Part VII.
State Board for Educator Certification
Chapter 227.
Admission to an Educator Preparation Program
19 TAC §§227.1, 227.10, 227.20
The State Board for Educator Certification proposes new §§227.1,
227.10 and 227.20, concerning Admission to an Educator Preparation Program.
In its proposed
Framework for Educator Preparation
and Certification
the Board stated as an underlying assumption that
"Board rules must identify a single set of standards applicable to all educator
preparation programs to enhance flexibility in program delivery and to accommodate
multiple routes."
To allow the profession to have a voice in establishing the standards under
which they will be governed, staff convened representatives from the Consortium
of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education (CSOTTE) to assist in the
development of rules. The CSOTTE membership or representatives recommended
the initial components, which were based on principles of high standards flexibility,
and accountability. The initial CSOTTE draft was then disseminated to the
membership of each of the CSOTTE organizations as well as to others across
the state, including college and university presidents, provosts, and vice
presidents for academic affairs. The Consortium representatives considered
all input received at an April 16, 1998, meeting and revised the initial draft
to incorporate additional ideas from the field. At its May meeting and during
its June retreat in 1998, the Board discussed the proposed components of the
candidacy rules. At its November 1998 meeting, the Board discussed the proposed
rule. No suggestions for changes were made.
Developing a single set of quality admission standards will assure consistency
in educator preparation as well as the accountability of those programs through
the Accountability System for Educator Preparation (ASEP). While entities
are held accountable for educator preparation, these rules provide appropriate
flexibility in allowing individual preparation programs to determine if applicants
possess the characteristics associated with success in the program and the
profession.
Pamela B. Tackett, Executive Director, State Board for Educator Certification,
has determined that for the first five-year period the rules are in effect,
enforcing or administering the rules do not have foreseeable implications
relating to cost or revenues of the state or local government. Fiscal impact
will be borne by educator preparation entities for the development of screening
processes and procedures, which include assessment of college level skills,
and development of policies and procedures for recognizing candidates' work
experiences. Some entities might pass on to potential candidates the costs
associated with the screening assessments. The estimated fiscal impact cannot
be determined at this time.
Ms. Tackett also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be to assure consistency in educator preparation as well as
the accountability of those programs through the Accountability System for
Educator Preparation (ASEP). There will be no effect on small businesses.
There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply
with the rules as proposed, however, the estimated fiscal impact cannot be
determined at this time.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Stephanie A. Korcheck, Director
of Policy and Planning, State Board for Educator Certification, 1001 Trinity
Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2603.
The new rules are proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC),
§21.044 which requires the State Board for Educator Certification to
propose rules that establish training requirements a person must accomplish
to obtain a certificate, enter an internship, or enter an induction-year program.
Section 21.044 also requires the Board to specify the minimum academic qualifications
required for a certificate and to propose rules governing educator preparation.
No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed new rules.
§227.1.General Provisions.
(a)
It is the responsibility of the education profession as
a whole to attract and to retain candidates for certification who demonstrate
the knowledge and skills necessary to improve the performance of the diverse
student population of this state.
(b)
Educator preparation programs should collaborate with local
school districts and education service centers pursuant to the Texas Education
Code, §22.083 to examine the criminal history of all students prior to
participation in preparation activities that occur in a field-based setting.
§227.10.Admission Criteria.
(a)
The entity delivering educator preparation shall establish
policies for the following:
(1)
screening activities to determine the candidate's appropriateness
for the certification sought.
(2)
screening for admission to include but not limited
to college level skills in reading, oral and written communication, critical
thinking, and mathematics.
(3)
academic criteria for admission that are published
and applied consistently to all candidates.
(b)
Preparation programs may adopt requirements in addition
to those explicitly required in this section.
(c)
Each preparation program must develop and implement specific
criteria and procedures that allow admitted individuals to substitute experience
and/or professional training directly related to the certificate being sought
for part of the preparation requirements.
§227.20.Implementation Date.
All educator preparation programs must implement this chapter no later
than Fall Semester 2000.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on
May 10, 1999.
TRD-9902697
Pamela B. Tackett
Executive Director
State Board for Educator Certification
Earliest possible date of adoption: June 20, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 469-3001
19 TAC §§228.1, 228.2, 228.10, 228.20, 228.30, 228.40, 228.50, 228.60
The State Board for Educator Certification proposes new §§228.1,
228.2, 228.10, 228.20, 228.30, 228.40, 228.50 and 228.60, concerning Requirements
for Educator Preparation Programs.
In its proposed
Framework for Educator Preparation
and Certification
the Board stated as an underlying assumption that
"Board rules must identify a single set of standards applicable to all educator
preparation programs to enhance flexibility in program delivery and to accommodate
multiple routes."
To allow the profession to have a voice in establishing the standards under
which they will be governed, staff convened representatives from the Consortium
of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education (CSOTTE) to assist in the
development of rules. The CSOTTE membership or representatives recommended
the initial components, which were based on principles of high standards flexibility,
and accountability. The initial CSOTTE draft was then disseminated to the
membership of each of the CSOTTE organizations as well as to others across
the state, including college and university presidents, provosts, and vice
presidents for academic affairs. The Consortium representatives considered
all input received at an April 16, 1998 meeting and revised the initial draft
to incorporate additional ideas from the field. At its May meeting and during
its June retreat in 1998, the Board discussed the proposed components of the
candidacy rules. At its November 1998 meeting, the Board discussed the proposed
rule. No suggestions for changes were made.
At its November 1998 meeting, the Board discussed the proposed rule and
directed staff to add language regarding the approval of additional certificate
fields at approved entities. Those entities that are fully accredited may
request by letter of intent additional certificate fields within the same
classes of certificates for which they are currently approved. The Executive
Director must approve the request. If additional fields are to be added in
a different class from what current approval allows, the entity must present
a full proposal for consideration and approval by the Board.
Four additional issues have been addressed in this version of the proposed
rule:
(1) more specific language has been included to emphasize the intent of
the Board to provide for multiple routes to certification including Centers
for the Professional Development of Teachers and alternative routes in accordance
with TEC §21.047 and TEC §21.049;
(2) a section has been added to require that institutions with branch campuses
or centers be responsible for those campuses'/centers' addressing the requirements
of this chapter as well as Chapters 227 (admission requirements) and 229 (Accountability
System for Educator Preparation);
(3) a reminder that approval of certificate programs by the Board or by
the Executive Director is contingent upon approval by other governing bodies
such as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board or Boards of Regents
and other members of program collaboratives; and
(4) stipulation of a minimum length of teaching required for the certificate
in compliance with TEC §21.044.
In addition, §228.2 has been added to define "ongoing, relevant field-based
experiences" as intended by the Board to ensure consistency among educator
preparation programs.
Developing a single set of quality program standards will assure consistency
in educator preparation as well as the accountability of those programs through
the Accountability System for Educator Preparation (ASEP). While entities
are held accountable, these rules provide for appropriate flexibility and
creativity in the design and delivery of educator preparation.
Pamela B. Tackett, Executive Director, State Board for Educator Certification,
has determined that for the first five-year period the rules are in effect,
enforcing or administering the rules do not have foreseeable implications
relating to cost or revenues of the state or local government. Fiscal impact
will be borne by educator preparation entities. Currently approved entities
must ensure that programs are collaboratively designed, delivered, and evaluated;
that curriculum is aligned with required knowledge and skills; and that field-based
preparation occurs on an on-going basis; and that the progress of students
is regularly measured throughout the preparation program. The estimated fiscal
impact cannot be determined at this time.
Ms. Tackett also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be to assure consistency in educator preparation as well as
the accountability of those programs through the Accountability System for
Educator Preparation (ASEP). There will be no effect on small businesses.
There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply
with the rules as proposed, however, the estimated fiscal impact cannot be
determined at this time.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Stephanie A. Korcheck, Director
of Policy and Planning, State Board for Educator Certification, 1001 Trinity
Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2603.
The new rules are proposed under the Texas Education Code (TEC)
§21.044, which requires the Board to establish training requirements
a person must accomplish to obtain a certificate; TEC §21.045, which
requires the Board to propose rules establishing standards to govern the approval
and continuing accountability of all educator preparation programs; TEC §21.047,
which requires the Board to aid the development of Centers for the Professional
Development of Teachers; and TEC §21.049, which directs the Board to
provide alternative routes to certification.
No other statues, articles or codes are affected by the proposed new rules.
§228.1.General Provisions.
(a)
To ensure the highest level of educator preparation and
practice, the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) recognizes that
the preparation of educators must be the joint responsibility of both educator
preparation programs and the Prekindergarten-Grade 12 public and private schools
of Texas. Collaboration in the development, delivery, and evaluation of educator
preparation will be required.
(b)
Consistent with the Texas Education Code (TEC) §21.047
and §21.049, the SBEC's rules governing educator preparation are designed
to promote flexibility and creativity in the design of programs, including
Centers for the Professional Development of Teachers and alternative routes
to certification, to accommodate the unique characteristics and needs of different
regions of the State as well as the diverse population of potential educators.
(c)
All educator preparation programs will be subject to the
same standards of performance, as required under Chapter 229 of this title
(relating to the Accountability System for Educator Preparation).
§228.2.Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Ongoing experiences - experiences that are continued and
built upon throughout the entire preparation program of study.
(2)
Relevant experiences -- experiences that directly
relate to the certificate sought.
(3)
Field-based experiences -- experiences in which the
primary activity of a candidate for certification is the performance of professional
educator activities while interacting with pre-kindergarten-Grade 12 students
and teachers and entity faculty/staff members in a school-related setting.
The professional activities include more than observation within a classroom.
The interaction with students, teachers, and entity faculty/staff must be
ongoing and relevant.
§228.10.Approval Process.
(a)
New Entity Approval. Entities seeking initial approval
to deliver educator preparation shall submit a proposal in accordance with
guidelines established by the Executive Director, with evidence indicating
the ability to comply with the provisions of this chapter and Chapter 227
of this title (relating to Admission to an Educator Preparation Program).
The proposal must also identify the certificates proposed to be offered by
the entity. The proposal will be reviewed under procedures approved by the
executive director, and the executive director shall recommend to the Board
whether the entity should be approved or denied accreditation pursuant to
Chapter 229, §229.3(c) of this title (relating to the Accreditation Process).
(b)
Continuing Entity Approval. Entities approved by the State
Board for Educator Certification under this chapter shall be reviewed at least
once every five years under procedures approved by the executive director;
however, a review may be conducted at any time at the discretion of the executive
director. Entities accredited under a Texas State Partnership Agreement with
a national accrediting body shall be considered to have met the cyclical review
requirements, unless the executive director determines that a review conducted
by the SBEC is appropriate.
(c)
Addition of Certificate Fields.
(1)
Preparation programs which are fully accredited may request
by "letter of intent" additional certificate fields within the classes of
certificates for which they have been previously approved by the Board. The
Executive Director must approve the request.
(2)
Preparation programs which are fully accredited may
request the addition of certificate fields in a class of certificates that
has not been previously approved by the Board. Under guidelines established
by the Executive Director, the entity must present a full proposal for consideration
and approval by the Board.
(d)
Approval of all education preparation programs by the Board
or by the Executive Director, including each specific certificate field, is
contingent upon approval by other lawfully established governing bodies, such
as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, boards of regents, or school
district boards of trustees.
(e)
Denial of Approval. Entities that fail to meet the requirements
of this chapter; Chapter 227 of this title (relating to Admission to an Educator
Preparation Program); or Chapter 229 of this title (relating to Accountability
System for Educator Preparation), will not be approved to deliver educator
preparation.
§228.20.Governance, Design, and Delivery of Educator Preparation Programs.
(a)
Preparation for the certification of educators shall be
delivered by institutions of higher education, regional education service
centers, public school districts, or other entities approved by the Board
under §228.10 of this title (relating to Approval Process).
(b)
The preparation of educators shall be a collaborative effort
among accredited public schools and/or private schools, as defined by Chapter
230, Subchapter Y of this title (relating to Definitions); regional education
service centers; institutions of higher education; and business and community
interests; and shall be delivered in cooperation with accredited public schools
and/or private schools. An advisory committee with members representing each
of the above shall assist in the design, delivery, evaluation, and major policy
decisions of the preparation program. The approved entity shall approve the
roles and responsibilities of each member of the advisory committee.
(c)
Executives at the entities' highest levels shall provide
sufficient support for educator preparation to enable all programs to meet
standards, and shall be accountable for the quality of the programs and the
candidates recommended for certification.
§228.30.Educator Preparation Curriculum.
(a)
The educator proficiencies and standards adopted by the
board shall be the curricular basis for all educator preparation and, for
each certificate, address the relevant knowledge and skills adopted by the
State Board of Education pursuant to the Texas Education Code (TEC) §28.002(c)-(d).
In addition, the preparation of all candidates for certification must include
the specified requirements for reading instruction adopted by the Board for
each certificate. Entities shall ensure that all preparation, including field-based
experiences, comply with this subsection.
(b)
Educator preparation entities shall provide evidence of
on-going and relevant field-based experiences, as determined by the collaborative,
in a variety of educational settings with diverse student populations, including
observation, modeling, and demonstration of promising practices to improve
student learning.
(c)
Prior to issuance of the Standard Certificate under Chapter
232, Subchapter M of this title (relating to the Types and Classes of Certificates
Issued), the preparation program shall require all candidates for certification
to complete a minimum of 12 weeks of full-day teaching practicum.
§228.40.Assessment and Evaluation of Candidates for Certification and Program Improvement.
(a)
To assure that candidates for certification are prepared
to receive the Standard Certificate, entities delivering educator preparation
shall establish benchmarks and structured assessments of the candidate's progress
throughout the program.
(b)
Entities delivering educator preparation shall determine
the readiness of its candidates to take the appropriate certification assessment(s),
including assessments of knowledge of content, professional development, and
professional ethics and standards of conduct.
(c)
Entities shall not recommend individuals to enter an induction
period unless those individuals hold at least the baccalaureate degree, unless
specifically exempted in rules adopted by the board.
(d)
For the purposes of program improvement, entities shall
continuously evaluate the design and delivery of the educator preparation
curriculum based on performance data, research-based promising practices,
and the results of internal and external assessments.
(e)
Entities shall regularly and substantively participate
in induction efforts for beginning educators. Observations and results from
this participation shall be used in the evaluations conducted under subsection
(d) of this section.
§228.50.Professional Conduct.
During the period of preparation, the preparation entity shall ensure
that the individuals preparing candidates and the candidates themselves demonstrate
adherence to Chapter 247 of this title (relating to Code of Ethics and Standard
Practices for Texas Educators).
§228.60.Implementation Date.
Not later than January 1, 2000, all approved educator preparation programs
shall affirm compliance with the provisions of this chapter under procedures
approved by the executive director.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on
May 10, 1999.
TRD-9902698
Pamela B. Tackett
Executive Director
State Board for Educator Certification
Earliest possible date of adoption: June 20, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 469-3001
Subchapter A. Assessment of Educators
Chapter 228.
Requirements for Educator Preparation Programs
Chapter 230.
Professional Educator Preparation and Certification