TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 5. STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS

Chapter 101. DENTAL LICENSURE

22 TAC §101.7

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §101.7, Licensure by Credentials in conjunction with its review of Chapter 101, Dental Licensure and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1458).

Paragraph (3)(A) and (3)(B) will be amended by deleting the phrase "prior to applying" and adding the phrase "preceding application to the State Board of Dental Examiners." The adopted amendments clarify language in the rule requiring that a dentist licensed in another jurisdiction who applies for a Texas dental license by virtue of credentials, must have continuously practiced dentistry during the five years immediately preceding application. In the past some applicants interpreted current language to mean "five calendar years" rather than the five year period immediately prior to application.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the intent of the rule will be easier to understand. The language of the amendment makes it clear that the five-year period must have occurred immediately before the application.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101852

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §101.8

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §101.8, Persons with Criminal Backgrounds, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 101, Dental Licensure and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1459).

The adopted amendments track the language of the statutes. The former subsection (a) is amended to include the wording now found in current subsection (b). Former subsection (d), now subsection (e) is amended at (8) to specify felony theft. Changes in statutory references have been made to reflect the codification of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code.

The adopted rule provides that the public will have a clearer understanding of the types of criminal offenses that could lead to revocation or suspension of a license or denial of an application for licensure. The enabling statutes require that the board issue guidelines stating how particular crimes relate to fitness for licensing and other criteria that affect licensing decisions. New subsection (a) states the purpose of the rule, that is, to comply with the requirements of the enabling statute. New subsection (b) clarifies that revocation, suspension or denial may be based on conviction under state or federal law of a felony or misdemeanor that directly relates to the duties of the profession. Paragraph (8) of new subsection (e) clarifies that a felony theft directly relates. Paragraph (10) clarifies that felony driving while intoxicated is another offense that is considered to directly relate. Former language concerning habitual use or addiction to controlled substance abuse has been deleted because a finding of such conduct might or might not result in a criminal conviction.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et. seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry; §53.022 and §53.023 which establishes whether a conviction relates to practice dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101853

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 103. DENTAL HYGIENE LICENSURE

22 TAC §103.2

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §103.2, Licensure by Credentials, Dental Hygienists, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 103, Dental Hygiene Licensure and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1460).

Paragraph (3)(A) and (3)(B) will be amended by deleting the phrase "prior to applying" and adding the phrase "preceding application to the State Board of Dental Examiners." The adopted amendments clarify language in the rule requiring that a dental hygienist licensed in another jurisdiction who applies for a Texas dental hygiene license by virtue of credentials, must have continuously practiced dental hygiene during the five years immediately preceding application. In the past some applicants interpreted current language to mean "five calendar years" rather than the five year period immediately prior to application.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the intent of the rule will be more easier to understand. The language of the amendment makes it clear that the five year period must have occurred immediately before the application.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §262.102 which authorizes the Board to make rules affecting the practice of dental hygiene; §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101851

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 104. CONTINUING EDUCATION

22 TAC §104.2

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §104.2, Providers in conjunction with its review of Chapter 104, Continuing Education and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1461).

The rule is amended to add the Western Regional Examining Board, the American Academy of Dental Hygiene, the American Dental Education Association, and the American Heart Association to the list of providers.

The amended rule provides an expanded list of educational providers available for dental professionals to obtain the continuing education required for annual license renewal.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §257.005 which provides that the Board shall develop a mandatory Continuing Education program and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101850

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 110. ENTERAL CONSCIOUS SEDATION

22 TAC §§110.1-110.4

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts new Chapter 110, Enteral Conscious Sedation and new §§110.1 Definitions, 110.2 Permit, 110.3 Permit Requirements and Clinical Provisions and 110.4 Effective Date with changes to the text published in the December 8, 2000 issue of the Texas Register (25TexReg12029). Changes were made to §110.1, Definitions at (3), (6), (7), (15) and added new definitions (18) and (19). Changes were also made to §110.2, Permit at subsection (b) and (e), and to §110.3 at subsection (c). No changes were made to §110.4. The new chapter will require that dentists who administer conscious sedation/anesthesia to patients, either orally or rectally, to obtain a permit to do so. The primary purpose of the new rules is to provide assurance to Texans that Texas dentists who administer conscious sedation through any route (those who administer conscious sedation parenterally, i.e., other than orally or rectally, are currently required to have a permit) have been adequately trained to do so. Depending on courses taken, a dental school graduate may not be fully trained to administer enteral conscious sedation. The new rules assure that such training will have been obtained by those who administer such sedation. Administration of medication for pain relief only will not require a permit under these rules. The rules also provide requirements for monitoring patients who are sedated, documentation of procedures followed and prescribe discharge criteria.

When the Board conducted public hearings in the summer of 1998 and again in 1999 on the parenteral conscious sedation rules, many speakers, especially those from the Texas dental schools, urged the Board to include enteral conscious sedation in those rules. The Board President appointed an ad hoc committee to study the issues and to prepare enteral conscious sedation rules. The rules adopted are the result of the Board's review of that committee's recommendations with changes based on input from the public.

Written comments were received and a public hearing was conducted by the entire Board on January 26, 2001. Most, if not all, commenters generally approved of the rules and proposed improvements to the rules rather than objecting to the concept of the rules. The Board has made minor changes to the rules in response to comments made. A discussion of all comments follows.

Written comments were made by four individuals. One commenter made written comments and suggested two changes. The first was a recommendation that §110.2(e)(2)(B) be changed by deleting the requirement that the permitted dentist and his/her staff must maintain current certification in basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and replacing it with a one time requirement that a PALS course be taken. Even though that section of the rule addresses both the dentist and staff, its effect is primarily directed toward staff. In order for dentists to renew their licenses they must submit proof of current completion of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation course. Staff should not be required to have training at the intense level provided by PALS. A basic CPR course is adequate to prepare them to assist the dentist in the event of an emergency. Further, CPR training for dentist and staff should periodically be reinforced and a one time program cannot accomplish this.

The commenter also proposed that §110.3 be amended to allow a dentist to make use of the service of a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) to administer anesthesia in a hospital or surgery center setting. The rule at subsection (d)(4) provides that a dentist may not allow a CRNA to administer anesthesia in the dentist's office unless the dentist has a permit for the procedure being performed. In a hospital setting where the hospital is responsible for the administration of anesthesia, non-dentists who administer anesthesia are not affected by the board's rules.

Another commenter also indicated that he heartily endorsed the rules. He suggested that various definitions of "supervision" be included and that the term "continuous direct supervision" be printed in bold type face. His issue is that by defining all types of supervision in the rules and by highlighting the one that applies in the context of these rules the reader will have no question about which definition applies. The board is of the opinion that only definitions that apply should be included within the rule and that highlighting is unnecessary since there is only the one definition of supervision.

Another commenter also wrote and commented that §110.3(c) and (d) should be amended to make it clear that a permit is required when nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation sedation is used with any enteral agent by changing (c) as follows: "Administration of nitrous oxide inhalation conscious sedation in combination with enteral administration of any agent, including minor tranquilizers used for anxiolysis, used for any sedation procedure requiring a permit under board rules requires both an enteral conscious sedation permit and a nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation permit.".

His point is well taken as the proposed language requires a permit only when an enteral agent is being used for sedation purposes. The better view is that when any enteral agent is being used in combination with nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation an enteral conscious sedation permit is required. Accordingly the language proposed by the commenter is adopted.

The same commenter also noted that subsection (d) of §110.3 could be interpreted by some readers to allow administration of potent benzodiazepines in combination with nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation without a permit. The Board is of the opinion that the language change to subsection (c) discussed above makes it clear that such an interpretation is unreasonable.

Another commenter made written comments and made three suggestions. First, that "anesthesia services" be amended to read "anesthesia/sedation services". The board agrees and the term is changed in each place it shows up in all the rules. The commenter also suggested that §110.1(7) be amended to make it clear that the Board could require a facility inspection of a location where a permitted dentist is employed. The Board agrees with the commenters' point but the Board is of the opinion that the language should be changed beyond the insertion of the word "in" to avoid reference to "primary or satellite facilities". The language is changed as follows: "Facility inspection - an on-site inspection to determine if a facility where the applicant proposes to provide anesthesia/sedation is supplied, equipped, staffed and maintained in a condition to support provision of anesthesia/sedation services that meet the minimum standard of care; may be required by the State Board of Dental Examiners prior to the issuance of a sedation/anesthesia permit or any time during the term of the permit."

The commenter also proposed inclusion of a definition of the term "anesthesia/sedation services". The Board is of the opinion that the term is defined by the context of the entire set of rules, and that an attempt to define the term would not serve to clarify the issue.

Two other commenters appeared at the public hearing and in general offered support for the rules as published. Both, however, offered suggested changes.

The first speaker appeared on behalf of the Texas Dental Association. He proposed that the board include a definition of the term "enteral". The board agrees that a definition is appropriate, and proposes to amend §110.1 by adding new definition (18) as follows: "(18) Enteral sedation - sedation that is achieved by a route of administration through the alimentary tract either orally or rectally."

The Texas Dental Association representative also suggested adding a list of minor tranquilizers be included in §110.3(d) to avoid questions concerning who must be permitted. The ad hoc committee appointed by the Board devoted a great deal of time to the issue and determined that listing those agents requiring a permit before use would be difficult to administer for a number of reasons including the fact that such a list would frequently change as new drugs are developed and as existing drugs are approved or accepted for oral use. More troubling than frequent changes to a list is the fact that many agents used for sedation are also used for analgesic and anxiolytic effect. To require that a dentist who, for example, wishes to orally administer Demerol for relief of pain to have an enteral conscious sedation permit simply because Demerol is also used for sedation is not reasonable. The Board recognizes that leaving it to the practitioner to define the purpose for which a medication is administered may result in a few individuals claiming that a permit is not needed when in fact medications are being administered for sedative effect. Nevertheless, the positive effect of these rules, the assurance that dentists who use enteral agents for sedation are trained to do so, far out weigh the possible negative mentioned. Should the Board attempt stricter rules, the legitimate outcry from the profession would likely be so great that the rules would not be adopted.

The Board will monitor the effectiveness of the rules and should they prove to be ineffective because of this "loophole" the Board can consider closing it.

Another individual appeared at hearing and proposed several changes addressed below. The commenter proposed adding a definition of "protective reflexes". The Board agrees and has added new definition (19) to §110.1 as follows: "(19) Protective reflexes - includes the ability to swallow water sprays and breath independently without coughing (i.e., laryngospasm) as well as maintain an unobstructed airway (i.e., lack of snoring and other signs of an obstructed airway). Severe and/or persistent coughing is probably indicative of a deep sedation level and partial loss of protective reflexes."

The commenter also suggested that §110.1(15) should be amended by changing the word "conscious" to "consciousness". The Board agrees and has made the change.

The commenter proposed amending Rule §110.1(3) to reflect that patient s who are sleeping and whose only response to painful stimuli is a reflex withdrawal are not in a state of conscious sedation. The Board agrees and the last sentence of paragraph (3) is amended as follows: "...Further, patients who are sleeping and whose only response is reflex withdrawal from repeated painful stimuli would not be considered to be in a state of conscious sedation."

The commenter also proposed amending the definitions of deep sedation, §110.1(4) to show "sleep" as an example of depressed consciousness and to provide that a patient may lose the ability to independently maintain an airway on room air. The definition in the rule is the definition used by the American Dental Association in its anesthesia guidelines. The Board is of the opinion that it is an appropriate description for use in these rules.

The commenter also proposed that §110.2 be amended to provide for different permits for dentists who orally sedate children, and for those who orally sedate adults. The ad hoc committee also discussed this type of approach at great length and determined that requiring a permit only for administration of enteral conscious sedation for children or having multiple levels of permits was not the most effective way to fully address the concerns with enteral sedation. Further, two levels of permits would impose an additional administrative burden on the agency with very little, if any, benefit. The commenter proposed language changes to §110.2(e)(C) to address dentists who would be permitted to sedate children only. Since the rules do not provide for levels of permits there is no need for this change.

The commenter recommended amending §110.3(b) to provide that enteral sedation may only be used to achieve conscious sedation unless the practitioner has a deep sedation permit. These rules address only conscious sedation levels and are not intended to in any way affect administration of deep sedation by those dentists having a deep sedation permit. Further, an individual who is permitted under these rules only is not permitted to administer deep sedation, whatever the route.

The commenter also proposed amending §110.3(h)(4) to eliminate an exception for brief procedures on the basis that the period of sedation will outlast the time of the procedure. Once a procedure is completed and the patient is in recovery the section of the rule addressing recovery will control. That section (i) requires continual monitoring of vital signs until oxygenation and circulation are stable.

The commenter also proposed that §110.3(h)(2) be amended to emphasize a need to monitor patients on room air unless oxygen saturation of the blood falls below 93%. This change falls under the heading of the knowledge needed to safely administer enteral conscious sedation. A permit will not be issued to licensees until they have completed appropriate training. This addition is not needed.

The last two proposals made by the commenter are similar to the comment addressed above in that they would add verbage to the rules that is part of the information that is included in the training necessary to obtain an enteral conscious sedation permit. The first is a proposal to add a statement that use of nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation may obscure respiratory depression because nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation is administered with oxygen. The second is an admonition to the permittee to be mindful of the pharmacological half life of the drugs utilized.

Finally, the Board on its own has amended §110.2(e)(1)(A) to include a requirement that completion of training must include documentation that the applicant has administered enteral conscious sedation in a minimum of five cases.

The new rules are adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001(a) which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry to protect the public health and safety.

§110.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1)

Analgesia -- the diminution or elimination of pain.

(2)

Competent -- displaying special skill or knowledge derived from training and experience.

(3)

Conscious Sedation -- a minimally depressed level of consciousness that retains the patient's ability to independently and continuously maintain an airway and respond appropriately to physical stimulation and verbal command, and that is produced by a pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic method, or a combination thereof. In accord with this particular definition, the drugs and/or techniques used should carry a margin of safety wide enough to render unintended loss of consciousness unlikely. Further, patients who are sleeping and whose only response is reflex withdrawal from repeated painful stimuli would not be considered to be in a state of conscious sedation.

(4)

Deep Sedation -- an induced state of depressed consciousness accompanied by partial loss of protective reflexes, including the inability to continually maintain an airway independently and/or respond purposefully to verbal command, and is produced by a pharmacological or non-pharmacological method, or a combination thereof.

(5)

Direct supervision -- the dentist responsible for the sedation/anesthesia procedure shall be physically present in the office and shall be continuously aware of the patient's physical status and well being.

(6)

Facility -- the office where a permit holder practices dentistry and provides anesthesia/sedation services.

(7)

Facility inspection -- an on-site inspection to determine if a facility where the applicant proposes to provide anesthesia/sedation is supplied, equipped, staffed and maintained in a condition to support provision of anesthesia/sedation services that meet the minimum standard of care; may be required by the State Board of Dental Examiners prior to the issuance of a sedation/anesthesia permit or any time during the term of the permit.

(8)

General anesthesia -- an induced state of unconsciousness accompanied by partial or complete loss of protective reflexes, including inability to independently maintain an airway and respond purposefully to physical stimulation or verbal command, and is produced by a pharmacological or non-pharmacological method or a combination thereof.

(9)

Immediately available -- on-site in the facility and available for immediate use.

(10)

Local anesthesia -- the elimination of sensations, especially pain, in one part of the body by the regional injection of a drug.

(11)

May -- indicates freedom or liberty to follow a reasonable alternative.

(12)

Must or shall -- indicates an imperative need and/or duty; an essential or indispensable item; mandatory.

(13)

Behavioral management -- to modify pharmacologically and/or psychologically behavior to a level that dental treatment can be performed effectively and efficiently.

(14)

Enteral conscious sedation-- light to mild conscious sedation administered not for analgesic effect, but primarily for behavioral management.

(15)

Anti-anxiety sedative -- a sedative agent administered in a dosage intended to reduce anxiety without diminishing consciousness or protective reflexes.

(16)

Minor tranquilizer -- a pharmacological agent which allows for uninterrupted interactive ability in a totally awake patient with no compromise in the ability to maintain a patent airway continuously and without assistance.

(17)

Anxiolysis -- pharmacological reduction of anxiety through the administration of a minor tranquilizer, which allows for uninterrupted interactive ability in a totally awake patient with no compromise in the ability to maintain a patent airway continuously and without assistance.

(18)

Enteral sedation -- sedation that is achieved by a route of administration through the alimentary tract either orally or rectally.

(19)

Protective reflexes -- includes the ability to swallow water sprays and breath independently without coughing (i.e., laryngospasm) as well as maintain an unobstructed airway (i.e., lack of snoring and other signs of an obstructed airway). Severe and/or persistent coughing is probably indicative of a deep sedation level and partial loss of protective reflexes.

§110.2.Permit.

(a)

A dentist licensed to practice in Texas who desires to use enteral conscious sedation either, must have a parenteral conscious sedation anesthesia permit or a deep/general sedation anesthesia permit issued pursuant to board rule or must obtain an enteral conscious sedation permit from the State Board of Dental Examiners. A permit is not required for administration of Schedule II drugs prescribed for pain control.

(1)

A permit may be obtained by completing an application form approved by the State Board of Dental Examiners, a copy of which may be obtained from the SBDE.

(2)

The application form must be filled out completely and appropriate fees paid.

(3)

Prior to issuance of a sedation/anesthesia permit the Board may require that the applicant undergo a facility inspection or further review of credentials. The SBDE may direct an Anesthesia Consultant, appointed pursuant to board rule to assist in this inspection or review. The applicant will be notified in writing if an inspection is required and provided with the name of an Anesthesia Consultant who will coordinate the inspection. The applicant must make arrangements for completion of the inspection within 180 days of the date the notice is mailed. An extension of no more than 90 days may be granted if the designated Anesthesia Consultant requests one.

(4)

An applicant for a sedation/anesthesia permit must be licensed and in good standing with the State Board of Dental Examiners. For purposes of these rules "good standing" means that a licensee is not suspended, whether or not the suspension is probated. Applications from licensees who are not in good standing will not be approved.

(b)

Once a permit is issued, the State Board of Dental Examiners upon payment of required fees shall automatically renew the permit annually unless after notice and opportunity for hearing the Board finds the permit holder has, or is likely to provide anesthesia/sedation services in a manner that does not meet the minimum standard of care. At such hearing the Board shall consider factors including patient complaints, morbidity, mortality, and anesthesia consultant recommendations.

(c)

Annual dental license renewal certificates shall include the annual permit renewal, except as provided for in subsection (b) of this section and shall be assessed an annual renewal fee of $5.00 payable with the license renewal. New permit fees are $28.75 payable with the application for permit.

(d)

Permit Restrictions: the Board may elect to issue a temporary enteral conscious sedation permit which will expire on a date certain. A full sedation/anesthesia permit may be issued after the dentist has complied with requests of the Board which may include, but shall not be limited to, review of the dentist's anesthetic technique, facility inspection and/or review of patient records to ascertain that the minimum standard of care is being met. If a full permit is not issued, the temporary permit will expire on the stated date, and no further action by the State Board of Dental Examiners will be required, and no hearing will be conducted.

(e)

Educational/Professional Requirements:

(1)

To become permitted to administer enteral conscious sedation, the dentist must satisfy one of the following criteria:

(A)

must have completed training consistent with that described in Part I or Part III of the American Dental Association (ADA) Guidelines for Teaching the Comprehensive Control of Pain and Anxiety in Dentistry, and have documented administration of enteral conscious anesthesia/sedation in a minimum of five cases;

(B)

must have completed an ADA accredited post-doctoral training program which affords comprehensive and appropriate training necessary to administer and manage enteral conscious sedation;

(C)

must have completed the two-day conscious sedation course in Pediatric Dentistry approved and developed by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; or

(D)

must have completed a two day enteral conscious sedation course approved by the SBDE.

(2)

The following shall apply to the administration of enteral conscious sedation in the dental office:

(A)

the operating dentist must complete at least every three years appropriate Continuing Education in enteral conscious sedation.

(B)

the operating dentist and his/her clinical staff must maintain current certification in basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation given by the American Heart Association or the American Red Cross.

§110.3.Permit Requirements and Clinical Provisions.

(a)

Enteral conscious sedation may be induced and maintained by a permitted dentist licensed by the State of Texas and practicing in Texas, a physician anesthesiologist licensed by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, or a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) licensed in Texas. When a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) is permitted to function under the supervision of a dentist, in the dental office, provision of enteral conscious sedation by a CRNA shall require the operating dentist to be permitted for its utilization.

(b)

Enteral conscious sedation is indicated for use only for conscious sedation as defined in Rule 110.1 of this title (relating to Definitions). Enteral conscious sedation is not indicated for use to achieve deep sedation.

(c)

Administration of nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation in combination with enteral administration of any agent, including minor tranquilizers used for anxiolysis, requires both an enteral conscious sedation permit and a nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation conscious sedation permit.

(d)

Minor tranquilizers used for anxiolysis may be prescribed for administration outside of the dental office when pre-procedure instructions are likely to be followed. Medications such as chloral hydrate and all drugs included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Controlled Substances Schedule II must not be administered outside of the dental office for sedation purposes. Medications other than minor tranquilizers used for anxiolysis administered outside of the office require a permit.

(e)

Standard of care requirements. Each dentist must maintain the minimum standard of care as detailed in board rules, and shall in addition:

(1)

adhere to the clinical requirements as detailed in subsection (f) of this section;

(2)

maintain under continuous direct supervision auxiliary personnel who shall be capable of reasonably assisting in procedures, problems, and emergencies incident to the use of enteral conscious sedation.

(3)

maintain current certification in basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the assistant staff by having them pass a course given by the American Heart Association or the American Red Cross; and

(4)

not allow an enteral conscious sedation procedure to be performed in his/her office by a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) unless the dentist holds a permit issued by the State Board of Dental Examiners for the procedure being performed. This provision addresses dentists and is not intended to address the scope of practice of persons licensed by any other agency.

(f)

Clinical Requirements. Each dentist must meet the following clinical requirements for utilization of enteral conscious sedation:

(1)

Patient Evaluation. Patients who are administered enteral conscious sedation must be suitably evaluated prior to the start of any sedative procedure. In healthy or medically stable individuals (ASA I, II), this may be simply a review of their current medical history and medication use. However, with individuals who may not be medically stable or who have a significant health disability (ASA III, IV) consultation with their primary care physician or consulting medical specialist regarding potential procedure risk is recommended.

(2)

Pre-Procedure preparation, informed consent:

(A)

the patient and/or guardian must be advised of the procedure associated with the delivery of the enteral conscious sedation.

(B)

equipment must be evaluated and maintained for proper operation.

(C)

baseline vital signs should be obtained at the discretion of the operator depending on the medical status of the patient and the nature of the procedure to be performed.

(D)

dentists administering enteral conscious sedation shall use sedative agents that he/she is competent to administer and shall administer such agents is a manner that is within the standard of care.

(g)

Personnel and Equipment: In addition to the dentist, at least one member of the assistant staff should be present during the administration of enteral conscious sedation.

(h)

Monitoring and Documentation:

(1)

Patients who have been administered enteral conscious sedation must be monitored during waiting periods prior to operative procedures. A responsible adult given appropriate written pre-procedural instruction may provide such monitoring. The patient should be monitored for alertness, responsiveness, breathing and skin coloration.

(2)

Dentists administering enteral conscious sedation must maintain direct supervision of the patient during the operative procedure and for such a period of time necessary to establish pharmacologic and physiologic vital sign stability.

(A)

Oxygenation. Color of mucosa, skin or blood shall be continually evaluated. Oxygen saturation must be evaluated continuously by pulse oximetry, except as provided in paragraph (4) of this section.

(B)

Ventilation. Must perform observation of chest excursions and/or auscultation of breath sounds.

(C)

Circulation. Must take and record an initial blood pressure and pulse and thereafter as appropriate except as provided in paragraph (4) of this section.

(3)

An appropriate time oriented anesthetic record must be maintained including documentation of individual administering the drug(s) and showing the name(s) of drug(s) and dosage(s) used.

(4)

In selected circumstances, enteral conscious sedation may be utilized without pulse oximetry or taking blood pressure and pulse. These circumstances include: sedation administered for brief procedures; extremely young children, patients who cooperate poorly due to unwillingness or inability to follow instructions, or patients whose level of anxiety will tend to be heightened by monitoring. When these situations occur, the dentist responsible for administering enteral conscious sedation must document the reasons preventing the recommended monitoring.

(i)

Recovery and Discharge:

(1)

recovery from enteral conscious sedation must include:

(A)

positive pressure oxygen and suction equipment must be immediately available in the recovery area and/or operatory;

(B)

continual monitoring of vital signs when the sedation/anesthesia is no longer being administered; i.e., the patient must have direct continuous supervision until oxygenation, and circulation are stable and the patient is appropriately responsive for discharge from the facility;

(C)

the dentist must determine and provide for documentation that oxygenation, circulation, activity, skin color and level of consciousness are appropriate and stable prior to discharge;

(D)

must provide explanation and documentation of written postoperative instructions to patient and/or a responsible adult at time of discharge;

(E)

the dentist must determine that the patient has met the following discharge criteria prior to leaving the office:

(i)

cardiovascular function satisfactory and stable;

(ii)

airway patency uncompromised and satisfactory;

(iii)

patient easily arousable and protective reflexes intact;

(iv)

state of hydration adequate;

(v)

patient can talk, if applicable;

(vi)

patient can sit unaided, if applicable;

(vii)

patient can ambulate, if applicable, with minimal assistance;

(viii)

For the child who is very young or disabled, and incapable of the usually expected responses, the pre-sedation level of responsiveness or the level as close as possible for that child should be achieved.

(ix)

Responsible individual is available.

(2)

patients who have unusual reactions to enteral conscious sedation must be assisted and monitored either in an operatory chair or recovery room until stable for discharge;

(3)

the dentist must determine that the patient is appropriately responsive prior to discharge.

(j)

Emergency Management. The dentist, personnel and facility must be prepared to treat emergencies that may arise from the administration of enteral conscious sedation, and must have the ability to provide positive pressure ventilation with 100% oxygen with an age appropriate device.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 26, 2001.

TRD-200101778

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 15, 2001

Proposal publication date: December 8, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 111. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS

22 TAC §111.6

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts the repeal of Chapter 111, Professional Corporations and §111.6, Requirements, as part of the rules review process and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1462).

The rule, last reviewed in 1984, impermissibly restricts the application of the Professional Corporations Act, Article 1528e, Texas Revised Civil Statutes. The rule as written limits the incorporators of a dental practice to licensed dentists. There is no basis for such a limitation in the statutes. Only a licensed dentist can be a director, officer or shareholder of a professional corporation formed by dentists, but any individual is allowed to be an incorporator. The role of the incorporator is largely limited to the act of execution of the articles of incorporation and restrictions on who may serve as incorporators have largely been eliminated.

No comments were received regarding the adoption of the proposal.

The rule is adopted for repeal under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101849

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 113. REQUIREMENTS FOR DENTAL OFFICES

22 TAC §113.2

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §113.2, X-Ray Laboratories, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 113, Requirements for Dental Offices, and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1462).

The new language of subsection (a) clarifies that in-house dental laboratories are regulated by the Dental Practice Act and must be on the premises of a dental office. The new language substitutes the words "Texas licensed dentist" for "legally practicing dentist." The new language is more precise. The new language about supervision acknowledges that ultimate responsibility for those activities that occur in a dental office, such as the taking of x-rays, rests with a licensed dentist and eliminates confusion.

New subsection (b) adds the requirement that the lead apron have a thyroid collar and is also corrected for grammar. New subsection (c) is also restructured for grammatical consistency.

The amendments provide for a rule that is easier to read and understand and that reflects the realities of modern dental practices.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101848

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §113.3

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts the repeal of §113.3, Office Leases, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 113, Requirements for Dental Offices and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1463).

The repeal of the rule provides for the elimination of a rule that was obsolete, irrelevant and unnecessary duplicative.

Rule 113.3 addresses a narrow segment of the spectrum of improper influence on the independent professional judgment of a dentist by persons other than dentists and is provided for in greater detail and clarity in subsection (c) paragraph (1) of Rule 109.500, Improper Influence on Professional Judgment, effective February 7, 2000. The intent of Rule 113.3 was to prevent the improper sharing of dental fees with a non-dentist. The intent is still valid and is well served by the language of Rule 109.500. Rule 109.500 has been repealed contemporaneously with adoption of new Rule 108.70, which will supplant the current Rule 109.500. Because the language of rule 113.3 is unnecessarily duplicative, it is repealed.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The repeal is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101847

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §113.4

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts the repeal of §113.4, Retail Leases, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 113, Requirements for Dental Offices and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1458).

The intent of the language of Rule 113.4 as written is exhaustively addressed in new rule 108.1, Professional Responsibility, which supplanted former rule 109.103. The former rule 113.4 was intended to prevent the unauthorized practice of dentistry by commercial establishments. A dental license is issued to a person who may structure the operation of his/her practice in any one of several business entities, including partnerships, associations and corporations so long as such structures are lawful. Rule 113.4 is inappropriate, obsolete, irrelevant and unnecessarily duplicative and is proposed for repeal.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The repeal is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101846

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 116. DENTAL LABORATORIES

22 TAC §116.2

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.2, Dental Technicians in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1464).

The reference to Article 4551, Section 1 has been changed to refer to Section 266.001, Occupations Code, reflecting the codification of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999. Language is also amended to comply with statutory language, which states that a dental technician may be certified by a nationally recognized board and does not specify a particular board.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the statutory references are current and that the rule accurately tracks statutory language

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102(b) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101845

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.3

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.3, Requirements, in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116, Dental Laboratories, and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1464).

The references to articles in the former Dental Practice Act are changed to the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999. The 76th Legislature also enacted Senate Bill 964, referred to properly in the amendment, which impacted on the former Dental Practice Act provisions dealing with registration of laboratories.

Amendments to subsection (c) are intended to clarify that, in order to satisfy the requirement for a certified dental technician, that person must be present at the dental laboratory and working as an employee of the laboratory. The former language was vague and difficult to interpret. The last sentence in subsection (c) is deleted. The requirement is that a certified dental technician work as an employee for a dental laboratory a minimum of 30 hours per week. It is conceivable, albeit doubtful, that a technician could serve more than one laboratory a minimum of 30 hours per week. It is not unheard of for employees to work 60 hour weeks and this restriction that a CDT may be the designated CDT for only one laboratory per year will not withstand constitutional scrutiny.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the requirements for registration and operation of a dental laboratory in Texas will be in compliance with the most recent legislation and reasonable and fair in their application.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code§266.102 (b) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories; §266.152 (d) which requires dental laboratories to have a CDT working on premise 30 hours per week and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101844

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.4

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.4 Continuing Education in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1466).

Amendments to §116.4 at subsection (b) are to correct grammar only. The phrase "...shall be comprised of..." is changed to read "...shall comprise...". Language in subsection (a) paragraph (1) and subsection (c) is amended to comply with statutory language, which states that a dental technician may be certified by a nationally recognized board and does not specify a particular board.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the language of the rule will be easier to read and accurately tracks statutory language.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101843

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.5

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.5 Exemption in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1466).

Subsection (a) is amended to comply with Senate Bill 964, Section 25, effective September 1, 1999. Paragraphs (1) and (2) are changed to modify the language to comply with statutory language. Subsection (b) is amended to make it clear that a dental technician must be present and working as an employee in the dental laboratory.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the rule complies with statutory language and is easier to understand.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101842

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.20

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.20 Definitions and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1467).

Changes in statutory references have been made to reflect the codification of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999.

The amended rule provides assurances to the public that statutory references are current.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101841

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.21

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.21, Dental Laboratory and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1468).

Changes in statutory references have been made to reflect the codification of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code.

The amended rule provides assurances to the public that statutory references are current.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101840

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.22

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.22, In House Dental Laboratory in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories and in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1458).

The language of the rule is changed to correct grammar and to reflect the changes in statutory references by the codification of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999. The clause "...and the laboratory does not employ more than two dental technicians..." is changed to read "An in house laboratory may not employ more than two dental technicians."

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that statutory references are current and that the language of the rule will be easier to understand.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101839

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.24

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.24, Registration Application and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116 Dental Laboratories in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1469).

The language of the rule is amended to reflect changes in statutory references of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999.

The amended rule provides assurances to the public that statutory references are current.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101838

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §116.25

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §116.25, Responsibility and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 116, Dental Laboratories in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1458).

The language of the rule is amended to reflect changes in statutory references of the Dental Practice Act into the Occupations Code, effective September 1, 1999.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that statutory references are current.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §266.102 which authorizes the Board to adopt rules affecting dental laboratories and §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101837

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 119. SPECIAL AREAS OF DENTAL PRACTICE

22 TAC §119.6

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §119.6, Pediatric Dentistry and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 119, Special Areas of Dental Practice, in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 1470).

The language of the rule is amended to comply with the definition of the specialty recommended and adopted in 1995 by the American Dental Association. The Board has determined that the new definition is a refinement of the original definition and contains more precise language.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the language of the definition of pediatric dentistry comports with an updated and acceptable interpretation of this special area of dental practice.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101836

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


22 TAC §119.7

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §119.7 Periodontology and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 119 Special Areas of Dental Practice in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1470).

The language of the rule is amended to comply with the definition of the specialty recommended and adopted in 1995 by the American Dental Association. The Board has determined that the new definition is a refinement of the original definition and contains more precise language.

The amended rule provides assurance to the public that the language of the definition of periodontics comports with an updated and acceptable interpretation of this special area of dental practice.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101835

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Chapter 125. APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OR EXCEPTION TO BOARD RULES

22 TAC §125.1

The State Board of Dental Examiners adopts amendments to §125.1 Board to Rule on Requests for Exceptions to Rules, and in conjunction with its review of Chapter 125 Applications for Special Consideration or Exception to Board Rules in accordance with the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature 1997, §167, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 16, 2001 issue of the Texas Register (26TexReg1471).

Rule 125.1 was adopted in 1976 at a time when the Board conducted adjudicative hearings under the Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act. Hearings are now conducted by the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH). The rule, as written, requires notice and hearing before an exception to the rules can be considered. Many of the former rules concerning practices and procedures before the agency have been supplanted by provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and SOAH rules. The Board has determined that it is appropriate to have a vehicle for applicants to request an exception to the rules, so long as such appearance does not involve a discussion of the merits of a pending investigation or contested case that is scheduled for hearing at SOAH.

The amended rule provides an avenue to request exceptions to Board rules that is easily understood and followed.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the proposal.

The amended rule is adopted under Texas Government Code §2001.021 et.seq; Texas Civil Statutes, the Occupations Code §254.001 which provides the State Board of Dental Examiners with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties, and to ensure compliance with laws relating to the practice of dentistry.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101834

Jeffry Hill

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: February 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6400


Part 19. POLYGRAPH EXAMINERS BOARD

Chapter 395. CODE OF OPERATING PROCEDURE OF POLYGRAPH EXAMINERS

22 TAC §395.17

The Polygraph Examiners Board adopts an amendment to §395.17, concerning Code of Operating Procedure of Polygraph Examiners, without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 27, 2000, issue of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 10615).

The section is amended to replace the word papers with documents.

This action is done due to the Board's review of the chapter.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the Polygraph Examiners Act, Article 4413 (29cc), §6, which provides the board with the authority to prescribe, adopt, and enforce rules relating to the administration and enforcement of the provisions of the Polygraph Examiners Act, Article 4413 (29cc).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 28, 2001.

TRD-200101809

Frank DiTucci

Executive Director

Polygraph Examiners Board

Effective date: April 17, 2001

Proposal publication date: October 27, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 424-2058