TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 15. TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Chapter 353. MEDICAID MANAGED CARE

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts amendments to Chapter 353, Subchapter A, §353.2 and §353.3 and Subchapter E, §§353.403, 353.405, 353.407, 353.409, 353.411, 353.413, 353.415, 353.417 and 353.419. Chapter 353 describes standards for the Medicaid Managed Care program. The amendments are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the May 19, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4125) and will not be republished.

HHSC amends the following rules: §353.2, Definitions; §353.3, Experience Rebate in the Managed Care Program; §353.403, Enrollment; §353.405, Marketing; §353.407, Requirements of Health Maintenance Organizations; §353.409, Scope of Services; §353.411, Accessibility of Services; §353.413, Managed Care Benefits and Services for Children Under 21 Years of Age; §353.415, Member Complaint Procedures; §353.417, Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement; and §353.419, Financial Standards.

The amendments to the rules are necessary to comply with changes in statute and regulation, to enhance Medicaid managed care efficiency, and to improve services to Members and providers.

Section 6 of Senate Bill 1188, 79th Legislature, Regular Session (2005) (codified at §533.005(a)(14) of the Government Code), requires a modification to the way in which Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) may reimburse Federally Qualified Health Centers and Rural Health Clinics for after hours care under some circumstances. In implementing this provision, it is necessary that new definitions be added to §353.2, and that the reimbursement framework be described. The reimbursement standard is contained in §353.407.

In addition, a new definition of Managed Care Organization is required to bring Medicaid regulations into conformity with Texas Department of Insurance regulations, which provide for an additional Medicaid managed care delivery model, the Exclusive Provider Benefit Plan (EPBP). Adding these new definitions requires corresponding changes to §§353.403, 353.405, 353.407, 353.409, 353.411 and 353.417.

The amendment to §353.3 is necessary in order to align the Medicaid experience rebate process with that of the Children's Health Insurance Program.

The amendment to §353.411 is necessary to provide HHSC with more detailed information regarding MCO compliance with Medicaid Member access to services requirements. The amendment to §353.415 is necessary to clarify MCO Member appeal rights. It is necessary to amend §353.419 to change a definition required by §353.2, as amended, and to broaden MCO solvency requirements.

HHSC received a comment regarding the proposed amendments during the comment period, which included a public hearing on May 30, 2006, from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc. A summary of the comment and HHSC's response follows.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc., expressing support for the elimination of the six-month time limit for a default enrollment period in §353.403(i). The commenter suggests that the "existing rule sets an arbitrary time limit that may not apply in all markets."

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment received from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc., in support of the proposed elimination of the six-month time limit for a default enrollment period. No change to the rules was requested by the commenter.

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1 TAC §353.2, §353.3

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604175

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


Subchapter E. STANDARDS FOR MEDICAID MANAGED CARE

1 TAC §§353.403, 353.405, 353.407, 353.409, 353.411, 353.413, 353.415, 353.417, 353.419

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604176

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


Chapter 354. MEDICAID HEALTH SERVICES

Subchapter A. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

6. HOSPITAL SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1077

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts amendments to §354.1077, relating to provider participation requirements, with changes to the proposed text as published in the June 23, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4973) and will be republished. Section 354.1077 is adopted with a minor change to subsection (a)(1) which references the "Texas Department of Health." The rule is being updated and references the new name "Department of State Health Services."

The proposed amendments will require hospitals in eight urban service areas to comply with the reimbursement provisions and rate reductions of 1 TAC §355.8064 in order to participate in the Texas Medicaid program. The amendments to §355.8064 are being adopted simultaneously in this issue of the Texas Register .

The 2006-2007 General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49, Senate Bill 1, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005) (Act) directs HHSC to achieve savings for services provided to Medicaid aged, blind and disabled clients in the following service areas: Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Lubbock, Nueces, Tarrant and Travis. The purpose of this rule is to implement the Section 49 mandate and to achieve the directed savings.

Section 49 of the Act further requires HHSC to utilize cost-effective models to better manage the care of these clients and, at the same time, achieve the identified savings. HHSC plans to meet this requirement by implementing a non-capitated Integrated Care Management (ICM) model in the Dallas and Tarrant service areas, and a partially capitated model with inpatient hospital services carved out in other urban service areas. The goal of both models is to promote proper utilization and integration of acute care and long-term care services, while achieving the savings directed by the Legislature.

During the comment period, which included a public hearing on July 26, 2006, HHSC received written comments regarding the proposed amendments from the partnership One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, Seton Hospital, the Texas Hospital Association, Medical City Hospital, Christus Healthcare Network, Tenet Healthcare, HCA, and Methodist Hospital of Dallas.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Hospital Association concerning §354.1077, stating that the proposed rule lacks statutory or legislative authority.

