Part 1.
TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Chapter 111.
CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM VISIBLE EMISSIONS AND PARTICULATE MATTER
Subchapter A. VISIBLE EMISSIONS AND PARTICULATE MATTER
2.
INCINERATION
30 TAC §§111.121, 111.123, 111.125, 111.127, 111.129
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC
or commission) adopts amendments to §111.121 (Single-, Dual-, and Multiple-Chamber
Incinerators); §111.123 (Medical Waste Incinerators); §111.125 (Testing
Requirements); §111.127 (Monitoring and Recordkeeping Requirements);
and §111.129 (Operating Requirements). The commission adopts these revisions
to 30 TAC Chapter 111 (Control of Air Pollution from Visible Emissions and
Particulate Matter); Subchapter A (Visible Emissions and Particulate Matter);
Division 2 (Incineration), in order to delete the current requirements for
oxygen (O
2
) and carbon monoxide (CO) continuous
emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) for incinerators that qualify for exemptions
in 30 TAC Chapter 106 (Exemptions from Permitting), §106.491 (Dual Chamber
Incinerators), and §106.494 (Pathological Incinerators). Sections 111.121,
111.123, 111.125, and 111.129 are adopted without changes to the proposed
text as published in the December 3, 1999 issue of the
Texas Register
(24 TexReg 10795) and will not be republished. Section
111.127 is adopted with changes and will be republished.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
The rules concerning incineration in Chapter 111, Division 2 currently
require most incinerators burning solid waste or pathological waste to be
equipped with CEMS. Incinerators burning more than 100 pounds per hour must
be equipped with O
2
CEMS and a continuous temperature
monitor/recorder. In addition, incinerators burning more than 225 pounds per
hour must be equipped with CO CEMS. The O
2
and
CO monitoring requirements are considered by several affected parties to be
cost prohibitive and not contributing to an environmental benefit that justifies
the additional cost.
On January 13, 1999, a representative in the Texas Legislature sent a letter
to the executive director suggesting that the commission initiate rulemaking
to exempt from monitoring requirements those incinerators which can meet a
permit by rule found in §106.491. Based on verbal discussions among the
air permits staff regarding the engineering and economics impact (for questions,
contact David Ferrell, Air Permits Division, (512) 239-1265), the executive
director sent a reply on February 16, 1999, agreeing to initiate this rulemaking.
On September 24, 1998, the commission received a letter from FM Systems,
Incorporated of Wheat Ridge, Colorado requesting the commission allow pathological
incinerators (for dead animals) to be permitted without the requirement for
an oxygen monitoring system. FM Systems, Incorporated proposed a temperature
chart recorder as a substitute for the oxygen monitor for the incinerators
in the 100 - 200 pound per hour range. On April 9, 1999, the commission received
a letter from FC Industries, Incorporated (FC Industries) (who represented
three incinerator manufacturers: Therm-Tec, Inc., of Sherwood, Oregon; Shenandoah
Manufacturing of Harrisonburg, Virginia; and National Incinerators of Corsicana,
Texas) requesting that continuous monitoring and recording of secondary chamber
temperature and oxygen on animal units burning more than 100 pounds per hour
should be eliminated entirely. FC Industries also stated that the cost for
a good quality, low maintenance oxygen monitor and recorder would be approximately
$10,000, which represents an additional cost over and above the cost of the
incinerator of approximately 25 - 30%. FC Industries stated that the temperature
and residence time requirements for secondary incinerator chambers specified
in commission rules ensures a complete burnout of smoke and odor and, therefore,
the oxygen monitor/recorder requirements provide no environmental benefit
that justifies the additional cost. FC Industries finally stated that Texas
is the only state which requires a continuous oxygen monitor/recorder for
animal incinerators. On April 13, 1999, the commission received a letter from
Therm-Tec, Inc. of Sherwood, Oregon requesting the commission review the requirement
for a continuous oxygen monitor for small pathological incinerators. Therm-Tec,
Inc. stated that the oxygen monitoring requirement imposes a major cost for
an incinerator operator, with an initial cost as high as 30% of the total
project cost, with no real gain in the control of pollution. It stated that
good combustion conditions are maintained through the temperature and residence
time requirements for the secondary chamber exhaust gas. The air permits staff
(see David Ferrell, Air Permits Division, (512) 239-1265) discussed the engineering
and economic analysis impacts and agree these changes can be made without
sacrificing air quality.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The adopted amendments to §§111.121, 111.125, 111.127, and 111.129
address the concerns raised by these affected parties by deleting the O
Section 111.129 states that "except in the case of incinerators with continuous
opacity or carbon monoxide monitors, or equivalent monitors approved by the
executive director . . ., the incinerator shall be limited in hours of operation
from one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset . . . ." Opacity cannot
be effectively monitored through visual methods during darkness; therefore,
the existing rule requires a CO CEMS or a continuous opacity monitoring system
(COMS). The existing rule language referring to the monitoring requirements
found in §111.127 is vague, and can be implied to allow units burning
less than 100 pounds per hour to burn during nighttime without a COMS or a
CO CEMS. While these units are considered to be relatively small, there is
no reason to allow nighttime operation when the opacity cannot be visually
monitored. Therefore, this adoption clarifies the commission rule by specifying
in §111.121(6) that all units, not just those burning more than 100 pounds
per hour, must either operate during daylight hours (one hour after sunrise
until one hour before sunset), or install a COMS, CO CEMS, or an equivalent
monitor approved by the executive director.
The amendments to the existing Chapter 111, Division 2 are being adopted
concurrently with a new Division 2 (Hospital and Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators) in 30 TAC Chapter 113 (Hazardous Air Pollutants and Stationary
Facility Performance Standards); Subchapter D (Designated Facilities and Pollutants), §§113.2070-113.2079.
In a separate rulemaking package, the new Division 2 in Subchapter D of Chapter
113 will replace the current medical waste incinerator rules found in Chapter
111 with the hospital and medical/infectious waste incinerator rules required
by Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 60, Subpart Ce (Hospital/Medical/Infectious
Waste Incinerator Emission Guidelines).
