TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 66. STATE ADOPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

Subchapter B. STATE ADOPTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

19 TAC §66.54, §66.57

The State Board of Education (SBOE) proposes amendments to §66.54 and §66.57, concerning state adoption and distribution of instructional materials. The sections specify requirements and procedures related to the number of sample review copies of instructional materials under consideration for adoption that must be submitted by publishers and that must be made available at regional education service centers (ESCs). During the March 2002 SBOE meeting, members heard testimony regarding the limited number of review copies of instructional materials under consideration for adoption available at the ESCs. The SBOE requested that staff prepare amendments to Chapter 66, State Adoption and Distribution of Instructional Materials, to address these concerns.

The proposed amendment to §66.54, Samples, would require that publishers provide ESCs with four sample copies of instructional materials rather than two. The two additional copies would provide greater access to the public for review. Language is also proposed to allow the commissioner of education to negotiate the appropriate number of samples a publisher must provide. This provision would allow the commissioner to exempt a publisher from the four-sample requirement in cases where little or no public review is expected or in cases where the volume of materials would pose a problem for storage and display at the ESC. An example of a possible exemption this year would be for publishers of prekindergarten systems. The prekindergarten systems include nine content areas, are expensive, and require large display areas. This exemption could offer some relief to ESCs that are experiencing space problems and would be exercised only for subjects in which public demand for additional review copies is expected to be low. In all cases, however, publishers would be asked to have the additional systems available in the event that there are requests from the public for the additional review copies. Publishers would be asked to expedite shipment of the additional copies to the ESCs immediately upon request by the agency. In addition, proposed new language requires publishers of Internet-based instructional content to provide the ESCs with appropriate information, such as locator information and passwords, if applicable, to ensure public access to their programs throughout the review period.

The proposed amendment to §66.57, Regional Education Service Centers: Procedures for Handling Samples; Public Access to Samples, would require ESCs to have any additional sample copies available to the public for checkout, rather than one copy. In addition, proposed new language requires the ESCs to make available appropriate information, such as locator information and passwords, to ensure public access to Internet-based instructional content throughout the review period.

Ann Smisko, associate commissioner for curriculum, assessment, and technology, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendments are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Ms. Smisko has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendments will be the provision of greater access to the public to instructional materials being considered for state adoption. There will be effect on small businesses. There is anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the amendments as proposed. Publishers will incur additional cost in providing additional review copies of textbooks to ESCs. The cost will vary from publisher to publisher. Costs would be similar for small and large publishers. ESC directors may be challenged to find additional space for storage and display of the extra review copies.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Accountability Reporting and Research, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 463-9701. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 475-3499. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendments submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register .

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, §31.003, which authorizes the SBOE to adopt rules for the adoption, requisition, distribution, care, use, and disposal of textbooks.

The amendments implement the Texas Education Code, §31.003.

§66.54.Samples.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Four [ Two ] sample copies of the student and teacher components of each instructional materials submission shall be filed with each of the 20 regional education service centers (ESCs) on or before the date specified in the schedule for the adoption process. These samples shall be available for public review. Publishers of Internet-based instructional content submitted for review shall provide the ESCs with appropriate information, such as locator information and passwords, required to ensure public access to their programs throughout the review period.

(c) If it is determined that good cause exists, the commissioner of education may extend the deadline for filing samples with ESCs or negotiate the appropriate number of samples a publisher must provide . At its discretion, the State Board of Education (SBOE) may remove from consideration any materials proposed for adoption that were not properly deposited with the ESCs, the Texas Education Agency (TEA), or members of the state review panel.

(d)-(i) (No change.)

§66.57.Regional Education Service Centers: Procedures for Handling Samples; Public Access to Samples.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Public access to samples.

(1) One sample of all instructional materials under consideration for adoption shall be retained in each ESC for review by interested persons until notification is received from the TEA. Any additional samples [ One sample ] shall be made available to be checked out according to rules established by each ESC based on demand. Appropriate information, such as locator information and passwords, shall be made available by the ESCs to ensure public access to Internet-based instructional content throughout the review period.

(2) Regional ESCs shall ensure reasonable public access to sample instructional materials, including access outside of normal working hours that shall be scheduled by appointment.

