TITLE 31.NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION

Part 10. TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD

Chapter 375. CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

2. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

31 TAC §375.12, §375.15

The Texas Water Development Board (board) proposes amendments to 31 TAC §375.12 and §375.15 concerning Clean Water State Revolving Fund, Subchapter A, relating to General Provisions, to provide for extended financing terms.

The board proposes to amend §375.12 and §375.15 in order to implement the March 17, 2006 Policy Statement of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Extended Financing Terms under the Clean Water Act State Revolving Fund Program (EPA Policy Statement). Currently, §375.12 limits the term of loans from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) to 20 years. According to the EPA Policy Statement, the board may use the CWSRF to purchase new municipal obligations with terms that exceed 20 years (extended financing terms). Subsequent to the EPA Policy Statement, EPA has issued additional memoranda identifying guidelines pursuant to which the board may purchase new municipal obligations with terms that exceed 20 years. The board proposes amendments to §375.12 and §375.15 to provide extended financing terms consistent with EPA guidance because the board believes that providing extended financing term responds to CWSRF program customer requests to provide terms that more closely match the life of the assets financed by the CWSRF. Additionally, the board proposes these amendments to provide an additional incentive for Texas communities to access the CWSRF program to address wastewater infrastructure needs in a cost-effective manner.

The board proposes to amend §375.12(a) to move the conditions under which the board can make loans identified in subsection (a)(1)(A), (B), and (C) to proposed new §375.12(c). According to the EPA guidance on extended financing terms, the conditions in subsection (a)(1)(A), (B), and (C) apply to both CWSRF loans as well as to the purchase of new municipal obligations with extended financing terms. The board proposes this amendment in order to consolidate the conditions applicable to loans and new municipal obligation purchases into proposed new subsection (c).

The board proposes a new subsection (c) to §375.12 to include the conditions pursuant to which the CWSRF may be used to finance loans pursuant to §375.12(a)(1) or to purchase new municipal obligations pursuant to §375.12(a)(2). The board proposes new §375.12(c)(1) and (2) because these are conditions currently applicable to loans under federal and state statute and because the EPA guidance on extended financing terms considers these conditions to be applicable to the purchase of new municipal obligations.

The board proposes new §375.12(c)(3) to apply the current loan requirement that loan repayments commence one year after project construction completion to the purchase of new municipal obligations. The proposal for this paragraph also includes new conditions that interest payments will commence no later than one year after the date of closing and principal payments will commence either one year after project completion or five years after the date the loan is closed or the purchase is made, whichever is earlier. The board proposes this amendment in order to insure that repayments are started within this timeframe in order to establish an adequate flow of funds into the CWSRF.

The board proposes new §375.12(c)(4) to include the current loan requirement that a loan term not exceed 20 years and that the loan is fully amortized within 20 years after the completion of construction, which is consistent with current federal and state statutes. As proposed, this requirement will be generally applicable to new municipal obligations purchased by the board as well. The board also proposes that this new paragraph include the additional condition that the average bond life of loans or municipal obligations not exceed 16 years. Current board rules allow loans and municipal obligations to have debt structures where the amount of principal paid may vary from year to year (also referred to as unlevel debt structure). The board has determined that allowing more principal to mature later in the term of the loan or municipal obligation may adversely affect the integrity of the CWSRF. Therefore, the board proposes to accommodate unlevel debt structures while insuring timely flow of funds into the CWSRF by limiting the average bond life to no more than 16 years when the term of the loan or municipal obligation is 20 years.

The board proposes new §375.12(c)(5) to allow extended financing terms only for the purchase of new municipal obligations as authorized by federal and state statutes. The board proposes extended financing term be defined as greater that 20 years but no more than 30 years because terms of greater than 30 years may reduce the amount of repayments to the CWSRF and thereby adversely affect the sustainability of the program. This proposed new paragraph provides three conditions under which the board may provide extended financing terms. First, the board proposes new §375.12(c)(5)(A) to limit the term to be no longer than the earlier of either 30 years or the useful life of the asset financed by the proposed assistance. The board proposes this condition to allow longer terms while maintaining the integrity of the CWSRF consistent with EPA guidance. Second, the board proposes new §375.12(c)(5)(B) to limit the average bond life for extended term financing to be no more than 20 years in order to insure a timely flow of funds into the CWSRF. Third, the board proposes new §375.12(c)(5)(C) to limit the amount of new municipal obligations purchased by the CWSRF to the amount estimated, pursuant to proposed §375.15(a), to be available for such financings while maintaining the total amount of funds historically available through the CWSRF.

The board proposes to amend §375.15(a) to include the requirement that the executive administrator prepare a capacity model analysis of the CWSRF for the board prior to its consideration of each annual intended use plan. The proposed amendment requires that the analysis identify the historical average annual assistance levels made available for financial assistance by the CWSRF program account; estimate the total amount of funds available for financial assistance from the CWSRF for the succeeding fiscal year; estimate an amount of financial assistance from the CWSRF that can be used for financial assistance for an extended term in the succeeding year in a manner that maintains the long-term capability of the CWSRF to provide financial assistance at the historical average annual assistance levels; estimate the amount of funds from the CWSRF to be made available for projects that will serve disadvantaged communities; and evaluate the long term availability of funds for the CWSRF. The board proposes this amendment to estimate the amount of funds that may be made available for extended financing terms without adversely affecting the integrity of the CWSRF. By this proposed amendment, the board proposes to move the current provisions of §375.15(a), which establishes categories of projects in the intended use plan, to §375.15(b) and renumbering accordingly. The board proposes this amendment for subject matter organizational purposes.

James LeBas, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, there will be positive fiscal implications on state and local government as a result of enforcement and administration of the amended sections. By allowing longer terms for financial assistance under the CWSRF, local governments will be able to reduce loan repayments and consequently maintain lower utility wastewater rates. Since local governments voluntarily participate in this program, however, it is not possible to determine with any precision the amount of the impact on local governments.

Mr. LeBas has also determined that for the first five years the amendments, as proposed, are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendments will be to allow municipalities and other public wastewater utility providers to maintain lower residential rate structures. Mr. LeBas has determined there will not be economic costs to small businesses or individuals required to comply with the amendments as proposed.

Comments on the proposal will be accepted for 30 days following publication and may be submitted to Jonathan Steinberg, Deputy Counsel, General Counsel's Office, Texas Water Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, Texas 78711-3231, by e-mail to jonathan.steinberg@twdb.state.tx.us or by fax at (512) 463-5580.

Statutory authority: Water Code, §6.101 and §15.605.

Cross reference to statute: Water Code, Chapter 15, Subchapter J.

§375.12.Types of Assistance.

(a) Use of fund. The fund may be used for the following purposes:

(1) to make loans [ on the condition that: ]

[ (A) such loans are made at or below market interest rates, including interest free loans at terms not to exceed 20 years; ]

[ (B) annual principal and interest payments will commence not later than one year after completion on any project and all loans will be fully amortized not later than 20 years after project completion; and ]

[ (C) the recipient of a loan will establish a dedicated source of revenue for repayment of loans ];

(2) to buy or refinance the bonds of eligible applicants within the state at or below market rates, when such debt obligations were incurred after March 7, 1985;

(3) for the reasonable costs of administering the fund and conducting activities under the Act, Title VI;

(4) as a source of revenue or security for the payment of principal and interest on revenue or general obligation bonds issued by the state if the proceeds of sale of such bonds will be deposited in the fund;

(5) to earn interest on fund accounts; and

(6) to guarantee or purchase insurance for local debt obligations.

(b) Refinancing of debt. Applications for which refinancing is sought must include provisions for purchase of insurance for the local debt obligation.

(c) Conditions of Financial Assistance. Financial assistance pursuant to subsection (a)(1) or (2) of this section may only be provided on the condition that:

(1) the financial assistance is made at or below market interest rates, including 0% interest;

(2) the recipient of the financial assistance will establish a dedicated source of revenue for repayment of the financial assistance;

(3) interest payments will commence no later than 1 year after the date of closing and annual principal payments will commence either one year after completion of project construction or five years after the date of closing, whichever is earlier;

(4) the term of the financial assistance shall not exceed 20 years, the average bond life shall not exceed 16 years provided, and the financial assistance will be fully amortized not later than 20 years after the completion of project construction; and

(5) notwithstanding paragraph (4) of this subsection, the board may buy the bonds of eligible applicants with an extended term (defined as a term of more than 20 years but not more than 30 years) on the condition that:

(A) the financial assistance is fully amortized not later than 30 years after the completion of project construction and the term of the bonds are no longer than either 30 years or the design life of the project for which the assistance is provided, whichever is earlier;

(B) the average bond life shall not exceed 20 years for either a level or unlevel debt service schedule; and

(C) providing the assistance will not exceed the amount identified in the applicable intended use plan as available for financial assistance with an extended term.

§375.15.Criteria and Methods for Distribution of Funds.

(a) Prior to the adoption by the board of the intended use plan in each fiscal year, the executive administrator shall prepare and present to the board a capacity model analysis of the CWSRF which shall, at a minimum:

(1) identify the historical average annual assistance levels made available for financial assistance by the CWSRF program account;

(2) estimate the total amount of funds available from the CWSRF for the succeeding fiscal year that can be used to provide financial assistance;

(3) estimate an amount of funds available from the CWSRF for the succeeding year that can be used to provide financial assistance for an extended term (defined as a term of more than 20 years but not more than 30 years) that maintains the long-term capability of the CWSRF to provide financial assistance at the historical average annual assistance levels;

(4) estimate an amount of funds available from the CWSRF for the succeeding year that can be used to provide financial assistance for projects that will serve disadvantaged communities; and

(5) evaluate the long term availability of funds for the CWSRF.

[ (a) After the executive administrator determines the amount of funds available for projects for a fiscal year, the funds will be applied to the list of projects designated to receive funding in the intended use plan. The list will be divided into eight categories as follows: ]

[ (1) category A, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations of 3,000 or fewer; ]

[ (2) category B, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 3,001 to 10,000; ]

[ (3) category C, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 10,001 to 25,000; ]

[ (4) category D, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 25,001 to 100,000; ]

[ (5) category E, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 100,001 to 500,000; ]

[ (6) category F, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations of 500,001 or greater; ]

[ (7) category G, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants for rural hardship communities; and ]

[ (8) category H, which shall consist of nonpoint source projects or estuary management projects. ]

(b) After the executive administrator determines the amount of funds available for projects for a fiscal year, the funds will be applied to the list of projects designated to receive funding in the intended use plan.

(1) The list will be divided into eight categories as follows:

(A) category A, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations of 3,000 or fewer;

(B) category B, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 3,001 to 10,000;

(C) category C, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 10,001 to 25,000;

(D) category D, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 25,001 to 100,000;

(E) category E, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations from 100,001 to 500,000;

(F) category F, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants with existing populations of 500,001 or greater;

(G) category G, which shall consist of treatment works projects proposed by applicants for rural hardship communities; and

(H) category H, which shall consist of nonpoint source projects or estuary management projects.

(2) [ (b) ] Projects for categories A-G shall be listed in priority ranking order with funds required and totaled by category. Projects in category H shall be listed in alphabetical order according to the name of the applicant with funds required and totaled for the category. Project costs will be based on cost estimates, acceptable to the executive administrator, contained in the intended use plan solicitation described in §375.17 of this title (relating to Intended Use Plan) used to establish the project list. Funds required by all projects in each category will then be totaled. Except for category G, a percentage of the total funds required by each category shall be computed based upon the ratio of funds required by each category to the funds required by all categories. The portion of the available funds shall be assigned to the categories based on this computed percentage, provided that no category will be assigned less than 7.0% of the total funds available unless the total needs of the category are less than 7.0%. The funds assigned to category G shall be equal to the amount of federal grants available for the fiscal year plus an equal amount of CWSRF loan funds.

(c) - (o) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 19, 2006.

TRD-200603823

Jonathan Steinberg

Deputy Counsel

Texas Water Development Board

Proposed date of adoption: September 19, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 475-2052