TITLE 7.BANKING AND SECURITIES

Part 1. FINANCE COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Chapter 4. CURRENCY EXCHANGE

7 TAC §4.3

The Texas Finance Commission (the commission) adopts amendments to §4.3, concerning reporting and recordkeeping requirements that apply to currency businesses, with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 7, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 9629).

The amendment to §4.3(a) changes the cited statute from Finance Code, §153.117(a)(2), to the correct statute, Finance Code, §153.117(a)(3). Prior to 1999, the limited exemption for license holders under Chapter 152 was codified as §153.117(a)(2). As a result of legislative action, the exemption now appears as §153.117(a)(3).

The amendment to §4.3(b) requires a license holder maintaining records out-of-state to submit the records for examination if requested by the banking commissioner. This amendment is necessary because of budgetary constraints currently imposed on out-of-state travel. Any additional costs of mailing incurred by a license holder will likely be offset by reduced travel expenses otherwise charged to the license holder in connection with an examination.

The amendments to §4.3(e)(1) and (2) allow more flexibility to the industry for maintaining records and will result in reduced regulatory burden. In particular, the deletion of §4.3(e)(1)(B) and (2)(B) eliminates a requirement that exceeded the real-time capability of most licensees to monitor multiple transactions by a customer. A licensee will still be expected to have procedures in place to track and report multiple transactions of which the licensee has knowledge, as required by federal law.

New §4.3(e)(3)(H) requires a licensee to record the names of sender and recipient in each transaction, and the amendment to §4.3(e)(4)(E) requires a licensee to record the identification of the other party's representative. This additional data will assist a licensee in identifying illegal structuring through multiple, related transactions that should be aggregated for reporting purposes.

The commission received one comment letter filed on behalf of the Non-Bank Funds Transmitters Group, comprised of Western Union Financial Services, Inc., Comdata Network, Inc., Travelers Express/MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., American Express Travel Related Services, Travelex America, Inc., and RIA Financial Services.

The commentor observed that the proposed amendments represent a major step forward in simplifying the requirements consistent with federal requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA"), but asserts that several inconsistencies remain that are extremely burdensome for licensees that operate in multiple states. The commentor therefore requests that the commission make modifications the commentor believes will better harmonize §4.3 with BSA record-keeping requirements and facilitate compliance, training, and transaction tracking, particularly for multi-state licensees.

First, the commentor noted that §4.3(e)(2) does not appear to contemplate allowing licensees or their agents to note in the record that, with regards to any information other than the name and address of the sender and recipient and the amount and date of the transmittal, that the additional information is lacking or unavailable. Further, federal law permits a financial institution to file a suspicious activity report with omitted information by noting on the report that certain information is not available. The commission disagrees. First, the example regarding suspicious activity report is inapposite; recordkeeping requirements are not synonymous with reporting requirements. Second, the authority to note exceptions is already included with respect to specific requirements under §4.3(e)(2) for which such a need exists.

Second, with respect to §4.3(e)(2)(A), (E), and (F), the commentor argued that requiring a licensee to obtain and record the telephone number of the sender as well as the recipient is inconsistent with the BSA wire transfer rules, which contain no such requirement in 31 C.F.R. §103.33(f)(1). Further, some customers will have no telephone, others will not know the numbers, and still others will fabricate a number to satisfy the request. The commentor questioned whether this requirement will serve any valid public policy goal and requests that telephone number be deleted from the section as adopted. The commission disagrees. A licensee should have a means of contacting a customer in the event of difficulties in completing the transaction. The criticized provisions clearly contemplate situations in which the customer or recipient has no telephone. If the data field containing the telephone numbers will not accept alpha characters, the notation that the customer or recipient has no telephone can consist of a numeric code.

Third, the commentor asserted that the requirement of §4.3(e)(3), that the licensee or agent maintain a "log", appears to be inconsistent with the §4.3(e)(2) requirements which allow records to be electronically maintained. The commission disagrees. Existing §4.3(f) requires logs and other records to be maintained in a "readily accessible and retrievable form", a format that clearly includes electronic records. Second, the Texas Uniform Electronics Transaction Act significantly restricts the ability of a state agency to require records to be maintained in a particular format, explicitly for the purpose of preventing discrimination against electronic records and signatures, see Texas Business and Commerce Code, §43.012.

Finally, the commentor observed that the §4.3(e)(4) requirement, that a licensee obtain a receipt for transactions conducted with other financial institutions, is vague and unclear regarding the transactions addressed by this requirement. Further, the commentor believes the related §4.3(e)(4)(E) requirement to obtain "initials" of the financial institution's representative is similarly ambiguous. The commission agrees that further clarification is appropriate. The commission has incorporated by reference the definitions of "financial institution" and "money services business" in 31 C.F.R. §103.11(n) and (uu), respectively, and has made other conforming changes. The requirement to obtain a receipt applies to a transaction with any financial institution; requirements regarding the content of the receipt apply only to a transaction with a money services business. The requirement for "initials" was merely intended to require a reference or appropriate coding to logically connect the transaction with the money services business employee that conducts the transaction, and the commission has added clarifying language to address the expressed concern.

The amendments are adopted under the rulemaking authority provided in Finance Code, §153.002, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules necessary to enforce and administer Finance Code, Chapter 153.

§4.3.Reporting and Recordkeeping.

(a) For purposes of this section, a "currency business" refers to a person that engages in or has engaged in currency exchange, transportation, or transmission transactions, whether the person is licensed under the Finance Code, Chapter 153, or is exempt from licensing under the Finance Code, §153.117(a)(3).

(b) A currency business shall maintain separate accounting books and records for its operations in Texas under the Act at a location readily accessible to the Texas Department of Banking (the department). If the records are maintained outside this state, the commissioner may require that the license holder make those records available at the department's office not later than the 20th day after the demand is sent.

(c) Currency business shall comply with all federal laws and regulations affecting their operations under the Finance Code, Chapter 153, and shall maintain records of all filings made pursuant to and documentation required under all applicable federal laws and regulations, including the requirements set forth in 31 United States Code, §5313 and 31 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 103.

(d) Each currency business shall, in a form prescribed by the banking commissioner (the commissioner), file quarterly written reports with the department. Except to the extent waived by the commissioner in the report form for a particular quarter, each report must include:

(1) year-to-date financial statements of the currency business signed by a principal of the currency business, including a balance sheet and statement of income and expenses;

(2) currency business activity including:

(A) monthly summaries of its activities for each month in the quarter;

(B) the number of and total dollar amount reported on Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs), Form 4789, filed with the Internal Revenue Service;

(C) the number of and total dollar amount reported on Reports of International Transportation of Currency or monetary Instruments (CMIRs), Form 4790, filed with the U.S. Customs Service;

(D) the total dollars of currency transportation and/or transmission activities by country; and

(E) the total dollars of transportation and/or transmission activities transacted on behalf of other companies under agent agreements with the currency business;

(3) a list of all new employees, with corresponding job titles and duties, hired by the currency business since the last reporting period;

(4) a list of the current principals of the currency business;

(5) an explanation of any change in ownership of the currency business during the quarter;

(6) the days and hours of operation of the currency business;

(7) a list of all services currently offered by the currency business;

(8) a list of all foreign and domestic bank accounts, account numbers, and the current names of persons with signature authority on the accounts;

(9) a list of all companies for which the currency business is an agent;

(10) a reconciliation of capital since the last quarter and documentation of changes; and

(11) other information required by the commissioner.

(e) In addition to the records required to be maintained under subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section, currency businesses shall keep the following records:

(1) Currency exchange. No currency business may engage in a currency exchange transaction in an amount in excess of $1,000, unless the currency business issues a receipt bearing a unique identification or transaction number for each of those transactions. The receipt must include the date of the transaction, the amount and type of currency received and given in exchange, the rate of exchange, and the applicable commission for the transaction. The currency business also must be able to associate or link each such transaction to a record that includes the following information:

(A) the name, address, and date of birth of the individual conducting the transaction;

(B) the social security number of the individual, or if the individual is an alien and does not have a social security number, then the passport number, alien identification card number, or other official document of the individual evidencing foreign nationality or residence;

(C) the name and address of the person or business on whose behalf the transaction is conducted if the individual is conducting the transaction on behalf of another person or business, together with the appropriate identification for such other person or business (e.g., passport number, taxpayer identification number, alien registration number);

(D) the location of the office where the transaction was conducted;

(E) the employee or representative of the currency business executing the transaction; and

(F) the specific identifying information (number, type, and issuer) of a document that contains the name and a photograph of the individual and is customarily acceptable within the banking community as a means of identification when cashing checks for nondepositors.

(2) Currency Transmission and Transportation. No currency business authorized to engage in currency transmission or transportation may enter into a currency transmission or transportation transaction of $3,000 or more in amount unless the currency business issues receipt, electronic record, or other written confirmation bearing a unique identification or transaction number for each of those transactions. The receipt, electronic record, or other written confirmation must bear the date and time of day of the transaction, the amount of the transmission in United States dollars, the rate of exchange (if applicable), and the applicable fee or commission for the transaction. The currency business also must be able to associate or link each such transaction to a record that includes the following information:

(A) the name, address, date of birth, and telephone number of the individual conducting the transaction, whether sender or recipient, or if the individual has no telephone, a notation in the record of that fact;

(B) the social security number of the individual, or if the individual is an alien and does not have a social security number, then the passport number, alien identification card number, or other official document of the customer evidencing foreign nationality or residence;

(C) the name and address of the person or business on whose behalf the transaction is conducted, if the individual is conducting the transaction on behalf of another person or business, together with the appropriate identification for such other person or business (e.g., passport number, taxpayer identification number, alien registration number);

(D) the location of the office where the transaction was conducted;

(E) if the customer is the sender, the designated recipient's name and either:

(i) the recipient's address and telephone number, or if the inquiry of the currency business reveals that the recipient has no telephone, a notation in the record of that fact; or

(ii) the identity of the recipient's bank and the recipient's bank account number, if the funds are being deposited in the recipient's bank account;

(F) if the customer is the recipient, the sender's name, address, and telephone number, to the extent such information is available to the currency business after reasonable inquiry, with a notation in the record of the type of information that is not available;

(G) the method of payment (e.g., cash, check, credit card, etc.);

(H) the employee or representative of the currency business executing the transaction; and

(I) the specific identifying information of a document that contains the name and photograph of the individual and is customarily acceptable within the banking community as a means of identification when cashing checks for nondepositors.

(3) A currency business shall maintain a log or logs of its activities under the Finance Code, Chapter 153, containing the following information for each transaction:

(A) the date of the transaction;

(B) the location of the office where the transaction was conducted;

(C) the amount and type of currency received and given in exchange, or the amount of the transmission or transportation, as applicable;

(D) the rate of exchange, if applicable;

(E) the amount of service charges or fees assessed in connection with the transaction;

(F) the number of the receipt issued in connection with the transaction, if any;

(G) if transportation, whether currency or monetary instrument; and

(H) if transmission, the names of the sender and the recipient.

(4) In addition to the receipt requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, a currency business must obtain a contemporaneous receipt for any transaction conducted with another financial institution, as that term is defined in 31 CFR §103.11(n), regardless of where the transaction is conducted. A receipt required by this paragraph must be retained by the currency business for a minimum of five years. If the receipt is issued by a money services business, as that term is defined in 31 CFR §103.11(uu), the receipt must contain the following information for each transaction:

(A) the transaction date;

(B) the transaction amount in dollars and the equivalent amount in any foreign currency;

(C) the applicable exchange rate;

(D) the name and address of the other money services business; and

(E) information sufficient to identify the representative of the other money services business that executed the transaction, such as the person's initials, unique employee code, or other appropriate identifier.

(f) All logs, records, and receipt information may be maintained by the currency business in a readily accessible and retrievable form and must be maintained for a period of at least five years. An actual duplicate copy of receipts issued by a currency business need not be retained if the information required on the receipt is maintained in hard copy form, on microfiche, or in an electronic database from which information may be reasonably retrieved in hard copy form.

(g) Failure to comply with this section constitutes grounds for denial, revocation, or suspension of a license as provided in the Finance Code, §153.115, assessment of a civil penalty in accordance with the Finance Code, §153.402, or issuance of a cease and desist order under the Finance Code, §153.407.

(h) The commissioner may waive any requirement of this section upon a showing of good cause if the commissioner is of the opinion that:

(1) the currency business maintains records sufficient for the department to examine its operations; or

(2) the imposition of the requirement would cause an undue burden on the currency business and conformity with the requirement would not significantly advance the state's interests under the Finance Code, Chapter 153.

(i) A currency business does not violate this section if it cannot produce records on transactions conducted prior to the effective date of this section which were not previously required by statute or rule.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401225

Everette D. Jobe

Certifying Official

Finance Commission of Texas

Effective date: March 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: November 7, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 9. RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS, APPEALS, AND RULEMAKINGS

Subchapter B. CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS

7 TAC §9.13, §9.21

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) adopts amendments to §9.13 and §9.21, concerning procedure for contested case hearings, without changes to the proposed text as published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 11). The text will not be republished.

Chapter 9 contains a body of rules comprising a modernized system of pleading and practice for administrative proceedings before a finance agency or the commission. Section 9.13 and §9.21 as amended more closely conform to actual practices that have developed in the hearings process and more clearly implement the original intent of the commission.

The amendment to §9.13 expands the language of the section to allow a supervisor or manager of a regulated business to appear on behalf of an employee of the business at hearings in which the employee is a party.

The amendment to §9.21 revises subsection (c) to more clearly relate to its original purpose of eliminating unnecessary paper, and adds new subsection (d) to more clearly articulate the power of the administrative law judge to exercise control over the discovery process if a party attempts to abuse the right of discovery. Discovery undertaken primarily for purposes of intimidation will not be permitted.

The commission received no comments regarding the amendments.

The amendments are adopted pursuant to Government Code §2001.004, which requires a state agency to adopt rules of practice stating the nature and requirements of all available formal and informal procedures. The amendments are also adopted under specific rulemaking authority contained in the substantive statutes administered by the finance agencies under the jurisdiction of the commission, including Finance Code, §§11.301, 11.302, 11.304, 11.306, 14.157, 31.003, 66.002, 96.002, 152.102, 153.002, 154.051, 156.102, 181.003, 201.003, 342.551, 348.513, 371.006, and 396.051, and Health and Safety Code, §711.012(a) and §712.008.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401226

Everette D. Jobe

Certifying Official

Finance Commission of Texas

Effective date: March 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Part 2. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF BANKING

Chapter 25. PREPAID FUNERAL CONTRACTS

Subchapter A. CONTRACT FORMS

7 TAC §25.5

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) adopts an amendment to §25.5, concerning approval of non-model contract forms, without changes to the proposed text as published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 12). The text will not be republished.

As amended, §25.5 will permit the department to waive or reduce the filing fee of $250 for review of minor amendments to a previously approved non-model document.

The commission received no comments.

The amendment to §25.5 is adopted under Finance Code, §154.051(b), which authorizes the commission to adopt reasonable rules regarding enforcement and administration of Chapter 154.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401227

Everette D. Jobe

Certifying Official

Texas Department of Banking

Effective date: March 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 26. PERPETUAL CARE CEMETERIES

7 TAC §§26.2, 26.4, 26.11, 26.12

The Finance Commission of Texas (commission) adopts new §26.4, concerning the time periods applicable to ordering and setting burial markers and monuments in perpetual care cemeteries, and new §26.12, concerning responding to written consumer complaints. The commission also adopts amendments to §26.2, concerning records a perpetual care cemetery must maintain, and §26.11, concerning the method of filing consumer complaints with the Texas Department of Banking (department). The commission adopts the amendment to §26.11 and new §26.4 with nonsubstantive changes to the proposed text as published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 12). The amendment to §26.2 and new §26.12 are adopted without changes and will not be republished.

Health and Safety Code, Chapter 712, governs the regulation of perpetual care cemeteries in Texas, and §712.008 authorizes the commission to adopt rules to enforce and administer the chapter. The adopted new §26.4 and §26.12 implement recently enacted Health and Safety Code, §712.008(b), which specifically directs the commission to adopt rules establishing reasonable standards for the timely placement of burial markers and monuments in a perpetual care cemetery and the timely response to consumer complaints about a perpetual care cemetery.

The adopted new sections apply to a cemetery corporation that owns or operates a perpetual care cemetery governed by Health and Safety Code, Chapter 712 (Cemetery). Adopted new §26.4 establishes time periods within which a Cemetery must order and set burial markers and monuments and related requirements. Adopted new §26.12 specifies the actions a Cemetery must take if it receives a written consumer complaint.

The adopted amendments to §26.2 and §26.11 conform the definitions of "consumer complaint" in §26.2(a)(3) and "consumer" in §26.11(a)(1), respectively, to the context in which these terms are used and make their meaning consistent with adopted new §26.4 and §26.12.

The commission received comments regarding the proposed amendments and new sections from an entity that owns perpetual care cemeteries. The commenter expressed concern that the proposed amendment to the definition of "consumer complaint" in §26.2(a)(3) is too broad and unduly burdensome and would require a Cemetery to respond to minor complaints regarding the manner in which the cemetery property is maintained or operated.

The commission disagrees that the definition of "consumer complaint" should be narrowed. The commission believes that a Cemetery should respond to every written consumer complaint in a timely manner, and that the imposition of this requirement is consistent with the broad language and probable intent of Health and Safety Code, §712.008(b)(2). The commission also believes that the definition of "consumer complaint", as proposed, eliminates the enforcement and compliance uncertainty that may result if the department and the Cemetery are required to determine on a complaint by complaint basis whether a particular consumer complaint requires a timely response.

Moreover, neither the definition of "consumer complaint" in amended §26.2(a)(3) and new §26.12, as proposed, nor any other provision of new §26.12, dictate whether, how, or when a Cemetery must actually resolve a consumer complaint, or expand the types of consumer complaints over which the department has substantive jurisdiction. The amendment and new section simply require the Cemetery to respond to a written consumer complaint within a certain period of time and to provide the consumer with certain basic information.

The commission additionally notes that the amendment to the §26.2(a)(3) definition of "consumer complaint", as proposed, conforms the definition to the recordkeeping requirements for consumer complaints established in §26.2(b)(2)(A), which requires a cemetery to keep each written complaint it receives from a consumer regarding the manner in which the cemetery operates or performs its contractual obligations.

For these reasons, the commission adopts the amendment to the definition of "consumer complaint" in §26.2(a)(3) and the definition of "consumer complaint" in new §26.12, as proposed without changes.

The commenter also suggested that the proposed definition of "consumer" in §26.11(a)(1)(B) be narrowed. As proposed, the term includes persons listed in Health and Safety Code, §711.002(a), as a "consumer" if the person who obtained the interment rights, services or merchandise from the Cemetery under a perpetual care agreement is deceased. The commenter was concerned that inclusion of these persons may require a Cemetery to disregard the wishes of a deceased's next of kin or the Cemetery's rules and regulations. The commenter suggested that §26.11(a)(1)(B) be revised to include only the closest next of kin as determined in Health and Safety Code, §711.002(a), rather than any person listed in that statutory provision as proposed.

The commission disagrees that the amendment to the definition of "consumer" in §26.11(a)(1)(B) should be revised as suggested. In enacting Health and Safety Code §711.002(a), which lists the persons who have a right to control the disposition of a decedent's remains, the legislature has recognized certain persons as having a special relationship with or interest in a deceased. The commission believes these persons should be considered "consumers" for purposes of the timely complaint response requirement. Moreover, with respect to the commenter's concern about potential conflicts, the Cemetery may explain any conflict between the substance of the complaint and the wishes of next of kin or its rules and regulations in its response to the complaining consumer. For these reasons, the commission declines to amend the definition of "consumer" in proposed §26.11(a)(1)(B) as suggested. The commission has, however, amended proposed §26.11(a)(1) to clarify that subparagraphs (A) and (B) of that subsection apply only for purposes of new adopted §26.12, regarding responding to consumer complaints.

The commenter also suggested that proposed new §26.4 be amended to clarify that a Cemetery is not obligated to order or set a monument or marker until all necessary acts have occurred and all charges and fees due the Cemetery have been paid in full. The commenter further suggested that the section more specifically address ordering and setting requirements applicable to markers and monuments sold on a pre-need basis.

The commission believes that §26.4(b)(1), (c)(2), and (d)(2), as proposed, require a purchaser to pay all amounts that may be due in connection with the marker or monument, including amounts related to the perpetual care cemetery agreement. However, in response to the comment, the commission has amended §26.4(b)(1), (c)(2), and (d)(2) to clarify that a Cemetery is not obligated to order or set a monument or marker until the purchaser has paid, in addition to the amount required by the Cemetery in connection with the monument or marker, all other amounts due the Cemetery under the perpetual care cemetery agreement, including amounts due for interment rights, the plot on which the marker or monument is to be set, and perpetual or endowment care fees.

Sections §26.4(b)(2), (c)(1) and (d)(1), as proposed, require purchaser approval of the marker or monument lettering and inspection and acceptance of the marker or monument if required by the Cemetery. The commission believes that these subsections make adequate provision for obtaining any required Cemetery approvals and that further clarification is unnecessary. The commission further believes that under §26.4(c)(3) and (d)(3), as proposed, the Cemetery need not set a marker or monument sold pre-need until specifically requested to do so and that no further clarification regarding pre-need purchases is necessary.

Finally, the commenter suggested that proposed §26.4(i) be amended to require that if a marker or monument is purchased from a third-party vendor, the vendor must satisfy the Cemetery's setting and placement rules and regulations. The commission agrees and has amended §26.4(i) by adding paragraph (4) to so provide.

The amendments and new sections are adopted under Health & Safety Code, §712.008(b), which authorizes the commission to adopt rules establishing reasonable standards for the timely placement of burial markers and monuments in a perpetual care cemetery and the timely response to consumer complaints regarding a perpetual care cemetery.

§26.4.When Must I Order and Set a Burial Marker or Monument in my Perpetual Care Cemetery?

(a) Definitions.

(1) "Department" means the Texas Department of Banking.

(2) "Purchaser" means the person who signs the contract to buy a burial marker or monument from you, and includes a person authorized under the terms of the contract to act for such person in connection with the contract. If such person is deceased and is the person for whom the marker or monument has been purchased, the term also includes any person listed in Health and Safety Code, §711.002(a), as you deem appropriate under the circumstances.

(3) "Set" means install or place.

(4) "You" or "I" means a cemetery corporation that owns or operates a perpetual care cemetery.

(b) When must I order the purchaser's burial marker or monument? You must order the marker or monument on or before the 10th day after the date as of which both of the following events have occurred:

(1) the purchaser pays you:

(A) the amount you require to order the marker or monument; and

(B) all amounts due under the perpetual care cemetery agreement, including charges for interment rights, the plot or plots on which the marker or monument is to be set, and fees for perpetual or endowment care; and

(2) the purchaser approves the design and lettering for the marker or monument and signs the necessary documentation directing or authorizing you to order the marker or monument.

(c) When must I set the burial marker, once it has been delivered to my cemetery location? You must set the marker on or before the 15th day after the date as of which all of the following events have occurred:

(1) the purchaser inspects and accepts the marker if you require inspection and approval;

(2) the purchaser pays you:

(A) all amounts due under the contract for the marker, including the amount due for the base if your cemetery requires that a base be used with the marker; and

(B) any remaining amounts due under the perpetual care cemetery agreement, including charges for interment rights, the plot or plots on which the marker or monument is to be set, and fees for perpetual or endowment care; and

(3) if the purchaser has stipulated in writing that the marker be set later than required under this subsection, the purchaser asks you to set the marker.

(d) When must I set the burial monument, once it has been delivered to my cemetery location? You must set the monument on or before the 25th day after the date as of which all of the following events have occurred:

(1) the purchaser inspects and accepts the monument if you require inspection and approval;

(2) the purchaser pays you:

(A) all amounts due under the contract for the monument, including the amount due for the foundation if your cemetery requires that a foundation be used with the monument; and

(B) any remaining amounts due under the perpetual care cemetery agreement, including charges for interment rights, the plot or plots on which the marker or monument is to be set, and fees for perpetual or endowment care; and

(3) if the purchaser has stipulated in writing that the monument be set later than required under this subsection, the purchaser asks you to set the monument.

(e) What if I cannot set the burial marker or monument within the time period required by subsection (c) or (d) of this section because of inclement weather or other special circumstances? If you cannot set the marker or monument within the required time period, you must notify the purchaser in writing no later than the 5th day after the date by which the marker or monument must be set under subsection (c) or (d) of this section. Your written notice must:

(1) if possible, state the date you expect to set the marker or monument; and

(2) provide an explanation of the delay.

(f) Must I keep a written log related to the burial marker or monument purchase and installation process to prove that I have complied with this section? No. However, the purchaser's marker or monument contract file must include all documentation necessary to verify and substantiate the dates specified in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section, as applicable, and your compliance with this section.

(g) Must I inform the purchaser of the date requirements established by this section? Yes. You must provide written notice to the purchaser of all of the date requirements in one of the following:

(1) purchase agreement;

(2) marker/monument order form;

(3) cemetery rules and regulations; or

(4) cemetery price list.

(h) Does subsection (b) of this section apply to burial markers or monuments the purchaser buys from someone other than my cemetery or an affiliate of my cemetery? No. Subsection (b) applies to only those markers and monuments purchased from you or from an affiliate of your cemetery. For purposes of this subsection, an affiliate means a company that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with you.

(i) If a purchaser buys a burial marker or monument from a vendor other than my cemetery and has it delivered to my cemetery, must I install the marker or monument within the time period provided for in subsection (c) or (d) of this section? Yes, provided:

(1) the purchaser has paid you all amounts due for the space or spaces in your cemetery on which the marker or monument will be set;

(2) the purchaser or vendor has paid all setting fees;

(3) the marker or monument meets your cemetery's standards requirements; and

(4) if applicable, the vendor has met all requirements relating to the setting and placement of the marker or monument under your cemetery's rules and regulations.

§26.11.How Do I Provide Information to Consumers on How to File a Complaint?

(a) Definitions.

(1) "Consumer" means a person who obtains or has obtained interment rights, merchandise or services from you under an agreement that provides for perpetual care. For purposes of §26.12 of this title (relating to What must I do If I Receive a Written Consumer Complaint?), the term includes:

(A) a person authorized under the terms of the agreement to act in connection with the agreement; and

(B) if the person for whom such interment rights, merchandise or services have been obtained is deceased, any person listed in Health and Safety Code, §711.002(a).

(2) "Privacy notice" means any notice which you give regarding a consumer's right to privacy as required by a specific state or federal law.

(3) "Required notice" means a notice in a form set forth or provided for in subsection (b)(1) of this section.

(4) "You" or "I" means a perpetual care cemetery that is certificated by the Texas Department of Banking under the Health and Safety Code.

(b) How do I provide notice of how to file complaints?

(1) You must use the following notice in order to let your consumers know how to file complaints: Complaints concerning perpetual care cemeteries should be directed to: Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705; 1-877/276-5554 (toll free); www.banking.state.tx.us.

(2) You must provide the required notice in the language in which a transaction is conducted.

(3) You must include the required notice with each privacy notice that you send out. The language and form of the notice must substantially conform to the required notice set out in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(4) Regardless of whether you are required by any state or federal law to give privacy notices, you must take appropriate steps to let your consumers know how to file complaints by giving them the required notice in compliance with paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(5) You must use the following measures to give the required notice:

(A) You must give the required notice when the consumer first obtains a product or service from you by including the required notice in the perpetual care cemetery purchase agreement.

(B) Those portions of your website that offer consumer goods and services must contain access to the required notice. The language and form of the notice must substantially conform to the required notice set out in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401228

Everette D. Jobe

Certifying Official

Texas Department of Banking

Effective date: March 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Part 6. CREDIT UNION DEPARTMENT

Chapter 91. CHARTERING, OPERATIONS, MERGERS, LIQUIDATIONS

Subchapter B. ORGANIZATION PROCEDURES

7 TAC §91.202

The Credit Union Commission adopts the amendments to §91.202 relating to forms of and amendments to bylaws and articles of incorporation without changes to the proposed text as published in the January 2, 2004 issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 15).

The amendments implement a new provision enacted in the 78th Session of the Legislature that was contained within HB 1307. The provision amended section 122.011 of the Texas Finance Code making it no longer necessary for a credit union to obtain the Commissioner's approval when they adopt standard bylaw amendments that have been adopted by the Commission. The amendments establish a procedure for a board to adopt standard bylaw provisions without the Commissioner's approval.

No comments were received on the proposal.

The amendment are adopted under the provision of the Texas Finance Code, §15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subchapter D of the Texas Finance Code.

The specific sections affected by the proposed amendments are Texas Finance Code, Sections 122.002, 122.005, and 122.011.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2004.

TRD-200401325

Harold E. Feeney

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Effective date: March 14, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


7 TAC §91.206

The Credit Union Commission adopts new §91.206 concerning an underserved area credit union's secondary capital accounts without changes to the text published in the January 2, 2004 issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 16).

The new rule implements a new provision enacted in the 78th Session of the Legislature that was contained within HB 1307. The provision added a new section 122.014 to the Texas Finance Code giving the Commission the authority to adopt rules for the organization and operation of underserved area credit unions, including rules concerning secondary capital accounts for underserved credit unions. The proposed new rule establishes the criteria a credit union must follow to issue secondary capital accounts.

No comments were received on the proposal.

The new rule is adopted under the provision of the Texas Finance Code, Section 15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subchapter D of the Texas Finance Code and under Section 122.014 of the Texas Finance Code which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules concerning secondary capital accounts.

The specific section affected by the proposed rule is Texas Finance Code, Section 122.014.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2004.

TRD-200401324

Harold E. Feeney

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Effective date: March 14, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


Subchapter D. POWERS OF CREDIT UNIONS

7 TAC §91.401

The Credit Union Commission adopts the repeal of existing §91.401 concerning operational powers without changes to the text published in the January 2, 2004 issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 17).

The Commission has determined that because of the many unrelated subsection of this rule, it would be less confusing to credit unions and to the general public to repeal the existing rule and to adopt the subsections as individual new rules. In conjunction with the repeal of §91.401, the Commission is proposing the adoption of the following new rules: §91.401, replacing §91.401(a); §91.402, replacing §91.401(f); §91.406, replacing §91.401(c); §91.407, replacing §91.401(d); §91.408, replacing §91.401(e); and §91.409, replacing §91.401(b).

No comments were received on the proposal.

The repeal is proposed under the provision of the Texas Finance Code, Section 15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subchapter D of the Texas Finance Code.

The specific sections affected by the proposed repeal are Texas Finance Code, Sections 123.103, 123.107, 122.011, 123.001, 123.002, 125.002, 125.003, 125.103, 125.504, 125.505, 125.507, 125.510, 15.4032, 122.012, 123.106, 123.202, and 123.203.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2004.

TRD-200401323

Harold E. Feeney

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Effective date: March 14, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


7 TAC §91.401

The Credit Union Commission adopts new §91.401, concerning the purchase, lease, or sale of fixed assets without changes to the text published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 18).

The new rule replaces existing §91.401(a) which was repealed elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register and makes certain substantive changes.

The new rule allows more flexibility for credit unions to invest in fixed assets and will result in reduced regulatory burden for well-capitalized credit unions. In particular, the new rule modifies the former rule to change the fixed asset limitation from 5% of total assets to the lesser of 70% of the credit union's retained earnings or 6% of total assets. The new rule also requires a credit union requesting a waiver of this limitation to provide evidence that the increase in operating expenses caused by the project can be supported after accounting for the current level of expenses and dividend commitments.

No comments were received on the proposal.

The new rule is adopted under the provision of the Texas Finance Code, §15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subchapter D of the Texas Finance Code.

The specific section affected by the proposed new rule is Texas Finance Code, §123.103.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2004.

TRD-200401322

Harold E. Feeney

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Effective date: March 14, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


7 TAC §91.402

The Credit Union Commission adopts new §91.402, concerning insurance for members without changes to the text published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 19).

The new rule replaces the existing §91.401(f) which was repealed elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register and makes certain substantive changes.

The new rule provides greater clarity and ease of use of the rule. The new rule modifies the former rule to comply with federal legislation that deals with privacy and protection of member information. Specifically it removes the affirmative authorization for credit unions to furnish membership lists to an insurance carrier or agent.

One comment was received on the proposal from a national life insurance trade association. The commenter was concerned that the elimination of what was §91.401(f)(4) stating "a credit union may furnish to an insurance carrier or an agent, any membership list of addresses..." from this new §91.402 might lead a credit union to think that they are prohibited from providing insurers with the names and addresses of their insured. The Commission believes that the deletion of the above provision does not prohibit a credit union from providing information to an insurer regarding its insured in accordance with federal and state privacy rules.

The rule is adopted under the provision of the Texas Finance Code, §15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subchapter D of the Texas Finance Code.

The specific section affected by the rule is Texas Finance Code, §123.107.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2004.

TRD-200401321

Harold E. Feeney

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Effective date: March 14, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


Part 8. JOINT FINANCIAL REGULATORY AGENCIES

Chapter 153. HOME EQUITY LENDING

7 TAC §§153.82, 153.84 - 153.88

The Joint Financial Regulatory Agencies comprised of the Finance Commission of Texas and the Texas Credit Union Commission (the "Commissions") adopt new 7 TAC, Chapter 153, §153.82 and §§153.84 - 153.88, administrative interpretations of subsection (t), Section 50, Article XVI, Texas Constitution, (the "Home Equity Lines of Credit" Laws or "HELOC"). The rules are adopted with non-substantive changes to the proposal as published in the January 2, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 33).

The Commissions made non-substantive changes to clarify and simplify the addressed provisions as the result of comments. The Commissions also made editing and clerical corrections.

At the February 20, 2004, concurrent meeting of the Finance Commission and Credit Union Commission, one commenter, Robert Doggett, testified. The commenter expressed concern over the absence of specific authorization allowing for any borrower to unilaterally close a HELOC to new advances in §153.82. The commenter stated that the interpretation impermissibly allows a borrower to take advances on a HELOC against the wishes and to the detriment of other borrowers. The Commissions considered this comment and disagree. Parties may contract to allow any borrower to close a HELOC account to new advances. However, the constitution does not require such a limitation. The Commissions decline to modify the interpretation.

The commenter also expressed concern over the failure of the interpretation to restrict the use of convenience and solicitation checks that are not preprinted solicitation checks and do not meet the criteria under §153.84(4). The commenter stated that any check received by a borrower for the purpose of enticing the borrower to request additional advances and that the borrower did not request immediately preceding the receipt of the check should be a prohibited device. The Commissions considered this comment and disagree. The constitution did not exclusively use the term "check," but modified it with the words "preprinted" and "solicitation." The Commissions believe that the interpretation accurately reflects the intent of the constitution and decline to modify the interpretation.

The Commissions received written comments. The following commenters generally supported adoption: Andrea Johnson of Neches Federal Credit Union; Karen M. Neeley of Independent Bankers Association of Texas; Alan J. Pohlmeier of Santa Fe Federal Credit Union-Amarillo; Lorena Rush of Wells Fargo; Karen Wilkerson of United Heritage Credit Union; Robert Zearfoss of Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union; Suzanne Yashewski of the Texas Credit Union League; Larry Young of Hughes, Watters & Askanase, LLP; Connie Shoemaker of San Antonio City Employees Federal Credit Union; Jeffery Farver of San Antonio Federal Credit Union; and Lori W. Hall of American Airlines Federal Credit Union. The following commenters generally supported adoption, but also requested clarifications or recommended modifications: Greg Storch of USE Credit Union; Sharon Gaugler of Austin Area Teachers Federal Credit Union; Chet Kimmell of Neighborhood Credit Union; and Mark D. Morris of JP Morgan Chase. The following commenters requested clarifications or recommended modifications: Joseph M. Dixon, III of SouthTrust Bank; and David Dulock of Black, Mann & Graham, LLP. Robert W. Doggett of Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid, Inc. commented that the interpretations improperly modified certain sections.

Section 50, Article XVI, Texas Constitution ("Section 50"), sets out the only permissible encumbrances on a homestead. Prior to 1998, Section 50 permitted liens on homestead property for the purposes of purchase money, taxes, an owelty of partition, the refinance of a lien, including tax liens, and home improvements. The 75th Legislature, 1997, passed House Joint Resolution 31 ("HJR 31"), which was adopted by the voters on November 4, 1997. Effective January 1, 1998, HJR 31 created two additional categories of authorized liens: a loan secured by the equity an owner has in a homestead and a reverse mortgage on a homestead. House Joint Resolution 31 also modified the existing provisions regarding liens on a homestead for home improvement purposes. During the 78th Legislature, 2003, Regular Session, the legislature passed Senate Joint Resolution 42 (SJR 42), which was adopted by the voters on September 13, 2003, and amended the constitution effective September 29, 2003. This amendment added Section 50(t) allowing homeowners to contract for home equity lines of credit for the first time in Texas history.

The constitutional provisions do not detail every aspect of home equity lending. Compliance with Section 50 along with other Texas and federal statutes and Texas constitutional provisions is required in making a home equity loan. These interpretations construe the language of Section 50(t) and provide the required practical framework for home equity lending that reflects the constitutional language and the intent of the legislature and the voters. For example, Section 50(t) contains terms that are not defined, even though definitions are necessary for clear meaning and consistent application. Additionally, the constitutional provisions are silent as to the effect of other laws on home equity lending.

Each section of Chapter 153 corresponds with an identified provision of the Texas constitution. The first portion of each section is typically a restatement of the constitutional provision.

The Commissions have applied Chapter 311, Government Code (Code Construction Act) in the use of language in Chapter 153. For example, in Chapter 153, words used in the singular include the plural and the plural includes the singular, the heading of a title, subtitle, chapter, subchapter, or section does not limit or expand the meaning of an interpretation, and the use of the word "include" means "including but not limited to."

The initial interpretations of Section 50(t) in Chapter 153 do not preclude future consideration by the Commissions of additional HELOC issues that may or may not be addressed at this time. Issues raised in comments to the proposed interpretations have been addressed in this preamble regardless of whether a change was made to the interpretation in response to the comments. Constitutional provisions not interpreted at this time may be addressed either at the request of an interested party or on the motion of the Commissions.

Section 153.82 interprets Section 50(t)(1) clarifying that any owner who is also a borrower may request an advance. The interpretation also recognizes that a lender and a borrower may contractually require specific borrowers or all borrowers to consent to a request for an advance.

Two commenters expressed agreement with §153.82. One commenter stated that "all owners who have any ownership interest in the home should have the ability, individually, to request an advance under a HELOC." The commenter agreed that additional safeguards could be established by the lender and the borrower to the loan.

Another commenter stated, "We believe the language in proposed §153.82 is the only legally defensible reading of the constitutional phrase 'the owner requests advances' in Section 50(t)(1). Indeed, a construction of this phrase that would require all owners to request advances . . . would be absurd when read in the context of the complete phrase, because it would require all owners to repay money--even if they were not borrowers!" The commenter went on to say, "the role of the Commissions in promulgating the proposed interpretations is not to decide what the constitutional provision ought to say; it is to interpret what it actually does say. We believe the language of the Constitution is clear and that proposed §153.82 accurately reflects that language."

One commenter disagreed with the portion of §153.82 that states: "a HELOC agreement may contain provisions that restrict who may request an advance or require all borrowers to consent to the request." The commenter suggested removing the language from the interpretation and adding new language that a HELOC agreement may contain provisions that "allow any borrower to close the account to new advances and may require that all borrowers consent to reactivation of the HELOC." The Commissions have considered this comment and disagree. Consequently, the Commissions decline to modify the interpretation. The Constitution does not prohibit a lender and a borrower from freely negotiating a contract with additional restrictions on who may access a HELOC. The Commissions also believe that the lender and a borrower may contract to allow any borrower to close an account to new advances.

Another commenter stated that "if there is more than one owner then both owners must consent to the advance" and that the Commissions' "interpretation will benefit predatory lenders." The Commissions reviewed this comment and believe that the interpretation is correct. Lenders are constitutionally required by Section 50(a)(6)(A) to obtain consent from all owners and all owners spouses to originate a HELOC. The original loan documents determine who is authorized to initiate advances within constitutional limits. The Commissions decline to modify this interpretation.

Section 153.84 interprets Section 50(t)(3), explaining the restrictions on methods of obtaining a HELOC advance. A preprinted solicitation check is a constitutionally prohibited method of obtaining a HELOC advance. This section defines the constitutional phrase "preprinted solicitation check;" this section does not prohibit convenience checks, prearranged drafts, and transfer instructions as methods of obtaining advances. The Commissions believe that if the legislature had intended a prohibition on all checks, it would have prohibited "checks" rather than prohibiting "preprinted solicitation check," which is a type of check. Checks used to obtain advances must be written for a minimum amount of $4,000 and comply with the limitations contained in Section 50(t)(5) and (6). The Commissions believe that adequate procedures should be in place to ensure that checks used to obtain advances do not result in a violation of any constitutional provisions.

The constitution specifically prohibits the use of credit cards, debit cards, preprinted solicitation checks, and "similar devices." The Commissions believe that the phrase "similar devices" refers to unnamed devices, whether they now exist or are produced in the future, and that the term was used by the drafters in lieu of a list of devices that may not be exhaustive.

Seven commenters specifically expressed support for convenience checks to access HELOC advances. One of these commenters stated, "the clarification of §153.84 concerning usage of checks for draws will be very advantageous to the credit union and its members."

Another commenter stated, "We strongly support proposed §153.84. It is abundantly clear that the relevant constitutional provision, Section 50(t)(3), does not prohibit check access. The discussion section of the proposed interpretation is absolutely correct...." The commenter stated, "we also believe that the definition of 'preprinted solicitation check' in proposed §153.84(3) is a sensible, reasonable definition, which gives effect to all three words in that phrase."

One commenter recommended that the term "convenience check" be excluded from the definition of "credit card" contained in §346.001(2), Texas Finance Code. The Commissions evaluated this recommendation and determined to modify the interpretation to include a definition of "credit card transaction" as defined in §301.001(1), Texas Finance Code. A credit card is a prohibited device for obtaining a HELOC advance under the constitution. The Commissions believe that a definition is helpful to ensure that parties understand which devices would fall under the definition of credit card and thus be prohibited.

One commenter was concerned that convenience checks could cause lenders procedural problems because of the other constitutional restrictions on advances. All constitutional requirements in connection with advances must be satisfied. If a lender cannot institute appropriate procedural safeguards in connection with the use of a nonprohibited method or device, then they should not use that method or device.

One commenter expressed that §153.84 improperly modifies Section 50(t)(3). The commenter stated that, "The constitutional provision does provide for acceptable methods to obtain an advance, it only prohibits certain types of advances meant to protect consumers." The commenter also expressed that the interpretation, "provides more loopholes that are not defined at all; prearranged draft, convenience check, and transfer instructions." The omission of a definition of "similar devices" by the drafters of the Constitution necessitates an interpretation. Without interpretation, the term 'similar device" would cause uncertainty for borrowers and lenders. The Commissions do not believe that loopholes are created by listing examples of permissible devices. The devices would be permissible even if the Commissions did not list them; however, they are listed to offer clarity to borrowers and lenders.

Section 50(t)(3) prohibits preprinted solicitation checks. Because the drafters of the constitution deliberately used the phrase "preprinted solicitation check," the Commissions carefully considered each word. The Commissions determined that a check is "preprinted" if the lender inserts at least one key payment term, such as the amount or payee on the face of the check. The Commissions determined that "solicitation" occurs when a lender initiates contact to either entice an owner to originate a HELOC or influence a borrower to request additional advances on an existing HELOC. The Commissions determined that §153.84(4) as proposed, limiting preprinted solicitation checks to "negotiable instruments," was too narrow and amended it to include all checks, whether or not they are negotiable instruments. Check is a statutorily defined term in the Texas Business and Commerce Code and the Commissions believe that definition applies in this context. The Commissions reconsidered §153.84(4) and determined that it adequately gives effect to all three words in the phrase "preprinted solicitation check." Except for the amendment explained in this paragraph, the Commissions otherwise respectfully decline to modify the interpretation.

One commenter asserted that §153.84 does not address or clarify the use of a HELOC established for overdraft protection (ODP). An ODP account would be activated if the checking account is overdrawn, then an advance of a minimum of $4,000 from the HELOC will cover the overdraft amount. The commenter asked, "If the owner overdraws his checking account, due to a transaction with his debit card, and the ODP feature of the checking account is used, is the debit card considered to be the access device that created the advance from the HELOC?" The Commissions have considered this issue and believe that this will constitute the use of a debit card or similar device which is prohibited. Therefore, the Commissions decline to modify the interpretation to allow HELOC use for ODP.

Two commenters requested an interpretation that an advance on a HELOC at the time of closing is not subject to the $4,000 minimum advance requirements. The Commissions decided to study this issue for future consideration. However, absent a constitutional amendment, a court ruling, or a future interpretation by the Commissions to the contrary, the Commissions believe that the $4,000 limitation applies to advances at closing.

Section 153.85 interprets Section 50(t)(4), defining the time the extension of credit is made. In relation to the allowable fees and charges associated with the loan, the time the extension of credit is made is the date on which the loan is closed.

One commenter stated, "We agree that the loan closing date should be used when determining the allowable fees and charges associated with the loan. A clear interpretation can prevent misunderstandings that could lead to costly and unnecessary litigation."

Another commenter stated, "Proposed §153.85, interpreting the phrase 'the date the extension of credit is established' to mean the closing date, is consistent with Section 50(t)(4). It is also consistent with the recently adopted interpretation of comparable constitutional language in Section 50(a)(6), 7 TAC §153.1(6), defining the 'date the extension of credit is made ' as the closing date. There is no logical reason that the 'date the extension of credit is established ' should be any later than the closing date, especially since, in a line of credit, the commitment to lend exists after execution of loan documents, regardless of when funding may occur. We support §153.85 as proposed."

Section 153.86 interprets Section 50(t)(5), clarifying that a HELOC may not violate the 80 percent fair market value limitation in Section 50(a)(6)(B). The interpretation also clarifies that the maximum principal balance of a HELOC is determined on the date of closing and does not change during the term of the HELOC.

One commenter expressed concern over the fact that the maximum principal balance of a HELOC does not increase as the value of the homestead increases over the life of the HELOC. The commenter suggested that the Commissions examine the intent of the law to see if a more liberal interpretation could be allowed. Section 50(t)(5) states in pertinent part that, "the maximum principal amount that may be extended under the account, when added to the aggregate total of the outstanding balance principal of all indebtedness secured by the homestead on the date the extension of credit is established ..." (Emphasis added) The Commissions have reviewed the intent and plain language of the constitution and have determined that a more liberal interpretation is not allowed.

Section 153.87 interprets the application of the fair market value limitation contained in Section 50(t)(6). The constitution allows for the principal amount of a HELOC to exceed the 50 percent fair market value limitation contained in Section 50(t)(6) but not the 80 percent fair market value limitation contained in Section 50(t)(5). The 50 percent fair market value limitation, however, is a restriction on additional advances if the aggregated amount of the HELOC exceeds 50 percent of the fair market value of the homestead. It is not the maximum loan to value amount of a HELOC. Under Section 50(t)(6), advances are prohibited until the principal balance of the HELOC is repaid to an amount equal to or less than 50 percent of the fair market value of the homestead. Each time a HELOC is paid down to 50 percent or less of the fair market value of the homestead, additional advances may be made by the lender, up to the limitation set forth in Section 50(t)(5). Paying a HELOC balance to zero does not prohibit further advances, unless the parties contract otherwise.

Two commenters expressed general support of §153.87. One of these commenters stated, "the plain language of the Constitution allows a HELOC up to 80% of the fair market value of the home. The fair market value limitation restricts additional advances if the amount of the HELOC exceeds 50% of the fair market value of the home at the time of loan closing. This interpretation seems appropriate and is supported by us."

One commenter requested that the language "equal to or" be added to §153.87(3) immediately preceding the word "below." The Commissions considered this request and added the phrase "equal to or" to more closely follow the plain language of the constitution.

One commenter disagreed with the "restriction of advances when the outstanding balance exceeds 50% of the fair market value." The commenter argues that this restriction does nothing to protect a consumer and makes it more costly and difficult for a consumer to use the equity in their home. The Commissions considered this argument, but have determined that the constitution requires this limitation, and the Commissions have no authority to adopt an interpretation that contradicts Section 50(t)(6).

Section 153.88 interprets Section 50(t)(8), explaining the repayment schedule. Section 153.88(a) allows for semi-monthly scheduled payments not more often than every 14 days. In computing a period of days, the first day is excluded, and the last day is included. Section 153.88(b) provides that the first repayment is not required to occur until two months after the first advance; if no advance is taken at the time the extension of credit is made, then the initial regular periodic payment must be scheduled to be paid no later than 60 days after the date of the first advance.

One commenter stated, "payment flexibility is important to consumers so we believe offering payments on the 15th and final day of the month will offer great benefits to credit union members." The commenter further expressed, "payments that coincide with pay dates would appeal to many consumers as well." Another commenter requested that language explaining that February is an anomaly and an exception to the requirement that payments not be made more often than once every 14 days be included in the interpretation and not just the preamble. The Commissions declined to modify the interpretation or address the issue in this preamble, but will further study the impact of February semi-monthly payment schedules.

One commenter expressed concern that §153.88 could be interpreted to prevent a borrower from electing a repayment schedule more frequently or otherwise different from the HELOC requirements of the constitution. The commenter requested that the following language be added: "Nothing in this section prohibits an owner from electing to voluntarily make payments on a schedule that is different from the repayment terms required by this section, so long as an election is not imposed or required by the lender." The Commissions considered this suggestion and clarified the interpretation by adding a subsection (c) which specifically allows a borrower to voluntarily prepay a HELOC on a more frequent schedule than is required by the lender.

One commenter said that there is a potential for confusion over the wording of §153.88(b) because it could be read to mean that a payment cannot be due until two months after the first advance. The commenter stated that "if the first advance is made on the next to last day of a statement cycle, the first interest payment may be due 30 days or less after the first advance." In order to make this language clearer, the commenter suggested rewriting §153.88(b) as: "Section 50(t)(8) does not require repayment of a HELOC to begin until two months after the initial advance. For example, if an advance is not made at the time of closing, repayment is not required to begin until after the first advance. If at any time there is no outstanding balance, then Section 50(t)(8) does not require a payment." The Commissions have considered this comment and disagree with the commenter's analysis of the constitution and the Commissions' interpretation. Section 153.88(b) specifically states that "Repayment of a HELOC is not required to begin until two months after..." (Emphasis added). The language "is not required" only provides the latest date when repayment must begin. It does not mean that repayment must begin on a date two months following the advance. The Commissions decline to make the suggested changes.

The Finance Commission and the Credit Union Commission are working together to achieve the interpretive consistency required by §11.308 and §15.413, of the Texas Finance Code (as added by Chapter 1207 Acts of the 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003).

The interpretations are adopted under the provisions of Section 50(u), Article XVI, Texas Constitution and §11.308 and §15.413, Texas Finance Code as added by Chapter 1207 (Acts of the 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003), which authorize the Finance Commission and the Credit Union Commission to adopt interpretations of Sections 50(a)(5)-(7), (e) - (p), and (t), Article XVI, Texas Constitution.

§153.82.Owner Requests for HELOC Advance: Section 50(t)(1).

A home equity line of credit (HELOC) is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which the owner requests advances, repays money, and reborrows money. Any owner who is also a named borrower on the HELOC may request an advance. A HELOC agreement may contain provisions that restrict which borrowers may request an advance or require all borrowers to consent to the request.

§153.84.Restrictions on Devices and Methods to Obtain a HELOC Advance: Section 50(t)(3).

A HELOC is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which an owner is prohibited from using a credit card, debit card, preprinted solicitation check, or similar device to obtain a HELOC advance.

(1) A lender may offer one or more non-prohibited devices or methods for use by the owner to request an advance. Permissible methods include contacting the lender directly for an advance, telephonic fund transfers, and electronic fund transfers. Examples of devices that are not prohibited similar devices include prearranged drafts, convenience checks, or written transfer instructions. Regardless of the permissible method or device used to obtain a HELOC advance, the amount of the advance must comply with:

(A) the advance requirements in Section 50(t)(2);

(B) the loan to value limits in Section 50(t)(5); and

(C) the debit or advance limits in Section 50(t)(6).

(2) An owner may, but is not required to, make in-person contact with the lender to obtain a HELOC advance.

(3) A credit card, which is a prohibited device under Section 50(t)(3), is a card that may be used for personal, family, or household use to debit an open-end account.

(4) A preprinted solicitation check, which is a prohibited device under Section 50(t)(3), is a check that:

(A) is provided to an owner for the purpose of originating a HELOC or to a borrower for the purpose of soliciting additional advances on an existing HELOC;

(B) contains at least one preprinted key payment term, such as the amount or payee; and

(C) is not requested by the borrower or owner.

§153.85.Time the Extension of Credit is Established: Section 50(t)(4).

(a) A HELOC is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which fees described in Section 50(a)(6)(E) are charged and collected only at the time the extension of credit is established and no fee is charged or collected in connection with any debit or advance.

(b) For the purpose of this section, the time the extension of credit is established for a HELOC refers to the date of closing.

§153.86.Maximum Principal Amount Extended under a HELOC: Section 50(t)(5).

A HELOC is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which the maximum principal amount that may be extended under the account, when added to the aggregated total of the outstanding principal balances of all indebtedness secured by the homestead on the date the extension of credit is established, cannot exceed 80 percent of the fair market value of the homestead on the date the extension of credit is made.

(1) At the time the initial or subsequent advance is made, the principal amount of the advance must comply with Section 50(t)(5). The following amounts when added together must be equal to or less than 80 percent of the fair market value:

(A) the amount of the advance;

(B) the amount of the principal balance of the HELOC at the time of the advance; and

(C) the principal balance outstanding of all other debts secured by the homestead on the date of the closing of the HELOC.

(2) An advance under Section 50(t)(5) must meet the requirements of Section 50(t)(2).

(3) The maximum principal balance of the HELOC that may be outstanding at any time must be determined on the date of closing and will not change through the term of the HELOC.

(4) For purposes of calculating the limits and thresholds under Section 50(t)(5) and (6), the outstanding principal balance of all other debts secured by the homestead is the principal balance outstanding of all other debts secured by the homestead on the date of the closing of the HELOC.

§153.87.Maximum Principal Amount of Additional Advances under a HELOC: Section 50(t)(6).

A HELOC is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which no additional debits or advances can be made if the total principal amount outstanding exceeds an amount equal to 50 percent of the fair market value of the homestead as determined on the date the account is established.

(1) A subsequent advance may be made only when the outstanding principal amount of the HELOC is 50 percent or less of the fair market value.

(2) A subsequent advance is prohibited if the outstanding principal amount of the HELOC exceeds 50 percent of the fair market value.

(3) If the outstanding principal amount exceeds 50 percent of the fair market value and then is repaid to an amount equal to or below the 50 percent of the fair market value, subsequent advances are permitted subject to the requirements of Section 50(t)(2) and (5).

§153.88.Repayment Terms of a HELOC: Section 50(t)(8).

(a) A HELOC is a form of an open-end account that may be debited from time to time, under which credit may be extended from time to time and under which repayment is to be made in regular periodic installments, not more often than every 14 days and not less often than monthly, beginning not later than two months from the date the extension of credit is established, and during the period during which the owner may request advances, each installment equals or exceeds the amount of accrued interest; and after the period during which the owner may request advances, installments are substantially equal.

(b) Repayment of a HELOC is not required to begin until two months after the initial advance. For example, if an advance is not made at the time of closing, the repayment period is not required to begin until after the first advance. If there is no outstanding balance, then a payment is not required.

(c) Nothing in this section prohibits a borrower from voluntarily making payments on a schedule that is more frequent or earlier than is required by a lender.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401216

Leslie L. Pettijohn

Commissioner

Joint Financial Regulatory Agencies

Effective date: March 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 936-7640