Attorney General Description of Attorney General submissions. Under provisions set out in the Texas Constitution, the Texas Government Code, Title 4, sec.402.042 and numerous statutes, the attorney general is authorized to write advisory opinions for state and local officials. These advisory opinions are requested by agencies or officials when they are confronted with unique or unusually difficult legal questions. The attorney general also determines, under authority of the Texas Open Records Act, whether information requested for release from governmental agencies maybe held from public disclosure. Requests for opinions, opinions, and open record decisions are summarized for publication in the Texas Register. The Attorney General responds to many requests for opinions and open records decisions with letter opinions. A letter opinion has the same force and effect as a formal Attorney General Opinion, and represents the opinion of the Attorney General unless and until it is modified or overruled by a subsequent letter opinion, a formal Attorney General Opinion, or a decision of a court of record. Letter Opinions LO-92-7 (RQ-335). Request from John D. Hughes, Hood County Attorney, Granbury, concerning use of the "records management and preservation fee" established by the Local Government Code sec.118.011(b). Summary of Opinion. The "records management and preservation" fee established by Senate Bill 770, Acts 1991, 72nd Legislature, Chapter 587, at 2104, may be collected by the county clerk at his discretion. Any fees collected should be deposited with the county treasurer in a separate account, which is subject to audit. The commissioners court is responsible for allocating county funds, but it may expend funds collected under the "records management and preservation" fee only "for specific records management and automation projects. " TRD-9206744 Opinions DM-105 (RQ-293). Request from Dan M. Boulware, District Attorney, Johnson and Somervell Counties, Johnson County Courthouse, Cleburne, concerning whether the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education exceeded its rulemaking authority in promulgating Title 37, sec.211.80(a)(1) of the Texas Administrative Code. Summary of Opinion. The Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education is not authorized to promulgate Title 37, sec.211.80(a)(1) of the Texas Administrative Code, a rule which requires an applicant for a peace officer, reserve, or jailer license to be a United States citizen. TRD-9206742 DM-106 (RQ-152). Request from Mike Moncrief, Chairman, General Issues Subcommittee, Texas State Senate, Austin, concerning whether services of auctioneers are "professional services" for purposes of laws governing the awarding of contracts by cities and counties, and related questions. Summary of Opinion. The determination of the city of Fort Worth that auctioneering services are not "professional services" for purposes of exemption from the competitive bidding requirements imposed by Local Government Code, Chapter 252 is not contrary to law. Moreover, municipalities may procure services through a competitive bidding process even if such services qualify for an exemption under Local Government Code, sec.252.022, other than those services covered by Texas Civil Statutes, Article 664-4. TRD-9206741 DM-107 (RQ-291). Request from Mike Driscoll, Harris County Attorney, Houston, concerning whether the Harris County Attorney is authorized to represent a Harris County Hospital District employee accused of criminal acts committed within the course of his duties, and whether the hospital district is authorized to hire an attorney to represent such an employee or to reimburse the employee's legal expenses following the conclusion of the litigation. Summary of Opinion. Article 2.08 of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits the Harris County Attorney from representing a Harris County Hospital District employee in a criminal case. The Health and Safety Code, sec.281.056(c), authorizes the Harris County Hospital District to hire an attorney to represent an employee. Whether the Texas Constitution permits the Harris County Hospital District to do so in a particular case involves questions of fact and must be determined by its board. The Harris County Hospital District is not authorized to reimburse an employee's legal expenses following the conclusion of the litigation. TRD-9206740 DM-108 (RQ-205). Request from Jack Skeen, Jr., Smith County Criminal District Attorney, County Courthouse, Tyler, concerning whether rule B11(c) of the Rules and Regulations of the Smith County Bail Bond Board which prohibits an original bail bond applicant from executing deeds of trust in property as security for obligations incurred in the bonding business is invalid as inconsistent with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 2372p-3. Summary of Opinion. A county bail bond board is without authority to