Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Chapter 1.
TEXAS BOARD OF HEALTH
Subchapter T. FAILURE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT
25 TAC §1.301
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes an amendment
to §1.301, concerning the suspension of license for failure to pay child
support.
This amendment is proposed to meet the requirements of Family Code, §232.011,
which indicates licensing issuing agencies, when provided with a final order
from the Office of Attorney General or a court, shall suspend the license
of anyone failing to pay child support.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). The department
has reviewed §1.301 and has determined that reasons for adopting the
section continue to exist because rules on this subject are needed.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §1.301
in the
Texas Register
on September 4, 1998
(23 TexReg 9075). No comments were received due to publication of this notice.
Susan K. Steeg, General Counsel, has determined that for each year of the
first five years the section is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the
section as proposed.
Ms. Steeg has determined that for each year of the first five years the
amendment of §1.301 is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a
result of enforcing the section will be to provide a means by which the public
can better understand the methods used by the department to suspend licenses
for failure to pay child support. There will be no cost effects on micro-businesses
or small businesses. This was determined by interpretation of the rules that
micro-businesses or small businesses will not be required to alter their business
practices as a result of the proposed amendment of this rule. There are no
economic costs to persons who may be affected by the proposed amendment of
this rule. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Robin Carter, Legal Assistant,
Office of General Counsel, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street,
Austin, Texas 78756, (512) 458-7236 or by E-mail at the following address:
robin.carter@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments will be accepted for 30 days following
publication of this proposal in the
Texas Register
.
The amendment is proposed under Health and Safety Code, §12.001,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with authority to adopt rules
to implement every duty imposed by law on the board, the department and the
commissioner.
The amendment affects Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12. The review of
the section implements Government Code, §2001.039.
§1.301.Suspension of License for Failure to [
(a)-(h)
(No change.)
(i)
The department is exempt from liability to a license holder
for any act authorized
and performed
under the Family Code, Chapter
232, and this section [
(j)-(l)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304854
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §3.41
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes new §3.41,
concerning the adoption by reference of the memorandum of understanding (MOU)
regarding interagency coordination of special education services to students
with disabilities in residential facilities.
Texas Education Code, §29.012, requires that the Texas Education Agency
(TEA), the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, the Texas
Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Health, the Department
of Protective and Regulatory Services, the Interagency Council on Early Childhood
Intervention, the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, the Texas Juvenile
Probation Commission, and the Texas Youth Commission by a cooperative effort
to develop and, by rule, adopt a memorandum of understanding to establish
the respective responsibilities of the agencies for the provision of a free
appropriate public education for children with disabilities who reside in
facilities operated or regulated by the agencies. The MOU is contained in
a rule adopted by the TEA at 19 Texas Administrative Code, §89.1115,
effective August 6, 2002.
The MOU establishes the respective responsibilities of school districts
and of residential facilities for the provision of a free appropriate public
education, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
and addresses the respective roles and responsibilities of participating agencies
in the sharing of information about, and coordination of services to, students
with disabilities receiving special education services who live in residential
facilities. The MOU may be considered for expansion, modification, or amendment
upon mutual agreement of the executive officers of the participating agencies.
In the event that federal and/or state laws are amended, federally interpreted,
or judicially interpreted so as to render continued implementation of the
MOU unreasonable or impossible, the participating agencies may agree to amend
or terminate the MOU.
Nance Stearman, Health Facility Licensing and Compliance Division, has
determined that, based upon the fiscal note provided by TEA in proposed rules
published in the January 18, 2002, issue of the
Texas Register
(27 TexReg 445), for the first five years the section
is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications to state or local government
as a result of enforcing or administering the section as proposed.
Ms. Stearman has also determined that for each of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated by TEA as a result
of enforcing or administering the section will be that the interruption of
education services to students with disabilities living in residential facilities
is minimized through interagency efforts to share relevant student information
and coordinate the delivery of services. There will be no effect on small
or micro-businesses, or large businesses to comply with the section as proposed
based upon the previously referenced TEA proposed rules. There is no anticipated
economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed.
There is no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cindy Bednar, Director of
Hospital Program, Health Facility Licensing and Compliance Division, Texas
Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, (512) 834-6648.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
The new section is proposed under Texas Education Code, §29.012,
which authorizes the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Department of Mental
Health and Mental Retardation, the Texas Department of Human Services, the
Texas Department of Health, the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services,
the Interagency Council on Early Childhood Intervention, the Texas Commission
on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, and the
Texas Youth Commission by a cooperative effort to develop and by rule adopt
a memorandum of understanding; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which
provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt rules
for its procedures and for the performance of each duty imposed by law on
the board, the department, or the Commissioner of Health.
The new section affects Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12; and Texas Education
Code, §29.012.
§3.41.Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Special Education Services to Students with Disabilities in Residential Facilities.
(a)
The Texas Department of Health (department) adopts by reference
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Texas Education Agency, Texas
Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Texas Department of Health,
Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Texas Commission on
Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, Texas Youth Commission,
Interagency Council on Early Childhood Intervention, and the Texas Department
of Human Services. The MOU contains the agreement required by Texas Education
Code, Chapter 29, §29.012, to establish the respective responsibilities
of these agencies for the provision of a free appropriate public education
for children with disabilities who reside in facilities operated or regulated
by the agencies.
(b)
The MOU is adopted by rule in 19 Texas Administrative Code, §89.1115.
(c)
The effective date of the MOU, with respect to the department,
is the same as the effective date of this section.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304855
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §3.51
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes new §3.51,
concerning the adoption by reference of the memorandum of understanding (MOU)
related to individual transition planning for students receiving special education
services.
Texas Education Code, §29.011, requires that the Texas Education Agency
(TEA), the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation (TDMHMR),
and the Texas Rehabilitation Commission (TRC), by a cooperative effort, develop
and, by rule, adopt a MOU that establishes the respective responsibilities
of each agency for the provision of services necessary to prepare students
enrolled in special education programs for a successful transition to life
outside of the public school system. The statute also authorizes the TEA,
TDMHMR, and TRC to request other appropriate agencies to participate in the
development of the MOU, and, if requested, requires the agencies to participate
and adopt the memorandum. The MOU to be adopted by reference is between the
Texas Education Agency, Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation,
Texas Rehabilitation Commission, Texas Department of Health, Texas Commission
for the Blind, Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Texas Department
of Housing and Community Affairs, Texas Department of Human Services, Texas
Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Texas Higher Education Coordinating
Board, Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, Texas Youth Commission, and the
Texas Workforce Commission. The MOU is contained in a rule adopted by the
TEA at 19 Texas Administrative Code, §89.1110, effective January 1, 2003.
The MOU addresses respective roles and responsibilities of participating
agencies in the sharing of information about, and coordination of services
to, eligible students with disabilities receiving transition services. The
MOU provides definitions, addresses information sharing and agency participation,
contains provisions relating to regional and local collaboration, cross-agency
training, and dispute resolution, and provides for the MOU to be reviewed
and considered for expansion, modification, or amendment at any time the executive
officers for the parties agree, or at least every four years.
Nance Stearman, Health Facility Licensing and Compliance Division, has
determined that, based upon the fiscal note provided by TEA in proposed rules
published in the June 28, 2002, issue of the
Texas
Register
(27 TexReg 5666), for the first five years the section is
in effect, there will be no fiscal implications to state or local government
as a result of enforcing or administering the section as proposed.
Ms. Stearman has also determined that for each of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated by TEA as a result
of enforcing or administering the section will be that successful transition
of students with disabilities to post-secondary adult life endeavors are facilitated
when all appropriate agencies, which may be responsible for providing and/or
paying for transition services, coordinate efforts. TEA further stated that
it is critical that delivery of transition services is a coordinated set of
activities, focused on identified individual outcomes, that includes all appropriate
adult service agencies and stakeholders. Better coordinated transition service
delivery systems result in increased opportunities for students to achieve
their post-secondary goals for adult life benefiting the individual, his or
her family, and the community. Additionally, better coordinated services are
more cost effective for the state by reducing costly duplicative efforts by
multiple agencies. There will be no effect on small or micro-businesses, or
large businesses to comply with the section as proposed based upon the previously
referenced TEA proposed rules. There are no anticipated economic costs to
persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is
no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cindy Bednar, Director of
Hospital Program, Health Facility Licensing and Compliance Division, Texas
Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, (512) 834-6648.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
The new section is proposed under Texas Education Code, §29.011,
which authorizes the TEA, TDMHMR, and the TRC, and other agencies they request
to participate, to develop and, by rule, adopt a memorandum of understanding;
and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides the Texas Board of
Health (board) with the authority to adopt rules for its procedures and for
the performance of each duty imposed by law on the board, the department,
or the Commissioner of Health.
The new section affects Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12; and Texas Education
Code, §29.011.
§3.51.Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Individual Transition Planning for Students Receiving Special Education Services.
(a)
The Texas Department of Health (department) adopts by reference
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Texas Education Agency, the
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Texas Rehabilitation
Commission, Texas Department of Health, Texas Commission for the Blind, Texas
Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Texas Department of Housing and
Community Affairs, Texas Department of Human Services, Texas Department of
Protective and Regulatory Services, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board,
Texas Juvenile Probation Commission, Texas Youth Commission, and the Texas
Workforce Commission. The MOU contains the agreement required by Texas Education
Code, Chapter 29, §29.011, to establish the respective responsibilities
of these agencies for the provision of the services necessary to prepare students
receiving special education services for a successful transition to life outside
the public school system.
(b)
The MOU is adopted by rule in 19 Texas Administrative Code, §89.1110.
(c)
The effective date of the MOU, with respect to the department,
is the same as the effective date of this section.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304853
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes the repeal of §§5.51-5.59
and new §§5.51-5.52, concerning the operations and funding for Poison
Control Centers and the Poison Control Coordinating Committee (committee).
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Sections 5.51-5.59
have been reviewed and the department has determined that reasons for adopting
the sections continue to exist in that rules on this subject are needed; however
the need to reorganize and modify the existing sections warrants the repeal
and proposed new sections.
Additionally, Government Code, Chapter 2110, requires that each state agency
adopt rules on advisory committees. The rules must state the purpose of the
committee, describe the tasks of the committee, describe the manner in which
the committee will report to the agency, and establish a date on which the
committee will be automatically abolished unless the governing body of the
agency affirmatively votes to continue the committee's existence.
In 1999, the Texas Board of Health (board) established a rule relating
to the Poison Control Coordinating Committee. Section 5.51 states that the
committee will automatically be abolished on November 1, 2003, and the department
has determined that the committee should be abolished on that date. Issues
relating to the type of advice previously provided by the committee are better
addressed through the establishment of ad hoc workgroups.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §§5.51-5.59,
as required by Government Code, §2001.039, in the February 12, 1999,
issue of the
Texas Register
(24 TexReg 1001).
In addition, a public hearing was held on May 13, 2002, to accept stakeholder
input.
The existing sections were edited and restructured to delete repetitive,
ambiguous, obsolete, unenforceable, and unnecessary language. The new sections
improve draftsmanship and make the rules more accessible, understandable,
and usable. Much of the proposed language is former language; however, the
sections were reorganized in a more logical manner resulting in the language
appearing as new in the proposed sections.
New §5.51 gives general program information and new §5.52 outlines
the criteria for funding.
Ernest (Skip) Oertli, Chief, Bureau of Epidemiology, has determined that
for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, there will
be no fiscal implication to state or local government as a result of enforcing
or administering the sections as proposed.
Dr. Oertli has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the new rules
will be increased clarity and ease of understanding the rules. There will
be no costs to micro-businesses or small businesses to comply with the sections
since the proposal will not require these entities to alter their business
practice. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required
to comply with the sections as proposed. There is no anticipated impact on
local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Judy Whitfield, Program Administrator,
Poison Control Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Texas Department of Health,
1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3183 (512) 458-7268. Comments will
be accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal in the
Subchapter B. POISON CONTROL CENTERS
25 TAC §§5.51 - 5.59
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeals are proposed under the Texas Health and
Safety Code, §11.016, which allows the board to establish advisory committees;
Government Code, Chapter 2110, which sets standards for the evaluation of
advisory committees by the agencies for which they function; Texas Health
and Safety Code, §77.009, which requires the board with the authority
to establish a program to award grants to fund a network of regional poison
control centers; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides
the board with authority to adopt rules to implement every duty imposed by
law on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health. The review
of these rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.
The repeals affect the Health and Safety Code, Chapters 5, 11, and 12.
§5.51.General Program Information.
§5.52.Eligible Recipients.
§5.53.State Network Operations Plan.
§5.54.Poison Control Answering Point (PCAP) Operations Plan.
§5.55.Procedures for Requests for Funding.
§5.56.Criteria for Funding.
§5.57.Contracts.
§5.58.Applied Research Grant Program.
§5.59.Poison Control Region.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304850
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §5.51, §5.52
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, §11.016, which allows the board to establish advisory committees;
Government Code, Chapter 2110, which sets standards for the evaluation of
advisory committees by the agencies for which they function; Texas Health
and Safety Code, §77.009, which requires the board with the authority
to establish a program to award grants to fund a network of regional poison
control centers; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides
the board with authority to adopt rules to implement every duty imposed by
law on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health. The review
of these rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.
The new sections affect the Health and Safety Code, Chapters 5, 11, and
12.
§5.51.General Program Information.
(a)
Authority. Health and Safety Code, Chapter 777, provides
the Texas Department of Health (department) and the Commission on State Emergency
Communications (commission) with the authority to establish a program to award
grants to fund a network of regional poison control centers.
(b)
The commission and the department shall adopt a statewide
telecommunications network plan. The plan may establish phased implementation
of the network. The plan shall consider the following:
(1)
uniform statewide 800-service availability for community
and professional access for poison information and referral;
(2)
direct access from Public Safety Answering Points to Poison
Control Answering Points for emergency calls; and
(3)
other features as appropriate and identified by this section.
(c)
The Texas Health and Human Services (HHS) regions shall
define the service areas for the Poison Control Answering Points, except where
telecommunications network design would greatly increase the cost of routing
the system. The regions are as follows:
(1)
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston - HHS
Regions 5 and 6;
(2)
The Dallas County Hospital District/North Texas Poison
Center - HHS Regions 3 and 4;
(3)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- HHS Regions 8 and 11;
(4)
R.E. Thomason General Hospital, El Paso County Hospital
District - HHS Regions 9 and 10;
(5)
Northwest Texas Hospital, Amarillo Hospital District -
HHS Regions 1 and 2; and
(6)
Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple - HHS Region
7.
§5.52.Funding.
(a)
Eligibility for funding.
(1)
The entities eligible to request funding are the regional
poison control centers for the state, designated under the Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 777, as follows:
(A)
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston;
(B)
Dallas County Hospital District/North Texas Poison Center;
(C)
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio;
(D)
R.E. Thomason General Hospital, El Paso County Hospital
District;
(E)
Northwest Texas Hospital, Amarillo Hospital District; and
(F)
Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple.
(2)
Each poison control center must be certified by the American
Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) until a statewide system certification
is achieved. The Commission on State Emergency Communications and the Texas
Department of Health shall work together with the AAPCC to certify the statewide
poison control network and/or individual centers as required.
(b)
Funding criteria. Applicants must meet all of the goals
and objectives outlined in the annual Request for Proposals, including:
(1)
the need of the region based on population served for poison
control services, and the extent to which the grant would meet the identified
need;
(2)
a four-year strategic plan assuring provision of quality
service;
(3)
demonstration that the Poison Control Answering Point is
working toward achieving and/or maintaining certification as a poison control
center with the AAPCC; and
(4)
the availability of other funding sources; the maintenance
of effort; and the development or existence of telecommunications systems.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304849
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter D. CLEARINGHOUSE FOR PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS SEEKING COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes the repeal of §§39.91-39.94
and new §§39.91-39.94, concerning the department's clearinghouse
for primary care providers seeking collaborative practice.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each agency review and consider
for readoption each rule adopted by the agency under Government Code, Chapter
2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). The department has reviewed and has determined
that the reasons for adopting §§39.91-39.94 continue to exist. Health
and Safety Code, §105.007, requires the Statewide Health Care Coordinating
Council (the council) to develop and establish a clearinghouse for health
professionals seeking collaborative practice. The department assists the council
in performing the council's duties and functions as authorized by Health and
Safety Code, §104.014, under these rules. The department has determined
that the rules would be more useful to interested individuals if the language
was simplified and updated; however, the existing sections are proposed for
repeal and the new sections are proposed without substantive changes.
The department published a Notice of Intent to Review for §§39.91-39.94
in the
Texas Register
(25 TexReg 3800), on
April 28, 2000. No comments were received due to publication of the notice.
Bruce A. Gunn, Ph.D., Director, Health Professions Resources Center, has
determined that for the each year of the first years the sections are in effect,
there will be no fiscal impact on state or local governments as a result of
administering the sections.
Dr. Gunn has determined that for each of the first five years the sections
are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering
the sections will be the increased ability for health professionals seeking
collaborative practice to locate positions available, or communities, professionals
and entities seeking health professionals to locate and place qualified individuals.
The purpose of the clearinghouse remains the same. There will be no effect
on small businesses or micro-businesses as a result of the new sections because
no substantive changes are being made. Only persons seeking to register with
the clearinghouse are required to comply with the sections. There are no economic
costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.
There will be no effect on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Bruce A. Gunn, Ph.D., Director,
Health Professions Resource Center, Center for Health Statistics, or Joan
Carol Bates, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Texas Department
of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3180, or electronically
to bruce.gunn@tdh.state.tx.us, or joan.bates@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments will
be accepted for 30 days following publication of the proposal in the
25 TAC §§39.91 - 39.94
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeals are proposed under the Health and Safety
Code, §105.007, which requires the council to establish the clearinghouse.
The department assists the council in performing the council's duties and
functions as authorized by Health and Safety Code, §104.014, under these
rules. Health and Safety Code, §12.001, provides the board with the authority
to adopt rules for the performance of each duty imposed by law on the board,
the department, and the commissioner. The review of these rules implements
Government Code, §2001.039.
The repeals affect Health and Safety Code, Chapters 12, 104, and 105.
§39.91.Purpose and Scope.
§39.92.Definitions.
§39.93.Scope of Clearinghouse Activities.
§39.94.Establishment of a Registry of Primary Care Providers Seeking Collaborative Practice Opportunities.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304842
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §§39.91 - 39.94
The new sections are proposed under the Health and Safety
Code, §105.007, which requires the council to establish the clearinghouse.
The department assists the council in performing the council's duties and
functions as authorized by Health and Safety Code, §104.014, under these
rules. Health and Safety Code, §12.001, provides the board with the authority
to adopt rules for the performance of each duty imposed by law on the board,
the department, and the commissioner. The review of these rules implements
Government Code, §2001.039.
The new sections affect Health and Safety Code, Chapters 12, 104, and 105.
§39.91.Purpose and Authority.
(a)
Purpose. These sections provide the criteria and procedures
the department uses to determine the health professionals to include in the
Health Professions Resource Center's primary care provider clearinghouse.
(b)
Authority. These sections are authorized by Health and
Safety Code, §105.007, which requires the council to develop and establish
a clearinghouse for health professionals seeking collaborative practice. The
department assists the council in performing the council's duties and functions
as authorized by Health and Safety Code, §104.014, under these rules.
§39.92.Definitions.
Terms used in this section have the following meanings, unless the
context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms not defined have their common meanings.
(1)
Board - The Texas Board of Health.
(2)
Clearinghouse - The Internet accessible registry maintained
by the Health Professions Resource Center listing primary care providers seeking
opportunities to serve on a primary care team in settings such as rural health
clinics, federally qualified health centers, or private group practices.
(3)
Council - The Statewide Health Coordinating Council
(4)
Department - The Texas Department of Health.
(5)
Federally qualified health centers - Has the meaning given
the term in 42 U.S.C. §1395x(aa)(4).
(6)
Health Professions Resource Center - The center established
by Health and Safety Code, Chapter 105, for the collection and analysis of
educational and employment trends for health professions in the state.
(7)
Primary care provider - Primary care providers include
the following:
(A)
a physician with an unrestricted, active license issued
by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners who practices or plans to practice
in the following specialty areas:
(i)
family/general practice;
(ii)
general pediatrics;
(iii)
general internal medicine; or
(iv)
obstetrics/gynecology;
(B)
an advanced practice nurse with an unrestricted, active
license as a registered nurse in Texas or a state party to the Interstate
Nurse Licensure Compact, authorization to practice as an advanced practice
nurse by the Board of Nurse Examiners for the State of Texas, and who practices
or plans to practice in any of the following specialty areas:
(i)
adult health;
(ii)
family health;
(iii)
geriatrics;
(iv)
nurse-midwifery;
(v)
pediatrics;
(vi)
school health; or
(vii)
women's health;
(C)
a physician assistant with an unrestricted, active license
issued by the Texas State Board of Physician Assistant Examiners who practices
or plans to practice in one of the following specialty areas:
(i)
family/general medicine;
(ii)
general pediatrics;
(iii)
general internal medicine; or
(iv)
obstetrics/gynecology.
(8)
Rural health clinics - Has the meaning given the term in
42 U.S.C. §1395x(aa)(2).
§39.93.Provider Registration.
A primary care provider may register with the clearinghouse by completing
and submitting a paper form to the clearinghouse, or by accessing and completing
the electronic Candidate Interview Forms available online using the department's
Internet site at http://www.tdh.state.tx.us/dpa/clrhouse.htm or http://www.texaspracticesites.org/.
§39.94.Duties of the Department.
(a)
The department will develop, maintain, and encourage the
use of the clearinghouse as an effective and efficient tool for primary care
providers to establish collaborative practice opportunities.
(b)
The department will collect name, mailing address, phone
number, electronic mail address, primary specialty information, preferred
practice setting, preferred practice location, and other information relevant
to establishing and effective clearinghouse for primary care providers.
(c)
The department will give a provider either written or electronic
notice of the status of the provider's registration. Only registrations with
all required fields completed and accepted will be included in the registry.
(d)
A provider whose registration is not approved for inclusion
in the registry for any reason other than for incomplete information may request
informal reconsideration of the determination by submitting a written request
to Manager, Health Professions Resource Center, Center for Health Statistics,
Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756. Written
requests for reconsideration must be made within 10 days from the date the
department sent an electronic notice or within 10 working days of the postmarked
date of the department's written notice. Denials based on failure to meet
the licensing requirements of the appropriate licensing authority are not
appealable to the department.
(e)
A provider will be included in the clearinghouse registry
for four months, unless the provider requests to be deleted. A provider must
reapply every four months to remain in the registry. The department will provide
electronic or written notices to registrants whose names will be deleted if
the provider does not re-register.
(f)
The department will update the registry only during the
first week of each month. Information received during the second through fourth
weeks of the month regarding additions, changes, or deletions to the registry
will be processed during the first week of the following month.
(g)
The department will notify providers and registrants when
the opportunity for a successful collaboration occurs, and work with each
party to follow through on opportunities.
(h)
There are no fees for using the services provided by the
clearinghouse.
(i)
Information provided to the department for inclusion in
the clearinghouse is subject to Government Code, §552.001, et seq.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304841
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter D. OSTEOPOROSIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
25 TAC §61.61
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes
the repeal of §61.61, concerning the Osteoporosis Advisory Committee
(committee). The committee has provided advice to the Texas Board of Health
(board) and the department on strategies for educating the public on the health
benefits of the early detection, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis.
In 1993, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 383 (now codified in
the Government Code, Chapter 2110) which requires that each state agency adopt
rules on advisory committees. The rules must state the purpose of the committee,
describe the tasks of the committee, and describe the manner in which the
committee will report to the agency.
Funding for the Osteoporosis Prevention Education Program was eliminated
for the FY 2004-2005 Biennium. Therefore, the need for this committee and
section no longer exists.
Jacquelyn McDonald, Director, Office of the Board of Health, has determined
that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, there
will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering this section.
Ms. McDonald has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated will be increased
flexibility and breadth in obtaining specific input on issues related to osteoporosis.
There will be no effect on micro-businesses or small businesses. The proposed
rule will not require small businesses and micro-businesses to alter their
business practices. There is no economic costs to persons as a result of the
elimination of all references to the committee. There will be no effect on
local employment.
Comments may be submitted to Jacquelyn McDonald, Director, Office of the
Board of Health, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
Texas 78756, (512) 458-7484. Comments on the proposed section will be accepted
for 30 days following publication in the
Texas Register
.
The repeal is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, §11.016,
which allows the board to establish advisory committees; Health and Safety
Code, §90.03, which allows the department to establish a task force on
osteoporosis; the Government Code, Chapter 2110, which sets standards for
the evaluation of advisory committees by the agencies for which they function;
and the Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides the board with
authority to adopt rules for the performance of every duty imposed by law
upon the board, the department, and the commissioner of health.
The proposed repeal affects the Health and Safety Code, Chapters 11 and
90; and the Government Code, Chapter 2110.
§61.61.The Osteoporosis Advisory Committee.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304848
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes the repeal of §73.22
and amendments to §§73.51, 73.54 and 73.55, concerning fees for
laboratory services.
The proposed rules include editorial changes to the existing rules; increases
to the maximum cap on existing fees and new fees for clinical and environmental
testing; and other laboratory services, such as calibration of thermometers.
The repeal of §73.22, which is the fee schedule for certification and
accreditation of environmental laboratories, is necessary because the Texas
Commission for Environmental Quality now administers this program. Section
73.51 contains editorial changes to correct misspelled chemical names and
to expand some of the definitions. Sections 73.54 and 73.55 contain the fee
schedules for clinical, newborn screening, environmental testing, and other
laboratory services. These sections include proposed new fees and increased
maximum caps on existing fees.
Dr. Susan Neill, Chief, Bureau of Laboratories, has determined that for
each year of the first five-year period the sections are in effect, there
will be fiscal implications as a result of administering the sections as proposed.
The estimated increase in revenues to the state for each of the first five
years the sections are in effect are $200,000 for FY 2004, $250,000 for FY
2005, $300,000 for FY 2006, $350,000 for FY 2007 and $400,000 for FY 2008.
These revenues will offset a portion of the costs of performing the laboratory
tests. Potentially, there will be increased costs to manage billing and accounts
receivable in the Bureau of Laboratories (bureau). It is estimated that the
costs to the department to administer the new provisions will be offset by
the estimated revenue increases. There will be no effect on existing contracts
with other state agencies. Increased costs to local governments cannot be
determined at this time.
Dr. Neill has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the sections will be the availability of tests previously unavailable
to local health departments, state agencies and contractors on a fee for service
basis. There will be no cost to micro-businesses, small businesses or persons
(other than to those that submit specimens for testing) to comply with the
sections as proposed. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be directed to Mrs. Sherry S. Clay, Director,
Quality and Regulatory Affairs Division, Bureau of Laboratories, Texas Department
of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3199. Comments will
be accepted for 30 days following the date of publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
25 TAC §73.22
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal is proposed under Health and Safety Code, §12.001,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt
rules for the performance of every duty imposed by law on the board, the department,
and the commissioner of health; §§12.031 and 12.032, which allow
the board to charge fees to a person who receives public health services from
the department; §12.034, which requires the board to establish collection
procedures and §12.035, which required the department to deposit all
money collected for fees and charges under §§12.032 and 12.033 in
the state treasury to the credit of the Texas Department of Health public
health service fee fund; and §12.0122, which allows the department to
enter into a contract for laboratory services.
The repeal affects Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12.
§73.22.Fee Schedule for Certification and Accreditation of Environmental Laboratories.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304846
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §§73.51, 73.54, 73.55
The amendments are proposed under Health and Safety Code, §12.001,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt
rules for the performance of every duty imposed by law on the board, the department,
and the commissioner of health; §§12.031 and 12.032, which allow
the board to charge fees to a person who receives public health services from
the department; §12.034, which requires the board to establish collection
procedures and §12.035, which required the department to deposit all
money collected for fees and charges under §§12.032 and 12.033 in
the state treasury to the credit of the Texas Department of Health public
health service fee fund; and §12.0122, which allows the department to
enter into a contract for laboratory services.
The amendments affect Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12.
§73.51.Fees.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in
this section shall have the following meaning unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise.
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(3)
Fish tissue metals group - Arsenic, [
(4)
(No change.)
(5)
ICP/ICP-MS drinking water metals group - Aluminum, arsenic,
barium, beryllium,
calcium,
total hardness (calculated), chromium,
copper, iron, lead, magnesium manganese, nickel, silver,
sodium,
and
zinc.
(6)
(No change.)
(7)
Semi-volatile organic compounds in fish - 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene,
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4-dimethylphenol,
2,4-dinitrophenol, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, 2,6-dinitrotoluene, 2-chloronaphthalene,
2-chlorophenol, 2-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylphenol, 2-nitroaniline, 2-nitrophenol,
3,4-methylphenol, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, 3-nitroaniline, 4,5-dinitro-2-methylphenol,
4-bromophenyl-phenylether, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 4-chloraniline, 4-chlorophenyl-phenylether,
4-nitroaniline, 4-nitrophenol, acenaphthene, acenapthylene, aldrin, alpha-bhc,
alpha-endosulfan, aniline, anthracene, benzidine, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene,
benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzoic
acid, benzyl alcohol, beta-bhc, beta-endosulfan, bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane,
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether, bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate,
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, chrysene, delta-bhc,
dibenz(a,h)anthracene,
[
(8)
(No change.)
(c)-(h)
(No change.)
§73.54.Fee Schedule for Clinical Testing and Newborn Screening.
Fees for clinical testing and newborn screening shall not exceed the
following amounts.
(1)
Human specimens.
(A)
Bacteriology.
(i)
Aerobic isolation, comprehensive -
$119
[
(ii)
Anaerobic isolation, comprehensive -
$94
[
(iii)
Bioterrorism
[
(I)
culture -
$119
[
(II)
smear -
$19
[
(iv)
Bordetella pertussis
:
(I)
culture -
$138
[
(II)
molecular testing -
$125
[
(v)
C. botulinum
isolation
-
$94
[
[
(vi)
[
(vii)
[
(I)
VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococcus) -
$63;
[
(II)
VRSA (vancomycin resistant
Staphylococcus
aureus
) -
$63
[
(III)
MRSA (methicillin resistant
(IV)
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
- $63; and
(V)
One drug susceptibility testing
- $63.
(viii)
[
(ix)
Magnetic bead enrichment for
(x)
Fatty acid analysis -
$63
[
(xi)
Genetic probe
:
(I)
[
(II)
amplified probe for gonorrhea
- $31;
(III)
amplified probe for chlamydia
- $31; and
(IV)
amplified probe for gonorrhea/chlamydia
-$63.
(xii)
Identification and typing:
(I)
EHEC
[
(II)
Haemophilus
[
(III)
Neisseria meningitides
[
(IV)
noncomplex typing (
Vibrio
,
(V)
other complex typing -
$130
[
(VI)
Salmonella
-
$119
[
(VII)
Shigella
-
$73
[
(VIII)
Streptococcus
, Group
A (GAS) -
$88
[
(IX)
Streptococcus, typing Groups
B, C, D, G - $88.
(xiii)
Molecular studies:
(I)
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
[
(II)
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -
$56
[
(xiv)
Mycolic acid studies -
$31
[
(xv)
Neisseria
type-name="italic">gonorrhoeae
[
(xvi)
Pure culture identification:
(I)
aerobes -
$56
[
(II)
anaerobes -
$100
[
(III)
Campylobacter
-
$69
[
(IV)
Neisseria
type-name="italic">gonorrhoeae
[
(xvii)
Streptococcus
screen
-
$25
[
(xviii)
Tissue:
(I)
Lyme disease -
$75
[
(II)
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF)
[
(III)
relapsing fever -
$113
[
(xix)
Toxin studies:
(I)
Botulinum
[
(II)
Clostridium
toxin -
$44
[
(III)
Shiga toxin -
$94;
[
(IV)
Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1 (TSST) -
$88;
[
(V)
Vibrio
cholera toxin -
$88.
(xx)
Vibrio
culture -
$88
[
(B)
Clinical chemistry.
(i)
Blood typing:
(I)
ABO typing -
$9.00
[
(II)
antibody screen (blood type) -
$25
[
(III)
antigen typing (blood type) -
$13
[
(IV)
antigen titering -
$13
[
(V)
Rh typing -
$13
[
(ii)
Cholesterol:
(I)
cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) -
$9.00
[
(II)
cholesterol only -
$8.00
[
(iii)
Glucose:
(I)
glucose, postprandial, 0 and 2 hours -
$14
[
(II)
glucose, random, fasting -
$7.00
[
(III)
glucose tolerance test, 1 hour -
$14
[
(IV)
glucose tolerance test, 2 hour -
$21
[
(V)
glucose tolerance test, 3 hour -
$28
[
(iv)
Hemoglobin, total -
$6.00
[
(v)
Hemoglobinopathy -
$15
[
(vi)
Lead screen -
$11
[
(vii)
Lipid profile, includes cholesterol; triglycerides; HDL;
and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) -
$28
[
(viii)
Phenylalanine -
$38
[
(ix)
Phenylalanine/Tyrosine -
$38
[
(x)
Tyrosine - $38.
(xi)
[
(xii)
[
[
(xiii)
Free T4 -
$19
[
(xiv)
Total T4 -
$16
[
(C)
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) analysis:
(i)
Beta-Globin 6 mutation panel
(HbS, HbC, Hb E, HbD, Beta-Thalassemias-29 and -88) - $150;
(ii)
Beta-Globin 5 mutation panel
(HbS, HbC, Hb E, Beta-Thalassemias-29 and -88) - $138;
(iii)
Hemoglobin S and C mutation
Test - $88;
(iv)
Hemoglobin E mutation test
- $88;
(v)
Beta-Thalassemia-29 and -88
mutation test - $100;
(vi)
Beta-Thalassemia-29 mutation
test - $63;
(vii)
Beta-Thalassemia-88 mutation
test - $63;
(viii)
Hemoglobin D mutation test
- $63;
(ix)
Beta-Globin sequencing (from
105 of cap site to IVS-1-60 - $188;
(x)
Beta-Globin sequencing (from
105 of cap site to IVS-1-60) added to another test - $100;
[
(xi)
[
(xii)
[
(xiii)
[
(xiv)
[
[
[
(xv)
[
(xvi)
[
(D)
Genetics:
(i)
alpha fetoprotein (AFP) -
$31
[
(ii)
ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) -
$16
[
(iii)
unconjugated estriol-3 (UE3) -
$22
[
(iv)
triple screen, includes ß-HCG, UE3, and AFP -
$63
[
(E)
Mycobacteriology/mycology.
