Open Records Question
ORQ-60 (Proposed).
Parties interested in submitting comment to the
Attorney General concerning the following proposed Open Records Question are
asked to please submit comment no later than July 15, 2002.
The Office of the Attorney General has received inquiries in connection
with open records requests made of various county clerks for electronic copies
of county clerk real property records. The information at issue in these open
records requests is apparently created or maintained by or for the county
clerk under a contract with a private vendor. The inquiries raise important
legal issues under the Texas Public Information Act ("PIA"), some of which
are issues of first impression.
The law requires the Attorney General "to maintain uniformity in the application,
operation, and interpretation of" the PIA. Gov't Code §552.011. In fulfilling
this duty, the Attorney General may issue "detailed and comprehensive" open
records decisions.
Id.
Under this authority,
the Attorney General thus proposes the following open records question:
ORQ-60 (Proposed).
Requestor: No requestor. Regarding whether electronic
copies of county clerk real property records created or maintained under a
contract with a private third party vendor, including such copies in the sole
actual possession of the vendor, are subject to the Public Information Act;
whether a county clerk or the clerk's vendor must comply with an open records
request for a copy of such information in electronic form; whether the vendor
may set the amount the county clerk charges for an electronic copy; whether
the requestor may be charged for costs associated with restricted access to
or use of the information by the county clerk at the county clerk's office,
and related questions.
The decision in ORQ-60 is intended to address the pertinent legal questions
of any party affected by the type of open records requests described above.
For more information call Michael Garbarino at (512)
936-6736.
TRD-200203126
Susan Gusky
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: May 22, 2002
Opinion No. JC-0503
The Honorable Frank Madla, Chair, Intergovernmental Relations Committee,
Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas 78711-2068
Re: Whether a county may maintain a road that has not been officially established
as a public road but which has been accessible to and regularly used by the
public (RQ-0469-JC)
S U M M A R Y
A county is limited to expending public funds on the construction and maintenance
of public roads. A county may not expend public funds to construct, improve,
or maintain private roads, except as authorized by article III, section 52f
of the Texas Constitution. In general, a road may become a public road either
pursuant to the statutory procedures set forth in the county road and eminent
domain laws, by dedication, or by prescriptive easement.
Before maintaining a road that has not been officially established as a
public road, a commissioners court must either obtain a judicial order declaring
the road a public road or, alternatively, in a county with a population greater
than 50,000, make its own determination that the road has become a public
road by dedication or by prescriptive easement. Private landowners or others
affected by a commissioners court's determination that a road is a public
road may seek to have their rights adjudicated by a court. In such an action
challenging a commissioners court's determination that a road is a public
road, the status of the road would be a question of fact.
In counties of 50,000 or fewer persons governed by chapter 281 of the Transportation
Code, a commissioners court is not authorized to determine that a road has
become a public road by dedication or by prescriptive easement based on events
occurring after that chapter's effective date, or to maintain such a road
on the basis of those common-law doctrines.
Opinion No. JC-0504
The Honorable Bill Turner, Brazos County District Attorney, Brazos County
Courthouse, 300 East 26th Street, Suite 310, Bryan, Texas 77803
Re: Whether section 37.123 of the Education Code, which creates the offense
of "disruptive activity," requires proof of intent (RQ-0474-JC)
S U M M A R Y
Section 37.123 of the Education Code, which prohibits disruptive activities
on a school campus, requires in order to sustain a conviction that the actor
intentionally engaged in one of the five species of conduct described in that
statute, rather than merely engaged in conduct that ultimately resulted in
one of the effects described therein.
Opinion No. JC-0505
Mr. O.C. "Chet" Robbins, Executive Director, Texas Funeral Service Commission,
333 Guadalupe, Suite 110, Austin, Texas 78701
Re: Whether a casket constitutes "funeral merchandise" for purposes of
Chapter 651 of the Occupations Code, and related questions (RQ-0477-JC)
S U M M A R Y
While a casket constitutes funeral merchandise for the purposes of chapter
651 of the Occupations Code, the sale of a casket for an imminent burial,
without more, does not constitute an act of funeral directing.
For further information,
please call the Opinion Committee at 512/ 463-2110 or access the website at
www.oag.state.tx.us.
TRD-200203118
Susan D. Gusky
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: May 21, 2002
RQ-0538
Mr. Jerry L. Benedict, Administrative Director, Office of Court Administration,
205 West 14th Street, Suite 600, Austin, Texas 78711-2066
Whether the legislature may define the state appellate courts as "state
agencies" for purposes of employment discrimination under chapter 21 of the
Labor Code (Request No. 0538-JC)
Briefs requested by June 21 , 2002
RQ-0539
The Honorable Bill G. Carter, Chair, Urban Affairs Committee, Texas House
of Representatives, P.O. Box 2910, Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Whether a city council may determine that its members are not eligible
to serve as members of a volunteer fire department, and related questions
(Request No. 0539-JC)
Briefs requested by June 17, 2002
RQ-0540
The Honorable Tim Cone, Upshur County, Criminal District Attorney, 405
North Titus Street, Gilmer, Texas 75644
Re: Whether section 130.908, Local Government Code is applicable after
a primary election or only after a general election, and related questions
(Request No. 0540-JC)
Briefs requested by June 21, 2002
RQ-0541
Mr. William M. Franz, Executive Director, State Board of Educator Certification,
1001 Trinity, Austin, Texas 78701-2603
Re: Procedure for certification of foreign educators by the State Board
for Educator Certification (Request No. 0541-JC)
Briefs requested by June 17, 2002
RQ-0542
Mr. Jeff Moseley, Executive Director, Texas Department of Economic Development,
P.O. Box 12728, Austin, Texas 78711-2728
Re: Enterprise project destinations under chapter 2303, Government Code,
the Texas Enterprise Zone Act (Request No. 0542-JC)
Briefs requested by June 21, 2002
RQ-0543
The Honorable Russell W. Malm, Midland County Attorney, 200 West Wall Street,
Suite 104, Midland, Texas 79701
Re: Authority of a county to enter into a multi-year lease of real property
with a private organization for the purpose of operating an art museum (Request
No. 0543-JC)
Briefs requested by June 20, 2002
RQ-0544
The Honorable Jeff Wentworth, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin,
Texas 78711-2068
The Honorable Edmund Kuempel, Texas House of Representatives, P.O. Box
2910, Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Effect of the defeat of a ballot proposition confirming the creation
of the Southeast Trinity Groundwater Conservation District, and related questions
(RQ-0544-JC)
Briefs requested by June 20, 2002
For further information,
please call the Opinion Committee at 512/ 463-2110 or access the website at
www.oag.state.tx.us.
TRD-200203148
Susan D. Gusky
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: May 22, 2002
Opinions
Requests for Opinions