TITLE in-addition

Coastal Coordination Council

Notice and Opportunity to Comment on Requests for Consistency Agreement/Concurrence under the Texas Coastal Management Program

On January 10, 1997, the State of Texas received federal approval of the Coastal Management Program (CMP) (62 Federal Register pp. 1439-1440). Under federal law, federal agency activities and actions affecting the Texas coastal zone must be consistent with the CMP goals and policies identified in 31 TAC 501. Requests for federal consistency review were received for the following projects(s) during the period of June 25, 1997, through June 27, 1997:

FEDERAL AGENCY ACTIONS:

Applicant: Mike Marlatt; Location: Colorado River, at lot 22, in Hubert-Watson Subdivision; Project Number: 97-0178-F1; Description of Proposed Action: The applicant proposes to increase the width of walkways to allow safer access for handicapped relatives; Type of Application: U.S.C.O.E. permit application #20914(01) under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. 403), and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A.§§125- 1387).

Applicant: David Till; Location: Colorado River, at lot 20, in St. Mary's Bayou; Project Number: 97-0179-F1; Description of Proposed Action: The applicant proposes to provide boat & fishing access adjacent property owners: Elsie Moore and Doug & Wands Anderson; Type of Application: U.S.C.O.E. permit application under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. 403).

Applicant: Calhoun County Navigation District; Location: Lavaca Bay at the Port of Port Lavaca; Project Number: 97-180-F1; Description of Proposed Action: The applicant proposes to maintain permitted depth in the Port of Port Lavaca-Point Comfort for the completion of new facilities authorized by COE Permits 14541 to 14541 (07); Type of Application: U.S.C.O.E. permit application #20914(01) under §10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.A. 403), and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A.§§125-1387).

Applicant: Vastar Resources, Inc.; Location: High Island Block 163, Lease OCS-G14869, OCS Federal Offshore Waters, Gulf of Mexico; Project Number: 97-0181-F1; Type of Application: Initial Plan of Exploration, Title 30 CFR 250.33 (f) and (h).

Pursuant to §306(d)(14) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C.A.§§1451-1464), as amended, interested parties are invited to submit comments on whether a proposed action should be referred to the Coastal Coordination Council for review and whether the action is or is not consistent with the Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies. All comments must be received within 30 days of publication of this notice and addressed to Ms. Janet Fatheree, Council Secretary, 1700 North Congress Avenue, Room 617, Austin, Texas 78701-1495.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708432

Garry Mauro

Chairman

Coastal Coordination Council

Filed: June 27, 1997


General Services Commission

Summary of Other State Bidder Preference Laws

(Editor's Note: The following notice was published in the March 14, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 2808). Due to formatting error, the section symbols for the citations were printed as"F5".)

The General Services Commission publishes this list of other state bidder preference laws in accordance with Texas Codes Annotated, Government Code, Title 10, §2252.003, which requires the publication of a list of states which have laws or regulations regarding the award of contracts for general construction, improvements, services, or public works projects or purchases of supplies, materials, or equipment to nonresident bidders, together with a citation to and summary of the most recent law or regulation of each state relating to the evaluation of bids from and award of contracts to nonresident bidders.

ALABAMA: Code of Alabama, §39-3-5 (1992) Reciprocal preference for public contracts in which any state, county or municipal funds are utilized; §41-16-27 (1991) - Preference to commodities produced in Alabama or sold by Alabama persons, firms, or corporations in the purchase of or contract for personal property or contractual services; §41-16-57 (Supp. 1995) - Preference to commodities produced in Alabama or sold by Alabama persons, firms, or corporations in the awarding of contracts generally;

ALASKA: Alaska Statutes, Title 36, §36.30.170 (Supp. 1996) Preference of 5.0% for Alaska products. Preference of 15% to resident bidder offering services through an employment program. Preference of 5% for insurance related contracts. Preference of 10% to resident sole proprietors with a disability.

ARIZONA: Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated, Title 34, §34-243 (1990) - Preference of 5.0% for construction materials.

ARKANSAS: Arkansas Code Annotated, §19-11-259 (1994) Preference of 5.0% for materials and equipment used in public works projects.

CALIFORNIA: California Government Code Annotated, §4331 (1995)-- Preference for supplies manufactured or produced in California. §4334 (1995) -- Preference of 5% to resident bidders in contracts for public works, with the construction of public bridges, buildings and other structures, or with the purchase of supplies for any public use.

COLORADO: Colorado Revised Statutes Annotated, §8-18-101 (Supp. 1996) - Reciprocal preference in contracts for commodities and services; §8-19-101 (1994) - Reciprocal preference in construction contracts; §43-2-208 (Supp. 1996) - Preference for Colorado labor in highway construction projects.

FLORIDA: Florida Statutes Annotated, Title XIX, §287.084 (Supp.1997) - Preference to Florida businesses for purchases of personal property.

GEORGIA: Georgia Code Annotated, §50-5-60 (1994)- Preference in the purchase and contracting of supplies, materials, equipment manufactured and printing produced in Georgia. Reciprocal preference for resident vendors.

HAWAII: Hawaii Statutes Annotated, §103D-1001 (1995) -Preference of 3% for Class I Hawaii products that have 25% to 49% of their manufactured cost in Hawaii; preference of 5% for Class II Hawaii products that have 50% to 74% of their manufactured cost in Hawaii; and a preference of 10% for Class III Hawaii products that have 75% or more of their manufactured cost in Hawaii.

IDAHO: Idaho Code Annotated, §60-101 (1996) -Preference for resident bidder in state printing contracts. §60-103 (1994) - Preference of 10% for residents who perform printing, engraving, binding, and stationery work in cases of excessive charge or lack of production facilities.