(i)
Acid fast bacillus (AFB):
(I)
amplification only -
$69
[
(II)
identification, referred isolates -
$31
[
(III)
primary drug panel -
$56
[
(IV)
probe only -
$44
[
(V)
Pyrazinamide (PZA) only -
$19
[
(VI)
secondary drug panel -
$163
[
(VII)
smear and culture -
$56
[
(VIII)
smear only -
$19
[
(IX)
smear, culture and fungal culture -
$131
[
(ii)
Direct High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC),
only -
$31
[
(iii)
Fungus:
(I)
culture -
$75
[
(II)
identification -
$69
[
(III)
probe only -
$44
[
(iv)
M. kansasii
susceptibility,
Rifampin
[
(F)
Newborn screening test kit, including screening panel -
$38
[
(G)
Parasitology.
(i)
Blood/tissue parasites -
$156
[
(ii)
Giardia/Cryptosporidium
antigen
screen -
$94
[
(iii)
Intestinal parasites -
$119
[
(iv)
Parasite culture -
$169
[
(v)
Pinworm swab -
$31
[
(vi)
Worm identification -
$44
[
(H)
Serology.
(i)
Arbovirus:
(I)
immunoglobulin G (IgG) -
$63
[
(II)
immunoglobulin M (IgM) -
$88
[
(III)
panel -
$150
[
(ii)
Aspergillus
-
$31
[
(iii)
Brucella
-
$16
[
(iv)
Cat scratch fever (
Bartonella
) -
$50
[
(v)
Cytomegalovirus (CMV):
(I)
IgG -
$38
[
(II)
IgM -
$44
[
(III)
panel -
$44
[
(vi)
Erlichia
-
$50
[
(vii)
FTA (fluorescent triponemal antibody) only -
$38
[
(viii)
Fungus:
(I)
identification -
$69
[
(II)
panel -
$88
[
(ix)
Hantavirus, IgG/IgM -
$94
[
(x)
Hepatitis A:
(I)
IgM -
$56
[
(II)
total -
$13
[
(xi)
Hepatitis B:
(I)
core antibody -
$38
[
(II)
surface antibody (Ab) -
$19
[
(III)
surface antigen (Ag) -
$13
[
(xii)
Hepatitis B e Ab -
$25
[
(xiii)
Hepatitis B e Ag -
$19
[
(xiv)
Hepatitis C (HCV) -
$15
[
(xv)
Hepatitis C (RIBA) -
$175
[
(xvi)
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV):
(I)
confirmation -
$44
[
(II)
screen -
$13
[
(III)
viral load -
$175
[
(xvii)
HIV/HCV panel -
$28
[
(xviii)
Influenza A and B -
$50
[
(xix)
Legionella
-
$69
[
(xx)
Lyme (
Borrelia
) IgG/IgM
panel -
$38
[
(xxi)
Miscellaneous serological tests -
$38
[
(xxii)
Mumps:
(I)
IgG -
$38
[
(II)
IgM -
$38
[
(xxiii)
Parvovirus B-19, IgG/IgM -
$75
[
(xxiv)
Plague (
Yersinia
) -
$19
[
(xxv)
Poliomyelitis (polio) I, II, III -
$88
[
(xxvi)
Q-fever -
$63
[
(xxvii)
Rickettsia
Panel -
$69
[
(xxviii)
Rickettsia/Ehrlichia
Panel
-
$119
[
(xxix)
RPR (rapid plasma reagent test) -
$6.00
[
(xxx)
RPR/syphilis confirmation -
$16
[
(xxxi)
Rubella:
(I)
IgG -
$19
[
(II)
IgM -
$38
[
(III)
screen -
$9.00
[
(xxxii)
Rubeola:
(I)
IgG -
$38
[
(II)
IgM -
$44
[
(xxxiii)
Toxoplasmosis:
(I)
IgG -
$50
[
(II)
IgM -
$50
[
(xxxiv)
Tularemia (
Francisela
)
-
$56
[
(xxxv)
Varicella zoster
-
$56
[
(xxxvi)
VDRL (venereal disease research laboratory) test -
$28
[
(xxxvii)
West Nile virus (WNV) -
$19
[
(I)
Virology.
(i)
Chlamydia
culture -
$100
[
(ii)
Dengue
isolation -
$100
[
(iii)
Electron microscope studies only -
$356
[
(iv)
Herpes simplex isolation -
$106
[
(v)
Influenza:
(I)
surveillance -
$156
[
(II)
subtyping -
$131
[
(vi)
Virus:
(I)
detection by PCR -
$313
[
(II)
virus identification on submitted isolate (reference specimen)
-
$313
[
(III)
virus isolation, comprehensive -
$263
[
(2)
Non-human specimens.
(A)
Bacteriology.
(i)
Environmental:
(I)
Swabs -
$31
[
(II)
Legionella
-
$88
[
(III)
bioterrorism -
$250
[
(IV)
bioterrorism smear -
$19;
[
(V)
thermometer calibration - $38;
and
(VI)
weight calibration - $38.
(ii)
Food.
(I)
Bioterrorism -
$250
[
(II)
Botulism (
C. botulinum
)
-
$150
[
(III)
Pathogen panel:
(-a-)
basic -
$144
[
(-b-)
complex -
$350
[
(IV)
Single organism -
$56
[
(V)
Standard plate count -
$31
[
(VI)
Toxin -
$56
[
(iii)
Milk and dairy products.
(I)
Dairy, cultured -
$44
[
(II)
Ice cream -
$88
[
(III)
Milk:
(-a-)
pasteurized milk panel -
$119
[
(-b-)
raw milk panel -
$150
[
(-c-)
single test -
$88
[
(iv)
Seafood:
(I)
brevitoxin -
$250
[
(II)
fecal coliform -
$50
[
(III)
standard plate count -
$44
[
(IV)
Vibrios
-
$75
[
(v)
Water.
(I)
Bay waters -
$38
[
(II)
Coliform:
(-a-)
fecal -
$38
[
(-b-)
coliform, total -
$50
[
(III)
Potable water -
$31
[
(IV)
Reagent water suitability -
$113
[
(B)
Entomology.
(i)
Insect examination, Chaga's disease -
$31
[
(ii)
Insect identification -
$25
[
(iii)
Mosquito identification:
(I)
adult, per carton -
$63
[
(II)
egg paddle, per paddle -
$8.00
[
(III)
larvae, per vial -
$56
[
(iv)
Tick examination:
(I)
Lyme disease,
Borrelia
and
Rocky
[
(II)
relapsing fever -
$44
[
(III)
tick [
(C)
Parasitology. Water filter examination -
$219
[
(D)
Serology.
(i)
Arbovirus, equine, includes western equine encephalitis
(WEE); eastern equine encephalitis (EEE); and
west nile virus (WNV)
[
(ii)
Hantavirus, animal -
$94
[
(iii)
Plague (
Yersinia
), animal
-
$19
[
(E)
Virology.
(i)
Arbovirus isolation:
(I)
avian -
$44
[
(II)
mosquito -
$75
[
(ii)
Arbovirus PCR:
(I)
avian -
$313
[
(II)
mosquito -
$313
[
(iii)
Avian serology:
(I)
arbovirus -
$69
[
(II)
arbovirus (chicken) -
$38
[
(iv)
Rabies testing -
$81
[
(v)
Rabies virus typing:
(I)
molecular -
$156
[
(II)
monoclonal -
$44
[
(F)
Handling fees.
(i)
Pathogenic agents -
$75
[
(ii)
Clinical specimens and environmental samples -
$38
[
§73.55.Fee Schedule for Chemical Testing of Environmental Samples.
Fees for chemical testing of environmental samples shall not exceed
the following amounts.
(1)
The following fees apply to the analysis of organic compounds
in air:
(A)
formaldehyde, National Institute Of Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) methods -
$163
[
(B)
pesticides, NIOSH
method
[
(C)
VOCs, NIOSH
method
[
(2)
The following fees apply to the analysis of drinking [
(A)
Inorganic parameters.
(i)
Individual tests:
(I)
alkalinity, total and phenolphthalein, Standard Methods
(SM), 18th edition, 2320B -
$29
[
(II)
bicarbonate-carbonate, with alkalinity, SM, 18th edition,
2320B -
$19
[
(III)
bicarbonate-carbonate, without alkalinity, SM, 18th edition,
2320B -
$29
[
(IV)
boron, SM, 18th edition,
4500B
[
(V)
bromate, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 300.1
-
$138
[
(VI)
bromide, EPA method 300.0 -
$31
[
(VII)
carbon, total organic, SM, 18th edition, 5310C -
$54
[
(VIII)
chlorate, EPA method 300.0 -
$69
[
(IX)
chloride, EPA method 300.0 -
$24
[
(X)
chlorine, SM, 19th edition, 4500-Cl F -
$25
[
(XI)
chlorine dioxide, SM, 19th edition, 4500-ClO2 B -
$100
[
(XII)
chlorite, EPA method 300.0 -
$69
[
(XIII)
chloramines, SM, 19th edition, 4500-ClO2 D -
$25
[
(XIV)
color, SM, 18th edition, [
(XV)
conductivity
, [
(XVI)
cyanide, total,
SM, 18th edition
[
(XVII)
fluoride, EPA method 300.0 -
$24
[
(XVIII)
hardness, EPA method 130.1 -
$54
[
(XIX)
nitrate and nitrite as nitrogen, EPA method 353.2 -
$28
[
(XX)
nitrate as nitrogen, EPA method 353.2 -
$28
[
(XXI)
nitrite as nitrogen, EPA method 353.2 -
$28
[
(XXII)
odor,
EPA method 140.1,
[
(XXIII)
perchlorate, EPA method 314.0 -
$69
[
(XXIV)
perchlorate, Unregulated Contamination Monitoring Regulation
(UCMR), EPA
method
314.0 -
$76
[
(XXV)
pH, EPA method 150.1 -
$24
[
(XXVI)
phenolics, total recoverable, EPA
method 420.1
[
(XXVII)
residue, total, SM, 18th edition, 2540B -
$28
[
(XXVIII)
silica, dissolved, SM, 18th edition, 4500Si
F
-
$30
[
(XXIX)
solids, suspended, volatile or fixed, SM, 18th edition,
2540G -
$39
[
(XXX)
solids, total dissolved, calculated, SM, 18th edition,
1030F -
$18
[
(XXXI)
solids, total dissolved, determined, SM, 18th edition,
2540C -
$39
[
(XXXII)
solids, total suspended, SM, 18th edition, 2540D -
$39
[
(XXXIII)
sulfate, EPA method 300.0 -
$24
[
(XXXIV)
turbidity, EPA method 180.1 -
$25
[
(ii)
Routine water mineral group, EPA methods 150.1, 300.0,
and 353.2, and SM, 18th edition, 2320B, 2510B, and
2540C
[
(B)
Metals analysis. A preparation fee applies to all drinking
water samples analyzed by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) or by inductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with turbidity greater than or equal
to 1 Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU). The total analysis cost includes
the sample preparation fee and the per-element or per-group fee.
(i)
Sample preparation fee - total recoverable metals digestion,
EPA method 200.2 -
$36
[
(ii)
Per-element analysis fees:
(I)
mercury, EPA method 245.1 -
$31
[
(II)
single ICP, EPA method 200.7 -
$24
[
(III)
single ICP-MS, EPA method 200.8 -
$31
[
(iii)
Group fees:
(I)
all metals drinking water group, EPA methods, 200.7, 200.8,
and 245.1 -
$330
[
(II)
ICP/ICP-MS metals drinking water group, EPA methods 200.7
and 200.8 -
$206
[
(III)
lead/copper, EPA method 200.8 -
$30
[
(C)
Organic compounds:
(i)
chlorinated pesticides and PCBs in drinking water, EPA
method 508 -
$258
[
(ii)
chlorophenoxy herbicides, EPA method 515.1
or EPA
method 515.4
-
$275
[
(iii)
chlorophenoxy herbicides, UCMR, EPA method 515.1
or EPA method 515.4
-
$303
[
(iv)
diquat and paraquat EPA method 549 -
$303
[
(v)
ethylene dibromide (EDB) and dibromochloropropane (DBCP),
EPA method 504.1 -
$195
[
(vi)
endothall, EPA method 548 -
$446
[
(vii)
glyphosate, EPA method 547 -
$211
[
(viii)
haloacetic acids and dalapon, EPA method 552.2 -
$275
[
(ix)
chlorinated disinfection-by-products (haloacetonitriles)
EPA method 551.1 -
$235
[
(x)
methylcarbamoyloximes
[
(xi)
organochlorine pesticides, EPA methods 505 and 508 -
$230
[
(xii)
phenols, UCMR List 2, EPA
method 528.1 - $263;
[
(xiii)
phenylurea, UCMR List 2,
EPA method 532.1 - $263;
(xiv)
[
(xv)
[
(xvi)
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
(PHA) and phthalates, EPA method 525.2 - $360;
(xvii)
[
(xviii)
semi-volatile organic compounds,
UCMR List 2, EPA method 526.1 - $263;
(xix)
[
(xx)
[
(xxi)
[
(xxii)
[
(D)
Radiochemicals:
(i)
alpha spectrometry preparation, DOE-RESL A-20 Pyrosulfate
Fusion -
$165
[
(ii)
carbon-14, Liquid Scintillation -
$123
[
(iii)
gross alpha and beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$113
[
(iv)
gross alpha or beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$100
[
(v)
gamma emitting isotopes, EPA method 901.1 -
$94
[
(vi)
plutonium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$90
[
(vii)
radium-226, EPA method 903.1 -
$83
[
(viii)
radium-228, EPA method 904.0 -
$118
[
(ix)
radon, EPA method 903.1 -
$83
[
(x)
strontium-89 or 90, EPA method
905.0
[
(xi)
thorium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$90
[
(xii)
total alpha emitting radium, EPA method 903.0 -
$90
[
(xiii)
tritium, EPA method 906.0 -
$64
[
(xiv)
uranium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$95
[
(xv)
Composite/storage fee -
$19
[
(3)
The following fees apply to the analysis of
food
[
(A)
Inorganic analyses:
(i)
[
(ii)
[
(iii)
[
(iv)
[
(v)
[
(vi)
[
(vii)
[
(viii)
[
(viv)
[
(x)
[
(xi)
[
(xii)
[
[
(xiii)
[
(xiv)
[
(xv)
fumonisin in corn products
by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) - $250;
(xvi)
[
[
(xvii)
[
(xviii)
[
(xix)
[
(xx)
[
(xxi)
[
(xxii)
[
(xxiii)
[
(xxiv)
[
(xxv)
[
(xxvi)
[
(xxvii)
[
(xxviii)
[
(xxix)
[
(B)
[
(C)
Metals analyses. A sample preparation
fee applies to all food samples analyzed by FLAA, GFAA, GHAA, ICP or ICP-MS
techniques. The total analysis fee includes the sample preparation fee and
the per-element fee. The fee for analysis of multiple metals by a single method
includes a single sample preparation fee and the appropriate per-element fees.
(i)
Sample preparation fee - total recoverable metals
digestion, EPA methods 200.2, 200.3, or SW-846 method 3050B - $46.
(ii)
Per-element fees:
(I)
mercury, EPA methods 245.1, 245.5, and 245.6,
and SW-846 methods 7470A and 7471A - $40;
(II)
single metal, FLAA or ICP, EPA 200 series methods
and EPA SW-846 methods 6010 or 7000 series - $24;
(III)
single metal, GFAA or GHAA, EPA 200 series
methods and EPA SW 846 methods 7000 series, and SM, 18th edition, 3114 - $38;
and
(IV)
single metal, ICP-MS, EPA method 200.8, EPA
SW-846 method 6020 - $31.
(4)
The following fees apply to the analysis of soil
[
(A)
pH, Soil, EPA method 9045B -
$28
[
(B)
Metals analysis. A sample preparation fee applies to the
analysis of all solid (soil, sediment, etc.) samples. The total cost of the
analysis will be the sample preparation fee plus the per-element [
(i)
Sample
[
(ii)
Per-element
[
(I)
lead in paint by
FLAA
[
(II)
lead in pottery leachate by
FLAA
[
(III)
lead and cadmium in pottery leachate by
FLAA
[
(IV)
lead in soil by
FLAA
[
(V)
lead in solids by
FLAA
[
(VI)
mercury, sediment, EPA method 245.5 and EPA SW-846 method
7471A -
$40
[
(VII)
non-routine single metal, EPA 200 series methods and
EPA SW-846 methods: 6010B, 6020, and 7000's -
$60
[
(VIII)
silver, EPA method 200.7, and EPA SW-846 methods 6010B,
7760A, and 7761 -
$60
[
(IX)
single metal,
FLAA
[
(X)
single metal, graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry
(GFAA) or gas hydride atomic absorption spectrometry (GHAA), EPA 200 series
methods and EPA SW-846 methods 7000 series, 7062, and 7742, and SM, 18th edition,
3114 -
$38
[
(XI)
single metal, ICP-MS, EPA method 200.8 and EPA SW-846
method 6020 -
$31
[
(C)
Radiochemistry:
(i)
alpha spectrometry preparation, DOE-RESL A-20 Pyrosulfate
Fusion -
$154
[
(ii)
gross alpha and beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$101
[
(iii)
gross alpha or beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$81
[
(iv)
gamma emitting isotopes, EPA method 901.1 -
$140
[
(v)
plutonium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$90
[
(vi)
radium-226, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 903.1 -
$133
[
(vii)
radium-228, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 904.0 -
$110
[
(viii)
strontium-89 or 90, EPA method
905.0
[
(ix)
thorium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$88
[
(x)
tritium, EPA method-Azeotopic Distillation -
$99
[
(xi)
uranium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$86
[
(5)
The following fees apply to the analysis of tissue and
vegetation samples. A tissue preparation (homogenization) fee applies to all
seafood tissue samples analyzed for organic compounds and/or metals. The total
analysis cost includes the tissue preparation fee, any analyte specific sample
preparation fee, and the per-element or per-group test fee.
(A)
Tissue preparation fees:
(i)
fillets, EPA method 200.3 -
$46
[
(ii)
whole fish and crabs, EPA method 200.3 -
$80
[
(B)
Metals analyses. A sample preparation fee applies to all
tissue samples analyzed by ICP or ICP-MS. The total analysis cost includes
the sample preparation fee and the per-element or per-group fee:
(i)
sample preparation fee - total recoverable metals digestion,
EPA method 200.3 -
$46
[
(ii)
per-element fees:
(I)
mercury, EPA method 245.6 -
$40
[
(II)
single metal,
FLAA
[
(III)
single metal, GFAA or GHAA, EPA 200 series, methods and
EPA SW-846 methods 7000 series, 7062, and 7742, and SM, 18th edition, 3114
-
$38
[
(IV)
single metal, ICP-MS, EPA method 200.8, EPA SW-846 method
6020 -
$31
[
(iii)
fish tissue
(includes per group fee and total recoverable
metals digestion fee)
[
(C)
Organic analyses
. The
[
(i)
organochlorine pesticides and PCB's, fish fillets, PAM
304 E1 and EPA SW-846 methods 8081A -
$1015
[
(ii)
organochlorine pesticides and PCB's, whole fish, PAM 304
E1 and EPA SW-846 methods 8081A -
$1206
[
(iii)
semi-volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry (GC/MS), fish, JAOAC method and EPA SW-846 methods 3540C and
8270C -
$648
[
(iv)
VOCs, GC/MS, fish, JAOAC method 64;653:ff and EPA SW-846
method 8260B -
$311
[
(v)
organochlorine pesticides in vegetables by Gas Chromatography
(GC) -
$755
[
(D)
Radiochemistry:
(i)
alpha spectrometry preparation, DOE-RESL A-20 Pyrosulfate
Fusion -
$154
[
(ii)
gamma emitting isotopes, EPA method 901.1 -
$138
[
(iii)
gross alpha and beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$111
[
(iv)
gross alpha or beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$81
[
(v)
plutonium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$90
[
(vi)
radium-226, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 903.1 -
$136
[
(vii)
radium-228, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 904.0 -
$98
[
(viii)
strontium-89 or 90, EPA method
905.0
[
(ix)
thorium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$88
[
(x)
tritium, EPA Method 906.0 Azeotopic Distillation -
$99
[
(xi)
uranium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$85
[
(6)
The following fees apply to the analysis of water
[
(A)
Inorganic parameters:
(i)
odor,
EPA method 140.1
[
(ii)
phenolics, total recoverable, EPA method
420.1
[
(iii)
UV 254, SM 19th edition, 5910 -
$69
[
(B)
Metals analysis. The following sample preparation fees
apply to the analysis of water and/or wastewater samples. The total cost of
the analysis will be the required sample preparation fee plus the per-element
[
(i)
Sample
[
(I)
total recoverable metals digestion, EPA method 200.2 and
EPA SW-846 methods 3005A, 3010A, and 3020A -
$38
[
(II)
filtration (dissolved metals), EPA SW-846 method 3005A
-
$26
[
(ii)
Per-element
[
(I)
mercury, EPA method 245.1 and EPA SW-846 method 7470A -
$40
[
(II)
silver (includes separate digestion), EPA method 200.7
and EPA SW-846 methods 6010B, 7760A, and 7761 -
$54
[
(III)
single metal,
FLAA
[
(IV)
single metal, GFAA or GHAA, EPA method 200 series and
EPA SW-846 methods 7000 series, 7062, and 7742, and SM, 18th edition, 3114
-
$38
[
(V)
single metal, ICP-MS, EPA method 200.8, and EPA SW-846
method 6020 -
$31
[
(C)
Radiochemistry:
(i)
alpha spectrometry preparation, DOE-RESL A-20 Pyrosulfate
Fusion -
$165
[
(ii)
carbon-14, Liquid Scintillation -
$123
[
(iii)
gross alpha and beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$113
[
(iv)
gross alpha or beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$100
[
(v)
gamma emitting isotopes, EPA method 901.1 -
$94
[
(vi)
plutonium, isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry
-
$90
[
(vii)
radium-226, EPA method 903.1 -
$101
[
(viii)
radium-228, EPA method 904.0 -
$85
[
(ix)
radon, EPA method 903.1 -
$83
[
(x)
strontium-89 or 90, EPA method
905.0
[
(xi)
thorium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$88
[
(xii)
total alpha emitting radium, EPA method 903.0 -
$88
[
(xiii)
tritium, EPA method 906.0 -
$64
[
(xiv)
uranium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectrometry -
$90
[
(7)
The following fees apply to the analysis of wipes/filters/cartridges.
[
(A)
Lead analysis,
FLAA
[
(B)
Radiochemistry:
(i)
alpha spectrometry preparation, DOE-RESL A-20 Pyrosulfate
Fusion -
$154
[
(ii)
carbon-14, Liquid Scintillation -
$145
[
(iii)
gross alpha and beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$65
[
(iv)
gross alpha or beta, EPA method 900.0 -
$50
[
(v)
gamma emitting isotopes, EPA method 901.1 -
$80
[
(vi)
plutonium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectroscopy -
$90
[
(vii)
radium-226, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 903.1 -
$136
[
(viii)
radium-228, DOE-RESL A-20/EPA method 904.0 -
$98
[
(ix)
strontium-89 or 90 EPA method
905.0
[
(x)
thorium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectroscopy -
$88
[
(xi)
tritium, Azeotopic Distillation -
$64
[
(xii)
uranium isotopes, DOE-RESL A-20 Alpha Spectroscopy -
$85
[
(8)
Other chemical testing:
(A)
blood identification, Source Book Forensic Serology -
$31
[
(B)
dust identification -
$58
[
(C)
identification of feces stains, AOAC method 981.22 -
$159
[
(D)
urine stain identification, AOAC methods
963.28,
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal
authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304847
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter B. COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes amendments to §§83.20
- 83.29 and repeal of §83.30, concerning the community hospital capital
improvement fund.
The rules implement Government Code, Chapter 403, §§403.1066
- 403.1067, which identify the community hospital capital improvement fund
as a dedicated account in the general revenue fund and delineate the department's
responsibility to provide grants, utilizing the earnings of the fund, to public
or nonprofit community hospitals with 125 beds or fewer located in an urban
area of the state.
The amendments and repeal are needed to clarify the definitions of operating
expense and rural area; reflect a name change of the Center for Rural Health
Initiatives to the Office of Rural Community Affairs and correct the legal
citation; delete a requirement for the submission of an annual report by grant
recipients; revise the contact from the Commissioner of Health to the Grant
Coordination Office and revise the grant title; remove references to application
and review process due dates; and delete eligibility for continuation funding.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for re-adoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to
the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). The department
has reviewed the sections and has determined that reasons for adopting the
sections continue to exist; however, the revisions are needed in order to
reflect the changes to program administration and the laws that pertain to
them.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §§83.20
- 83.30 in the
Texas Register
on July 18,
2003 (28 TexReg 6975). No comments were received due to publication of the
notice.
Peggy Belcher, Bureau of Budget and Revenue, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect,
there will be no fiscal implications to state and local governments as a result
of administering the sections as proposed.
Ms. Belcher has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect, the public benefit anticipated
is the encouragement of some eligible hospitals to apply for a grant for which
the hospitals may have not previously considered submitting an application.
There will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses since such
businesses are not eligible to receive grant funds under these rules, no anticipated
economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the sections as
proposed, and no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments may be submitted to Peggy Belcher, Grant Coordination Office,
Bureau of Budget and Revenue, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street,
Austin, Texas, 78756-3199, (512) 458-7485 (telephone), (512) 458-7537 (fax),
or E-mail peggy.belcher@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments on the proposed sections
will be accepted for 30 days following publication in the
Texas Register
.
25 TAC §§83.20 - 83.29
The amendments are proposed under Government Code, Chapter
403, §403.1066, which enables the department to adopt rules governing
grants made from the fund; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which
provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with authority to adopt rules to
implement every duty imposed by law on the board, the department, and the
commissioner of health. The review of these rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.
The amendments affect the Government Code, Chapter 403, §§403.1066
- 403.1067.
§83.20.Purpose.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
This subchapter governs the administration of [
§83.21.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall
have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1) - (6)
(No change.)
(7)
Operating expense - An expense, including an administrative
expense, incurred in the daily operation of the grantee hospital.
The
costs of capital medical equipment leases are not operating expenses.
(8)
Rural area - A county that
has
[
(9)
(No change.)
§83.22.Sources and Allocation of Funds.
(a) - (c)
(No change.)
(d)
The department shall have the authority and discretion
to:
(1)
determine the purpose(s) of [
(2) - (4)
(No change.)
(e)
(No change.)
§83.23.Eligibility for Grants.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
A hospital eligible to receive a rural health facility
capital improvement grant, loan, or loan guarantee from the
Office of
Rural Community Affairs
[
§83.24.Requirements for Grants.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
[
§83.25.Procedures for Grant Announcements.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
The department shall maintain a list of persons to be notified
of requests for proposals. Any person wanting to be placed on the list should
contact:
Grant Coordination Office,
[
(c)
(No change.)
§83.26.Procedures for Grant Applications.
(a) - (c)
(No change.)
(d)
[
§83.27.Competitive Review Process.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
[
§83.28.Selection Criteria.
(a)
No grant shall be approved unless, in the opinion of the
department, it addresses only capital improvements and does not propose to
expend funds for [
(b)
(No change.)
§83.29.Project Approval.
(a)
Grant recipients shall execute a contract with the department.
The contract shall detail items
including a
[
(b)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304844
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §83.30
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal is proposed under Government Code, Chapter
403, §403.1066, which enables the department to adopt rules governing
grants made from the fund; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which
provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with authority to adopt rules to
implement every duty imposed by law on the board, the department, and the
commissioner of health. The review of this rule implements Government Code, §2001.039.
The repeal affects the Government Code, Chapter 403, §§403.1066
- 403.1067.
§83.30.Continuation Funding.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304843
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter B. IMMUNIZATION REQUIREMENTS IN TEXAS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
25 TAC §97.63
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes an amendment
to §97.63, concerning immunization requirements for children attending
Texas child-care facilities and elementary schools regarding the DTaP requirement.
Recent outbreaks of pertussis throughout Texas have resulted in death and
disability of children. There is currently no requirement for pertussis vaccination
in children between the ages of 15 months and 5 years of age due to a publication
error that was recently discovered. This rule will also align the DTP/DTaP
immunization requirements for Texas students with the most recent Recommended
Childhood and Adolescent Immunization Schedule issued by the Advisory Committee
in Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Casey S. Blass, Chief, Bureau Immunization and Pharmacy Support, has determined
that for the first five-year period that the section will be in effect there
will be minimal fiscal implications to state and local government as a result
of enforcing and administering the section as proposed. The addition of one
more dose of DTaP vaccine to the school immunization requirements could increase
associated costs to the state.
Mr. Blass has also determined that for each year of the first five years
that the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing and administering the section as proposed will emerge as an increase
in the immunization compliance rate of Texas children who attend schools and
child-care facilities. No impact on micro-businesses or small businesses is
expected because the cost administration of the additional dose of vaccine
will be covered by parents and insurance companies. The fiscal impact on parents
is minimal, because most parents follow the recommended immunization schedule.
The proposed change will not affect children who are already age-appropriately
vaccinated against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. There will be no impact
on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Janie Garcia, Immunization
Division, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas
78756, (512) 458-7284, or (800) 252-9152. Comments will be accepted for 30
days following publication of this proposal in the
Texas Register
.
This amendment is proposed under Health and Safety Code, §81.023,
which requires the Board of Health (board) to develop immunization requirements
for children; the immunization requirements are adopted as a statewide control
measure for communicable disease as defined in Health and Safety Code, §§81.081
and 81.082; Education Code, §38.001, which allows the board to develop
immunization requirements for admission to any elementary or secondary school;
Human Resources Code, §42.043, which requires the department to make
rules regarding the immunization of children admitted to child-care facilities;
and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides the board with the
authority to adopt rules for the performance of every duty imposed by law
on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health.
This proposed amendment affects Health and Safety Code, §81.023; Texas
Education Code, §38.001; and Human Resource Code, §42.043.
§97.63.Required Immunizations.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
(c)
The following immunizations are required in the respective
age groupings. A child or student must meet all the immunizations requirements
specific to an age group upon first entering the age group. Implementation
of requirements for hepatitis B vaccine for adolescents and varicella vaccine
and hepatitis A for all ages is contingent upon the appropriation of funds
to the department for these purposes. By July 1 of each odd-numbered year,
the department will publish a statement on whether or not these vaccines have
been funded and are required as specified.
(1)
Children less than five years of age: polio vaccine; diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis
(DTP) or diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine; measles, mumps,
and rubella vaccine (MMR); Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine
(HibCV), hepatitis A, and varicella vaccine.
(A) - (E)
(No change.)
(F)
Children 15 months of age
through four years of age
, but not yet five years of age [
(i)
(No change.)
(ii)
any combination of DTP/DTaP will meet the following requirement:
(I)
children 17 months of age and
younger are required to have three doses of DTP/DTaP vaccine; and
(II)
children 18 months of age
through three years of age are required to have four doses of DTP/DTaP vaccine.
Pediatric diphtheria-tetanus (DT) vaccine is an acceptable substitute for
DTP/DTaP vaccine if pertussis vaccine is medically contraindicated; and
(III)
children four years of age
are required to have five doses of DTP/DTaP vaccine. The fifth dose is not
necessary if the fourth dose in the series is given on or after the fourth
birthday. Pediatric diphtheria-tetanus (DT) vaccine is an acceptable substitute
for DTP/DTaP vaccine if pertussis vaccine is medically contraindicated.
(iii) - (vi)
(No change.)
(2)
Children and students five years of age or older.
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
Diphtheria/Tetanus/Pertussis
[
(i)
Five doses of a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis containing
vaccine in any combination are required. The fifth dose is not necessary if
the fourth dose in the series is given on or after the fourth birthday. Pediatric
diphtheria-tetanus (DT) vaccine is an acceptable substitute for DTP/DTaP vaccine
if pertussis vaccine is medically contraindicated
[
(ii)
(No change.)
(C) - (H)
(No change.)
(3)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304839
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §102.1 - 102.5
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes amendments
to §§102.1 - 102.5, concerning the distribution of tobacco settlement
proceeds to political subdivisions.
The rules implement the Government Code, Chapter 12, Subchapter J, which
designates the department's responsibilities under the Agreement Regarding
Disposition of Tobacco Settlement Proceeds (agreement) filed on July 24, 1998,
in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, in the case styled
The State of Texas v. The American Tobacco Co., et al., No. 5-96CV-91. The
department collects information and certifies amounts of the tobacco settlement
proceeds for annual distribution to political subdivisions. The term "political
subdivision" means a hospital district, another local political subdivision
owning or maintaining a public hospital, or a county of the State of Texas
responsible for providing indigent health care to the general public. The
Health and Safety Code, Chapter 61, defines which entities are responsible
for providing indigent health care to the general public.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for re-adoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to
the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). The department
has reviewed the sections and has determined that reasons for adopting the
sections continue to exist; however, the revisions are needed in order to
reflect the changes to program administration and the laws that pertain to
them.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §§102.1-
102.5 in the
Texas Register
on July 18, 2003
(28 TexReg 7025). No comments were received.
The amendments update a statutory reference, delete references to dates
and activities that have already occurred, and clarify other language.
Peggy Belcher, Bureau of Budget and Revenue, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, there
will be no fiscal implications to state and local governments as a result
of administering the amended sections as proposed.
Ms. Belcher has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated is the
assurance that expenditure statements identifying unreimbursed health care
expenditures are accurately filed by political subdivisions which, in turn,
results in the appropriate amount of funds being reimbursed for expenditures
by local governments for health care services to the general public. There
will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses since such businesses
do not receive tobacco settlement proceeds, no anticipated economic costs
to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed, and no
anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments may be submitted to Peggy Belcher, Grant Coordination Office,
Bureau of Budget and Revenue, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street,
Austin, Texas, 78756-3199, (512) 458-7485 (phone), (512) 458-7537 (fax), or
peggy.belcher@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments on the proposed sections will be accepted
for 30 days following publication in the
Texas Register
.
The amendments are proposed under Health and Safety Code, Chapter
12, Subchapter J, §§12.138 - 12.139, which requires the department
to adopt rules governing the distribution of tobacco settlement proceeds to
political subdivisions; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides
the Texas Board of Health (board) with authority to adopt rules to implement
every duty imposed by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner
of health. The review of these rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.
The amendments affect the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 12, Subchapter
J.
§102.1.General.
(a)
This chapter implements
the Health and Safety Code, §§12.131
- 12.139
[
(b)
(No change.)
§102.2.Distributions.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
The income earned through investment of the permanent trust
account established under the agreement will be distributed [
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(c)
[
§102.3.Annual Claims.
(a)
General.
A
[
(b)- (f)
(No change.)
§102.4.Regular Audits [
(a) - (c)
(No change.)
(d)
A regular audit may include a review of any audit
or financial statement
of the political subdivision performed by persons
other than the department. A political subdivision being audited by the department
shall make available to the department or its contractor such an audit
or financial statement
at the department's or its contractor's request.
§102.5.Disputes.
(a) - (c)
(No change.)
(d)
An audit of the political subdivision that submitted the
disputed information may be performed.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
The political subdivision shall fully cooperate in the
audit. The audit may include a review of any audit
or financial statement
of the political subdivision.
(e)
(No change.)
(f)
A political subdivision for which an audit indicates an
overstatement may request in writing a hearing on the matter within 20 days
of receiving written notice from the department of the audit findings. The
notice shall state whether a monetary penalty is proposed. A monetary penalty
may not exceed
10
[
(g) - (m)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304845
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter B. CARE OF ANIMALS BY CIRCUSES, CARNIVALS, AND ZOOS
25 TAC §§169.41 - 169.48
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes amendments
to §§169.41 - 169.48, concerning the care of animals by circuses,
carnivals, and zoos. Specifically, the sections cover purpose; definitions;
facilities for housing the animals; food and water requirements; care in transit;
licenses; and state inspection agents. The amended language aligns with current
state law and clarifies the requirements for meeting standards.
The rules are being amended in accordance with Government Code, §2001.039,
which requires that each state agency conduct a review of its rules every
four years and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant
to Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedures Act). Sections
169.41 - 169.48 have been reviewed and the department has determined that
reasons for adopting the sections continue to exist, in that rules on these
subjects are needed and are mandated by Occupations Code, Chapter 2152.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §§169.41
- 169.48 as required by Government Code, §2001.039, in the
Texas Register
on May 19, 2000 (25 TexReg 4598). The department received
no comments due to the publication of the notice.
Jane C. Mahlow, DVM, MS, Director of Zoonosis Control Division, has determined
that for each year of the first five years that the sections will be in effect
there will be no fiscal implications to state or local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering the sections as proposed.
Dr. Mahlow has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect the public health benefit anticipated as a result
of these amendments will be to promote humane conditions for these animals
and to promote public health and safety. There is no anticipated cost to small
businesses or micro-businesses, nor to persons who are required to comply
with the sections as proposed, because the rules make no additional substantive
operational requirements of owners, except those that will result in more
efficient operation of the circus, carnival, or zoo. There is no increase
in the fee charged for a license. There is no anticipated effect on local
employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Jane C. Mahlow, DVM, MS, Texas
Department of Health, Zoonosis Control Division, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
Texas 78756, telephone (512) 458-7255, or jane.mahlow@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments
will be accepted for 30 days after publication of the proposal in the
The amendments are proposed under the Occupations Code, Chapter
2152, "Regulation of Circuses, Carnivals, and Zoos," §2152.051, which
requires the Texas Board of Health (board) to adopt rules necessary to administer
the chapter; and Health and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides the
board with the authority to adopt rules for the performance of every duty
imposed by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health.
The proposed amendments affect Occupations Code, Chapter 2152. The review
of the rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.
§169.41. Purpose. [
The purpose of these rules is to establish standards regarding the
care of animals in circuses, carnivals, and zoos which will promote humane
conditions for these animals and public health and safety.
§169.42.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Act -
Occupations Code, Chapter 2152
[
[
(2)
[
(3)
[
(4)
[
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
(8)
[
§169.43.Facilities for Housing the Animals.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
(c)
Outdoor holding facilities shall:
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
provide adequate shelter to protect animals from any form
of overheating
, direct rays of the sun,
[
(3) - (5)
(No change.)
(d) - (i)
(No change.)
§169.44.Transportation of Animals.
(a)
Primary enclosure construction. All compartments, transport
cages, cartons, or crates shall be constructed [
(1) - (8)
(No change.)
(b) - (c)
(No change.)
§169.45.Food and Water Requirements.
(a)
Each live animal shall be fed a sufficient quantity of
food
at least
once in each 24-hour period unless there are special
instructions given by a licensed veterinarian.
The food shall be free
from contamination, wholesome, palatable, and of sufficient quality and nutritive
value to meet the normal requirements for the condition and size of the animal(s).
(b)
Potable water shall be provided
at all times or at
least twice daily for periods of not less than one hour, except as directed
by a licensed veterinarian
[
§169.46.Care in Transit.
The carrier, driver, or other employee shall be responsible to:
(1) - (3)
(No change.)
(4)
provide shade to protect the live animal when sunlight
is likely to cause overheating or discomfort in such a manner that the surrounding
air temperature should not fall below
50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees
Celsius)
[
(5)
(No change.)
§169.47.Licenses.
(a) - (f)
(No change.)
(g)
Any facility that does not meet required standards
will not be licensed by TDH
[
§169.48.State Inspection Agents.
Each agent
inspecting
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304840
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §§169.61 - 169.65
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes amendments
to §§169.61 - 169.65, concerning the training of animal shelter
personnel. Specifically, the sections cover the purpose, definitions, courses,
prerequisites for course attendance, and course content. The amended language
aligns with current state law.
The rules are being amended in accordance with Government Code, §2001.039,
which requires that each state agency conduct a review of its rules every
four years and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant
to the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedures Act). Sections
169.61 - 169.65 have been reviewed and the department has determined that
reasons for adopting the sections continue to exist in that rules on these
subjects are needed; however, revisions were necessary as outlined in this
preamble.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §§169.61
- 169.65 as required by Government Code, §2001.039, in the
Texas Register
on May 19, 2000 (25 TexReg 4598). The department received
no comments due to the publication of the notice.
Jane C. Mahlow, DVM, MS, Director of Zoonosis Control Division, has determined
that for each year of the first five years that the sections will be in effect
there will be an anticipated $33,750 per year income to the state that may
be paid by local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the
sections as proposed. The projected amount is based on current enrollment
at the training courses (an average of 450 students) multiplied by an estimated
$75 per student fee. However, Animal Control Officer training course attendance
by animal shelter employees is elective, not mandatory. It is anticipated
that the number of animal shelter employees registering for courses will decline
due to the increase in course costs. A course fee is required by statute,
Health and Safety Code, §823.004. If the highest fee of $225 per student
to cover program costs were to be charged, the cost would be prohibitive for
students to attend and would cause the demise of this mandated training program.
The rule amendments shift this fee from the optional purchase of the course
training manual to a registration fee.
Dr. Mahlow has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect the public health benefit anticipated as a result
of this will be to allow the fees to remain flexible to reflect current economic
trends so animal shelter personnel can continue to receive training; animal
shelter personnel serve a pertinent role in the control of zoonotic diseases.
There is no anticipated cost to small businesses or micro-businesses nor to
persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed because they
are not participants in this type of training. There is no anticipated effect
on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Jane C. Mahlow, DVM, MS, Texas
Department of Health, Zoonosis Control Division, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
Texas 78756, telephone (512) 458-7255, or jane.mahlow@tdh.state.tx.us. Comments
will be accepted for 30 days after publication of the proposal in the
The amendments are proposed under the Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 823, "Animal Shelters," §823.004, which requires the Texas Board
of Health (board) to prescribe standards and reasonable fees for training
animal shelter personnel in animal health and disease control, humane care
and treatment of animals, control of animals in an animal shelter, and transportation
of animals; and §12.001, which provides the board with the authority
to adopt rules for the performance of every duty imposed by law on the board,
the department, and the commissioner of health.
The amendments affect Health and Safety Code, Chapter 823.
§169.61.Purpose.
The purpose of these sections is to set standards [
§169.62.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall
have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Animal Control Officer (ACO) course--An appropriate training
session administered by the
department
[
(2)-(3)
(No change.)
§169.63.Courses.
(a)
The basic ACO course gives introductory instruction in
the topics listed in
§169.65
[
(b)
(No change.)
(c)
The administrative ACO course includes instruction in supervisory
and management skills
needed
[
§169.64.Prerequisites for Course Attendance.
(a)
Basic, advanced, or administrative. A person must
apply
[
(b)
Basic, advanced, or administrative. A
fee will be charged for each person attending an ACO course. The fee will
not exceed the amount equal to the cost of conducting the ACO course divided
by the expected number of participants; this fee will not exceed $225.
(c)
[
(1)
satisfactorily completed a basic ACO course and, subsequently,
worked or volunteered in animal shelter/animal control activities at least
2,000 hours; and
(2)
provided a recommendation from the individual's supervisor
, including
[
(d)
[
(1)
satisfactory completion of
[
(2)
experience
[
(3)
completion of
[
§169.65.Course Content.
[
[(b)
There is no cost for attending a course.
However, the Animal Control Officer Training Manual, which can be purchased
from the department, is an essential reference.]
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304861
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter B. TEXAS YOUTH CAMPS SAFETY AND HEALTH
25 TAC §265.26
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes new §265.26,
concerning the prohibition of nudity at youth camps except in limited situations.
Specifically, new §265.26 provides that a youth camp may not allow campers
to be nude, except when taking a bath or shower in the camp's designated bathing
or showering facilities, or when changing clothing and/or undergarments in
the camp's designated cabins, dormitories, or other residential structures.
The new section is necessary for the department to carry out its responsibilities
under the Texas Youth Camp Safety and Health Act, Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 141. The new rule is not due to recent legislation, but is in response
to published comments from nudist associations that plan to operate nudist
youth camps in Texas during the 2004 camping season.
Elias Briseno, Director, General Sanitation Division, has determined that
for each year of the first five-year period the section is in effect, there
will be no fiscal implications to state or local government as a result of
administering the section as proposed.
Mr. Briseno has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the section will be to further protect public health by prohibiting nudity
at youth camps where minors gather. There will be no costs to micro-businesses
or small businesses to comply with the section as proposed, based on the department's
interpretation of the rule and the lack of specific information that any particular
nudist youth camp intends to apply for a youth camp license. There are no
anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the
section as proposed unless costs are incurred as a result of a rule violation.
There is no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Elias Briseno, Director, General
Sanitation Division, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
Texas, 78756, (512) 834-6600, Extension 2303, Fax (512) 834-6707. Comments
will be accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal in the
The new section is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, §141.009,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt
rules to establish health and safety standards for youth camps; and the Health
and Safety Code, §12.001, which provides the Texas Board of Health (board)
with the authority to adopt rules for the performance of every duty imposed
by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health.
The new section affects Health and Safety Code, Chapter 141.
§265.26.Nudity Prohibited.
A youth camp may not allow campers to be nude, except when taking a
bath or shower at the camp's designated bathing or showering facilities, or
when changing clothing and/or undergarments in the camp's designated cabins,
dormitories, or other residential structures.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304851
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §265.131
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes an amendment
to §265.131, concerning the Registered Sanitarian Advisory Committee
(committee). The committee has provided advice to the Texas Board of Health
(board) and the department related to rules regarding registered professional
sanitarians. The committee is established under the Health and Safety Code, §11.016,
which allows the board to establish advisory committees. The committee is
governed by the Government Code, Chapter 2110, concerning state agency advisory
committees.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). The department
has reviewed §265.131 and has determined that reasons for adopting the
section continue to exist; however, changes were necessary as described in
this preamble.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §265.131
in the
Texas Register
on July 11, 2003 (28
TexReg 5549). No comments were received due to publication of this notice.
In 1993, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 383 (now codified in
the Government Code, Chapter 2110), which requires that each state agency
adopt rules on advisory committees. The rules must state the purpose of the
committee, describe the tasks of the committee, describe the manner in which
the committee will report to the agency, and establish a date on which the
committee will be automatically abolished unless the governing body of the
agency affirmatively votes to continue the committee's existence.
In 2001, the board established a rule relating to the Registered Sanitarian
Advisory Committee. The rule states that the committee will automatically
be abolished on September 1, 2003. The board has now reviewed and evaluated
the committee and has determined that the committee should continue in existence
until September 1, 2007.
This section amends provisions relating to the operation of the committee.
Specifically, language is revised to: continue the committee until September
1, 2007; specify that the committee appoints its presiding and assistant presiding
officers; include additional requirements regarding statements by members;
and clarify the components that the committee must include in an annual report
to the board.
Jacquelyn McDonald, Director of the Office of the Board of Health, has
determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect,
there will be no fiscal implications for state and local government as a result
of administering the section as proposed.
Ms. McDonald has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of amending
the section will be to provide a continuance of the committee and continued
advice to the department on this important issue. There will be no costs to
small business or micro-business resulting from compliance with this section,
as this section addresses only continuance of the committee; terms of office;
statements by members; and information to be included in the annual report.
There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply
with the section as proposed. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments may be submitted to Jacquelyn McDonald, Director, Office of the
Board of Health, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
Texas 78756, (512) 458-7484. Comments on the proposed section will be accepted
for 30 days following publication in the
Texas Register
.
The amendment is proposed under Health and Safety Code, §11.016,
which allows the board to establish advisory committees; Health and Safety
Code, §12.001, which provides the board with the authority to adopt rules
for the performance of every duty imposed by law on the board, the department,
and the commissioner; and Government Code, §2110.005, which requires
the department to adopt rules stating the purpose and tasks of its advisory
committees.
The proposed amendment affects the Health and Safety Code, Chapters 11
and 12; and the Government Code, Chapter 2110. The review of this rule implements
Government Code, §2001.039.
§265.131.Registered Sanitarian Advisory Committee.
(a)-(d)
(No change.)
(e)
Review and duration. By September 1,
2007
[
(f)-(g)
(No change.)
(h)
Officers. The
committee
[
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(3)
The assistant presiding officer shall perform the duties
of the presiding officer in case of the absence or disability of the presiding
officer. In case the office of presiding officer becomes vacant, the assistant
presiding officer will [
(4)
If the office of assistant presiding officer becomes vacant,
it may be filled [
(5)-(6)
(No change.)
(i)
Meetings. The committee shall meet
only as necessary
[
(1)-(7)
(No change.)
(j)-(m)
(No change.)
(n)
Statement by members.
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(3)
A committee member should not accept or
solicit any benefit that might reasonably tend to influence the member in
the discharge of the member's official duties.
(4)
A committee member should not disclose
confidential information acquired through his or her committee membership.
(5)
A committee member should not knowingly
solicit, accept, or agree to accept any benefit for having exercised the member's
official powers or duties in favor of another person.
(6)
A committee member who has a personal
or private interest in a matter pending before the committee shall publicly
disclose the fact in a committee meeting and may not vote or otherwise participate
in the matter. The phrase "personal or private interest" means the committee
member has a direct pecuniary interest in the matter but does not include
the committee member's engagement in a profession, trade, or occupation when
the member's interest is the same as all others similarly engaged in the profession,
trade, or occupation.
(o)
Reports to board. The committee shall file an annual written
report with the board.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
The report shall identify the costs related to the committee's
existence, including the cost of department staff time spent in support of
the committee's activities
and the source of funds used to support the
committee's activities
.
(3)
(No change.)
(p)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304864
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
Subchapter D. GENERAL
25 TAC §289.205
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes an amendment
to §289.205, concerning hearing and enforcement procedures.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Section 289.205
has been reviewed and the department has determined that the reasons for adopting
the section continue to exist; however, revisions to the rule are necessary
as outlined in this preamble.
The department published a Notice of Intention to Review for §289.205
regarding Government Code, §2001.039, in the
Texas Register
(28 TexReg 1663) on February 21, 2003. No comments were
received by the department on this section following publication of the notice.
The proposed revision changes references to the Formal Hearing Procedures
throughout the rule to properly cite the references. The words "agency rule"
and "rules" were deleted throughout the section and replaced with "requirements
of this chapter" for consistency with language used throughout the chapter.
The definition of "Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)" was added to §289.205(b)
to accurately state who will be responsible for conducting hearings for the
department. Subsequently, the definition of "Hearing examiner" was deleted
since this term is now obsolete as a result of the responsibility of the department's
hearings now belonging to the administrative law judge. As a result of deleting
the definition of "hearing examiner", the term "hearing examiner" was deleted
throughout the section and replaced with "ALJ." In §289.205(b)(18), the
word "Fund" was changed to "Account" and the words "A fund" are changed to
"An account" to accurately state the name of the account as a result of implementing
changes authorized by House Bill 1678 (78th Legislature 2003). The word "writing"
was deleted and replaced with the words "submitting a written request to"
to clarify the intent of the rule in §289.205(c)(2), (g)(3), (h)(2),
and (i)(9). In §289.205(g)(1)(C), the words "violation of, or" are added
at the beginning of the sentence for consistency with language used throughout
the chapter. At the end of the last sentence of §289.205(g)(2), the word
"receipt" was replaced with the word "service" to be consistent with the use
of this term as addressed in this section. In §289.205(g)(3), (h)(2),
and (i)(9), the words "or date of mailing" were deleted and replaced with
"of the notice" to use the correct term as addressed in this section. In §289.205(i)(3)(C),
the word "applicable" was replaced with the words "any of the" for consistency
with language used throughout the chapter. The words "occupational and" are
added before the words "...public health..." to be consistent with language
used throughout this chapter. In §289.205(j), the term "administrative
penalties" was changed from upper case to lower case to reflect the correct
form and style for rule text. The words "...that could have been prevented
by corrective action and for which the licensee, registrant, or certified
industrial radiographer did not take effective corrective action" are deleted
at the end of §289.205(j)(3)(A) to more accurately describe the process
for administering administrative penalties. The wording "returning the source
of registration to a licensee" was changed to "returning the source of radiation
to a licensee" in §289.205(l)(2)(C) because the original wording was
incorrect. The last sentence of current §289.205(l)(4), was deleted as
this language was redundant. In §289.205(m)(5)(B), "Fund" was replaced
with "Account" to accurately state the name of the account as a result of
implementing changes authorized by House Bill 1678 (78th Legislature 2003).
In the last sentence of §289.205(m)(6), the words "makes a written application
to the agency for a hearing" were replaced with "submits a written request
to the director," the words "date of the" are added before "order," and "date"
are deleted at the end to clarify the intent of the rule. The words "of the
State Office of Administrative Hearings" replaced the word "agency" to accurately
state the hearing location. The following changes were made because the requirements
are not limited to licensees, registrants, or certified industrial radiographers.
The requirements apply to any person not complying with the requirements of
this chapter. In current §289.205(b)(8), the word "person" replaces "licensee,
registrant, or a certified industrial radiographer." The definition of "Notice
of Violation" in §289.205(b)(13) was changed from, "The notice normally
requires the licensee, registrant, certified mammography system, or certified
industrial radiographer to provide..." to "The notice requires the person
receiving the notice to provide..." and in §289.205(b)(13)(A) the word
"person" replaces "the licensee, registrant, certified mammography system,
or certified industrial radiographer." The words "and other persons" was added
to the end of the title of §289.205(i). Section 289.205(i)(1) was changed
from "A licensee, registrant, or certified industrial radiographer who commits..."
to "A licensee, registrant, certified industrial radiographer, or other person
who commits..." The words ", or other persons" are added to the title of §289.205(k)
and §289.205(k)(1). In §289.205(m), the words "for licenses, certificates
of registration, or certified industrial radiographers" were deleted. The
last sentence of §289.205(m)(1) was deleted. The word "licensee" was
replaced with the word "person" in §289.205(m)(2)(B). The words "licensee,
registrant, or certified industrial radiographer" were replaced with the words
"person receiving the order" in the first sentence of §289.205(m)(6)
and the word "person" replaced the words "licensee, registrant, or certified
industrial radiographer" in the second sentence of that same paragraph.
This amendment is part of the department's continuing effort to update,
clarify, and simplify its rules regarding the control of radiation based upon
technological advances, public concerns, legislative directives, or other
factors.
Ruth E. McBurney, C.H.P., Director, Division of Licensing, Registration
and Standards, Bureau of Radiation Control, has determined that for each year
of the first five years the section will be in effect, there will be no fiscal
implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering
the section as proposed.
Mrs. McBurney has also determined that for each year of the first five
years the proposed section will be in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of enforcing the section will be to ensure continued protection
of the public, workers, and the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation
by ensuring that rules are clear and specific and that those persons regulated
are informed of the appropriate hearing and enforcement procedures. There
will be no fiscal impact on applicants/licensees that are small businesses,
micro-businesses or other persons required to comply with the rule. No additional
costs will be incurred because no additional requirements are added. The revisions
correct reference citations and clarify the intent. There is no anticipated
impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ruth E. McBurney, C.H.P.,
Director, Division of Licensing, Registration and Standards, Bureau of Radiation
Control, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas
78756-3189, Telephone (512) 834-6688 or electronic mail at Ruth.McBurney@tdh.state.tx.us.
Public comments will be accepted for 30 days following publication of this
proposal in the
Texas Register
. In addition,
a public meeting to accept oral comments will be held at 1:30 p.m., Tuesday,
September 30, 2003, in Conference Room N-218, Texas Department of Health,
Bureau of Radiation Control, located at the Exchange Building, 8407 Wall Street,
Austin, Texas.
The amendment is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, §401.051,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with authority to adopt rules
and guidelines relating to the control of radiation; and §12.001, which
provides the board with the authority to adopt rules for its procedure and
for the performance of each duty imposed by law on the board, the department,
or the commissioner of health.
The amendment affects Health and Safety Code, Chapters 12 and 401. The
review of the rule implements Government Code, §2001.039.
§289.205.Hearing and Enforcement Procedures.
(a)
Purpose. This section governs the following in accordance
with the Texas Radiation Control Act (Act), the Texas Administrative Procedure
Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001, and the Formal Hearing Procedures,
§§1.21, 1.23, 1.25, and 1.27
[
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
determining compliance with or granting of exemptions from
the requirements of this chapter
[
(3)-(4)
(No change.)
(b)
Definitions. The following words and terms when used in
this chapter shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) - Administrative
law judge from the State Office of Administrative Hearings.
(3)
[
(4)
[
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
(8)
[
(9)
[
(A)
safety, safeguards, or environmental problems;
(B)
compliance with regulatory, license condition, or registration
condition requirements;
(C)
proposed corrective measures including, but not limited
to, schedules for implementation; and
(D)
enforcement options available to the agency.
(10)
[
[
(11)
Interested person - A person who participates in a hearing
concerning a contested case but who is not admitted as a party by the
ALJ
[
(12)
(No change.)
(13)
Notice of violation - A written statement of one or more
alleged infringements of a legally binding requirement. The notice [
(A)
corrective steps taken by the
person
[
(B)-(C)
(No change.)
(14)
(No change.)
(15)
Party - A person designated as such by the
ALJ
[
(A)-(C)
(No change.)
(16)-(17)
(No change.)
(18)
Radiation and Perpetual Care
Account
[
(19)-(21)
(No change.)
(c)
Procedures for licensing actions under the Act, §401.054.
(1)
Except as provided in subsections (d)-(f) of this section,
when the agency grants, renews, denies, transfers, or amends any specific
license for the possession of radioactive materials, or grants exemptions
from
requirements of this chapter
[
(2)
Any person who considers himself/herself a person affected
by an agency action described in paragraph (1) of this subsection or any applicant/licensee
may request a hearing by
submitting a written request to
[
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(3)
Either the applicant/licensee or the agency may contest
the standing of a requestor as a person affected by motion filed with the
ALJ
[
(4)
The
ALJ
[
(5)
(No change.)
(d)
Special procedures for issuing, renewing, or amending byproduct
material licenses in accordance with §289.260 of this title.
(1)-(3)
(No change.)
(4)
When a hearing is requested in writing within 30 days after
publication of the notice described in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the
procedures described in subsection (c)(3) and (4) of this section and Formal
Hearing Procedures,
§§1.21, 1.23, 1.25, and 1.27
[
(5)
(No change.)
(e)
Special procedures for issuing or renewing licenses to
process or store radioactive waste from other persons in accordance with §289.254
of this title (relating to Licensing of Radioactive Waste Processing and Storage
Facilities).
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(3)
A hearing will be held only when requested, unless scheduled
by the agency on its own motion. When a hearing is requested in writing by
the date stated in the notice described in paragraph (1) of this subsection,
the procedures described in subsection (c)(3) and (4) of this section and
the Formal Hearing Procedures,
§§1.21, 1.23, 1.25, and 1.27
[
(A)-(H)
(No change.)
(f)
(No change.)
(g)
Revocation of accreditation of mammography facilities.
(1)
An accreditation of
a
mammography facility may
be revoked, for any of the following:
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(C)
violation of, or
failure to observe any of the
terms and conditions of the Act, this chapter, or order of the agency.
(2)
Before the agency revokes an accreditation of mammography
facility, the agency shall give notice by personal service or by certified
mail, addressed to the last known address, of the facts or conduct alleged
to warrant the revocation by complaint, and order the accredited mammography
facility to show cause why the mammography facility accreditation should not
be revoked. The accredited mammography facility shall be given an opportunity
to request a hearing on the matter no later than 30 days after
service
[
(3)
Any accredited mammography facility against whom the agency
contemplates an action described in paragraph (1) of this subsection may request
a hearing by
submitting a written request to
[
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(h)
Denial of an application for a license, certificate of
registration, accreditation of a mammography facility, or industrial radiographer
certification.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
Any applicant, licensee, registrant, mammography facility
seeking accreditation, or certified industrial radiographer against whom the
agency contemplates an action described in paragraph (1) of this subsection
may request a hearing by
submitting a written request to
[
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(i)
Compliance procedures for licensees, registrants, [
(1)
A licensee, registrant, [
(2)
(No change.)
(3)
Any license, certificate of registration, or industrial
radiographer certification may be modified, suspended, or revoked in whole
or in part, for any of the following:
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(C)
violation of, or failure to observe
any of the
[
(4)-(6)
(No change.)
(7)
Except in cases in which the
occupational and
public
health, interest, or safety requires otherwise, no license, certificate of
registration, or industrial radiographer certification shall be modified,
suspended, or revoked unless, prior to the institution of proceedings therefore,
facts or conduct that may warrant such action shall have been called to the
attention of the licensee, registrant, or certified industrial radiographer
in writing, and the licensee, registrant, or certified industrial radiographer
shall have been accorded an opportunity to demonstrate compliance with all
lawful requirements.
(8)
(No change.)
(9)
Any applicant, licensee, registrant, or certified industrial
radiographer against whom the agency contemplates an action described in paragraph
(8) of this subsection may request a hearing by
submitting a written
request to
[
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(j)
Assessment of
administrative penalties
[
(1)
When the agency determines that monetary penalties are
appropriate, proposals for assessment of and hearings on administrative penalties
shall be made in accordance with the Act, §401.384, and applicable sections
of the Formal Hearing Procedures,
§§1.21, 1.23, 1.25, and 1.27
[
(2)
(No change.)
(3)
Application of administrative penalties. The agency may
impose differing levels of penalties for different severity level violations
and different classes of users as follows.
(A)
Administrative penalties may be imposed for severity level
I and II violations. Administrative penalties will be considered for severity
level III, IV, and V violations when they are combined with those of higher
severity level(s) or for repeated violations [
(B)-(D)
(No change.)
(4)
(No change.)
(k)
Severity levels of violations for licensees, registrants,
[
(1)
Violations for licensees, registrants, [
(A)-(E)
(No change.)
(2)-(4)
(No change.)
(l)
Impoundment of sources of radiation.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
At the agency's discretion, the impounded sources of radiation
may be disposed of by:
(A)-(B)
(No change.)
(C)
returning the source of
radiation
[
(D)
(No change.)
(3)
If agency action is necessary to protect the public health
and safety, no prior notice need be given the owner or possessor. If agency
action is not necessary to protect the public health and safety, the agency
will give written notice to the owner and/or the possessor of the impounded
source of radiation of the intention to dispose of the source of radiation.
Notice shall be the same as provided in subsection (i)(8) of this section.
The owner or possessor shall have 30 days from the date of personal service
or mailing to request a hearing under the Formal Hearing Procedures,
§§1.21, 1.23, 1.25, and 1.27
[
(4)
Upon agency disposition of a source of radiation, the agency
may notify the owner and/or possessor of any expense the agency may have incurred
during the impoundment and/or disposition and request reimbursement. If the
amount is not paid within 60 days from the date of notice, the agency may
request the Attorney General to file suit against the owner/possessor for
the amount requested. [
(5)
(No change.)
(m)
Emergency orders [
(1)
When an emergency exists requiring immediate action to
protect the public health or safety or the environment, the agency may, without
notice or hearing, issue an order citing the existence of such emergency and
require that certain actions be taken as it shall direct to meet the emergency.
The agency shall, no later than 30 days following the end of the month in
which the action was taken, submit notice of the action for publication in
the
Texas Register
. The action taken will
remain in full force and effect unless and until modified by subsequent action
of the agency. [
(2)
In addition to the requirements of paragraph (1) of this
subsection, the agency shall issue an order directing any action and corrective
measure needed to remedy or neutralize the following emergency situations:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
if the
person
[
(3)-(4)
(No change.)
(5)
The agency shall use any security provided by a licensee
under the Act to pay toward the costs of such actions and corrective measures
taken. If the cost of actions and corrective measures require more funds than
the security has provided, the agency shall request the Attorney General to
seek reimbursement from the licensee or person causing the threat.
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
The agency may request the Attorney General to file suit
for reimbursement if the agency uses security from the Radiation and Perpetual
Care
Account
[
(6)
The
person receiving the order
[
(A)-(C)
(No change.)
(n)
Miscellaneous provisions.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
Interested person.
(A)-(D)
(No change.)
(E)
At the discretion of the
ALJ
[
(3)
Hearing location. Hearings will be held at the [
(4)
Prepared testimony. The following shall apply to written
testimony of a witness:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
written testimony shall be subject to objection and may
be stricken by the
ALJ
[
(5)
(No change.)
(6)
Non-party witness and mileage fees.
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
The person requesting the attendance of the witness or
deponent must deposit with the agency the funds estimated by the
ALJ
[
(7)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304852
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes the repeal of
existing §§295.101-295.109, concerning occupational health rules
and guidelines, and new §295.101, concerning recommended allowable concentrations
of toxic gases that are being made available to the public.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Section 295.101
has been reviewed and the department has determined that reasons for adopting
the section continue to exist in that a rule on this subject is needed; however, §295.101
needs revisions as described in this preamble and is being proposed as a new
section under an amended subchapter heading. Sections 295.102-295.109 have
been reviewed and the department has determined that the reasons for adopting
the sections as rules no longer continue to exist.
A notice of intention to review for §§295.101-295.109 was published
in the January 5, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 245) for the state agency review of rules in accordance
with Government Code, §2001.039. No comments were received due to publication
of this notice.
Existing §295.101 is being proposed for repeal and new §295.101
is being proposed in order to clarify the change in purpose of the section,
remove obsolete exposure limits for hazardous substances, and provide recommended
allowable concentrations of toxic gases. Sections 295.102-295.109 are being
proposed for repeal because the sections were intended by the Legislature
to serve only as guidance standards, and publication of such information in
rules limits the department's ability to provide the most current recommended
occupational health standards using the most cost effective means. Guidance
standards and other occupational safety and health information will now be
available to the public via the program's website or by contacting the program
at the address and telephone number provided in new §295.101(d).
The proposed new title for Subchapter D, "Occupational Health Guidelines,"
clarifies that sections under this subchapter serve as occupational health
guidelines, rather than occupational standards for places of employment. New §295.101(a)
specifies that the information in the section is being provided in order to
meet the requirement specified in the Health and Safety Code (HSC), §341.016(c)(1),
for the department to provide the public with information on allowable concentrations
of toxic gases. This subsection also clarifies that the department's authority
to issue occupational standards is limited by the language in the Health and
Safety Code, §341.016(c)(2), and the fact that since passage of HSC, §341.016
in 1945, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has
been given preemptive federal jurisdiction over occupational safety and health
matters in Texas industrial establishments; i.e., in the private sector. Therefore,
the information provided in the section is being provided as public information,
rather than enforceable standards. New §295.101(b) provides information
on how the department derived the List of Toxic Gases and Recommended Allowable
Concentrations. Section 295.101(b) clarifies that the List of Toxic Gases
includes only those gases that meet the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard's
(29 Code of Federal Regulations, §1910.1200, Appendix A) definitions
of "toxic" or "highly toxic" by inhalation. New §295.101(b) also clarifies
that the toxic gases are identified by both chemical name and Chemical Abstract
Service (CAS) Number and the Recommended Allowable Concentrations (RAC) for
each gas was derived from the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit for that substance,
provided in both parts per million (ppm) and milligrams per cubic meter (mg/M
Elias Briseno, Director, General Sanitation Division, has determined that
for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, there will
be no fiscal implications to state or local government as a result of administering
the sections as proposed.
Mr. Briseno has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of
administering the sections will be increased public awareness of toxic gases
and recommended allowable concentrations. There will be no costs to micro-businesses
or small businesses to comply with the section as proposed since the rules
are intended to serve only as guidelines. There are no anticipated economic
costs to persons who are required to comply with the repeals and new section
as proposed since the allowable concentrations of toxic gases proposed in
new §295.101 are not enforceable by the department. There is no anticipated
impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Elias Briseno, General Sanitation
Division, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas,
78756, (512) 834-6635, extension 2303, fax (512) 834-6707. Comments will be
accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal in the
Texas Register
. In addition, a public hearing on the proposed sections
will be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at the Texas Department
of Health, Room M-653, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas.
Subchapter D. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH RULES AND GUIDELINES
25 TAC §§295.101 - 295.109
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeals are proposed under the Health and Safety
Code, §341.002, which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with
the authority to adopt necessary rules to administer and enforce Chapter 341; §341.016(c)(1),
which requires the department to make available to the state's citizens information
concerning allowable concentrations of toxic gases; and §12.001, which
provides the board with the authority to adopt rules for the performance of
every duty imposed by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner
of health.
The repeals affect the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 341. The review
of the existing sections implements Government Code, §2001.039.
§295.101.Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants.
§295.102.Exposure to Toxic and Hazardous Substances.
§295.103.Occupational Noise Exposure.
§295.104.Respiratory Protection.
§295.105.Ventilation.
§295.106.Environmental Standards in Industrial Establishments.
§295.107.Sanitation in the Workplace.
§295.108.Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records.
§295.109.Medical Services and First Aid.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304856
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §295.101
The new section is proposed under the Health and Safety Code, §341.002,
which provides the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt
necessary rules to administer and enforce Chapter 341; §341.016(c)(1),
which requires the department to make available to the state's citizens information
concerning allowable concentrations of toxic gases; and §12.001, which
provides the board with the authority to adopt rules for the performance of
every duty imposed by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner
of health.
The new section affects the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 341. The review
of the existing sections being repealed into this new section implements Government
Code, §2001.039.
§295.101.Recommended Allowable Concentrations of Toxic Gases.
(a)
Purpose. The authority for these rules is granted to the
Texas Department of Health (department) in the Health and Safety Code, §341.002.
The purpose of this section is to provide the public with information on recommended
allowable concentrations of toxic gases, as specified in the Health and Safety
Code (HSC), §341.016(c)(1). Since HSC, §341.016, only provides the
department with authority for developing occupational and sanitation standards
for industrial establishments, and since the department's authority over industrial
establishments is preempted by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), the department is issuing the List of Toxic Gases and Recommended
Allowable Concentrations only as a guideline.
(b)
Information sources. In developing the List of Toxic Gases
and Recommended Allowable Concentrations (RACs) for this section, the department
used the following information and criteria.
(1)
The List of Toxic Gases was derived from those gases appearing
in Table Z-1, "Limits for Air Contaminants," published by the U.S. Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 29 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), §1910.1000. Only those gases that had a Median Lethal Concentration
(LC(50)) in air of more than 200 parts per million (ppm) were selected for
inclusion on the List of Toxic Gases. The department used the LC(50) criterion
to ensure that only those gases that met the definition of "highly toxic"
or "toxic," as those terms are defined in OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard,
29 CFR, §1910.1200, Appendix A, would be included on the List of Toxic
Gases.
(2)
In order to ensure a unique identity for each toxic gas
and provide the public with information that could be used to match chemical
name synonyms to a specific listed gas, both the chemical name and the corresponding
Chemical Abstract Service Number (CAS#) are referenced in the List of Toxic
Gases.
(3)
The Recommended Allowable Concentration (RAC) for each
toxic gas was derived from its corresponding Table Z-1 Permissible Exposure
Limit (PEL) concentration established by OSHA. As appropriate, the RAC is
provided in both ppm in air and milligrams per cubic meter (mg/M
3).
(c) Adopted List of Toxic Gases and Recommended Allowable Concentrations.
(d)
Responsibility for implementation of program. The department's
responsibilities under this section are carried out through its General Sanitation
Division. Routine inquiries regarding this section and requests for additional
guidance related to occupational health and safety should be addressed to:
Texas Department of Health, General Sanitation Division, 1100 West 49th Street,
Austin, Texas 78756, or telephone number (512) 834-6635.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304857
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
25 TAC §§295.121 - 295.126
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Health or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes
the repeal of existing §§295.121-295.126, concerning industrial
homework standards.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Sections 295.121-295.126
have been reviewed, and the department has determined that reasons for adopting
the sections no longer continue to exist.
A notice of intention to review for §§295.121-295.126 was published
in the January 5, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 245) for the state agency review of rules in accordance
with Government Code, §2001.039. No comments were received due to publication
of this notice.
Existing §§295.121-295.126 are being proposed for repeal in order
to remove unnecessary language and delete an obsolete reference to a program
created in 1937 when industrial homeworkers were commonly used to manufacture
articles for employers. The existing rules contain language that is redundant
with language in the Health and Safety Code (HSC), Chapter 143, the Industrial
Homework Act, and is being proposed for repeal in order to remove unnecessary
rules.
Elias Briseno, Director, General Sanitation Division, has determined that
for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, there will
be no fiscal implications to state or local government as a result of repealing
the sections as proposed.
Mr. Briseno has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the repeals are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of the
repeals will be elimination of unnecessary rules. There will be no costs to
micro-businesses or small businesses as a result of repealing the sections
because all of the requirements for compliance with HSC, Chapter 143, are
included in the language of the statute. There are no anticipated economic
costs to persons as a result of repealing the sections. There is no anticipated
impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Elias Briseno, General Sanitation
Division, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas,
78756, (512) 834-6635, extension 2303, fax (512) 834-6707. Comments will be
accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal in the
Texas Register
.
The repeals are proposed under HSC, §143.010, which provides
the Texas Board of Health (board) with the authority to adopt necessary rules
to administer and enforce Chapter 143; and §12.001, which provides the
board with the authority to adopt rules for the performance of every duty
imposed by law on the board, the department, and the commissioner of health.
The repeals affect HSC, Chapter 143. The review of the rules implements
Government Code, §2001.039.
§295.121.Scope and Purpose.
§295.122.Definitions.
§295.123.General Requirements.
§295.124.Employer's Permit.
§295.125.Homeworker's Certificate.
§295.126.Forms.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on August 7, 2003.
TRD-200304860
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236
The Texas Department of Health (department) proposes the repeal of
existing §§295.141-295.148, concerning standards for face and eye
protection in public schools, and new §§295.141-295.143, concerning
guidelines for selection and use of face and eye protection in public schools.
Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review
and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the
Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Sections 295.141-295.148
have been reviewed and the department has determined that reasons for adopting
the sections continue to exist in that guidelines on this subject are needed.
However, §§295.141-295.148 need revisions as described in this preamble
and are being repealed and proposed as new §§295.141-295.143.
A notice of intention to review for §§295.141-295.148 was published
in the January 5, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 245) for the state agency review of rules in accordance
with Government Code, §2001.039. No comments were received due to publication
of this notice.
Existing §§295.141-295.148 are being proposed for repeal in order
to clarify the change in applicability of the sections, remove obsolete standards
and guidelines for face and eye protection, remove manufacturing and design
standards that are not applicable to the purchasers of face and eye protection
equipment, and facilitate adoption by reference of current and amended federal
standards as guidelines for selection and use of face and eye protection.
The proposed amended title for Subchapter F, "Guidelines for Selection
and Use of Face and Eye Protection in Public Schools," clarifies that the
sections under this subchapter are intended to serve as recommended guidelines
for performing hazard assessments and making choices regarding the appropriate
types of face and eye protection needed for certain activities in public schools,
rather than serving as standards for the design and manufacture of face and
eye protective equipment. New §295.141 clarifies that the rules are issued
as health protection guidelines for selection and use of face and eye protection
in public schools under the Health and Safety Code, §341.002(2), and
are applicable to employees, students, and visitors who participate in certain
educational activities and programs that pose a high risk for face or eye
injuries. New §295.142 proposes to adopt by reference, as guidelines
only, the standards for selection and use of eye and face personal protective
equipment established by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), and to adopt as a guideline, as amended, an OSHA reference document
that assists employers in selecting eye and face protection based on workplace
hazard assessments. New §295.143 provides a program mailing address and
telephone number in order to ensure public access to the referenced documents
and other program information.
Elias Briseno, Director, General Sanitation Division, has determined that
for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, there will
be no fiscal implications to state or local government as a result of administering
the sections as proposed.
Mr. Briseno has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of
administering the sections will be a decrease in the number of face and eye
injuries experienced by staff, students, and visitors participating in science
laboratories or in vocational, art, industrial arts or science courses in
public schools. There will be no costs to micro-businesses or small businesses
to comply with the sections as proposed since the proposed amendments are
only applicable to public schools. There are no anticipated economic costs
to persons who choose to comply with the sections as proposed because the
existing rules that are being proposed for repeal also instructed public schools
to provide face and eye protection for the covered activities. There is no
anticipated impact on local employment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Elias Briseno, General Sanitation
Division, Texas Department of Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas,
78756, (512) 834-6635, extension 2303, fax (512) 834-6707. Comments will be
accepted for 30 days following publication of this proposal in the
Texas Register
. In addition, a public hearing on the proposed sections
will be held at 9:00 a.m., Friday, September 5, 2003, at the Texas Department
of Health, Room M-653, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas.
Subchapter F. STANDARDS FOR FACE AND EYE PROTECTION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
To ] Pay Child Support.
performed by the department
].
Chapter 3.
MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING WITH OTHER STATE AGENCIES
Chapter 5.
GRANTS AND CONTRACTS
Chapter 5.
POISON CONTROL CENTERS
Chapter 39.
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE SERVICES PROGRAM
Chapter 61.
CHRONIC DISEASES
Chapter 73.
LABORATORIES
mercury, copper,
selenium,
] cadmium,
copper,
[
zinc, and
] lead,
mercury, selenium, and zinc
.
dinbenz(a,h)anthracene,
] dibenzofuran,
dieldrin, diethylphthalate, dimethylphthalate, di-n-butylphthalate, di-n-octylphthalate,
diphenylhydrazine, endosulfan sulfate, endrin, endrin aldehyde, endrin ketone,
fluoranthene, fluorene, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, hexachlorobenzene,
hexachlorobutadiene, hexachlorocyclopentadiene, hexachloroethane, hexachlorophene,
indeno-(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,
[
indent-(1,2,3-cd)pyrene,
] isophorone,
lindane, napthalene, nitrobenzene, n-nitrosodiethylamine, n-nitrosodimethylamine,
n-nitroso-di-n-butylamine, n-nitroso-di-n-propylamine, n-nitrosodiphenylamine,
p,p'-ddd, p,p'-dde, p,p'-ddt, pentachlorophenol, phenanthrene, phenol, pyrene,
pyridine.
$95
].
$75
].
Bioterriorism
]:
$95
]; and
$15
].
$110
]; and
$100
].
$75
].
(vi)
C. difficile - $95.]
(vii)
] Diphtheria culture -
$113
[
$90
].
(viii)
] Drug susceptibility testing:
$50; and
]
$50
];
(ix)
] Enteric pathogens -
$88
[
$70
].
$50
].
for
] gonorrhea/chlamydia (GC/CT)
-
$31
[
$25.
]
;
E. coli,
enterohemorrhagic E. coli
(EHEC)
], only -
$128
[
$102
];
type-name="italic">Hemophilus
]
influenzae
-
$119
[
$95
];
Neiseria meningitidies
]
-
$119
[
$95
];
$50
];
$110
];
$90
];
$58
]; [
and
];
$70.
]
; and
Pulsed-Field
Gel Electrophoresis
] (PFGE) -
$125
[
$100
]; and
$45
].
$25
].
N. gonorrheae
] culture -
$56
[
$45
].
$45
];
$80
];
$55
]; and
N. gonorrheae
] -
$69
[
$55
].
$20
].
$60
];
RMSF
] -
$75
[
$60
]; and
$90
].
botulinus
] toxin -
$163
[
$130
];
$35
];
$75; and
]
$70.
]
and
$70
].
$7.50
];
$20
];
$10
];
$10
]; and
$10.50
].
$7.50
]; and
$6.00
].
$1
];
$5.50
];
$11
];
$16.50
]; and
$22
].
$4.50
].
$12
].
$9.00
].
$22.00
].
$30
].
$30
].
(x)
] Thyroid profile includes total
thyroxine (T4); free T4; and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) -
$63
[
$25
].
(xi)
] TSH -
$31
[
$25
].
(xii)
Tyrosine - $30.]
$15
].
$12.50
].
(i)
ß-Hemoglobulin panel
(5 tests) - $85;]
(ii)
] Congenital adrenal hyperplasia
-
$538
[
$430
];
(iii)
] Congenital adrenal hyperplasia,
DNA carrier analysis of family member -
$206
[
$165
];
(iv)
] Galactosemia -
$506
[
$405
];
(v)
] Galactosemia, DNA carrier
analysis of family member -
$206
[
$165
];
(vi)
Hemoglobinopathy study, E29n
or E28 - $45;]
(vii)
Hemoglobinopathy study,
S and C - $50;]
(viii)
] Phenylketonuria -
$600
[
$480
]; and
(ix)
] Phenylketonuria, DNA carrier
analysis of family member -
$206
[
$165
].
$25
];
$12.50
];
$17.50
]; and
$50
].
$55
];
$25
];
$45
];
$35
];
$15
];
$130
];
$45
];
$15
]; and
$105
].
$25
].
$60
];
$55
]; and
$35
].
rifampin
] -
$13
[
$10
].
$30
]. (Fees are based on the newborn screening test
kits described in §73.21 of this title (relating to Newborn Screening),
which includes the costs of the screening panel.)
$125
].
$75
].
$95
].
$135
].
$35
].
$25
].
$50
];
$70
];
and
$120
].
$25
].
$12.50
].
$40
].
$30
];
$35
]; and
$35
].
$40
].
$30
].
$55
]; and
$70
].
$75
].
$45
]; and
$10
].
$30
];
$15
];
and
$10
].
$20
].
$15
].
$12
].
$140
].
$35
];
$10
]; and
$140
].
$22
].
$40
].
$55
].
$30
].
$30
].
$30
]; and
$30
].
$60
].
$15
].
$70
].
$50
].
$55
].
$95
].
$5.00
].
$12.50
].
$15
];
$30
]; and
$7.50
].
$30
]; and
$35
].
$40
]; and
$40
].
$45
].
$45
].
$25
].
$15
].
$80
].
$80
].
$285
].
$85
].
$125
]; and
$105
].
$250
];
$205
]; and
$210
].
$25
];
$70
];
$200; and
]
;
$15.
]
$200
].
$120
].
$115
]; and
$280.
]
;
$45
].
$25
].
$45
].
$35
].
$70
].
$95
];
$120
]; and
$70
].
$200
];
$40
];
$35
];
and
$60
].
$30
].
$30
]; and
$40
].
$25
].
$90
].
$25
].
$20
].
$50
];
$5.00
]; and
$45
].
Rock
] Mountain
Spotted Fever
[
spotted
fever
] (RMSF) -
$44
[
$35
];
$35
]; and
Tick
] identification, per vial -
$31
[
$25
].
$175
].
WNV
] -
$63
[
$50
].
$75
].
$15
].
$35
]; and
$60
].
$250
]; and
$250
].
$55
]; and
$30
].
$65
].
$125
]; and
$35
].
$60
];
$30
].
$130
];
Method
]
-
$200
[
$160
]; and
Method
] -
$186
[
$149
].
(including bottled)
] water
(including bottled water)
samples.
$23
];
$15
];
$23
];
4500B-B
] -
$66
[
$53
];
$110
];
$25
];
$43
];
$55
];
$19
];
$20
];
$80
];
$55
];
$20
];
Ed.
] 2120B -
$30
[
$24
];
conductance
] SM,
18th edition, 2510B -
$24
[
$19
];
EPA
method
] 4500 CN-B+C+E -
$69
[
$55
];
$19
];
$43
];
$22
];
$22
];
$22
];
SM, 18th edition,
] 2150B -
$63
[
$50
];
$55
];
$61
];
$19
];
4020.1
] -
$60
[
$48
];
$22
];
$24
];
$31
];
$14
];
$31
];
$31
];
$19
]; and
$20
].
1030F
] -
$214
[
$147
].
$29
].
$25
];
$19
]; and
$25
].
$264
];
$165
]; and
$24
].
$206
];
$220
];
$242
];
$242
];
$156
];
$357
];
$169
];
$220
];
$188
];
n-methylcarbomayloximes
] and n-methylcarbamates (carbamate) pesticides, EPA method 531.1 -
$250
[
$200
];
$184
];
(xii)
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
(PHA) and phthalates, EPA method 525.2 - $288;]
xiii)
] PHA and phthalates, UCMR,
EPA method 525.2 -
$396
[
$317
];
(xiv)
] PCB screening by
perchlorination
[
Perchlorination
], EPA method 508A -
$366
[
$293
];
(xv)
] semi-volatile organic compounds,
EPA method 525.2 -
$360
[
$288
];
(xvi)
] trihalomethanes, EPA method
502.2 -
$84
[
$67
];
(xvii)
] trihalomethanes, EPA method
524.2 -
$84
[
$67
];
(xviii)
] VOCs, EPA method 524.2
-
$183
[
$146
]; and
(xix)
] VOCs, UCMR, EPA method
524.2 -
$223
[
$178
].
$132
];
$98
];
$90
];
$80
];
$75
];
$72
];
$66
];
$94
];
$66
];
905.1
] -
$126
[
$101
];
$70
];
$70
]; .
$51
];
$76
]; and
$15
].
Food
] and food products
.
[
:
]
(A)
] added substances,
Association
of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC)
[
United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA)
] calculation -
$16
[
$13
];
(B)
] added water,
AOAC
[
USDA
] calculation -
$16
[
$13
];
(C)
] benzoate,
AOAC
[
Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC)
] method 960.38 -
$101
[
$81
];
(D)
] cereal,
USDA
[
UDSA
] CRL method -
$80
[
$64
];
(E)
] deterioration, canned products,
AOAC chart -
$30
[
$24
];
(F)
] fat, dairy products, AOAC
method 46.616 -
$44
[
$35
];
(G)
] fat, paly screen, AOAC method
46.616 -
$44
[
$35
];
(H)
] fat, soxhlet extraction,
USDA
method Fat-1
[
Fat method
] -
$101
[
$81
];
(I)
] filth, AOAC methods -
$44
[
$35
];
(J)
] filth, beverages, AOAC method
965.38 -
$44
[
$35
];
(K)
] filth, cereal foods, AOAC
method 971.32 -
$44
[
$35
];
(L)
] filth, [
nuts and grains,
] AOAC method 941.16 -
$44
[
$35
];
(M)
filth, pasta, AOAC methods - $35;
]
(N)
] filth, spices, AOAC method
945.83 -
$44
[
$35
];
(O)
] food coloring, AOAC method
988.13 -
$73
[
$58
];
(P)
] insect identification, Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) Technical Bulletin #2 -
$44
[
$35
];
(Q)
lead in food by flame atomic absorption
spectrometry FLAAS - $36;
]
(R)
] maximum internal temperature,
USDA ICT 2 method -
$101
[
$81
];
(S)
] meat protein,
AOAC
[
USDA
] calculation -
$19
[
$15
];
(T)
] moisture (total water), USDA
M01 method -
$21
[
$17
];
(U)
] moisture-protein ratio,
AOAC
[
USDA
] calculation -
$40
[
$90
];
(V)
] package exam for rodent contamination,
AOAC method 973.63 -
$30
[
$24
];
(W)
] pH of food products, AOAC
method 981.12 -
$25
[
$20
];
(X)
] protein, total, USDA protein
block digestion -
$73
[
$58
];
(Y)
] rodent pellet, identification,
FDA Microscope Analytical Methods in Food and Drug Control -
$44
[
$35
];
(Z)
] salt, USDA
method SLT
[
Salt method
] -
$131
[
$105
];
(AA)
] soy protein concentrate,
USDA
SOY1
[
SOY 1
] method -
$80
[
$64
];
(BB)
] soya, USDA
SOY1
[
SOY 1
] method -
$80
[
$64
];
(CC)
] sulfite, AOAC method
980.17 -
$83
[
$66
];
(DD)
] water activity,
AOAC
method 978.18
[
SM, 18th edition, 5910
] -
$44
[
$35
]; and
(EE)
]
Organic analysis,
tetracycline
in milk, FDA/AOAC methods -
$125
[
$100
].
Soil
] and solids:
$22
].
or
per-group analytical
] fee
.
[
:
]
The fee for
analysis of multiple metals by a single method includes a single sample preparation
fee and the appropriate per-element fees.
sample
] preparation fee -
acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils, EPA SW-846 Method 3050B -
$44
[
$36
].
per-element
] fee:
FLAAS
] -
$44
[
$35
];
FLAAS
] -
$33
[
$26
];
FLASS
] -
$59
[
$47
];
FLAAS
] -
$46
[
$37
];
FLAAS
] -
$44
[
$35
];
$32
];
$48
];
$48
];
FAAS
] or ICP,
EPA 200 series methods, 200.7, and EPA SW-846 6010B and 7000 series methods
-
$26
[
$21
];
$30
]; and
$25
].
$123
];
$81
];
$65
];
$112
];
$72
];
$109
];
$88
];
200.3
] -
$147
[
$118
];
$70
];
$79
]; and
$68
].
$37
];
and
$64
].
$37
].
$32
];
FAAS
] or ICP,
EPA 200 series methods, 200.7, or EPA SW-846 methods 6010B, or 7000's -
$24
[
$19
];
$30
];
$25
]; and
metal group fee
] -
$283
[
$189
].
(the
] organic
analysis
fee includes
[
fees include
] any required sample
cleanup procedures[
)
]:
$812
];
$965
];
$518
];
$249
]; and
$604
].
$123
];
$110
];
$89
];
$65
];
$72
];
$109
];
$78
];
905.1
] -
$149
[
$119
];
$70
];
$79
]; and
$68
].
Water
] and wastewater.
SM, 18th edition,
2150B
] -
$65
[
$50
];
4020.1
] -
$60
[
$48
]; and
$55
].
or per-group analytical
] fee
.
[
:
]
The fee for analysis of multiple metals by a single method includes a single
sample preparation fee and the appropriate per-element fees.
sample
] preparation fees:
$30
];
and
$21
].
per-element
] fees:
$32
];
$43
];
FAAS
] or ICP,
EPA method 200.8, 200.7 and EPA SW-846 methods 6010B, and 7000 series -
$24
[
$19
];
$30
]; and
$25
].
$132
];
$98
];
$90
];
$80
];
$75
];
$72
];
$81
];
$68
];
$66
];
905.1
] -
$126
[
$101
];
$70
];
$70
];
$51
]; and
$76
].
Wipe/filter/cartridge.
]
FLAAS
] -
$40
[
$32
].
$123
];
$116
];
$52
];
$40
];
$64
];
$72
];
$109
];
$78
];
905.1
] -
$148
[
$118
];
$70
];
$51
]; and
$68
].
$25
];
$46
];
$127
];
and
945.88, 942.24,
]
and
959.14 -
$44
[
$35
].
Chapter 83.
PUBLIC HEALTH IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
the
] grants, the submission and review of grant applications, and the award
of [
the
] grants.
had
]
a population [
in the most recent decennial United States census
]
of 150,000 or less
or
,
with respect to
[
or that
part of
] a county
that has
[
with
] a population
of
more
[
greater
] than 150,000
and
that
contains a geographic area that
is not delineated as urbanized by the
federal census bureau, that part of the county that is not delineated as urbanized
[
United States Census Bureau
].
the
] grants pursuant
to law and this subchapter;
Center for Rural Health Initiatives
]
under
the Government Code, Chapter 487, Subchapter H,
[
Health
and Safety Code, Chapter 106, Subchapter G,
] is not eligible to receive
a grant under this subchapter.
(c)
Grant recipients shall submit
an annual report to the department, in a form and at a time determined by
the department.]
Commissioner of Health,
] Attention:
Community Hospital Capital Improvement
[
TDH Innovation
] Grants, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas
,
78756.
Applicants will be given a minimum of 60 calendar
days to file applications after a request for proposals is published.
]
Applications must be received by the department on or before the closing date
specified in the request for proposals.
(c)
The department's review process
shall be completed within 45 days after the closing date.]
operating expenses or
] debt retirement
or operating expenses with the exception of capital medical equipment leases
.
such as
]
budget, reporting requirements, general provisions for department grant contracts,
and any other specifics that might apply to the award.
Chapter 97.
COMMUNICABLE DISEASES
(15 months through four years
of age)
]:
Tetanus/Diphtheria
].
Children and
students six years of age and younger: at least four doses of DTP/DTaP, DT,
or Td vaccine are required, provided at least one dose has been received on
or after the fourth birthday. Pertussis vaccine is not required for children/students
who are five years of age and older. Children with a medical contraindication
to pertussis vaccine will need to have had only three doses of any combination
of DTP/DTaP/DT/Td vaccines if their first dose was given on or after the first
birthday and their third dose was given on or after the fourth birthday
].
For further information see §97.77(c) and (d) of this title.
Chapter 102.
DISTRIBUTION OF TOBACCO SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS
Acts 1999, 76th Legislature, Chapter 753, Article 2 (House
Bill 1161)
] and the responsibilities of the Texas Department of Health
(department) under the Agreement Regarding Disposition of Tobacco Settlement
Proceeds (agreement) filed on July 24, 1998, in United States District Court,
Eastern District of Texas, in the case styled The State of Texas v. The American
Tobacco Co., et al., No. 5-96CV-91. The term "agreement" includes the subsequent
Clarification of Agreement Regarding Disposition of Settlement Proceeds filed
on July 24, 1998, in that litigation.
for the
first time in April 2001 and
] in April of each [
succeeding
]
year.
(1)
]
Only the earnings of the account will be distributed.
The corpus of the fund will remain in the permanent trust account.
(2)
Payments into the permanent
trust account are scheduled in the agreement as follows:]
(A)
January 3, 2000 - $501.5 million;]
(B)
January 2, 2001 - $551.5 million;]
(C)
January 2, 2002 - $551.5 million; and]
(D)
January 2, 2003 - $201.4 million.]
(c)
The corpus of the lump sum
trust account established under the agreement will be distributed in April
2000 and April 2001.]
(1)
The April 2001 lump sum distribution will be
combined with the distribution of the first year's earnings from the permanent
trust account.]
(2)
Payments into the lump sum trust account are
scheduled in the agreement as follows:]
(A)
January 3, 2000 - $100 million; and]
(B)
January 2, 2001 - $50 million.]
(d)
] A political subdivision that
receives a pro rata share of the annual distribution has sole authority over
the expenditure of those funds. The agreement does not require a political
subdivision to expend any portion of the distribution for a specified purpose;
however, any portion of the distribution expended for unreimbursed health
care expenditures in a calendar year may be counted toward the political subdivision's
pro rata share of the annual distribution in the subsequent year.
Beginning in calendar year
2000, a
] political subdivision may claim a pro rata share of the annual
distribution based on its "unreimbursed health care expenditures" in the previous
calendar year. These expenditures are defined in the agreement as "those actual
expenditures made by a Political Subdivision which are directly attributable
to the provision of health care services to the general public, either directly
or by contract or agreement with a third party provider, and for which no
reimbursement is made by or expected from any third party source or fund.
(Lump Sum Trust Account or Permanent Trust Account payments shall not count
as reimbursement.)" The term "unreimbursed expenditures" does not include
contractual allowances or discounts for health care services required under
a third party payor agreement.
audits ].
ten
]% of the overstated unreimbursed
health care costs. A monetary penalty may be imposed if the political subdivision
failed to exercise reasonable diligence to comply with the requirements of
these rules.
Chapter 169.
ZOONOSIS CONTROL Introduction ]
Texas
Civil Statutes Article 4447v
], the legislative authority for these rules.
(2)
Animal - Any live, warm-blooded
animal which is used for exhibition purposes; except domestic farm animals
used for food and fiber.]
(3)
] Board - Texas Board of Health.
(4)
] Commissioner - Commissioner
of the Texas Department of Health.
(5)
] Department - Texas Department
of Health (TDH).
(6)
] Housing facility - Any room,
building, or area used to contain a primary enclosure or enclosures.
(7)
] Primary enclosure - Any structure
used to immediately restrict an animal or animals to a limited amount of space,
such as a room, pen, run, cage, compartment or hutch.
(8)
] Sanitize - To make physically
clean and to destroy disease
-
producing agents.
(9)
] Zoonosis Control Division (ZCD)
- Division [
of the Bureau of Veterinary Public Health
] of the Texas
Department of Health to which the responsibility for implementing these rules
is
[
as
] assigned.
or
] cold or
inclement weather
, and direct effects of wind, rain, or snow
;
in
] such [
a manner
] that:
every 12 hours
].
7.2 degrees Celsius (45 degrees Fahrenheit)
] nor
be allowed to exceed
85 degrees Fahrenheit (29.5 degrees Celsius)
[
29.5 degrees Celsius (85 degrees Fahrenheit)
]; and
Denial, suspension, and revocation.
The basis an actions will be as outlined in Texas Civil Statutes Article 4447v, §9;
Texas Civil Statutes Article 6252-13a, §§13-20; and the board's
formal hearing procedures, §§1.21-1.32 of this title (relating to
Formal Hearing Procedures)
].
employed to inspect
] circuses,
carnivals, or zoos under
Occupations Code, Chapter 2152
[
Texas Civil Statutes Article 4443, §8
], will be
approved
[
certified
] by the director, Zoonosis Control Division.
Subchapter C. TRAINING OF ANIMAL SHELTER PERSONNEL
and charge
fees
] for the training of animal shelter and animal control personnel
as to animal health and disease control, humane care and treatment, transportation
of animals, and the control of animals in an animal shelter.
Texas Department of
Health (department)
]. There are three types of training: basic, advanced,
and administrative.
§169.65(a)
]
of this title (relating to Course Content).
necessary
] to implement
and direct application of the concepts taught in the basic and advanced courses.
have applied
] for attendance with the [
department's
] Regional Zoonosis Control Program conducting the ACO course. Course
enrollment will be based on space availability policies set by the region
hosting the course.
(b)
] Advanced. A person must have:
to include
] a statement that the person meets
prerequisites for course attendance.
(c)
] Administrative. A person must
provide a recommendation from the individual's supervisor
, including
[
to include
] a statement that the person meets one of the
following prerequisites for course attendance:
satisfactorily
completed
] an advanced ACO course;
worked
] in an administrative
position for two years; or
completed
] 60 hours
of college credit.
(a)
]
The basic and advanced courses will include
technical coverage of topics deemed pertinent to animal shelter/animal control
personnel by the department's Zoonosis Control Division (ZCD) including, but
not limited to, animal health and disease control, humane care and treatment
of animals, control of animals in an animal shelter, and the transportation
of animals. The administrative course will include instruction in supervisory
and management skills necessary to implement and support the concepts taught
in the basic and advanced courses.
Chapter 265.
GENERAL SANITATION
Subchapter J. ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2003
], the board will initiate and complete a review of the committee
to determine whether the committee should be continued, consolidated with
another committee, or abolished. If the committee is not continued or consolidated,
the committee shall be abolished on that date.
chairman of the
board
] shall
elect from its members
[
appoint
]
a presiding officer and an assistant presiding officer to begin serving on
September 1 of each odd-numbered year.
serve until a successor is appointed to
]
complete the unexpired portion of the term of the office of presiding officer.
temporarily
] by vote of the committee [
until a successor is appointed by the chairman of the board
].
at least once each year
] to conduct committee business.
Chapter 289.
RADIATION CONTROL
Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34
] of this title (relating to the Texas Board of Health):
agency rule
], order, or
condition of the license or certificate of registration;
(2)
] Applicant - A person seeking
a license, certificate of registration, accreditation of mammography facility,
or industrial radiographer certification, issued under the provisions of the
Act and the requirements in this chapter.
(3)
] Board - The Texas Board of
Health.
(4)
] Certified industrial radiographer
- An individual who meets the definition of radiographer as stated in §289.255(c)
of this title (relating to Radiation Safety Requirements and Licensing and
Registration Procedures for Industrial Radiography).
(5)
] Commissioner - The Texas commissioner
of health.
(6)
] Contested case - A proceeding
in which the agency determines the legal rights, duties, or privileges of
a party after an opportunity for adjudicative hearing.
(7)
] Director - The director of
the radiation control program under the agency's jurisdiction.
(8)
] Enforcement conference - A
meeting held by the agency with management of a
person
[
licensee,
registrant, or a certified industrial radiographer
] to discuss the following:
(9)
] Hearing - A proceeding to
examine an application or other matter before the agency in order to adjudicate
rights, duties, or privileges.
(10)
Hearing examiner - An attorney selected
by the agency to conduct hearings.
]
hearing examiner
].
normally
] requires the
person receiving the notice
[
licensee, registrant, certified mammography system, or certified industrial
radiographer
] to provide a written statement describing the following:
licensee, registrant, certified mammography system, or certified industrial
radiographer,
] and the results achieved;
hearing examiner
]. A party may consist of the following:
Fund
] -
An account
[
A fund
] established [
in the state treasury
] for the purposes described in the Act, §401.305.
rules
], orders, or
licenses in accordance with the Act, the agency shall, no later than 30 days
following the end of the month in which the action was taken, submit notice
of the action for publication in the
Texas Register
. The action taken will remain in full force and effect unless and
until modified by subsequent action of the agency.
writing
] the director within 30 days after the notice is published in
the
Texas Register
.
hearing examiner
] no later than ten days prior to the
hearing. The requestor has the burden of proof in a hearing to determine whether
the requestor is a person affected.
hearing examiner
] may designate
parties at the commencement of the hearing on the merits.
Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34
] of this title apply. Failure to submit
a written request for a hearing in the form specified by subsection (c)(2)
of this section within 30 days may result in no hearing being held and the
proposed agency action being taken.
Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34
] of this title apply.
Failure to submit a written request for a hearing in the form prescribed in
subsection (c)(2) of this section on or before the stated date could result
in denial of party status and in issuance or renewal of the license by the
commissioner.
receipt
] of the notice.
writing
]
the director within 30 days of service
of the notice
[
or date
of mailing
].
writing
] the director within 30 days of service
of the notice
[
or date of mailing
].
and
] certified industrial radiographers
, and other persons
.
or
] certified industrial
radiographer
, or other person
who commits a violation(s) will be
issued a notice of violation.
applicable
] terms and conditions of the Act, this chapter, or of the
license, certificate of registration, or industrial radiographer certification
or order of the agency.
writing
] the director within 30 days of service
of the notice
[
or date of mailing
].
Administrative Penalties
].
Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34
] of this title.
that could have been prevented
by corrective action and for which the licensee, registrant, or certified
industrial radiographer did not take effective corrective action
].
or
] certified industrial radiographers
, or other persons
.
or
]
certified industrial radiographers
, or other persons
shall be categorized
by one of the following severity levels.
registration
] to a licensee or registrant after the emergency is over and settlement
of any compliance action; or
Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34
] of this title, and in accordance with subsection (i)(9) of this section,
concerning the intention of the agency. If no hearing is requested within
that period of time, the agency may take the contemplated action, and such
action is final.
If the owner/possessor desires to contest the
amount of such charge, the owner/possessor may request a hearing under the
Formal Hearing Procedures, Chapter 1, §§1.21-1.34 of this title
and in accordance with subsection (i)(9) of this section.
]
for licenses, certificates of registration,
or certified industrial radiographers
].
These emergency orders shall apply to licenses, certificates
of registration, or certified industrial radiographers.
]
licensee
] managing
the byproduct material, or the operation generating the byproduct material
or the radioactive waste, is unable to correct or neutralize the threat.
Fund
] to pay for actions or corrective
measures to remedy spills or contamination by radioactive material resulting
from a violation of the Act or
requirements of this chapter
[
a rule
], license, or order of the agency.
licensee,
registrant, or certified industrial radiographer
] shall be afforded
the opportunity for a hearing on an emergency order. Notice of the action,
along with a complaint, shall be given to the
person
[
licensee,
registrant, or certified industrial radiographer
] by personal service
or certified mail, addressed to the last known address. A hearing shall be
held on an emergency order if the person receiving the order
submits
a written request to the director
[
makes a written application
to the agency for a hearing
] within 30 days of the
date of the
order [
date
].
hearing examiner
] an interested person may make an unsworn statement. Such statement
shall not be made a part of the record.
agency
] offices
of the State Office of Administrative Hearings
in
Austin unless the
ALJ
[
hearing examiner
] specifies another
location.
hearing examiner
]. The witness
shall be subject to cross-examination.
hearing examiner
] to accrue in accordance with subparagraph
(A) of this paragraph when filing a motion for the issuance of a subpoena
or a commission to take a deposition.
Chapter 295.
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Subchapter D. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH GUIDELINES
Subchapter E. INDUSTRIAL HOMEWORK STANDARDS
Chapter 295.
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH