TITLE 10.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Part 7. TEXAS RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION

Chapter 300. ADMINISTRATION

10 TAC §300.5

The Texas Residential Construction Commission (the "commission") adopts a new section at Title 10, Part 7, Chapter 300, §300.5 regarding the establishment of statutorily mandated task forces pursuant to provisions of the Property Code Chapters 430 and 436 and in accordance with Government Code Chapter 2110, regarding advisory committees. The new section is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the May 7, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 4365). The new section is adopted to implement provisions of House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01) and specifically provisions of Chapter 430, Property Code, and in accordance with Government Code Chapter 2110, regarding advisory committees.

Section 300.5, relating to Task Forces, provides for the commission's appointment of members to three separate task forces for purposes of obtaining advice in areas of mold reduction and remediation, rain harvesting and water recycling, and residential arbitrators and arbitration. The section further provides for the composition, responsibilities, meeting requirements and reporting requirements for each task force.

No comments were received regarding the adoption of this section.

The purpose of the new section is to establish statutorily mandated task forces to advise the commission in areas of mold reduction and remediation, rain harvesting and water recycling, and residential arbitrators and arbitration. The section further provides for the composition, responsibilities, meeting requirements and reporting requirements for each task force.

The new section is adopted under Property Code §408.001, which provides general authority for the commission to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of Title 16; Property Code §430.003, which provides for the establishment of a task force concerning mold reduction and remediation; Property Code §430.004, which provides for the establishment of a task force to develop design recommendations for rain harvesting and water recycling; Property Code §436.004, which provides for the establishment of a task force concerning residential arbitrators and arbitration; and Gov't Code Chapter 2110, which relates to agency advisory committees.

The statutory provisions affected by the adoption are set forth in the Title 16, Property Code §§408.001, 430.003, 430.004, and 436.004 and Gov't Code Chapter 2110.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the adoption.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 21, 2004.

TRD-200404038

Susan Durso

General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Effective date: July 11, 2004

Proposal publication date: May 7, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9638


Chapter 301. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS

10 TAC §301.1

The Texas Residential Construction Commission (the "commission") adopts a new section at Title 10, Part 7, Chapter 301, §301.1, concerning definitions to be used in construing agency rules promulgated to implement the Texas Residential Construction Commission Act, Title 16, Property Code.

The commission is adopting this section to assist those who use the commission’s rules by providing terminology that will enable users to better understand and use the sections adopted.

The new section is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the January 9, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 269).

Written comments were received regarding this adoption. All written comments were due by February 9, 2004. Written comments were submitted by Jay Dyer of the Texas Association of Builders ("TAB") and John Cobarruvias of Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings ("HADD"). No party requested a hearing pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code §2001.029.

In a letter dated February 5, 2004, TAB submitted a number of proposed changes to the proposed text in its written comments. TAB proposed that the reference to the Texas Residential Construction Act ("the Act") in the "builder" definition should be deleted to increase readability. The purpose of the definitions section is to provide guidance to rule-users in reading the agency rules, not to repeat statutory definitions. Offering the introductory statutory reference to which TAB objects assists by directing rule-users to the full definition if the user determines that would be of further help. However, because the section definition is not as comprehensive as the statutory definition, TAB’s comment raises a question as to whether the inclusion of the statutory reference causes more confusion than it alleviates. For that reason, the commission has deleted cross-references to statutory definitions throughout the section when the inclusion of the reference creates more confusion than it alleviates.

TAB also suggested that the "builder" definition should be further modified to delete the phrase "when required by the context" because it believes that the rule should track the language of the statute. For the reasons stated above, the commission has rephrased the "builder" definition to read "when required by the context of the rule" to make clear that the definitions in the rule are for the purposes of utilizing the agency’s rules. TAB also suggested that the builder definition should include statutory exclusion found in §401.003(c) of the Act. The commission does not agree that the statutory exclusionary language is necessary to understand the commission’s rules and therefore declines to add the suggested language. The exclusionary language regarding licensed tradesmen in the statutory definition of "builder" is a matter for public education but is not required to understand the commission’s rules.

TAB commented that definitions for the terms "building and performance standards" and "construction defect," should not provide references to the respective provisions of the Act, but instead should quote the exact language of the statute. For the reason stated above, the commission does not agree to quote the statutory definition of either term. Therefore, the commission declines to adopt the definition suggested by TAB. Similarly, "construction defect" is a term defined by statute; the rule is not adopted to repeat verbatim terms defined elsewhere, but to offer direction to rule-users. However, in reviewing the proposed definition of "building and performance standards," it became apparent that the proposed definition was too limited. Currently, "building and performance standards" include not only those to be adopted by the commission but also those that are applicable to residential construction prior to the commission’s adoption of standards. For that reason, the commission revised the definition to encompass all home building standards that may apply to a house or duplex subject to the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

TAB commented that the definition of the term "home" should be revised to replace the term "residential dwelling" with "house." The International Residential Code (IRC) refers to "one and two family dwellings" and refers to "dwelling units." House Bill 730 requires the commission to adopt standards equivalent to the IRC for residential construction. Accordingly, the commission believes that the definition of home should include the IRC terminology "dwelling unit" and has revised the definition, accordingly.

TAB commented that the definition "improvement to the interior of an existing home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000" should be modified to change the plural "modifications" to the singular "modification." TBA suggested that the term "alteration" should be added to demonstrate that a fixture need not be added for the Act to apply. TBA further suggested that the phrase "to the builder" should be added to the second sentence. The commission agrees that these suggestions help clarify the definition and has revised the definition to encompass those suggestions, although without accepting them verbatim.

TAB commented that the definition of the term "living space" at should be revised to add the term "residential" and delete the phrases "embodying walls, floor and ceilings that are similar to the rest of the home." The commission accepts the suggestion that the term "enclosed area" is sufficient to encompass the elements of the enclosure. For the sake of brevity, the commission has revised the definition consistent with TAB’s suggestions.

TAB commented that the reference to the Act found in the definition of the term "statutory warranty" should be replaced with the Act’s specific provisions. The definition would then be supplemented with a separate definition for "statutory warranty of habitability." The statute actually refers to the legal requirement that home construction comply with the building and performance standards applicable to the construction. Therefore, the commission has revised the definition to delete the reference to the statute, but also to more accurately reflect the use of the term in the rules. The commission does not intend to address the warranty of habitability in this rule at this time.

TAB commented that the definition of the term "state inspector" should be supplemented with a definition for the "state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process." The commission declines the suggestion to include this supplemental definition because the term is self-explanatory and an entire chapter of rules is dedicated to the discussion of the process described by the term.

TAB commented that the definition of the term "third-party inspector" should be revised to delineate the services that a third-party inspector would perform. The commission modified the definition of "third-party inspector" to capture TAB’s comment.

Finally, TAB commented that the term "an improvement to the interior of the home when the cost paid for the work exceeds $20,000" should be rephrased to read "an improvement to the interior of an existing home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000." The suggestion is well-taken and the phrase has been modified accordingly.

In an electronic message dated January 19, 2004, HADD commented that the definitions of "builder", "material improvement" and "transaction governed by the Act" should include the specific exclusion "foundation repair or any repair of an existing structure such as siding replacement." The commission does not find that the addition will improve the definitions and declines to adopt the language suggested.

HADD commented that the last clause "an appurtenance to a home to meet the applicable warranty and building and performance standards during the applicable warranty period" should be deleted. Since the clause tracks the language found in §401.004 of the Act, the commission will not modify the definition as a result of HADD’s comment.

Finally, HADD commented that a definition is needed for the term "structural defect." The commission declines to adopt a definition for that term at this time; however, the commission will consider the issue raised by HADD’s comment when adopting building and performance standards.

In addition to written public comments received concerning definitions, the commission held informal public meetings around the state between January and March of 2004 and received comments on a variety of issues pending before the commission, including rule comments. During those informal meetings, Roy Hickman of Aiken Construction commented that a definition for the term "foundation failure" was needed. The commission declines to create a definition for this term at this time; however, the commission will consider the issue raised by Mr. Aiken’s comment when adopting building and performance standards.

All comments regarding this section, including any not specifically referenced herein, were fully considered by the commission. The commission has made other minor modifications to the proposed rule text for the purpose of clarifying its intent and improving style and readability.

The new section is adopted to implement new legislation enacted during the 78th Legislative Session, Regular Session, House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01), including Title 16, Property Code. Section 408.001 of the Property Code provides general authority for the commission to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of Title 16, Property Code.

The newly adopted section was previously adopted and published as an emergency section in the January 9, 2004 issue in the Emergency Rules section of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 257).

The statutory provisions affected by the adoption of this section are those set forth in Property Code Chapter 408 and House Bill 730, 78th Legislature, R.S., ch. 458 §101.

§301.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in rules promulgated by the commission, shall have the following meanings unless the context of the rule clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Accrual or accrued--when a homeowner first discovers a condition in the home that is a potential construction defect.

(2) Act--the Texas Residential Construction Commission Act, Title 16, Property Code.

(3) Affiliate--a person who directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by or is under common control with a specified person.

(4) Builder--

(A) any business entity or individual who, for a fixed price, commission, fee, wage, or other compensation, constructs or supervises or manages the construction of:

(i) a new home;

(ii) a material improvement to a home, other than an improvement solely to replace or repair a roof of an existing home; or

(iii) an improvement to the interior of an existing home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000.

(B) When required by the context of the rule, the term may include:

(i) an owner, officer, director, shareholder, partner, affiliate or employee of the builder;

(ii) a risk retention group governed by §21.54, Insurance Code, that insures all or any part of builder's liability for the cost to repair a residential construction defect; and

(iii) a third-party warranty company and its administrator.

(5) Building and performance standards--those standards that apply to home construction built pursuant to a transaction governed by the Act.

(6) Commission--the Texas Residential Construction Commission.

(7) Construction defect--

(A) the failure of the design, construction or repair of a home, an alteration of or a repair, addition or improvement to an existing home, or an appurtenance to a home to meet the applicable warranty and building and performance standards during the applicable warranty period; and

(B) any physical damage to the home, an appurtenance to the home, or real property on which the home or appurtenance is affixed that is proximately caused by that failure.

(8) Executive Director--the individual employed by the commission as the chief executive for the agency or any person to whom the Executive Director has delegated the authority to act on behalf of the Executive Director.

(9) Home--the real property, improvements and appurtenances thereto for a single-family residential dwelling unit or duplex.

(10) ICC--the International Code Council, Inc., currently located at 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 600, Falls Church, Virginia, 22041-3401, or at a subsequent address, and any successor organization that performs substantially the same functions that the ICC performs as of December 1, 2003.

(11) Improvement to the interior of an existing home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000--any modification to the interior living space of a home, which includes the addition or installation of permanent fixtures inside the home, pursuant to an agreement for work for total consideration in excess of $20,000 to be paid by a homeowner to a single builder.

(12) Living space--the enclosed area in a home that is suitable for year-round residential use.

(13) Local building official--the agency or department of a municipality, county or other local political subdivision with authority to make inspections and to enforce the laws, ordinances, and regulations applicable to the construction, alteration, or repair of homes in that locality.

(14) Material improvement--a modification to an existing home that either increases or decreases the home's total square footage of living space that also modifies the home's foundation, perimeter walls or roof. A material improvement does not include modifications to an existing home if the modifications are designed primarily to repair or replace the home's component parts.

(15) Person--an individual, partnership, company, corporation, association, or any other legal entity, however organized.

(16) State inspector--a person employed by the commission whose duties include serving as a member of an appellate panel to:

(A) review the recommendations of third-party inspectors;

(B) provide consultation to third-party inspectors; and

(C) administer the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

(17) Statutory warranty--the legal requirement that the component parts of a home perform to the building and performance standards applicable to the construction for the number of years as set in statute, to wit:

(A) one year for workmanship and materials;

(B) two years for plumbing, electrical, heating, and air-conditioning delivery systems; and

(C) ten years for major structural components of the home.

(18) Third-party inspector--a person approved by the commission to conduct an objective home inspection and prepare a report of that inspection as part of the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

(19) Transaction governed by the Act--an agreement between a homeowner and a builder:

(A) for the construction of a new home; or

(B) for construction on an existing home that is:

(i) a material improvement to the home other than an improvement solely to replace or repair the roof; or

(ii) an improvement to the interior of the home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 18, 2004.

TRD-200404005

Susan Durso

General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Effective date: July 8, 2004

Proposal publication date: January 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9638


Chapter 302. FEES

10 TAC §302.2

The Texas Residential Construction Commission (the "commission") adopts a new section at Title 10, Part 7, Chapter 302, §302.2 regarding fees for providing copies of public information pursuant to provisions of the Texas Government Code Chapter 552. The new section is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the May 7, 2004 issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 4366) and will not be republished.

Section 302.2, relating to Fees for Public Information, provides that the commission will determine the fees for providing copies of public information in accordance with the rules adopted by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission.

No comments were received regarding the adoption of this rule.

The new rule is adopted to notify the public that the agency will charge fees for copies of public information consistent with the rules adopted by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission on the subject.

The new section is adopted under Property Code §408.001, which provides general authority for the commission to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of Title 16, Property Code and Government Code §552.262, which requires that governmental bodies use the rules adopted by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission to determine charges for making copies of public information.

The statutory provisions affected by the adoption are set forth in the Title 16, Property Code, §408.001 and Government Code §552.262.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the adoption.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 18, 2004.

TRD-200404004

Susan Durso

General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Effective date: July 8, 2004

Proposal publication date: May 7, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9638


Chapter 303. REGISTRATION

Subchapter C. REGISTRATION OF THIRD-PARTY INSPECTORS

10 TAC §§303.200 - 303.210

The Texas Residential Construction Commission (the "commission") adopts new sections at Title 10, Part 7, Chapter 303, Subchapter C, §§303.202 - 303.210, regarding the registration and qualification of third-party inspectors who take part in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process described in Title 16, Property Code, with changes to the proposed text as published in the May 7, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 4367) and adopts §§303.200 and 303.201 without changes to the proposed text. Sections 303.202 - 303.210 are republished with changes to the proposed text. Sections 303.200 and 303.201 will not be republished.

The sections are adopted to comply with new legislation, House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01), hereinafter referred to as the "Act." The new sections are adopted under Chapter 427, Property Code (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01), which provides, in part, that third-party inspectors who take part in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process must be registered with the state and must meet certain statutory qualifications to serve in that capacity.

Section 303.200 states the commission will register two types of inspectors to serve as neutral third parties in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

Section 303.201 provides that the commission will conduct background checks on individuals who apply under this subchapter to serve as third-party inspectors.

Section 303.202 provides that individuals seeking to register as third-party inspectors must submit a completed application on a commission-prescribed form and the appropriate fee and must meet the qualifications required under the Act for the type of inspections they wish to perform and provide evidence of their qualifications.

Section 303.203 states that the commission shall utilize information gleaned from the application and the individual's background check to determine if an individual is fit to carry out the duties of serving as a third-party inspector under the Act. It further lists certain factors that the commission will review in determining the fitness of individuals applying to serve as third-party inspectors who have a criminal history.

Section 303.204 provides that after an individual has been approved to serve as a third-party inspector, the commission will promptly notify the individual and provide a certificate of registration, which shall be effective for one year from the date on the certificate.

Section 303.205 addresses the procedure and requirements for denying an application for registration.

Section 303.206 provides the process and requirements for appealing the denial of an application under §303.205.

Section 303.207 addresses the statutorily-required commission-developed training program for third-party inspectors and the requirement that registered third-party inspectors complete the commission-developed training prior to participation in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

Section 303.208 provides that registered third-party inspectors notify the commission in writing of material changes in the information provided as a part of the application within thirty (30) days of the change. It further provides that a material change includes, but is not limited to, a change of address or a change in criminal history as a result of a previously unadjudicated or undisclosed criminal charge other than traffic tickets or Class C misdemeanors that are not crimes involving moral turpitude.

Section 303.209 addresses the renewal of third-party inspector registration.

Section 303.210 provides that the commission shall revoke a registration approved under this subchapter if the commission determines that the registrant is no longer qualified or fit to serve. Further, the commission may revoke a registration if the registrant fails to timely disclose to the commission a relationship that could reasonably be considered to create a conflict of interest or impair the inspector's neutrality in serving as a third-party inspector under the Act.

Written comments were received via electronic transmission from John Cobarruvias of Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings ("HADD") on May 28, 2004. HADD commented that §303.202(c)(1) should be revised to require that a third-party inspector possess five or more years experience as an inspector in residential construction instead of five or more years of experience working in the field of residential construction. The stated minimum requirements are set forth in §427.001 of the Act. Therefore, the commission declines to accept the suggested change. HADD further commented that §§303.202(c)(3) and 303.202(d)(3) should be modified to require that third-party inspectors must also attest that they did not receive more than 10% of their gross income from providing inspection services for home builders or from working for a builder or the building industry, instead of receipt of no more than 10% of income from fees for expert witness services. Again, the rule’s language duplicates §427.001 of the Act. Accordingly, the commission declines to accept the suggested modification to the rule.

HADD commented that §303.202(d)(2) should be revised to require that a third-party inspector appointed to structural matters must possess at least ten (10) years experience as an engineer in residential construction. This rule is in accordance with §427.001 of the Act, which provides that in structural matters the third party inspector will be an engineer or an architect with a minimum of ten (10) years experience in residential construction. Since the current rule is similar to the suggested revision, the commission finds that further modification is unnecessary.

Written comments were received from the Texas Association of Builders ("TAB") on May 27, 2004, regarding the adoption of these rules. TAB commented that §§303.202(c)(3) and 303.202(d)(3) should be revised so that the language would be identical. The commission agrees that for purposes of consistency §303.202(c)(3) should be revised. Accordingly, the text was modified. TAB also commented that in subsections in which the term "registered inspectors" appears, the rules should be revised to replace the term with "third-party inspectors." The commission agrees and the replacements were made to §§303.203, 303.204 and 303.208.

TAB commented that §303.207 should be modified so that it is clear that the commission-developed training would only apply to structural third-party inspectors. The commission has decided to require training for all registered third-party inspectors, not just structural inspectors. Therefore, the commission declines to accept the modification.

In addition to the written comments received regarding the proposed rule text, the commission received comments on the emergency third-party inspector rules published in the January 23, 2004, issue of Texas Register (29 TexReg 573). HADD commented that §303.202(d)(2) should be revised to require that a third-party inspector who may be appointed by the commission to a dispute involving a structural matter should possess ten years experience as a "licensed" engineer in residential construction. Glen Davis of Eagle Inspection also provided written comment regarding the qualifications of a structural third-party inspector. Mr. Davis suggested that the rule be revised to require that a third-party inspector who is appointed by the commission to inspect a home on a structural matter should be a structural engineer currently licensed by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers. Mr. Davis further suggested that architects be excluded because most architects do not have the same knowledge to make a forensic determination of a structural defect that structural engineers possess. The language in §303.202(d)(2) tracks the language of §427.001 of the Act, which also includes the use of architects. Therefore, the commission declines to accept either of the suggested revisions.

Mike Cothran of MLC Real Estate Inspectors commented that he had reservations about the emergency third-party inspector rules with regard to the time required of each inspector in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process, the reporting requirements, the evidence-gathering process, liability issues for the inspector, the geographical area limits of service, recusal requirements, and the fee schedule. Although Mr. Cothran’s comments were broad in scope, the commission has considered the comments thoroughly and has made revisions to ensure clarity in its rules. Some of Mr. Cothran’s other concerns have been addressed during the development of the commission’s third-party inspector training course.

TAB also provided written comments concerning the emergency third-party inspector rules. TAB commented that §303.202(c)(3) and (d)(3) should be revised for readability and to include exclusionary language concerning the ten percent (10%) of gross income derived from witness services. TAB also commented on §303.205, pertaining to denial of registration, and suggested revisions for purposes of readability. The commission agreed with these comments and made the revisions as found in the proposed text published in the May 7, 2004 issue of the Texas Register in an effort to improve the readability of the rule text.

TAB also commented that §303.209 should be revised to replace the term "shall" with "may" because renewal is not a mandatory requirement. The commission agreed that to the extent a person chooses not to continue to act as a third-party inspector that person is not required to renew a certificate of registration. The proposed rule was revised accordingly.

Additionally, the commission held several informal public meetings around the state between January and March of 2004 and gathered comments on a variety of issues pending before the commission, including rule comments concerning third-party inspector rules that were adopted under emergency rulemaking action. All comments regarding the emergency rules and the proposed rules, including any not specifically referenced herein, were fully considered by the commission. The commission has also made other minor modifications to the proposed rule text for the purposes of clarifying its intent, correcting typographical errors and improving style and readability.

The new sections are adopted to implement new legislation enacted during the 78th Legislative Session, Regular Session, House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01), including Title 16, Property Code. Section 408.001 of the Property Code provides general authority for the commission to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of Title 16. Property Code Chapter 427 provides for the registration and qualification of persons who will participate in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process as third-party inspectors.

The statutory provisions affected by the adopted sections are those set forth in Title 16, Property Code, specifically Section 408.001 and Chapter 427 and in House Bill 730, 78th Legislature, R.S., ch. 458, §1.01.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the adoption.

§303.202.Application.

(a) An individual applying for registration to serve as a third-party inspector for appointment in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process must submit a completed application on a commission-prescribed form and the appropriate fee.

(b) An individual may submit an application for registration with the commission to serve as both a workmanship and materials inspector and a structural inspector. An individual seeking to serve as both a workmanship and materials inspector and a structural inspector must meet the qualifications of each position.

(c) An individual applying for registration as a third-party inspector for issues related to workmanship and materials shall:

(1) provide credible documentation that the individual has acquired a minimum of five years of experience working in the field of residential construction;

(2) provide documentation that the individual has a current ICC certification as a residential combination inspector;

(3) attest that the individual has not received more than ten percent of the individual’s gross income from providing expert witness services, including retainer fees accepted for the purpose of providing testimony, evidence or consultation in connection with a pending or threatened legal action. For purposes of calculating ten percent of the individual’s gross income, the individual should multiply the amount of gross income reported on the last federal income tax return filed by that individual by ten percent. Fees for expert witness services, including providing testimony or evidence in a legal action, received by the individual as a result of having served in the capacity of a registered third-party inspector may be excluded from the amount of gross income when calculating the percentage of gross income received from providing expert witness services under this subsection; and

(4) provide any other information that the commission has deemed necessary to assess the individual's qualifications and fitness to serve as a third-party inspector.

(d) An individual applying for registration as a third-party inspector for issues involving a structural matter shall:

(1) provide documentation that the individual is a state-licensed professional engineer or a state-licensed architect;

(2) provide documentation that the individual has acquired a minimum of ten (10) years of experience working in the field of residential construction;

(3) attest that the individual has not received more than ten percent of the individual’s gross income from providing expert witness services, including retainer fees accepted for the purpose of providing testimony, evidence or consultation in connection with a pending or threatened legal action. For purposes of calculating ten percent of the individual’s gross income, the individual should multiply the amount of gross income reported on the last federal income tax return filed by that individual by ten percent. Fees for expert witness services, including providing testimony or evidence in a legal action, received by the individual as a result of having served in the capacity of a registered third-party inspector may be excluded from the amount of gross income when calculating the percentage of gross income received for providing expert witness services under this subsection; and

(4) provide any other information that the commission has deemed necessary to assess the individual's qualifications and fitness to serve as a third-party inspector.

§303.203.Determination of Qualifications and Fitness.

(a) The commission shall review each application to determine if the individual is qualified to serve as the type of third-party inspector for which the individual has submitted an application and shall utilize all the information received as a result of the application to determine whether the individual is fit to perform the duties of a third-party inspector, including the results of the criminal background check.

(b) In reviewing an application to determine if an individual is fit to carry out the duties of a third-party inspector under this subchapter, the commission shall consider, among other things, whether the individual has a criminal history and if so:

(1) the nature and seriousness of any crimes for which the individual has a prior conviction or convictions, including whether a prior conviction is for a crime involving moral turpitude;

(2) the extent to which service as a registered third-party inspector might offer the individual an opportunity to engage in further criminal activity of a same or similar nature as that for which the individual has a prior conviction;

(3) the extent and nature of the individual's past criminal activity;

(4) the age of the individual when any criminal activity occurred;

(5) the remoteness in time between the submission of the application and the date of the individual's last criminal conviction;

(6) the individual's overall work history in relation to the dates of any criminal convictions;

(7) documentation of the individual's successful rehabilitation efforts while incarcerated or after release, including but not limited to, restitution to the victim, completion of probationary requirements and completion of community service; and

(8) other documentation of the individual's fitness to serve as a third-party inspector, as requested by the commission.

(c) An individual applying for registration must provide the commission with any information deemed necessary to determine whether the individual is qualified and fit to serve as a third-party inspector in a timely manner in order to complete the application process. Failure to comply with a commission request for information will result in a denial of the application.

§303.204.Notice of Approved Registration.

(a) The commission shall notify individuals of any approved registration under this subchapter no later than fifteen days of receipt of a completed application and the appropriate fee.

(b) The commission shall provide registered third-party inspectors with a certificate of registration, which shall remain effective for at least one year from the effective date shown on the certificate, unless otherwise revoked or suspended.

§303.205.Denial of Registration.

(a) The commission shall deny a certificate of registration or a renewal of registration if the commission determines that the individual is unqualified or unfit to perform the duties of a third-party inspector.

(b) If the commission denies a certificate of registration or a renewal of registration, the commission shall provide written notice to the individual via certified mail, return receipt requested, not later than the 15th day after the commission receives the completed application for registration or renewal and the appropriate fee.

(c) The commission shall state the reason(s) for denial of a certificate of registration in its written notice to the individual and provide notice of the opportunity for appeal.

§303.206.Appeal of Denial.

(a) An individual who receives a notice of denial under §303.205 may appeal the decision to the Executive Director by submitting a written request for reconsideration not later than thirty (30) days from receipt of the notice of denial.

(b) The decision of the Executive Director is a final agency decision not subject to further administrative appeal.

§303.207.Training.

(a) The commission shall develop an initial training program for all registered third-party inspectors.

(b) Registered third-party inspectors must complete the commission-developed training prior to participation in the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process.

§303.208.Material Change in Information.

(a) A registered third-party inspector shall report to the commission in writing, using a commission-prescribed form, any material change in the information provided to the commission in the application for certificate of registration within thirty days of the change.

(b) A material change includes, but is not limited to, a change of address or contact information, revocation of a professional certificate or license or a criminal charge, including any Class C misdemeanor charge for a crime involving moral turpitude, made or adjudicated against a registered third-party inspector, since the date of that inspector’s last application on file with the commission.

§303.209.Renewal.

(a) A registered third-party inspector may apply annually to renew the third-party inspector's registration.

(b) A registered third-party inspector who seeks to renew a previously granted certificate of registration shall file an application for renewal on a commission-prescribed application and submit the appropriate fee.

(c) Applications for renewal shall be reviewed as provided under §303.203 of this subchapter to determine whether the individual continues to be qualified and fit to serve as a third-party inspector.

§303.210.Revocation of Registration.

(a) After notice and opportunity to be heard, the commission shall revoke the certificate of registration of any registered third-party inspector who is determined to be unqualified or unfit to continue serving as a third-party inspector.

(b) The commission may revoke a certificate of registration approved under this subchapter if:

(1) the commission determines that a third-party inspector knowingly failed to timely disclose to the commission a financial or personal relationship with a party to a dispute to which the third-party inspector has been appointed under the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process; and

(2) that the relationship could reasonably be considered by the other party to the dispute to create an incurable conflict of interest for the third-party inspector or otherwise substantially impair the third-party inspector's ability to serve as a neutral third-party inspector in the dispute.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 18, 2004.

TRD-200404002

Susan Durso

General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Effective date: July 8, 2004

Proposal publication date: May 7, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9638


Chapter 313. STATE-SPONSORED INSPECTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS (SIRP)

10 TAC §§313.1 - 313.26

The Texas Residential Construction Commission (the "commission") adopts new sections at Title 10, Part 7, Chapter 313, §§313.1 - 313.26 regarding the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process (SIRP) as provided for in Title 16, Property Code and in Property Code Chapter 27, as amended by House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg. R.S., ch. 458, §101). The sections are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the May 7, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 4369) as to §§313.1 - 313.26.

The new sections are adopted to comply with new legislation including House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01) and new Chapter 426, Property Code, which provides, in part, for an informal inspection and dispute resolution process to assist homeowners and builders in resolving post-construction disputes for alleged construction defects discovered after September 1, 2003.

Section 313.1 states the applicability of the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process (SIRP) to post-construction disputes regarding alleged construction defects.

Section 313.2 describes the notice and opportunity to inspect required as a prerequisite to making a request to initiate the SIRP.

Section 313.3 provides information on a builder’s obligations and potential liability as a result of receipt of notice of a request alleging a threat to health or safety.

Section 313.4 describes the relevant time periods for a timely request for the SIRP.

Section 313.5 describes the process for making a request to participate in the SIRP.

Section 313.6 describes the information that must be included in a request to initiate the SIRP.

Section 313.7 provides information on the required notice of the initiation of the SIRP to other interested parties.

Section 313.8 provides information regarding the required fees for inspection.

Section 313.9 describes the commission’s initial review of the request.

Section 313.10 describes the builder’s continuing right to inspect the affected home.

Section 313.11 describes the appointment process for the third-party inspector.

Section 313.12 describes the process by which a party to a dispute can object to the appointment of a third-party inspector.

Section 313.13 describes the process for conducting a home inspection.

Section 313.14 describes the third-party inspector’s report.

Section 313.15 describes the requirements and procedures for requesting an extension of time.

Section 313.16 describes the form of the third-party inspector’s report.

Section 313.17 provides for the delivery of the third-party inspector’s report to the commission and to the parties to the dispute.

Section 313.18 provides for the reimbursement of inspection fees and costs under certain circumstances.

Section 313.19 provides for the time to appeal the third-party inspector’s report.

Section 313.20 describes the appeals process.

Section 313.21 provides for an offer of repair.

Section 313.22 provides a procedure for responding to the offer of repair.

Section 313.23 provides for a supplemental offer of repair if the original offer is rejected.

Section 313.24 provides that an offer not accepted is deemed rejected after a period of twenty-five days.

Section 313.25 describes the procedures for repair and inspection that follow acceptance of an offer of repair.

Section 313.26 provides for the establishment and payment of fees to third-party inspectors who are subpoenaed to provide expert witness services.

Written comments were received from Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings ("HADD") and the Texas Association of Builders ("TAB") regarding this adoption. HADD, an association with over 25 members, also filed a written request for a public hearing for comment on the SIRP rules. As the result of HADD’s request, a public hearing was held at commission headquarters in Austin, Texas, on May 26, 2004. HADD provided testimony that was memorialized in its written comments. HADD commented that SIRP is too lengthy a process and too complex for a homeowner to use without the assistance of an attorney. HADD indicated that a lawsuit in small claims court would be a speedier alternative. The commission has not exceeded the statutory time periods for any step in the process and, therefore, cannot modify any rules to shorten the process any further. In addition, in response to public comment, commission made changes to the adopted rules to enhance readability.

At the public hearing, HADD also commented that in §313.1(a)(3) it was unclear whether an alleged construction defect was discovered on or after September 1, 2003, in a eight-year old home, would the home be eligible for SIRP. The commission finds that the rules describe the SIRP as whole and that by reading §§313.1 and 313.4, the rules provide sufficient information for a lay person to determine that a defect discovered after September 1, 2003 in an eight-year old home is eligible for the SIRP. The commission has made every effort to improve the readability of the rules while preserving the statutory requirements.

HADD further commented that in §313.6(a)(7) should be stricken as too complex. The commission agreed that revision was needed for improved readability and has modified the provision accordingly. HADD also commented that §313.8(b) should be modified so that a homeowner should never be required to pay an inspection fee. The language of the rule reflects the language in §426.004 of the Act which provides that the party who submits the request for SIRP shall pay the inspection fee. Therefore, the commission declines to modify the rule. However, the commission is aware that the inspection fee may cause a burden for some requestors and §313.8(d) provides a process whereby a requestor may request a waiver or reduction of the inspection fee.

HADD commented that §313.7 should be modified so that the commission, and not the requestor, should be required to notify all interested parties of the request for SIRP. Section 428.001(d) of the Act requires that the requestor provide notice of the request by certified mail, return receipt requested. HADD further commented that §313.10 should be stricken because it allows the builder excess time to address the issue. The builder’s right to inspect the home is required under §428.002 of the Act and the rule tracks the language under the Act. Therefore, the commission declines to accept these suggestions.

HADD commented that §313.11 should be modified to reduce the period of time for appointing a third-party inspector from 15 days to five days. Similar to the above responses, this provision tracks the language of §428.003 of the Act. Therefore, the commission declines to accept the suggested modification. HADD commented that clarification was needed because §§313.13 and 313.14 appear to be inconsistent. Section 313.13(c) requires the third-party inspector to gather information relevant to the inspection. Section 313.14(c) provides that the third-party inspector will base his or her findings on applicable warranty and building and performance standards. The commission does not find an inconsistency with these rule, but rather, finds that §313.13 provides for the implementation of §313.14. Therefore, no modification was made. HADD further commented that the 45-day period for filing the third-party inspector’s report in §313.14(b) is too lengthy and should be reduced to 21 days. Section 428.004 of the Act provides that the third-party inspector be permitted up to 60 days to issue the recommendations as a result of a structural inspection. The rule incorporates the total sixty-day period permitted by statute for structural inspections, so the commission declines to make the suggested modification.

HADD commented that the builder’s offer to repair in §313.21(c) should not include any language in which the builder partially pays for the repair. The language in the rule tracks §27.004 of the Property Code which provides that in a claim subject to the SIRP a builder may offer to settle the dispute at the builder’s partial or total expense. Therefore, the commission declines to accept the suggested change.

HADD also commented that this subsection should be amended to require that the offer must include the sentence, "The repair complies with the inspector’s recommendation." Since the SIRP calls for a second inspection by the third-party inspector after the repairs are made to ensure the repairs comply with the recommendations, the commission has determined that this suggested language is unnecessary.

Cynthia Grant commented at the public hearing that the SIRP was too complex to understand. As discussed above, the commission has modified the proposed rules to enhance readability and comprehension but to retain the statutory requirements. All time periods within the rules are mandated by statute and therefore will not be modified.

Cathy Bretz also commented at the public hearing that all records gathered in the SIRP should be available to the public. Although public access is not addressed under the rules of this chapter, the documents and other tangible items gathered in the inspection process are subject to the provisions of the Texas Public Information Act ("TPIA"). Therefore, the commission finds it unnecessary to include those provisions within these rules. Ms. Bretz concurred with HADD and Ms. Grant that the process was too time-consuming and complicated. The commission has addressed this issue in the discussion above.

Finally, Leslie Bice commented that §313.10 should be amended so that a builder is not provided with a right of inspection because the builder has generally inspected the alleged defect before the requestor initiated the SIRP. As mentioned above, the right of inspection is statutorily required. Therefore, the commission declines the suggested modification. Ms. Bice also commented that deadlines should be implemented in the repair process. The rules relating to the SIRP incorporate all time limits referenced in Chapter 27 of the Texas Property Code, the Texas Residential Construction Liability Act. These time limits include Section 27.004(b) which requires a builder to repair a construction defect not later than forty-five (45) days after receipt of a homeowner acceptance of the builder’s offer to repair. Therefore, the commission declines further modification on the timelines included in the rules.

In a letter dated May 27, 2004, TAB submitted its written comments for the commission’s consideration. TAB commented that the defined term "SIRP" in §313.1(a) should be moved to the Chapter 301, pertaining to Definitions. The Commission agrees that the defined term could be appropriately placed in Chapter 301. However, to ensure ease of use for the reader, the definition has been provided at the beginning of this chapter. Accordingly, the commission declines to modify the rule as suggested.

TAB commented the defined term "SIRP" in the title of §313.2 should be deleted and moved to Chapter 301. For reasons expressed above, the Commission declines to accept the suggestion. TAB further commented that §313.2(a) should be rephrased to make the rule more "user-friendly." The commission agreed that the revision was needed to enhance readability and has revised the rule accordingly. TAB also commented that the second sentence in §313.3 should be deleted to make the rule more consistent with the Act and to avoid any interpretation that the commission was offering legal advice. The language of the rule closely tracks §428.005 of the Act and the rules are intended to provide guidance to those who interact with the commission and those who are registered with the commission. The commission believes in cases where there is an imminent threat to health safety, the affected parties should be aware of the possible consequences if the builder fails to act within a reasonable time. Therefore, the commission declines to accept the suggested change.

TAB also commented in its May 27, 2004 letter that §313.4(2) should be deleted because §313.4(1) is sufficient. The rule tracks the language of §§426.001 and 426.006 of the Act. Section 313.4(2) encompasses the Statute of Repose that limits SIRP eligibility to ten years for structural defects. Consequently, the commission declines to accept the proposed deletion. Next, TAB commented that language should be added to §313.5(b) to establish that a builder will reimburse the homeowner the cost of the home registration fee, if the home registration was the builder’s responsibility and the builder failed to do so. The commission agrees and has modified the rule accordingly.

TAB commented that §313.6(a)(2) should be modified to add the phrase "if the request was initiated by the homeowner" in order to clarify that this provision only applies to homeowner-initiated SIRP requests. The commission agrees that the 30-day notice requirement under this subsection pertains only to a homeowner who files a request for SIRP and the commission agrees that suggested language would add clarity to the rule. Accordingly, the rule has been revised.

TAB further commented that §313.6(a)(3) should be deleted because there is no reference to this in the Act and the builder’s response should be irrelevant to the commission. The commission disagrees with this opinion. Section 428.001(b) of the Act provides, in part when referring to the SIRP request, for [the inclusion of] "evidence that depicts the nature and cause of each alleged construction defect and the nature and extent of repairs." The homeowner’s inclusion of the builder’s response or a description of the builder’s response may assist the commission in determining the eligibility of the homeowner’s SIRP request or assist the inspector in determining the nature of the alleged defect or the availability of a possible repair remedy. Therefore, the commission declines to modify the rule. TAB also commented that §313.6(a)(4) should include the phase "that are subject of the request" for the sake of clarity and completeness. The commission agrees and has modified the rule accordingly. TAB further commented that the phase "and who have prepared any written materials regarding their inspection" in §313.6(a)(6) should be deleted because, as written, it is inconsistent with the Act. The commission agrees that the phrase could be result in unintended results and is unnecessary. Therefore, the commission has deleted the phrase. Finally, TAB commented §313.6(a)(7) should be revised to make the rule more "user-friendly." The commission agreed that revision was needed for the sake of clarity and has made the change to the rule.

TAB commented that it was concerned with the determinations made by the commission under §313.9(a) and suggested the deletion of subsection (a). To ensure cost-effective delivery of service to the public, it is necessary for the commission to determine whether a request for SIRP is complete and otherwise eligible for SIRP before the appointment of a third-party inspector. Therefore, the commission finds this provision is necessary and declines the suggestion. TAB further commented that §313.9(c) should contain a time limit for a requestor to supplement an incomplete request. The suggestion was for a period of 30 days after receipt of the commission notification of an incomplete application. TAB’s comments address an issue of internal agency procedure and the statutory limitations on making a request to initiate the SIRP. The commission declines to restrict the requestor on completing the application beyond the statutory limitations.

TAB commented the word "written" should be inserted in §313.10(c) to clarify the rule. The commission agrees that the word would further clarify the rule and had made the inclusion in the rule. TAB commented that §313.13(f) should be deleted or revised to clarify that disclosure requirements pertain equally to both parties in the SIRP. The commission agrees and rule has been revised for clarity.

TAB commented that §313.14(b)(2) should be revised so that language would be more consistent with the Act. The commission agrees and unnecessary language was deleted. TAB commented that §313.18 is vague and the commission should specify the circumstances wherein the commission will order the reimbursement of a party’s fees and costs. The language of this rule tracks the §428.004(d) of the Act which grants the commission discretionary authority to order reimbursement of inspection fees and expenses if the third-party inspector finds in favor of the SIRP requestor. The commission declines to delineate each circumstance wherein reimbursement will be ordered so that commission may retain its flexibility and evaluate each circumstance on a case-by-case basis.

Finally, TAB commented that §§313.21 - 313.24 should be deleted because these are provisions of the Texas Residential Construction Liability Act in Property Code Chapter 27 and therefore the commission lacks the authority to adopt these rules. The commission disagrees with this comment because the language tracks Property Code §24.004 which specifically refers to Title 16 of the Property Code, Subtitle D, the SIRP. Therefore, the commission is within its authority to adopt rules to implement the SIRP. Further, as previously discussed, the commission’s rules are intended to offer guidance to users. The commission finds that ease of use is enhanced by the placement of all requirements and procedures for SIRP within one chapter. As a result, the commission declines to delete the provisions as suggested by TAB.

HADD, TAB, Sarah Senterfitt, and Gerard Duhon, P.E., previously submitted written comments in response to the commission’s Strawman Proposal on the SIRP and the emergency SIRP rules published in the January 23, 2003 issue of Texas Register (29 TexReg 574). Those comments were considered and many suggestions were incorporated into the proposed text published on May 7, 2004.

All comments regarding these rules, including any not specifically referenced herein, were fully considered by the commission. The commission has made other minor modifications to the proposed rule text for the purpose of clarifying its intent and improving style and readability.

The new rules are adopted to implement new legislation enacted during the 78th Legislative Session, Regular Session, House Bill 730 (Act effective Sept. 1, 2003, 78th Leg., R.S., ch. 458, §1.01), including Title 16, Property Code, Chapter 426 and Chapter 27 as amended. Section 408.001 of the Property Code provides general authority for the commission to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of Title 16, Property Code. Property Code Chapter 426 provides for the implementation of the SIRP and Property Code Chapter 27 includes statutory requirements that affect users of the SIRP.

The statutory provisions affected by this adoption are those set forth in the Title 16, Property Code Chapters 408, 426, Property Code Chapter 27 and House Bill 730, 78th Legislature, R.S.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the adoption.

§313.1.Purpose.

(a) The state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process (SIRP) described in this chapter applies to a dispute that:

(1) is between a homeowner and a builder;

(2) arises from a transaction governed by the Act;

(3) is a result of alleged construction defect(s) that were discovered on or after September 1, 2003; and

(4) is the basis for a claim other than a claim solely for personal injury, survival, wrongful death or damage to goods.

(b) The commission shall provide any person who files a request with a copy of the commission’s policies and procedures relating to investigation and resolution of a request.

§313.2.Prerequisite to State-sponsored Inspection and Dispute Resolution Process (SIRP).

(a) Before a homeowner may file a request to initiate the SIRP, a homeowner must give the builder a 30-day written notice of any claimed construction defect(s).

(b) After notice has been provided to the builder as required in §313.2 (a), the homeowner must also provide the builder, or its designated consultants, a reasonable opportunity to inspect the affected home if the builder requests such an opportunity.

(c) If a homeowner contacts the commission to initiate the SIRP before the homeowner has provided the builder with the required written notice and the inspection opportunity, the homeowner will be provided with the requirements and the procedures for filing a request to initiate the SIRP, and instructions on the procedure to initiate the SIRP if the dispute remains unresolved.

§313.3.Notice of Defect Alleging Threat to Health or Safety.

A builder who receives written notice of an alleged construction defect that creates an imminent threat to the health or safety of the inhabitants of the residence shall take reasonable steps to cure the defect as soon as practicable. If a builder fails to cure the defect in a reasonable time, the homeowner may have the defect cured and recover from the builder the homeowner’s reasonable costs to cure the defect, reasonable attorney's fees, expenses associated with curing the defect, and other damages not inconsistent with the Act.

§313.4.Timely Filing a Request to Initiate the SIRP.

To participate in SIRP, a person must file a request to initiate the SIRP:

(1) on or before the second anniversary of the date of the discovery of the alleged construction defect(s), but not later than the thirtieth day after the expiration date of any warranty period applicable to the alleged construction defects(s); and

(2) on or before the tenth anniversary of

(A) the date of the initial transfer of title from the builder to the initial owner of the affected home, or

(B) if the transaction that is the subject of the dispute did not involve a title transfer, the date the construction commenced or the date on which the agreement describing the transaction was signed, whichever was earlier.

§313.5.Filing a Request to Initiate the SIRP.

(a) Either the homeowner or the builder may initiate the SIRP by filing a request with the commission.

(b) If the affected home is not registered with the commission at the time the request is filed, the requesting party must also register the home with the commission by submitting a commission-prescribed home registration form and the appropriate fee. A builder who failed to register the affected home in accordance with Chapter 303, Registration of Homes, shall reimburse the homeowner the cost of the home registration fee.

(c) When a person contacts the commission to initiate the SIRP, the commission will provide the person with information necessary to file a request, information on the applicable fees for a third-party inspection, the registration status of the affected home and instructions to register an unregistered home, if applicable.

§313.6.Information Required for the Request.

(a) The request shall be submitted on a commission-prescribed form and must include:

(1) a description of the transaction giving rise to the dispute, including,

(A) the date on which the title transferred from the builder to the initial homeowner, if the transaction giving rise to the dispute was for new home construction on the builder’s property; or

(B) the date on which the agreement describing the transaction was signed or work commenced, whichever is earlier, if the transaction giving rise to the dispute did not involve a title transfer, including new home construction on the homeowner’s property, a material improvement to an existing home or an improvement to the interior of an existing home when the cost of the work exceeds $20,000.

(2) credible documentation that establishes that the homeowner provided the builder with or that the builder received written notice of the alleged construction defect(s) at least thirty days prior to filing the request if the request was initiated by the homeowner;

(3) a general description of the builder’s response to the homeowner’s notice of alleged construction defect(s) provided pursuant to §313.2(a) of this chapter, and a copy of the written response, if any;

(4) a reasonably detailed description of the alleged construction defect(s) included in request;

(5) an itemized list of all out-of-pocket expenses and engineering or consulting fees incurred by the requestor in connection with the alleged construction defect(s);

(6) a list of the names and addresses of all professionals or other persons, known to the requestor, who have inspected the alleged construction defect(s) on behalf of the requestor; and

(7) any documents or other tangible things that depict the nature and cause of the alleged construction defect(s) and that depict the nature and extent of repairs necessary to remedy the construction defect(s), including, expert reports, photographs, and videotapes, if these documents and tangible things are either within the requestor’s physical possession or if the requestor has the right to obtain the document or tangible thing from a third party, such as an agent or a representative of the requestor.

(8) The following are excluded from the provisions of subsections (a)(6) and (a)(7) of this section:

(A) any documents or tangible things that were prepared or developed in anticipation of litigation, for trial or for an arbitration proceeding by the requestor’s attorneys or by the attorneys’ representatives or agents for the requestor;

(B) any documents or tangible things that reflect communications between a requestor and the requestor’s attorneys or the attorneys’ representatives or agents on behalf of the requestor and that were made in anticipation of litigation, for trial or for an arbitration proceeding; or

(C) the name of any person who inspected the home on behalf of the requestor in connection with the construction defect(s) alleged in the request before the SIRP request was submitted to the commission, so long as the requestor will not call upon this person as an expert witness or use any of the materials prepared by this person during either the SIRP or any action between the builder and the homeowner that arises out of an alleged construction defect that is the subject of the request.

(b) With regard to information provided under subsection (a)(6) and (a)(7), a requestor who fails to submit the name of any person who inspected the home on behalf of the requestor prior to the filing of a SIRP request in connection with the alleged construction defect(s) may be prohibited from designating that person as an expert witness and from using any materials prepared by such person in the SIRP or any action arising out of any alleged construction defect(s) that is the subject of the request.

§313.7.Notice of the Request.

(a) The requestor shall send a copy of the request and all information submitted along with the request, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to all other interested parties to the dispute.

(b) A copy of the request and submitted information mailed to other interested parties must also be mailed to counsel for any interested party represented by counsel, if known to the requestor.

§313.8.Inspection fee.

(a) The commission will establish a fee that is commensurate with the scope of the requested inspection and the type of construction defect(s) alleged.

(b) The commission shall publish the established fee on its website and make it available to the public in writing.

(c) The request to initiate the SIRP must include the appropriate inspection fee.

(d) A requestor who is able to show financial need may submit a request for a reduction or waiver of the inspection fee.

(1) The request for a reduction or waiver of the inspection fee must include a sworn affidavit of inability to pay fees on a commission-prescribed form at the time the request to initiate an SIRP is filed.

(2) The Executive Director shall review any request for a fee reduction or waiver and the supporting affidavit to determine whether to approve or deny the request.

(3) The Executive Director’s decision on a request for fee reduction or waiver is a final agency decision and is not subject to further administrative appeal.

§313.9.Initial Request Review.

(a) Upon receipt of a request to initiate the SIRP, the commission shall review the request to determine if the request contains information alleging or otherwise demonstrating:

(1) that the dispute arises from a transaction governed by the Act;

(2) that the request is complete and includes the required attachments and the payment of the appropriate fees;

(3) that the affected home is registered with the commission;

(4) that the alleged construction defect(s) were discovered on or after September 1, 2003;

(5) that the request is timely under §313.4 of this chapter; and

(6) that the request involves a dispute between a homeowner and a builder regarding alleged construction defect(s) giving rise to a claim that is not:

(A) solely for personal injury, survival, wrongful death; or

(B) solely for damage to goods not including damage to the home; or

(C) for an alleged violation of §27.01, Business & Commerce Code, regarding Fraud in Real Estate and Stock Transactions; or

(D) based solely on a builder’s wrongful abandonment of an improvement project before completion; or

(E) for an alleged violation of Property Code, Chapter 162, regarding Construction Payments, Loan Receipts, and Misapplication of Trust Funds.

(b) If the commission determines that the request is not complete or that the claim is not eligible for the SIRP, the commission shall notify the requestor in writing and specify the reason(s) the request is not complete or ineligible for the SIRP.

(c) A requestor who has submitted an incomplete request will be provided an opportunity to supplement the request to cure its deficiencies.

(d) If the commission determines that the claim is ineligible for the SIRP, the commission will return all materials submitted by the requestor and will refund any paid inspection fee.

§313.10.Builder’s Continuing Right to Inspect.

(a) In addition to the right to inspect under §313.2(b) of this chapter upon the written request, at any time after a request to initiate the SIRP has been filed with the commission and prior to the conclusion of the SIRP, a builder shall be given a reasonable opportunity to inspect the affected home, or to have the home inspected, to determine the nature and cause of the alleged construction defect(s) and the nature and extent of repairs necessary to remedy the alleged construction defect(s).

(b) The builder may take reasonable steps during an inspection to document the alleged construction defect(s) and the condition of the home.

(c) If the homeowner delays the inspection for more than five days after receipt of the builder’s written request to inspect the home under this subsection, any period for subsequent action to be taken by the builder or a registered third-party inspector as prescribed by this chapter shall be extended by one day for each day the inspection is delayed.

§313.11.Appointment of Third-Party Inspector.

(a) No later than fifteen days after the commission has determined that the request to initiate SIRP is complete and that the dispute is eligible for the SIRP, the commission shall appoint a third-party inspector to conduct an inspection and shall notify the requestor and respondent of the appointment in writing.

(1) Written notification under this subsection will be provided by the most expedient and effective means available to both parties, including facsimile or electronic transmission.

(2) The commission, in its sole discretion, shall determine the most expedient and effective means available to both parties for transmission of the written notice of the appointment.

(b) The commission shall appoint a qualified third-party inspector from the list of registered third-party inspectors maintained by the commission. The inspector appointed shall be the next available inspector on the list of qualified inspectors in the affected home’s geographic region.

§313.12.Objection to the Third-Party Inspector Appointed.

(a) Each party shall have one opportunity to object to the appointed third-party inspector, with or without cause. The objection must be submitted to the commission in writing, by mail, facsimile or electronic transmission within two business days of receipt of notice of the appointment.

(b) Failure to timely notify the commission of a party’s objection to the appointed third-party inspector waives the party’s right to object, unless the party is able to establish that newly-acquired material information has been found regarding a conflict of interest that could not have reasonably been discovered prior to the expiration of the objection period.

(c) Following receipt of a party’s objection, the commission shall appoint the next available third-party inspector from the list of registered third-party inspectors, and shall notify the interested parties of the new appointment as provided under §313.11 of this chapter.

§313.13.Home Inspection.

(a) If the commission does not receive a timely written objection to the appointed third-party inspector, the commission shall contact the third-party inspector with information regarding the dispute, including the names of the interested parties and their counsel, if any. Unless the third-party inspector advises the commission of a conflict of interest with either of the parties to the dispute, the commission shall forward to the appointed third-party inspector a copy of the SIRP request and all documentation submitted with the request.

(b) As soon as practicable but no later than two (2) business days after receipt of the SIRP request, the appointed third-party inspector shall contact the homeowner to arrange a mutually convenient time to inspect the affected home. The third-party inspector shall notify the builder and the homeowner of the date and time of the inspection. The homeowner and builder, including any of their consultants or representatives, may be present at the inspection.

(c) The third-party inspector shall gather all information and other data that the third-party inspector, in the inspector’s sole professional judgment, deems relevant to the inspection and shall gather it by any reasonable means including taking photographs and measurements and interviewing the homeowner, the builder, and any consultants present. An interview under this subsection may take place outside the presence of others not aligned with the party subject to the interview, if the third-party inspector in the inspector’s sole discretion deems it preferable for the orderly conduct of the inspection.

(d) The third-party inspector may suspend the inspection if a party interferes with the inspection in such a manner as to prohibit the third-party inspector from performing the assigned duties in an impartial and professional manner.

(e) The third-party inspector shall not engage or employ the services of any testing company or any consultant.

(f) Except as otherwise provided under §313.6(a)(8), the builder shall submit to the third-party inspector any documentation or tangible things created or generated as a result of having received a notice of alleged construction defect(s) under §313.2 of this chapter for consideration in the third-party inspector’s report to the commission.

§313.14.The Third-Party Inspector’s Report.

(a) If the alleged construction defect(s) described in the request do not include a structural matter, the third-party inspector shall submit a report with recommendations to the commission as soon as practicable after the inspection, but not later than the 12th day after the date the third-party inspector receives the SIRP request and materials submitted by the requestor from the commission, except as otherwise provided by this chapter.

(b) If the alleged construction defect(s) described in the request involve a structural matter:

(1) the third-party inspector shall inspect the home as soon as practicable after receipt of the request from the commission, but not later than the 12th day after the date the third-party inspector receives the request and the requestor’s submitted materials from the commission; and

(2) the third-party inspector shall submit a report after the inspection with recommendations to the commission as soon as practicable, but not later than the 45th day after the date the third-party inspector receives the request and materials submitted by the requestor from the commission, except as otherwise provided by this chapter.

(c) The third-party inspector’s report shall set forth the inspector’s findings based on applicable warranty and building and performance standards and shall include the inspector’s recommendation for repairs, if any. Third-party inspectors shall consider a range of repair or remediation options to address the alleged construction defect(s).

(d) A third-party inspector’s report shall not include a recommendation for payment of monetary damages, a price for the recommended repairs, or a determination of the value of any loss allegedly suffered by the homeowner.

§313.15.Extension of Time.

(a) A third-party inspector who conducts a structural inspection may request from the Executive Director an extension of time for a period of no longer than five days for any deadline imposed on the third-party inspector under §313.14 of this chapter.

(b) A party to a dispute involving a claim related to an alleged structural defect may request an extension of time from the Executive Director for any deadline imposed on the third-party inspector under §313.14 of this chapter.

(c) The Executive Director shall grant an extension of time requested under subsection (a) of this section upon a showing of that the cause for the delay was not reasonably foreseeable by the third-party inspector when the appointment was made.

(d) The Executive Director shall grant an extension under subsection (b) of this section as follows:

(1) for a period of no longer than five days without regard to cause if the parties to the dispute agree to the extension in writing; or

(2) upon a showing of good cause by the requesting party if the request is made for an extension of greater than five days; or

(3) upon a showing of good cause by the requesting party if the other party to the dispute does not agree to an extension.

(e) The Executive Director’s decision on whether to grant or deny an extension of time requested under this section is a final agency decision not subject to further administrative appeal.

§313.16.Form of Third-party Inspector’s Report.

The third-party inspector’s report shall be submitted to the commission on a commission-prescribed form.

§313.17.Delivery of the Third-party Inspector’s Report.

The third-party inspector shall submit his report to the commission and the commission shall promptly transmit the report to the homeowner and the builder.

§313.18.Reimbursement of Fees and Costs.

If the third-party inspector’s findings support all or a portion of the allegations of the requesting party, the commission may order the other party to reimburse all or part of the fees or costs of inspection paid by the requestor.

§313.19.Time to Appeal of the Third-party Inspector’s Report.

(a) A homeowner or builder may appeal the third-party inspector's report and recommendation(s) on or before the 15th day after receipt of the report.

(b) A party to the dispute may request an extension of time to file a notice of appeal of the third-party inspector’s report.

(1) Upon a showing of good cause for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, the Executive Director may extend the deadline by no more than five days.

(2) The Executive Director’s determination of good cause to grant or deny an extension of time under this subsection is a final agency decision and is not subject to further administrative appeal.

§313.20.Appeal Process.

(a) If a homeowner or builder appeals the findings or recommendations in a third-party inspector's report, the Executive Director shall refer the appeal to a three-person panel of state inspectors. If the request involves a structural matter, one the panel members shall be a licensed professional engineer.

(b) The appellate panel shall conduct a review of the third-party inspector’s report and the written documents and tangible things considered by the third-party inspector in making the findings and recommendations, including but not limited to materials submitted with the request, any information or data gathered by the third-party inspector and documentation or tangible things provided to the third-party inspector by one of the parties during the SIRP and prior to the issuance of the report.

(c) The appellate panel shall make written findings of fact and shall recommend approval, rejection or modifications to the findings and recommendations of the third-party inspector or shall recommend that the matter be remanded to the third-party inspector for further action as directed by the appellate panel.

(d) The appellate panel shall file a written report of its findings and recommendations with the Executive Director not later than the 25th day after the notice of appeal is filed with the commission.

(e) The Executive Director shall transmit the appellate panel’s rulings to the parties to the appeal not later than the fifth day after receipt of the appellate panel’s rulings.

(f) A ruling by an appellate panel under this section is a final agency decision not subject to further administrative appeal.

§313.21.Offer to Repair.

(a) Not later than the 15th day after the commission has transmitted the third-party inspector’s report to the parties, or if the third-party inspector’s report has been appealed, not later than the 15th date following the date that the appellate panel’s ruling has been transmitted to the parties, a builder may make a written offer of settlement to the homeowner to repair the alleged construction defect(s).

(b) The offer must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the homeowner at the homeowner’s last known address or the homeowner’s attorney, if the homeowner is represented by counsel.

(c) The offer may include either an agreement by the builder to repair or to have repaired by an independent contractor, partially or totally at the builder’s expense, or at a reduced rate to the homeowner, any construction defect(s) included in the SIRP request.

(d) The offer shall include in reasonable detail the repairs to be made and shall provide that the repairs will be made within forty-five days after the date the builder receives written notice of the homeowner’s acceptance of the offer, except as delayed by the homeowner or by the occurrence of events beyond the builder’s control.

§313.22.Response to Offer to Repair.

(a) If the homeowner considers the builder’s offer to repair under §313.21 of this chapter to be unreasonable, the homeowner shall notify the builder, in writing, on or before the 25th day after the date the homeowner receives the offer, and shall provide, in detail, any reason(s) the homeowner finds the offer to be unreasonable.

(b) If the homeowner accepts the builder’s offer to repair under §313.21 of this chapter, the homeowner shall notify the builder of the acceptance, in writing, as soon as practicable, but not later than the 25th day after the date the homeowner receives the offer.

§313.23.Supplemental Written Offer to Repair.

Not later than the tenth day after the date the builder receives a written response from the homeowner under §313.22 of this chapter, the builder may make a supplemental written offer of settlement. The builder shall send any such supplemental written offer by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the homeowner, or if the homeowner is represented by counsel, to the homeowner’s attorney.

§313.24.Offer Rejected.

An offer of repair made under this chapter that is not accepted in writing by the 25th day after the date of receipt, is deemed rejected.

§313.25.Procedures Following Acceptance of Offer of Repair.

(a) If a homeowner accepts a builder’s offer to repair under this chapter, the builder, upon completion of the repairs, shall engage, at the builder’s expense, the third-party inspector who issued the report and recommendation under §313.14 to inspect the repairs and to determine whether the home, as repaired, complies with the applicable statutory warranty and building and performance standards.

(b) Following the third-party inspector’s post-repair inspection, the builder shall have a reasonable period, not to exceed fifteen days, to address any minor cosmetic deficiencies necessary to fully complete the repairs.

§313.26.Third-Party Inspectors as Witnesses.

(a) If a commission-appointed third-party inspector who has conducted an inspection pursuant to this chapter is subpoenaed by a party to the dispute that was the subject of the inspection to provide testimony by deposition, in court or in any alternative form of dispute resolution proceeding, or to provide other expert witness services, the party who caused the subpoena to be issued must pay to the third-party inspector a reasonable fee and related expenses for the services requested.

(b) The commission shall establish reasonable fees for witness services performed by a registered third-party inspector who is subpoenaed to provide services as described in subsection (a) of this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 18, 2004.

TRD-200404003

Susan Durso

General Counsel

Texas Residential Construction Commission

Effective date: July 8, 2004

Proposal publication date: May 7, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9638