TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 5. GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION

Chapter 111. EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATION DIVISION

Subchapter B. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS PROGRAM

1 TAC §§111.14, 111.17, 111.28

The General Services Commission proposes amendments to Title 1, TAC, Chapter 111, Subchapter B, §111.14, relating to subcontracts, §111.17, relating to Certification Process; and §111.28, relating to the Mentor Protégé Program. The amendments are proposed due to the enactment of Senate Bill 311 (SB 311), Article 13, 77th Leg. (2001) which amended the statutory language of §§2161.061 and 2161.253, Texas Government Code. The amended statutory language found in §13.01, SB 311 relates to the Commission's approval of local governments or nonprofit organizations certification programs for businesses that substantially fall under the same definition for Historically Underutilized Business found in §2161.001, Texas Government Code. Amended statutory language in §13.02, SB 311 determines that a contractor has made a good faith effort if a contractor participates in a Mentor-Protégé Program and submits a Protégé as a subcontractor in the contractor's historically underutilized business subcontracting plan.

Henry Johnson, Program Director for Historically Underutilized Business, determined for the first five year period the rules are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering these proposed rules.

Mr. Johnson further determines that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these rules will be compliance with law enacted in SB 311, Article 13, 77th Leg (2001) relating to the Historically Underutilized Business Certification Program and the Mentor Protege Program. There will be no effect on large, small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with these rules and there is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposals may be submitted to Mr. Wm. J. Philbin, Legal Counsel, General Services Commission, P.O. Box 13047, Austin, Texas 78711-3047. Comments must be received no later than thirty days from the date of publication of the proposal to the Texas Register .

The amendments are proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2161.002, 2161.061, and 2161.253 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2161.

§111.14.Subcontracts.

(a) Requirement for HUB subcontracting plans. In accordance with the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2161, Subchapter F, each state agency that considers entering into a contract with an expected value of $100,000 or more shall, before the agency solicits bids, proposals, offers, or other applicable expressions of interest, determine whether subcontracting opportunities are probable under the contract.

(1) State agencies shall use the following steps in making the determination of whether subcontracting opportunities are probable under the contract:

(A) Use the HUB participation goals in §111.13 of this title (relating to Annual Procurement Utilization Goals);

(B) Research the Centralized Master Bidders List, the HUB Directory, the Internet, and other directories, identified by the commission, for HUBs that may be available to perform the contract work;

(C) Additionally, determination of subcontracting opportunities may include, but is not limited to, the following:

(i) contacting other state and local agencies and institutions of higher education to obtain information regarding similar contracting and subcontracting opportunities; and

(ii) reviewing the history of similar agency purchasing transactions.

(2) If subcontracting opportunities are probable, each agency's invitation for bids or other purchase solicitation documents for construction, professional services, other services, and commodities for $100,000 or more shall state that probability and require a HUB subcontracting plan. Accordingly, potential contractor/vendor responses that do not include a completed HUB subcontracting plan shall be rejected as a material failure to comply with advertised specifications in accordance with §113.6 (a) of this title (relating to Bid Evaluation and Award). The plan shall include goals established pursuant to §111.13 of this title (relating to Annual Procurement Utilization Goals).

(b) Development and evaluation of HUB subcontracting plans. A state agency shall require a potential contractor vendor to state whether it is a Texas certified HUB. Potential contractors/vendors shall follow, but are not limited to, procedures in subsection (b)(1) of this section when developing the HUB subcontracting plan. The HUB subcontracting plan shall include the form provided by the agency identifying the subcontractors that will be used during the course of the contract, the expected percentage of work to be subcontracted, and the approximate dollar value of that percentage of work. The potential contractor/vendor shall provide all additional information required by the agency.

(1) Evidence of good faith effort in developing a HUB subcontracting plan includes, but is not limited to, the following procedures:

(A) Divide the contract work into reasonable lots or portions to the extent consistent with prudent industry practices.

(B) Notify HUBs of the work that the potential contractor/vendor intends to subcontract. The preferable method of notification shall be in writing. The notice shall, in all instances, include the scope of the work, information regarding the location to review plans and specifications, information about bonding and insurance requirements, and identify a contact person. The notice shall be provided to potential HUB subcontractors prior to submission of the contractor's/vendor's bid. The potential contractor/vendor shall provide potential HUB subcontractors reasonable time to respond to the potential contractor's/vendor's notice. "Reasonable time to respond" in this context is no less than five working days from receipt of notice, unless circumstances require a different time period, which is determined by the agency and documented in the contract file. The potential contractor/vendor shall effectively use the commission's Centralized Master Bidders List, the HUB Directory, Internet resources, and other directories as identified by the commission or agency when searching for HUB subcontractors. Contractors/Vendors may rely upon the services of minority, women, and community organizations contractor groups, local, state, and federal business assistance offices, and other organizations that provide assistance in identifying qualified applicants for the HUB program who are able to perform all or select elements of the HUB subcontracting plan. The potential contractor/vendor shall provide the notice described in this subsection to three or more HUBs that perform the type of work required. Upon request, the potential contractor/vendor shall provide official written documentation (i.e. phone logs, fax transmittals, etc.) to demonstrate compliance with the notice required in this subsection.

(C) Provide written justification of the selection process, if a non HUB subcontractor is selected through means other than competitive bidding, or a HUB bid is the best value responsive bidder to a competitive bid invitation, but is not selected.

(D) Advertise HUB subcontracting opportunities in general circulation, trade association, and/or minority/woman focus media concerning subcontracting opportunities.

(E) Encourage a selected noncertified minority or woman owned business subcontractor to apply for certification by the commission in accordance with the procedures set forth in §111.17 of this title (relating to Certification Process).

(2) If the contract is a lease contract, the lessor shall comply with the requirements of this section from and after the occupancy date provided in the lease, or such other time as may be specified in the invitation for bid for the lease contract.

(3) In making a determination whether a good faith effort has been made in the development of the required HUB subcontracting plan, a state agency shall require the potential contractor/vendor to submit supporting documentation explaining in what ways the potential contractor/vendor has made a good faith effort according to each criterion listed in subsection (b)(1) of this section. The documentation shall include at least the following:

(A) Whether the potential contractor/vendor divided the contract work into reasonable lots or portions consistent with prudent industry practices.

(B) Whether the potential contractor/vendor notices contain adequate information about bonding, insurance, the availability of plans, the specifications, scope of work, and other requirements of the contract to three or more qualified HUBs allowing reasonable time for HUBs to participate effectively.

(C) Whether the potential contractor/vendor negotiated in good faith with qualified HUBs, not rejecting qualified HUBs who were also the best value responsive bidder.

(D) Whether the potential contractor/vendor documented reasons for rejection of a HUB or met with the rejected HUB to discuss the rejection.

(E) Whether the potential contractor/vendor advertised in general circulation, trade association, and/or minority/women focus media concerning subcontracting opportunities.

(F) Whether the potential contractor/vendor assisted non-certified HUBs to become certified.

(G) Whether the contractor has entered into a fully executed agreement and the same has been registered with the commission prior to submitting the plan.

(i) The sub-contracting plan can only be in the scope of work as described in the Mentor/Protégé Agreement and signed by both parties to satisfy the subcontracting plan requirement.

(ii) The potential contractor/vendor should indicate the use of a Protégé HUB firm to satisfy this requirement of the subcontracting plan. The Protégé must be approved for participation in the Mentor/Protege Program as prescribed in §111.28 of this title (relating to the Mentor Protégé Program). The Protégé firm should have the ability to perform the scope of work indicated in the subcontracting plan and the signed agreement.

(iii) A contractor's participation in a mentor-Protégé program under Texas Government Code, §2161.065 and submission of a Protégé as a subcontractor in the HUB subcontracting plan constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area of the plan including the protege.

(4) The HUB subcontracting plan shall be reviewed and evaluated prior to contract award and, if accepted, shall become a provision of the agency's contract. No changes shall be made to an accepted subcontracting plan prior to its incorporation into the contract. State agencies shall review the supporting documentation submitted by the potential contractor/vendor to determine if a good faith effort has been made in accordance with this section and the bid specifications. If the agency determines that a submitted HUB subcontracting plan was not developed in good faith, the agency shall treat the lack of good faith as a material failure to comply with advertised specifications, and the subject bid or other response shall be rejected. The reasons for rejection shall be recorded in the procurement file.

(5) If the potential contractor/vendor can perform all the subcontracting opportunities identified by the agency, a statement of the potential contractor's/vendor's intent to complete the work with its employees and resources without any subcontractors will be submitted with the potential contractor's/vendor's bid, proposal, offer, or other expression of interest. If the potential contractor/vendor is selected and decides to subcontract any part of the contract after the award, as a provision of the contract, the contractor/vendor must comply with provisions of this section relating to developing and submitting a subcontracting plan before any modifications or performance in the awarded contract involving subcontracting can be authorized by the state agency. If the selected contractor/vendor subcontracts any of the work without prior authorization and without complying with this section, the contractor/vendor would be deemed to have breached the contract and be subject to any remedial actions provided by Texas Government Code, Chapter 2161, state law and this section. Agencies may report non-performance relative to its contracts to the commission in accordance with Chapter 113, Subchapter F of this title (relating to the Vendor Performance and Debarment Program).

(c) Submission, review and determination of changes to an approved subcontracting plan during contract performance. If at any time during the term of the contract, a contractor/vendor desires to make changes to the approved subcontracting plan, such proposed changes must be received for prior review and approval by the state agency before changes will be effective under the contract. The contractor/vendor must comply with provisions of subsection (b) of this section relating to developing and submitting a subcontracting plan for substitution of work or of a subcontractor, prior to any alternatives being approved under the subcontracting plan. The state agency shall approve changes by amending the contract or by another form of written agency approval. The reasons for amendments or other written approval shall be recorded in the procurement file.

