Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Chapter 69.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to repeal Subchapter
L, concerning contract administration, §§69.201-69.212, 69.220,
69.266, and 69.275-69.279, in its Contracted Services chapter; and proposes
new Subchapter A, concerning general information, §§69.1-69.4; Subchapter
B, concerning purchase of goods and services and award of subgrants, §§69.11-69.19;
Subchapter C, concerning procurement protests, §§69.31-69.40; Subchapter
D, concerning subgrants and subcontracts, §§69.51- 69.55; Subchapter
E, concerning cost principles, §§69.71-69.73; Subchapter F, concerning
nonrenewal or reduction of block grant funds, §69.81; Subchapter G, concerning
contract renewal and termination, §§69.91-69.93; Subchapter H, concerning
disputes, §§69.101-69.103; Subchapter I, concerning audits, §§69.111-69.118;
Subchapter J, concerning recovery of improper payments, §§69.131-69.139;
Subchapter K, concerning information and records, §§69.151-69.160;
and Subchapter L, concerning debarment and suspension, §§69.171-69.186,
in its newly titled Contract Administration chapter.
The purpose of the repeals and new sections is to reorganize the rules
governing DHS's contractors, potential contractors, vendors, and subrecipients
and rewrite them in plain English to make them easier for the public and contractors
to navigate and understand. The new rules govern aspects of contract administration
including the types of contracts that fall under the rules in the chapter,
the solicitation process, the purchase of goods and services, the award of
subgrants, procurement protests, dispute resolution, allowable costs, renewal
and termination of contracts, maintenance and use of information and records,
audits, and debarment and suspension. Information and policy contained in
the new rules is substantially unchanged, with the following additions: (1)
new §69.2 adds a definitions section to the chapter; (2) new §69.4
adds a requirement that DHS respond in writing within 14 days of a contractor's
written inquiry; (3) new §69.17 aligns the definition of a solicitation
package with that of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; (4) new §69.131
and §69.132 clarify that DHS can use both recoupment and restitution
to recover improper payments; (5) new §§69.151- 69.160 provide specific
requirements for a contractor's use and maintenance of client information
and include a requirement that the state auditor have access to contractor
records; and (6) new §69.172(2) changes the period of debarment from
a maximum of six years unless a longer time is mandated by other requirements
to a specific length of time commensurate with the seriousness of the violation
and other pertinent factors, but generally not more than six years. The purpose
of repealing §69.212 it to eliminate an obsolete rule concerning Year
2000 requirements from DHS's rule base.
Gordon Taylor, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that, for the first
five-year period the proposed sections are in effect, there are no fiscal
implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering
the sections.
Charles F. Lyon, Deputy Commissioner for Support Services, has determined
that, for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the
public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is that the
rules regarding contract administration at DHS will be easier for the public,
including contractors, potential contractors, vendors, and subrecipients to
read and understand. The public will also find that the rules provide better
descriptions of contractor responsibilities for client information, audits,
information maintenance, termination of contracts, and use of subcontracts
and subgrants. There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses
as a result of enforcing or administering the sections, because the new rules
contain substantially the same polices as are currently in place, and any
new information and policies do not have an economic impact. As DHS contractors,
businesses of all sizes have equal opportunities to contract with equal liability.
There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply
with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local employment
in geographic areas affected by these sections.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Bill Gordon
at (512) 438- 2196. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor,
Rules Unit-062, Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030,
Austin, Texas 78714-9030, within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, DHS has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly,
DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these
rules.
These rules are promulgated by DHS. This state agency is currently scheduled
to be merged sometime in 2004 into two successor agencies, the Texas Health
and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and the Texas Department of Aging and
Disability Services. This change is mandated by legislation passed by the
78th Legislature.
At the time of that transition, HHSC will have complete authority for these
and all related rules. This may result in these rules being changed from one
chapter of the Texas Administrative Code to another or other changes.
Subchapter A. GENERAL INFORMATION
40 TAC §§69.1 - 69.4
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.1.What is the purpose of this chapter?
This chapter provides agency-wide guidance for administration of the
following types of contracts:
(1)
goods and services contracts authorized by the Texas Human
Resources Code §22.002(f) and 1 TAC Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase
of Goods and Services by Health and Human Services Agencies);
(2)
client service subgrants authorized by the Texas Human
Resources Code, §22.002(f);
(3)
professional services contracts authorized by the Texas
Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A;
(4)
consulting services contracts authorized by the Texas Government
Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter B;
(5)
international cooperation agreements authorized by the
International Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 792);
(6)
interagency contracts authorized by the Texas Government
Code, Chapter 771; and
(7)
interlocal contracts authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation
Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 791).
§69.2.What is contract administration?
Contract administration is the purchase and ongoing oversight of vendor
contracts, and the granting and ongoing oversight of subgrants. Procedures
including planning, budgeting, payment systems, policy development, and legal
review are integral to the administration of Texas Department of Human Services
(DHS) contracts. Contract administration is based on federal and state laws.
DHS may implement additional requirements to meet particular needs if those
requirements do not conflict with federal or state law, or with the rules
in this chapter.
§69.3.What do certain words and terms in this chapter mean?
The words and terms in this chapter have the following meanings, unless
the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Area/program area--The organizational part of the Texas
Department of Human Services (DHS) that enters into the contract.
(2)
Authorized representative--An individual or entity that
is authorized to take action on behalf of another entity.
(3)
Award--The act of giving a contract to a vendor or to a
subrecipient. An award may be competitive or noncompetitive.
(4)
Contract--
(A)
a written agreement between a purchasing entity and a vendor
to purchase goods and services; or
(B)
a written agreement between a grantor and a recipient or
a recipient and a subrecipient to carry out all or part of a program.
(5)
DHS--The Texas Department of Human Services.
(6)
Goods--Products, merchandise, equipment, supplies, or commodities
acquired for consumption, use, or distribution.
(7)
Grant--Financial assistance in the form of money or property
that provides support to accomplish a public purpose by helping the grantor
carry out all or part of a program. Competition may be used to award a grant.
The term does not include procurement/vendor contracts.
(8)
Pass-through entity--Provides funds or property to a subrecipient
under a grant or subgrant to carry out all or part of a program.
(9)
Prime contract--A contract DHS initiates with a subrecipient
or vendor.
(10)
Program--Assistance and services administered by DHS that
is designed to help needy families and individuals attain and retain the capability
of independence and self-care.
(11)
Purchase--An acquisition of goods and services from a
vendor for use by the purchaser or for use by a client/recipient of a program.
(12)
Services--Skilled or unskilled labor or professional work.
(13)
Solicitation package--Used to invite entities to compete
for a contract and to explain the requirements that must be met. May go by
other names, including invitation for bid or request for proposal.
(14)
Subcontract--A vendor purchase made by a subrecipient
or a vendor to fulfill the subrecipient's or vendor's contract responsibilities.
It does not include the purchase of goods and services that are for the contractor's
direct consumption or use, or that fall outside its contracted responsibilities.
(15)
Subgrant--A contract between a pass-through entity and
a subrecipient to carry out all or part of a program.
(16)
Subrecipient--Uses funds or property received from a pass-through
entity to carry out all or part of a program.
(17)
Vendor--An individual or business that offers goods or
services for purchase, lease, lease- purchase, or barter.
§69.4.How does DHS handle written inquiries from contractors?
If DHS staff receive a written inquiry from a contractor, staff must
respond in writing no later than 14 days after the date they received the
inquiry.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401197
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.11 - 69.19
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs;
and under the Government Code, §2161.003, which directs state agencies
to adopt the Texas Building and Procurement Commission's rules under Government
Code, §2161.002, as the agency's own rules.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040;
and the Government Code, §2161.003.
§69.11.What is competition?
Competition means an action in which two or more qualified or responsible
entities, acting independently, are solicited for a contract. It allows the
contemporaneous and comparative evaluation of bids, proposals, offers, quotes,
or other suitable expressions of interest.
§69.12.To what extent does DHS use competition in awarding vendor purchases and subgrants?
(a)
DHS uses open and free competition to the maximum extent
practical to award vendor purchases and subgrants.
(b)
DHS may use noncompetitive methods if authorized by law
or rule and if:
(1)
qualified providers are allowed to enroll if payment terms
are accepted;
(2)
no acceptable offers using a competitive method are received;
(3)
services are available from only one source; or
(4)
a bona fide emergency constitutes an immediate threat to
public health or safety or creates an imminent risk of loss to DHS that DHS
documents and justifies in the record. Despite the existence of a bona fide
emergency, DHS conducts the process to provide as much competition as is practical
under the circumstances.
§69.13.What is open enrollment?
Open enrollment is a noncompetitive method that DHS uses to contract
with all providers that meet program-specified qualifications.
§69.14.How does a potential contractor know if it is in its best interest to enter an open enrollment contract?
DHS requires all open enrollment contractors to complete a pre- contract
orientation, unless the program area determines that such an orientation is
not required. The program area establishes the content and method of delivery
of the orientation.
§69.15.Does DHS recognize historically underutilized businesses (HUBs)?
Yes.
(1)
DHS acts affirmatively to ensure that small and historically
underutilized businesses (HUBs) have an equal opportunity to compete for and/or
to be selected as contractors, subcontractors, and subrecipients.
(2)
DHS adopts by reference the Texas Building and Procurement
Commission's rules at 1 TAC, Chapter 111, Subchapter B (relating to Historically
Underutilized Business Program).
§69.16.Does DHS recognize charities and religious organizations?
Yes.
(1)
DHS acts affirmatively to ensure that charitable and religious
organizations have an equal opportunity to contract with DHS.
(2)
Religious organizations that contract with DHS retain their
independence from the state, including their control over the definition,
development, practice, and expression of religious beliefs.
(3)
DHS does not require religious organizations with which
it contracts to alter their form of internal governance or remove religious
art, icons, scripture, or other symbols.
§69.17.What are the characteristics of a DHS solicitation package?
(a)
A solicitation package contains:
(1)
clear and accurate descriptions of the goods and services
to be purchased or clear and accurate program requirements;
(2)
all information or documents required to enable a potential
contractor to respond (whether attached to the package or incorporated by
reference); and
(3)
all evaluation requirements.
(b)
Technical requirements in the package must not unduly restrict
competition by eliminating or limiting potential contractors' participation.
(c)
Construction of the package must provide, to the greatest
extent practicable, a level playing field for all prospective contracts.
§69.18.Does DHS have to make an award if it posts a solicitation?
No. DHS has the right to reject all bids/offers submitted in response
to a solicitation.
§69.19.How will bidders and offerors know about awards?
(a)
Contracts for goods and services awarded according to 1
TAC, Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase of Goods and Services by Health and
Human Services Agencies) are posted within two workdays of the award on the
Electronic State Business Daily at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us.
(b)
Others are notified according to the means described in
the solicitation package.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401196
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.31 - 69.40
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.31.Can DHS's award decisions be protested?
(a)
Yes. DHS allows procurement protests. However, the right
to protest does not apply to:
(1)
the award of grants or subgrants;
(2)
common commodities or services, including goods and services
acquired for direct consumption or use by the agency in the day-to-day support
of the agency's administrative operations (such as office supplies and equipment,
building maintenance and cleaning services, or temporary employment services);
(3)
goods and services purchased pursuant to the Interagency
Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 771) or to the Interlocal
Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 791);
(4)
the lease, purchase, or lease-purchase of real property;
(5)
interstate or international agreements executed in accordance
with applicable law;
(6)
a service of a public utility; or
(7)
a service within the definition of "automated information
system" under the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2157.
(b)
The program area conducting the procurement may have additional
rights and requirements for its procurement protests.
§69.32.Who can request a procurement protest review?
The following may request a protest review:
(1)
an offeror or bidder, if the award is made under the competitive
procurement method and the protestor is not selected for the award; or
(2)
a prospective offeror or bidder, if the award is a sole
source or emergency procurement.
§69.33.How does the public know when DHS makes a sole source or emergency award?
The public may view sole source and emergency purchase awards made
according to 1 TAC, Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase of Goods and Services
by Health and Human Services Agencies) on the Electronic State Business Daily
at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us.
§69.34.Are there limits to what may be protested?
A protestor must limit its protest to matters relating to the protestor's
qualifications, the suitability of the goods or services offered by the protestor,
or alleged irregularities in the procurement process.
§69.35.How does a protestor get copies of applicable protest policies and procedures?
A protestor requests procurement protest policies and procedures from
the DHS representative noted in the Electronic State Business Daily award
posting.
§69.36.How must a protestor request a review?
The request for review must:
(1)
be in writing;
(2)
specify reason(s) for the request and provide supporting
documentation;
(3)
be signed by the person who signed the offer or bid on
behalf of the protestor or its successor, unless the protest is of a sole
source or emergency procurement;
(4)
be delivered to the DHS official contact, as specified
in applicable DHS procurement protest policies and procedures; and
(5)
be received by DHS within 10 business days after the award
notice is posted on the Electronic State Business Daily. If the tenth business
day is on a state holiday, the due date rolls forward to the next DHS workday.
§69.37.Are the protest proceedings formal?
No. Procurement protest reviews are informal and are not conducted
under the Government Code, Chapter 2001 or 2260.
§69.38.How is a protest review conducted?
The review is conducted as follows:
(1)
The part of DHS making the procurement maintains authority
for the protest review.
(2)
DHS designates a person not involved in the procurement
to conduct the review.
(3)
DHS, at its sole discretion, may request supplemental oral
or written information to complement the information submitted in §69.36(2)
of this chapter (relating to How must a protestor request a review?).
(4)
To resolve the protest, the reviewer considers information
required in §69.36(2) of this chapter and any additional oral or written
supplemental information that DHS requests.
(5)
DHS completes the review within five workdays of DHS's
receipt of the request.
(6)
DHS provides a written resolution to the protestor. It
is mailed no later than the sixth workday after receipt of the request. The
written resolution is DHS's official statement of resolution. Oral comments
DHS makes about the protest are not binding.
(7)
The period for review and release of the written resolution
may be extended at the sole discretion of DHS.
§69.39.What happens to the contract if a protest is filed?
(a)
DHS does not finalize a tentative procurement award until
DHS provides a written resolution of the protest to the protestor, unless:
(1)
there is a bona fide emergency; or
(2)
state or federal law requires the award to be completed
by a particular date.
(b)
If the protest is upheld, a contract required by bona fide
emergency or federal or state law is voidable.
§69.40.If a protestor is dissatisfied with the results of the review, is there any other administrative remedy?
The protestor has no further administrative recourse, unless the part
of DHS conducting the procurement allows otherwise in its rules.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401195
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.51 - 69.55
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.51.Can a DHS contractor carry out its contract by entering into subgrants or subcontracts?
