Part 20.
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
Chapter 800.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Subchapter C. PERFORMANCE AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
40 TAC §800.81
The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) proposes new §800.81
regarding Board Performance.
The purpose of Subchapter C is generally to set forth the performance requirements
applicable to the Boards. The proposed rule emphasizes the partnership between
the Commission and Boards in assuring compliance with federal and state requirements
through a performance-based contract method. The purpose of the rule is to
describe the performance standards applicable to Boards and other subrecipients
and to set forth the Boards responsibilities regarding those performance requirements.
The 74th Texas Legislature enacted Texas' landmark legislation, House Bill
1863 (H.B. 1863), in 1995, now codified in part in Texas Labor Code Chapter
302 and Texas Government Code Chapter 2308. This state law reformed both the
welfare and workforce systems and made Texas the nation's leader among reform-minded
states. House Bill 1863 provided local elected officials the opportunity to
form local workforce development boards (Boards) that enjoy the flexibility
and authority to design and oversee the delivery of workforce development
services that meet the needs of local employers and workers.
A key goal of the federal Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 (42 U.S.C.A.
Section 2801 et seq.) was that of improving the effectiveness and efficiency
of federally-funded job training programs. WIA recognized the strides made
by the Texas workforce development system and specifically provided for the
state to maintain many of the features of H.B. 1863 through grandfather provisions.
The Commission, as the entity responsible for overseeing the implementation
of H.B. 1863 and WIA, sets policy regarding performance standards using federal
and state performance measures. The Commission approves the performance targets
during the budget process based upon federal and state statutory and regulatory
performance measures and requirements. In addition, the Commission sets policy
regarding contracts to ensure that the performance requirements are met and
that contracts are performance-based. Performance-based contracts describe
expectations in terms of specific outcomes, results, or final work products,
as opposed to methods, processes, or designs. The Agency then incorporates
performance standards in contracts with the Boards and other subrecipients
of federal and state funds that are funded through the Commission.
The Commission ensures compliance with the WIA and other federal and state
performance standards while providing options for the Boards to exercise local
flexibility. The Commission works with the Boards to ensure that contract
performance requirements are consistent with the Board's and State's strategic
planning goals and objectives, and adjusted for local factors including specific
economic, demographic and other characteristics of populations to be served
in the local workforce development area and other factors the Commission deems
appropriate. The Commission welcomes comment and input by all interested parties
regarding performance in order to achieve the key objectives of maximizing
access to employment, education and training options, while minimizing the
Boards' reporting requirements.
The overall goal of the Commission is to use, to the maximum extent practicable,
performance-based contracting methods in its management of contracts with
the Boards. Performance-based contracting concepts and methodologies that
are generally applied to contracts with the Boards and other subrecipients
are designed to: (1) describe performance requirements in terms of results
rather than methods of accomplishing the work; (2) use measurable (i.e., terms
of quality, timeliness, quantity) performance standards and objectives and
quality assurance plans; (3) and provide a basis for either performance incentive
awards for achieving high performance or penalty imposition for low performance.
The Commission is charged with ensuring accountability of Boards and subrecipients
of the Agency. Boards are charged with the oversight and management of the
services and activities of the One-Stop Service Delivery Network.
Texas Government Code Chapter 2308, Texas Labor Code Title 4 and WIA have
made Boards responsible for a number of duties and responsibilities for the
administration of Commission-funded activities, including maintaining adequate
fiscal systems, complying with the uniform rules for administration of grants
and agreements, meeting the contract performance measures, and complying with
all applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
Randy Townsend, Director of Finance, has determined that for each year
of the first five years the rule will be in effect, the following statements
will apply:
There are no additional estimated costs to the state and to local governments
expected as a result of enforcing or administering the rule;
There are no estimated reductions in costs to the state and to local governments
as a result of enforcing or administering the rule;
There are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to
local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule;
There are no foreseeable implications relating to costs or revenue of the
state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule;
and
There are no anticipated economic costs to persons required to comply with
the rule.
Mr. Townsend has also determined that there is no anticipated adverse impact
on small businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the rule because
small businesses are not regulated or required to do anything by the rule.
James Barnes, Director of Labor Market Information, has determined that
there is no significant negative impact upon employment conditions in this
state as a result of the proposed rule.
Barbara Cigainero, Director of Workforce and Development, has determined
that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public
benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to provide information
and set forth requirements regarding the performance.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to John Moore, Texas Workforce
Commission Building, 101 East 15th Street, Room 608, Austin, Texas 78778,
(512) 463-3041. Comments may also be submitted via fax to (512) 463-1426 or
e-mailed to: John.Moore@twc.state.tx.us.. Comments must be received by the
Agency within thirty days from the date of the publication in the
Texas Register
.
The new rule is proposed under Texas Labor Code §301.061
and §302.002, which provide the Texas Workforce Commission with the authority
to adopt, amend, or repeal such rule as it deems necessary for the effective
administration of Agency services and activities.
The rule affects Texas Labor Code, Chapter 302, and Texas Human Resources
Code, Chapters 31 and 44.
§800.81.Board Performance.
(a)
A Board shall achieve levels of performance consistent
with performance standards that are reflected in the individual Board's contracts
with the Commission.
(b)
The Commission shall determine the performance standards
by using measures of performance based on federal and state performance requirements
and by using factors that may be necessary to achieve the mission of the Commission.
(c)
A Board shall comply with all Commission rules, Workforce
Development (WD) Letters, the Grants and Contracts Manual, the Financial Manual
and guidance letters of the Agency, including rules contained in other chapters
of this Part XX applicable to specific programs, including but not limited
to Chapter 841 relating to WIA.
(d)
A Board's achievement of high levels of performance may
result in the Commission providing incentives for the Board.
(e)
A Board's failure to meet minimum levels of performance
as referenced in the Board's contract may result in corrective actions, penalties
or sanctions as specified in:
(1)
Part XX of this title (relating to the Texas Workforce
Commission), including chapter 800, Subchapter E. relating to Sanctions;
(2)
the Board's contract with the Commission; or
(3)
as otherwise provided for by federal or state statute or
rule.
(f)
A Board may submit to the Commission a request for an adjustment
to the minimum levels of performance.
(g)
The Commission may determine what constitutes a necessary
adjustment to local performance measures and may consider specific economic,
demographic and other characteristics of populations to be served in the local
workforce development area and other factors the Commission deems appropriate
including the anticipated impact of the adjustment on the state's performance.
(h)
The Governor may adopt additional performance incentives
and sanctions provisions as provided in WIA.
(i)
A Board shall comply with and remain subject to the provisions
contained in Chapter 805 effective on July 1, 2001, relating to performance
or any other matters addressed in Chapter 805 regarding any funds granted
by the Secretary of Labor under the JTPA regulations or Act, including NRA
and other funds.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on July 26, 2001.
TRD-200104352
John Moore
Assistant General Counsel
Texas Workforce Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: September 9, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 463-2573
The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) proposes amendments to §§841.31,
841.32, 841.34, 841.38, 841.39, 841.41, 841.44, and 841.46 and proposes the
repeal of and new §§841.40, 841.43, 841.45, and 841.47 regarding
the Eligible Training Provider Certification System (ETPS) required under
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998.
The 74th Texas Legislature and the Governor enacted Texas' landmark legislation,
House Bill 1863 (H.B. 1863), in 1995, now codified in part in Texas Labor
Code Chapter 302 and Texas Government Code Chapter 2308. This state law reformed
both the welfare and workforce systems and made Texas the nation's leader
among reform-minded states. H.B. 1863 provided local elected officials the
opportunity to form local workforce development boards (Boards) that enjoy
the flexibility and authority to design and oversee the delivery of workforce
development services that meet the needs of local employers and workers.
A key goal of the federal Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998 (42 U.S.C.A.
Section 2801 et seq.) was that of improving the effectiveness and efficiency
of federally-funded job training programs. WIA recognized the strides made
in the Texas workforce development system and specifically provided for the
state to maintain many of the features of H.B. 1863.
The Commission, as the entity responsible for overseeing the implementation
of WIA, has endeavored to provide formal and informal opportunities for comment
and input by all interested parties. While developing the ETPS, the Commission
has continued to work closely with representatives of the training provider
community, Boards and partner agencies. The Commission ensures compliance
with the WIA while providing options for the Boards and the training provider
community. The Commission continues to seek options for streamlining processes,
including those for the certification process and for performance reporting
by eligible training providers. A key objective is to maximize participant
access to education and training options, while minimizing providers' reporting
burdens.
The purpose of Subchapter C is to address the ETPS as required under the
Act. Changes are proposed for the purposes of streamlining the ETPS, reflecting
changes necessitated by the implementation of the automated, Internet-based
ETPS and to allow Boards discretion to permit the ETPS and the use of Individual
Training Accounts (ITAs) to apply to other workforce services funded through
the Commission. In addition to the proposed changes, the Commission invites
the public to comment on methods to simplify the ETPS. The language in many
of the sections remains the same with the following exceptions:
Section 841.31 addresses the scope and coverage of this subchapter. The
ETPS and the use of ITAs to secure and pay for adult training services are
primary service delivery mechanisms under the WIA. A sentence is added that
acknowledges the Boards' option to use these mechanisms for adult training
services funded by Choices, Food Stamp Employment and Training (FS E&T),
Welfare-to-Work (WtW), Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and North American
Free Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance (NAFTA-TAA).
Section 841.32 addresses training services. The changes to the language
include adding a sentence to subsection (a) that acknowledges the expanded
coverage of the rule to cover adult training services funded by Choices, FS
E&T, WtW, TAA and NAFTA-TAA.
Section 841.34 addresses ITAs. The changes include adding a subsection
(c) that acknowledges the expanded coverage of the rule to cover adult training
services funded by Choices, FS E&T, WtW, TAA and NAFTA-TAA.