(d) Determining contractor/vendor contract compliance. The contractor/vendor shall maintain business records documenting its compliance with the HUB subcontracting plan and shall submit a compliance report to the contracting agency periodically and in the format required by the contract documents. During the term of the contract, the state agency shall determine whether the value of the subcontracts to HUBs meets or exceeds the HUB subcontracting provisions specified in the contract. Accordingly, state agencies shall audit and require a contractor/vendor to whom a contract has been awarded to report to the agency the identity and the amount paid to its subcontractors in accordance with 111.16(c) of this title (relating to State Agency Reporting Requirements). If the contractor/vendor is meeting or exceeding the provisions, the state agency shall maintain documentation of the contractor's/vendor's efforts in the contract file. If the contractor/vendor fails to meet the HUB subcontracting provisions specified in the contract, the state agency shall notify the contractor of any deficiencies. The state agency shall give the contractor/vendor an opportunity to submit documentation and explain to the state agency why the failure to fulfill the HUB subcontracting plan should not be attributed to a lack of good faith effort by the contractor/vendor.

(1) In determining whether the contractor/vendor made the required good faith effort, the agency may not consider the success or failure of the contractor/vendor to subcontract with HUBs in any specific quantity. The agency's determination is restricted to considering factors indicating good faith effort including, but not limited to, the following:

(A) Whether the contractor gave timely notice to the subcontractor regarding the time and place of the subcontracted work.

(B) Whether the contractor facilitated access to the work site, electrical power, and other necessary utilities.

(C) Whether documentation or information was provided that included potential changes in the scope of contract work.

(2) If a determination is made that the contractor/vendor failed to implement the HUB subcontracting plan in good faith, the agency, in addition to any other remedies, may report nonperformance to the commission in accordance with Chapter 113, Subchapter F of this title (relating to Vendor Performance and Debarment Program).

(3) State agencies shall review their procurement procedures to ensure compliance with this section. In accordance with § 111.26 of this title (relating to HUB coordinator responsibilities) the agency's HUB coordinator and contract administrators should facilitate institutional compliance with this section.

§111.17.Certification Process.

(a) A business seeking certification as an historically underutilized business must submit an application to the commission on a form prescribed by the commission, affirming under penalty of perjury that the business qualifies as an historically underutilized business.

(b) If requested by the commission, the applicant must provide any and all materials and information necessary to demonstrate active participation in the control, operation, and management of the historically underutilized business.

(c) Texas Government Code, §2161.231, provides that a person commits a felony of the third degree if the person intentionally applies as an historically underutilized business for an award of a purchasing contract or public works contract and the person knowingly does not meet the definition of an historically underutilized business.

(d) The commission shall certify the applicant as an historically underutilized business or provide the applicant with written justification of its denial of certification within 60 days after the date the commission receives a satisfactorily completed application from the applicant.

(e) The commission reviews and evaluates applications, and may reject an application based on one or more of the following:

(1) the application is not satisfactorily completed;

(2) the applicant does not meet the requirements of the definition of historically underutilized business;

(3) the application contains false information;

(4) the applicant does not provide required information in connection with the certification review conducted by the commission; or

(5) the applicant's record of performance of any prior contracts with the state.

(f) The Commission may approve the existing Certification Program of one or more local governments or non-profit organizations in this state that certify historically underutilized businesses, minority business enterprises, women's business enterprises, disadvantaged business enterprises that substantially fall under the same definition, to the extent applicable for Historically Underutilized Business found in §2161.001, Texas Government, and maintain them on the Commission's Historically Underutilized Businesses list, if

(1) the local government or non-profit organization meets or exceeds the standards established by the Commission as set out in Chapter 111, Subchapter B of this title (relating to the Historically Underutilized Business Program).

(2) agrees to the terms and conditions as required by statue relative to the agreement between the local government and/or non-profits for the purpose of certification of Historically Underutilized Businesses.

(g) The agreement in subsection (f) of this section must take effect immediately and contain conditions as follows:

(1) allow for automatic certification of business certified by the local government or non-profit organization (Program) as prescribed by the commission;

(2) provide for the efficient updating of the commission database containing information about historically underutilized businesses and potential historically underutilized businesses as prescribed by the commission;

(3) provide for a method by which the commission may efficiently communicate with businesses certified by the local government or non-profit organization;

(4) provide those businesses with information about the state's Historically Underutilized Business Program; and

(5) require that a local government or non-profit organization that enters into an agreement under subsection (f) of this section, complete the certification of an applicant with written justification of its certification denial within the period established by the commission in its rules for certification.

(h) The commission will not accept the certification of a local government or non-profit organization that charges for the certification of businesses to be listed on the Historically Underutilized Business list maintained by the commission.

(i) The commission may terminate an agreement made under this section if a local government or non-profit organization fails to meet the standards established by the commission for certifying Historically Underutilized Businesses. In the event of the termination of an agreement, those HUB's that were certified as a result of the agreement will maintain their HUB status during the fiscal year in which the agreement was in effect. Those HUB's who are removed from the HUB list as a result of the termination of an agreement with a local government or non-profit organization may apply directly to the commission for certification as a Historically Underutilized Business.

[(f) The commission will develop agreements with local governments to identify historically underutilized businesses and assist these businesses in obtaining state certification through the commission.]

(j) [ (g) ] The commission will send all certified HUBs an orientation packet including a certificate, description of certification value/significance, list of agency purchasers, and information regarding electronic commerce, the Texas Marketplace, and the state procurement process.

§111.28.Mentor Protégé Program.

(a) In accordance with the Texas Government Code, Section 2161.065, the commission shall design a Mentor Protégé Program to foster long-term relationships between contractors/vendors and Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) and to increase the ability of HUBs to contract with the state or to receive subcontracts under a state contract. The objective of the Mentor Protégé Program is to provide professional guidance and support to the Protégé to facilitate their development and growth. All participation is voluntary and program features should remain flexible so as to maximize participation. Each state agency with a biennial appropriation that exceeds $10 million shall implement a Mentor Protégé Program.

(b) In efforts to design a Mentor Protégé Program, each agency, because of its unique mission and resources, is encouraged to implement a Mentor Protégé Program that considers;

(1) the needs of Protégé businesses requesting to be mentored;

(2) the availability of mentors who possess unique skills, talents, and experience related to the mission of the agency's Program; and

(3) the agency's staff and resources.

(c) Agencies may elect to implement Mentor Protégé Programs individually or cooperatively with other agencies, and/or other public entities and private organizations, with skills, resources and experience in Mentor Protégé Programs. Agencies are encouraged to implement a Mentor Protégé Program to address the needs of its Protégé businesses in the following critical areas of the state's procurements:

(1) construction,

(2) commodities, and/or

(3) services.

(d) State agencies may consider, but are not limited to, the following factors in developing their Mentor Protégé Program:

(1) Develop and implement internal procedures, including an application process, regarding the Mentor Protégé Program which identifies the eligibility criteria and the selection criteria for mentors and potential HUB Protégé businesses;

(2) Recruit contractor/vendor mentors and proteges to voluntarily participate in the Program;

(3) Establish a Mentor Protégé Program objective identifying both the roles and expectations of the agency, mentor and the protege;

(4) Monitor the progress of the mentor Protégé relationship;

(5) Identify key agency resources including senior managers and procurement personnel to assist with the implementation of the Program; and

(6) Encourage partnerships with local governmental and nonprofit entities to implement a community based Mentor Protégé Program.

(e) An agency's Mentor Protégé Program must include mentor eligibility and selection criteria. In determining the eligibility and selection of a mentor, state agencies may consider the following criteria:

(1) Whether the mentor is a registered bidder on the commission's Centralized Master Bidders List (CMBL);

(2) Whether the mentor has extensive work experience and can provide developmental guidance in areas that meet the needs of the protege, including but not limited to, business, financial, and personnel management; technical matters such as production, inventory control and quality assurance; marketing; insurance; equipment and facilities; and/or other related resources.

(3) Whether the mentor is in "good standing" with the State of Texas and is not in violation of any state statutes, rules or governing policies;

(4) Whether the mentor has mentoring experience; and

(5) Whether the mentor has a successful past work history with the agency.

(f) An agency's Mentor Protégé Program must include Protégé eligibility and selection criteria. In determining the eligibility and selection of HUB protege, state agencies may use the following criteria:

(1) Whether the Protégé is eligible and willing to become certified as a HUB;

(2) Whether the Protégé's business has been operational for at least one year;

(3) Whether the Protégé is willing to participate with a mentoring firm and will identify the type of guidance that is needed for its development;

(4) Whether the Protégé is in "good standing" with the State of Texas and is not in violation of any state statutes, rules or governing policies; and

(5) Whether the Protégé is involved in a mentoring relationship with another contractor/vendor.

(g) The mentor and the protégé should agree on the nature of their involvement under the agency's mentor/protégé initiative. Each agency will monitor the process of the relationship. The mentor and Protégé relationship should be reduced to writing and that agreement may include, but is not limited to, the following:

(1) Identification of the developmental areas in which the Protégé needs guidance ;

(2) The time period which the developmental guidance will be provided by the mentor;

(3) Name, address, phone and fax numbers, and the points of contact that will oversee the agreement of the mentor and protege;

(4) Procedure for a mentor firm to notify the protégé in advance if it intends to voluntarily withdraw from the program or terminate the mentor Protégé relationship;

(5) Procedure for a protégé firm to notify the mentor in advance if it intends to terminate the mentor protégé relationship;

(6) A mutually agreed upon timeline to report the progress of the mentor Protégé relationship to the state agency.

(h) Each agency must notify its mentors and proteges that participation is voluntary. The notice must include written documentation that participation in the agency's Mentor Protégé Program is neither a guarantee for a contract opportunity nor a promise of business; but the Program's intent is to foster positive long-term business relationships.

(i) State agencies may demonstrate their good faith under this section by submitting a supplemental letter with documentation to the commission with their HUB Report or legislative appropriations request identifying the progress and testimonials of mentors and proteges that participate in the agency's Program. In accordance with §111.26 of this title (relating to HUB Coordinator Responsibilities) the agency's HUB Coordinator shall facilitate compliance by its agency.

