PROPOSED RULES Before an agency may permanently adopt a new or amended section or repeal an existing section, a proposal detailing the action must be published in the Texas Register at least 30 days before action is taken. The 30-day time period gives interested persons an opportunity to review and make oral or written comments on the section. Also, in the case of substantive action, a public hearing must be granted if requested by at least 25 persons, a governmental subdivision or agency, or an association having at least 25 members. Symbology in proposed amendments. New language added to an existing section is indicated by the use of bold text. [Brackets] indicate deletion of existing material within a section. TITLE 7. BANKING AND SECURITIES Part III. State Banking Board Chapter 31. Miscellaneous 7 TAC sec.31.5 The State Banking Commissioner, on behalf of the State Banking Board of Texas pursuant to 7 TAC sec.35.6, proposes an amendment to 7 TAC sec.31.5 regarding substitute members of the State Banking Board. Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342-115, provides that the Deputy Treasurer and the Deputy Banking Commissioner may substitute at State Banking Board meetings for the State Treasurer and the Banking Commissioner, respectively, but only if identified by name in an enabling rule. The proposed amendment identifies the current Deputy Treasurer. Everette D. Jobe, general counsel, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. Mr. Jobe also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be the ability of the Board to conduct official meetings in the absence of either the State Treasurer or the Texas Banking Commissioner. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons or entities who are required to comply with the section as proposed. Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Everette D. Jobe, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294. The amendment is proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342-115, which provide the State Banking Board with the authority to prescribe by rule the individual who is authorized to sit as a substitute member of the Board when the State Treasurer or the Banking Commissioner is unable to personally attend an official meeting of the State Banking Board, and under 7 TAC sec.35.6, which delegates the authority to propose rules for public comment to the Banking Commissioner. The following are the articles and sections that are affected by the proposed amended sec.30.5: Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342-115. sec.31.5. Members of the Board. When either the state treasurer or commissioner is unable to personally attend an official meeting of the board, the respective first deputy of such member may appear and vote. The present first deputy to the treasurer is Michael D. Doyle,
    [Paul J. Williams,] deputy treasurer, and the present deputy to the commissioner is Randall S. James, deputy banking commissioner. Two such deputies may not sit as substitute members of the board at the same time. This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's authority to adopt. Issued in Austin, Texas, on January 5, 1994. TRD-9434205 Everette D. Jobe General Counsel Texas Department of Banking Earliest possible date of adoption: February 11, 1994 For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300 TITLE 34. PUBLIC FINANCE Part I. Comptroller of Public Accounts Chapter 9. Property Tax Administration Subchapter I. Validation Procedures 34 TAC sec.9.4031 The Comptroller of Public Accounts proposes new sec.9.4031, concerning the methods and procedures necessary to discount future income from the sale of oil or gas to present value. Section 9.4031 consists of a manual called Manual for Discounting Oil and Gas Income. The new section is necessary because House Bill 925, 73rd Legislature, 1993, requires the comptroller to develop and distribute this manual for discounting oil and gas income to appraisal districts. The manual gives the appraisal districts methods and procedures for discounting future income from the sale of oil and gas to present value. The manual explains the concept of discounting; the discounted cash flow equation; discounted cash flow appraisal; discount rate components; and three acceptable techniques for estimating a "discount rate" in the discounted cash flow method: market surveys, sales, and weighted average cost of capital. Mike Reissig, chief revenue estimator, has determined that for the first five- year period the rule will be in effect there will be no significant revenue impact on the state or local government. Mr. Reissig also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be in providing new information regarding tax responsibilities. There are no significant fiscal implications for small businesses. There is no significant anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed rule. Comments on the new section may be submitted to Barbara Truesdale, Manager, Property Tax Division, P.O. Box 13528, Austin, Texas 78711-3528. The new section is proposed under the Tax Code, sec.23.175, which requires the comptroller to develop and distribute to each appraisal office appraisal manuals that specify methods and procedures to discount future income from the sale of oil and gas from the interest to present value. The new section implements the Tax Code, sec.23.175. sec.9.4031. Manual for Discounting Oil and Gas Income. (a) The Comptroller of Public Accounts adopts a Manual for Discounting Oil and Gas Income
      , with text as follows. (b) Basis of the Manual for Discounting Oil and Gas Income
        . (1) Property Tax Code, sec.23.175, enacted by the 73rd Legislature, 1993, requires the comptroller's office to develop and distribute to each appraisal district an appraisal manual that specifies the methods and procedures to calculate the present value of oil and gas properties using discounted future income. (2) Section 23.175 also directs each appraisal district to use the specified methods and procedures. (c) Introduction. (1) This manual explains the concept of discounting, the discounted cash flow (DCF) equation, DCF appraisal and three acceptable techniques for estimating a "discount rate" in the DCF method. The numbers used in the calculations are for illustrative purposes only. (2) The three acceptable techniques for estimating discount rates are: (A) market surveys; (B) oil and gas sales analysis; and (C) weighted average cost of capital (WACC), also called "band of investment." (3) Together, these techniques provide a range of discount rates. The appraiser must estimate the risk for each oil or gas property to assign a discount rate from the discount rate range. (4) The appendices provide examples to illustrate DCF appraisal, the WACC estimating technique, a standard deviation analysis and a description of property specific risk factors. (d) Discounting. (1) Because investors prefer immediate cash returns over future cash returns, investors pay less for future cash flows-they "discount" them. The amount investors discount the future cash flows depends on the length of time until the cash is due, the amount of risk that the cash will not be tendered when due and the rate of return available from other comparably risky investments. This discounting procedure converts future income to present value usually using annual discount factors. The discount factor for each successive year declines to reflect the reduced value of revenue received in the future. The appraiser calculates the present worth of the forecast revenue stream by multiplying the projected net income (cash flow) for each year by the calculated discount factor for that year. These discount factors are derived from the discount rate (also known as the yield rate), and the process is known as discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. (2) The International Association of Assessing Officers in Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration
          (1990) defines "discount rate" as: "The rate of return on investment; the rate an investor requires to discount future income to its present worth. It is made up of an interest rate and an equity yield rate. Theoretical factors considered in setting a discount rate are the safe rate earned from a completely riskless investment (this rate may reflect anticipated loss of purchasing power due to inflation) and compensation for risk, lack of liquidity, and investment management expenses. The discount rate is most often estimated by band-of-investment analysis or a sales comparison analysis that estimates typical internal rates of return." (3) The discount rate is a key variable in discounted cash flow analysis, making correct rate selection crucial. The market's expectations are critical when choosing a discount rate. According to the Appraisal of Real Estate
            by the Appraisal Institute (1992): "The selection of the yield discount rate is critical to DCF analysis. To select an appropriate rate an appraiser must verify and interpret the attitudes and expectations of market participants, including buyers, sellers, advisers, and brokers. Although the actual yield on an investment cannot be calculated until the investment is sold, an investor may set a target yield for the investment before or during ownership. Historical yield rates derived from comparable sales may be relevant, but they reflect past, not future, benefits in the mind of the investor and may not be reliable indicators of current yield. Therefore, the selection of yield rates for discounting cash flows should focus on the prospective or forecast yield rates anticipated by typical buyers and sellers of comparable investments. An appraiser can verify investor assumptions directly by interviewing the parties to comparable sales transactions or indirectly by estimating the income expectancy and likely reversion for a comparable property and deriving a prospective yield rate." (e) Discounted cash flow appraisal. (1) The DCF method is versatile and widely used to appraise property. An appraiser using DCF first projects an anticipated net income for each year of the property's remaining economic life. Each annual cash flow is discounted to present value, and then all the present values are added to obtain the total market value of the real property interest being appraised. (2) The DCF formula is expressed as follows: [graphic] (3) To estimate the present value (PV), an estimate of the income (cash flow) to be received in each period is necessary. The number of periods, (usually years) used in the analysis is determined by the number of years that the mineral property is expected to produce a positive net income. (4) There are many variations on the DCF formula. The formulas vary based on the time the money is received, i.e., continuously, beginning of period, middle of period or end of period. The period may be continuous, daily, monthly, quarterly, bi-annual or annual. Many oil properties are evaluated using an annual mid-period discounting variation of the DCF formula. The appropriate present worth factor for mid-year DCF analysis is: [graphic] (5) Appendix 1 illustrates how a discounted cash flow is calculated, using a mid-year factor, for a mineral property. (f) Discount rate components. (1) Components. The discount rate used in discounted cash flow analysis has several components. These include: (A) inflation rate; (B) risk-free component; (C) general risk premium; and (D) property-specific risk premium. (2) The inflation rate. The annual rate of price change for a basket of consumer goods. Inflation is normally measured by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), calculated by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. The inflation rate is the most basic component of a discount rate. An investor's rate of return must equal the rate of inflation just to break even in real dollar terms. (3) The risk-free component. A return to compensate the investor for a loss of liquidity. This component can also be defined as the risk-free rate minus the inflation rate. The risk free rate is made up of the inflation rate plus a return to reimburse the investor for a loss of liquidity and is measured by the yield to maturity on Federal government securities with a maturity period comparable to the investment under consideration (oil or gas reserves in this case). The market perceives these securities as risk-free for all practical purposes since they are issued by the United States government. (4) General risk premium. (A) A return to compensate the investor for assuming diversified company-wide risk. The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) minus the risk-free rate is the general risk premium. The WACC is measured by weighting the typical oil company debt and equity costs by the typical