Response: HHSC has the authority to adopt §354.1077 under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; §531.021, Government Code, which provides HHSC with the authority to administer Medicaid funds and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements; and §32.021, Human Resources Code, which provides HHSC with the authority to administer the Medicaid program and adopt rules for the proper and efficient operation of the program.

Comment: In their written comments, the partnership of One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, Seton Hospital, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated that the proposed rate reductions will significantly impact current reimbursement rates, which have already been cut by five percent, resulting in hospitals receiving only 80% of their costs to provide Medicaid services.

Response: Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the Section 49 savings target is achieved.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated that the $109.5 million in savings targeted for the 2006-2007 biennium was unrealistically high.

Response: HHSC understands the concern; however, Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs a savings target of $109,500,000 in general revenue.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated the hospital industry supported implementation of an Integrated Care Management (ICM) model in all expansion service areas. The commenters expressed the opinion that this would give all provider types an opportunity to make the system work in a collaborative manner but that ICM is now being implemented only in the Dallas and Tarrant service areas.

Response: The proposed rule change addresses only provider participation requirements and not where the ICM model will be implemented.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, Seton Hospital, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated the proposed rule will be harmful to local taxpayers and businesses as costs not covered by Medicaid are passed on to taxpayers and commercial health plans.

Response: HHSC acknowledges that the proposed rule may result in a net loss in revenue to publicly owned hospitals, not to exceed $59.3 million over the five-year period. The negative fiscal impact on revenues of local governments is based on an 8% reduction in fiscal year 2007 rates. Publicly owned hospitals receiving UPL funding will be able to offset loss in federal funding resulting from the 8% rate reduction by claiming increased federal funding from UPL payments. However, Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the savings target is achieved.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals and the Texas Hospital Association stated the proposed rule is arbitrary in that it does not specify the amount that the inpatient rates will be reduced nor does it identify which hospitals in each market will be subject to the rate reduction.

Response: HHSC acknowledges that a final determination as to which hospitals in each market will be subject to the rate reduction or the amount of the reductions has not yet been made, but HHSC disagrees that the rule is arbitrary. The scope of the rule includes all hospitals within the designated service areas, and HHSC will notify each affected hospital of any applicable rate reduction once a final determination has been made. HHSC values each hospital's participation in the Medicaid program, but continued participation in the program is voluntary.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals stating the proposed provider participation rule is inappropriate for a program that is voluntary.

Response: HHSC values each hospital's participation in the Medicaid program. However, Section 49 of the 2006-2007 General Appropriations Act requires that HHSC achieve targeted savings in the identified service areas.

Comment: In their written comments, the partnership of One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, and the Texas Hospital Association stated the proposed rule change will force some hospitals to terminate their Medicaid contracts, which may adversely impact access to hospital care.

Response: Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the savings target is achieved.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas, to administer Medicaid funds, and to adopt rules necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the Medicaid program; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

§354.1077.Provider Participation Requirements.

(a) A hospital must comply with each of the following requirements to qualify for participation as a hospital in the Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program. A hospital must:

(1) be licensed by the Department of State Health Services (department) as a general or special hospital, unless exempt from licensure by the appropriate licensing authority. This requirement does not apply to military hospitals providing inpatient emergency hospital services;

(2) be enrolled and participating in the Medicare Program as a hospital;

(3) sign a written provider agreement with the department or its designee to participate in the Medicaid program. The provider agreement requires the hospital to comply with the terms of the agreement and all requirements of the Medicaid program, including regulations, rules, handbooks, standards, and guidelines published by the department or its designee; and

(4) comply with the utilization review plan approved by the department or its designee.

(b) Effective December 1, 1991, the hospital must maintain policies and procedures regarding the following policies with respect to all adult individuals receiving inpatient services provided by the hospital:

(1) provide all adult individuals the following information regarding advance directives at the time of the individual's admission as an inpatient:

(A) the individual's rights under Texas law, whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the state, to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and the right to formulate advance directives (directive to physicians/living will or durable power of attorney for health care); and

(B) the hospital's policies respecting the implementation of such rights;

(2) document in the individual's medical record whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;

(3) not condition the provision of care or otherwise discriminate against an individual based on whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;

(4) ensure compliance with the requirements of Texas law, whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of Texas, respecting advance directives at facilities of the provider or organization; and

(5) provide for education for staff and the community on issues concerning advance directives.

(c) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of this section, effective September 1, 2006, a hospital in the Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Lubbock, Nueces, Tarrant or Travis Service Areas will not be permitted to participate in the Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program unless the hospital agrees in writing to comply with the provisions of §355.8064 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Adjustment for Hospitals Providing Inpatient Services to SSI and SSI-Related Clients).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604177

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: June 23, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


33. TELEMEDICINE SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1430, §354.1432

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts amendments to §354.1430, Definitions, and §354.1432, Benefits and Limitations, which relate to Texas Medicaid telemedicine services, with changes to the proposed text as published in the April 21, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 3335). The text of the rules will be republished.

The proposed amendments to the telemedicine services rules are to satisfy the requirements of Senate Bill 1340, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, which requires HHSC to develop, by rule, a pilot program under which Medicaid recipients in need of mental health services are provided those services through telemedicine. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) is responsible for implementing the program. The pilot will be evaluated by the state to determine whether extension of the use of telemedicine improves access to mental health services and quality of care.

HHSC received comments regarding the proposed amendments during the comment period, which included a public hearing on May 16, 2006. Comments were received from the Texas Council of Community Mental Health and Mental Retardation (MHMR) Centers, Inc. (Texas Council), Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR Center, MHMR of Tarrant County, MHMR Authority of Harris County and staff from DSHS. The rules were modified in response to some of the comments. In addition, advanced practice nurse is defined to correspond with the definition included in the Medicaid Telemedicine Reimbursement Rule. A summary of the comments and HHSC's responses follows.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., concerning §354.1430, which defines provider types eligible to perform services at the remote site. The Texas Council requested that Registered Nurses (RNs) and Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) be included as allowable remote site providers.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc. The amendments to §354.1430 allow qualified mental health professionals (QMHPs) as defined in the Texas Administrative Code, Title 25, §412.303(31) employed by or contracted with local mental health authorities to serve as remote site providers. RNs are already included in the definition of QMHPs. The intent of Senate Bill 1340 is to allow the use of QMHPs, which does not include LVNs. No change was made to the rule in response to the comment.

Comment: HHSC received comments from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR Center, MHMR of Tarrant County, and MHMR Authority of Harris County, concerning the definition of the remote site, which must be in a "rural or medically underserved area." The concern is that limiting the pilot to rural and medically underserved areas will perpetuate the restriction of access to services in some parts of the State, particularly those urban areas not designated as "medically underserved areas." The community centers contend that the homeless population in urban areas could benefit from this pilot, and that the project could greatly impact mental health authorities' ability or work with the homeless population, which benefits communities and has an impact on the Statewide Jail Diversion initiative as well. Another concern is that Texas has many urban areas that do not have readily available public transportation, further complicating the intended population's access to service. In cities that do have accessible public transportation, persons with disabilities and families with children in need of service may not feel safe using public transportation due to high crime rates in these areas.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comments. HHSC's Medicaid telemedicine program is limited to recipients in rural and medically underserved areas as defined by the Department of Health and Human Services. HHSC may consider future changes to the rule based on the evaluation of the pilot. No change was made to the rule in response to the comment.

Comment: HHSC received comments from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., concerning the definition of a rural area, which is defined as a "county with a population of 50,000 or less." The Texas Council reports that there are several counties in Texas that would not meet this definition simply because of the number of inmates incarcerated in some of Texas' state prisons. The Texas Council indicates that is another example of access being denied to mentally ill persons who could significantly benefit from telemedicine services.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., concerning the definition of a rural area. The mental health telemedicine pilot has been designed to offer and evaluate the impact of increased availability of these services in rural and medically underserved areas of the state consistent with HHSC's current telemedicine program. HHSC may consider future changes to the rule based on the evaluation of the pilot. No change was made to the rule in response to the comment.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., concerning local mental health authorities and the costs associated with both the hub and remote sites. The Texas Council understands that reimbursement would apply only to the Medicaid service being provided at the hub site. The Texas Council recommends that HHSC consider the total costs of providing telemedicine services and adjust the reimbursement rates accordingly.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from the Texas Council of Community MHMR Centers, Inc., concerning payment rates. This rule affects program policy, which is separate from the Medicaid rate-setting processes. No change was made to the rule in response to the comment.

Comment: HHSC received comments from Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR Center, concerning the current limitations of telemedicine and that there are mental health services other than those provided by a physician that could be provided via telemedicine that would benefit Texas Medicaid citizens. Rehabilitative services, such as skills training, and case management services may also be performed via telemedicine, thus enhancing the accessibility of services.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from the Bluebonnet Trails Community MHMR Center. Current Texas Medicaid telemedicine policy requires that the hub site provider be a physician. This pilot, by design, is narrow in scope with a focus on physician services. HHSC may consider future changes to the rule based on the evaluation of the pilot. No change was made to the rule in response to the comment.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from DSHS staff to include language in the rule that makes it clear that community mental health and mental retardation centers (CMHMRCs) contracted with DSHS are qualified to be hub site providers.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from DSHS staff. At this time, HHSC has opted to include providers affiliated with local mental health authorities instead of CMHMRCs to the list of hub site providers.

Comment: HHSC Medicaid/CHIP Division staff suggested that the definition of advanced practice nurse in §354.1430, Definitions, correspond to the definition of advanced practice nurse in the Medicaid Telemedicine Reimbursement Rule, 1 TAC §355.7001.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment from HHSC Medicaid/CHIP Division staff. HHSC has clarified the definition by listing the provider types that are included within the scope of practice of an advanced practice nurse.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.

§354.1430.Definitions.

Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings.

(1) Hub Site--A hub site is the location where the consulting physician is physically located.

(2) Hub Site Provider--A hub site provider must be a:

(A) Physician at a rural health facility or an accredited medical or osteopathic school located in Texas, or a physician at one of the following entities affiliated through a written contract or agreement with a government agency, accredited medical, or osteopathic school located in Texas:

(B) Hospital;

(C) Teaching hospital;

(D) Tertiary center;

(E) Health clinic; or

(F) Local Mental Health Authority as defined in Health and Safety Code §533.035.

(3) Remote Site-- A remote site is where the Medicaid client is physically located.

(4) Remote Site Provider--A remote site provider is located in rural or medically underserved areas and is limited to the following provider types:

(A) Physician;

(B) Advanced practice nurse (APN), including nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), 1 TAC §355.8281; certified nurse midwives (CNMs), 1 TAC §355.8161; and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), 1 TAC §355.8221;

(C) Hospital;

(D) Federally qualified health center (FQHC);

(E) Rural health clinic (RHC);

(F) Physician assistant (PA); or

(G) One of the following qualified professionals contracted with or employed by a local mental health authority:

(i) Licensed psychologist;

(ii) Licensed professional counselor (LPC);

(iii) Licensed clinical social worker (LCSW);

(iv) Licensed marriage and family therapist (LMFT); or

(v) Qualified mental health professional (QMHP) as defined in 25 TAC §412.303(31).

(5) Rural area--A rural area is defined as a county with a population of 50,000 or less or a county that was not designated as a metropolitan area by the United States Bureau of the Census according to the most current federal census and does not have within the boundaries of the county a hospital, licensed under Chapter 241, Health and Safety Code, with more than 100 beds.

(6) Rural Health Facility--A rural health facility is located in a rural county and is affiliated with an accredited medical school, teaching hospital, or government agency through a written contract or agreement.

(7) Telemedicine--Telemedicine is a method of health care service delivery used to facilitate medical consultations by a physician to health care providers in rural or underserved areas for purposes of patient diagnosis or treatment that requires advanced telecommunications technologies.

(8) Telepathology--Telepathology is the practice of pathology (consultation, education and research) using telecommunications to transmit data and images between two or more sites remotely located from each other.

(9) Teleradiology--Teleradiology is a means of electronically transmitting radiographic patient images and consultative text from one location to another.

(10) Underserved--An underserved area that meets the definition of Medically Underserved Area (MUA) or Medically Underserved Population (MUP) by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

§354.1432.Benefits and Limitations.

(a) Telemedicine services are a health care benefit of the Texas Medicaid Program. Telemedicine services are described below.

(1) Telemedicine services are direct "face-to-face" interactive video communications with the client. Teleradiology and telepathology are exceptions to the direct face-to-face requirement.

(2) Telemedicine hub site providers may be reimbursed only for consultation or interpretation using interactive video as defined by Medicaid telemedicine medical policy and as currently reimbursed under the Texas Medicaid Program.

(3) Telemedicine remote sites may be reimbursed for services when any one of the following places of service are utilized and billed:

(A) Practitioner's office;

(B) Rural Health Clinic;

(C) Federally Qualified Health Clinic;

(D) Inpatient hospital;

(E) Outpatient hospital;

(F) Emergency room;

(G) ICF-MR facility; or

(H) A local mental health authority clinic as defined in Health and Safety Code §533.035 or outreach site associated with a local mental health authority.

(4) Telephone conversations, chart reviews, electronic mail messages and facsimile transmissions do not constitute a telemedicine interactive video consultation, and will not be reimbursed as telemedicine service.

(5) Texas Health Steps (THSteps), also known as Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment, preventive health visits are not reimbursed if performed via telemedicine. Health care or treatment provided for conditions identified during these preventive health visits may be reimbursed if the health care is provided via telemedicine.

(6) Nursing facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and client homes are not approved places of service as remote sites for telemedicine services.

(b) Reimbursement for Services Performed Using Telemedicine.

(1) Providers seeking reimbursement for telemedicine services must provide and bill for the service in the manner prescribed by the Texas Medicaid Program.

(2) Telemedicine services are reimbursed in accordance with the existing Medicaid reimbursement methodology as defined in §355.7001 of this title (relating to Telemedicine Services Reimbursement).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604178

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: April 21, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


Chapter 355. REIMBURSEMENT RATES

Subchapter G. TELEMEDICINE SERVICES AND OTHER COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES

1 TAC §355.7001

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts an amendment to §355.7001, Telemedicine Services Reimbursement, with minor changes to the proposed text as published in the April 21, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 3337). The text of the rule will be republished.

Section 355.7001, addresses the reimbursement methodology rule references for telemedicine services in Chapter 355, Reimbursement Rates.

The purpose of the amendment is to revise the reimbursement methodology for telemedicine services to add provider types delivering mental health services through telemedicine under the pilot program required by Senate Bill (SB) 1340, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005. SB 1340 requires that HHSC develop, by rule, and the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) implement, a pilot program under which Medicaid recipients in need of mental health services will be provided those services through telemedicine. The pilot is intended to enable the state to determine whether extension of the use of telemedicine would improve the delivery of mental health services and be cost-effective.

The proposed rule has been revised for adoption to include the correct reference to the reimbursement methodology for physician assistants (PAs) at 1 TAC §355.8093 rather than the incorrect reference of 1 TAC §355.8091. The rule is further revised to identify all four types of advanced practice nurses (APNs), i.e., nurse practitioners (NPs), clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), and certified nurse midwives (CNMs), along with the applicable references to the specific reimbursement methodology rules for each provider type. The proposed version identified only NPs, CNSs, and CNMs.

HHSC received comments during the 30-day comment period. Written comments were received from the Coalition of Nurses in Advanced Practice (CNAP) and the Texas Academy of Nurse Anesthetists (TANA). The rule was modified in response to the comments. A summary of the comments and HHSC's response follows:

Comment: CNAP and TANA stated that the proposed rule only included three types of advanced practice nurses (APNs) and did not properly include CRNAs.

Response: The rule has been revised to include all four types of APNs.

The amendment is adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

§355.7001.Telemedicine Services Reimbursement.

Telemedicine services are reimbursed in accordance with the existing Medicaid reimbursement methodology for the applicable provider type as follows:

(1) physicians, 1 TAC §355.8085;

(2) physician assistants (PAs), 1 TAC §355.8093;

(3) advanced practice nurses (APNs), including nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs), 1 TAC §355.8281, certified nurse midwives (CNMs), 1 TAC §355.8161, and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs), 1 TAC §355.8221;

(4) hospitals, 1 TAC §355.8061 and 1 TAC §355.8063;

(5) federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), 1 TAC §355.8261;

(6) rural health clinics (RHCs), 1 TAC §355.8101; and

(7) the following qualified professionals contracted with or employed by a local mental health authority:

(A) psychologists, 1 TAC §355.8081 and 1 TAC §355.8085; and

(B) licensed professional counselors (LPCs), licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs), and licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFTs), 1 TAC §355.8091.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604179

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: April 21, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

4. MEDICAID HOSPITAL SERVICES

1 TAC §355.8063

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts an amendment to §355.8063 in Chapter 355, without changes to the proposed text as published in the June 23, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4974) and will not be republished. Chapter 355 describes Medicaid reimbursement methodology generally. Section 355.8063 describes the reimbursement methodology for inpatient hospital services.

The proposed amendment modifies §355.8063(o) to add freestanding psychiatric facilities to those facilities that are reimbursed under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) cost principles. This change is estimated to result in annual savings to the Medicaid program.

The amendment to §355.8063 is the result of the expiration of the Lone STAR Select II waiver program. The Lone STAR Select II waiver program offered participating freestanding psychiatric facilities a negotiated per diem reimbursement in lieu of cost-based reimbursement; non-participating psychiatric facilities were reimbursed on a cost basis. With the expiration of the waiver, the rule is being revised to convert previously participating freestanding psychiatric facilities from per diem reimbursement to cost-based reimbursement, effective September 1, 2006. Converting the methodology for freestanding psychiatric facilities from a negotiated per diem rate to TEFRA reimbursement will allow HHSC to reimburse providers based on their actual costs instead of a negotiated rate that does not accurately represent the providers' true costs.

During the comment period, which included a public hearing on July 26, 2006, HHSC received written comments regarding the proposed rule from Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center, the Texas Hospital Association, and the partnership One Voice and The Network of Behavioral Health Providers. A summary of comments and HHSC's responses follows.

Comment: In their written comments, Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital, and Laurel Ridge Treatment Center stated that TEFRA reimbursement would result in the reduction of psychiatric bed capacity for Medicaid patients.

Response: The amendment does not require freestanding psychiatric providers to adjust their Medicaid licensed bed capacity. A return to TEFRA cost-based reimbursement is necessary because of the expiration of the Lone STAR Select II waiver program, which was the basis for the negotiated per diem rate. HHSC will consider the commenters' proposal of a prospective payment system as a possible alternative to the TEFRA cost-based reimbursement methodology.

Comment: In their written comments, Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center and the Texas Hospital Association stated that TEFRA reimbursement is inadequate for freestanding psychiatric hospitals because the hospitals incur numerous operational costs that are not reimbursed under TEFRA.

Response: Providers that are paid under TEFRA principles are reimbursed based on a percentage of their allowable charges. The proposed amendment does not alter the services that are currently covered under Medicaid or the definition of an allowable cost. If costs incurred by the hospital are an allowable covered cost under Medicaid, the provider will receive reimbursement for these costs. A return to TEFRA cost-based reimbursement is necessary because of the expiration of the Lone STAR Select II waiver program, which was the basis for the negotiated per diem rate. HHSC will consider the commenters' proposal of a prospective payment system as a possible alternative to the TEFRA cost-based reimbursement methodology.

Comment: In their written comments, Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital and Laurel Ridge Treatment Center stated that TEFRA reimbursement eliminates any incentives for hospitals to continue treating children enrolled in the Department of Family and Protective Services' Child Protective Services (CPS) foster care program because the proposed rule shifts the cost of HHSC's inability to place children who are Medicaid beneficiaries in non-hospital settings onto the hospitals.

Response: The amendment changes the methodology used to reimburse providers but does not place limitations on the Medicaid population for which freestanding psychiatric hospitals provide medical services. Moreover, a return to TEFRA cost-based reimbursement is necessary because of the expiration of the Lone STAR Select II waiver program, which was the basis for the negotiated per diem rate. HHSC will consider the commenters' proposal of a prospective payment system as a possible alternative to the TEFRA reimbursement methodology.

Comment: In their written comments, Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center, and the Texas Hospital Association stated that under Texas law, freestanding psychiatric hospitals are required to obtain a face-to-face physician evaluation prior to each inpatient admission for which the hospitals do not receive reimbursement.

Response: The proposed rule change pertains to the reimbursement methodology for freestanding psychiatric hospitals, not to allowable Medicaid covered charges.

Comment: In their written comments, Cypress Creek Hospital, Millwood Hospital, Texas West Oaks Hospital, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center, the partnership of One Voice and The Network of Behavioral Health Providers, and the Texas Hospital Association recommended that HHSC implement a per diem-based prospective payment system (PPS) reimbursement methodology effective September 1, 2006. The providers proposed that HHSC continue to reimburse hospitals based on the current selective contracting per diem rates until a new PPS rate methodology is implemented.

Response: Psychiatric hospitals are required to convert back to cost-based reimbursement since the waiver program was not renewed and contracts between HHSC and the participating freestanding psychiatric facilities have expired. Due to time constraints, HHSC cannot implement a reimbursement change from cost-based reimbursement to a PPS methodology by September 1, 2006. However, HHSC will consider the commenters' proposal of a prospective payment system as a possible alternative to the TEFRA reimbursement methodology.

The amendment is adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas, to administer Medicaid funds, and to adopt rules necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the Medicaid program; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604180

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: June 23, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


1 TAC §355.8064

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts new §355.8064, Reimbursement Adjustment for Hospitals Providing Inpatient Services to SSI and SSI-Related Clients. The new rule is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the June 23, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4976). The text of the rule will be republished. The new rule is being adopted without proposed subsection (c), and the succeeding paragraphs have been renumbered accordingly.

New §355.8064 will modify Medicaid reimbursement to hospitals in eight urban service areas for inpatient services to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and SSI-related clients. The 2006-07 General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49, S.B.1, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005) (Act) directs HHSC to achieve savings for services provided to Medicaid aged, blind and disabled clients in the following service areas: Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Lubbock, Nueces, Tarrant and Travis. The purpose of this rule is to achieve the directed savings.

Section 49 of the Act further requires HHSC to utilize cost-effective models to better manage the care of these clients and, at the same time, achieve the identified savings. HHSC plans to meet this requirement by implementing a non-capitated Integrated Care Management (ICM) model in the Dallas and Tarrant service areas, and a partially capitated ICM model with inpatient hospital services carved out in the other urban service areas. The goal of both models is to promote proper utilization and integration of acute care and long-term care services, while achieving the savings directed by the Legislature.

HHSC received comments regarding the proposed rule during the comment period, which included a public hearing on July 26, 2006, from One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, Seton Hospital, Texas Hospital Association, Medical City Hospital, Christus Healthcare Network, Tenet Healthcare, HCA, and Methodist Hospital of Dallas. The hospitals and hospital associations shared the general consensus that the proposed rate reductions will significantly impact current reimbursement rates, which have already been cut by 5%, resulting in hospitals receiving only 80% of their costs associated with providing Medicaid services. In addition, the hospitals and hospital associations stated that the proposed rule will be harmful to local taxpayers and businesses, as costs not covered by Medicaid are passed on to taxpayers and commercial health plans, and that access to hospital care may be adversely impacted.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Hospital Association concerning §355.8064, stating that the proposed rule lacks statutory or legislative authority.

Response: HHSC has the authority to adopt §355.8064 under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; §531.021, Government Code, which provides HHSC with the authority to administer Medicaid funds and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements; and §32.021, Human Resources Code, which provides HHSC with the authority to administer the Medicaid program and adopt rules for the proper and efficient operation of the program.

Comment: In their written comments, the partnership of One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, Seton Hospital, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated that the proposed rate reductions will significantly impact current reimbursement rates, which have already been cut by 5 percent, resulting in hospitals receiving only 80% of their costs to provide Medicaid services.

Response: Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the Section 49 savings target is achieved. However, HHSC's decision to delete proposed subsection (c) will lessen the impact of the rule on the affected hospitals' reimbursement rates.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated that the $109.5 million in savings targeted for the 2006-07 biennium was unrealistically high.

Response: HHSC understands the concern about the amount of the savings target; however, Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs a savings target of $109,500,000 in general revenue.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated the hospital industry supported implementation of an Integrated Care Management (ICM) model in all expansion service areas. The commenters expressed the opinion that this would give all provider types an opportunity to make the system work in a collaborative manner but that ICM is now being implemented only in the Dallas and Tarrant service areas.

Response: The proposed rule change addresses only provider participation requirements and not where the ICM model will be implemented.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, Seton Hospital, the Texas Hospital Association, and Medical City Hospital stated the proposed rule will be harmful to local taxpayers and businesses as costs not covered by Medicaid are passed on to taxpayers and commercial health plans.

Response: HHSC acknowledges that the proposed rule may result in a net loss in revenue to publicly owned hospitals. The negative fiscal impact on revenues of local governments is based on an 8% reduction in fiscal year 06 rates. Publicly owned hospitals receiving UPL funding will be able to offset loss in federal funding resulting from the 8% rate reduction by claiming increase federal funding from UPL payments. However, Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the savings target is achieved.

Comment: In their written comments, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals and the Texas Hospital Association stated the proposed rule is arbitrary in that it does not specify the amount that the inpatient rates will be reduced nor does it identify which hospitals in each market will be subject to the rate reduction.

Response: Subsection (b) specifies the amount of the rate reduction. Subsection (a) identifies which hospitals will be subject to the rate reduction: all hospitals, other than hospitals described in new subsection (c), in the identified service areas. HHSC will notify each affected hospital of the rate reduction.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals stating the proposed provider participation rule is inappropriate for a program that is voluntary.

Response: HHSC values each hospital's participation in the Medicaid program. However, Section 49 of the 2006-07 General Appropriations Act requires that HHSC achieve the targeted savings in the identified service areas.

Comment: In their written comments, the partnership of One Voice and the Network of Behavioral Health Providers, the Texas Association of Public and Nonprofit Hospitals, El Paso County Hospital District, and the Texas Hospital Association stated the proposed rule change will force some hospitals to terminate their Medicaid contracts, which may adversely impact access to hospital care.

Response: Senate Bill 1, General Appropriations Act (Article II, Special Provisions, Section 49), 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, directs HHSC, to the extent necessary, to adjust provider payments in the designated service areas to ensure that the savings target is achieved. However, HHSC's decision to delete proposed subsection (c) will lessen the impact of the rule on the affected hospitals' reimbursement rates.

The new rule is adopted under Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; Human Resources Code, §32.021, and Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas, to administer Medicaid funds, and to adopt rules necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the program; and Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

§355.8064.Reimbursement Adjustment for Hospitals Providing Inpatient Services to SSI and SSI-Related Clients.

(a) Effective September 1, 2006, reimbursement to hospitals in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Lubbock, Nueces, Tarrant and Travis service areas for inpatient services will be determined according to the methodology described in §355.8063 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Methodology for Inpatient Hospital Services) and shall be reduced by the percent discount in subsection (b) of this section. The percent discounts are necessary to achieve budgetary savings as permitted under §355.201 of this title (relating to Establishment and Adjustment of Reimbursement Rates by the Health and Human Services Commission).

(b) Up to an eight percent discount may be applied to the reimbursement rates of all hospitals for inpatient services provided to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and SSI-related clients in service areas as determined by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC).

(c) In-state children's hospitals that are cost reimbursed in accordance with §355.8063 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Methodology for Inpatient Hospital Services) are exempt from the percent discount in subsection (b) of this section.

(d) Definitions.

(1) Bexar Service Area means Atascosa, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall, Medina and Wilson counties.

(2) Dallas Service Area means Collin, Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Kaufman, Navarro and Rockwall counties.

(3) El Paso Service Area means El Paso County.

(4) Harris Service Area means Brazoria, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Montgomery and Waller counties.

(5) Lubbock Service Area means Crosby, Floyd, Garza, Hale, Hockley, Lamb, Lubbock, Lynn and Terry counties.

(6) Nueces Service Area means Aransas, Bee, Calhoun, Jim Wells, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio, San Patricio and Victoria counties.

(7) Tarrant Service Area means Denton, Hood, Johnson, Parker, Tarrant and Wise counties.

(8) Travis Service Area means Bastrop, Burnet, Caldwell, Hays, Lee, Travis and Williamson counties.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604181

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: June 23, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


1 TAC §355.8071

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts new §355.8071 to establish the methodology HHSC will use to distribute supplemental (Upper Payment Limit or UPL) payments to in-state children's hospitals. The new rule is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the June 23, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4977) and will not be republished.

New §355.8071 allows HHSC to make UPL payments to specific in-state children's hospitals and establish the methodology HHSC will use to calculate these supplemental payments. The 2006-07 General Appropriations Act (Article II, Health and Human Services Commission, Rider 73, S.B. 1, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005) appropriates $12.5 million in General Revenue for each year of the biennium to provide Medicaid UPL reimbursement to in-state children's hospitals. The rider directs HHSC to implement Medicaid UPL reimbursement to cover the cost incurred by Medicare designated children's hospitals in providing inpatient services. The rider also directs HHSC to develop a methodology to prioritize the UPL payments to reduce Medicaid losses in any children's hospital with a Medicaid patient load that exceeds 60 percent of the hospital total inpatient days.

HHSC did not receive comments regarding the proposed rule during the comment period, which included a public hearing on July 26, 2006.

The new rule is adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Executive Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604182

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: June 23, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900


Chapter 370. STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM

Subchapter E. PROVIDER REQUIREMENTS

1 TAC §§370.451 - 370.454

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts new Subchapter E, Provider Requirements, in Chapter 370, State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), §§370.451 - 370.454. Sections 370.451 and 370.453 are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the May 19, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4135). The text of the rule will be republished. Sections 370.452 and 370.454 are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the May 19, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4135) and will not be republished.

This new subchapter contains definitions, provides information about Significant Traditional Provider determinations and appeals, prohibits balance billing, and describes the experience rebate requirements in the CHIP program.

HHSC received two comments from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc., regarding the proposed rules during the 30-day comment period, which included a public hearing on May 30, 2006. A summary of these comments and HHSC's responses follows.

Comment: HHSC received a comment from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc. in which the commenter suggested revising the definition of "Eligible Provider" in §370.451 to include "a non-network provider who agrees with an HMO or EPBP to see a CHIP member for an agreed-upon rate on a case-by-case basis".

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment and agrees with the commenter. The rule was revised to include the modified definition of "Eligible Provider."

Comment: HHSC received a comment from UniCare Health Plans of Texas, Inc. suggesting that the phrase "Providers who contract with an HMO or EPBP" be deleted in §370.453(a) and be replaced with "Eligible Providers" to recognize the practice where a non-network provider contracts with an HMO on a member specific basis to provide covered services.

Response: HHSC acknowledges the comment and agrees with the commenter. The rule was revised as suggested, and the same change was made to §370.453(c) for consistency purposes.

The new rules are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the Executive Commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement HHSC's duties; and the Texas Health and Safety Code, §62.051(d), which directs HHSC to adopt rules as necessary to implement the Children's Health Insurance Program.

§370.451.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Claims Processing Entity--The Health Maintenance Organization (HMO), Exclusive Provider Benefit Plan (EPBP) or its subcontractor who processes claims for CHIP.

(2) Day--A calendar day.

(3) Eligible Provider--A network provider who provides medical services to a covered CHIP member or a non-network provider who agrees with an HMO or EPBP to see a CHIP member for an agreed-upon rate on a case-by-case basis.

(4) Exclusive Provider Benefit Plan (EPBP)--A managed care plan that complies with 28 TAC §§3.9201 - 3.9212, relating to the Texas Department of Insurance's requirements for exclusive provider benefit plans, and contracts with the Commission to provide CHIP or Medicaid coverage.

(5) Experience Rebate--A portion of the HMO or EPBP's net income before taxes that is returned to the State.

(6) Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)--An organization that holds a certificate of authority from the Texas Department of Insurance to operate as an HMO under Chapter 843 of the Texas Insurance Code or a certified Approved Non-Profit Health Corporation (ANHC) formed in compliance with Chapter 844 of the Texas Insurance Code.

(7) Significant Traditional Provider or STP--A provider with whom CHIP members have well-established or longstanding provider/client relationships, or to whom the members have typically or traditionally visited for health care.

§370.453.Balance Billing.

(a) Eligible providers must agree that payment received for covered services will be accepted as payment in full and must agree that they will not bill the member or the member's guardian for any remaining balance for covered services rendered.

(b) The prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to unauthorized out-of-network services, or to services that are not a covered benefit.

(c) Eligible providers may not bill or take other recourse against the member or the member's guardian for claims denied as a result of error attributed to the eligible provider or Claims Processing Entity.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 10, 2006.

TRD-200604183

Steve Aragón

Chief Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: September 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6900