ILLINOIS: Illinois Compiled Statutes Annotated, 30 ILCS §505/6 (Supp. 1996) - Reciprocal preference for public contracts; 10% preference for using products made from recycled materials in public contracts.

INDIANA: Indiana Code Ann., Title 4, §4-13.4-2-9 (Supp. 1996)-- Reciprocal preference. Title 5, §5-17-6-20 (Supp. 1996) - Preference of 10% for supplies in which 50% of volume of the original component of supplies consists of recycled materials, or the cost of purchasing recycled materials equals at least 50% of cost of producing supplies; Title 5, §5-17-6-20.1 (Supp. 1996) - Preference of 15% for supplies that contain at least 50% by volume of recycled materials that have been used by an ultimate consumer of the materials; Title 5, §5-17-6-22 - Preference of 10% for soybean oil based ink; Title 5, §5-17-6-23 - Preference of 10% for soy diesel/bio diesel.

IOWA: Iowa Code Annotated, §18.6 (1989) Resident preference in tie bids, and reciprocal preference with states that mandate a percentage preference for the purchase of equipment, supplies, or services; §73A.21 (Supp. 1996) - Reciprocal preference for public improvement contracts.

KANSAS: Kansas Statutes Annotated, §75-3740 (Supp. 1995) Resident preference in tie bids; preference for paper products containing highest percentage of recycled materials in tie bids. §75-3740(a) (1989) -- Reciprocal preference in construction and public work contracts. §75-3740(b) (Supp. 1995) Preference for recycled paper that contains not less than 50% waste paper by weight.

LOUISIANA: Louisiana Revised Statutes Annotated, §38:2225 (1989) - Reciprocal preference in public works contracts. §38:2251 (Supp. 1997) -- 5% Preference for products produced or manufactured in Louisiana. §38:2251.1 (1989) -- 10% Preference for milk and dairy products produced or processed in Louisiana. §38:2251.2 (1989) -- 10% Preference for steel rolled in Louisiana. §38:2253 (1989) -- Preference to firms doing business in the State of Louisiana. §39:1595 (Supp. 1997) - Preference of 7.0% for products produced, grown or harvested in Louisiana; preference of 4.0% for meat and meat products and domesticated catfish processed in Louisiana; §39:1595.1 (1989) - Reciprocal preference for all contracts except highway construction; §39:1595.2 (1989) - Reciprocal preference in public works contracts; §39:1595.3 (1989) - 5.0% Preference for resident vendors to organize or administer rodeos and livestock shows; §39:1595.5 (Supp. 1997) - Reciprocal preference for items purchased from Louisiana retailers; §39:1595.6 (1989) - 10% Preference for steel rolled in Louisiana.

MAINE: Maine Revised Statutes Annotated Title 26, §1301 (1996)- Preference in tie bids for construction or public works contracts.

MARYLAND: Annotated Code of Maryland, State Finance and Procurement Article, §14-401 (1995) - Reciprocal preference for procurement contracts.

MASSACHUSETTS: Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 149, §179A (1996) -- Preference to U.S. citizens in awarding of public work contracts.

MICHIGAN: Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated, §18.1261 (1994) Preference in tie bids.

MINNESOTA: Minnesota Statutes Annotated, §16B.102 (1995) - Reciprocal preference for construction or repairs contracts and purchases of supplies, materials, and equipment rental.

MISSISSIPPI: Mississippi Code 1972 Annotated, §19-13-111 (1995)- Resident preference in tie bids for printing, stationery and office supplies; §31-3-21 (Supp. 1996) - Reciprocal preference for public works contracts, and resident preference in tie bids; §31-7-15 (Supp. 1996) - Resident preference in tie bids for commodities; §31-7-47 (1996) - Reciprocal preference for public contracts, and resident preference in tie bids; §31-7-77 (1990) - Reciprocal preference in purchases of meat products; §73-13-45 (1995) - Reciprocal preference and resident preference in tie bids for professional engineering services.

MISSOURI: Missouri Annotated Statutes, §34.070 (1992) Resident preference in tie bids; §34.076 (Supp. 1997) - Reciprocal preference for products and for public works contracts, except for contracts for highways and public transportation.

MONTANA: Montana Code Annotated, §18-1-102 (1995)- Reciprocal preference in award of public contracts for construction, repair, or public works; preference of 3.0% for purchases of goods; and preference of 5.0% for residents offering Montana made goods; §18-1-111 (1995) - Preference in tie bids for goods.

NEBRASKA: Nebraska Revised Statutes, §73-101.01 (1990) Reciprocal preference.

NEW JERSEY: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, §52:32-1.4 (1986) Reciprocal preference for contracts for goods and services.

NEW MEXICO: New Mexico Statutes Annotated, §13-1-21 (Supp. 1996) - Preference of 5.0% to resident manufacturers and resident businesses; preference of 5% to resident manufacturers and resident businesses for the purchase of recycled content goods or virgin content goods; preference of 10% to resident manufacturers and resident business for the purchase of both recycled content goods and virgin content goods. §13-4-1 (1992) - Preference for residents in public works contracts "whenever practicable"; §13-4-2 (1992) - Preference of 5.0% to resident contractors for public works contracts.

NORTH CAROLINA: North Carolina General Statutes Article 3, §143-59 (Supp. 1996) - Preference in tie bids for foods, supplies, materials, equipment, printing or services.

NORTH DAKOTA: North Dakota Century Code, §44-08-01 (1995) Reciprocal preference for goods, merchandise, supplies, equipment, and construction and repair contracts.

OHIO: Ohio Revised Code Annotated Title 1, §153.012 (1994) Reciprocal preference in highway and public works contracts.

OKLAHOMA: Oklahoma Statutes 1991 Title 74, §85.17 (1995) Reciprocal preference.

OREGON: Oregon Revised Statutes, §279.029 (1995)- Reciprocal preference.

PENNSYLVANIA: Pennsylvania Statutes Annotated, Title 73, §1645.7 (1993) - Reciprocal preference for goods, supplies, equipment, printing, or materials.

SOUTH CAROLINA: Code Of Laws Of South Carolina Annotated, Article 5, §11-35-1520 (Supp. 1995) - Preference in tie bids; preference of 2.0% on purchases up to $2.5 million, and 1.0% on purchases over $2.5 million. Preferences do not apply to construction contracts or to purchases of goods if the price of a single unit of the item is more than $10,000.

SOUTH DAKOTA: South Dakota Codified Laws Annotated, §5-19-3 (1994) - Reciprocal preference in contracts for public works, goods, merchandise, supplies, and equipment; §5-23-13 (1994) - Preference to resident bidders and products in tie bids; §5-23-21.2 (1994) - Reciprocal preference.

TENNESSEE: Tennessee Code Annotated, §12-4-802 (1992) Reciprocal preference in construction contracts for states contiguous to Tennessee.

TEXAS: Texas Government Code Annotated, Title 10, Subtitle D, §2155.444 (1996) -- Preference in tie bids for goods and agricultural products produced or grown in Texas, or offered by Texas bidders, that are of equal cost and quality to other states of the United States. Preference in tie bids for goods and agricultural products from other states of the United States over foreign goods and agricultural products that are of equal cost and quality. Texas Government Code, §2252.002 - Reciprocal preference.

UTAH: Utah Code Annotated, §63-56-20.5 (1993) Reciprocal preference for goods, supplies, equipment, materials , and printing; §63-56-20.6 (1993) - Reciprocal preference for construction contracts.

VERMONT: Vermont Statutes Annotated, §§1401 and 1402 (Supp. 1995) - Preference to resident companies and licensed resident agents in the purchase of insurance coverage for the State of Vermont and its employees

VIRGINIA: Code of Virginia 1950 Annotated, §11-47 (1993) Preference in tie bids; reciprocal preference for goods, services, and construction.

WASHINGTON: Revised Code of Washington, §43.19.704 (Supp. 1996) - Reciprocal Preference Washington Administrative Code, §236-48-085 (1989) Reciprocal Preference

WEST VIRGINIA: West Virginia Code Annotated, §5A-3-37 (Supp. 1996) - Preference of 2.5% to resident bidders for construction contracts over $50,000; preference of 2.5% to resident bidders who employ at least 75% West Virginia residents; and preference of 2.5% to nonresident vendors who employ at least 100 residents and have at least 75% resident employees; §5A-3-37a (1993) - Reciprocal preference for commodities or printing.

WISCONSIN: Wisconsin Statutes, §16.75 (Supp. 1995) - Preference to resident bidders in the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, and contractual services against states that impose a resident preference; §16.855 (Supp. 1995) - Preference to resident bidders in construction projects against states that impose a resident preference; §44.57 (Supp. 1995) - Preference to resident artists for works of art in state buildings.

WYOMING: Wyoming Statutes Annotated, §16-6-102 (Supp. 1995) Preference of 5.0% in public works contracts; §16-6-301 (Supp. 1995) - Preference of 10% in printing contracts.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on March 5, 1997.

TRD-9703087

Judy Ponder

General Counsel

General Services Commission

Filed: March 5, 1997


Texas Department of Health

Notice of Revocation of Certificates of Registration

The Texas Department of Health, having duly filed complaints pursuant to Texas Regulations for Control of Radiation, Part 13 (25 Texas Administrative Code §289.112), has revoked the following certificates of registration: William Mitchell, M.D., Longview, R04824, June 24, 1997; Jerry Clem, D.D.S., Inc., Richardson, R06376, June 24, 1997; James M. Petty, Corpus Christi, R18773, June 24, 1997; Las Palmas Chiropractic, Corpus Christi, R19748, June 24, 1997; Downtown Advanced Medical Clinic, Houston, R20447, June 24, 1997; Biomedical Equipment Repair, Houston, R21709, June 24, 1997; W/C Chiropractic Clinic, Houston, R21879; June 24, 1997.

A copy of all relevant material is available for public inspection at the Bureau of Radiation Control, Exchange Building, 8407 Wall Street, Austin, Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (except holidays).

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 1997.

TRD-9708461

Susan K. Steeg

General Counsel

Texas Department of Health

Filed: June 30, 1997


Notice of a Request for Proposal for Epilepsy Services

Purpose: The Texas Department of Health (TDH), Epilepsy Program is requesting proposals for the provision of epilepsy services to eligible individuals, with special emphasis on adults 21 and older, in selected areas of the state.

Description: Epilepsy services will be reimbursed through contractual arrangements with TDH, Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control. Funds will be awarded for a two-year period from September 1, 1997 through August 31, 1999. Contracts will be in accordance with Texas law, TDH policies, Epilepsy Program Guidelines and the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards (UGCMS) manual which is available from TDH, Grants Management Division, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3199.

Eligible Applicants: Eligible offerors include nonprofit and/or governmental agencies that can provide the range of medical, non-medical and support activities deemed necessary to TDH to effectively serve eligible persons in the selected catchment areas.

Limitations: Funding for the selected proposal will depend upon available state appropriations. The Texas Department of Health reserves the right to reject any and all offerors received in response to the request for proposal (RFP) and cancel the RFP if it is deemed in the best interest of TDH.

Terms: The tentative effective date for the contract is September 1, 1997. A competitively procured contract usually begins at the start of each state fiscal year (September 1). At its option, TDH may negotiate the renewal or extension of any contract(s) on a noncompetitive basis for a total contract duration not to exceed 24 months.

Deadline: All proposals to be considered for funding through this RFP must be received by 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 1997, at the Texas Department of Health, Epilepsy Program, Attention: Ms. Elizabeth T. Flores, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756. Proposals received after this deadline or via fax transmission will not be accepted.

Evaluation and Selection: An internal evaluation by TDH staff will rank and score the proposals. The evaluation will be based upon the criteria outlined in the RFP.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 1997.

TRD-9708460

Susan K. Steeg

General Counsel

Texas Department of Health

Filed: June 30, 1997


Texas Department of Human Services

Notice of Consultant Contract Award-Year 2000 Phase II Conversion and Implementation

In accordance with the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2254, the Texas Department of Human Services (TDHS) publishes this notice of award of a consultant contract. The original request for consulting services was published in the April 15, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 3555).

The contract was awarded to Eligibility Management Systems (EMS), located at 111 Monument Circle, Suite 522, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204. The contractor agreed to provide oversight, quality assurance and Project Management for TDHS's Year 2000 Phase II Conversion and Implementation vendor. The dollar amount of the contract is not to exceed $1,358,000. The contract's duration is June 6, 1997 through August 31, 1999, and may be extended through May 18, 2000, with no additional funds. The contractor is not required to submit reports under the terms of the contract.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708408

Glen Scott

General Counsel

Texas Department of Human Services

Filed: June 27, 1997


Public Notice-Availability of Intended Use Report of 1988 Title XX Block Grant Funds

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) has published a report outlining the proposed intended use of federal block grant funds during fiscal year 1998 for Title XX social services programs administered by the Texas Department of Human Services, the Texas Department of Health, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, and the Texas Workforce Commission. To obtain free copies of the report, send written requests to Elisa Hendricks, Government Relations Division, Mail Code W-623, Texas Department of Human Services, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030. DHS is seeking written comments from representatives of both public and private sectors regarding the proposed use of Title XX block grant funds. Written comments will be accepted through August 4, 1997. Please mail comments to the address listed previously.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708357

Glen Scott

Agency Liaison

Texas Department of Human Services

Filed: June 26, 1997


Texas Department of Insurance

Insurer Services

The following applications have been filed with the Texas Department of Insurance and are under consideration:

Application for incorporation in Texas for Texas Facility Insurance Corporation, a domestic fire and casualty company. The home office is in Austin, Texas.

Application for a name change in Texas for Financial Assurance Incorporated, a domestic life, accident and health company. The proposed new name is Financial Assurance Life Insurance Company. The home office is in Dallas, Texas.

Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice was filed with the Texas Department of Insurance, addressed to the attention of Cindy Thurman, 333 Guadalupe Street, M/C 305-2C, Austin, Texas 78701.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708391

Bernice Ross

Deputy Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: June 27, 1997


Third Party Administrator Application

The following third party administrator (TPA) application has been filed with the Texas Department of Insurance and is under consideration.

Application for admission to Texas of Westport Management Services, Inc., a foreign third party administrator. The home office is Hockessin, Delaware.

Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice was filed with the Secretary of State, addressed to the attention of Charles M. Waits, MC 107-5A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78714-9104.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708390

Bernice Ross

Deputy Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: June 27, 1997


Texas Juvenile Probation Commission

Request for Proposals

Pursuant to HB 2031, 74th Texas Legislature regular session, and Rider #4 of the TJPC Appropriations by the 75th Texas Legislature regular session, the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission invites proposals for implementation of the TJPC Buffalo Soldier's Heritage Program in the five legislative designated counties of Bexar, Dallas, Tarrant, Tom Green, and Washington. The selected providers will report directly to the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission and the Buffalo Soldier's Heritage Program State Advisory Board.

Detailed specifications are contained in the Request for Proposal available June 23, 1997 from the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission at 4900 N. Lamar, 5th Floor, Austin, Texas 78751 and P.O. Box 13547, Austin, Texas 78711-3547. For additional information, contact Maribeth Powers, TJPC Director of Program Services, at (512) 424-6674 or Demetrius Lewis, TJPC Resource Specialist, at (512) 424-6686.

Proposals will be accepted only in writing and only at the offices of TJPC. Faxes will not be accepted. Proposals must be submitted with an original and two copies no later than 5:00 p.m., August 4, 1997. The Texas Juvenile Probation Commission reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.

The Texas Juvenile Probation Commission will consider proposals that provide the required services, knowledge of the Buffalo Soldiers history, experience in providing direct services to at-risk youth, experience in providing outdoor programming, and experience as a local community based and community supported entity.

The TJPC has the sole discretion and reserves the right to cancel the request for proposal if it is considered to be in the best interest of the agency to do so.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708298

Vicki Wright

Executive Director

Texas Juvenile Probation Commission

Filed: June 26, 1997


Lower Colorado River Authority

Request for Proposal — Public Notice

Sealed proposals will be received by the Lower Colorado River Authority, Corporate Purchasing Services, 3701 Lake Austin Boulevard, Hancock Building, Room H407H, Austin, Texas 78703 until 3:00 p.m. on July 28, 1997 for:

Legacy Systems Project

An Intent to Respond Form will be required by July 8, 1997. A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held on July 10, 1997. Information pertaining to this request may be accessed through the internet at www.lcra.org. Request for Proposals with specifications and information may also be obtained at the previous listed address or by calling 512-473-3210. LCRA reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 1997.

TRD-9708456

Glen E.Taylor

General Counsel

Lower Colorado River Authority

Filed: June 30, 1997


Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Notice of Cancellation of Public Hearing on Medicaid Rates

Notice is hereby given that the public hearing to receive comments on the department's proposed reimbursements for the Medicaid program Home and Community-based Services-OBRA (HCS-OBRA) scheduled for July 9, 1997, has been canceled. A public hearing to receive comments on the proposed reimbursement for the HCS-OBRA program will be rescheduled.

The Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation (TDMHMR) will conduct, as previously scheduled, a public hearing to receive comments on the department's proposed reimbursements for the period September 1, 1997, through August 31, 1998, for the Medicaid program Home and Community-based Services. The public hearing is held in compliance with Title 25, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 409, Subchapter A, §409.002(j), which requires a public hearing on proposed reimbursement rates for medical assistance programs.

The hearing will be held at 8:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 9, 1997, in the auditorium of the main TDMHMR Central Office building (building 2) at 909 West 45th Street in Austin, Texas.

Persons who wish to offer testimony but who are unable to attend the hearing may submit written comments which must be received by noon the day of the hearing. The written comments should be sent to the Data Analysis Section, Medicaid Administration, Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, P.O. Box 12668, Austin, Texas 78711-2668 or faxed to (512) 206-5725.

Interested parties may obtain a copy of the reimbursement briefing package by calling the Data Analysis Section at 512/206-5680. If interpreters for the hearing impaired are required, please contact the Data Analysis Section at the number given above at least 72 hours in advance of the hearing.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 30, 1997.

TRD-9708467

Ann K. Utley

Chair, Texas MHMR Board

Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Filed: June 30, 1997


Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Applications for Waste Disposal Permits

Notices of Applications for waste disposal permits issued during the period of June 23 thru June 27, 1997.

The Executive Director will issue these permits unless one or more persons file written protests and/or a request for a hearing within 30 days after newspaper publication of the notice.

To request a hearing, you must submit the following: (1) your name (or for a group or association, an official representative), mailing address, daytime phone number, and fax number, if any; (2) the name of the applicant and the permit number; (3) the statement "I/we request a public hearing;" (4) a brief description of how you would be adversely affected by the granting of the application in a way not common to the general public; (5) the location of your property relative to the applicant's operations; and (6) your proposed adjustments to the application/permit which would satisfy your concerns and cause you to withdraw your request for hearing.

Information concerning any aspect of these applications may be obtained by contacting the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Chief Clerks Office-MC105, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711. Individual members of the public who wish to inquire about the information contained in this notice, or to inquire about other agency permit applications or permitting processes, should call the TNRCC Office of Public Assistance, Toll Free, at 1-800-687-4040.

Listed are the name of the applicant and the city in which the facility is located, type of facility, location of the facility, type of application-new permit, amendment, or renewal and permit number.

CITY OF TRINITY, P.O. Drawer 431, Trinity, Texas 75862; wastewater treatment plant; located approximately 1,500 feet east-southeast of the intersection of Pegoda Road (Farm-to-Market Road 356) and Ramey Street in southeast Trinity in Trinity County, Texas; renewal; 10617-001.

TIMOTHY BRENT CLAIBORNE, 712 North Broadway #99, Joshua, Texas 76058; wastewater treatment facilities; located on the west side of U.S. Highway 287 approximately 4,500 feet southeast of its junction with State Highway 114 in Wise County, Texas; renewal; 13142-001.

TAPATIO SPRINGS SERVICE COMPANY, P.O. Box 550, Boerne, Texas 78006; wastewater treatment facilities and disposal site; located approximately 1200 feet south of the intersection of Interstate Highway 10 and Farm-to-Market Road 475 in Kendall County, Texas; renewal; 12404-001.

CITY OF BLOOMING GROVE, P.O. Box 237, Blooming Grove, Texas; 76626-0237; wastewater treatment facilities; located on the west bank of Rush Creek, at a point approximately 4,200 feet southeast of the intersection of State Highway 22 and Farm-to-Market Road 55 in Navarro County, Texas; renewal; 11606-001.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 18, c/o Vinson & Elkins, 1001 Fannin Street, 2300 First City Tower, Houston, Texas 77002-6760; wastewater treatment plant; located adjacent to Lake Conroe and Rusty Creek; approximately 1.0 mile southwest of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 1097 and Bentwater Drive in Montgomery County, Texas; renewal; 13273-001.

CITY OF BEASLEY, P.O. Box 122, Beasley, Texas 77417; wastewater treatment plant; located approximately 3,000 feet east of the intersection of U.S. Highway 59 (Southwest Freeway) and Farm-to-Market Road 1875, approximately 3,000 feet west-southwest of the intersection of U.S. Highway 59 and Eslieb Road, on the frontage of Emerson Road south of the City of Beasley in Fort Bend County, Texas; renewal; 11450-001.

TECSAFE, LLC., 2711 Shaver, Pasadena, Texas, 77502; commercial industrial hazardous and non-hazardous waste treatment research, development, and demonstration facility for the storage and processing of hazardous waste and Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 non-hazardous industrial solid wastes; located on State Highway 176, on approximately 100 acres, 30 miles west of Andrews, in Andrews County, Texas; new; HW-50366; a 45-day comment period for this application.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708419

Eugenia K. Brumm, Ph.D.

Chief Clerk

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Filed: June 27, 1997


Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Notice of Availability and Request for Comments on a Proposed Settlement of Natural Resource Damages Claim

AGENCIES: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas General Land Office and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (hereafter, Natural Resource Trustees).

ACTION: Notice of availability of a proposed settlement and of a 30 day period for public comment on the settlement.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following proposed resolution of a claim in United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Texas, Paris Division (In Re: Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., Debtor, Case Number 96-31549-11) for natural resource damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and applicable state law.

The Natural Resource Trustees, acting through the Attorney General's Office, have reached an agreement with Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc. (VPG) to resolve VPG's and several other entities' liability for injuries to natural resources and the services they provide caused by the release of hazardous substances from a former VPG facility.

VPG operated a pesticide formulation and packaging operation in Commerce, Texas, from the early 1940's until approximately 1970. Releases from VPG's facility caused the contamination of Sayle Creek, a stream located adjacent to and downstream of the plant location, with arsenic and a variety of pesticides (including toxaphene, dieldrin and DDT). Injuries to natural resources and services subject to Natural Resource Trustees' authority, including the contamination of creek waters and sediment and injuries to biota, occurred as a result of the releases.

The proposed settlement, requires VPG to construct a restoration project in the general vicinity of the site composed of not less than 11.2 acres of freshwater wetlands and 4.5 acres of riparian habitat. The exact location has not yet been determined but the restoration project will be located adjacent to an existing waterway and connected to the waterway in such a manner that the waterway periodically supplies water to the constructed wetlands and at such time provides for the opportunity for ingress and egress of aquatic organisms. The wetlands component of the project shall be comprised of a complex of interconnected open water and vegetated marsh areas. The wetlands shall be composed of multiple (greater than three) permanently flooded open water ponds adding up to a total of 2-3 acres, with the remainder of the area being made up of depressional wetlands and shelves that are connected via multiple channels to the open water ponds. Wetland areas shall be planted with multiple species of high, emergent and floating wetland vegetation indigenous to or compatible with the local area. The required riparian areas shall be interspersed around and throughout the wetlands in a logical pattern that maximizes the opportunity for wildlife access and cover. Riparian vegetation shall be composed of a variety of ground cover, mid-story and over-story species indigenous to or compatible with the local area that provide beneficial services for wildlife and shall include hardwood tree species. VPG shall pay all costs associated with site acquisition and the design, planning, permitting, construction, maintenance, and monitoring of the Restoration Project, up to $800,000. The Natural Resource Trustees will oversee project design, construction and post-construction monitoring of project performance.

The opportunity for public review and comment on the proposed settlement announced in this notice is required under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and parallel provisions of 43 CFR 11.32 (c) of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment regulations.

Interested members of the public are invited to request a copy of the proposed settlement from Don Pitts, Resource Protection Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin , Texas 78744, (512) 389-4726.

DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing on or before August 1, 1997 to Don Pitts, Resource Protection Division, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin , Texas 78744, (512) 389-4726, fax (512) 389-4799. Written comments received will be considered by the Natural Resource Trustees and the Attorney General in finalizing the proposed agreement.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708406

Bill Harvey

Regulatory Coordinator

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Filed: June 27, 1997


Texas Public Finance Authority

Request for Proposals for Bond Counsel

The Texas Public Finance Authority (the Authority) is requesting proposals for bond counsel services. The deadline for proposal submission is noon, July 28, 1997.

The Authority's Board of Directors (the Board) will make its selection based upon demonstrated competence, experience, knowledge and qualifications, as well as the reasonableness of the proposed fee for the service to be rendered. Firms responding to the Request for Proposal must maintain a Texas office staffed with personnel who are responsible for providing bond counsel service to the Authority. All things being equal, the Board will give first consideration to firms whose principal place of business is located in Texas. By the Request for Proposal, however, the Board has not committed itself to employ bond counsel nor does the suggested scope of service or term of agreement therein require that the bond counsel be employed for any or all of those purposes. The Board reserves the right to make those decisions after receipt of proposals and the Board's decision on these matters is final. The Board reserves the right to negotiate individual elements of the Firm's proposal and to reject any and all proposals

Copies of the Request for Proposal may be obtained by calling or writing Marce Watkins or Jeanine Barron, Texas Public Finance Authority, P.O. Box 12906, Austin, Texas 78711, (512) 463-5544.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 25, 1997.

TRD-9708290

Kimberly K. Edwards

Executive Director

Texas Public Finance Authority

Filed: June 25, 1997


Request for Proposals for Financial Advisor

The Texas Public Finance Authority (the Authority) is requesting proposals for financial advisory services. The deadline for proposal submission is noon, July 23, 1997.

The Board will make its selection based upon demonstrated competence, experience, knowledge and qualifications, as well as the reasonableness of the proposed fee for the service to be rendered. Firms responding to the Request for Proposal must maintain a Texas office staffed with personnel who are responsible for providing financial advisory services to the Authority. All things being equal, the Board will give first consideration to firms whose principal place of business is located in Texas. By the Request for Proposal, however, the Board has not committed itself to employ a financial advisor nor does the suggested scope of service or term of agreement therein require that the financial advisor be employed for any or all of those purposes. The Board reserves the right to make those decisions after receipt of proposals and the Board's decision on these matters is final. The Authority reserves the right to negotiate individuals elements of the firm's proposal and to reject any and all proposals

Copies of the Request for Proposal may be obtained by calling or writing Marce Watkins or Jeanine Barron, Texas Public Finance Authority, P.O. Box 12906, Austin, Texas 78711, (512) 463-5544.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 25, 1997.

TRD-9708289

Kimberly K. Edwards

Executive Director

Texas Public Finance Authority

Filed: June 25, 1997


Public Utility Commission Of Texas

Notice Of Application For Service Provider Certificate Of Operating Authority

Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas an application on June 20, 1997, for a service provider certificate of operating authority (SPCOA), pursuant to §3.2532 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1995. A summary of the application follows.

Docket Title and Number: Application of North Texas Telecommunications for a Service Provider Certificate of Operating Authority, Docket Number 17604 before the Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Applicant intends to provide resale of all local exchange services currently offered by the local exchange carriers, i.e., local service, touch call, call-waiting, speed call. This would include any service the local exchange carrier will provide for resale.

Applicant's requested SPCOA geographic area includes the exchanges served by GTE Southwest, Inc. of Argyle, Bartonville, Carrollton, Coppell, Denton, Lewisville and Justin, Texas.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or call the commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120 no later than July 9, 1997. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708341

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


Notices Of Intent To File Pursuant To Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27

Notice is given to the public of the intent to file with the Public Utility Commission of Texas an application pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27 for a 50 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for Schertz-Cibolo ISD in Schertz, Texas.

Tariff Title and Number: Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a 50 Station Addition to the Existing PLEXAR-Custom Service for Schertz-Cibolo ISD in Schertz, Texas, Pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27. Tariff Control Number 17608.

The Application: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is requesting approval for a 50 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for Schertz-Cibolo ISD in Schertz, Texas. The geographic service market for this specific service is the San Antonio local access and transport area.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or call the commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512)936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708342

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


Notice is given to the public of the intent to file with the Public Utility Commission of Texas an application pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27 for a 16 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for the City of Fort Worth in Fort Worth, Texas.

Tariff Title and Number: Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a 16 Station Addition to the Existing PLEXAR-Custom Service for the City of Fort Worth in Fort Worth, Texas, Pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27. Tariff Control Number 17606.

The Application: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is requesting approval for a 16 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for the City of Fort Worth in Fort Worth, Texas. The geographic service market for this specific service is the Dallas local access and transport area.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or call the commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708343

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


Notice is given to the public of the intent to file with the Public Utility Commission of Texas an application pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27 for a new PLEXAR-Custom service for Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas.

Tariff Title and Number: Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a New PLEXAR-Custom Service for Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas, Pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27. Tariff Control Number 17603.

The Application: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is requesting approval for a new PLEXAR-Custom service for Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas. The geographic service market for this specific service is the Lubbock local access and transport area.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or call the commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708344

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


Notice is given to the public of the intent to file with the Public Utility Commission of Texas an application pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27 for a 24 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for Amarillo ISD in Amarillo, Texas.

Tariff Title and Number: Application of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a 24 Station Addition to the Existing PLEXAR-Custom Service for Amarillo ISD in Amarillo, Texas, Pursuant to Public Utility Commission Substantive Rule 23.27. Tariff Control Number 17602.

The Application: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company is requesting approval for a 24 station addition to the existing PLEXAR-Custom service for Amarillo ISD in Amarillo, Texas. The geographic service market for this specific service is the Amarillo local access and transport area.

Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or call the commission's Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708345

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


Public Notice of Interconnection Agreement

On June 13, 1997, GTE Southwest Incorporated (GTE-SW) and PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P. (PrimeCo) collectively referred to as Applicants, filed a joint application for approval of an interconnection agreement adopted pursuant to §252(i) of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (FTA96), 47 United States Code, §§151 et. seq., and the Public Utility Regulatory Act of 1995 (PURA), Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated, Article 1446c-O, (Vernon 1997). The joint application has been designated Docket Number 17582. The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement are available for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin, Texas.

The FTA96 authorizes the commission to review and approve any interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation of the parties. Pursuant to FTA96 §252(e)(2) the commission may reject any agreement if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement, or that implementation of the agreement, or any portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity. Additionally, under FTA96 §252(e)(3), the commission may establish or enforce other requirements of state law in its review of the agreement, including requiring compliance with intrastate telecommunications service quality standards or requirements. The commission must act to approve the agreement within 90 days after it is submitted by the parties.

The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments on the joint application by filing 18 copies of the comments with the commission's filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each of the Applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number 17582. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public hearing, shall be filed by July 21, 1997, and shall include:

1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those interests;

2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:

a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party to the agreement; or

b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity; or

c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and

3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.

After reviewing any comments, the commission will determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence by the Applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.

Persons with questions about this docket or who wish to comment on the application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may call the Public Utility Commission Office of Consumer Affairs at (512) 936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence should refer to Docket Number 17582.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 27, 1997.

TRD-9708420

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Filed: June 27, 1997


Railroad Commission of Texas

Notice of Extended Comment Period and Public Hearing

In the May 9, 1997, Texas Register (22 TexReg 4046), the Railroad Commission of Texas proposed the repeal of §§9.20- 9.27, and new §§9.20, 9.21, 9.22, 9.24, 9.25, and 9.26, and amendments to §9.29 regarding notice to real property owners concerning installation of a new LP-gas container or an addition to an existing LP-gas installation. Also published in that issue at 22 TexReg 4112 were proposed new LPG Forms 500 and 500A. The original comment period ended June 23, 1997. Due to the public interest and number of comments received, the Commission hereby extends the comment period to Friday, August 15, 1997, at 5:00 p.m. Comments may be submitted to Kellie Martinec, Rules Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, Railroad Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967. For further information, contact Thomas D. Petru at the Railroad Commission at 512-463-6949.

In addition, the Commission will hold a public comment hearing on these rules on Wednesday, August 13, 1997, from 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. in the William B. Travis Building, Room 1-111, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas.

Any interested person may appear and offer comments, either orally or in writing; however, questioning for those making oral comments will be reserved exclusively for the presiding officers as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. Depending upon the number of speakers, the commission may limit the time for comments to afford all interested parties an opportunity to comment. While any person with pertinent comments will be granted an opportunity to present them during the course of the meeting, the presiding officers reserve the right to restrict comments in terms of time and repetitive content. Organizations, associations, and groups are encouraged to present their commonly held views and identical or similar comments through a single representative member where possible. Presentations must remain pertinent to the issues being discussed. A person may not assign a portion of his or her time to another speaker. A person who disrupts the public meeting must leave the hearing room if ordered to do so by the presiding officers.

Comments on the proposed rules, including suggestions or requests for alternative language or other revisions, should be submitted in writing and should include citation to sections, subsections, paragraphs, etc., for proper reference.

Any person with a disability who needs auxiliary aids and/or services in order to have an equal opportunity to communicate and participate effectively in this public hearing must request such aids or services by 3:00 p.m., Monday, July 28, 1997, by notifying the Personnel Office of the Railroad Commission by mail at P.O. Box 12967, Austin, Texas 78711-2967, or by telephone at (512) 463-7327 or TDD Number (512) 463-7284.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on June 26, 1997.

TRD-9708334

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel, Office of General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Filed: June 26, 1997


University of Houston System

Request for Proposals (Readvertisement) Student Information System Business Process Analysis Project

This Request for Proposal (RFP) is filed under the Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter B, §2254.028.

University of Houston-System Business Process Analysis Project July 1, 1997

Project Background: In addition to being statutorily autonomous, the component campuses of the University of Houston System (The University of Houston (UH), University of Houston-Clear Lake (UHCL), University of Houston-Downtown (UHD), and the University of Houston-Victoria (UHV) reflect distinctly different missions ranging from doctoral and research programs, to upper-level and graduate programs to open admissions undergraduate and developmental education. UH and UHD are located in the center of the City of Houston; UHCL's campus is approximately 20 miles southeast, in Clear Lake City, while UHV is 110 miles southwest of Houston in Victoria. Collectively the campuses strive to provide leadership in providing high quality, post-secondary educational opportunities for the third largest metropolitan area in the country.

Currently, these component campuses use different student information systems. For the past twelve months the campuses have been reviewing state-of-the-art student information systems and are committed to acquiring a common student information system which allows decision makers, whether the board of regents, senior management, or mid-management levels to easily access information that is consistent across components. In addition UHS seeks to increase the integration of the processes within the student information system, among other university systems, and private service entities. The newly acquired system will be engineered as an Oracle application, and will be functionally integrated to a newly acquired, Oracle based, UH-System Financial System application.

The University of Houston-System solicits proposals to provide leadership and technical support to complete a Student Information System, Business Process Analysis exercise that will lead to a smooth and successful transition to a common student information system, that will achieve these previously stated goals.

Project Scope: RFP's submitted for this project should cover, at a minimum, the following activities:

1) A review and documentation of campus student information system related business process including recruiting, admissions, registration, student billing and receivables, catalog management , class scheduling and facilities management, faculty management, grades, security, financial aid, degree auditing, alumni development, student housing, and institutional assessment tools.

2) Detailed review sessions with key campus customer managers in each functional area to articulate opportunities warranting business process reengineering. These sessions must also include opportunities to incorporate needed inter-campus SIS and MIS related business process rengineering opportunities.

3) Detailed documentation of all targeted (existing and reengineered) processes, including analysis to determine how acquired software will address these identified processes.

4) Completion of documentation and preparation of rules processes for inclusion in a Oracle-based SIS system application.

5) Finalize student data, options, default rules, security and reporting requirements.

RFP Requirements: Six Copies of vendor proposals should be submitted to the attention of: Mr. Chuck Shomper, Associate Vice President for Information Technology, E. Cullen 111A, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204

RFP Submission Deadline:

Noon, Thursday July 30, 1997

In addition to covering the points summarized in the Project Scope section, vendor responses must also include the following information.

1) Detailed BPR project timelines with clearly articulated benchmark points and sample deliverables.

2) Summary of vendor project team leadership to be dedicated to the project, including vita for all proposed project team leadership.

3) Estimates of campus staff time required to complete each of the project activities.

4) Projected cost estimates detailed as follows: aggregated costs of project scope activities 1-5 numbers.

5) Vendor References including sites where vendor has led student information system BPR activities. References must include campus contact persons with current addresses and phone numbers.

6) Sample project deliverables paralleling activities outlined in Project Scope section.

The following information and format must be provided by the proposer. Any proposal not providing the required information for conforming to the format may be eliminated in the evaluation. Proposals shall be prepared by typewriter or word processor and shall be initialed in ink by an authorized representative of the company. Alterations or erasures shall be initialed in ink by the person signing the RFP. At least one proposal submitted by the proposer must bear an original signature. Failure to submit a proposal bearing an original signature will result in rejection of the proposal. No oral, telegraphic, telephone or facsimile proposals will be accepted.

Proposals must be complete, including at a minimum points covered in Project Scope and RFP Requirements Sections. Incomplete proposals cannot be considered and cannot be supplemented by submissions delivered after the closing time and date of the RFP.

The following two documents must be submitted as a complete proposer response:

*Cover letter: A cover letter prepared on the proposer's business stationary must accompany the system and cost proposals. The purpose of this letter is to transmit the proposal, so it should be brief.

*The letter must contain a statement that the vendor is responding to the UHS Student Information System Business Process Reengineering Project RFP. It must contain the following items: a statement that the attached proposal is complete as submitted and a statement that all prices, delivery schedules, and other significant factors contained in the proposal are valid for 90 days from the proposal closing date. The letter must be signed by a representative who is authorized to contractually obligate the proposer.

*Proposal Narrative: The proposal should be prepared in a clear and concise manner and it should address all appropriate points in this RFP including all points outlined in the Project Scope, and RFP Requirements section.

The UHS reserves the right to reject all proposals or request any information it deems necessary to make the final determination as to the proposer's ability to provide the items requested before entering into any contract. By submitting a proposal, the proposer agrees to be governed by the terms and conditions set forth in this document and any variations may, at the sole discretion of the university, render such proposal non responsive. Any inconsistencies between the RFP and the laws of the State of Texas, except where subsequent amendments to any contract resulting from this RFP are specifically agreed to in writing by the parties to supersede any such provision of this RFP.

Vendor questions regarding this RFP may be directed to either: Mr. Chuck Shomper (UH) 713-743-1600 or Dr. C. Van Wyatt (UHCL) 281-283-3021

Issued in Houston, Texas, on June 25, 1997.

TRD-9708392

Chuck Shomper

Associated Vice President for Information Technology

University of Houston

Filed: June 27, 1997