oil company debt and equity capital structure percentages, and then adding the weighted costs. If one were appraising companies, the WACC would be the discount rate since it reflects the market's expected yields from the stock and debt of a company. Calculation of a WACC will be explained in more detail later in this manual. (B) For property tax purposes, appraisers estimate the value of individual mineral reserves, not the value of oil companies. Buyers of mineral reserves usually perceive these individual reserves as riskier than the stock and debt of an entire company. Companies can spread their risk over many individual mineral reserves and often over several kinds of assets (some of which are unrelated to the oil or gas business). This asset diversification reduces the company's risk and, as a result, the WACC derived from company financial data is usually lower than an individual producing property's discount rate. However, the WACC is always higher than the risk-free rate. This increase in the rate is a general risk premium to reward investors for assuming the diversified company-wide risk. (5) Property-specific risk premium. A return that compensates the investor for assuming the unique risks associated with a particular mineral producing property. The discount rate minus the WACC is the property-specific risk premium. Investors demand a premium above the WACC to compensate them for this individual property risk. For certain high-risk properties, this premium can be quite high. See subsection (k)(3) of this section (Appendix 4) for a list of property-specific risk factors. (6) Component summary. These discount rate components can be summarized: [graphic] (A) There are other ways to "build up" a discount rate. This method's advantage is that the first three components are quantifiable from public data. The property-specific risk premium may be derived from available data in some cases, but in general, the appraiser must estimate it. (B) Refer to subsection (k)(3) of this section (Appendix 4) for mineral- property conditions that should be considered when estimating the property specific risk premium. (g) Using the three techniques. (1) Components contained in the three techniques. (A) Market surveys and sales analysis result in rates that include all of the discount rate components. However, in these two techniques, the rate included for the property-specific risk premium is the typical rate for the properties included in the survey or sales analysis. The appraiser must estimate the property-specific risk premium (unless the sales sample is directly comparable to the property being appraised) and adjust for atypically high or low risk. This means that the appraiser must reduce the risk premium for properties with less than the typical risk and increase the risk premium for properties with more than the typical risk. (B) The third technique (WACC) produces a rate that does not contain a component for property-specific risk. Because it lacks this component, the typical WACC of potential purchasers sets a minimum value for a discount rate and the appraiser must calculate the typical WACC of potential purchasers to know this lower limit. On a case-by-case basis, the appraiser should exclude oil companies from the WACC calculation if they cannot participate in the market for the property he or she is currently appraising. For instance, small companies may not be able to bid on certain very valuable oil and gas properties because of insufficient capital. A typical WACC for larger oil companies would establish an appropriate minimum discount rate for appraising these properties. (C) An investor should not buy a property at a lower discount rate than his or her WACC, otherwise the investor's net worth will decrease. The appraiser must add the property-specific risk premium to the typical WACC of potential purchasers to develop a discount rate. See subsection (k)(3) of this section (Appendix 4) for a list of property-specific risk factors. (2) Developing a range. (A) Ideally, the appraiser should use these three techniques simultaneously to develop a range of discount rates. The typical WACC sets the lower limit, while surveys and direct sales analysis provide a set of discount rates that the appraiser can use as a database that will help to estimate a midrange discount rate and an upper limit to the discount rate. Examples of these techniques can be found in subsection (k)(3) of this section (the appendices). (B) Some mineral properties may appear to sell at or below the purchaser's WACC. There are several reasons that a mineral property may appear to change hands at a discount rate equal to or less than the WACC. When a buyer (or appraiser) reduces the cash flows to account for reserve recovery risk the discount rate will not reflect the risk, but the purchase price will. To calculate a discount rate that is comparable to discount rates from other sales, the appraiser must quantify the risk adjustment and add it back to the cash flows. This discount rate will be higher than the non-risk-inclusive rate. (C) Atypical income tax deductions, or abnormally high or low overhead can also create an artificially high or low discount rate. When faced with market evidence that would indicate a discount rate at less than a company's cost of capital, the appraiser should review all other appraisal parameters to determine why an abnormally low discount rate is indicated. An understated income stream is the most obvious reason. The appraiser may be able to adjust the cash flows and derive a market discount rate or may delete the sale from consideration. (h) Market surveys. (1) An appraiser may use market surveys as an indicator of the discount rate. Many studies and surveys are published to help the appraiser estimate an appropriate discount rate or range of rates for appraising oil and gas properties. The Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers' (SPEE) Annual Survey
              and the Western States Petroleum Association's (WSPA) Analysis of Oil and Gas Property Transfers and Sales and Derivation of a Band of Investment
                are good examples. (2) The SPEE survey asks producers', consultants', and bankers' opinions on future prices, cost escalation and economic indices (including the discount rate) used in petroleum property evaluation. (3) The WSPA study, conducted by Richard J. Miller and Associates, consists of two parts: an analysis of oil and gas property transactions and sales occurring in California from 1984 through the current year and an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) or "Band of Investment" of a representative group of companies for the same years. The WACC analysis is based on public data. (i) Developing a discount rate from sales. (1) Basic steps. To develop a discount rate from sales requires three basic steps: (A) obtain recent sales prices from a variety of oil and gas producing properties; (B) develop cash flow projections for each property; and (C) calculate the internal rate of return (IRR) for each sale. This is also known as the discounted cash flow return on investment (DCFROI). (2) Sales sources. Information about sales can be obtained from a variety of sources, but the best source is the buyer or seller. Other sources that list sales of oil and gas property include the Texas Railroad Commission, Oil and Gas Journal 300
                  , Strevig and Associates, private firms and oil and gas companies. It is important to remember that the sale of an oil or gas property must be a market transaction when developing a discount rate from sales. (3) Cash flow projections. After obtaining verified sales prices, the appraiser develops cash flow projections for each property. To the extent possible, the appraiser must talk with the parties to each sale to determine their expectations of the property and take those into account when making projections. The validity of the derived discount rate is a direct function of the amount of information obtained from the buyer and seller about their cash flow projections. The appraiser must incorporate this information into his or her projections. If the appraiser's projections differ from the buyer's and seller's expectations, the discount rate derived from the sale will be invalid. (4) Calculating the IRR. (A) The third step in developing a discount rate from sales is to calculate the internal rate of return (IRR). The IRR is the yield (discount) rate at which the present value of a cash income stream equals the present value of the cash expenditures (the sales price in our analysis) necessary to produce that income stream. This discount rate is prospective; it does not depend on the historical performance of the property, but on the market participants' expectations of future performance. The discount rate at which the present value of the cash flows equals the sales price can be determined by trial and error. However, there are several calculators and personal computer software packages that can solve for the discount rate (IRR). (B) Although computational procedures may vary slightly, this measure is also referred to as the profitability-index and investor's method. The IRR recognizes that funds received now are more valuable than those received at some future time. The investment outlay can be regarded as borrowed funds and the pre-tax cash flow as the payment of principle plus compound interest on the investment. (j) Weighted average cost of capital. (1) Definition. A widely used method for deriving a pre-tax base discount rate for valuation purposes is the band of investment, or WACC technique. The basis for this analysis is the financial data from a broad sample of oil companies that derive a majority of their operating revenues from oil and gas production. Since petroleum property valuation typically involves discounting cash flows over a long period of time, a long-term cost of capital is most appropriate for developing an oil or gas property discount rate. Thus, the appraiser should incorporate a broad time series of data to approximate a long- term cost of capital. (2) Required calculations. Four sets of calculations are required to determine the WACC. (A) The typical capital structure is derived and expressed as a proportion of debt and equity. (B) The typical cost of outstanding debt is calculated based on bond yields. (C) The typical cost of equity is computed using the Capital Asset Pricing Model
                    (CAPM) or another method such as the DCF Model
                      . (D) Debt and equity costs are weighted according to the typical capital structure percentages and added to derive a typical cost of capital. (3) Capital structure. (A) "Capital structure" describes in percentage terms the sources of funds (capital) used to purchase the assets necessary to operate a company. The capital structure of any company consists of debt and equity. The debt portion consists of long-term debt (represented by outstanding bonds) and preferred stock, while the equity portion consists of outstanding common stock. If the company is funded by debt and equity of equal value, the capital structure is 50% debt and 50% equity. (B) To estimate a discount rate for mass appraisal purposes, the appraiser should use the typical market capital structure for a representative group of major and independent oil companies that derive a majority of their operating revenues from oil and gas production. (4) Cost of debt. The yield-to-maturity is the best approximation of the cost of debt capital. This yield is observable in the marketplace and can be found by referring to Standard and Poor's Corporation Bond Guide
                        , Moody's Bond Report or
                          a comparable publication. (5) Cost of equity. (A) The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is the preferred approximation of equity cost since it considers both historical market yields and current expectations, plus a market-derived equity risk factor. The CAPM method measures the cost of equity by considering that an investor's required rate of return on common stock is comprised of a risk-free return plus a risk adjustment factor related to the specific stock. This is represented by the following equation: [graphic] (B) The current risk-free rate (Rfc) is typically based on current long-term government securities, i.e., the yield-to-maturity observed on an annual basis on a default-free treasury bond, note or bill of the relevant time period. For oil and gas property appraisal, the yield on a long-term bond is an appropriate measure of the risk-free rate. (C) The historical market return on equities (Rm) on common stocks and the historical arithmetic mean on long-term government bond income returns (Rfh) can be obtained from Ibbotson Associates' Stock, Bonds, Bills and Inflation.
                            . The beta coefficient (B) measures market risk by regressing the stock's total return against the market's total return. A more detailed description of the beta calculation can be found in the Ibbotson Associates report. The beta coefficient value can be obtained from Value Line Publishing, Incorporated's The Value Line Investment Survey
                              , Standard and Poor's Corporation's S&P Stock Reports
                                and similar investment services. (D) The difference between the historical risk-free (Rfh) and market (Rm) rates of return is a measure of the non-systematic or non-market related risk caused by changes specific to the companies comprising the stock rate of return sample and is, in effect, an equity risk premium. Note that two different risk- free rates of return are used in the CAPM. The current risk-free rate (Rfc) is used to acknowledge the expectational function of the model. The historical risk-free rate (Rfh) is used in conjunction with the historical market return for the same time period when calculating the equity risk premium. (E) The cost of equity resulting from this model is a nominal (current dollar) after tax rate. Conversion to a nominal, pre-tax rate requires dividing the equity cost (K) by 1 minus the federal statutory income tax rate for petroleum companies. The income tax rate is presently 35%. This is represented by the following equation: [graphic] (6) Weighting debt and equity costs. (A) Once capital structure, debt and equity costs are determined, the final step in deriving the WACC is to weight the cost of debt and equity by the proportional share each has in the overall capital structure. This is represented by the following equations: [graphic] (B) The WACC estimating technique is illustrated in subsection (k)(3) of this section (Appendix 2). (7) Final discount rate selection. (A) As discussed earlier, the typical WACC of potential purchasers sets the lower end of the discount rate range. To help establish the upper end of the discount rate range, the appraiser can calculate a standard deviation of all the discount rates indicated by the sales in the sales sample and the survey. One standard deviation above and below the mean contains 68% of all the observations in a normally distributed set of data. Two standard deviations above and below the mean contains over 99% of all the observations in a normally distributed set of data. The data may not be normally distributed. Even so, this kind of analysis may help the appraiser to establish the upper end of the discount rate range. (B) Very high-risk properties (for example, a one-well lease with high water production near the end of its economic life) may be discounted by the market at two standard deviations above the mean. Properties with lesser risk will have correspondingly lower discount rates. One standard deviation above the mean may establish an upper limit for properties in a typical risk-range. The mean or median of the discount rates from the sales analysis and the survey indicates the mid-range discount rate. (C) For a standard deviation analysis to have meaning in selecting an upper limit to the discount rate range, the survey or sales data set must contain properties with broadly varying risk
                                  . A high-end discount rate selected by this method will not apply to very risky properties (it will be too low) unless these risky properties are represented in the sales data set used in the analysis. (D) To select a discount rate for an individual property, the appraiser must assess the property-specific risk inherent in the property. Subsection (k)(3) of this section (Appendix 4) lists risk factors that should be taken into account. (k) Summary. (1) This manual describes methods and procedures used to calculate the present value of oil and gas properties using discounted future income. The discounted cash flow method, DCF, is the most widely used method to appraise mineral properties. (2) Within the DCF equation, there are three generally accepted techniques for estimating a discount rate: market surveys, oil and gas sales analysis and the weighted average cost of capital. Ideally, the appraiser should use these three techniques simultaneously to develop a range of discount rates. (3) The evaluation of oil and gas properties demonstrates the importance of viewing a discount rate in the context of the entire appraisal, including the production decline rate, price and cost parameters. The discount rate should not be considered an isolated variable, for it is only one component of a complex interaction of variables that collectively determine an estimate of value. [graphic] This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's authority to adopt. Issued in Austin, Texas, on January 4, 1994. TRD-9434167 Martin E. Cherry Chief, General Law Section Comptroller of Public Accounts Earliest possible date of adoption: February 11, 1994 For further information, please call: (512) 463-4028