(3) On or before the date specified in the schedule for the adoption process, each ESC shall issue a news release publicizing the date on which sample instructional materials will be available for review at the center and shall notify all school districts in the region of the schedule.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 13, 2002.

TRD-200202932

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Manager, Policy Planning

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 23, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


Part 7. STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION

Chapter 247. EDUCATORS' CODE OF ETHICS

19 TAC §247.2

The State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) proposes amendments to §247.2, relating to the Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators (Educator's Code of Ethics). The proposed changes to the Educator's Code of Ethics and the reasons for them are explained below.

Section 247.2(a): Statement of Purpose. Perhaps the most noticeable revision to the Code of Ethics is the replacement of the subsection formally headed "Professional Responsibility" with a "Statement of Purpose," which outlines a philosophy of ethical and professional conduct for Texas educators. While all educators should aspire to exemplify the highest standards of their profession, the declaration of ethical conduct contained in this Statement of Purpose is intended only to establish general ethical guidelines for educators, not to outline sanctionable conduct. In contrast, the principles and standards contained in the revised Code of Ethics delineate specific behaviors which reflect a violation of an educator's ethical obligations and which may subject an educator to sanctions.

Section 247.2(b): Enforceable Standards. To streamline and simplify the Educators' Code of Ethics, the drafters of the revised Code decided to reduce the number of principles from five to three. The first two principles of the current Code of Ethics-"Principle I: Professional ethical and conduct," §247.2(b), and "Principle II: Professional practices and performance," §247.2(c) -have been merged into one broader principle entitled "Professional Ethical Conduct, Practices and Performances," proposed §247.2(b)(1). The rationale behind this merger is that both Principle I and Principle II establish general guidelines governing the ethical conduct of educators, while the other principles specifically address the conduct of educators towards particular classes of individuals, such as students or professional colleagues. Additionally, current Principle V-"Ethical conduct toward parents and community," §247.2(e)-has been removed. While the Revisions Committee does not intend simply to release educators from an obligation to behave ethically towards parents and the community, the concepts addressed under Principle V do not properly identify the clear standards of conduct required to establish the Code of Ethics as an effective and enforceable document. Therefore, language outlining an educator's ethical responsibility to parents and the community has been included in the Statement of Purpose.

The principles of ethical behavior contained in the revised Code of Ethics address three categories of educator conduct: ethical conduct generally, ethical conduct towards professional colleagues, and ethical conduct toward students. Each principle is further defined by specific, observable standards of conduct describing unethical behaviors that may subject the educator to sanctions. The principles are arranged in paragraphs under §247.2(b) and their related standards are set out in corresponding subparagraphs. A brief explanation of the reasons behind the changes follows:

Section 247.2(b)(1): Professional Ethical Conduct, Practices, and Performance.

SUBPARAGRAPH (A): "Standard 1.1. The educator shall not knowingly engage in deceptive practices regarding official policies of the school district or educational institution."

This standard provides that, in order to commit an ethical violation, an educator must knowingly attempt to deceive or actually deceive an individual regarding official policies of the school district or an educational institution through deceptive practices, which may be written or oral conduct by the educator. (Proposed amendment of current Principle I, Standard 1, at §247.2(b)(1).)

SUBPARAGRAPH (B): "Standard 1.2. The educator shall not knowingly misappropriate, divert or use monies, personnel, property or equipment committed to his or her charge for personal gain or advantage."

To clearly define an educator's ethical obligations regarding the property and personnel placed under his or her control, the drafters of the revised Code propose this standard, which better identifies the unethical conduct required to comply with this ethical obligation. This amended standard is proposed because the current Code of Ethics, which requires an educator to "honestly account for all funds committed to his or her charge," does not adequately identify conduct that is required for full compliance with the standard. (Proposed amendment of current Principle I, Standard 2, at §247.2(b)(2).)

SUBPARAGRAPH (C): "Standard 1.3. The educator shall not submit fraudulent requests for reimbursement, expenses or pay."

This new standard is proposed to identify particular types of unethical conduct not specifically delineated in the current Code of Ethics. Presently, the Code speaks of conducting financial business with integrity (Principle I, Standard 2, at §247.2(b)(2)) without offering any guidance regarding that business which is subject to this provision and what, precisely, constituted unethical conduct regarding an educator's financial business.

SUBPARAGRAPH (D): "Standard 1.4. The educator shall not use institutional or professional privileges for personal or partisan advantage."

No amendment is proposed for this standard (currently Principle I, Standard 3, at §247.2(b)(3)).

SUBPARAGRAPH (E): "Standard 1.5. The educator shall neither accept nor offer gratuities, gifts, or favors that impair professional judgment or to obtain special advantage. This standard shall not restrict the acceptance of gifts or tokens offered and accepted openly from students, parents, or other persons or organizations in recognition or appreciation of service."

This proposed standard combines two of the current standards (Principle I, Standard 4, at §247.2(b)(4); Principle I, Standard 5, at §247.2(b)(5)), so that it includes both the offer and the acceptance of inappropriate gifts that may impair the educator. The drafters of the revised Code of Ethics recognize that tokens of appreciation given to educators are commonplace and that the acceptance of these nominal gifts should not constitute unethical behavior by the educator. Consequently, this revised standard specifically excludes from any definition of unethical behavior tokens of recognition, such as plaques, fruit, baked goods, coffee mugs, ornaments, and the like in an effort to reflect the normal, acceptable interactions between educators, students, and parents.

SUBPARAGRAPH (F): "Standard 1.6. The educator shall not falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so."

No amendment is proposed for this standard (currently Principle I, Standard 6, at §247.2(b)(6)).

SUBPARAGRAPH (G): "Standard 1.7. The educator shall comply with state regulations, written local school board policies and other applicable state and federal laws."

No amendment is proposed for this standard (currently Principle II, Standard 5, at §247.2(c)(5)).

SUBPARAGRAPH (H): "Standard 1.8. The educator shall apply for, accept, offer, or assign a position or a responsibility on the basis of professional qualifications."

The amendment to this standard (currently Principle II, Standard 1, §247.2(c)(1)) is proposed to remove the language "and shall adhere to the terms of a contract or appointment." Contract abandonment and assignment are adequately addressed elsewhere in the Board's rules (i.e., at 19 TAC §249.14).

Section 247.2(b)(2): Ethical Conduct Toward Professional Colleagues.

SUBPARAGRAPH (A): "Standard 2.1. The educator shall not reveal confidential health or personnel information concerning colleagues unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law."

The proposed amendment for this standard (currently Principle III, Standard 1, at §247.2(d)(1)) adds the phrase "health or personnel" to clarify what types of information should not be revealed.

SUBPARAGRAPH (B): "Standard 2.2. The educator shall not harm others by knowingly making false statements about a colleague or the school system."

This standard (currently Principle III, Standard 2, at §247.2(d)(2)) would be amended to require that, to be sanctioned, the educator must have made a false statement that actually caused harm to a professional colleague.

SUBPARAGRAPH (C): "Standard 2.3. The educator shall adhere to written local school board policies and state and federal laws regarding the hiring, evaluation, and dismissal of personnel."

To clarify that ethical conduct applies to individuals and not to policies and procedures, the proposed amendment for this standard (currently Principle III, Standard 3, at §247.2(d)(3)) would apply it to "personnel" rather than to "processes."

SUBPARAGRAPH (D): "Standard 2.4. The educator shall not interfere with a colleague's exercise of political, professional, or citizenship rights and responsibilities."

This standard (currently Principle III, Standard 4, at §247.2(d)(4)) is proposed for amendment to include professional rights, such as the right to belong to a professional organization.

SUBPARAGRAPH (E): "Standard 2.5. The educator shall not discriminate against or coerce a colleague on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status."

The Board proposes to eliminate the word "harass" from this standard (currently Principle III, Standard 5, at §247.2(d)(5)). Because sexual harassment is addressed in state and federal law, includes the concept of harassment in the definition of discrimination, the word "harass" is redundant.

SUBPARAGRAPH (F): "Standard 2.6. The educator shall not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to influence professional decisions or colleagues."

This standard (currently Principle III, Standard 7, at §247.2(d)(7)) is not proposed for amendment.

SUBPARAGRAPH (G): "Standard 2.7. The educator shall not retaliate against any individual who has filed a complaint with the SBEC under this chapter."

This proposed new standard would help protect complainants from retaliation for filing complaints against educators with SBEC.

Section247.2(b)(3): Ethical Conduct Toward Students.

SUBPARAGRAPH (A): "Standard 3.1. The educator shall not reveal confidential information concerning students unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law."

The Board does not propose amending this standard (currently Principle IV, Standard 3, at §247.2(e)(3)).

SUBPARAGRAPH (B): "Standard 3.2. The educator shall not knowingly treat a student in a manner that adversely affects the student's learning, physical health, mental health or safety."

The amendment proposed for this standard (currently Principle IV, Standard 4, at §247.2(e)(4)) requires that an educator knowingly treat a student in a harmful manner to violate this provision of the Code of Ethics. The current standard requires that an educator make a reasonable effort to protect a student from harmful conditions. To warrant sanction, the educator must willfully commit misconduct that adversely affects a student's well-being.

SUBPARAGRAPH (C): "Standard 3.3. The educator shall not deliberately or knowingly misrepresent facts regarding a student."

This standard (currently Principle IV, Standard 5, at §247.2(e)(5)) now requires that an educator shall not "distort facts." The proposed amendment prohibits deliberate and knowing misrepresentations of fact regarding a student. In the simplest terms, the revised language prohibits an educator from lying about a student.

SUBPARAGRAPH (D): "Standard 3.4. The educator shall not exclude a student from participation in a program, deny benefits to a student, or grant an advantage to a student on the basis of race, color, sex, disability, national origin, religion, or family status."

The Board proposes to remove the word "unfairly" from this standard (currently Principle IV, Standard 6, at §247.2(e)(6)). Whenever an educator treats a student in the manner described in this provision, that treatment is "unfair" by definition. Therefore, the word "unfair" is redundant.

SUBPARAGRAPH (E): "Standard 3.5. The educator shall not engage in physical mistreatment of a student."

This proposed new standard reiterates an educator's responsibility to treat every student in a respectful manner and specifies that inappropriate use of force against a student is not tolerated by the educational community.

SUBPARAGRAPH (F): "Standard 3.6. The educator shall not solicit or engage in sexual conduct or a romantic relationship with a student."

This proposed new standard specifies that any kind of romantic encounter or relationship between an educator and a student is unacceptable, regardless of the age of the student.

SUBPARAGRAPH (G): "Standard 3.7. The educator shall not furnish alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs to any student or knowingly allow any student to consume alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs in the presence of the educator."

This proposed new standard emphasizes that the educational community does not tolerate the misconduct described in this provision.

Dan Junell, General Counsel, State Board for Educator Certification, has determined that for the first five year period the amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government or small business as a result of enforcing the amendments. SBEC should realize savings in disciplinary-proceedings costs through efficient enforcement of reasonable, clear, and concise ethical standards, reducing the number of non-jurisdictional and frivolous complaints. The agency, however, cannot now estimate the amount of any such savings.

Mr. Junell also has determined that for each year of the first five years that the amendments are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendments as proposed would benefit the public by helping make public schools a safe and productive environment for students and educators. If adopted, the revised Code of Ethics and Standards Practices for Texas Educators would provide greater clarity regarding the professional standards expected of all Texas educators and delineate those specific behaviors which may subject educators to sanctions. The proposed revisions would streamline the Code of Ethics and eliminate vague, ambiguous language, thus providing reasonable, clear, and concise ethical standards for Texas educators to comply with. Persons affected by these amendments should incur no additional costs as a result of the implementation of the proposed rules.

Interested persons wishing to comment on the proposed rules must submit their comments in writing to William M. Franz, Executive Director, State Board for Educator Certification, 1001 Trinity, Austin, TX 78701-2603, within the 30-day comment period, which begins on the date of publication of this issue of the Texas Register . The comments should contain the following title or reference: "Comments on proposed amendments to the Educator's Code of Ethics, 19 TAC §247.2."

The amendments are proposed under the authority of the following provisions of the Education Code: §21.031(a), which empowers SBEC to regulate and oversee all aspects of the standards of conduct of public school educators; and §21.041(b)(8), which requires SBEC to propose rules that provide for the enforcement and amendment of an educator's code of ethics.

The proposed amendment affects §21.031(a), Education Code, which requires the Board to regulate and oversee all aspects of the standards of conduct of public school educators; and §21.041(b)(7), Education Code, which requires the Board to propose rules that provide for disciplinary proceedings, including the suspension or revocation of an educator certificate, as provided by Chapter 2001, Government Code.

§247.2.Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators.

(a) Statement of Purpose. The Texas educator shall comply with standard practices and ethical conduct toward students, professional colleagues, school officials, parents, and members of the community and shall safeguard academic freedom. The Texas educator, in maintaining the dignity of the profession, shall respect and obey the law, demonstrate personal integrity, and exemplify honesty. The Texas educator, in exemplifying ethical relations with colleagues, shall extend just and equitable treatment to all members of the profession. The Texas educator, in accepting a position of public trust, shall measure success by the progress of each student toward realization of his or her potential as an effective citizen. The Texas educator, in fulfilling responsibilities in the community, shall cooperate with parents and others to improve the public schools of the community.

(b) Enforceable Standards.

(1) Professional Ethical Conduct, Practices and Performance.

(A) Standard 1.1. The educator shall not knowingly engage in deceptive practices regarding official policies of the school district or educational institution.

(B) Standard 1.2. The educator shall not knowingly misappropriate, divert, or use monies, personnel, property, or equipment committed to his or her charge for personal gain or advantage.

(C) Standard 1.3. The educator shall not submit fraudulent requests for reimbursement, expenses, or pay.

(D) Standard 1.4. The educator shall not use institutional or professional privileges for personal or partisan advantage.

(E) Standard 1.5. The educator shall neither accept nor offer gratuities, gifts, or favors that impair professional judgment or to obtain special advantage. This standard shall not restrict the acceptance of gifts or tokens offered and accepted openly from students, parents, or other persons or organizations in recognition or appreciation of service.

(F) Standard 1.6. The educator shall not falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so.

(G) Standard 1.7. The educator shall comply with state regulations, written local school board policies, and other applicable state and federal laws.

(H) Standard 1.8. The educator shall apply for, accept, offer, or assign a position or a responsibility on the basis of professional qualifications.

(2) Ethical Conduct Toward Professional Colleagues.

(A) Standard 2.1. The educator shall not reveal confidential health or personnel information concerning colleagues unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.

(B) Standard 2.2. The educator shall not harm others by knowingly making false statements about a colleague or the school system.

(C) Standard 2.3. The educator shall adhere to written local school board policies and state and federal laws regarding the hiring, evaluation, and dismissal of personnel.

(D) Standard 2.4. The educator shall not interfere with a colleague's exercise of political, professional, or citizenship rights and responsibilities.

(E) Standard 2.5. The educator shall not discriminate against or coerce a colleague on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status.

(F) Standard 2.6. The educator shall not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to influence professional decisions or colleagues.

(G) Standard 2.7. The educator shall not retaliate against any individual who has filed a complaint with the SBEC under this chapter.

(3) Ethical Conduct Toward Students.

(A) Standard 3.1. The educator shall not reveal confidential information concerning students unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.

(B) Standard 3.2. The educator shall not knowingly treat a student in a manner that adversely affects the student's learning, physical health, mental health, or safety.

(C) Standard 3.3. The educator shall not deliberately or knowingly misrepresent facts regarding a student.

(D) Standard 3.4. The educator shall not exclude a student from participation in a program, deny benefits to a student, or grant an advantage to a student on the basis of race, color, sex, disability, national origin, religion, or family status.

(E) Standard 3.5. The educator shall not engage in physical mistreatment of a student.

(F) Standard 3.6. The educator shall not solicit or engage in sexual conduct or a romantic relationship with a student.

(G) Standard 3.7. The educator shall not furnish alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs to any student or knowingly allow any student to consume alcohol or illegal/unauthorized drugs in the presence of the educator.

[ (a) Professional responsibility. The Texas educator should strive to create an atmosphere that will nurture to fulfillment the potential of each student. The educator shall comply with standard practices and ethical conduct toward students, professional colleagues, school officials, parents, and members of the community. In conscientiously conducting his or her affairs, the educator shall exemplify the highest standards of professional commitment.]

[ (b) Principle I: Professional ethical conduct. The Texas educator shall maintain the dignity of the profession by respecting and obeying the law, demonstrating personal integrity, and exemplifying honesty.]

[ (1) Standard 1. The educator shall not intentionally misrepresent official policies of the school district or educational institution and shall clearly distinguish those views from personal attitudes and opinions.]

[ (2) Standard 2. The educator shall honestly account for all funds committed to his or her charge and shall conduct financial business with integrity.]

[ (3) Standard 3. The educator shall not use institutional or professional privileges for personal or partisan advantage.]

[ (4) Standard 4. The educator shall accept no gratuities, gifts, or favors that impair professional judgment.]

[ (5) Standard 5. The educator shall not offer any favor, service, or thing of value to obtain special advantage.]

[ (6) Standard 6. The educator shall not falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so.]

[ (c) Principle II: Professional practices and performance. The Texas educator, after qualifying in a manner established by law or regulation, shall assume responsibilities for professional administrative or teaching practices and professional performance and shall demonstrate competence.]

[ (1) Standard 1. The educator shall apply for, accept, offer, or assign a position or a responsibility on the basis of professional qualifications and shall adhere to the terms of a contract or appointment.]

[ (2) Standard 2. The educator shall not deliberately or recklessly impair his or her mental or physical health or ignore social prudence, thereby affecting his or her ability to perform the duties of his or her professional assignment.]

[ (3) Standard 3. The educator shall organize instruction that seeks to accomplish objectives related to learning.]

[ (4) Standard 4. The educator shall continue professional growth.]

[ (5) Standard 5. The educator shall comply with written local school board policies, state regulations, and other applicable state and federal laws.]

[ (d) Principle III: Ethical conduct toward professional colleagues. The Texas educator, in exemplifying ethical relations with colleagues, shall accord just and equitable treatment to all members of the profession.]

[ (1) Standard 1. The educator shall not reveal confidential information concerning colleagues unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.]

[ (2) Standard 2. The educator shall not willfully make false statements about a colleague or the school system.]

[ (3) Standard 3. The educator shall adhere to written local school board policies and state and federal laws regarding dismissal, evaluation, and employment processes.]

[ (4) Standard 4. The educator shall not interfere with a colleague's exercise of political and citizenship rights and responsibilities.]

[ (5) Standard 5. The educator shall not discriminate against, coerce, or harass a colleague on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status.]

[ (6) Standard 6. The educator shall not intentionally deny or impede a colleague in the exercise or enjoyment of any professional right or privilege.]

[ (7) Standard 7. The educator shall not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to influence professional decisions or colleagues.]

[ (8) Standard 8. The educator shall have the academic freedom to teach as a professional privilege, and no educator shall interfere with such privilege except as required by state and/or federal laws.]

[ (e) Principle IV: Ethical conduct toward students. The Texas educator, in accepting a position of public trust, should measure success by progress of each student toward realization of his or her potential as an effective citizen.]

[ (1) Standard 1. The educator shall deal considerately and justly with each student and shall seek to resolve problems including discipline according to law and school board policy.]

[ (2) Standard 2. The educator shall not intentionally expose the student to disparagement.]

[ (3) Standard 3. The educator shall not reveal confidential information concerning students unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.]

[ (4) Standard 4. The educator shall make reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions detrimental to learning, physical health, mental health, or safety.]

[ (5) Standard 5. The educator shall not deliberately distort facts.]

[ (6) Standard 6. The educator shall not unfairly exclude a student from participation in a program, deny benefits to a student, or grant an advantage to a student on the basis of race, color, sex, disability, national origin, religion, or family status.]

[ (7) Standard 7. The educator shall not unreasonably restrain the student from independent action in the pursuit of learning or deny the student access to varying points of view.]

[ (f) Principle V: Ethical conduct toward parents and community. The Texas educator, in fulfilling citizenship responsibilities in the community, should cooperate with parents and others to improve the public schools of the community.]

[ (1) Standard 1. The educator shall make reasonable effort to communicate to parents information that lawfully should be revealed in the interest of the student.]

[ (2) Standard 2. The educator shall endeavor to understand community cultures and relate the home environment of students to the school.]

[ (3) Standard 3. The educator shall manifest a positive role in school-public relations.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 13, 2002.

TRD-200202927

William Franz

Executive Director

State Board for Educator Certification

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 23, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 469-3011