Section 841.38 addresses the initial certification process for exempt providers.
A change is made in the first sentence to clarify Board responsibilities for
developing local requirements, rather than a written application, for the
submission of initial eligibility applications for exempt programs.
Section 841.39 addresses the alternative application for initial eligibility
determination by non-exempt training providers. Changes are made to subsection
(b) to address modifications in application requirements due to conversion
to the automated, Internet-based ETPS and to specify the exemption of providers
that are subject to Texas or another state's regulation or audit from the
requirement to submit financial stability documentation. Changes are also
made to subsection (c) to remove the requirement that training provider applicants
provide performance information regarding the percentage of all individuals
participating in the applicable program who obtained unsubsidized employment
in an occupation related to the program conducted.
Section 841.40 addresses the submission of an initial eligibility application.
Language is added to address the required use of the automated, Internet-based
ETPS for application submission and review and to address provider compliance
with state law.
Section 841.41 addresses initial eligibility determination. Language in
subsection (b) related to a mandatory six-month waiting period for reapplication
after Board denial of an initial eligibility application is deleted in order
to provide additional flexibility with regard to the development of local
appeals policy.
Section 841.43 addresses application for subsequent eligibility determination.
The option to request a specific certification date is removed since it is
not applicable to the subsequent eligibility determination process. Language
is added to address the required use of the automated, Internet-based ETPS
for application submission and review and to address provider compliance with
state law. Language is added to allow for adjusting the certification renewal
period if an appeal is approved to ensure that the period of certification
is one year in length.
Section 841.44 addresses the determination of subsequent eligibility. In
subsection (e) language related to a mandatory six-month waiting period for
reapplication after Board denial of an initial eligibility application is
deleted in order to provide additional flexibility with regard to the development
of local appeals policy.
Section 841.45 addresses the annual adoption of standards of performance.
Changes are made to clarify the process for annual adoption and issuance of
performance standards.
Section 841.46 addresses the requirements for submission and retention
of verifiable program-specific performance information. The requirement that
performance information be submitted on a quarterly basis is deleted since
submission of required data is not subject to this stringent timeline and
the subsections are re-lettered accordingly.
Section 841.47 addresses the certified provider list and the name is modified
to reflect that the training provider list includes "eligible" training providers.
Language related to Board submission of certified provider lists, and applicable
performance and cost data, is deleted to reflect process changes related to
the conversion to the automated, Internet-based ETPS. The remaining subsections
are re-lettered accordingly.
The remaining rules in Subchapter C, §841.48 and §841.49, contain
no changes to the prior rules.
Randy Townsend, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for the first
five years the rules are in effect, the following statements will apply:
there are no additional estimated costs to the state and to local governments
expected as a result of enforcing or administering the rules;
there are no estimated reductions in costs to the state or to local governments
expected as a result of enforcing or administering the rules;
there are no estimated losses or increases in revenue to the state or to
local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rules;
there are no foreseeable implications relating to costs or revenues to
the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering
the rules; and
there are no anticipated costs to persons who are required to comply with
the rules as proposed.
Mr. Townsend has also determined that there is no anticipated adverse impact
on small businesses as a result of enforcing or administering these rules
because any regulatory burdens or impact on small businesses (including micro-businesses)
as well as foreseeable adverse economic effects or costs, if any, would be
a result of federal statute and regulations, which are the basis for these
proposed rules, and second, as far as can be determined, small businesses
(including micro-businesses) are not required to do anything as a result of
these rules that is not required to receive WIA funding for training. In the
event that a Board, Board's contractor, or a subrecipient of the Agency is
required to expend funds as a result of applying for the training provider
certification, the expense may in part or whole be covered by the grant. Likewise,
the expenses may be larger for larger entities and smaller for smaller entities
but proportionate to the amount of training activities provided and for which
certification is sought.
Barbara Cigainero, Director of Workforce Development, has determined that
for each year of the first five years that the rules will be in effect the
public benefit anticipated as a result of the adoption of the proposed rules
will be to improve and simplify for consumers the ETPS; maintain sufficient
provisions to meet state requirements; ensure efficient use of funds to meet
the needs of employers, job seekers, and the training provider community;
and strengthen the relationship among the Commission, the Boards and training
providers in developing a seamless network of services.
James Barnes, Director of Labor Market Information, has determined that
there is no foreseeable negative impact upon employment conditions in this
state as a result of these proposed rules.
Comments on the proposed sections may be submitted to John Moore, Texas
Workforce Commission, 101 East 15th Street, Room 608, Austin, Texas 78778;
fax number (512) 463-1426; or e-mail to john.moore@twc.state.tx.us. Comments
must be received by the Agency no later than 30 days from the date this proposal
is published in the
Texas Register
.
Subchapter C. ELIGIBLE TRAINING PROVIDER CERTIFICATION
Chapter 841.
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT