Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 5.
FINANCE
Subchapter F. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDIT PROGRAM
43 TAC §§5.70 - 5.74
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) adopts
new Subchapter F, §§5.70 - 5.74, concerning the Transportation Development
Credit Program. New §5.72 is adopted with changes to the proposed text
as published in the March 10, 2006, issue of the
Texas Register
(31 TexReg 1628). New §§5.70, 5.71, 5.73 and
5.74 are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the
March 10, 2006, issue of the
Texas Register
(31
TexReg 1628) and will not be republished.
EXPLANATION OF ADOPTED SECTIONS
Title 23, USC, §120, as amended by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, SAFETEA-LU (Pub.
L. No. 109-59)(2005) (SAFETEA-LU), permits a state to use certain toll revenue
expenditures, transportation development credits, formerly called toll credits,
as a credit toward the non-Federal share of all programs authorized by Title
23, with the exception of emergency relief programs and for transit programs
authorized by Title 49, Chapter 53. Transportation development credits are
designed to encourage states to increase capital investment in infrastructure;
to increase the flexibility of state transportation finance programs; and
to enable states to more effectively utilize existing resources. The Texas
Transportation Commission (commission) has a statutory obligation to enhance
existing sources of revenue and to create alternate sources of revenue. The
department proposes the adoption of rules concerning transportation development
credits to implement the applicable laws.
New §5.70, Purpose, identifies the applicable federal law and states
its purpose and also states that the rules are intended to specify the procedures
and conditions by which an entity may be eligible for award of transportation
development credits and how the commission may award credits.
New §5.71, Definitions, defines "commission," "department," "eligible
entity," "eligible project," "executive director," "locally earned credits,"
and "transportation development credits."
The term "eligible entity" is defined as any entity that is eligible for
funding under Title 23, USC or Title 49, Chapter 53, USC and is in good standing
with the department and has no deficiencies or findings of noncompliance.
It is defined in the manner that conforms to the applicable federal law and
states the basic requirement of good standing for any entity wishing to do
business with the department. The requirement that an entity be in good standing
with the department will ensure that the department enhances existing sources
of revenue; that it maximizes the generation of revenue from existing assets
of the department; and, that it increases the role of local and regional leaders
in solving the state's transportation problems by rewarding those entities
in good standing.
The term "eligible project" is defined as highway, rail, transit, bicycle
or pedestrian projects, as authorized by Title 23, USC, other than the emergency
relief programs authorized by §125, and Title 49, Chapter 53, USC, as
amended by SAFETEA-LU. This is consistent with the department's plan to encourage
development of new mobility opportunities and transportation solutions that
will enhance transportation by roads and highways or serve as an alternate
to traditional modes of transportation.
The term "locally earned credits" is defined as transportation development
credits earned from a project of a regional tollway authority; a project of
a county acting under Transportation Code, Chapter 284; a project of a regional
mobility authority; an international bridge not owned by the state; and a
department project located within the geographic area of a regional mobility
authority that has developed one or more toll projects. This reflects the
department's goal to empower local and regional leaders to solve local and
regional transportation problems, and to reward local and regional efforts
to solve transportation problems.
The term "transportation development credits" is defined as a financing
tool approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that allows states
to use their federal obligation authority without the requirement of non-federal
matching dollars. Credits are earned when the state, a toll authority, or
a private entity funds a capital transportation investment with toll revenues
earned on existing toll facilities, excluding revenues needed for debt service,
returns to investors or the operation and maintenance of toll facilities.
The term describes a financing tool, formerly called toll credits, that allows
states to use their federal obligation authority without the requirement of
non-federal matching dollars, thus increasing the flexibility of the resources
available to the department as well as the department's local and regional
partners.
New §5.72, describes the competitive process by which the commission
will award 75% of the state's locally earned transportation development credits.
The commission has expressed its intention to empower local and regional leaders
to solve local and regional transportation problems.
Section 5.72(d), Program call, describes the manner in which the department
will solicit proposals for the competitive award of credits by periodically
publishing a solicitation notice in the
Texas Register
.
Section 5.72(e), Proposal, describes the requirements of a proposal submitted
in response to a solicitation published by the department. The plan has five
goals: 1) reduce congestion; 2) enhance safety; 3) expand economic opportunity;
4) improve air quality; and, 5) increase the value of transportation assets.
The plan is based on four strategies: 1) use all financial options to build
transportation projects; 2) empower local and regional leaders to solve local
and regional transportation problems; 3) increase competitive pressure to
drive down the cost of transportation projects; and, 4) demand consumer driven
decisions that respond to traditional market forces. The proposal must provide
a detailed description of the need for the project and how the award of transportation
development credits for the project will meet the requirements of the commission's
plan for statewide transportation.
Section 5.72(f), Award, describes the manner in which the commission will
consider proposals and projects submitted in response to a published notice
soliciting proposals. The subsection enumerates the criteria that the commission
will use in awarding transportation development credits in a manner that expands
the availability of funding for transportation projects, reduces congestion,
expands economic opportunity, enhances safety, improves air quality and increases
the value of transportation assets. The subsection reflects how the commission
will reward local and regional efforts to help the department complete transportation
projects faster and to help the department's efforts to reduce congestion,
enhance safety, expand economic opportunity, improve air quality, and increase
the value of transportation assets. Section 5.72(f) also adds the requirement
that the local and regional leaders must coordinate proposals and proposed
projects with the local metropolitan planning organization if the project
falls within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning organization for
the purpose of obtaining the organization's concurrence on the proposal or
proposed project. The requirement for metropolitan planning organization concurrence
will demonstrate to the commission that the project has regional support.
Section 5.72(g), Unused credits, describes how the commission will determine
if credits are being utilized in a manner that maximizes the value of the
credits for the benefit of the department's statewide transportation plan.
Any transportation development credits that cannot be awarded to a region
due to a lack of eligible projects or credits that have been previously awarded,
but after one year are not covered under an executed project agreement, shall
be available for discretionary award by the commission. This requirement is
consistent with the commission's statutory obligation to enhance existing
sources of revenue and to create alternate sources of revenue that can be
applied to transportation projects.
New §5.73, Discretionary award, describes the process by which the
commission will make discretionary awards of transportation development credits.
By maintaining discretionary control over 25% of the available locally earned
transportation development credits, the commission will be able to exercise
its role as the state's leader in the plan to resolve the state's transportation
problem and to maintain its responsibility to plan and approve transportation
projects that will benefit the entire state.
Section 5.73(b), Award, describes the commission's discretionary award
of credits and is consistent with the same criteria used to make transportation
development credit award determinations for the competitive process. The subsection
also adds the requirement that the local and regional leaders must coordinate
proposals and proposed projects with the local metropolitan planning organization
if the project falls within the boundaries of the metropolitan planning organization
for the purpose of obtaining the organization's expressed opinion on the proposal
or proposed project.
Section 5.73(c), Unused credits, states that if an entity awarded credits
does not sign the required agreement within one year of award, the commission
may award those credits to another entity.
New §5.74, Administration, states that an entity awarded transportation
development credits shall enter into a project agreement with the department
and shall comply with other requirements specified by the executive director.
These requirements are consistent with the department's other requirements
related to doing business with the department.
COMMENTS
The department received comments from four entities. All four commenters
expressed general support for the rules as proposed.
The first commenter only expressed general support for the rules as proposed.
The second commenter also expressed general support for the rules as proposed
and in addition made specific suggestions for revision of the rules.
Comment:
The commenter suggested expanding the list of eligible projects listed
in §5.72(c), Eligible project, to include projects that better meet the
goals stated by the Texas Transportation Commission, specifically to include
air quality projects.
Response:
The department agrees with the commenter and has added a sentence to §5.72(c),
stating that an air quality improvement initiative or project will only be
eligible for award of transportation development credits in the department's
competitive call if the proposer is able to demonstrate that the project is
located in an area currently in nonattainment with federal air quality standards;
that the project will solve specific traffic congestion problems, in a manner
other than adding additional capacity to highways for single occupant vehicles
and that the project will decrease mobile source emissions and reduce vehicle
miles traveled, as reflected by the region's economic growth, land use, and
transportation infrastructure changes. This addition to the rule will better
reflect the department's goals and its strategic plan for fiscal years 2005-2009.
