TITLE 4.AGRICULTURE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Chapter 3. BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION PROGRAM

The Texas Department of Agriculture (the department) proposes new Chapter 3, Subchapter E, §3.119, concerning the creation of a nonstatutory boll weevil eradication zone for the Lower Rio Grande Valley, and the repeal of Subchapter G, §3.300, concerning the transfer of Glassock County to an active boll weevil eradication zone. New §3.119 is proposed to designate a new nonstatutory boll weevil eradication zone consisting of the counties in the Texas Lower Rio Grande Valley which are not included in another established boll weevil eradication zone, in order to allow cotton producers in the proposed area an opportunity to establish a manageable, efficient eradication program that meets the local needs of producers. The repeal of §3.300 is proposed to eliminate an unnecessary section. Glassock County is now included as part of the St. Lawrence Boll Weevil Eradication Zone, which has recently voted in an eradication program. New §3.119 establishes the Lower Rio Grande Valley Boll Weevil Eradication Zone consisting of all of Brooks, Cameron, Hidalgo, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Maverick, Starr, Webb, Willacy, and Zapata counties. A grower referendum will be conducted to determine whether or not a boll weevil eradication program and assessment will be approved in the area proposed as the Lower Rio Grande Valley Zone. The repeal of §3.300 eliminates this section, which transferred Glassock County from the St. Lawrence Boll Weevil Eradication Zone to the Permian Basin Zone.

Brian Murray, special assistant for producer relations, has determined that for the first five-year period the new section and repeal are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new section or the repeal. Costs of administering §3.119 will be borne by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation. Should the Lower Rio Grande Valley Boll Weevil Eradication Zone become active upon grower referendum, producer, state and federal funds will be utilized in active eradication. Amounts are not determinable at this time, as no formal budget has been developed.

Mr. Murray also has determined that for each year of the first five years §3.119 is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to allow the area to vote on a Boll Weevil Eradication program thus allowing the potential that the entire Lower Rio Grande Valley will be under active eradication. The public benefit of the repeal of §3.300 will be the elimination of unnecessary rules. There will be an economic effect on micro-businesses or small businesses and/or to persons acting as cotton growers who are required to comply with new §3.119. The cost to these entities will be dependent upon the maximum grower assessment approved by cotton growers in the zone. There will be no economic effect on micro-businesses or small businesses and/or to persons acting as cotton growers who are required to comply with the repeal of §3.300.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Brian Murray, Special Assistant for Producer Relations, Texas Department of Agriculture, P. O. Box 12847, and Austin, Texas 78711. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

Subchapter E. CREATION OF ERADICATION ZONES

4 TAC §3.119

The new section is proposed under the Texas Agriculture Code, §74.120, which provides the commissioner of agriculture with the authority to adopt rules to carry out the purposes of Chapter 74; §74.1042, which provides the commissioner of agriculture with the authority to designate by rule an area of the state as a proposed boll weevil eradication zone.

The code affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, Subchapter D.

§3.119.Lower Rio Grande Valley Boll Weevil Eradication Zone.

The Lower Rio Grande Valley Boll Weevil Eradication Zone shall consist of the following area: all of Brooks, Cameron, Hidalgo, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Maverick, Starr, Webb, Willacy, and Zapata counties.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 28, 2004.

TRD-200403614

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 11, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Subchapter G. TRANSFER OR ADDITION OF AREAS FROM ONE ERADICATION ZONE TO ANOTHER ZONE

4 TAC §3.300

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Department of Agriculture or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal is proposed under the Texas Agriculture Code (the code), §74.120, which provides the commissioner of agriculture with the authority to adopt rules to carry out the purposes of Chapter 74; and §74.108, which provides the commissioner of agriculture with the authority to transfer by rule an area from one boll weevil eradication zone to another.

The code affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, Subchapter D.

§3.300.Glassock County.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 28, 2004.

TRD-200403615

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 11, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Chapter 20. COTTON PEST CONTROL

The Texas Department of Agriculture (the department) proposes amendments to §20.1, §20.3, §20.10, §20.16, §20.20 and §20.22, concerning cotton pest control regulations. The amendments are being proposed with the intent to clarify certain terminology and formalize current practices. Terms in §20.1 have been eliminated or modified for clarification purposes. Language has been added to §20.3(b)(1) related to violations and enforcement actions to provide for current department practices and procedures. The scientific name of the boll weevil has been corrected in §20.10. In §20.16, the exceptions to restrictions are clarified. The boundaries for Zone 2, Areas 3 and 4, are being amended in §20.20(b)(4) in response to a request from that zone's Cotton Producers Advisory Committee (CPAC). Stalk destruction requirements in §20.22(a) for Zone 9 are being changed at the request of their CPAC to require only shredding and to establish a stalk destruction deadline of February first. The graphic containing the stalk destruction deadlines has been simplified by the deletion of planting dates, which are not set for many zones and are not used for regulatory purposes.

Language in §20.22 related to alternative methods of destruction has been eliminated because past rule changes have set non-hostability as the standard for destruction in zones 1-8, a change that makes this option irrelevant for those zones. Any alternative methods of destruction in zones 9 and 10 will be considered by the CPAC and appropriate rule changes can be made at that time. In §20.22(b)(6), re-growth is included as a basis for individual extensions for cotton that had been previously brought into compliance with stalk destruction requirements.

The department is proposing a new §20.22(c) to provide for current department practices and procedures. This new section gives the department the option of suspending enforcement activities in any zone, area, or county when weather or other conditions (including possible homeland security issues) temporarily prevent enforcement activities. Changes in §20.22(d) are made to clarify the cut-off date for the accrual of penalties.

Dr. Robert Crocker, Coordinator for Pest Management and Citrus Programs, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect there will be no anticipated fiscal impact for state and local governments as a result of administering or enforcing the rules, as proposed.

Dr. Crocker also has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering and enforcing the sections will be to provide cotton stalk destruction dates more appropriate to local growing conditions, increasing compliance and streamlining extension procedures. The amendments also benefit the public by minimizing the risk of artificial re-infestation of a restricted area by boll weevils, thereby protecting the investment that cotton producers and the State of Texas have made to eradicate the pest. There is no cost anticipated to micro-businesses, small businesses or individuals required to comply with the amendments.

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

4 TAC §20.1, §20.3

The amendments are proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74, Subchapter A; and §74.122, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules relating to quarantining areas of Texas that are infested with the boll weevil, including rules addressing the storage and movement of regulated articles into and out of a quarantined area.

The code that is affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74.

§20.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

[ (1) Alternative method of destruction-Any means other than the specified method of cotton stalk destruction for a designated zone mentioned in §20.22 of this title (relating to Stalk Destruction Requirements).]

(1) [ (2) ] Certificate--A phytosanitary certificate issued by an authorized representative of the department allowing the movement of plants or plant products, or a document issued by an authorized representative of the department allowing the movement of equipment or vehicles.

(2) [ (3) ] Certified Cotton Producer Organization--An organization approved and certified under the requirements established by the National Cotton Council.

(3) [ (4) ] Compliance agreement--A written agreement signed by a person engaged in growing, distributing, handling or moving regulated articles whereby, he or she agrees to comply with conditions specified in the agreement concerning the basis upon which a certificate may be issued for movement of regulated articles or for the purposes of compliance with applicable rules.

(4) [ (5) ] Cotton-- Any [ All ] parts of cotton or [ and ] wild cotton plants ; this definition includes all members of the genera Gossypium and Thurberia.

(5) [ (6) ] Cotton destruction date--The date established in this chapter for the destruction of cotton stalks.

(6) [ (7) ] Cotton lint--All forms of raw ginned cotton except linters and gin waste.

(7) [ (8) ] Cotton products--Seed cotton, cotton lint, linters, oil mill waste, gin waste, squares, bolls, gin trash, cotton seed, cottonseed hulls, and all other forms of unmanufactured cotton fiber.

(8) [ (9) ] Cotton seed--The seed of the cotton plant, separated from lint.

(9) [ (10) ] Destroyed, or destruction--Killed (including [ by cutting or dislodging the roots, burying the entire plant, or by an alternative method which completely kills ] the leaves, stems, flowers, fruit, and roots ) or rendered non hostable. [ of the plant. Applicable to Zones 9 and 10. ]

(10) [ (11) ] Eradicated area--An area apparently free of boll weevil or, for which scientific documentation acceptable to the department has been provided that indicates that no boll weevils were captured for a period of at least one cotton growing season by weevil pheromone traps operated by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation or other governmental agency.

(11) [ (12) ] Eradication area--A defined area in which a boll weevil eradication program has been initiated.

(12) [ (13) ] Foundation--The Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc.

(13) [ (14) ] Functionally eradicated area--An area meeting the trapping criteria for a suppressed area with no confirmed evidence of boll weevil reproduction occurring in the area and no oviposition in squares, and in which the movement of regulated articles presents a threat to the success of the boll weevil eradication program. The boll weevil population must be equal to or less than an average of 0.001 boll weevils per trap per week for the cotton growing season as measured by boll weevil pheromone traps operated by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation or other governmental agency.

(14) [ (15) ] Gin motes--Short fragments of unmanufactured cotton fiber removed from lint cleaners after ginning cotton.

(15) [ (16) ] Gin trash--All material produced during the cleaning and ginning of seed cotton, except lint, linters, cotton seed, and gin waste.

(16) [ (17) ] Gin waste--All forms of unmanufactured waste cotton fiber resulting from the ginning of seed cotton, including gin motes.

(17) [ (18) ] Hostable material [ cotton ]--Cotton [ that has ] fruiting structures such as buds, squares, flowers or bolls [ present ].

(18) [ (19) ] Linters--Residual unmanufactured cotton fiber separated from cottonseed after the lint has been removed.

(19) [ (20) ] Non-hostable [ cotton-Cotton ] --Refers to cotton that is free of fruiting structures such as buds, squares, flowers or bolls [ in Zones 1 - 8 ].

(20) [ (21) ] Oil mill waste--Waste products, including linters, derived from the milling of cottonseed.

(21) [ (22) ] Plow--To dislodge or sever the roots of plants in a manner which prevents further growth. Equipment used to accomplish this could include a stalk puller, any type of plow, or similar implement.

(22) [ (23) ] Protection plan--A plan developed for the purpose of mitigating, with the goal of preventing, boll weevil infestation and establishment in an area. Mitigating measures may include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A) the field treatment of cotton and cotton products prior to delivery to an area or a gin by an approved insecticide;

(B) requirements for moving, handling, storage and treatment or use of approved insecticide applications to regulated articles; and

(C) monitoring of boll weevils at a specified site(s) as approved by the department.

(23) [ (24) ] Regrowth cotton--Cotton that has not been completely destroyed in such a way as to absolutely prevent further growth.

(24) [ (25) ] Restricted Area--An area designated as suppressed, functionally eradicated, or eradicated of boll weevils, as those terms are defined in this section.

(25) [ (26) ] Seed cotton--All forms of un-ginned cotton from which the seed has not been separated.

(26) [ (27) ] Stalk puller--An implement which dislodges the roots of cotton plants by pulling up the stalks.

(27) [ (28) ] Standing stalks--Original, undestroyed cotton plants growing in a field before or after harvesting.

(28) [ (29) ] Suppressed area--An area in which some boll weevil reproduction may be present in the area or a portion thereof, and in which the movement of regulated articles presents a threat to the success of the boll weevil eradication program The boll weevil population must be equal to or less than 0.025 boll weevils per trap per week for the cotton-growing season as measured by boll weevil pheromone traps operated by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation or other governmental agency.

(29) [ (30) ] Trap--type of adult boll weevil pheromone trap approved by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation.

(30) [ (31) ] Treatment--The act of eliminating possible cotton pest infestation(s) by means of cleaning, spraying or fumigation to eliminate the infestation.

(31) [ (32) ] Volunteer cotton--For purposes of this chapter, cotton developing from incidental seeds after the growing season between harvest and planting the next year's crop.

§20.3.Violations and Enforcement Actions.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Enforcement Actions.

(1) The department may direct any means of conveyance containing plants, plant products, or other items susceptible to cotton pest contamination to an authorized inspection point for treatment or reinspection prior to entering a restricted area. To minimize the risk of contamination of a restricted area by such means of conveyance discovered or apprehended in restricted areas, the department may seize and maintain control over the means of conveyance and it's relevant contents until the department is satisfied that they are safely decontaminated or that they no longer pose a threat to the quarantine. Any costs associated with such decontamination (including the cost of decontamination, transportation of the means of conveyance, destruction of contaminated materials, and special materials that the department may deem necessary to prevent regulated materials from leaving the means of conveyance) are the responsibility of the violator(s).

(2) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 28, 2004.

TRD-200403635

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 11, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Subchapter B. QUARANTINE REQUIREMENTS

4 TAC §20.10, §20.16

The amendments are proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74, Subchapter A; and §74.122, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules relating to quarantining areas of Texas that are infested with the boll weevil, including rules addressing the storage and movement of regulated articles into and out of a quarantined area.

The code that is affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74.

§20.10.Quarantined Pest.

The quarantined pest is the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman [ Boheman ], in any living stage of development.

§20.16.Restrictions.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) Exceptions. The following are exceptions to the restrictions in subsection (a) of this section:

(1) Cotton harvesting equipment and other equipment associated with the production and transport of cotton as well as used gin equipment, otherwise prohibited from movement by these rules, may be moved to or through a restricted area provided the equipment is free of hostable material, seed cotton [ cotton products ] and boll weevils in any stage of development or treated in one of the following manners:

(A) physical removal of hostable material and seed cotton including, but not limited to, the following methods:

(i) - (iii) (No change.)

(B) (No change.)

(2) - (3) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 28, 2004.

TRD-200403636

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 11, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Subchapter C. STALK DESTRUCTION PROGRAM

4 TAC §20.20, §20.22

The amendments are proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74, Subchapter A; §74.004 which provides the department with the authority to establish regulated areas, dates and appropriate methods of destruction of stalks, other cotton parts and products of host plants for cotton pests; and §74.122, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules relating to quarantining areas of Texas that are infested with the boll weevil, including rules addressing the storage and movement of regulated articles into and out of a quarantined area.

The code that is affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74.

§20.20.Pest Management Zones.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Zones. Established zones include the following counties:

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) Zone 2, Area (3). Aransas except for that part north of Copano Bay (including but not limited to Lamar and Blackjack peninsulas) , San Patricio and south and east of U.S. Highway 59 in Bee and Live Oak.

(5) Zone 2, Area (4). Aransas north of Copano Bay (including but not limited to Lamar and Blackjack peninsulas), Calhoun, Goliad, LaSalle, McMullen, Refugio, Victoria and north and west of U.S. Highway 59 in Bee and Live Oak.

(6) - (15) (No change.)

§20.22.Stalk Destruction Requirements.

(a) Deadlines and methods. All cotton plants in pest management zones 1-8 shall be rendered non-hostable by the stalk destruction dates indicated for the zone. Destruction shall periodically be formed to prevent the presence of fruiting structures. Destruction of all cotton plants shall be accomplished in Zone 9 by shredding [ Zones 9 ] and in Zone 10 [ shall be accomplished ] by shredding and plowing and completely burying the stalk. Soil should be tilled to a depth of [ 2 or more inches in Zone 9 and to a depth of ] 6 or more inches in Zone 10.

Figure: 4 TAC §20.22(a)

[ (b) Alternative destruction. Alternative methods of destruction are allowed except in Zones 9 and 10 without notifying the department. Exceptions to the standard destruction method in Zones 9 and 10 will be considered by the Cotton Producer Advisory Committee for those zones on a case by case basis.]

(b) [ (c) ] Deadline extensions.

(1) The department may, on written request by a farm owner and/or operator, grant an extension of the cotton destruction deadline in any pest management zone. Requests for extensions in any zone may be granted for the reasons listed in subparagraphs (A)-(E) of this paragraph:

(A) research conducted inside a sealed greenhouse or lab;

(B) weather factors;

(C) illness;

(D) mechanical failure; or

(E) other good cause.

(2) The department may grant a blanket extension of the destruction deadline covering an entire cotton stalk destruction zone or a portion of an entire zone in any one of the following circumstances:

(A) in response to a written request by the cotton producer advisory committee, in a given zone authorized and signed by a majority of the committee members;

(B) in response to a written request by the chairman of the cotton producer advisory committee, or his designee, on behalf of the committee; or

(C) in response to a significant number of individual written requests for individual extensions from cotton producers in a given zone as the result of an extreme weather event such as prolonged periods of heavy rain, prolonged periods of drought, a tropical storm, a hurricane, or other such extreme weather event.

(3) A blanket extension may be implemented at the department's own initiative if a zone or other area experiences a serious unforeseen condition that prevents the department from surveying fields for compliance or which clearly makes compliance by a substantial majority of producers impossible.

(4) Request forms may be obtained from any of the following locations within a cotton pest management zone:

(A) County Extension office;

(B) Farm Service Agency office; or

(C) Texas Department of Agriculture.

(5) Failure to complete the form entirely may result in denial of the request.

(6) All requests for extensions shall be postmarked on or prior to the cotton destruction deadline. However, if a field is in compliance with destruction requirements on the deadline, but later is in violation due to regrowth or volunteer cotton with fruiting structures as a result of extended periods of wet weather that does not allow for mechanical destruction, an extension request may be submitted after the deadline. Once a field has been declared a public nuisance by the department, no extension requests will be granted.

(c) Enforcement suspensions.

(1) The department may temporarily suspend cotton stalk destruction deadline enforcement activities in a zone or portion thereof, due to conditions that temporarily prevent enforcement activities.

(2) During an enforcement suspension, for the zone or portion thereof under suspension, no new violations of the cotton stalk destruction deadline will be documented; compliance deadlines for previously recorded violations of the deadline will not advance; and penalty periods related to the deadline will not accrue.

(3) At the end of the enforcement suspension, all suspended activities and processes will resume, at the point where they had left off.

(d) Once a new cotton crop is planted in an area for commercial purposes [ a zone ] and has emerged, the requirement to destroy original growth, regrowth, or volunteer cotton from the previous crop year shall end [ until after the next harvest ]. Violations arising prior to the emergence date of cotton planted for commercial purposes [ planting of a new crop ] in a zone will be pursued, but penalties shall cease to accrue on that date.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 28, 2004.

TRD-200403637

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 11, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075