Yes, if approved by the program area. Contractors may enter subgrants
or subcontracts but must first obtain DHS's approval of the subgrants and
subcontracts.
§69.52.What does DHS consider when deciding whether to approve a subgrant or subcontract?
DHS considers:
(1)
whether program requirements are met when a subgrant or
subcontract is used;
(2)
whether award or purchase requirements are met when a subrecipient
or subcontractor is selected; and
(3)
if the prime contract instrument contains appropriate provisions
regarding subgrants/subcontracts.
§69.53.In what format does DHS give approval?
Approval may take the form of written policy, a contract clause, a
letter written in response to a request, or other written means the program
area determines.
§69.54.If prior approval is not obtained, what are the potential consequences?
Lack of prior approval is grounds for termination of the prime contract.
§69.55.Must subgrants and subcontracts contain any specific provisions?
Yes. Contractors entering into subgrants and subcontracts must require
subrecipients and subcontractors to accept and abide by each of the applicable
provisions in the prime contract.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401194
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.71 - 69.73
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.71.How does DHS determine which costs are allowable?
Allowable costs differ, depending upon the kind of contractor. The
following principles must be used to determine allowable costs for contracts
in which costs are used in pricing, administration, or settlement:
(1)
State, local, or federally recognized Indian tribal governments
must use Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87.
(2)
Nonprofit organizations must use OMB Circular A-122.
(3)
Institutions of higher education must use OMB Circular
A-21.
(4)
Hospitals must use 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 74, Appendix E.
(5)
Commercial organizations and nonprofit organizations listed
in OMB Circular A-122, Attachment C, must use the contract cost principles
and procedures at 48 CFR Part 31.
§69.72.Must a contractor refer only to federal regulations to determine allowable costs?
No. Some program areas develop guidelines that provide additional program-specific
information. In such instances, the contractors must use the program-developed
guidelines.
§69.73.Can DHS pay for costs that fall outside a contractor's contract period?
A contractor may charge DHS only allowable costs resulting from obligations
incurred during the contract's funding period.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401193
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §69.81
The new section is proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new section implements the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.81.What does DHS consider when deciding whether to renew or reduce a subrecipient's block grant funds?
When deciding whether to renew or reduce a subrecipient's block grant
funds, DHS considers:
(1)
the effectiveness of services rendered by various subrecipients;
(2)
the cost efficiency of programs undertaken by each subrecipient;
(3)
the extent to which the services of each subrecipient meet
the needs of groups or classes of individuals who are poor or underprivileged
or have a disability;
(4)
the degree to which services can be provided by other programs
in that area;
(5)
the extent to which clients are involved in the subrecipient's
decision making;
(6)
the need to provide services in the state without discrimination
as to race, religion, or geographic region;
(7)
the availability of sufficient block grant funds to continue
funding at the current level;
(8)
the subrecipient's degree of compliance with the terms
of the contract;
(9)
the extent to which priorities and need for services change;
(10)
changes in state laws or federal regulations resulting
in reductions;
(11)
the subrecipient's compliance with audit requirements;
and
(12)
DHS rules requiring or authorizing competition.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401192
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.91 - 69.93
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.91.What is renewal?
Renewal materially extends the life of a contract. The renewal is based
upon a term, if any, within the contract that allows extension of the contract.
§69.92.Is renewal automatic if a contract contains a renewal clause?
No. However, DHS may renew a contract if:
(1)
the contract terms allow renewal;
(2)
nothing in law prohibits renewal;
(3)
funding is available;
(4)
the renewal is justified by a continuing need for the goods,
services, or program;
(5)
the renewal is justified by the contractor's performance;
and
(6)
a competitively awarded contract is renewed no more than
four times and does not last for more than five years. In exceptional circumstances,
the DHS commissioner may extend the time frames.
§69.93.What happens if a contract is terminated?
(a)
When a prime contract with a vendor is terminated, DHS
conducts a review to determine any overpayment or underpayment, and makes
a final review to determine whether the contractor has met the terms, conditions,
and specifications of the contract.
(b)
Subgrant closeout procedures, including disposition of
equipment, are conducted in accordance with procedures in Office of Management
and Budget Circular A-110, Section __.71:
(1)
Subrecipients must submit all financial reports, performance
reports, and any other reports required by the terms and conditions of the
subgrant within 90 calendar days after the date of completion of the subgrant
or sooner if required by a program area. DHS may approve extensions when requested
by the subrecipient.
(2)
Unless DHS authorizes an extension, a subrecipient must
liquidate all obligations incurred under the subgrant not later than 90 calendar
days after the funding period or the date of completion as specified in the
terms and conditions of the subgrant or in agency implementing instructions.
(3)
DHS makes payment within 30 days to a subrecipient for
allowable reimbursable costs that are properly billed under the subgrant being
closed out.
(4)
The subrecipient must promptly refund any balances of unobligated
cash that DHS has advanced or paid and that the subrecipient is not authorized
to retain.
(5)
When authorized by the terms and conditions of the subgrant,
DHS makes a settlement for any upward or downward adjustments to DHS's share
of costs after receiving closeout reports.
(6)
The subrecipient must account for any real and personal
property acquired with subgrant funds as required by law.
(7)
In the event a final audit has not been performed before
the closeout of a subgrant, DHS retains the right to recover an appropriate
amount after fully considering the recommendations on disallowed costs resulting
from the final audit.
(c)
Upon termination of a prime contract, the contractor and
each subrecipient and subcontractor are responsible for the prompt settlement
of the termination claims, including claims from employees, vendors, subrecipients,
and subcontractors.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401191
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.101 - 69.103
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.101.What action may DHS take against a contractor in the case of a dispute?
If a contractor materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions
of a contract, DHS may take one or more of the following actions:
(1)
withhold payments and/or remove clients on all or a portion
of a contract pending a dispute resolution or an appeal decision;
(2)
disallow all or part of the cost of activity or action
not in compliance;
(3)
wholly or partly suspend or terminate the contract;
(4)
withhold further awards; or
(5)
take other remedies that may be legally available.
§69.102.If a contractor does not agree with an action that DHS takes against it, what recourse does the contractor have?
The contractor may appeal the action using the processes in Chapter
79, Subchapter Q, of this title (relating to Formal Appeals).
§69.103.If a contractor and its subrecipient or subcontractor have a grievance that they cannot settle, can they turn to DHS to resolve the grievance?
No. Responsibility for resolution resides with the parties that entered
the subgrant or subcontract.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401190
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.111 - 69.118
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.111.Is a contractor subject to audit and contract review?
Yes. When a contractor, subcontractor, or subrecipient accepts funds,
it also accepts the authority of federal and state governments, including
DHS as an agency of state government, to perform reviews and audits and to
have access to records as described in Subchapter K of this chapter (relating
to Information and Records).
§69.112.What are a contractor's obligations during a review or audit?
During a review or audit, the contractor must give DHS or its authorized
representative access to all documentation regarding the contract, including
claims for payment. The contractor's documentation must establish that the
contractor is entitled to the payments it received.
§69.113.May DHS's review and audit procedures include the use of sampling and extrapolation?
Yes. DHS procedures for contract reviews or audits may include the
use of sampling and extrapolation.
§69.114.How are sampling and extrapolation used in a review or audit?
DHS selects a statistically valid sample of the cases or claims for
which the contractor received payment during the time covered by the review
and examines the records for those cases or claims. All improper payments
or units of service in the sample cases or claims are then totaled and extrapolated
to all of the cases or claims for which DHS paid the contractor during the
audit period.
§69.115.How does DHS determine an extrapolated improper payment?
An improper payment amount is 93% of the total extrapolated improper
amount.
§69.116.Which contractors are required to have single audits?
(a)
Vendor contracts are not required to have single audits.
(b)
DHS notifies contractors if they are subject to Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133. Federal regulations may require
subrecipients to obtain an annual single audit.
(1)
State and local governments, institutions of higher education,
and other nonprofit organizations (including hospitals) designated as subrecipients
must refer to the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act Amendments
of 1996 (31 United States Code §§7501-7507) and OMB Circular A-133.
(2)
For-profit hospitals not covered by the audit provisions
of OMB Circular A-133 must refer to the audit requirements of the federal
funding source.
(3)
Commercial organizations are subject to the audit requirements
DHS establishes and incorporates into the contract.
§69.117.Does DHS help pay the costs of a subrecipient's single audit?
If a subrecipient would like for DHS to help pay the cost of the single
audit, the subrecipient must obtain DHS's written approval before procuring
the single audit.
§69.118.Are there special audit requirements for block grant subrecipients?
If DHS requests it, a block grant subrecipient must provide DHS an
annual audit of the contract or evidence that an annual audit has been performed.
If law does not require a single audit, another type audit must be performed
to meet DHS monitoring requirements.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401189
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.131 - 69.139
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.131.How does DHS recover improper payments to a contractor?
DHS recovers improper payments through recoupment and restitution when
DHS verifies that contractors have been overpaid because of improper billing
or accounting practices, or for failure to comply with the contract terms.
§69.132.What are recoupment and restitution?
(a)
DHS recoups a contractor's debt by offsetting money the
contractor owes from money DHS owes the contractor.
(b)
A contractor provides restitution by directly paying DHS
money the contractor owes.
§69.133.How are improper billing or accounting practices determined?
Improper billing or accounting practices are determined using federal,
state, and local laws; DHS rules; contract provisions; and statistical data
on program use compiled from paid claims.
§69.134.How does DHS notify a contractor when discrepancies are found?
DHS notifies the contractor in writing of the types of discrepancies,
the method of computing the reasonable dollar amount to be refunded, and any
actions DHS may take.
§69.135.What recourse does a contractor have if it disagrees with review or audit findings?
The contractor may:
(1)
request that DHS conduct an audit of 100% of the contract-related
records or an additional audit of the records by sampling; and
(2)
may appeal the audit results using the processes in Chapter
79, Subchapter Q, of this title (relating to Formal Appeals).
§69.136.Does the contractor have to pay for additional audit work?
When a contractor requests additional audit work, it must agree to
pay the cost of performing the work at current DHS costs. However, DHS absorbs
the cost for additional audit work if the work reduces disallowed costs by
more than 15%.
§69.137.Can DHS charge interest on outstanding balances on unpaid debts?
Yes. DHS may charge interest on all unpaid debts. Interest is computed
in accordance with the Texas Finance Code, Chapter 304, on the unpaid balance
due on a simple interest basis. DHS may charge and collect interest on installment
payments.
§69.138.How long does a contractor have to make payment before interest begins to accrue?
If the contractor does not pay the full amount due within 30 days of
receiving DHS's letter demanding payment, interest begins to accrue on the
31st day.
§69.139.If a contractor files an appeal, does DHS charge interest while the appeal is resolved?
Yes. Interest continues to accrue during any administrative appeal
process that extends beyond the 31st day after the contractor receives DHS's
letter demanding payment. If any part of an appeal is found in the contractor's
favor, the interest that accrued against the part of the appeal that was found
in the contractor's favor is dismissed.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401188
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.151 - 69.160
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.151.Can DHS release applicant and client information to a contractor?
DHS can release information to a contractor about people who apply
for or receive assistance from DHS. Release must be for purposes directly
connected to the administration of DHS programs.
§69.152.Is there any prohibition on a contractor's use of information about people who apply for or receive assistance from DHS?
Yes. Neither a contractor nor its staff may use applicant or client
information for purposes other than to carry out the purposes for which DHS
released the information or for which the contractor created the information
on behalf of DHS.
§69.153.Under what circumstances can information about people who apply for or receive assistance be released to other entities?
Unless a properly executed applicant/client data release is provided,
information cannot be released for purposes other than those for which DHS
originally released the information or those for which the contractor created
the information on behalf of DHS. The entity receiving the information must
agree to DHS conditions that apply to the information.
§69.154.Does a contractor have responsibility for the security of information about people who apply for or receive assistance?
Yes. Contractors must:
(1)
provide information security;
(2)
protect information privacy;
(3)
ensure information confidentiality and integrity;
(4)
protect information from loss; and
(5)
store, process, transport, transmit, and discard the information
in ways that prevent unauthorized individuals from accessing the information.
§69.155.Do state and federal governments have a right to access a contractor's, subrecipient's, or subcontractor's records?
Yes. Contractors, subrecipients, and subcontractors must cooperate
fully and provide DHS or its duly authorized representatives access to contract
records. Duly authorized representatives include the state auditor, the federal
funding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their
duly authorized representatives. The contractor and its subrecipients and
subcontractors must make records available at reasonable times and for reasonable
periods.
§69.156.What may state and federal authorities and their duly authorized representatives do with the records?
When a contractor, subcontractor, or subrecipient directly or indirectly
accepts funds, it also accepts the authority of DHS, the state auditor, the
federal funding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and
their duly authorized representatives to perform audits, evaluations, monitoring,
investigations, and examinations, and to make transcripts and excerpts.
§69.157.What contractor records need to be accessible?
Books, documents, papers, client records, and other records that are
directly pertinent to a contract must be maintained and made accessible upon
request. The materials include financial and supporting data, statistical
records, and any records pertinent to the deliverables or program components
for which a claim or cost report is submitted to DHS or its agent.
§69.158.How long must contractors, subrecipients, and subcontractors keep contract- related records?
(a)
The records must be kept for a minimum of three years and
90 days after the end of the contract period. If any litigation, claim, or
audit involving these records begins before three years and 90 days expire,
the contractor, subrecipient, or subcontractor must keep the records and documents
for not less than three years and 90 days or until all litigation, claims,
or audit findings are resolved, whichever is longer.
(b)
All medical records must be kept for five years from their
creation.
§69.159.What must happen to contract-related records upon termination of business operations?
Upon termination of a contract, subgrant, or subcontract, the contractor
must ensure that:
(1)
records are stored and accessible;
(2)
someone is responsible for adequately maintaining the records;
(3)
the DHS contract manager is notified in writing about how
and where the records will be maintained and whom DHS can contact in order
to access the records; and
(4)
if information in paragraph (3) of this section changes,
the DHS contract manager is notified in writing of the updated information
within 10 days of the change.
§69.160.Must the requirements of this subchapter appear in contracts with subrecipients and subcontractors?
Yes. The contractor must ensure that the requirements in this subchapter
are included in any subgrant or subcontract it enters under a prime contract
with DHS. When a subcontractor provides goods and services for the contractor's
direct consumption and has access to applicant and client information, the
subcontract must contain requirements in this subchapter relating to use,
confidentiality, and security of applicant and client information.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401198
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §§69.171 - 69.186
The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.171.What is the purpose of debarment and suspension?
DHS may apply the remedies of debarment and suspension to exclude participation
by contractors and potential contractors that do not serve the best interest
of DHS.
§69.172.What do certain words and terms in this subchapter mean?
The words and terms in this subchapter have the following meanings,
unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Contractor--Individuals or legal entities that have existing
DHS contracts or are otherwise participating providers, including subcontractors,
subrecipients, subsidiaries or affiliates, or employees that are directly
involved in administration of a DHS contract.
(2)
Debarment--Termination of rights to continue an existing
contract; receive a new contract; participate as a provider or as an employee
directly involved in administration of a DHS contract; or make a bid, offer,
application, or proposal for a DHS contract. Debarment is for a specific length
of time commensurate with the seriousness of the violation, the extent of
the violation, prior impositions of sanctions or penalties, willingness to
comply with program rules and directives, and other pertinent information.
Generally, debarment will not exceed six years. Where conditions warrant,
a longer period may be imposed.
(3)
Potential contractor--Individuals or legal entities that
wish to submit a bid, offer, application, or proposal for a DHS contract,
subgrant, or subcontract, or otherwise request participation as a provider.
(4)
Suspension of contractual rights--Temporarily withholding
rights to conduct business with DHS. A suspension is in effect until an investigation,
hearing, or trial is concluded and DHS can make a determination about:
(A)
the contractor's future right to contract or subcontract;
or
(B)
a potential contractor's future right to have DHS consider
its offer, bid, proposal, or application.
§69.173.Do debarment and suspension apply to all types of contracts?
(a)
The requirements for and restrictions imposed by debarment
and suspension found in this chapter apply to all types of contracts DHS enters
through its authority to contract found in the Texas Human Resources Code,
Chapter 22.
(b)
These requirements do not supersede rules in Chapter 79,
Subchapter V, of this title (relating to Fraud or Abuse Involving Medical
Providers), unless the rule language specifies that they do.
§69.174.Whom may DHS debar or suspend?
(a)
DHS may debar or suspend:
(1)
an individual;
(2)
a corporation;
(3)
a partnership; or
(4)
a division of a contractor.
(b)
The decision to debar or suspend may result from the acts
of an individual, corporation, partnership or other association of a contractor,
or potential contractor, or a division of the entity.
(c)
The resulting debarment or suspension may be effective
against any of the parties listed in subsection (a) of this section. The acts
that result in debarment or suspension can occur before the association with
the contractor. DHS considers remedial actions taken by the responsible officials
of the contractor or potential contractor in determining whether debarment
or suspension is applied.
§69.175.Does every contract violation result in debarment or suspension?
Even a single occurrence of a violation may result in debarment or
suspension if it is severe. Other adverse actions may be taken if the violation
is isolated or less severe. Rules governing specific programs may specify
sanctions or adverse actions for violations by program contractors.
§69.176.What are the reasons for debarring an individual or entity?
Rights to contract with DHS may be removed for many causes. The decision
to debar is based, in part, on the severity of the violation or a pattern
of violations. Contractual rights may be removed for reasons including:
(1)
debarment from contracting by any unit of the federal government
or any unit of a state government;
(2)
being found guilty, pleading guilty, pleading no contest,
or receiving a deferred adjudication in criminal court relating to:
(A)
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, any form of fraud, receipt of stolen property, or
any other offense indicating lack of business integrity or honesty;
(B)
drug-related offenses;
(C)
violation of federal antitrust statutes related to the
submission of bids or proposals; or
(D)
physical or sexual abuse or neglect offenses; and
(3)
violating contract provisions, including:
(A)
failure to comply with applicable federal and state statutes;
and
(B)
failure to perform according to the terms of one or more
contracts, subgrants, or subcontracts. The failure or unsatisfactory performance
used to justify debarment must occur within the preceding five years.
§69.177.What is considered failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance?
Failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance includes:
(1)
failure to correct contract performance deficiencies after
receiving written notice about them;
(2)
failure to repay or make satisfactory arrangements to repay
overpayments or payments made in error, or to pay assessed monetary damages
or penalties;
(3)
failure to meet required standards;
(4)
failure to maintain required licensure or certification;
(5)
failure to execute required contract amendments;
(6)
billing for goods or services that are not provided;
(7)
falsifying or misrepresenting information in an attempt
to increase payment rates or secure a contract; and
(8)
failure to make available upon demand records the contractor
is required to maintain.
§69.178.Can a contractor employ or subcontract with a debarred individual or entity?
No. If, after finding out about an individual or entity's debarment,
the contractor employs, contracts with, or continues to employ or contract
with an individual or entity to perform services under a DHS contract, the
contractor is subject to adverse action by DHS, including debarment.
§69.179.What is the effect of debarment on the contractor or potential contractor?
Individuals or entities that have been debarred may not:
(1)
receive a contract;
(2)
retain a contract that was awarded before debarment;
(3)
be employed in a position involving administration of a
DHS contract;
(4)
participate in administration of DHS programs;
(5)
bill to or receive payment from DHS for services or supplies
provided by the debarred entity on or after the effective date of the debarment;
or
(6)
include costs associated with the debarred individual or
entity on a cost report or other documentation used to determine payment rates
or fees.
§69.180.When can DHS suspend a contractor?
DHS may suspend a contractor or potential contractor when there is
reason to believe that grounds for debarment exist or if there is an outstanding
indictment against the contractor, potential contractor, or an associated
individual or entity.
§69.181.What happens during suspension?
During the period of suspension:
(1)
payments or a part of a payment may be withheld;
(2)
DHS may refuse to accept a bid, offer, application, or
proposal from the potential contractor;
(3)
DHS may refuse to award a contract to the potential contractor;
and
(4)
DHS may stop referring potential clients to the suspended
entity.
§69.182.What happens if the contractor is able to correct the problems that led to the suspension?
If the contractor is able to correct the problems that led to the suspension,
DHS must:
(1)
pay withheld payments for eligible services that were provided
during the suspension; and
(2)
resume contract payments.
§69.183.What happens if the contractor is not able to correct the problems that led to the suspension?
If the contractor is not able to resolve the problems, DHS initiates
debarment proceedings.
§69.184.What is sufficient evidence to establish debarment or suspension?
The sufficiency of evidence required depends on the cause of the suspension
or debarment.
(1)
If there is evidence that the contractor or potential contractor
has been found guilty, pled guilty, pled no contest, or received a deferred
adjudication in criminal court relating to an activity prohibited in this
chapter, that is sufficient evidence to suspend or debar. If the decision
that caused debarment is reversed on appeal, the contractor must provide written
proof of the reversal to have its contract rights restored. DHS restores contract
rights unless the contractor is also debarred or suspended on other grounds.
(2)
If the cause is debarment from contracting by any unit
of the federal government or any unit of a state government, it is sufficient
to offer official notice from the other state or federal agency that the entity
has been debarred. The notice may be addressed to either DHS or the debarred
entity.
(3)
Other causes of debarment or suspension may be established
by evidence of failure to meet contracting terms or standards, including evidence
of the severity or recurrence of violations of performance requirements.
§69.185.Are there appeal rights for debarred or suspended parties?
Contractors and potential contractors that are placed in suspension
or that have been debarred have all the notice and appeal rights provided
in Chapter 79 of this title (relating to Legal Services).
§69.186.What must be included in the notices of suspension and debarment?
Notices must include the following, as applicable:
(1)
the grounds for the action;
(2)
the length of the debarment;
(3)
the conditions that might cause a suspension to be released;
(4)
a statement explaining the effect of the suspension or
debarment; and
(5)
a statement of whether the suspension or debarment is in
effect throughout DHS.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401199
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
Subchapter L. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
40 TAC §§69.201 - 69.212, 69.220, 69.266, 69.275 - 69.279
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Human Services or in the Texas Register office,
Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeals are proposed under the Human Resources
Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.
The repeals implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.
§69.201.Scope.
§69.202.Procurement.
§69.203.Subcontracts.
§69.204.Required Disclosure of Current or Previous Employment at the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS).
§69.205.Contractor's Records.
§69.206.Contract Renewal and Termination.
§69.207.Disputes.
§69.208.Methods for Auditing Contracts.
§69.209.Recoupment of Improper Payments.
§69.210.Computing Interest on Unpaid Audit Charges.
§69.211.Prior Approval.
§69.212.Year 2000 Responsibilities.
§69.220.General Services Commission Rules Pertaining to Historically Underutilized Businesses.
§69.266.Reduction or Nonrenewal of Block Grant Contracts.
§69.275.Debarment and Suspension of Current and Potential Contractor's Rights.
§69.276.Causes for and Conditions of Debarment.
§69.277.Causes for and Conditions of Suspension.
§69.278.Proof Required for Debarment and Suspension.
§69.279.Notice Requirements for Debarment and for Suspension.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401200
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to amend §92.3,
concerning definitions; §92.41, concerning standards for Type A, Type
B, and Type E assisted living facilities; §92.62, concerning general
requirements; §92.559, concerning What is the administrative penalty
schedule?; and new §92.129, concerning authorized electronic monitoring
(AEM), in its Licensing Standards for Assisted Living Facilities chapter.
The purpose of the amendments and new section is to implement changes mandated
by the 78th Texas Legislature and correct references within the chapter. The
amendment to §92.3 adds the definitions for authorized electronic monitoring,
covert electronic monitoring, and electronic monitoring device; corrects a
licensing standards reference; and corrects the address for the National Fire
Protection Association. New §92.129 adds the requirement that AEM be
allowed in assisted living facilities and outlines procedures to follow for
electronic monitoring. The amendment to §92.559 adds an administrative
penalty related to AEM. The amendment to §92.62 adds the requirement
for assisted living facilities constructed or licensed after August 1, 2004,
to have a central air conditioning system, or a substantially similar air
conditioning system, that is capable of maintaining a temperature suitable
for resident comfort within areas used by residents. The amendment to §92.41
corrects a reference to the Nursing Practice Act.
Gordon Taylor, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that, for the first
five-year period the proposed sections are in effect, there may be a fiscal
implication for state government, but not for local government, as a result
of enforcing or administering the sections. If an administrative penalty is
imposed for violation of the rules on AEM, it would bring in revenue to the
state in the amount of the penalty, but it is not possible to anticipate the
number of penalties that might be imposed during the first five-year period.
Bettye M. Mitchell, Deputy Commissioner for Long Term Care, has determined
that, for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the
public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is to (1)
allow a resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, to monitor
the resident's room through the use of an electronic monitoring device that
will provide an avenue to protect the resident from abuse or neglect; (2)
ensure a comfortable environment by maintaining facility temperature at a
level that is suitable for resident comfort; (3) enhance the public's ability
to locate desired information referenced in the rules; and (4) have rules
that comply with current state law.
There may be an adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses as
a result of enforcing or administering the sections. There is no cost for
facilities to allow AEM as the resident, or resident's guardian or legal representative,
is responsible for providing and installing the monitoring equipment if they
choose to monitor the resident's room. The administrative penalty is not applied
for licensed facilities that comply with the rules concerning AEM. Licensed
facilities that violate the rules concerning AEM may be assessed an administrative
penalty. The requirement for facilities licensed or constructed after August
1, 2004, to have a central air conditioning unit or substantially similar
air conditioning system has no effect on currently licensed facilities, and
this requirement for new facilities would normally be incorporated in the
cost of starting a business. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons
who are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated
effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Jeanoyce
Wilson at (512) 438-2353 in DHS's Long Term Care-Regulatory Policy Section.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor, Rules Unit-093,
Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030,
within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, DHS has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly,
DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these
rules.
These rules are promulgated by DHS. This state agency is currently scheduled
to be merged sometime in 2004 into two successor agencies, the Texas Health
and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and the Texas Department of Aging and
Disability Services. This change is mandated by legislation passed by the
78th Legislature.
At the time of that transition, HHSC will have complete authority for these
and all related rules. This may result in these rules being changed from one
chapter of the Texas Administrative Code to another or other changes.
Subchapter A. INTRODUCTION
40 TAC §92.3
The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living
facilities.
The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068
§92.3.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the
following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1) - (3)
(No change.)
(4)
Authorized electronic monitoring
(AEM)--The placement of an electronic monitoring device in a resident's room
and using the device to make tapes or recordings after making a request to
the facility to allow electronic monitoring.
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
(A)
a management company, landlord, or other business entity
that operates or contracts with others for the operation of an assisted living
facility;
(B)
any person who is a controlling person of a management
company or other business entity that operates an assisted living facility
or that contracts with another person for the operation of an assisted living
facility; and
(C)
any other individual who, because of a personal, familial,
or other relationship with the owner, manager, landlord, tenant, or provider
of an assisted living facility, is in a position of actual control or authority
with respect to the facility, without regard to whether the individual is
formally named as an owner, manager, director, officer, provider, consultant,
contractor, or employee of the facility. This does not include an employee,
lender, secured creditor, landlord, or other person who does not exercise
formal or actual influence or control over the operation of an assisted living
facility.
(8)
Covert electronic monitoring--The
placement and use of an electronic monitoring device that is not open and
obvious, and the facility and DHS have not been informed about the device
by the resident, by a person who placed the device in the room, or by a person
who uses the device.
(9)
[
(10)
[
(11)
[
(12)
Electronic monitoring device--Video
surveillance cameras and audio devices installed in a resident's room, designed
to acquire communications or other sounds that occur in the room. An electronic,
mechanical, or other device used specifically for the nonconsensual interception
of wire or electronic communication is excluded from this definition.
(13)
[
(14)
[
(15)
[
(16)
[
(17)
[
(18)
[
(19)
[
(20)
[
(21)
[
(A)
recognized as a drug in the official United States Pharmacopoeia,
Official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, Texas Drug Code Index
or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of these official
documents;
(B)
intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment,
or prevention of disease;
(C)
other than food intended to affect the structure or any
function of the body;
(D)
intended for use as a component of any substance specified
in this definition. It does not include devices or their components, parts,
or accessories.
(22)
[
(23)
[
(24)
[
(25)
[
(26)
[
(27)
[
(28)
[
(29)
[
(30)
[
(31)
[
(32)
[
(33)
[
(34)
[
(35)
[
(36)
[
(37)
[
(38)
[
(39)
[
(40)
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the
Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401201
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §92.41
The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living
facilities.
The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068
§92.41.Standards for Type A, Type B, and Type E Assisted Living Facilities.
(a) - (i)
(No change.)
(j)
Medications.
(1)
Administration. Medications must be administered according
to physician's orders.
(A)
Residents who choose not to or cannot self-administer their
medications must have their medications administered by a person who:
(i) - (ii)
(No change.)
(iii)
is an employee of the facility to whom the administration
of medication has been delegated by a registered nurse, who has trained them
to administer medications or verified their training. The delegation of the
administration of medication is governed by 22 TAC Chapter
225 (concerning
RN Delegation to Unlicensed Personnel and Tasks Not Requiring Delegation in
Independent Living Environments for Clients with Stable and Predictable Conditions)
[
(B) - (D)
(No change.)
(2) - (6)
(No change.)
(k) - (p)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401202
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §92.62
The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living
facilities.
The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068
§92.62.General Requirements.
(a) - (h)
(No change.)
(i)
General safety features.
(1) - (9)
(No change.)
(10)
Cooling and heating must be provided for occupant comfort.
Conditioning systems must be capable of maintaining the comfort ranges of
68 degrees Fahrenheit to 82 degrees Fahrenheit in resident-use areas.
A facility constructed or licensed after August 1, 2004, must have a central
air conditioning system, or a substantially similar air conditioning system,
that is capable of maintaining a temperature suitable for resident comfort
within areas used by residents.
Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning
(HVAC) equipment must comply with the provisions of NFPA 90A or 90B, as applicable.
NFPA 90A requires automatic shut down upon activation of the fire alarm in
HVAC systems of over 2,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) capacity.
(11) - (15)
(No change.)
(j) - (m)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401203
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
40 TAC §92.129
The new section is proposed under the Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living
facilities.
The new section implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068
§92.129.Authorized Electronic Monitoring (AEM).
(a)
A facility must permit a resident, or the resident's guardian
or legal representative, to monitor the resident's room through the use of
electronic monitoring devices.
(b)
A facility may not refuse to admit an individual and may
not discharge a resident because of a request to conduct authorized electronic
monitoring.
(c)
The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) Information
Regarding Authorized Electronic Monitoring form must be signed by or on behalf
of all new residents upon admission. The form must be completed and signed
by or on behalf of all current residents by October 1, 2004. A copy of the
form must be maintained in the active portion of the resident's clinical record.
(d)
A resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative,
who wishes to conduct AEM must request AEM by giving a completed, signed,
and dated DHS Request for Authorized Electronic Monitoring form to the manager
or designee. A copy of the form must be maintained in the active portion of
the resident's clinical record.
(1)
If a resident has the capacity to request AEM and has not
been judicially declared to lack the required capacity, only the resident
may request AEM, notwithstanding the terms of any durable power of attorney
or similar instrument.
(2)
If a resident has been judicially declared to lack the
capacity required to request AEM, only the guardian of the resident may request
AEM.
(3)
If a resident does not have the capacity to request AEM
and has not been judicially declared to lack the required capacity, only the
legal representative of the resident may request AEM.
(A)
A resident's physician makes the determination regarding
the capacity to request AEM. Documentation of the determination must be made
in the resident's clinical record.
(B)
When a resident's physician determines the resident lacks
the capacity to request AEM, a person from the following list, in order of
priority, may act as the resident's legal representative for the limited purpose
of requesting AEM:
(i)
a person named in the resident's medical power of attorney
or other advance directive;
(ii)
the resident's spouse;
(iii)
an adult child of the resident who has the waiver and
consent of all other qualified adult children of the resident to act as the
sole decision-maker;
(iv)
a majority of the resident's reasonably available adult
children;
(v)
the resident's parents; or
(vi)
the individual clearly identified to act for the resident
by the resident before the resident became incapacitated or the resident's
nearest living relative.
(e)
A resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative,
who wishes to conduct AEM also must obtain the consent of other residents
in the room, using the DHS Consent to Authorized Electronic Monitoring form.
When complete, the form must be given to the manager or designee. A copy of
the form must be maintained in the active portion of the resident's clinical
record.
(1)
Consent to AEM may be given only by:
(A)
the other resident or residents in the room;
(B)
the guardian of the other resident, if the resident has
been judicially declared to lack the required capacity; or
(C)
the legal representative of the other resident, determined
by following the same procedure established under subsection (d)(3) of this
section.
(2)
Another resident in the room may condition consent on:
(A)
pointing the camera away from the consenting resident,
when the proposed electronic monitoring is a video surveillance camera; and
(B)
limiting or prohibiting the use of an audio electronic
monitoring device.
(3)
AEM must be conducted in accordance with any limitation
placed on the monitoring as a condition of the consent given by or on behalf
of another resident in the room. The resident's roommate, or the roommate's
guardian or legal representative, assumes responsibility for assuring AEM
is conducted according to the designated limitations.
(4)
If AEM is being conducted in a resident's room, and another
resident is moved into the room who has not yet consented to AEM, the monitoring
must cease until the new resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative,
consents.
(f)
When the completed DHS Request for Authorized Electronic
Monitoring form and the DHS Consent to Authorized Electronic Monitoring form,
if applicable, have been given to the manager or designee, AEM may begin.
(1)
Anyone conducting AEM must post and maintain a conspicuous
notice at the entrance to the resident's room. The notice must state that
the room is being monitored by an electronic monitoring device.
(2)
The resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative,
must pay for all costs associated with conducting AEM, including installation
in compliance with life safety and electrical codes, maintenance, removal
of the equipment, posting and removal of the notice, or repair following removal
of the equipment and notice, other than the cost of electricity.
(3)
The facility must meet residents' requests to have a video
camera obstructed to protect their dignity.
(4)
The facility must make reasonable physical accommodation
for AEM, which includes providing:
(A)
a reasonably secure place to mount the video surveillance
camera or other electronic monitoring device; and
(B)
access to power sources for the video surveillance camera
or other electronic monitoring device.
(g)
All facilities, regardless of whether AEM is being conducted,
must post an 8 1/2-inch by 11- inch notice at the main facility entrance.
The notice must be entitled "Electronic Monitoring" and must state, in large,
easy-to-read type, "The rooms of some residents may be monitored electronically
by or on behalf of the residents. Monitoring may not be open and obvious in
all cases."
(h)
A facility may:
(1)
require an electronic monitoring device to be installed
in a manner that is safe for residents, employees, or visitors who may be
moving about the room, and meets all local and state regulations;
(2)
require AEM to be conducted in plain view; and
(3)
place a resident in a different room to accommodate a request
for AEM.
(i)
A facility may not discharge a resident because covert
electronic monitoring is being conducted by or on behalf of a resident. If
a facility discovers a covert electronic monitoring device and it is no longer
covert as defined in §92.3 of this chapter (relating to Definitions),
the resident must meet all the requirements for AEM before monitoring is allowed
to continue.
(j)
All instances of abuse or neglect must be reported to DHS,
as required by §92.102 of this chapter (relating to Abuse, Neglect, or
Exploitation Reportable to the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) by
Facilities). For purposes of the duty to report abuse or neglect, the following
apply:
(1)
A person who is conducting electronic monitoring on behalf
of a resident is considered to have viewed or listened to a tape or recording
made by the electronic monitoring device on or before the 14th day after the
date the tape or recording is made.
(2)
If a resident, who has capacity to determine that the resident
has been abused or neglected and who is conducting electronic monitoring,
gives a tape or recording made by the electronic monitoring device to a person
and directs the person to view or listen to the tape or recording to determine
whether abuse or neglect has occurred, the person to whom the resident gives
the tape or recording is considered to have viewed or listened to the tape
or recording on or before the seventh day after the date the person receives
the tape or recording.
(3)
A person is required to report abuse based on the person's
viewing of or listening to a tape or recording only if the incident of abuse
is acquired on the tape or recording. A person is required to report neglect
based on the person's viewing of or listening to a tape or recording only
if it is clear from viewing or listening to the tape or recording that neglect
has occurred.
(4)
If abuse or neglect of the resident is reported to the
facility and the facility requests a copy of any relevant tape or recording
made by an electronic monitoring device, the person who possesses the tape
or recording must provide the facility with a copy at the facility's expense.
The cost of the copy must not exceed the community standard. If the contents
of the tape or recording are transferred from the original technological format,
a qualified professional must do the transfer.
(5)
A person who sends more than one tape or recording to DHS
must identify each tape or recording on which the person believes an incident
of abuse or evidence of neglect may be found. Tapes or recordings should identify
the place on the tape or recording that an incident of abuse or evidence of
neglect may be found.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.
TRD-200401204
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
9.
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
Subchapter B. PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND AWARD OF SUBGRANTS
Subchapter C. PROCUREMENT PROTESTS
Subchapter D. SUBGRANTS AND SUBCONTRACTS
Subchapter E. COST PRINCIPLES
Subchapter F. NONRENEWAL OR REDUCTION OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
Subchapter G. CONTRACT RENEWAL AND TERMINATION
Subchapter H. DISPUTES
Subchapter I. AUDITS
Subchapter J. RECOVERY OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS
Subchapter K. INFORMATION AND RECORDS
Subchapter L. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Chapter 69.
CONTRACTED SERVICES
Chapter 92.
LICENSING STANDARDS FOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES
(4)
] Change of ownership--A change:
of 50% or more in the ownership of the business organization that is licensed
to operate the facility; in the owner holding the facility license; or in
the federal tax payer identification number.
(5)
] Co-mingles--The laundering
of wearing apparel and/or linens of two or more individuals together.
(6)
] Controlling person--A person
with the ability, acting alone or with others, to directly or indirectly,
influence, direct, or cause the direction of the management, expenditure of
money, or policies of an assisted living facility or other person. A controlling
person includes:
(7)
] DHS--Texas Department of Human
Services.
(8)
] Dietitian--A person who currently
holds a license or provisional license issued by the Texas State Board of
Examiners of Dietitians.
(9)
] Disclosure statement--A department-designed
form for prospective residents or their representatives that each assisted
living facility must complete. The form contains information regarding the
preadmission, admission, and discharge process; resident assessment and service
plans; staffing patterns; the physical environment of the facility; resident
activities; and facility services.
(10)
] Facility--An establishment
under the scope of Assisted Living Facility Licensing Act, Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 247, which furnishes room, board, and one or more personal care
services.
(11)
] Fire Suppression Authority--The
paid or volunteer fire-fighting organization or tactical unit that is responsible
for fire suppression operations and related duties once a fire incident occurs
within its jurisdiction.
(12)
] Governmental unit--The state
or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision, or any department,
division, board, or other agency of any of the foregoing.
(13)
] Health care professional--An
individual licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized to administer health
care, for profit or otherwise, in the ordinary course of business or professional
practice. The term includes a physician, registered nurse, licensed vocational
nurse, licensed dietitian, physical therapist, and occupational therapist.
(14)
] Immediate threat--There
is considered to be an immediate threat to the health or safety of a resident,
or a situation is considered to put the health or safety of a resident in
immediate jeopardy, if there is a situation in which an assisted living facility's
noncompliance with one or more requirements of licensure has caused, or is
likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident.
(15)
] Immediately available--The
capacity of facility staff to immediately respond to an emergency after being
notified through a communication and/or alarm system. The staff is to be no
more than 600 feet from the farthest resident.
(16)
] Management services--Services
provided under contract between the owner of a facility and a person to provide
for the operation of a facility, including administration, staffing, maintenance,
or delivery of resident services. Management services do not include contracts
solely for maintenance, laundry, or food services.
(17)
] Manager--The individual
in charge of the day-to-day operation of the facility.
(18)
] Medication--Medication is
any substance:
(19)
] Medication administration--The
direct application of a medication or drug to the body of a resident by an
individual legally allowed to administer medication in the State of Texas.
(20)
] Medication assistance or
supervision--The assistance or supervision of the medication regimen by facility
staff. Refer to
§92.41(j)
[
§92.41(i)
] of this
chapter (relating to Standards for Type A, Type B, and Type E Assisted Living
Facilities).
(21)
] Medication (self-administration)--The
capability of residents to administer their own medication/treatments without
assistance from the facility staff.
(22)
] NFPA 101--The 1988 publication
titled "NFPA 101 Life Safety Code" published by the National Fire Protection
Association, Inc.,
1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, Massachusetts
02169
[
02269
].
(23)
] Person--Any individual,
firm, partnership, corporation, association, or joint stock association, and
the legal successor thereof.
(24)
] Person with a disclosable
interest--Any person who owns 5.0% interest in any corporation, partnership,
or other business entity that is required to be licensed under Health and
Safety Code, Chapter 247. A person with a disclosable interest does not include
a bank, savings and loan, savings bank, trust company, building and loan association,
credit union, individual loan and thrift company, investment banking firm,
or insurance company unless such entity participates in the management of
the facility.
(25)
] Personal care services--Assistance
with meals, dressing, movement, bathing, or other personal needs or maintenance;
the administration of medication or the assistance with or supervision of
medication; or general supervision or oversight of the physical and mental
well-being of a person who needs assistance to maintain a private and independent
residence in the facility or who needs assistance to manage his or her personal
life, regardless of whether a guardian has been appointed for the person.
(26)
] Physician--A practitioner
licensed by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners.
(27)
] Resident--Anyone accepted
for care in the assisted living facility.
(28)
] Respite--The provision by
a facility of room, board, and care at the level ordinarily provided for permanent
residents of the facility to a person for not more than 60 days for each stay
in the facility.
(29)
] Restraints--Chemical restraints
are psychoactive drugs administered for the purposes of discipline or convenience
and are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Physical restraints
are any manual method, or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment
attached or adjacent to the resident that restricts freedom of movement.
(30)
] Safety--Protection from
injury or loss of life due to such conditions as fire, electrical hazard,
unsafe building or site conditions, and the hazardous presence of toxic fumes
and materials.
(31)
] Seclusion--The placement
of a resident apart from other residents for any period of time in an area
from which egress is prevented.
(32)
] Service plan--A written
description of the medical care or the supervision and non-medical care needed
by a person.
(33)
] Short-term acute episode--An
illness of less than 30 days duration.
(34)
] Staff--Any employee of an
assisted living facility.
(35)
] Standards--The minimum licensing
standards in Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Standards for Licensure)
intended to protect the health and safety of the residents.
(36)
] Terminal condition--A medical
diagnosis, certified by a physician, of an illness that will result in death
in six months or less.
(37)
] Universal precautions--An
approach to infection control in which blood, any body fluids visibly contaminated
with blood, and all body fluids in situations where it is difficult or impossible
to differentiate between body fluids are treated as if known to be infectious
for HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens.
Subchapter C. STANDARDS FOR LICENSURE
218 (concerning Delegation of Selected Nursing Tasks by Registered
Professional Nurses to Unlicensed Personnel)
], which implements the
Nursing
[
Nurse
] Practice Act.
Subchapter D. FACILITY CONSTRUCTION
Subchapter G. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Subchapter H. ENFORCEMENT