provide that an applicant for a bail bondsman license must make the security deposit required by Texas Civil Statutes, Article 2372p-3, sec.6(f) in the form of a cashier's check, certificate of deposit, cash or cash equivalent, and that he may not satisfy the requirement by executing deeds to property in trust to the board in accordance with the provisions of sec.6(f)(2). TRD-9206739 DM-109 (RQ-48). Request from Robert Flowers, Executive Director, State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Austin, concerning whether a constitutional county judge is disqualified from presiding over probate proceedings involving wills that he prepared or witnessed and related questions. Summary of Opinion. The Texas Constitution Article V, sec.11, provides for disqualification of a judge from sitting in a case in which he is interested, in which either of the parties is connected with him by a degree of affinity or consanguinity set out in the laws, or in which he has been counsel in the case. A "case" within the third ground of disqualification includes an uncontested probate matter. Whether a judge is disqualified pursuant to the Texas Constitution Article V, sec.11 from presiding in a particular probate matter requires a case-by-case determination based on all relevant facts and circumstances. TRD-9206738 DM-110 (RQ-208). Request from Larry E. Kosta, Executive Director, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, Austin, concerning whether section 11(b) of the Texas Boxing and Wrestling Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 8501-1, applies to cable television companies collecting pay-per-view fees from subscribers viewing live telecasts of professional boxing performances. Summary of Opinion. Cable television companies collecting a special pay-per-view fee from subscribers who wish to view a simultaneous telecast of a live boxing performance are not subject to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 8501-1, sec.11(b). TRD-9206737 DM-111 (RQ-247). Request from Scott W. Johnson, Reeves County Attorney, County Courthouse, Pecos, concerning whether the county sheriff or the county commissioners court has the authority to choose a physician and schedule the physician to provide medical services to inmates incarcerated in the county jails. Summary of Opinion. A county commissioners court has the authority to contract with a licensed physician to provide medical services to inmates incarcerated in the county jails. A county sheriff has the authority to schedule medical services for the county jails. TRD-9206736 DM-112 (RQ-284). Request from Ron Lewis, Chairman, Natural Resources Committee, Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning the legality of "casino night" fundraising by nonprofit organizations. Summary of Opinion. Those participating in "casino games" at the described non-profit charitable organization fund-raising event would violate the Penal Code, sec.47.02 prohibition on gambling-"making bets"-unless, as a matter of fact, the "casino games" in question fall within a "carnival contests" exception to the definition of "bet" in the Penal Code, sec.47.01(1)(C) and (D). TRD-9206735 Requests for Opinions (RQ-345). Request from Larry A. Farrow, Executive Director, Texas Funeral Service Commission, Austin, concerning whether the El Paso Medical Examiner can charge funeral homes a daily storage fee for holding bodies. (RQ-346). Request from George Pierce, Chair, Urban Affairs Committee, Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning whether a home rule city council member is barred by state law from voting on zoning matters affecting territory which includes that member's residence. (RQ-347). Request from Marvin J. Titzman, Executive Director, Texas Surplus Property Agency, San Antonio, concerning whether a tax-exempt, nonprofit corporation which is exempt from the Texas Proprietary School Act and the Texas Education Code, sec.32.12(A)(2), is a nonprofit "school" for purposes of Texas law. (RQ-348). Request from Allen Ross Hightower, Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning the distribution of funds to fire departments by county fire district boards. (RQ-349). Request from Patricia S. Tweedy, M.P.A., Executive Director, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, Austin, concerning whether privileged information relevant to the parent-child relationship that a psychologist gained during a voluntary psychological evaluation of a person involved in, or associated with, court proceedings involving the parent-child relationship are excepted from disclosure under Texas Civil Rule of Evidence 510(d)(6). (RQ-350). Request from Craig D. Pedersen, Executive Administrator, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, concerning whether the Texas Water Development Board may accept funds from private businesses to offset the cost of issuing an agency newsletter, and related questions. (RQ-351). Request from Jack E. Crump, Executive Director, Commission on Jail Standards, Austin, concerning authority of the Commission on Jail Standards to promulgate rules regarding the temporary emergency housing of county inmates, and related questions. TRD-9206743 (RQ-352). Request from Phyllis Massey, County Auditor, County of DeWitt, Cuero, concerning whether the term "county treasury" means "county depository" in Chapter 59 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in provisions regarding depositing of forfeited moneys. (RQ-353). Request from O.H. "Ike" Harris, Chair, Jurisprudence Committee, The Texas Senate, Austin, concerning whether the Insurance Code, Article 21.24-2, sec.4(c), bars a physician who accepts an assignment of health insurance benefits from waiving payment of deductibles or copayments. (RQ-354). Request from Peter Potemkin, Executive Director, Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Facility, Austin, concerning whether, under sec.3(a)(1) or sec.3(a)(10) of the Open Records Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6251-17a, the Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Facility can withhold from public disclosure the guidelines it uses to determine the percentage of the estimated premium it will require an applicant to pay as a deposit, and related questions. (RQ-355). Request from John Whitmire, Chair, Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, The Texas Senate, Austin, concerning whether sec.3(a) (15) of the Open Records Act, Article 6252-17a, Texas Civil Statutes, which makes certain birth and death records available to the public, applies to the San Antonio Metropolitan Health District, and related questions. (RQ-356). Request from Tim Curry, Criminal District Attorney, Tarrant County Justice Center, Fort Worth, concerning whether the Local Government Code, sec.117.002, which requires district and county clerks to deliver certain abandoned funds to the state treasurer, violates Article II, sec.1 of the Texas Constitution, and related questions. (RQ-357). Request from Gary L. Watkins, Chair, Higher Education Committee, The Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning whether a community college district board interim chancellor of the same community college district, and related question. (RQ-358). Request from Gary L. Watkins, Chair, Higher Education Committee, The Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning whether notice that a community college district board was to consider the selection of an interim chancellor satisfied the requirements of the Texas Open Meeting Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6252-17. (RQ-359). Request from Jim Mapel, Criminal District Attorney, Brazoria County Courthouse, Angleton, concerning whether a home rule city may adopt a nepotism rule that is more restrictive than state law. (RQ-360). Request from Jimmy B. Wright, Lynn County Attorney, Tahoka, concerning whether a county may legally pay employees $200 per month in lieu of coverage if they elect not to receive health insurance coverage through the county's group health insurance plan, and related questions. (RQ-361). Request from Mike Driscoll, Harris County Attorney, Houston, concerning whether Harris County can arrange to have its checks drawn on a branch banking site that is located outside the county if the bank's depository is located in the county seat, pursuant to the Local Government Code, sec.116.021, et seq. (RQ-362). Request from Bryan M. Perot, Executive Officer, Polygraph Examiners Board, Austin, concerning whether Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6252-9b, sec.7(A)(a) prohibits a former member of the Polygraph Examiners Board from appearing before the board in connection with sponsoring a polygraph intern. (RQ-363). Request from James Warren Smith, Jr., Frio County Attorney, Pearsall, concerning whether a county commissioner's court is authorized to promulgate regulations creating a "smoke-free" environment or designate restricted areas in county buildings or facilities for smoking. (RQ-364). Request from Ron Wilson, Chair, Committee on Liquor Regulation, Texas House of Representatives, Austin, concerning questions relating to the transfer of funds from the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County to the City of Houston, pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 1118x. (RQ-365). Request from Mike Driscoll, Harris County Attorney, Houston, concerning whether the personnel records of the Harris County Sheriff's Office are excepted from disclosure under the Local Government Code, sec.157.904. (RQ-366). Request from Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney, Smith County Courthouse, Tyler, concerning whether the Open Meetings Act, sec.2(g) , excepts from required disclosure under the Open Records Act the names of applicants for public employment discussed by a governmental body in an executive session. TRD-9206745