TITLE public-safety-and-corrections

Part III. Texas Youth Commission

Chapter 85. Admission and Placement

Subchapter B. Placement Planning

37 TAC §85.21

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes an amendment to §85.21, concerning program assignment system. The amendments to the section will allow for adjustments in residential placement assignments of youth committed to TYC. Adjustments are justified to ensure that youth are placed with consideration to level of risk and level of security provided by each placement. Specifically, youth classified as general offenders with medium risk level will be placed in high restriction rather than medium restriction level on initial placement. Youth classified as Violators of CINS Probation with a medium risk score will be placed in high restriction facilities on initial placement (previously omitted). A waiver is being amended to allow for placement assignment in a specialized treatment medium restriction facility when the treatment is most appropriate.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the assurance of the most appropriate residential placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas 78765.

The amendment is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, concerning determination of treatment, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to order the youth's confinement under conditions TYC believes best for the youth's welfare and the interest of the public.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

§85.21.Program Assignment System.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to establish an objective, equitable system of program assignment for each youth in TYC care. Based on each youth's offense(s), and risk level, TYC has predetermined the most appropriate level of restriction and minimum length of stay requirement for public protection and for promotion of rehabilitation. Youth in coeducational facilities have equal access to agency programs and activities.

(b)

Applicability.

(1)

For specifics regarding classification, see (GAP) §85.23 of this title (relating to Classification).

(2)

For specifics regarding minimum length of stay, see (GAP) §85.25 of this title (relating to Minimum Length of Stay).

(3)

For specifics regarding restriction levels, see (GAP) §85.27 of this title (relating to Program Restriction Levels).

(4)

For specifics regarding completion of program and movement to another program, and for specifics on movement of sentenced offender options, see (GAP) §85.29 of this title (relating to Program Completion and Movement of Other Than Sentenced Offenders) and (GAP) §85.33 of this title (relating to Program Completion and Movement of Sentenced Offenders) .

(c)

Placement System Factors. The program placement system shall incorporate the following factors.

(1)

Classification shall be determined by the classifying offense and a finding regarding extenuating circumstances.

(2)

The minimum length of stay shall be designated by the classification.

(3)

Risk shall be assessed and used as a guideline in designating restriction level.

(4)

Placements shall be made according to restriction and needs.

(A)

Initial placements will always be to residential programs, [ except for some youth classified as violators of CINS probation. ]

(B)

A youth's assessed service needs will be considered in the selection of a placement within the required level of restriction.

(d)

System Description. The determining factors result in the following placement and length of stay determinations for all TYC youth on initial commitment, for youth recommitted for the commission of a felony or high risk offense, and for youth found at an administrative level I hearing to have committed a felony or high risk offense.

(1)

A sentenced offender shall be sentenced by the court and, regardless of risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction with a fenced perimeter.

(2)

A type A violent offender shall be assigned a minimum length of stay of 24 months, and with any risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction with a fenced perimeter.

(3)

A type B violent offender shall be assigned a minimum length of stay of 12 months, and with any risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction.

(4)

A chronic serious offender, controlled substances dealer, or firearms offender [ classified on or after January 1, 1996, ] shall be assigned a minimum length of stay of twelve months and with any risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction.[ The minimum length of stay for these youth classified before January 1, 1996, is nine months. ]

(5)

A general offender classified:

[ (A)

on or after January 1, 1996,] shall be assigned a minimum length of stay of nine months, and with a:]

(A)

[ (i) ] high or medium risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction;

(B)

[ (ii) ] low [ or medium ] risk level, assigned to a program of medium restriction.

[ (B)

before January 1, 1996, shall be assigned a minimum length of stay of six months, and with a:]

[ (i)

high risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction;]

[ (ii)

low or medium risk level, assigned to a program of medium restriction.]

(6)

A Violator of Conduct Indicating a Need for Supervision (CINS) Probation shall be assigned no minimum length of stay , and with a:

(A)

high or medium risk level, assigned to a program of high restriction;

(B)

low risk level, assigned to a program of medium restriction.

(e)

Program Placement Responsibility. The centralized placement unit shall be responsible for all specific program placement selections/assignments.

(f)

Waivers and Exceptions. Waivers and exceptions may be granted under special circumstances.

(1)

A restriction level designation, except that of sentenced offender or type A violent offender, may be waived by the director of centralized placement unit or designee when a youth is qualified. A designated restriction may be waived in order to provide specialized treatment or when it is determined that a youth is physically handicapped or has a special medical condition, [ not available in the designated restriction when it is determined that a youth is physically/mentally handicapped, has a special medical condition, or is emotionally disturbed, ] if such handicap or condition would prevent the youth from functioning in the designated restriction level.

