TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 1. TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD

Chapter 4. RULES APPLYING TO ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §4.7

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §4.7(b), concerning changing references from the former Texas Academic Skills Program to the Texas Success Initiative without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 19, 2004 issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10669). Specifically, these amendments remove from Board rules all references to the former Texas Academic Skills Program (TASP) and replaces them with references to the current Texas Success Initiative.

No comments were received regarding the amendments to this section.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Coordinating Board with general rule-making authority; §61.002, which establishes the Coordinating Board as an agency charged to provide leadership and coordination for the Texas higher education system; §61.051, which provides the Coordinating Board with authority to coordinate institutions of public higher education in promoting quality education; and §61.0651, which charges the Board to adopt and recommend management policies applicable to institutions of higher education in relation to management of human resources and physical plants.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500472

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 19, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 5. RULES APPLYING TO PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND/OR HEALTH-RELATED INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Subchapter C. APPROVAL OF NEW ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AND ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES AT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES AND/OR HEALTH-RELATED INSTITUTIONS

19 TAC §5.45, §5.46

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §5.45 and §5.46, concerning the academic qualifications of faculty in Texas institutions of higher education in regard to requests for new degree programs without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 19, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10672).

Specifically, these amendments would establish criteria for evaluating faculty credentials in regard to determining faculty members’ contributions to proposed degree programs.

The following comments were received regarding the amendments:

Comments: Texas A&M University supports the Coordinating Board decision to consider only accredited U.S. degrees and degrees from international institutions that have demonstrated equivalence to U.S. degrees when evaluating faculty resources needed for new degree programs.

Response: No changes were made as a result of this comment.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Board with general rule-making authority; §61.002, which establishes the Board as an agency charged to provide leadership and coordination for the Texas higher education system; §61.051, which provides the Board with authority to coordinate institutions of public higher education in promoting quality education; Texas Education Code, §51.807, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt rules relating the Uniform Admissions; Texas Education Code, §51.762(a), which provides the Board with the authority to implement the Common Admission Application, Texas Education Code, §61.074, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt rules relating to grade-point calculation, Texas Education Code, §61.051(d) and (e), which directs the Board to develop the role and mission of each institution and periodically review the role and mission statements, Tables of Programs, and all certificate and degree programs, Texas Education Code, §61.051(j), which requires the approval of the Board for operation of off-campus educational units, and Texas Education Code, §61.055, which requires a Board finding that a new department, school, or degree or certificate program is adequately financed.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500473

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 19, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 7. PRIVATE AND OUT-OF-STATE PUBLIC POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OPERATING IN TEXAS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §7.4

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §7.4(a), concerning accrediting agencies which exempt institutions from Board oversight without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 19, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10674).

Specifically, the first amendment to §7.4(a) will list the new names of two accrediting agencies recognized by the Board for purposes of exemption from the statute and will clarify that one accrediting association is recognized by the Board only at the undergraduate level and not the graduate level.

No comments were received regarding the amendments to this section.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Board with general rule-making authority; Texas Education Code, §61.002, which establishes the Board as an agency charged to provide leadership and coordination for the Texas higher education system; Texas Education Code, §§61.301 - 61.319, concerning regulation of private postsecondary education institutions; §61.311, which provides the Board with the authority to promulgate rules governing certificates of authority; Texas Education Code, §§61.401 - 61.405, regarding regulation of public institutions of higher education established outside the boundaries of the State of Texas; and Texas Education Code, §61.403 which provides the Board with the authority to promulgate rules regarding out of state public institutions.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500474

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 19, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 17. CAMPUS PLANNING

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §17.3

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §17.3, concerning Definitions, with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 26, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10861).

Specifically, these amendments provide definitions for the Assistant Commissioner, Parking Structure, Technical Research Building, and University System and for the delegation of project approval authority to the Assistant Commissioner.

The following comments were received regarding the proposal:

Comment: The University of Texas System made additional comments related to the rules regarding the Board's statutory authority and interpretation of the statutes related to deferred maintenance, Master Plan reports, audits, and Energy Savings Performance Contracts.

Response: These comments are related to sections not under consideration by the Board.

The amendments are adopted under Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt rules, and Texas Education Code, §61.058 and §61.0572.

§17.3.Definitions.

The following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Acquisition--To come into possession or control of real property or facilities. This includes the acceptance, purchase, lease-purchase, transfer, or exchange of land or facilities.

(2) Academic Facilities--Facilities used for primary instruction, research, and public service functions of the institution. Academic facilities typically would include classrooms, libraries, administrative and faculty offices, and student and research laboratories.

(3) Addition--Expansion or extension of an existing facility that increases its size or capacity.

(4) Assignable Area of a Building--The sum of all areas within the interior walls of rooms on all floors of a building assigned to, or available for assignment to, an occupant or use, excluding unassigned space. This is also referred to as net assignable square feet (NASF).

(5) Assistant Commissioner--The administrative officer having oversight of the campus planning function at the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

(6) Athletic Facilities--Facilities used for athletic programs, including intercollegiate athletics, intramural athletics, and athletically-oriented academic programs.

(7) Auditorium or Assembly--A room, hall, or building designed and equipped for the assembly of large groups for such events as dramatic and musical productions, devotional activities, livestock judging, faculty/staff meetings, or commencement. Included are theaters, concert halls, arenas, chapels and livestock judging pavilions. Assembly facilities may also serve instructional purposes to a minor or incidental extent.

(8) Auxiliary Enterprise Buildings or Space--Income-generating structures and space such as dormitories, cafeterias, student union buildings, stadiums, athletic facilities, housing or boarding facilities used by a fraternity, sorority, or private club, and alumni centers used solely for those purposes. Auxiliary space is not supported by State appropriations.

(9) Board or Coordinating Board--The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board members and the agency.

(10) Building--A structure with at least two walls for permanent or temporary shelter of persons, animals (excluding animal caging equipment), plants, materials, or equipment that is attached to a foundation, roofed, serviced by a utility (exclusive of lighting), is a source of maintenance and repair activities, and is under the control or jurisdiction of the institution's governing board, regardless of its location.

(11) Campus Deferred Maintenance Plan (MP2)--A detailed report of institutional programs to address deferred maintenance and critical deferred maintenance.

(12) Campus Master Plan--A detailed long-range plan of institutional physical plant needs, including facilities construction and/or development, land acquisitions, and campus facilities infrastructure; the plan provides long-range and strategic analyses and facilities development guidelines.

(13) Capital Renewal--Includes capital improvements and changes to a facility in response to evolving needs. The changes may occur because of new programs or to correct functional obsolescence. Capital renewal needs are not part of the deferred maintenance backlog.

(14) Certification--Institutional attestation of reports or other submissions as being true or as represented.

(15) Classroom--A room used for scheduled classes. These rooms may be called lecture rooms, lecture-demonstration rooms, seminar rooms, or general purpose classrooms. A classroom may contain multimedia or telecommunications equipment, such as those used for distance learning. A classroom may be furnished with special equipment (e.g., globes, maps, pianos) appropriate to a specific area of study. A classroom does not include conference rooms, meeting rooms, auditoriums, or class laboratories.

(16) Class Laboratory--A room used primarily by regularly scheduled classes that require special-purpose equipment for student participation, experimentation, observation, or practice in a field of study. Class laboratories may be referred to as teaching laboratories, instructional shops, computer laboratories, drafting rooms, band rooms, choral rooms, group studios. Laboratories that serve as individual or independent study rooms are not included.

(17) Clinical Facility--A facility often associated with a hospital or medical school that is devoted to the diagnosis and care of patients in the instruction of health professions and allied health professions; medical instruction may be conducted, and patients may be examined and discussed. Clinical facilities include, but are not limited to, patient examination rooms, testing rooms, and consultation rooms.

(18) Committee or Committee on Campus Planning--The members of the Board appointed to consider facility-related issues.

(19) Commissioner--The chief executive officer of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

(20) Critical Deferred Maintenance--The physical conditions of a building or facility that places its occupants at risk of harm or the facility at risk of not fulfilling its functions.

(21) Deferred Maintenance--An existing or imminent building maintenance-related deficiency from prior years that needs to be corrected, or scheduled preventive maintenance tasks that were not performed because other tasks funded within the budget were perceived to have higher priority status. The accumulation of facility components in need of repair brought about by age, use, or damage for which remedies are postponed or considered backlogged. This may include those repairs postponed due to insufficient funding.

(22) Diagnostic Support Laboratory--the central diagnostic service area for a health care facility. Included are pathology laboratories, pharmacy laboratories, autopsy rooms, isotope rooms, etc., providing such services as hematology, tissue chemistry, bacteriology, serology, blood banks, and basal metabolism. In veterinary facilities, this includes necropsy rooms.

(23) Education and General (E&G)--Space used for teaching, research, or the preservation of knowledge, including the proportional share used for those activities in any building or facility used jointly with auxiliary enterprise, or space that is permanently unassigned. E&G space is supported by state appropriations.

(24) Emergency--An unforeseen combination of circumstances that calls for immediate action and requires an urgent need for assistance or relief that, if not taken, would result in an unacceptable cost to the state; or, an urgent need for assistance or relief due to a natural disaster; or an unavoidable circumstance whereby the delay of the project approval would critically impair the institution's function.

(25) Eminent Domain--A legal process wherein the institution takes private property for public use.

(26) Energy Systems--Infrastructure in a building that includes facility electric, gas, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and water systems.

(27) Energy Savings Performance Contract--A contract for energy or water conservation measures to reduce energy or water consumption or operating costs of institutional facilities in which the estimated savings in utility costs resulting from the conservation measures is guaranteed to offset the cost of the measures over a specified period.

(28) Facilities Audit--Comprehensive review of institutional facility development, planning activities, and reports.

(29) Facilities Inventory--A collection of building and room records that reflects institutional space and how it is being used. The records contain codes that are uniformly defined by the Board and the United States Department of Education and reported by the institutions on an ongoing basis to reflect a current facilities inventory. The facilities inventory includes a record of property owned by or under the control of the institution.

(30) Facilities Development Plan (MP1)--A detailed formulation of institutional programs to address deferred maintenance, critical deferred maintenance, facilities construction, demolition, property acquisitions, or physical plant development.

(31) Financing Directly Derived from Students--Funds resulting from the collection of fees or other charges to students, such as designated tuition, student activities fees, housing revenue, bookstore or student union revenue, etc. Bond proceeds for which one or more of these sources provides debt service shall also be considered financing directly derived from students.

(32) Financing Indirectly Derived from Students--Funds generated from funds accumulated from students, primarily interest on funds accumulated directly from students.

(33) Gift--A donation or bequest of money or another tangible item, a pledge of a contribution, or the acquisition of real property or facilities at no cost to the state or to the institution. It may also represent a method of finance for a project.

(34) Gross Square Feet (GSF)--The sum of all square feet of floor areas within the outside faces of a building's exterior walls. This includes the areas, finished and unfinished, on all floors of an enclosed structure, i.e., within the environmentally controlled envelope, for all stories or areas which have floor surfaces.

(35) Housing Facility--A single- or multi-family residence used exclusively for housing or boarding students, faculty, or staff members.

(36) Information Resource Project--Projects related to the purchase or lease-purchase of computer equipment, purchase of computer software, purchase or lease-purchase of telephones, telephone systems, and other telecommunications and video-teleconferencing equipment.

(37) Intercollegiate Athletic Facility--Any facility used primarily to support intercollegiate athletics, including stadiums, arenas, multi-purpose centers, playing fields, locker rooms, coaches’ offices, and similar facilities.

(38) Infrastructure--The underlying foundation or basic framework of a facility, including but not limited to, the utility distribution system of plumbing, heating/ventilation/air conditioning, electrical, sewage, drainage, architectural, safety and Code compliance, roads, grounds, and landscaping.

(39) Institution or institution of higher education--A Texas public institution of higher education as defined in Texas Education Code, §61.003(8), except a community/junior college.

(40) Legislative Authority--Specific statutory authorization.

(41) Lease--A contract by which real estate, equipment, or facilities are conveyed for a specified term and for a specified rent. Includes the transfer of the right to possession and use of goods for a term in return for consideration. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the term includes a sublease.

(42) Lease-Purchase--A lease project that includes the acquisition of real property by sale, mortgage, security interest, pledge, gift, or any other voluntary transaction at some future time.

(43) Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF)--The sum of all areas within the interior walls of rooms on all floors of a building assigned to, or available for assignment to, an occupant or use, excluding unassigned areas. NASF includes auxiliary space and E&G space.

(44) New Construction--The creation of a new building or facility, the addition to an existing building or facility, or new infrastructure that does not currently exist on campus. New construction would add gross square footage to an institution's existing space.

(45) Non-student Sources--Funds generated from athletic department operations, gifts and grants, facility usage fees, related revenue, and appropriated funds.

(46) NCAA Football Bowl Championship Series--A program of the NCAA under which certain NCAA Division I-A football universities share proceeds of college bowl games.

(47) Parking Structure--A facility or garage used for housing or storing vehicles. Included are garages, boathouses, airport hangars, and similar buildings. Barns or similar field buildings that house farm implements and surface parking lots are not included.

(48) Phased Project--A project that has more than one part, each one having fixed beginning and ending dates, specified cost estimates, and scope. Phased projects consider future phase needs in the project plan; each phase is able to stand alone as an individual project.

(49) Private Funding--Gifts, grants, or other funds to be used for facilities development projects that are provided by persons or entities other than the university or institution requesting consideration of the project.

(50) Project--The process that includes the construction, repair, renovation, addition, alteration of a campus, building, or facility, or its infrastructure, or the acquisition of real property.

(51) Real Property--Land with or without improvements such as buildings.

(52) Repair and Renovation (R&R)--Construction upgrades to an existing building, facility, or infrastructure that currently exists on campus; this includes the finish-out of shell space. R&R may add E&G NASF space.

(53) Replacement Value--The value of an institution's overall campus facilities, as determined annually by the Board. The method of calculation is based upon recently approved Board project costs, with adjustments based upon room types and the institution's location within the state. Replacement values for public universities, the Lamar State Colleges, and the Texas State Technical Colleges are calculated only for E&G space. Replacement values for public health-related institutions are calculated for the NASF space. Replacement values are used to measure the validity of construction projects that are submitted to the Board for approval and are not recommended for insurance purposes.

(54) Research Facility--A facility used primarily for experimentation, investigation, or training in research methods, professional research and observation, or a structured creative activity within a specific program. Included are laboratories used for experiments or testing in support of instructional, research, or public service activities.

(55) Shell Space--An area within a building with an unfinished interior designed to be converted into usable space at a later date.

(56) Space Need--The result of the comparison of an institution's actual space to the predicted need as calculated by the Board's Space Projection Model.

(57) Standard--Basis, criteria, or benchmark used for evaluating the merits of a project request or an institutional comparison to a benchmark.

(58) Technical Research Building--Space used for research, testing, and training in a mechanical or scientific field. Special equipment is required for staff and/or student experimentation or observation. Included are specialized laboratories for new technologies that have stringent environmental controls on air quality, temperature, vibration, and humidity. Facilities generally include space for specialized technologies, semiconductors, biotechnology, advanced materials, quantum computing and advanced manufacturing quantum computing technology, nanoscale measurement tools, integrated microchip-level technologies for measuring individual biological molecules, and experiments in nanoscale disciplines.

(59) Tracking Report--Institutional reports indicating the status of approved projects.

(60) Tuition Revenue Bonds Project--A project for which an institution has legislative authority to finance a construction or land acquisition project as provided for in Texas Education Code, §§55.01 - 55.25.

(61) Unimproved Real Property--Real property on which there are no buildings or facilities.

(62) University System--The association of one or more public senior colleges or universities, medical or dental units, or other agencies of higher education under the policy direction of a single governing board.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500475

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 26, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Subchapter B. BOARD APPROVAL

19 TAC §17.12

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §17.12, concerning Campus Planning with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 26, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10864).

Specifically, these amendments provide for the delegation of project approval authority to the Assistant Commissioner. The amendments adjust thresholds for delegated authority from the Board to the Committee on Campus Planning, the Commissioner of Higher Education, and the Deputy Commissioner when acting on behalf of the Commissioner, to expedite processing facilities development applications.

The following comments were received regarding the section:

Comment: Texas Tech University commented on the threshold levels proposed in the rules suggesting clarification of the approval thresholds to ensure that there was no overlap by using the phrase "but less than" in lieu of the proposed term "but not more than" in all of §17.12 of Board rules regarding Delegation of Approval Authority.

Response: The Board concurs with this comment and has proposed clarifying language for the thresholds.

Comment: The University of Texas System commented on the threshold levels proposed in the rule indicating that the proposal is a positive step in the right direction.

Response: The Board appreciates the positive comment.

Comment: One commenter asked if the agency reorganization in process would affect the approval authority of the Assistant Commissioner, Finance, Campus Planning, and Research.

Response: The Board amends the definition in §17.3(5) and §17.12 to read only "Assistant Commissioner".

Comment: The University of Texas System made additional comments related to the rules regarding the Board's statutory authority and interpretation of the statutes related to deferred maintenance, Master Plan reports, audits, and Energy Savings Performance Contracts.

Response: These comments are related to sections not under consideration by the Board.

The amendments are adopted under Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt rules, and Texas Education Code, §61.058 and §61.0572.

§17.12.Delegation of Approval Authority.

(a) Commissioner. The Board authorizes the Commissioner, and the Deputy Commissioner when acting on behalf of the Commissioner, to review or approve the following types of projects upon certification of authority by the proposing institution's governing board that the project meets all of the specified Board standards for that project type.

(1) New construction with a total project cost of $15 million but less than $25 million;

(2) Repair and renovation of existing buildings or facilities with a total project cost of $15 million but less than $25 million;

(3) Gifts or acquisition of improved real property with E&G space having a value of $5 million but less than $10 million;

(4) Purchase of real property having a value of $5 million but less than $10 million;

(5) Evaluation of projects funded more than 50 percent with tuition revenue bond proceeds that meet Board standards having a total projected cost of $25 million or more;

(6) Auxiliary enterprise projects being acquired, constructed, or renovated without the use of state general revenue funds and with a total project cost of $10 million but less than $25 million;

(7) Projects previously reviewed or approved by the Commissioner but requiring first or second reconsideration under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects), providing they continue to be eligible for Commissioner approval;

(8) Projects previously reviewed or approved by the Board, Committee, or Commissioner that require reconsideration under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects) relating to any change in the funding source of an approved project with a total projected cost of $25 million or more; and

(9) New construction, major repair and renovation, or property acquisition that affects only the University System and not a member institution, and has a total projected cost of $15 million but less than $25 million;

(10) Emergency requests eligible for Commissioner approval under the provisions of §17.22 of this title (relating to Emergency Approval of Projects); and

(11) Any project referred to the Commissioner by the Assistant Commissioner.

(b) Assistant Commissioner. The Board authorizes the Assistant Commissioner to approve the following types of projects, upon certification of authority by the proposing institution's governing board that the project meets all of the specified Board standards for that project type:

(1) New construction with a total project cost less than $15 million;

(2) Repair and renovation of existing buildings or facilities with a total project cost less than $15 million;

(3) Gifts or acquisition of improved real property with E&G space having a value less than $5 million;

(4) Purchase of real property having a value less than $5 million;

(5) Evaluation of projects funded more than 50 percent with tuition revenue bond proceeds that meet Board standards with a total projected cost less than $25 million;

(6) Auxiliary enterprise projects being acquired, constructed, or renovated without the use of state general revenue funds and with a total project cost less than $10 million;

(7) Projects previously reviewed or approved by the Assistant Commissioner but requiring first or second reconsideration under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects), providing they continue to be eligible for Assistant Commissioner approval;

(8) Projects previously reviewed or approved by the Board, Committee, Assistant Commissioner that require reconsideration under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects) relating to any change in the funding source of an approved project with a total projected cost less than $25 million; and

(9) New construction, major repair and renovation, or property acquisition that affects only the University System, and not a member institution, and has a total projected cost less than $15 million.

(c) Committee on Campus Planning. The Board authorizes the Committee to approve the following types of projects, upon certification of authority by the proposing institution's governing board:

(1) New construction projects having a total project cost of $25 million but less than $50 million;

(2) Repair and renovation of existing buildings or facilities having a total project cost of more than $25 million;

(3) Purchase of real property having a value of $10 million but less than $25 million;

(4) Gifts or acquisition of improved real property with E&G space having a value of $10 million but less than $25 million;

(5) Evaluation of projects funded more than 50 percent with tuition revenue bond proceeds and not qualifying for Commissioner approval;

(6) Auxiliary enterprise projects having a total project cost of $25 million but less than $50 million;

(7) Projects previously approved but requiring re-approval under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects) and not eligible for re-approval by the Commissioner;

(8) Any new construction, major repair and renovation, or property acquisition submitted by a University System that only affects the system, and not a component institution with a total projected cost of $25 million or more;

(9) Emergency requests eligible for Committee approval under the provisions of §17.22 of this title (relating to Emergency Approval of Projects).

(10) Any project referred to the Committee by the Commissioner, or the Assistant Commissioner; and

(11) Any project requiring a third re-approval under the provisions of §17.14 of this title (relating to Re-approval of Projects).

(d) Board. The following types of projects shall be approved by the Board:

(1) New construction with a total project cost of $50 million or more;

(2) Purchase of real property having a value of $25 million or more;

(3) Gifts or acquisition of improved real property with E&G space having a value of $25 million or more;

(4) Auxiliary enterprise projects costing $50 million or more; and

(5) Any project referred to the Board by the Committee or the Commissioner.

(e) The Commissioner may refer projects to the Committee or the Board. The Committee may refer projects to the Board. The Assistant Commissioner may refer projects to the Committee.

(f) Decisions of the Committee on Campus Planning are final. Decisions of the Commissioner may be appealed to the Board.

(g) Decisions of the Assistant Commissioner may be appealed to the Committee.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500476

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 26, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Subchapter D. RULES APPLYING TO NEW CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITION PROJECTS

19 TAC §17.30

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to §17.30 concerning Campus Planning with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 26, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10866). Specifically, these amendments provide for efficiency thresholds for clinical facilities, technical research buildings, and parking structures.

The following comments were received regarding the sections:

Comment: Texas Tech University questioned the use of a standard for parking structures, suggesting that the parking industry does not use efficiency in the form of a percent for these facilities, but uses a measure of square feet (SF) per car. It was suggested that 300 SF per car would be an excellent structure on a perfect site, with an average structure achieving an efficiency of 350 to 400 SF per car. The commenter recommended that the efficiency of a parking garage be eliminated from the rules.

Response: As a result of this review, the Board agrees with this comment and establishes the standard for parking structures at an efficiency of 300 SF per parking space for automobile facilities; 325 SF per parking space for boathouses; and 1,000 SF per parking space for airplanes. The rule provides that if the parking structure does not meet this standard, the project may be approved if the institution demonstrates that the lower efficiency is due to the shape of the available land or site or other conditions that warrant the lower efficiency.

Comment: The University of Texas System made a general comment on the standards section of the rules and asks for an impartial opinion regarding the statutory authority of the agency and greater input into developing all standards.

Response: Involvement by the universities, colleges, and health-related institutions has been paramount in recommending changes to the rules. Several Working Groups and generous informal communications have been evident in the development of the Campus Planning rules. Changes to rules requested by this university system have been considered and the Board recommends that dialog continues. No specific change to the rules is proposed by the university system.

Comment: The University of Texas System made additional comments related to the rules regarding the Board's statutory authority and interpretation of the statutes related to deferred maintenance, Master Plan reports, audits, and Energy Savings Performance Contracts.

Response: These comments are related to sections not under consideration by the Board.

The amended section is adopted under Texas Education Code, §61.027, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt rules, and Texas Education Code, §§61.058 and 61.0572.

§17.30.Standards for New Construction and/or Addition Projects.

To obtain Board approval for a new construction and/or addition project, an institution shall demonstrate that the project complies with the following standards:

(1) Institutional Standards. The institution shall demonstrate that a new construction and/or addition project complies with the following institutional standards:

(A) Deferred Maintenance.

(i) The Board standard for deferred maintenance shall be the ratio of campus deferred maintenance costs to replacement value of 5 percent or less.

(ii) If the ratio of campus deferred maintenance costs to replacement value is more than 5 percent, a project may be approved if the institution demonstrates that:

(I) the project is intended to reduce the deferred maintenance on the campus, or

(II) the institution has demonstrated a reduction in its deferred maintenance to replacement value ratio 10 percent or more for the immediate prior three years.

(iii) Alternatively, if the deferred maintenance to replacement value ratio is greater than 5 percent, a project may be approved if the institution:

(I) submits a written plan on a form specified by the Board for substantial progress toward meeting the standard; and

(II) provides the Board with a statement signed by the president of the institution, regarding its ability to support and maintain the proposed facility while continuing to address current institutional facility maintenance needs. The president of the institution may not delegate this authority.

(B) Critical Deferred Maintenance.

(i) The Board standard for critical deferred maintenance is zero.

(ii) If the critical deferred maintenance is greater than zero, a project may be approved if the institution:

(I) Develops an acceptable plan in place to address any critical deferred maintenance reported on the master plan; and

(II) the institution shall demonstrate progress towards meeting the plan goals; and

(III) the institution shall provide the Board with a statement signed by the president of the institution regarding its ability to support and maintain the proposed facility while continuing to address current institutional facility maintenance needs. The president of the institution may not delegate this authority.

(2) Project Standards. The institution shall demonstrate that a new construction or addition project complies with the following project standards:

(A) Space Need--The project shall not create a campus space surplus, or add to an existing surplus, as determined by the Board's space projection model report, required by § 17.100 of this title (relating to Board Reports).

(i) If the institution has a predicted surplus of space in the current Space Projection Model report and the project is required to accommodate future predicted enrollment growth, the Board may consider a written plan from the institution, on a form specified by the Board, for substantial progress toward meeting the standard. The plan must include:

(I) an explanation of the expected growth and how the predicted growth will impact the institution;

(II) a demonstration of progress towards eliminating the surplus;

(III) a statement regarding the ability of the institution to support and maintain the proposed facility while continuing to address current institutional facility needs; and

(IV) a demonstration that, upon completion of the project, the institution will comply with the Board standard and eliminate the space surplus.

(V) The plan shall be signed by the president of the institution. The president of the institution may not delegate this authority within the requesting institution.

(ii) If more than one project is submitted for an agenda, all projects submitted for the current agenda will be considered in the determination of a campus surplus or deficit.

(B) Cost--The construction building cost per gross square foot shall be within the range of similar projects approved by the Board within the last five years, adjusted for inflation as described in the board's Construction Cost report (§ 17.100 of this title relating to Board Reports). If the construction cost per gross square foot exceeds the maximum cost of similarly approved projects, the cost per gross square foot shall not exceed the highest actual construction cost per gross square foot reported to R.S. Means unless the institution can demonstrate that the higher cost is due to market conditions or other circumstances that warrant the higher cost.

(C) Efficiency--The ratio of NASF to GSF for the space in projects for classrooms and general purpose facilities shall be 0.60 or greater. Where the following specialized space is predominant in the project, the ratios of NASF to GSF shall be as follows:

(i) Office space: 0.65 or greater;

(ii) Clinical facility; 0.50 or greater;

(iii) Diagnostic support laboratories: 0.50 or greater; and

(iv) Technical research buildings: 0.50 or greater; and

(v) Parking structure: and

(I) 300 Square Feet per parking space for automobile facilities;

(II) 325 Square Feet per parking space for boathouses; and

(III) 1,000 Square Feet per parking space for airplanes.

(IV) If the parking structure does not meet this standard, the project may be approved if the institution demonstrates that the lower efficiency is due to the shape of the available land or site or other conditions that warrant the lower efficiency.

(vi) For mixed-use facilities, the ratio of NASF to GSF shall be calculated for each space type and considered separately.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500477

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 26, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Chapter 22. GRANT AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMS

Subchapter F. PROVISIONS FOR THE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMS FOR VOCATIONAL NURSING STUDENTS

19 TAC §22.112

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts an amendment to §22.112 concerning the Provisions for the Scholarship Programs for Vocational Nursing Students, without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 19, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10674). Specifically, on February 1, 2004, the Board of Vocational Nurse Examiners, which regulated the practice of licensed vocational nurses in Texas, ceased to exist as a separate agency. Licensed vocational nurses are now regulated by the Board of Nurse Examiners. The amendment reflects the change and eliminates any confusion regarding the licensing agency for vocational nurses.

No comments were received regarding the amendments.

The amendment is adopted under the Texas Education Code, §61.656, which allows the Coordinating Board the authority to make rules regarding the establishment and administration of a scholarship program for vocational nursing students.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 2, 2005.

TRD-200500478

Jan Greenberg

General Counsel

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: February 22, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 19, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 427-6114


Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 101. ASSESSMENT

Subchapter BB. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING THE STUDENT SUCCESS INITIATIVE

19 TAC §§101.2003, 101.2005, 101.2007, 101.2011, 101.2013

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) adopts amendments to §§101.2003, 101.2005, 101.2007, 101.2011, and 101.2013, concerning assessment. The amendments to §§101.2003, 101.2005, and 101.2011 are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 22, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 9788) and will not be republished. The amendments to §101.2007 and §101.2013 are adopted with changes to the proposed text. The sections address the Student Success Initiative (SSI). The adopted amendments provide clarifications on grade advancement testing requirements, test administration and schedule, role of grade placement committees, alternate assessment, and accelerated instruction.

The 76th Texas Legislature, 1999, mandated a new testing program of increased rigor, size, and scope that was implemented in the 2002-2003 school year. The 76th Texas Legislature also mandated new grade advancement testing requirements as part of this new testing program; these requirements were enacted as the SSI and are specified in TEC, §28.0211.

The SSI mandates new passing requirements to be phased in as follows: beginning in school year 2002 - 2003 for the reading test at Grade 3, beginning in school year 2004 - 2005 for the reading and mathematics tests at Grade 5, and beginning in school year 2007-2008 for the reading and mathematics tests at Grade 8. As specified by these requirements, a student may advance to the next grade level only by passing these tests or by unanimous decision of his or her grade placement committee (GPC) as likely to perform at grade level after accelerated instruction. TEC, §28.0211, provides that admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committees will determine the manner of participation in accelerated instruction of special education students who do not perform satisfactorily on one or more of the specified assessment instruments. ARD committees will also make decisions about promotion/retention of these special education students.

The adopted amendments to 19 TAC Chapter 101, Assessment, Subchapter BB, Commissioner's Rules Concerning the Student Success Initiative, are in accordance with TEC, §28.0211. These changes were guided by agency commitment to the following policy: to support student academic achievement of the essential knowledge and skills at each grade level to enable a student to succeed at the next grade level.

The purpose of these rule changes is to ensure that the grade advancement testing requirements are part of an overall system of support for student academic achievement. The following is a summary of the adopted amendments to 19 TAC Chapter 101, Subchapter BB.

Section 101.2003, Grade Advancement Testing Requirements, is amended by adding a new subsection (b) relating to criteria that identifies eligible students subject to all of the grade advancement requirements. A new subsection (c) is added to clarify the conditions under which a student is subject to the automatic retention component of SSI and to ensure that a student not subject to the automatic retention policy still receives the benefits of SSI (targeted or accelerated instruction, for example). Subsequent subsections are reordered accordingly. Subsection (d), formerly subsection (c), is modified to reflect the inclusion of all eligible students enrolled in Grades 3, 5, or 8 who are receiving special education services. Subsection (e), formerly subsection (d), is modified to correct a TAC reference. No changes were made to this section since published as proposed.

Section 101.2005, Test Administration and Schedule, is amended by adding a new subsection (d) to require a campus or district to accommodate the request of an out-of-district student to participate in the third administration of an SSI test if that campus or district is testing one or more local students on the applicable test and if the out-of-district student has registered to take the test by a date determined by the agency. A minor editorial change is made in subsection (c)(2). No changes were made to this section since published as proposed.

Section 101.2007, Role of Grade Placement Committee, is amended by adding language to subsection (f)(1) to ensure that districts are aware that performance on past state-mandated assessments may be used as one indicator of student performance in the grade placement committee deliberations. Language is added to subsection (f)(3) to clarify that grade placement committees can consider extenuating circumstances that may have had adverse effects on the student. A new subsection (f)(4) is added to reinforce through rule that the grade placement committee may consider the period of enrollment in making grade placement decisions. A minor technical edit is made in subsection (b). In response to public comments from the Texas Classroom Teachers Association (TCTA), the following changes were made to this section since published as proposed. Language in subsection (b) was revised to clarify that the teacher selected to be included on a student's grade placement committee must be a certified teacher of the subject of the assessment on which the student failed to perform satisfactorily and must be familiar with the student in that subject area. Language in subsection (f)(3) was revised to clarify that the grade placement committee may consider the student's ability to participate in regular instruction as well as his or her ability to participate in testing or accelerated instruction when making a decision about whether to promote the student.

Section 101.2011, Alternate Assessment, is amended in subsection (c) to require the reporting of results of alternate assessments to the Texas Education Agency in a format specified by the agency. No changes were made to this section since published as proposed.

Section 101.2013, Accelerated Instruction, is amended by adding a new subsection (d) that requires districts to accommodate the request of an out-of-district student to participate in any established, on-campus summer accelerated instruction program, provided the student is living away from his or her home district and the program matches the accelerated instruction prescribed by the Grade Placement Committee. The subsequent subsection is reordered accordingly. In response to public comment from the TCTA, this section was revised slightly since published as proposed. Language in subsection (a) was revised to clarify that any accelerated instruction for students who have failed the test must maintain a ratio of no more than ten students to each teacher per class.

The following is a summary of public comments received on the proposed amendments to 19 TAC Chapter 101, Subchapter BB, and corresponding agency responses.

Comment. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association (TCTA) requested that §101.2007(b) be modified to clarify that the teacher selected for the grade placement committee must be a teacher of the subject of the assessment instrument on which the student failed to perform satisfactorily and should be most familiar with the student in that subject area.

Agency Response. The agency agrees and has revised the language in this section accordingly.

Comment. The TCTA suggested that the language in §101.2013(a) be revised to clarify that accelerated instruction is intended to be a pull-out program for students who have failed the test, with no more than ten of these students per teacher per class as specified in law.

Agency Response. The agency agrees and has modified the language in this section accordingly.

Comment. The TCTA suggested that this subchapter be revised to specify in rule that the grade placement committees are required to develop written reports documenting the decisions of the committee with respect to issues discussed at the meeting.

Agency Response. The agency agrees that it is important to document GPC decisions; however, the section will not be modified to add this specification at this time. The agency spoke with the Texas Statewide Network of Assessment Professionals (TSNAP) to get feedback on what grade placement committees are doing currently. The feedback that the agency received from TSNAP was that districts are currently documenting their decisions using formats determined at the district level. The agency will solicit further input on this issue for potential inclusion next year so that any change would be effective in a timely manner and may be incorporated into the appropriate test administration manual.

The amendments are adopted under the Texas Education Code, §28.0211, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules and procedures necessary to implement grade advancement testing requirements to support student academic achievement of the essential knowledge and skills.

The amendments implement the Texas Education Code, §28.0211.

§101.2007.Role of Grade Placement Committee.

(a) In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §28.0211, the superintendent of each school district and chief administrative officer of each charter school shall establish procedures for convening a grade placement committee (GPC) for each student who fails to demonstrate proficiency on the second administration of the test required for grade advancement. Decisions by the GPC shall be made on an individual student basis to ensure the most effective way to support the student's academic achievement on grade level.

(b) The GPC shall be composed of the principal or principal's designee, the student's parent or guardian, and the student's teacher(s) of the subject of the grade advancement test(s) on which the student has failed to demonstrate proficiency. If this teacher is unavailable, the principal shall designate, to serve on the GPC, a teacher certified in the subject of the assessment on which the student failed to perform satisfactorily and who is most familiar with the student's performance in that subject area. If more than one parent or guardian has the authority to make educational decisions regarding the student, a good faith effort must be made to notify both parents, but participation of any one parent or guardian is sufficient. Either parent or only one guardian may initiate an appeal. If both parents or guardians serve on the GPC but do not agree, either may agree to promote the student (if the remaining members of the GPC also agree to the promotion). The district may accept a parent's or guardian's written designation of another individual to serve on the GPC for all purposes. The district may accept a parent's or guardian's written and signed waiver of participation in the GPC and designation of the remaining members of the GPC as the decision-making entity for all purposes.

(1) If a parent or guardian or designee is unable to attend a meeting, the district may use other methods to ensure parent participation, including individual and conference telephone calls. The district may designate an individual to act on behalf of the student in place of a parent, guardian, or designee if no such person can be located. A surrogate parent named to act on behalf of a student with a disability shall be considered a parent for purposes of TEC, §28.0211.

(2) The district shall make a good faith effort to notify a parent or guardian to attend the GPC. If a parent or guardian is unavailable, the remaining members of the GPC must convene as required by this section and take any actions required, except that the GPC may not agree to promote a student under TEC, §28.0211(e), unless a parent, guardian, or designee has appealed. A district may allow an appeal to be filed in writing in lieu of attending the GPC.

(c) Within five working days of receipt of student test results for the second administration of the test required for grade advancement, the district shall notify (for each student who fails to demonstrate proficiency) the campus principal of student test results. Upon receipt of this notice, the principal shall notify the teacher and parent or guardian of the test results. This notice shall include a description of the purpose and responsibilities of the GPC and the time and place for the GPC to hold its first meeting.

(d) The GPC is responsible for prescribing the accelerated instruction the student is to receive before the third testing opportunity. The GPC shall also decide at this time whether the student shall take the assessment specified in §101.2003 of this title (relating to Grade Advancement Testing Requirements) or the alternate assessment, as authorized by §101.2011 of this title (relating to Alternate Assessment). In the absence of unanimous agreement, the student shall take the assessment specified in §101.2003 of this title.

(e) The GPC must convene again if a student fails to demonstrate proficiency on the third administration of a test required for grade advancement and is thereby automatically retained at the same grade level. Within five working days of receipt of student test results for this administration, the district shall notify (for each student who fails to demonstrate proficiency) the principal or principal's designee of student test results. Upon receipt of this notice from the district, the principal shall inform the teacher and parent or guardian of the time and place for the GPC to hold a meeting. This notice shall inform the parent or guardian of the opportunity to appeal the automatic retention of the student. The district shall establish a procedure to ensure a good faith effort is made toward securing the parent's or guardian's receipt of the retention notification. The parent or guardian may appeal the retention by submitting a request to the GPC within five working days of receipt of this retention notification.

(f) If an appeal has been initiated by the parent or guardian, the GPC may decide in favor of promotion only if the GPC concludes, upon review of all facts and circumstances and in accordance with standards adopted by the local school board, that the student is likely to perform on grade level given additional accelerated instruction during the next school year. A student may be promoted only if the GPC's decision is unanimous. The review and final decision of the GPC must be appropriately documented as meeting the standards adopted by the local school board. These standards may include but are not limited to the following:

(1) evidence of satisfactory student performance, including grades, portfolios, work samples, local assessments, previous state assessments, and individual reading and mathematics diagnostic tests or inventories;

(2) improvement in student test performance over the three testing opportunities;

(3) extenuating circumstances that may have adversely affected the student's participation in instruction, the student's participation in the required assessments, or the student's participation in accelerated instruction; and

(4) consideration of whether a student was not enrolled in a Texas public school for part of the school year.

(g) In accordance with TEC, §28.0211(e), the placement decision by the GPC shall be made before the start of the next school year or, if applicable, upon reenrollment of a student after this date.

(h) A student who has been promoted upon completion of a school year in a school other than a Texas public school may be enrolled in that grade without regard to whether the student has successfully completed an assessment required under TEC, §28.0211. This subsection does not limit the authority of a district to appropriately place a student under TEC, Chapter 25, Subchapter B.

(i) In addition to the placement decision, the GPC shall develop an accelerated educational plan for each student who does not pass after three testing opportunities, regardless of whether the student has been promoted or retained. This plan shall include the accelerated instruction that the district must provide during the next school year. The plan must be designed to enable the student to perform at the appropriate grade level by the end of the next school year. The district shall establish a policy for monitoring the student during the school year to ensure that the student is progressing in accordance with the plan. The accelerated education plan must provide for interim progress reports to the student's parent or guardian and the opportunity for consultation with the teacher and/or principal as needed.

§101.2013.Accelerated Instruction.

(a) Each time a student fails to demonstrate proficiency on an assessment required for grade advancement, the school district or charter school shall provide the student with accelerated instruction in the applicable subject. Accelerated instruction should be consistent with previous diagnostic testing and intervention activities, if any, the student has received. Accelerated instruction for students who have failed an assessment may not have a ratio of more than ten students to each teacher per class.

(b) Accelerated instruction required after the first and second testing opportunities should be designed to address student needs to the greatest extent possible before the next respective testing opportunity.

(c) Each school district and each charter school shall be responsible for providing transportation to students required to attend acceleration programs if these programs occur outside of regular school hours.

(d) A school district must accommodate the request of an out-of-district student to participate in any established, on-campus summer accelerated instruction program, provided the student is living away from his or her home district and the program matches the accelerated instruction prescribed by the student's Grade Placement Committee.

(e) Accelerated instruction shall be based on but not limited to the following:

(1) assessment of specific student needs, which may include as appropriate the following: teacher observations and evaluations; academic progress reports; previous identification of student needs and corresponding interventions; and performance on previous assessment instruments in the applicable subject.

(2) best instructional practices identified through research that the district may obtain and implement through technical assistance from the Texas Education Agency and education service centers.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 4, 2005.

TRD-200500513

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Effective date: February 24, 2005

Proposal publication date: October 22, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497