Comment:
The commenter also suggested including specific timeframes (annually, semiannually)
for publication of credits earned in the state and credits earned in each
region; and the commenter suggested further definition of a schedule for the
call for projects proposed in §5.72(d), Program Call, for advance planning
purposes.
Response:
The department agrees to consider implementation of these suggestions,
but no revision was made to the rule as a result of the comment.
Comment: A public hearing on the rules was held on March 31, 2006 and two
speakers presented comments. Both commenters expressed support for the rules.
No responses to comments were made at the public hearing.
The first speaker wanted to make sure that vehicle preventive maintenance
is eligible for transportation development credits. The speaker further stated
that the proposed 75/25 split may need to be changed, to leave more of the
award of credits to the discretion of the commission.
The second speaker expressed support for the rules and further commented
that the commission should consider awarding transportation development credits
to transit operators which received congressional earmarks, because the credits
are a good way of leveraging federal funds. The speaker also presented a concern
that the award of transportation development credits would be overly-subjective
and stated that transit projects should get due consideration.
Response: The department's rule makes it clear that transit entities, authorized
to receive funding by Chapter 53 of Title 49 U.S. Code, are eligible for award
of transportation development credits and that capital expenses, as defined
by Chapter 31 of this title, are projects that are eligible for award of transportation
development credits.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the
conduct of the work of the department.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE
Transportation Code, §201.101.
§5.72.Competitive Process.
(a)
Purpose. The commission will award 75% of the state's locally
earned credits in accordance with this section.
(b)
Awarding credits to region. Except as provided in subsection
(g) of this section, the commission will award credits under this section
to projects within the region from which they were earned. For purposes of
this section, "region" means the planning boundaries of the metropolitan planning
organization.
(c)
Eligible project. A highway project is not eligible for
award under this section unless the proposer demonstrates that the project
provides direct support of a rail, transit, bicycle, pedestrian project or
will improve air quality. An air quality project is not eligible for award
under this section unless the proposer demonstrates that the project is located
in an area currently in nonattainment with federal air quality standards;
that the project will solve specific traffic congestion problems, in a manner
other than adding additional highway capacity for single occupant vehicles;
and that the project will decrease mobile source emissions and reduce vehicle
miles traveled, as reflected by the region's economic growth, land use, and
transportation infrastructure changes.
(d)
Program call. The department will periodically publish
a notice in the
Texas Register
soliciting
proposals for the award of transportation development credits under this section.
(e)
Proposal.
(1)
An eligible entity may submit a proposal for an eligible
project in response to a notice published under subsection (d) of this section.
The proposal must include a detailed description of:
(A)
the project and the need for the project;
(B)
how the award of transportation development credits will
expand the availability of funding for transportation projects;
(C)
how the project will:
(i)
reduce congestion;
(ii)
expand economic opportunity;
(iii)
enhance safety;
(iv)
improve air quality; and
(v)
increase the value of transportation assets.
(2)
If the project is located within the planning boundaries
of a metropolitan planning organization, the eligible entity must obtain the
concurrence of the metropolitan planning organization.
(3)
The executive director may require supplemental information
to clarify the issues described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(f)
Award.
(1)
The commission will not consider a project unless the project
has been endorsed by the applicable metropolitan planning organization.
(2)
The commission will award transportation development credits
under this section after considering the potential of the project to:
(A)
expand the availability of funding for transportation projects;
(B)
reduce congestion;
(C)
expand economic opportunity;
(D)
enhance safety;
(E)
improve air quality; and
(F)
increase the value of transportation assets.
(g)
Unused credits.
(1)
If an entity awarded credits under this section does not
sign an agreement under §5.74 of this subchapter (relating to Administration)
within one year of award, unused credits shall be available for discretionary
award under §5.73 of this subchapter (relating to Discretionary Award).
(2)
If, after three program calls, the department has not received
enough eligible projects to use credits available to a region under this section,
the unused credits shall be available for discretionary award under §5.73
of this subchapter.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's
legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 26, 2006.
TRD-200602923
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: June 15, 2006
Proposal publication date: March 10, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8683
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) adopts the repeal
of §§31.3, 31.61, 31.62, 31.64, and 31.65 and simultaneously adopts
new §§31.3, 31.61, and 31.62, concerning the rail fixed guideway
system state safety oversight program without changes to the proposed text
as published in the March 10, 2006,
Texas Register
(31 TexReg 1632) and will not be republished.
EXPLANATION OF ADOPTED REPEALS AND NEW SECTIONS
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) adopted new regulations governing
Rail Fixed Guideway Systems, State Safety Oversight. The new regulations are
published in Title 49 CFR Part 659 and are entitled: Rail Fixed Guideway Systems;
State Safety Oversight. New provisions specify the department responsibility
of adopting requirements that address the elements identified in 49 CFR Part
659. In accordance with the federal regulation, new adopted §31.3, §31.61
and §31.62 require the rail fixed guideway systems to adhere to the provisions
outlined in the federal regulations.
In 1991, Congress required that the FTA establish a program providing for
the state-conducted oversight of the safety and security of rail systems not
regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), by enacting a statute
in Title 49 USC §5330. FTA published final regulations to implement the
federal statute in 1995 and the final rule went into effect January 26, 1996.
In 1997, the Texas Legislature enacted a state statute, Transportation Code, §455.005,
requiring state compliance with Title 49 USC §5330. In enacting the state
statute in May 1997, the Texas Legislature adopted the compliance requirements
set out in the FTA regulations in effect at the time. The department adopted
rules to further implement the statute in September 1997. The state statute
states that its purpose is to ensure state compliance with the federal statute
published in Title 49 USC §5330.
The FTA amended its regulations that implement the federal statute and
published final regulations on April 29, 2005. The final regulations became
effective on May 31, 2005 and the date by which states are required to comply
is May 1, 2006.
FTA's new final regulations contain compliance requirements that are more
stringent and more specific than the requirements stated in its former regulations.
The regulations are more specific in that the FTA no longer requires compliance
with standards published in a transportation association manual, rather the
new rule enumerates the specific compliance standards.
The department adopts the repeal of §31.3 and simultaneously adopts
new §31.3 in a revised form. New §31.3, Definitions, adopts new
terms that match terms used in the new federal regulations.
The new federal regulations spell out the requirements formerly stated
in the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Manual and guidelines,
instead of incorporating the requirements by reference. The FTA determined
that it is in the interest of users to publish all of the provisions of the
APTA Manual in the state safety oversight regulation, so reference to APTA
guidelines must be deleted. The new federal regulations were intended to improve
the performance of the State Safety Oversight Program and to ensure the following
outcomes: (1) enhance program efficiency; (2) increase responsiveness to recommendations
from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and emerging safety and
security issues; (3) improve consistency in the collection and analysis of
accident causal factors through increased coordination with other federal
reporting and investigation programs; and (4) improve performance of the hazard
management process. The regulation also clarifies FTA's oversight management
objectives, and streamlines current reporting requirements. The regulations
also address heightened concerns for rail transit security and emergency preparedness.
Terms no longer used in the federal regulations include references to "APTA,"
"hazardous condition," and "unacceptable hazardous condition," as those terms
were used in the manual. New provisions are adopted in order for the state
to comply with the federal statute and the regulations that implement the
statute. New terms and definitions are included to reflect the new federal
regulations: "corrective action plan," "FRA," "hazard," "individual," "investigation,"
"new starts project," "passenger operations," "program standard," "rail accident,"
"rail transit accident," "rail transit contractor," "rail transit controlled
property," "rail transit fixed guideway system," "rail transit passenger,"
"rail transit vehicle," "security," "system safety program plan," and "system
security plan." The definitions have been renumbered to reflect the deletions
and additions detailed above.
The department adopts the repeal of §31.61 and simultaneously adopts
new §31.61 in a revised form. New §31.61, Rail Transit Agency Responsibilities,
adopts new provisions to comply with the federal regulations published in
49 CFR Part 659.
New §31.61(a) sets out the requirements for each rail transit agency
to develop and implement a system safety program that complies with the federal
regulations. Rail transit agencies are required to develop and maintain a
separate system safety program plan that complies with the requirements specified
in the federal regulations.
New §31.61(b) sets out the requirements for each rail transit agency
to develop and implement a system security plan that complies with the new
federal regulations.
New §31.61(c) requires each rail transit agency to perform an annual
review of its system safety program and its system security plan that complies
with the new federal regulations.
New §31.61(d) requires the rail transit authority to maintain ongoing
internal safety and security reviews that complies with the new federal regulations.
New §31.61(e) requires the rail transit agency to develop and document
a hazard management process that complies with the new federal regulations.
The rail transit agency hazard management process must be part of its system
safety program plan, to be reviewed and approved by the department. The rail
transit agency must develop, in coordination with the department, thresholds
for the notification and reporting of hazards to the department. Measures
to eliminate or control hazards and the associated corrective actions are
to be managed through the hazard management process, including rail transit
agency procedures for providing the department with reports to track mitigation.
The rail transit agency's hazard management process must include, at a minimum,
a definition of the rail transit agency’s approach to the hazard management
and resolution process, a list of the sources and mechanisms used to support
the ongoing identification of hazards, the process by which identified hazards
will be evaluated and prioritized for elimination or control, the mechanism
used to track identified hazards to resolution, and the process for ongoing
reporting of hazard resolution activities to the department.
New §31.61(f) requires the rail transit agency to notify the department
of accidents, including a fatality, injuries requiring immediate medical attention
and property damage, in accordance with federal regulations. FTA has modified
the thresholds for the notification and investigation of accidents. Rail transit
agencies are required to report the occurrence of accidents within two (2)
hours. In those instances where the rail transit agency shares track with
the general railroad system and is subject to FRA notification requirements,
the rail transit agency must notify the department within two (2) hours of
an incident for which FRA is notified. The department must investigate, or
cause to be investigated, all accidents meeting the notification and investigation
thresholds.
New §31.61(g) requires the transit agency to develop and implement
corrective action plans that comply with the new federal regulations. The
department must review and approve all procedures, except those used by the
NTSB that will be used to conduct an investigation on its behalf. The rail
transit agency is required to develop corrective action plans to address findings
from accidents and the department's three-year safety and security review.
In the case of accident investigations, the department is responsible for
ensuring that a corrective action plan is developed, implemented, and tracked,
regardless of the entity that conducts the investigation on the state's behalf.
The provisions identify a dispute resolution process for matters related to
corrective action plan requirements.
The provisions in §31.62, State Responsibilities, are repealed because
they set out the department's responsibilities for reporting and compliance
with the new federal regulations, in 49 CFR Part 659. The provisions state
internal requirements for the department and are therefore not required to
be adopted as a rule.
The department adopts the repeal of §31.64, Contractors for Rail Fixed
Guideway Transit Agencies, because the provisions covered under this section
are now listed in the elements contained in 49 CFR Part 659 and the requirements
are reflected under the new adopted §31.61.
The department adopts the repeal of §31.65, Deadlines, and simultaneously
adopts new §31.62, Deadlines, reflecting the requirements outlined in
the new federal regulations, 49 CFR Part 659.
COMMENTS
No comments on the proposed repeals and new sections were received.
Subchapter A. GENERAL
43 TAC §31.3
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The repeal is adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides
the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) with the authority to establish
rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more specifically,
Transportation Code, §455.005, which requires the commission to adopt
rules governing rail fixed guideway system safety oversight.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE
Transportation Code, §201.101 and §455.005.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 26, 2006.
TRD-200602924
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: June 15, 2006
Proposal publication date: March 10, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8683
43 TAC §31.3
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new section is adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) with the authority
to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more
specifically, Transportation Code, §455.005, which requires the commission
to adopt rules governing rail fixed guideway system safety oversight.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE
Transportation Code, §201.101 and §455.005.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 26, 2006.
TRD-200602925
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: June 15, 2006
Proposal publication date: March 10, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8683
Chapter 31.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Subchapter F. RAIL SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAM