Request for Opinions
RQ-0487-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Tanya S. Davis
Cooke County Attorney
Cooke County Courthouse, 3rd Floor
Gainesville, Texas 76240
Re: Whether chapter 171, Local Government Code, applies to a constable
who owns and operates a wrecker service (Request No. 0487-GA)
Briefs requested by June 26, 2006
RQ-0488-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Sterling Harmon
Gaines County Attorney
Post Office Box 1927
Seminole, Texas 79360
Re: Whether the recovery provisions of section 12.301, Parks and Wildlife
Code, apply to a person who kills a game animal under section 62.011(c) and
fails to keep the edible parts of the animal in an edible condition (Request
No. 0488-GA)
Briefs requested by June 26, 2006
RQ-0489-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Robert E. Talton
Chair, Committee on Urban Affairs
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Tax status of property owned by limited partnerships created by political
subdivisions (Request No. 0489-GA)
Briefs requested by June 26, 2006
For further information, please access the website
at www.oag.state.tx.us or call the Opinion Committee at (512) 463-2110.
TRD-200603020
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 2, 2006
RQ-0490-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Tim Curry
Tarrant County Criminal District Attorney
401 West Belknap Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0201
Re: Tax status of a partnership between a private commercial enterprise
and an economic development corporation created under section 4B of article
5190.6 Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, the Economic Development Corporation
Act of 1979 (Request No. 0490-GA)
Briefs requested by June 30, 2006
RQ-0491-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Bruce Isaacks
Denton County Criminal District Attorney
Post Office Box 2850
Denton, Texas 76202
Re: Whether the $37 filing fee adopted by House Bill 11, Seventy-ninth
Legislature, Second Called Session, should be charged in bond forfeiture cases
(Request No. 0491-GA)
Briefs requested by June 30, 2006
RQ-0492-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Robert E. Talton
Chair, Committee on Urban Affairs
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Release of a towed vehicle from a vehicle storage facility (Request
No. 0492-GA)
Briefs requested by June 30, 2006
RQ-0493-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Bruce Isaacks
Denton County Criminal District Attorney
Post Office Box 2344
Denton, Texas 76209
Re: Circumstances under which a county is required to pay for the employment
of a guardian ad litem appointed by a court in a family law matter to which
a governmental body is not a party (Request No. 0493-GA)
Briefs requested by June 30, 2006
RQ-0494-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Burt Solomons
Chair, Committee on Financial Institutions
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Whether the Board of Chiropractic Examiners may permit candidates for
a chiropractic license to complete college courses at a chiropractic college
that has been accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
or a similar agency (Request No. 0494-GA)
Briefs requested by July 1, 2006
RQ-0495-GA
Requestor:
The Honorable Leticia Van de Putte, R.Ph.
Chair, Committee on Veteran Affairs and Military Installations
Texas State Senate
Post Office Box 12068
Austin, Texas 78711-2068
Re: Whether golf carts and tractors are "motor vehicles" for purposes of
the Texas Tort Claims Act, chapter 101, Civil Practices and Remedies Code
(Request No. 0495-GA)
Briefs requested by July 1, 2006
For further information, please access the website
at www.oag.state.tx.us or call the Opinion Committee at (512) 463-2110.
TRD-200603071
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 7, 2006
Opinion No. GA-0431
The Honorable Robert E. Talton
Chair, Committee on Urban Affairs
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Whether a municipality that adopts its budget by ordinance must adopt
budget amendments by ordinance (RQ-0414-GA)
S U M M A R Y
A municipality may amend an ordinance only by adopting an act of equal
dignity. Thus a municipality that adopts its budget by ordinance may not amend
the budget by adopting a resolution, motion, or order.
A municipal governing body may expend funds only in strict compliance with
an adopted budget "except in an emergency." TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. §102.009(b)
(Vernon 1999). Even in the absence of an emergency, however, a municipal governing
body may change the budget "for municipal purposes."
Id.
§102.010.
Opinion No. GA-0432
Mr. William H. Kuntz, Jr.
Executive Director
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Post Office Box 12157
Austin, Texas 78711-2157
Re: Whether there is an irreconcilable conflict between portions of two
bills enacted by the Seventy-ninth Legislature with regard to sterilization
requirements for certain barbering and cosmetology services (RQ-0415-GA)
S U M M A R Y
A barber or cosmetologist who treats nails, hands, or feet under chapter
1601 or chapter 1602 of the Occupations Code must sterilize nondisposable
instruments with an autoclave. Likewise, the owner or manager of a barber
or cosmetology shop or school must provide an autoclave for the sterilization
of nondisposable instruments.
Opinion No. GA-0433
The Honorable David Swinford
Chair, Committee on State Affairs
Texas House of Representatives
Post Office Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Validity of a charter provision that permits a home-rule city to amend
its charter by ordinance (RQ-0416-GA)
S U M M A R Y
An amendment to a home-rule city charter that purports to grant authority
to the city to amend its charter by ordinance is void because it is inconsistent
with article XI, section 5 of the Texas Constitution, which requires all charter
amendments to be approved by a majority of qualified voters in the city. Thus,
a charter amendment adopted by ordinance is invalid.
For further information, please access the website
at www.oag.state.tx.us or call the Opinion Committee at (512) 463-2110.
TRD-200603019
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 2, 2006
Opinion No. GA-0434
The Honorable Kip Averitt
Chair, Committee on Natural Resources
Texas State Senate
Post Office Box 12068 Austin, Texas 78711-2068
Re: Authority of the El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board to set
an impact fee for new development in the City of El Paso and its extraterritorial
jurisdiction (RQ-0417-GA)
S U M M A R Y
The El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board is not authorized to establish
an impact fee for water and wastewater infrastructure for new development
in the City of El Paso and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. Local Government
Code chapter 395 vests in the City of El Paso the sole authority to adopt
such impact fees. If the El Paso City Council approves the imposition of impact
fees for water and wastewater infrastructure in the city and its extraterritorial
jurisdiction, it may delegate ministerial authority to the El Paso Water Utilities
Public Service Board to collect those fees.
For further information, please access the website
at www.oag.state.tx.us or call the Opinion Committee at (512) 463-2110.
TRD-200603072
Stacey Schiff
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: June 7, 2006
Opinions