he request of a worker formerly engaged in activities controlled by the licensee or registrant, each licensee or registrant shall furnish a written report of the worker's exposure to sources of radiation. The report shall include the dose record for each year the worker was required to be monitored in accordance with §289.202(f) of this title. Such report shall be furnished within 30 days from the date of the request, or within 30 days after the dose of the individual has been determined by the licensee or registrant, whichever is later. The report shall cover the period of time that the worker's activities involved exposure to sources of radiation and the dates and locations of work under the license or certificate of registration in which the worker participated during this period.

(4)

When a licensee or registrant is required in accordance with §289.202(xx), (yy), and (zz) of this title to report to the agency any exposure of an individual to sources of radiation, the licensee or the registrant shall also provide the individual a written report of that individual's exposure data included therein. Such reports shall be transmitted at a time not later than the transmittal to the agency.

(5)

At the request of a worker who is terminating employment with the licensee or registrant in work involving exposure to sources of radiation during the current year, each licensee or registrant shall provide at termination to each such worker, or to the worker's designee, a written report regarding the radiation dose received by that worker from operations of the licensee or registrant during the current year or fraction thereof. If the most recent individual monitoring results are not available at that time, a written estimate of the dose shall be provided together with a clear indication that this is an estimate.

(e)

Presence of representatives of licensees or registrants and workers during inspection.

(1)

Each licensee or registrant shall afford to the agency at all reasonable times opportunity to inspect materials, machines, activities, facilities, premises, and records in accordance with this chapter.

(2)

During an inspection, agency inspectors may consult privately with workers as specified in subsection (f) of this section. The licensee or registrant may accompany agency inspectors during other phases of an inspection.

(3)

If, at the time of inspection, an individual has been authorized by the workers to represent them during agency inspections, the licensee or registrant shall notify the inspectors of such authorization and shall give the workers' representative an opportunity to accompany the inspectors during the inspection of physical working conditions.

(4)

Each workers' representative shall be routinely engaged in work under control of the licensee or registrant and shall have received instructions as specified in subsection (c) of this section.

(5)

Different representatives of licensees or registrants and workers may accompany the inspectors during different phases of an inspection if there is no resulting interference with the conduct of the inspection. However, only one workers' representative at a time may accompany the inspectors.

(6)

With the approval of the licensee or registrant and the workers' representative, an individual who is not routinely engaged in work under control of the licensee or registrant, for example, a consultant to the licensee or registrant or to the workers' representative, shall be afforded the opportunity to accompany agency inspectors during the inspection of physical working conditions.

(7)

Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, agency inspectors are authorized to refuse to permit accompaniment by any individual who deliberately interferes with a fair and orderly inspection. With regard to any area containing proprietary information, the workers' representative for that area shall be an individual previously authorized by the licensee or registrant to enter that area.

(f)

Consultation with workers during inspections.

(1)

Agency inspectors may consult privately with workers concerning matters of occupational radiation protection and other matters related to applicable provisions of agency regulations and licenses to the extent the inspectors deem necessary for the conduct of an effective and thorough inspection.

(2)

During the course of an inspection any worker may bring privately to the attention of the inspectors, either orally or in writing, any past or present condition which that individual has reason to believe may have contributed to or caused any violation of the Act, the requirements in this chapter, license or certificate of registration conditions, or any unnecessary exposure of an individual to radiation from any source of radiation under the licensee's or registrant's control. Any such notice in writing shall comply with the requirements of subsection (g)(1) of this section.

(3)

The provisions of paragraph (2) of this subsection shall not be interpreted as authorization to disregard instructions in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.

(g)

Requests by workers for inspections.

(1)

Any worker or representative of workers who believes that a violation of the Act, the requirements of this chapter, or license or certificate of registration conditions exists or has occurred in work under a license or certificate of registration with regard to radiological working conditions in which the worker is engaged, may request an inspection by giving notice of the alleged violation to the agency. Any such notice shall be in writing, shall set forth the specific grounds for the notice, and shall be signed by the worker or representative of the workers. A copy shall be provided to the licensee or registrant by the agency no later than at the time of inspection except that, upon the request of the worker giving such notice, the worker's name and the name(s) of individual(s) referred to therein shall not appear in such copy or on any record published, released, or made available by the agency, except for good cause shown.

(2)

If, upon receipt of such notice, the agency determines that the request meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection, and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the alleged violation exists or has occurred, an inspection shall be made as soon as practicable to determine if such alleged violation exists or has occurred. Inspections in accordance with this section need not be limited to matters referred in the request.

(3)

No licensee or registrant, contractor or subcontractor of a licensee or registrant shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any worker because of the following:

(A)

such worker has filed any request or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under this chapter;

(B)

such worker has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding; or

(C)

because of the exercise by such worker on behalf of that individual or others of any option afforded by this section.

(h)

Inspections not warranted.

(1)

If the agency determines, with respect to a request under subsection (g) of this section, that an inspection is not warranted because there are no reasonable grounds to believe that a violation exists or has occurred, the agency shall notify the requestor in writing of such determination. The requestor may obtain review of such determination in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Government Code, Chapters 2001 and 2002.

(2)

If the agency determines that an inspection is not warranted because the requirements of subsection (g)(1) of this section have not been met, the agency shall notify the requestor in writing of such determination. Such determination shall be without prejudice to the filing of a new request meeting the requirements of subsection (g)(1) of this section.

(i)

Notice to employees. The following form, or an equivalent as stated in subsection (b)(3) of this section, shall be posted.

Figure: 25 TAC §289.203(i)

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 18, 1998.

TRD-9808090

Susan K. Steeg

General Counsel

Texas Department of Health

Effective date: June 7, 1998

Proposal publication date: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 458-7236


25 TAC §289.204

The Texas Department of Health (department), by majority vote of the Texas Board of Health (board) on May 15, 1998, enters this order finally adopting an amendment to §289.204, concerning fees for certificates of registration, radioactive material(s) licenses, emergency planning and implementation, and other regulatory services, without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 27, 1998, issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 1891), and therefore the section will not be republished.

The amendment to §289.204 adds a definition to clarify a license category, assesses additional fees for licenses that contain authorizations for more than one license category, deletes the provision for proration of fees, restructures the method by which fees for certificates of registration are assessed, and separates the fees for evaluation of sealed sources and devices into fees for initial evaluations and amendments requiring re-evaluation. The amendment also increases the majority of license fees by 50% to correct an imbalance in the percentage of costs recovered from certificate of registration fees versus license fees when compared to the percentage of program costs charged against certification of registration activities versus license activities. This amendment is part of the department's ongoing evaluation of program fees to comply with the provisions of Health and Safety Code §401.301.

The department made no changes to the text of the proposed rule.

The following comments were received concerning the proposed section. Following each comment is the department's response.

Comment: Concerning §289.204, one commenter suggested that the increased fees were apparently initiated to further shift the funding of the Bureau of Radiation Control to those entities possessing sources of radiation. The commenter noted that this may not adversely affect entities that can easily pass on costs of these fees to the ultimate consumers of the benefits of radiation. However, for medical programs, these increases will have to come from cuts from some other internal funds and will not be recovered. The commenter recommended that the proposed increases not be instituted for medical and/or state-funded institutions.

Response: The department acknowledged the commenter's statements. The department is directed to recover as close to 100% of its regulatory costs, including indirect costs, as possible. The issue of exempting certain entities, such as state-funded insti