TITLE 16.ECONOMIC REGULATION

Part 2. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Chapter 27. RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Subchapter D. VENDOR PROTESTS

16 TAC §27.161

The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) proposes new §27.161 relating to Procedures for Resolving Vendor Protests. Proposed §27.161 will provide procedures for resolving vendor protests relating to agency purchasing issues as required by the Texas Government Code Annotated 2155.076. The proposed new section closely follows the rule on such protests promulgated by the Texas Building and Procurement Commission in the Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 5, Chapter 111, Subchapter A, §111.3. Project Number 24803 is assigned to this proceeding.

Susan K. Durso, General Counsel, has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the proposed section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Ms. Durso has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to provide readily available written protest procedures for vendors who wish to dispute issues related to agency purchases. There will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing this section. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed.

Ms. Durso has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect there should be no effect on a local economy, and therefore no local employment impact statement is required under the Administrative Procedure Act §2001.022.

Comments on the proposed new rule (16 copies) may be submitted to the Filing Clerk, Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue, P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, within 30 days after publication. Comments should be organized in a manner consistent with the organization of the proposed rule. All comments should refer to Project Number 24803.

This new rule is proposed under the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated §14.002 and §14.052 (Vernon 1998, Supplement 2002) (PURA), which provides the Public Utility Commission with the authority to make and enforce rules reasonably required in the exercise of its powers and jurisdiction, including rules of practice and procedure; and specifically, Texas Government Code Annotated §2155.076 which requires the commission to develop and adopt protest procedures for vendors' protests concerning commission purchases that are consistent with the Texas Building and Procurement Commission rules on the same subject.

Cross Reference to Statutes: Texas Government Code Annotated §2155.076 and Public Utility Regulatory Act §14.002 and §14.052.

§27.161.Procedures for Resolving Vendor Protests.

(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meaning unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Commission--The Public Utility Commission of Texas.

(2) Purchasing officer--A commission employee who has received certification as a Texas Public Purchaser and who is responsible for assisting with commission purchases, and who has been designated the purchasing officer for the purchase in question.

(3) Interested parties--All vendors who have submitted bids or proposals for the provision of goods or services pursuant to a solicitation for a contract with the commission.

(b) Protest procedures. Any actual or prospective bidder, offerer, proposer or contractor who considers himself to have been aggrieved in connection with the commission's solicitation, evaluation, or award of a contract may formally protest to the purchasing officer. Such protests must be made in writing and received by the purchasing officer within ten working days after the protesting party knows, or should have known, of the occurrence of the action that is protested. Protests must conform to the requirements of this subsection and subsection (d) of this section, and shall be resolved through use of the procedures that are described in subsections (e) - (j) of this section. The protesting party shall mail or deliver copies of the protest to the purchasing officer and other interested parties.

(c) Stay of contract award. In the event of a timely protest under this section, the commission shall not proceed further with the solicitation or award of the contract unless the executive director, after consultation with the purchasing officer and the general counsel, makes a written determination that the contract must be awarded without delay, to protect the best interests of the commission.

(d) Protest requirements. A protest must be sworn and contain:

(1) a specific identification of the statutory or regulatory provision that the protesting party alleges has been violated;

(2) a specific description of each action by the commission that the protesting party alleges to be a violation of the statutory or regulatory provision that the protesting party has identified pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection;

(3) a precise statement of the relevant facts;

(4) a statement of any issues of law or fact that the protesting party contends must be resolved;

(5) a statement of the argument and authorities that the protesting party offers in support of the protest; and

(6) a statement that copies of the protest have been mailed or delivered to the commission and all other identifiable interested parties.

(e) Purchasing officer's role and responsibilities. The purchasing officer shall conduct a review of issues raised by the protesting parties and shall have the following role and responsibilities in resolving the protest issues among the parties:

(1) The purchasing officer may settle and resolve the dispute over the solicitation or award of a contract at any time before the matter is submitted on appeal to the executive director.

(2) The purchasing officer may solicit written responses to the protest from other interested parties.

(3) If the protest is not resolved by mutual agreement, the purchasing officer will issue a written determination on the protest. The purchasing officer will consult with the general counsel in preparing a written determination.

(4) If the purchasing officer determines that no violation of statutory or regulatory provisions has occurred, then the purchasing officer shall inform the protesting party, the executive director, and other interested parties by letter that states the reasons for the determination.

(5) If the purchasing officer determines that a violation of any statutory or regulatory provisions may have occurred in a situation in which a contract has not been awarded, then the purchasing officer shall inform the protesting party, the executive director, and other interested parties of that determination by letter that states the reasons for the determination and the appropriate remedy.

(6) If the purchasing officer determines that a violation of any statutory or regulatory provisions may have occurred in a situation in which a contract has been awarded, then the purchasing officer shall inform the protesting party, the executive director, and other interested parties of that determination by letter that states the reasons for the determination. This letter may include a declaration that the contract is void.

(f) Appeal from purchasing officer determination. The protesting party may appeal a determination of a protest by the purchasing officer to the executive director of the commission. An appeal of the purchasing officer's determination must be in writing and received in the executive director's office no later than ten working days after the date on which the purchasing officer has sent written notice of his determination. The scope of the appeal shall be limited to a review of the purchasing officer's determination. The protesting party shall mail or deliver to the purchasing officer and all other interested parties a copy of the appeal, which must contain a certified statement that such copies have been provided.

(g) Executive director review or reference of appeal. The executive director shall confer with general counsel in the review of the matter appealed. The executive director may consider any documents that the commission staff or interested parties may have submitted. At the discretion of the executive director, the matter may be referred to the commissioners for their consideration in a regularly scheduled open meeting or the executive director may issue a written decision on the protest.

(h) Appeals referred to commission. The following requirements shall apply to a protest that the executive director has referred to the commissioners:

(1) The executive director shall deliver copies of the appeal and any responses by interested parties to the commissioners.

(2) The commissioners may consider any documents that commission staff or interested parties have submitted.

(3) The commissioners may confer with general counsel in their review of the matter appealed.

(4) The commissioners' determination of the appeal shall be made on the record and reflected in the minutes of the open meeting, and shall be final.

(i) Written determination of appeal. A determination issued either by the commissioners in open meeting, or in writing by the executive director, shall be the final administrative action of the commission.

(j) Protest/appeal not timely filed. A protest or appeal that is not filed timely shall not be considered unless good cause for delay is shown or the executive director determines that an appeal raises issues that are significant to commission procurement practices or procedures in general.

(k) Document retention. The commission shall maintain all documentation on the purchasing process that is the subject of a protest or appeal in accordance with the commission's retention schedule.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 10, 2002.

TRD-200203636

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 936-7306


Part 4. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION

Chapter 69. REGULATION OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION SERVICE PROVIDERS

16 TAC §69.80

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation ("Department") proposes an amendment to §69.80, concerning the fees for the Regulation of Certain Transportation Service Providers program.

The amendment to §69.80 proposes to decrease the application processing and renewal fee for a Certificate of Registration as a Transportation Service Provider or Freight Forwarder from $320 to $200 for each application.

The Department is required by the Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51, §51.202 to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering programs, which include the Regulation of Certain Transportation Service Providers program. The fees currently in place are above the amounts needed to cover program costs in current and future periods. The decrease would not adversely affect the administration or enforcement of the Regulation of Certain Transportation Service Providers program.

William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, there will be no additional cost to state or local governments as a result of administering or enforcing the fee change. There will be no effect on local government.

Mr. Kuntz also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit will be enhanced public welfare and consumer protection. There will be an economic effect on small businesses and persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. The cost of compliance will be a decrease of $120 for each application processed or renewed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, P.O. Box 12157, Austin, Texas 78711, or facsimile (512) 475-2874, or electronically: whkuntz@license.state.tx.us. The deadline for comments is 30 days after publication in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51, §51.202 which authorizes the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering the programs and activities under its jurisdiction which includes the Regulation of Certain Transportation Service Providers program.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposal are those set forth in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6675(e) and Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§69.80.Fees.

(a) The application processing and renewal fee for a Certificate of Registration as a Transportation Service Provider or Freight Forwarder is $200 [ $320 ] for each application.

(b) - (d) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203772

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


Chapter 72. STAFF LEASING SERVICES

16 TAC §72.81, §72.83

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation ("Department") proposes amendments to §72.81 and §72.83, concerning the fees for the Staff Leasing Services program.

The amendment to §72.81 proposes to decrease the fees in the tiered structure for the two year license and two year renewal licensing fees from $3,000 to $2,000 for 0 to 249 assigned employees; from $4,000 to $3,000 for 250 to 750 assigned employees; and, from $5,000 to $4,000 for more than 750 assigned employees. The amendment to §72.81(b) is also being proposed to decrease the limited staff leasing service license fee from $1,000 to $750.

The amendment to §72.83 proposes to decrease the fee for a duplicate license or name change from $50 to $25 and to delete the $10 fee for adding more than one trademark to a license.

The Department is required by the Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51, §51.202 to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering programs, which include the Staff Leasing Services program. The fees currently in place are above the amounts needed to cover program costs in current and future periods. The decrease would not adversely affect the administration or enforcement of the Staff Leasing Services program.

William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there will be no additional cost to state or local governments as a result of administering or enforcing the fee changes. There will be no effect on local government.

Mr. Kuntz also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit will be enhanced public welfare and consumer protection. There will be an economic effect on small businesses and persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed. The cost of compliance will be a decrease of $1,000 for the two year license and two year renewal licensing fee, a decrease of $250 for a limited staff leasing services license fee, and a reduction of $25 in the fee for issuing a duplicate license or name change.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, P.O. Box 12157, Austin, Texas 78711, or facsimile (512) 475-2874, or electronically: whkuntz@license.state.tx.us. The deadline for comments is 30 days after publication in the Texas Register .

The amendments are proposed under Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51, §51.202 which authorizes the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering the programs and activities under its jurisdiction which includes the Staff Leasing Services program.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposal are those set forth in the Texas Labor Code, Chapter 91 and Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§72.81.Fees--Licensing.

(a) The two year license and two year renewal licensing fee shall be:

(1) $2,000 [ $3,000 ] for 0 to 249 assigned employees;

(2) $3,000 [ $4,000 ] for 250 to 750 assigned employees; and,

(3) $4,000 [ $5,000 ] for more than 750 assigned employees.

(b) The limited staff leasing services license shall be $750 [ $1,000 ].

§72.83.Fees--Duplicate Licensing/Name Change.

The fee shall be $25 [ $50 ] for issuing a duplicate license or for a license name change. [ If adding more than one trademark an additional $10 per trademark shall be required. ]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203771

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348