TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 61. SCHOOL DISTRICTS

Subchapter II. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING HIGH SCHOOL ALLOTMENT

19 TAC §§61.1091 - 61.1101

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §§61.1091 - 61.1101, concerning the high school allotment for school districts. The proposed new sections would implement provisions for the administration of high school allotment funds in accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.113, Recognition of High School Completion and Success and College Readiness Programs, §39.114, High School Allotment, and §42.2516, Additional State Aid for Tax Reduction, as added by House Bill (HB) 1, 79th Texas Legislature, Third Called Session.

HB 1, 79th Texas Legislature, Third Called Session, amended the TEC by adding §42.2516(b)(3), which provides additional state aid to districts for the purpose of improving graduation and college readiness rates, and §39.113 and §39.114, which authorize the commissioner of education to adopt rules to implement provisions relating to use of this additional state aid referred to as the high school allotment.

Recognizing that overall graduation and college readiness rates in Texas high schools, while improving, are still too low, the Texas Legislature provided additional funds for the purpose of addressing these achievement issues. Specifically, the Legislature directed that these funds be used for the purposes of: (1) preparing underachieving students in Grades 9-12 for entrance into institutions of higher education, (2) encouraging all students in Grades 9-12 to pursue advanced academic opportunities, (3) providing opportunities for students to take academically rigorous course work, (4) aligning secondary and postsecondary curriculum and expectations, and (5) supporting other promising high school completion and success initiatives in Grades 6-12 approved by the commissioner of education.

The proposed new rules in 19 TAC Chapter 61, School Districts, Subchapter II, Commissioner's Rules Concerning High School Allotment, would implement the statutory provisions of the high school allotment as follows.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1091, Definitions, would establish applicable definitions when used in the context of the new subchapter.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1092, Payment of the High School Allotment, would establish provisions relating to calculation, payment and reconciliation, and reporting.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1093, Use of Funds, would delineate acceptable programs and activities that may be funded.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1094, Exceptions for Alternative Uses of Funds, would establish that eligible school districts will be identified that may receive exceptions for alternative uses of the funds.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1095, Allowable Expenditures, would identify allowable expenditures, including textbooks and professional development, for example.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1096, Unallowable Expenditures, would identify indirect or administrative costs or athletics as unallowable expenditures.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1097, Additional High School Completion and Success Initiatives Approved by the Commissioner, would establish procedures for submitting initiatives for commissioner approval for uses other than those specified.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1098, Policy Advisory Group, would describe the composition and role of an advisory group that would review activities and programs implemented with high school allotment funds and make recommendations to the commissioner.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1099, School District Annual Performance Review, would set forth requirements relating to local school district establishment and continuation of annual performance goals for programs, activities, and strategies implemented with high school allotment funds.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1100, Evaluation of Programs, would describe the TEA evaluation of programs implemented with high school allotment funding.

Proposed new 19 TAC §61.1101, Standards for Selecting and Methods for Recognizing Districts and Campuses Offering Exceptional Programs, would describe the process and standards for selecting recognized districts and campuses. The proposed new section would also specify that recognition methods would be established by the commissioner.

Districts will report the use of these funds in the same manner as other allotments using separate accounting to enable the TEA to report back to the Legislature on the effectiveness of the allotment.

Stakeholder meetings and forums were held and input received during the development of the proposed new sections. These meetings include the June 7 - 8, 2006, meeting with the Texas Association of Secondary School Principals; the June 26 - 27, 2006, summer conference of the University of Texas/Texas Association of School Administrators; and the July 20, 2006, public stakeholder meeting.

Christi Martin, Senior Advisor in the Office of Education Initiatives, has determined that for the first five-year period the new sections are in effect there will be fiscal implications for state and local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new sections. The proposed new sections implementing HB 1 provide a high school allotment of $275 for each student in average daily attendance in Grades 9-12. This cost is included in the current appropriations. The estimated expenditure for the state for fiscal year 2007 is $318,565,150 with an estimated increase of approximately 2.2% per year for each of the next five years.

Ms. Martin has determined that for each year of the first five years the new sections are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the new sections will be the provision of financial support and guidance to districts and charter schools. This program is expected to: (1) increase the percentage of students graduating from high school, (2) increase enrollment in advanced courses, (3) increase the percentage of students successfully graduating on the Recommended High School Program and Distinguished Achievement Program, and (4) increase the percentage of students who achieve the higher education readiness component qualifying scores on both the English language arts and the mathematics sections of the exit-level Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed new sections.

The public comment period on the proposal begins August 18, 2006, and ends September 17, 2006. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed new sections submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The new sections are proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.113(b), which authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules for the administration of programs for recognition of high school completion and success and college readiness, §39.114(d), which authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to administer provisions relating to high school allotment funds, and §42.2516(k), which authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules necessary to administer provisions relating to additional state aid for tax reduction.

The new sections implement the Texas Education Code, §§39.113, 39.114, and 42.2516.

§61.1091.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Academically rigorous course work--Academically rigorous course work is an academically intense and high-quality program of study that provides students with the information and skills necessary to successfully enroll in entry-level courses at an institution of higher education without the need for developmental course work. Academically rigorous coursework includes four years of math and four years of science at the high school level.

(2) Advanced academic opportunity--An advanced academic opportunity includes the following:

(A) advanced courses, such as College Board advanced placement and International Baccalaureate courses, and others as defined in §74.30 of this title (relating to Identification of Advanced Courses), with the exception of the Social Studies Advanced Studies;

(B) dual enrollment courses for which students receive both high school and college credit, as limited by §74.25 of this title (relating to High School Credit for College Courses);

(C) an original research/project as defined by §74.54 of this title (relating to Distinguished Achievement High School Program--Advanced High School Program) or by §74.64 of this title (relating to Distinguished Achievement High School Program--Advanced High School Program); and

(D) advanced technical credit courses.

(3) College readiness program--A college readiness program is any program, activity, or strategy designed to do either of the following:

(A) increase the number of students who are academically prepared to enroll in entry-level courses at institutions of higher education without the need for developmental course work; or

(B) increase the number of students who enroll in institutions of higher education.

(4) Developmental course work--As defined in §4.53 of this title (relating to Definitions), developmental course work refers to non-degree-credit course work designed to address a student's deficiencies.

(5) High school allotment--The high school allotment refers to funds allocated under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §42.2516(b)(3).

(6) High school completion and success initiative--A high school completion and success initiative is any program, activity, or strategy designed to do the following:

(A) improve student achievement in high school; and

(B) increase the number of students who graduate from high school.

(7) Institution of higher education--An institution of higher education is any public technical institute, public junior college, public senior college or university, medical or dental unit, or other agency of higher education as defined in the TEC, §61.003.

(8) School district--For the purposes of this subchapter, an open-enrollment charter school is considered a school district.

§61.1092.Payment of the High School Allotment.

(a) In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 42, Subchapter E, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) shall distribute funds to school districts for the purpose of payment of the high school allotment, as specified by the provisions in this subchapter.

(b) Each school district shall provide to the TEA an estimate of student enrollment for Grades 9-12 for the school district in a manner established by the commissioner of education.

(c) High school allotment funds shall be distributed to each school district as a part of regularly scheduled state aid payments according to the district's Foundation School Program payment schedule.

(d) School districts shall account for the receipt and expenditure of funds distributed under the TEC, §42.2516(b)(3), in accordance with §109.41 of this title (relating to Financial Accountability System Resource Guide). Specific procedures for reporting the receipt and expenditure of high school allotment funds may be established by the commissioner.

§61.1093.Use of Funds.

In accordance with the Texas Education Code, §39.114(a), high school allotment funds may be spent on the following, which, unless otherwise noted, shall be targeted toward Grades 9-12:

(1) programs that provide underachieving students with the following:

(A) instruction in study skills for success in college level work;

(B) academic and community support for success in college preparatory classes; and

(C) information about and access to college and financial aid;

(2) activities designed to increase the number of students who take preparatory college entrance examinations and college entrance examinations;

(3) programs that increase the number of students who enroll and succeed in College Board advanced placement courses and International Baccalaureate courses;

(4) programs that increase the number of students who take College Board advanced placement examinations and International Baccalaureate examinations;

(5) programs that expand participation in dual enrollment or concurrent enrollment courses;

(6) activities designed to increase access for underachieving students to college and financial aid;

(7) activities designed to create a college-going culture within a district or on a campus;

(8) early college high school programs that provide at-risk students and other students with the opportunity to graduate from high school with an associate's degree or 60 hours of credit toward a baccalaureate degree;

(9) programs that provide academic support and instruction to increase the number of students who complete the Recommended High School Program or the Distinguished Achievement Program as defined in Chapter 74, Subchapter E, of this title (relating to Graduation Requirements, Beginning with School Year 2004-2005), or Chapter 74, Subchapter F, of this title (relating to Graduation Requirements, Beginning with School Year 2007-2008);

(10) strategies that create small learning communities, advocacy programs, or advisory programs for students;

(11) programs or activities that create individualized high school graduation and postsecondary plans for students;

(12) programs that ensure that students have access to rigorous curriculum, effective instruction, and timely formative assessment;

(13) programs that create opportunities for middle and high school educators and college and university faculty to jointly identify college and secondary curricular requirements and expectations and develop means to align these requirements and expectations;

(14) summer transition programs and other programs that provide academic support and instruction for students entering Grade 9; and

(15) other high school completion and success initiatives as approved by the commissioner of education.

§61.1094.Exceptions for Alternative Uses of Funds.

In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.114(b), before the beginning of the 2008-2009 school year, the commissioner of education shall identify school districts that are eligible for exceptions for alternative uses of high school allotment funds.

§61.1095.Allowable Expenditures.

(a) A school district may use high school allotment funds to support a program or activity that is currently in place in the district or on a campus, provided that the program satisfies at least one of the permissible uses of funds identified in the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.114(a), and further defined in §61.1093 of this title (relating to Use of Funds).

(b) A school district may spend high school allotment funds on the following, provided these items are for uses identified in the TEC, §39.114(a), and further defined in §61.1093 of this title:

(1) tuition and fees;

(2) textbooks and other instructional materials;

(3) transportation;

(4) equipment, including science laboratory equipment;

(5) technology;

(6) parent and community involvement and outreach;

(7) professional development;

(8) technical assistance services;

(9) performance reward and incentive programs for students;

(10) personnel costs, including salaries and benefits;

(11) stipends and extra-duty pay; and

(12) performance reward and incentive programs established in district policy or employment contracts.

(c) School districts may pool high school allotment funds to implement multi-district programs for the uses of funds identified in the TEC, §39.114(a), and further defined in §61.1093 of this title.

§61.1096.Unallowable Expenditures.

A school district may not spend high school allotment funds on indirect or administrative costs or athletic programs.

§61.1097.Additional High School Completion and Success Initiatives Approved by the Commissioner.

(a) In order to implement high school completion and success initiatives for students in Grades 6-12 other than those programs, activities, and strategies identified for Grades 6-12 in the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.114(a), or further defined in §61.1093 of this title (relating to Use of Funds), a school district must apply to the Texas Education Agency (TEA), by a date set by the commissioner of education. The application must include a standard application as required by the TEA division responsible for approving high school completion and success initiatives under this subchapter. No application is needed to implement programs in accordance with §61.1093 of this title.

(b) The TEA shall review and consider approval of applications submitted under this section.

(c) The TEA may consider criteria that include, but are not limited to, the following when determining whether to approve an application:

(1) indications that the initiative will improve student performance in relation to the performance indicators established in §61.1099 of this title (relating to School District Annual Performance Review);

(2) evidence that activities under the initiative address the needs of the target population participating in the initiative;

(3) indications that the design of the initiative reflects up-to-date knowledge about high school completion and success and/or college readiness and effective practices;

(4) the qualifications, experience, or certifications of personnel or external consultants involved in the initiative; and

(5) the appropriateness of proposed expenditures.

(d) A school district that receives approval from the TEA to implement a high school completion and success initiative under this section may be required to re-apply for approval each year.

(e) The TEA may identify specific programs, activities, and strategies that are approved for use in the expenditure of high school allotment funds in addition to those identified in the TEC, §39.114(a), or further defined in §61.1093 of this title.

§61.1098.Policy Advisory Group.

(a) The commissioner of education may create an advisory group composed of stakeholders, including the following:

(1) representatives from school districts;

(2) representatives from institutions of higher education;

(3) experts with high school completion and success and college readiness experience; and

(4) other interested stakeholders.

(b) The advisory group may review activities and programs implemented with high school allotment funds and make recommendations to the commissioner regarding the following:

(1) standards for evaluating the success and cost-effectiveness of high school completion and success and college readiness programs implemented with high school allotment funds;

(2) criteria for identifying and disseminating promising practices and strategies; and

(3) guidance for school districts and campuses in establishing and improving high school completion and success and college readiness programs implemented with high school allotment funds.

(c) If requested by the commissioner, the advisory group shall make recommendations regarding standards for selecting and methods for recognizing school districts and campuses with exceptional high school completion and success and college readiness programs implemented with high school allotment funds.

§61.1099.School District Annual Performance Review.

(a) At a public hearing of the board of trustees, each school district shall establish annual performance goals for programs, activities, and strategies implemented with high school allotment funds related to the following performance indicators:

(1) percentage of students graduating from high school;

(2) enrollment in advanced courses, including College Board advanced placement courses, International Baccalaureate courses, and dual or college credit courses;

(3) percentage of students successfully graduating on the Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program described in Chapter 74, Subchapter E, of this title (relating to Graduation Requirements, Beginning with School Year 2004-2005), or Chapter 74, Subchapter F, of this title (relating to Graduation Requirements, Beginning with School Year 2007-2008);

(4) percentage of students who achieve the higher education readiness component qualifying scores on the English language arts section of the exit-level Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS); and

(5) percentage of students who achieve the higher education readiness component qualifying scores on the mathematics section of the exit-level TAKS.

(b) Annually, each school district shall review its progress in relation to the performance indicators specified in subsection (a) of this section. Progress should be assessed based on information that is disaggregated with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status.

(c) Each school district shall ensure that decisions about the continuation or establishment of programs, activities, and strategies implemented with high school allotment funds are based on:

(1) state assessment results and other student performance data;

(2) standards for success and cost-effectiveness as established by the commissioner of education in accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.113(a)(1); and

(3) guidance for improving high school completion and success and college readiness programs as established by the commissioner in accordance with TEC, §39.113(a)(2).

§61.1100.Evaluation of Programs.

(a) The Texas Education Agency (TEA) shall evaluate programs implemented with high school allotment funds based on the following:

(1) performance indicators as established in §61.1099 of this title (relating to School District Annual Performance Review); and

(2) standards for success and cost-effectiveness as established by the commissioner in accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.113(a)(1).

(b) In addition to the evaluation on the indicators identified in subsection (a) of this section, school districts shall be evaluated based on the academic quality indicators in the TEA's performance-based monitoring system and other compliance requirements.

§61.1101.Standards for Selecting and Methods for Recognizing Districts and Campuses Offering Exceptional Programs.

(a) In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.113(a)(3), by January 1 of each year, beginning in 2008, the commissioner of education shall select for recognition districts and campuses that offer exceptional high school completion and success and college readiness programs implemented with high school allotment funds.

(b) The standards for selecting school districts and campuses with exceptional high school completion and success and college readiness programs shall be established by the commissioner of education.

(c) The standards for selection shall be based on information that is disaggregated with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. Standards for selection shall include consideration of district and campus performance in relation to the following:

(1) performance indicators as established in §61.1099 of this title (relating to School District Annual Performance Review);

(2) standards for success and cost-effectiveness as established by the commissioner in accordance with the TEC, §39.113(a)(1); and

(3) district or campus improvement relative to districts and campuses that exhibit similar characteristics of students served by the campus or district, including, but not limited to, past academic performance, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and limited English proficiency.

(d) The methods for recognizing school districts and campuses that offer exceptional high school completion and college readiness programs implemented with high school allotment funds shall be established by the commissioner.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2006.

TRD-200604043

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


Chapter 102. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Subchapter FF. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING GOVERNOR'S EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE AWARD PROGRAMS

19 TAC §102.1071

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §102.1071, concerning the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program--Texas Educator Excellence Grant. The proposed new section would implement the requirements of the Texas Education Code (TEC), Subchapter N, as added by House Bill 1, 79th Texas Legislature, Third Called Session, that requires the commissioner to, by rule, establish procedures and adopt guidelines for the administration of the awards for the student achievement program.

House Bill 1, 79th Texas Legislature, Third Called Session, added the TEC, Subchapter N, establishing a program whereby classroom teachers and other campus personnel may receive an incentive award from an eligible campus through the student achievement program. The legislation requires that the commissioner establish the grant award program and adopt rules for developing a campus incentive plan and the awarding of funds.

Proposed new 19 TAC §102.1071 would implement this new legislation by establishing the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program--Texas Educator Excellence Grant. The new section proposes provisions that would: (1) prescribe a procedure that a school district and open-enrollment charter school must follow to apply for and receive funding on behalf of an eligible campus for the grant program under this section; (2) establish guidelines for determining which campuses are eligible to receive funding; (3) provide guidelines by which a campus will submit to the agency an incentive plan developed by a campus-level decision-making body and with significant classroom teacher involvement; and (4) stipulate the manner in which incentive payments are allocated to classroom teachers and other eligible campus employees.

At least 75% of the total award must be used to provide incentives to classroom teachers who have both demonstrated success in improving student performance using objective, quantifiable measures and who have collaborated with faculty and staff to contribute to improving overall student performance on the campus. The remaining 25% of the award must be used to fund other activities which may include incentives for other school personnel, professional development for classroom teachers who did not receive an incentive payment, teacher mentoring support, recruitment and retention of highly-qualified teachers, teacher stipends, and other programs that have been proven to directly contribute to improved student achievement. Grant funds may not be used for an employee whose primary responsibility is supervision of an athletic activity.

The proposed new section would provide guidelines and procedures for campuses, open-enrollment charter schools, and school districts to follow in order to apply for the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program--Texas Educator Excellence Grant. Grantees must agree to submit all information, application materials, and reports required by the TEA.

Christi Martin, Senior Advisor in the Office of Education Initiatives, has determined that for the first five-year period the new section is in effect there will be fiscal implications for state and local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new section. The proposed new section would allow the TEA to award grants from funds appropriated for the program beginning with the 2006-2007 school year and may not exceed $100 million in the 2006-2007 school year, except as expressly authorized by the General Appropriations Act or other law. To the extent practicable, the campus shall pay a classroom teacher an incentive payment in an amount of not less than $3,000 or more than $10,000. In fiscal year 2006, $155,000 has been set aside from agency administrative funds for TEA's eGrants planning, design, and implementation. In fiscal year 2006 through fiscal year 2009, $140,000 has been set aside from agency administrative funds for each year to fund personnel to administer the grant program.

Ms. Martin has determined that for each year of the first five years the new section is in effect the student benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the new section will be the positive impact the program will have on classroom teaching by rewarding classroom teachers and other school personnel for success in improving student performance, and for collaborating with faculty and staff to contribute to improving overall student performance on the campus. Improving education for the school children of Texas will prepare them for success in the future and create a more highly educated and prepared workforce. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed new section.

The public comment period on the proposal begins August 18, 2006, and ends September 17, 2006. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed new section submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The new section is proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.652 and §21.658, which authorize the commissioner to, by rule, establish procedures and adopt guidelines for the administration of the awards for the student achievement program.

The new section implements the Texas Education Code, §§21.652 - 21.658.

§102.1071.Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program--Texas Educator Excellence Grant.

(a) Establishment of program.

(1) In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.652, the Governor's Educator Excellence Award Program--Texas Educator Excellence Grant is established as an annual grant program under which a district or open-enrollment charter school may receive a grant on behalf of an eligible campus as an award for student achievement. Provisions regarding implementation of the program are described in this section.

(2) Funds from this program will be distributed to a district or open-enrollment charter school, on behalf of an eligible campus, that submitted an approved campus incentive plan developed in accordance with the TEC, §21.654, and subsection (c) of this section.

(b) Campus eligibility.

(1) Campus eligibility shall be determined in accordance with the TEC, §21.653.

(2) Each year of the grant, a new list of eligible campuses will be published by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). Academically Unacceptable campuses will not be included on this list. Campuses may be eligible to receive this grant multiple times.

(3) Campuses receiving the Governor's Educator Excellence Grant established by the Governor's Executive Order RP 51 in 2005 are ineligible to receive the award described in this section until June 1, 2009.

(c) Campus incentive plan.

(1) As delineated in the TEC, §21.654, a campus incentive plan must be:

(A) developed by each campus-level decision-making body;

(B) approved by its district-level committee; and

(C) submitted by a district on behalf of an eligible campus.

(2) The campus-level body developing the plan should be composed of individuals representing a diverse and broad mix of teachers, including representation from different grade levels and subject areas.

(3) The district may choose to provide guidance to campuses in the creation of plans.

(4) The TEA may consider for approval only a campus incentive plan developed, approved, and submitted in accordance with the TEC, §21.654, and this section.

(5) A campus that has implemented an approved incentive plan may choose to renew its plan, should it be eligible for funding in subsequent years, for up to three years after the first year of implementation.

(d) Amount of program award.

(1) In accordance with the TEC, §21.655, each eligible campus whose campus incentive plan is approved is entitled to a grant award in an amount determined by the commissioner of education.

(2) Award amounts may vary from one year to the next.

(e) Incentive payments to classroom teachers.

(1) An eligible campus must distribute a specified percentage of its program grant award to classroom teachers in accordance with the TEC, §21.656.

(2) All funds must be used to provide incentives not previously funded with state, local, or federal funds.

(3) Incentives awarded under this subsection may be used only for classroom teachers. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "classroom teacher" is defined as "an educator who is employed by a school district and who, not less than an average of four hours each day, teaches in an academic instructional setting or a career and technology instructional setting." For the purposes of this subsection, the definition of the term "classroom teacher" does not include a teacher's aide or a full-time administrator.

(4) As specified in the TEC, §21.656, and further delineated in this subsection, an eligible campus receiving program funds may distribute an incentive payment only to a classroom teacher who:

(A) demonstrates success in improving student achievement. Measures determining a classroom teacher's success in improving student performance must allow for program administrators to evaluate teacher impact on student achievement; and

(B) successfully collaborates with faculty and staff to contribute to improving overall student performance on the campus. The collaboration must be measured using campus-based activities. Participation in tutoring sessions or personal-planning periods is not a sufficient measure of collaboration.

(f) Distribution of other program funds.

(1) An eligible campus must distribute a specified percentage of its program grant award to employees other than classroom teachers in accordance with the TEC, §21.657.

(2) An eligible campus receiving programs funds must use funds for some or all of the 14 provisions specified in the TEC, §21.657, when distributing incentive payments. Additional details about three of these provisions are provided in this subsection.

(A) Stipends paid for teachers to participate in after-school or Saturday programs, as specified in the TEC, §21.657(a)(10), must be used to supplement not supplant.

(B) Stipends paid for teachers who hold a postgraduate degree, as specified in the TEC, §21.657(a)(12), must be for a postgraduate degree that will improve instructional abilities, excluding education administration, mid-management certification, and superintendency certification. These stipends must be used to supplement not supplant.

(C) Extending funding to feeder campuses, as outlined in the TEC, §21.657(a)(13), must be to implement an activity described in the TEC §21.657. The student population of the feeder campus shall not be used to determine campus award eligibility or the award amount.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2006.

TRD-200604044

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497