(2)

Any placement designation except those of sentenced offenders and type A violent offenders may be waived by the director of the centralized placement unit or designee when population is at or above established capacity.

(3)

For waiver of classification, see (GAP) §85.23 of this title (relating to Classification).

(4)

For movement for population control see (GAP) §85.29 of this title (relating to Program Completion and Movement).

(g)

Parent Notification. Parents/guardians shall be notified of all placements.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902123

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


37 TAC §85.25

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes an amendment to §85.25, concerning minimum length of stay. The amendment to the section will eliminate the language that makes certain provisions for youth classified before January 1, 1996, as this information is no longer needed. Disciplinary minimum lengths of stay may be assigned to youth as a disciplinary consequence for certain behavior.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the assurance of the most appropriate length of stay requirement for a youth considering safety of the public. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas 78765.

The amendment is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, concerning determination of treatment, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to order the youth's confinement under conditions TYC believes best for the youth's welfare and the interest of the public.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

§85.25.Minimum Length of Stay.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to establish by policy, a minimum period of time a youth will spend in residential placements (high or medium restriction) having reduced access to the public and which is based on the most serious offense the youth committed. The maximum period of time a youth may spend in residential placement is the total time until he/she reaches age 21. Release from residential placement anytime prior to age 21 is based on the youth's successful completion of release criteria, one of which is the minimum length of time set by the agency.

(b)

Applicability.

(1)

Except where specifically named, requirements herein do not apply to sentenced offenders. See (GAP) §85.37 of this title (relating to Sentenced Offender Disposition) for additional information. The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) complies with orders of the committing court regarding sentences for youth sentenced to commitment to TYC.

(2)

A disciplinary assigned length of stay of up to six months may be assigned in accordance with (GAP) §95.11 of this title (relating to Disciplinary Transfer/Assigned Minimum Length of Stay Consequences).

(c)

Explanation of Terms Used.

(1)

Minimum Length of Stay (MLS) - the factor in the placement and movement system which is the predetermined minimum period of time a youth will be assigned to live in a residential placement. TYC has established two types of minimum lengths of stay requirements for TYC youth, classification MLS , and assigned disciplinary MLS. This rule primarily addresses classification MLS.

(2)

Minimum period of confinement - the period of time established by law that a youth sentenced to commitment in TYC for offenses occurring on or after January 1, 1996, shall be confined in a TYC residential placement. The minimum period of confinement is the earliest of:

(A)

completion of the sentence, or

(B)

10 years for youth sentenced for capital murder; three years for youth sentenced for an aggravated controlled substance felony or a felony of the first degree; two years for a felony of the second degree; and one year for a felony of the third degree.

(3)

Classification MLS - a minimum length of stay directly associated with each classification established on initial commitment, for youth recommitted for the commission of a felony or high-risk offense, and for youth found at an administrative level I hearing to have committed a felony or high-risk offense. [ Classification minimum lengths of stay of youth classified before January 1, 1996 may include creditable time for events occurring prior to commitment. ]

(4)

Assigned disciplinary MLS - the minimum length of stay assigned to a youth as a disciplinary consequence for behavior. [ which may occur anytime a youth is in a residential setting. ]

(d)

Minimum Length of Stay.

(1)

Sentenced offenders shall serve the time assessed by the juvenile court, until the earliest of:

(A)

release approved by the committing court;

(B)

completion of the sentence; or

(C)

completion of the minimum period of confinement (for youth committed for acts occurring on or after January 1, 1996 only).

(2)

Type A violent offenders must complete a minimum of 24 months.

(3)

Type B violent offenders must complete a minimum length of stay of 12 months.

(4)

Chronic serious offenders, controlled substances dealers, and firearms offenders must complete a minimum length of stay of 12 months [ if classified on or after January 1, 1996 or nine months if classified before that date. ]

(5)

General offenders must complete a minimum length of stay of nine months [ if classified on or after January 1, 1996, or six months if classified before that date. ]

(6)

A Violator of Conduct Indicating a Need for Supervision (CINS) Probation has no minimum length of stay.

(e)

Creditable Time.

(1)

On initial classification, the minimum length of stay shall be counted from the first day a youth reaches any TYC operated or assigned facility.

(2)

On recommitment, the minimum length of stay shall be counted from the first day a youth reaches any TYC operated or assigned facility, and any incomplete MLS at the time of recommitment is eliminated; unless:

(A)

a youth is recommitted for the same conduct following an appeal of the original commitment, in which case the youth shall be given credit toward completion of the new MLS for any time spent in TYC custody as a result of the original commitment; or

(B)

a youth is recommitted for the same conduct for which a level I or II hearing has already been held, in which case the youth shall be given credit toward completion of the new MLS for the time already served as a result of that level I or II hearing.

(3)

On TYC reclassification, if previous classification MLS:

(A)

has been completed, the new classification minimum length of stay shall be counted from the date of the most recent due process hearing.

(B)

has not yet been completed, the new classification minimum length of stay shall be counted from the completion of the previous MLS.

(4)

After the count begins, all time spent in program, on furlough or in detention or jail (except as a disposition in a criminal case) will be counted toward meeting a minimum length of stay requirement.

(5)

Time spent as an escapee from a TYC placement or time spent in jail or a court ordered placement in an adult correctional residential program as disposition in a criminal case shall not be counted toward meeting the minimum length of stay requirement.

(f)

Creditable Time for Sentenced Offenders.

(1)

On initial classification, the minimum period of confinement shall be counted from the first day a youth reaches any TYC operated or assigned facility. Only time spent in a TYC assigned facility shall be credited toward completion of minimum period of confinement.

(2)

Sentenced offenders will be credited with days, as assessed by the court, detained in connection with the classifying offense. Time will be credited at the end of the total sentence.

(g)

Restrictions.

(1)

All minimum lengths of stay will run consecutively except when a youth is recommitted.

(2)

Classification MLSs must be completed before any assigned disciplinary MLS begins.

(3)

Certain youth [ Youth ] may be eligible for transition to medium restriction to complete the minimum length of stay requirement in accordance with (GAP) §85.29 of this title (relating to Program Completion and Movement) of Other Than Sentenced Offenders.

(h)

Waivers and Reductions.

(1)

The classification minimum length of stay requirement may be reduced by the deputy executive director in extenuating circumstances when it is documented that the minimum length of stay is not justified because of the nature of the youth's classifying offense and offense history.

(2)

The disciplinary assigned MLS may be reduced in accordance with (GAP) §95.11 of this title (relating to Disciplinary Transfer/Assigned Minimum Length of Stay Consequences).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902124

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


37 TAC §85.27

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes an amendment to §85.27, concerning program restriction levels. The amendment to the section will clarify that emergency shelters are not assigned a restriction level for placement purposes of youth committed to TYC. Youth are assigned to emergency shelters only on a short-term emergency basis until permanent assignments are made. Day-treatment programs are being removed as examples of minimum restriction programs since TYC no longer uses this type of program.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the assurance of the most appropriate placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas 78765.

The amendment is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, concerning determination of treatment, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to order the youth's confinement under conditions TYC believes best for the youth's welfare and the interest of the public.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

§85.27.Program Restriction Levels.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to categorize programs in which TYC youth may be placed relative to the program's intent to restrict a youth's access to the general community. The level of restriction assists TYC staff in placing youth in the least restrictive most appropriate placement available.

(b)

Explanation of Terms Used.

(1)

Self-contained Program - a 24 hour supervision program in which the treatment, training and education program is conducted on the premises. A self-contained program is a program without routine unsupervised access to the community, unless otherwise stated.

(2)

Routine Unsupervised Access to the Community - a privilege offered by some programs whereby a youth may be absent from the program without staff supervision for 48 hours or more per month prior to the youth's last month in the program.

(3)

Staff secure - a staff to youth ratio appropriate to ensure security of high risk youth.

(c)

Emergency shelters are not designated with a restriction level.

(d)

[ (c) ] Levels.

(1)

High Restriction - a program which is secured by a perimeter fence. For example:

(A)

TYC training schools;

(B)

intermediate sanctions facilities;

(C)

boot camps;

(D)

Corsicana Residential Treatment Center;

(E)

self-contained residential contract placement designated by TYC as appropriate;

(F)

state hospitals;

(2)

Medium Restriction - any residential program which provides routine unsupervised access to the community. For example:

(A)

TYC halfway houses;

(B)

any residential contract program which is not self-contained, e.g., certain substance abuse programs, residential treatment centers, group homes, or organizational foster care;

(3)

Minimum Restriction - Any nonresidential program which provides treatment or training at least eight hours per day five days a week , for example, [ . For example: ] independent living preparation in structured apartments.

[ (A)

day treatment;]

[ (B)

independent living preparation in structured apartments.]

(4)

Home - the home of the parent, other relative or individual acting in the role of parent, managing conservator, or guardian, or an independent living arrangement, in which there is treatment or training less than eight hours per day, five times a week. For example:

(A)

home or home substitute;

(B)

independent living in any approved location.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902125

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


37 TAC §85.29

(Editor's note: The Texas Youth Commisison proposes for permanent adoption the repealed section it adopts on an emergency basis in this issue. The text of the repealed section is in the Emergency Rules section of this issue.)

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes the repeal of §85.29, concerning Program Completion and Movement. This section is being repealed to allow for the publication of a new section.

An identical repeal has been adopted by emergency and is available for public review.

Terry Graham, Assistant Executive Deputy Director of Finance, has determined that for the first five-year period the repeal as proposed is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the repeal.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the repeal is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the repeal will be the assurance of the most appropriate residential placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the repeal as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Coordinator, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas 78765.

The repeal is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.034, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to make rules appropriate to the accomplishment of its functions.

The proposed repeal implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902128

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


(Editor's note: The Texas Youth Commisison proposes for permanent adoption new section it adopts on an emergency basis in this issue. The text of the new section is in the Emergency Rules section of this issue.)

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes new §85.29, concerning program completion and movement of other than sentenced offenders. All references to sentenced offenders in the repealed section have been simultaneously proposed in a new section, (GAP) §85.33 Program Completion and Movement of Sentenced Offenders. For youth committed to TYC, this new rule will establish criteria and procedure for the completion of a TYC treatment program and corresponding eligibility for transition to a program of less restriction, and/or release home or to a home substitute. Movement criteria are based on degree of severity of the offense. When criteria have been met, youth may earn parole status. Certain exceptions may be made for hardship cases, to control population, and for certain mentally ill and mentally retarded youth.

An identical emergency action has been adopted and is available for public review.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the assurance of the most appropriate residential placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas 78765.

The new rule is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, concerning determination of treatment, which provides the Texas Youth Commission authority to discharge the child from control when it is satisfied that discharge will best serve the child's welfare and the protection of the public.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902129

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


37 TAC §85.33

(Editor's note: The Texas Youth Commission proposes for permanent adoption the new section it adopts on an emergency basis in this issue. The text of the new section is in the Emergency Rules section of this issue.)

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes new §85.33, concerning Program Completion and Movement of Sentenced Offenders. The new section addresses the treatment of juvenile offenders sentenced to commitment in TYC. Related information that existed in the repealed rule, (GAP) §85.29 of this title (relating to Program Completion and Movement), is being moved and/or revised in this new rule. Included are criteria for transferring youth to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) when warranted and for retaining youth in TYC when likewise warranted. Criteria are established for youth completion of program requirements and for eligibility to move to a placement of less restriction. Sentenced offenders are placed in high restriction facilities and must serve their minimum periods of confinement in high restriction prior to consideration for movement to less restriction, unless approved by the court. No youth will be considered for movement from high restriction solely on the basis of having completed the minimum period of confinement. The additional criteria require that each youth has demonstrated competence over all resocialization components including cognitive distortions and behavioral patterns that contributed to the offender's committing offense(s). This new rule contains information regarding youth committed under concurrent determinate sentence and indeterminate commitment orders as previously contained in the repealed section (GAP) §85.35 of this title (relating to Special Circumstances: Multiple Commitment Orders).

An identical new rule has been adopted by emergency and is available for public review.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the assurance of the most appropriate residential placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas, 78765.

The new section is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, concerning determination of treatment, which provides the Texas Youth Commission authority to discharge the child from control when it is satisfied that discharge will best serve the child's welfare and the protection of the public.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902131

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


37 TAC §85.35

(Editor's note: The Texas Youth Commission proposes for permanent adoption the repealed section it adopts on an emergency basis in this issue. The text of the repealed section is in the Emergency Rules section of this issue.)

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes the repeal of §85.35, concerning special circumstances: multiple commitment orders. This section is being repealed and the information regarding youth committed under concurrent determinate sentence and indeterminate commitment orders has been proposed for adoption in a new section (GAP) §85.33 of this title (relating to Program and Movement of Sentenced Offenders).

Terry Graham, Assistant Executive Deputy Director of Finance, has determined that for the first five-year period the repeal as proposed is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the repeal.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the repeal is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the repeal will be the assurance of the most appropriate residential placement for a youth considering safety of the public and treatment of the youth. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the repeal as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Coordinator, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas, 78765.

The repeal is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.034, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to make rules appropriate to the accomplishment of its functions.

The proposed repeal implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 9, 1999.

TRD-9902133

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 23, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244