TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 61. SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Subchapter HH. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING CLASSROOM SUPPLY REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM

19 TAC §61.1081

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes an amendment to §61.1081, concerning the classroom supply reimbursement program. Section 61.1081 establishes a program whereby classroom teachers may be reimbursed for personal expenditures made for classroom supplies. The proposed amendment would update several provisions of the program, including the addition of reimbursements to campus library media specialists, the replacement of the requirement for a "district policy" with a "district procedure," and the elimination of the requirement that districts receiving grant funds create a separate account for these funds.

House Bill 1844, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, added TEC, §21.413, that established a program whereby classroom teachers may be reimbursed for personal expenditures made for classroom supplies. The legislation required that the commissioner establish the reimbursement program and adopt rules for the local allocation of funds. TEC, §21.413 specified that a school district must match any funds provided to the district under the program with local funds and the funds used to match may not replace local funds. Teachers may use the funds at their discretion, as long as the use is of benefit to the district's students. Effective September 1, 2005, the TEC, §21.413, was renumbered as TEC, §21.414, by the 79th Texas Legislature, 2005.

The commissioner adopted 19 TAC §61.1081, effective January 4, 2004, to implement legislation by establishing the process for districts to apply for the Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program funds, the eligibility requirements for district participation, and the criteria by which the TEA will evaluate district applications. The rule also addresses other provisions such as district compliance, disputes about allowable teacher expenditures, district ownership of durable goods, and the timeline for expenditure of funds for each school year.

The proposed amendment would update several provisions of the program. Reimbursement of campus library media specialists would be added in subsections (a)-(e) whenever reimbursement to teachers is referenced. Senate Bill 1, 79th Texas Legislature, General Appropriations Act, Rider 60 authorizes the TEA to include "campus library media specialist" for the reimbursement of personal expenditures made for classroom supplies. Additional specific updates include the following.

Subsection (a) regarding the application process would be revised to remove the requirement that districts submit information about actual local fund expenditures and to change the requirement that districts report the number of recipients of reimbursements from the last five years to the last two years.

Subsection (b) regarding eligibility requirements would be revised to eliminate the requirement that districts receiving grant funds create a Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant account separate from other accounts to which the grant shall be deposited and the requirement that participating districts deposit local matching funds into the designated account. This revision would also clarify that local matching funds may be donated by a variety of entities. The requirement to retain receipts obtained from teachers for reimbursement would also be eliminated. Subsequent to the rule adoption in 2004, several business officials expressed concern about the creation of a separate account for the Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant funds. They noted that doing so is not a common practice for business officials and although they track the funds, opening a separate account is burdensome. The proposed revision included in subsection (b) would address this concern.

Subsection (c) regarding evaluation criteria would be revised to update a reference in revised subsection (a).

Subsection (d) regarding other provisions would be revised to clarify that funds for each grant period must be expended by the end date of that grant period.

Christi Martin, senior advisor in the office of education initiatives, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment. The proposed amendment, that includes expanding the reimbursement program to include campus library media specialists, would not impact the amount of grant awards.

Ms. Martin has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendment would be to allow campus library media specialists, as well as teachers, to obtain more and better supplies for their classrooms, directly benefiting student learning. The proposed amendment would also provide flexibility to school districts applying for and in implementing the specific grant program. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the amendment.

The public comment period on the proposal begins June 2, 2006, and ends July 2, 2006. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendment submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.414, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules and establish a reimbursement program under which the commissioner provides funds to a school district for the purpose of reimbursing classroom teachers in the district who expend personal funds on classroom supplies. Rider 60, page III-18, Senate Bill 1, Acts of the 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005 (the General Appropriations Act), extends the reimbursement program to include campus library media specialists.

The amendment implements the Texas Education Code, §21.414, and Rider 60, page III-18, Senate Bill 1, Acts of the 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005 (the General Appropriations Act).

§61.1081.Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program.

(a) Application process. In order to participate in the classroom supply reimbursement program authorized by Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.414 [ §21.413 ] , a school district must apply to the Texas Education Agency (TEA) for these funds by a date set by the commissioner of education. The application must include the following:

(1) a standard Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program district application;

[ (2) actual total local fund expenditures on teacher supply reimbursements for school year 2003 if applying during school year 2004, for school years 2003 and 2004 if applying during school year 2005, and for the most recent three school years if applying after school year 2005 (to aid in determining if local expenditures are being reduced). Local funds are all funds over which the district exercises control or approval authority used to reimburse teachers for tangible items of direct benefit to students;]

(2) [ (3) ] the number of teachers and campus library media specialists who have received reimbursement for supply purchases in the last two [ five ] years;

(3) [ (4) ] the number of teachers and campus library media specialists anticipated to receive reimbursement under this program and the amount each teacher and campus library media specialist will be eligible to receive; and

(4) [ (5) ] a district procedure [ policy ] that would ensure each teacher and campus library media specialist meets the requirement that an expenditure will benefit students.

(b) Eligibility requirements. To be eligible to participate in the classroom supply reimbursement program, a district will be required to:

(1) re-apply to participate each year;

(2) [ create a Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant account separate from other accounts to which the grant shall be deposited and ] account for funds in accordance with applicable state and federal requirements;

(3) match individual [ deposit in the designated account an amount of local funds defined in subsection (a)(2) of this section at least equal to the greater of the amount of the grant or the previous year's expenditure on teacher supply reimbursements. Individual ] reimbursements from the Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program [ must be matched ] with an equal amount of local funds . Local matching funds may be donated, or otherwise provided, to the school district by local community groups, parent/teacher organizations, businesses, professional organizations, etc. ;

(4) ensure that items purchased with grant funds [ in the designated account ] are tangible items, of direct benefit to students;

(5) retain ownership of all durable goods purchased under this program. A district may develop a procedure [ policy ] allowing each teacher and campus library media specialist to retain ownership of goods of nominal value purchased with grant money; and

[ (6) retain receipts obtained from teachers for reimbursement and make these records available for audit purposes; and]

(6) [ (7) ] return unexpended Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program balances at the end of the state fiscal year for which they were awarded.

(c) Evaluation criteria. Applications to the TEA will be evaluated on the following criteria:

(1) information about a district's existing supply reimbursement program, if applicable;

(2) the balance between the number of teachers and campus library media specialists receiving reimbursements and the size of the reimbursements;

(3) the process by which a district would determine whether an expenditure meets the student benefit criteria as required in subsection (a)(4) [ (a)(5) ] of this section; and

(4) the district's size relative to other applicants.

(d) Other provisions.

(1) A district found in noncompliance with the provisions specified in this section must reimburse the state for funds unaccounted for or used for purposes not meeting the requirements in TEC, §21.414 [ §21.413 ].

(2) A district found to have reduced its local expenditures may be required to refund the entire grant to the state.

(3) A district may allow, but not require, teachers and campus library media specialists to pool their respective supply monies for the purchase of an item, as long as the item meets the student benefit criteria established by the district.

(4) Funds for each grant period [ school year ] must be expended by the end date of that grant period [ July 31 of that school year ].

(5) Total reimbursement to an individual teacher or campus library media specialist in a single year from the Teacher Supply Reimbursement Grant Program may not exceed $200. Reimbursements from local funds may exceed the matching requirement in subsection (b)(3) of this section.

(6) The reimbursement program may be implemented only if funds are specifically appropriated by the legislature for the program or if the commissioner identifies available funds, other than general revenue funds, that may be used for the program.

(e) Dispute resolution.

(1) A determination by the local school district board of trustees of any dispute involving teacher or campus library media specialist reimbursement is final and may not be appealed to the TEA, except as provided by TEC, §7.057. Nothing in this provision precludes the TEA from recovering funds from a district pursuant to an audit.

(2) A determination by the TEA in the administration of this program is final and may not be appealed.

(f) Expiration date. This section, issued under TEC, §21.414 [ §21.413 ] , expires September 1, 2007.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 22, 2006.

TRD-200602859

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 2, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


Chapter 97. PLANNING AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Subchapter AA. ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING

19 TAC §97.1001

(Editor's note: In accordance with Government Code, §2002.014, which permits the omission of material which is "cumbersome, expensive, or otherwise inexpedient," the figure in 19 TAC §97.1001 is not included in the print version of the Texas Register. The Figure is available in the on-line edition of the June 2, 2006, issue of the Texas Register.)

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes an amendment to §97.1001, concerning accountability. Section 97.1001 describes the state accountability rating system and adopts applicable excerpts of the most recently published accountability manual. The proposed amendment would adopt applicable excerpts of the 2006 Accountability Manual , dated May 2006.

Legal counsel with the TEA has recommended that the procedures for issuing accountability ratings for public school districts and campuses be adopted as part of the Texas Administrative Code . This decision was made in 2000 given a court decision challenging state agency decision making via administrative letter/publications. Given the statewide application of the accountability rating process and the existence of sufficient statutory authority for the commissioner of education to formally adopt rules in this area, portions of each annual accountability manual have been adopted since 2000. The accountability system evolves from year to year so the criteria and standards for rating and acknowledging schools in the most current year differ to some degree over those applied in the prior year. The intention is to annually update 19 TAC §97.1001 to refer to the most recently published accountability manual.

The proposed amendment to 19 TAC §97.1001 would adopt excerpts of the 2006 Accountability Manual , dated May 2006, into rule as a figure. The excerpts, Chapters 2-6, 8, 10-12, 14-16, and Appendix I of the 2006 Accountability Manual , specify the indicators, standards, and procedures used by the commissioner of education to determine accountability ratings, both standard and alternative education accountability (AEA), for districts, campuses, and charter schools. These chapters also specify indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine Gold Performance Acknowledgment (GPA) on additional indicators for Texas public school districts and campuses. In addition, these chapters specify procedures for submitting an appeal and evaluating districts and campuses impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and/or Rita. The TEA will issue accountability ratings under the procedures specified in the 2006 Accountability Manual in August 2006. Ratings may be revised as a result of investigative activities by the commissioner as authorized under TEC, §39.074 and §39.075.

In 2006, campuses and districts will be evaluated using four base indicators: Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) results, completion rates, annual dropout rates, and student performance on the State Developed Alternative Assessment (SDAA) II. In 2006, the GPA system will award acknowledgment on 14 separate indicators to districts and campuses rated Academically Acceptable or higher: Attendance Rate for Grades 1-12; Advanced Course/ Dual Enrollment Completion; Advanced Placement/ International Baccalaureate Results; College Admissions Test Results; Commended Performance on Reading/ English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, Writing, Science and/or Social Studies; Recommended High School Program/ Distinguished Achievement Program Participation; Comparable Improvement on Reading/ ELA and Mathematics; and Texas Success Initiative - Higher Education Readiness Component on ELA and/or Mathematics.

Criss Cloudt, associate commissioner for accountability and data quality, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment.

Dr. Cloudt has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendment would be to continue to inform the public of the existence of annual manuals specifying rating procedures for the public schools by including this rule in the Texas Administrative Code . There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the amendment.

The public comment period on the proposal begins June 2, 2006, and ends July 2, 2006. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendment submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §§39.051(c)-(d), 39.072(c), 39.0721, 39.073, and 29.081(e), which authorize the commissioner of education to specify the indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine standard accountability ratings and alternative education accountability ratings and to determine acknowledgment on additional indicators.

The amendment implements the Texas Education Code, §§39.051(c)-(d), 39.072(c), 39.0721, 39.073, and 29.081(e).

§97.1001.Accountability Rating System.

(a) The rating standards established by the commissioner of education under Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.051(c) and (d), shall be used to evaluate the performance of districts, campuses, and charter schools. The indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine ratings under both standard and alternative education accountability (AEA) procedures will be annually published in official Texas Education Agency publications. These publications will be widely disseminated and cover the following procedures:

(1) indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine district ratings;

(2) indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine campus ratings;

(3) indicators, standards, and procedures used to determine acknowledgment on Additional Indicators; and

(4) procedures for submitting a rating appeal.

(b) The standard and alternative procedures by which districts, campuses, and charter schools are rated and acknowledged for 2006 [ 2005 ] are based upon specific criteria and calculations, which are described in excerpted sections of the 2006 [ type-name="italic">2005 ] Accountability Manual , dated May 2006 [ June 2005 ] , provided in this subsection.

Figure: 19 TAC §97.1001(b) (.pdf)

(c) Ratings may be revised as a result of investigative activities by the commissioner as authorized under TEC, §39.074 and §39.075.

(d) The specific criteria and calculations used in the accountability manual are established annually by the commissioner of education and communicated to all school districts and charter schools.

(e) The specific criteria and calculations used in the annual accountability manual adopted for school years prior to 2006-2007 [ 2005-2006 ] remain in effect for all purposes, including accountability, data standards, and audits, with respect to those school years.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 22, 2006.

TRD-200602860

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 2, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


Chapter 105. FOUNDATION SCHOOL PROGRAM

Subchapter AA. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING OPTIONAL EXTENDED YEAR PROGRAM

19 TAC §105.1001

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes an amendment to §105.1001, concerning the optional extended year program. Section 105.1001 establishes provisions relating to the administration of the optional extended year program. The proposed amendment would update the rule to reflect existing statute and the related rider and agency administration of the program.

The Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.082, Optional Extended Year Program, was added in 1995 by the 74th Texas Legislature and amended in 1997 and 2003 by the 75th and 78th Texas Legislatures, respectively. TEC, §29.082, allows the commissioner of education to adopt rules for the administration of programs provided under this section. In accordance with the TEC, §29.082, a school district may set aside an amount from the district's allotment under the TEC, §42.152, or may apply to the TEA for funding of an extended year program for a period not to exceed 30 instructional days for students in Kindergarten-Grade 11 who are identified as likely not to be promoted to the next grade level for the succeeding school year. A school district may also apply for funding for a program for students in Grade 12 who are identified as likely not to graduate from high school before the beginning of the succeeding school year. 19 TAC §105.1001 is the rule adopted by the commissioner of education to implement the TEC, §29.082. Since the adoption of this commissioner's rule in 1997 and the last amendment to the rule in 1999, several changes to the program have taken place impacting some provisions currently in rule.

In 2003, statutory changes expanded the grade levels to be served by the optional extended year program to include Grades 9-12 in addition to Kindergarten-Grade 8. Accordingly, the proposed amendment to 19 TAC §105.1001 would change all grade references from Kindergarten-Grade 8 to Kindergarten-Grade 12.

Additionally, the proposed amendment would revise subsection (b)(1) to align the optional extended year program with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requirement to serve 40% economically disadvantaged students. Districts currently serving 35%-39% will not receive optional extended year program funding. Currently, the districts funded by the program that are serving 35%-39% economically disadvantaged students have less economic need than districts serving 40% or greater. Increasing the percentage rate to 40% will enable additional allocations to eligible school districts based on the amount necessary to provide extended year instructional services to 10% of the at-risk student population in Kindergarten-Grade 12. The proposed amendment would also revise subsection (b)(2) to clarify the 10% maximum entitlement.

In a March 1, 2000, letter to administrators, then Commissioner of Education Jim Nelson authorized a change in policy relevant to Kindergarten students in the optional extended year program and in the accelerated reading instructional program. Prior to this letter, school districts were not allowed to serve Kindergarten students with both fund sources. In accordance with the administrative letter, school districts have been allowed to serve Kindergarten students with one or both of these fund sources since the 1999-2000 school year. However, the optional extended year program and the accelerated reading instruction program remain as two separate programs and must be implemented and funded according to statute and guidelines. Since the 1999-2000 school year, the optional extended year program and the accelerated reading instructional program have progressed one year at a time to provide the programs to Grades 1 and 2 as well. The proposed amendment would modify language in subsection (e) to reflect the policy change authorized by the March 2000 letter.

The proposed amendment would add language in subsection (l) to clarify what type of tutorial programs are accepted under the optional extended year program. Completing daily homework assignments is not the intent of the program. The purpose of the term "tutorial" is to clarify the instructional setting. The one-teacher-to-one-student model is not appropriate for the optional extended year program format. The small group tutorial with a limited number of students working on a specifically designed component of an academic program to increase academic achievement is acceptable.

The proposed amendment would modify subsection (m) to clarify the existing requirement to submit statistical data concerning student participation.

Judy de la Garza, deputy associate commissioner for school support services, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment. The proposed amendment does not cost more money; it just changes the way money flows. The proposal to align the optional extended year program with NCLB requirements to serve 40% economically disadvantaged students would shift funding away from those school districts currently serving 35%-39%. For example, based on school year 2004-2005 allocated funds, this would cause $926,400 (based on $120 per student funding) to be shifted for those schools serving 40%-100% economically disadvantaged students (based on $132 per student funding). Currently, the districts funded by the program that are serving 35%-39% economically disadvantaged students have less economic need than districts serving 40% or greater. Increasing the percentage to 40% would enable additional allocations to eligible school districts based on the amount necessary to provide extended year instructional services to 10% of the at-risk population in Kindergarten-Grade 12. The proposed change to expand from Grade 8 to Grade 12 does not change any funding.

Ms. de la Garza has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendment would be that more at-risk populations would be served in Kindergarten-Grade 12. The public will realize a benefit of having an increasingly prepared workforce exiting from the public high schools. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the amendment.

The public comment period on the proposal begins June 2, 2006, and ends July 2, 2006. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendment submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.082, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules for the administration of optional extended year programs.

The amendment implements the Texas Education Code, §29.082.

§105.1001.Optional Extended Year Program.

(a) Each school district seeking funding for an optional extended year program under the Texas Education Code, §29.082, must submit an application in a format prescribed by the commissioner of education. Once funded, the program shall comply with the provisions of the Texas Education Code, §29.082.

(b) School districts shall be funded annually based on the most recent district data available to the Texas Education Agency through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). Funding shall be based on the following:

(1) Eligibility. School districts in which at least 40% [ 35% ] of the students in Kindergarten through Grade 12 [ 8 ] are from economically disadvantaged families will be eligible for funding.

(2) Maximum entitlement. Funding for an eligible school district under this section shall be based on the amount necessary to provide extended year instructional services to [ not more than ] 10% of the at-risk student population in Kindergarten through Grade 12 [ 8 ].

(3) Per capita amount. The per capita amount will be determined by dividing the total program allocation by the sum of the maximum entitlement populations in Kindergarten through Grade 12 [ 8 ] in eligible school districts.

(4) Reallocation. Program funds not requested by eligible school districts will be reallocated to school districts with 50% or more economically disadvantaged students.

(c) At a minimum, school districts will be required to provide services to the number of students identified on the school district's entitlement notice used for funding. School districts that have fewer students participating in the optional extended year program than identified for calculating the school district's maximum entitlement (including reallocation, if applicable) will have their entitlement reduced on a per-capita basis.

(d) A school district receiving funds under the Texas Education Code, §29.082, that is also receiving funds for an optional extended year program for students in Kindergarten through Grade 12 [ 8 ] under the Option 4 wealth equalization agreement authorized under the Texas Education Code, Chapter 41, must adjust its Option 4 equalization agreement. The district must adjust the agreement to redirect the use of funds to a qualifying activity other than an optional extended year program for students in Kindergarten through Grade 12 [ 8 ] to the extent necessary to avoid duplicate funding of optional extended year programs.

(e) A school district receiving funds for the accelerated reading instruction program authorized under the Texas Education Code, §28.006(g), is eligible [ ineligible ] to use funds authorized under the Texas Education Code, §29.082, to serve students in Kindergarten through [ during the 1999-2000 school year, Kindergarten-Grade 1 during the 2000-2001 school year, and Kindergarten- ] Grade 2 [ during the 2001-2002 school year ]. Each optional extended year program must have auditable funding documentation linking direct service expenditures and optional extended year program funds used to identify eligible students.

(f) An optional extended year program may extend the day, the week, or the year. The program shall be conducted beyond the required instructional days which may include intercessions for year-round programs.

(g) A school district may use funds under this section for follow-up activities so long as the optional extended year program is provided for no less than 30 instructional days. Follow-up activities provided by this subsection are restricted to participants of the program.

(h) All costs under the optional extended year program must be necessary and reasonable for carrying out the objectives of the program and for the proper and efficient performance and administration of the program.

(i) Students who do not meet district standards or policies for promotion on the basis of academic achievement or demonstrated proficiency of the subject matter of the course or grade level shall be eligible for services under the optional extended year program.

(j) A school district must include a parent/family awareness component in the program.

(k) Training required under Texas Education Code, §29.082(d), shall provide teachers with the knowledge and skills needed to help students in the program meet challenging state content and student performance standards. Training is to occur prior to the implementation of the program. Additional professional development may be provided throughout the implementation of the program.

(l) A school district shall incorporate effective instructional strategies into the design of the program to ensure students are provided with the skills needed to be successful in the following school year. An extended day program must be implemented beyond the regular seven-hour day and may not include tutorials or extended in-school day-care services. A tutorial program with the basic design to complete homework is not an acceptable instructional design for the program. A tutorial program using pre- and post-testing with each student working on a sequenced and focused program over time to enable the student to attain greater academic success is acceptable.

(m) A school district shall submit an annual report evaluating the program in the time and format required by the Agency. A school district shall also submit, in a manner determined by the commissioner, [ The report shall include ] a complete list of students who participated in the program for at least one day.

(n) For audit purposes, a school district shall maintain documentation to support each of the requirements of this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 22, 2006.

TRD-200602861

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 2, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497