TITLE 40.SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Chapter 69. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to repeal Subchapter L, concerning contract administration, §§69.201-69.212, 69.220, 69.266, and 69.275-69.279, in its Contracted Services chapter; and proposes new Subchapter A, concerning general information, §§69.1-69.4; Subchapter B, concerning purchase of goods and services and award of subgrants, §§69.11-69.19; Subchapter C, concerning procurement protests, §§69.31-69.40; Subchapter D, concerning subgrants and subcontracts, §§69.51- 69.55; Subchapter E, concerning cost principles, §§69.71-69.73; Subchapter F, concerning nonrenewal or reduction of block grant funds, §69.81; Subchapter G, concerning contract renewal and termination, §§69.91-69.93; Subchapter H, concerning disputes, §§69.101-69.103; Subchapter I, concerning audits, §§69.111-69.118; Subchapter J, concerning recovery of improper payments, §§69.131-69.139; Subchapter K, concerning information and records, §§69.151-69.160; and Subchapter L, concerning debarment and suspension, §§69.171-69.186, in its newly titled Contract Administration chapter.

The purpose of the repeals and new sections is to reorganize the rules governing DHS's contractors, potential contractors, vendors, and subrecipients and rewrite them in plain English to make them easier for the public and contractors to navigate and understand. The new rules govern aspects of contract administration including the types of contracts that fall under the rules in the chapter, the solicitation process, the purchase of goods and services, the award of subgrants, procurement protests, dispute resolution, allowable costs, renewal and termination of contracts, maintenance and use of information and records, audits, and debarment and suspension. Information and policy contained in the new rules is substantially unchanged, with the following additions: (1) new §69.2 adds a definitions section to the chapter; (2) new §69.4 adds a requirement that DHS respond in writing within 14 days of a contractor's written inquiry; (3) new §69.17 aligns the definition of a solicitation package with that of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission; (4) new §69.131 and §69.132 clarify that DHS can use both recoupment and restitution to recover improper payments; (5) new §§69.151- 69.160 provide specific requirements for a contractor's use and maintenance of client information and include a requirement that the state auditor have access to contractor records; and (6) new §69.172(2) changes the period of debarment from a maximum of six years unless a longer time is mandated by other requirements to a specific length of time commensurate with the seriousness of the violation and other pertinent factors, but generally not more than six years. The purpose of repealing §69.212 it to eliminate an obsolete rule concerning Year 2000 requirements from DHS's rule base.

Gordon Taylor, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed sections are in effect, there are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Charles F. Lyon, Deputy Commissioner for Support Services, has determined that, for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is that the rules regarding contract administration at DHS will be easier for the public, including contractors, potential contractors, vendors, and subrecipients to read and understand. The public will also find that the rules provide better descriptions of contractor responsibilities for client information, audits, information maintenance, termination of contracts, and use of subcontracts and subgrants. There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the sections, because the new rules contain substantially the same polices as are currently in place, and any new information and policies do not have an economic impact. As DHS contractors, businesses of all sizes have equal opportunities to contract with equal liability. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Bill Gordon at (512) 438- 2196. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor, Rules Unit-062, Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register .

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, DHS has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly, DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these rules.

These rules are promulgated by DHS. This state agency is currently scheduled to be merged sometime in 2004 into two successor agencies, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services. This change is mandated by legislation passed by the 78th Legislature.

At the time of that transition, HHSC will have complete authority for these and all related rules. This may result in these rules being changed from one chapter of the Texas Administrative Code to another or other changes.

Subchapter A. GENERAL INFORMATION

40 TAC §§69.1 - 69.4

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.1.What is the purpose of this chapter?

This chapter provides agency-wide guidance for administration of the following types of contracts:

(1) goods and services contracts authorized by the Texas Human Resources Code §22.002(f) and 1 TAC Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase of Goods and Services by Health and Human Services Agencies);

(2) client service subgrants authorized by the Texas Human Resources Code, §22.002(f);

(3) professional services contracts authorized by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A;

(4) consulting services contracts authorized by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter B;

(5) international cooperation agreements authorized by the International Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 792);

(6) interagency contracts authorized by the Texas Government Code, Chapter 771; and

(7) interlocal contracts authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 791).

§69.2.What is contract administration?

Contract administration is the purchase and ongoing oversight of vendor contracts, and the granting and ongoing oversight of subgrants. Procedures including planning, budgeting, payment systems, policy development, and legal review are integral to the administration of Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) contracts. Contract administration is based on federal and state laws. DHS may implement additional requirements to meet particular needs if those requirements do not conflict with federal or state law, or with the rules in this chapter.

§69.3.What do certain words and terms in this chapter mean?

The words and terms in this chapter have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Area/program area--The organizational part of the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) that enters into the contract.

(2) Authorized representative--An individual or entity that is authorized to take action on behalf of another entity.

(3) Award--The act of giving a contract to a vendor or to a subrecipient. An award may be competitive or noncompetitive.

(4) Contract--

(A) a written agreement between a purchasing entity and a vendor to purchase goods and services; or

(B) a written agreement between a grantor and a recipient or a recipient and a subrecipient to carry out all or part of a program.

(5) DHS--The Texas Department of Human Services.

(6) Goods--Products, merchandise, equipment, supplies, or commodities acquired for consumption, use, or distribution.

(7) Grant--Financial assistance in the form of money or property that provides support to accomplish a public purpose by helping the grantor carry out all or part of a program. Competition may be used to award a grant. The term does not include procurement/vendor contracts.

(8) Pass-through entity--Provides funds or property to a subrecipient under a grant or subgrant to carry out all or part of a program.

(9) Prime contract--A contract DHS initiates with a subrecipient or vendor.

(10) Program--Assistance and services administered by DHS that is designed to help needy families and individuals attain and retain the capability of independence and self-care.

(11) Purchase--An acquisition of goods and services from a vendor for use by the purchaser or for use by a client/recipient of a program.

(12) Services--Skilled or unskilled labor or professional work.

(13) Solicitation package--Used to invite entities to compete for a contract and to explain the requirements that must be met. May go by other names, including invitation for bid or request for proposal.

(14) Subcontract--A vendor purchase made by a subrecipient or a vendor to fulfill the subrecipient's or vendor's contract responsibilities. It does not include the purchase of goods and services that are for the contractor's direct consumption or use, or that fall outside its contracted responsibilities.

(15) Subgrant--A contract between a pass-through entity and a subrecipient to carry out all or part of a program.

(16) Subrecipient--Uses funds or property received from a pass-through entity to carry out all or part of a program.

(17) Vendor--An individual or business that offers goods or services for purchase, lease, lease- purchase, or barter.

§69.4.How does DHS handle written inquiries from contractors?

If DHS staff receive a written inquiry from a contractor, staff must respond in writing no later than 14 days after the date they received the inquiry.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401197

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter B. PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND AWARD OF SUBGRANTS

40 TAC §§69.11 - 69.19

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs; and under the Government Code, §2161.003, which directs state agencies to adopt the Texas Building and Procurement Commission's rules under Government Code, §2161.002, as the agency's own rules.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040; and the Government Code, §2161.003.

§69.11.What is competition?

Competition means an action in which two or more qualified or responsible entities, acting independently, are solicited for a contract. It allows the contemporaneous and comparative evaluation of bids, proposals, offers, quotes, or other suitable expressions of interest.

§69.12.To what extent does DHS use competition in awarding vendor purchases and subgrants?

(a) DHS uses open and free competition to the maximum extent practical to award vendor purchases and subgrants.

(b) DHS may use noncompetitive methods if authorized by law or rule and if:

(1) qualified providers are allowed to enroll if payment terms are accepted;

(2) no acceptable offers using a competitive method are received;

(3) services are available from only one source; or

(4) a bona fide emergency constitutes an immediate threat to public health or safety or creates an imminent risk of loss to DHS that DHS documents and justifies in the record. Despite the existence of a bona fide emergency, DHS conducts the process to provide as much competition as is practical under the circumstances.

§69.13.What is open enrollment?

Open enrollment is a noncompetitive method that DHS uses to contract with all providers that meet program-specified qualifications.

§69.14.How does a potential contractor know if it is in its best interest to enter an open enrollment contract?

DHS requires all open enrollment contractors to complete a pre- contract orientation, unless the program area determines that such an orientation is not required. The program area establishes the content and method of delivery of the orientation.

§69.15.Does DHS recognize historically underutilized businesses (HUBs)?

Yes.

(1) DHS acts affirmatively to ensure that small and historically underutilized businesses (HUBs) have an equal opportunity to compete for and/or to be selected as contractors, subcontractors, and subrecipients.

(2) DHS adopts by reference the Texas Building and Procurement Commission's rules at 1 TAC, Chapter 111, Subchapter B (relating to Historically Underutilized Business Program).

§69.16.Does DHS recognize charities and religious organizations?

Yes.

(1) DHS acts affirmatively to ensure that charitable and religious organizations have an equal opportunity to contract with DHS.

(2) Religious organizations that contract with DHS retain their independence from the state, including their control over the definition, development, practice, and expression of religious beliefs.

(3) DHS does not require religious organizations with which it contracts to alter their form of internal governance or remove religious art, icons, scripture, or other symbols.

§69.17.What are the characteristics of a DHS solicitation package?

(a) A solicitation package contains:

(1) clear and accurate descriptions of the goods and services to be purchased or clear and accurate program requirements;

(2) all information or documents required to enable a potential contractor to respond (whether attached to the package or incorporated by reference); and

(3) all evaluation requirements.

(b) Technical requirements in the package must not unduly restrict competition by eliminating or limiting potential contractors' participation.

(c) Construction of the package must provide, to the greatest extent practicable, a level playing field for all prospective contracts.

§69.18.Does DHS have to make an award if it posts a solicitation?

No. DHS has the right to reject all bids/offers submitted in response to a solicitation.

§69.19.How will bidders and offerors know about awards?

(a) Contracts for goods and services awarded according to 1 TAC, Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase of Goods and Services by Health and Human Services Agencies) are posted within two workdays of the award on the Electronic State Business Daily at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us.

(b) Others are notified according to the means described in the solicitation package.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401196

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter C. PROCUREMENT PROTESTS

40 TAC §§69.31 - 69.40

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.31.Can DHS's award decisions be protested?

(a) Yes. DHS allows procurement protests. However, the right to protest does not apply to:

(1) the award of grants or subgrants;

(2) common commodities or services, including goods and services acquired for direct consumption or use by the agency in the day-to-day support of the agency's administrative operations (such as office supplies and equipment, building maintenance and cleaning services, or temporary employment services);

(3) goods and services purchased pursuant to the Interagency Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 771) or to the Interlocal Cooperation Act (Texas Government Code, Chapter 791);

(4) the lease, purchase, or lease-purchase of real property;

(5) interstate or international agreements executed in accordance with applicable law;

(6) a service of a public utility; or

(7) a service within the definition of "automated information system" under the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2157.

(b) The program area conducting the procurement may have additional rights and requirements for its procurement protests.

§69.32.Who can request a procurement protest review?

The following may request a protest review:

(1) an offeror or bidder, if the award is made under the competitive procurement method and the protestor is not selected for the award; or

(2) a prospective offeror or bidder, if the award is a sole source or emergency procurement.

§69.33.How does the public know when DHS makes a sole source or emergency award?

The public may view sole source and emergency purchase awards made according to 1 TAC, Chapter 391 (relating to Purchase of Goods and Services by Health and Human Services Agencies) on the Electronic State Business Daily at http://esbd.tbpc.state.tx.us.

§69.34.Are there limits to what may be protested?

A protestor must limit its protest to matters relating to the protestor's qualifications, the suitability of the goods or services offered by the protestor, or alleged irregularities in the procurement process.

§69.35.How does a protestor get copies of applicable protest policies and procedures?

A protestor requests procurement protest policies and procedures from the DHS representative noted in the Electronic State Business Daily award posting.

§69.36.How must a protestor request a review?

The request for review must:

(1) be in writing;

(2) specify reason(s) for the request and provide supporting documentation;

(3) be signed by the person who signed the offer or bid on behalf of the protestor or its successor, unless the protest is of a sole source or emergency procurement;

(4) be delivered to the DHS official contact, as specified in applicable DHS procurement protest policies and procedures; and

(5) be received by DHS within 10 business days after the award notice is posted on the Electronic State Business Daily. If the tenth business day is on a state holiday, the due date rolls forward to the next DHS workday.

§69.37.Are the protest proceedings formal?

No. Procurement protest reviews are informal and are not conducted under the Government Code, Chapter 2001 or 2260.

§69.38.How is a protest review conducted?

The review is conducted as follows:

(1) The part of DHS making the procurement maintains authority for the protest review.

(2) DHS designates a person not involved in the procurement to conduct the review.

(3) DHS, at its sole discretion, may request supplemental oral or written information to complement the information submitted in §69.36(2) of this chapter (relating to How must a protestor request a review?).

(4) To resolve the protest, the reviewer considers information required in §69.36(2) of this chapter and any additional oral or written supplemental information that DHS requests.

(5) DHS completes the review within five workdays of DHS's receipt of the request.

(6) DHS provides a written resolution to the protestor. It is mailed no later than the sixth workday after receipt of the request. The written resolution is DHS's official statement of resolution. Oral comments DHS makes about the protest are not binding.

(7) The period for review and release of the written resolution may be extended at the sole discretion of DHS.

§69.39.What happens to the contract if a protest is filed?

(a) DHS does not finalize a tentative procurement award until DHS provides a written resolution of the protest to the protestor, unless:

(1) there is a bona fide emergency; or

(2) state or federal law requires the award to be completed by a particular date.

(b) If the protest is upheld, a contract required by bona fide emergency or federal or state law is voidable.

§69.40.If a protestor is dissatisfied with the results of the review, is there any other administrative remedy?

The protestor has no further administrative recourse, unless the part of DHS conducting the procurement allows otherwise in its rules.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401195

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter D. SUBGRANTS AND SUBCONTRACTS

40 TAC §§69.51 - 69.55

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.51.Can a DHS contractor carry out its contract by entering into subgrants or subcontracts?

Yes, if approved by the program area. Contractors may enter subgrants or subcontracts but must first obtain DHS's approval of the subgrants and subcontracts.

§69.52.What does DHS consider when deciding whether to approve a subgrant or subcontract?

DHS considers:

(1) whether program requirements are met when a subgrant or subcontract is used;

(2) whether award or purchase requirements are met when a subrecipient or subcontractor is selected; and

(3) if the prime contract instrument contains appropriate provisions regarding subgrants/subcontracts.

§69.53.In what format does DHS give approval?

Approval may take the form of written policy, a contract clause, a letter written in response to a request, or other written means the program area determines.

§69.54.If prior approval is not obtained, what are the potential consequences?

Lack of prior approval is grounds for termination of the prime contract.

§69.55.Must subgrants and subcontracts contain any specific provisions?

Yes. Contractors entering into subgrants and subcontracts must require subrecipients and subcontractors to accept and abide by each of the applicable provisions in the prime contract.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401194

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter E. COST PRINCIPLES

40 TAC §§69.71 - 69.73

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.71.How does DHS determine which costs are allowable?

Allowable costs differ, depending upon the kind of contractor. The following principles must be used to determine allowable costs for contracts in which costs are used in pricing, administration, or settlement:

(1) State, local, or federally recognized Indian tribal governments must use Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87.

(2) Nonprofit organizations must use OMB Circular A-122.

(3) Institutions of higher education must use OMB Circular A-21.

(4) Hospitals must use 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 74, Appendix E.

(5) Commercial organizations and nonprofit organizations listed in OMB Circular A-122, Attachment C, must use the contract cost principles and procedures at 48 CFR Part 31.

§69.72.Must a contractor refer only to federal regulations to determine allowable costs?

No. Some program areas develop guidelines that provide additional program-specific information. In such instances, the contractors must use the program-developed guidelines.

§69.73.Can DHS pay for costs that fall outside a contractor's contract period?

A contractor may charge DHS only allowable costs resulting from obligations incurred during the contract's funding period.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401193

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter F. NONRENEWAL OR REDUCTION OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDS

40 TAC §69.81

The new section is proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new section implements the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.81.What does DHS consider when deciding whether to renew or reduce a subrecipient's block grant funds?

When deciding whether to renew or reduce a subrecipient's block grant funds, DHS considers:

(1) the effectiveness of services rendered by various subrecipients;

(2) the cost efficiency of programs undertaken by each subrecipient;

(3) the extent to which the services of each subrecipient meet the needs of groups or classes of individuals who are poor or underprivileged or have a disability;

(4) the degree to which services can be provided by other programs in that area;

(5) the extent to which clients are involved in the subrecipient's decision making;

(6) the need to provide services in the state without discrimination as to race, religion, or geographic region;

(7) the availability of sufficient block grant funds to continue funding at the current level;

(8) the subrecipient's degree of compliance with the terms of the contract;

(9) the extent to which priorities and need for services change;

(10) changes in state laws or federal regulations resulting in reductions;

(11) the subrecipient's compliance with audit requirements; and

(12) DHS rules requiring or authorizing competition.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401192

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter G. CONTRACT RENEWAL AND TERMINATION

40 TAC §§69.91 - 69.93

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.91.What is renewal?

Renewal materially extends the life of a contract. The renewal is based upon a term, if any, within the contract that allows extension of the contract.

§69.92.Is renewal automatic if a contract contains a renewal clause?

No. However, DHS may renew a contract if:

(1) the contract terms allow renewal;

(2) nothing in law prohibits renewal;

(3) funding is available;

(4) the renewal is justified by a continuing need for the goods, services, or program;

(5) the renewal is justified by the contractor's performance; and

(6) a competitively awarded contract is renewed no more than four times and does not last for more than five years. In exceptional circumstances, the DHS commissioner may extend the time frames.

§69.93.What happens if a contract is terminated?

(a) When a prime contract with a vendor is terminated, DHS conducts a review to determine any overpayment or underpayment, and makes a final review to determine whether the contractor has met the terms, conditions, and specifications of the contract.

(b) Subgrant closeout procedures, including disposition of equipment, are conducted in accordance with procedures in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110, Section __.71:

(1) Subrecipients must submit all financial reports, performance reports, and any other reports required by the terms and conditions of the subgrant within 90 calendar days after the date of completion of the subgrant or sooner if required by a program area. DHS may approve extensions when requested by the subrecipient.

(2) Unless DHS authorizes an extension, a subrecipient must liquidate all obligations incurred under the subgrant not later than 90 calendar days after the funding period or the date of completion as specified in the terms and conditions of the subgrant or in agency implementing instructions.

(3) DHS makes payment within 30 days to a subrecipient for allowable reimbursable costs that are properly billed under the subgrant being closed out.

(4) The subrecipient must promptly refund any balances of unobligated cash that DHS has advanced or paid and that the subrecipient is not authorized to retain.

(5) When authorized by the terms and conditions of the subgrant, DHS makes a settlement for any upward or downward adjustments to DHS's share of costs after receiving closeout reports.

(6) The subrecipient must account for any real and personal property acquired with subgrant funds as required by law.

(7) In the event a final audit has not been performed before the closeout of a subgrant, DHS retains the right to recover an appropriate amount after fully considering the recommendations on disallowed costs resulting from the final audit.

(c) Upon termination of a prime contract, the contractor and each subrecipient and subcontractor are responsible for the prompt settlement of the termination claims, including claims from employees, vendors, subrecipients, and subcontractors.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401191

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter H. DISPUTES

40 TAC §§69.101 - 69.103

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.101.What action may DHS take against a contractor in the case of a dispute?

If a contractor materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of a contract, DHS may take one or more of the following actions:

(1) withhold payments and/or remove clients on all or a portion of a contract pending a dispute resolution or an appeal decision;

(2) disallow all or part of the cost of activity or action not in compliance;

(3) wholly or partly suspend or terminate the contract;

(4) withhold further awards; or

(5) take other remedies that may be legally available.

§69.102.If a contractor does not agree with an action that DHS takes against it, what recourse does the contractor have?

The contractor may appeal the action using the processes in Chapter 79, Subchapter Q, of this title (relating to Formal Appeals).

§69.103.If a contractor and its subrecipient or subcontractor have a grievance that they cannot settle, can they turn to DHS to resolve the grievance?

No. Responsibility for resolution resides with the parties that entered the subgrant or subcontract.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401190

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter I. AUDITS

40 TAC §§69.111 - 69.118

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.111.Is a contractor subject to audit and contract review?

Yes. When a contractor, subcontractor, or subrecipient accepts funds, it also accepts the authority of federal and state governments, including DHS as an agency of state government, to perform reviews and audits and to have access to records as described in Subchapter K of this chapter (relating to Information and Records).

§69.112.What are a contractor's obligations during a review or audit?

During a review or audit, the contractor must give DHS or its authorized representative access to all documentation regarding the contract, including claims for payment. The contractor's documentation must establish that the contractor is entitled to the payments it received.

§69.113.May DHS's review and audit procedures include the use of sampling and extrapolation?

Yes. DHS procedures for contract reviews or audits may include the use of sampling and extrapolation.

§69.114.How are sampling and extrapolation used in a review or audit?

DHS selects a statistically valid sample of the cases or claims for which the contractor received payment during the time covered by the review and examines the records for those cases or claims. All improper payments or units of service in the sample cases or claims are then totaled and extrapolated to all of the cases or claims for which DHS paid the contractor during the audit period.

§69.115.How does DHS determine an extrapolated improper payment?

An improper payment amount is 93% of the total extrapolated improper amount.

§69.116.Which contractors are required to have single audits?

(a) Vendor contracts are not required to have single audits.

(b) DHS notifies contractors if they are subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133. Federal regulations may require subrecipients to obtain an annual single audit.

(1) State and local governments, institutions of higher education, and other nonprofit organizations (including hospitals) designated as subrecipients must refer to the audit requirements contained in the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 United States Code §§7501-7507) and OMB Circular A-133.

(2) For-profit hospitals not covered by the audit provisions of OMB Circular A-133 must refer to the audit requirements of the federal funding source.

(3) Commercial organizations are subject to the audit requirements DHS establishes and incorporates into the contract.

§69.117.Does DHS help pay the costs of a subrecipient's single audit?

If a subrecipient would like for DHS to help pay the cost of the single audit, the subrecipient must obtain DHS's written approval before procuring the single audit.

§69.118.Are there special audit requirements for block grant subrecipients?

If DHS requests it, a block grant subrecipient must provide DHS an annual audit of the contract or evidence that an annual audit has been performed. If law does not require a single audit, another type audit must be performed to meet DHS monitoring requirements.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401189

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter J. RECOVERY OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS

40 TAC §§69.131 - 69.139

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.131.How does DHS recover improper payments to a contractor?

DHS recovers improper payments through recoupment and restitution when DHS verifies that contractors have been overpaid because of improper billing or accounting practices, or for failure to comply with the contract terms.

§69.132.What are recoupment and restitution?

(a) DHS recoups a contractor's debt by offsetting money the contractor owes from money DHS owes the contractor.

(b) A contractor provides restitution by directly paying DHS money the contractor owes.

§69.133.How are improper billing or accounting practices determined?

Improper billing or accounting practices are determined using federal, state, and local laws; DHS rules; contract provisions; and statistical data on program use compiled from paid claims.

§69.134.How does DHS notify a contractor when discrepancies are found?

DHS notifies the contractor in writing of the types of discrepancies, the method of computing the reasonable dollar amount to be refunded, and any actions DHS may take.

§69.135.What recourse does a contractor have if it disagrees with review or audit findings?

The contractor may:

(1) request that DHS conduct an audit of 100% of the contract-related records or an additional audit of the records by sampling; and

(2) may appeal the audit results using the processes in Chapter 79, Subchapter Q, of this title (relating to Formal Appeals).

§69.136.Does the contractor have to pay for additional audit work?

When a contractor requests additional audit work, it must agree to pay the cost of performing the work at current DHS costs. However, DHS absorbs the cost for additional audit work if the work reduces disallowed costs by more than 15%.

§69.137.Can DHS charge interest on outstanding balances on unpaid debts?

Yes. DHS may charge interest on all unpaid debts. Interest is computed in accordance with the Texas Finance Code, Chapter 304, on the unpaid balance due on a simple interest basis. DHS may charge and collect interest on installment payments.

§69.138.How long does a contractor have to make payment before interest begins to accrue?

If the contractor does not pay the full amount due within 30 days of receiving DHS's letter demanding payment, interest begins to accrue on the 31st day.

§69.139.If a contractor files an appeal, does DHS charge interest while the appeal is resolved?

Yes. Interest continues to accrue during any administrative appeal process that extends beyond the 31st day after the contractor receives DHS's letter demanding payment. If any part of an appeal is found in the contractor's favor, the interest that accrued against the part of the appeal that was found in the contractor's favor is dismissed.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401188

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter K. INFORMATION AND RECORDS

40 TAC §§69.151 - 69.160

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.151.Can DHS release applicant and client information to a contractor?

DHS can release information to a contractor about people who apply for or receive assistance from DHS. Release must be for purposes directly connected to the administration of DHS programs.

§69.152.Is there any prohibition on a contractor's use of information about people who apply for or receive assistance from DHS?

Yes. Neither a contractor nor its staff may use applicant or client information for purposes other than to carry out the purposes for which DHS released the information or for which the contractor created the information on behalf of DHS.

§69.153.Under what circumstances can information about people who apply for or receive assistance be released to other entities?

Unless a properly executed applicant/client data release is provided, information cannot be released for purposes other than those for which DHS originally released the information or those for which the contractor created the information on behalf of DHS. The entity receiving the information must agree to DHS conditions that apply to the information.

§69.154.Does a contractor have responsibility for the security of information about people who apply for or receive assistance?

Yes. Contractors must:

(1) provide information security;

(2) protect information privacy;

(3) ensure information confidentiality and integrity;

(4) protect information from loss; and

(5) store, process, transport, transmit, and discard the information in ways that prevent unauthorized individuals from accessing the information.

§69.155.Do state and federal governments have a right to access a contractor's, subrecipient's, or subcontractor's records?

Yes. Contractors, subrecipients, and subcontractors must cooperate fully and provide DHS or its duly authorized representatives access to contract records. Duly authorized representatives include the state auditor, the federal funding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives. The contractor and its subrecipients and subcontractors must make records available at reasonable times and for reasonable periods.

§69.156.What may state and federal authorities and their duly authorized representatives do with the records?

When a contractor, subcontractor, or subrecipient directly or indirectly accepts funds, it also accepts the authority of DHS, the state auditor, the federal funding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, and their duly authorized representatives to perform audits, evaluations, monitoring, investigations, and examinations, and to make transcripts and excerpts.

§69.157.What contractor records need to be accessible?

Books, documents, papers, client records, and other records that are directly pertinent to a contract must be maintained and made accessible upon request. The materials include financial and supporting data, statistical records, and any records pertinent to the deliverables or program components for which a claim or cost report is submitted to DHS or its agent.

§69.158.How long must contractors, subrecipients, and subcontractors keep contract- related records?

(a) The records must be kept for a minimum of three years and 90 days after the end of the contract period. If any litigation, claim, or audit involving these records begins before three years and 90 days expire, the contractor, subrecipient, or subcontractor must keep the records and documents for not less than three years and 90 days or until all litigation, claims, or audit findings are resolved, whichever is longer.

(b) All medical records must be kept for five years from their creation.

§69.159.What must happen to contract-related records upon termination of business operations?

Upon termination of a contract, subgrant, or subcontract, the contractor must ensure that:

(1) records are stored and accessible;

(2) someone is responsible for adequately maintaining the records;

(3) the DHS contract manager is notified in writing about how and where the records will be maintained and whom DHS can contact in order to access the records; and

(4) if information in paragraph (3) of this section changes, the DHS contract manager is notified in writing of the updated information within 10 days of the change.

