Public Utility Commission of Texas
Title 16, Part 2
The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) readopts Texas Administrative
Code, Chapter 25, Substantive Rules Applicable to Electric Service Providers,
pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Administrative Procedure Act (APA), §2001.039,
Agency Review of Existing Rules. The notice of intention to review Chapter
25 was published in the
Texas Register
on
September 21, 2001, (26 TexReg 7283). Project Number 22067 is assigned to
this review proceeding.
APA §2001.039 requires that each state agency review and readopt,
readopt with amendments, or repeal the rules adopted by that agency pursuant
to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001. Such reviews shall include, at
a minimum, an assessment by the agency as to whether the reason for adopting
or readopting the rules continues to exist. The commission requested specific
comments on whether the reason for adopting the substantive rules in Chapter
25 continues to exist.
The commission finds that the reason for adopting Chapter 25 continues
to exist. However, the commission also finds that certain sections require
amendments and other sections are obsolete due to the restructuring of the
electric industry. Separate rulemaking proceedings will be initiated to amend
or repeal these sections as discussed further in this preamble.
The commission received comments on the notice of intention to review from
American Electric Power Company (AEP), Reliant Energy HL&P (Reliant-HL&P),
Reliant Resources, Inc. (RRI), TXU Electric Company (TXU), and Xcel Energy
on behalf of Southwestern Public Service Company (Xcel).
General comments related to Chapter 25
Commenters stated that the majority of the rules in Chapter 25 should be
readopted or readopted with amendments; however, there are certain sections
that commenters believe should be repealed as indicated in subsequent discussions.
AEP, Reliant-HL&P and Xcel commented that the use of the terms "electric
utility" and "utility" need to be reviewed throughout the rules to determine
the applicability of the terms as defined. As a result of Senate Bill 7, 76th
Legislative Session (1999), the electric industry has been significantly restructured
and each rule should reference the bundled or unbundled entity to which it
applies. Xcel stated that the rules must preserve those portions that apply
to integrated utilities still under regulation while accommodating the restructured
electric industry. AEP commented that the majority of the rules need to be
amended to specify the applicable entities in both the new market structure
and among utilities not implementing customer choice in January 2002.
Reliant-HL&P and Xcel commented that the term "customer" should also
be carefully reviewed in each section and should be specific as to the type
of service that the customer receives. Commenters suggested that the rules
should provide definitions for each type of customer and then the individual
rules should reference those individual classifications of customers to avoid
confusion.
Commenters also noted that general clean-up of the rules is needed, e.g.,
to remove obsolete dates and references to integrated resource planning (IRP).
The commission agrees that the applicability of each section needs to be
carefully reviewed to specify the applicable entities in both the new market
structure and among utilities not implementing customer choice in January
2002. The terms "electric utility" and "utility" need to be modified as necessary
to reference the bundled or unbundled entity responsible for meeting the requirements
of each section. The commission also agrees that some general clean-up of
the rules is needed to remove obsolete dates and references to IRP, as well
as references to rule sections in Chapter 23 which no longer exist. New rulemaking
projects will be initiated to make the necessary changes to the substantive
rules in Chapter 25.
Subchapter A, General Provisions
§25.1, Purpose and Scope of Rules
TXU commented that §25.1(b) should reflect that many of the new rules
address non- utility market participants as well as utility service providers
and consumers.
The commission agrees with TXU that this section should reflect that many
of the new rules also address non-utility market participants. The commission
anticipates that this section will be carefully reviewed in a future rulemaking
project.
§25.2, Cross-Reference Transition Provision
The commission received no comments on this section.
§25.3, Severability Clause
TXU commented that the second sentence should be amended to include non-utility
market participants whose duties are also addressed in Chapter 25.
The commission agrees with TXU that this section should reflect that non-utility
market participants are subject to certain duties addressed in Chapter 25.
The commission anticipates that this section will be carefully reviewed in
a future rulemaking project.
§25.4, Statement of Nondiscrimination
The commission received no comments on this section.
§25.5, Definitions
RRI stated that the definitions section should be expanded to include terms
used in multiple sections of the substantive rules; all terms should be reviewed
to ensure that the terms' application are consistent throughout the rules;
the terms should be reviewed for consistency with Chapter 25, Appendix IV,
Tariff for Retail Delivery Service, and with the Electric Reliability Council
of Texas (ERCOT) protocols; the terms "public utility" and "utility" should
be replaced with the specific entities, i.e., the transmission and distribution
utility (TDU), retail electric provider (REP), and/or power generation company
(PGC) responsible for the requirements of the rule.
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "ERCOT protocols" should be amended
to include customer registration activities; "freeze period" should be deleted
as obsolete after January 2002; "power cost recovery factor" should be amended
to clarify that it does not apply to utility territories open to full competition
after January 1, 2002; and "retail electric provider" should be amended to
clarify that a certificate is required from the commission.
The commission agrees with RRI that the defined terms in this section should
be carefully reviewed and amended, including expansion of terms where appropriate,
to ensure consistent applicability throughout Chapter 25. The commission additionally
agrees that, although definitions of transmission and distribution, retail
electric provider, and power generation company currently exist in the section,
the terms "public utility" or "utility" may need substantive modification
so that the terms accurately reflect the correct type of applicable market
participant.
The commission also agrees with Reliant-HL&P that certain definitions
may need amendment or deletion to accurately reflect their applicability in
light of market changes brought forth through commencement of competition.
The commission intends to initiate a rulemaking project(s) to carefully review
and implement modifications to the section where appropriate.
§25.6, Cost of Copies of Public Information
The commission received no comments on this section.
Subchapter B, Customer Service and Protection
General comments on §§25.21-25.31
TXU commented that the rules in this subchapter should be amended where
appropriate to address distinctions between those areas of the state where
competition will exist after January 2002 and those areas that will not yet
be competitive. TXU further stated that in those areas where competition will
exist, Subchapter B should be amended to conform to §25.214 of this title
(relating to Terms and Conditions of Retail Delivery Service Provided by Investor
Owned Transmission and Distribution Utilities); Chapter 25, Appendix IV, Tariff
for Retail Delivery Service; and Subchapter R, relating to Customer Protection
Rules for Retail Electric Service.
Xcel commented that the subchapter should be readopted and made applicable
to those utilities that continue to operate under traditional regulation.
Reliant-HL&P stated that §§25.21 - 25.31 should be amended
to clarify that these sections do not apply to transmission and distribution
utilities.
