TITLE 31.NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION

Part 2. TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT

Chapter 65. WILDLIFE

Subchapter H. PUBLIC LANDS PROCLAMATION

31 TAC §§65.190, 65.191, 65.193, 65.198, 65.199, 65.201

The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission adopts amendments to §§65.190, 65.191, 65.193, 65.198, 65.199, and 65.201, concerning the Public Lands Proclamation. Section 65.199 is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the February 18, 2005, issue of the Texas Register (30 TexReg 810). Sections 65.190, 65.191, 65.193, 65.198, and 65.201 are adopted without changes and will not be republished.

The amendment to §65.190, concerning Application, alters nomenclature by replacing the term 'non-consumptive use' with the term 'recreational use.' The term 'non-consumptive' has been used historically as an umbrella term to encompass all activities other than hunting and fishing; however, it gives the impression that public usage other than hunting and fishing results in little or no impact to public resources on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands. The change is necessary because all uses of wildlife management areas and public hunting lands involve, to varying degrees, some type of resource impact. This change is made throughout the subchapter where necessary. The amendment also updates references and citations where necessary, removes reference to Caddo Lake State Park (which is no longer a unit of public hunting lands), and removes references to the Bryan Beach Unit of the Peach Point Wildlife Management Area, which is no longer owned by the department.

The amendment to §65.191, concerning Definitions, consists of several actions. The amendment alters the definition of 'all terrain vehicle.' Until now, the department has defined an ATV as any motor vehicle that 'cannot be operated on a public roadway,' which technically allowed inappropriate motor vehicles such as farm machinery, treaded or tracked vehicles, and construction equipment to be considered as ATVs. The department's intent in allowing the use of ATVs (where they are allowed) is to permit public users, particularly disabled users, greater ease of access, but only within biologically acceptable parameters. Obviously, heavy equipment is incompatible with sound biological management, as fragile soils and vegetative communities are easily disturbed, resulting in impacts to the fish and wildlife resources that depend upon them for habitat. Therefore, the department is replacing the current definition with the definition of ATV used in the Transportation Code. In concert with the change, the department also added another definition from the Transportation Code, the definition for 'motor vehicle,' in order to provide complete consistency of terminology, and a definition for 'off-road vehicle,' to create an inclusive term to encompass vehicles other than ATVs that could be used for off-road purposes.

The amendment also adds a definition for 'camping.' That term has not heretofore been defined, but the department has decided that a definition is needed in order to clarify exactly what is meant by that term as it applies to public use of wildlife management areas and public hunting lands.

The amendment also provides a revised definition of 'disabled person.' Previous to this rulemaking a person was required to possess a physician's statement attesting to the person's permanent ambulatory disability (as defined in the Transportation Code) in order establish the person's status as disabled. In order to avoid confusion and the difficulties associated with verification of physician's statements, the new definition would require any person seeking status as disabled to possess a state-issued disabled placard or license plate. The amendment is necessary to create a single standard for documentation of disability.

The amendment also alters the definition of the Limited Public Use (LPU) permit. Prior to this rulemaking, the LPU permit was not valid for the take of wildlife resources. The adopted definition is necessary because the amendment to §65.193 allows the LPU permit to be used for fishing on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands.

The amendment also replaces the definition for 'non-consumptive activities' with the term 'recreational use,' which is defined as 'any use other than hunting or fishing.' The new definition is necessary because all users of wildlife management areas and public hunting lands, even those who do not hunt or fish, participate in some sort of impact on those areas. The proposed definition simply aggregates the variety of public uses other than hunting and fishing under a single term of reference.

The amendment to §65.193, concerning Access Permit Required and Fees, allows any person entering a wildlife management area or public hunting lands to fish under a Limited Public Use permit (LPU) and removes a reference to hunting and fishing activities with respect to the waiver of fees for a person participating in a regular hunt under an Annual Public Hunting (APH) permit. The change is necessary to allow persons to access wildlife management areas and public hunting areas, when feasible, for fishing activities under an LPU on days when regular permit hunts are being conducted. The proposed amendment also removes references to the Bryan Beach Unit of the Peach Point Wildlife Management Area, which is no longer owned by the department.

The amendment to §65.198, concerning Entry, Registration, and Checkout, replaces the term 'non-consumptive use' with the term 'recreational use' for the reasons noted previously in the discussion of amendments to §65.190.

The amendment to §65.199, concerning General Rules of Conduct, removes a reference to the Texas Conservation Passport, which no longer exists.

The amendment also prohibits camping on any given unit of public hunting lands for more than 14 consecutive days or more than 21 days in any 30-day period. The amendment is necessary in order to ensure that recreational opportunity is equitably distributed. Since demand for camping use on many if not most public hunting areas is high, the department feels that the limitations on duration of use are a fair way of ensuring that those areas are available for the enjoyment of the greatest number of people.

The amendment also changes an outmoded reference to WMA antlerless permits. The department issues such permits on units of public hunting lands shared by the department and the U.S. Forest Service. The permits are now referred to as USFS antlerless permits. The change is necessary to provide an accurate naming convention.

The amendment also restricts the parking or leaving of motor vehicles to designated parking areas. The amendment is necessary to prevent the creation of impromptu parking areas, which result in degradation of habitat and storm water runoff erosion.

The amendment also requires persons who wish to operate a motor vehicle, ATV, or off-road vehicle under special provisions for disabled persons to possess a state-issued disabled placard or license plate, or other state-issued evidence that the person is entitled to disabled status. Under the previous rules, people seeking to use vehicles under provisions for disabled persons were required to possess only a physician's statement stating that the person met the requirements in the Transportation Code to be eligible for a disabled placard or license plate. The department reasons that if the standard for determining disabled status is the same as that used for issuance of a placard or plate, confusion and difficulties associated with verification of physician's statements can be avoided by requiring that a placard or plate be possessed as proof of disability.

The amendment also prohibits any activity not specifically authorized by order of the executive director or regulation of the commission. The amendment is necessary to address unanticipated situations or instances in which an aspect of public use is clearly antithetical to the department's mission or injurious or potentially injurious to resources or habitat, but is not specifically addressed within this subchapter.

The amendment to §65.201, concerning Motor Vehicles, includes off-road vehicles in the applicability of the section. The amendment is necessary to make the provisions of the section consistent with changes that alter the meaning of the term 'motor vehicle' and introduce the term 'off-road vehicle' in §65.191, concerning Definitions. Under current rules, an ATV is any motor vehicle that cannot be legally operated on a public roadway. The proposed amendment to §65.191 creates scenarios in which off-road vehicles can be used in the same way as ATVs, making it necessary to include them in provisions of §65.201. The amendment is necessary to provide an encompassing provision to regulate all types of vehicle use on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands.

The amendment to §65.190 will function by providing an accurate list of properties to which the provisions of the subchapter apply and by employing terminology that is consistent with that employed throughout the rest of the subchapter.

The amendment to §65.191 will function by establishing the meaning of words and terms used throughout the rules in order to provide clarity and make regulatory compliance and enforcement easier.

The amendment to §65.193 will function by allowing fishing on wildlife management areas under a Limited Public Use permit (LPU) and by eliminating inaccurate references.

The amendment to §65.198 will function by standardizing terminology.

The amendment to §65.199 will function by: removing outdated references; prohibiting persons from camping on any given unit of public hunting lands for more than 14 consecutive days or more than 21 days in any 30-day period; restricting the parking or leaving of motor vehicles to designated parking areas; requiring persons who wish to operate a motor vehicle, ATV, or off-road vehicle under special provisions for disabled persons to possess a state-issued disabled placard or license plate; and prohibiting any activity not specifically authorized by order of the executive director or regulation of the commission.

The amendment to §65.201 will function by providing the department with the means to effectively control the use of various types of vehicles on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands.

The department received five comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to redefine the term 'all-terrain vehicle' (ATV) to be consistent with the definition of that term in the Transportation Code. Of the comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption, one commenter stated that the amended rule would prohibit the use of 6-wheeled vehicles and two commenters stated that vehicles with bench-type seats would be prohibited. The department disagrees with the comments and responds that the rule as adopted merely makes the definition of ATV consistent with the definition of ATV in the Transportation Code. The department's rules governing the use of vehicles are not affected. Vehicle use (whether motor vehicles in general, or subcategories such as ATVs and off-road vehicles) remains a function of site-by-site decisions made by management personnel and published in the department publications entitled "Applications for Drawings on Public Lands" and "Public Hunting Lands Map Booklet." No changes were made as a result of the comments. The department received 32 comments supporting adoption of the rule as proposed.

The department received 11 comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to allow a person to fish under the Limited Public Use (LPU) permit. The comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption were as follows.

One commenter stated that everyone fishing or hunting on a wildlife management area should have to purchase the Annual Public Hunting (APH) permit. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that in order to encourage more people to try fishing, the department has waived fishing license requirements on state parks and wildlife management areas. Since fishing privileges are currently included under the APH permit and persons entering state parks and wildlife management areas do not need a fishing license, the department reasons that prohibiting LPU permit holders from fishing makes very little sense, since all other classes of visitors are allowed to fish. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that there would be safety problems if anglers were allowed on wildlife management areas at the same time when hunts were being conducted. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that under the current rules no person accessing an area for hunting purposes is prohibited from fishing, and in fact many hunters bring angling equipment with them when they hunt so that they can go fishing and hunting on the same trip. The department is not aware of any unsafe or dangerous situations resulting from the practice. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

The department received 21 comments supporting adoption of the proposed amendment.

The department received six comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to prohibit camping on any given unit of public hunting lands for more than 14 consecutive days or more than 21 days in any 30-day period. The comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption were as follows.

One commenter stated that the department should institute the restriction on an area-by-area basis as the need arises. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that statewide effect is necessary to ensure a fair and equitable application of the regulation to all users. No change was made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that the restriction should not be applied to hunters. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that due to staffing and manpower constraints it would be impractical to attempt to verify the daily activities of all users for the purposes of differentiation. No changes were made as a result of the comment. The department received 30 comments supporting adoption of the proposed amendment.

The department received 11 comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to restrict the parking or leaving of motor vehicles to designated parking areas. The comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption were as follows.

One commenter stated that people should be able to access hunting areas without having to walk. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that one of the main attractions of hunting for most people is the interaction with the natural world, away from the usual distractions of everyday life, such as motor vehicle traffic. Additionally, the department notes that the construction of roads to all hunting compartments on every area would be prohibitively expensive. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that parking only in designated parking areas will make many areas inaccessible to people using non-powered conveyances (bikes, feet, float-tubes, canoes, kayaks, etc.). The department disagrees with the commenter and responds that the provision would apply only to motor vehicles and trailers. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

The department received 26 comments supporting adoption of the proposed amendment.

The department received seven comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to require persons seeking to operate a motor vehicle, ATV, or off-road vehicle under special provisions for disabled persons to possess a state-issued disabled placard or license plate, or other state-issued evidence that the person is entitled to disabled status. The comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption were as follows.

One commenter stated that the fee for issuance of the placard, plate or other state evidence should be established only to cover the printing or manufacturing costs of the placard or plate. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that the department does not issue the plate or placard and therefore imposes no fee. No change was made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that since the state charges a fee for issuing a placard, the rule would require the purchase of the placard even though the individual may not want or need to use handicapped parking spaces but only needs assistance with the distances needed to travel on the public areas. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that the rule applies only to people who wish to avail themselves of special provisions for disabled users and is not limited to parking privileges. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that too many people receive disabled plates or placards without a physician's statement. The department neither agrees nor disagrees with the comment, and responds that the issue is not within the department's purview to address, since the department is not the entity that issues the plates and placards. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

The department received 26 comments supporting adoption of the proposed amendment.

The department received 11 comments opposing adoption of the proposed amendment to prohibit any activity not specifically authorized by order of the executive director or regulation of the commission. The comments offering a specific rationale for opposing adoption were as follows.

One person stated that the executive director should not be given free reign on what activities are legal on any public land and that publicly elected officials should determine that. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that under the provisions of Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 81, the legislature has delegated to the executive director the authority to prohibit hunting and fishing in wildlife management areas or public hunting lands to protect any species of wildlife or fish; to prescribe the number, kind, sex, and size of game or fish that may be taken; and to prescribe the means, methods, and conditions for the taking of game or fish during an open season in wildlife management areas or public hunting lands. Chapter 81 also delegates authority to the Parks and Wildlife Commission to adopt rules governing recreational activities in wildlife management areas. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

Three commenters stated that the proposed amendment would allow the department too broad an interpretation and that prohibited activities should be identified and not left up to someone's opinion. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that to the greatest extent possible the department attempts to explicitly identify activities that are treated as unlawful activities, but clearly, it is impossible to account for every possibility. The department further notes that the amendment is intended only to address unanticipated situations or instances in which an aspect of public use is clearly antithetical to the department's mission or injurious or potentially injurious to resources or habitat. No changes were made as a result of the comments.

One commenter stated that it is the department's job to be aware of "unanticipated situations," and that that the rule would be a blanket regulation that gives the state too much unrestricted power. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that the regulations as a body represent the department's best efforts to contemplate the variety of potential activities that persons might engage in as a consequence of using wildlife management areas and public hunting lands and that the purpose of the regulations is to protect public resources, provide for the equitable and reasonable enjoyment of those resources, and safeguard the health and safety of persons enjoying those resources. The department also comments that the department informs all persons entering wildlife management areas and public hunting lands as to standards of conduct and behavior. The department also notes that the rules adopted by the commission or established by the executive director are implemented within the statutory authority granted to the department by the legislature and are not unrestricted. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

One commenter stated that "it is better to state what is not allowed because stating what is allowed gives limited freedom to the using public to adapt a new use on a particular site. Stating what is only allowed also slants allowable uses to the interpretation of the executive director or regulation of the commission, which could be narrow or politically motivated. Narrow definitions of use could also be intentionally or unintentionally overly enforced in the field by enforcement personnel." The department disagrees with the comment and responds that the amendment does not alter any prohibitions explicitly articulated under existing rules. The amendment is intended only to address situations or events that could not be foreseen and explicitly prohibited beforehand. The rationale for this is that such situations could be injurious to resources the department is charged with protecting, or could possibly involve threats to the health and safety of persons enjoying those resources. The department also comments that the legislature has delegated specific regulatory authority to commission and the executive director; and that, in fact, other than the legislature, the commission and the executive director are the only mechanisms for regulating public use of wildlife management areas and public hunting lands. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

Nineteen commenters supported adoption of the proposed amendment.

One commenter stated that the department should suspend hunting in Choke Canyon State Park for three years so that wildlife can recover. The department disagrees with the comment and responds that the harvest on Choke Canyon State Park is an annual recommendation that specifies the number of deer to be harvested, based on a biological evaluation of habitat condition and population. No changes were made as a result of the comment.

The Texas Wildlife Association commented in support of adoption of the proposed amendments.

The amendments are adopted under Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 81, Subchapter E, which provides the Parks and Wildlife Commission with authority to establish an open season on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands and authorizes the executive director to regulate numbers, means, methods, and conditions for taking wildlife resources on wildlife management areas and public hunting lands; Chapter 12, Subchapter A, which provides that a tract of land purchased primarily for a purpose authorized by the code may be used for any authorized function of the department if the commission determines that multiple use is the best utilization of the land's resources; and §42.0177, which authorizes the commission to modify or eliminate the tagging requirements of Chapter 42.

§65.199.General Rules of Conduct.

This section applies to all public hunting lands unless an exception for a specific area and time period is designated by the executive director or by written permission of the department. It is unlawful for any person to:

(1) fail to obey regulations posted at the area or policies established by order of the executive director, fail to comply with instructions on permits or area leaflets, or refuse to follow directives given by departmental personnel in the discharge of official duties;

(2) possess a firearm, archery equipment, or any other device for taking wildlife resources on public hunting lands, except for persons authorized by the department to hunt or conduct research on the area, commissioned law enforcement officers, and department employees in performance of their duties;

(3) camp or construct an open fire anywhere other than in a designated campsite. On the Alabama Creek, Bannister, Caddo, Moore Plantation, and Sam Houston National Forest WMAs, this restriction applies only during the period from the day prior to the opening of the archery deer season through the day following the close of the general deer season;

(4) camp for more than 14 consecutive days on the same unit of public hunting lands, or for more than 21 days in any 30-day period;

(5) cause, create, or contribute to excessive or disturbing sounds beyond the person's immediate campsite between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.;

(6) establish a camp and leave it unattended for a period of longer than 24 hours;

(7) disturb or remove plants, wood, rocks, gravel, sand, soil, shell, artifacts, or other objects from public hunting lands, except as authorized by the department;

(8) write on, scratch, or otherwise deface natural features, signs, buildings, or other structures;

(9) fail to deposit refuse in designated containers or fail to remove it from the area;

(10) consume or be under the influence of alcohol while engaged in hunting activities, or to publicly consume or display an alcoholic beverage while on public hunting lands;

(11) possess dogs in camp that are not confined or leashed;

(12) use or possess any type of riding stock or pack animal on public hunting lands at any time, except:

(A) as may be provided by order of the executive director; or

(B) by written authorization of the department;

(13) use an airboat within the boundaries of public hunting lands, except as provided by executive order or by written permission of the department;

(14) take an antlerless deer during the general open season on wildlife management areas jointly managed by TPW and the U.S. Forest Service (Alabama Creek, Bannister, Caddo, Moore Plantation, or Sam Houston National Forest) unless that person possesses on their person a U.S.F.S. antlerless permit;

(15) enter a unit of public hunting lands with an equine or equines, or cause the entry of an equine or equines to a unit of public hunting lands, unless that person has in their immediate possession, for each equine in the person's custody or equine that the person allowed to enter the unit of public hunting lands, a completed VS Form 10-11 (Texas Animal Health Commission) showing that the equine has tested negative to an official Equine Infectious Anemia test within the previous 12 months. The documentation required by this paragraph shall be made available for inspection upon the request of any department employee acting within the scope of official duties;

(16) park or leave a motor vehicle unattended anywhere other than in designated parking areas, if parking areas have been designated;

(17) use a motor vehicle, off-road vehicle, or ATV on a road, in an area, or at a time when such use is restricted to disabled persons, unless the person is in possession of a state-issued disabled parking placard or disabled license plate or assisting such a person.

(18) engage in any activity not specifically authorized by order of the executive director or regulation of the commission.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 18, 2005.

TRD-200501986

Gene McCarty

Chief of Staff

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Effective date: June 7, 2005

Proposal publication date: February 18, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 389-4775


Part 10. TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD

Chapter 363. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

3. FORMAL ACTION BY THE BOARD

31 TAC §363.33

The Texas Water Development Board (board) adopts amendments to 31 TAC §363.33, concerning the Interest Rates for Loans and Purchase of Board's Interest in State Participation Projects, without changes to the proposed text as published in the April 1, 2005, issue of the Texas Register (30 TexReg 1897) and will not be republished. These amendments are adopted to allow the board to set a unique interest rate for a loan out of the Texas Water Development Funds and to restructure the paragraph relating to setting the rate for such loans for clarification.

Section 363.33(a)(2) of the board rules sets the lending rate for a loan from the Texas Water Development Funds. The amendments to §363.33(a)(2) include new subparagraph (D) to allow the board to set a lending rate for a loan out of the Texas Water Development Funds that is different than the rate set by the lending rate procedure in order to facilitate the restructuring of an existing board loan that is in imminent risk of default as determined by the board. In such a situation, the board would refinance the existing debt of a political subdivision with a new loan from the Texas Water Development Funds with an interest rate that maximizes the ability of the political subdivision to make payments. For example, the new loan may utilize a 0% or 1% interest rate, a rate that could not be achieved through the current lending rate procedure. The addition is not intended to provide a new source of low interest financing for water and wastewater projects. Rather, the addition is intended to provide the board with a vehicle to assist political subdivisions in preventing defaults of loans with the board.

The amendments are also adopted to §363.33(a)(2) to modify the lettering of the subparagraphs in §363.33(a)(2) to provide clarification of the procedures under this section.

There were written comments in opposition to the proposed rules, received from Mr. Charles O'Dell, Director, HayesCAN. Mr. O'Dell expressed concern that utilizing the proposed amendments to extend the life of problematic loans is bad public policy. He also commented that using the proposed amendments to refinance an existing loan in the board's Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) portfolio would violate CWSRF program goals and the public trust.

BOARD RESPONSE: The board believes it is sound public policy to take proactive action to address loans that are in imminent risk of default and to prevent such defaults. The proposed amendments provide a useful tool to address such loans before they reach the default stage. The proposed amendments also provide a viable alternative to litigation and the opportunity to avoid the costs and potential interruption in service associated with litigation. The proposed amendments affect the CWSRF only to the extent that a special interest Texas Water Development Funds loan is utilized by a borrower to refinance an existing CWSRF loan. Such a transaction is not only consistent with CWSRF program rules but benefits the CWSRF by facilitating the repayment in full of the underlying CWSRF loan. The board is adopting the rules without change based on the written comments.

The amendments are adopted under the authority of the Texas Water Code, §6.101.

The statutory provisions affected by the amendments are Texas Water Code, Chapter 17, Subchapter E.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 17, 2005.

TRD-200501973

Suzanne Schwartz

General Counsel

Texas Water Development Board

Effective date: June 6, 2005

Proposal publication date: April 1, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 475-2052