TITLE 22. EXAMINING BOARDS

PART 3. TEXAS BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS

CHAPTER 75. RULES OF PRACTICE

22 TAC §75.17

The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners adopted the following rule amendment without changes at its regularly scheduled board meeting held on May 14, 2009. The proposed amendment was published in the January 2, 2009, issue of the Texas Register (34 TexReg 21).

The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) adopts without changes an amendment to §75.17 of this title, relating to scope of practice, to establish that manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is within the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas. When the Board first adopted this section, the Board specifically reserved its decision on MUA in order to resolve questions regarding its status under the Chiropractic Act, Texas Occupations Code Ch. 201. See the June 2, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4613).

MUA is a noninvasive procedure that involves the manipulation of the musculoskeletal system while a patient is under a general anesthesia. MUA is usually performed in either a hospital or a surgical center and is conducted as a cooperative procedure in which a licensee works with an anesthesiologist and additional medical staff. MUA has been part of the practice of chiropractic in Texas for more than 25 years, and the Board has not received any complaints regarding the practice of MUA.

The Chiropractic Act provides that a person practices chiropractic if they "perform nonsurgical, nonincisive procedures, including adjustment and manipulation, to improve the subluxation complex or the biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system." Tex. Occ. Code §201.002(b)(2). The Act also provides that the Board may not require additional training or certify chiropractors to perform MUA. §201.154; see §201.1525(3).

The status of whether MUA remains within the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas, however, has been in dispute. Under the Chiropractic Act, "surgical procedure" is defined as including "a procedure described in the surgery section of the common procedure coding system as adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services of the United States Department of Health and Human Services." §201.002(a)(4). As discussed in the preamble for the original adoption of this section, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have not adopted a coding system of their own but instead have incorporated by reference the American Medical Association's (AMA's) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Codebook. See the June 2, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4613). The Board has clarified this by setting forth a definition for "CPT Codebook" that references use of the CPT Codebook by CMS. MUA is listed in the surgery section of the 2004 CPT Codebook in reference to manipulation of the spine (code 22505), shoulder joint (23700), hip joint (27275), knee joint (27570), and ankle (27860). AMA, CPT Terminology 78, 85, 100, 103, and 106 (2004).

Thus, there is an apparent conflict between the Chiropractic Act's authorization for licensees to perform manipulations and the limitation of the Board's ability to certify MUA practitioners with the AMA's identification of MUA as a surgical procedure. However, the Legislature has also provided that an entire statute is intended to be effective. Code Construction Act, Texas Government Code §311.021(2). Where there is a conflict between a general provision and a special or local provision, "the provisions shall be construed, if possible, so that effect is given to both," but "[i]f the conflict between the general provision and the special or local provision is irreconcilable, the special or local provision prevails as an exception to the general provision, unless the general provision is the later enactment and the manifest intent is that the general provision prevail." Tex. Gov't Code §311.026. The limitation on the certification of MUA practitioners under §201.154 of the Chiropractic Act is a special provision. The definition of "surgical procedure" under §201.002(a)(3) is a general provision. In order to give effect to the entire Chiropractic Act, the special provision for MUA in §201.154 must be read as an exception to the Act's definition of "surgical procedure." Consequently, MUA is not a surgical procedure prohibited under the Act, and MUA is within the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas.

The Board received two comments in opposition to the rule from the Texas Medical Association and Texas Mutual Insurance Company. The Board received a comment in support of the rule from Parker College of Chiropractic.

One commenter said that the Board's reasoning was "contorted and forced" and that "a clear reading of the statute prohibits a chiropractor from performing surgical procedures, especially those listed in the CPT code." The other commenter similarly noted that the proposed rule is contrary to the clear legislative intent and that the "Board's phrasing of the issues creates a nonexistent conflict." The Board disagrees. The Board is required to construe the Chiropractic Act in a manner that gives effect to all of its terms. The specific mention of MUA in §201.154 is in conflict with the implied exclusion of MUA as a surgical procedure and creates an ambiguity in the Act. The Board has resolved this ambiguity by finding that MUA remains within the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas. The Board has found no legislative intent on whether MUA is within the scope of practice. In fact, the Legislature declined to consider a bill during the 80th legislative session in 2007 that would have specified that MUA was part of the practice of medicine and thus not part of the practice of chiropractic. No change was made in response to these comments.