Sections 111.121, 111.123, 111.125, 111.127, and 111.129 are amended in
several places to reflect the movement of medical waste incineration requirements
from Chapter 111 to Chapter 113. Existing language in §111.123 is replaced
with a statement that the requirements for medical waste incinerators have
been moved to Chapter 113, Subchapter D, Division 2.
Section 111.121(6) is deleted and existing paragraph (7) renumbered because
the compliance dates established in the existing paragraph (6) have long since
passed and are thus no longer necessary. The new paragraph (6) specifies that
the operating requirements specified in §111.129(1), concerning operations
during daylight hours, are applicable to incinerators which can claim a permit
by rule found in §106.491 or §106.494. This clarifies the commission
rule that all units, not just those burning more than 100 pounds per hour,
must either operate during daylight hours or install a COMS or a CO CEMS.
Section 111.127(a) is amended to delete the requirement for continuous
monitoring for O
2
or CO for units meeting a permit
by rule in §106.491. These units can burn up to 500 pounds per hour of
waste which is generated on-site. Such waste includes paper, wood, cardboard
cartons, rags, garbage (animal and vegetable wastes as defined in 30 TAC Chapter
101 (General Air Quality Rules)), and combustible floor sweepings containing
overall not more than 10% treated papers, plastic, or rubber scraps. Subsection
(a) is also amended to delete the requirement for continuous monitoring for
O
2
for units meeting the exemption in §106.494.
These units can burn up to 200 pounds per hour of pathological waste which
is generated on-site.
Numerous editorial changes are incorporated to ensure that the incineration
rules in Chapter 111 are consistent with the Guiding Principles and policies
of the commission, and are consistent in format, style, and tone per commission
guidelines. Section 111.125(2) is amended to allow the use of two additional
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test methods (Methods
26 and 26A) to test hydrogen chloride emissions. The current test method specified
is contained in the Texas Air Control Board Sampling Procedures Manual, dated
July 1985. The two additional test methods will provide greater flexibility
for the owners/operators in testing their CO emissions.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS
The commission has reviewed the rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis
requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and has determined
that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not
meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in the statute.
"Major environmental rule" means a rule the specific intent of which is to
protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way, the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. The adopted amendments
to Chapter 111 are not anticipated to adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state because
the adopted amendments delete current regulatory requirements which are anticipated
to have positive economic benefits in affected facilities. The positive economic
benefits are realized through the elimination of the requirement to purchase
and operate continuous oxygen and carbon monoxide monitoring systems, while
at the same time monitoring good combustion with the existing continuous temperature
monitoring requirement. The adopted amendments do not change current emissions
standards nor the amount of emissions produced by the affected parties. The
adopted amendments represent only a change in the method of monitoring those
emissions, and as such, the amended monitoring requirements are sufficient
to verify good combustion practices of the affected units and protection of
the public health and safety. In addition, the adopted amendments are not
a "major environmental rule" because they do not meet any of the four applicability
requirements of a "major environmental rule." Specifically, the adopted amendments
do not exceed a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement
of state law, exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement, nor are adopted
solely under the general powers of the commission. There were no comments
on the draft Regulatory Impact Analysis during the public comment period.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission has prepared a Takings Impact Assessment for these rules
in accordance with Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The following is
a summary of that assessment. The rules in Chapter 111, Subchapter A, Division
2 currently require most incinerators burning solid waste to be equipped with
CEMS. Incinerators burning more than 100 pounds per hour must be equipped
with O
2
CEMS and a continuous temperature monitor/recorder.
In addition, incinerators burning more than 225 pounds per hour must be equipped
with CO CEMS. The O
2
and CO monitoring requirements
are considered by the affected parties to be cost prohibitive and not contributing
to an environmental benefit that justifies the additional cost. The adopted
amendments to §§111.121, 111.125, 111.127, and 111.129 address the
concerns raised by above mentioned persons by deleting the O
2
and CO CEMS requirements for certain dual-chamber incinerators which
can meet a permit by rule found in §106.491 or §106.494. These adopted
amendments will not delete the requirement to continuously monitor the secondary
chamber exhaust gas temperature for incinerators which burn more than 100
pounds per hour because temperature is critical in ensuring complete combustion
and can be monitored at a significantly lower capital cost of approximately
$2,000, than with an O
2
or CO CEMS capital cost
of approximately $10,000.
This adoption also clarifies the commission rule that all units, not just
those burning more than 100 pounds per hour, must either operate during daylight
hours, or install a COMS or CO CEMS. The current rule language is vague and
can be implied to allow that units burning no more than 100 pounds per hour
can operate at night without installing either a COMS or CO CEMS. While these
units are considered relatively small, it has not been the commission's intent
to allow nighttime operation when the opacity cannot be visually monitored.
Therefore, the adopted rule language will clarify that all units, no matter
what the burn rate, must either monitor opacity with a CO CEMS or COMS, or
restrict operations to daylight hours only.
Promulgation and enforcement of these rules will not burden private real
property which is the subject of the rules because this rulemaking will result
in a cost savings for units that can qualify for a permit by rule found in §106.491
or §106.494. The cost savings for parties purchasing these incinerators
will include an approximate reduction in initial capital cost of 25 - 30%
and an approximate reduction in annual operating cost of $3,000.
Also, the following exception to the application of Chapter 2007 of the
Texas Government Code listed in §2007.043(b) applies to these rules:
II. B. 5. Adoption of these rule amendments will make the existing rules less
stringent for any party which purchases and operates small dual-chamber incinerators
that can qualify for a permit by rule found in §106.491 or §106.494.
Under existing rules, affected parties which incinerate more than 100 pounds
per hour of waste must install, maintain, and operate continuous emissions
monitoring systems for O
2
content and temperature
of the exhaust gas stream. In addition, affected parties which incinerate
more than 225 pounds per hour must install, maintain, and operate a CEMS to
monitor CO emissions in the exhaust gas stream. Affected parties which incinerate
less than 100 pounds per hour are not required to install and operate a CEMS
for oxygen or CO, nor continuous monitor/recorders for temperature. The adopted
rules will require only continuous monitoring and recording of the exhaust
gas temperature for those incinerators which incinerate more than 100 pounds
per hour. The requirement for an O
2
and CO CEMS
remains the same for incinerators which cannot meet either of the permit exemptions,
i.e., for units burning more than 500 pounds per hour for non-pathological
waste incinerators and more than 225 pounds per hour for pathological waste
incinerators.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW
The commission has determined that of this rulemaking relates to an action
or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance
with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as amended (Texas Natural Resource
Code, §§33.201 et seq.), and the commission's rules in 30 TAC Chapter
281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency with the Texas Coastal Management
Program. As required by 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2) and 30 TAC §281.45(a)(3),
relating to actions and rules subject to the CMP, commission rules governing
air pollutant emissions must be consistent with the applicable goals and policies
of the CMP. The commission has reviewed this action for consistency with the
CMP goals and policies in accordance with the rules of the Coastal Coordination
Council, and has determined that the action is consistent with the applicable
CMP goals and policies. The CMP policy applicable to this rulemaking action
is the policy that commission rules comply with regulations at 40 CFR, to
protect and enhance air quality in the coastal area (31 TAC §501.14(q)).
Although there is no analogous federal requirement at this time, §7429
of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires EPA to establish
performance standards and other requirements for each category of solid waste
incineration unit. In addition 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation,
Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans), requires that states adopt
rules to ensure that they attain and maintain the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). These adopted rules involve emissions of two of the NAAQS,
particulate and carbon monoxide, and do not propose an increase in emissions
which would violate the NAAQS. The adopted rules do not change current emissions
standards nor the amount of emissions produced by the affected parties. The
adopted rules represent only a change in the method of monitoring those emissions,
and as such the amended monitoring requirements are sufficient to verify good
combustion practices of the affected units and protection of the public health
and safety. Therefore, the adopted rules are consistent with 40 CFR Part 51.
There were no comments on the consistency of the proposed rules with the CMP
during the public comment period.
HEARING AND COMMENTERS
A public hearing on this proposal was held in Austin on January 5, 2000,
at 10:00 a.m. in Room 5108 of TNRCC Building F, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle.
The comment period closed on January 7, 2000. No commenters submitted oral
testimony on the proposal. Two commenters submitted written testimony on the
proposal. One individual generally supported the proposal. The Texas Department
of Transportation (TxDOT) neither opposed nor supported the proposal.
ANALYSIS OF TESTIMONY
An individual stated that §111.127 is too big, unwieldy, hard to read,
and confusing. The individual suggested that the section be broken down so
it is easier to read and clear as to what requirements apply to each type
of incinerator.
The commission agrees that §111.127, as well as the other sections
in Subchapter A, needs to be rewritten in a more readable and less confusing
format. Although some editorial changes were made in this proposal, other
rulemaking priorities precluded a complete regulatory reformatting of Chapter
111 at this time. Chapter 111 is currently undergoing its quadrennial review
to determine if the need for the rules continue to exist. Part of the quadrennial
review is to receive comment from the public regarding the readability, formatting,
and clarity of Chapter 111, therefore the comment from this individual will
be referred to the quadrennial review team.
An individual expressed support of the requirement in §111.127(a)
that incinerators which qualify for a permit by rule under §106.491 or §106.494
must have a monitoring device that continuously measures and records the temperature
of the incinerator exhaust gas.
The commission agrees that the temperature monitoring requirement in §111.127(a)
is critical to ensuring complete combustion and that a continuous temperature
monitor can reliably monitor complete combustion at a reasonable capital cost.
An individual expressed an opinion that the stack test records kept in
accordance with §111.127(b) should be maintained until the next stack
test is conducted rather than being kept only two years. The individual stated
that the air quality inspectors will not know if a test has been conducted
if the records are not kept longer than two years.
The primary purpose of this rulemaking action is to revise the monitoring
requirements for certain small incinerators. A secondary purpose is to delete
the medical waste incineration rules and references to those rules from Chapter
111 so that hospital/medical/infectious waste incineration rules may be adopted
into Chapter 113. As such, the amendments proposed in §111.127 did not
address the records retention period. Chapter 111 is scheduled to undergo
its quadrennial review this summer to determine if the need for the rules
continues to exist. Part of the quadrennial review is to receive comment from
the public regarding technical changes to the Chapter 111 existing rule language,
therefore the comment from this individual will be referred to the quadrennial
review team.
TxDOT stated that they reviewed the proposal, but had no comment on the
proposed amendments.
The commission appreciates the TxDOT review of the rule proposal.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
These amendments are adopted under the Texas Water Code, §5.103 and §5.105,
which provide the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary
to carry out its powers and duties under the provisions of the Texas Water
Code or other laws of this state; and under Texas Health and Safety Code,
Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §382.017, which provides the commission with
the authority to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the
TCAA. The amendments are also adopted under the TCAA, §382.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to control the quality of the state's
air, which the newly adopted rule will accomplish by regulating air emissions
from incinerators; and §382.016, which authorizes the commission to require
monitoring requirements and examination of records and therefore is consistent
with the referenced requirements.
§111.127.Monitoring and Recordkeeping Requirements.
(a)
Except for incinerators which can qualify for a permit
by rule found in §106.491 of this title (relating to Dual Chamber Incinerators),
or §106.494 of this title (relating to Pathological Waste Incinerators),
incinerators burning more than 100 pounds per hour of waste as specified in §111.121
of this title (relating to Single-, Dual-, and Multiple-Chamber Incinerators)
shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device that continuously
measures and records the oxygen (O
2
) content
and temperature of the exhaust gas of the incinerator. Incinerators which
qualify for a permit by rule in §106.491 or §106.494 of this title,
and which burn more than 100 pounds per hour, shall install, calibrate, maintain,
and operate a monitoring device that continuously measures and records the
temperature of the exhaust gas of the incinerator. The monitoring device for
incinerators equipped with a wet scrubbing device shall continuously measure
and record the pressure drop of the gas flow through the wet scrubbing device.
Except for incinerators which can qualify for a permit by rule found in §106.491
or §106.494 of this title, incinerators burning more than 225 pounds
per hour of domestic, municipal, commercial, or industrial solid waste shall
be equipped with continuous emissions monitors which measure and record in-stack
carbon monoxide (CO) in addition to the other requirements of this section.
A total hydrocarbon (THC) monitor may be substituted for the CO monitor if
a THC standard is established in accordance with §111.121(3) of this
title. For municipal incinerators built prior to 1990 and burning less than
2,000 pounds per hour of municipal solid waste, a stack test for CO may be
performed to establish O
2
and temperature requirements
necessary to maintain minimum CO emissions, and monitoring of these parameters
may be substituted for the CO monitoring device. The O
2
, THC, and CO monitoring devices described in this section must be
certified for use following procedures outlined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) 60, Appendix B, Performance Specifications 3 and 4, respectively. Such
certification must be approved by the executive director or a designated representative
of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). Compliance
determinations may be made based on results of monitoring with a certified
monitor. Compliance with the CO and/or THC requirements specified in §111.121(3)
of this title and §111.124(4) of this title (relating to Burning Hazardous
Waste Fuels in Commercial Combustion Facilities) may be demonstrated using
a rolling hourly average. The rolling hourly average shall be defined as the
arithmetic mean of the 60 most recent one-minute concentrations measured by
the continuous monitoring system.
(b)
The owner or operator of an incinerator or commercial combustion
facility subject to the requirements of §§111.121, 111.124, and
111.125 of this title (relating to Single-, Dual-, and Multiple-Chamber Incinerators;
Burning Hazardous Waste Fuels in Commercial Combustion Facilities; and Testing
Requirements), respectively, shall maintain written records of all monitoring
and testing results, hours of operation, and quantity of waste burned. Such
records shall be retained for a period of not less than two years before being
destroyed. Such records shall be made available upon request by authorized
representatives of the TNRCC, United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), or local air pollution control agencies. Alternately, for facilities
other than commercial combustion facilities, in the absence of records verifying
waste quantities burned, the design capacity of the unit will be used to determine
applicable controls.
(c)
The owner or operator of a commercial combustion facility
subject to the requirements of §111.124 of this title shall install,
calibrate, maintain, and operate a monitoring device that continuously measures
and records the waste feed rate, combustion gas velocity, opacity, O
(d)
Upon the request of the executive director or a designated
representative of the TNRCC, EPA, or local air pollution control agency, the
owner or operator of an incinerator which is exempt from the requirements
specified in §111.121 of this title and whose incinerator has the capacity
to burn more than 100 pounds per hour shall maintain written records of the
amount of waste burned. Such records shall be retained for a period of not
less than two years before being destroyed.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 19, 2000.
TRD-200003506
Margaret Hoffman
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Effective date: June 11, 2000
Proposal publication date: December 3, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) adopts
amendments to §113.1 (Definitions), and new §113.2070 (Definitions), §113.2071
(Designated Facilities), §113.2072 (Emission Limits), §113.2074
(Inspection Requirements), §113.2075 (Compliance and Performance Testing
Requirements), §113.2076 (Monitoring, Reporting, and Recordkeeping Requirements), §113.2077
(Waste Management Plan), §113.2078, (Operating Procedures and Operator
Training/Qualification Requirements), and §113.2079 (Compliance Schedules).
The commission adopts these revisions to Chapter 113 (Control of Air Pollution
from Toxic Materials); Subchapter A (Definitions); and Subchapter D (Designated
Facilities and Pollutants), new Division 2 (Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators) in order to implement the Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerator (HMIWI) emission guidelines found in Title 40 Code of Federal
Regulations Part 60 (40 CFR 60), Subpart Ce (Emission Guidelines and Compliance
Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators) adopted September
15, 1997. The commission also adopts a new section II. F. (Plan for Control
of Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators) in the Control Strategy
chapter of the State Plan for the Control of Designated Facilities and Pollutants
(state plan). Sections 113.2070-113.2072 and 113.2075-113.2078 are adopted
with changes to the proposed text as published in the February 25, 2000 issue
of the
Texas Register
(25 TexReg 1523). Sections
113.1, 113.2074, and 113.2079 are adopted without changes to the proposed
text and will not be republished.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
The amendments, new sections, and state plan revisions are based on the
federal rules regarding emission guidelines (40 CFR 60, Subpart Ce, Emission
Guidelines and Compliance Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators)
published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September
15, 1997, under the authority of the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA), §111
(42 United States Code (USC), §7411). A copy of the emission guidelines
is available either through the EPA or the commission. The FCAA requires that
state regulatory agencies implement the emission guidelines as part of a state
plan developed in accordance with 42 USC, §7411(d) (Standards of Performance
for Existing Sources) and §7429 (Solid Waste Combustion), and that the
state regulatory agencies submit that plan to the EPA.
The commission regulations controlling air emissions from medical waste
incinerators date back to 1990. These regulations were found in Title 30 Texas
Administrative Code (30 TAC), Chapter 111 (Control of Air Pollution from
Visible Emissions and Particulate Matter), §§111.123, 111.125, 111.127,
and 111.129. The air emissions controlled in the existing regulations include
visible emissions (opacity), particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HCl),
and carbon monoxide (CO) with the level of control for each type of emissions
based on the size of the incinerator unit. Under a separate but concurrent
rulemaking action (Rule Log Number 1999-012-111-AI), the existing medical
waste incinerator rules in §111.123 are being repealed. The new rules
in Chapter 113, Subchapter D, Division 2, will control emissions from existing
hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators. The air emissions to be controlled
in the new regulations include opacity, PM, CO, HCl, dioxins/furans, oxides
of nitrogen (NO
x
), sulfur dioxide (SO
2
), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd). As with the existing
regulations, the level of control for each type of emissions will be based
on the size of the incinerator unit. There are four size categories of affected
facilities: (1) large, with a charge rate design capacity greater than 500
pounds per hour (lb/hr); (2) medium, with a charge rate design capacity greater
than 200 and less than or equal to 500 lb/hr; (3) small, with a charge rate
design capacity less than or equal to 200 lb/hr; and (4) small-remote, which
is a small unit which combusts less than 2,000 pounds per week and is located
greater than 50 miles from the boundary of the nearest metropolitan statistical
area (MSA).
The emission guidelines and these adopted rules do not prescribe one control
system over another. The HMIWI owners or operators may choose the actual equipment
to retrofit a unit that they believe will achieve the required emissions limits.
One control system may be combustion system upgrades, referred to as "good
combustion practices." "Good combustion practices" is referenced in the EPA
emission guidelines as a two-second residence time in the secondary combustion
chamber at 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit (F), but those operating parameters are
not required by the EPA. The term "good combustion practices" is clarified
by definition in the state rules at 30 TAC §113.2070. Good combustion
practices will adequately control PM, CO, and dioxins/furans for many units.
Other control systems include acid gas/PM scrubbing systems, and are typically
more expensive than combustion upgrades. These systems will control multiple
pollutants including dioxins/furans, PM, Pb, Cd, Hg, and HCl. Most of the
existing units will need to install add-on control systems in order to meet
all of the emission standards. Units at facilities meeting the small-remote
definition may elect to comply emission limits based on the use of good combustion
practices alone.
As part of a 1994 EPA grant objective (FY-94-CAAA-VI-123), the commission
was required to develop a list of medical waste incinerators (MWI). The commission
developed this list through a questionnaire that was sent to all hospitals
registered with the Texas Department of Health, medical schools, Veterans
Administration hospitals, and various other facilities. The questionnaire
was mailed to over 550 locations in June 1995, but the response was only approximately
60%. These lists were also updated with information compiled from existing
commission databases and records. The commission identified 75 MWI operating
in the state as of 1995, which included 68 on-site MWI units, and forwarded
the source inventory data to the EPA in October 1995. The commission also
identified, but did not list, an additional 47 MWI previously in existence,
but which were no longer in operation. The EPA in turn produced a national
source inventory list which included 62 HMIWI in Texas which are potentially
affected by these rules.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
These rules revise §113.1 by adding definitions for "designated facility"
and "designated pollutant" as they are used in 42 USC, §7411(d) and §7429.
The existing definition for "Section 111(d) state plan" was revised to clarify
the federal requirements as codified in 42 USC, and to specify that the state
plan was submitted in accordance with the FCAA.
The new §113.2070 defines terms used in the new division that are
either previously undefined or are used differently by the federal emission
guidelines that is the basis for the rules. The definitions were taken from
40 CFR §60.31e (Definitions) and include: "biologicals," "blood products,"
"body fluids," "bypass stack," "chemotherapeutic waste," "co-fired combustor/incinerator,"
"commercial medical waste incinerator," "dioxins/furans," "dry scrubber,"
"fabric filter (or baghouse)," "facilities manager," "good combustion practices,"
"high-air phase," "hospital," "hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator
(HMIWI) or HMIWI unit," "batch HMIWI," "continuous HMIWI," "intermittent HMIWI,"
"large HMIWI," "medium HMIWI," "small HMIWI," "small-remote HMIWI," "hospital
waste," "infectious agent," "low-level radioactive waste," "malfunction,"
"maximum charge rate," "maximum design waste burning capacity," "maximum fabric
filter inlet temperature," "maximum flue gas temperature," "medical waste,"
"medical/infectious waste," "minimum sorbent flow rate," "minimum wet scrubber
parameters," "minimum secondary chamber temperature," "modification (or modified
incinerator)," "operating day," "operation," "particulate matter," "pathological
waste," "primary chamber," "pyrolysis," "shutdown," "standard conditions,"
"startup," "toxic equivalent quantity (TEQ)," and "wet scrubber." The definition
of "good combustion practices" was changed to clarify that the time and temperature
parameters were not required to be two seconds and 1,800 degrees F for all
HMIWI units.
Section 113.2071 specifies those designated facilities to which these rules
apply, which are any facilities with existing HMIWI units for which construction
was commenced on or before June 20, 1996. Section 113.2071 also lists those
HMIWI units that are not subject to the control requirements, which include
combustors during periods when burning only pathological waste, low-level
radioactive waste, and/or chemotherapeutic waste; co-fired combustors; combustors
required to have a permit under the federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, §3005;
combustors meeting the applicability requirements under 40 CFR 60, Subparts
Cb, Ea, or Eb (Municipal Waste Combustors); pyrolysis units; and cement kilns
firing hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste. Section 113.2071 also
states that any physical or operational changes made to an existing HMIWI
solely for the purpose of complying with the requirements of these rules are
not considered to be a modification as defined in 40 CFR 60, Subpart Ec (Standards
of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which
Construction is Commenced after June 20, 1996) and do not result in an existing
HMIWI unit becoming subject to the provisions of Subpart Ec.
The new §113.2072 establishes emissions limits for all designated
facilities, which are based on the sizes of the affected facilities. The limits
are applied to emissions of PM, CO, dioxins/furans, HCl, SO
2
, NO
x
, Pb, Hg, and Cd. The section also
specifies a limit for opacity of 5.0%. The EPA emission guidelines suggest
an opacity requirement of 10%, however, the existing commission rules specify
an opacity limit of 5.0%. The section also requires affected units to file
an abbreviated federal operating permit application with the executive director.
Subsection (b)(1) was changed to clarify that the minimum residence time and
temperature are to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
The new §113.2074 specifies inspection requirements on those small
HMIWI units that can meet the small-remote criteria. These small-remote units
are not required to install add-on controls to meet the emission limits, but
rather are required to implement good combustion practices. These practices
are verified through the inspection requirements and are maintained by a repair
timeline of ten days after an equipment inspection.
The new §113.2075 specifies the performance testing (stack test) requirements
for all affected units. The stack tests are to be performed annually for a
period of three years, after which they may be performed every third year.
Any portion of the stack test that is failed must return to the annual schedule
until it passes another three consecutive years. The section also requires
that units with scrubbers must establish maximum and minimum operating parameters
for each control system during the initial performance test to determine compliance
with the emission limits. Operation outside of these parameters shall constitute
violations of the applicable emission standards. Finally, small-remote units
are required to perform an initial stack test to determine operating parameters
for maximum charge rate and minimum secondary chamber temperature, which are
subsequently used to determine ongoing compliance with the emission standards.
The new §113.2076 specifies the monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements for the affected units. The units are required to have suitable
equipment to monitor and record the operating parameters developed during
the stack tests. The small-remote units are only required to install and operate
a device for measuring and recording the temperature of the secondary chamber
on a continuous basis, and a device which automatically measures and records
the date, time, and weight of each charge fed into the HMIWI unit. Section
113.2076(a)(7) was changed to clarify that the continuous emissions monitoring
system (CEMS) referenced is a CO CEMS.
The new §113.2077 requires each affected facility to prepare a waste
management plan in order to reduce the amount of toxic emissions from incinerated
waste. This plan shall identify the feasibility and the approach to separate
certain components of the solid waste stream from the health care waste stream.
Language was added to clarify the elements of a waste management plan.
The new §113.2078 specifies the operating procedures and operator
training/qualification requirements for the affected facilities. Each owner
or operator shall document their operating procedures and maintain those procedures
in a readily accessible location for all HMIWI operators. These procedures
shall be reviewed annually. In addition, no owner or operator shall allow
the affected facility to operate at any time unless a fully trained and qualified
HMIWI operator is accessible. Unnecessary language was deleted to clarify
that a fully-trained and qualified operator could directly supervise other
operators. The section also specifies the minimum requirements for operator
training.
Section 113.2079 specifies the schedules for affected facilities to come
into compliance with these rules. Within 60 days from the date the commission
publishes in the
Texas Register
that the EPA
has approved these rules and state plan, owners or operators shall submit
a notice of intent to comply with these rules, a petition for a compliance
extension, or a notice of intent to shut down the incinerator. All affected
HMIWI units must be in compliance with the rules or shut down within one year
after the EPA has approved these rules and state plan, unless they have been
granted a compliance or shutdown extension. In no case shall any affected
facility delay compliance or shut down past September 15, 2002. Finally, this
section specifies that any HMIWI unit subject to the requirements of the federal
operating permits program shall submit an abbreviated application to the executive
director on or before September 15, 2000.
REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission reviewed the rulemaking action in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rulemaking could meet the definition of a "major environmental rule"
as defined in that statute. "Major environmental rule" means a rule the specific
intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health
from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the
state. The specific intent of the amendments is to implement emission limits
for existing HMIWI in accordance with federal guidelines and regulations under
the FCAA. Certain HMIWI will be affected and will be required to comply with
federal standards/guidelines whether or not the commission adopts the amendments.
The amendments to Chapter 113 are not anticipated to add any significant additional
costs to affected individuals or businesses beyond the requirements which
will be implemented if the amendments are not adopted. These rules are intended
to protect the environment and could have a material adverse effect on the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. However,
Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, only applies to a major environmental
rule, the result of which is to: (1) exceed a standard set by federal law,
unless the rule is specifically required by state law; (2) exceed an express
requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal
law; (3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program; or (4) adopt a rule solely under the general
powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The amendments do not meet any of these four applicability requirements
of a "major environmental rule." Specifically, the emission standards within
this proposal are based on federal performance-based guidelines/standards.
In the amendments, none of the standards exceed any standard set by federal
law. These rules are not an express requirement of state law, but were developed
based on the EPA's
Emission Guidelines and Compliance
Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators
as mandated
by the FCAA. If the commission does not adopt emission limits with EPA-approved
emission limits within a specified time frame, then the EPA is required to
adopt federal rules for those existing facilities. The affected facilities
will be required to comply with EPA-approved emission limits whether they
are promulgated by commission rules or by federal regulations. The amendments
do not exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or a contract between
state and federal government. The amendments were not developed solely under
the general powers of the agency, but are adopted under the authority of the
Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.103; Texas Health and Safety Code, Texas Clean
Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.014, 382.016, 382.017, 382.0195,
and 382.021; and 42 USC, §7411(d) and §7429. The commission invited
public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis, but received no comments.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these rules in
accordance with to Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The following is
a summary of that assessment. On September 15, 1997, the EPA adopted rules
regarding emission guidelines for existing HMIWI units and new source performance
standards for new HMIWI units. The FCAA requires that state regulatory agencies
implement the emission guidelines according to a state plan developed in accordance
with the FCAA, 42 USC, §7411(d) and §7429, and submit that plan
to the EPA. The specific purpose of the rulemaking action is to implement
the emission guidelines for existing HMIWI units in accordance with 42 USC, §7411(d)
and §7429 by the development and submittal of rules and a corresponding
state plan to the EPA. These rules and corresponding state plan satisfy the
federal requirement, therefore, the exemption that applies to these rules
is that of an action reasonably taken to fulfill an obligation mandated by
federal law. Therefore, this rulemaking action will not constitute a takings
under Chapter 2007 of the Texas Government Code.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission determined that this rulemaking relates to an action or
actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance
with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as amended (Texas Natural Resources
Code, §§33.201 et seq.), and the commission rules in 30 TAC Chapter
281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency with the Coastal Management Program.
As required by 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2) and 30 TAC §281.45(a)(3), relating
to actions and rules subject to the CMP, commission rules governing air pollutant
emissions must be consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the
CMP. The commission has reviewed this rulemaking action for consistency with
the CMP goals and policies in accordance with the rules of the Coastal Coordination
Council, and determined that the rulemaking action is consistent with the
applicable CMP goals and policies. The CMP goal applicable to this rulemaking
action is the goal (31 TAC §501.12(l)) to protect, preserve, restore,
and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity, functions, and values of the
coastal natural resource areas. The CMP policy applicable to this rulemaking
action is the policy (31 TAC §501.14(q)) that commission rules comply
with federal regulations in 40 CFR to protect and enhance the air quality
in the coastal area. The effect of these rules will be to implement state
rules which are as strict as the minimum emission guidelines found in 40 CFR
60, Subpart Ce. No new sources of air contaminants will be authorized and
emissions from existing HMIWI units will be significantly reduced as a result
of these rules. Therefore, in compliance with 31 TAC §505.22(e), this
rulemaking action is consistent with the CMP goals and policies.
No persons submitted comments on the consistency of the proposed rules
with the CMP during the public comment period.
EFFECT ON SITES SUBJECT TO THE FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT PROGRAM
Because 30 TAC Chapter 113 is an applicable requirement under 30 TAC Chapter
122 (Federal Operating Permits), owners or operators subject to the Federal
Operating Permit Program must, consistent with the revision process in Chapter
122, revise their operating permit to include the revised Chapter 113 requirements
for each emission unit affected by the revisions to Chapter 113 at their site.
HEARING AND COMMENTERS
A public hearing was held in Austin on March 21, 2000, and there were two
attendees. No one provided oral comment at the hearing. The comment period
closed on March 27, 2000. Written comments were received from the EPA, which
expressed full support of the proposed rules and associated state plan. Written
comments were also received from the Texas Hospital Association (THA) which
acknowledged the fact that these rules and state plan are mandated by the
EPA, but also made several recommendations on how the commission could assist
hospitals comply with these rules.
ANALYSIS OF TESTIMONY
The EPA congratulated the commission for the work done to develop the rules
and state plan, and expressed pleasure with the format and contents. The EPA
also stated that the rules were very clear and closely followed the federal
requirements. Finally, the EPA stated that the additional information required
by 42 USC, §7411(d) in the overall state plan was clearly identified
and meets the criteria for submittal of state plans. The THA also acknowledged
the fact that these rules and state plan are mandated by the EPA.
The commission appreciates the timely review of the rules and state plan
submittal.
The THA stated that they supported efforts to promote a clean environment,
nevertheless, for those hospitals that use on-site HMIWIs, the rules likely
will create significant financial burdens at a time when they are least able
to afford them. As a result, the THA requested that the commission consider
several recommendations to assist hospitals with on-site HMIWIs in complying
with the adopted rules. These recommendations include rule clarification,
business assistance, future regulation, education and outreach, and compliance
assistance.
Rule Clarification
The THA stated that the proposed rules (§113.2072(b)(1)) require HMIWIs
to burn at 1,800 degrees F or higher for a minimum of two seconds; however,
the EPA guidelines do not require two seconds at 1,800 degrees F. The THA
also stated that some on-site HMIWIs in Texas currently may be burning at
lower temperatures and for shorter times, and requested the commission clarify
to the regulated community whether HMIWIs burning at less than 1,800 degrees
F and/or for less than two seconds will be permitted to continue to do so.
The commission agrees that the proposed rules were written in such a way
that the two-second residence time and 1,800-degree secondary chamber temperature
could be construed to be firm commission requirements where the EPA does not
require those minimum values. The minimum values for these two operating parameters
are determined by the design of the incinerator, as well as the quantity and
composition of the wastes incinerated, such that each individual incinerator
can meet the emissions limits specified in §113.2072. If an on-site HMIWI
can meet all of the emission limits with different values for residence time
and secondary chamber temperature, as demonstrated by a performance test performed
in accordance with §113.2075, then those values define good combustion
practice for that particular unit. Therefore, the commission changed the definition
of "good combustion practice" and the operational requirements in §113.2072
accordingly so that their minimum value may be established during the performance
test as indicators of good combustion practices.
Business Assistance
The THA stated that new scrubbers are estimated to cost between $25,000
and $500,000 each, required annual stack testing will cost at least $15,000
per year, a new incinerator could cost a minimum of $50,000, and extensive
emissions reporting and training will also entail financial cost as well as
administrative burdens for hospitals. The THA stated further that while it
is clear that the goal of the commission and the EPA is to reduce reliance
on the use of HMIWIs, and the number of HMIWIs is declining, there may be
some hospitals that choose to continue using HMIWIs. Their decision could
be based on practical considerations, including the inability to obtain feasible
alternatives for medical waste disposal in their locales. The THA requested
that the commission direct efforts of the small business assistance program
to assist hospitals in complying with the new rules, including financial assistance.
The commission agrees that the hospital industry within this state, especially
the smaller hospitals, could benefit from support of the commission's small
business assistance program. Therefore, the Small Business and Environmental
Assistance (SBEA) Division has been notified of this request. The director
of the SBEA division is Mr. Israel Anderson, who may be reached at (512) 239-5319.
Future Regulation
The THA stated that some smaller, rural hospitals would consider transport
of medical waste as a disposal alternative; however, they are unable to obtain
contracted transport services because of the cost and distances involved.
The THA further stated that while the commission's transport rules do permit
small special waste generators to transport their own untreated waste to a
transfer station or storage facility without meeting the extensive transporter
registration requirements, this exemption is limited to transport of 50 pounds
or less per month. THA recommended that the commission consider an increase
of this limit to allow a greater number of small-quantity generators to choose
the self-transport option.
The 50-pound per month self transporter limit is found in 30 TAC §330.1005
(Transporters of Medical Waste). While a change to that rule to increase
this limit is beyond the scope of this rulemaking action, an increase in the
monthly limit deserves review as a means of providing flexibility to handle
waste for smaller rural hospitals. Therefore, this recommendation has been
referred to the Office of Environmental Policy, Analysis, and Assessment for
further study.
Education and Outreach
The THA stated that the rules would require that an incinerator operator
have a federally-mandated minimum of 24 hours of classroom training on 13
subjects, including recordkeeping requirements, combustion controls and monitoring,
and work safety procedures. In addition, four hours of annual refresher training
and an examination administered by the instructor would be required. Furthermore,
the operator is required to be on-site or available within one hour anytime
the HMIWI unit is operational. This on-site/availability requirement could
make it difficult for operators to travel appreciable distances to attend
training/education programs. The THA recommended that the commission make
training programs available throughout the state so that operators can attend,
or alternatively, make this training available through distance learning via
computer modules and the internet.
The commission is not funded nor staffed to develop and conduct specific
training programs regarding compliance with these rules; however, it does
believe that operator training is a vital part of the safe and efficient operation
of an HMIWI unit. The EPA established the basic requirements for HMIWI training
courses in their emission guidelines and new source performance standard for
HMIWI units. These basic training requirements are echoed in these rules and
state plan. The EPA produced a handbook titled "Operation and Maintenance
of Hospital Medical Waste Incinerators," EPA/425/6-89/024, January 1990, which
is an excellent source for HMIWI information. The EPA also maintains a list
of certified training vendors who can provide HMIWI operator training. In
addition, the incinerator manufacturing and servicing vendors typically have
training programs that cover their product lines. Regarding training availability
through distance learning via computers and the internet, the EPA operates
the Air Pollution Training Institute (APTI) which may be found at http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/eog/apti.html
on the internet. APTI operates several training formats which include classroom,
self-study, satellite, and internet training. With the large number of HMIWI
units located throughout the country and this state which require operator
training, the commission believes that certified training vendors will be
readily available within the state.
Compliance Assistance
The THA requested that the commission provide compliance assistance to
hospitals in other ways. The THA suggested that the commission develop and
publish a list of companies that provide alternative medical waste disposal
methods, including a list of medical waste transport companies. The commission
should also provide educational opportunities concerning management of hospital
waste streams, segregation of medical waste from other waste, good combustion
practices, and compliance with the new rules. Finally, the THA recommended
that the commission send a letter to each hospital with an on-site HMIWI stating
clearly the compliance deadlines, estimated cost of compliance for each component
of the rules, the fundamental requirements of the rules, and the names and
telephone numbers of resource people at the commission.
The commission agrees that a list of companies that provide alternative
medical waste disposal methods, including medical waste transport companies,
would be useful to the member hospitals of THA, and the SBEA Division has
been notified of this request. On the other hand, each of the hospitals in
the THA also belong to various trade associations, such as the Texas Association
of Healthcare Facilities Management and the American Society for Healthcare
Environmental Services, which would be an excellent sources for vendor information.
The commission agrees that information concerning management of hospital
waste streams, alternative waste treatment methods, and segregation of medical
waste from other waste streams would be very useful to the individual THA
hospitals. The SBEA Division has also been notified of this request.
The commission agrees that a letter to each hospital with an on-site HMIWI
would be a useful tool for each facility to achieve compliance with the new
rules. However, the commission's list of facilities with active HMIWI is incomplete.
As part of a 1994 EPA grant objective (FY-94-CAAA-VI-123), the commission
was required to develop a list of medical waste incinerators. The commission
developed this list through a questionnaire that was sent to all hospitals
registered with the Texas Department of Health, medical schools, Veterans
Administration hospitals, and various other facilities. The questionnaire
was mailed to over 550 locations in June 1995, but the response was only approximately
60%. These lists were also updated with information compiled from existing
commission databases and records. The commission identified 75 MWI operating
in the state as of 1995, which included 68 on-site MWI units, and forwarded
the source inventory data to the EPA in October 1995. The commission also
identified, but did not list, an additional 47 MWI previously in existence,
but which were no longer in operation. Based on the rate of return for the
questionnaires and other information in various commission data bases, the
commission estimates that there are approximately 100 affected facilities
within the state. The EPA emissions guidelines also require the commission
to update the list of affected facilities and develop an emissions inventory
based on the facilities with active HMIWI units. As part of the commission
update, letters will be sent to each of the known affected facilities. These
letters will contain a copy of the adopted rules and the names and telephone
numbers of the appropriate resource personnel at the commission. The commission
would appreciate any information the THA could provide concerning an updated
list of member hospitals which have on-site HMIWI to assist the commission
in its efforts to notify the appropriate hospitals.
Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS
30 TAC §113.1
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is adopted under the TWC, §5.103, which provides the
commission the authority to adopt rules to carry out its powers and duties
under the TWC. The amendment is also adopted under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, TCAA, §382.011, which provides the commission the authority to
control the quality of the state's air; §382.012, which provides the
commission the authority to prepare and develop a general, comprehensive plan
for the control of the state's air; §382.014, which provides the commission
the authority to require the submission of emissions data for an emissions
inventory; §382.016, which provides the commission the authority to prescribe
reasonable requirements for measuring, monitoring, and recording emissions; §382.017,
which provides the commission the authority to adopt rules consistent with
the policy and purposes of the TCAA; §382.0195 which provides the commission
the authority to prescribe control technology for infectious waste incinerators; §382.021,
which provides the commission the authority to prescribe sampling methods
and procedures; and FCAA, 42 USC, §7411(d) and §7429, which require
the state to implement emission guidelines as part of a state plan.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 22, 2000.
TRD-200003519
Margaret Hoffman
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Effective date: June 11, 2000
Proposal publication date: February 25, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
Chapter 113.
CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM TOXIC MATERIALS
Subchapter D. DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS