Opinions
Opinion No. JC-0571
The Honorable Patricia Gray, Chair, House Committee on Public Health, Texas
House of Representatives, P.O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Whether a building owned and operated by a municipal hospital authority,
but leased in part to a private business, is subject to the exclusive public
use requirement of article XI, section 9 of the Texas Constitution, and related
questions. (RQ-0547-JC)
S U M M A R Y
A building owned and operated by the Tomball Hospital Authority (the "Authority"),
but leased in part to a private business for operation as a "long-term care
hospital," must satisfy the exclusive public use requirement to qualify for
property tax exemption under article VIII, section 2 of the Texas Constitution
and section 11.11(a) of the Tax Code. That requirement is not, as a matter
of law, satisfied by the statutory tax-exemption language of the Authority's
enabling statute, section 262.004 of the Health and Safety Code. To satisfy
the exclusive public use requirement, the leased space must be used exclusively
"for the health, comfort, and welfare of the public" served by the Authority's
hospital. Whether the proposed use of the leased space as a privately operated
long-term care hospital satisfies the exclusive public use requirement necessitates
investigation and resolution of facts. If the leased space is not used exclusively
for public purposes, the Authority would be liable under the law for taxes
assessed against the building.
Opinion No. JC-0572
Mr. Richard F. Reynolds, Executive Director, Texas Workers' Compensation
Commission, Southfield Building, MS-4D 4000 South IH-35 Austin, Texas 78704-7491
Re: Whether a Workers' Compensation Commission rule requiring that written
communications be sent to both a claimant and the claimant's attorney creates
an exception to Rule 4.02(a) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional
Conduct, which prohibits an attorney from communicating with a person who
is represented by counsel. (RQ-0551-JC)
S U M M A R Y
A Texas Workers' Compensation Commission rule requiring that written communications
related to a claim be sent to both a claimant and the claimant's attorney,
see 28 Tex. Admin. Code §102.4(b) (2002), creates an exception to Rule
4.02(a) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits
an attorney from communicating with a person who is represented by counsel,
see Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof'l Conduct 4.02(a) (precluding communications
with a person represented by counsel unless lawyer "is authorized by law to
do so").
Opinion No. JC-0573
Ms. Michele L. Henricks, Executive Director, Court Reporters Certification
Board, P. O. Box 13131 Austin, Texas 78711-3131
Re: Whether any action is required of the Court Reporters Certification
Board in the implementation of section 57.021(d) of the Government Code. (RQ-0553-JC)
S U M M A R Y
Section 57.021(d) of the Government Code, which authorizes the Texas Commission
for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing to "maintain a list of persons certified
by the Court Reporters Certification Board as specialists in real-time captioning,"
does not require the Court Reporters Certification Board to take any action.
This provision is insufficient to confer on the Board the authority to certify
specialists in real-time captioning. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §57.021(d)
(Vernon Supp. 2002). No other provision of law confers such certification
authority on the Board.
Opinion No. JC-0574
The Honorable Sherry L. Robinson, Waller County Criminal District Attorney,
836 Austin Street, Suite 105 Hempstead, Texas 77445
Re: Procedure by which a prosecutor may obtain a waiver from the state
of a conflict of interest. (RQ-0550-JC)
S U M M A R Y
No statute authorizes a county judge to obtain a waiver from the commissioners
court on behalf of the county of a conflict of interest under Rule 1.06(b)
of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. The validity of a
judicial proceeding will not be affected if the county judge represents an
individual in a court of his or her county without the consent of the commissioners
court.
Opinion No. JC-0575
Honorable Gwyn Shea, Secretary of State, State of Texas, P.O. Box 12697,
Austin, Texas 78711.
Re: Meaning of "state officer" for purposes of article XVI, section 1 of
the Texas Constitution, which requires such individuals to sign an anti-bribery
statement. (RQ-0555-JC)
S U M M A R Y
Article XVI, section 1(b) of the Texas Constitution requires elected and
appointed officers to sign an anti-bribery statement before taking the oath
or affirmation of office required by article XVI, section 1(a). State-level
officers, but not local officers, must file the signed statement with the
secretary of state. Local officers must sign the statement and retain it with
the official records of the office. Questions about whether a particular officer
is a "state officer" within article XVI, section 1(c) may be resolved by consulting
relevant statutes, constitutional provisions, and judicial decisions.
For information regarding this publication, please
access the website at www.oag.state.tx.us
or call the Opinion Committee
at 512-463-2110.
TRD-200207403
Susan D. Gusky
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: November 13, 2002