(j) Each State Agency that sponsors a Mentor/Protégé Program must report that information to the commission upon completion of a signed agreement of both parties. A copy of the signed agreement of both parties should be forwarded to the commission, to be maintained on the approved list of Mentor/Protege. When an agency approves a Mentor/Protégé Agreement, that agreement is valid for all state agencies in the agreed upon scope of work for that Mentor/Protege Agreement.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107090

William J. Philbin

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Chapter 115. FACILITIES LEASING PROGRAM

Subchapter A. STATE LEASED PROPERTY

1 TAC §§115.1 - 115.10

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the General Services Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The General Services Commission proposes the repeal of Title 1, TAC, Chapter 115, Subchapter A--State Leased Property, §§115.1 - 115.10. The repeal of Chapter 115 is being proposed in order to delete obsolete language as a result of the enactment of Senate Bill 311 (SB 311), Article 10, 77th Legislature (2001), The repeal of Chapter 115 will also allow for new rules to be proposed and published simultaneously in this publication of the Texas Register .

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, has determined for the first five year period the repeals are in effect. There will be no fiscal implication for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the repeals.

Mr. Davenport further determines that for each year of the first five-year period the repeals are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the repeals is the deletion of obsolete and cumbersome language, and the creation of more efficient rules relating to Facilities Leasing Program under the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2167 and SB 311, Article 10, 77th Legislature (2001). There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the repeal as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Juliet U. King, General Counsel, General Services Commission, P.O. Box 13047, Austin, Texas 78711-3047. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

The repeal of Title 1, TAC, Chapter 115, is proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2165.004, 2165.108 and 2167.008 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following codes are affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapters 2165, §2165.004 ; and Subchapter E, §§2165.201 - 2165.215; and Chapter 2167; and SB 311, Article 10, 77th Legislature. (2001).

§115.1.Definitions.

§115.2.General.

§115.3.Receipt and Processing of Requisitions for Leased Space.

§115.4.Filling Requisitions from Nonprivate Public Sources.

§115.5.Leasing from a Private Source.

§115.6.Negotiation with a Private Source.

§115.7.Amendment of Lease.

§115.8.Transfer by Lessor.

§115.9.Bidders List.

§115.10.Delegation of Leasing Authority.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107109

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


1 TAC §§115.1 - 115.11

The General Services Commission proposes new Title 1, TAC, Chapter 115, Subchapter A--State Leased Property, §§115.1 - 115.11, concerning the Facilities Leasing Program. The new rules are proposed in accordance with Senate Bill 311 (SB 311), Article 10, 77th Legislature (2001) which added language concerning the best value standard for lease space; use of private firms to obtain space; and reporting requirement on state agencies noncompliant with leasing requirements. The proposed new rules will also replace obsolete language found in the proposed repealed rules for Title 1, TAC, Chapter 115, §§115.1 - 115.10 that are being published simultaneously in this publication of the Texas Register .

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, has determined for the first five year period the new rules are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering these new rules.

Mr. Davenport has further determined that for each year of the first five-year period the new rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these rules will be reduced life cycle costs for leased space and on time delivery of space, which should also result in lower costs for space. There will be no effect on large, small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with these rules and there is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Juliet U. King, Acting General Counsel, General Services Commission, P.O. Box 13047, Austin, Texas 78711-3047. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

New Title 1, Part 5, TAC, Chapter 115 is proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2165.004, 2167.004 (amended by SB 311, §10.04, 77th Legislature (2001)), 2167.008, 2167.052 (amended by SB 311, §10.05, 77th Legislature (2001)), 2167.0541 (new by SB 311, §10.08, 77th Legislature (2001)), and 2167.105 (new by SB 311, §10.10, 77th Legislature (2001)) which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapters 2165, §2165.004; and Subchapter E, §§2165.201 - 2165.215; and Chapter 2167; and SB 311, Article 10, 77th Legislature (2001)

§115.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Potential lessor list--A list of prospective potential lessors maintained by the Commission which sets out the names and addresses of building owners and agents who have shown an interest in leasing space to the state and from whom bids or proposals can be solicited for obtaining leased space for state use.

(2) Commission--The General Services Commission, or its successor agency, the Texas Building and Procurement Commission.

(3) Emergency Lease - A lease negotiated with a private source for a term not to exceed 24 months, as determined by the commission.

(4) State agency or agency--A board, a commission, or other authorized agency of the state government.

(5) Unduly restrictive specifications--Specifications that unnecessarily limit competition by setting requirements unrelated to the state's actual needs, which have the effect of favoring one or more prospective bidders over all the rest.

§115.2.General.

(a) The authority for obtaining leased space for state agencies or departments rests with the commission by virtue of Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2167. In accordance with §2165.107, Government Code, the commission shall give preference to available state-owned space under its control.

(b) The commission shall lease space on the basis of determining the best value for the state. In determining the best value, the commission may consider:

(1) the cost of the lease contract;

(2) the condition and location of the lease space;

(3) utility costs;

(4) access to public transportation;

(5) parking availability;

(6) security;

(7) telephone service availability;

(8) indicators of probable lessor performance under the contract, such as the lessor's financial resources and the lessor's experience;

(9) compliance with the architectural barriers law, Article 9102, Revised Statutes; and

(10) other factors deemed relevant by the commission.

§115.3.Receipt and Processing of Requisitions for Leased Space.

(a) Requests for allocation, relinquishment, or modification of space in state-leased and owned facilities under the commission's control shall be made in writing to the commission's director of Facilities Construction and Space Management Division by the agency head or designee of the requesting agency in accordance with §122.2 of this title (relating to Requests for Allocation, Relinquishment, or Modification of Space in State-Leased or Owned Facilities Under the Commission's Control). Facilities Leasing will develop operating procedures defining all requirements related to requests for state space.

(b) In certain cases, the commission may enter into an emergency lease. In making this determination and in establishing a term of the emergency lease not to exceed 24 months, the commission shall consider the amount and type of space required, the market conditions of the area in which space is needed, the governmental responsibilities of the agency, and the potential impact on the public, and the best interest of the state.

(c) All requests for leased space must be submitted by the requisitioning agency and signed by the agency head or an authorized official, duly certifying the availability of funds for the payment of such leased space, and compliance with the square footage requirements based on the number of FTEs authorized for the agency.

(d) All requests for space must be submitted on a completed commission approved application and contain specifications for leased space which shall conform to the following:

(1) The term of the lease may not exceed a maximum of 10 years. (Please note that Texas Government Code, Title 10, Chapter 2167, §2167.055(c)) permits the consideration of an option to renew for additional terms not to exceed 10 years each, as may be considered by the commission in the state's best interests; and the requisition should note, in the area provided, the length of the initial occupancy period requested by the agency); as well as number and length of renewal periods requested (to be by mutual agreement between lessee and lessor unless otherwise requested).

(2) The commission may include in all specifications for space exceeding a two-year initial term, a provision requiring a separate bid price for utility and/or janitorial cost (if an Invitation for Bid establishes that payment for either utility costs and/or janitorial costs) and may allow an escalation clause to be included in the terms and conditions of the lease to cover periodic escalation of full rental costs of the lease, including utility and/or janitorial costs (if applicable) on account of increases in property values, tax and operating expenses, rental rates, labor or wage rates, and / or utility rates. (The rate of the allowable consumer price index escalation is based upon Lessor's responsibility to pay utility and/or janitorial cost, if any.); and

(3) If the commission considers it advisable, it may include an option for the commission to purchase the space subject to the legislature's appropriation of funds for the purchase, and such an option shall show the amount that would be accumulated by the state and credited toward the purchase at various periods during the term of the lease, if any, and the purchase price of the property at the beginning of each fiscal biennium during the term of the lease.

(4) Development of needed specifications for submission to the commission should be completed by the requesting agency with the guidance of the commission. In no event should the requesting agency allow a prospective bidder to develop or improperly influence the written specifications. Evidence of any such cooperative effort which has the effect of eliminating effective competition and which results in the bidder receiving a lease from the state shall be grounds for seeking to void the lease, removal of the bidder from the bidders' list, and any other remedy available to the state. The commission shall alter or reject any specification it considers unduly restrictive. (See §115.1 of this chapter (relating to Definitions).)

(5) The requesting agency shall estimate its anticipated moving costs from its present leased quarters, if any. Such an estimate shall include only the actual, out-of-pocket cost of moving, relocation of communication equipment and loss of time expenses.

§115.4.Filling Lease Space Requests from Nonprivate Public Sources.

If such state-owned space is not available,

(1) space may be leased from another state agency through an interagency contract;

(2) space may be obtained through transfer of leased space from another state agency or public source;

(3) space may be obtained from the federal government through a negotiated lease; or

(4) space may be obtained from a political subdivision of this state, including a county, a municipality, a school district, a water or irrigation district, a council of government, or a regional planning council, through a negotiated lease. It is contemplated for the purpose of this section that the political subdivision generally will own the property to be leased to the state; however, the state may sublease from political subdivisions leasing from non-public entities if the state pays not more than market price and where:

(A) political subdivisions occupy more than half of the primary leased space; or

(B) political subdivisions pay at least 10% of the primary lease cost of the space occupied by the state; or

(C) it is determined by the commission to be in the best interest of the state.

§115.5.Leasing from a Private Source.

(a) Space may be leased from a private source that provides the best value for the state through the following methods:

(1) Competitive Bidding;

(2) Competitive Sealed Proposals; and

(3) Direct Negotiations.

(b) The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to implement these rules and shall document best value determinations.

(c) When formal bids or offers are requested, bids or offers may not be taken or accepted by telephone or word of mouth. In evaluating bids, the commission shall give no credence to, nor make any allowances for, any comments to prospective lessors allegedly made to them by employees of the requesting agency. No statements or promises made by such employees shall be binding upon the commission in making its award, or considered to be a term or condition of the resulting lease. (See §115.3(d)(9) of this chapter (relating to Receipt and Processing of Requisitions for Leased Space.) )

(d) The commission may not enter into a lease if the space in question has been determined to be noncompliant with the provisions of Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2167, §2167.006, concerning the elimination of barriers to handicapped persons, unless approved by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

(e) A Notice of Award shall be the means by which the successful bidder or offeror and the requesting agency are notified of the commission's determination of award of a lease contract. Notice of Award will be made in writing. The Notice of Award shall be a binding lease contract when served upon the successful bidder or offeror. Service shall be complete upon deposit of the Notice of Award, enclosed in a postpaid, properly addressed wrapper, in a post office or official depository under the care and custody of the United States Postal Service. The affidavit of any person showing service of the Notice of Award shall be prima facie evidence of the fact of service.

§115.6.Amendment of Lease.

Any lease entered into pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2167, Subchapter B, and these sections may be amended during its term so long as the commission finds the amendment to be in the best interests of the state.

§115.7.Transfer by Lessor.

Lessor's sale, assignment, or transfer of lessor's right to receive payments for lessor's obligation to perform under the lease may be provided for in the terms and conditions of the lease, but lease payments to the new lessor shall be approved by the commission only if and when the transfer is sufficiently documented in the records of the commission. The Lessor shall comply with the rules and procedures of the commission to affect the change of lessor in order that lease payments can be made.

§115.8.Potential Lessors' List.

The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to ensure all prospective offerors may be considered for inclusion on any relevant solicitations by maintaining an offerors' list.

§115.9.Delegation of Leasing Authority.

The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to delegate the authority to enter into lease contracts for space to state agencies, including institutions of higher-education. The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to produce an annual report to the Commission regarding opportunities for delegating leasing authority to state agencies with statewide operations.

§115.10.Use of Private Firms to Obtain Space.

The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to solicit and manage private brokerage or real estate firms as consultants to assist in obtaining lease space on behalf of the Commission.

§115.11.Report on Noncompliance.

The Facilities Leasing Program shall develop operating procedures to determine and annually report to members of the state agency's governing body and to the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the house of representatives the agencies' noncompliance with commission rules or other state laws related to leasing requirements. The report is to contain an estimate of the fiscal impact resulting from noncompliance.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107108

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Chapter 123. FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND SPACE MANAGEMENT DIVISION

The General Services Commission proposes the repeal of Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123, Subchapter A - General Matters,§123.1 and §123.2; Subchapter B - Real Property Acquisition,§123.12 and §123.13; Subchapter C - Construction Project Administration,§§123.23 through 123.33; and Subchapter D - Wage Rates, §123.43 and §123.44. The repeal is proposed in order to allow for the adoption of more efficient and streamlined new rules under Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123 that are being published simultaneously in this publication of the Texas Register . The new rules will also be compliant with the legislative requirements of S.B. 311, Art. 9, §14.05 and S.B. 1268, 77th Leg. (2001).

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, has determined for the first five year period the rules are in effect, there will be no will be no fiscal implication for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering these new rules.

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, further determines that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these rules will be the deletion of cumbersome and obsolete language. There will be no effect on large, small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with these rules and there is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposals may be submitted to Juliet King, Acting General Counsel, General Services Commission, P.O. Box 13047, Austin, TX 78711-3047. Comments must be received no later than thirty days from the date of publication of the proposal to the Texas Register .

Subchapter A. GENERAL MATTERS

1 TAC §123.1, §123.2

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the General Services Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The proposed repeal of Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123 is made under the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2166.062, and 2166.202 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166.

§123.1.Definitions.

§123.2.Delegation of Authority.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107104

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter B. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS

1 TAC §123.12, §123.13

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the General Services Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The proposed repeal of Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123 is made under the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§ 2152.003, 2166.062, and 2166.202 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166.

§123.12.Land and Real Property Acquisition, Negotiated.

§123.13.Land and Real Property Acquisition, Condemnation.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107105

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter C. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1 TAC §§123.23 - 123.33

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the General Services Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The proposed repeal of Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123 is made under the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D,§§2152.003, 2166.062, and 2166.202 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166.

§123.23.General Project Responsibility.

§123.24.Project Analysis Process.

§123.25.Construction Project Process.

§123.26.Exclusions from Commission Authority.

§123.27.Selection of Design Professionals for Construction Projects.

§123.28.Contractor Qualifications.

§123.29.Bidding Procedures.

§123.30.Construction Contract Award.

§123.31.Emergency Bidding and Award Procedures.

§123.32.Construction Contract Administration.

§123.33.Small Contractor Participation Assistance Program.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107106

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter D. WAGE RATES

1 TAC §123.43, §123.44

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the General Services Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The proposed repeal of Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123 is made under the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2166.062, and 2166.202 which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166.

§123.43.Wage Rate Surveys.

§123.44.Withholding of Penalties.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107107

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Chapter 123. FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND SPACE MANAGEMENT DIVISION

The General Services Commission proposes new Title 1, T.A.C., Chapter 123, Subchapter A - General Matters, §123.1 and §123.2; Subchapter B - Real Property Acquisition, §123.12 and §123.13; Subchapter C - Construction Project Administration, §§123.23 through 123.33; and Subchapter D - §123.43 and §123.44. The new rules are proposed due to the enactment of S.B. 311, Art. 9 and §14.05, 77th Leg. (2001) and S.B. 1268, 77th Leg. (2001) which contains new language relating to lowest and best bid method for awarding a contract, including design-build; the construction manager-at-risk and competitive sealed proposal methods for a project; surety technical assistance services for the benefit of small and historically underutilized businesses ; determination of the prevailing wage rate in counties bordering the United Mexican States, or a county adjacent to a county bordering the United Mexican States; and requirements that the commission establish procedures for the process to acquire property, for implementing the exclusion process from the commission's authority, for the selection of design professionals, and procedures for the management of the construction process. The proposed new rules will also replace obsolete and cumbersome language found in the proposed repeal for Title 1, T.A.C, Chapter 123 that is being published simultaneously in this publication of the Texas Register.

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, has determined for the first five year period the rules are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering these new rules

John Davenport, Director of Facilities Construction and Space Management, further determines that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these rules will be lower project costs and on time delivery of projects. The new rules will also be compliant with the requirements of S.B. 311, Art. 9 and §14.05, 77th Leg. (2001) and S.B. 1268, 77th Leg. (2001) There will be no effect on large, small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with these rules and there is no impact on local employment.

Comments on the proposals may be submitted to Ms. Juliet King, Acting General Counsel, General Services Commission, P.O. Box 13047, Austin, TX 78711-3047. Comments must be received no later than thirty days from the date of publication of the proposal to the Texas Register.

Subchapter A. GENERAL MATTERS

1 TAC §123.1, §123.2

The new rules are proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.003, 2166.062, 2166.202, 2166.2525 (new by S.B. 311, §9.02, 77th Leg. (2001)), 2166.2526 (new by S.B. 311, §9.03, 77th Leg. (2001)) which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166 and S.B. 311, Art. 9, 77th Leg. (2001)

§123.1. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Commission -- The six member board of the General Services Commission of the State of Texas, or its successor organization, the seven member board of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission.

(2) Contractor's Qualification Form -- The TBPC provided document which contractors must complete and return to TBPC in order to be considered for a construction contract award.

(3) Cost of Services -- The costs incurred by TBPC in providing construction project administration services, including project management, professional inspection, staff time, prior project analysis cost, travel expense, the estimated cost of minor and incidental materials used in pursuit of a project, and may include an overhead rate to cover employee benefit costs.

(4) Design Professional -- Persons licensed by the State of Texas to practice architecture in accordance with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 249a (relating to Architects) or engineering in accordance with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271a (relating to the Texas Engineering Practice Act).

(5) Facilities Construction and Space Management Division (FCSMD) -- The TBPC division responsible for administration of construction projects under the commission's jurisdiction, and such other projects that the commission has agreed to manage.

(6) TBPC -- The General Services Commission. or its successor agency, the Texas Building and Procurement Commission (herein referred to collectively as "TBPC"), for the State of Texas.

(7) Notice to Proceed -- A TBPC written order issued to a general contractor under contract on a project which establishes the start and completion dates for the contract and the project schedule.

(8) Planning Fund -- A fund administered by FCSMD from which authorized planning expenditures are initially paid.

(9) Project Analysis -- A study done before the legislative appropriation process for a project to develop a reliable estimate of the cost of the project to be used in the appropriations process, and as authorized by Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166, Subchapter D.

(10) Project -- A building construction project as defined in Texas Government Code, §2166.001(4) that is financed wholly or partly by a specific appropriation, a bond issue or federal money. The term includes the construction of:

(A) a building, structure or appurtenant facility or utility, including the acquisition and installation or original equipment and original furnishings; and

(B) an addition to, alteration, rehabilitation or repair of, an existing building, structure, or appurtenant facility or utility.

(11) Project Request Forms -- The TBPC provided document which using agencies must complete and return to TBPC in order to initiate a project for construction.

(12) Using Agency -- An instrumentality of the state that occupies and uses a state-owned or state-leased building, or the commission, with respect to a state-owned building maintained by the commission.

(13) Uniform General Conditions (UGC) -- The terms and conditions for state construction projects promulgated in accordance with Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166, Subchapter G.

(14) Wage Rates -- The schedule of the hourly rate of pay plus payments made to or on behalf of employees for benefits such as health insurance, pension plans, death benefits and vacation pay.

§123.2. Delegation of Authority.

(a) The commission may act to exercise any power or authority set out in Chapter 123 of this title (relating to the Facilities Construction and Space Management Division), or it may delegate such authority to the executive director. The executive director, in exercising delegated authority, may further delegate his authority to another member of the FCSMD staff.

(b) Operating Procedures for Chapter 123 of this title may be found in FCSMD's Internal Procedures Manual.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107100

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter B. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS

1 TAC §123.12, §123.13

The new rules are proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.03, 2166.062, 2166.202, 2166.2525 (new by S.B. 311, §9.02, 77th Leg. (2001)), 2166.2526 (new by S.B. 311, §9.03, 77th Leg. (2001)) which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

The following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166 and S.B. 311, Art. 9, 77th Leg. (2001)

§123.12.Land and Real Property Acquisition, Negotiated.

(a) FCSMD shall establish procedures for the process to acquire property, per appropriate direction in legislation.

(b) Written responses to the Request for Offers to sell from property owners will be evaluated by TBPC staff. All final recommendations shall be presented to the commission or purchasing agency for acceptance. All appropriate studies, appraisals and title work shall accompany such recommendations.

(c) The TBPC or the purchasing agency, shall accept offers which are in the best interest of the State of Texas. The TBPC and the purchasing agency retain the right to reject any and all offers.

(d) The TBPC or the purchasing agency, after acceptance of a written offer to sell property, is authorized to complete the purchase as follows:

(1) A real estate contract will be executed by the seller and the TBPC stating all specific conditions of the transfer of property, including delivery of draft deeds, acquisition of title policies, conduct of surveys, environmental tests and other such matters, and other details of the individual transaction. A closing on the transaction shall be scheduled at the convenience of the parties.

(2) The terms and conditions under which the TBPC purchases the real property shall be designed to comply with applicable law to protect the interests of the State of Texas and shall be reasonable and prudent under normal business practices.

§123.13.Land and Real Property Acquisition, Condemnation.

(a) When no agreement on purchase price between the seller and the buyer is reached through negotiations, the TBPC may exercise its power of eminent domain.

(b) At least one appraisal as to fair market value shall be obtained from independent sources and a final offer presented to the seller based on an appraisal.

(c) The final offer to purchase shall contain a designated acceptance period stated in calendar days.

(d) If this final offer to purchase is not accepted by the seller within the designated time period, the commission may proceed to make a finding of public purpose for the taking and seek assistance from the office of the Attorney General to proceed with the condemnation action.

(e) Conduct of the condemnation proceedings shall be in accordance with state law.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107101

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter C. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ADMINISTRATION

1 TAC §§123.23 - 123.33

new rules are proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.03, 2166.062, 2166.202, 2166.2525 (new by S.B. 311, §9.02, 77th Leg. (2001)), 2166.2526 (new by S.B. 311, §9.03, 77th Leg. (2001)) and S.B. 1268 77th Leg. (2001) which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166 and S.B. 311, Art. 9, 77th Leg. (2001) and S.B. 1268, 77th Leg. (2001)

§123.23.General Project Responsibility.

(a) The TBPC is responsible for the administration of project analyses and construction projects for all state agencies except as otherwise provided in Texas Government Code, §§2166.003 and 2166.004, and other statutes.

(b) The TBPC will act as the owner for the benefit of the using agency and shall provide timely and complete information to the using agency for any pending project for which it is responsible.

(c) The TBPC shall act in the best interests of the State of Texas in administering project contracts for which it is responsible.

(d) Each construction project administered by the TBPC shall bear the cost of services rendered thereon. At the start of a construction project, an estimate of the cost of services provided by the TBPC will be provided to the using agency. This estimate may be changed by agreement of the TBPC and the using agency.

(e) One-half of the cost of services shall be transferred to TBPC upon approval of the total project cost by the using agency. The remaining half of the cost of services fee shall be transferred to the TBPC upon award of the primary construction contract for each project or approval to begin construction on projects using alternate delivery procedures. TBPC shall use the fees collected to pay for the expenses of performing its services.

(f) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures that outline the process for construction project management.

§123.24.Project Analysis Process.

(a) The using agency is responsible for initiating a project analysis. The using agency shall initiate a project analysis by submitting to the FCSMD a request that a project analysis of a proposed project be prepared. Standard request forms are provided by the FCSMD and are available on the FCSMD Computer Management System (CMS).

(b) To ensure results are available in a timely manner, requests for project analyses shall be made no later than January 1 of even-numbered years in order to ensure completion in time for submission with an using agency's budget prior to the regular session of the legislature.

(c) Project analyses shall be prepared based on FCSMD detailed operating procedures.

§123.25.Construction Project Process.

(a) Initiation of a construction project.

(1) The using agency is responsible for initiating a construction project. The using agency may commence the process by submitting a request on its letterhead to initiate work on the project or through the CMS. Project Request forms are provided by the FCSMD and are available on the CMS. The using agency must identify the source and amount of funds to be applied to the project. If the funds for the project are not directly appropriated to the GSC, the using agency must execute an interagency agreement with the GSC, which will govern the payment of all services and contracts necessary to accomplish the project.

(2) Projects should be initiated at the earliest opportunity after authorization by the Legislature, but not later than January 1 of even-numbered years. This timeframe is required for a contract award to be made within the fiscal year for which appropriated project funds are available.

(b) Selection of Construction Delivery Method: When a project has been requested by a using agency or appropriated to the TBPC, FCSMD shall assess which construction method provides the state with the best value:

(1) Lowest and Best Bid

(2) Design-Build

(3) Construction Manager at Risk

(4) Competitive Sealed Proposals

(c) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures to manage the construction project process.

§123.26.Exclusions from Commission Authority.

(a) Pursuant to the Texas Government Code, §§2166.003 (a)(6) and (7), §§2166.004 and 2166.063, certain types of repair and rehabilitation projects are not subject to TBPC construction administration, or are otherwise excluded from TBPC's jurisdiction.

(b) Applications for a determination that a project is excluded shall be provided to the FCSMD in writing on or before June 1 of each fiscal year. The FCSMD shall advise using agencies that because an approval after the June 1 deadline may result in funds not be spent during that fiscal year, that TBPC assumes no liability thereof. Each application must provide the proposed changes, budget information, and method of construction intended by the using agency.

(c) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for implementing the exclusion process.

§123.27.Selection of Design Professionals for Construction Projects.

(a) Registration of Design Professionals.

(1) On or before May 1 of odd-numbered years, the FCSMD shall advertise in appropriate media, including the TBPC web site, the Texas Electronic State Business Daily and such other media generally available to the public, for all interested design professionals to register with the TBPC for the following biennium.

(2) Registration with the TBPC will be accomplished by filling out a questionnaire, either in writing or electronically, and submitting it on or before July 1 of odd numbered years, or anytime before or after that date.

(b) Selection process for construction project design professionals. FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for selection of design professionals

(c) Non-prime design selections. The TBPC shall conduct selections of design professionals for non-prime design work in accordance with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, for non-prime design professionals, and Chapter 2166, Subchapter D, for design professionals who may perform prime and non-prime design services. The TBPC reserves the authority to award multiple, indefinite quantity services agreements to design professionals in the disciplines needed by FCSMD.

§123.28.Contractor Qualifications.

(a) Interested contractors shall submit a contractor's qualification form to the FCSMD in a timely fashion and no later than the date established in the notice to bidders. Forms are available for pick up with bid documents. Incomplete forms shall be rejected.

(b) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for contractor selection.

§123.29.Bidding Procedures.

(a) All TBPC construction projects are competitively bid, except those using best value alternate delivery methods, and publicly opened in the office designated by the commission.

(b) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating instructions for the contractor selection and bidding process, including selection for best value alternate delivery methods.

§123.30.Construction Contract Award.

(a) Award of construction contracts will be made by the commission except in cases of emergency outlined in §123.31(c) of this chapter (relating to Emergency Bidding and Awards Procedures). Award will be based upon the best value to the state for bids and proposals received from a qualified bidder.

(b) FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for construction contract award.

§123.31.Emergency Bidding and Award Procedures.

(a) Emergency Bidding. The FCSMD may issue an advertisement for a bid and let a bid for a period of time less than required by Texas Government Code, §2166.253, when an emergency condition requires expedient action.

(b) Emergency conditions. Emergency conditions include, but are not limited to:

(1) preventing undue additional cost to a state agency; or

(2) preventing or removing a hazard to life or property.

(c) Emergency award procedures. The executive director, or his designee, is authorized to award construction contracts when conditions as described in subsection (b) of this section are determined to exist. The award shall be reported to the commission at its next regularly scheduled meeting for ratification.

(d) Documenting emergency conditions. Each time an emergency is determined to exist, a written statement describing the emergency condition shall be prepared for approval by the executive director. Copies of the document shall be maintained in the project file.

§123.32.Construction Contract Administration.

FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for management of the construction process, which shall focus on administrative procedures, and successful compliance with the project schedule and budget, and successful completion of the project.

§123.33.Small Contractor Participation Assistance Program.

The TBPC operates a Small Contractor Participation Assistance Program as set forth in Texas Government Code, §2166.258 (amended by S.B. 1268, 77th Legi. (2001)) and §2166.259 and this section. In accordance with Texas Government Code, §2166.258, this shall include the contracting with insurance company(ies), surety company(ies), agent(s) or broker(s) to provide surety technical assistance services for the benefit of small and historically underutilized businesses. FCSMD shall develop detailed operating procedures for implementation of this process.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107102

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Subchapter D. WAGE RATES

1 TAC §123.43, §123.44

new rules are proposed under the authority of the Texas Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, §§2152.03, 2166.062, 2166.202, 2166.2525 (new by S.B. 311, §9.02, 77th Leg. (2001)), 2166.2526 (new by S.B. 311, §9.03, 77th Leg. (2001)) which provides the General Services Commission with the authority to promulgate rules necessary to implement the sections.

following code is affected by these rules: Government Code, Title 10, Subtitle D, Chapter 2166 and S.B. 311, §14.05, 77th Leg. (2001).

§123.43.Wage Rate Surveys.

(a) The TBPC has adopted the prevailing wage rates for the locality as determined by the United States Department of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, if the survey was conducted within three years before the project in question is to be bid, or the wage determination of the Texas Workforce Commission, or other available sources. For counties designated in Section 14.05 of SB 311, 77th Leg'. (2001) the TBPC will use the "Davis-Bacon" rates and the wage rate determinations of the Texas Workforce Commission, or other available surveys, for the local and state average wage rate determinations.

(b) Affected workers and contractors and subcontractors are responsible for complying with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2258. The TBPC is not a party to arbitration under the Texas Government Code.

§123.44.Withholding of Penalties.

The TBPC shall retain the amounts authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter 2258 upon a finding that prevailing wages have not been paid. The TBPC shall use any amounts retained to pay the affected worker in accordance with Texas Government Code, §2258.056.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 16, 2001.

TRD-200107103

Juliet King

Legal Counsel

General Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-3960


Part 12. COMMISSION ON STATE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

Chapter 251. REGIONAL PLANS--STANDARDS

1 TAC §251.10

The Commission on State Emergency Communications (CSEC) proposes an amendment to §251.10, concerning proposed guidelines for implementing wireless E9-1-1 services with 9-1-1 funds deposited in the 9-1-1 Services Fee Fund.

The proposed rule would modify parts of the rule that have become outdated since the rule was last adopted and that would benefit from revision in light of modifications, clarifications, priorities, and rulings by the Federal Communications Commission in Docket number 94-102 related to wireless E9-1-1. It would also further clarify and incorporate the ad hoc process that has been used to determine reasonable costs for purposes of wireless service provider reimbursement and would recognize that the Commission may substitute the ad hoc process with a rule process in a separate rulemaking.

CSEC seeks comments on the following specific issues:

1. The proposed rule in subsection (a) adds a definition for ESRK. CSEC seeks comments on whether this definition is appropriate? Should any other definitions be added to the proposed rule?

2. The proposed rule adds in subsection (b)(4) a clarification to the current interoperability language by inserting "to the extent technically feasible." CSEC seeks comment on whether there are situations where solutions to the interoperability issues are not currently technically feasible?

3. In view of the recent Federal Communications Commission decision in Docket number 94-102 involving the City of Richardson, Texas, subsection (b)(3) of proposed rule includes a provision on making a timely request to the 9-1-1 Network Provider and/or ALI Host Database Provider, as applicable and necessary, for any upgrade necessary to transmit and deliver the wireless Phase II information. CSEC seeks comments on whether there are currently upgrades that may be necessary in these situations and the current due dates for such upgrades? CSEC seeks comments on whether the upgrades that have been implemented to date or that will be implemented to address Phase II service in the future will permit full migration from Phase I deployments that used NCAS, CAS, and/or Hybrid solutions? CSEC seeks comments on whether there are any known impediments to migrating from NCAS, CAS, and/or Hybrid Phase I solutions for purposes of delivering Phase II service? CSEC also seeks comments on whether these upgrades vary depending on whether a wireless carrier proposes a network or a handset Phase II solution?

4. CSEC seeks comments whether interested parties have suggested modifications to the proposed rule or suggested modifications to CSEC or COG processes that may further facilitate the implementation of Phase II service in the state program areas?

Paul Mallett, executive director, has determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Mr. Mallett also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be improved services in facilitating the delivery of a wireless emergency call through automatic number and location information data. No historical data is available, however, there appears to be no direct impact on small or large businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. There is no anticipated local employment impact as a result of enforcing the section.

Initial comments on the proposed rule may be submitted in writing within 30 days after publication of the proposal in the Texas Register to Paul Mallett, Executive Director, Commission on State Emergency Communications, 333 Guadalupe Street, Suite 2-212, Austin, Texas 78701-3942.

The proposed rule is proposed pursuant to the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771, §§771.051, 771.055, 771.057, 771.071, 771.0711, 771.072, 771.075, and 771.078 which authorize the Commission, among other things, to adopt policies, procedures, and minimum performance standards for providing 9-1-1 service and prescribing the use of the 9-1-1 funds for providing 9-1-1 service.

No other statute, article or code is affected by the proposed amendment.

§251.10.Guidelines for Implementing Wireless E9-1-1 Service.

(a) Definitions. When used in this rule, the following words and terms shall have the meanings identified in this section, unless the context and use of the word or terms clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) 9-1-1 Database Record--A physical record, which includes the telephone subscriber information to include the caller's telephone number, related locational information, and class of service, and conforms to NENA adopted database standards.

(2) 9-1-1 Funds--Funds assessed and disbursed in accordance with the Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771 but the term does not include wireless 9-1-1 emergency service fees not deposited in the 9-1-1 Services Fee Fund.

(3) 9-1-1 Equipment--Capital equipment acquired partially or in whole with 9-1-1 funds and designed to support and/or facilitate the delivery of an emergency 9-1-1 call to an appropriate emergency response agency.

(4) 9-1-1 Governmental Entity--An RPC or District, as defined in Texas Health and Safety Code Chapter 771.055, and Chapter 772, Subchapter B, C, [ or ] D, or F that administers the provisioning of 9-1-1 service.

(5) 9-1-1 Governmental Entity Jurisdiction--As defined in applicable law, Texas Health and Safety Code Chapters 771 and 772, the geographic coverage area in which a 9-1-1 Governmental Entity provides emergency 9-1-1 service.

(6) 9-1-1 Operator--The PSAP operator receiving 9-1-1 calls.

(7) 9-1-1 Network Provider--The current operator of the selective router/switching that provides the interface to the PSAP for 9-1-1 service.

(8) Automatic Location Identification (ALI) Database--A computer database used to update the Call Back Number information of wireless end users and the Cell Site/Sector information for Phase I call delivery, as well as the X, Y coordinates for longitude and latitude for Phase II call delivery.

(9) Call Associated Signaling (CAS)--A method for delivery of the mobile directory number (MDN) of the calling party plus the emergency service routing digits (ESRD) from the wireless network through the 9-1-1 selective router to the PSAP. The 20 digits of data delivered are sent either over Feature Group D (FG-D) or ISUP from the wireless switch to the 9-1-1 router. From the router to the PSAP, the 20-digit stream is delivered using either Enhanced Multi-Frequency (EMF) or ISDN connections.

(10) Call Back Number--The mobile directory number (MDN) of a Wireless End User who has made a 9-1-1 call, which usually can be used by the PSAP to call back the Wireless End User if a 9-1-1 call is disconnected. In certain situations, the MDN forwarded to the PSAPs may not provide the PSAP with information necessary to call back the Wireless End User making the 9-1-1 call, including, but not limited to, situations affected by illegal use of Service (such as fraud, cloning, and tumbling) and uninitialized handsets and non-authenticated handsets.

(11) Cell Site--A radio base station in the WSP Wireless Network that receives and transmits wireless communications initiated by or terminated to a wireless handset, and links such telecommunications to the WSP's network.

(12) Cell Sector--An area, geographically defined by WSP (according to WSP's own radio frequency coverage data), and consisting of a certain portion of all of the total coverage area of a Cell Site.

(13) Cell Site/Sector Information--Information that indicates, to the receiver of the information, the location of the Cell Site receiving a 9-1-1 call initiated by a Wireless End User, and which may also include additional information regarding a Cell Sector.

(14) Cell Sector Identifier--The unique numerical designation given to a particular Cell Sector that identifies that Cell Sector.

(15) Class of Service--A standard acronym, code or abbreviation of the classification of telephone service of the Wireless End User, such as WRLS (wireless), that is delivered to the PSAP CPE.

(16) Digital Map--A computer generated and stored data set based on a coordinate system, which includes geographical and attribute information pertaining to a defined location. A digital map includes street name and locational information, data sets related to emergency service provider boundaries, as well as other associated data.

(17) Emergency Communication District (District)--A public agency or group of public agencies acting jointly that provided 9-1-1 service before September 1, 1987, or that had voted or contracted before that date to provide that service; or a district created under Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 772, Subchapter B, C, [ or ] D , or F .

(18) Emergency Service Number (ESN)--A number stored by the selective router/switch used to route a call to a particular PSAP.

(19) Emergency Service Routing Digits (ESRD)--As defined in J-Std-034, an ESRD is a digit string that uniquely identifies a base station, cell sector, or sector. This number may also be a network routable number (but not necessarily a dialable number ) .

(20) ESRK--Emergency Service Routing Key--A temporary phone number that routes an emergency call to the correct Public Safety Answering Point and allows access to the information in Automatic Location Identification.

(21) [ (20) ] FCC--The Federal Communications Commission.

(22) [ (21) ] FCC Order--The Federal Communications Commission Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 94-102, released July 26, 1996, and as amended by subsequent decisions.

(23) [ (22) ] Host ALI Records--Templates from the ALI Database that identify the Cell Site location and the Call Back Number of the Wireless End User making a 9-1-1 call.

(24) [ (23) ] Hybrid CAS/NCAS--This method for wireless E9-1-1 call delivery uses a combination of CAS and NCAS techniques to deliver the location and call back numbers to a PSAP. The MSC sends the location and call back information to a selective router using the standard CAS interface defined in J-Std-034. The selective router then uses an NCAS approach to deliver the information to a PSAP. That is, the selective router sends the location and call back information to the wireline emergency services database and the caller's call back number, or MDN, to the PSAP. The MDN is then used as a key to retrieve the cell/tower information for PSAP display.

(25) [ (24) ] J-Std-034--A standard, jointly developed by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), to provide the delta changes necessary to various existing standards to accommodate the Phase I requirements. This standard identifies that the interconnection between the mobile switching center (MSC) and the 9-1-1 selective router/switch is via:

(A) an adaptation of the Feature Group-D Multi Frequency (FG-D protocol), or

(B) the use of an enhancement to the Integrated Services Digital Network User Part (ISUP) Initial Address Message (IAM) protocol. In this protocol, the caller's location is provided as a ten-digit number referred to as the emergency services routing digits (ESRDs). The protocol NENA-03-002, Recommendation for the Implementation of Enhanced Multi Frequency (MF) Signaling, E9-1-1 Tandem to PSAP, is the corollary of J-Std-034 FG-D protocol.

(26) J-Std-036--A standard, jointly developed by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS), to make provision for introduction of location determination technology for Phase II delivery of wireless E9-1-1 calls.

(27) [ (25) ] Mobile Directory Number (MDN)--A 10-digit dialable directory number used to call a Wireless Handset.

(28) [ (26) ] Mobile Switching Center (MSC)--A switch that provides stored program control for wireless call processing.

(29) [ (27) ] National Emergency Number Association (NENA).

(30) [ (28) ] NENA 02-001--A standard set of formats and protocols for the Automatic Location Identification (ALI) data exchange between service providers and Enhanced 9-1-1 systems, developed by the NENA Data Standards Subcommittee (June 1998 revision).

(31) [ (29) ] NENA 03-002--A standard, or technical reference, developed by the NENA Network Technical Committee, to provide recommendations for the implementation of Enhanced Multi Frequency (MF) Signaling, E9-1-1 Tandem to PSAP. The J-Std-034 FG-D protocol, referenced in paragraph (25) [ (24) ] of this subsection, is the corollary protocol of NENA 03-002.

(32) [ (30) ] Non-Callpath Associated Signaling (NCAS)--This method for wireless E9-1-1 call delivery delivers routing digits over existing signaling protocol, including commonly applied CAMA trunking into and out of selective routers or SS7 into selective routers . The voice call is set up using the existing interconnection method that the wireline company uses from an end office to the router and from the router to the PSAP. The ANI delivered with the voice call is an emergency service routing digit (ESRD), not a MDN. All data, including the MDN and cell sector that receives the call, is delivered to the PSAP via the data path within the ALI record.

(33) [ (31) ] Phase I E9-1-1 Service--The service by which the WSP delivers to the designated PSAP the Wireless End User's call back number and Cell Site/Sector information when a wireless end user has made a 9-1-1 call, as contracted by the 9-1-1 Governmental Entity agency.

(34) [ (32) ] Phase II E9-1-1 Service--The service by which the WSP delivers to the designated PSAP the Wireless End User's call back number, Cell Site/Sector information, as well as X, Y (longitude, latitude) coordinates to the accuracy standards set forth in the FCC Order.

(35) [ (33) ] Phase I E9-1-1 Service Area(s)--Those geographic portions of a 9-1-1 Governmental Entity Jurisdiction in which WSP is licensed to provide Service. Collectively, all such geographic portions of the 9-1-1 Governmental Entity's Jurisdiction subject to this rule shall be referred to herein as the "Phase I E9-1-1 Service Areas."

(36) [ (34) ] Regional Planning Commission--A commission established under Local Government Code, Chapter 391, also referred to as a council of governments (COG).

(37) [ (35) ] Regional Strategic Plans--Regional plans developed in compliance with Chapter 771 shall include a strategic plan that projects regional 9-1-1 service costs, and service fee and other non-equalization surcharge revenues at least five years into the future, beginning September 1, 1994. Within the context of Section 771.056(d), the [ Advisory ] Commission on State Emergency Communications (CSEC) [ (ACSEC) ] shall consider any revenue insufficiencies to represent need for equalization surcharge funding support.

(38) [ (36) ] Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)--A 24-hour communications facility established as an answering location for 9-1-1 calls originating within a given service area, as further defined in applicable law Texas Health and Safety Code Chapters 771 and 772.

(39) [ (37) ] Service Control Point (SCP)--A centralized database system used for, among other things, wireless Phase I E9-1-1 Service applications. It specifies the routing of 9-1-1 calls from the Cell Site to the PSAP. This hardware device contains special software and data that includes all relevant Cell Site locations and Cell Sector Identifiers.

(40) [ (38) ] Selective Router--A switching office placed in front of a set of PSAPs that allows the networking of 9-1-1 calls based on the ESRD assigned to the call.

(41) Standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement--The standard Phase I and/or Phase II Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement, as applicable, provided by the Commission and available on the Commission's web site.

(42) [ (39) ] Uninitialized Call--Any wireless E9-1-1 call from a wireless handset which, for any reason, has either not had service initiated or authenticated with a legitimate WSP.

(43) [ (40) ] Vendor--A third party used by either the 9-1-1 Governmental Entity or WSP to provide services.

(44) [ (41) ] WSP--The named wireless service provider and all its affiliates (collectively referred to as "WSP").

(45) [ (42) ] WSP Subscribers--Wireless telephone customers who subscribe to the Service of WSP and have a billing address within a 9-1-1 Governmental Entity Jurisdiction.

(46) [ (43) ] Wireless 9-1-1 Call--A call made by a wireless end user utilizing a WSP wireless network, initiated by dialing "9-1-1" (and, as necessary, pressing the "Send" or analogous transmitting button) on a Wireless Handset.

(47) [ (44) ] Wireless End User--Any person or entity receiving service on a WSP Wireless System.

(48) [ (45) ] WSP Wireless System--Those mobile switching facilities, Cell Sites, and other facilities that are used to provide wireless Phase I & II E9-1-1 service.

(b) Policy and Procedures. As authorized by the Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771.051, the [ Advisory ] Commission on State Emergency Communications (Commission) shall develop minimum performance standards for equipment and operation of 9-1-1 service to be followed in developing regional plans, and impose 9-1-1 emergency service fees and equalization surcharges to support the planning, development, and provision of 9-1-1 service throughout the State of Texas. The implementation of such service involves the procurement, installation and operation of equipment, database and network services and facilities designed to either support or facilitate the delivery of an emergency call to an appropriate emergency response agency. As mandated by FCC Order, and as authorized by Chapter 771, Section .0711, of the Texas Health and Safety Code, the CSEC [ ACSEC ] shall impose on each wireless telecommunications connection a 9-1-1 emergency service fee to provide for the automatic number identification and automatic location identification of wireless E9-1-1 calls. Furthermore, the Commission recognizes the rapidly changing telecommunications environment in wireline and wireless services and its impact on 9-1-1 emergency services. Automatic number and location information is crucial data in facilitating the delivery of an emergency call. It is the policy of the Commission that all 9-1-1 emergency calls for service be handled at the highest level of service available. In accordance with this policy, the following policies and procedures shall apply to the procurement, installation, and implementation of wireless E9-1-1 services funded in part or in whole by the 9-1-1 funds as that term is defined in this rule referenced above. Prior to the Commission considering allocation and expenditure of 9-1-1 funds for implementation of wireless Phase I and/or Phase II wireless E9-1-1 services, a COG or other 9-1-1 Governmental Entity requesting 9-1-1 equalization surcharge funds to provide wireless E9-1-1 service and/or other entity subject to the commission's jurisdiction according to the terms of Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771 [ and/or District receiving 9-1-1 fees and/or equalization surcharge funds from the Commission ] shall meet the following applicable requirements listed in paragraphs (1)-(15) of this subsection:

(1) Commission Survey and Review--Prior to any wireless E9-1-1 Service implementation in any regional council (COG) area, the Commission shall solicit in writing from each all WSPs within the area State of Texas a detailed description of its technical approach to implementing Phase I and/or Phase II (where applicable); and, the proposed WSP reasonable cost associated with that implementation. The Commission will review and evaluate this information and consider its appropriateness for implementation. Upon completion of this process, the Commission will communicate these WSP evaluations to the regional councils (COGs), and notify the COGs that they may request and implement wireless E9-1-1 service as described in paragraphs (2) - (15) of this subsection.

(2) Phase I E9-1-1 Implementation. The provisioning for delivery of a caller's mobile directory number and the location of a cell site receiving a 9-1-1 call to the designated PSAP. Implementation of Phase I service must be accomplished within 6-months of written request according to the FCC Order. Prior to implementing Phase I wireless E9-1-1 service (but not prior to requesting the service from WSP) , the following conditions must be satisfied and demonstrated to the Commission as described in paragraph (14) of this subsection:

(A) the COG9-1-1 entity requesting service has determined, based on reasonable investigation, that it currently has sufficient funds to cover its the costs of receiving and utilizing the wireless E9-1-1 Phase I information and to reimburse the WSP's reasonable costs [ sufficient funding mechanism for the recovery of all reasonable costs relating to the provisioning of such service is in place ];

(B) the PSAPs administered by the COG9-1-1 entity are capable of receiving and using the data associated with such service or has ordered the necessary equipment and has commitments from its supplier(s) that PSAPs will be capable within 6 months of the request to WSP ;

(C) the COG9-1-1 entity, the Commission or Commission Staff on behalf of the COG9-1-1 entity, has requested [ requests ] such service in writing from the WSP service provider; and

(D) demonstrate, as applicable, that it has made a timely request to the 9-1-1 Network Provider and/or ALI Host Database Provider, as applicable and necessary, for any upgrades needed to transmit and deliver the wireless E9-1-1 Phase I information.

(E) and that the COG9-1-1 entity and WSP both accept the roles and responsibilities in the implementation of wireless E9-1-1 service as provided in Attachment 1 of the standard Wireless Phase I E9-1-1 Service Agreement.

[(D) an executed contract between 9-1-1 entity and WSP for such service, and which includes a wireless service work plan, fee schedule and standards.]

(3) Phase II E9-1-1 Implementation--provisioning for delivery of a caller's mobile directory number and the caller's location, within or exceeding 125 meters RMS the level of accuracy required by the FCC , to the designated PSAP. Implementation of Phase II service will be consistent with the FCC Order. Prior to implementing Phase II wireless E9-1-1 service (but not prior to requesting the service from WSP, if the COG's request for Phase II service has been approved by the Commission or approved in writing by Commission Staff) , the following conditions, in addition to those listed in paragraph (2) of this subsection must be satisfied and demonstrated to the Commission as described in paragraph (14) of this subsection:

(A) the COG requesting service has determined, based on reasonable investigation, that it currently has sufficient funds to cover the costs of receiving and utilizing the wireless E9-1-1 Phase II information;

(B) [ (A) ] provision for digital base map and graphical display, in conjunction with approved Strategic Plan and Commission §251.7 of this title (relating to Guidelines for Implementing Integrated Services);

(C) [ (B) ] demonstrate, and provide in writing, that the [ location determination technology and ] digital base map and PSAP CPE are capable of displaying [ identifying ] the caller's location within a [ 125 meters in at least 67% of calls delivered, or the ] degree of accuracy that meets or exceeds the requirements of the FCC or has ordered the necessary equipment and has commitments from its supplier(s) that the PSAPs will be capable within 6 months of the request to WSP Order; and [ as required by FCC Order; ]

(D) demonstrate, as applicable, that it has made a timely request to the 9-1-1 Network Provider and/or ALI Host Database Provider, as applicable and necessary, for any upgrades needed to transmit and deliver the wireless E9-1-1 Phase II information.

[(C) a revised executed contract between 9-1-1 entity and WSP for such service and which includes a wireless service work plan, fee schedule and standards.]

(4) Responsibilities. It shall be the responsibility of the 9-1-1 Government Entity, the WSP and any necessary third party (including, but not limited to, 9-1-1 Network Provider/Local Exchange Carrier, Host ALI Provider, SCP software developers and hardware providers, and other suppliers and manufacturers) to fully cooperate for the successful implementation and provision of Phase I and Phase II E9-1-1 service. These same parties are also responsible for ensuring that the deployment and implementation of their wireless E9-1-1 solution is , to the extent technically feasible, thoroughly interoperable with other wireless E9-1-1 solutions, including permitting the proper and seamless transfer of wireless E9-1-1 emergency call information to PSAPs between differing wireless E9-1-1 solutions. The Commission acknowledges that the successful and timely provision of such service is dependent upon the timely and effective performance and cooperative , good faith efforts of all of the parties listed in this section. All parties shall comply with the FCC Order, other FCC guidelines and requirements related to wireless E9-1-1 service, Texas laws, and Commission Rules.

(5) Deployment. Unless otherwise approved by the Commission or Commission Staff as an exception, the COG [ , ] 9-1-1 entity and the WSP will agree upon one , or a combination, of the following methods of wireless call delivery listed in subparagraphs (A) - (D) of this paragraph:

(A) Call Associated Signaling (CAS);

(B) Non-Call path Associated Signaling (NCAS);

(C) Hybrid CAS/NCAS Architecture; and

(D) Exceptions to CAS, NCAS, or Hybrid CAS/NCAS, as in the case of standalone ALI environments--specific solution should be illustrated and demonstrated prior to execution of contract.

(6) Data Delivery--Unless otherwise approved by the Commission, the COG 9-1-1 entity and the WSP will agree upon one of the following methods for the delivery of data elements necessary for Phase I E9-1-1 service. The COG 9-1-1 entity and WSP shall provision for redundancy within all methods.

(A) SS7/ISUP--WSP will deliver the twenty digits of information necessary for Phase I services by sending SS7 signaling messages in ISUP format to the 9-1-1 selective router;

(B) Feature Group D--WSP will deliver the twenty digits of information necessary for completion of Phase I services to the 9-1-1 selective router in the standard format required; and

(C) Service Control Point (SCP)-- WSP will route all necessary information directly to the COG 9-1-1 entity's ALI database through an independent service control point.

(7) Standards--Unless an exception is approved by the Commission, the COG 9-1-1 entity, the WSP and any third party/vendor, will ensure that all appropriate and applicable industry standards be adhered to in provisioning E9-1-1 wireless service. These standards shall include, but not be limited to:

(A) J-Std 34 and NENA 03-002 for CAS and Hybrid CAS/NCAS deployments;

(B) NENA 02-0101 as benchmark data standards. All parties shall cooperate fully in the development and maintenance of all wireless data, such as cell site locations, Emergency Service Routing Digits, selective routing databases, and timely updates of any such data;

(C) Any and all modifications to these standards, currently under development by appropriate standards bodies, for CAS, NCAS, Hybrid CAS/NCAS, and Phase II/LDT deployments. Any such pending standard should be adhered to upon adoption;

(D) The Commission hereby establishes a standard Class of Service (COS) to be used by the COG 9-1-1 entity's PSAPs and the WSPs to identify calls delivered to the PSAP as WRLS (wireless), or until a standard is established by NENA;

(E) Commission §251.4 of this title (relating to Guidelines for the Provisioning of Accessibility Equipment) for provisioning of TTY/TDD equal access consistent with FCC rules and orders;

(F) All applicable standards shall be agreed upon by both parties to the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement contract ; and [ . ]

(G) The Commission may approve exceptions to the standards listed in this section upon demonstration by the WSP and the COG PSAP of valid reasons and comparable efficiency and cost.

(8) Reasonable Cost Elements--The Commission will consider that the costs to be incurred by the COG9-1-1 entity, or RPC, will be reviewed and approved within the existing Strategic Planning process and provided within CSEC Rule 251.6, Guidelines for Strategic Plans, Amendments, and Revenue Allocation. The Commission will consider that the reasonable costs incurred by the WSP to be reimbursed by the 9-1-1 Governmental Entity may include the following listed in subparagraphs (A) - (F) of this paragraph:

(A) Trunking. To provide network connectivity between the necessary network elements, the following costs may [ shall ] be allowed:

(i) Dedicated transport from mobile switching center (MSC) to selective router, (including in that connectivity any port connection charges or other pre-LEC selective router charges) at a rate and quantity no higher than agreed to within the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement and as approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff or Commission rule in that connectivity any port connection charges or other pre-LEC selective router charges;

[(ii) From selective router to PSAP;]

[(iii) From PSAP to ALI Database;]

(ii) [ (iv) ] From mobile switching center (MSC) to service control point (SCP) at a rate and quantity no higher than agreed to within the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement and as approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff or Commission rule ;

(iii) [ (v) ] From service control point (SCP) to ALI Database at a rate and quantity no higher than agreed to within the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement and as approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff or Commission rule; and [ ; ]

[(vi) From ALI Database to PSAP.]

[(B) Network--To provision the transference of necessary digits from the selective router to the PSAP in a CAS deployment, an upgrade or modification to the selective router will be necessary. The Commission will not consider this as an allowable cost.]

(B) [ (C) ] Database--To provision and deliver the necessary data through the network and to the PSAP for Phase I compliance, the following costs listed in clauses [ in ] (i)-(ii) of this subparagraph may [ will ] be allowed:

(i) Non-recurring costs associated with initial emergency service routing digits (ESRD) or emergency service routing keys (ESRK) load into selective router or SCP at a rate and quantity no higher than agreed to within the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement and as approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff, or Commission rule ; and

(ii) Monthly recurring costs associated with maintaining ESRD or ESRD or ESRK data in the selective router or SCP at a rate and quantity no higher than agreed to within the standard Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement and as approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff, or Commission rule .

(C) Comparable Costs. In determining the reasonableness of costs, the Commission or Commission Staff may compare the costs being submitted for recovery by one provider to the costs of other, similarly situated providers. No single WSP shall be reimbursed for costs above the comparable costs of the other WSPs within the COG region.

[(D) CPE--To provision the 9-1-1 entity's PSAP equipment to have the capability to receive and display information necessary to comply with Phase I call delivery requirements, the Commission has previously funded software upgrades to CPE for 20-digit and two 10-digit capability. These costs should be accommodated within the regional council's currently, or previously, approved strategic plan.]

[(E) Map Display--The cost to provision the 9-1-1 entity's PSAP equipment to have the capability to receive and graphically display caller's cell site/sector location information, as well as the X, Y (longitude, latitude coordinates).]

[(F) Training--The cost to train COG and/or PSAP personnel to efficiently and effectively receive and process Phase I & Phase II wireless E9-1-1 calls. This training shall be conducted by the COG, WSP, local service provider, and/or third party, as necessary, upon initial deployment of wireless service and at regularly scheduled intervals. Training plans and any associated costs shall be proposed to COG within WSP written proposal of service, submitted to the Commission for approval via the strategic plan amendment review process as outlined in Rule 251.6, and included in an executed standardized contract for wireless E9-1-1 service.]

(9) Testing--The COG, WSP, local service provider and any third party shall conduct initial and regularly scheduled network, database and equipment testing to ensure the integrity of the existent and proposed wireline/wireless 9-1-1 system operated by the COG, for any Phase I and/or Phase II wireless E9-1-1 service deployment. These tests shall include, at a minimum:

(A) network connectivity;

[(B) call setup times;]

(B) [ (C) ] equipment capabilities of receiving and displaying callback number and cell site/sector information;

(C) [ (D) ] initial implementation field testing of each of a WSP's cell sites routing to the designated PSAP and delivery of accurate call data; and the routing and data delivery ability and accuracy of any new cell sites, or maintenance sites, that may be added by a WSP in any particular region. [ ability to transfer the wireless E9-1-1 call. ] The COG shall submit the initial testing documentation and findings to the Commission within the strategic plan amendment approval process [ as referenced in paragraph (8) of this subsection, Reasonable Cost Elements. ] , as provided in CSEC Rule 251.6, Guidelines for Strategic Plans, Amendments, and Revenue Allocation, and as established through Commission wireless testing policies and procedures that meet or exceed FCC guidelines. The COG shall maintain documentation of initial, maintenance, and regularly scheduled testing and notify the Commission of any on-going, negative outcomes.

(10) Fair and Equitable Provisioning of Wireless E9-1-1 Service-- The COG, WSP, local service provider, and any relevant third party shall provision E9-1-1 service to in the COG region as to achieve a consistent level of service to WSP End Users subscribers that is in compliance with applicable federal and state laws and rules and applicable industry standards. [ The COG shall establish the level of wireless E9-1-1 service required within its region, and shall ensure that each WSP operating within its region provides comparable levels of wireless E9-1-1 service to all wireless subscribers within the region, within reasonable implementation parameters. ] In determining the reasonableness of costs, the Commission may compare the costs being submitted for recovery by one provider to the costs of other, similarly situated providers. No single WSP shall be reimbursed for costs above the comparable costs of the other WSP within the COG region or at a rate and quantity higher than approved as reasonable within the contract by the Commission, Commission Staff, or Commission rule .

(11) Uninitialized Calls--Must be passed through the wireless 9-1-1 network, and uniformly identified to the PSAP , in accordance with rules and procedures established by the FCC .

(12) Third Party Contracts--Any and all subcontracts between WSP and third party vendors, for the deployment of Phase I & II wireless E9-1-1 service deployments, shall adhere to the primary contract as executed between COG and WSP , and/or the applicable FCC Orders, Guidelines, and Rules .

(13) Proposals for Wireless E9-1-1 Service--All proposals by WSPs for wireless 9-1-1 service should be presented to the COG in writing and shall include a complete description of network, database, equipment display requirements, training and accessibility elements. Such proposals should include detailed cost information, as well as technical solutions, network diagrams, documented wireless 9-1-1 call set-up times, deployment plans and timelines, specific work plans, WSP network contingency and disaster recovery plans, escalation lists, trouble call response times, as well as any other information required by the COG. Unless otherwise confidential by law, all information provided to the COG becomes a matter of public record and is subject to the Texas Public Information Act.

(14) Strategic Plan Amendment Review and Approval Process--Upon demonstration of compliance with paragraphs (2)(A) and (3)(A) of this subsection, and prior to executing a standardized contract for Wireless 9-1-1 Service Agreement , the COG shall submit such proposals, as described paragraph (13) of this subsection, to the Commission for approval, via the strategic plan review and/or amendment process described in §251.6 of this title. Strategic Plan amendment requests should include all of the information provided by WSP to COG, as well as complete information regarding the geographic areas as well as the tandems, exchanges and PSAPs affected [ effected ] by the proposed deployment.

(15) Execution of Standardized Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement Contract--Upon review and approval by the Commission, Commission Staff, or Commission rule, the [ ACSEC ] COG and WSP shall enter into a standardized Wireless E9-1-1 Service Agreement. The standard agreement contract shall be provided by the Commission, and shall include all of the information contained in the proposal and amendments reviewed and approved by the Commission. Commission staff shall review all such contracts before they are executed , amended, or renewed . COG shall provide the Commission a copy of all fully executed contracts.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on November 19, 2001.

TRD-200107147

Paul Mallett

Executive Director

Commission on State Emergency Communications

Earliest possible date of adoption: December 30, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6933