TITLE in-addition

Texas Department of Agriculture

Request for Qualifications: Intellectual Property and Copyright/Trademark Counsel

The Texas Department of Agriculture (the Department), an agency of the state of Texas, is publishing this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeking to employ an Intellectual Property and Copyright/Trademark Counsel to assist the Department with legal services in the intellectual property and copyright/trademark areas of law in the implementation of programs under Title III of the Texas Agriculture Code.

The Department was granted by the Texas Legislature the authority in Title III of the Texas Agriculture Code to promote various products and commodities associated with Texas enterprises through marketing programs that include the use of copyrighted material and registered trademarks owned by the state of Texas. The Department is also authorized to establish programs to promote economic development in rural Texas and has also utilized registered trademarks for those programs.

The Department may implement design marks which are registered trademarks, as well as other copyrighted material, in the implementation of product promotion programs such as: the GO TEXAN Partner Program, the Texas Oyster Program, the Texas Shrimp Marketing Assistance Program, TAP, Taste of Texas, Vintage Texas, Texas Grown, Naturally Texas, Texas Wine Marketing Assistance Program, and its Food and Nutrition Program and other programs pertaining to the promotion of healthy foods. In addition, the Department may implement registered trademarks for its rural economic development programs.

Statement of Duties for the Counsel.

The counsel's responsibilities for intellectual and copyright/trademark work will include, but will not be limited to, securing state and federal trademark/certification registrations, advising the Department on protection of property rights while registrations are pending, and advising or assisting with any matter directly related to securing registration and protection of the Department's interests in the property.

With respect to intellectual property and copyright/trademark issues, counsel, in consultation with the staff of the Department, will prepare all legal documents required by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Texas Secretary of State's Office, Comptroller of Public Accounts, Attorney General, or outside parties; protect Department interests in such property and obtain registrations and certifications from the appropriate authorities; and review actions and render opinions on the legality of pending, existing or proposed copyrighted material/trademark.

The counsel shall also perform other legal services, if requested by the Department, that do not come within the functions of registration or certification of copyrighted material or trademark, but are needed for the implementation and administration of such copyrighted material and trademarks within the context of the Department's promotional, nutrition and rural economic development programs. Such services shall include, without limitation, the following: consultation concerning planning and development of copyrighted material and design marks for programs of the Department; review of design mark applications and registrations; advice and services concerning legislation affecting such programs; and advising on, and upon request of the Department potential claims against other parties by the Department in relation to copyrighted material and trademarks programs.

Proposal Contents.

Responses to this RFQ should include, at least, the following: a thorough description of your firm's ability to represent the Department in the stated job duties; a description of your firm's past experience as intellectual property and copyright/trademark counsel for other state agencies; a description of your firm's past experience as counsel to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Texas Secretary of State's Office, and other similar agencies in other states; a designation of the individuals who might be assigned to the work of the Department; examples of similar programs in which your firm has assisted as legal counsel; a quotation of your proposed fee structure based upon the certification and registration of trademarks and counsel of clients; a statement addressing the effort made by your firm to encourage and develop the participation of women and minorities in your firm; affirmation that the firm does not, and shall not during the term of the contract, represent any plaintiff in a proceeding seeking monetary damages from the State of Texas or any of its agencies; and a statement of willingness to comply with policies, directives, and guidelines of the Department and the Attorney General of the State of Texas.

Statement of Evaluation Process.

Responses to this RFQ will be evaluated and ranked according to the information provided, and summarized for the Commissioner of Agriculture's review. Staff will rank the proposals and make a recommendation to the Commissioner. The Department intends to select the proposal that demonstrates the highest degree of competency and the necessary qualifications and experience in providing the requested legal services at a fair and reasonable price.

Proposal Requirements.

A duly authorized representative of the firm must execute the submitted response. An unsigned response will not be accepted. Issuance of this RFQ in no way constitutes a commitment by the Department to award a contract, or to pay for any services incurred either in the preparation of a response to this RFQ or for the production of any contract for services. All communications with the Department concerning this RFQ and the selection of counsel should be directed to Ashley Harden, Acting General Counsel, on behalf of the Department. Any contact by a submitting firm, its employees or representatives, with any staff member of the Department for the purposes of soliciting or encouraging a favorable review may be considered grounds for disqualification.

Proposal Submission.

All proposals must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., August 1, 2006. Proposal responses, modifications or addenda to an original response received by the Department after the specified time and date for closing will not be considered. Each firm is responsible for ensuring that its response reaches the Department before the proposed due date. Firms should submit one unbound original and three (3) copies of their proposal to: Ashley Harden, Acting General Counsel, Texas Department of Agriculture , P.O. Box 12847, Austin, Texas 78711, Street Address: 1700 N. Congress, Stephen F. Austin Bldg., 11th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701.

Please mark the envelopes containing proposals with the following note in the lower left-hand corner: IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL REQUEST: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT/TRADEMARK COUNSEL. All proposals become the property of the Department. Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this request. Oral responses, instructions or offers will not be considered. The Department reserves the right to reject any and all responses.

Term of the Agreement.

The contract term shall be for the period beginning September 1, 2006, through August 31, 2007.

Terms of the Agreement.

The contract issued under this RFQ will be in the form prescribed by the Office of the Attorney General for Outside Counsel Contracts.

Proposal Modification.

Any response may be modified or withdrawn even after received by the Department at any time prior to the proposal due date. No material changes will be allowed after the expiration of the proposal due date; however, non-substantive corrections or deletions may be made with the approval of staff of the Department. The Department reserves the exclusive right to review proposals and make an appropriate selection from such proposals. The Department is not bound to accept any proposal by virtue of this RFQ.

Cost Incurred in Responding.

All costs directly or indirectly related to preparation of a response to the RFQ or any oral presentation required to supplement and/or clarify the RFQ which may be required by the Department shall be the sole responsibility of, and shall be borne by your firm.

Release of Information and Open Records.

All proposals shall be deemed, once submitted, to be the property of the Department. Information submitted in response to this RFQ shall not be released by the Department during the proposal evaluation process or prior to the awarding of a contract. After the Department completes the process and a contract is awarded, proposals and information included therein may be subject to public disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act.

TRD-200603258

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Filed: June 14, 2006


Ark-Tex Council of Governments

Request for Qualifications for Environmental Assessments

PROJECT: U.S. EPA Brownfield Hazardous Assessment Grant

ISSUER: ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (ATCOG)

PROJECT CONTACT: Elizabeth Layman, Environmental Resource Planner

SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: 5:00 P.M. June 26, 2006.

The Ark-Tex Council of Governments (ATCOG) expects that the selected contractor will:

Prepare and maintain schedules and budgets for assessment activities

Conduct and oversee site assessments and prepare technical reports including:

Review of historical records and due diligence

Onsite sample collection and analysis

Evaluation of cleanup options and costs

Quality Assurance Project Plan in compliance with US EPA Regulations

Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment and reports

Provide status and financial information

Attend meetings of ATCOG advisory committees

Prepare presentations regarding project progress

Develop a budget which includes plans for cleanup and reuse

The ATCOG consultant selection process will include:

Soliciting Requests for Qualifications

Reviewing qualifications and selecting consultants to present Oral Presentations 45 minutes in length.

Negotiating a contract with a selected consultant to begin work immediately

SUBMIT ELEVEN (11) COPIES TO:

Elizabeth Layman, Environmental Resource Planner

ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

P.O. Box 5307

Texarkana, TX 75505-5307

No electronically transmitted proposals will be accepted.

TRD-200603100

L.D. Williamson

Executive Director

Ark-Tex Council of Governments

Filed: June 8, 2006


Office of the Attorney General

Notice of Settlement of a Texas Water Code Enforcement Action

Notice is hereby given by the State of Texas of the following proposed resolution of an environmental enforcement lawsuit under Texas Water Code §7.110. Before the State may settle a judicial enforcement action under Chapter 7 of the Texas Water Code, the State shall permit the public to comment in writing on the proposed judgment. The Attorney General will consider any written comments and may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed agreed judgment if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Code.

Case Title and Court: Harris County, Texas and The State of Texas v. The Lubrizol Corporation, Cause No. 2006-07009, in the 215th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.

Nature of Defendant's Operations: Defendant, the Lubrizol Corp., owns and operates a chemical plant specializing in the production of lubricant additives in Deer Park, Harris County, Texas. Harris County's petition alleges that during February and July of 2005, Defendants emitted into the atmosphere a highly reactive volatile organic compound from their site and illegally discharged industrial and/or other waste into Patrick Bayou in violation of regulations issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. These air emissions and waste discharges were unauthorized and were in violation of the Texas Clean Air Act, the Texas Health & Safety Code §§382.085(a) and (b), 30 Texas Admin. Code §§116.115(b)(2)(G) and (c), Air Quality Permit No. 22046, Special Conditions 1 and 2, and the Texas Water Code §26.121.

Proposed Agreed Judgment: The proposed agreed judgment contains civil penalties and attorney's fees. In the proposed settlement, Defendants agree to pay a civil penalty of $12,000 to be divided evenly between Harris County and the State. The proposed judgment awards attorney's fees of $2,000 to Harris County and $1,000 to the State. Defendants are jointly and severally liable for monetary awards in the judgment.

For a complete description of the proposed settlement, the complete proposed Amended Agreed Final Judgment should be reviewed. Requests for copies of the judgment, and written comments on the proposed settlement should be directed to Laura E. Miles-Valdez, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Texas Attorney General, P.O. Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548, (512) 463-2012, facsimile (512) 320-0052. Written comments must be received within 30 days of publication of this notice to be considered.

For information regarding this publication, contact Lauri Saathoff, Agency Liaison, at (512) 463-2096.

TRD-200603163

Stacey Schiff

Deputy Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Filed: June 12, 2006


Notice of Settlement of a Texas Water Code Enforcement Action

Notice is hereby given by the State of Texas of the following proposed resolution of an environmental enforcement lawsuit under Texas Water Code §7.110. Before the State may settle a judicial enforcement action under Chapter 7 of the Texas Water Code, the State shall permit the public to comment in writing on the proposed judgment. The Attorney General will consider any written comments and may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed agreed judgment if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Code.

Case Title and Court: Harris County, Texas and The State of Texas v. Gulf Bayport Chemicals, L.P. , Cause No. 2006-19028, in the 152nd Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.

Nature of Defendant's Operations: Defendant, Gulf Bayport Chemicals, L.P., owns and operates the chemical plant located at 9700 Bayport Blvd., Pasadena, Harris County, Texas. Harris County's petition alleges that on September 24, 2005, the defendant Gulf Bayport, L.P., illegally discharged glycerin/soybean oil into the water of the State, specifically into Harris County Flood Control ditch A104-04-00 and Taylor Bayou, in violation of Texas Water Code §26.121. This discharge was unauthorized and was in violation of Texas Water Code §26.121.

Proposed Agreed Judgment: The proposed agreed judgment contains civil penalties and attorney's fees. In the proposed settlement, Defendants agree to pay a civil penalty of $8,000 to be divided evenly between Harris County and the State. The proposed judgment awards attorney's fees of $1,000 to Harris County and $1,000 to the State. Defendant is liable for monetary awards in the judgment.

For a complete description of the proposed settlement, the complete proposed Amended Agreed Final Judgment should be reviewed. Requests for copies of the judgment, and written comments on the proposed settlement should be directed to Laura E. Miles-Valdez, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Texas Attorney General, P.O. Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548, (512) 463-2012, facsimile (512) 320-0052. Written comments must be received within 30 days of publication of this notice to be considered.

For information regarding this publication, contact Lauri Saathoff, Agency Liaison, at (512) 463-2096.

TRD-200603178

Stacey Schiff

Deputy Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Filed: June 12, 2006


Coastal Coordination Council

Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Requests for Consistency Agreement/Concurrence Under the Texas Coastal Management Program

On January 10, 1997, the State of Texas received federal approval of the Coastal Management Program (CMP) (62 Federal Register pp. 1439-1440). Under federal law, federal agency activities and actions affecting the Texas coastal zone must be consistent with the CMP goals and policies identified in 31 TAC Chapter 501. Requests for federal consistency review were deemed administratively complete for the following project(s) during the period of June 2, 2006, through June 8, 2006. As required by federal law, the public is given an opportunity to comment on the consistency of proposed activities in the coastal zone undertaken or authorized by federal agencies. Pursuant to 31 TAC §§506.25, 506.32, and 506.41, the public comment period for these activities extends 30 days from the date published on the Coastal Coordination Council web site. The notice was published on the web site on June 14, 2006. The public comment period for these projects will close at 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2006.

FEDERAL AGENCY ACTIONS:

Applicant: Galveston County Municipal Utility District No. 12 ; Location: The project is located within the subdivisions of Omega Bay and Bayou Vista, off Highland Bayou, located northwest of the Highway 6 and I-45 intersection, Galveston County, Texas. The project can be located on the U.S.G.S. quadrangle map entitled: Virginia Point, Texas. Approximate UTM Coordinates in NAD 27 (meters): Zone 15; Easting: 311765; Northing: 3245703. Project Description: This permit application was initially coordinated via a public notice, dated 30 December 2005, under Permit Application No. 24013. The original permit application included dredging and ecosystem restoration within the Bayou Vista Channels and Omega Bay Channels. The applicant, with concurrence from the City of Bayou Vista, has requested the permit application be split into two separate applications. This permit application, No. 24216, will reflect the request for dredging and ecosystem restoration within the Omega Bay Channels. The dredging and ecosystem restoration of the City of Bayou Vista Channels will be processed under Corps Permit Application No. 24013. The City of Bayou Vista Channel dredging and ecosystem restoration will be publicly coordinated under a separate public notice. The impacts associated with this project have not increased since the public notice dated December 30, 2005. The applicant proposes to perform maintenance hydraulic dredging within the existing canals in the Omega Bay Subdivision to maintain recreational navigation. Approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged from Omega Bay. The canals will be dredged to a maximum depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water. The canals vary from 75 to 100 feet wide. The surface area of the canals to be dredged would be 4.5 acres. The dredge material will be utilized to restore up to 8 acres of emergent saline marsh. To address the concerns raised during the initial public notice, the applicant has moved the majority of the ecosystem restoration area to along the I-45 frontage road. The marsh restoration area will be located west and north of Omega Bay, adjacent to and within the existing marsh restoration area associated with Corps Permit No. 22473(01), and will be called the Omega Bay Mitigation Area. CCC Project No.: 06-0303-F1; Type of Application: U.S.A.C.E. permit application #24216 is being evaluated under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. §403) and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. §1344). Note: The consistency review for this project may be conducted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality under §401 of the Clean Water Act.

Applicant: Galveston County Municipal Utility District No. 12 ; Location: The project is located within the subdivision of Bayou Vista, off Highland Bayou, located northwest of the Highway 6 and I-45 intersection, Galveston County, Texas. The project can be located on the U.S.G.S. quadrangle map entitled: Virginia Point, Texas. Approximate UTM Coordinates in NAD 27 (meters): Zone 15; Easting: 311765; Northing: 3245703. Project Description: This permit application was initially coordinated via a public notice dated 30 December 2005. The original permit application included dredging and ecosystem restoration within the Bayou Vista Channels and Omega Bay Channels. The applicant, with concurrence from the City of Bayou Vista, has requested the permit application be split into two separate applications. This permit application, No. 24013, will reflect the request for dredging and ecosystem restoration within the City of Bayou Vista Channels. The dredging and ecosystem restoration of the Omega Bay Channels is now being processed under Permit Application No. 24216, which is being coordinated under a separate public notice. The impacts associated with this project have not increased since the original public notice. The applicant proposes to perform maintenance hydraulic dredging, for 10 years, within the existing canals in the Bayou Vista subdivisions to maintain recreational navigation. Approximately 35,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the Bayou Vista canals. The canals will be dredged to a maximum depth of 8 feet below mean lower low water. The canals vary from 75 to 100 feet wide. The surface area of the canals to be dredged would be 14 acres. The dredge material will be utilized to restore up to 8 acres of emergent saline marsh. The marsh restoration area would be located south of Bayou Vista, within the Saconas marsh, and will be called the Bayou Vista Mitigation Area. CCC Project No.: 06-0304-F1; Type of Application: U.S.A.C.E. permit application #24013 is being evaluated under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. §403) and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. §1344). Note: The consistency review for this project may be conducted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality under §401 of the Clean Water Act.

Pursuant to §306(d)(14) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C.A. §§1451-1464), as amended, interested parties are invited to submit comments on whether a proposed action is or is not consistent with the Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies and whether the action should be referred to the Coastal Coordination Council for review.

Further information on the applications listed above may be obtained from Ms. Tammy Brooks, Consistency Review Coordinator, Coastal Coordination Council, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, or tammy.brooks@glo.state.tx.us. Comments should be sent to Ms. Brooks at the above address or by fax at (512) 475-0680.

TRD-200603245

Larry L. Laine

Chief Clerk/Deputy Land Commissioner

Coastal Coordination Council

Filed: June 13, 2006


Comptroller of Public Accounts

Local Sales Tax Rate Changes Effective July 1, 2006

TRD-200603272

Martin Cherry

Chief Deputy General Counsel

Comptroller of Public Accounts

Filed: June 14, 2006


Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner

Notice of Rate Ceilings

The Consumer Credit Commissioner of Texas has ascertained the following rate ceilings by use of the formulas and methods described in §303.003 and §303.009, Tex. Fin. Code.

The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for the period of 06/19/06 - 06/25/06 is 18% for Consumer 1 /Agricultural/Commercial 2 /credit through $250,000.

The weekly ceiling as prescribed by §303.003 and §303.009 for the period of 06/19/06 - 06/25/06 is 18% for Commercial over $250,000.

1 Credit for personal, family or household use.

2 Credit for business, commercial, investment or other similar purpose.

TRD-200603264

Leslie L. Pettijohn

Commissioner

Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner

Filed: June 14, 2006


Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Enforcement Orders

An agreed order was entered regarding YJK Inc. dba Granger Food Store, Docket No. 2003-0257-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,800 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A default order was entered regarding Lakhani Investments, Inc. dba Alamo Food Mart, Docket No. 2003-1070-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Courtney St. Julian, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0617, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Steve Henricus Byl dba Dutch Cowboy Dairy, Docket No. 2002-1299-AGR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,640 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Justin Lannen, Staff Attorney at (817) 588-5927, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Shawn & Shawn, Inc., Docket No. 2003-0897-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,200 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Dana Shuler, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2505, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Mirage Stop, Inc., Docket No. 2003-1443-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,900 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Courtney St. Julian, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0617, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Docket No. 2003-1470-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $80,444 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Alfred Okpohworho, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8918, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An order was entered regarding JNS & Samir Corporation, Docket No. 2004-0241-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $14,400 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shannon Strong, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0252, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding McCulloch County, Docket No. 2004-0827-MLM-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $31,250 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Laurencia Fasoyiro, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8914, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A default order was entered regarding Aarish Investments, Inc., Docket No. 2004-1235-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,050 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Kari Gilbreth, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1320, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Jeffy's, Inc., Docket No. 2004-1253-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,280 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Feroz Ali Jivani dba MC Food Store 2, Docket No. 2004-1666-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Rebecca Combs, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-6939, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Lanxess Corporation, Docket No. 2005-0006-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $17,955 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Laurencia Fasoyiro, Staff Attorney at (713) 422-8914, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding BP Products North America Inc., Docket No. 2005-0224-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $336,556 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Terry Murphy, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5025, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding The Premcor Refining Group Inc., Docket No. 2005-0585-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,860 in administrative penalties with $1,372 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Jaime Garza, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6030, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A default order was entered regarding Harvey Gillespe, Docket No. 2005-0628-MSW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $7,350 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A default order was entered regarding Gary Don Stahlheber dba Oak Hollow Mobile Home Park, Docket No. 2005-0655-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,260 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lena Roberts, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0019, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding City of Teague, Docket No. 2005-0673-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,080 in administrative penalties with $2,016 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Rose T. Wong and Mitchel Wong, Docket No. 2005-0785-EAQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,250 in administrative penalties with $450 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Audra Ruble, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3126, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Transportation, Docket No. 2005-0922-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,875 in administrative penalties with $375 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Special Camps For Special Kids, Docket No. 2005-0969-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,680 in administrative penalties with $1,336 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding TXI Operations, LP, Docket No. 2005-1061-IWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $91,502 in administrative penalties with $18,300 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Laurie Eaves, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4495, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding City of Floresville, Docket No. 2005-1066-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $12,120 in administrative penalties with $2,424 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Mac Vilas, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2557, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding A B C Concrete, Inc., Docket No. 2005-1071-WQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,350 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shana Horton, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1088, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A default order was entered regarding Curtis Shupak dba Village WSC, Docket No. 2005-1120-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,010 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shawn Slack, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1877, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Houston Fruitland Inc., Docket No. 2005-1169-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,083 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation, Docket No. 2005-1254-IWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $14,100 in administrative penalties with $2,820 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Catherine Albrecht, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3672, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Firoz A. Kurjee dba Wee Mart, Docket No. 2005-1346-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,650 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Jaime Garza, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6030, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding William Dewitt dba 45 Kwik Stop, Docket No. 2005-1377-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative penalties with $1,000 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Public Safety, Docket No. 2005-1465-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,500 in administrative penalties with $500 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Nadia Hameed, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3629, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding A & K Enterprises, Inc. dba Country Food Store, Docket No. 2005-1484-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,040 in administrative penalties with $808 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding WTG Fuels, Inc. dba Plaza Self Serve 150322, Docket No. 2005-1547-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,500 in administrative penalties with $900 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shontay Wilcher, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2136, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding The Lubrizol Corporation, Docket No. 2005-1554-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $53,400 in administrative penalties with $10,680 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting John Muennink, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3423, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding J. D. Abrams, L.P., Docket No. 2005-1561-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,100 in administrative penalties with $420 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Jason Kemp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5610, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Wafia Hanif dba Super Stop Texaco, Docket No. 2005-1573-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $8,500 in administrative penalties with $1,700 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shontay Wilcher, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2136, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Sabine Cogen LP, Docket No. 2005-1658-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $11,040 in administrative penalties with $2,208 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Jorge Ibarra, Enforcement Coordinator at (817) 588-5890, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding H. E. Butt Grocery Company, Docket No. 2005-1688-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative penalties with $1,000 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Trina Grieco, Enforcement Coordinator at (210) 403-4006, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Gulamali Bharwani dba Texfra, Docket No. 2005-1716-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,900 in administrative penalties with $380 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Kent Heath, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4575, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Timberlane Estates Property Owners Association, Inc., Docket No. 2005-1717-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,040 in administrative penalties with $208 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Tel Croston, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5717, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding John Daugherty dba John Daugherty Homes, Docket No. 2005-1756-WQ-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Shana Horton, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-1088, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, Docket No. 2005-1769-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $31,875 in administrative penalties with $6,375 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Miriam Hall, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1044, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding National Oilwell Varco, L.P., Docket No. 2005-1770-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $23,000 in administrative penalties with $4,600 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation, Docket No. 2005-1774-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,550 in administrative penalties with $910 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Kathleen Decker, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-6500, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Exxon Mobil Corporation, Docket No. 2005-1792-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,675 in administrative penalties with $1,335 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting John Muennink, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3423, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Enbridge Pipelines East Texas L.P., Docket No. 2005-1809-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,100 in administrative penalties with $1,220 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Amy Burgess, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2540, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Centauri Technologies, L.P., Docket No. 2005-1817-IHW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $25,949 in administrative penalties with $5,190 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Joseph Daley, Enforcement Coordinator at (817) 588-5928, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Buda/Kyle Church of Christ, Docket No. 2005-1841-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Elvia Maske, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0789, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Public Safety, Docket No. 2005-1847-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,625 in administrative penalties with $525 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding United Petroleum Transports, Inc., Docket No. 2005-1851-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,020 in administrative penalties with $204 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Deana Holland, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2504, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Docket No. 2005-1896-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $13,750 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Audra Ruble, Enforcement Coordinator at (361) 825-3126, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Gulbrandsen Technologies Inc., Docket No. 2005-1927-IWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $9,900 in administrative penalties with $1,980 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Merrilee Hupp, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4490, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Jon-Lin Corp., Docket No. 2005-1947-MLM-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,000 in administrative penalties with $1,000 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Laurie Eaves, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4495, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Hope Agri Products of Texas, Ltd., Docket No. 2005-1979-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $16,000 in administrative penalties with $3,200 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Carolyn Lind, Enforcement Coordinator at (903) 535-5145, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding City of Robert Lee, Docket No. 2005-1988-MSW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,950 in administrative penalties with $990 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Anita Keese, Enforcement Coordinator at (956) 430-6034, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Bell County Water Control & Improvement District 1, Docket No. 2005-2002-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,450 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Sandy VanCleave, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2670, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding We Are Crazy, Inc. dba Country Pantry 10, Docket No. 2005-2019-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,675 in administrative penalties with $535 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Kent Heath, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-4575, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Regent Coach Line, Ltd., Docket No. 2005-2036-MLM-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,500 in administrative penalties with $900 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lynley Doyen, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1364, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Maverick Tube, L.P., Docket No. 2005-2049-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,075 in administrative penalties with $1,015 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Sherronda Martin, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3680, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Eagle Railcar Services, L.P., Docket No. 2005-2059-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $9,450 in administrative penalties with $1,890 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Sherronda Martin, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3680, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Central Freight Lines, Inc., Docket No. 2005-2060-MSW-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,000 in administrative penalties with $600 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Edward Moderow, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-2680, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Lyondell-Citgo Refining LP, Docket No. 2005-2073-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $10,000 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Kimberly Morales, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 422-8938, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding KBC Services, Inc. dba Marina Bay Harbor Yacht Club, Docket No. 2005-2076-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,050 in administrative penalties with $210 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Delek Refining, Ltd., Docket No. 2006-0028-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,264 in administrative penalties with $853 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Samuel Short, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5363, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Continental Carbon Company, Docket No. 2006-0039-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $5,100 in administrative penalties with $1,020 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Cari-Michel LaCaille, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1387, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Monument Inn, Inc., Docket No. 2006-0058-MWD-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,450 in administrative penalties with $1,290 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Lynley Doyen, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-1364, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding H.R.N. Inc. dba Collins Food Mart, Docket No. 2006-0059-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $6,300 in administrative penalties with $1,260 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Enterprise Products Operating L.P., Docket No. 2006-0100-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,500 in administrative penalties with $500 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Scott Barnett, Enforcement Coordinator at (713) 767-3523, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Hueco Quarry, Inc., Docket No. 2006-0109-AIR-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $1,020 in administrative penalties with $204 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Harvey Wilson, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0321, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Trany Inc. dba MS Express 722, Docket No. 2006-0116-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $3,150 in administrative penalties with $630 deferred.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Rajesh Acharya, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0577, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Beacon Estates Water Supply Corporation, Docket No. 2006-0129-PWS-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $2,340 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Michael Limos, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-5839, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

A Filed Citation was entered regarding Tina Lee, Docket No. 2006-0344-PST-E on May 31, 2006 assessing $1,750 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting David Van Soest, Enforcement Coordinator at (512) 239-0468, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

An agreed order was entered regarding Mehdi Maredia dba AA & RL Kountry Store, Docket No. 2005-1578-PST-E on June 5, 2006 assessing $4,200 in administrative penalties.

Information concerning any aspect of this order may be obtained by contacting Robert Mosley, Staff Attorney at (512) 239-0627, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087.

TRD-200603268

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 14, 2006


Notice of Availability and Request for Comments on a Proposed Draft Amended Natural Resource Damages Restoration Plan

AGENCIES: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas General Land Office, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior (collectively the Natural Resource Trustees).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a proposed Draft Amended Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for injuries to natural resources from releases of hazardous substances at the Koppers Texarkana National Priority List site and a 30-day period for public comment on this document beginning June 23, 2006.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a proposed Draft Amended Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment (Amended Plan), to be used in the resolution of the Natural Resource Trustees' claim for natural resource damages at the Koppers Texarkana National Priority List site (the Site), is available for public review and comment. The Trustees have developed an Amended Plan to address unforeseen events which have made it impossible to implement the preferred restoration alternative originally selected. This document has been prepared by the Natural Resource Trustees in cooperation with Beazer East, Inc. (Beazer) to address injuries or potential injuries to natural resources and the services they provide as a result of releases of hazardous substances at or from the former Koppers Texarkana Wood Preserving Facility in Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas. The Amended Plan describes revisions to the originally approved Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment (Draft Plan), which was released for public comment on October 18, 2002. The Draft Plan described potential injuries related to the Site and presented a preferred restoration alternative. The previously proposed restoration project would have provided compensation through the preservation of at least 56.5 acres of riparian and wetland habitat along Howard Creek, in Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas. The Trustees and Beazer have since determined that the property is no longer viable as a restoration alternative.

The Trustees and Beazer have concluded a search for alternative restoration projects. The search evaluated a range of projects within the Days Creek watershed in and around Texarkana, Texas and found no suitable or available properties in the area. The Trustees and Beazer then began a regional search for suitable restoration properties that met the criteria presented in the previously approved Draft Plan and that had identified title and conservation easement holders. After completing this search, the nearest suitable property was located within the Nature Conservancy's Lennox Woods Preserve in Red River County. This project would preserve a minimum of 76 acres of bottomland woodland and wetland habitats in perpetuity through a conservation easement held by the Natural Area Preservation Association, and the fee title of the property being held by the Nature Conservancy of Texas. The Trustees and Beazer are therefore presenting the Lennox Woods Preserve project as the amended preferred restoration alternative for the compensation of natural resource injuries at the former Koppers Texarkana Wood Preserving Facility in Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas.

The opportunity for public review and comment on the proposed Amended Plan announced in this notice is required under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. To receive a copy of the proposed Amended Plan, interested members of the public are invited to contact: Charles Brigance, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Remediation Division MC 142, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, (512) 239-2238 or cbriganc@tceq.state.tx.us .

The Amended Plan may also be reviewed on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Natural Resource Trustee Program Web site at: www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/nrtp/index.html .

DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 2006, to Charles Brigance of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality at the address listed in the previous paragraph. The Natural Resource Trustees will consider all written comments prior to finalizing the proposed Amended Plan.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Site is a former wood treatment facility that began operation in 1910. It is located approximately one mile west of downtown Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas. Waggoner Creek is located immediately adjacent to the Site and forms its western boundary.

On April 16, 1984, The Texas Department of Water Resources (now the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) recommended to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that the site be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). The EPA concurred and the Site was proposed for placement on the NPL on October 15, 1984. The site was subsequently added to the NPL on June 10, 1986.

The Natural Resource Trustees determined that a natural resource damage assessment was appropriate due to potential injuries to aquatic and biological natural resources, as a result of surface water runoff and groundwater discharges into Waggoner Creek and an on-site pond. A cooperative assessment of injuries or potential injuries to natural resources was jointly performed by the Natural Resource Trustees and Beazer.

The cooperative assessment determined that the release of hazardous materials at or from the Site resulted in injury or potential injury to natural resources. The Draft Plan described the compensatory restoration project initially proposed to compensate the public for lost ecological services identified in the cooperative damage assessment. Details of the injury assessment and the review of potential restoration options were outlined in the Draft Plan. The Draft Plan was released for public review on October 18, 2002. The document described the assessment procedures used to define the natural resource services losses and to scale the restoration action. It also identified a preservation property preferred to compensate for those service losses caused by the natural resource injuries at the Site. The Trustees did not receive public comment concerning the Draft Plan.

The originally approved preservation property was located south of the City of Texarkana in Bowie County, Texas. The property was a 56.5-acre parcel located on Howard Creek, approximately 1.8 miles south of the Koppers Texarkana Site. The property was bordered by residential development to the north, west and southeast, and undeveloped woodlands along most of the south and east. The property contained extensive wetlands, ponds and riparian hardwood forests, as well as upland pine forests. The habitat supported numerous species of bird, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians.

The property and habitat were to have been preserved in perpetuity through the transfer to a public or private entity and/or use of appropriate conservation easements, deed restrictions, or other legal instruments to ensure the ecological integrity of the site. Numerous public and private organizations were contacted and presented the opportunity to either hold fee title or easement rights on the Howard Creek Preservation property. However, with increasing development in the area and the completion of the new Highway 59 corridor near the restoration project, many of the entities viewed the property as a potential liability and felt that preserving the ecological integrity of the site would be extremely difficult. After two years of attempts to work through these issues and with continued development in the area it became obvious that the property would not attract a fee title or easement holder. The Trustees and Beazer have since determined that the property is no longer viable as a restoration alternative.

The Trustees have identified an alternate preferred restoration alternative that would compensate for potential injuries to water quality and aquatic habitats through the preservation of a 76-acre parcel of bottomland hardwood habitat and aquatic resources located along Pecan Bayou within the Nature Conservancy of Texas' Lennox Woods Preserve, in Red River County, Texas. The parcel has a substantial aquatic habitat component. The property is located within an area that represents high quality old-growth bottomland hardwood forest and contains extensive wetlands, backwaters, and riparian hardwood forest, which support numerous species of aquatic fauna, birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. The ecological services provided by the property will be preserved in perpetuity through the placement of a conservation easement.

TRD-200603229

Mary Risner

Director, Litigation Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Default Orders of Administrative Enforcement Actions

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Default Orders (DOs). The commission staff proposes a DO when the staff has sent an executive director's preliminary report and petition (EDPRP) to an entity outlining the alleged violations; the proposed penalty; and the proposed technical requirements necessary to bring the entity back into compliance; and the entity fails to request a hearing on the matter within 20 days of its receipt of the EDPRP. Similar to the procedure followed with respect to Agreed Orders entered into by the executive director of the commission in accordance with Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075, this notice of the proposed order and the opportunity to comment is published in the Texas Register no later than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period closes, which in this case is July 24, 2006 . The commission will consider any written comments received and the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of a DO if a comment discloses facts or considerations that indicate a proposed DO is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes and rules within the commission's jurisdiction, or orders and permits issued in accordance with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to a proposed DO is not required to be published if those changes are made in response to written comments.

A copy of each proposed DO is available for public inspection at both the commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A, 3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional office listed as follows. Comments about the DO should be sent to the attorney designated for the DO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087, MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 2006 . Comments may also be sent by facsimile machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The commission's attorneys are available to discuss the DOs and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone numbers; however, comments on the DOs should be submitted to the commission in writing .

(1) COMPANY: Big Chipper of Texas, Inc. dba Big Chipper Parker Road Recycling Facility; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1521-MSW-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104497790; LOCATION: 1629 Parker Road, Carrollton, Denton County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wood recycling facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §330.4(f)(1)(B), by failing to obtain a permit or registration prior to the storage, processing, removal, or disposal of municipal solid waste; 30 TAC §37.921 and §328.5(d), by failing to demonstrate financial assurance for closure of the facility; PENALTY: $4,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Robert Mosley, Litigation Division MC 175, (512) 239-0627; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(2) COMPANY: Bob Perry dba Amistad American Camp Ground; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-1827-PWS-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102676715; LOCATION: Highway 90 West, Del Rio, Val Verde County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(2)(A)(i) and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §341.033(d), by failing to collect routine bacteriological samples at a frequency based on the population served by the facility; 30 TAC §290.122(c)(2)(B) and THSC, §341.033(d), by failing to notify persons served by the facility of the failure to collect routine bacteriological samples by direct delivery or by continuously posting the notice in conspicuous places within the area served by the facility; PENALTY: $1,980; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Laredo Regional Office, 707 East Calton Road, Suite 304, Laredo, Texas 78041-3638, (956) 791-6611.

(3) COMPANY: Jerry Barger dba Barger Salvage Yard; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1665-WQ-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104458294; LOCATION: 497 Apache Street, Kempner, Lampasas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: automotive salvage yard; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §122.26(c), by failing to obtain authorization to discharge storm water associated with industrial activity; PENALTY: $5,350; STAFF ATTORNEY: Robert Mosley, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0627; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.

(4) COMPANY: Jon A. Friend dba Besaw's Cafe; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1487-PWS-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN101191484; LOCATION: 3506 Battleground Road, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(2)(A)(i) and §290.122(c)(2)(B) and THSC, §341.033(d), by failing to perform routine monthly bacteriological sampling of the public drinking water supply and failed to provide public notification of the failure to conduct monthly bacteriological sampling during the months of May through August 2003 and November 2003 through April 2005; 30 TAC §290.51(a)(3) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay all Fiscal Year 2005 Public Health Service fees, including all late fees, for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 31011039; PENALTY: $12,925; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0619; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(5) COMPANY: Milton Doss; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1584-MLM-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 26819 and RN104601877; LOCATION: 5500 -5490 Greenforest Lane outside of Texarkana, Bowie County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: property; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §330.4(a) and TWC, §26.121(c), by failing to dispose of municipal solid waste, scrap tires, five-gallon plastic buckets, air conditioning refrigerant bottles, refrigerators, sofas, mattresses, carpet, carpet pad, construction debris, trees, and brush at an authorized site and failed to prevent an unauthorized discharge into or adjacent to waters in the state; 30 TAC §111.219(7) and THSC, §382.085(b), by burning unauthorized materials including scrap tires, construction debris, plastics, railroad ties, shingles, freon cylinders, and municipal solid waste at the site; 30 TAC §330.4(a) and TWC, §26.121(c), by failing to dispose of municipal solid waste, scrap tires, construction debris, trees, and brush at an authorized site and failed to prevent an unauthorized discharge into or adjacent to waters in the state; PENALTY: $5,400; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0619; REGIONAL OFFICE: Tyler Regional Office, 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.

(6) COMPANY: Nelco Distributing Company dba Nelco Corner; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1223-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104557921; LOCATION: 1045 South State Highway 359, Mathis, San Patricio County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of underground storage tank (UST) systems; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and §334.128(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay UST fees for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 and aboveground storage tank fees for 2003, 2004, and 2005; PENALTY: $4,200; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Corpus Christi Regional Office, 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.

(7) COMPANY: Price Construction, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0295-AIR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 907901D and RN102743747; LOCATION: one mile east of University Avenue on North Loop 289, Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: hot mix asphalt plant; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.110(a)(2)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to submit a registration for the installation of a pollution control device; 30 TAC §116.115(c), New Source Review Air Permit 7901, Special Condition 3, and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to use only the fuel specified by the permit; PENALTY: $5,500; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rebecca Davis, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-5487; REGIONAL OFFICE: Lubbock Regional Office, 4630 50th Street, Suite 600, Lubbock, Texas 79414-3520, (806) 796-7092.

(8) COMPANY: Sohail Afridi dba Lumberton Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1449-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102353554; LOCATION: 2346 Highway 69 South, Lumberton, Hardin County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all UST records at the station and make them available for inspection to commission personnel upon request; 30 TAC §115.245(2) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment at least once every 12 months; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to monitor USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once every month (not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring); 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for all USTs involved in the retail sale of petroleum substances as a motor fuel; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay UST fees for TCEQ Financial Assurance Account No. 0060267U and associated late fees for fiscal year 2005; PENALTY: $8,925; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mark Curnutt, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0624; REGIONAL OFFICE: Beaumont Regional Office, 3870 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.

(9) COMPANY: Dexter Simpson dba Overton Road Chevron; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1971-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 75267 and RN102835766; LOCATION: 3926 East Overton Road, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rebecca Davis, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-5487; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(10) COMPANY: Judy Davis dba Judy's Kountry Kitchen; DOCKET NUMBER: 2006-0063-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102260767; LOCATION: Highway 75 and Farm-to-Market Road 315, Poyner, Henderson County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), and Agreed Order Docket No. 2004-1480-PST-E, Ordering Provision No. 2.a., by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; 30 TAC §334.50(a)(1)(A) and (b)(2)(A)(i)(III); §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii); and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to provide a release detection method capable of detecting a release from any portion of the UST system which contained regulated substances including the tanks, piping, and other underground ancillary equipment; 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for all USTs involved in the retail sale of petroleum substances as a motor fuel; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(4)(A)(vii) and (c)(5)(B)(ii), by failing to timely renew a previously issued UST delivery certificate by submitting a properly completed UST registration and self-certification form at least 30 days before the expiration date of the delivery certificate; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(A)(i) and TWC, §26.3467(a), by failing to make available to a common carrier a valid, current TCEQ delivery certificate before accepting delivery of a regulated substance into the USTs at the facility; 30 TAC §334.22(a); Agreed Order, Docket No. 2004-1480-PST-E, Ordering Provision No. 2.b.; and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay outstanding UST fees for TCEQ Account No. 0054411U for fiscal years 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006; PENALTY: $21,450; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Tyler Regional Office, 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.

(11) COMPANY: Pak Convenience Store, Inc. dba One Stop #15; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1154-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102402179; LOCATION: 8460 Denton Drive, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to monitor the UST system at a frequency of at least once every month (not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring) in a manner which would detect a release; 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for the UST system; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(4)(A)(vii) and (c)(5)(B)(ii), by failing to timely renew a previously issued delivery certificate, and failed to make immediately available upon request by TCEQ staff a current TCEQ delivery certificate for the USTs at the facility; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain on the premises of the facility all required records, and failed to make those records immediately available for inspection upon request by TCEQ personnel; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay, at the time and in the manner required, outstanding annual facility fees for TCEQ Account No. 0052830U for fiscal year 2006; PENALTY: $6,222; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0019; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(12) COMPANY: Tajammal Incorporated dba Super Stop 18; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1493-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102382058; LOCATION: 5480 College Street, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.242(9) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to post operating instructions conspicuously on the front of each gasoline dispensing pump equipped with a Stage II vapor recovery system; 30 TAC §115.242(3)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain the Stage II vapor recovery system in proper operating condition as specified by California Air Resources Board Executive Order(s), and free of defects that would impair the effectiveness of the system; 30 TAC §115.246(7)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain all required Stage II records for review upon request; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to monitor tanks for releases at a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC § 334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test line leak detectors at least once per year; 30 TAC § 334.50(b)(2) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test product piping at least once per year; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(9)(A)(iv) and §334.72, by failing to notify the commission within 24 hours of a suspected release when statistical inventory reconciliation analysis results were "Fail" or "Inconclusive"; 30 TAC §334.74, by failing to conduct release investigation and confirmation steps within 30 days of discovery of a suspected release; 30 TAC §115.245(2) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment at least once every 12 months; PENALTY: $20,800; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Beaumont Regional Office, 3870 Eastex Freeway, Beaumont, Texas 77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.

TRD-200603248

Mary Risner

Director, Litigation Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Settlement Agreements of Administrative Enforcement Actions

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) staff is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed Agreed Orders (AOs) in accordance with Texas Water Code (TWC), §7.075. Section 7.075 requires that before the commission may approve the AOs, the commission shall allow the public an opportunity to submit written comments on the proposed AOs. Section 7.075 requires that notice of the opportunity to comment must be published in the Texas Register no later than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period closes, which in this case is July 24, 2006 . Section 7.075 also requires that the commission promptly consider any written comments received and that the commission may withdraw or withhold approval of an AO if a comment discloses facts or considerations that the consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the statutes and rules within the commission's orders and permits issued in accordance with the commission's regulatory authority. Additional notice of changes to a proposed AO is not required to be published if those changes are made in response to written comments.

A copy of each proposed AO is available for public inspection at both the commission's central office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A, 3rd Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-3400 and at the applicable regional office listed as follows. Comments about an AO should be sent to the attorney designated for the AO at the commission's central office at P.O. Box 13087, MC 175, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be received by 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 2006 . Comments may also be sent by facsimile machine to the attorney at (512) 239-3434. The designated attorney is available to discuss the AO and/or the comment procedure at the listed phone number; however, §7.075 provides that comments on an AO should be submitted to the commission in writing .

(1) COMPANY: Highness Enterprises, Inc. dba All Time Food Store; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1571-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN101798361; LOCATION: 29719 Brook Chase Drive, Spring, Montgomery County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.246(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7)(A) and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), §382.085(b), by failing to maintain records onsite at the station ordinarily manned during business hours, and make immediately available for review upon request; 30 TAC §115.245(3) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to provide written notification to the appropriate TCEQ Regional Office at least ten working days in advance of the testing date and who will conduct the test; 30 TAC §115.242(3)(A) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain the Stage II vapor recovery system in proper operating condition including the absence or disconnection of any component that is a part of the approved system; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain the underground storage tank (UST) records as required; 30 TAC § 334.50(b)(1)(A) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to ensure that all tanks are monitored in a manner which will detect a release at a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to conduct proper release detection for the piping associated with the UST system; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test the line leak detectors on an annual basis for performance and operational reliability; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to conduct monthly reconciliation of inventory control records in a manner sufficiently accurate to detect a release which equals or exceeds the sum of 1% of flow-through plus 130 gallons; 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures for all UST systems at the station; PENALTY: $5,680; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(2) COMPANY: Hunters Creek Business Park, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1873-EAQ-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN104590567; LOCATION: within the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone, at the southwestern corner of Highway 46 and Oak Run Parkway near New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: tract of land; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §213.4(a)(1), by failing to obtain commission approval of an Edwards Aquifer Protection Plan (EAPP) prior to commencing clearing activities, including clearing trees from the land or the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone; PENALTY: $15,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: San Antonio Regional Office, 14250 Judson Road, San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.

(3) COMPANY: Larry Beakey dba BBT Investments; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0381-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 21226 and RN102821758; LOCATION: 824 South F Street, Harlingen, Cameron County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: petroleum storage tank facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective inventory control for the underground storage tank (UST) system; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A)(i)(III), and (b)(2), and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to monitor the USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once every month (not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring), by failing to monitor the piping associated with the UST system for releases, and by failing to test the piping for performance and operational reliability at least once each year; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C), by failing to permanently tag, label, or mark the UST system with an identification number that is identical to the UST registration and self-certification number; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain records for the UST system; PENALTY: $5,185; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Harlingen Regional Office, 1804 West Jefferson Avenue, Harlingen, Texas 78550-5247, (956) 425-6010.

(4) COMPANY: Madat Hirani dba Circle J Food Store; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0041-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102405768; LOCATION: 12310 Cullen Boulevard, Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail fuel sales; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.49(a)(2) and (c)(4)(C) and TWC, §26.3475(d), by failing to properly maintain and test the cathodic protection system for adequacy of protection once every three years; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A) and (b)(2)(A)(i) and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to monitor the USTs for releases at a frequency of at least once per month, not to exceed 35 days between each monitoring and failed to equip the regular unleaded product line with an automatic line leak detector; PENALTY: $4,500; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deborah A. Bynum, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1976; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(5) COMPANY: Metroplex Sand & Gravel, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-2094-WQ-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103959144; LOCATION: 10000 Trammel Davis Road, Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: sand dredging operation; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §281.25(a)(4) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §122.26(a), by failing to obtain authorization to discharge storm water associated with industrial activity to water in the state through an individual permit or the Multi-Sector General permit; PENALTY: $5,700; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(6) COMPANY: Rudolphs, Inc. dba Cuero One Stop dba Lantz Shell and dba One Stop 5; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1514-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: RN101872679, RN101882694, and RN102235249; LOCATION: 710 North Esplanade Street, 102 East Broadway Street, and 101 Industrial Boulevard, Cuero, Dewitt County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience stores with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all required UST records at the Cuero One Stop Facility and make them available for inspection upon request by commission personnel; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all required UST records at the Lantz Shell Facility and make them available for inspection upon request by commission personnel; 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to maintain all required UST records at the One Stop 5 Facility and make them available for inspection upon request by commission personnel; PENALTY: $3,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Deanna Sigman, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0619; REGIONAL OFFICE: Corpus Christi Regional Office, 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.

(7) COMPANY: Shawn & Sameer, Inc. dba Lawn Minit Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1664-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102382827; LOCATION: 6448 United States Highway 84, Lawn, Taylor County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.10(b), by failing to have records immediately available for inspection upon request by the TCEQ investigator; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to monitor piping associated with the USTs for releases; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(2)(A)(i)(III) and TWC, §26.3475(a), by failing to test the line leak detectors at least once per year for performance and operational reliability; 30 TAC §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii) and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1), by failing to conduct inventory control reconciliation on a monthly basis sufficiently accurate to detect a release as small as the sum of 1.0% of the total substance flow-through for the month plus 130 gallons; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C), by failing to ensure that a legible tag, label, or marking with the tank number is permanently applied upon or affixed to either the top of the fill tube or to a non-removable point in the immediate area of the fill tube according to the UST registration and self-certification form; 30 TAC §334.49(c)(2)(C) and (c)(4) and TWC, §26.3475(d), by failing to test the cathodic protection system for operability and adequacy of protection at a frequency of at least once every three years, and failing to inspect the rectifier at least once every 60 days; PENALTY: $6,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Mark Curnutt, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0624; REGIONAL OFFICE: Abilene Regional Office, 1977 Industrial Boulevard, Abilene, Texas 79602-7833, (325) 698-9674.

(8) COMPANY: The Estate of Robert Walker; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0418-AGR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN103022364; LOCATION: 5048 Father Anders Loop, Cistern, Fayette County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: hog farm; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §321.47(c)(1) and TWC, §26.121(a)(1) by failing to locate, construct, and manage the control of facilities and land management unit of an animal feeding operation in a manner that would protect surface and groundwater quality; 30 TAC §321.47(c)(2) by failing to prevent nuisance conditions and minimize odor conditions in accordance with the requirements of 30 TAC §321.31(b) and 30 TAC §321.47(d)(8) by failing to equip the Retention Control Systems with either irrigation, evaporation, or liquid removal systems; 30 TAC §321.47(f)(19)(A) by failing to restrict animals from coming into direct contact with surface water in the state; PENALTY: $6,300; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Austin Regional Office, 1921 Cedar Bend Drive, Suite 150, Austin, Texas 78758-5336, (512) 339-2929.

(9) COMPANY: Toko Foko Inc. dba MSM Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1785-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 49985 and RN102029402; LOCATION: 6013 North Farm-to-Market Road 565, Baytown, Chambers County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §§115.246(6), 115.244(3) and 334.10(b)(1)(B); and THSC, §382.085(b) by failing to maintain a record of the results of the daily and monthly Stage II inspections conducted at the station and failing to maintain UST records pertaining to spill and overfill control records and corrosion protection records; 30 TAC §334.50(a)(1)(A) and (b)(2)(A)(i)(III); and TWC, §26.3475(c)(1) by failing to perform an annual performance test on the existing line leak detectors and failing to provide the UST system with a method or combination of methods, of release detection capable of detecting a release from any portion of the UST system which contains regulated substances; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(A)(i) by failing to make available to a common carrier a valid, current TCEQ delivery certificate before delivery of a regulated substance into the UST; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(B)(ii) by failing to ensure that the UST registration and self-certification forms were submitted to the agency in a timely manner; 30 TAC §334.8(c)(5)(C) by failing to permanently tag or label each UST fill tube at the facility with the number used to identify the tank on the registration and self-certification form filed with the commission; 30 TAC §334.48(c) by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic inventory control on all UST systems at a retail facility; PENALTY: $9,000; STAFF ATTORNEY: Laurencia Fasoyiro, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8914; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(10) COMPANY: Town of Hackberry; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1107-MWD-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102077054; LOCATION: the southern end of Maxwell Road, Hackberry, Denton County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment facility; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(17) and Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. 13434001, Monitoring and Requirement No. 1, by failing to report discharge monitoring report data for the months from September 2003 through June 2004; 30 TAC §305.125(1), TWC, §26.121(a) and TPDES Permit No. 13434001, Final Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Nos. 1 and 2, by failing to comply with permitted effluent limits during March, May, June, July, and August 2004; PENALTY: $21,700; STAFF ATTORNEY: Shana Horton, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-1088; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(11) COMPANY: Waco Infinity Properties, Ltd.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-1185-AIR-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN104665351; LOCATION: 1207 West McGregor Drive, McGregor, McLennon County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: real property; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §111.201 and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to prevent outdoor burning; PENALTY: $1,675; STAFF ATTORNEY: Rachael Gaines, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0078; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.

(12) COMPANY: Yari Enterprises, Inc. dba Git N Go; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-0445-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBER: RN102245263; LOCATION: 302 South 17th Street, West Columbia, Brazoria County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to demonstrate acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum USTs; 30 TAC §334.48(c) and §334.50(d)(1)(B)(ii), by failing to conduct manual or automatic inventory control for all USTs at the facility, and by failing to conduct inventory control reconciliation on a monthly basis; 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A)(i)(III), and (b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and TWC, §26.3475(a) and (c)(1), by failing to test line leak detectors and product piping at least once per year for performance and operational reliability, and by failing to monitor tanks (release detection) for releases at a frequency of at least once every month; 30 TAC §115.245(2) and THSC, §382.085(b), by failing to conduct the annual and triennial Stage II testing to verify proper operation of the Stage II equipment; 30 TAC §334.22(a) and TWC, §5.702, by failing to pay outstanding underground storage tank fees for TCEQ Financial Administration Account No. 0059929U; PENALTY: $17,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Kathleen Decker, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-6500; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

(13) COMPANY: Kash 'N' Karry, Inc. dba Magic Texaco; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1842-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 65383 and RN101542330; LOCATION: 110 West Southlake Boulevard, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Alfred Okpohworho, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8918; REGIONAL OFFICE: Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Office, 2309 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76118-6951, (817) 588-5800.

(14) COMPANY: Lakhani Ashraf dba Easy Shop; DOCKET NUMBER: 2005-0178-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 45256 and RN102250693; LOCATION: 3510 South College Avenue, Bryan, Brazos County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases from the operation of petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $3,150; STAFF ATTORNEY: Alfred Okpohworho, Litigation Division, MC R-12, (713) 422-8918; REGIONAL OFFICE: Waco Regional Office, 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.

(15) COMPANY: Tsuo-Min Chi dba A-Sunnys; DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-1224-PST-E; TCEQ ID NUMBERS: 43969 and RN102281268; LOCATION: 6240 Synott Road, Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULES VIOLATED: 30 TAC §37.815(a) and (b), by failing to provide acceptable financial assurance for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of two petroleum USTs; PENALTY: $2,100; STAFF ATTORNEY: Lena Roberts, Litigation Division, MC 175, (512) 239-0019; REGIONAL OFFICE: Houston Regional Office, 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.

TRD-200603247

Mary Risner

Director, Litigation Division

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Request for Grant Applications for Fiscal Year 2007 Clean Water Act, §319(h) Grant

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is requesting grant applications for nonpoint source projects that address the objectives, goals, and/or priorities identified in the State of Texas Nonpoint Source Management Program. Funds awarded under this grant may not pay for activities which are required by: a wastewater discharge permit or a storm water permit (although related activities not specifically required by the permits are allowed). This request does NOT seek agricultural or silvicultural projects under the jurisdiction of the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board.

Who is eligible to apply? : Grants will be available to all state agencies or political subdivisions of the State of Texas, including cities, counties, school districts, state universities, and special districts. Private, for profit, and nonprofit organizations may participate in projects as partners or contractors but may not apply directly for funding.

How to Apply and When : Information on the CWA, §319 grant program and how to apply for CWA, §319 grant funding can be accessed on the TCEQ Nonpoint Source Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/monitoring/nps/mgmt-plan/index.html . The grant application packet will be posted on the Texas Procurement and Building Commission's Texas Marketplace Web site at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us . The TCEQ will accept applications for consideration of CWA, §319 funding for Fiscal Year 2007 between June 23 and August 23, 2006.

Matching : All projects must include non-federal matching funds of 40% of the project's total costs (i.e., 60/40 match of the 100% total cost, 60% is federal funds and 40% is match funds). Applicants should make an effort to identify other similar work going on within the state. Applicants are encouraged to collaborate and partner with other state or local agencies for measurable nonpoint source pollution reduction.

election Procedures : TCEQ will review the applications, and based on the evaluation criteria, the number of applications submitted, and funds available in each funding category (base and incremental), a portion or potentially all will be invited to submit proposals. A submission request for a proposal does not guarantee full or partial funding through this Request for Grant Application (RFGA). Applicants who are selected will be notified in writing to prepare a proposal and will be assigned to a TCEQ project manager by September 27, 2006. The project manager will work with the applicant to draft and finalize the work plan prior to submittal to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA will review all work plans prior to TCEQ awarding grant funds.

Questions/Final Addendum : Questions regarding this RFGA will be taken through July 19, 2006. If the applicant has any questions regarding this RFGA contact Regina Adams, Procurements and Contracts, Office of Administrative Services, (512) 239-3427, Fax (512) 239-6004, or email radams@tceq.state.tx.us , MC 181, 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building A, Room 123, Austin, Texas 78753. All questions and answers will be posted to the Texas Procurement and Building Commission's Texas Marketplace Web site at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us for public viewing. Any final addendum to this RFGA will be made by August 18, 2006 and notice will be made on the Texas Marketplace.

Grant Schedule : The following dates are included in the Fiscal Year 2007 Grant Application Process: June 23, 2006 - RFGA Start Date; July 19, 2006 - Deadline for questions regarding RFGA; August 18, 2006 - Final Addendum to RFGA to the Texas Procurement and Building Commission's Texas Marketplace; August 23, 2006 - Deadline for submitting applications; September 27, 2006 - Potential applicants will be notified in writing to submit proposals; November 22, 2006 - Final work plans are due for submittal to EPA; March 2007 - Projected date of EPA Award; April 2007 - (Contingent on EPA Award) TCEQ initiates contracts with applicants.

TRD-200603220

Stephanie Bergeron Perdue

Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Nitrate-Nitrogen in Lower Sabinal River Watershed

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning nitrate-nitrogen loading in the Lower Sabinal River of the Nueces River Basin. TCEQ will also conduct a public meeting to receive comments on the implementation plan.

Lower Sabinal River (Segment 2110), located in Uvalde County, is included in the State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d) list of impaired water bodies. As required by §303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was developed for nitrate-nitrogen. The TMDL was adopted by the commission on August 10, 2005, as an update to the State Water Quality Management Plan. Upon adoption by the commission, the TMDL was submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval. EPA approved the TMDL on October 13, 2005. The implementation plan is a flexible tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies involved in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management.

A public meeting will be held in Sabinal, Texas, on June 27, 2006, at 7:00 p.m., at the Sabinal City Hall, located at 501 North Center Street. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. Open discussion will not occur during the meeting; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the matter 30 minutes prior to the meeting and will answer questions before and after the meeting. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan. The commission requests comment on each of the six major components of the implementation plan: description of control actions and management measures, implementation schedule, legal authority, follow-up monitoring plan, measurable outcomes, and communication strategy. After the public comment period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation plan, if appropriate. The final implementation plan will then be considered for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the implementation plan by the commission, the final implementation plan and a response to public comments will be made available on the TCEQ Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html .

Written comments should be submitted to Ward Ling, TCEQ TMDL Section, MC 203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414. All comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference Implementation Plan for One Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrate-Nitrogen in Lower Sabinal River, For Segment 2110. For further information regarding this proposed TMDL implementation plan, please contact Ward Ling, TCEQ Central Office, at (512) 239-6238 or eling@tceq.state.tx.us . Copies of the document summarizing the proposed TMDL implementation plan can be obtained via the commission's Web site or by calling (512) 239-4900.

Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at (512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

TRD-200603219

Stephanie Bergeron Perdue

Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Fish Tissue in the Lake Worth Watershed

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in fish tissue in Lake Worth of the Trinity River Basin. TCEQ will also conduct a public meeting to receive comments on the implementation plan.

Lake Worth (Segment 0807), located in Tarrant County, is included in the State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d) list of impaired water bodies. As required by the federal Clean Water Act, §303(d) a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was developed for PCBs in fish tissue. The TMDL was adopted by the commission on August 10, 2005, as an update to the State Water Quality Management Plan. Upon adoption by the commission, the TMDL was submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval. EPA approved the TMDL on October 13, 2005. The implementation plan is a flexible tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies involved in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management.

A public meeting will be held in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 6, 2006, at 7:00 p.m., at the Fort Worth City Hall, City Council Chamber located at 1000 Throckmorton Street. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. Open discussion will not occur during the meeting; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the matter 30 minutes prior to the meeting and will answer questions before and after the meeting. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan. The commission requests comment on each of the six major components of the implementation plan: description of control actions and management measures, implementation schedule, legal authority, follow-up monitoring plan, measurable outcomes, and communication strategy. After the public comment period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation plan, if appropriate. The final implementation plan will then be considered for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the implementation plan by the commission, the final implementation plan and a response to public comments will be made available on the TCEQ Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html .

Written comments should be submitted to Roger Miranda, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Chief Engineer's Office, TMDL Section, MC 203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414. All comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference Implementation Plan for One Total Maximum Daily Load for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Fish Tissue in Lake Worth, For Segment 0807 . For further information regarding this proposed TMDL implementation plan, please contact Roger Miranda, TCEQ Central Office, at (512) 239-6278 or rmiranda@tceq.state.tx.us . Copies of the document summarizing the proposed TMDL implementation plan can be obtained via the commission's Web site or by calling (512) 239-4900.

Persons with disabilities who have special communication or other accommodation needs who are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at (512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

TRD-200603227

Stephanie Bergeron Perdue

Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Request for Public Comment and Notice of a Public Meeting for an Implementation Plan to Address Total Dissolved Solids and Chlorides in the Clear Creek Above Tidal Watershed

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ or commission) has made available for public comment a draft implementation plan concerning total dissolved solids and chlorides loading in the Clear Creek Above Tidal watershed of San Jacinto-Brazos River Basin. TCEQ will also conduct a public meeting to receive comments on the implementation plan.

Clear Creek Above Tidal (Segment 1102), located in Fort Bend, Harris, Brazoria, and Galveston Counties, is included in the State of Texas Clean Water Act, §303(d) list of impaired water bodies. As required by §303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) were developed for total dissolved solids and chlorides. The TMDLs were adopted by the commission on April 12, 2006, as updates to the State Water Quality Management Plan. Upon adoption by the commission, the TMDLs were submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for review and approval. The implementation plan is a flexible tool that the governmental and non-governmental agencies involved in TMDL implementation will use to guide their program management.

A public meeting will be held in Pearland, Texas, on July 11, 2006, at 7:00 p.m., at the Pearland City Hall Council Chambers, located at 3519 Liberty Drive. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. Open discussion will not occur during the meeting; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the matter 30 minutes prior to the meeting and will answer questions before and after the meeting. The purpose of the public meeting is to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the proposed plan. The commission requests comment on each of the six major components of the implementation plan: description of control actions and management measures, implementation schedule, legal authority, follow-up monitoring plan, measurable outcomes, and communication strategy. After the public comment period, TCEQ staff may revise the implementation plan, if appropriate. The final implementation plan will then be considered for approval by the commission. Upon approval of the implementation plan by the commission, the final implementation plan and a response to public comments will be made available on the TCEQ Web site at http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html .

Written comments should be submitted to Andrew Sullivan, TCEQ TMDL Section, MC 203, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-1414. All comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., July 14, 2006, and should reference Implementation Plan for Two Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Dissolved Solids and Chlorides in Clear Creek above Tidal, For Segment 1102 . For further information regarding this proposed TMDL implementation plan, please contact Andrew Sullivan, TCEQ Central Office, at (512) 239-4587 or asulliva@tceq.state.tx.us . Copies of the document summarizing the proposed TMDL implementation plan can be obtained via the commission's Web site or by calling (512) 239-4900.

Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who are planning to attend the meeting should contact the agency at (512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

TRD-200603221

Stephanie Bergeron Perdue

Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Water Quality Applications

The following notices were issued during the period of June 2, 2006 through June 8, 2006.

The following require the applicants to publish notice in the newspaper. The public comment period, requests for public meetings, or requests for a contested case hearing may be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, Mail Code 105, P.O. Box 13087, Austin Texas 78711-3087, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF THIS NOTICE.

Apple Springs Independent School District has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 14086-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 6,200 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 357 and Farm-to-Market Road 2501, and north of State Highway 94 in Trinity County, Texas.

City of Deport has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 10741-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 183,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 1000 feet south of U.S. Highway 271 and 1400 feet west of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 1149 and U.S. Highway 271 in Lamar County, Texas.

City of Joaquin has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 12718-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 137,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 2,700 feet northeast of the intersection of Jackson Street and U.S. Highway 84 in the City of Joaquin in Shelby County, Texas.

City of Presidio has applied to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for a new permit, proposed TPDES Permit No. WQ0014679001, to authorize the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at an annual average flow not to exceed 1,250,000 gallons per day. The facility will be located approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the City of Presidio on the north side of Farm-to-Market Road 170 in Presidio County, Texas.

City of Sabinal has applied for a new permit, proposed Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. WQ0014689001, to authorize the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 340,000 gallons per day. The facility will be located approximately 5,300 feet south of the intersection of State Hwy. 187 and Dunlap Avenue, along Dunlap Avenue and Rhylander Road (County Road 386) in Uvalde County, Texas.

City of Yantis has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 12187-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 42,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately one mile south of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 17 and State Highway 154 in Wood County, Texas.

LeTourneau, Inc., which operates a heavy equipment manufacturing plant, has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. WQ0001603000, which authorizes the discharge of contact and noncontact cooling water, parts/equipment washdown water, storm water runoff, and previously monitored effluents (wastewater from the vacuum degassing process, non contact cooling water, contact cooling water, and storm water via internal Outfall 101 and wastewater from the hot forming process via internal Outfall 201) on an intermittent and flow variable basis via Outfall 001. The facility is located at 2400 S. McArthur Boulevard, approximately 0.25 mile northwest of the intersection of Estes Parkway and Farm-to-Market Road 1845, and approximately 0.75 mile north of Interstate Highway 20 in the southwestern portion of the City of Longview, Gregg County, Texas.

Mallard Point WWTP, LLC has applied to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 14215-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 22,500 gallons per day. The proposed permit would also authorize the disposal of treated domestic wastewater via irrigation on 40 acres of a 90 acre golf course. The facility is located approximately 8,650 feet north and 2,000 feet west of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 1,564 and U.S. Highway 69 in Hunt County, Texas.

Town of Ponder has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 11287-003, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 225,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 2,500 feet southeast of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 2449 and Farm-to-Market Road 156, approximately 1,200 feet east of Farm-to-Market Road 156 and 1,600 feet south of Farm-to-Market Road 2449 in Denton County, Texas.

TRD-200603267

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 14, 2006


Notice of Water Rights Application

Notice issued on June 13, 2006:

APPLICATION NO. 5927 Michael L. Gilbert and Donna G. Gilbert, 7405 96th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79424, applicants, have applied for a Water Use Permit to divert and use not to exceed 90 acre-feet of water per year from Running Water Draw, Brazos River Basin, for agricultural (irrigation) purposes in Hale County. The application was received on November 14, 2005. Additional information was received on February 6 and March 10, 2006. The application was declared administratively complete and filed with the Office of the Chief Clerk on March 21, 2006. Ownership of the land is evidenced by a Warranty Deed with Vendor's Lien filed as Volume 978, Page 4211 in the Hale County Clerk's Office. The Commission will review the application as submitted by the applicant and may or may not grant the application as requested. Written public comments and requests for a public meeting should be submitted to the Office of Chief Clerk, at the address provided in the information section below, within 30 days of the date of newspaper publication of the notice.

INFORMATION SECTION

A public meeting is intended for the taking of public comment, and is not a contested case hearing.

The Executive Director can consider approval of an application unless a written request for a contested case hearing is filed. To request a contested case hearing, you must submit the following: (1) your name (or for a group or association, an official representative), mailing address, daytime phone number, and fax number, if any: (2) applicant's name and permit number; (3) the statement "[I/we] request a contested case hearing;" and (4) a brief and specific description of how you would be affected by the application in a way not common to the general public. You may also submit any proposed conditions to the requested application which would satisfy your concerns. Requests for a contested case hearing must be submitted in writing to the TCEQ Office of the Chief Clerk at the address provided in the information section below.

If a hearing request is filed, the Executive Director will not issue the requested permit and may forward the application and hearing request to the TCEQ Commissioners for their consideration at a scheduled Commission meeting.

Written hearing requests, public comments or requests for a public meeting should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC 105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087. For information concerning the hearing process, please contact the Public Interest Counsel, MC 103, at the same address. For additional information, individual members of the general public may contact the Office of Public Assistance at 1-800-687-4040. General information regarding the TCEQ can be found at our web site at www.tceq.state.tx.us.

TRD-200603266

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 14, 2006


Proposal for Decision

The State Office of Administrative Hearings issued a Proposal for Decision and Order to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on June 6, 2006, in the matter of the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Petitioner v. Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation; SOAH Docket No. 582-05-7505; TCEQ Docket No. 2004-1505-AIR-E. The commission will consider the Administrative Law Judge's Proposal for Decision and Order regarding the enforcement action against Huntsman Petrochemical Corporation on a date and time to be determined by the Office of the Chief Clerk in Room 201S of Building E, 12100 N. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas. This posting is Notice of Opportunity to Comment on the Proposal for Decision and Order. The comment period will end 30 days from date of this publication. Written public comments should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC-105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087. If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact Paul Munguia, Office of the Chief Clerk, (512) 239-3300.

TRD-200603270

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 14, 2006


Proposal for Decision

The State Office of Administrative Hearings issued a Proposal for Decision and Order to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on June 6, 2006, in the matter of the Executive Director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Petitioner v. Murrill Len Baxley dba Texas Defensive Shooting Academy; SOAH Docket No. 582-05-5033; TCEQ Docket No. 2003-0029-MSW. The commission will consider the Administrative Law Judge's Proposal for Decision and Order regarding the enforcement action against Murrill Len Baxley dba Texas Defensive Shooting Academy on a date and time to be determined by the Office of the Chief Clerk in Room 201S of Building E, 12100 N. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas. This posting is Notice of Opportunity to Comment on the Proposal for Decision and Order. The comment period will end 30 days from date of this publication. Written public comments should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC-105, TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087. If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact Paul Munguia, Office of the Chief Clerk, (512) 239-3300.

TRD-200603269

LaDonna Castañuela

Chief Clerk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Filed: June 14, 2006


Department of Family and Protective Services

Interagency Coordinating Council (ICC) for Building Healthy Families Public Hearing

The Interagency Coordinating Council (ICC) for Building Healthy Families, as established by the 79th Texas Legislature House Bill (HB) 1685, facilitates communication and collaboration concerning policies for the prevention of and early intervention in child abuse and neglect among state agencies whose programs and services promote and foster healthy families. To that end, the Council prepared and submitted to the Texas Legislature an inventory of the child abuse and neglect prevention and early intervention policies, programs, and activities of each agency represented on the council. The Council requests that those wanting to provide public input also review the inventory, which is available on the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) website at: http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Prevention_and_Early_Intervention/About_Prevention _and_Early_Intervention/icc.asp

The ICC will conduct a public hearing to solicit input from stakeholders to complete their charge in making recommendations to the Texas Legislature for improving the coordination and collaboration of child abuse and neglect prevention and early intervention program and services among state agencies. The Public Hearing will be held on July 27, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m. and ending at 4:00 p.m. in the Public Hearing Room (125W) on the first floor of the John H. Winters Building, 701 W. 51st Street, Austin, Texas. The ICC requests that testimonies focus on the following questions:

(1) How can state agencies better collaborate and coordinate to improve child abuse and neglect prevention programs and services?

(2) Do you have any suggestions for how state agencies can support communities and providers in implementing evidence-based programs?

(3) What best evidence-based and cost-effective prevention programs do we lack in Texas?

(4) Are there areas in Texas where demand for child abuse and neglect prevention services far exceeds availability?

(5) Do you have any feedback to provide regarding the ICC Inventory Report?

To ensure an opportunity for all who wish to present, those attending the public hearing should anticipate limiting their presentations to 10 minutes. Time limits may be adjusted at the hearing based on the actual attendance.

In lieu of public testimony, members of the public may submit written comments through a link designed for this purpose http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=730222238183. Written comments may also be submitted via email to ICC@dfps.state.tx.us or to Rachel Porter-Daniel at DFPS-PEI, P.O. Box 149030, Mail Code Y-956, Austin, TX 78714-9030. Comments submitted after July 27, 2006, may not be considered.

Persons with disabilities planning to attend this meeting who need auxiliary aids or services may contact Rachel Porter-Daniel at (512) 821-4745, no later than July 10, 2006, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. A computer with a CD drive (requires Windows Office 2000 or less) and Internet connection, as well as a projector, will be available to presenters at the public hearing. Presenters requiring other audio or visual equipment for presentations should contact Rachel Porter-Daniel at (512) 821-4745, no later than July 10, 2006.

TRD-200603241

Gerry Williams

General Counsel

Department of Family and Protective Services

Filed: June 13, 2006


Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Public Notice

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission announces its intent to submit Transmittal Number 06-024, Amendment Number 742, to the Texas State Plan for Medical Assistance, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

The purpose of this amendment is to comply with the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Section 6036, "Improved Enforcement of Documentation Requirements." (Public Law Number 109-171, February 8, 2006). The Deficit Reduction Act requires Medicaid applicants and recipients who declare to be a United States citizen or national to furnish satisfactory documentary evidence of United States citizenship as defined in the Act. The proposed amendment is effective July 1, 2006.

The proposed amendment is estimated to result in a cost of $709,141 in state funds and $1,644,553 in total funds for State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2006. Additional cost in SFY 2007 is not anticipated.

To obtain copies of the proposed amendment, interested parties may contact Glennell Berry by mail at Office of Family Services, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, P.O. Box 12668, mail code 2039, Austin, Texas 78711-2668; by telephone at (512) 206-4545; by fax at (512) 206-4556; or by e-mail at glennell.berry@hhsc.state.tx.us.

Copies of the proposal will also be made available for public review at the local offices of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.

TRD-200603273

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Filed: June 14, 2006


Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs

Notice of Public Hearing, Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Plan FFY 2007

For the fiscal year that begins October 1, 2006, the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) anticipates receiving federal funds to continue the operation of certain programs that assist very low-income Texans with home energy. While in the process of deciding how to use Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) funds, TDHCA now seeks opinions of groups affected by LIHEAP programs as well as opinions of other interested citizens.

As part of the public information, consultation, and public hearing requirements for LIHEAP, the Community Affairs Division of the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) will conduct a public hearing and post the proposed plan on the TDHCA internet site. Primarily, the hearing solicits comments on the proposed use and distribution of federal fiscal year (FFY) 2007 funds provided under LIHEAP. LIHEAP provides funding for the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) and utility assistance--known as "Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program (CEAP)".

The public hearing has been scheduled as follows:

Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 2:00 p.m.

Room #116, TDHCA Headquarters,

221 East 11th St.

Austin, Texas

A representative from TDHCA will explain the planning process and receive comments from interested citizens and affected groups regarding the proposed plan for LIHEAP subrecipients. A copy of the Draft LIHEAP Plan may be obtained after June 23, 2006, through TDHCA's web site, http://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/ea.htm or by contacting the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, Community Affairs Division, Energy Assistance Section, P.O. Box 13941, Austin, Texas 78711-3941, or by phone at (512) 475-1435.

Anyone may submit comments on the draft plan in written form or oral testimony at the public hearing. TDHCA must receive written comments no later than 5:00 p.m., Monday, July 24, 2006. Comments concerning the draft plan may be submitted via the Internet to john.touchet@tdhca.state.tx.us or by fax (512) 475-3935 or through John Touchet at TDHCA using the postal service address provided above. If you have any questions regarding the public hearing process or any of the programs referenced above, please contact TDHCA, Community Affairs Division, Energy Assistance Section.

Individuals who require auxiliary aids or services for this meeting should contact Ms. Gina Esteves at (512) 475-3943 or Relay Texas at 1-800-735-2989 at least two days before the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.

Non-English speaking individuals who require interpreters for this meeting should contact John Touchet, (512) 475-1435 at least three days before the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.

Personas que hablan español y requieren un intérprete, favor de llamar a Jorge Reyes al siguiente número (512) 475-4577 por lo menos tres días antes de la junta para hacer los preparativos apropiados.

TRD-200603230

Michael Gerber

Executive Director

Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs

Filed: June 13, 2006


Houston-Galveston Area Council

Request for Proposals

The Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) solicits proposals from individuals and organizations interested in providing technical assistance for the Gulf Coast Workforce Board staff in the further development and implementation of projects for the Ideal Work Environment Workgroup of the Health Services Steering Committee. The Workforce Board's system offers service for the more than 110,000 businesses and 5.2 million residents of a 13-county area that includes Houston, Harris County, and the twelve surrounding counties. Prospective bidders may obtain a copy of the Request for Proposals online at http://h-gac.com or http://www.theworksource.org or by contacting Carol Kimmick or Angela Bergaila at (713) 627-3200 or by sending an email to carol.kimmick@h-gac.com. Responses are due at H-GAC offices by 12:00 noon on Monday, July 17, 2006. H-GAC does not accept late proposals, and we will not make exceptions.

TRD-200603239

Jack Steele

Executive Director

Houston-Galveston Area Council

Filed: June 13, 2006


Texas Department of Insurance

Company Licensing

Application to change the name of MINNESOTA INSURANCE COMPANY to AIG ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign fire and/or casualty company. The home office is in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Any objections must be filed with the Texas Department of Insurance, within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the Texas Register publication, addressed to the attention of Godwin Ohaechesi, 333 Guadalupe Street, M/C 305-2C, Austin, Texas 78701.

TRD-200603265

Gene C. Jarmon

Chief Clerk and General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: June 14, 2006


Third Party Administrator Applications

The following third party administrator (TPA) applications have been filed with the Texas Department of Insurance and are under consideration.

Application for admission to Texas of PROVIDENT AGENCY, INC., a foreign third party administrator. The home office is PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA.

Application for incorporation in Texas of NEW BENEFITS, LTD., a domestic third party administrator. The home office is DALLAS, TEXAS.

Application to change the name and home office of WAUSAU BENEFITS, INC., WAUSAU, WISCONSIN to FISERV HEALTH PLAN ADMINISTRATORS, INC. (using the assumed name FISERV HEALTH-WAUSAU BENEFITS), a foreign third party administrator. The home office is WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice is published in the Texas Register , addressed to the attention of Matt Ray, MC 107-1A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.

TRD-200603088

Gene C. Jarmon

Chief Clerk and General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: June 7, 2006


Third Party Administrator Applications

The following third party administrator (TPA) applications have been filed with the Texas Department of Insurance and are under consideration.

Application to change the name of STARMOUNT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., to ALWAYSCARE BENEFITS, INC., a foreign third party administrator. The home office is BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA.

Application to change the name of CITISTREET ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, INC., to METLIFE ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, INC., a domestic third party administrator. The home office is IRVING, TEXAS.

Application to change the name of ADVANCEPCS HEALTH, L.P., to CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, L.P., a foreign third party administrator. The home office is WILMINGTON, DELAWARE.

Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice is published in the Texas Register , addressed to the attention of Matt Ray, MC 107-1A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78701.

TRD-200603281

Gene C. Jarmon

Chief Clerk and General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: June 14, 2006


Texas Lottery Commission

Instant Game Number 621 "Break the Bank"

1.0 Name and Style of Game.

A. The name of Instant Game No. 621 is "BREAK THE BANK". The play style is "key number match with auto win".

1.1 Price of Instant Ticket.

A. Tickets for Instant Game No. 621 shall be $2.00 per ticket.

1.2 Definitions in Instant Game No. 621.

A. Display Printing - That area of the instant game ticket outside of the area where the Overprint and Play Symbols appear.

B. Latex Overprint - The removable scratch-off covering over the Play Symbols on the front of the ticket.

C. Play Symbol - The printed data under the latex on the front of the ticket that is used to determine eligibility for a prize. Each Play Symbol is printed in Symbol font in black ink in positive except for dual-image games. The possible black play symbols are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, $1.00, $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $10.00, $20.00, $50.00, $200, $1,000, $3,000, $30,000, and MONEYSTACK SYMBOL.

D. Play Symbol Caption - The printed material appearing below each Play Symbol which explains the Play Symbol. One caption appears under each Play Symbol and is printed in caption font in black ink in positive. The Play Symbol Caption which corresponds with and verifies each Play Symbol is as follows:

Figure 1: GAME NO. 621 - 1.2D

E. Retailer Validation Code - Three (3) letters found under the removable scratch-off covering in the play area, which retailers use to verify and validate instant winners. These three (3) small letters are for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The possible validation codes are: Table 2 of this section.

Figure 2: GAME NO. 621 - 1.2E

Low-tier winning tickets use the required codes listed in Figure 2. Non-winning tickets and high-tier tickets use a non-required combination of the required codes listed in Figure 2 with the exception of ∅, which will only appear on low-tier winners and will always have a slash through it.

F. Serial Number - A unique 13 (thirteen) digit number appearing under the latex scratch-off covering on the front of the ticket. There is a boxed four (4) digit Security Number placed randomly within the Serial Number. The remaining nine (9) digits of the Serial Number are the Validation Number. The Serial Number is positioned beneath the bottom row of play data in the scratched-off play area. The Serial Number is for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The format will be: 0000000000000.

G. Low-Tier Prize - A prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $8.00, $10.00, $12.00 or $20.00.

H. Mid-Tier Prize - A prize of $50.00 or $200.

I. High-Tier Prize - A prize of $1,000, $3,000 or $30,000.

J. Bar Code - A 22 (twenty-two) character interleaved two (2) of five (5) bar code which will include a three (3) digit game ID, the seven (7) digit pack number, the three (3) digit ticket number and the nine (9) digit Validation Number. The bar code appears on the back of the ticket.

K. Pack-Ticket Number - A 13 (thirteen) digit number consisting of the three (3) digit game number (621), a seven (7) digit pack number, and a three (3) digit ticket number. Ticket numbers start with 001and end with 250 within each pack. The format will be: 621 -0000001-001.

L. Pack - A pack of "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game tickets contains 250 tickets, packed in plastic shrink-wrapping and fanfolded in pages of two (2). Tickets 001 and 002 will be on the top page; tickets 003 and 004 on the next page; etc.; and tickets 249 and 250 will be on the last page. Please note the books will be in a A - B configuration.

M. Non-Winning Ticket - A ticket which is not programmed to be a winning ticket or a ticket that does not meet all of the requirements of these Game Procedures, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), and applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401.

N. Ticket or Instant Game Ticket, or Instant Ticket - A Texas Lottery "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game No. 621 ticket.

2.0 Determination of Prize Winners. The determination of prize winners is subject to the general ticket validation requirements set forth in Texas Lottery Rule 401.302, Instant Game Rules, these Game Procedures, and the requirements set out on the back of each instant ticket. A prize winner in the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game is determined once the latex on the ticket is scratched off to expose 19 (nineteen) play symbols. If the player matches any of YOUR NUMBERS play symbols to any of the 3 LUCKY NUMBERS play symbols, the player wins the prize shown for that number. If the player reveals a "moneystack" symbol, the player wins the prize instantly. No portion of the display printing nor any extraneous matter whatsoever shall be usable or playable as a part of the Instant Game.

2.1 Instant Ticket Validation Requirements.

A. To be a valid Instant Game ticket, all of the following requirements must be met:

1. Exactly 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must appear under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket;

2. Each of the Play Symbols must have a Play Symbol Caption underneath, unless specified, and each Play Symbol must agree with its Play Symbol Caption;

3. Each of the Play Symbols must be present in its entirety and be fully legible;

4. Each of the Play Symbols must be printed in black ink except for dual image games;

5. The ticket shall be intact;

6. The Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be present in their entirety and be fully legible;

7. The Serial Number must correspond, using the Texas Lottery's codes, to the Play Symbols on the ticket;

8. The ticket must not have a hole punched through it, be mutilated, altered, unreadable, reconstituted or tampered with in any manner;

9. The ticket must not be counterfeit in whole or in part;

10. The ticket must have been issued by the Texas Lottery in an authorized manner;

11. The ticket must not have been stolen, nor appear on any list of omitted tickets or non-activated tickets on file at the Texas Lottery;

12. The Play Symbols, Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be right side up and not reversed in any manner;

13. The ticket must be complete and not miscut, and have exactly 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket, exactly one Serial Number, exactly one Retailer Validation Code, and exactly one Pack-Ticket Number on the ticket;

14. The Serial Number of an apparent winning ticket shall correspond with the Texas Lottery's Serial Numbers for winning tickets, and a ticket with that Serial Number shall not have been paid previously;

15. The ticket must not be blank or partially blank, misregistered, defective or printed or produced in error;

16. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols must be exactly one of those described in Section 1.2.C of these Game Procedures;

17. Each of the 19 (nineteen) Play Symbols on the ticket must be printed in the Symbol font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; the ticket Serial Numbers must be printed in the Serial font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and the Pack-Ticket Number must be printed in the Pack-Ticket Number font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;

18. The display printing on the ticket must be regular in every respect and correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and

19. The ticket must have been received by the Texas Lottery by applicable deadlines.

B. The ticket must pass all additional validation tests provided for in these Game Procedures, the Texas Lottery's Rules governing the award of prizes of the amount to be validated, and any confidential validation and security tests of the Texas Lottery.

C. Any Instant Game ticket not passing all of the validation requirements is void and ineligible for any prize and shall not be paid. However, the Executive Director may, solely at the Executive Director's discretion, refund the retail sales price of the ticket. In the event a defective ticket is purchased, the only responsibility or liability of the Texas Lottery shall be to replace the defective ticket with another unplayed ticket in that Instant Game (or a ticket of equivalent sales price from any other current Instant Lottery game) or refund the retail sales price of the ticket, solely at the Executive Director's discretion.

2.2 Programmed Game Parameters.

A. Consecutive non-winning tickets will not have identical play data, spot for spot.

B. Non-winning prize symbols will not match a winning prize symbol on a ticket.

C. No duplicate Lucky Numbers on a ticket.

D. There will be no correlation between the matching symbols and the prize amount.

E. The auto win symbol will never appear more than once on a ticket.

F. No duplicate non-winning play symbols on a ticket.

2.3 Procedure for Claiming Prizes.

A. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $2.00, $4.00, $6.00, $8.00, $10.00, $12.00, $20.00, $50.00 or $200, a claimant shall sign the back of the ticket in the space designated on the ticket and present the winning ticket to any Texas Lottery Retailer. The Texas Lottery Retailer shall verify the claim and, if valid, and upon presentation of proper identification, make payment of the amount due the claimant and physically void the ticket; provided that the Texas Lottery Retailer may, but is not in some cases, required to pay a $50.00 or $200 ticket. In the event the Texas Lottery Retailer cannot verify the claim, the Texas Lottery Retailer shall provide the claimant with a claim form and instruct the claimant on how to file a claim with the Texas Lottery. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, a check shall be forwarded to the claimant in the amount due. In the event the claim is not validated, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly. A claimant may also claim any of the above prizes under the procedure described in Section 2.3.B and 2.3.C of these Game Procedures.

B. To claim a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize of $1,000, $3,000 or $30,000, the claimant must sign the winning ticket and present it at one of the Texas Lottery's Claim Centers. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, payment will be made to the bearer of the validated winning ticket for that prize upon presentation of proper identification. When paying a prize of $600 or more, the Texas Lottery shall file the appropriate income reporting form with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and shall withhold federal income tax at a rate set by the IRS if required. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

C. As an alternative method of claiming a "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game prize, the claimant must sign the winning ticket, thoroughly complete a claim form, and mail both to: Texas Lottery Commission, Post Office Box 16600, Austin, Texas 78761-6600. The risk of sending a ticket remains with the claimant. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

D. Prior to payment by the Texas Lottery of any prize, the Texas Lottery shall deduct a sufficient amount from the winnings of a person who has been finally determined to be:

1. delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the Comptroller, the Texas Workforce Commission, or Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;

2. delinquent in making child support payments administered or collected by the Attorney General; or

3. delinquent in reimbursing the Texas Health and Human Services Commission for a benefit granted in error under the food stamp program or the program of financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resource Code;

4. in default on a loan made under Chapter 52, Education Code; or

5. in default on a loan guaranteed under Chapter 57, Education Code.

E. If a person is indebted or owes delinquent taxes to the State, other than those specified in the preceding paragraph, the winnings of a person shall be withheld until the debt or taxes are paid.

2.4 Allowance for Delay of Payment. The Texas Lottery may delay payment of the prize pending a final determination by the Executive Director, under any of the following circumstances:

A. if a dispute occurs, or it appears likely that a dispute may occur, regarding the prize;

B. if there is any question regarding the identity of the claimant;

C. if there is any question regarding the validity of the ticket presented for payment; or

D. if the claim is subject to any deduction from the payment otherwise due, as described in Section 2.3.D of these Game Procedures. No liability for interest for any delay shall accrue to the benefit of the claimant pending payment of the claim.

2.5 Payment of Prizes to Persons Under 18. If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of less than $600 from the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deliver to an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian a check or warrant in the amount of the prize payable to the order of the minor.

2.6 If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of more than $600 from the "BREAK THE BANK" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deposit the amount of the prize in a custodial bank account, with an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian serving as custodian for the minor.

2.7 Instant Ticket Claim Period. All Instant Game prizes must be claimed within 180 days following the end of the Instant Game or within the applicable time period for certain eligible military personnel as set forth in Texas Government Code §466.408. Any prize not claimed within that period, and in the manner specified in these Game Procedures and on the back of each ticket, shall be forfeited.

2.8 Disclaimer. The number of prizes in a game is approximate based on the number of tickets ordered. The number of actual prizes available in a game may vary based on number of tickets manufactured, testing, distribution, sales and number of prizes claimed. An Instant Game ticket may continue to be sold even when all the top prizes have been claimed.

3.0 Instant Ticket Ownership.

A. Until such time as a signature is placed upon the back portion of an Instant Game ticket in the space designated, a ticket shall be owned by the physical possessor of said ticket. When a signature is placed on the back of the ticket in the space designated, the player whose signature appears in that area shall be the owner of the ticket and shall be entitled to any prize attributable thereto. Notwithstanding any name or names submitted on a claim form, the Executive Director shall make payment to the player whose signature appears on the back of the ticket in the space designated. If more than one name appears on the back of the ticket, the Executive Director will require that one of those players whose name appears thereon be designated by such players to receive payment.

B. The Texas Lottery shall not be responsible for lost or stolen Instant Game tickets and shall not be required to pay on a lost or stolen Instant Game ticket.

4.0 Number and Value of Instant Prizes. There will be approximately 10,080,000 tickets in the Instant Game No. 621. The approximate number and value of prizes in the game are as follows:

Figure 3: GAME NO. 621 - 4.0

A. The actual number of tickets in the game may be increased or decreased at the sole discretion of the Texas Lottery.

5.0 End of the Instant Game. The Executive Director may, at any time, announce a closing date (end date) for the Instant Game No. 621 without advance notice, at which point no further tickets in that game may be sold.

6.0 Governing Law. In purchasing an Instant Game ticket, the player agrees to comply with, and abide by, these Game Procedures for Instant Game No. 621, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401, and all final decisions of the Executive Director.

TRD-200603262

Kimberly L. Kiplin

General Counsel

Texas Lottery Commission

Filed: June 14, 2006


Instant Game Number 687 "$50,000 Payday"

1.0 Name and Style of Game.

A. The name of Instant Game No. 687 is "$50,000 PAYDAY". The play style is "key number match with auto win".

1.1 Price of Instant Ticket.

A. Tickets for Instant Game No. 687 shall be $5.00 per ticket.

1.2 Definitions in Instant Game No. 687.

A. Display Printing - That area of the instant game ticket outside of the area where the Overprint and Play Symbols appear.

B. Latex Overprint - The removable scratch-off covering over the Play Symbols on the front of the ticket.

C. Play Symbol - The printed data under the latex on the front of the instant ticket that is used to determine eligibility for a prize. Each Play Symbol is printed in Symbol font in black ink in positive except for dual-image games. The possible black play symbols are: $5.00, $10.00, $15.00, $25.00, $50.00, $100, $500, $5,000, $50,000, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, MONEY STACK SYMBOL and COIN SYMBOL.

D. Play Symbol Caption - The printed material appearing below each Play Symbol which explains the Play Symbol. One caption appears under each Play Symbol and is printed in caption font in black ink in positive. The Play Symbol Caption which corresponds with and verifies each Play Symbol is as follows:

Figure 1: GAME NO. 687 - 1.2D

E. Retailer Validation Code - Three (3) letters found under the removable scratch-off covering in the play area, which retailers use to verify and validate instant winners. These three (3) small letters are for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The possible validation codes are:

Figure 2: GAME NO. 687 - 1.2E

Low-tier winning tickets use the required codes listed in Figure 2. Non-winning tickets and high-tier tickets use a non-required combination of the required codes listed in Figure 2 with the exception of ∅, which will only appear on low-tier winners and will always have a slash through it.

F. Serial Number - A unique 13 (thirteen) digit number appearing under the latex scratch-off covering on the front of the ticket. There is a boxed four (4) digit Security Number placed randomly within the Serial Number. The remaining nine (9) digits of the Serial Number are the Validation Number. The Serial Number is positioned beneath the bottom row of play data in the scratched-off play area. The Serial Number is for validation purposes and cannot be used to play the game. The format will be: 0000000000000.

G. Low-Tier Prize - A prize of $5.00, $10.00 or $15.00.

H. Mid-Tier Prize - A prize of $25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500.

I. High-Tier Prize - A prize of $5,000 or $50,000.

J. Bar Code - A 22 (twenty-two) character interleaved two (2) of five (5) bar code which will include a three (3) digit game ID, the seven (7) digit pack number, the three (3) digit ticket number and the nine (9) digit Validation Number. The bar code appears on the back of the ticket.

K. Pack-Ticket Number - A 13 (thirteen) digit number consisting of the three (3) digit game number (687), a seven (7) digit pack number, and a three (3) digit ticket number. Ticket numbers start with 001 and end with 075 within each pack. The format will be: 687-0000001-001.

L. Pack - A pack of "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game tickets contains 075 tickets, packed in plastic shrink-wrapping and fanfolded in pages of one (1). Ticket 001 will be shown on the front of the pack; the back of ticket 075 will be revealed on the back of the pack. All packs will be tightly shrink-wrapped. There will be no breaks between the tickets in a pack. Every other book will reverse i.e., reverse order will be; the back of ticket 001 will be shown on the front of the pack and the front of ticket 075 will be shown on the back of the pack.

M. Non-Winning Ticket - A ticket which is not programmed to be a winning ticket or a ticket that does not meet all of the requirements of these Game Procedures, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), and applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401.

N. Ticket or Instant Game Ticket, or Instant Ticket - A Texas Lottery "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game No. 687 ticket.

2.0 Determination of Prize Winners. The determination of prize winners is subject to the general ticket validation requirements set forth in Texas Lottery Rule 401.302, Instant Game Rules, these Game Procedures, and the requirements set out on the back of each instant ticket. A prize winner in the "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game is determined once the latex on the ticket is scratched off to expose 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols. If a player matches any of YOUR NUMBERS play symbols to any of the WINNING NUMBERS play symbols, the player wins the prize shown for that number. If a player reveals a "coin" symbol, the player wins the prize shown instantly. If a player reveals a "money stack" symbol, the player wins DOUBLE the prize shown for that symbol. No portion of the display printing nor any extraneous matter whatsoever shall be usable or playable as a part of the Instant Game.

2.1 Instant Ticket Validation Requirements.

A. To be a valid Instant Game ticket, all of the following requirements must be met:

1. Exactly 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols must appear under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket;

2. Each of the Play Symbols must have a Play Symbol Caption underneath, unless specified, and each Play Symbol must agree with its Play Symbol Caption;

3. Each of the Play Symbols must be present in its entirety and be fully legible;

4. Each of the Play Symbols must be printed in black ink except for dual image games;

5. The ticket shall be intact;

6. The Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be present in their entirety and be fully legible;

7. The Serial Number must correspond, using the Texas Lottery's codes, to the Play Symbols on the ticket;

8. The ticket must not have a hole punched through it, be mutilated, altered, unreadable, reconstituted or tampered with in any manner;

9. The ticket must not be counterfeit in whole or in part;

10. The ticket must have been issued by the Texas Lottery in an authorized manner;

11. The ticket must not have been stolen, nor appear on any list of omitted tickets or non-activated tickets on file at the Texas Lottery;

12. The Play Symbols, Serial Number, Retailer Validation Code and Pack-Ticket Number must be right side up and not reversed in any manner;

13. The ticket must be complete and not miscut, and have exactly 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols under the latex overprint on the front portion of the ticket, exactly one Serial Number, exactly one Retailer Validation Code, and exactly one Pack-Ticket Number on the ticket;

14. The Serial Number of an apparent winning ticket shall correspond with the Texas Lottery's Serial Numbers for winning tickets, and a ticket with that Serial Number shall not have been paid previously;

15. The ticket must not be blank or partially blank, misregistered, defective or printed or produced in error;

16. Each of the 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols must be exactly one of those described in Section 1.2.C of these Game Procedures;

17. Each of the 43 (forty-three) Play Symbols on the ticket must be printed in the Symbol font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; the ticket Serial Numbers must be printed in the Serial font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and the Pack-Ticket Number must be printed in the Pack-Ticket Number font and must correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery;

18. The display printing on the ticket must be regular in every respect and correspond precisely to the artwork on file at the Texas Lottery; and

19. The ticket must have been received by the Texas Lottery by applicable deadlines.

B. The ticket must pass all additional validation tests provided for in these Game Procedures, the Texas Lottery's Rules governing the award of prizes of the amount to be validated, and any confidential validation and security tests of the Texas Lottery.

C. Any Instant Game ticket not passing all of the validation requirements is void and ineligible for any prize and shall not be paid. However, the Executive Director may, solely at the Executive Director's discretion, refund the retail sales price of the ticket. In the event a defective ticket is purchased, the only responsibility or liability of the Texas Lottery shall be to replace the defective ticket with another unplayed ticket in that Instant Game (or a ticket of equivalent sales price from any other current Instant Lottery game) or refund the retail sales price of the ticket, solely at the Executive Director's discretion.

2.2 Programmed Game Parameters.

A. Consecutive non-winning tickets within a book will not have identical patterns.

B. Players can win up to twenty (20) times in this play area.

C. No duplicate non-winning YOUR NUMBERS on a ticket.

D. Non-winning prize symbols will not match a winning prize symbol on a ticket.

E. On all tickets, a non-winning prize will never occur more than three (3) times.

F. No duplicate WINNING NUMBERS will appear on a ticket.

G. The "money stack" symbol and "coin" symbol will never appear as a "WINNING NUMBER".

H. The "money stack" symbol will win DOUBLE the prize amount shown and will win as per the prize structure.

I. The "money stack" and "coin" symbols may appear on the same winning ticket.

J. The "coin" symbol will win the prize amount shown below it automatically.

K. The "coin" symbol will never appear more than once on a ticket.

L. YOUR NUMBERS will never equal the corresponding Prize symbol.

2.3 Procedure for Claiming Prizes.

A. To claim a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game prize of $5.00, $10.00, $15.00, $25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500, a claimant shall sign the back of the ticket in the space designated on the ticket and present the winning ticket to any Texas Lottery Retailer. The Texas Lottery Retailer shall verify the claim and, if valid, and upon presentation of proper identification, make payment of the amount due the claimant and physically void the ticket; provided that the Texas Lottery Retailer may, but is not, in some cases, required to pay a $25.00, $50.00, $100 or $500 ticket. In the event the Texas Lottery Retailer cannot verify the claim, the Texas Lottery Retailer shall provide the claimant with a claim form and instruct the claimant on how to file a claim with the Texas Lottery. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, a check shall be forwarded to the claimant in the amount due. In the event the claim is not validated, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly. A claimant may also claim any of the above prizes under the procedure described in Section 2.3.B and Section 2.3.C of these Game Procedures.

B. To claim a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game prize of $5,000 or $50,000, the claimant must sign the winning ticket and present it at one of the Texas Lottery's Claim Centers. If the claim is validated by the Texas Lottery, payment will be made to the bearer of the validated winning ticket for that prize upon presentation of proper identification. When paying a prize of $600 or more, the Texas Lottery shall file the appropriate income reporting form with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and shall withhold federal income tax at a rate set by the IRS if required. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

C. As an alternative method of claiming a "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game prize, the claimant must sign the winning ticket, thoroughly complete a claim form, and mail both to: Texas Lottery Commission, Post Office Box 16600, Austin, Texas 78761-6600. The risk of sending a ticket remains with the claimant. In the event that the claim is not validated by the Texas Lottery, the claim shall be denied and the claimant shall be notified promptly.

D. Prior to payment by the Texas Lottery of any prize, the Texas Lottery shall deduct a sufficient amount from the winnings of a person who has been finally determined to be:

1. delinquent in the payment of a tax or other money collected by the Comptroller, the Texas Workforce Commission, or Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission;

2. delinquent in making child support payments administered or collected by the Attorney General;

3. delinquent in reimbursing the Texas Health and Human Services Commission for a benefit granted in error under the food stamp program or the program of financial assistance under Chapter 31, Human Resources Code;

4. in default on a loan made under Chapter 52, Education Code; or

5. in default on a loan guaranteed under Chapter 57, Education Code.

E. If a person is indebted or owes delinquent taxes to the State, other than those specified in the preceding paragraph, the winnings of a person shall be withheld until the debt or taxes are paid.

2.4 Allowance for Delay of Payment. The Texas Lottery may delay payment of the prize pending a final determination by the Executive Director, under any of the following circumstances:

A. if a dispute occurs, or it appears likely that a dispute may occur, regarding the prize;

B. if there is any question regarding the identity of the claimant;

C. if there is any question regarding the validity of the ticket presented for payment; or

D. if the claim is subject to any deduction from the payment otherwise due, as described in Section 2.3.D of these Game Procedures. No liability for interest for any delay shall accrue to the benefit of the claimant pending payment of the claim.

2.5 Payment of Prizes to Persons Under 18. If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of less than $600 from the "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deliver to an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian a check or warrant in the amount of the prize payable to the order of the minor.

2.6 If a person under the age of 18 years is entitled to a cash prize of more than $600 from the "$50,000 PAYDAY" Instant Game, the Texas Lottery shall deposit the amount of the prize in a custodial bank account, with an adult member of the minor's family or the minor's guardian serving as custodian for the minor.

2.7 Instant Ticket Claim Period. All Instant Game prizes must be claimed within 180 days following the end of the Instant Game or within the applicable time period for certain eligible military personnel as set forth in Texas Government Code §466.408. Any prize not claimed within that period, and in the manner specified in these Game Procedures and on the back of each ticket, shall be forfeited.

2.8 Disclaimer. The number of prizes in a game is approximate based on the number of tickets ordered. The number of actual prizes available in a game may vary based on number of tickets manufactured, testing, distribution, sales and number of prizes claimed. An Instant Game ticket may continue to be sold even when all the top prizes have been claimed.

3.0 Instant Ticket Ownership.

A. Until such time as a signature is placed upon the back portion of an Instant Game ticket in the space designated, a ticket shall be owned by the physical possessor of said ticket. When a signature is placed on the back of the ticket in the space designated, the player whose signature appears in that area shall be the owner of the ticket and shall be entitled to any prize attributable thereto. Notwithstanding any name or names submitted on a claim form, the Executive Director shall make payment to the player whose signature appears on the back of the ticket in the space designated. If more than one name appears on the back of the ticket, the Executive Director will require that one of those players whose name appears thereon be designated by such players to receive payment.

B. The Texas Lottery shall not be responsible for lost or stolen Instant Game tickets and shall not be required to pay on a lost or stolen Instant Game ticket.

4.0 Number and Value of Instant Prizes. There will be approximately 5,040,000 tickets in the Instant Game No. 687. The approximate number and value of prizes in the game are as follows:

Figure 3: GAME NO. 687 - 4.0

A. The actual number of tickets in the game may be increased or decreased at the sole discretion of the Texas Lottery Commission.

5.0 End of the Instant Game. The Executive Director may, at any time, announce a closing date (end date) for the Instant Game No. 687 without advance notice, at which point no further tickets in that game may be sold.

6.0 Governing Law. In purchasing an Instant Game ticket, the player agrees to comply with, and abide by, these Game Procedures for Instant Game No. 687, the State Lottery Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 466), applicable rules adopted by the Texas Lottery pursuant to the State Lottery Act and referenced in 16 TAC, Chapter 401, and all final decisions of the Executive Director.

TRD-200603263

Kimberly L. Kiplin

General Counsel

Texas Lottery Commission

Filed: June 14, 2006


Panhandle Regional Planning Commission

Legal Notice

The Panhandle Regional Planning Commission (PRPC) expects to issue a Request for Proposals seeking a qualified contractor to manage the delivery of federal and state funded child care services in the 26 counties of the Panhandle Workforce Development Area.

The award will be based primarily on a proposer's qualifications; organizational, administrative and fiscal capabilities; service delivery abilities and strategies; and costs effectiveness. Proposers must be willing to provide services in all counties and operate on a cost reimbursement basis. The initial funding period for the contract to be awarded as a result of this solicitation is expected to be from October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. Contract renewals may be awarded for up to three additional one-year periods. Such renewals will be subject to criteria that include acceptable performance, continued qualification to perform associated work and mutual agreement of the parties.

Organizations interested in submitting a proposal are encouraged to attend a Proposer's Conference at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 in the PRPC 3rd Floor Conference Room, 415 West Eighth Avenue, Amarillo, Texas. Sealed proposals must be submitted to PRPC by 3:00 p.m. on Friday, July 28, 2006. A copy of the Request for Proposals may be obtained by contacting Tony White, Workforce Development Budget, Contracts and Monitoring Manager at (806) 372-3381 or (800) 477-4562.

TRD-200603231

Anthony White

WFD Budget, Contracts and Monitoring Manager

Panhandle Regional Planning Commission

Filed: June 13, 2006


Public Utility Commission of Texas

Additional Notice of Application for Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas of an application on April 26, 2006, for a service provider certificate of operating authority (SPCOA), pursuant to §§54.151 - 54.156 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). A summary of the application follows.

Docket Title and Number: Application of Clearwire Telecommunications Services, LLC for a Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority, Docket Number 32650 before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Applicant intends to provide T1-Private Line, and DSI or higher capacity transport, special access & 911 access.

Applicant's initial requested SPCOA geographic area includes the area of Texas currently served by AT&T Texas and Verizon Southwest. Additional geographic areas included in the application amendment of June 1, 2006, are Taylor Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Valor Telecommunications of Texas, Texas-ALLTEL, Inc., ALLTEL (d/b/a Sugarland Telephone Company) and Sprint-Centel (d/b/a Sprint Communications Company, L.P.).

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32650.

TRD-200603237

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Application for Amendment to Certificated Service Area Boundary

Notice is given to the public of an application filed on June 9, 2006, with the Public Utility Commission of Texas, for an amendment to a certificated service area boundary in Wilson County, Texas.

Docket Style and Number: Application of AT&T Texas to Amend Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to Modify the Service Area Boundaries of the Elmendorf Zone (San Antonio) and the Floresville Exchange (Verizon); Docket Number 32805.

The Application: The minor boundary amendment is being filed to realign the boundary between AT&T Texas's Elmendorf Zone of the San Antonio metropolitan exchange and Verizon's Floresville exchange to allow AT&T to provide local exchange telephone service to a proposed new subdivision. The proposed boundary amendment will transfer a small portion of territory from Verizon to AT&T Texas. Verizon has provided a letter of concurrence endorsing this proposed change.

Persons wishing to comment on the action sought or intervene should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by June 30, 2006, by mail at P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll-free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free) 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32805.

TRD-200603235

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Application for Amendment to Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority

On June 8, 2006, Trans Texas Technologies filed an application with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (Commission) to amend its service provider certificate of operating authority (SPCOA) granted in SPCOA Certificate Number 60435. Applicant intends to reflect a change in its service area to include the entire State of Texas.

The Application: Application of Trans Texas Technologies for an Amendment to its Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority, Docket Number 32798.

Persons wishing to comment on the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32798.

TRD-200603238

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Application to Amend Certificated Service Area Boundaries

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas of an application filed on June 6, 2006, for an amendment to certificated service area boundaries within Cameron County, Texas.

Docket Style and Number: Application of the Brownsville Public Utilities Board (BPUB) to Amend a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for Service Area Boundaries within Cameron County (East Bank Subdivision); Docket Number 32790.

The Application: The application encompasses an area of land which is singly certificated to American Electric Power Company (AEP), formerly known as Central Power & Light (CP&L), and is within the corporate limits of the City of Brownsville. BPUB received a letter request from Ron Valentin requesting BPUB to provide electric utility service to a proposed 100.33 acre subdivision located in northwest Brownsville. The estimated cost to BPUB to provide service to this proposed area is $434,041.66. The area is presently undeveloped. If the application is granted the area would be dually certificated for electric service.

Persons wishing to comment on the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas no later than June 30, 2006, by mail at P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll-free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free) 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32790.

TRD-200603236

Adriana A. Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 13, 2006


Notice of Petition for Waiver of Denial of Request for Number Block

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) of a petition on June 6, 2006, for waiver of denial by the North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA) Pooling Administrator (PA) of Time Warner Telecom of Texas, L.P.'s (TWTC) request for an additional thousands block in the Georgetown, Texas rate center.

Docket Title and Number: Petition of Time Warner Telecom of Texas, L.P. for State Waiver to Obtain an Individual Growth Block from Pooling Administrator. Docket Number 32792.

The Application: TWTC requested an additional thousands block to allow it to have the ability to offer local two-way calling and extended metro service in the Georgetown, Texas rate center.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas by mail at P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or by phone at (512) 936-7120 or toll free at 1-888-782-8477 no later than June 28, 2006. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or toll free at 1-800-735-2989. All comments should reference Docket Number 32792.

TRD-200603101

Adriana Gonzales

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 8, 2006


Texas Residential Construction Commission

Notice of Applications for Designation as a "Texas Star Builder"

The Texas Residential Construction (commission) adopted rules regarding the procedures for designation as a "Texas Star Builder" at 10 TAC §303.300. The rules were adopted pursuant to §416.011, Property Code (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003), which provides that the commission shall establish rules and procedures through which a builder can be designated as a "Texas Star Builder." The commission rules for application for designation can be found on the commission's website at www.trcc.state.tx.us.

10 TAC §303.300(i)(2) requires the commission to publish in the Texas Register notice of the application of each person seeking to become designated as a "Texas Star Builder" registered under this subchapter. The commission will accept public comment on each application for twenty-one (21) days after the date of publication of the notice. Information provided in response to this notice will be utilized in evaluating the applicants for approval. The Texas Star Builder designation requires that a builder or remodeler demonstrate that its education, experience, and commitment to professionalism sets the builder or remodeler apart from its peers and offers some assurance to its customers that its quality of service and construction will be above average.

Pursuant to 10 TAC § 303.300(i)(2), the commission hereby notices the application(s) for designation as a "Texas Star Builder" of:

Crawford Renovation Group, Inc., 9019 Pagewood, Houston, Texas 77063. Crawford Renovation Group, Inc., holds TRCC builder registration #11426. The applicant's registered agent is Benjamin Crawford.

Interested persons may send written comments regarding this application to Susan K. Durso, General Counsel, Texas Residential Construction Commission, P. O. Box 13144, Austin, Texas 78711-3144. Comments regarding this application will be accepted for twenty-one days following the date of publication of this notice in the Texas Register . Thereafter, the comments will not be considered as timely filed.

TRD-200603271

Christopher Burnett

Assistant General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Filed: June 14, 2006


Texas Tech University System

Notice of Request for Legal Counsel for Intellectual Property

Research and scholarship on the part of members of the faculty, staff, and students of Texas Tech will result in inventions, biological materials and other proprietary materials, plants, manuscripts, patentable and non-patentable, computer software, and trade secrets or other products, medical treatments and devices that are potentially marketable and the rights in which should be adequately protected. For assistance with such issues, Texas Tech will engage outside counsel for review of and advice regarding intellectual property matters as they relate to academia and medical technology, including evaluating patentability of technologies, preparing, filing, prosecuting, and maintaining patent applications, dealing with United States Patent Office, including response to Office Actions from the Patent Office, and assuring payment of issue and maintenance fees. Texas Tech will also engage outside counsel from time to time to pursue litigation against infringers of intellectual property rights. The law firm/attorney must be admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Responses to this RFP should include at least the following:

(1) description of the firms or attorneys for performing legal services, including prior experience in intellectual property matters, specifically as they relate to institutions of higher education and schools of medicine, your firm's experience in the field of patent law, including the size and scope of the practice, the number of attorneys active in the practice and other resources of the firm relevant to the practice;

(2) the names, experience and technical expertise of each attorney who may be assigned to work on such matters;

(3) the availability of the lead attorney and others assigned to the project;

(4) appropriate information regarding efforts made by the firm to encourage and develop the participation of minorities and women in the provision of legal services;

(5) submission of fee information (either in the form of hourly billing rates for each attorney and other staff members who may be assigned to perform such services in relation to Texas Tech's intellectual property matters, comprehensive flat fees, or other fee arrangements directly related to the achievement of specific goals and cost controls) and billable expenses;

(6) a comprehensive description of the procedures to be used by the firm to supervise the provision of legal services in a timely and cost-effective manner;

(7) full contact information for the firm;

(8) disclosures of conflicts of interest, identifying each and every matter in which the firm has, within the past calendar year, represented any entity or individual with an interest adverse to Texas Tech or any component entity, the State of Texas, or any of its board, agencies, commissions, universities, or elected or appointed officials(s); and

(9) confirmation of willingness to comply with Texas Tech's and the Texas Attorney General's policies, directives, and guidelines.

Proposals sent in response to this RFP will be evaluated in light of several criteria, including: expertise, availability of a lead attorney, prior experience in handling intellectual property matters relating to higher education and schools of medicine, procedures for providing timely and cost-effective services, and reasonableness of fees. Although the fee structure and overall cost of this representation will be an important factor in evaluating proposals submitted in response to this RFP, the successful firm(s) will clearly demonstrate exceptional expertise and experience with the intellectual property matters made the subject of this RFP.

Proposals must remain firm as to services and fees for 90 days. No proposals will be accepted by oral communication, electronic mail, telegraphic transmission, or facsimile transmission.

Three copies of the proposal are requested. The proposal should be typed, preferably double-spaced, on 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper with all pages sequentially numbered, and either stapled or bound together. They should be sent by mail or delivered in person, marked "RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSEL" and addressed to Jennifer Adling, Director of Contracting, as set forth below.

All questions shall be submitted through the Contracting Office in writing. Oral responses to questions will not be binding on the University. Questions may be submitted by Fax (806) 742-0350 or email jennifer.adling@ttu.edu.

The proposal should describe the scope of services and the deliverables to be provided. An original and three copies of the proposal should be submitted in writing by 3:00 p.m., central time, July 21, 2006 to:

Jennifer Adling

Director of Contracting

Texas Tech University

15th Street & University Avenue

327 Drane Hall

Lubbock, Texas 79409-1101

(806) 742-3841

Any proposal received after the above listed time and date will be rejected as a material failure. The University is not responsible for the failure of carrier services to deliver on time.

Texas Tech University reserves the right to accept or reject any (or all) proposals submitted. Issuance of this request for proposal in no way obligates The University to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of a response.

It is the policy of the System to actively seek the involvement of Historically Underutilized Businesses (minority-owned and women-owned businesses). Accordingly, Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) qualified to do so are encouraged to submit a proposal in accordance with this RFP.

TRD-200603148

Jennifer Adling

Director of Contracting

Texas Tech University System

Filed: June 12, 2006


Texas Department of Transportation

Aviation Division - Request for Proposal for Aviation Engineering Services

The City of Wharton, through its agent the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage an aviation professional engineering firm for services pursuant to Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive proposals for professional aviation engineering design services described below:

Airport Sponsor: City of Wharton, Wharton Regional Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.:06HGWHRTN. Scope: Provide engineering/design services for site development and associated appurtenances for a pre-engineered metal aircraft hangar building system, drainage improvements, and installation of REILs at the Wharton Regional Airport.

The DBE goal is set at 0%. TxDOT Project Manager is Megan Caffall.

To assist in your proposal preparation the most recent Airport Layout Plan, 5010 drawing, and project narrative are available online at www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm by selecting "Wharton Regional Airport".

Interested firms shall utilize the latest version of Form AVN-550, titled "Aviation Engineering Services Proposal". The form may be requested from TxDOT Aviation Division, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483, phone number, 1-800-68-PILOT (74568). The form may be emailed by request or downloaded from the TxDOT web site, URL address http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avn550.doc . The form may not be altered in any way. All printing must be in black on white paper, except for the optional illustration page. Firms must carefully follow the instructions provided on each page of the form. Proposals may not exceed the number of pages in the proposal format. The proposal format consists of seven pages of data plus two optional pages consisting of an illustration page and a proposal summary page. Proposals shall be stapled but not bound in any other fashion. PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN ANY OTHER FORMAT. ATTENTION: To ensure utilization of the latest version of Form AVN-550, firms are encouraged to download Form AVN-550 from the TxDOT website as addressed above. Utilization of Form AVN-550 from a previous download may not be the exact same format. Form AVN-550 is an MS Word Template.

Please note:

Five completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550 must be received by TxDOT Aviation Division at 150 E. Riverside Drive, 5th Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than Monday, July 17, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. Electronic facsimiles or forms sent by email will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms to the attention of Amy Slaughter.

The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government members. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of proposals. The committee will review all proposals and rate and rank each. The criteria for evaluating engineering proposals can be found at http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/aviation/consultant.htm . All firms will be notified and the top rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations. The selection committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

If there are any procedural questions, please contact Amy Slaughter, Grant Manager, or Megan Caffall, Project Manager for technical questions at 1-800-68-PILOT (74568).

TRD-200603218

Bob Jackson

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Filed: June 13, 2006


Aviation Division - Request for Proposal for Aviation Engineering Services

The City of Edinburg, through its agent the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage an aviation professional engineering firm for services pursuant to Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive proposals for professional aviation engineering design services described below:

Airport Sponsor: City of Edinburg, Edinburg International Airport. TxDOT CSJ No.:06HGEDINB. Scope: Provide engineering/design services for site development and associated appurtenances for a pre-engineered metal aircraft hangar building system at the Edinburg International airport.

The DBE goal is set at 0%. TxDOT Project Manager is Megan Caffall.

To assist in your proposal preparation, the most recent Airport Layout Plan, 5010 drawing, and project narrative are available online at www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm by selecting "Edinburg International Airport."

Interested firms shall utilize the latest version of Form AVN-550, titled "Aviation Engineering Services Proposal." The form may be requested from TxDOT Aviation Division, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483, phone number, 1-800-68-PILOT (74568). The form may be e-mailed by request or downloaded from the TxDOT website, URL address http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avn550.doc . The form may not be altered in any way. All printing must be in black on white paper, except for the optional illustration page. Firms must carefully follow the instructions provided on each page of the form. Proposals may not exceed the number of pages in the proposal format. The proposal format consists of seven pages of data plus two optional pages consisting of an illustration page and a proposal summary page. Proposals shall be stapled but not bound in any other fashion. PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN ANY OTHER FORMAT. ATTENTION: To ensure utilization of the latest version of Form AVN-550, firms are encouraged to download Form AVN-550 from the TxDOT website as addressed above. Utilization of Form AVN-550 from a previous download may not be the exact same format. Form AVN-550 is an MS Word Template.

Please note:

Eight completed, unfolded copies of Form AVN-550 must be received by TxDOT, Aviation at 150 E. Riverside Drive, 5th Floor, South Tower, Austin, Texas 78704 no later than Monday, July 17, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. Electronic facsimiles or forms sent by e-mail will not be accepted. Please mark the envelope of the forms to the attention of Amy Slaughter.

The Consultant Selection Committee (committee) will be composed of local government members. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of proposals. The committee will review all proposals and rate and rank each. The criteria for evaluating engineering proposals can be found at http://www.dot.state.tx.us/services/aviation/consultant.htm . All firms will be notified and the top rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations. The committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

If there are any procedural questions, please contact Amy Slaughter, Grant Manager, or Megan Caffall, Project Manager, for technical questions at 1-800-68-PILOT (74568).

TRD-200603260

Bob Jackson

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Filed: June 14, 2006


Request for Information

REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROCUREMENT PROCESS

The Texas Department of Transportation ("TxDOT") is seeking information to assist in developing and implementing its Comprehensive Development Agreement ("CDA") procurement process. This Request for Information ("RFI") is issued solely to obtain information to assist TxDOT on an administrative level. It does not constitute a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ"), a Request for Proposals ("RFP"), or other solicitation document; nor does it represent an intention to issue an RFQ or an RFP in the future. This RFI does not commit TxDOT to contract for any supply or service whatsoever. TxDOT will not pay for any information or administrative cost incurred in response to this RFI. Responses to this RFI are due by noon, Central Daylight Time, on July 3, 2006. See Sections 3 and 4 for further information.

1. OVERVIEW

TxDOT has initiated an aggressive CDA program - working with the private sector to meet the transportation needs of the State of Texas for generations to come. A critical element of the program is the procurement process utilized to solicit proposals and select preferred partners. A sound framework for procurement will enable TxDOT to meet its objectives and provide a stable, predictable deal flow for the market over the next several years.

While TxDOT is committed to doing what is in the best interests of the taxpayers and traveling public, we strive to create a pro-business environment as well, by capturing private sector innovation in ways that are prudent. TxDOT places great importance on developing efficient, effective and transparent procurement processes. As the pace of development picks up, TxDOT wishes to engage the market to solicit feedback on our current approach and identify opportunities for improvement - building upon the lessons learned from what has proved successful in public-private partnership transactions in the United States and around the world.

By responding to this RFI, you can provide valuable input and help shape the framework for competition in Texas.

Currently, the procurement process for a "typical" CDA competition, for a project that has already reached or is near environmental clearance, consists of the key stages set forth in the following chart.

CDA Procurement Stage Chart

2. INFORMATION REQUESTED

TxDOT is interested in your views on our current and anticipated procurement processes. In responding to this RFI, TxDOT asks parties to submit their perspectives on as many of the following issues as possible. Please number the answers to match the question numbers below. In addition, please provide a brief (no more than 3 pages) summary of your organization and your previous experience with large transportation-related procurements and other relevant qualifications.

A. Procurement Timing

TxDOT aims to have aggressive procurement schedules that still provide proposers enough time to develop high quality submittals.

A1. In a standard "best value," hard price proposal process, how much time do you think TxDOT should allow for each stage of the procurement process identified in Section 1 above? The Procurement Timing column in the above chart is designed to track the estimated number of days from the issuance of the RFQ (solicited and unsolicited procurements) to reach the CDA procurement stage at issue. If helpful, you may fill in the Procurement Timing column in the chart with your estimates of the number of days needed to reach each procurement stage.

A2. In particular, how much time do you need to respond to an RFQ? What factors/characteristics of the RFQ stage dictate the amount of time needed and how predictable are these factors?

A3. How much time do you need to respond to an RFP? What factors/characteristics of the RFP stage dictate the amount of time needed and how predictable are these factors?

B. Short-Listing

In general, TxDOT believes that the short-listing process ensures not only qualified teams, but optimizes and maximizes the procurement competition and allows for one-on-one meetings in a narrowed universe.

B1. Do you support a short-listing step? Why or why not?

B2. From the perspective of a developer investing significant funds to prepare a proposal, how many teams do you believe should be short-listed (even if there are many strong teams responding to an RFQ)?

B3. What do you believe to be the most appropriate criteria for creating a short-list at the RFQ stage?

C. Proposer/Subcontractor Prequalification and Pre-Certification

TxDOT recently received legislative authority to proceed directly to the proposal stage of any CDA procurement for a design-build project. The qualifications assessment would be bypassed in favor of a prequalification and pre-certification stage for construction and engineering service providers, respectively, but only on design-build CDA projects. TxDOT currently anticipates that the design-build CDA prequalification and pre-certification program would operate very much like TxDOT's current prequalification program for highway construction projects and its current pre-certification program for engineering services with regard to meeting prequalification/pre-certification requirements on a design-build CDA project. TxDOT is in the process of drafting rules to implement this streamlined CDA process.

C1. What recommendations do you have for tailoring TxDOT's current rules governing its existing prequalification/pre-certification programs to the design-build CDA prequalification/pre-certification program?

C2. What categories of engineering services would you propose be included as categories for pre-certification for design-build CDAs?

C3. What qualification requirements would you propose be included for prequalification as a construction service provider for design-build CDAs?

D. One-On-One Meetings With Proposers

For large U.S. procurements, there has been success in the use of one-on-one meetings with individual proposers during the period prior to proposal submission. The intention of these meetings is to enable frank exchange of information, ideas, and concerns. To encourage such exchanges, TxDOT has sought to use appropriate safeguards during these meetings.

D1. Do you support one-on-one meetings (after shortlisting and before RFP issuance) for review and comment on draft procurement and contract related documents? Why or why not?

D2. For the kinds of projects that TxDOT is currently considering, how much time do you believe should be spent on this activity (that is, how many rounds of meetings between TxDOT and proposers are beneficial)?

D3. What subjects should be covered in one-on-one meetings?

D4. How can one-on-one meetings be organized to provide value to you, the proposer?

E. Project Definition/Status of Environmental Clearance

The procurement process defined in Section 1 above effectively assumes a relatively well-defined project (including environmental approvals) prior to initiating a procurement process.

E1. What are your views on waiting until a project is largely defined (including environmental approvals) before initiating a procurement process?

E2. To what extent should all projects be progressed to or near environmental approval before initiating procurement?

E3. To what extent are there circumstances under which TxDOT should seek proposals well before a project is environmentally cleared?

E4. Under what circumstances and to what extent would you accept the cost and schedule risk associated with environmental approvals (e.g., "sweat equity")?

F. Pre-Development Agreement

TxDOT and other U. S. public entities have entered into pre-development agreements with developers to utilize the private sector's innovative ideas related to project definition, delivery, and financing in order to finalize project scope. Examples of this approach are the original TTC-35 and current TTC-69 procurements.

F1. In what circumstances should TxDOT consider entering into a pre-development agreement with a developer?

F2. To what extent would you be interested in such a procurement? Why?

F3. Under what conditions would you offer "sweat equity" and other contributions in advance of a project proving feasible and ready to develop?

F4. Do you believe that the use of a pre-development agreement in the right circumstances captures private sector innovation in ways that it cannot capture with consulting resources and of sufficient value to outweigh the benefits to the public of a price-oriented competition?

G. Proposer Innovation

Through its CDA program, TxDOT seeks to capture private sector innovation, value and skills by using tools not available to it through its traditional procurement system. It does this in a variety of ways, including through the use of performance-based specifications and outcomes, among other tools.

G1. What can TxDOT do to encourage proposers bringing innovative ideas and other added value to the CDA procurement process?

G2. Is it possible to factor a proposer's innovative ideas into a procurement while still utilizing transparent selection criteria and achieving competitive pricing?

G3. Would you, as a proposer, prefer a procurement that brought you into the project development process well in advance of project feasibility or after a project's definition and feasibility was achieved? Why?

H. Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs)

In the ATC process, proposers are given the opportunity to propose value-added enhancements that require, within carefully constructed bounds, TxDOT-approved deviations from technical requirements.

H1. To what extent do you support the "alternative technical concept" process as part of the procurement process for a concession CDA?

H2. If you support ATCs, do you believe the RFP should allow proposers to incorporate them into their base proposal or offer them as options to the base proposal?

I. Alternative Configurations - Risks & Processes

I1. To what extent would you welcome the opportunity to offer an alternative configuration to a project if it meant reopening an already-received environmental approval or supplementing an environmental document in a way that would require new public hearings and additional analysis?

I2. If you support being given the opportunity described in Question I1, would you accept the delay and cost risk at the time of your selection?

I3. In the situation described in Question I1, how do you believe a selection should be made among proposers?

J. Current and Potential Use of TIFIA and PABs

Through the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act ("TIFIA"), the United States Department of Transportation ("USDOT") provides credit assistance in the form of direct loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit (rather than grants) to projects of national and regional significance.

TxDOT has been authorized, through FHWA's Special Experimental Project No. 15 ("SEP-15"), to carry out an experimental program for applying for credit assistance under the TIFIA program for up to three projects. Under this program, TxDOT would be the initial applicant for TIFIA credit assistance for a particular project. After review and approval of TxDOT's application, including a pro forma finance plan, FHWA would issue a conditional credit commitment for TIFIA assistance the successful proposer can use. The successful proposer would be given up to four months to close financing.

SAFETEA-LU authorized up to $15 billion in private activity bonds (PABs) to be issued for qualified highway or surface freight transfer facilities. TxDOT is preparing applications to the USDOT for several project-specific PAB allocations.

J1. As a proposer, how valuable to you are the TIFIA and PABs programs generally? Why?

J2. Do you find TxDOT's SEP-15 TIFIA program helpful? Why or why not? How could this system be improved upon?

J3. How should TIFIA be incorporated into the CDA procurement process outside of the process approved under SEP-15?

J4. Do you believe TIFIA and PABS will prove to be useful tools in connection with the financing of TxDOT toll concessions? Why or why not?

J5. Do you have any other suggestions for alternative approaches or refinements that would make TIFIA and PABs more useful?

K. Streamlined CDA Procurement Process

The procurement process for a CDA is a significant investment of time, energy, and resources - for both TxDOT and proposers. We are constantly seeking to vet our procurement requirements to ensure they capture value for the taxpayer without placing undue burdens on proposers.

K1. From a proposer's perspective, what opportunities exist to streamline TxDOT's current CDA procurement process or to render these processes more transparent, user friendly and/or efficient?

K2. Please comment on any specific submittal requirements or procurement requirements which are not necessary or the value of which is outweighed by the burden they create.

L. Internal TxDOT Project Development Procedures

When approaching the variety of potential projects that it could pursue, TxDOT must decide how, when and to what degree to develop a project in anticipation of a procurement for a CDA with a private developer.

L1. From what you have seen, is TxDOT using its resources (time and funds) wisely when preparing for CDA projects? Please give examples, if possible.

L2. How should TxDOT spend its limited resources to prepare projects for CDA procurements? What elements of project preparation are more important than others? What level of project development is appropriate before starting the procurement?

M. TxDOT Provision Of Data Mining Information

In order to ascertain project feasibility and to streamline the CDA procurement process, TxDOT has engaged its own consultants to perform traffic and revenue work for potential CDA projects. TxDOT provides the results from this work to project proposers so that each proposer is not required to duplicate these efforts. Additionally, TxDOT believes that this process avoids problems associated with proposers using disparate traffic and revenue data.

M1. From a proposer's perspective, is TxDOT's provision of data mining information helpful? Why or why not?

M2. How can TxDOT improve this process? How would these changes benefit the procurement?

N. Submission Of Preliminary Proposals Prior To Proposal Due Date

TxDOT is considering implementing a new step in the procurement process, wherein proposers could submit preliminary proposals before the proposal due date for review by TxDOT. The purpose of the review would be to determine responsiveness to the RFP requirements and screen for issues that might prevent a proposal from being placed in the competitive range. As part of this review, TxDOT would only contact proposers through written requests for clarification or written notices regarding issues that might prevent a proposal from being placed in the competitive range. TxDOT would not use this process to suggest improvements to a proposal or to take other actions that could be construed as negotiations. If used, TxDOT would fully describe the preliminary proposal submission and review process in the RFP.

N1. From a proposer's perspective, would a preliminary proposal submission process be helpful? Why or why not? What are the greatest benefits to this process? What are the greatest weaknesses?

N2. Assuming TxDOT includes the preliminary proposal submission process into its CDA procurements, what steps could TxDOT take to maximize the benefit of this process for proposers? Please be as specific as possible.

O. Master Utility Adjustment Agreements

Currently, in order to facilitate coordination of utility adjustment efforts, TxDOT's CDAs establish a system whereby a developer enters into a "Master Utility Adjustment Agreement" ("MUAA") with each impacted utility owner to address the specifics of its utility adjustments; TxDOT is not a party to these agreements. An MUAA can address one adjustment or a group of adjustments. If the parties need to address the adjustment of additional utilities, they amend the MUAA to include those additional utilities. The developer and the utility owners are free to determine between them which party is responsible for design and construction of each adjustment. TxDOT provides the forms to be used for the MUAA and amendments. A developer and a utility owner can negotiate changes to these forms, but TxDOT reserves the right to review and approve the final form of the MUAAs.

O1. From a proposer's perspective, do you find this process helpful? Why or why not?

O2. How can TxDOT improve this process to accommodate the needs and concerns of developers?

O3. To what extent should TxDOT be involved in the utility adjustment process?

O4. Instead of leaving a developer to enter into MUAAs with utility owners, should TxDOT enter into memoranda of agreement with affected utility owners prior to issuing an RFP, which would establish the utility owners' agreement to follow specified procedures and requirements during the adjustment process?

3. CONFIDENTIALITY/PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT

All written correspondence, exhibits, photographs, reports, other printed material, tapes, electronic disks, and other graphic and visual aids submitted to TxDOT in response to this RFI are, upon their receipt by TxDOT, the property of the State of Texas, may not be returned to the submitting parties, and are subject to the Public Information Act, Chapter 552, Texas Government Code (the "Act"). Respondents should familiarize themselves with the provisions of the Act. In no event shall the State of Texas, TxDOT, or any of their agents, representatives, consultants, directors, officers, or employees be liable to a respondent for the disclosure of all or a portion of the information submitted in response to this RFI.

4. GENERAL INFORMATION

RFI Issuance Date: June 5, 2006

RFI Closing Date: July 3, 2006

TxDOT reserves the right to modify the above anticipated schedule milestones at any time and for any reason.

At its option, TxDOT may also elect to follow up directly with respondents with more detailed questions or to clarify submissions.

Point of Contact:

Mr. Ed Pensock, Jr., P.E.

Texas Department of Transportation

Director of Corridor Systems

Texas Turnpike Authority Division

125 East 11th Street

Austin, TX 78701

(Ph): (512) 587-1940

(E-mail): epensoc@dot.state.tx.us

Please send an electronic copy of your responses to this RFI to Mr. Pensock at the E-mail address referenced above. If for any reason you cannot submit your responses electronically, please send a copy of the responses to Mr. Pensock at the address above.

TRD-200603261

Bob Jackson

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Filed: June 14, 2006


Texas Water Development Board

Request for Proposals

The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB/Board) requests, pursuant to 31 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §355.92, the submission of regional water planning proposals leading to the possible award of contracts to revise or update regional water plans as described in 31 TAC Chapter 357. In order to receive a grant, the applicant must be a political subdivision and must have been designated an eligible applicant by a regional water planning group as defined in 31 TAC §355.91. 31 TAC Chapter 355, Subchapter C provides guidance for regional water planning grants.

Description of Funding Consideration.

Total funding for activities related to the development or revision of a regional water plan shall not exceed 100 percent of the total cost of the planning for that regional water planning area as defined in 31 TAC §355.91. Funds awarded for grants under this request for proposals may total up to the amount of funds appropriated for such activities for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 biennium. The following are the characteristics of activities, which will be eligible for funding:

1. Evaluation of new water management strategies in response to changed conditions;

2. Studies that will further implementation of recommended water management strategies;

3. Refinement of water supply information or water management strategies;

4. Activities that will help overcome problems from the last round of planning;

5. Further evaluation of water management strategies, especially regional solutions, to meet needs in small communities or rural areas;

6. Reevaluation of population and demand projections only under the presence of changed conditions;

7. Interregional coordination; and

8. Administrative and public participation activities.

Funding for administrative and public participation activities will be provided to all regions in order to obtain public input, provide notice, and amend plans, as necessary. Funding for other scope-of-work activities will be awarded on a competitive basis. In the event that acceptable proposals are not submitted or that insufficient funds are available to fund priority regional water planning tasks, the TWDB retains the right to not award contract funds. Additional funding to complete the 2006-2011 planning cycle will be awarded to planning groups in the fall of 2007 based on appropriations received for the regional water planning effort during the Fiscal Year 2008-2009 biennium.

Deadline, Review Criteria, and Contact Person for Additional Information.

Five double-sided copies and an electronic version of a complete regional water planning grant proposal must be filed with the Board prior to 5:00 p.m., September 14, 2006. Proposals must be directed either in person to Phyllis Thomas, Texas Water Development Board, Stephen F. Austin Building, 1700 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas, or by mail to Phyllis Thomas, Texas Water Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, Texas 78711-3231.

Proposals will be evaluated according to 31 TAC §355.94. All potential applicants may contact the Board to obtain these guidelines and specific scoring criteria or they may be obtained from the Texas Water Development Board's webpage at: www.twdb.state.tx.us. Requests for information, the Board's rules, and instruction sheet covering the research and planning fund, may be directed to Bill Roberts at the preceding address or by calling (512) 936-0853, or by e-mail at bill.roberts@TWDB.state.tx.us.

TRD-200603279

Wendall Corrigan Braniff

General Counsel

Texas Water Development Board

Filed: June 14, 2006


Request for Qualifications for the Selection of Arbitrage Compliance Service Provider

PURPOSE

The Texas Water Development Board (the "Board") seeks proposals in response to this Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") from firms with the qualifications and experience to provide arbitrage compliance and related services as required to ensure compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 148 and Treasury regulations promulgated therein ("Section 148").

It is the policy of the Board to make a good faith effort to include participation by Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) in its contracts. HUB certified firms are for-profit business entities that are certified by the Texas General Services Commission, in accordance with that agency's rules found in Title I Texas Administrative Code §§111.11 - 111.28. HUBs and other minority and women-owned businesses capable of performing the scope of services described in this RFP are encouraged to respond.

TERM OF AGREEMENT

The contract term is to be for a two year period from September 1, 2006 to August 31, 2008, renewable, at the Board's option, for up to five years. The Board will provide notice of its decision to renew 30 days before the end of the then current contract term. The Board retains the right to negotiate all elements of the contract, including fees for renewal terms, if the renewal option is exercised. The Board also retains the right to terminate the contract for any reason and at any time upon the payment of then earned fees and expenses.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

A brief transmittal letter may accompany each proposal, which summarizes the proposal's key points and must be signed by an authorized representative who is responsible for committing the firm's resources. There is a 20-page limit including attachments and the submitted proposal must be in hard copy (no fax or email). The minimum font size must be 12 point or larger. Please restate the question at the beginning of each response and provide a separate section for that response, or indicate why no response is given.

No joint proposals should be submitted. No oral interviews are expected to be conducted. It is the expressed desire of the Board Members that arbitrage compliance service providers refrain from any contact or communication with members of the Board, key staff and our Financial Advisor or the undersigned regarding this RFQ until the selection process is completed.

It is anticipated that the arbitrage service provider will be selected at the Board meeting on Tuesday, August 15, 2006. Responses are due on Monday, July 10, 2006 by 12:00 Noon. Six (6) copies of the proposal should be delivered as follows:

Texas Water Development Board

Stephen F. Austin Bldg.

1700 N. Congress Avenue, Room 516

Austin, Texas 78701

Attention: Ms. Veronica Hinojosa-Segura

Director, Debt & Portfolio Management

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1. Perform all required calculations including a calculation of arbitrage liability not less than annually for each issue of outstanding debt (the Board currently has 31 issues that require arbitrage calculations), and not less than semi-annually for the issues with a penalty election.

2. Create and maintain records necessary to determine arbitrage liability, if any, on outstanding obligations of the Board.

3. Review reports of investment and expenditure of bond proceeds, within the meaning of Section 148, as necessary to ensure compliance with Section 148.

4. Assist the Board in preparing or causing to be prepared any schedules, reports, or records necessary to perform or support a calculation of arbitrage liability.

5. Provide the Board a report of the calculations of arbitrage liability within 60 days after the end of each State's fiscal year.

6. Prepare transmittals and forms necessary to report and pay arbitrage liability on time.

7. Provide advice and recommendation as the Board may request concerning unique or extraordinary compliance issues that may arise from time to time.

FORM OF RESPONSE

1. Overview of the Firm

Provide a description of the firm, including general experience and history with arbitrage compliance, date founded, number of offices, location and number of professionals and employees in each office, total number of employees and professionals in the firm, description of practice areas in addition to arbitrage compliance services and firm philosophy. Indicate which office(s) perform arbitrage compliance work and will be responsible for day-to-day contact with the Board. Describe structure of firm ownership (e.g., publicly held corporation, partnership, etc.) and any parents, affiliates, or subsidiaries of the firm.

2. Qualifications

A. List the experience of the firm and/or the professionals proposed to be assigned to the Board in providing arbitrage compliance services. Responses to this question should identify the client by name and state the number of bond issues covered by your retention. Also provide the type of bond issue(s) involved the par amount of the bonds, or other information relevant to establishing your firm's experience and expertise.

B. Please describe your experience, if any, in assisting a client with an audit or other regulatory proceedings related to the services solicited by this RFQ.

3. Other Services

Please describe other services that your firm offers, such as underwriting, financial advisory services, investor relation programs, or investment of bond proceeds. Please describe your experience with such services.

4. Monitoring and Compliance Plan

Describe the steps your firm would take to assume and carry out the responsibilities of the Board's arbitrage compliance provider.

5. Resumes

Provide brief resumes for those individuals who would be assigned to serve the Board. Indicate the individual's years of experience in arbitrage work, public finance, licenses or certification. Specify who would be assigned as the primary contact for the Board.

6. Business Practices

A. Please describe your firm's experience and involvement working with HUB certified firms (if your firm is not HUB certified) or as a HUB certified firm, in providing any professional services to clients or in operating your business.

B. Please describe efforts made by your firm to encourage and develop the participation of minorities and women in your firm's provision of arbitrage compliance and/or other professional services. Complete the table attached as Exhibit B.

7. Conflicts of Interest, Litigation, and Compliance History

A. Please disclose any conflicts of interest. Disclose all contractual or informal business arrangements/agreements, including fee arrangements and consulting agreements between your Firm and the Board, its staff and/or its Board, or any entity that provide services to the Board.

B. Please disclose any material litigation, administrative proceeding, violation of or investigation for, violation of any regulatory agency rules (SEC, MSRB, NASD, NYSE) in which your firm was involved, whether currently ongoing or concluded.

8. References

Provide names, addresses, and phone numbers of at least two references.

9. Fee structure

Provide your fee, by inserting a fee per calculation per issue in the appropriate column on Exhibit A.

PROPOSAL MODIFICATION

Any proposal may be modified or withdrawn at any time prior to the proposal due date. No material changes will be allowed after the expiration of the proposed due date. The Board also reserves the right to make amendments to the RFQ by giving written notice to all firms who receive the RFQ and publishing notice thereof in the Texas Register.

COSTS INCURRED IN RESPONDING

All costs directly or indirectly related to preparation of a response to this RFQ or any oral presentation required to supplement and/or clarify the RFQ which may be required by the Board shall be the sole responsibility of, and shall be borne by, your firm.

BASIS OF AWARD

The Board will make its selection based on demonstrated competence, experience, knowledge and qualifications, as well as the reasonableness of the proposed fee for the mentioned services in Exhibit A.

Firms responding are encouraged to maintain a Texas office staffed with personnel who are responsible for providing services to the Board. By this RFQ, however, the Board has not committed itself to employ an arbitrage compliance consultant. The Board reserves the right to negotiate individual elements of any proposal and to reject any and all proposals.

The Board will not participate in any programs, nor will it conduct business, with any entity that is found to knowingly discriminate against persons on the basis of race, color, gender, age, and national origin, and religion, physical or mental disability.

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

TRD-200603280

Wendall Corrigan Braniff

General Counsel

Texas Water Development Board

Filed: June 14, 2006


Brazos Valley Council of Governments

Request for Proposal - Business Training Seminar Services

On June 13, 2006 the Brazos Valley Council of Governments (BVCOG) and Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley Board (WSBVB) will release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Business Training Seminar Services. One or more trainers are needed to provide training to businesses and their staff in the Brazos Valley region (Brazos, Washington, Robertson, Burleson, Madison, Leon and Grimes counties). Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley Board will receive responses to the RFP until 4:00 P.M., CST, July 11, 2006. No responses will be accepted after this deadline. Potential respondents may view and print the RFP from the web at www.bvjobs.org. The contact person for this RFP is Anne McKibben, amckibben@bvcog.org, (979) 595-2800.

TRD-200603149

Tom Wilkinson

Executive Director

Brazos Valley Council of Governments

Filed:


Request for Qualifications - Legal Notice

Policy Studies Inc. (PSI), on behalf of Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley Centers, seeks to procure agreements with one or more eligible vendors to provide temporaries who would perform specific duties related to a variety of workforce center operations.

To be eligible for consideration, vendors will be required to provide services as specified in the Request for Quotes.

Any agreement resulting from this request for quotes will remain in effect through June 16, 2007 and may be renewed annually. Workforce Solutions Brazos Valley or PSI reserves the right to contract with multiple vendors and makes no guarantee that services from your agency will be requested.

Vendors interested in receiving a mailed copy of the Request for Quotes may contact PSI's Employment Manager, Jill Bukowski at (303) 228-9160. Responses must be returned by 5:00 pm CDT on June 28, 2006 to receive consideration.

Issued By

Policy Studies Inc.

1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 300

Denver, CO 80202

(303) 863-0900

TRD-200603147

Tom Wilkinson

Executive Director

Brazos Valley Council of Governments

Filed: June 12, 2006