§69.160.Must the requirements of this subchapter appear in contracts with subrecipients and subcontractors?

Yes. The contractor must ensure that the requirements in this subchapter are included in any subgrant or subcontract it enters under a prime contract with DHS. When a subcontractor provides goods and services for the contractor's direct consumption and has access to applicant and client information, the subcontract must contain requirements in this subchapter relating to use, confidentiality, and security of applicant and client information.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401198

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter L. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION

40 TAC §§69.171 - 69.186

The new sections are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.171.What is the purpose of debarment and suspension?

DHS may apply the remedies of debarment and suspension to exclude participation by contractors and potential contractors that do not serve the best interest of DHS.

§69.172.What do certain words and terms in this subchapter mean?

The words and terms in this subchapter have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Contractor--Individuals or legal entities that have existing DHS contracts or are otherwise participating providers, including subcontractors, subrecipients, subsidiaries or affiliates, or employees that are directly involved in administration of a DHS contract.

(2) Debarment--Termination of rights to continue an existing contract; receive a new contract; participate as a provider or as an employee directly involved in administration of a DHS contract; or make a bid, offer, application, or proposal for a DHS contract. Debarment is for a specific length of time commensurate with the seriousness of the violation, the extent of the violation, prior impositions of sanctions or penalties, willingness to comply with program rules and directives, and other pertinent information. Generally, debarment will not exceed six years. Where conditions warrant, a longer period may be imposed.

(3) Potential contractor--Individuals or legal entities that wish to submit a bid, offer, application, or proposal for a DHS contract, subgrant, or subcontract, or otherwise request participation as a provider.

(4) Suspension of contractual rights--Temporarily withholding rights to conduct business with DHS. A suspension is in effect until an investigation, hearing, or trial is concluded and DHS can make a determination about:

(A) the contractor's future right to contract or subcontract; or

(B) a potential contractor's future right to have DHS consider its offer, bid, proposal, or application.

§69.173.Do debarment and suspension apply to all types of contracts?

(a) The requirements for and restrictions imposed by debarment and suspension found in this chapter apply to all types of contracts DHS enters through its authority to contract found in the Texas Human Resources Code, Chapter 22.

(b) These requirements do not supersede rules in Chapter 79, Subchapter V, of this title (relating to Fraud or Abuse Involving Medical Providers), unless the rule language specifies that they do.

§69.174.Whom may DHS debar or suspend?

(a) DHS may debar or suspend:

(1) an individual;

(2) a corporation;

(3) a partnership; or

(4) a division of a contractor.

(b) The decision to debar or suspend may result from the acts of an individual, corporation, partnership or other association of a contractor, or potential contractor, or a division of the entity.

(c) The resulting debarment or suspension may be effective against any of the parties listed in subsection (a) of this section. The acts that result in debarment or suspension can occur before the association with the contractor. DHS considers remedial actions taken by the responsible officials of the contractor or potential contractor in determining whether debarment or suspension is applied.

§69.175.Does every contract violation result in debarment or suspension?

Even a single occurrence of a violation may result in debarment or suspension if it is severe. Other adverse actions may be taken if the violation is isolated or less severe. Rules governing specific programs may specify sanctions or adverse actions for violations by program contractors.

§69.176.What are the reasons for debarring an individual or entity?

Rights to contract with DHS may be removed for many causes. The decision to debar is based, in part, on the severity of the violation or a pattern of violations. Contractual rights may be removed for reasons including:

(1) debarment from contracting by any unit of the federal government or any unit of a state government;

(2) being found guilty, pleading guilty, pleading no contest, or receiving a deferred adjudication in criminal court relating to:

(A) embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, any form of fraud, receipt of stolen property, or any other offense indicating lack of business integrity or honesty;

(B) drug-related offenses;

(C) violation of federal antitrust statutes related to the submission of bids or proposals; or

(D) physical or sexual abuse or neglect offenses; and

(3) violating contract provisions, including:

(A) failure to comply with applicable federal and state statutes; and

(B) failure to perform according to the terms of one or more contracts, subgrants, or subcontracts. The failure or unsatisfactory performance used to justify debarment must occur within the preceding five years.

§69.177.What is considered failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance?

Failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance includes:

(1) failure to correct contract performance deficiencies after receiving written notice about them;

(2) failure to repay or make satisfactory arrangements to repay overpayments or payments made in error, or to pay assessed monetary damages or penalties;

(3) failure to meet required standards;

(4) failure to maintain required licensure or certification;

(5) failure to execute required contract amendments;

(6) billing for goods or services that are not provided;

(7) falsifying or misrepresenting information in an attempt to increase payment rates or secure a contract; and

(8) failure to make available upon demand records the contractor is required to maintain.

§69.178.Can a contractor employ or subcontract with a debarred individual or entity?

No. If, after finding out about an individual or entity's debarment, the contractor employs, contracts with, or continues to employ or contract with an individual or entity to perform services under a DHS contract, the contractor is subject to adverse action by DHS, including debarment.

§69.179.What is the effect of debarment on the contractor or potential contractor?

Individuals or entities that have been debarred may not:

(1) receive a contract;

(2) retain a contract that was awarded before debarment;

(3) be employed in a position involving administration of a DHS contract;

(4) participate in administration of DHS programs;

(5) bill to or receive payment from DHS for services or supplies provided by the debarred entity on or after the effective date of the debarment; or

(6) include costs associated with the debarred individual or entity on a cost report or other documentation used to determine payment rates or fees.

§69.180.When can DHS suspend a contractor?

DHS may suspend a contractor or potential contractor when there is reason to believe that grounds for debarment exist or if there is an outstanding indictment against the contractor, potential contractor, or an associated individual or entity.

§69.181.What happens during suspension?

During the period of suspension:

(1) payments or a part of a payment may be withheld;

(2) DHS may refuse to accept a bid, offer, application, or proposal from the potential contractor;

(3) DHS may refuse to award a contract to the potential contractor; and

(4) DHS may stop referring potential clients to the suspended entity.

§69.182.What happens if the contractor is able to correct the problems that led to the suspension?

If the contractor is able to correct the problems that led to the suspension, DHS must:

(1) pay withheld payments for eligible services that were provided during the suspension; and

(2) resume contract payments.

§69.183.What happens if the contractor is not able to correct the problems that led to the suspension?

If the contractor is not able to resolve the problems, DHS initiates debarment proceedings.

§69.184.What is sufficient evidence to establish debarment or suspension?

The sufficiency of evidence required depends on the cause of the suspension or debarment.

(1) If there is evidence that the contractor or potential contractor has been found guilty, pled guilty, pled no contest, or received a deferred adjudication in criminal court relating to an activity prohibited in this chapter, that is sufficient evidence to suspend or debar. If the decision that caused debarment is reversed on appeal, the contractor must provide written proof of the reversal to have its contract rights restored. DHS restores contract rights unless the contractor is also debarred or suspended on other grounds.

(2) If the cause is debarment from contracting by any unit of the federal government or any unit of a state government, it is sufficient to offer official notice from the other state or federal agency that the entity has been debarred. The notice may be addressed to either DHS or the debarred entity.

(3) Other causes of debarment or suspension may be established by evidence of failure to meet contracting terms or standards, including evidence of the severity or recurrence of violations of performance requirements.

§69.185.Are there appeal rights for debarred or suspended parties?

Contractors and potential contractors that are placed in suspension or that have been debarred have all the notice and appeal rights provided in Chapter 79 of this title (relating to Legal Services).

§69.186.What must be included in the notices of suspension and debarment?

Notices must include the following, as applicable:

(1) the grounds for the action;

(2) the length of the debarment;

(3) the conditions that might cause a suspension to be released;

(4) a statement explaining the effect of the suspension or debarment; and

(5) a statement of whether the suspension or debarment is in effect throughout DHS.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401199

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 69. CONTRACTED SERVICES

Subchapter L. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

40 TAC §§69.201 - 69.212, 69.220, 69.266, 69.275 - 69.279

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the Texas Department of Human Services or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeals are proposed under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 22, which authorizes DHS to administer public assistance programs.

The repeals implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.040.

§69.201.Scope.

§69.202.Procurement.

§69.203.Subcontracts.

§69.204.Required Disclosure of Current or Previous Employment at the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS).

§69.205.Contractor's Records.

§69.206.Contract Renewal and Termination.

§69.207.Disputes.

§69.208.Methods for Auditing Contracts.

§69.209.Recoupment of Improper Payments.

§69.210.Computing Interest on Unpaid Audit Charges.

§69.211.Prior Approval.

§69.212.Year 2000 Responsibilities.

§69.220.General Services Commission Rules Pertaining to Historically Underutilized Businesses.

§69.266.Reduction or Nonrenewal of Block Grant Contracts.

§69.275.Debarment and Suspension of Current and Potential Contractor's Rights.

§69.276.Causes for and Conditions of Debarment.

§69.277.Causes for and Conditions of Suspension.

§69.278.Proof Required for Debarment and Suspension.

§69.279.Notice Requirements for Debarment and for Suspension.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401200

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 92. LICENSING STANDARDS FOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to amend §92.3, concerning definitions; §92.41, concerning standards for Type A, Type B, and Type E assisted living facilities; §92.62, concerning general requirements; §92.559, concerning What is the administrative penalty schedule?; and new §92.129, concerning authorized electronic monitoring (AEM), in its Licensing Standards for Assisted Living Facilities chapter.

The purpose of the amendments and new section is to implement changes mandated by the 78th Texas Legislature and correct references within the chapter. The amendment to §92.3 adds the definitions for authorized electronic monitoring, covert electronic monitoring, and electronic monitoring device; corrects a licensing standards reference; and corrects the address for the National Fire Protection Association. New §92.129 adds the requirement that AEM be allowed in assisted living facilities and outlines procedures to follow for electronic monitoring. The amendment to §92.559 adds an administrative penalty related to AEM. The amendment to §92.62 adds the requirement for assisted living facilities constructed or licensed after August 1, 2004, to have a central air conditioning system, or a substantially similar air conditioning system, that is capable of maintaining a temperature suitable for resident comfort within areas used by residents. The amendment to §92.41 corrects a reference to the Nursing Practice Act.

Gordon Taylor, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed sections are in effect, there may be a fiscal implication for state government, but not for local government, as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. If an administrative penalty is imposed for violation of the rules on AEM, it would bring in revenue to the state in the amount of the penalty, but it is not possible to anticipate the number of penalties that might be imposed during the first five-year period.

Bettye M. Mitchell, Deputy Commissioner for Long Term Care, has determined that, for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is to (1) allow a resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, to monitor the resident's room through the use of an electronic monitoring device that will provide an avenue to protect the resident from abuse or neglect; (2) ensure a comfortable environment by maintaining facility temperature at a level that is suitable for resident comfort; (3) enhance the public's ability to locate desired information referenced in the rules; and (4) have rules that comply with current state law.

There may be an adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. There is no cost for facilities to allow AEM as the resident, or resident's guardian or legal representative, is responsible for providing and installing the monitoring equipment if they choose to monitor the resident's room. The administrative penalty is not applied for licensed facilities that comply with the rules concerning AEM. Licensed facilities that violate the rules concerning AEM may be assessed an administrative penalty. The requirement for facilities licensed or constructed after August 1, 2004, to have a central air conditioning unit or substantially similar air conditioning system has no effect on currently licensed facilities, and this requirement for new facilities would normally be incorporated in the cost of starting a business. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Jeanoyce Wilson at (512) 438-2353 in DHS's Long Term Care-Regulatory Policy Section. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor, Rules Unit-093, Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register .

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, DHS has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly, DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these rules.

These rules are promulgated by DHS. This state agency is currently scheduled to be merged sometime in 2004 into two successor agencies, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services. This change is mandated by legislation passed by the 78th Legislature.

At the time of that transition, HHSC will have complete authority for these and all related rules. This may result in these rules being changed from one chapter of the Texas Administrative Code to another or other changes.

Subchapter A. INTRODUCTION

40 TAC §92.3

The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living facilities.

The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068

§92.3.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) Authorized electronic monitoring (AEM)--The placement of an electronic monitoring device in a resident's room and using the device to make tapes or recordings after making a request to the facility to allow electronic monitoring.

(5) [ (4) ] Change of ownership--A change: of 50% or more in the ownership of the business organization that is licensed to operate the facility; in the owner holding the facility license; or in the federal tax payer identification number.

(6) [ (5) ] Co-mingles--The laundering of wearing apparel and/or linens of two or more individuals together.

(7) [ (6) ] Controlling person--A person with the ability, acting alone or with others, to directly or indirectly, influence, direct, or cause the direction of the management, expenditure of money, or policies of an assisted living facility or other person. A controlling person includes:

(A) a management company, landlord, or other business entity that operates or contracts with others for the operation of an assisted living facility;

(B) any person who is a controlling person of a management company or other business entity that operates an assisted living facility or that contracts with another person for the operation of an assisted living facility; and

(C) any other individual who, because of a personal, familial, or other relationship with the owner, manager, landlord, tenant, or provider of an assisted living facility, is in a position of actual control or authority with respect to the facility, without regard to whether the individual is formally named as an owner, manager, director, officer, provider, consultant, contractor, or employee of the facility. This does not include an employee, lender, secured creditor, landlord, or other person who does not exercise formal or actual influence or control over the operation of an assisted living facility.

(8) Covert electronic monitoring--The placement and use of an electronic monitoring device that is not open and obvious, and the facility and DHS have not been informed about the device by the resident, by a person who placed the device in the room, or by a person who uses the device.

(9) [ (7) ] DHS--Texas Department of Human Services.

(10) [ (8) ] Dietitian--A person who currently holds a license or provisional license issued by the Texas State Board of Examiners of Dietitians.

(11) [ (9) ] Disclosure statement--A department-designed form for prospective residents or their representatives that each assisted living facility must complete. The form contains information regarding the preadmission, admission, and discharge process; resident assessment and service plans; staffing patterns; the physical environment of the facility; resident activities; and facility services.

(12) Electronic monitoring device--Video surveillance cameras and audio devices installed in a resident's room, designed to acquire communications or other sounds that occur in the room. An electronic, mechanical, or other device used specifically for the nonconsensual interception of wire or electronic communication is excluded from this definition.

(13) [ (10) ] Facility--An establishment under the scope of Assisted Living Facility Licensing Act, Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which furnishes room, board, and one or more personal care services.

(14) [ (11) ] Fire Suppression Authority--The paid or volunteer fire-fighting organization or tactical unit that is responsible for fire suppression operations and related duties once a fire incident occurs within its jurisdiction.

(15) [ (12) ] Governmental unit--The state or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision, or any department, division, board, or other agency of any of the foregoing.

(16) [ (13) ] Health care professional--An individual licensed, certified, or otherwise authorized to administer health care, for profit or otherwise, in the ordinary course of business or professional practice. The term includes a physician, registered nurse, licensed vocational nurse, licensed dietitian, physical therapist, and occupational therapist.

(17) [ (14) ] Immediate threat--There is considered to be an immediate threat to the health or safety of a resident, or a situation is considered to put the health or safety of a resident in immediate jeopardy, if there is a situation in which an assisted living facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of licensure has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident.

(18) [ (15) ] Immediately available--The capacity of facility staff to immediately respond to an emergency after being notified through a communication and/or alarm system. The staff is to be no more than 600 feet from the farthest resident.

(19) [ (16) ] Management services--Services provided under contract between the owner of a facility and a person to provide for the operation of a facility, including administration, staffing, maintenance, or delivery of resident services. Management services do not include contracts solely for maintenance, laundry, or food services.

(20) [ (17) ] Manager--The individual in charge of the day-to-day operation of the facility.

(21) [ (18) ] Medication--Medication is any substance:

(A) recognized as a drug in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, Official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, Texas Drug Code Index or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of these official documents;

(B) intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease;

(C) other than food intended to affect the structure or any function of the body;

(D) intended for use as a component of any substance specified in this definition. It does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories.

(22) [ (19) ] Medication administration--The direct application of a medication or drug to the body of a resident by an individual legally allowed to administer medication in the State of Texas.

(23) [ (20) ] Medication assistance or supervision--The assistance or supervision of the medication regimen by facility staff. Refer to §92.41(j) [ §92.41(i) ] of this chapter (relating to Standards for Type A, Type B, and Type E Assisted Living Facilities).

(24) [ (21) ] Medication (self-administration)--The capability of residents to administer their own medication/treatments without assistance from the facility staff.

(25) [ (22) ] NFPA 101--The 1988 publication titled "NFPA 101 Life Safety Code" published by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc., 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169 [ 02269 ].

(26) [ (23) ] Person--Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or joint stock association, and the legal successor thereof.

(27) [ (24) ] Person with a disclosable interest--Any person who owns 5.0% interest in any corporation, partnership, or other business entity that is required to be licensed under Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247. A person with a disclosable interest does not include a bank, savings and loan, savings bank, trust company, building and loan association, credit union, individual loan and thrift company, investment banking firm, or insurance company unless such entity participates in the management of the facility.

(28) [ (25) ] Personal care services--Assistance with meals, dressing, movement, bathing, or other personal needs or maintenance; the administration of medication or the assistance with or supervision of medication; or general supervision or oversight of the physical and mental well-being of a person who needs assistance to maintain a private and independent residence in the facility or who needs assistance to manage his or her personal life, regardless of whether a guardian has been appointed for the person.

(29) [ (26) ] Physician--A practitioner licensed by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners.

(30) [ (27) ] Resident--Anyone accepted for care in the assisted living facility.

(31) [ (28) ] Respite--The provision by a facility of room, board, and care at the level ordinarily provided for permanent residents of the facility to a person for not more than 60 days for each stay in the facility.

(32) [ (29) ] Restraints--Chemical restraints are psychoactive drugs administered for the purposes of discipline or convenience and are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Physical restraints are any manual method, or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident that restricts freedom of movement.

(33) [ (30) ] Safety--Protection from injury or loss of life due to such conditions as fire, electrical hazard, unsafe building or site conditions, and the hazardous presence of toxic fumes and materials.

(34) [ (31) ] Seclusion--The placement of a resident apart from other residents for any period of time in an area from which egress is prevented.

(35) [ (32) ] Service plan--A written description of the medical care or the supervision and non-medical care needed by a person.

(36) [ (33) ] Short-term acute episode--An illness of less than 30 days duration.

(37) [ (34) ] Staff--Any employee of an assisted living facility.

(38) [ (35) ] Standards--The minimum licensing standards in Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Standards for Licensure) intended to protect the health and safety of the residents.

(39) [ (36) ] Terminal condition--A medical diagnosis, certified by a physician, of an illness that will result in death in six months or less.

(40) [ (37) ] Universal precautions--An approach to infection control in which blood, any body fluids visibly contaminated with blood, and all body fluids in situations where it is difficult or impossible to differentiate between body fluids are treated as if known to be infectious for HIV, hepatitis B, and other blood-borne pathogens.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401201

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter C. STANDARDS FOR LICENSURE

40 TAC §92.41

The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living facilities.

The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068

§92.41.Standards for Type A, Type B, and Type E Assisted Living Facilities.

(a) - (i) (No change.)

(j) Medications.

(1) Administration. Medications must be administered according to physician's orders.

(A) Residents who choose not to or cannot self-administer their medications must have their medications administered by a person who:

(i) - (ii) (No change.)

(iii) is an employee of the facility to whom the administration of medication has been delegated by a registered nurse, who has trained them to administer medications or verified their training. The delegation of the administration of medication is governed by 22 TAC Chapter 225 (concerning RN Delegation to Unlicensed Personnel and Tasks Not Requiring Delegation in Independent Living Environments for Clients with Stable and Predictable Conditions) [ 218 (concerning Delegation of Selected Nursing Tasks by Registered Professional Nurses to Unlicensed Personnel) ], which implements the Nursing [ Nurse ] Practice Act.

(B) - (D) (No change.)

(2) - (6) (No change.)

(k) - (p) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401202

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter D. FACILITY CONSTRUCTION

40 TAC §92.62

The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living facilities.

The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068

§92.62.General Requirements.

(a) - (h) (No change.)

(i) General safety features.

(1) - (9) (No change.)

(10) Cooling and heating must be provided for occupant comfort. Conditioning systems must be capable of maintaining the comfort ranges of 68 degrees Fahrenheit to 82 degrees Fahrenheit in resident-use areas. A facility constructed or licensed after August 1, 2004, must have a central air conditioning system, or a substantially similar air conditioning system, that is capable of maintaining a temperature suitable for resident comfort within areas used by residents. Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment must comply with the provisions of NFPA 90A or 90B, as applicable. NFPA 90A requires automatic shut down upon activation of the fire alarm in HVAC systems of over 2,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) capacity.

(11) - (15) (No change.)

(j) - (m) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401203

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter G. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

40 TAC §92.129

The new section is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living facilities.

The new section implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068

§92.129.Authorized Electronic Monitoring (AEM).

(a) A facility must permit a resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, to monitor the resident's room through the use of electronic monitoring devices.

(b) A facility may not refuse to admit an individual and may not discharge a resident because of a request to conduct authorized electronic monitoring.

(c) The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) Information Regarding Authorized Electronic Monitoring form must be signed by or on behalf of all new residents upon admission. The form must be completed and signed by or on behalf of all current residents by October 1, 2004. A copy of the form must be maintained in the active portion of the resident's clinical record.

Figure: 40 TAC §92.129(c)

(d) A resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, who wishes to conduct AEM must request AEM by giving a completed, signed, and dated DHS Request for Authorized Electronic Monitoring form to the manager or designee. A copy of the form must be maintained in the active portion of the resident's clinical record.

(1) If a resident has the capacity to request AEM and has not been judicially declared to lack the required capacity, only the resident may request AEM, notwithstanding the terms of any durable power of attorney or similar instrument.

(2) If a resident has been judicially declared to lack the capacity required to request AEM, only the guardian of the resident may request AEM.

(3) If a resident does not have the capacity to request AEM and has not been judicially declared to lack the required capacity, only the legal representative of the resident may request AEM.

(A) A resident's physician makes the determination regarding the capacity to request AEM. Documentation of the determination must be made in the resident's clinical record.

(B) When a resident's physician determines the resident lacks the capacity to request AEM, a person from the following list, in order of priority, may act as the resident's legal representative for the limited purpose of requesting AEM:

(i) a person named in the resident's medical power of attorney or other advance directive;

(ii) the resident's spouse;

(iii) an adult child of the resident who has the waiver and consent of all other qualified adult children of the resident to act as the sole decision-maker;

(iv) a majority of the resident's reasonably available adult children;

(v) the resident's parents; or

(vi) the individual clearly identified to act for the resident by the resident before the resident became incapacitated or the resident's nearest living relative.

(e) A resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, who wishes to conduct AEM also must obtain the consent of other residents in the room, using the DHS Consent to Authorized Electronic Monitoring form. When complete, the form must be given to the manager or designee. A copy of the form must be maintained in the active portion of the resident's clinical record.

(1) Consent to AEM may be given only by:

(A) the other resident or residents in the room;

(B) the guardian of the other resident, if the resident has been judicially declared to lack the required capacity; or

(C) the legal representative of the other resident, determined by following the same procedure established under subsection (d)(3) of this section.

(2) Another resident in the room may condition consent on:

(A) pointing the camera away from the consenting resident, when the proposed electronic monitoring is a video surveillance camera; and

(B) limiting or prohibiting the use of an audio electronic monitoring device.

(3) AEM must be conducted in accordance with any limitation placed on the monitoring as a condition of the consent given by or on behalf of another resident in the room. The resident's roommate, or the roommate's guardian or legal representative, assumes responsibility for assuring AEM is conducted according to the designated limitations.

(4) If AEM is being conducted in a resident's room, and another resident is moved into the room who has not yet consented to AEM, the monitoring must cease until the new resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, consents.

(f) When the completed DHS Request for Authorized Electronic Monitoring form and the DHS Consent to Authorized Electronic Monitoring form, if applicable, have been given to the manager or designee, AEM may begin.

(1) Anyone conducting AEM must post and maintain a conspicuous notice at the entrance to the resident's room. The notice must state that the room is being monitored by an electronic monitoring device.

(2) The resident, or the resident's guardian or legal representative, must pay for all costs associated with conducting AEM, including installation in compliance with life safety and electrical codes, maintenance, removal of the equipment, posting and removal of the notice, or repair following removal of the equipment and notice, other than the cost of electricity.

(3) The facility must meet residents' requests to have a video camera obstructed to protect their dignity.

(4) The facility must make reasonable physical accommodation for AEM, which includes providing:

(A) a reasonably secure place to mount the video surveillance camera or other electronic monitoring device; and

(B) access to power sources for the video surveillance camera or other electronic monitoring device.

(g) All facilities, regardless of whether AEM is being conducted, must post an 8 1/2-inch by 11- inch notice at the main facility entrance. The notice must be entitled "Electronic Monitoring" and must state, in large, easy-to-read type, "The rooms of some residents may be monitored electronically by or on behalf of the residents. Monitoring may not be open and obvious in all cases."

(h) A facility may:

(1) require an electronic monitoring device to be installed in a manner that is safe for residents, employees, or visitors who may be moving about the room, and meets all local and state regulations;

(2) require AEM to be conducted in plain view; and

(3) place a resident in a different room to accommodate a request for AEM.

(i) A facility may not discharge a resident because covert electronic monitoring is being conducted by or on behalf of a resident. If a facility discovers a covert electronic monitoring device and it is no longer covert as defined in §92.3 of this chapter (relating to Definitions), the resident must meet all the requirements for AEM before monitoring is allowed to continue.

(j) All instances of abuse or neglect must be reported to DHS, as required by §92.102 of this chapter (relating to Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation Reportable to the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) by Facilities). For purposes of the duty to report abuse or neglect, the following apply:

(1) A person who is conducting electronic monitoring on behalf of a resident is considered to have viewed or listened to a tape or recording made by the electronic monitoring device on or before the 14th day after the date the tape or recording is made.

(2) If a resident, who has capacity to determine that the resident has been abused or neglected and who is conducting electronic monitoring, gives a tape or recording made by the electronic monitoring device to a person and directs the person to view or listen to the tape or recording to determine whether abuse or neglect has occurred, the person to whom the resident gives the tape or recording is considered to have viewed or listened to the tape or recording on or before the seventh day after the date the person receives the tape or recording.

(3) A person is required to report abuse based on the person's viewing of or listening to a tape or recording only if the incident of abuse is acquired on the tape or recording. A person is required to report neglect based on the person's viewing of or listening to a tape or recording only if it is clear from viewing or listening to the tape or recording that neglect has occurred.

(4) If abuse or neglect of the resident is reported to the facility and the facility requests a copy of any relevant tape or recording made by an electronic monitoring device, the person who possesses the tape or recording must provide the facility with a copy at the facility's expense. The cost of the copy must not exceed the community standard. If the contents of the tape or recording are transferred from the original technological format, a qualified professional must do the transfer.

(5) A person who sends more than one tape or recording to DHS must identify each tape or recording on which the person believes an incident of abuse or evidence of neglect may be found. Tapes or recordings should identify the place on the tape or recording that an incident of abuse or evidence of neglect may be found.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401204

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter H. ENFORCEMENT

9. ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES

40 TAC §92.559

The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 247, which authorizes DHS to license and regulate assisted living facilities.

The amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, §§247.001-247.068

§92.559.What is the administrative penalty schedule?

The administrative penalty schedule lists the gradations of administrative penalty fees:

Figure: 40 TAC §92.559

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2004.

TRD-200401205

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 4, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734