection records; 30 TAC §334.50(a)(1)(A)
and (b)(2)(A)(i)(III); and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1) by failing to perform
an annual performance test on the existing line leak detectors and failing
to provide the UST system with a method or combination of methods, of release
detection capable of detecting a release from any portion of the UST system
which contains regulated substances; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(A)(i) by failing
to make available to a common carrier a valid, current TCEQ delivery certificate
before delivery of a regulated substance into the UST; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(B)(ii)
by failing to ensure that the UST registration and self-certification forms
were submitted to the agency in a timely manner; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C)
by failing to permanently tag or label each UST fill tube at the facility
with the number used to identify the tank on the registration and self-certification
form filed with the commission; 30 TAC §334.48(c) by failing to conduct
effective manual or automatic inventory control on all UST systems at a retail
facility; PENALTY: $9,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Laurencia Fasoyiro, Litigation
Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8914; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office,
5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(10) COMPANY: Town of Hackberry; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1107-MWD-E; TCEQ ID
NUMBER: RN102077054; LOCATION: the southern end of Maxwell Road, Hackberry,
Denton County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment facility; RULES
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(17) and Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (TPDES) Permit No. 13434001, Monitoring and Requirement No. 1, by failing
to report discharge monitoring report data for the months from September 2003
through June 2004; 30 TAC §305.125(1), TWC, §26.121(a) and TPDES
Permit No. 13434001, Final Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements
Nos. 1 and 2, by failing to comply with permitted effluent limits during March,
May, June, July, and August 2004; PENALTY: $21,700; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana
Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort
Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817)
588-5800.
(11) COMPANY: Waco Infinity Properties, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1185-AIR-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104665351; LOCATION: 1207 West McGregor Drive, McGregor,
McLennon County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: real property; RULES VIOLATED: 30
TAC §111.201 and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to prevent outdoor
burning; PENALTY: $1,675; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division,
MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger
Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(12) COMPANY: Yari Enterprises, Inc. dba Git N Go; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0445-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102245263; LOCATION: 302 South 17th Street, West Columbia,
Brazoria County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales
of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to
demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and
for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused
by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; 30 TAC §334.48(c)
and §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii), by failing to conduct manual or automatic inventory
control for all USTs at the facility, and by failing to conduct inventory
control reconciliation on a monthly basis; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A)(i)(III),
and (b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to test
line leak detectors and product piping at least once per year for performance
and operational reliability, and by failing to monitor tanks (release detection)
for releases at a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC §115.245(2)
and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to conduct the annual and triennial
Stage II testing to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment; 30
TAC §334.22(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay outstanding underground
storage tank fees for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 0059929U;
PENALTY: $17,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC
175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue,
Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(13) COMPANY: Kash 'N' Karry, Inc. dba Magic Texaco; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1842-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 65383 and RN101542330; LOCATION: 110 West Southlake Boulevard,
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with
retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b),
by failing to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective
action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage
caused by accidental releases from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY:
$3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Alfred Okpohworho, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713)
422-8918; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel
Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.
(14) COMPANY: Lakhani Ashraf dba Easy Shop; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0178-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 45256 and RN102250693; LOCATION: 3510 South College Avenue,
Bryan, Brazos County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing
to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and
for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused
by accidental releases from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $3,150;
STAFF ATTORNEY: Alfred Okpohworho, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8918;
REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco,
Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(15) COMPANY: Tsuo-Min Chi dba A-Sunnys; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1224-PST-E;
TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 43969 and RN102281268; LOCATION: 6240 Synott Road, Houston,
Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales
of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to
provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for
compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by
accidental releases arising from the operation of two petroleum USTs; PENALTY:
$2,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0019;
REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
TRD-200603247
Mary Risner
Director, Litigation Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is requesting grant
applications for nonpoint source projects that address the objectives, goals,
and/or priorities identified in the State of Texas Nonpoint Source Management
Program. Funds awarded under this grant may not pay for activities which are
required by: a wastewater discharge permit or a storm water permit (although
related activities not specifically required by the permits are allowed).
This request does NOT seek agricultural or silvicultural projects under the
jurisdiction of the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board.
Who is eligible to apply?
: Grants will
be available to all state agencies or political subdivisions of the State
of Texas, including cities, counties, school districts, state universities,
and special districts. Private, for profit, and nonprofit organizations may
participate in projects as partners or contractors but may not apply directly
for funding.
How to Apply and When
: Information on the
CWA, §319 grant program and how to apply for CWA, §319 grant funding
can be accessed on the TCEQ Nonpoint Source Web site at
http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/monitoring/nps/mgmt-plan/index.html
. The grant application packet will be posted on the Texas Procurement
and Building Commission's Texas Marketplace Web site at
http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us
. The TCEQ will accept applications for
consideration of CWA, §319 funding for Fiscal Year 2007 between June
23 and August 23, 2006.
Matching
: All projects must include non-federal
matching funds of 40% of the project's total costs (i.e., 60/40 match of the
100% total cost, 60% is federal funds and 40% is match funds). Applicants
should make an effort to identify other similar work going on within the state.
Applicants are encouraged to collaborate and partner with other state or local
agencies for measurable nonpoint source pollution reduction.
election Procedures
: TCEQ will review the
applications, and based on the evaluation criteria, the number of applications
submitted, and funds available in each funding category (base and incremental),
a portion or potentially all will be invited to submit proposals. A submission
request for a proposal does not guarantee full or partial funding through
this Request for Grant Application (RFGA). Applicants who are selected will
be notified in writing to prepare a proposal and will be assigned to a TCEQ
project manager by September 27, 2006. The project manager will work with
the applicant to draft and finalize the work plan prior to submittal to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA will review all work
plans prior to TCEQ awarding grant funds.
Questions/Final Addendum
: Questions regarding
this RFGA will be taken through July 19, 2006. If the applicant has any questions
regarding this RFGA contact Regina Adams, Procurements and Contracts, Office
of Administrative Services, (512) 239-3427, Fax (512) 239-6004, or email
Grant Schedule
: The following dates are
included in the Fiscal Year 2007 Grant Application Process: June 23, 2006
- RFGA Start Date; July 19, 2006 - Deadline for questions regarding RFGA;
August 18, 2006 - Final Addendum to RFGA to the Texas Procurement and Building
Commission's Texas Marketplace; August 23, 2006 - Deadline for submitting
applications; September 27, 2006 - Potential applicants will be notified in
writing to submit proposals; November 22, 2006 - Final work plans are due
for submittal to EPA; March 2007 - Projected date of EPA Award; April 2007
- (Contingent on EPA Award) TCEQ initiates contracts with applicants.
TRD-200603220
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has
made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning nitrate-nitrogen
loading in the Lower Sabinal River of the Nueces River Basin. TCEQ will also
conduct a public meeting to receive comments on the implementation plan.
Lower Sabinal River (Segment 2110), located in Uvalde County, is included
in the State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d) list of impaired water
bodies. As required by §303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, a Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was developed for nitrate-nitrogen. The TMDL was
adopted by the commission on August 10, 2005, as an update to the State Water
Quality Management Plan. Upon adoption by the commission, the TMDL was submitted
to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and
approval. EPA approved the TMDL on October 13, 2005. The implementation plan
is a flexible tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies involved
in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management.
A public meeting will be held in Sabinal, Texas, on June 27, 2006, at 7:00
p.m., at the Sabinal City Hall, located at 501 North Center Street. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. Open
discussion will not occur during the meeting; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the matter 30 minutes prior to the meeting and
will answer questions before and after the meeting. The purpose of the public
meeting is to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed
plan. The commission requests comment on each of the six major components
of the implementation plan: description of control actions and management
measures, implementation schedule, legal authority, follow-up monitoring plan,
measurable outcomes, and communication strategy. After the public comment
period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation plan, if appropriate. The
final implementation plan will then be considered for approval by the commission.
Upon approval of the implementation plan by the commission, the final implementation
plan and a response to public comments will be made available on the TCEQ
Web site at
http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html
.
Written comments should be submitted to Ward Ling, TCEQ TMDL Section, MC
203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414.
All comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at (512) 239-4900.
Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.
TRD-200603219
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has
made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) in fish tissue in Lake Worth of the Trinity River Basin.
TCEQ will also conduct a public meeting to receive comments on the implementation
plan.
Lake Worth (Segment 0807), located in Tarrant County, is included in the
State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d) list of impaired water bodies.
As required by the federal Clean Water Act, §303(d) a Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) was developed for PCBs in fish tissue. The TMDL was adopted by
the commission on August 10, 2005, as an update to the State Water Quality
Management Plan. Upon adoption by the commission, the TMDL was submitted to
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval.
EPA approved the TMDL on October 13, 2005. The implementation plan is a flexible
tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies involved in TMDL
implementation will use to guide their program management.
A public meeting will be held in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 6, 2006, at
7:00 p.m., at the Fort Worth City Hall, City Council Chamber located at 1000
Throckmorton Street. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon
in order of registration. Open discussion will not occur during the meeting;
however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the matter 30
minutes prior to the meeting and will answer questions before and after the
meeting. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity
to comment on the proposed plan. The commission requests comment on each of
the six major components of the implementation plan: description of control
actions and management measures, implementation schedule, legal authority,
follow-up monitoring plan, measurable outcomes, and communication strategy.
After the public comment period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation
plan, if appropriate. The final implementation plan will then be considered
for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the implementation plan by
the commission, the final implementation plan and a response to public comments
will be made available on the TCEQ Web site at
http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html
.
Written comments should be submitted to Roger Miranda, Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality, Chief Engineer's Office, TMDL Section, MC 203, P.O.
Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414. All comments
must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference
Implementation Plan for One Total Maximum Daily Load for Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs) in Fish Tissue in Lake Worth, For Segment 0807
. For further
information regarding this proposed TMDL implementation plan, please contact
Roger Miranda, TCEQ Central Office, at (512) 239-6278 or
rmiranda@tceq.state.tx.us
. Copies of the document summarizing the proposed
TMDL implementation plan can be obtained via the commission's Web site or
by calling (512) 239-4900.
Persons with disabilities who have special communication or other accommodation
needs who are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at
(512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.
TRD-200603227
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has
made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning total
dissolved solids and chlorides loading in the Clear Creek Above Tidal watershed
of San Jacinto-Brazos River Basin. TCEQ will also conduct a public meeting
to receive comments on the implementation plan.
Clear Creek Above Tidal (Segment 1102), located in Fort Bend, Harris, Brazoria,
and Galveston Counties, is included in the State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d)
list of impaired water bodies. As required by §303(d) of the federal
Clean Water Act, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) were developed for total
dissolved solids and chlorides. The TMDLs were adopted by the commission on
April 12, 2006, as updates to the State Water Quality Management Plan. Upon
adoption by the commission, the TMDLs were submitted to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency for review and approval. The implementation
plan is a flexible tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies
involved in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management.
A public meeting will be held in Pearland, Texas, on July 11, 2006, at
7:00 p.m., at the Pearland City Hall Council Chambers, located at 3519 Liberty
Drive. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of
registration. Open discussion will not occur during the meeting; however,
an agency staff member will be available to discuss the matter 30 minutes
prior to the meeting and will answer questions before and after the meeting.
The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity
to comment on the proposed plan. The commission requests comment on each of
the six major components of the implementation plan: description of control
actions and management measures, implementation schedule, legal authority,
follow-up monitoring plan, measurable outcomes, and communication strategy.
After the public comment period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation
plan, if appropriate. The final implementation plan will then be considered
for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the implementation plan by
the commission, the final implementation plan and a response to public comments
will be made available on the TCEQ Web site at
http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html
.
Written comments should be submitted to Andrew Sullivan, TCEQ TMDL Section,
MC 203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414.
All comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at (512) 239-4900.
Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.
TRD-200603221
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 13, 2006
The following notices were issued during the period of June 2, 2006 through
June 8, 2006.
The following require the applicants to publish notice in the newspaper.
The public comment period, requests for public meetings, or requests for a
contested case hearing may be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk,
Mail Code 105, P.O. Box 13087, Austin Texas 78711-3087, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF
THE DATE OF NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF THIS NOTICE.
Apple Springs Independent School District has applied for a renewal of
TPDES Permit No. 14086-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic
wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 6,200 gallons per day. The
facility is located approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection
of Farm-to-Market Road 357 and Farm-to-Market Road 2501, and north of State
Highway 94 in Trinity County, Texas.
City of Deport has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 10741-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 183,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
1000 feet south of U.S. Highway 271 and 1400 feet west of the intersection
of Farm-to-Market Road 1149 and U.S. Highway 271 in Lamar County, Texas.
City of Joaquin has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 12718-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 137,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
2,700 feet northeast of the intersection of Jackson Street and U.S. Highway
84 in the City of Joaquin in Shelby County, Texas.
City of Presidio has applied to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) for a new permit, proposed TPDES Permit No. WQ0014679001, to authorize
the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at an annual average flow not
to exceed 1,250,000 gallons per day. The facility will be located approximately
1.5 miles southeast of the City of Presidio on the north side of Farm-to-Market
Road 170 in Presidio County, Texas.
City of Sabinal has applied for a new permit, proposed Texas Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. WQ0014689001, to authorize
the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to
exceed 340,000 gallons per day. The facility will be located approximately
5,300 feet south of the intersection of State Hwy. 187 and Dunlap Avenue,
along Dunlap Avenue and Rhylander Road (County Road 386) in Uvalde County,
Texas.
City of Yantis has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 12187-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 42,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
one mile south of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 17 and State Highway
154 in Wood County, Texas.
LeTourneau, Inc., which operates a heavy equipment manufacturing plant,
has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. WQ0001603000, which authorizes
the discharge of contact and noncontact cooling water, parts/equipment washdown
water, storm water runoff, and previously monitored effluents (wastewater
from the vacuum degassing process, non contact cooling water, contact cooling
water, and storm water via internal Outfall 101 and wastewater from the hot
forming process via internal Outfall 201) on an intermittent and flow variable
basis via Outfall 001. The facility is located at 2400 S. McArthur Boulevard,
approximately 0.25 mile northwest of the intersection of Estes Parkway and
Farm-to-Market Road 1845, and approximately 0.75 mile north of Interstate
Highway 20 in the southwestern portion of the City of Longview, Gregg County,
Texas.
Mallard Point WWTP, LLC has applied to the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 14215-001, which authorizes
the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to
exceed 22,500 gallons per day. The proposed permit would also authorize the
disposal of treated domestic wastewater via irrigation on 40 acres of a 90
acre golf course. The facility is located approximately 8,650 feet north and
2,000 feet west of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 1,564 and U.S.
Highway 69 in Hunt County, Texas.
Town of Ponder has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 11287-003,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 225,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
2,500 feet southeast of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 2449 and Farm-to-Market
Road 156, approximately 1,200 feet east of Farm-to-Market Road 156 and 1,600
feet south of Farm-to-Market Road 2449 in Denton County, Texas.
TRD-200603267
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 14, 2006
Notice issued on June 13, 2006:
APPLICATION NO. 5927 Michael L. Gilbert and Donna G. Gilbert, 7405 96th
Street, Lubbock, Texas 79424, applicants, have applied for a Water Use Permit
to divert and use not to exceed 90 acre-feet of water per year from Running
Water Draw, Brazos River Basin, for agricultural (irrigation) purposes in
Hale County. The application was received on November 14, 2005. Additional
information was received on February 6 and March 10, 2006. The application
was declared administratively complete and filed with the Office of the Chief
Clerk on March 21, 2006. Ownership of the land is evidenced by a Warranty
Deed with Vendor's Lien filed as Volume 978, Page 4211 in the Hale County
Clerk's Office. The Commission will review the application as submitted by
the applicant and may or may not grant the application as requested. Written
public comments and requests for a public meeting should be submitted to the
Office of Chief Clerk, at the address provided in the information section
below, within 30 days of the date of newspaper publication of the notice.
INFORMATION SECTION
A public meeting is intended for the taking of public comment, and is not
a contested case hearing.
The Executive Director can consider approval of an application unless a
written request for a contested case hearing is filed. To request a contested
case hearing, you must submit the following: (1) your name (or for a group
or association, an official representative), mailing address, daytime phone
number, and fax number, if any: (2) applicant's name and permit number; (3)
the statement "[I/we] request a contested case hearing;" and (4) a brief and
specific description of how you would be affected by the application in a
way not common to the general public. You may also submit any proposed conditions
to the requested application which would satisfy your concerns. Requests for
a contested case hearing must be submitted in writing to the TCEQ Office of
the Chief Clerk at the address provided in the information section below.
If a hearing request is filed, the Executive Director will not issue the
requested permit and may forward the application and hearing request to the
TCEQ Commissioners for their consideration at a scheduled Commission meeting.
Written hearing requests, public comments or requests for a public meeting
should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC 105, TCEQ, P.O. Box
13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087. For information concerning the hearing process,
please contact the Public Interest Counsel, MC 103, at the same address. For
additional information, individual members of the general public may contact
the Office of Public Assistance at 1-800-687-4040. General information regarding
the TCEQ can be found at our web site at www.tceq.state.tx.us.
TRD-200603266
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 14, 2006
The State Office of Administrative Hearings issued a Proposal for Decision
and Order to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on June 6, 2006,
in the matter of the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, Petitioner v. Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation; SOAH Docket No.
582-05-7505; TCEQ Docket No. 2004-1505-AIR-E. The commission will consider
the Administrative Law Judge's Proposal for Decision and Order regarding the
enforcement action against Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation on a date and
time to be determined by the Office of the Chief Clerk in Room 201S of Building
E, 12100 N. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas. This posting is Notice of Opportunity
to Comment on the Proposal for Decision and Order. The comment period will
end 30 days from date of this publication. Written public comments should
be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC-105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087,
Austin, Texas 78711-3087. If you have any questions or need assistance, please
contact Paul Munguia, Office of the Chief Clerk, (512) 239-3300.
TRD-200603270
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 14, 2006
The State Office of Administrative Hearings issued a Proposal for Decision
and Order to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on June 6, 2006,
in the matter of the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, Petitioner v. Murrill Len Baxley dba Texas Defensive Shooting Academy;
SOAH Docket No. 582-05-5033; TCEQ Docket No. 2003-0029-MSW. The commission
will consider the Administrative Law Judge's Proposal for Decision and Order
regarding the enforcement action against Murrill Len Baxley dba Texas Defensive
Shooting Academy on a date and time to be determined by the Office of the
Chief Clerk in Room 201S of Building E, 12100 N. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas.
This posting is Notice of Opportunity to Comment on the Proposal for Decision
and Order. The comment period will end 30 days from date of this publication.
Written public comments should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk,
MC-105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087. If you have any questions
or need assistance, please contact Paul Munguia, Office of the Chief Clerk,
(512) 239-3300.
TRD-200603269
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Filed: June 14, 2006
Interagency Coordinating Council (ICC) for Building Healthy Families Public Hearing
The Interagency Coordinating Council (ICC) for Building Healthy Families,
as established by the 79th Texas Legislature House Bill (HB) 1685, facilitates
communication and collaboration concerning policies for the prevention of
and early intervention in child abuse and neglect among state agencies whose
programs and services promote and foster healthy families. To that end, the
Council prepared and submitted to the Texas Legislature an inventory of the
child abuse and neglect prevention and early intervention policies, programs,
and activities of each agency represented on the council. The Council requests
that those wanting to provide public input also review the inventory, which
is available on the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) website
at: http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Prevention_and_Early_Intervention/About_Prevention
_and_Early_Intervention/icc.asp
The ICC will conduct a public hearing to solicit input from stakeholders
to complete their charge in making recommendations to the Texas Legislature
for improving the coordination and collaboration of child abuse and neglect
prevention and early intervention program and services among state agencies.
The Public Hearing will be held on July 27, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m. and
ending at 4:00 p.m. in the Public Hearing Room (125W) on the first floor of
the John H. Winters Building, 701 W. 51st Street, Austin, Texas. The ICC requests
that testimonies focus on the following questions:
(1) How can state agencies better collaborate and
coordinate to improve child abuse and neglect prevention programs and services?
(2) Do you have any suggestions for how state agencies
can support communities and providers in implementing evidence-based programs?
(3) What best evidence-based and cost-effective
prevention programs do we lack in Texas?
(4) Are there areas in Texas where demand for child
abuse and neglect prevention services far exceeds availability?
(5) Do you have any feedback to provide regarding
the ICC Inventory Report?
To ensure an opportunity for all who wish to present, those attending the
public hearing should anticipate limiting their presentations to 10 minutes.
Time limits may be adjusted at the hearing based on the actual attendance.
In lieu of public testimony, members of the public may submit written comments
through a link designed for this purpose http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=730222238183.
Written comments may also be submitted via email to ICC@dfps.state.tx.us or
to Rachel Porter-Daniel at DFPS-PEI, P.O. Box 149030, Mail Code Y-956, Austin,
TX 78714-9030. Comments submitted after July 27, 2006, may not be considered.
Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting who need auxiliary
aids or services may contact Rachel Porter-Daniel at (512) 821-4745, no later
than July 10, 2006, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A computer
with a CD drive (requires Windows Office 2000 or less) and Internet connection,
as well as a projector, will be available to presenters at the public hearing.
Presenters requiring other audio or visual equipment for presentations should
contact Rachel Porter-Daniel at (512) 821-4745, no later than July 10, 2006.
TRD-200603241
Gerry Williams
General Counsel
Department of Family and Protective Services
Filed: June 13, 2006
Public Notice
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission announces its intent to
submit Transmittal Number 06-024, Amendment Number 742, to the Texas State
Plan for Medical Assistance, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.
The purpose of this amendment is to comply with the Deficit Reduction Act
of 2005, Section 6036, "Improved Enforcement of Documentation Requirements."
(Public Law Number 109-171, February 8, 2006). The Deficit Reduction Act requires
Medicaid applicants and recipients who declare to be a United States citizen
or national to furnish satisfactory documentary evidence of United States
citizenship as defined in the Act. The proposed amendment is effective July
1, 2006.
The proposed amendment is estimated to result in a cost of $709,141 in
state funds and $1,644,553 in total funds for State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2006.
Additional cost in SFY 2007 is not anticipated.
To obtain copies of the proposed amendment, interested parties may contact
Glennell Berry by mail at Office of Family Services, Texas Health and Human
Services Commission, P.O. Box 12668, mail code 2039, Austin, Texas 78711-2668;
by telephone at (512) 206-4545; by fax at (512) 206-4556; or by e-mail at
glennell.berry@hhsc.state.tx.us.
Copies of the proposal will also be made available for public review at
the local offices of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.
TRD-200603273
Steve Aragón
Chief Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Filed: June 14, 2006
Notice of Public Hearing, Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Plan FFY 2007
For the fiscal year that begins October 1, 2006, the Texas Department of
Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) anticipates receiving federal funds
to continue the operation of certain programs that assist very low-income
Texans with home energy. While in the process of deciding how to use Low-Income
Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) funds, TDHCA now seeks opinions of
groups affected by LIHEAP programs as well as opinions of other interested
citizens.
As part of the public information, consultation, and public hearing requirements
for LIHEAP, the Community Affairs Division of the Texas Department of Housing
and Community Affairs (TDHCA) will conduct a public hearing and post the proposed
plan on the TDHCA internet site. Primarily, the hearing solicits comments
on the proposed use and distribution of federal fiscal year (FFY) 2007 funds
provided under LIHEAP. LIHEAP provides funding for the Weatherization Assistance
Program (WAP) and utility assistance--known as "Comprehensive Energy Assistance
Program (CEAP)".
The public hearing has been scheduled as follows:
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 2:00 p.m.
Room #116, TDHCA Headquarters,
221 East 11th St.
Austin, Texas
A representative from TDHCA will explain the planning process and receive
comments from interested citizens and affected groups regarding the proposed
plan for LIHEAP subrecipients. A copy of the Draft LIHEAP Plan may be obtained
after June 23, 2006, through TDHCA's web site, http://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/ea.htm
or by contacting the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Community
Affairs Division, Energy Assistance Section, P.O. Box 13941, Austin, Texas
78711-3941, or by phone at (512) 475-1435.
Anyone may submit comments on the draft plan in written form or oral testimony
at the public hearing. TDHCA must receive written comments no later than 5:00
p.m., Monday, July 24, 2006. Comments concerning the draft plan may be submitted
via the Internet to john.touchet@tdhca.state.tx.us or by fax (512) 475-3935
or through John Touchet at TDHCA using the postal service address provided
above. If you have any questions regarding the public hearing process or any
of the programs referenced above, please contact TDHCA, Community Affairs
Division, Energy Assistance Section.
Individuals who require auxiliary aids or services for this meeting should
contact Ms. Gina Esteves at (512) 475-3943 or Relay Texas at 1-800-735-2989
at least two days before the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can
be made.
Non-English speaking individuals who require interpreters for this meeting
should contact John Touchet, (512) 475-1435 at least three days before the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.
Personas que hablan español y requieren un intérprete, favor
de llamar a Jorge Reyes al siguiente número (512) 475-4577 por lo menos
tres días antes de la junta para hacer los preparativos apropiados.
TRD-200603230
Michael Gerber
Executive Director
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Filed: June 13, 2006
Request for Proposals
The Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) solicits proposals from individuals
and organizations interested in providing technical assistance for the Gulf
Coast Workforce Board staff in the further development and implementation
of projects for the Ideal Work Environment Workgroup of the Health Services
Steering Committee. The Workforce Board's system offers service for the more
than 110,000 businesses and 5.2 million residents of a 13-county area that
includes Houston, Harris County, and the twelve surrounding counties. Prospective
bidders may obtain a copy of the Request for Proposals online at http://h-gac.com
or http://www.theworksource.org or by contacting Carol Kimmick or Angela Bergaila
at (713) 627-3200 or by sending an email to carol.kimmick@h-gac.com. Responses
are due at H-GAC offices by 12:00 noon on Monday, July 17, 2006. H-GAC does
not accept late proposals, and we will not make exceptions.
TRD-200603239
Jack Steele
Executive Director
Houston-Galveston Area Council
Filed: June 13, 2006
Company Licensing
Application to change the name of MINNESOTA INSURANCE COMPANY to AIG ADVANTAGE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign fire and/or casualty company. The home office
is in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Any objections must be filed with the Texas Department of Insurance, within
twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the
Texas
Register
publication, addressed to the attention of Godwin Ohaechesi,
333 Guadalupe Street, M/C 305-2C, Austin, Texas 78701.
TRD-200603265
Gene C. Jarmon
Chief Clerk and General Counsel
Texas Department of Insurance
Filed: June 14, 2006
The following third party administrator (TPA) applications have been filed
with the Texas Department of Insurance and are under consideration.
Application for admission to Texas of PROVIDENT AGENCY, INC., a foreign
third party administrator. The home office is PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA.
Application for incorporation in Texas of NEW BENEFITS, LTD., a domestic
third party administrator. The home office is DALLAS, TEXAS.
Application to change the name and home office of WAUSAU BENEFITS, INC.,
WAUSAU, WISCONSIN to FISERV HEALTH PLAN ADMINISTRATORS, INC. (using the assumed
name FISERV HEALTH-WAUSAU BENEFITS), a foreign third party administrator.
The home office is WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.
Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice is published
in the
Texas Register
, addressed to the attention
of Matt Ray, MC 107-1A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.
TRD-200603088
Gene C. Jarmon
Chief Clerk and General Counsel
Texas Department of Insurance
Filed: June 7, 2006
The following third party administrator (TPA) applications have been filed
with the Texas Department of Insurance and are under consideration.
Application to change the name of STARMOUNT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC.,
to ALWAYSCARE BENEFITS, INC., a foreign third party administrator. The home
office is BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.
Application to change the name of CITISTREET ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, INC.,
to METLIFE ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, INC., a domestic third party administrator.
The home office is IRVING, TEXAS.
Application to change the name of ADVANCEPCS HEALTH, L.P., to CAREMARKPCS
HEALTH, L.P., a foreign third party administrator. The home office is WILMINGTON,
DELAWARE.
Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice is published
in the
Texas Register
, addressed to the attention
of Matt Ray, MC 107-1A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.
TRD-200603281
Gene C. Jarmon
Chief Clerk and General Counsel
Texas Department of Insurance
Filed: June 14, 2006
Instant Game Number 621 "Break the Bank"
1.0 Name and Style of Game.
A. The name of Instant Game No. 621 is "BREAK THE BANK". The play style
is "key number match with auto win".
1.1 Price of Instant Ticket.
A. Tickets for Instant Game No. 621 shall be $2.00 per ticket.
1.2 Definitions in Instant Game No. 621.
A. Display Printing - That area of the instant game ticket outside of the
area where the Overprint and Play Symbols appear.
B. Latex Overprint - The removable scratch-off covering over the Play Symbols
on the front of the ticket.
C. Play Symbol - The printed data under the latex on the front of the ticket
that is used to determine eligibility for a prize. Each Play Symbol is printed
in Symbol font in black ink in positive except for dual-image games. The possible
black play symbols are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
$1.00, $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $10.00, $20.00, $50.00, $200, $1,000, $3,000,
$30,000, and MONEYSTACK SYMBOL.
D. Play Symbol Caption - The printed material appearing below each Play
Symbol which explains the Play Symbol. One caption appears under each Play
Symbol and is printed in caption font in black ink in positive. The Play Symbol
Caption which corresponds with and verifies each Play Symbol is as follows:
E. Retailer Validation Code - Three (3) letters found under the removable
scratch-off covering in the play area, which retailers use to verify and validate
instant winners. These three (3) small letters are for validation purposes
and cannot be used to play the game. The possible validation codes are: Table
2 of this section.
Low-tier winning tickets use the required codes listed in Figure 2. Non-winning
tickets and high-tier tickets use a non-required combination of the required
codes listed in Figure 2 with the exception of ∅, which will only appear
on low-tier winners and will always have a slash through it.
F. Serial Number - A unique 13 (thirteen) digit number appearing under
the latex scratch-off covering on the front of the ticket. There is a boxed
four (4) digit Security Number placed randomly within the Serial Number. The
remaining nine (9) digits of the Serial Number are the Validation Number.
The Serial Number is positioned beneath the bottom row of play data in the
scratched-off play area. The Serial Number is for validation purposes and
cannot be used to play the game. The format will be: 0000000000000.
G. Low-Tier Prize - A prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $8.00, $10.00, $12.00
or $20.00.
H. Mid-Tier Prize - A prize of $50.00 or $200.
I. High-Tier Prize - A prize of $1,000, $3,000 or $30,000.
J. Bar Code - A 22 (twenty-two) character interleaved two (2) of five (5)
bar code which will include a three (3) digit game ID, the seven (7) digit
pack number, the three (3) digit ticket number and the nine (9) digit Validation
Number. The bar code appears on the back of the ticket.
K. Pack-Ticket Number - A 13 (thirteen) digit number consisting of the
three (3) digit game number (621), a seven (7) digit pack number, and a three
(3) digit ticket number. Ticket numbers start with 001and end with 250 within
each pack. The format will be: 621 -0000001-001.
L. Pack - A pack of "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game tickets contains 250
tickets, packed in plastic shrink-wrapping and fanfolded in pages of two (2).
Tickets 001 and 002 will be on the top page; tickets 003 and 004 on the next
page; etc.; and tickets 249 and 250 will be on the last page. Please note
the books will be in a A - B configuration.
M. Non-Winning Ticket - A ticket which is not programmed to be a winning
ticket or a ticket that does not meet all of the requirements of these Game
Procedures, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), and
applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery
Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401.
N. Ticket or Instant Game Ticket, or Instant Ticket - A Texas Lottery "BREAK
THE BANK" Instant Game No. 621 ticket.
2.0 Determination of Prize Winners. The determination of prize winners
is subject to the general ticket validation requirements set forth in Texas
Lottery Rule 401.302, Instant Game Rules, these Game Procedures, and the requirements
set out on the back of each instant ticket. A prize winner in the "BREAK THE
BANK" Instant Game is determined once the latex on the ticket is scratched
off to expose 19 (nineteen) play symbols. If the player matches any of YOUR
NUMBERS play symbols to any of the 3 LUCKY NUMBERS play symbols, the player
wins the prize shown for that number. If the player reveals a "moneystack"
symbol, the player wins the prize instantly. No portion of the display printing
nor any extraneous matter whatsoever shall be usable or playable as a part
of the Instant Game.
2.1 Instant Ticket Validation Requirements.
A. To be a valid Instant Game ticket, all of the following requirements
must be met:
1. Exactly 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must appear under the latex overprint
on the front portion of the ticket;
2. Each of the Play Symbols must have a Play Symbol Caption underneath,
unless specified, and each Play Symbol must agree with its Play Symbol Caption;
3. Each of the Play Symbols must be present in its entirety and be fully
legible;
4. Each of the Play Symbols must be printed in black ink except for dual
image games;
5. The ticket shall be intact;
6. The Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must
be present in their entirety and be fully legible;
7. The Serial Number must correspond, using the Texas Lottery's codes,
to the Play Symbols on the ticket;
8. The ticket must not have a hole punched through it, be mutilated, altered,
unreadable, reconstituted or tampered with in any manner;
9. The ticket must not be counterfeit in whole or in part;
10. The ticket must have been issued by the Texas Lottery in an authorized
manner;
11. The ticket must not have been stolen, nor appear on any list of omitted
tickets or non-activated tickets on file at the Texas Lottery;
12. The Play Symbols, Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket
Number must be right side up and not reversed in any manner;
13. The ticket must be complete and not miscut, and have exactly 19 (nineteen)
Play Symbols under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket,
exactly one Serial Number, exactly one Retailer Validation Code, and exactly
one Pack-Ticket Number on the ticket;
14. The Serial Number of an apparent winning ticket shall correspond with
the Texas Lottery's Serial Numbers for winning tickets, and a ticket with
that Serial Number shall not have been paid previously;
15. The ticket must not be blank or partially blank, misregistered, defective
or printed or produced in error;
16. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must be exactly one of those
described in Section 1.2.C of these Game Procedures;
17. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols on the ticket must be printed
in the Symbol font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at
the Texas Lottery; the ticket Serial Numbers must be printed in the Serial
font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;
and the Pack-Ticket Number must be printed in the Pack-Ticket Number font
and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;
18. The display printing on the ticket must be regular in every respect
and correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and
19. The ticket must have been received by the Texas Lottery by applicable
deadlines.
B. The ticket must pass all additional validation tests provided for in
these Game Procedures, the Texas Lottery's Rules governing the award of prizes
of the amount to be validated, and any confidential validation and security
tests of the Texas Lottery.
C. Any Instant Game ticket not passing all of the validation requirements
is void and ineligible for any prize and shall not be paid. However, the Executive
Director may, solely at the Executive Director's discretion, refund the retail
sales price of the ticket. In the event a defective ticket is purchased, the
only responsibility or liability of the Texas Lottery shall be to replace
the defective ticket with another unplayed ticket in that Instant Game (or
a ticket of equivalent sales price from any other current Instant Lottery
game) or refund the retail sales price of the ticket, solely at the Executive
Director's discretion.
2.2 Programmed Game Parameters.
A. Consecutive non-winning tickets will not have identical play data, spot
for spot.
B. Non-winning prize symbols will not match a winning prize symbol on a
ticket.
C. No duplicate Lucky Numbers on a ticket.
D. There will be no correlation between the matching symbols and the prize
amount.
E. The auto win symbol will never appear more than once on a ticket.
F. No duplicate non-winning play symbols on a ticket.
2.3 Procedure for Claiming Prizes.
A. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00,
$8.00, $10.00, $12.00, $20.00, $50.00 or $200, a claimant shall sign the back
of the ticket in the space designated on the ticket and present the winning
ticket to any Texas Lottery Retailer. The Texas Lottery Retailer shall verify
the claim and, if valid, and upon presentation of proper identification, make
payment of the amount due the claimant and physically void the ticket; provided
that the Texas Lottery Retailer may, but is not in some cases, required to
pay a $50.00 or $200 ticket. In the event the Texas Lottery Retailer cannot
verify the claim, the Texas Lottery Retailer shall provide the claimant with
a claim form and instruct the claimant on how to file a claim with the Texas
Lottery. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, a check shall be
forwarded to the claimant in the amount due. In the event the claim is not
validated, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.
A claimant may also claim any of the above prizes under the procedure described
in Section 2.3.B and 2.3.C of these Game Procedures.
B. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $1,000, $3,000 or
$30,000, the claimant must sign the winning ticket and present it at one of
the Texas Lottery's Claim Centers. If the claim is validated by the Texas
Lottery, payment will be made to the bearer of the validated winning ticket
for that prize upon presentation of proper identification. When paying a prize
of $600 or more, the Texas Lottery shall file the appropriate income reporting
form with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and shall withhold federal income
tax at a rate set by the IRS if required. In the event that the claim is not
validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant
shall be notified promptly.
C. As an alternative method of claiming a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game
prize, the claimant must sign the winning ticket, thoroughly complete a claim
form, and mail both to: Texas Lottery Commission, Post Office Box 16600, Austin,
Texas 78761-6600. The risk of sending a ticket remains with the claimant.
In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim
shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.
D. Prior to payment by the Texas Lottery of any prize, the Texas Lottery
shall deduct a sufficient amount from the winnings of a person who has been
finally determined to be:
1. delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the Comptroller,
the Texas Workforce Commission, or Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;
2. delinquent in making child support payments administered or collected
by the Attorney General; or
3. delinquent in reimbursing the Texas Health and Human Services Commission
for a benefit granted in error under the food stamp program or the program
of financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resource Code;
4. in default on a loan made under Chapter 52, Education Code; or
5. in default on a loan guaranteed under Chapter 57, Education Code.
E. If a person is indebted or owes delinquent taxes to the State, other
than those specified in the preceding paragraph, the winnings of a person
shall be withheld until the debt or taxes are paid.
2.4 Allowance for Delay of Payment. The Texas Lottery may delay payment
of the prize pending a final determination by the Executive Director, under
any of the following circumstances:
A. if a dispute occurs, or it appears likely that a dispute may occur,
regarding the prize;
B. if there is any question regarding the identity of the claimant;
C. if there is any question regarding the validity of the ticket presented
for payment; or
D. if the claim is subject to any deduction from the payment otherwise
due, as described in Section 2.3.D of these Game Procedures. No liability
for interest for any delay shall accrue to the benefit of the claimant pending
payment of the claim.
2.5 Payment of Prizes to Persons Under 18. If a person under the age of
18 years is entitled to a cash prize of less than $600 from the "BREAK THE
BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deliver to an adult member of
the minor's family or the minor's guardian a check or warrant in the amount
of the prize payable to the order of the minor.
2.6 If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of
more than $600 from the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall
deposit the amount of the prize in a custodial bank account, with an adult
member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian serving as custodian
for the minor.
2.7 Instant Ticket Claim Period. All Instant Game prizes must be claimed
within 180 days following the end of the Instant Game or within the applicable
time period for certain eligible military personnel as set forth in Texas
Government Code §466.408. Any prize not claimed within that period, and
in the manner specified in these Game Procedures and on the back of each ticket,
shall be forfeited.
2.8 Disclaimer. The number of prizes in a game is approximate based on
the number of tickets ordered. The number of actual prizes available in a
game may vary based on number of tickets manufactured, testing, distribution,
sales and number of prizes claimed. An Instant Game ticket may continue to
be sold even when all the top prizes have been claimed.
3.0 Instant Ticket Ownership.
A. Until such time as a signature is placed upon the back portion of an
Instant Game ticket in the space designated, a ticket shall be owned by the
physical possessor of said ticket. When a signature is placed on the back
of the ticket in the space designated, the player whose signature appears
in that area shall be the owner of the ticket and shall be entitled to any
prize attributable thereto. Notwithstanding any name or names submitted on
a claim form, the Executive Director shall make payment to the player whose
signature appears on the back of the ticket in the space designated. If more
than one name appears on the back of the ticket, the Executive Director will
require that one of those players whose name appears thereon be designated
by such players to receive payment.
B. The Texas Lottery shall not be responsible for lost or stolen Instant
Game tickets and shall not be required to pay on a lost or stolen Instant
Game ticket.
4.0 Number and Value of Instant Prizes. There will be approximately 10,080,000
tickets in the Instant Game No. 621. The approximate number and value of prizes
in the game are as follows:
A. The actual number of tickets in the game may be increased or decreased
at the sole discretion of the Texas Lottery.
5.0 End of the Instant Game. The Executive Director may, at any time, announce
a closing date (end date) for the Instant Game No. 621 without advance notice,
at which point no further tickets in that game may be sold.
6.0 Governing Law. In purchasing an Instant Game ticket, the player agrees
to comply with, and abide by, these Game Procedures for Instant Game No. 621,
the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), applicable rules
adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced
in 16 TAC, Chapter 401, and all final decisions of the Executive Director.
TRD-200603262
Kimberly L. Kiplin
General Counsel
Texas Lottery Commission
Filed: June 14, 2006
1.0 Name and Style of Game.
A. The name of Instant Game No. 687 is "$50,000 PAYDAY". The play style
is "key number match with auto win".
1.1 Price of Instant Ticket.
A. Tickets for Instant Game No. 687 shall be $5.00 per ticket.
1.2 Definitions in Instant Game No. 687.
A. Display Printing - That area of the instant game ticket outside of the
area where the Overprint and Play Symbols appear.
B. Latex Overprint - The removable scratch-off covering over the Play Symbols
on the front of the ticket.
C. Play Symbol - The printed data under the latex on the front of the instant
ticket that is used to determine eligibility for a prize. Each Play Symbol
is printed in Symbol font in black ink in positive except for dual-image games.
The possible black play symbols are: $5.00, $10.00, $15.00, $25.00, $50.00,
$100, $500, $5,000, $50,000, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, MONEY
STACK SYMBOL and COIN SYMBOL.
D. Play Symbol Caption - The printed material appearing below each Play
Symbol which explains the Play Symbol. One caption appears under each Play
Symbol and is printed in caption font in black ink in positive. The Play Symbol
Caption which corresponds with and verifies each Play Symbol is as follows:
E. Retailer Validation Code - Three (3) letters found under the removable
scratch-off covering in the play area, which retailers use to verify and validate
instant winners. These three (3) small letters are for validation purposes
and cannot be used to play the game. The possible validation codes are:
Low-tier winning tickets use the required codes listed in Figure 2. Non-winning
tickets and high-tier tickets use a non-required combination of the required
codes listed in Figure 2 with the exception of ∅, which will only appear
on low-tier winners and will always have a slash through it.
F. Serial Number - A unique 13 (thirteen) digit number appearing under
the latex scratch-off covering on the front of the ticket. There is a boxed
four (4) digit Security Number placed randomly within the Serial Number. The
remaining nine (9) digits of the Serial Number are the Validation Number.
The Serial Number is positioned beneath the bottom row of play data in the
scratched-off play area. The Serial Number is for validation purposes and
cannot be used to play the game. The format will be: 0000000000000.
G. Low-Tier Prize - A prize of $5.00, $10.00 or $15.00.
H. Mid-Tier Prize - A prize of $25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500.
I. High-Tier Prize - A prize of $5,000 or $50,000.
J. Bar Code - A 22 (twenty-two) character interleaved two (2) of five (5)
bar code which will include a three (3) digit game ID, the seven (7) digit
pack number, the three (3) digit ticket number and the nine (9) digit Validation
Number. The bar code appears on the back of the ticket.
K. Pack-Ticket Number - A 13 (thirteen) digit number consisting of the
three (3) digit game number (687), a seven (7) digit pack number, and a three
(3) digit ticket number. Ticket numbers start with 001 and end with 075 within
each pack. The format will be: 687-0000001-001.
L. Pack - A pack of "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game tickets contains 075
tickets, packed in plastic shrink-wrapping and fanfolded in pages of one (1).
Ticket 001 will be shown on the front of the pack; the back of ticket 075
will be revealed on the back of the pack. All packs will be tightly shrink-wrapped.
There will be no breaks between the tickets in a pack. Every other book will
reverse i.e., reverse order will be; the back of ticket 001 will be shown
on the front of the pack and the front of ticket 075 will be shown on the
back of the pack.
M. Non-Winning Ticket - A ticket which is not programmed to be a winning
ticket or a ticket that does not meet all of the requirements of these Game
Procedures, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), and
applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery
Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401.
N. Ticket or Instant Game Ticket, or Instant Ticket - A Texas Lottery "$50,000
PAYDAY" Instant Game No. 687 ticket.
2.0 Determination of Prize Winners. The determination of prize winners
is subject to the general ticket validation requirements set forth in Texas
Lottery Rule 401.302, Instant Game Rules, these Game Procedures, and the requirements
set out on the back of each instant ticket. A prize winner in the "$50,000
PAYDAY" Instant Game is determined once the latex on the ticket is scratched
off to expose 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols. If a player matches any of YOUR
NUMBERS play symbols to any of the WINNING NUMBERS play symbols, the player
wins the prize shown for that number. If a player reveals a "coin" symbol,
the player wins the prize shown instantly. If a player reveals a "money stack"
symbol, the player wins DOUBLE the prize shown for that symbol. No portion
of the display printing nor any extraneous matter whatsoever shall be usable
or playable as a part of the Instant Game.
2.1 Instant Ticket Validation Requirements.
A. To be a valid Instant Game ticket, all of the following requirements
must be met:
1. Exactly 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols must appear under the latex overprint
on the front portion of the ticket;
2. Each of the Play Symbols must have a Play Symbol Caption underneath,
unless specified, and each Play Symbol must agree with its Play Symbol Caption;
3. Each of the Play Symbols must be present in its entirety and be fully
legible;
4. Each of the Play Symbols must be printed in black ink except for dual
image games;
5. The ticket shall be intact;
6. The Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must
be present in their entirety and be fully legible;
7. The Serial Number must correspond, using the Texas Lottery's codes,
to the Play Symbols on the ticket;
8. The ticket must not have a hole punched through it, be mutilated, altered,
unreadable, reconstituted or tampered with in any manner;
9. The ticket must not be counterfeit in whole or in part;
10. The ticket must have been issued by the Texas Lottery in an authorized
manner;
11. The ticket must not have been stolen, nor appear on any list of omitted
tickets or non-activated tickets on file at the Texas Lottery;
12. The Play Symbols, Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket
Number must be right side up and not reversed in any manner;
13. The ticket must be complete and not miscut, and have exactly 43 (forty-three)
Play Symbols under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket,
exactly one Serial Number, exactly one Retailer Validation Code, and exactly
one Pack-Ticket Number on the ticket;
14. The Serial Number of an apparent winning ticket shall correspond with
the Texas Lottery's Serial Numbers for winning tickets, and a ticket with
that Serial Number shall not have been paid previously;
15. The ticket must not be blank or partially blank, misregistered, defective
or printed or produced in error;
16. Each of the 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols must be exactly one of those
described in Section 1.2.C of these Game Procedures;
17. Each of the 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols on the ticket must be printed
in the Symbol font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at
the Texas Lottery; the ticket Serial Numbers must be printed in the Serial
font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;
and the Pack-Ticket Number must be printed in the Pack-Ticket Number font
and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;
18. The display printing on the ticket must be regular in every respect
and correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and
19. The ticket must have been received by the Texas Lottery by applicable
deadlines.
B. The ticket must pass all additional validation tests provided for in
these Game Procedures, the Texas Lottery's Rules governing the award of prizes
of the amount to be validated, and any confidential validation and security
tests of the Texas Lottery.
C. Any Instant Game ticket not passing all of the validation requirements
is void and ineligible for any prize and shall not be paid. However, the Executive
Director may, solely at the Executive Director's discretion, refund the retail
sales price of the ticket. In the event a defective ticket is purchased, the
only responsibility or liability of the Texas Lottery shall be to replace
the defective ticket with another unplayed ticket in that Instant Game (or
a ticket of equivalent sales price from any other current Instant Lottery
game) or refund the retail sales price of the ticket, solely at the Executive
Director's discretion.
2.2 Programmed Game Parameters.
A. Consecutive non-winning tickets within a book will not have identical
patterns.
B. Players can win up to twenty (20) times in this play area.
C. No duplicate non-winning YOUR NUMBERS on a ticket.
D. Non-winning prize symbols will not match a winning prize symbol on a
ticket.
E. On all tickets, a non-winning prize will never occur more than three
(3) times.
F. No duplicate WINNING NUMBERS will appear on a ticket.
G. The "money stack" symbol and "coin" symbol will never appear as a "WINNING
NUMBER".
H. The "money stack" symbol will win DOUBLE the prize amount shown and
will win as per the prize structure.
I. The "money stack" and "coin" symbols may appear on the same winning
ticket.
J. The "coin" symbol will win the prize amount shown below it automatically.
K. The "coin" symbol will never appear more than once on a ticket.
L. YOUR NUMBERS will never equal the corresponding Prize symbol.
2.3 Procedure for Claiming Prizes.
A. To claim a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game prize of $5.00, $10.00, $15.00,
$25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500, a claimant shall sign the back of the ticket
in the space designated on the ticket and present the winning ticket to any
Texas Lottery Retailer. The Texas Lottery Retailer shall verify the claim
and, if valid, and upon presentation of proper identification, make payment
of the amount due the claimant and physically void the ticket; provided that
the Texas Lottery Retailer may, but is not, in some cases, required to pay
a $25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500 ticket. In the event the Texas Lottery Retailer
cannot verify the claim, the Texas Lottery Retailer shall provide the claimant
with a claim form and instruct the claimant on how to file a claim with the
Texas Lottery. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, a check shall
be forwarded to the claimant in the amount due. In the event the claim is
not validated, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified
promptly. A claimant may also claim any of the above prizes under the procedure
described in Section 2.3.B and Section 2.3.C of these Game Procedures.
B. To claim a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game prize of $5,000 or $50,000,
the claimant must sign the winning ticket and present it at one of the Texas
Lottery's Claim Centers. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, payment
will be made to the bearer of the validated winning ticket for that prize
upon presentation of proper identification. When paying a prize of $600 or
more, the Texas Lottery shall file the appropriate income reporting form with
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and shall withhold federal income tax at
a rate set by the IRS if required. In the event that the claim is not validated
by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be
notified promptly.
C. As an alternative method of claiming a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game
prize, the claimant must sign the winning ticket, thoroughly complete a claim
form, and mail both to: Texas Lottery Commission, Post Office Box 16600, Austin,
Texas 78761-6600. The risk of sending a ticket remains with the claimant.
In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim
shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.
D. Prior to payment by the Texas Lottery of any prize, the Texas Lottery
shall deduct a sufficient amount from the winnings of a person who has been
finally determined to be:
1. delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the Comptroller,
the Texas Workforce Commission, or Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;
2. delinquent in making child support payments administered or collected
by the Attorney General;
3. delinquent in reimbursing the Texas Health and Human Services Commission
for a benefit granted in error under the food stamp program or the program
of financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resources Code;
4. in default on a loan made under Chapter 52, Education Code; or
5. in default on a loan guaranteed under Chapter 57, Education Code.
E. If a person is indebted or owes delinquent taxes to the State, other
than those specified in the preceding paragraph, the winnings of a person
shall be withheld until the debt or taxes are paid.
2.4 Allowance for Delay of Payment. The Texas Lottery may delay payment
of the prize pending a final determination by the Executive Director, under
any of the following circumstances:
A. if a dispute occurs, or it appears likely that a dispute may occur,
regarding the prize;
B. if there is any question regarding the identity of the claimant;
C. if there is any question regarding the validity of the ticket presented
for payment; or
D. if the claim is subject to any deduction from the payment otherwise
due, as described in Section 2.3.D of these Game Procedures. No liability
for interest for any delay shall accrue to the benefit of the claimant pending
payment of the claim.
2.5 Payment of Prizes to Persons Under 18. If a person under the age of
18 years is entitled to a cash prize of less than $600 from the "$50,000 PAYDAY"
Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deliver to an adult member of the minor's
family or the minor's guardian a check or warrant in the amount of the prize
payable to the order of the minor.
2.6 If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of
more than $600 from the "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall
deposit the amount of the prize in a custodial bank account, with an adult
member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian serving as custodian
for the minor.
2.7 Instant Ticket Claim Period. All Instant Game prizes must be claimed
within 180 days following the end of the Instant Game or within the applicable
time period for certain eligible military personnel as set forth in Texas
Government Code §466.408. Any prize not claimed within that period, and
in the manner specified in these Game Procedures and on the back of each ticket,
shall be forfeited.
2.8 Disclaimer. The number of prizes in a game is approximate based on
the number of tickets ordered. The number of actual prizes available in a
game may vary based on number of tickets manufactured, testing, distribution,
sales and number of prizes claimed. An Instant Game ticket may continue to
be sold even when all the top prizes have been claimed.
3.0 Instant Ticket Ownership.
A. Until such time as a signature is placed upon the back portion of an
Instant Game ticket in the space designated, a ticket shall be owned by the
physical possessor of said ticket. When a signature is placed on the back
of the ticket in the space designated, the player whose signature appears
in that area shall be the owner of the ticket and shall be entitled to any
prize attributable thereto. Notwithstanding any name or names submitted on
a claim form, the Executive Director shall make payment to the player whose
signature appears on the back of the ticket in the space designated. If more
than one name appears on the back of the ticket, the Executive Director will
require that one of those players whose name appears thereon be designated
by such players to receive payment.
B. The Texas Lottery shall not be responsible for lost or stolen Instant
Game tickets and shall not be required to pay on a lost or stolen Instant
Game ticket.
4.0 Number and Value of Instant Prizes. There will be approximately 5,040,000
tickets in the Instant Game No. 687. The approximate number and value of prizes
in the game are as follows:
A. The actual number of tickets in the game may be increased or decreased
at the sole discretion of the Texas Lottery Commission.
5.0 End of the Instant Game. The Executive Director may, at any time, announce
a closing date (end date) for the Instant Game No. 687 without advance notice,
at which point no further tickets in that game may be sold.
6.0 Governing Law. In purchasing an Instant Game ticket, the player agrees
to comply with, and abide by, these Game Procedures for Instant Game No. 687,
the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), applicable rules
adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced
in 16 TAC, Chapter 401, and all final decisions of the Executive Director.
TRD-200603263
Kimberly L. Kiplin
General Counsel
Texas Lottery Commission
Filed: June 14, 2006
Legal Notice
The Panhandle Regional Planning Commission (PRPC) expects to issue a Request
for Proposals seeking a qualified contractor to manage the delivery of federal
and state funded child care services in the 26 counties of the Panhandle Workforce
Development Area.
The award will be based primarily on a proposer's qualifications; organizational,
administrative and fiscal capabilities; service delivery abilities and strategies;
and costs effectiveness. Proposers must be willing to provide services in
all counties and operate on a cost reimbursement basis. The initial funding
period for the contract to be awarded as a result of this solicitation is
expected to be from October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. Contract renewals
may be awarded for up to three additional one-year periods. Such renewals
will be subject to criteria that include acceptable performance, continued
qualification to perform associated work and mutual agreement of the parties.
Organizations interested in submitting a proposal are encouraged to attend
a Proposer's Conference at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 in the PRPC
3rd Floor Conference Room, 415 West Eighth Avenue, Amarillo, Texas. Sealed
proposals must be submitted to PRPC by 3:00 p.m. on Friday, July 28, 2006.
A copy of the Request for Proposals may be obtained by contacting Tony White,
Workforce Development Budget, Contracts and Monitoring Manager at (806) 372-3381
or (800) 477-4562.
TRD-200603231
Anthony White
WFD Budget, Contracts and Monitoring Manager
Panhandle Regional Planning Commission
Filed: June 13, 2006
Additional Notice of Application for Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas of an application on April 26, 2006, for a service provider certificate
of operating authority (SPCOA), pursuant to §§54.151 - 54.156 of
the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). A summary of the application follows.
Docket Title and Number: Application of Clearwire Telecommunications Services,
LLC for a Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority, Docket Number
32650 before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
Applicant intends to provide T1-Private Line, and DSI or higher capacity
transport, special access & 911 access.
Applicant's initial requested SPCOA geographic area includes the area of
Texas currently served by AT&T Texas and Verizon Southwest. Additional
geographic areas included in the application amendment of June 1, 2006, are
Taylor Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Valor Telecommunications of Texas, Texas-ALLTEL,
Inc., ALLTEL (d/b/a Sugarland Telephone Company) and Sprint-Centel (d/b/a
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.).
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326,
or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than
June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989.
All comments should reference Docket Number 32650.
TRD-200603237
Adriana A. Gonzales
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: June 13, 2006
Notice is given to the public of an application filed on June 9, 2006,
with the Public Utility Commission of Texas, for an amendment to a certificated
service area boundary in Wilson County, Texas.
Docket Style and Number: Application of AT&T Texas to Amend Certificate
of Convenience and Necessity to Modify the Service Area Boundaries of the
Elmendorf Zone (San Antonio) and the Floresville Exchange (Verizon); Docket
Number 32805.
The Application: The minor boundary amendment is being filed to realign
the boundary between AT&T Texas's Elmendorf Zone of the San Antonio metropolitan
exchange and Verizon's Floresville exchange to allow AT&T to provide local
exchange telephone service to a proposed new subdivision. The proposed boundary
amendment will transfer a small portion of territory from Verizon to AT&T
Texas. Verizon has provided a letter of concurrence endorsing this proposed
change.
Persons wishing to comment on the action sought or intervene should contact
the Public Utility Commission of Texas by June 30, 2006, by mail at P. O.
Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll-free
at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free)
1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32805.
TRD-200603235
Adriana A. Gonzales
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: June 13, 2006
On June 8, 2006, Trans Texas Technologies filed an application with the
Public Utility Commission of Texas (Commission) to amend its service provider
certificate of operating authority (SPCOA) granted in SPCOA Certificate Number
60435. Applicant intends to reflect a change in its service area to include
the entire State of Texas.
The Application: Application of Trans Texas Technologies for an Amendment
to its Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority, Docket Number
32798.
Persons wishing to comment on the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326,
or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than
June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephones
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989.
All comments should reference Docket Number 32798.
TRD-200603238
Adriana A. Gonzales
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: June 13, 2006
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas of an application filed on June 6, 2006, for an amendment to certificated
service area boundaries within Cameron County, Texas.
Docket Style and Number: Application of the Brownsville Public Utilities
Board (BPUB) to Amend a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for Service
Area Boundaries within Cameron County (East Bank Subdivision); Docket Number
32790.
The Application: The application encompasses an area of land which is singly
certificated to American Electric Power Company (AEP), formerly known as Central
Power & Light (CP&L), and is within the corporate limits of the City
of Brownsville. BPUB received a letter request from Ron Valentin requesting
BPUB to provide electric utility service to a proposed 100.33 acre subdivision
located in northwest Brownsville. The estimated cost to BPUB to provide service
to this proposed area is $434,041.66. The area is presently undeveloped. If
the application is granted the area would be dually certificated for electric
service.
Persons wishing to comment on the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas no later than June 30, 2006, by mail at P. O.
Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll-free
at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free)
1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32790.
TRD-200603236
Adriana A. Gonzales
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: June 13, 2006
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission) of a petition on June 6, 2006, for waiver of denial
by the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA) Pooling Administrator
(PA) of Time Warner Telecom of Texas, L.P.'s (TWTC) request for an additional
thousands block in the Georgetown, Texas rate center.
Docket Title and Number: Petition of Time Warner Telecom of Texas, L.P.
for State Waiver to Obtain an Individual Growth Block from Pooling Administrator.
Docket Number 32792.
The Application: TWTC requested an additional thousands block to allow
it to have the ability to offer local two-way calling and extended metro service
in the Georgetown, Texas rate center.
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326,
or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than
June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephones
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989.
All comments should reference Docket Number 32792.
TRD-200603101
Adriana Gonzales
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: June 8, 2006
Notice of Applications for Designation as a "Texas Star Builder"
The Texas Residential Construction (commission) adopted rules regarding
the procedures for designation as a "Texas Star Builder" at 10 TAC §303.300.
The rules were adopted pursuant to §416.011, Property Code (Act effective
Sept. 1, 2003), which provides that the commission shall establish rules and
procedures through which a builder can be designated as a "Texas Star Builder."
The commission rules for application for designation can be found on the commission's
website at www.trcc.state.tx.us.
10 TAC §303.300(i)(2) requires the commission to publish in the
Pursuant to 10 TAC § 303.300(i)(2), the commission hereby notices
the application(s) for designation as a "Texas Star Builder" of:
Crawford Renovation Group, Inc., 9019 Pagewood, Houston, Texas 77063. Crawford
Renovation Group, Inc., holds TRCC builder registration #11426. The applicant's
registered agent is Benjamin Crawford.
Interested persons may send written comments regarding this application
to Susan K. Durso, General Counsel, Texas Residential Construction Commission,
P. O. Box 13144, Austin, Texas 78711-3144. Comments regarding this application
will be accepted for twenty-one days following the date of publication of
this notice in the
Texas Register
. Thereafter,
the comments will not be considered as timely filed.
TRD-200603271
Christopher Burnett
Assistant General Counsel
Texas Residential Construction Commission
Filed: June 14, 2006
Notice of Request for Legal Counsel for Intellectual Property
Research and scholarship on the part of members of the faculty, staff,
and students of Texas Tech will result in inventions, biological materials
and other proprietary materials, plants, manuscripts, patentable and non-patentable,
computer software, and trade secrets or other products, medical treatments
and devices that are potentially marketable and the rights in which should
be adequately protected. For assistance with such issues, Texas Tech will
engage outside counsel for review of and advice regarding intellectual property
matters as they relate to academia and medical technology, including evaluating
patentability of technologies, preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining
patent applications, dealing with United States Patent Office, including response
to Office Actions from the Patent Office, and assuring payment of issue and
maintenance fees. Texas Tech will also engage outside counsel from time to
time to pursue litigation against infringers of intellectual property rights.
The law firm/attorney must be admitted to practice before the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
Responses to this RFP should include at least the following:
(1) description of the firms or attorneys for performing legal services,
including prior experience in intellectual property matters, specifically
as they relate to institutions of higher education and schools of medicine,
your firm's experience in the field of patent law, including the size and
scope of the practice, the number of attorneys active in the practice and
other resources of the firm relevant to the practice;
(2) the names, experience and technical expertise of each attorney who
may be assigned to work on such matters;
(3) the availability of the lead attorney and others assigned to the project;
(4) appropriate information regarding efforts made by the firm to encourage
and develop the participation of minorities and women in the provision of
legal services;
(5) submission of fee information (either in the form of hourly billing
rates for each attorney and other staff members who may be assigned to perform
such services in relation to Texas Tech's intellectual property matters, comprehensive
flat fees, or other fee arrangements directly related to the achievement of
specific goals and cost controls) and billable expenses;
(6) a comprehensive description of the procedures to be used by the firm
to supervise the provision of legal services in a timely and cost-effective
manner;
(7) full contact information for the firm;
(8) disclosures of conflicts of interest, identifying each and every matter
in which the firm has, within the past calendar year, represented any entity
or individual with an interest adverse to Texas Tech or any component entity,
the State of Texas, or any of its board, agencies, commissions, universities,
or elected or appointed officials(s); and
(9) confirmation of willingness to comply with Texas Tech's and the Texas
Attorney General's policies, directives, and guidelines.
Proposals sent in response to this RFP will be evaluated in light of several
criteria, including: expertise, availability of a lead attorney, prior experience
in handling intellectual property matters relating to higher education and
schools of medicine, procedures for providing timely and cost-effective services,
and reasonableness of fees. Although the fee structure and overall cost of
this representation will be an important factor in evaluating proposals submitted
in response to this RFP, the successful firm(s) will clearly demonstrate exceptional
expertise and experience with the intellectual property matters made the subject
of this RFP.
Proposals must remain firm as to services and fees for 90 days. No proposals
will be accepted by oral communication, electronic mail, telegraphic transmission,
or facsimile transmission.
Three copies of the proposal are requested. The proposal should be typed,
preferably double-spaced, on 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper with all pages sequentially
numbered, and either stapled or bound together. They should be sent by mail
or delivered in person, marked "RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY COUNSEL" and addressed to Jennifer Adling, Director of Contracting,
as set forth below.
All questions shall be submitted through the Contracting Office in writing.
Oral responses to questions will not be binding on the University. Questions
may be submitted by Fax (806) 742-0350 or email jennifer.adling@ttu.edu.
The proposal should describe the scope of services and the deliverables
to be provided. An original and three copies of the proposal should be submitted
in writing by 3:00 p.m., central time, July 21, 2006 to:
Jennifer Adling
Director of Contracting
Texas Tech University
15th Street & University Avenue
327 Drane Hall
Lubbock, Texas 79409-1101
(806) 742-3841
Any proposal received after the above listed time and date will be rejected
as a material failure. The University is not responsible for the failure of
carrier services to deliver on time.
Texas Tech University reserves the right to accept or reject any (or all)
proposals submitted. Issuance of this request for proposal in no way obligates
The University to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation
of a response.
It is the policy of the System to actively seek the involvement of Historically
Underutilized Businesses (minority-owned and women-owned businesses). Accordingly,
Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) qualified to do so are encouraged
to submit a proposal in accordance with this RFP.
TRD-200603148
Jennifer Adling
Director of Contracting
Texas Tech University System
Filed: June 12, 2006
Aviation Division - Request for Proposal for Aviation Engineering Services
The City of Wharton, through its agent the Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT), intends to engage an aviation professional engineering firm for services
pursuant to Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A. TxDOT Aviation Division
will solicit and receive proposals for professional aviation engineering design
services described below:
Airport Sponsor: City of Wharton, Wharton Regional Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.:06HGWHRTN.
Scope: Provide engineering/design services for site development and associated
appurtenances for a pre-engineered metal aircraft hangar building system,
drainage improvements, and installation of REILs at the Wharton Regional Airport.
The DBE goal is set at 0%. TxDOT Project Manager is Megan Caffall.
To assist in your proposal preparation the most recent Airport Layout Plan,
5010 drawing, and project narrative are available online at
www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm
by selecting
"Wharton Regional Airport".
Interested firms shall utilize the latest version of Form AVN-550, titled
"Aviation Engineering Services Proposal". The form may be requested from TxDOT
Aviation Division, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483, phone number,
1-800-68-PILOT (74568). The form may be emailed by request or downloaded from
the TxDOT web site, URL address
http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avn550.doc
. The form may not be altered in any way. All printing must be in black
on white paper, except for the optional illustration page. Firms must carefully
follow the instructions provided on each page of the form. Proposals may not
exceed the number of pages in the proposal format. The proposal format consists
of seven pages of data plus two optional pages consisting of an illustration
page and a proposal summary page. Proposals shall be stapled but not bound
in any other fashion. PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN ANY OTHER FORMAT.
ATTENTION: To ensure utilization of the latest version of Form AVN-550, firms
are encouraged to download Form AVN-550 from the TxDOT website as addressed
above. Utilization of Form AVN-550 from a previous download may not be the
exact same format. Form AVN-550 is an MS Word Template.
Please note:
Five completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550
must be received
by TxDOT Aviation Division at 150 E. Riverside Drive,
5th Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than
Monday, July 17, 2006, at 4:00 p.m.
Electronic facsimiles or forms
sent by email will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms
to the attention of Amy Slaughter.
The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government
members. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following
the completion of review of proposals. The committee will review all proposals
and rate and rank each. The criteria for evaluating engineering proposals
can be found at
http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/aviation/consultant.htm
. All firms will be notified and the top rated firm will be contacted
to begin fee negotiations. The selection committee does, however, reserve
the right to conduct interviews for the top rated firms if the committee deems
it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following
interviews.
If there are any procedural questions, please contact Amy Slaughter, Grant
Manager, or Megan Caffall, Project Manager for technical questions at 1-800-68-PILOT
(74568).
TRD-200603218
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Filed: June 13, 2006
The City of Edinburg, through its agent the Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT), intends to engage an aviation professional engineering firm for services
pursuant to Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A. TxDOT Aviation Division
will solicit and receive proposals for professional aviation engineering design
services described below:
Airport Sponsor: City of Edinburg, Edinburg International Airport. TxDOT
CSJ No.:06HGEDINB. Scope: Provide engineering/design services for site development
and associated appurtenances for a pre-engineered metal aircraft hangar building
system at the Edinburg International airport.
The DBE goal is set at 0%. TxDOT Project Manager is Megan Caffall.
To assist in your proposal preparation, the most recent Airport Layout
Plan, 5010 drawing, and project narrative are available online at
www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm
by selecting
"Edinburg International Airport."
Interested firms shall utilize the latest version of Form AVN-550, titled
"Aviation Engineering Services Proposal." The form may be requested from TxDOT
Aviation Division, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483, phone number,
1-800-68-PILOT (74568). The form may be e-mailed by request or downloaded
from the TxDOT website, URL address
http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avn550.doc
. The form may not be altered in any way. All printing must be in black
on white paper, except for the optional illustration page. Firms must carefully
follow the instructions provided on each page of the form. Proposals may not
exceed the number of pages in the proposal format. The proposal format consists
of seven pages of data plus two optional pages consisting of an illustration
page and a proposal summary page. Proposals shall be stapled but not bound
in any other fashion. PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN ANY OTHER FORMAT.
ATTENTION: To ensure utilization of the latest version of Form AVN-550, firms
are encouraged to download Form AVN-550 from the TxDOT website as addressed
above. Utilization of Form AVN-550 from a previous download may not be the
exact same format. Form AVN-550 is an MS Word Template.
Please note:
Eight completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550
must be received
by TxDOT, Aviation at 150 E. Riverside Drive, 5th
Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than
Monday, July 17, 2006, at 4:00 p.m.
Electronic facsimiles or forms
sent by e-mail will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms
to the attention of Amy Slaughter.
The Consultant Selection Committee (committee) will be composed of local
government members. The final selection by the committee will generally be
made following the completion of review of proposals. The committee will review
all proposals and rate and rank each. The criteria for evaluating engineering
proposals can be found at
http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/aviation/consultant.htm
. All firms will be notified and the top rated firm will be contacted
to begin fee negotiations. The committee does, however, reserve the right
to conduct interviews for the top rated firms if the committee deems it necessary.
If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.
If there are any procedural questions, please contact Amy Slaughter, Grant
Manager, or Megan Caffall, Project Manager, for technical questions at 1-800-68-PILOT
(74568).
TRD-200603260
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Filed: June 14, 2006
REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The Texas Department of Transportation ("TxDOT") is seeking information
to assist in developing and implementing its Comprehensive Development Agreement
("CDA") procurement process. This Request for Information ("RFI") is issued
solely to obtain information to assist TxDOT on an administrative level. It
does not constitute a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ"), a Request for Proposals
("RFP"), or other solicitation document; nor does it represent an intention
to issue an RFQ or an RFP in the future. This RFI does not commit TxDOT to
contract for any supply or service whatsoever. TxDOT will not pay for any
information or administrative cost incurred in response to this RFI. Responses
to this RFI are due by noon, Central Daylight Time, on July 3, 2006. See Sections
3 and 4 for further information.
1. OVERVIEW
TxDOT has initiated an aggressive CDA program - working with the private
sector to meet the transportation needs of the State of Texas for generations
to come. A critical element of the program is the procurement process utilized
to solicit proposals and select preferred partners. A sound framework for
procurement will enable TxDOT to meet its objectives and provide a stable,
predictable deal flow for the market over the next several years.
While TxDOT is committed to doing what is in the best interests of the
taxpayers and traveling public, we strive to create a pro-business environment
as well, by capturing private sector innovation in ways that are prudent.
TxDOT places great importance on developing efficient, effective and transparent
procurement processes. As the pace of development picks up, TxDOT wishes to
engage the market to solicit feedback on our current approach and identify
opportunities for improvement - building upon the lessons learned from what
has proved successful in public-private partnership transactions in the United
States and around the world.
By responding to this RFI, you can provide valuable input and help shape
the framework for competition in Texas.
Currently, the procurement process for a "typical" CDA competition, for
a project that has already reached or is near environmental clearance, consists
of the key stages set forth in the following chart.
2. INFORMATION REQUESTED
TxDOT is interested in your views on our current and anticipated procurement
processes. In responding to this RFI, TxDOT asks parties to submit their perspectives
on as many of the following issues as possible. Please number the answers
to match the question numbers below. In addition, please provide a brief (no
more than 3 pages) summary of your organization and your previous experience
with large transportation-related procurements and other relevant qualifications.
A. Procurement Timing
TxDOT aims to have aggressive procurement schedules that still provide
proposers enough time to develop high quality submittals.
A1. In a standard "best value," hard price proposal process, how much time
do you think TxDOT should allow for each stage of the procurement process
identified in Section 1 above? The Procurement Timing column in the above
chart is designed to track the estimated number of days from the issuance
of the RFQ (solicited and unsolicited procurements) to reach the CDA procurement
stage at issue. If helpful, you may fill in the Procurement Timing column
in the chart with your estimates of the number of days needed to reach each
procurement stage.
A2. In particular, how much time do you need to respond to an RFQ? What
factors/characteristics of the RFQ stage dictate the amount of time needed
and how predictable are these factors?
A3. How much time do you need to respond to an RFP? What factors/characteristics
of the RFP stage dictate the amount of time needed and how predictable are
these factors?
B. Short-Listing
In general, TxDOT believes that the short-listing process ensures not only
qualified teams, but optimizes and maximizes the procurement competition and
allows for one-on-one meetings in a narrowed universe.
B1. Do you support a short-listing step? Why or why not?
B2. From the perspective of a developer investing significant funds to
prepare a proposal, how many teams do you believe should be short-listed (even
if there are many strong teams responding to an RFQ)?
B3. What do you believe to be the most appropriate criteria for creating
a short-list at the RFQ stage?
C. Proposer/Subcontractor Prequalification and Pre-Certification
TxDOT recently received legislative authority to proceed directly to the
proposal stage of any CDA procurement for a design-build project. The qualifications
assessment would be bypassed in favor of a prequalification and pre-certification
stage for construction and engineering service providers, respectively, but
only on design-build CDA projects. TxDOT currently anticipates that the design-build
CDA prequalification and pre-certification program would operate very much
like TxDOT's current prequalification program for highway construction projects
and its current pre-certification program for engineering services with regard
to meeting prequalification/pre-certification requirements on a design-build
CDA project. TxDOT is in the process of drafting rules to implement this streamlined
CDA process.
C1. What recommendations do you have for tailoring TxDOT's current rules
governing its existing prequalification/pre-certification programs to the
design-build CDA prequalification/pre-certification program?
C2. What categories of engineering services would you propose be included
as categories for pre-certification for design-build CDAs?
C3. What qualification requirements would you propose be included for prequalification
as a construction service provider for design-build CDAs?
D. One-On-One Meetings With Proposers
For large U.S. procurements, there has been success in the use of one-on-one
meetings with individual proposers during the period prior to proposal submission.
The intention of these meetings is to enable frank exchange of information,
ideas, and concerns. To encourage such exchanges, TxDOT has sought to use
appropriate safeguards during these meetings.
D1. Do you support one-on-one meetings (after shortlisting and before RFP
issuance) for review and comment on draft procurement and contract related
documents? Why or why not?
D2. For the kinds of projects that TxDOT is currently considering, how
much time do you believe should be spent on this activity (that is, how many
rounds of meetings between TxDOT and proposers are beneficial)?
D3. What subjects should be covered in one-on-one meetings?
D4. How can one-on-one meetings be organized to provide value to you, the
proposer?
E. Project Definition/Status of Environmental Clearance
The procurement process defined in Section 1 above effectively assumes
a relatively well-defined project (including environmental approvals) prior
to initiating a procurement process.
E1. What are your views on waiting until a project is largely defined (including
environmental approvals) before initiating a procurement process?
E2. To what extent should all projects be progressed to or near environmental
approval before initiating procurement?
E3. To what extent are there circumstances under which TxDOT should seek
proposals well before a project is environmentally cleared?
E4. Under what circumstances and to what extent would you accept the cost
and schedule risk associated with environmental approvals (e.g., "sweat equity")?
F. Pre-Development Agreement
TxDOT and other U. S. public entities have entered into pre-development
agreements with developers to utilize the private sector's innovative ideas
related to project definition, delivery, and financing in order to finalize
project scope. Examples of this approach are the original TTC-35 and current
TTC-69 procurements.
F1. In what circumstances should TxDOT consider entering into a pre-development
agreement with a developer?
F2. To what extent would you be interested in such a procurement? Why?
F3. Under what conditions would you offer "sweat equity" and other contributions
in advance of a project proving feasible and ready to develop?
F4. Do you believe that the use of a pre-development agreement in the right
circumstances captures private sector innovation in ways that it cannot capture
with consulting resources and of sufficient value to outweigh the benefits
to the public of a price-oriented competition?
G. Proposer Innovation
Through its CDA program, TxDOT seeks to capture private sector innovation,
value and skills by using tools not available to it through its traditional
procurement system. It does this in a variety of ways, including through the
use of performance-based specifications and outcomes, among other tools.
G1. What can TxDOT do to encourage proposers bringing innovative ideas
and other added value to the CDA procurement process?
G2. Is it possible to factor a proposer's innovative ideas into a procurement
while still utilizing transparent selection criteria and achieving competitive
pricing?
G3. Would you, as a proposer, prefer a procurement that brought you into
the project development process well in advance of project feasibility or
after a project's definition and feasibility was achieved? Why?
H. Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs)
In the ATC process, proposers are given the opportunity to propose value-added
enhancements that require, within carefully constructed bounds, TxDOT-approved
deviations from technical requirements.
H1. To what extent do you support the "alternative technical concept" process
as part of the procurement process for a concession CDA?
H2. If you support ATCs, do you believe the RFP should allow proposers
to incorporate them into their base proposal or offer them as options to the
base proposal?
I. Alternative Configurations - Risks & Processes
I1. To what extent would you welcome the opportunity to offer an alternative
configuration to a project if it meant reopening an already-received environmental
approval or supplementing an environmental document in a way that would require
new public hearings and additional analysis?
I2. If you support being given the opportunity described in Question I1,
would you accept the delay and cost risk at the time of your selection?
I3. In the situation described in Question I1, how do you believe a selection
should be made among proposers?
J. Current and Potential Use of TIFIA and PABs
Through the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act ("TIFIA"),
the United States Department of Transportation ("USDOT") provides credit assistance
in the form of direct loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit
(rather than grants) to projects of national and regional significance.
TxDOT has been authorized, through FHWA's Special Experimental Project
No. 15 ("SEP-15"), to carry out an experimental program for applying for credit
assistance under the TIFIA program for up to three projects. Under this program,
TxDOT would be the initial applicant for TIFIA credit assistance for a particular
project. After review and approval of TxDOT's application, including a pro
forma finance plan, FHWA would issue a conditional credit commitment for TIFIA
assistance the successful proposer can use. The successful proposer would
be given up to four months to close financing.
SAFETEA-LU authorized up to $15 billion in private activity bonds (PABs)
to be issued for qualified highway or surface freight transfer facilities.
TxDOT is preparing applications to the USDOT for several project-specific
PAB allocations.
J1. As a proposer, how valuable to you are the TIFIA and PABs programs
generally? Why?
J2. Do you find TxDOT's SEP-15 TIFIA program helpful? Why or why not? How
could this system be improved upon?
J3. How should TIFIA be incorporated into the CDA procurement process outside
of the process approved under SEP-15?
J4. Do you believe TIFIA and PABS will prove to be useful tools in connection
with the financing of TxDOT toll concessions? Why or why not?
J5. Do you have any other suggestions for alternative approaches or refinements
that would make TIFIA and PABs more useful?
K. Streamlined CDA Procurement Process
The procurement process for a CDA is a significant investment of time,
energy, and resources - for both TxDOT and proposers. We are constantly seeking
to vet our procurement requirements to ensure they capture value for the taxpayer
without placing undue burdens on proposers.
K1. From a proposer's perspective, what opportunities exist to streamline
TxDOT's current CDA procurement process or to render these processes more
transparent, user friendly and/or efficient?
K2. Please comment on any specific submittal requirements or procurement
requirements which are not necessary or the value of which is outweighed by
the burden they create.
L. Internal TxDOT Project Development Procedures
When approaching the variety of potential projects that it could pursue,
TxDOT must decide how, when and to what degree to develop a project in anticipation
of a procurement for a CDA with a private developer.
L1. From what you have seen, is TxDOT using its resources (time and funds)
wisely when preparing for CDA projects? Please give examples, if possible.
L2. How should TxDOT spend its limited resources to prepare projects for
CDA procurements? What elements of project preparation are more important
than others? What level of project development is appropriate before starting
the procurement?
M. TxDOT Provision Of Data Mining Information
In order to ascertain project feasibility and to streamline the CDA procurement
process, TxDOT has engaged its own consultants to perform traffic and revenue
work for potential CDA projects. TxDOT provides the results from this work
to project proposers so that each proposer is not required to duplicate these
efforts. Additionally, TxDOT believes that this process avoids problems associated
with proposers using disparate traffic and revenue data.
M1. From a proposer's perspective, is TxDOT's provision of data mining
information helpful? Why or why not?
M2. How can TxDOT improve this process? How would these changes benefit
the procurement?
N. Submission Of Preliminary Proposals Prior To
Proposal Due Date
TxDOT is considering implementing a new step in the procurement process,
wherein proposers could submit preliminary proposals before the proposal due
date for review by TxDOT. The purpose of the review would be to determine
responsiveness to the RFP requirements and screen for issues that might prevent
a proposal from being placed in the competitive range. As part of this review,
TxDOT would only contact proposers through written requests for clarification
or written notices regarding issues that might prevent a proposal from being
placed in the competitive range. TxDOT would not use this process to suggest
improvements to a proposal or to take other actions that could be construed
as negotiations. If used, TxDOT would fully describe the preliminary proposal
submission and review process in the RFP.
N1. From a proposer's perspective, would a preliminary proposal submission
process be helpful? Why or why not? What are the greatest benefits to this
process? What are the greatest weaknesses?
N2. Assuming TxDOT includes the preliminary proposal submission process
into its CDA procurements, what steps could TxDOT take to maximize the benefit
of this process for proposers? Please be as specific as possible.
O. Master Utility Adjustment Agreements
Currently, in order to facilitate coordination of utility adjustment efforts,
TxDOT's CDAs establish a system whereby a developer enters into a "Master
Utility Adjustment Agreement" ("MUAA") with each impacted utility owner to
address the specifics of its utility adjustments; TxDOT is not a party to
these agreements. An MUAA can address one adjustment or a group of adjustments.
If the parties need to address the adjustment of additional utilities, they
amend the MUAA to include those additional utilities. The developer and the
utility owners are free to determine between them which party is responsible
for design and construction of each adjustment. TxDOT provides the forms to
be used for the MUAA and amendments. A developer and a utility owner can negotiate
changes to these forms, but TxDOT reserves the right to review and approve
the final form of the MUAAs.
O1. From a proposer's perspective, do you find this process helpful? Why
or why not?
O2. How can TxDOT improve this process to accommodate the needs and concerns
of developers?
O3. To what extent should TxDOT be involved in the utility adjustment process?
O4. Instead of leaving a developer to enter into MUAAs with utility owners,
should TxDOT enter into memoranda of agreement with affected utility owners
prior to issuing an RFP, which would establish the utility owners' agreement
to follow specified procedures and requirements during the adjustment process?
3. CONFIDENTIALITY/PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT
All written correspondence, exhibits, photographs, reports, other printed
material, tapes, electronic disks, and other graphic and visual aids submitted
to TxDOT in response to this RFI are, upon their receipt by TxDOT, the property
of the State of Texas, may not be returned to the submitting parties, and
are subject to the Public Information Act, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code
(the "Act"). Respondents should familiarize themselves with the provisions
of the Act. In no event shall the State of Texas, TxDOT, or any of their agents,
representatives, consultants, directors, officers, or employees be liable
to a respondent for the disclosure of all or a portion of the information
submitted in response to this RFI.
4. GENERAL INFORMATION
RFI Issuance Date: June 5, 2006
RFI Closing Date: July 3, 2006
TxDOT reserves the right to modify the above anticipated schedule milestones
at any time and for any reason.
At its option, TxDOT may also elect to follow up directly with respondents
with more detailed questions or to clarify submissions.
Point of Contact:
Mr. Ed Pensock, Jr., P.E.
Texas Department of Transportation
Director of Corridor Systems
Texas Turnpike Authority Division
125 East 11th Street
Austin, TX 78701
(Ph): (512) 587-1940
(E-mail):
epensoc@dot.state.tx.us
Please send an electronic copy of your responses to this RFI to Mr. Pensock
at the E-mail address referenced above. If for any reason you cannot submit
your responses electronically, please send a copy of the responses to Mr.
Pensock at the address above.
TRD-200603261
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Filed: June 14, 2006
Request for Proposals
The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB/Board) requests, pursuant to 31
Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §355.92, the submission of regional water
planning proposals leading to the possible award of contracts to revise or
update regional water plans as described in 31 TAC Chapter 357. In order to
receive a grant, the applicant must be a political subdivision and must have
been designated an eligible applicant by a regional water planning group as
defined in 31 TAC §355.91. 31 TAC Chapter 355, Subchapter C provides
guidance for regional water planning grants.
Description of Funding Consideration.
Total funding for activities related to the development or revision of
a regional water plan shall not exceed 100 percent of the total cost of the
planning for that regional water planning area as defined in 31 TAC §355.91.
Funds awarded for grants under this request for proposals may total up to
the amount of funds appropriated for such activities for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007
biennium. The following are the characteristics of activities, which will
be eligible for funding:
1. Evaluation of new water management strategies in response to changed
conditions;
2. Studies that will further implementation of recommended water management
strategies;
3. Refinement of water supply information or water management strategies;
4. Activities that will help overcome problems from the last round of planning;
5. Further evaluation of water management strategies, especially regional
solutions, to meet needs in small communities or rural areas;
6. Reevaluation of population and demand projections only under the presence
of changed conditions;
7. Interregional coordination; and
8. Administrative and public participation activities.
Funding for administrative and public participation activities will be
provided to all regions in order to obtain public input, provide notice, and
amend plans, as necessary. Funding for other scope-of-work activities will
be awarded on a competitive basis. In the event that acceptable proposals
are not submitted or that insufficient funds are available to fund priority
regional water planning tasks, the TWDB retains the right to not award contract
funds. Additional funding to complete the 2006-2011 planning cycle will be
awarded to planning groups in the fall of 2007 based on appropriations received
for the regional water planning effort during the Fiscal Year 2008-2009 biennium.
Deadline, Review Criteria, and Contact Person for
Additional Information.
Five double-sided copies and an electronic version of a complete regional
water planning grant proposal must be filed with the Board prior to 5:00 p.m.,
September 14, 2006. Proposals must be directed either in person to Phyllis
Thomas, Texas Water Development Board, Stephen F. Austin Building, 1700 North
Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, or by mail to Phyllis Thomas, Texas Water
Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, Texas 78711-3231.
Proposals will be evaluated according to 31 TAC §355.94. All potential
applicants may contact the Board to obtain these guidelines and specific scoring
criteria or they may be obtained from the Texas Water Development Board's
webpage at: www.twdb.state.tx.us. Requests for information, the Board's rules,
and instruction sheet covering the research and planning fund, may be directed
to Bill Roberts at the preceding address or by calling (512) 936-0853, or
by e-mail at bill.roberts@TWDB.state.tx.us.
TRD-200603279
Wendall Corrigan Braniff
General Counsel
Texas Water Development Board
Filed: June 14, 2006
PURPOSE
The Texas Water Development Board (the "Board") seeks proposals in response
to this Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") from firms with the qualifications
and experience to provide arbitrage compliance and related services as required
to ensure compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 148 and Treasury regulations
promulgated therein ("Section 148").
It is the policy of the Board to make a good faith effort to include participation
by Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) in its contracts. HUB certified
firms are for-profit business entities that are certified by the Texas General
Services Commission, in accordance with that agency's rules found in Title
I Texas Administrative Code §§111.11 - 111.28. HUBs and other minority
and women-owned businesses capable of performing the scope of services described
in this RFP are encouraged to respond.
TERM OF AGREEMENT
The contract term is to be for a two year period from September 1, 2006
to August 31, 2008, renewable, at the Board's option, for up to five years.
The Board will provide notice of its decision to renew 30 days before the
end of the then current contract term. The Board retains the right to negotiate
all elements of the contract, including fees for renewal terms, if the renewal
option is exercised. The Board also retains the right to terminate the contract
for any reason and at any time upon the payment of then earned fees and expenses.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
A brief transmittal letter may accompany each proposal, which summarizes
the proposal's key points and must be signed by an authorized representative
who is responsible for committing the firm's resources. There is a 20-page
limit including attachments and the submitted proposal must be in hard copy
(no fax or email). The minimum font size must be 12 point or larger.
Please restate the question at the beginning of each response
and provide a separate section for that response, or indicate why no response
is given.
No joint proposals should be submitted. No oral interviews are expected
to be conducted.
It is the expressed desire of the
Board Members that arbitrage compliance service providers refrain from any
contact or communication with members of the Board, key staff and our Financial
Advisor or the undersigned regarding this RFQ until the selection process
is completed.
It is anticipated that the arbitrage service provider will be selected
at the Board meeting on Tuesday, August 15, 2006. Responses are due on Monday,
July 10, 2006 by 12:00 Noon. Six (6) copies of the proposal should be delivered
as follows:
Texas Water Development Board
Stephen F. Austin Bldg.
1700 N. Congress Avenue, Room 516
Austin, Texas 78701
Attention: Ms. Veronica Hinojosa-Segura
Director, Debt & Portfolio Management
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. Perform all required calculations including a calculation of arbitrage
liability not less than annually for each issue of outstanding debt (the Board
currently has 31 issues that require arbitrage calculations), and not less
than semi-annually for the issues with a penalty election.
2. Create and maintain records necessary to determine arbitrage liability,
if any, on outstanding obligations of the Board.
3. Review reports of investment and expenditure of bond proceeds, within
the meaning of Section 148, as necessary to ensure compliance with Section
148.
4. Assist the Board in preparing or causing to be prepared any schedules,
reports, or records necessary to perform or support a calculation of arbitrage
liability.
5. Provide the Board a report of the calculations of arbitrage liability
within 60 days after the end of each State's fiscal year.
6. Prepare transmittals and forms necessary to report and pay arbitrage
liability on time.
7. Provide advice and recommendation as the Board may request concerning
unique or extraordinary compliance issues that may arise from time to time.
FORM OF RESPONSE
1. Overview of the Firm
Provide a description of the firm, including general experience and history
with arbitrage compliance, date founded, number of offices, location and number
of professionals and employees in each office, total number of employees and
professionals in the firm, description of practice areas in addition to arbitrage
compliance services and firm philosophy. Indicate which office(s) perform
arbitrage compliance work and will be responsible for day-to-day contact with
the Board. Describe structure of firm ownership (e.g., publicly held corporation,
partnership, etc.) and any parents, affiliates, or subsidiaries of the firm.
2. Qualifications
A. List the experience of the firm and/or the professionals proposed to
be assigned to the Board in providing arbitrage compliance services.
Responses to this question should identify the client by
name and state the number of bond issues covered by your retention. Also provide
the type of bond issue(s) involved the par amount of the bonds, or other information
relevant to establishing your firm's experience and expertise.
B. Please describe your experience, if any, in assisting a client with
an audit or other regulatory proceedings related to the services solicited
by this RFQ.
3. Other Services
Please describe other services that your firm offers, such as underwriting,
financial advisory services, investor relation programs, or investment of
bond proceeds. Please describe your experience with such services.
4. Monitoring and Compliance Plan
Describe the steps your firm would take to assume and carry out the responsibilities
of the Board's arbitrage compliance provider.
5. Resumes
Provide brief resumes for those individuals who would be assigned to serve
the Board. Indicate the individual's years of experience in arbitrage work,
public finance, licenses or certification. Specify who would be assigned as
the primary contact for the Board.
6. Business Practices
A. Please describe your firm's experience and involvement working with
HUB certified firms (if your firm is not HUB certified) or as a HUB certified
firm, in providing any professional services to clients or in operating your
business.
B. Please describe efforts made by your firm to encourage and develop the
participation of minorities and women in your firm's provision of arbitrage
compliance and/or other professional services. Complete the table attached
as Exhibit B.
7. Conflicts of Interest, Litigation, and Compliance
History
A. Please disclose any conflicts of interest. Disclose all contractual
or informal business arrangements/agreements, including fee arrangements and
consulting agreements between your Firm and the Board, its staff and/or its
Board, or any entity that provide services to the Board.
B. Please disclose any material litigation, administrative proceeding,
violation of or investigation for, violation of any regulatory agency rules
(SEC, MSRB, NASD, NYSE) in which your firm was involved, whether currently
ongoing or concluded.
8. References
Provide names, addresses, and phone numbers of at least two references.
9. Fee structure
Provide your fee, by inserting a fee per calculation per issue in the appropriate
column on Exhibit A.
PROPOSAL MODIFICATION
Any proposal may be modified or withdrawn at any time prior to the proposal
due date. No material changes will be allowed after the expiration of the
proposed due date. The Board also reserves the right to make amendments to
the RFQ by giving written notice to all firms who receive the RFQ and publishing
notice thereof in the Texas Register.
COSTS INCURRED IN RESPONDING
All costs directly or indirectly related to preparation of a response to
this RFQ or any oral presentation required to supplement and/or clarify the
RFQ which may be required by the Board shall be the sole responsibility of,
and shall be borne by, your firm.
BASIS OF AWARD
The Board will make its selection based on demonstrated competence, experience,
knowledge and qualifications, as well as the reasonableness of the proposed
fee for the mentioned services in Exhibit A.
Firms responding are encouraged to maintain a Texas office staffed with
personnel who are responsible for providing services to the Board. By this
RFQ, however, the Board has not committed itself to employ an arbitrage compliance
consultant. The Board reserves the right to negotiate individual elements
of any proposal and to reject any and all proposals.
The Board will not participate in any programs, nor will it conduct business,
with any entity that is found to knowingly discriminate against persons on
the basis of race, color, gender, age, and national origin, and religion,
physical or mental disability.
TRD-200603280
Wendall Corrigan Braniff
General Counsel
Texas Water Development Board
Filed: June 14, 2006
Request for Proposal - Business Training Seminar Services
On June 13, 2006 the Brazos Valley Council of Governments (BVCOG) and Workforce
Solutions Brazos Valley Board (WSBVB) will release a Request for Proposals
(RFP) for Business Training Seminar Services. One or more trainers are needed
to provide training to businesses and their staff in the Brazos Valley region
(Brazos, Washington, Robertson, Burleson, Madison, Leon and Grimes counties).
Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley Board will receive responses to the RFP
until 4:00 P.M., CST, July 11, 2006. No responses will be accepted after this
deadline. Potential respondents may view and print the RFP from the web at
www.bvjobs.org. The contact person for this RFP is Anne McKibben, amckibben@bvcog.org,
(979) 595-2800.
TRD-200603149
Tom Wilkinson
Executive Director
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
Filed:
Policy Studies Inc. (PSI), on behalf of Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley
Centers, seeks to procure agreements with one or more eligible vendors to
provide temporaries who would perform specific duties related to a variety
of workforce center operations.
To be eligible for consideration, vendors will be required to provide services
as specified in the Request for Quotes.
Any agreement resulting from this request for quotes will remain in effect
through June 16, 2007 and may be renewed annually. Workforce Solutions Brazos
Valley or PSI reserves the right to contract with multiple vendors and makes
no guarantee that services from your agency will be requested.
Vendors interested in receiving a mailed copy of the Request for Quotes
may contact PSI's Employment Manager, Jill Bukowski at (303) 228-9160. Responses
must be returned by 5:00 pm CDT on June 28, 2006 to receive consideration.
Issued By
Policy Studies Inc.
1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 863-0900
TRD-200603147
Tom Wilkinson
Executive Director
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
Filed: June 12, 2006
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
Office of the Attorney General
Notice of Settlement of a Texas Water Code Enforcement Action
Coastal Coordination Council
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Notice of Availability and Request for Comments on a Proposed Draft Amended Natural Resource Damages Restoration Plan
Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Default Orders of Administrative Enforcement Actions
Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Settlement Agreements of Administrative Enforcement Actions
Notice of Request for Grant Applications for Fiscal Year 2007 Clean Water Act, §319(h) Grant
Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Nitrate-Nitrogen in Lower Sabinal River Watershed
Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Fish Tissue in the Lake Worth Watershed
Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Total Dissolved Solids and Chlorides in the Clear Creek Above Tidal Watershed
Notice of Water Quality Applications
Notice of Water Rights Application
Proposal for Decision
Proposal for Decision
Department of Family and Protective Services
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Houston-Galveston Area Council
Texas Department of Insurance
Third Party Administrator Applications
Third Party Administrator Applications
Texas Lottery Commission
Instant Game Number 687 "$50,000 Payday"
Panhandle Regional Planning Commission
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Notice of Application for Amendment to Certificated Service Area Boundary
Notice of Application for Amendment to Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority
Notice of Application to Amend Certificated Service Area Boundaries
Notice of Petition for Waiver of Denial of Request for Number Block
Texas Residential Construction Commission
Texas Tech University System
Texas Department of Transportation
Aviation Division - Request for Proposal for Aviation Engineering Services
Request for Information
Texas Water Development Board
Request for Qualifications for the Selection of Arbitrage Compliance Service Provider
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
Request for Qualifications - Legal Notice