TITLE 16.ECONOMIC REGULATION

Part 1. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Chapter 3. OIL AND GAS DIVISION

16 TAC §3.80

The Commission proposes to amend §3.80, relating to Commission Forms, Applications, and Filing Requirements, to add to Table 1, entitled Railroad Commission Oil and Gas Division Forms, the Security Administrator Designation (SAD) Form, the Form CF-1 (Commercial Facility Bond Form), and the revised version of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Form 8700-12 (RCRA Subtitle C Site Identification Form), as well as to correct the title of Form CF-2 (Commercial Facility Irrevocable Letter of Credit).

Recently amended §3.80, which became effective on April 12, 2004, includes revised language relating to electronic filing in anticipation of changes and/or new electronic filing opportunities that are developing in association with the expansion of the Electronic Compliance and Approval Process (ECAP) and the Commission's Oil and Gas Migration (OGM) Project. The OGM Project is a major initiative to move the Commission's outdated computer mainframe technologies to an open systems environment. In addition to improving the Oil and Gas Division's internal business processes and providing the public with access to accurate up-to-date information, the OGM Project is providing the Commission with opportunities to reassess its data reporting requirements and enhance electronic filing capabilities. The initial step for ECAP, an electronic commerce system that eliminates paper by capturing, storing, and transmitting oil or gas well permitting information electronically, converted the filing, review, and approval of a drilling permit application (Form W-1) to a completely electronic process. Now that the initial step is completed and the infrastructure is in place to support the filing, processing, and storage of drilling permits, ECAP has been incorporated into the Commission's OGM Project, which eventually will include all compliance permits and performance reports.

To provide for electronic filing in association with ECAP, several years ago the Commission developed a required authorization procedure through the filing and approval of a hard copy Master Electronic Filing Agreement (MEFA) and a Security Administrator Designation (SAD) Form. Before an operator could file electronically, both the Commission and operator representatives were required to sign the MEFA, which established the terms of agreement for electronic filing. Signing the SAD Form was also a condition of participation in ECAP. Upon Commission approval of the MEFA, the security administrator is notified of his or her assigned User ID. The security administrator could then distribute security by assigning additional User IDs to employees within the company and designating the forms they are authorized to file electronically through ECAP.

In the amendments to §3.80 that became effective on April 12, 2004, the Commission replaced language concerning requirements for electronic filing under ECAP and language relating to requirements for electronic filing under the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) program with broader language to accommodate changes in the requirements for electronic filing associated with the Commission's new automated systems.

The new language included in §3.80, amended effective April 12, 2004, makes the MEFA unnecessary for electronic filing of oil and gas forms. (The MEFA is still a requirement for other electronic filings at the Commission.) Furthermore, the Commission proposes to revise the current SAD Form to conform the language to new §3.80 and to include the revised form in Table 1 of §3.80(a), entitled Railroad Commission Oil and Gas Division Forms, which lists all Oil and Gas Division forms and the date that each was adopted or last revised. The Commission also proposes to revise the instructions for obtaining permission to file electronically with the Commission. The changes to the SAD Form reflect the Commission's decision to expand its use to any electronic filing with the Commission, not just ECAP filing, and to allow third-party filers.

An operator wishing to file electronically with the Commission's Oil and Gas Division must complete and submit to the Commission a SAD Form. An operator may designate multiple security administrators. After receiving an operator's SAD Form, the Commission will issue to each designated security administrator a User ID that will allow the security administrator to access and update the Commission's electronic filing security system. The security administrator will then be responsible for assigning additional User IDs to individuals within the company and for maintaining that security. The distributed security design ensures that the control will rest within the operator's organization through each operator's designated security administrator(s). No MEFA will be required.

There will be no immediate changes for any operator that already has met the ECAP filing requirements. The SAD Form the operator previously filed will remain in effect after the revised SAD Form is adopted; however, there are 12 petroleum consultants/independent contractors or other non-operators who previously filed a SAD Form with the Commission who would be required to complete and submit a revised SAD Form once it is adopted if they wish to continue electronic filing on behalf of operators. In addition, operators who are currently filing with the Oil and Gas Division electronically and who have never submitted a SAD Form would be required to do so; however, all electronic filers would be required to have their software re- certified for any future new technical requirements that result from movement of programs from the Commission's mainframe to its new open systems environment. The Commission will provide advance notice of any future changes in electronic filing requirements.

The Commission also proposes to add to Table 1 Form CF-1, Commercial Facility Bond, and to correct the title of Form CF-2 to "Commercial Facility Irrevocable Letter of Credit."

Finally, the Commission proposes to add to Table 1 the revised version of the Form EPA 8700-12 (RCRA Subtitle C Site Identification Form), which the Environmental Protection Agency revised effective January 2004, and which is required by §3.98 of this title, relating to Standards for Management of Hazardous Oil and Gas Waste.

Leslie Savage, Oil and Gas Division planner, has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments as proposed would be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for local governments and no net fiscal implications for the state. The portion of the proposed amendments concerning the SAD Form and the procedures for electronic filing authorization are related to changes that the Commission already has planned in association with the OGM Project. Further, the Commission has endeavored to draft proposed language in the SAD Form and the electronic filing procedures with sufficient breadth to accommodate any of the possible options related to electronic filing that might be considered for adoption through the OGM Project.

Ms. Savage also has determined that for each year of the first five years that the amendments would be in effect, the primary public benefit would be more efficient government.

Ms. Savage has estimated that the cost of compliance with the proposed amendments to §3.80 for individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses will be negligible. Currently, the Commission does not require electronic filing of any Oil and Gas Division documents or data; electronic filing of Oil and Gas Division information at the Commission is discretionary.

Texas Government Code, §2006.002, requires a state agency considering adoption of a rule that would have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to reduce the effect if doing so is legal and feasible considering the purpose of the statutes under which the rule is to be adopted. Before adopting a rule that would have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or micro-businesses, a state agency must prepare a statement of the effect of the rule on small businesses and micro-businesses. This statement must include an analysis of the cost of compliance with the rule for small businesses and micro-businesses and a comparison of that cost with the cost of compliance for the largest businesses affected by the rule, using cost for each employee, cost for each hour of labor, or cost for each $100 of sales.

Because entities required to file an organization report and affiliates of such entities performing operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are not required to make filings with the Commission reporting number of employees, labor costs, amount of sales, or gross receipts, the Commission cannot determine whether a particular entity required to comply with §3.80 may be a small business or a micro-business. However, the Commission has determined that it is likely that some operators would meet the definitions of these terms in Texas Government Code, §2006.001. The Commission assumes further that, during a given year, at least one entity desiring to make an electronic filing with the Commission in accordance with §3.80 would be an individual, small business, or micro-business. However, the revised SAD Form and associated revised procedures, as well as the inclusion in the rule of Form CF-1 and new EPA Form 8700-12, impose no mandatory additional costs. In fact, deletion of the requirement to file the MEFA should result in a decrease in the cost of filing electronically with the Commission. In addition, after an entity has completed the necessary requirements to enable the entity to file documents and data with the Commission electronically, the entity should save money previously spent on postage and handling.

For the purpose of making the comparison required by Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c), the Commission assumes that, during a given year, at least one entity desiring to file electronically with the Commission in accordance with §3.80 would be an individual, small business, or micro-business and that the that the cost of writing, typing, copying, and mailing the revised SAD Form to enable the business to make electronic filings with the Commission would be $50. Therefore, the cost of complying with §3.80, as amended, would be $50 per employee if the entity has one employee, $2.50 per employee if the entity has 20 employees, and $0.50 per employee if the entity has 99 employees. Comparable cost per employee of electronic filing for the largest businesses affected by the proposed amendment would be $0.10 for an employer of 500 persons and $0.05 for an employer of 1,000 persons.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Rules Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967; online at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/commentform.html; or by electronic mail to rulescoordinator@rrc.state.tx.us. The Commission specifically requests comments and information on the proposed form changes that are part of this rulemaking. The Commission will accept comments for 30 days after publication in the Texas Register , and encourages all interested persons to submit comments no later than the deadline. The Commission cannot guarantee that comments submitted after the deadline will be considered. For further information, call Ms. Savage (512) 463-7308. The status of Commission rulemakings in progress is available at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/proposed.html.

The Commission proposes the amendments to §3.80 pursuant to Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which give the Commission jurisdiction over all persons owning or engaged in drilling or operating oil or gas wells and persons owning or operating pipelines in Texas and the authority to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under Commission jurisdiction; and §91.142, which requires the Commission to obtain specified information from a person, firm, partnership, joint stock association, corporation, or other domestic or foreign organization operating wholly or partially in this state and acting as principal or agent for another for the purpose of performing operations which are within the jurisdiction of the Commission.

Statutory authority: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 91.142.

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 91.142.

Issued in Austin, Texas on April 23, 2004.

§3.80.Commission Oil and Gas Forms, Applications, and Filing Requirements.

(a) Forms. Forms required to be filed at the Commission shall be those prescribed by the Commission as listed in Table 1 of this subsection. A complete set of all Commission forms listed on Table 1 required to be filed at the Commission shall be kept by the Commission secretary and posted on the Commission's web site. Notice of any new or amended forms shall be issued by the Commission. For any required or discretionary filing, an organization may either file the prescribed form on paper or use any electronic filing process in accordance with subsections (e) or (f) of this section, as applicable. The Commission may at its discretion accept an earlier version of a prescribed form, provided that it contains all required information and meets the requirements of subsection (e)(3) of this section.

Figure: 16 TAC §3.80(a)

(b) - (f) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402730

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Chapter 7. GAS SERVICES DIVISION

Subchapter B. SPECIAL PROCEDURAL RULES

16 TAC §7.45

The Railroad Commission of Texas proposes to amend §7.45, relating to Quality of Service, to add wording in paragraph (5)(C)(i) to authorize a designee of the Attorney General in the Crime Victims Services Division of the Office of the Attorney General (CVSD) to certify that a person is a victim of family violence. Currently, §7.45(5)(C)(i) requires a gas utility to waive any requirement that an applicant for gas utility service pay a deposit if the applicant has been determined to be a victim of family violence, as defined in the Texas Family Code, §71.004, by a family violence center, by treating medical personnel, or by law enforcement agency personnel. This determination must be evidenced by the applicant's submission of a certification letter developed by the Texas Council on Family Violence. The waiver for gas utility deposits helps victims of family violence to obtain gas utility service in new and safer surroundings with relative ease. The proposed amendment would add one more entity--the Attorney General's designee in the CVSD--as authorized to certify that a person is a victim of family violence, thus allowing a person being assisted by the CVSD to obtain the certification letter without having to return to a family violence center, treating medical personnel, or law enforcement agency personnel for the required signature.

The Commission amended §7.45(5)(C)(i), effective November 10, 2003, based on comments by the Texas Council on Family Violence in other rulemaking proceedings. As amended, the rule requires a gas utility to waive any deposit requirement for residential service for an applicant who has been determined to be a victim of family violence as defined in Texas Family Code, §71.004, by a family violence center, by treating medical personnel, or by law enforcement agency personnel. This determination must be evidenced by the applicant's submission of a certification letter developed by the Texas Council on Family Violence and made available on its web site. This provision is similar to the rules and process for a waiver for electric utility and telephone utility deposits that are currently adopted by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) and currently in effect in 16 Tex. Admin. Code §25.478(a)(3)(D), relating to Credit Requirements and Deposits, for electric service providers, and 16 Tex. Admin. Code §26.24(a)(1)(B)(iv), also titled Credit Requirements and Deposits, for telecommunications service providers. The Commission's rule is similar to the two PUC rules except that the Commission's rule authorizes certification by law enforcement agency personnel in addition to certification by a family violence center or by treating medical personnel. This new proposed amendment extends certification authority to the CVSD.

Jackie Standard, Director of Licensing and Permits, Gas Services Division, has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment. Any tariff filings by gas utilities required as a result of the proposed amendment would be handled by current Commission staff as part of the Commission's routine work. In addition, the work of the CVSD could be somewhat more streamlined by being able to provide a victim of family violence with the certification letter needed to obtain the gas utility deposit waiver.

Ms. Standard has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment will be in effect, the public benefit will include the assurance that the services provided by gas utilities and the obligations imposed upon them in providing that service are just and reasonable. In addition, the public benefit will include slightly more streamlined assistance for victims of family violence, enabling those persons to effect separation from violent circumstances with a little less difficulty. When an incident occurs, the victim contacts the police or seeks a protective order. The police usually refer or take the victim to a hospital, and are required to advise the victim of the Crime Victims Compensation Fund. If there is a law enforcement victim liaison available, or if the medical facility has Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) or Sexual Assault Response Team (SART) personnel, the victim will be assisted in completing the application for compensation, including certification letters for utility deposit waivers. However, if the victim is so traumatized that he or she is not able to make a rational decision concerning whether to leave the home, the victim would need to return to the law enforcement agency or medical facility to get the certification letter signed. Also, unless an advocate has already furnished a victim of family violence with the certification letter, a CVSD caseworker sends the letter to the victim and offers the waiver as an option because CVSD cannot demand that a victim seek a waiver. The victim then must take the letter to the shelter, medical personnel, or law enforcement to obtain an authorized signature, which the victim may or may not be able to get quickly, and perhaps not at all. Once signed, however, the victim would be able to submit the letter to the gas utility. By amending the rule to authorize a designee in the CVSD to sign the certification letter, victims of family violence could avoid that possible delay in obtaining a signed letter.

Ms. Standard has estimated that there may be a cost of compliance with the proposal for the individual, small business, or micro-business natural gas service provider. Such providers will not be required to expend funds to comply with the rule, but may experience some reduction in fees received, because some persons may not be required to pay a deposit. Forgoing the relatively small deposit amounts (averaging about $50) should not adversely affect a gas utility. Further, because the Commission exercises exclusive original jurisdiction over the rates and services of gas utilities outside municipal areas, the number of utility customers to whom this rule would apply is a very small percentage of all gas utility customers in Texas; the number of those customers who might qualify for a deposit waiver in this instance is likely to be a small number. The Commission cannot find that there would be an increase in the number of persons qualifying for a gas utility deposit waiver just because CVSD would be authorized to sign certification letters. CVSD currently assists victims of family violence in obtaining the certification letters; the proposed amendment potentially does away with some of the delay in the process.

Texas Government Code, §2006.002, requires a state agency considering adoption of a rule that would have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to reduce the effect if doing so is legal and feasible considering the purpose of the statutes under which the rule is to be adopted. Before adopting a rule that would have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or micro-businesses, a state agency must prepare a statement of the effect of the rule on small businesses and micro-businesses, which must include an analysis of the cost of compliance with the rule for small businesses and micro-businesses and a comparison of that cost with the cost of compliance for the largest businesses affected by the rule, using cost for each employee, cost for each hour of labor, or cost for each $100 of sales.

The proposed amendment does not alter the current deposit waiver requirement, which makes no distinction based on a utility's status as an individual, small business, or micro-business. Adding CVSD as an entity authorized to certify that a person is a victim of family violence is not likely to increase the number of waivers that an individual, small business, or micro-business utility must grant. Gas utilities within the jurisdiction of the Commission are required to file an Annual Report with the Commission that reports certain operational and financial information; such data include certain costs and revenues.

The Commission has determined that there are approximately eight (8) small businesses and eighteen (18) micro-businesses out of a total of thirty-three (33) natural gas distribution utilities. The smallest small business has been identified as having annual revenues of approximately $236,000. The smallest micro-business has been identified as having annual revenues of approximately $115. The combined eight (8) small businesses and eighteen (18) micro-businesses, twenty-six (26) utilities, generate approximately $130 million dollars per year. For the purpose of making the comparison required by Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c), the Commission assumes that at least one gas utility that is an individual, small business, or a micro-business will be required to grant a waiver of its deposit requirement. The Commission further assumes that the cost of complying with §7.45, as amended, would be the loss of one deposit that otherwise would be collected. For the smallest small business with annual revenue of $236,000, the standard deposit as stated in its tariff is approximately $75, making the cost of compliance $3.17 per $100 of sales. For the smallest micro-business with $115 of annual revenue, the standard residential low-density deposit as stated in its tariff is based on a formula but does not exceed $100. Forgoing collection of this deposit is a cost of compliance of $86.96 per $100 of sales.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Rules Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967; online at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/commentform.html; or by electronic mail to rulescoordinator@rrc.state.tx.us. The Commission will accept comments for 30 days after publication in the Texas Register and the comments should refer to Gas Utilities Docket No. 9449. The Commission encourages all interested persons to submit comments no later than the deadline. The Commission cannot guarantee that comments submitted after the deadline will be considered. For further information, call Ms. Standard at (512) 463-7118. The status of Commission rulemakings in progress is available at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/proposed.html.

The Commission proposes the amendment under Texas Utilities Code, §102.001, which gives the Railroad Commission exclusive original jurisdiction over the rates and services of a gas utility distributing natural gas or synthetic natural gas in areas outside a municipality; Texas Utilities Code, §102.151, which requires gas utilities to file schedules showing all rates for a gas utility service, product, or commodity offered by the gas utility and each rule or regulation that relates to or affects a rate of the gas utility or a gas utility service, product, or commodity furnished by the gas utility; Texas Utilities Code, §104.001, which vests in the Railroad Commission all the authority and power of this state to ensure compliance with the obligations of gas utilities in Texas Utilities Code, Title 3, Subtitle A, and which authorizes the regulatory authority to adopt rules for determining the classification of customers and services; Texas Utilities Code, §104.005, which prohibits a gas utility from directly or indirectly charging, demanding, collecting, or receiving from a person a greater or lesser compensation for a service provided or to be provided by the utility than the compensation prescribed by the applicable schedule of rates filed under Texas Utilities Code, §102.151; and Texas Utilities Code, §104.251, which requires gas utilities to furnish service, instrumentalities, and facilities that are safe, adequate, efficient, and reasonable.

Statutory authority: Texas Utilities Code, §§102.001, 102.151, 104.001, 104.005, and 104.251.

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Utilities Code, Chapters 102 and 104.

Issued in Austin, Texas on April 23, 2004.

§7.45.Quality of Service.

For gas utility service to residential and small commercial customers, the following minimum service standards shall be applicable in unincorporated areas. In addition, each gas distribution utility is ordered to amend its service rules to include said minimum service standards within the utility service rules applicable to residential and small commercial customers within incorporated areas, but only to the extent that said minimum service standards do not conflict with standards lawfully established within a particular municipality for a gas distribution utility. Said gas distribution utility shall file service rules incorporating said minimum service standards with the Railroad Commission and with the municipalities in the manner prescribed by law.

(1) - (4) (No change.)

(5) Applicant deposit.

(A) - (B) (No change.)

(C) Amount of deposit and interest for residential service, and exemption from deposit.

(i) Each gas utility shall waive any deposit requirement for residential service for an applicant who has been determined to be a victim of family violence as defined in Texas Family Code, §71.004, by a family violence center, by treating medical personnel, [ or ] by law enforcement agency personnel , or by a designee of the Attorney General in the Crime Victim Services Division of the Office of the Attorney General . This determination shall be evidenced by the applicant's submission of a certification letter developed by the Texas Council on Family Violence and made available on its web site.

(ii) - (iv) (No change.)

(D) - (H) (No change.)

(6) - (8) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402729

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


16 TAC §§7.70 - 7.74, 7.80 - 7.87

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the Railroad Commission of Texas or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The Railroad Commission of Texas proposes the repeal of §§7.70-7.74, and 7.80-7.87, relating to General and Definitions; Odorization Equipment, Odorization of Natural Gas, and Odorant Concentration Tests; Written Procedure for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints; Master Metered Systems; School Piping Testing; Definitions; Safety Regulations Adopted; Jurisdiction; Retroactivity; Required Records and Reporting; Intrastate Pipeline Facility Construction; Corrosion Control Requirements; and Enforcement. Collectively, these are the pipeline safety rules in Texas Administrative Code, Title 16, Chapter 7. The Commission proposes the repeals in order to move the pipeline safety rules into Texas Administrative Code, Title 16, Chapter 8, as proposed in a separate, concurrent rulemaking, to join six other pipeline safety rules already in Chapter 8.

One current rule, §7.85, regarding Intrastate Pipeline Facility Construction, will not be retained in Chapter 8 because it duplicates the requirements contained in another rule. Section 7.85 requires pipelines to be constructed of steel; this requirement is already part of the Commission's rules under 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 195, which the Commission has adopted by reference.

Mary McDaniel, Director, Safety Division, has determined that, for each year of the first five years that the repeals are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments because the virtually identical rule requirements will continue to exist in a different chapter.

Ms. McDaniel has also determined that, for each year of the first five years the repeals are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the repeals (and the concurrent new rules in Chapter 8) will be a clearer understanding of the pipeline safety requirements because they will be separated from requirements in Chapter 7 that apply to the economic regulation of gas utilities.

There is no anticipated economic cost to individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses required to comply with the proposed repeals.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Rules Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967; online at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/commentform.html; or by electronic mail to rulescoordinator@rrc.state.tx.us. The Commission will accept comments for 60 days after publication in the Texas Register and should refer to Gas Utilities Docket No. 9255. For more information, call Mary McDaniel at (512) 463-7166. The status of Commission rulemakings in progress is available at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/proposed.html.

The repeals are proposed under Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121, Subchapter E, which authorizes the Commission to adopt safety standards for the transportation of natural gas and for natural gas pipeline facilities; to require record maintenance and reports; and to inspect records and facilities to determine compliance with adopted safety standards; and Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 117, which requires the Commission to adopt rules that include safety standards for and practices applicable to the intrastate transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide by pipeline and intrastate hazardous liquids pipeline facilities.

The Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121, Subchapter E, and the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 117, are affected by the proposed repeals.

Issued in Austin, Texas on April 23, 2004.

§7.70.General and Definitions.

§7.71.Odorization Equipment, Odorization of Natural Gas, and Odorant Concentration Tests.

§7.72.Written Procedure for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints.

§7.73.Master Metered Systems.

§7.74.School Piping Testing.

§7.80.Definitions.

§7.81.Safety Regulations Adopted.

§7.82.Jurisdiction.

§7.83.Retroactivity.

§7.84.Required Records and Reporting.

§7.85.Intrastate Pipeline Facility Construction.

§7.86.Corrosion Control Requirements.

§7.87.Enforcement.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402735

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Chapter 8. PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATIONS

The Railroad Commission of Texas proposes new rules and amendments to current rules in Title 16, Chapter 8, Subchapters A through D, specifically, new §§8.1 and 8.5, relating to General Applicability and Standards, and Definitions, in Subchapter A, General Requirements and Definitions; new §8.51, relating to Organization Report, amendments to §8.101, relating to Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines, and new §§8.105, 8.110, 8.115, 8.125, and 8.130, relating to Records, Operations and Maintenance Procedures, Construction Commencement Report, Waiver Procedure, and Enforcement, in Subchapter B, Requirements for All Pipelines; amendments to §8.201, relating to Pipeline Safety Program Fees, new §§8.203,8.205, 8.210, 8.215, 8.220, 8.225, and 8.230, relating to Supplemental Regulations, Written Procedure for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints, Reports, Odorization of Gas, Master Metered Systems, Plastic Pipe Requirements, and School Piping Testing, amendments to §8.235, Natural Gas Pipelines Public Education and Liaison, and new §8.245, relating to Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations, in Subchapter C, Requirements for Natural Gas Pipelines Only; and new §§8.301 and 8.305, relating to Required Records and Reporting, and Corrosion Control Requirements, in Subchapter D, Requirements for Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Only.

The Commission proposes the new sections to move the pipeline safety rules from Title 16, Chapter 7 of the Texas Administrative Code into new Chapter 8; the repeal of the rules currently found in Chapter 7 is proposed in a separate, concurrent rulemaking. The proposed new rules will join §8.101, relating to Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines, in Subchapter B, Requirements For All Pipelines; §8.201, relating to Pipeline Safety Program Fees, §8.235, relating to Natural Gas Pipelines Public Education and Liaison, and §8.240, relating to Discontinuance of Service, in Subchapter C, Requirements for Natural Gas Pipelines Only; and §8.310, relating to Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Public Education and Liaison, and §8.315, relating to Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines or Pipeline Facilities Located Within 1,000 Feet of a Public School Building or Facility, in Subchapter D, Requirements for Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Only.

The Commission proposes two new rules in Chapter 8 that do not have a current counterpart in Chapter 7: §8.125, Waiver Procedure, which implements a process that has been used by the Commission and operators on an informal basis for at least 10 years, and §8.245, Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations, which is required by the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531(d), and Texas Utilities Code, §121.206(d), enacted by Senate Bill 310 (Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1233, §§ 5 and 71, respectively, eff. Sept. 1, 2001).

Proposed new Subchapter A, General Requirements and Definitions.

Proposed new Subchapter A, General Requirements and Definitions, will include proposed new §8.1, relating to General Applicability and Standards, and proposed new §8.5, relating to Definitions.

Proposed new §8.1, General Applicability and Standards, is derived from current §§7.70, 7.81, and 7.82. Proposed new §8.1(a), concerning applicability, is derived from current §§7.70(c), 7.82, and the first sentence in current §7.70(d); it states the scope of the chapter, which applies to all gas pipeline facilities and facilities used in the intrastate transportation of natural gas, including master metered systems, as provided in 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) §60101, et seq ., and Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121; the intrastate pipeline transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide and all intrastate pipeline facilities as provided in 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq ., and Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 117; and all pipeline facilities originating in Texas waters (three marine leagues and all bay areas). These pipeline facilities include those production and flow lines originating at the well. This subsection specifically provides that the rules in Chapter 8 do not apply to those facilities and transportation services subject to federal jurisdiction under: 15 U.S.C. §717, et seq ., or 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .

Proposed new §8.1(b), concerning minimum safety standards, derives from current §§7.70(a) and 7.81, and adopts by reference the federal pipeline safety standards found in 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .; 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191, Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports, and Safety-Related Condition Reports; 49 CFR Part 192, Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards; 49 CFR Part 193, Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards; 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .; 49 CFR Part 195, Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline; and 49 CFR Part 199, Drug and Alcohol Testing.

Currently, §§7.70(a) and 7.81 adopt the federal pipeline safety standards as of March 21, 2002. Proposed new §8.1(b) will show this date as April 9, 2004. The federal safety rule amendments that will be captured are summarized in the following 12 paragraphs.

USDOT's Amendment No. 195-76, published at 67 Federal Register (FR) 2136, extended the regulations on managing the integrity of hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines that affect high consequence areas to operators with less than 500 miles of regulated pipelines. In 49 CFR §195.452(d)(2), the date after which prior assessments may qualify for use was incorrectly published as December 18, 2006. The corrected date is February 15, 1997. The effective date for the correction was February 15, 2002.

USDOT's Amendment 192-77, published at 67 FR 50824, defined areas of high consequence where the potential consequences of a gas pipeline accident may be significant or may do considerable harm to people and their property. The definition includes current class 3 and 4 locations; facilities with persons who are mobility-impaired, confined, or hard to evacuate; and places where people gather for recreational and other purposes. For facilities with mobility-impaired, confined, or hard-to-evacuate persons, and places where people gather, the corridor of protection from the pipeline is 300 feet, 660 feet, or 1,000 feet depending on the pipeline's diameter and operating pressure. The effective date was September 5, 2002.

USDOT's Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) published a final rule at 68 FR 11748 modifying or adding the definition of "administrator" in several sections of the Code of Federal Regulations for clarification and consistency between RSPA regulations. The changes were in 49 CFR Parts 107, 190, 191, 192, 193, 195, 198, and 199 -- specifically, §§107.1, 190.3, 191.3, 192.3, 193.2007, 195.2, 198.3, and 199.3. The effective date was March 12, 2003.

USDOT published an interim final rule at 68 FR 31624 to amend a provision of its drug and alcohol testing procedures to change the instructions to medical review officers with respect to reporting specimens as dilute or substituted. The change was based on USDOT's experience since the adoption of the current rule and new scientific information on the subject. The effective date was May 28, 2003.

Amendment No. 40-12, published at 67 FR 43946, revised the Management Information System forms currently used within five USDOT agencies and the United States Coast Guard for submission of annual drug and alcohol program data. The five DOT agencies are the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, and the Research and Special Programs Administration. The single form replaced 21 different data collection forms. The effective date is July 25, 2003. Also, at 68 FR 75455, USDOT published a final rule requiring the use of this single form as adopted in 49 CFR Part 40. Following the July 25, 2003, adoption, USDOT had requested comments and suggestions for changes to the MIS form and process. The final rule responded to those comments and made modifications to the previous DOT agency MIS forms. Use of the new MIS form will be required for employer MIS submissions in 2004, which will document 2003 data. The effective date was December 31, 2003.

Amendments Nos. 191-15, 192-92, and 195-72, published at 68 FR 46109, addressed the safety regulation responsibility for producer-operated natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines that cross into State waters without first connecting to a transporting operator's facility on the Outer Continental Shelf. The rule specified the procedures by which producer operators can petition for approval to operate under safety regulations governing pipeline design, construction, operation, and maintenance issued by either RSPA or the Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service. The effective date was September 4, 2003.

Amendment 195-78, published at 68 FR 53526, changed several safety standards for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. The changes, which concern welder qualifications, backfilling, records, training, and signs, were based on recommendations by the National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives and were made to improve the clarity and effectiveness of the standards. The effective date was October 14, 2003.

Amendment 192-93, published at 68 FR 53895, changed some of RSPA's Office of Pipeline Safety's safety standards for gas pipelines. The changes were based on recommendations from the National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives and a review of the recommendations by the State Industry Regulatory Review Committee. The changes improved the clarity and effectiveness of the standards. The effective date was October 15, 2003.

Amendment 192-95, published at 68 FR 69778, required operators to develop integrity management programs for gas transmission pipelines located where a leak or rupture could do the most harm, such as in high consequence areas. The rule required gas transmission pipeline operators to perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity, to improve data collection, integration, and analysis, to repair and remediate the pipeline as necessary, and to implement preventive and mitigative actions. RSPA's Office of Pipeline Safety also modified the definition of high consequence areas in response to a petition for reconsideration from industry associations. The final rule addressed statutory mandates, safety recommendations, and conclusions from accident analyses, all of which indicate that coordinated risk control measures are needed to improve pipeline safety. The effective date was originally published as January 14, 2004, and included the incorporation by reference of certain publications; however, at 69 FR 2307, RSPA published a correction to change the effective date to February 14, 2004, to meet the 60-day requirement for Congressional review of major rules.

Amendment 40-13, published at 69 FR 3021, adds drug and alcohol abuse counselors certified by the National Board for Certified Counselors, Inc. and Affiliates, specifically NBCC's Master Addictions Counselor, to those eligible to be substance abuse professionals under 49 CFR Part 40, subpart O. The effective date was January 22, 2004.

Amendment 195-80, published at 69 FR 537, requires operators of pipeline systems subject to RSPA's hazardous liquid pipeline safety regulations to prepare and file annual reports containing information about those systems. The data will provide the basis for more efficient and meaningful analyses of the safety status of hazardous liquid pipelines. RSPA's Office of Pipeline Safety will use the information to compile a national pipeline inventory, identify and determine the scope of safety problems, and target inspections. The effective date was February 5, 2004.

Amendment 193-18, published at 69 FR 11330, clarifies that the operation, maintenance, and fire protection requirements of RSPA's Office of Pipeline Safety's regulations for liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities apply to LNG facilities in existence or under construction as of March 31, 2000. An earlier final rule made the applicability of these requirements unclear. Additional changes to the regulations remove incorrect cross- references, clarify fire drill requirements, and require reviews of plans and procedures. The final rule also changes the regulations so that cross-references to the National Fire Protection Association standard NFPA 59A refer to the 2001 edition of the standard rather than the 1996 edition. The effective date was April 9, 2004; however, LNG plants existing on March 31, 2000, need not comply with provisions of 49 CFR §193.2801 on emergency shutdown systems, water delivery systems, detection systems, and personnel qualification and training until September 12, 2005. The final rule also incorporates by reference certain other publications.

Proposed new §8.1(c), derived from the second sentence of current §7.70(d) and §7.70(e), relates to special situations and specifically states the Commission's authority to impose more stringent safety requirements. This subsection also allows pipeline operators to seek waivers under the procedure set out in proposed new §8.125.

Proposed new §8.1(d), concerning concurrent filing, requires a person filing any document or information with the Department of Transportation to file a copy of that document or information with the Safety Division.

Proposed new §8.1(e), concerning penalties, states the statutory source of authority for the Commission to impose penalties for submitting false or misleading information.

Proposed new §8.1(f), concerning retroactivity, states that nothing in this chapter shall be applied retroactively to any existing intrastate pipeline facilities concerning design, fabrication, installation, or established operating pressure, except as required by the Office of Pipeline Safety, Department of Transportation. All intrastate pipeline facilities shall be subject to the other safety requirements of this chapter.

Proposed new §8.5, Definitions, derives from current §§7.70(b), 7.71(a), and 7.80; in addition, definitions from current §7.74, relating to school piping testing, and current §8.101, relating to pipeline integrity assessment, are included. In addition, the Commission also proposes to adopt by reference the definitions given in 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, 195, and 199 for the purposes of this chapter. This proposed new section includes definitions for many more terms than are defined in the current rules in Chapter 7, and omits only one current definition, that of "Act," currently found in §7.74(b)(1). By defining more terms, the Commission expects to achieve greater precision and consistency in the rules and, it is hoped, better understanding of the rules, and more uniformity in interpretation and application of the rules.

Proposed new §8.5(1), defines the term "affected person," which applies only to the procedures and requirements of proposed new §8.125, relating to Waiver Procedure. The term includes but is not limited to persons owning or occupying real property within 500 feet of any property line of the site for the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought; the city council, as represented by the city attorney, the city secretary, the city manager, or the mayor, if the property that is the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located wholly or partly within any incorporated municipal boundaries, including the extraterritorial jurisdiction of any incorporated municipality (if the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located within more than one incorporated municipality, then the city council of every incorporated municipality within which the site is located is an affected person); the county commission, as represented by the county clerk, if the property that is the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located wholly or partly outside the boundary of any incorporated municipality (if the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located within more than one county, then the county commission of every county within which the site is located is an affected person; and any other person who would be adversely impacted by the waiver sought.

Proposed new §8.5(2) defines the term "applicant" as a person who has filed with the Safety Division a complete application for a waiver to a pipeline safety rule or regulation, or a request to use direct assessment or other technology or assessment methodology not specifically listed in §8.101(b)(1). The current rules do not define this term.

Proposed new §8.5(3) defines the term "application for waiver" as the written request, including all reasons and all appropriate documentation, for the waiver of a particular rule or regulation with respect to a specific facility or operation. The current rules do not define this term.

Proposed new §8.5(4) defines "charter school" as an elementary or secondary school operated by an entity created pursuant to Texas Education Code, Chapter 12. This definition is identical to that found in current §7.74(b)(2).

Proposed new §8.5(5) defines "Commission" as the Railroad Commission of Texas, eliminating the identical duplicative definitions found in current §7.70(b)(6) and §7.80(1).

Proposed new §8.5(6) defines "direct assessment" as a structured process that defines locations where a pipeline is physically examined to provide assessment of pipeline integrity. The process includes collection, analysis, assessment, and integration of data, including but not limited to the items listed in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The physical examination may include coating examination and other applicable non-destructive evaluation. This definition is identical to that found in current §8.101(a)(1)(A).

Proposed new §8.5(7) defines "director" as the director of the Commission's Safety Division or the director's delegate. The term is not defined in the current rules.

Proposed new §8.5(8) defines "division" as the Safety Division of the Commission. The current rules do not define this term; rather the current rules refer to the Pipeline Safety Section of the Gas Services Division. The Safety Division was created in the Commission's reorganization in September 2003.

Proposed new §8.5(9) defines "farm tap odorizer" as a wick- type odorizer serving a consumer or consumers off any pipeline other than that classified as distribution as defined in 49 CFR Part 192.3 which uses not more than 10 mcf on an average day in any month. This is identical to the current definition of this term in §7.71(a)(2).

Proposed new §8.5(10) defines "gas" as natural gas, flammable gas, or other gas which is toxic or corrosive; this is the same definition as found in current §7.70(b)(2).

Proposed new §8.5(11) defines "gas company" as any person who owns or operates pipeline facilities used for the transportation or distribution of gas, including master metered systems. This combines the definitions currently found in §7.70(b)(5) and §7.71(a)(1), and eliminates the redundant provisions and references to federal regulations found in §7.71(a)(1) which are already incorporated by reference.

Proposed new §8.5(12) defines "hazardous liquid" as petroleum, petroleum products, anhydrous ammonia, or any substance or material which is in liquid state, excluding liquefied natural gas, when transported by pipeline facilities and which has been determined by the United States Secretary of Transportation to pose an unreasonable risk to life or property when transported by pipeline facilities. This is identical to the current definition of this term in §7.80(2).

Proposed new §8.5(13) defines "in-line inspection" as an internal inspection by a tool capable of detecting anomalies in pipeline walls such as corrosion, metal loss, or deformation. This is the same definition found in current §8.101(a)(1)(B).

Proposed new §8.5(14) defines "intrastate pipeline facilities" as pipeline facilities located within the State of Texas which are not used for the transportation of natural gas or hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide in interstate or foreign commerce. This is identical to the current definition of this term in §7.80(3).

Proposed new §8.5(15) defines "lease user" as a consumer who receives free gas in a contractual agreement with a pipeline operator or producer. This is the same definition as in current §7.71(a)(3).

Proposed new §8.5(16) defines "liquids company" as any person who owns or operates a pipeline or pipelines and/or pipeline facilities used for the transportation or distribution of any hazardous liquid, carbon dioxide, or anhydrous ammonia. This term is not defined in the current rules.

Proposed new §8.5(17) defines "master meter operator" as the owner, operator, or manager of a master metered system. This term is not defined in the current rules.

Proposed new §8.5(18) defines "master metered system" as a pipeline system (other than a local distribution company) for distributing gas within but not limited to a definable area, such as a mobile home park, housing project, or apartment complex, where the operator purchases metered gas from an outside source for resale through a gas distribution pipeline system. The gas distribution pipeline system supplies the ultimate consumer who either purchases the gas directly through a meter or by other means such as rents. Other than changing the defined term from "master meter system" to "master metered system," this is identical to the provision found in §7.70(b)(8).

Proposed new §8.5(19) defines "natural gas supplier" as the entity selling and delivering the natural gas to a school facility or a master metered system. If more than one entity sells and delivers natural gas to a school facility or master metered system, each entity is a natural gas supplier for purposes of this chapter. This definition is similar to that found in current §7.74(b)(3), but by changing the current rule from "the individual or company selling and delivering the natural gas to a school facility" to "the entity selling and delivering the natural gas to a school facility or a master metered system," the Commission intends to include as "natural gas suppliers" those municipally-owned gas systems that sell and deliver natural gas to master metered systems.

Proposed new §8.5(20) defines "operator" as a person who operates on his or her own behalf or is an agent designated by the owner to operate intrastate pipeline facilities. This definition is identical to the current one found in §7.80(4).

Proposed new §8.5(21) defines "person" as any individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative association, joint stock association, trust, or any other business entity, including any trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal representative thereof, a state agency or institution, a county, a municipality, or school district or any other governmental subdivision of this state. As proposed, this definition combines and reconciles the two slightly different definitions of the word "person" found in current §7.70(b)(1) and §7.80(5).

Proposed new §8.5(22) defines "person responsible for a school facility" as, in the case of a public school, the superintendent of the school district as defined in Texas Education Code, §11.201, or the superintendent's designee previously specified in writing to the natural gas supplier. In the case of charter and private schools, person responsible for a school facility is the principal of the school or the principal's designee previously specified in writing to the natural gas supplier. This definition is the same as that found in current §7.74(b)(4).

Proposed new §8.5(23) defines the term "pipeline facilities" as new and existing pipe, right-of-way, and any equipment, facility, or building used or intended for use in the transportation of gas or hazardous liquids or their treatment during the course of transportation. This proposed definition combines and reconciles the slightly different definitions of the term found in current §7.70(b)(4) and §7.80(6).

Proposed new §8.5(24) defines "pressure test" as those techniques and methodologies prescribed for leak-test and strength-test requirements for pipelines. For natural gas pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 192, and specifically include 49 CFR §§192.505, 192.507, 192.515, and 192.517. For hazardous liquids pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 CFR Part 195, and specifically include 49 CFR §§195.305, 195.306, 195.308, and 195.310. This definition is identical to that found in current §8.101(a)(1)(C).

Proposed new §8.5(25) defines "private school" as an elementary or secondary school operated by an entity accredited by the Texas Private School Accreditation Commission. This definition is the same as that found in current §7.74(b)(5).

Proposed new §8.5(26) defines "public school" as an elementary or secondary school operated by an entity created in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and accredited by the Texas Education Agency pursuant to Texas Education Code, Chapter 39, Subchapter D. The term does not include programs and facilities under the jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, the Texas Youth Commission, the Texas Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice or any probation agency, the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, the Texas School for the Deaf and Regional Day Schools for the Deaf, the Texas Academy of Mathematics & Science, the Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities, and home schools or proprietary schools as defined in Texas Education Code, §132.001. This definition is the same as that found in current §7.74(b)(6).

Proposed new §8.5(27) defines "school facility" as all piping, buildings and structures operated by a public, charter, or private school that are downstream of a meter measuring natural gas service in which students receive instruction or participate in school sponsored extracurricular activities, excluding maintenance or bus facilities, administrative offices, and similar facilities not regularly utilized by students. This is identical to the definition in current §7.74(b)(7).

Proposed new §8.5(28) defines "Secretary" as the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation. This term is not defined in the current rules.

Proposed new §8.5(29) defines "transportation of gas" as the gathering, transmission, or distribution of gas by pipeline or its storage within the State of Texas. For purposes of safety regulation, the term shall not include the gathering of gas in those rural locations which lie outside the limits of any incorporated or unincorporated city, town, village, or any other designated residential or commercial area such as a subdivision, a business or shopping center, a community development, or any similar populated area which the Secretary may define as a nonrural area. This definition is substantially the same as that found in current §7.70(b)(3) but has been reworded for clarity.

Proposed new §8.5(30) defines "transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide" as the movement of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide by pipeline, or their storage incidental to movement, except that, for purposes of safety regulations, it does not include any such movement through gathering lines in rural locations or production, refining, or manufacturing facilities or storage or in-plant piping systems associated with any of those facilities. This proposed definition adds "carbon dioxide" to the definition, but otherwise is identical to that found in current §7.80(8).

Subchapter B. Requirements for All Pipelines.

Proposed new rules in Subchapter B, Requirements for All Pipelines, will include proposed new §8.51, Organization Report; proposed new §8.105, Records; §8.110, Operations and Maintenance Procedures; §8.115, Construction Commencement Report; §8.125, Waiver Procedure, and §8.130, Enforcement, which will join current §8.101, Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines, as proposed to be amended.

Proposed new §8.51 states the requirement that all gas companies and all liquids companies not otherwise required to file a Form P-5, organization report, file one in compliance with 16 Tex. Admin. Code §3.1, relating to Organization Report; Retention of Records; Notice Requirements. This requirement is specifically intended to require that master meter operators file a Form P-5, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code, §121.201. While the proposed new rule does not derive specifically from a current rule in Chapter 7, the requirement itself is not new, because the provision in Texas Utilities Code, §121.201, was enacted in 1999.

Proposed amendments to §8.101, Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines, will remove the definitions for "direct assessment," "in-line inspection," and "pressure test" that are being proposed in new §8.5. There will be no change to the definitions. In subsection (b), the wording is proposed to be changed to recognize that the deadline by which pipeline operators were to have complied has passed. No other changes are proposed for §8.101.

Proposed new §8.105, Records, combines the requirements found in current §§7.70(h) and 7.84(f) into a single rule applicable to both gas and liquids pipelines. The Commission has modified current wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements. Pipeline operators are required to maintain the most current record or records for at least the longer of either the interval between prescribed tests plus one year or five years if no other time period is specified. For gas pipelines, those records and documents required by 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, and 199, and §8.215, relating to Odorization of Gas, must be retained. For liquids pipelines, those records and documents required by 49 CFR Parts 195 and 199 must be retained. In addition, operators must retain for the specified period records of all design and installation of new and used pipe, including design pressure calculations, pipeline specifications, specified minimum yield strength and wall-thickness calculations, each valve, fitting, fabricated branch connection, closure, flange connection, station piping, fabricated assembly, and above-ground breakout tank; records of all pipeline construction, procedures, training, and inspection pertaining to welding, nondestructive testing, and cathodic protection; records of all hydrostatic testing performed on all pipeline segments, components, and tie-ins; and records involved in the performance of the procedures outlined in the operations and maintenance procedure manual required by §8.110, relating to Operations and Maintenance Procedures.

Proposed new §8.110, Operations and Maintenance Procedures, derives from current §§7.70(i) and 7.84(d), and combines the current requirements into a single rule. The Commission has modified current wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements. Each pipeline operator is required to prepare a manual or procedural plan, required by 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, 195 or 199, as applicable, and make it available for Commission inspection upon request. If the Commission finds the plan is inadequate to achieve safe operation, the operator must revise the plan. The new rule does not require the filing of the plan 20 days before it becomes effective.

Proposed new §8.115, Construction Commencement Report, combines the current requirements of §§7.70(g)(4) and 7.84(c). The proposed new rule applies to all construction totaling one mile or more. Currently, §7.70(g)(4) applies only to gas pipelines and only to construction of five miles or more; there is no minimum length specified in current §7.84(c). At least 30 days prior to commencement of construction of any installation totaling one mile or more of pipe, each operator is required to file with the Commission a report stating the proposed originating and terminating points for the pipeline, counties to be traversed, path, size and type of pipe to be used, type of service, design pressure, and length of the proposed line. By making the report required for commencement of all construction totaling one mile of pipe or more and applicable to both gas and liquids pipelines, the Commission intends to minimize confusion for the pipeline industry, reduce the number of inquiries to the Commission by the industry, and to maintain better control over the agency's inspection schedule.

Proposed new §8.125, Waiver Procedure, formalizes the process for obtaining Commission waiver of compliance with safety rules that the Commission has used for several years on an informal basis. This proposed new rule has no counterpart in the current rules, but, as previously stated, implements a process that has been used by the Commission and pipeline operators on an informal basis for at least 10 years. Proposed new subsection (a) provides the method for filing an application for a waiver of a pipeline safety rule and the procedures the agency will follow in processing such applications. The Commission specifically directs that the Safety Division will not assign a docket number to or consider any application filed in response to a notice of violation of a pipeline safety rule.

Proposed new §8.125(b) provides details about the form of the application for waiver, and proposed new subsection (c) specifies the contents of the application. Essential to the application are a description of the facility at which the operation that is the subject of the waiver request is conducted, including, if necessary, design and operation specifications, monitoring and control devices, maps, calculations, and test results; a description of the acreage and/or address upon which the facility and/or operation is located, including a plat drawing, identification of the site, environmental surroundings, placement of buildings and areas intended for human occupancy that could be endangered by a failure or malfunction of the facility or operation, any increased risks the particular operation would create if the waiver were granted, and the additional safety measures that are proposed to compensate for those risks; a statement of the reason the particular operation, if the waiver were granted, would not be inconsistent with protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the general public; and a list of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all affected persons.

Proposed new §8.125(d) sets out the requirements of the notice that the applicant is required to provide. The applicant must send a copy of the application and a notice of protest form published by the Commission by certified mail, return receipt requested, to all affected persons on the same date the applicant files its application with the Division. The notice must describe the nature of the waiver sought; state that affected persons have 30 calendar days from the date of the last publication to file written objections or requests for a hearing with the Division; and include the docket number of the application and the mailing address of the Division. The applicant must file all return receipts with the Division as proof of notice. In addition, the applicant is required to publish notice of its application for waiver of a pipeline safety rule once a week for two consecutive weeks in the state or local news section of a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the facility or operation for which the requested waiver is located, and must file with the Division a publisher's affidavit from each newspaper in which notice was published as proof of publication of notice. The director may require the applicant to give additional or different types of notice.

Proposed new §8.125(e) provides that affected persons have standing to object to or request a hearing on an application for a waiver, and sets forth the procedure and requirements for doing so.

Proposed new §8.125(f) details the process for the director's review of a waiver application. If the director does not receive any objections or requests for a hearing from any affected person, the director may recommend in writing that the Commission grant the waiver if granting the waiver will neither imperil nor tend to imperil the health, safety or welfare of the general public and the environment. The director shall forward the file, along with the written recommendation that the waiver be granted, to the Office of General Counsel for the preparation of an order. The rule specifically provides that the director may not recommend that the Commission grant the waiver if the application was filed either to correct an existing violation or to avoid the expense of safety compliance, and requires the director to dismiss with prejudice to refiling an application filed in response to a notice of violation of a pipeline safety rule. If the director declines to recommend that the Commission grant the waiver, the director must notify the applicant in writing of the recommendation and the reason for it, and inform the applicant of any specific deficiencies in the application. If the director declines to recommend that the Commission grant the waiver, and if the application was not filed either to correct an existing violation or solely to avoid the expense of safety compliance, the applicant may either modify the application to correct the deficiencies and resubmit the application or file a written request for a hearing on the matter within ten calendar days of receiving notice of the assistant director's written decision not to recommend that the Commission grant the application.

Proposed new §8.125(g) sets forth the procedures for hearings on applications for waiver of a pipeline safety rule. Within three days of receiving either a timely-filed objection or a request for a hearing, the director forwards the file to the Office of General Counsel for the setting of a hearing. The Office of General Counsel assigns a presiding examiner to conduct a hearing. The presiding examiner must mail notice of the hearing by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than 30 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing to the applicant, all persons who filed an objection or a request for a hearing, and all other affected persons. The presiding examiner conducts the hearing in accordance with the procedural requirements of Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001 (the Administrative Procedure Act), and Chapter 1 of Title 16 (the Commission's rules of practice and procedure).

Proposed new §8.125(h) provides that after a hearing, the Commission may grant a waiver of a pipeline safety rule based on a finding or findings that the grant of the waiver will neither imperil nor tend to imperil the health, safety or welfare of the general public and the environment.

Proposed new §8.125(i) sets out the procedure by which notice is given to the United States Department of Transportation. The Commission's grant of a waiver becomes effective in accordance with the provisions of 49 United States Code Annotated, §60118(d).

Proposed new §8.130, Enforcement, derives from current §7.70(j) and §7.87, and provides for periodic inspections and company obligations. Proposed subsection (a) states that the Safety Division shall have responsibility for the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. To this end, the Safety Division shall formulate a plan or program for periodic evaluation of the books, records, and facilities of gas companies and liquids companies operating in Texas on a sampling basis, in order to satisfy the Commission that these companies are in compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

Proposed subsection (b) lists the scope of inspection and provides that, upon reasonable notice, the Safety Division or its authorized representative may, at any reasonable time, inspect the books, files, records, reports, supplemental data, other documents and information, plant, property, and facilities of a gas company or a liquids company to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter .

Proposed new subsection (c) lists the company obligations and states that each operator, officer, employee, and representative of a gas company or a liquids company operating in Texas shall cooperate with the Safety Division and its authorized representatives in the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter; in the determination of compliance with the provisions of this chapter; and in the investigation of violations, alleged violations, accidents or incidents involving intrastate pipeline facilities. Each operator, officer, employee, and representative of a gas company or a liquids company operating in Texas shall make readily available all company books, files, records, reports, supplemental data, other documents, and information, and shall make readily accessible all company plant, property, and facilities as the Safety Division or its authorized representative may reasonably require in the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter; in the determination of compliance with the provisions of this chapter; and in the investigation of violations, alleged violations, accidents or incidents involving intrastate pipeline facilities.

Subchapter C. Requirements for Natural Gas Pipelines Only.

Proposed rules in Subchapter C will include current §8.201, Pipeline Safety Program Fees, as proposed to be amended; proposed new §8.203, Supplemental Regulations; proposed new §8.205, Written Procedure for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints; proposed new §8.210, Reports; proposed new §8.215, Odorization of Gas; proposed new §8.220, Master Metered Systems; proposed new §8.225, Plastic Pipe Requirements; proposed new §8.230, School Piping Testing; current §8.235, Natural Gas Pipelines Public Education and Liaison, as proposed to be amended; current §8.240, Discontinuance of Service; and proposed new §8.245, Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations.

Proposed amendments to §8.201, relating to Pipeline Safety Program Fees, concern the per-service line surcharge that natural gas distribution systems may assess customers to recover the amounts remitted to the Commission, and which customers may be assessed the one-time surcharge. In subsection (b)(3)(D), the surcharge amount is proposed to be changed from the current $0.37 per service line to $0.50 per service line, the statutory maximum under Texas Utilities Code, § 121.211, to minimize potential under-recoveries by the distribution utilities.

In subsection (b)(4) and subsection (c)(4), the Commission makes amendments to recognize that pipeline safety matters are now handled by the Safety Division, created in the agency's September 2003 reorganization. The proposed amendments to these subsections add the Safety Division as an additional recipient of the reports required from operators of natural gas distribution systems and master metered systems.

Proposed new §8.203, Supplemental Regulations, derives from current §7.70(k). The Commission has modified current wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements. These provisions supplement the regulations appearing in 49 CFR Part 192, adopted under proposed new §8.1(b).

Proposed new §8.203(1) provides that Section 192.3 is supplemented by the following: "Short section of pipeline" means a segment of a pipeline 100 feet or less in length.

Proposed new §8.203(2) provides that Section 192.455(b) is supplemented by the following language after the first sentence: "Tests, investigation, or experience must be backed by documented proof to substantiate results and determinations."

Proposed new §8.203(3) provides that Section 192.457 is supplemented by the following language in subsection (b)(3): "(3) Bare or coated distribution lines. The operator shall determine the areas of active corrosion by electrical survey, or where electrical survey is impractical, by the study of corrosion and leak history records, by leak detection survey, or by other effective means, documented by data substantiating results and determinations"; and by the following subsection: "(d) When a condition of active external corrosion is found, positive action must be taken to mitigate and control the effects of the corrosion. Schedules must be established for application of corrosion control. Monitoring effectiveness must be adequate to mitigate and control the effects of the corrosion prior to its becoming a public hazard or endangering public safety."

Proposed new §8.203(4) provides that Section 192.465 is supplemented by the following language after the first sentence of subsection (a): "Test points (electrode locations) used when taking pipe-to-soil readings for determining cathodic protection shall be selected so as to give representative pipe-to-soil readings. Test points (electrode locations) over or near an anode or anodes shall not, by themselves, be considered representative readings"; by the following language in subsection (e): "(e) After the initial evaluation required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of §192.455 and paragraph (b) of §192.457, each operator shall, at intervals not exceeding three years, reevaluate its unprotected pipelines and cathodically protect them in accordance with this subpart in areas in which active corrosion is found. The operator shall determine the areas of active corrosion by electrical survey, or where electrical survey is impractical, by the study of corrosion and leak history records, by leak detection survey, or by other effective means, documented by data substantiating results and determinations"; and by the following subsection: "(f) When leak detection surveys are used to determine areas of active corrosion, the survey frequency must be increased to monitor the corrosion rate and control the condition. The detection equipment used must have sensitivity adequate to detect gas concentration below the lower explosive limit and be suitable for such use."

Proposed new §8.203(5) provides that Section 192.475(a) is supplemented by the following language at the end: "Corrosive gas" means a gas which, by chemical reaction with the pipe to which it is exposed, usually metal, produces a deterioration of the material."

Proposed new §8.203(6) provides that Section 192.479 is supplemented by the following subsection: "(c) 'atmospheric corrosion' means aboveground corrosion caused by chemical or electrochemical reaction between a pipe material, usually a metal, and its environment, that produces a deterioration of the material."

Proposed new §8.205, Written Procedures for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints, derives from current §7.72. The Commission has modified current wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements. Each gas company must have written procedures which must include, at a minimum, the following: a procedure or method for receiving leak complaints or reports, or both, on a 24-hour, seven day per week basis; a requirement to make and maintain a written record of all calls received and actions taken; a requirement that supervisory personnel review calls received and actions taken to insure no hazardous conditions exist at the close of the work day; standards for training and equipping personnel used in the investigation of leak complaints or reports, or both; procedures for locating the source of a leak and determining the degree of hazard involved; a chain of command for service personnel to follow if assistance is required in determining the degree of hazard; and instructions to be issued by service personnel to customers or the public or both, as necessary, after a leak is located and the degree of hazard determined.

Proposed new §8.210, Reports, derives from current §7.70(g). The Commission has modified current wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.210(a)(1) requires a gas company, at the earliest practical moment or within two hours following discovery, to notify the Commission by telephone of any event that involves a release of gas from any pipeline which caused a death or any personal injury requiring hospitalization; required taking any segment of a transmission line out of service, with one exception; resulted in unintentional gas ignition requiring emergency response; caused estimated damage to the property of the operator, others, or both totaling $5,000 or more, including gas loss; or could reasonably be judged as significant because of location, rerouting of traffic, evacuation of any building, media interest, etc., even though it does not fall within the other event descriptions of this paragraph.

Proposed new §8.210(a)(2) provides the exception to the requirement that a gas company give notice of any release of gas which required taking a segment of a transmission line out of service. The gas company is not required to make a telephonic report for a leak or incident if that leak or incident occurred solely as a result of or in connection with planned or routine maintenance or construction.

Proposed new §8.210(a)(3) provides that the telephonic report must be made to the Commission's 24-hour emergency line at (512) 463-6788 and must include the following information: the operator or gas company's name; the location of the leak or incident; the time of the incident or accident; the fatalities and/or personal injuries; the phone number of the operator; and any other significant facts relevant to the accident or incident.

Proposed new §8.210(a)(4) provides that following the initial telephonic report for accidents, leaks, or incidents that caused a death or any personal injury requiring hospitalization, caused estimated damage to the property of the operator, others, or both totaling $5,000 or more, including gas loss, or could reasonably be judged as significant because of location, rerouting of traffic, evacuation of any building, media interest, etc., the operator who made the telephonic report must submit to the Commission a written report summarizing the accident or incident. The report must be submitted as soon as practicable within 30 calendar days after the date of the telephonic report. The written report must be made in duplicate on forms supplied by the Department of Transportation. The Division must forward one copy to the Department of Transportation. The written report is not required to be submitted for master metered systems, but the Commission may require an operator to submit a written report for an accident or incident not otherwise required to be reported.

Proposed new §8.210(b) requires that each gas company submit an annual report for its systems in the same manner as required by 49 CFR Part 191. The report must be submitted to the Division in duplicate on forms supplied by the Department of Transportation not later than March 15 of each year for the preceding calendar year. The Division forwards one copy to the Department of Transportation. The annual report is not required to be submitted for a petroleum gas system, as that term is defined in 49 CFR §192.11, which serves fewer than 100 customers from a single source or a master metered system.

Proposed new §8.210(c) requires each gas company to submit to the Division in writing a safety-related condition report for any condition outlined in 49 CFR Part 191.25.

Proposed new §8.210(d) requires that within 60 days of completion of underwater inspection, each operator must file with the Division a report of the condition of all underwater pipelines subject to 49 CFR 192.612(a).

Proposed new §8.215, Odorization of Gas, derives from current §7.71. The Commission has modified the current rule's organization and wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.215(a) requires each gas company to continuously odorize gas by the use of a malodorant agent as set forth in the section unless the gas contains a natural malodor or is odorized prior to delivery by a supplier. Unless required by 49 CFR Part 192.625(B) or otherwise by this section, odorization is not required for gas in underground or other storage; gas used or sold primarily for use in natural gasoline extraction plants, recycling plants, chemical plants, carbon black plants, industrial plants, or irrigation pumps; or gas used in lease and field operation or development or in repressuring wells. Gas must be odorized by the user if the gas is delivered for use primarily in one of the activities or facilities listed in paragraph (2) of subsection (a) and is also used in one of those activities for space heating, refrigeration, water heating, cooking, and other domestic uses; or the gas is used for furnishing heat or air conditioning for office or living quarters. In the case of lease users, the supplier must ensure that the gas will be odorized before being used by the consumer.

Proposed new §8.215(b) requires gas companies to use odorization equipment approved by the Commission as provided in the subsection. Commercial manufacturers of odorization equipment manufactured under accepted rules and practices of the industry must submit plans and specifications of such equipment to the Division with Form PS-25 for approval of standardized models and designs. The Division maintains a list of approved commercially available odorization equipment.

Each operator is required to maintain a list of odorization equipment used in its particular operations, including the location of the odorization equipment, the brand name, model number, and the date last serviced. This list must be available for review during safety evaluations by the Division.

Prior to using shop-made or other odorization equipment not approved by the Commission under paragraph (1) of subsection (b), a gas company must submit to the Division Form PS-25 and plans and specifications for the equipment. Within 30 days of receiving Form PS-25 and related documents, the Division shall recommend in writing to notify the gas company in writing whether the equipment is approved or not approved for the requested use.

Proposed new §8.215(c) provides that the Division will maintain a list of approved malodorants which meet certain criteria. The malodorant when blended with gas in the amount specified for adequate odorization of the gas must not be deleterious to humans or to the materials present in a gas system and shall not be soluble in water to a greater extent than 2 1/2 parts by weight of malodorant to 100 parts by weight of water. The products of combustion from the malodorant must be nontoxic to humans breathing air containing the products of combustion and the products of combustion must not be corrosive or harmful to the materials to which such products of combustion would ordinarily come in contact. The malodorant agent to be introduced in the gas, or the natural malodor of the gas, or the combination of the malodorant and the natural malodor of the gas must have a distinctive malodor so that when gas is present in air at a concentration of as much as 1.0% or less by volume, the malodor is readily detectable by an individual with a normal sense of smell. Injection of approved malodorant or the natural malodor must be at a rate sufficient to achieve the specified requirements.

Proposed new §8.215(d) requires each gas company to record the volume of odorant and calculate the injection rate as frequently as necessary to maintain adequate odorization, but not less than once each quarter, the following malodorant information for all odorization equipment, except farm tap odorizers. The following information must be recorded and retained in the company's files odorizer location; brand name and model of odorizer; name of malodorant, concentrate, or dilute; quantity of malodorant at beginning of month/quarter; amount added during month/quarter; quantity at end of month/quarter; MMcf of gas purchased during month/quarter; and the injection rate per MMcf.

Operators must check, test, and service farm tap odorizers at least annually according to the terms of the approved schedule of service and maintenance for farm tap odorizers Form PS-9, filed with and approved by the Division. Each gas company must maintain records to reflect the date of service and maintenance on file for at least two years.

Proposed new §8.215(e) requires each gas company to conduct the following concentration tests on the gas supplied through its facilities and required to be odorized. Other tests conducted in accordance with procedures approved by the Division may be substituted for the following room and malodorant concentration test meter methods. Test points must be distant from odorizing equipment, so as to be representative of the odorized gas in the system. Tests must be performed at least once each calendar year or at such other times as the Division may reasonably require. The results of these tests must be recorded on the approved odorant concentration test Form PS-6 or equivalent and retained in each company's files for at least two years.

For a room test, the test results must include the odorizer name and location; the date the test was performed, test time, location of test, and distance from odorizer, if applicable; the percent gas in air when malodor is readily detectable; and signatures of witnesses to the test and the supervisor of the test.

For a malodorant concentration test meter, the test results must include the odorizer name and location; the malodorant concentration meter make, model, and serial number; the date the test was performed, test time, odorizer tested, and distance from odorizer, if applicable; the test results indicating percent in air when malodor is readily detectable; and signature of person performing the test.

Farm tap odorizers are exempt from the odorization testing requirements. Gas companies that obtain gas into which malodorant previously has been injected or gas which is considered to have a natural malodor and therefore do not odorize the gas themselves are required to conduct quarterly malodorant concentration tests and retain records for a period of two years.

Proposed new §8.220, Master Metered Systems, derives from current §7.73. The Commission has modified the current rule's organization and wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.220(a) requires each master meter operator to comply with the minimum safety standards in 49 CFR Part 192.

Proposed new §8.220(b) requires each master meter operator to conduct a leakage survey on the system every two years, using leak detection equipment.

Proposed new §8.220(c) requires natural gas suppliers to be responsible for installation and inspection of overpressure equipment at those master meter locations where 10 or more consumers are served low pressure gas.

Proposed new §8.225, Plastic Pipe Requirements, derives from current §7.70(g)(2)(C); (g)(5); and (g)(6). The Commission has modified the current rule's organization and wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.225(a) requires each operator to record information relating to each material failure of plastic pipe during each calendar year, and annually to file with the Division, in conjunction with the annual report, a summary of the failures, using Form PS-80, Annual Plastic Pipe Failure Report. The initial Forms PS-80, reporting plastic pipe failure data for calendar year 2001, were due by March 15, 2002.

Proposed new §8.225(b) provides that by March 15, 2003, and March 15, 2004, operators must report on Form PS-82, Annual Report of Plastic Installation and/or Removal, the amount, in miles, of plastic pipe installed and/or removed during the preceding calendar year. The mileage must be further identified by system, nominal pipe size, material designation code, pipe category, and pipe manufacturer. For all new installations of plastic pipe, each operator must record and maintain for the life of the pipeline the following information for each pipeline segment: all specification information printed on the pipe; the total length; a citation to the applicable joining procedures used for the pipe and the fittings; and the location of the installation to distinguish the end points. A pipeline segment is defined as a continuous piping where the pipe specification required by ASTM D2513 or ASTM D2517 does not change.

Proposed new §8.225(c) provides that beginning March 15, 2005, and annually thereafter, each operator must report to the Commission the amount of plastic pipe in natural gas service as of December 31 of the previous year. The amount of plastic pipe must be determined by a review of the records of the operator and reported on Form PS-81, Plastic Pipe Inventory. The report must include the system; miles of pipe; calendar year of installation; nominal pipe size; material designation code; pipe category; and pipe manufacturer.

Proposed new §8.225(d) requires that operators of systems with more than 1,000 customers file the required reports electronically in a format specified by the Commission.

Proposed new §8.225(e) provides that operators complete all required forms in accord with the section, including signatures of company officials. The Commission may consider the failure of an operator to complete all forms as required to be a violation under Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121, and may seek penalties as permitted by that chapter.

Proposed new §8.230, School Piping Testing, derives from current §7.74. The Commission has modified the current rule's organization by moving the definitions from current §7.74(a) to proposed new §8.5 and re-lettering the remaining subsections; otherwise, the substance of the current provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.230(a) states the purpose of this section as being the implementation of the requirements of Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, relating to the testing of natural gas piping systems in school facilities.

Proposed new §8.230(b) requires natural gas suppliers to develop procedures for receiving written notice from a person responsible for a school facility, specifying the date and result of each test; and terminating natural gas service to a school facility in the event that the natural gas supplier receives notification of a hazardous natural gas leak in the school facility piping system pursuant to this rule, or the natural gas supplier does not receive written notification specifying the date that testing has been completed on a school facility and the results of such testing. A natural gas supplier may rely on a written notification that complies with the rule as proof that a school facility is in compliance with Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, and the rule. A natural gas supplier has no duty to inspect a school facility for compliance with Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507.

Proposed new §8.230(c) states that a natural gas piping pressure test performed under a municipal code in compliance with the rule satisfies the testing requirements. A pressure test to determine if the natural gas piping in each school facility will hold at least normal operating pressure must be performed as specified. For systems on which the normal operating pressure is less than 0.5 psig, the test pressure must be 5 psig and the time interval 30 minutes. For systems on which the normal operating pressure is 0.5 psig or more, the test pressure must be 1.5 times the normal operating pressure or 5 psig, whichever is greater, and the time interval 30 minutes. A pressure test using normal operating pressure may be utilized only on systems operating at 5 psig or greater, and the time interval must be one hour. The testing must be conducted by a licensed plumber; a qualified employee or agent of the school who is regularly employed as or acting as a maintenance person or maintenance engineer; or a person exempt from the plumbing license law as provided in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6243-101, §3.

The testing of public school facilities must be completed as follows: for school facilities tested prior to the beginning of the 1997-1998 school year, at least once every two years thereafter before the beginning of the school year; for school facilities not tested prior to the beginning of the 1997-1998 school year, as soon as practicable thereafter but prior to the beginning of the 1998-1999 school year and at least once every two years thereafter before the beginning of the school year; for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar and tested prior to July 1, 1997, at least once every two years thereafter; and for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar and not tested prior to July 1, 1997, once prior to July 1, 1998, and at least once every two years thereafter.

The testing of charter and private school facilities must occur at least once every two years and must be performed before the beginning of the school year, except for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar, which must be tested not later than July 1 of the year in which the test is performed. The initial test of charter and private school facilities must occur prior to the beginning of the 2003-2004 school year or by August 31, 2003, whichever is earlier.

The firm or individual conducting the test must immediately report any hazardous natural gas leak to the board of trustees of the school district and the natural gas supplier; for a public school facility, and to the person responsible for such school facility and the natural gas supplier for a charter or private school facility. The school pipe testing must be recorded on Railroad Commission Form PS-86.

Proposed new §8.230(d) requires natural gas suppliers to maintain for at least two years a listing of the school facilities to which it sells and delivers natural gas as well as copies of the written notification regarding testing, Form PS-86, and hazardous leaks received pursuant to Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, and the rule.

The proposed amendment to §8.235, Natural Gas Pipelines Public Education and Liaison, would substitute "Safety Division" for "Gas Services Division, Pipeline Safety Section," in subsection (e).

Proposed new §8.245, Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations, derives from current §§7.70(j), but is expanded to include the requirements enacted by Senate Bill 310 (Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1233, §§ 5 and 71, respectively, eff. Sept. 1, 2001) in Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531, and Texas Utilities Code, §121.206, both of which require the Commission, by rule, to adopt guidelines to be used in determining the amount of the penalty for violations of pipeline safety rules.

Specifically, Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531(d) provides that the rule must set forth the guidelines to be used in determining the amount of the penalty for a violation of a provision of Title 3 of the Texas Natural Resources Code or a rule, order, or permit that relates to pipeline safety. The guidelines must also include a penalty calculation worksheet that specifies the typical penalty for certain violations, circumstances justifying enhancement of a penalty and the amount of the enhancement, and circumstances justifying a reduction in a penalty and the amount of the reduction. The guidelines must take into account the permittee's history of previous violations, including the number of previous violations; the seriousness of the violation and of any pollution resulting from the violation; any hazard to the health or safety of the public; the degree of culpability; the demonstrated good faith of the person charged; and any other factor the commission considers relevant.

Texas Utilities Code, §121.206, authorizes the Commission to assess an administrative penalty against a person who violates Texas Utilities Code, §121.201, or Subchapter I (Texas Utilities Code, §§121.451-121.454) or a safety standard or rule relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities adopted under those provisions. Subsection 121.206(d) requires that the Commission's rule must include a penalty calculation worksheet that specifies the typical penalty for certain violations, circumstances justifying enhancement of a penalty and the amount of the enhancement, and circumstances justifying a reduction in a penalty and the amount of the reduction. The guidelines must take into account the permittee's history of previous violations, including the number of previous violations; the seriousness of the violation and of any pollution resulting from the violation; any hazard to the health or safety of the public; the degree of culpability; the demonstrated good faith of the person charged; and any other factor the commission considers relevant. The proposed rule summarizes and explains the Commission's practice with respect to requesting, recommending, or finally assessing penalties in an enforcement action.

Proposed new §8.245(a) provides that the section offers only guidelines, in compliance with the requirements of Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531(d), and Texas Utilities Code, §121.206(d). The penalty amounts contained in the tables in this section are provided solely as guidelines to be considered by the Commission in determining the amount of administrative penalties for violations of provisions of Title 3 of the Texas Natural Resources Code relating to pipeline safety, or of rules, orders or permits relating to pipeline safety adopted under those provisions, and for violations of Texas Utilities Code, §121.201 or Subchapter I (§§121.451-121.454), or a safety standard or rule relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities adopted under those provisions.

Proposed new §8.245(b) states that the establishment of these penalty guidelines in no way limits the Commission's authority and discretion to assess administrative penalties in any amount up to the statutory maximum when warranted by the facts in any case.

Proposed new §8.245(c) lists the factors to be considered in determining the amount of any penalty requested, recommended, or finally assessed in an enforcement action. The amount will be determined on an individual case-by-case basis for each violation, taking into consideration the person's history of previous violations, including the number of previous violations; the seriousness of the violation and of any pollution resulting from the violation; any hazard to the health or safety of the public; the degree of culpability; the demonstrated good faith of the person charged; and any other factor the Commission considers relevant.

Proposed new §8.245(d) sets forth typical penalties for violations of provisions of Title 3 of the Texas Natural Resources Code relating to pipeline safety, or of rules, orders, or permits relating to pipeline safety adopted under those provisions, and for violations of Texas Utilities Code, §121.201 or Subchapter I (§§121.451-121.454), or a safety standard or rule relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities adopted under those provisions in Table 1.

Proposed new §8.245(e) explains that for violations that involve threatened or actual pollution; result in threatened or actual safety hazards; result from the reckless or intentional conduct of the person charged; or involve a person with a history of prior violations, the Commission may assess an enhancement of the typical penalty, as shown in Table 2. The enhancement may be in any amount in the range shown for each type of violation.

Proposed new §8.245(f) provides that for violations in which the person charged has a history of prior violations within seven years of the current enforcement action, the Commission may assess an enhancement based on either the number of prior violations or the total amount of previous administrative penalties, but not both. The actual amount of any penalty enhancement will be determined on an individual case-by-case basis for each violation. The guidelines in Tables 3 and 4 are intended to be used separately. Either guideline may be used where applicable, but not both.

Proposed new §8.245(g) provides that the recommended penalty for a violation may be reduced by up to 50% if the person charged agrees to a settlement before the Commission conducts an administrative hearing to prosecute a violation. Once the hearing is convened, the opportunity for the person charged to reduce the basic penalty is no longer available. The reduction applies to the basic penalty amount requested and not to any requested enhancements.

Proposed new §8.245(h) provides that, in determining the total amount of any penalty requested, recommended, or finally assessed in an enforcement action, the Commission may consider, on an individual case-by-case basis for each violation, the demonstrated good faith of the person charged. Demonstrated good faith includes, but is not limited to, actions taken by the person charged before the filing of an enforcement action to remedy, in whole or in part, a violation of the pipeline safety rules or to mitigate the consequences of a violation of the pipeline safety rules.

Proposed new §8.245(i) explains the penalty calculation worksheet in Table 5. The worksheet lists the typical penalty amounts for certain violations; lists each of the circumstances justifying enhancements of a penalty and the amount of the enhancement; and lists each of the circumstances justifying a reduction in a penalty and the amount of the reduction.

Subchapter D. Requirements for Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Only.

Proposed new rules in Subchapter D, Requirements for Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines Only, will include proposed new §8.301, Required Records and Reporting; and proposed new §8.305, Corrosion Control Requirements; and current §8.310, Community Liaison and Public Education for Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines, and §8.315, Hazardous Liquids and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines or Pipeline Facilities Located Within 1,000 Feet of a Public School Building or Facility.

Proposed new §8.301, Required Records and Reporting, derives from current §7.84(a), (b), (c) and (e). The Commission has modified the current rule's organization and wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Proposed new §8.301(a) covers accident reports. In the event of any failure or accident involving an intrastate pipeline facility from which any hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide is released, if the failure or accident is required to be reported by 49 CFR Part 195, then the operator is required to report to the Commission. In the event of an accident involving crude oil, the operator must notify the Division, which in turn must notify the Commission's appropriate Oil and Gas district office, by telephone to the Commission's emergency line at the earliest practicable moment following discovery of the incident (within two hours). The initial telephone report must include the company/operator name; the location of leak or incident; the time and date of accident/incident; any fatalities and/or personal injuries; phone number of operator; and other significant facts relevant to the accident or incident.

Within 30 days of discovery of the incident, the operator must submit a completed Form H-8 to the Oil and Gas Division of the Commission. In situations specified in the 49 CFR Part 195, the operator must also file duplicate copies of the required Department of Transportation form with the Division.

For incidents involving hazardous liquids, other than crude oil, and carbon dioxide, the operator must notify the Division by telephone at the earliest practicable moment following discovery (within two hours) and within 30 days of discovery of the incident, file in duplicate with the Division a written report using the appropriate Department of Transportation form (as required by 49 CFR Part 195) or a facsimile.

Proposed new §8.301(b) pertains to annual reports. Each operator is required to file with the Commission an annual report on Form PS-45 listing line sizes and lengths, hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide being transported, and accident/failure data. The report is to be filed with the Commission on or before March 15 of a year for the preceding calendar year reported.

Proposed new §8.301(c) covers the requirement that operators file facility response plans. Simultaneously with filing either an initial or a revised facility response plan with the United States Department of Transportation, each operator is required to submit to the Division a copy of the initial or revised facility response plan prepared under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, for all or any part of a hazardous liquid pipeline facility located landward of the coast.

Proposed new §8.305, Corrosion Control Requirements, derives from current §7.86. The Commission has modified the current rule's organization and wording to achieve specificity and clarity, but the substance of the provisions is unchanged from current requirements.

Operators are required to comply or ensure compliance with the specified requirements for the installation and construction of new pipeline metallic systems, the relocation or replacement of existing facilities, and the operation and maintenance of steel pipelines.

Proposed new §8.305(1) sets forth the requirements for atmospheric corrosion control. Each aboveground pipeline or portion of pipeline exposed to the atmosphere must be cleaned and coated or jacketed with material suitable for the prevention of atmospheric corrosion. For onshore pipelines, the intervals between inspections must not exceed five years; for offshore pipelines, reevaluations are required at least once each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 15 months.

Proposed new §8.305(2) deals with pipeline coatings. All coated pipe used for the transport of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide must be electrically inspected prior to placement using coating deficiency (holiday) detectors to check for any faults not observable by visual examination. The holiday detector must be operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and at a voltage level appropriate for the electrical characteristics of the pipeline system being tested.

Proposed new §8.305(3) requires that joint fittings, and tie-ins be coated with materials compatible with the coatings on the pipe.

Proposed new §8.305(4) pertains to cathodic protection test stations. Each cathodically protected pipeline must have test stations or other electrical measurement contact points sufficient to determine the adequacy of cathodic protection. These locations must include but are not limited to pipe casing installations and all foreign metallic cathodically protected structures. Test stations (electrode locations) used when taking pipe-to-soil readings for determining cathodic protection must be selected to give representative pipe-to-soil readings. Readings taken at test stations (electrode locations) over or near one or more anodes are not, by themselves, considered representative.

In addition, all test lead wire attachments and bared test lead wires must be coated with an electrically insulating material. Where the pipe is coated, the insulation of the test lead wire material must be compatible with the pipe coating and wire insulation. Cathodic protection systems must meet or exceed the minimum criteria set forth in Criteria For Cathodic Protection of the most current edition of the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Standard RP-01-69.

Proposed new §8.305(5) concerns monitoring and inspection. Each cathodic protection rectifier or impressed current power source must be inspected at least six times each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 2 1/2 months, to ensure that it is operating properly. Each reverse-current switch, diode, and interference bond whose failure would jeopardize structure protection must be checked electrically for proper performance six times each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 2 1/2 months. Each remaining interference bond must be checked at least once each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 15 months. Each operator is required to utilize right-of-way inspections to determine areas where interfering currents are suspected. In the course of these inspections, personnel must be alert for electrical or physical conditions which could indicate interference from a neighboring source. Whenever suspected areas are identified, the operator must conduct appropriate electrical tests within six months to determine the extent of interference and take appropriate action.

Proposed new §8.305(6) requires that each operator take prompt remedial action to correct any deficiencies observed during monitoring.

Mary McDaniel, Director, Safety Division, has determined that for each year of the first five years that the proposed new rules and amendments will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications to state or local governments. Municipalities that operate natural gas distribution systems are subject to the Commission's pipeline safety rules; however, the proposed new rules are either substantively the same as current rules in Chapter 7, some of which have been in place since 1976, or they put into a formal rule a procedure that has been used by Commission staff and subject pipelines on an informal basis for several years. Proposed new §8.245, Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations, embodies in rule format a summary and explanation of statutory provisions and Commission practice with respect to requesting, recommending, and determining penalty amounts for pipeline safety violations, as required by Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531(d), and Texas Utilities Code, §121.206(d), enacted by Senate Bill 310 (Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1233, §§ 5 and 71, respectively, eff. Sept. 1, 2001), but only those pipeline operators who become subject to Commission enforcement actions for pipeline safety violations would be subject to its terms.

Ms. McDaniel has also determined that, for each year of the first five years that the proposed new rules and amendments are in effect, the public benefit will be that all pipeline safety rules will be located in their own chapter. This should make it easier for operators to locate the rules, thus making compliance easier for pipeline operators to achieve and making pipeline operations safer. Also, combining provisions that apply to all pipelines is efficient. Having all pipeline safety regulations in a single chapter makes them easier for the public to find and understand what is required of pipeline operators.

The Commission anticipates that there will be no additional cost to individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses of complying with the proposed new rules and amendments. Most of the new rules are substantively the same as current rules in Chapter 7, with which all operators are currently required to comply. One proposed new rule merely formalizes the procedure for obtaining a waiver of a pipeline safety rule that has been observed informally for at least 10 years. Finally, proposed new §8.245 applies to pipeline operators against whom enforcement actions are brought for violations of pipeline safety rules, and is a summary and explanation of current statutory provisions and Commission practice with respect to requesting, recommending, and determining penalty amounts for pipeline safety violations.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Rules Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967; online at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/commentform.html; or by electronic mail to rulescoordinator@rrc.state.tx.us. The Commission will accept comments for 60 days after publication in the Texas Register and should refer to Gas Utilities Docket No. 9255. For more information, call Mary McDaniel at (512) 463-7166. The status of Commission rulemakings in progress is available at www.rrc.state.tx.us/rules/proposed.html.

Subchapter A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITIONS

16 TAC §8.1, §8.5

The Commission proposes the new sections and the amendments to current rules in Chapter 8, Subchapter A, under Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which give the Commission jurisdiction over all common carrier pipelines in Texas, persons owning or operating pipelines in Texas, and their pipelines and oil and gas wells, and authorize the Commission to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in §81.051, including such rules as the Commission may consider necessary and appropriate to implement state responsibility under any federal law or rules governing such persons and their operations; Texas Natural Resources Code, §§117.001-117.101, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide and associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degrees permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .; and Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of gas and to associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degree permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.251-121.253, which governs the use of malodorants in natural and liquefied natural gas and authorizes the Commission to make rules as necessary to carry out the purposes of this section; and Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, which govern the testing of natural gas piping systems in school facilities and require the Commission to enforce the provisions of the statute.

Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 117.001-117.101; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005-121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq ., are affected by the proposed new sections and amendments in Chapter 8, Subchapter A.

Statutory authority: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 117.001-117.101; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005- 121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 81 and 117; Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121; and 49 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 601.

Issued in Austin, Texas on April 23, 2004.

§8.1.General Applicability and Standards.

(a) Applicability.

(1) The rules in this chapter establish minimum standards of accepted good practice and apply to:

(A) all gas pipeline facilities and facilities used in the intrastate transportation of natural gas, including master metered systems, as provided in 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) §60101, et seq ., and Texas Utilities Code, §§121.001-121.507;

(B) the intrastate pipeline transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide and all intrastate pipeline facilities as provided in 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq ., and Texas Natural Resources Code, §§117.011 and 117.012; and

(C) all pipeline facilities originating in Texas waters (three marine leagues and all bay areas). These pipeline facilities include those production and flow lines originating at the well.

(2) The regulations do not apply to those facilities and transportation services subject to federal jurisdiction under: 15 U.S.C. §717, et seq ., or 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .

(b) Minimum safety standards. The Commission adopts by reference the following provisions, as modified in this chapter, effective April 9, 2004.

(1) Natural gas pipelines shall be designed, constructed, maintained, and operated in accordance with 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .; 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 191, Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline; Annual Reports, Incident Reports, and Safety-Related Condition Reports; 49 CFR Part 192, Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards; and 49 CFR Part 193, Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards.

(2) Hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide pipelines shall comply with 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq .; and 49 CFR Part 195, Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline.

(3) All operators of pipelines and/or pipeline facilities shall comply with 49 CFR Part 199, Drug and Alcohol Testing.

(c) Special situations. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the Commission, after notice and hearing, from prescribing more stringent standards in particular situations. In special circumstances, the Commission may require the following:

(1) Any operator which cannot determine to its satisfaction the standards applicable to special circumstances may request in writing the Commission's advice and recommendations. In a special case, and for good cause shown, the Commission may authorize exemption, modification, or temporary suspension of any of the provisions of this chapter, pursuant to the provisions of §8.125 of this title (relating to Waiver Procedure).

(2) If an operator transports gas and/or operates pipeline facilities which are in part subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission and in part subject to the Department of Transportation pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §60101, et seq ., the operator may request in writing to the Commission that all of its pipeline facilities and transportation be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation. If the operator files a written statement under oath that it will fully comply with the federal safety rules and regulations, the Commission may grant an exemption from compliance with this chapter.

(d) Concurrent filing. A person filing any document or information with the Department of Transportation shall file a copy of that document or information with the Safety Division.

(e) Penalties. A person who submits incorrect or false information with the intent of misleading the Commission regarding any material aspect of an application or other information required to be filed at the Commission may be penalized as set out in Texas Natural Resources Code, §§117.051-117.054, and/or Texas Utilities Code, §§121.206-121.210, and the Commission may dismiss with prejudice to refiling an application containing incorrect or false information or reject any other filing containing incorrect or false information.

(f) Retroactivity. Nothing in this chapter shall be applied retroactively to any existing intrastate pipeline facilities concerning design, fabrication, installation, or established operating pressure, except as required by the Office of Pipeline Safety, Department of Transportation. All intrastate pipeline facilities shall be subject to the other safety requirements of this chapter.

§8.5.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. In addition to the following defined terms, definitions given in 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, 195, and 199 are hereby adopted by reference as definitions for purposes of this chapter.

(1) Affected person--This definition of this term applies only to the procedures and requirements of §8.125 of this title (relating to Waiver Procedure). The term includes but is not limited to:

(A) persons owning or occupying real property within 500 feet of any property line of the site for the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought;

(B) the city council, as represented by the city attorney, the city secretary, the city manager, or the mayor, if the property that is the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located wholly or partly within any incorporated municipal boundaries, including the extraterritorial jurisdiction of any incorporated municipality. If the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located within more than one incorporated municipality, then the city council of every incorporated municipality within which the site is located is an affected person;

(C) the county commission, as represented by the county clerk, if the property that is the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located wholly or partly outside the boundary of any incorporated municipality. If the site of the facility or operation for which the waiver is sought is located within more than one county, then the county commission of every county within which the site is located is an affected person;

(D) any other person who would be adversely impacted by the waiver sought.

(2) Applicant--A person who has filed with the Safety Division a complete application for a waiver to a pipeline safety rule or regulation, or a request to use direct assessment or other technology or assessment methodology not specifically listed in §8.101(b)(1), of this title (relating to Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines).

(3) Application for waiver--The written request, including all reasons and all appropriate documentation, for the waiver of a particular rule or regulation with respect to a specific facility or operation.

(4) Charter school--An elementary or secondary school operated by an entity created pursuant to Texas Education Code, Chapter 12.

(5) Commission--The Railroad Commission of Texas.

(6) Direct assessment--A structured process that defines locations where a pipeline is physically examined to provide assessment of pipeline integrity. The process includes collection, analysis, assessment, and integration of data, including but not limited to the items listed in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The physical examination may include coating examination and other applicable non-destructive evaluation.

(7) Director--the director of the Safety Division or the director's delegate.

(8) Division--The Safety Division of the Commission.

(9) Farm tap odorizer--A wick-type odorizer serving a consumer or consumers off any pipeline other than that classified as distribution as defined in 49 CFR Part 192.3 which uses not more than 10 mcf on an average day in any month.

(10) Gas--Natural gas, flammable gas, or other gas which is toxic or corrosive.

(11) Gas company--Any person who owns or operates pipeline facilities used for the transportation or distribution of gas, including master metered systems.

(12) Hazardous liquid--Petroleum, petroleum products, anhydrous ammonia, or any substance or material which is in liquid state, excluding liquefied natural gas, when transported by pipeline facilities and which has been determined by the United States Secretary of Transportation to pose an unreasonable risk to life or property when transported by pipeline facilities.

(13) In-line inspection--An internal inspection by a tool capable of detecting anomalies in pipeline walls such as corrosion, metal loss, or deformation.

(14) Intrastate pipeline facilities--Pipeline facilities located within the State of Texas which are not used for the transportation of natural gas or hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide in interstate or foreign commerce.

(15) Lease user--A consumer who receives free gas in a contractual agreement with a pipeline operator or producer.

(16) Liquids company--Any person who owns or operates a pipeline or pipelines and/or pipeline facilities used for the transportation or distribution of any hazardous liquid, or carbon dioxide, or anhydrous ammonia.

(17) Master meter operator--The owner, operator, or manager of a master metered system.

(18) Master metered system--A pipeline system (other than a local distribution company) for distributing gas within but not limited to a definable area, such as a mobile home park, housing project, or apartment complex, where the operator purchases metered gas from an outside source for resale through a gas distribution pipeline system. The gas distribution pipeline system supplies the ultimate consumer who either purchases the gas directly through a meter or by other means such as rents.

(19) Natural gas supplier--The entity selling and delivering the natural gas to a school facility or a master metered system. If more than one entity sells and delivers natural gas to a school facility or master metered system, each entity is a natural gas supplier for purposes of this chapter.

(20) Operator--A person who operates on his or her own behalf or as an agent designated by the owner to operate intrastate pipeline facilities.

(21) Person--Any individual, firm, joint venture, partnership, corporation, association, cooperative association, joint stock association, trust, or any other business entity, including any trustee, receiver, assignee, or personal representative thereof, a state agency or institution, a county, a municipality, or school district or any other governmental subdivision of this state.

(22) Person responsible for a school facility--In the case of a public school, the superintendent of the school district as defined in Texas Education Code, §11.201, or the superintendent's designee previously specified in writing to the natural gas supplier. In the case of charter and private schools, the principal of the school or the principal's designee previously specified in writing to the natural gas supplier.

(23) Pipeline facilities--New and existing pipe, right-of-way, and any equipment, facility, or building used or intended for use in the transportation of gas or hazardous liquid or their treatment during the course of transportation.

(24) Pressure test--Those techniques and methodologies prescribed for leak-test and strength-test requirements for pipelines. For natural gas pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 192, and specifically include 49 CFR §§192.505, 192.507, 192.515, and 192.517. For hazardous liquids pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 CFR Part 195, and specifically include 49 CFR §§195.305, 195.306, 195.308, and 195.310.

(25) Private school--An elementary or secondary school operated by an entity accredited by the Texas Private School Accreditation Commission.

(26) Public school--An elementary or secondary school operated by an entity created in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and accredited by the Texas Education Agency pursuant to Texas Education Code, Chapter 39, Subchapter D. The term does not include programs and facilities under the jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, the Texas Youth Commission, the Texas Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice or any probation agency, the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, the Texas School for the Deaf and Regional Day Schools for the Deaf, the Texas Academy of Mathematics & Science, the Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities, and home schools or proprietary schools as defined in Texas Education Code, §132.001.

(27) School facility--All piping, buildings and structures operated by a public, charter, or private school that are downstream of a meter measuring natural gas service in which students receive instruction or participate in school sponsored extracurricular activities, excluding maintenance or bus facilities, administrative offices, and similar facilities not regularly utilized by students.

(28) Secretary--The Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation.

(29) Transportation of gas--The gathering, transmission, or distribution of gas by pipeline or its storage within the State of Texas. For purposes of safety regulation, the term shall not include the gathering of gas in those rural locations which lie outside the limits of any incorporated or unincorporated city, town, village, or any other designated residential or commercial area such as a subdivision, a business or shopping center, a community development, or any similar populated area which the Secretary of Transportation may define as a nonrural area.

(30) Transportation of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide--The movement of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide by pipeline, or their storage incidental to movement, except that, for purposes of safety regulations, it does not include any such movement through gathering lines in rural locations or production, refining, or manufacturing facilities or storage or in-plant piping systems associated with any of those facilities.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402736

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Subchapter B. REQUIREMENTS FOR NATURAL GAS AND HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS PIPELINES

16 TAC §§8.51, 8.101, 8.105, 8.110, 8.115, 8.125, 8.130

The Commission proposes the new sections and the amendments to current rules in Chapter 8, Subchapter B, under Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which give the Commission jurisdiction over all common carrier pipelines in Texas, persons owning or operating pipelines in Texas, and their pipelines and oil and gas wells, and authorize the Commission to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in §81.051, including such rules as the Commission may consider necessary and appropriate to implement state responsibility under any federal law or rules governing such persons and their operations; Texas Natural Resources Code, §§117.001-117.101, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide and associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degrees permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of gas and to associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degree permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.251-121.253, which governs the use of malodorants in natural and liquefied natural gas and authorizes the Commission to make rules as necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, and Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, which govern the testing of natural gas piping systems in school facilities and require the Commission to enforce the provisions of the statute.

Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, 117.001-117.101; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005-121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq ., are affected by the proposed new sections and amendments in Chapter 8, Subchapter B.

Statutory authority: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 117.001-117.101; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005- 121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 81 and 117; Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121; and 49 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 601.

§8.51.Organization Report.

Each gas company and each liquids company operating wholly or partially within this state, acting either as principal or as agent for another, and performing operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission, shall have on file with the Commission an approved organization report (Form P-5) and financial security as required by Texas Natural Resources Code, §§91.103-91.1091, and §3.1 of this title (relating to Organization Report; Retention of Records; Notice Requirements).

§8.101.Pipeline Integrity Assessment and Management Plans for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines.

(a) [ Definitions and Applicability. ]

[(1) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.]

[(A) Direct assessment--A structured process that defines locations where a pipeline is physically examined to provide assessment of pipeline integrity. The process includes collection, analysis, assessment, and integration of data, including but not limited to the items listed in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The physical examination may include coating examination and other applicable non-destructive evaluation.]

[(B) In-line inspection--An internal inspection by a tool capable of detecting anomalies in pipeline walls such as corrosion, metal loss, or deformation.]

[(C) Pressure test--Those techniques and methodologies prescribed for leak-test and strength-test requirements for pipelines. For natural gas pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR) Part 192, and specifically include 49 CFR §§192.503(b)(c)(d), 192.505, 192.507, 192.515, and 192.517. For hazardous liquids pipelines, the requirements are found in 49 CFR Part 195, and specifically include 49 CFR §§195.304, 195.305, 195.306, 195.308, and 195.310.]

[ (2) Applicability. ] This section does not apply to plastic pipelines.

(b) By February 1, 2002, operators of intrastate transmission and gathering lines subject to the requirements of 49 CFR 192 or 49 CFR 195 shall have designated [ designate ] to the Commission [ Commission's Pipeline Safety Section ] on a system-by-system or segment within each system basis whether the pipeline operator has chosen to use the risk-based analysis pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection or the prescriptive plan authorized by paragraph (2) of this subsection. Operators using the risk-based plan shall complete at least 50% of the initial assessments by January 1, 2006, and the remainder by January 1, 2011; operators using the prescriptive plan shall complete the initial integrity testing by January 1, 2006, or January 1, 2011, pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (2) of this subsection.

(1) - (2) (No change.)

(c) - (f) (No change.)

§8.105.Records.

Each pipeline operator shall maintain the following most current record or records for at least the longer of either the interval between prescribed tests plus one year or five years if no other time period is specified:

(1) For gas pipelines, those records and documents required by 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, and 199, and §8.215 of this chapter (relating to Odorization of Gas).

(2) For liquids pipelines, those records and documents required by 49 CFR Parts 195 and 199.

(3) Records of all design and installation of new and used pipe, including design pressure calculations, pipeline specifications, specified minimum yield strength and wall-thickness calculations, each valve, fitting, fabricated branch connection, closure, flange connection, station piping, fabricated assembly, and above-ground breakout tank.

(4) Records of all pipeline construction, procedures, training, and inspection pertaining to welding, nondestructive testing, and cathodic protection.

(5) Records of all hydrostatic testing performed on all pipeline segments, components, and tie-ins.

(6) Records involved in the performance of the procedures outlined in the operations and maintenance procedure manual required by §8.110 of this title (relating to Operations and Maintenance Procedures).

§8.110.Operations and Maintenance Procedures.

Each pipeline operator shall prepare a manual or procedural plan, required by 49 CFR Parts 191, 192, 193, 195 or 199, as applicable, and shall make it available for Commission inspection upon request. If the Commission finds the plan is inadequate to achieve safe operation, the operator shall revise the plan.

§8.115.Construction Commencement Report.

At least 30 days prior to commencement of construction of any installation totaling one mile or more of pipe, each operator shall file with the Commission a report stating the proposed originating and terminating points for the pipeline, counties to be traversed, path, size and type of pipe to be used, type of service, design pressure, and length of the proposed line.

§8.125.Waiver Procedure.

(a) Filing. Any person may apply for a waiver of a pipeline safety rule or regulation by filing an application for waiver with the Division. Upon the filing of an application for waiver of a pipeline safety rule, the Division shall assign a docket number to the application and shall forward it to the director, and thereafter all documents relating to that application shall include the assigned docket number. The Division shall not assign a docket number to or consider any application filed in response to a notice of violation of a pipeline safety rule.

(b) Form. The application shall be typewritten on paper not to exceed 8 1/2 inches by 11 inches and shall have margins of at least one inch. The contents of the application shall appear on one side of the paper and shall be double or one and one-half spaced, except that footnotes and lengthy quotations may be single spaced. Exhibits attached to an application shall be the same size as the application or folded to that size.

(c) Content. The application shall contain the following:

(1) the name, business address, and telephone number, and facsimile transmission number and electronic mail address, if available, of the applicant and of the applicant's authorized representative, if any;

(2) a description of the particular operation for which the waiver is sought;

(3) a statement concerning the regulation from which the waiver is sought and the reason for the exception;

(4) a description of the facility at which the operation is conducted, including, if necessary, design and operation specifications, monitoring and control devices, maps, calculations, and test results;

(5) a description of the acreage and/or address upon which the facility and/or operation that is the subject of the waiver request is located. The description shall:

(A) include a plat drawing;

(B) identify the site sufficiently to permit determination of property boundaries;

(C) identify environmental surroundings;

(D) identify placement of buildings and areas intended for human occupancy that could be endangered by a failure or malfunction of the facility or operation;

(E) state the ownership of the real property of the site; and

(F) state under what legal authority the applicant, if not the owner of the real property, is permitted occupancy;

(6) an identification of any increased risks the particular operation would create if the waiver were granted, and the additional safety measures that are proposed to compensate for those risks;

(7) a statement of the reason the particular operation, if the waiver were granted, would not be inconsistent with protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the general public;

(8) an original signature, in ink, by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative, if any; and

(9) a list of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all affected persons, as defined in §8.5 of this title (relating to Definitions).

(d) Notice.

(1) The applicant shall send a copy of the application and a notice of protest form published by the Commission by certified mail, return receipt requested, to all affected persons on the same date of filing the application with the Division. The notice shall describe the nature of the waiver sought; shall state that affected persons have 30 calendar days from the date of the last publication to file written objections or requests for a hearing with the Division; and shall include the docket number of the application and the mailing address of the Division. The applicant shall file all return receipts with the Division as proof of notice.

(2) The applicant shall publish notice of its application for waiver of a pipeline safety rule once a week for two consecutive weeks in the state or local news section of a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the facility or operation for which the requested waiver is located. The notice shall describe the nature of the waiver sought; shall state that affected persons have 30 calendar days from the date of the last publication to file written objections or requests for a hearing with the Division; and shall include the docket number of the application and the mailing address of the Division. Within ten calendar days of the date of last publication, the applicant shall file with the Division a publisher's affidavit from each newspaper in which notice was published as proof of publication of notice. The affidavit shall state the dates on which the notice was published and shall have attached to it the tear sheets from each edition of the newspaper in which the notice was published.

(3) The applicant shall give any other notice of the application which the director may require.

(e) Protest.

(1) Affected persons shall have standing to object to or request a hearing on an application.

(2) A person who objects to or who requests a hearing on the application shall file a written objection or request for a hearing with the Division no later than the 30th calendar day after the date the notice of the application was postmarked or the last date the notice was published in the newspaper in the county in which the person owns or occupies property, whichever is later.

(3) The objection or request for a hearing shall:

(A) state the name, address, and telephone number of the person filing the objection or request for hearing and of every person on whose behalf the objection or request for a hearing is being filed; and

(B) include a statement of the facts on which the person filing the protest relies to conclude that each person on whose behalf the objection or request for a hearing is being filed is an affected person, as defined in §8.5 of this title (relating to Definitions).

(f) Division review.

(1) The director shall complete the review of the application within 60 calendar days after the application is complete. If an application remains incomplete 12 months after the date the application was filed, such application shall expire and the director shall dismiss without prejudice to refiling.

(A) If the director does not receive any objections or requests for a hearing from any affected person, the director may recommend in writing that the Commission grant the waiver if granting the waiver will neither imperil nor tend to imperil the health, safety or welfare of the general public and the environment. The director shall forward the file, along with the written recommendation that the waiver be granted, to the Office of General Counsel for the preparation of an order.

(B) The director shall not recommend that the Commission grant the waiver if the application was filed either to correct an existing violation or to avoid the expense of safety compliance. The director shall dismiss with prejudice to refiling an application filed in response to a notice of violation of a pipeline safety rule.

(C) If the director declines to recommend that the Commission grant the waiver, the director shall notify the applicant in writing of the recommendation and the reason for it, and shall inform the applicant of any specific deficiencies in the application.

(2) If the director declines to recommend that the Commission grant the waiver, and if the application was not filed either to correct an existing violation or solely to avoid the expense of safety compliance, the applicant may either:

(A) modify the application to correct the deficiencies and resubmit the application; or

(B) file a written request for a hearing on the matter within ten calendar days of receiving notice of the assistant director's written decision not to recommend that the Commission grant the application.

(g) Hearings.

(1) Within three days of receiving either a timely-filed objection or a request for a hearing, the director shall forward the file to the Office of General Counsel for the setting of a hearing.

(2) The Office of General Counsel shall assign a presiding examiner to conduct a hearing.

(3) The presiding examiner shall mail notice of the hearing by certified mail, return receipt requested, not less than 30 calendar days prior to the date of the hearing to:

(A) the applicant;

(B) all persons who filed an objection or a request for a hearing; and

(C) all other affected persons.

(4) The presiding examiner shall conduct the hearing in accordance with the procedural requirements of Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001 (the Administrative Procedure Act), and Chapter 1 of this title (relating to Practice and Procedure).

(h) Finding requirement. After a hearing, the Commission may grant a waiver of a pipeline safety rule based on a finding or findings that the grant of the waiver will neither imperil nor tend to imperil the health, safety or welfare of the general public and the environment.

(i) Notice to United States Department of Transportation. Upon a Commission order granting a waiver of a pipeline safety rule, the director shall give written notice to the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of 49 United States Code Annotated, §60118(d). The Commission's grant of a waiver becomes effective in accordance with the provisions of 49 United States Code Annotated, §60118(d).

§8.130.Enforcement.

(a) Periodic inspection. The Safety Division shall have responsibility for the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. To this end, the Safety Division shall formulate a plan or program for periodic evaluation of the books, records, and facilities of gas companies and liquids companies operating in Texas on a sampling basis, in order to satisfy the Commission that these companies are in compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

(b) Scope of inspection. Upon reasonable notice, the Safety Division or its authorized representative may, at any reasonable time, inspect the books, files, records, reports, supplemental data, other documents and information, plant, property, and facilities of a gas company or a liquids company to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

(c) Company obligations.

(1) Each operator, officer, employee, and representative of a gas company or a liquids company operating in Texas shall cooperate with the Safety Division and its authorized representatives in the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter; in the determination of compliance with the provisions of this chapter; and in the investigation of violations, alleged violations, accidents or incidents involving intrastate pipeline facilities.

(2) Each operator, officer, employee, and representative of a gas company or a liquids company operating in Texas shall make readily available all company books, files, records, reports, supplemental data, other documents, and information, and shall make readily accessible all company plant, property, and facilities as the Safety Division or its authorized representative may reasonably require in the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter; in the determination of compliance with the provisions of this chapter; and in the investigation of violations, alleged violations, accidents or incidents involving intrastate pipeline facilities.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402737

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Subchapter C. REQUIREMENTS FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINES ONLY

16 TAC §§8.201, 8.203, 8.205, 8.210, 8.215, 8.220, 8.225, 8.230, 8.235, 8.245

The Commission proposes the new sections and the amendments to current rules in Chapter 8, Subchapter C, under Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which give the Commission jurisdiction over all common carrier pipelines in Texas, persons owning or operating pipelines in Texas, and their pipelines and oil and gas wells, and authorize the Commission to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in §81.051, including such rules as the Commission may consider necessary and appropriate to implement state responsibility under any federal law or rules governing such persons and their operations; Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531, which requires the Commission by rule to adopt guidelines to be used in determining the amount of the penalty for a violation of a provision of Texas Natural Resources Code, Title 3, or a rule, order, license, permit, or certificate that relates to pipeline safety; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of gas and to associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degree permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .; Texas Utilities Code, §121.206, which authorizes Commission assessment of an administrative penalty for violations of safety standards or rules relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities and requires the Commission to adopt by rule guidelines to be used in determining the amount of such penalty; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.251-121.253, which governs the use of malodorants in natural and liquefied natural gas and authorizes the Commission to make rules as necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, and Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, which govern the testing of natural gas piping systems in school facilities and require the Commission to enforce the provisions of the statute.

Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 81.0531; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005-121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq ., are affected by the proposed new sections and amendments in Chapter 8, Subchapter C.

Statutory authority: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 81.0531; Texas Utilities Code, §§121.201-121.210, §§121.251-121.253, and §§121.5005- 121.507; and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 81; Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121; and 49 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 601.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on April 23, 2004.

§8.201.Pipeline Safety Program Fees.

(a) (No change.)

(b) The Commission hereby assesses each investor-owned natural gas distribution system and each municipally owned natural gas distribution system an annual pipeline safety program fee of $0.37 for each service (service line) reported to be in service at the end of calendar year 2003 by each system operator on the Distribution Annual Report, Form F7100.1-1, to be filed on March 15, 2004.

(1) - (2) (No change.)

(3) Each operator of an investor-owned natural gas distribution system and each operator of a municipally-owned natural gas distribution system shall recover, by a surcharge to its existing rates, the amount the operator paid to the Commission under paragraph (1) of this subsection. The surcharge:

(A) - (C) (No change.)

(D) shall not exceed $0.50 [ $0.37 ] per service or service line.

(4) No later than 90 days after the last billing cycle in which the pipeline safety program fee surcharge is billed to customers, each operator of an investor-owned natural gas distribution system and each operator of a municipally-owned natural gas distribution system shall file with the Commission's Gas Services Division and the [ , Pipeline ] Safety Division [ Section, ] a report showing:

(A) - (D) (No change.)

(5) - (6) (No change.)

(c) The Commission hereby assesses each master meter system an annual inspection fee of $100 per master meter system.

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) No later than 90 days after the last billing cycle in which the pipeline safety program fee surcharge is billed to customers, each master meter operator shall file with the Commission's Gas Services Division and the [ , Pipeline ] Safety Division [ Section, ] a report showing:

(A) - (D) (No change.)

(d) (No change.)

§8.203.Supplemental Regulations.

The following provisions supplement the regulations appearing in 49 CFR Part 192, adopted under §8.1(b) of this chapter (relating to General Applicability and Standards).

(1) Section 192.3 is supplemented by the following: "Short section of pipeline" means a segment of a pipeline 100 feet or less in length.

(2) Section 192.455(b) is supplemented by the following language after the first sentence: "Tests, investigation, or experience must be backed by documented proof to substantiate results and determinations."

(3) Section 192.457 is supplemented:

(A) by the following language in subsection (b)(3): "(3) Bare or coated distribution lines. The operator shall determine the areas of active corrosion by electrical survey, or where electrical survey is impractical, by the study of corrosion and leak history records, by leak detection survey, or by other effective means, documented by data substantiating results and determinations";

(B) by the following subsection: "(d) When a condition of active external corrosion is found, positive action must be taken to mitigate and control the effects of the corrosion. Schedules must be established for application of corrosion control. Monitoring effectiveness must be adequate to mitigate and control the effects of the corrosion prior to its becoming a public hazard or endangering public safety."

(4) Section 192.465 is supplemented:

(A) by the following language after the first sentence of subsection (a): "Test points (electrode locations) used when taking pipe-to-soil readings for determining cathodic protection shall be selected so as to give representative pipe-to-soil readings. Test points (electrode locations) over or near an anode or anodes shall not, by themselves, be considered representative readings";

(B) by the following language in subsection (e): "(e) After the initial evaluation required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of §192.455 and paragraph (b) of §192.457, each operator shall, at intervals not exceeding three years, reevaluate its unprotected pipelines and cathodically protect them in accordance with this subpart in areas in which active corrosion is found. The operator shall determine the areas of active corrosion by electrical survey, or where electrical survey is impractical, by the study of corrosion and leak history records, by leak detection survey, or by other effective means, documented by data substantiating results and determinations";

(C) by the following subsection: "(f) When leak detection surveys are used to determine areas of active corrosion, the survey frequency must be increased to monitor the corrosion rate and control the condition. The detection equipment used must have sensitivity adequate to detect gas concentration below the lower explosive limit and be suitable for such use."

(5) Section 192.475(a) is supplemented by the following language at the end: "Corrosive gas" means a gas which, by chemical reaction with the pipe to which it is exposed, usually metal, produces a deterioration of the material."

(6) Section 192.479 is supplemented by the following subsection: "(c) 'atmospheric corrosion' means aboveground corrosion caused by chemical or electrochemical reaction between a pipe material, usually a metal, and its environment, that produces a deterioration of the material."

§8.205.Written Procedure for Handling Natural Gas Leak Complaints.

Each gas company shall have written procedures which shall include at a minimum the following provisions:

(1) a procedure or method for receiving leak complaints or reports, or both, on a 24-hour, seven day per week basis;

(2) a requirement to make and maintain a written record of all calls received and actions taken;

(3) a requirement that supervisory personnel review calls received and actions taken to insure no hazardous conditions exist at the close of the work day;

(4) standards for training and equipping personnel used in the investigation of leak complaints or reports, or both;

(5) procedures for locating the source of a leak and determining the degree of hazard involved;

(6) a chain of command for service personnel to follow if assistance is required in determining the degree of hazard;

(7) instructions to be issued by service personnel to customers or the public or both, as necessary, after a leak is located and the degree of hazard determined.

§8.210.Reports.

(a) Accident, leak, or incident report.

(1) Telephonic report. At the earliest practical moment or within two hours following discovery, a gas company shall notify the Commission by telephone of any event that involves a release of gas from any pipeline which:

(A) caused a death or any personal injury requiring hospitalization;

(B) required taking any segment of a transmission line out of service, except as described in paragraph (2) of this subsection;

(C) resulted in unintentional gas ignition requiring emergency response;

(D) caused estimated damage to the property of the operator, others, or both totaling $5,000 or more, including gas loss; or

(E) could reasonably be judged as significant because of location, rerouting of traffic, evacuation of any building, media interest, etc., even though it does not meet subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph.

(2) A gas company shall not be required to make a telephonic report for a leak or incident which meets only paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection if that leak or incident occurred solely as a result of or in connection with planned or routine maintenance or construction.

(3) The telephonic report shall be made to the Commission's 24- hour emergency line at (512) 463-6788 and shall include the following:

(A) the operator or gas company's name;

(B) the location of the leak or incident;

(C) the time of the incident or accident;

(D) the fatalities and/or personal injuries;

(E) the phone number of the operator; and

(F) any other significant facts relevant to the accident or incident.

(4) Written report.

(A) Following the initial telephonic report for accidents, leaks, or incidents described in paragraph (1)(A), (D), and (E) of this subsection, the operator who made the telephonic report shall submit to the Commission a written report summarizing the accident or incident. The report shall be submitted as soon as practicable within 30 calendar days after the date of the telephonic report. The written report shall be made in duplicate on forms supplied by the Department of Transportation. The Division shall forward one copy to the Department of Transportation.

(B) The written report is not required to be submitted for master metered systems.

(C) The Commission may require an operator to submit a written report for an accident or incident not otherwise required to be reported.

(b) Pipeline safety annual reports.

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, each gas company shall submit an annual report for its systems in the same manner as required by 49 CFR Part 191. The report shall be submitted to the Division in duplicate on forms supplied by the Department of Transportation not later than March 15 of a year for the preceding calendar year. The Division shall forward one copy to the Department of Transportation.

(2) The annual report is not required to be submitted for:

(A) a petroleum gas system, as that term is defined in 49 CFR §192.11, which serves fewer than 100 customers from a single source; or

(B) a master metered system.

(c) Safety related condition reports. Each gas company shall submit in writing a safety-related condition report for any condition outlined in 49 CFR Part 191.25. The gas company shall submit a copy to the Division.

(d) Offshore pipeline condition report. Within 60 days of completion of underwater inspection, each operator shall file with the Division a report of the condition of all underwater pipelines subject to 49 CFR 192.612(a). The report shall include the information required in 49 CFR 191.27.

§8.215.Odorization of Gas.

(a) Odorization of gas.

(1) Each gas company shall continuously odorize gas by the use of a malodorant agent as set forth in this section unless the gas contains a natural malodor or is odorized prior to delivery by a supplier.

(2) Unless required by 49 CFR Part 192.625(B) or by this section, odorization is not required for:

(A) gas in underground or other storage;

(B) gas used or sold primarily for use in natural gasoline extraction plants, recycling plants, chemical plants, carbon black plants, industrial plants, or irrigation pumps; or

(C) gas used in lease and field operation or development or in repressuring wells.

(3) Gas shall be odorized by the user if:

(A) the gas is delivered for use primarily in one of the activities or facilities listed in paragraph (2) of this subsection and is also used in one of those activities for space heating, refrigeration, water heating, cooking, and other domestic uses; or

(B) the gas is used for furnishing heat or air conditioning for office or living quarters.

(4) In the case of lease users, the supplier shall ensure that the gas will be odorized before being used by the consumer.

(b) Odorization equipment. Gas companies shall use odorization equipment approved by the Commission as follows.

(1) Commercial manufacturers of odorization equipment manufactured under accepted rules and practices of the industry shall submit plans and specifications of such equipment to the Division with Form PS-25 for approval of standardized models and designs. The Division shall maintain a list of approved commercially available odorization equipment.

(2) Each operator shall be required to maintain a list of odorization equipment used in its particular operations, including the location of the odorization equipment, the brand name, model number, and the date last serviced. The list shall be available for review during safety evaluations by the Division.

(3) Prior to using shop-made or other odorization equipment not approved by the Commission under paragraph (1) of this subsection, a gas company shall submit to the Division Form PS-25 and plans and specifications for the equipment. Within 30 days of receiving Form PS-25 and related documents, the Division shall notify the gas company in writing whether the equipment is approved or not approved for the requested use.

(c) Malodorants. The Division shall maintain a list of approved malodorants which shall meet the following criteria.

(1) The malodorant when blended with gas in the amount specified for adequate odorization of the gas shall not be deleterious to humans or to the materials present in a gas system and shall not be soluble in water to a greater extent than 2 1/2 parts by weight of malodorant to 100 parts by weight of water.

(2) The products of combustion from the malodorant shall be nontoxic to humans breathing air containing the products of combustion and the products of combustion shall not be corrosive or harmful to the materials to which such products of combustion would ordinarily come in contact.

(3) The malodorant agent to be introduced in the gas, or the natural malodor of the gas, or the combination of the malodorant and the natural malodor of the gas shall have a distinctive malodor so that when gas is present in air at a concentration of as much as 1.0% or less by volume, the malodor is readily detectable by an individual with a normal sense of smell.

(4) Injection of approved malodorant or the natural malodor shall be at a rate sufficient to achieve the requirement of paragraph (3) of this subsection.

(d) Malodorant tests and reports.

(1) Malodorant injection report. Each gas company shall record the volume of odorant and shall calculate the injection rate as frequently as necessary to maintain adequate odorization but not less than once each quarter the following malodorant information for all odorization equipment, except farm tap odorizers. The required information shall be recorded and retained in the company's files:

(A) odorizer location;

(B) brand name and model of odorizer;

(C) name of malodorant, concentrate, or dilute;

(D) quantity of malodorant at beginning of month/quarter;

(E) amount added during month/quarter;

(F) quantity at end of month/quarter;

(G) MMcf of gas purchased during month/quarter; and

(H) injection rate per MMcf.

(2) Operators shall check, test, and service farm tap odorizers at least annually according to the terms of the approved schedule of service and maintenance for farm tap odorizers Form PS-9, filed with and approved by the Division. Each gas company shall maintain records to reflect the date of service and maintenance on file for at least two years.

(e) Malodorant concentration tests and reports.

(1) Each gas company shall conduct the following concentration tests on the gas supplied through its facilities and required to be odorized. Other tests conducted in accordance with procedures approved by the Division may be substituted for the following room and malodorant concentration test meter methods. Test points shall be distant from odorizing equipment, so as to be representative of the odorized gas in the system. Tests shall be performed at least once each calendar year or at such other times as the Division may reasonably require. The results of these tests shall be recorded on the approved odorant concentration test Form PS-6 or equivalent and retained in each company's files for at least two years.

(A) Room test--Test results shall include the following:

(i) odorizer name and location;

(ii) date test performed, test time, location of test, and distance from odorizer, if applicable;

(iii) percent gas in air when malodor is readily detectable; and

(iv) signatures of witnesses to the test and the supervisor of the test.

(B) Malodorant concentration test meter--Test results shall include the following:

(i) odorizer name and location;

(ii) malodorant concentration meter make, model, and serial number;

(iii) date test performed, test time, odorizer tested, and distance from odorizer, if applicable;

(iv) test results indicating percent in air when malodor is readily detectable; and

(v) signature of person performing the test.

(2) Farm tap odorizers shall be exempt from the odorization testing requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(3) Gas companies that obtain gas into which malodorant previously has been injected or gas which is considered to have a natural malodor and therefore do not odorize the gas themselves shall be required to conduct quarterly malodorant concentration tests and retain records for a period of two years.

§8.220.Master Metered Systems.

(a) Compliance with minimum standards required. Master meter operators shall comply with the minimum safety standards in 49 CFR Part 192.

(b) Leakage survey. Each master meter operator shall conduct a leakage survey on the system every two years, using leak detection equipment.

(c) Overpressure equipment. Natural gas suppliers shall be responsible for installation and inspection of overpressure equipment at those master meter locations where 10 or more consumers are served low pressure gas.

§8.225.Plastic Pipe Requirements.

(a) Plastic pipe failure report. Each operator shall record information relating to each material failure of plastic pipe during each calendar year, and annually shall file with the Division, in conjunction with the annual report required to be filed under §8.210(b) of this chapter (relating to Reports), a summary of the failures on Form PS-80, Annual Plastic Pipe Failure Report. Operators shall file initial Forms PS-80, reporting plastic pipe failure data for calendar year 2001, by March 15, 2002.

(b) Plastic pipe installation and/or removal report.

(1) Each operator shall report to the Commission on March 15, 2003, and March 15, 2004, the amount in miles of plastic pipe installed and/or removed during the preceding calendar year on Form PS-82, Annual Report of Plastic Installation and/or Removal. The mileage shall be identified by:

(A) system;

(B) nominal pipe size;

(C) material designation code;

(D) pipe category; and

(E) pipe manufacturer.

(2) For all new installations of plastic pipe, each operator shall record and maintain for the life of the pipeline the following information for each pipeline segment:

(A) all specification information printed on the pipe;

(B) the total length;

(C) a citation to the applicable joining procedures used for the pipe and the fittings; and

(D) the location of the installation to distinguish the end points. A pipeline segment is defined as a continuous piping where the pipe specification required by ASTM D2513 or ASTM D2517 does not change.

(c) Plastic pipe inventory report. Beginning March 15, 2005, and annually thereafter, each operator shall report to the Commission the amount of plastic pipe in natural gas service as of December 31 of the previous year. The amount of plastic pipe shall be determined by a review of the records of the operator and shall be reported on Form PS-81, Plastic Pipe Inventory. The report shall include the following:

(1) system;

(2) miles of pipe;

(3) calendar year of installation;

(4) nominal pipe size;

(5) material designation code;

(6) pipe category; and

(7) pipe manufacturer.

(d) Electronic format required. Operators of systems with more than 1,000 customers shall file the reports required by this section electronically in a format specified by the Commission.

(e) Report forms; signature required. Operators shall complete all forms required to be filed in accord with this section, including signatures of company officials. The Commission may consider the failure of an operator to complete all forms as required to be a violation under Texas Utilities Code, Chapter 121, and may seek penalties as permitted by that chapter.

§8.230.School Piping Testing.

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to implement the requirements of Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, relating to the testing of natural gas piping systems in school facilities.

(b) Procedures. Natural gas suppliers shall develop procedures for:

(1) receiving written notice from a person responsible for a school facility specifying the date and result of each test as provided by subsection (c) of this section.

(2) terminating natural gas service to a school facility in the event that:

(A) the natural gas supplier receives notification of a hazardous natural gas leak in the school facility piping system pursuant to this rule; or

(B) the natural gas supplier does not receive written notification specifying the date that testing has been completed on a school facility as provided by subsection (c) of this section, and the results of such testing.

(3) A natural gas supplier may rely on a written notification complying with this rule as proof that a school facility is in compliance with Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507, and this rule.

(4) A natural gas supplier shall have no duty to inspect a school facility for compliance with Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005-121.507.

(c) Testing.

(1) A natural gas piping pressure test performed under a municipal code in compliance with paragraph (4) of this subsection shall satisfy the testing requirements.

(2) A pressure test to determine if the natural gas piping in each school facility will hold at least normal operating pressure shall be performed as follows:

(A) For systems on which the normal operating pressure is less than 0.5 psig, the test pressure shall be 5 psig and the time interval shall be 30 minutes.

(B) For systems on which the normal operating pressure is 0.5 psig or more, the test pressure shall be 1.5 times the normal operating pressure or 5 psig, whichever is greater, and the time interval shall be 30 minutes.

(C) A pressure test using normal operating pressure shall be utilized only on systems operating at 5 psig or greater, and the time interval shall be one hour.

(3) The testing shall be conducted by:

(A) a licensed plumber;

(B) a qualified employee or agent of the school who is regularly employed as or acting as a maintenance person or maintenance engineer; or

(C) a person exempt from the plumbing license law as provided in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6243-101, §3.

(4) The testing of public school facilities shall occur as follows:

(A) for school facilities tested prior to the beginning of the 1997-1998 school year, at least once every two years thereafter before the beginning of the school year;

(B) for school facilities not tested prior to the beginning of the 1997-1998 school year, as soon as practicable thereafter but prior to the beginning of the 1998-1999 school year and at least once every two years thereafter before the beginning of the school year;

(C) for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar and tested prior to July 1, 1997, at least once every two years thereafter; and

(D) for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar and not tested prior to July 1, 1997, once prior to July 1, 1998, and at least once every two years thereafter.

(5) The testing of charter and private school facilities shall occur at least once every two years and shall be performed before the beginning of the school year, except for school facilities operated on a year-round calendar, which shall be tested not later than July 1 of the year in which the test is performed. The initial test of charter and private school facilities shall occur prior to the beginning of the 2003-2004 school year or by August 31, 2003, whichever is earlier.

(6) The firm or individual conducting the test shall immediately report any hazardous natural gas leak as follows:

(A) in a public school facility, to the board of trustees of the school district and the natural gas supplier; and

(B) in a charter or private school facility, to the person responsible for such school facility and the natural gas supplier.

(7) The school pipe testing shall be recorded on Railroad Commission Form PS-86.

(d) Records. Natural gas suppliers shall maintain for at least two years a listing of the school facilities to which it sells and delivers natural gas as well as copies of the written notification regarding testing, Form PS-86, and hazardous leaks received pursuant to Texas Utilities Code, §§121.5005- 121.507, and this rule.

§8.235.Natural Gas Pipelines Public Education and Liaison.

(a) - (d) (No change.)

(e) Proximity to public school. Each owner or operator of a natural gas pipeline or natural gas pipeline facility any part of which is located within 1,000 feet of a public school building or public school recreational area shall notify the Commission by filing with the Safety [ Gas Services ] Division [ , Pipeline Safety Section, ] the following information:

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(f) (No change.)

§8.245.Penalty Guidelines for Pipeline Safety Violations.

(a) Only guidelines. This section complies with the requirements of Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0531(d), and Texas Utilities Code, §121.206(d). The penalty amounts contained in the tables in this section are provided solely as guidelines to be considered by the Commission in determining the amount of administrative penalties for violations of provisions of Title 3 of the Texas Natural Resources Code relating to pipeline safety, or of rules, orders or permits relating to pipeline safety adopted under those provisions, and for violations of Texas Utilities Code, §121.201 or Subchapter I (§§121.451-121.454), or a safety standard or rule relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities adopted under those provisions.

(b) Commission authority. The establishment of these penalty guidelines shall in no way limit the Commission's authority and discretion to assess administrative penalties in any amount up to the statutory maximum when warranted by the facts in any case.

(c) Factors considered. The amount of any penalty requested, recommended, or finally assessed in an enforcement action will be determined on an individual case-by-case basis for each violation, taking into consideration the following factors:

(1) the person's history of previous violations, including the number of previous violations;

(2) the seriousness of the violation and of any pollution resulting from the violation;

(3) any hazard to the health or safety of the public;

(4) the degree of culpability;

(5) the demonstrated good faith of the person charged; and

(6) any other factor the Commission considers relevant.

(d) Typical penalties. Typical penalties for violations of provisions of Title 3 of the Texas Natural Resources Code relating to pipeline safety, or of rules, orders, or permits relating to pipeline safety adopted under those provisions, and for violations of Texas Utilities Code, §121.201 or Subchapter I (§§121.451-121.454), or a safety standard or rule relating to the transportation of gas and gas pipeline facilities adopted under those provisions are set forth in Table 1.

Figure: 16 TAC §8.245(d)

(e) Penalty enhancements for certain violations. For violations that involve threatened or actual pollution; result in threatened or actual safety hazards; result from the reckless or intentional conduct of the person charged; or involve a person with a history of prior violations, the Commission may assess an enhancement of the typical penalty, as shown in Table 2. The enhancement may be in any amount in the range shown for each type of violation.

Figure: 16 TAC §8.245(e)

(f) Penalty enhancements for certain violators. For violations in which the person charged has a history of prior violations within seven years of the current enforcement action, the Commission may assess an enhancement based on either the number of prior violations or the total amount of previous administrative penalties, but not both. The actual amount of any penalty enhancement will be determined on an individual case-by- case basis for each violation. The guidelines in Tables 3 and 4 are intended to be used separately. Either guideline may be used where applicable, but not both.

Figure 1: 16 TAC §8.245(f)

Figure 2: 16 TAC §8.245(f)

(g) Penalty reduction for settlement before hearing. The recommended penalty for a violation may be reduced by up to 50% if the person charged agrees to a settlement before the Commission conducts an administrative hearing to prosecute a violation. Once the hearing is convened, the opportunity for the person charged to reduce the basic penalty is no longer available. The reduction applies to the basic penalty amount requested and not to any requested enhancements.

(h) Demonstrated good faith. In determining the total amount of any penalty requested, recommended, or finally assessed in an enforcement action, the Commission may consider, on an individual case-by-case basis for each violation, the demonstrated good faith of the person charged. Demonstrated good faith includes, but is not limited to, actions taken by the person charged before the filing of an enforcement action to remedy, in whole or in part, a violation of the pipeline safety rules or to mitigate the consequences of a violation of the pipeline safety rules.

(i) Penalty calculation worksheet. The penalty calculation worksheet shown in Table 5 lists the typical penalty amounts for certain violations; the circumstances justifying enhancements of a penalty and the amount of the enhancement; and the circumstances justifying a reduction in a penalty and the amount of the reduction.

Figure: 16 TAC §8.245(i)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402738

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Subchapter D. REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS PIPELINES ONLY

16 TAC §8.301, §8.305

The Commission proposes the new sections and the amendments to current rules in Chapter 8, Subchapter D, under Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which give the Commission jurisdiction over all common carrier pipelines in Texas, persons owning or operating pipelines in Texas, and their pipelines and oil and gas wells, and authorize the Commission to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth in §81.051, including such rules as the Commission may consider necessary and appropriate to implement state responsibility under any federal law or rules governing such persons and their operations; and Texas Natural Resources Code, §§117.001-117.101, which authorize the Commission to adopt safety standards and practices applicable to the transportation of hazardous liquids and carbon dioxide and associated pipeline facilities within Texas to the maximum degrees permissible under, and to take any other requisite action in accordance with, 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .

Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 117.001-117.101, and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq ., are affected by the proposed new sections and amendments in Chapter 8, Subchapter D.

Statutory authority: Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, and 117.001-117.101, and 49 United States Code Annotated, §60101, et seq .

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 81 and 117; and 49 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 601.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on April 23, 2004.

§8.301.Required Records and Reporting.

(a) Accident reports. In the event of any failure or accident involving an intrastate pipeline facility from which any hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide is released, if the failure or accident is required to be reported by 49 CFR Part 195, the operator shall report to the Commission as follows.

(1) Incidents involving crude oil. In the event of an accident involving crude oil, the operator shall:

(A) notify the Division, which shall notify the Commission's appropriate Oil and Gas district office, by telephone to the Commission's emergency line at (512) 463-6788 at the earliest practicable moment following discovery of the incident (within two hours) and include the following information:

(i) company/operator name;

(ii) location of leak or incident;

(iii) time and date of accident/incident;

(iv) fatalities and/or personal injuries;

(v) phone number of operator;

(vi) other significant facts relevant to the accident or incident.

(B) within 30 days of discovery of the incident, submit a completed Form H-8 to the Oil and Gas Division of the Commission. In situations specified in the 49 CFR Part 195, the operator shall also file duplicate copies of the required Department of Transportation form with the Division.

(2) Hazardous liquids, other than crude oil, and carbon dioxide. For incidents involving hazardous liquids, other than crude oil, and carbon dioxide, the operator shall:

(A) notify the Division of such incident by telephone at the earliest practicable moment following discovery (within two hours); and

(B) within 30 days of discovery of the incident, file in duplicate with the Division a written report using the appropriate Department of Transportation form (as required by 49 CFR Part 195) or a facsimile.

(b) Annual report. Each operator shall file with the Commission an annual report on Form PS-45 listing line sizes and lengths, hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide being transported, and accident/failure data. The report shall be filed with the Commission on or before March 15 of a year for the preceding calendar year reported.

(c) Facility response plans. Simultaneously with filing either an initial or a revised facility response plan with the United States Department of Transportation, each operator shall submit to the Division a copy of the initial or revised facility response plan prepared under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, for all or any part of a hazardous liquid pipeline facility located landward of the coast.

§8.305.Corrosion Control Requirements.

Operators shall comply or ensure compliance with the following requirements for the installation and construction of new pipeline metallic systems, the relocation or replacement of existing facilities, and the operation and maintenance of steel pipelines.

(1) Atmospheric corrosion control. Each aboveground pipeline or portion of pipeline exposed to the atmosphere shall be cleaned and coated or jacketed with material suitable for the prevention of atmospheric corrosion. For onshore pipelines, the intervals between inspections shall not exceed five years; for offshore pipelines, reevaluations shall be required at least once each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 15 months.

(2) Coatings. All coated pipe used for the transport of hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide shall be electrically inspected prior to placement using coating deficiency (holiday) detectors to check for any faults not observable by visual examination. The holiday detector shall be operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and at a voltage level appropriate for the electrical characteristics of the pipeline system being tested.

(3) Installation. Joints, fittings, and tie-ins shall be coated with materials compatible with the coatings on the pipe.

(4) Cathodic protection test stations. Each cathodically protected pipeline shall have test stations or other electrical measurement contact points sufficient to determine the adequacy of cathodic protection. These locations shall include but are not limited to pipe casing installations and all foreign metallic cathodically protected structures. Test stations (electrode locations) used when taking pipe-to-soil readings for determining cathodic protection shall be selected to give representative pipe-to-soil readings. Readings taken at test stations (electrode locations) over or near one or more anodes shall not, by themselves, be considered representative.

(A) All test lead wire attachments and bared test lead wires shall be coated with an electrically insulating material. Where the pipe is coated, the insulation of the test lead wire material shall be compatible with the pipe coating and wire insulation.

(B) Cathodic protection systems shall meet or exceed the minimum criteria set forth in Criteria For Cathodic Protection of the most current edition of the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Standard RP-01-69.

(5) Monitoring and inspection.

(A) Each cathodic protection rectifier or impressed current power source shall be inspected at least six times each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 2 1/2 months, to ensure that it is operating properly.

(B) Each reverse-current switch, diode, and interference bond whose failure would jeopardize structure protection shall be checked electrically for proper performance six times each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 2 1/2 months. Each remaining interference bond shall be checked at least once each calendar year, with intervals not to exceed 15 months.

(C) Each operator shall utilize right-of-way inspections to determine areas where interfering currents are suspected. In the course of these inspections, personnel shall be alert for electrical or physical conditions which could indicate interference from a neighboring source. Whenever suspected areas are identified, the operator shall conduct appropriate electrical tests within six months to determine the extent of interference and take appropriate action.

(6) Remedial action. Each operator shall take prompt remedial action to correct any deficiencies observed during monitoring.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 23, 2004.

TRD-200402739

Mary Ross McDonald

Managing Director

Railroad Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1295


Part 8. TEXAS RACING COMMISSION

Chapter 309. RACETRACK LICENSES AND OPERATIONS

Subchapter C. HORSE RACETRACKS

4. OPERATIONS

16 TAC §309.293

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §309.293, relating to the head numbers on a racehorse during a thoroughbred meet. The proposed amendment allows the association the option to use or not use head numbers on a race horse during a thoroughbred meet. The proposal was presented to the Commission as a petition for rulemaking by Lone Star Park at Grand Prairie.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect the anticipated public benefit will be to enhance the economic benefits of pari-mutuel racing to racetracks, by reducing costs of operation. There is no economic cost to an individual required to comply with the proposal. The proposal has a no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; and §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters relating to the operation of pari-mutuel ractracks.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§309.293.Saddle Cloth.

(a) An association shall provide a saddle cloth and head number to each horse scheduled in a race except in a thoroughbred race where the head number may optionally be provided . The saddle cloth must have a number printed on the side that is large enough to be read clearly from the stewards' stand and the photofinish tower.

(b) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 19, 2004.

TRD-200402592

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 6, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009