The commission agrees with TXU and Xcel that these sections need to be
modified throughout to acknowledge that the rules apply to electric utilities
operating in non-competitive areas. The commission disagrees with TXU that
these rules should be amended to conform to §25.214, since that rule
only applies to utilities that operate in competitive areas. The customer
protection rules that apply to utilities that operate in competitive areas
are properly found in Subchapter R, relating to Customer Protection Rules
for Retail Electric Service. The commission also believes other substantive
revisions may need to be made to these sections to fully ensure that the customer
safeguards envisioned by the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) §39.101
are available to all retail customers in the state of Texas regardless of
their provider. The commission will open a separate project to make these
other more substantive revisions.
§25.28, Bill Payment and Adjustments
Xcel commented that §25.28(c) requires a utility to correct overbilling
for the entire period overbilled but that subsection (d) limits a utility
to correcting underbilling to only six months unless it results from theft
of service. Xcel stated that this section should be modified to better balance
collection rights of utilities by allowing utilities to justify a longer period
for collecting underbilled accounts.
The commission disagrees with Xcel's argument and finds that it is the
responsibility of the electric utility or REP to provide accurate bills to
customers. The customers should not be penalized if the electric utility or
REP fails to bill appropriately. Therefore, the commission declines to amend
the rule for this purpose. However, as mentioned above, the commission believes
other substantive revisions need to be made to this rule to fully ensure that
the customer safeguards envisioned by PURA §39.101 are available to all
retail customers in the state of Texas regardless of their provider. The commission
will open a separate project to make these other more substantive revisions.
§25.29, Disconnection of Service
Xcel commented that §25.29 should be expanded to allow a utility to
disconnect a customer without notice if the customer is attempting to avoid
or evade payment by changing their identity or asking another customer to
apply for new service at their address.
The commission disagrees with Xcel's argument. The scenario put forth by
Xcel is similar to the provision contained at §25.23(a)(4) that allows
a utility to refuse to provide electric service if the electric utility can
prove that the customer is attempting to avoid or evade payment of a prior
bill by changing their identity. Since that provision clearly places the burden
on the utility to prove such action, and allows the customer to challenge
such claim by the utility, it does not seem appropriate to deny the customer
the right to receive a disconnect notice. The disconnect notice in this instance
is the only communications vehicle between the electric utility and the customer
which would allow the customer the right to challenge the company's assertion.
However, as mentioned above, the commission believes other substantive revisions
need to be made to this rule to fully ensure that the customer safeguards
envisioned by PURA §39.101 are available to all retail customers in the
state of Texas regardless of their provider. The commission will open a separate
project to make these other more substantive revisions.
§25.41, Price to Beat
RRI commented that §25.41 should be reopened, at a minimum, to amend
subsection (g) as follows:
(1) Paragraph (1)(C) should be modified to eliminate any threshold percentage
difference. RRI stated that the 4.0% threshold currently in the rule, in combination
with the limit to biannual adjustments, creates an unnecessary and unacceptable
level of financial exposure for the affiliate REP.
(2) Paragraph (1)(F) should be modified to allow an affiliated REP to transition
to the use of an electricity commodities index prior to the time of the affiliated
PGC's finalized stranded cost determination.
(3) Paragraph (2) should be modified to allow the commission to set the
price to beat at a level that exceeds the September 1, 1999 bundled rates,
adjusted for fuel, when necessary to allow affiliated REPs to maintain financial
integrity. In addition, RRI stated that this section should include a time
frame by which the commission will rule upon a request for an adjustment for
financial integrity.
RRI also stated that subjection (i)(2) should be modified so that customers
dropped to the provider of last resort by an affiliated REP shall be counted
as load served by a non-affiliated REP.
The commission finds that existing §25.41 should not be amended at
this time. While it is possible that the commission may desire to revisit
certain aspects of the price to beat rule as the market develops, there has
currently been little or no experience with market operations under the rule,
and as such, it is impossible to know at this point whether or not the existing
rule is adequate.
§25.43, Provider of Last Resort (POLR)
AEP and RRI stated that they understand the commission already intends
to initiate a rulemaking to review and amend §25.43 and reserve any comments
on this section for that proceeding.
The commission agrees that this rule has already been identified as one
needing modification and will open a separate project to initiate needed changes.
Subchapter C, Quality of Service
General comments on §§25.51-25.53
AEP noted that the rule should specify applicable entities in both the
new market structure and those utilities not implementing customer choice
January 1, 2002. TXU commented that the rules in Subchapter C should be amended
where necessary to address new relationships among TDUs, REPs and retail customers
where competition will exist after January 2002 and those areas that will
not yet be competitive. TXU also stated that this subchapter should be amended
to conform to §25.214 and its Tariff for Retail Delivery Service.
The commission agrees that it is necessary to revise portions of Subchapter
C to address the new relationships among those entities where competition
exists and those areas that will not yet be competitive after January 1, 2002.
These amendments should achieve consistency between existing rules and §25.214
and its Tariff for Retail Delivery Service. The commission intends to address
these revisions in a subsequent rulemaking.
§25.51, Power Quality
Reliant-HL&P advised that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with "transmission and distribution utility." RRI commented that this section
should be amended to reflect the latest ERCOT protocols, and the obligations
of ERCOT, transmission and distribution service providers, and load serving
entities.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P's and RRI's comments. In addition
to their comments, the commission points out that this section must be revised
so that those transmission and distribution utilities implementing retail
customer choice January 1, 2002 are no longer permitted to offer a competitive
service and to correctly identify the parties involved and their responsibilities
while maintaining the existing section's requirements for transmission and
distribution utilities not implementing customer choice on January 1, 2002.
§25.52, Reliability and Continuity of Service.
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with "transmission and distribution utility."
The commission agrees this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002. The commission intends to address these revisions
in a subsequent rulemaking.
§25.53, Emergency Operations Plan
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.53 should be amended to: modify
the term "utility" to specify the unbundled electric entity that should provide
the information; amend subsection (a) to delete obsolete date for initial
action; amend subsection (c)(1) because commission rules do not currently
provide that the TDU will have access to information on the critical loads
service; amend subsection (c)(2) to adapt to electric restructuring, as the
TDU will not have current load information or the responsibility to ensure
adequate generation supply; amend subsection (c)(3) to adapt to electric restructuring
as the distinction of shedding interruptible and firm load is no longer valid
and the commission should address the procedures used to shed load and perform
rotating black-outs in light of the new marketplace; amend subsection (c)(5)
so that it does not apply to the TDU who will no longer have access to power
plant weatherization plans and procedures; and amend subsection (c)(6) as
the TDU will no longer have access to alternative fuel and storage capacity
information.
RRI stated that §25.53 should be amended to reflect the three different
relationships in the deregulated market (TDU provides service to competitive
retailers; competitive retailers provide other services to retail customers;
and the relationship between TDUs and the end-use customers).
The commission agrees that extensive amendments are necessary to this section
and intends to address these revisions in a subsequent rulemaking.
Subchapter D, Records, Reports, and Other Required
Information
§25.71, General Procedures, Requirements
and Penalties
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.72, Uniform System of Accounts
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information. Reliant-HL&P
stated that subsection (b) should be amended due to the fact that the definitions
of "major" and "nonmajor" in subsection (b) do not apply to entities other
than REPs and that subsection (c) should be amended as the terms "major" and
"nonmajor" are no longer applicable.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify the applicable entities
that should provide the information in both the new market structure and among
utilities not implementing customer choice in January 2002. The commission
also agrees that the definitions of "major" and "nonmajor" should be modified
to include the TDUs.
§25.73, Financial and Operating Reports
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information. In
addition, Reliant-HL&P commented that the requirement in subsection (b)
for TDUs to file earnings monitoring reports is redundant with the requirements
for TDUs in §25.192(c) of this title (relating to Transmission Service
Rates).
The commission agrees that this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002. The commission disagrees that the requirements in
subsection (b) for TDUs are redundant with the requirements for TDUs in §25.192(c).
Subsection (b) requires transmission service providers to file a report that
will permit the commission to monitor its transmission costs and revenue.
Section 25.192(c) regarding transmission cost of service explains which expenses
in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) expense accounts should
be included in transmission cost of service. The commission finds that the
reference in subsection (b) to §25.193(a)(5) of this title (relating
to Distribution Service Provider Transmission Cost Recovery Factors (TCRF))
should be amended to §25.192(g)(5) in order to reflect the correct section
of the rules.
§25.74, Reports on Sale of Property and Mergers
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information. Reliant-HL&P
also commented that subsection (d) should be modified to clarify that the
language in the last sentence, "energy conservation loans available to customers,"
does not apply to utilities whose territories are opened to full competition
as of January 1, 2002.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.75, Reports on Sale of 50% or More of
Stock
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.76, Gross Receipts Assessment Report
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.76 should be amended to specify
that the REP is responsible for reporting and paying the assessment to the
Comptroller.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.77, Payments, Compensation, and Other
Expenditures
AEP commented that this section should be amended to specify the applicable
entities in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing
customer choice in January 2002.
The commission agrees this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.78, State Agency Utility Account Information
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information and
noted that the TDU will not have the required information. TXU stated that
the rule should be reviewed to determine if amendments are necessary to address
the new relationships among TDUs, REPs and retail customers in those areas
of the state where a competitive retail environment will exist when the retail
market opens and those areas that will not yet be in a competitive retail
market.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.79, Equal Opportunity Reports
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity that should provide the information.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.80, Annual Report on Historically Underutilized
Businesses
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to indicate that the TDU is responsible for this filing.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.81, Service Quality Reports
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to indicate that the TDU is responsible for this filing.
The commission agrees this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002 that is responsible for filing the annual service quality
reports. The commission intends to address these revisions in a subsequent
rulemaking.
§25.82, Fuel Cost and Use Information
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.82 should be modified to specify
that this section only applies to utilities that continue to operate under
full regulation. Reliant-HL&P further stated that beginning January 2002
monthly fuel information is competitively sensitive and therefore should not
be reported by unbundled entities.
The commission concurs with Reliant-HL&P that §25.82 should be
modified. The commission disagrees that unbundled entities are excused from
the reporting requirement. The issue of competitively sensitive information
will be dealt with by having all reports under this section filed for commission
use only, under terms of a confidentiality agreement, regardless of whether
the entity is unbundled or not.
§25.83, Construction Reports
Reliant-HL&P stated that §25.83 should be repealed as current
practice at the commission negates the need for "preliminary construction
reports". Reliant-HL&P advised that TDUs already file a "Monthly Construction
Status Report of Electric Utilities" and that the information required by §25.83
is already contained in that monthly report. Reliant-HL&P stated that
if this section is not repealed, it should be modified to indicate that the
TDU is responsible for this report.
The commission agrees this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002. The commission does not agree that this section should
be repealed. The commission intends to amend this section to more closely
reflect the requirements of the monthly construction status report.
§25.84, Reporting of Affiliate Transactions
for Electric Utilities
No comments were received on this section.
§25.85, Report of Workforce Diversity and
Other Business Practices
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to indicate that the TDU is responsible for this filing.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.87, Distribution Unbundling Reports
AEP, Reliant-HL&P, and TXU all commented that the report required by §25.87
is obsolete and this section should be repealed. TXU stated that if it is
decided that this section is still needed for bundled utilities after January
2002 then the rule should be amended accordingly. RRI stated that subsection
(e)(1) should be modified to clarify that TDUs are responsible for the metering
reports.
The commission agrees that this section should be repealed and will initiate
a project to repeal this section.
§25.89, Report of Loads and Resources
Reliant-HL&P stated that §25.89 is obsolete and should be repealed.
If it is not repealed, then it should be amended to: remove references to
the "independent system operator" as that term is no longer used by ERCOT;
recognize that in the new marketplace transmission customers generally do
not specify the resources to be used (to the extent that certain wholesale
customers still specify resources, the term "customers" needs to be defined
to clarify which customers still have this responsibility); and correct the
reference to §25.198 of this title (Initiating Transmission Service)
from subsection (l) to subsection (i).
The commission disagrees that this section should be repealed. Section
25.198 requires transmission service customers to provide ERCOT with annual
updates of load and resource forecasts. Section 25.89 requires that these
reports also be filed with the commission. ERCOT will continue to use the
data provided in the reports required in §25.198, and the commission
believes that to the extent the data is provided to ERCOT, it should be filed
with the commission in accordance with §25.89. The commission agrees
that the rule should specify applicable entities in both the new market structure
and among utilities not implementing customer choice in January 2002. The
commission also recognizes that the reference to §25.198 needs to be
corrected.
§25.90, Market Power Mitigation Plans
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be replaced
with the unbundled electric entity affected by the requirements. Reliant-HL&P
and RRI stated that the first sentence in subsection (a) should be deleted
as that requirement was completed December 1, 2000 and that subsection (b)
regarding initial information filing should be deleted in its entirety.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002. The commission also agrees with the suggested changes
to subsections (a) and (b).
§25.91, Generating Capacity Reports
See
"General comments related to Chapter 25."
Subchapter E, Certification, Licensing and Registration
§25.101, Certification Criteria
AEP, Reliant-HL&P and TXU stated that §25.101 should be amended
to delete obsolete references to certificates for generating facilities. In
addition, Reliant-HL&P advised that it carries forth its comments made
in Project Number 24101,
Rulemaking Concerning Transmission
Line Routing; Proposed Amendment to Subst. R. §25.101
, regarding
subsection (c)(2)(C)(i)-(vii). Reliant-HL&P further stated that amendments
to this section are needed as the necessity to file a long-form certificate
of convenience and necessity should not depend on whether the generator is
a qualifying facility or an independent power producer; to address the definition
of the term "customer"; to modify the term "electric utility" to specify the
TDU; to delete the term "independent system operator" as it is obsolete; and
to delete obsolete portions of subsections (b) and (c).
The commission agrees that extensive amendments are necessary to this section
and intends to address these revisions in a subsequent rulemaking.
§25.102, Coastal Management Program
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to specify the TDU and that references to certificates for generating facilities
should be deleted as obsolete.
The commission agrees this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002 that are responsible for complying with the requirements
of the Coastal Management Program when applying for a certificate for the
construction of transmission facilities The commission will address the revisions
in a subsequent rulemaking.
§25.105, Registration and Reporting by Power
Marketers; §25.107, Certification of Retail Electric Providers (REPs); §25.108,
Financial Standards for Retail Electric Providers the Regarding the Billing
and Collection of Transition Charges; §25.109, Registration of Power
Generation Companies and Self-Generators; and §25.111, Registration of
Aggregators
The commission received no comments on these sections.
Subchapter F, Metering
General comments on §§25.121-25.129
AEP noted that the rule should specify applicable entities in both the
new market structure and those utilities not implementing customer choice
January 1, 2002. TXU commented that the rules in Subchapter F should be amended
where appropriate to address distinctions between those areas of the state
where competition will exist after January 1, 2002 and those areas that will
not yet be competitive. TXU stated that where competition will exist, the
rules in Subchapter F should be amended where necessary to conform to §25.214,
Appendix IV - Tariff for Retail Delivery Service, and the ERCOT protocols.
Reliant-HL&P commented that §§25.121 - 25.126 should be repealed
due to the adoption of §25.214 and the standard terms and conditions
adopted in the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service. If not repealed, Reliant-HL&P
recommended changes to each section.
The commission disagrees with Reliant-HL&P that these sections should
be repealed. The commission agrees with AEP and TXU that these rules should
be amended to specify applicable entities in both the new market structure
and those utilities not implementing customer choice January 1, 2002. The
commission also agrees that these sections need to be amended as discussed
in more detail under each specific section.
§25.121, Meter Requirements
Reliant-HL&P stated that there is a conflict between subsection (d)(2)
and Section 5.10.2.1 of the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service. Reliant-HL&P
also stated that the term "electric utility" should be modified to specify
the unbundled electric entity that is affected by the requirements. Subsection
(b) should state that the responsibilities of the TDU for metering are limited
to load and/or generation directly connected to its facilities.
The commission agrees that there is a conflict between what subsection
(d)(2) requires the retail customer to provide without cost to the company
and what Section 5.10.2.1 requires the retail customer to provide in the Tariff
for Retail Delivery Service. The commission agrees that this section should
be amended to distinguish between entities that will and entities that will
not enter competition on January 1, 2002.
§25.122, Meter Records; §25.123, Meter
Readings; and §25.125, Adjustments Due to Meter Errors
If these sections are not repealed, Reliant-HL&P commented that the
term "electric utility" should be modified to specify the unbundled electric
entity that is affected by the rules' requirements and that the term "customer"
should be modified to specify "retail customer."
The commission agrees that each of these sections should be amended so
that the language makes a distinction between those entities that do and those
that do not enter retail competition January 1, 2002. The commission agrees
that inconsistencies between these sections and the corresponding sections
of the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service should be eliminated.
§25.124, Meter Testing
If this section is not repealed, Reliant-HL&P commented that this section
should be amended as subsections (c) and (d)(5) are not consistent with Section
4.7.4 of the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service regarding changes allowed
for the recovery of costs to test the meter and the standard for calibration
of the test equipment. In addition, Reliant-HL&P commented that the term
"electric utility" should be modified to specify the unbundled electric entity
that is affected by the rules' requirements and that the term "customer" should
be modified to specify "retail customer."
The commission agrees that this section should be amended to make it consistent
with the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service and that appropriate language
be used to correctly specify those entities affected by the requirement of
the rules.
§25.126, Meter Tampering
Reliant-HL&P commented that this section should be repealed and the
issue of meter tampering should be addressed in the standard terms and conditions
for the Tariff for Retail Delivery Service.
The commission finds that this section should be maintained but with additional
language that identifies those affected entities who are implementing customer
choice as well as those who are not.
§25.127, Generating Station Meters, Instruments,
and Records
Reliant-HL&P stated that subsection (a) should be amended to clarify
that the TDU is not responsible for metering the generating stations and that
the rule should reference the requirements contained in the ERCOT protocols.
RRI commented that this section should be revised to reflect the ERCOT protocols
and the obligations of ERCOT, transmission and distribution service providers,
and load service entities.
The commission agrees that the section should be amended to reflect the
ERCOT protocols and to identify the entities who are implementing customer
choice and those who are not.
§25.128, Interconnection Meters and Circuit
Breakers
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to specify the unbundled electric entity that is affected by the requirements.
RRI commented that this section should be revised to reflect the ERCOT protocols
and the obligations of ERCOT, transmission and distribution service providers,
and load service entities.
The commission agrees that this section should be revised to identify those
entities who are implementing customer choice and to reflect the ERCOT protocols.
Subchapter G, Submetering
§25.141, Central System or Nonsubmetered
Master Metered Utilities and §25.142, Submetering for Apartments, Condominiums,
and Mobile Home Parks
TXU commented that the rules in Subchapter G should be amended where appropriate
to address distinctions between those areas of the state where competition
will exist after January 1, 2002 and those areas that will not yet be competitive.
TXU stated that where competition will exist, the rules in Subchapter G should
be amended where necessary to conform to §25.214, Appendix IV - Tariff
for Retail Delivery Service, and the ERCOT protocols.
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" or "utility"
should be modified to specify the unbundled entity affected by the requirements
of the rule (i.e., the REP). RRI stated that these sections should be modified
to reflect the three different relationships in the deregulated market: (1)
the relationship in which TDUs provide electric utility service to competitive
retailers; (2) the relationship in which competitive retailers provide other
services to retail customers; and (3) the relationship between TDUs and end-use
customers.
The commission agrees that these sections should be amended to clearly
identify the affected entities, both those who are implementing retail choice
and those who are not, and to clearly specify each entity's responsibilities.
Subchapter H, Electrical Planning
Division 1: Renewable Energy Resources and Use
of Natural Gas
§25.172, Goal for Natural Gas
The commission received no comments on §25.172.
§25.173, Goal for Renewable Energy
TXU commented that the commission needs to delete subsection (p) as indicated
in the order adopting §25.476(g) under Project Number 22816,
Rulemaking Proceeding to Develop Standards for the Labeling of Electricity
with Respect to Fuel Mix and Air Emissions
.
The commission agrees and will initiate a project to make this change.
Division 2: Energy Efficiency and Customer-Owned
Resources
§25.181, Energy Efficiency Goal
AEP commented that this section should specify the applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002. Reliant-HL&P stated that subsection (g)(4) should
be deleted as obsolete after January 2002.
The commission agrees that subsection (g)(4) should be deleted and will
initiate a project to amend this section and further review its applicability.
Subchapter I, Transmission and Distribution
Division 1: Open-Access Comparable Transmission
Service for Electric Utilities in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas
§25.191, Transmission Service Requirements; §25.192,
Transmission Service Rates; §25.193, Distribution Service Provider Transmission
Cost Recovery Factors (TCRF); §25.195, Terms and Conditions for Transmission
Service; §25.196, Standards of Conduct; §25.202, Commercial Terms
for Transmission Service; §25.203, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
The commission received only general comments that these sections should
be readopted.
§25.198, Initiating Transmission Service
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.198 pertains to the obsolete process
of "applying" for "planned" transmission service and should be substantially
modified to conform to the current practice of the commission.
The commission agrees that amendments are necessary to this section to
conform to current practice and the commission intends to address these revisions
in a subsequent rulemaking.
§25.200, Load Shedding, Curtailments, and
Redispatch
AEP commented that §25.200 should be reviewed to determine if it is
still applicable in the new market structure. Reliant-HL&P and TXU stated
that subsection (e) should be deleted as obsolete since the implementation
of a single control area in the ERCOT region.
The commission believes that this section is applicable in the new market
structure but may need minor revisions, i.e., the deletion of subsection (e)
which is no longer applicable. The commission intends to address these revisions
in a subsequent rulemaking.
Division 2: Transmission and Distribution Applicable
to All Electric Utilities
§25.211, Interconnection of On-Site Distributed
Generation (DG); and §25.212, Technical Requirements for Interconnection
and Parallel Operation of On-Site Distributed Generation
AEP commented that in addition to specifying applicable entities in both
the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer choice
in January 2002, §25.211 should be amended so that obsolete requirements
due to restructuring are eliminated. Reliant- HL&P stated that the terms
"electric utility" and "utility" should be replaced with "distribution service
provider" in §25.211 and with "distribution utility" in §25.212.
The commission agrees that the rule should specify applicable entities
in both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002 and that obsolete requirements should be eliminated.
§25.214, Terms and Conditions of Retail Delivery
Service Provided by Investor Owned Transmission and Distribution Utilities
The commission received no comments on this section.
§25.221, Electric Cost Separation
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" should be modified
to specify the unbundled entity affected by the requirements of this section
and that subsection (e)(2) should be deleted as obsolete. TXU stated that §25.221
has been superceded by the rules in §§25.341 - 25.346 and, therefore,
should be repealed.
The commission agrees that this section is obsolete and has been superceded
by §§25.341 - 25.346. The commission will initiate a project to
repeal this section.
§25.223, Unbundling of Energy Service
AEP and TXU commented that §25.223 is obsolete, has been superceded
by §§25.341 - 25.346 and, therefore, should be repealed. Reliant-HL&P
stated that the terms "electric utility" and "energy service" should be modified
to conform to the new marketplace and that subsection (f) should be deleted
as obsolete.
The commission agrees that this section is obsolete and has been superceded
by §§25.341 - 25.346. The commission will initiate a project to
repeal this section.
§25.227, Electric Utility Service for Public
Retail Customers
TXU commented that §25.227 should be amended to reflect that this
section is not applicable in areas of the state where competition began in
January 2002.
The commission agrees this section should be amended to specify applicable
entities in the new market structure.
Subchapter J, Costs, Rates and Tariffs
Division 1: Retail Rates
§25.231, Cost of Service
Reliant-HL&P commented that the term "electric utility" needs to be
thoroughly reviewed. In some instances the term should be "transmission and
distribution utility" and in others it should be "power generation company."
Reliant-HL&P further stated that the terms "to the public" or "for public
use" need to be amended as a transmission and distribution utility will not
render service to the public but to PGCs and REPs. In addition, subsection
(b) should be modified to: (1) reflect in paragraph (1)(F)(i) that a component
of non-bypassable charges related to the nuclear decommissioning fund are
included in the rates of a TDU; (2) reflect in paragraph (1)(F)(iii) that
decommissioning fund and trust balances are reviewed in a TDUs rate case;
and (3) reflect in paragraph (1)(F)(iv) that a decommissioning study should
be the responsibility of the PGC as TDUs do not have access to the information.
TXU commented that §25.231 should be amended to reflect that after
unbundling some aspects of the cost of service calculation will differ for
unbundled TDUs.
The commission agrees that the rule needs to be thoroughly reviewed and
the language should be modified to specify the applicable entities in the
new market structure. The commission also agrees that subsection (b)(1)(F)
should be amended to reflect the change in the reporting and collection of
the nuclear decommissioning costs as a result of the new market structure.
§25.232, Adjustments for House Bill 11, Acts
of 72nd Legislature, First Called Special Session 1991.
Reliant-HL&P and TXU stated that §25.232 should be repealed as
obsolete. AEP commented that this section should be thoroughly reviewed to
determine if it has continued applicability to Southwestern Electric Power
Company (SWEPCO) as a result of the abatement of the SWEPCO unbundled cost
of service (UCOS) case as ordered in the readiness docket and repealed if
found to be obsolete.
The commission agrees that this section is obsolete and will initiate a
project to repeal this section.
§25.233, Treatment of Integrated Resource
Plan Costs
AEP, Reliant-HL&P, RRI and TXU all commented that §25.233 is obsolete
and should be repealed.
The commission agrees and will initiate a project to repeal this section.
§25.234, Rate Design
See
"General comments related to Chapter 25."
§25.235, Fuel Costs - General
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.235 should be modified to specify
that it only applies to those utilities that continue under full regulation.
Beginning January 1, 2002 fuel costs will no longer be recovered pursuant
to a fuel proceeding for unbundled entities. TXU stated that this section
should clarify that it does not apply to unbundled TDUs.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P that the rule should be modified
to clarify its applicability to only those utilities continuing under full
regulation.
§25.236, Recovery of Fuel Costs
Reliant-HL&P and TXU stated that §25.236 is still needed for each
utilities' final fuel reconciliation. After that time, this section should
be modified to specify that it only applies to utilities that continue to
operate under full regulation and does not apply to unbundled TDUs.
The commission agrees that the rule should be modified to apply only to
those utilities that have not filed a final fuel reconciliation according
to §25.236(g).
§25.237, Fuel Factors
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.237 should be modified to specify
that it only applies to utilities that continue to operate under full regulation.
TXU stated that subsection (d), regarding the schedule for filing petitions
to revise fuel factors, should be amended to delete references to utilities
no longer required to make such filings after unbundling.
Xcel stated that in view of the recent fuel market experience and volatility
and the reduction in the number of utilities that §25.237 will apply
to, the rule should be amended to provide increased flexibility to ensure
more concurrent recovery of fuel costs, i.e., allowing a utility to petition
to adjust the fuel factor every three months instead of every six months.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P and TXU that the rule needs
to be amended to clarify the non-price to beat entities still subject to its
requirements. The commission is willing to consider Xcel's proposal to shorten
the intervals between petitions to adjust the fuel factor.
§25.238, Power Cost Recovery Factors (PCRF)
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.238 should be modified to specify
that it only applies to those utilities that continue under full regulation.
TXU stated that this section should clarify that it does not apply to unbundled
TDUs.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P that the rule should be modified
so that it applies only to utilities that remain under full regulation.
§25.240, Contribution Disclosure Statements
in Appeals of Municipal Utility Rates
The commission received no comments on this section.
§25.241, Form and Filing of Tariffs
Reliant-HL&P stated that the terms "electric utility" and "utility"
should be modified to specify the unbundled electric entity that should file
tariffs. TXU commented that this section should be amended to clarify that
unbundled TDUs are required to use the standard terms and conditions agreement
pursuant to §25.214.
The commission agrees this section should specify applicable entities in
both the new market structure and among utilities not implementing customer
choice in January 2002.
§25.242, Arrangements Between Qualifying
Facilities and Electric Utilities
This rule is currently being revised under Project Number 24365, Rulemaking Concerning Arrangements Between Qualifying Facilities
and Electric Utilities
. Commenters advised that they will provide comments
on this section in that proceeding.
§25.251, Renewable Energy Tariff
Reliant-HL&P commented that §25.251 should be repealed as obsolete
as renewable energy pricing and marketing will be governed by the marketplace
after January 2002. If not repealed, the terms "electric utility" and "utility"
should be modified to specify the unbundled electric entity to which the rule
applies. AEP and TXU stated that the rule should be modified to specify the
applicable entity in both the new market structure and among utilities not
implementing customer choice in January 2002.
The commission agrees with AEP and TXU that the rule should be modified
to clarify to which entities it applies.
Division 2: Recovery of Stranded Costs
§25.261, Stranded Cost Recovery of Environmental
Cleanup Costs; §25.265, Securitization by River Authorities and Electric
Cooperatives
The commission received no comments on these sections.
Subchapter K, Relationships with Affiliates
§25.271, Foreign Utility Company Ownership
by Exempt Holding Companies
Reliant-HL&P commented that the terms "electric utility" and "utility"
should be modified to specify the unbundled electric entity subject to the
requirements of the rule. In addition, subsections (c)(2)(G)(ii), (c)(2)(J),
(d)(1)(G), and (e)(1) should be amended to change the ten day filing requirement
to 15 days to be consistent with §25.71(f)(6) regarding due dates of
reports.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P that modifications to §25.271
may be necessary to accurately reflect that its provisions are also applicable
to unbundled electric entities. Additionally, the commission agrees that the
pertinent provisions of §25.271 that pertain to filing requirements should
be amended to reflect the applicable requirements in §25.71(f)(6). Careful
review and revision of §25.271 will be addressed in a future rulemaking
project.
§25.272, Code of Conduct for Electric Utilities
and Their Affiliates; §25.275, Code of Conduct for Municipally Owned
Utilities and Electric Cooperatives Engaged in Competitive Activities
The commission received no comments on these sections.
§25.273, Contracts Between Electric Utilities
and Their Competitive Affiliates
Reliant-HL&P commented that the terms "electric utility" and "utility"
should be modified to specify the unbundled electric entities subject to the
requirements of this section.
The commission agrees with Reliant-HL&P that this section should be
amended to accurately reflect the applicability of requirements in §25.273,
where appropriate, to unbundled electric entities. The commission will carefully
review this section to make necessary, corresponding amendments through a
future rulemaking project.
Subchapter L, Nuclear Decommissioning
§25.301, Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts
TXU and Reliant-HL&P commented that this section, especially the terms
"electric utility" and "utility," need to be carefully reviewed to conform
to the new relationship that will exist after unbundling between the affiliated
PGC and the unbundled TDUs, i.e., the TDU will be collecting the decommissioning
funds through rates but the PGC will be responsible for management of the
funds.
The commission agrees that this section should be reviewed and modified
to conform to the new relationships that will exist in both the new market
structure and among utilities not implementing customer choice in January
2002.
Subchapter O, Unbundling and Market Power
Division 1: Unbundling
§25.341, Definitions
TXU stated that discussions are underway with commission staff and interested
parties concerning the initiation of a project to address issues related to
non-roadway lighting that will involve amending this section.
The commission intends to initiate a rulemaking project to review the definitions
within §25.341 for possible amendment.
§25.342, Electric Business Separation
TXU commented that many of the requirements of §25.342 have already
been accomplished for the utilities that will be unbundled when the retail
market opens. Therefore, this section should be amended to modify the provisions
related to compliance and timing, and retain only those provisions that will
continue to be needed after the market opens.
The commission acknowledges that revisions to §25.342 may be necessary
in order to modify the rule to accurately reflect provisions within the section
that affected entities must continue to satisfy and those, to date that have
been satisfied. The commission will initiate a rulemaking project in order
to carefully review and amend, if necessary, this provision as appropriate.
§25.343, Competitive Energy Services
See
"General comments related to Chapter 25."
§25.344, Cost Separation Proceedings
Reliant-HL&P commented that many TDUs have already filed these cases;
therefore, the applicability of the rule is more limited than stated. TXU
stated that the rules should be amended to modify the provisions related to
applicability, compliance, and ERCOT transmission costs as many of the rule
requirements have already been accomplished.
The commission recognizes, as identified by Reliant-HL&P, that many
TDUs have filed and the commission has recently processed several cost separation
proceedings. The commission further acknowledges that it may be necessary
to modify §25.344 to accurately reflect its remaining applicability.
The commission will initiate a rulemaking project to carefully review and
make revisions to the rule, as necessary.
§25.345, Recovery of Stranded Costs Through
Competition Transition Charge (CTC)
The commission received no comments on this section.
§25.346, Separation of Electric Utility Metering
and Billing Service Costs and Activities
See
"General comments related to Chapter 25."
Division 2: Independent Organizations
§25.361, Electric Reliability Council of
Texas (ERCOT)
The commission received no comments on this section.
Division 3: Capacity Auction
§25.381, Capacity Auctions
The commission has established Project Number 24492,
Rulemaking Proceeding to Revise Substantive Rule §25.381, Capacity Auctions
to initiate changes to this section. Commenters indicated that they
are participating in this proceeding regarding changes to §25.381.
Division 4: Other Market Power Issues
§25.401, Share of Installed Generation Capacity
The commission received no comments regarding this section.
Subchapter P, Pilot Projects
§25.431, Retail Competition Pilot Projects
Reliant-HL&P and RRI commented that §25.431 should be modified
to reflect that it is not applicable to utilities whose territories are open
to full competition January 1, 2002. TXU commented that this section may need
to be modified to reflect the current status of non-ERCOT areas of the state.
The commission agrees that §25.431 does not adequately address deadlines
and similar details relevant to pilot projects to be conducted in a non-ERCOT
area. The commission will initiate a project to make necessary revisions to
this section to respond to events that have occurred since its adoption.
Subchapter Q, System Benefit Fund
§25.451, Administration of the System Benefit
Account; §25.453, Targeted Energy Efficiency Programs; §25.454,
Rate Reduction Program; and §25.457, Implementation of the System Benefit
Fee by the Municipally Owned Utilities and Electric Cooperatives
The commission received no comments on the sections in Subchapter Q.
Subchapter R, Customer Protection Rules for Retail
Electric Service
§25.471, General Provisions of Customer Protection
Rules; §25.472, Privacy of Customer Information; §25.473, Non-English
Language Requirements; §25.474, Selection or Change of Retail Electric
Provider; §25.475, Information Disclosures to Residential and Small Commercial
Customers; §25.476, Labeling of Electricity with Respect to Fuel Mix
and Environmental Impact; §25.477, Refusal of Electric Service; §25.478,
Credit Requirements and Deposits; §25.479, Issuance and Format of Bills; §25.480,
Bill Payment and Adjustments; §25.481, Unauthorized Charges; §25.482,
Termination of Contract; §25.483, Disconnection of Service; §25.484,
Do Not Call List; §25.491, Record Retention and Reporting Requirements; §25.492,
Non-Compliance with Rules or Orders; Enforcement by the Commission
The commission received no comments on these sections of Subchapter R.
§25.485, Customer Access and Complaint Handling
RRI commented that subsection (b) should be revised to remove the prohibition
on the right of a residential or small commercial customer to contract for
alternative dispute resolution. RRI stated that customers should have the
right to agree to mediation, referral to the commission or arbitration. RRI
advised that any concerns regarding fairness could be dealt with through commission
adoption of an approved arbitration clause or standard arbitration clauses.
The commission disagrees with RRI's proposed amendment and declines to
amend this section at this time. The rule, as written, does not prohibit a
company from offering arbitration or mediation alternatives, it simply prohibits
a REP from requiring a customer to use such alternatives to resolve a dispute.
The commission does not believe it is appropriate for a customer to be required
to engage in alternative dispute resolution since a customer has a right to
bring a complaint to the commission.
All comments, including any not specifically referenced herein, were fully
considered by the commission.
The commission readopts Chapter 25, Substantive Rules Applicable to Electric
Service Providers, pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA), Texas
Utilities Code Annotated §14.002 (Vernon 1998, Supplement 2002) which
provides the commission with the authority to make and enforce rules reasonably
required in the exercise of its powers and jurisdiction; and Texas Government
Code §2001.039 which requires each state agency to review and readopt
its rules every four years.
Cross Reference to Statutes: Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Title II,
Public Utility Regulatory Act, and Title IV, Chapters 161, 163, 181, 182,
183, 184, and 185.
Subchapter A. General Provisions.
16 TAC §25.1. Purpose and Scope of Rules.
16 TAC §25.2. Cross-Reference Transition Provision.
16 TAC §25.3. Severability Clause.
16 TAC §25.4. Statement of Nondiscrimination.
16 TAC §25.5. Definitions.
16 TAC §25.6. Cost of Copies of Public Information.
Subchapter B. Customer Service and Protection.
16 TAC §25.21. General Provisions of Customer Service and Protection
Rules.
16 TAC §25.22. Request for Service.
16 TAC §25.23. Refusal of Service.
16 TAC §25.24. Credit Requirements and Deposits.
16 TAC §25.25. Issuance and Format of Bills.
16 TAC §25.26. Spanish Language Requirements.
16 TAC §25.27. Retail Electric Service Switchovers.
16 TAC §25.28. Bill Payment and Adjustments.
16 TAC §25.29. Disconnection of Service.
16 TAC §25.30. Complaints.
16 TAC §25.31. Information to Applicants and Customers.
16 TAC §25.41. Price to Beat.
16 TAC §25.43. Provider of Last Resort (POLR).
Subchapter C. Quality of Service.
16 TAC §25.51. Power Quality.
16 TAC §25.52. Reliability and Continuity of Service.
16 TAC §25.53. Emergency Operations Plan.
Subchapter D. Records, Reports, and Other Required Information.
16 TAC §25.71. General Procedures, Requirements and Penalties.
16 TAC §25.72. Uniform System of Accounts.
16 TAC §25.73. Financial and Operating Reports.
16 TAC §25.74. Reports on Sale of Property and Mergers.
16 TAC §25.75. Reports on Sale of 50% or more of Stock.
16 TAC §25.76. Gross Receipts Assessment Report.
16 TAC §25.77. Payments, Compensation, and Other Expenditures.
16 TAC §25.78. State Agency Utility Account Information.
16 TAC §25.79. Equal Opportunity Reports.
16 TAC §25.80. Annual Report on Historically Underutilized Businesses.
16 TAC §25.81. Service Quality Reports.
16 TAC §25.82. Fuel Cost and Use Information.
16 TAC §25.83. Construction Reports.
16 TAC §25.84. Annual Reporting of Affiliate Transactions for Electric
Utilities.
16 TAC §25.85. Report of Workforce Diversity and Other Business Practices.
16 TAC §25.87. Distribution Unbundling Reports.
16 TAC §25.89. Report of Loads and Resources.
16 TAC §25.90. Market Power Mitigation Plans.
16 TAC §25.91. Generating Capacity Reports.
Subchapter E. Certification, Licensing and Registration.
16 TAC §25.101. Certification Criteria.
16 TAC §25.102. Coastal Management Program.
16 TAC §25.105. Registration and Reporting by Power Marketers.
16 TAC §25.107. Certification of Retail Electric Providers (REPs).
16 TAC §25.108. Financial Standards for Retail Electric Providers
Regarding the Billing and Collection of Transition Charges.
16 TAC §25.109. Registration of Power Generation Companies and Self-Generators.
16 TAC §25.111. Registration of Aggregators.
Subchapter F. Metering.
16 TAC §25.121. Meter Requirements.
16 TAC §25.122. Meter Records.
16 TAC §25.123. Meter Readings.
16 TAC §25.124. Meter Testing.
16 TAC §25.125. Adjustments Due to Meter Errors.
16 TAC §25.126. Meter Tampering.
16 TAC §25.127. Generating Station Meters, Instruments, and Records.
16 TAC §25.128. Interconnection Meters and Circuit Breakers.
Subchapter G. Submetering.
16 TAC §25.141. Central System or Nonsubmetered Master Metered Utilities.
16 TAC §25.142 Submetering for Apartments, Condominiums, and Mobile
Home Parks.
Subchapter H. Electrical Planning.
DIVISION 1: Renewable Energy Resources and Use of Natural Gas.
16 TAC §25.172. Goal for Natural Gas.
16 TAC §25.173. Goal for Renewable Energy.
DIVISION 2: Energy Efficiency and Customer-Owned Resources.
16 TAC §25.181. Energy Efficiency Goal.
Subchapter I. Transmission and Distribution.
DIVISION 1: Open -Access Comparable Transmission Service for Electric Utilities
in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
16 TAC §25.191. Transmission Service Requirements.
16 TAC §25.192. Transmission Service Rates.
16 TAC §25.193. Distribution Service Provider Transmission Cost Recovery
Factors (TCRF).
16 TAC §25.195. Terms and Conditions for Transmission Service.
16 TAC §25.196. Standards of Conduct.
16 TAC §25.198. Initiating Transmission Service.
16 TAC §25.200. Load Shedding, Curtailments, and Redispatch.
16 TAC §25.202. Commercial Terms for Transmission Service.
16 TAC §25.203. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
DIVISION 2: Transmission and Distribution Applicable to All Electric Utilities.
16 TAC §25.211. Interconnection of On-Site Distributed Generation
(DG).
16 TAC §25.212. Technical Requirements for Interconnection and Parallel
Operation of On-Site Distributed Generation.
16 TAC §25.214. Terms and Conditions of Retail Delivery Service Provided
by Investor Owned Transmission and Distribution Utilities.
16 TAC §25.221. Electric Cost Separation.
16 TAC §25.223. Unbundling of Energy Service.
16 TAC §25.227. Electric Utility Service for Public Retail Customers.
Subchapter J. Costs, Rates and Tariffs.
DIVISION 1: Retail Rates.
16 TAC §25.231. Cost of Service.
16 TAC §25.232. Adjustment for House Bill 11, Acts of 72nd Legislature,
First Called Special Session 1991.
16 TAC §25.233. Treatment of Integrated Resource Plan Costs.
16 TAC §25.234 Rate Design.
16 TAC §25.235 Fuel Costs- General.
16 TAC §25.236 Recovery of Fuel Costs.
16 TAC §25.237 Fuel Factors.
16 TAC §25.238 Power Cost Recovery Factors (PCRF).
16 TAC §25.240. Contribution Disclosure Statements in Appeals of Municipal
Utility Rates.
16 TAC §25.241. Form and Filing of Tariffs.
16 TAC §25.242. Arrangements Between Qualifying Facilities and Electric
Utilities.
16 TAC §25.251. Renewable Energy Tariff.
DIVISION 2: Recovery of Stranded Costs.
16 TAC §25.261. Stranded Cost Recovery of Environmental Cleanup Costs.
16 TAC §25.265. Securitization by River Authorities and Electric Cooperatives.
Subchapter K. Relationships with Affiliates.
16 TAC §25.271. Foreign Utility Company Ownership by Exempt Holding
Companies.
16 TAC §25.272. Code of Conduct for Electric Utilities and Their Affiliates.
16 TAC §25.273. Contracts Between Electric Utilities and Their Competitive
Affiliates.
16 TAC §25.275. Code of Conduct for Municipally Owned Utilities and
Electric Cooperatives Engaged in Competitive Activities.
Subchapter L. Nuclear Decommissioning.
16 TAC §25.301. Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts.
Subchapter O. Unbundling and Market Power.
DIVISION 1: Unbundling.
16 TAC §25.341. Definitions.
16 TAC §25.342. Electric Business Separation.
16 TAC §25.343. Competitive Energy Services.
16 TAC §25.344. Cost Separation Proceedings.
16 TAC §25.345. Recovery of Stranded Costs Through Competition Transition
Charge (CTC).
16 TAC §25.346. Separation of Electric Utility Metering and Billing
Service Costs and Activities.
DIVISION 2. Independent Organizations.
16 TAC §25.361. Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).
DIVISION 3: Capacity Auction.
16 TAC §25.381. Capacity Auctions.
DIVISION 4: Other Market Power Issues.
16 TAC §25.401. Share of Installed Generation Capacity.
Subchapter P. Pilot Projects.
16 TAC §25.431. Retail Competition Pilot Projects.
Subchapter Q. System Benefit Fund.
16 TAC §25.451. Administration of the System Benefit Account.
16 TAC §25.453. Targeted Energy Efficiency Programs.
16 TAC §25.454. Rate Reduction Program.
16 TAC §25.457. Implementation of the System Benefit Fee by the Municipally
Owned Utilities and Electric Cooperatives.
Subchapter R. Customer Protection Rules for Retail Electric Service.
16 TAC §25.471. General Provisions of Customer Protection Rules.
16 TAC §25.472. Privacy of Customer Information.
16 TAC §25.473. Non-English Language Requirements.
16 TAC §25.474. Selection or Change of Retail Electric Provider.
16 TAC §25.475. Information Disclosures to Residential and Small Commercial
Customers.
16 TAC §25.477. Refusal of Electric Service.
16 TAC §25.478. Credit Requirements and Deposits.
16 TAC §25.479. Issuance and Format of Bills.
16 TAC §25.480. Bill Payment and Adjustments.
16 TAC §25.481. Unauthorized Charges.
16 TAC §25.482. Termination of Contract.
16 TAC §25.483. Disconnection of Service.
16 TAC §25.484. Do Not Call List.
16 TAC §25.485. Customer Access and Complaint Handling.
16 TAC §25.491. Record Retention and Reporting Requirements.
16 TAC §25.492. Non-Compliance with Rules or Orders; Enforcement by
the Commission.
TRD-200201280
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: March 1, 2002