One commenter disagreed with the Board's interpretation of §201.154 and argued that §201.154 does not expressly state that chiropractors may perform MUAs and that the Legislature would not have restricted the Board from establishing standards for the practice of MUA, noting that the Board is authorized to provide standards of care under §201.1525(3). Certainly, §201.154 does not expressly provide that chiropractors may perform MUAs. If it did, we would not be having this argument. The Board stands by its interpretation that §201.154 is a limitation of its general authority under §201.1525(3) to "require a license holder to obtain additional training or certification to perform certain procedures or use certain equipment." No change was made in response to this comment.

One commenter argued that the legislative intent of §201.154 was to prevent chiropractors from performing MUAs. The Board's research into the legislative history of this provision has not revealed any such intent. No change was made in response to this comment.

One commenter argued that because the definition of surgical procedure in §201.002(a)(4) is a more recent enactment than §201.154 that the ambiguity should be resolved in favor of determining that MUA is not part of the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas. Section 311.026(a) of the Code Construction Act provides that "[i]f a general provision conflicts with a special or local provision, the provisions shall be construed, if possible, so that effect is given to both." That is what the Board has done. The rule cited by the commenter is in §311.026(b) which provides that "[i]f the conflict between the general provision and the special or local provision is irreconcilable, the special or local provision prevails as an exception to the general provision, unless the general provision is the later enactment and the manifest intent is that the general provision prevail." The Board does not see that the general provision defining surgical procedures in §201.002(a)(4) is irreconcilable with the specific provision for MUA in §201.154. The Board has merely resolved the ambiguity between the provisions by interpreting that the specific provision controls over the general incorporation by reference. No change was made in response to this comment.

The amendment is adopted under the Texas Occupations Code, §201.152, relating to rules, which authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to regulate the practice of chiropractic; and §201.1525, relating to rules clarifying scope of practice of chiropractic.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the adopted amendment.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 10, 2009.

TRD-200902326

Glenn Parker

Executive Director

Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners

Effective date: June 30, 2009

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2009

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6901


22 TAC §75.21

The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) adopts new §75.21, relating to acupuncture, to set forth the minimal acceptable qualifications and procedures for the practice of acupuncture by licensed doctors of chiropractic. Section 75.21 is adopted with changes to the proposed text published in the January 2, 2009, issue of the Texas Register (34 TexReg 22). In drafting this rule, the Board consulted the rules of the chiropractic licensing boards of Colorado, Florida, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia, in addition to other sources.

Acupuncture has been part of the practice of chiropractic in Texas since before this Board was founded in 1949. The practice of acupuncture by chiropractors has been expressly authorized since the Legislature amended the Acupuncture Act in 1997 to allow chiropractors and other health care practitioners to practice acupuncture when they are acting within the scope of their licenses (See Texas Occupations Code §205.003). Post-graduate training in acupuncture is offered by the chiropractic colleges, and the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners (NBCE) offers a national standardized certification examination in acupuncture in addition to the 4,500 didactic and clinical hours required for licensure (See http://www.nbce.org/written/desc-acu.html.) However, these training requirements are needed in order to bring the licensing standards in Texas into line with the licensing standards of other states.

The Board has previously determined that acupuncture is within the scope of practice of chiropractic in Texas (See 22 TAC §75.17, relating to scope of practice). The practice of acupuncture by a chiropractor is both authorized and limited by the Chiropractic Act (See Texas Occupations Code §201.002(b)). The Board's existing rule regarding proper diligence and efficient practice of chiropractic, §75.2 of this title, requires that a chiropractor not perform or attempt to perform procedures in which the chiropractor is untrained by education or experience.

WORKING GROUP

In light of the numerous comments received regarding the number of hours of training that would be sufficient for a licensed doctor of chiropractic to practice acupuncture, the Board has determined that further rulemaking is needed on this issue. To that end, the Board has formed an interdisciplinary working group to study this issue and has invited the Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine and other interested groups to participate in this study. Other persons interested in participating in this working group are encouraged to contact the Board's Executive Director, Mr. Glenn Parker, at (512) 305-6706 or glenn.parker@tbce.state.tx.us or via facsimile at (512) 305-6705. However, due the importance of establishing some standards for the education and training required for the practice of acupuncture by a licensed doctor of chiropractic and in order to provide prospective applicants for licensure with notice of the required standards, the Board has decided to adopt the rule as proposed with changes in response to comments. As a result of the working group's study, the Board anticipates amending this rule in a later rulemaking to increase the number of hours of training required to practice acupuncture.

OVERVIEW

Subsection (a) of this proposed rule would provide a definition for acupuncture and the related practices of acupressure and meridian therapy. Subsection (b) would establish that a licensee must have the equivalent of one-hundred (100) hours of training in acupuncture by one of three means. Subsection (c) would provide for the grandfathering of existing licensees, that are in good standing with the Board and other jurisdictions where they are licensed, by allowing licensees to receive a credit of ten hours of training in acupuncture for each year of practice. Thus, a licensee that has been practicing for at least ten years would be able to meet the requirement for 100 hours of training. Subsection (d) would require that, beginning on January 1, 2010, applicants for licensure must successfully complete either the national standardized certification examination in acupuncture offered by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners or the examination offered by the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine.

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

The Board received fourteen comments in opposition to the proposed rule from the Academy of Oriental Medicine at Austin, Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, American College of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Patients First Coalition, Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Texas Association of Acupuncturists, Texas College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Texas Medical Association, Texas Neurological Society, Texas Pain Society, Texas Pediatric Society, Texas Society of Pathologists, Texas State Board of Acupuncture Examiners, and Texas Urological Society. The Board received three comments in support of the rule from Parker College of Chiropractic, the Texas Chiropractic Association, and from a licensed doctor of chiropractic.

In response to a request from the public, the Board's Rules Committee held a public hearing on the proposed rule in Austin on April 28, 2009. At the hearing, the committee heard from the Academy of Oriental Medicine at Austin, Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine, Texas Association of Acupuncturists, Texas Chiropractic Association, and Texas College of Traditional Chinese Medicine and received additional written comments. All of the comments received are addressed below.

Six comments said that the proposed rule would improperly expand the practice of chiropractic to include needle electromyography (EMG). One comment said that the proposed language would allow chiropractors to perform procedures they are not legally allowed to perform. These comments are not germane to this rulemaking. This rule merely sets forth educational standards for the practice of acupuncture by doctors of chiropractic and does not address the practice of chiropractic. The Board has previously determined that acupuncture and needle EMG are part of the practice of chiropractic in Texas (See scope of practice rule at 22 TAC §75.17). The Board's comments regarding acupuncture and needle EMG on adoption of the scope of practice rule are incorporated herein by reference as published in the June 2, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 4613). No change was made in response to these comments.

One comment stated that the Acupuncture Act, Texas Occupations Code §205.001(2), limits the scope of acupuncture to a treatment modality and not a diagnostic procedure. Additional comments said that the use of acupuncture should be performed according to the definition set out in the Acupuncture Act. These comments are not germane to this rulemaking. Section 205.003 of the Acupuncture Act provides that the Acupuncture Act "does not apply to a health care professional licensed under another statute of this state and acting within the scope of the license." The Board discussed the practice of acupuncture by licensed doctors of chiropractic as part of the scope of practice rulemaking, and those comments are incorporated herein by reference (31 TexReg 4613). In addition, the definition of acupuncture used in this rule applies only to the education and training requirements in this rule. Furthermore, chiropractors are authorized to "use objective and subjective means to analyze, examine, or evaluate the biomechanical condition of the spine and musculoskeletal system of the human body" (Tex. Occ. Code §201.002(b)(1)). No change was made in response to these comments.

Two comments stated that the definition of acupuncture in the Acupuncture Act is binding upon the Board and that, if the definition of acupuncture requires interpretation, the Board should defer to the Texas State Board of Acupuncture Examiners to make that interpretation. The Board respectfully disagrees. Section 205.003 of the Acupuncture Act provides that the Acupuncture Act "does not apply to a health care professional licensed under another statute of this state and acting within the scope of the license." The Board has authority to adopt rules regarding the practice of chiropractic, including the practice of acupuncture by doctors of chiropractic (Tex. Occ. Code §201.152 and §201.1525). Furthermore, the discussion of acupuncture in this rule applies only to the training in acupuncture that is expected by a doctor of chiropractic that includes acupuncture as part of their practice. The Board discussed the practice of acupuncture by licensed doctors of chiropractic as part of the scope of practice rulemaking, and those comments are incorporated herein by reference (31 TexReg 4613). No change was made in response to this comment.

One comment stated that the proposed definition of acupuncture in subsection (a) exceeded the Board's rulemaking authority. The Board disagrees. Section 205.003 of the Acupuncture Act provides that the Acupuncture Act "does not apply to a health care professional licensed under another statute of this state and acting within the scope of the license." The Board has authority to adopt rules regarding the practice of chiropractic, including the practice of acupuncture by doctors of chiropractic (Tex. Occ. Code §201.152 and §201.1525). Furthermore, the discussion of acupuncture in this rule applies only to the training in acupuncture that is expected by a doctor of chiropractic that includes acupuncture as part of their practice. No change was made in response to this comment.

One comment stated that the proposed rule would disrupt existing referral patterns between chiropractors and acupuncturists and that acupuncturists would be less likely to refer patients to chiropractors. The Board disagrees. The Board anticipates that chiropractors will continue to work cooperatively with acupuncturists and other health care providers in promoting the best practices for patient care. No change was made in response to this comment.

Eight comments stated that the requirement of only 100 hours in undergraduate or post-graduate classes in the use and administration of acupuncture, examination in acupuncture by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, or 100 hours of training in the use and administration of acupuncture is inadequate and that, in order to demonstrate minimal competence, the number of hours should be increased to approximate the number of hours required to graduate from an accredited acupuncture school. As noted above, the Board agrees in part and notes that the specific training in acupuncture under this rule is in addition to the normal requirements of a chiropractic education. For comparison, one Texas acupuncture school, the Academy of Oriental Medicine at Austin, requires as part of a three-year program 528 hours in acupuncture and techniques, 636 hours in Chinese herbal studies, 492 hours in integral studies, 546 hours in biomedical sciences, and 1,008 hours in clinical training. Whereas, one Texas chiropractic school, Parker College of Chiropractic, requires as part of its nine trimester program 1,290 hours in the basic sciences, 915 hours in the chiropractic sciences, 1,320 hours in clinical sciences, and 1,005 hours in a chiropractic wellness clinic. As discussed above, the Board is contemplating further rulemaking to possibly increase the number of required hours and is forming an interdisciplinary working group to study this issue. No change was made in response to this comment at this time.

Four comments stated that the amount of training required under the rule presented a risk to public safety. The Board agrees with their concerns regarding the risk of adverse events with acupuncture. However, the proposed rule will provide at least an initial standard for training. Whereas, the only standard that currently applies is under §75.2(a)(1)(B) which provides only that a licensee may not perform or attempt to perform procedures in which they are untrained by education or experience. As noted above, the Board has formed a working group to study this issue further. No change was made in response to this comment at this time.

Two comments stated that there are no accreditation programs that provide only 100 hours of acupuncture training. The Board disagrees. The NBCE exam and some states require 100 hours. As noted above, the Board has formed a working group to study this issue further. No change was made in response to this comment at this time.

One comment stated that it would be inadequate to allow a person to practice acupuncture based solely on successfully completing the NBCE acupuncture exam. The Board agrees. However, acupuncture may only be practiced by a licensed chiropractor who had fulfilled both the requirements of this rule and the other requirements for licensure, including successfully completing a chiropractic education and the other mandatory NBCE exams. No change was made in response to this comment.

Two comments stated that inadequate training would also contribute to poor clinical outcomes. One comment stated that poor clinical outcomes would discourage patients from seeking the care of acupuncturists and chiropractors. The Board agrees with these concerns but notes that the training required in order to practice acupuncture under this rule would be in addition to the general education and training requirements for a license to practice chiropractic. Chiropractors also have an existing and ongoing obligation to assess and evaluate a patient's status under §75.2(a)(1)(A) of this title, relating to proper diligence and efficient practice of chiropractic. As noted above, the Board has formed a working group to study this issue further. No change was made in response to this comment at this time.

Two comments stated that the chiropractic schools do not offer sufficient training in acupuncture in either academic or clinical training. The Board agrees. This is why this rule sets forth training requirements for the practice of acupuncture that are in addition to the training provided as part of a chiropractic degree program. No change was made in response to this comment.

One comment stated that the proposed rule is contrary to the trend in healthcare of raising standards for licensure. The Board disagrees. Currently, the Board has no express requirements setting forth minimum standards for the practice of acupuncture by chiropractors. This rule will establish minimum standards, and through the work of the working group discussed above, the Board will look at increasing these standards. Thus, this rule is consistent with the trend of raising standards for licensure and practice. No change was made in response to this comment.

One comment suggested that anyone who practices acupuncture should be required to pass the examination offered by the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (NCCAOM). The Board agrees in part. As set forth in this rule, the NBCE acupuncture exam in combination with the other required exams, Parts I - IV, is sufficient to demonstrate competency and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare (See www.nbce.org). The Board acknowledges, however, the value of recognizing the NCCAOM exam and in allowing applicants the choice of which exam to take. Subsections (b)(2) and (d) have been revised to allow for applicants to take the NCCAOM exam.

One comment recommended that the Board also require successful completion of the Council of Colleges of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine's Clean Needle Technique course and practical examination. The Board disagrees. Applicants for licensure are required to participate in substantial clinical training for their chiropractic degree and required to successfully complete the NBCE's Part IV clinical exam, both of which cover subjects similar to those covered by the suggested clean needle technique course and exam. No change was made in response to this comment.

Two comments disagreed with the provision for grandfathering existing licensees under subsection (c) that have been practicing acupuncture without any training. The Board disputes the basis of this comment. While the Board has not had an express training requirement for a specific number of hours, licensees have been required to have training under §75.2(a)(1)(B). However, the Board agrees that this provision could be revised to clarify that doctors of chiropractic are expected to be trained in acupuncture. In addition, the Board finds that the amount of hours credited for each year of practice should be reduced to ten hours per year to ensure that existing practitioners have the requisite experience consistent with the standards adopted in this rule to continue practicing.

One comment suggested that subsection (d) of the proposed rule be revised for clarity to replace the last occurrence of "licensure" in the first sentence with "acupuncture." The Board agrees with this comment and has made the suggested change.

One comment suggested that subsection (d) be revised to add language to clarify that the provisions of subsection (b) will apply only to new applicants. The Board disagrees. The rule is structured so that the general requirements for licensees are in subsection (b), the grandfathering provision for existing licensees is in subsection (c), and the requirement that after January 1, 2010, new licensees must complete the NBCE acupuncture exam is in subsection (d). No change was made in response to this comment.

One comment requested that if the Board is to proceed with this rulemaking that an advisory committee be formed as provided for under the Administrative Procedure Act, §2001.031. The Board agrees in part. As noted above, the Board has formed a working group to further study the appropriate number of hours that should be required and that working group meets the general requirements of §2001.031. However, as also noted above, the Board sees that it is important to adopt a rule now in order to establish initial standards for training in acupuncture and to provide prospective applicants with notice of the requirements for licensure. No change was made in response to this comment.

AUTHORITY

The new rule is adopted under Texas Occupations Code §201.152, relating to rules, and §201.1525, relating to rules clarifying scope of chiropractic. Section 201.152 authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to regulate the practice of chiropractic. Section 201.1525 authorizes the Board to adopt rules requiring a license holder to obtain additional training or certification to perform certain procedures or use certain equipment.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the new rule.

§75.21.Acupuncture.

(a) Acupuncture, and the related practices of acupressure and meridian therapy, includes methods for diagnosing and treating a patient by stimulating specific points on or within the musculoskeletal system by various means, including, but not limited to, manipulation, heat, cold, pressure, vibration, ultrasound, light electrocurrent, and short-needle insertion for the purpose of obtaining a biopositive reflex response by nerve stimulation.

(b) In order to practice acupuncture, a licensee shall either:

(1) successfully complete at least one-hundred (100) hours training in undergraduate or post-graduate classes in the use and administration of acupuncture provided by a bona fide reputable chiropractic school or by an acupuncture school approved by the Texas State Board of Acupuncture Examiners;

(2) successfully complete either:

(A) the national standardized certification examination in acupuncture offered by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; or

(B) the examination offered by the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine; or

(3) successfully complete at least one-hundred (100) hours training in the use and administration of acupuncture in a course of study approved by the board.

(c) Existing licensees that have been trained in acupuncture, that have been practicing acupuncture, and that are in good standing with the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners and other jurisdictions where they are licensed, may meet the requirements of subsection (b) of this section by counting each year of practice as ten hours of training in the use and administration of acupuncture.

(d) Beginning on January 1, 2010, an applicant for licensure must successfully complete either the national standardized certification examination in acupuncture offered by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners or the examination offered by the National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine in order to practice acupuncture. This requirement will supersede the provisions of subsection (b) of this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 12, 2009.

TRD-200902378

Glenn Parker

Executive Director

Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners

Effective date: July 2, 2009

Proposal publication date: January 2, 2009

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6901