PART 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
CHAPTER 112. TEXAS ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR SCIENCE
The State Board of Education (SBOE) adopts amendments to §§112.1, 112.21, and 112.41 and new §§112.10 - 112.16, 112.17 - 112.20, and 112.31 - 112.39, concerning the Texas essential knowledge and skills (TEKS) for science. The amendments to §§112.1, 112.21, and 112.41 and new §§112.10, 112.17, and 112.31 are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the February 13, 2009, issue of the Texas Register (34 TexReg 927) and will not be republished. New §§112.11 - 112.16, 112.18 - 112.20, and 112.32 - 112.39 are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the February 13, 2009, issue of the Texas Register (34 TexReg 927). The sections establish the TEKS for science courses in elementary, middle school, and high school. The adopted amendments and new sections establish revised science TEKS for implementation beginning with the 2010-2011 school year.
In January, February, May, September, October, and December 2008, committees were convened to review the science TEKS. In April, May, September, and October 2008, committees were convened to develop TEKS for a new earth and space science course. During the September 2008 meeting, the SBOE received draft recommendations for proposed revisions to the science TEKS. Informal public feedback and feedback from expert reviewers was shared with the science TEKS review committees as they continued to work on their recommendations for proposed revisions in November and December 2008. A discussion item regarding the proposed revisions to 19 TAC Chapter 112 was presented to the Committee of the Full Board during the November 2008 meeting.
The Committee of the Full Board held a public hearing on 19 TAC Chapter 112, Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Science, Subchapter A, Elementary, Subchapter B, Middle School, and Subchapter C, High School, on January 21, 2009. At the January 23, 2009, meeting, the SBOE amended and approved the proposed revisions for first reading and filing authorization.
The Committee of the Full Board held a second public hearing on the proposed revisions to 19 TAC Chapter 112, Subchapters A - C, on March 25, 2009. At the March 27, 2009, meeting, the SBOE amended and approved the proposed revisions for second reading and final adoption.
The following changes were made to the proposed revisions to 19 TAC Chapter 112 since published as proposed.
Elementary.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(4)(A) in Kindergarten-Grade 5 that contains supplies and equipment lists was modified to re-order, remove, or add some supplies and equipment.
Grades 3-8 and All High School Courses.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(3)(A) in Grades 3-8 and in subsection (c)(3)(A) in all high school courses was amended to read, "in all fields of science, analyze, evaluate, and critique scientific explanations by using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, including examining all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations, so as to encourage critical thinking by the student."
§112.12, Grade 1.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 1 was amended to add the phrase "and day and night."
§112.13, Grade 2.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(7)(A) in Grade 2 was substituted to read as follows: "observe and describe rocks by size, texture, and color."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(D) in Grade 2 was substituted to read as follows: "observe, describe, and record patterns of objects in the sky, including the appearance of the Moon."
§112.14, Grade 3.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 3 was amended by inserting the word "mechanical" after the word "including."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(6)(B) in Grade 3 was substituted to read as follows: "demonstrate and observe how position and motion can be changed by pushing and pulling objects to show work being done such as swings, balls, pulleys, and wagons."
The knowledge and skills statement in subsection (b)(8) in Grade 3 was amended by substituting the phrase "in the Sun, Earth, and Moon system" with "among objects in the sky."
The following student expectation was added in Grade 3 as subsection (b)(8)(D): "identify the planets in Earth's solar system and their position in relation to the Sun."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(10)(B) in Grade 3 was amended by substituting the words "from the" with "in response to living in a certain."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(10)(C) in Grade 3 was amended by substituting the word "mealworms" with "frogs."
§112.15, Grade 4.
The knowledge and skills statement in subsection (b)(6) in Grade 4 was amended by substituting the word "occurs" with "exists."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 4 was amended by inserting the word "mechanical" after the word "including" and substituting the word "electrical" for "electricity."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(6)(D) in Grade 4 was substituted to read as follows: "design an experiment to test the effect of force on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(A) in Grade 4 was substituted to read as follows: "measure and record changes in weather and make predictions using weather maps, weather symbols, and a map key."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 4 was amended by striking the phrase "in the reflection of sunlight," and adding the words "tides, seasons."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(9)(A) in Grade 4 was substituted to read as follows: "investigate that most producers need sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to make their own food, while consumers are dependent on other organisms for food."
§112.16, Grade 5.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 5 was amended by inserting the word "mechanical" after the word "including."
The following student expectation was added in Grade 5 as subsection (b)(6)(D): "design an experiment that tests the effect of force on an object."
The following student expectation was added in Grade 5 as subsection (b)(8)(D): "identify and compare the physical characteristics of the Sun, Earth, and Moon."
§112.18, Grade 6.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 6 was amended by adding the words "comparative and" to "descriptive investigations."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(5)(D) in Grade 6 was amended by substituting the word "compounds" with "a new substance."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(B) in Grade 6 was amended by striking the word "motion" and adding the word "position."
The following student expectation was added in Grade 6 as subsection (b)(8)(E): "investigate how inclined planes and pulleys can be used to change the amount of force to move an object."
§112.19, Grade 7.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 7 was amended by adding the words "comparative and" to "descriptive investigations."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(7)(B) in Grade 7 was substituted to read as follows: "illustrate the transformation of energy within an organism such as the transfer from chemical energy to heat and thermal energy in digestion."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(12)(A) in Grade 7 was amended by substituting the phrase "are adapted to perform" with "have adaptations that allow."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(14)(C) in Grade 7 was amended by adding the words "in the nucleus."
§112.20, Grade 8.
The student expectation in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 8 was amended by adding the words "comparative and" to "descriptive investigations."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(2)(B) in Grade 8 was amended by adding the words "comparative and" to "experimental investigations."
The student expectation in subsection (b)(7)(C) in Grade 8 was amended by substituting the words "lunar cycle to its" with "position of the Moon and Sun to their."
High school.
A student expectation in subsection (c)(1) was modified where needed to read as follows: "demonstrate an understanding of the use and conservation of resources and the proper disposal or recycling of materials."
A student expectation in subsection (c)(3) was modified where needed to read as follows: "draw inferences based on data related to promotional materials for products and services."
A student expectation in subsection (c)(3) was modified where needed to read as follows: "communicate and apply scientific information extracted from various sources such as current events, news reports, published journal articles, and marketing materials."
§112.32, Aquatic Science.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(3)(F) in Aquatic Science was substituted to read as follows: "research and describe the history of aquatic science and contributions of scientists."
§112.34, Biology.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(2)(C) in Biology was amended by substituting the words "new areas or science" with "new areas of science."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(2)(E) in Biology was amended by substituting the phrase "investigative procedures" with "descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations."
The following student expectation was added in Biology as subsection (c)(3)(F): "research and describe the history of biology and contributions of scientists."
The following student expectation in subsection (c)(7)(B) was stricken in Biology: "analyze and evaluate the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry to explain the sudden appearance, stasis, and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record." Also in Biology, the following student expectation in subsection (c)(7)(B) was added: "analyze and evaluate scientific explanations concerning any data of sudden appearance, stasis, and sequential nature of groups in the fossil record."
The following student expectation was added in Biology as subsection (c)(7)(G): "analyze and evaluate scientific explanations concerning the complexity of the cell."
The following student expectation was added in Biology as subsection (c)(9)(D): "analyze and evaluate the evidence regarding formation of simple organic molecules and their organization into long complex molecules having information such as the DNA molecule for self-replicating life."
§112.35, Chemistry.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(1)(A) in Chemistry was substituted to read as follows: "demonstrate safe practices during laboratory and field investigations, including the appropriate use of safety showers, eyewash fountains, safety goggles, and fire extinguishers."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(10)(G) in Chemistry was amended to correct the spelling of the name "Lowery" with "Lowry."
§112.36, Earth and Space Science.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(4)(A) in Earth and Space Science was amended by substituting the phrase "the concept of an expanding universe that originated about 14 billion years ago" with "current theories of the evolution of the universe, including estimates for the age of the universe."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(5)(B) in Earth and Space Science was amended by substituting the words "sources of heat" with "thermal energy sources."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(6)(A) in Earth and Space Science was amended by inserting the words "that could have occurred."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(7)(B) in Earth and Space Science was amended by striking the phrase "apply radiometric dating methods that can be used to" and adding the phrase "using radiometric dating methods."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(8)(A) in Earth and Space Science was substituted to read as follows: "analyze and evaluate a variety of fossil types such as transitional fossils, proposed transitional fossils, fossil lineages, and significant fossil deposits with regard to their appearance, completeness, and alignment with scientific explanations in light of this fossil data."
The student expectation in subsection (c)(13)(F) in Earth and Space Science was amended by adding the phrase "given the complexity of living systems."
§112.37, Environmental Systems.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(9)(G) in Environmental Systems was substituted to read as follows: "analyze how ethical beliefs can be used to influence scientific practices such as methods for increasing food production."
The following student expectation was added in Environmental Systems as subsection (c)(9)(H): "analyze and evaluate different views on the existence of global warming."
§112.38, Physics.
The student expectation in subsection (c)(5)(C) in Physics was amended by substituting the words "their centers" with "them."
The Texas Education Agency determined that the rule actions will have no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses or microbusinesses; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
In accordance with the Texas Education Code, §7.102(f), the SBOE approved this rule action for adoption by a vote of two-thirds of its members to specify an effective date earlier than the beginning of the 2009-2010 school year. The earlier effective date will allow districts to begin preparing for implementation in the 2009-2010 school year and will provide for appropriate alignment with the new end-of-course exam development schedule. The effective date is 20 days after filing as adopted.
Following is a summary of public comments and corresponding responses regarding the proposed revisions to 19 TAC Chapter 112, Subchapters A - C.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for an emphasis on empirical data at the elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the elementary TEKS are precise in providing examples for each objective.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the explicit expectation of investigative time in the elementary curriculum was helpful and agreed with the percentages used in the revisions.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Thirty-seven teachers, one administrator, two parents, and two community members commented that the percentage of time spent on classroom and outdoor investigations should be increased to 80% in all elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained the appropriate percentage of time spent in classroom and outdoor investigations for each grade level.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for increased specificity at the elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the concept of changes in materials caused by heating and cooling repeats throughout the grades with not enough difference in rigor to warrant so much repeatability.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the references to changes in materials caused by heating and cooling are appropriately placed in elementary grades in the revised TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed elementary TEKS reflect solid, teachable science for the Kindergarten-Grade 5 student.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the topic of magnets was repeated in many elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and properly sequenced the topic of magnets throughout the grades.
Comment. One teacher commented that the quantity of science equipment was great and was a budget concern in the elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the deletion of the systems TEKS in all grade levels.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the organizing concept of systems is integrated throughout the revised elementary TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that the concepts of the age of the world and reproduction as a basic need of life should be taught at the elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the current placement of these concepts in secondary grades of the revised TEKS was more appropriate for these science concepts.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed elementary TEKS are broad and shallow.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised elementary TEKS had appropriate breadth and depth.
Comment. One teacher commented that the elementary TEKS should include more authentic tasks.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(i), the SBOE may not adopt rules that designate the methodology used by a teacher.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the recommended percentages of science investigations in the proposed elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the recommended percentages for classroom and laboratory investigations in the revised elementary TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the TAKScope lessons in science should be included.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(i), the SBOE may not adopt rules that designate the methodology used by a teacher.
Comment. One teacher commented that the laboratory and field language in the proposed elementary introduction is not strong enough to compel instruction.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. One teacher commented that elementary children need to be provided environmental education outdoors and expressed support for the inclusion of 50% laboratory and field investigations.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The revised elementary TEKS state that, "the student conducts classroom and outdoor investigations." The introductions for each grade level include a recommendation for the percentage of time to be spent on laboratory and field investigations.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed elementary revisions are more detailed and to the point.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Six teachers commented that the proposed elementary TEKS need more mention of the solar system and order of planets.
Response. The SBOE agreed and strengthened the student expectations that address the solar system and planets. The SBOE also took action to approve changes to respond to this and other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed elementary TEKS do not mention planets, only the Earth, Moon, and Sun system.
Response. The SBOE agreed and strengthened the student expectations that address planets. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to this and other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that if we all truly follow this very sensible approach to teaching science as found in the proposed TEKS, fifth grade teachers would simply reinforce what students discovered through logical, concrete, and expanding exposure to science concepts.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to this and other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed concerned that the average teacher would not be able to easily interpret the elementary TEKS the way they are written.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and were grade-level specific. Further clarification of the standards should occur during curriculum development and professional development.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed elementary TEKS should specify time in minutes per week that students should spend in science by grade level and have some kind of accountability.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(i), the SBOE may not adopt rules that designate the time spent by a teacher or a student on a particular task or subject.
Comment. One teacher commented that gloves are not necessary at the elementary level.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two teachers commented that the order of the proposed elementary TEKS should be shifted so that the life science TEKS follow the section on process skills.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The order of topics in the revised TEKS would not prevent educators from delivering instruction in a sequence that is effective in their classrooms.
Comment. Two teachers commented that "inexhaustible" resources should be included in the proposed elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the use of only the terms "renewable" and "non-renewable" would be more clear and better understood.
Comment. One teacher commented that the materials and equipment for sifting should be added to the lists of tools in the proposed elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. School districts may use additional equipment at their discretion. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the concept of vibrations producing sound was not represented in the proposed elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE determined that the presentation of energy, including sound energy, was appropriate as written in the revised elementary TEKS.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for inclusion of recycling and alternative energy concepts in the proposed elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE retained the references to recycling and alternative energy in the revised elementary TEKS.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that the Kindergarten introduction be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Kindergarten TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that numbers in the Kindergarten introductory paragraphs should be shifted to allow the time statement to stand alone, as follows: (4) Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of instructional time.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. One teacher commented that "on a daily basis" should be changed to "one consistent week of each month" to show patterns in seasonal changes throughout the year in Kindergarten.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The instructional delivery may be adjusted at the local level to best meet the needs of students and teachers.
Comment. One teacher commented that Kindergarten students should be using thermometers.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The revised TEKS include a demonstration thermometer in the list of suggested tools at the Kindergarten level.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Kindergarten, classroom and outdoor investigations should be 70% of the instructional time.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The proposed revised TEKS include a recommendation that districts facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of instructional time at the Kindergarten level.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Kindergarten, the following language should be moved from the introduction to a knowledge and skills statement, "The student for at least 80% of instructional time, conducts investigations in the classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school safety procedures."
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-six teachers commented that a student expectation in Kindergarten should read, "demonstrate how to use and conserve materials such as conserving water and reusing or recycling of paper."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS appropriately included the use, conservation, and reuse or recycling of plastic and metal, as well as paper.
Comment. One teacher commented that standard units of measurement, as well as nonstandard units, should be included in the proposed Kindergarten TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-six teachers commented that a student expectation in Kindergarten should be simplified to remove the portion of the expectation that required students to make predictions based on observations and to simply expect students to make observations of patterns in nature such as the shapes of leaves.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in Kindergarten should be changed to, "explore what scientists do and how they investigate things in the natural world and use tools to help in their investigations."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and retained the proposed student expectation, "describe what scientists do," which would not prohibit educators from making connections between what scientists do with the science students are learning.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that timing devices should be removed from the proposed Kindergarten TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-six teachers commented that tools in Kindergarten should not include cameras, terrariums, aquariums, weather instruments (unless specified), clocks, collection nets, and nonstandard measuring items.
Response. The SBOE agreed that cameras should be removed from the equipment list but disagreed with additional recommended adjustments to the list and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE also took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-six teachers commented that relative size and mass are not developmentally correct vocabulary for Kindergarten students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS are grade appropriate and clearly written.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in Kindergarten should be changed to, "explore different forms of energy such as light, heat, and sound."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the phrase, "use the five senses to explore. . ." was an appropriate expectation.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that additional examples of movement, "such as a push or pull," should be added to the physical sciences in Kindergarten.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and included sufficient examples of movement.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that in Kindergarten, a student expectation should be revised to read, "observe and describe properties of water."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included appropriate references regarding water.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-six teachers commented that in Kindergarten, students should, "observe and describe objects in the sky such as the Moon and Sun." The reference to "stars" and "clouds" should be removed from the proposed student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate with the reference to stars and clouds.
Comment. Two teachers, nine administrators, and two university/college staff commented that in Kindergarten, the same text as Grade 3, as follows, should also be used: "The student knows that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures that help them survive within their environments."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that in Kindergarten, the student expectation, "identify ways that young plants resemble the parent plant," should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised student expectation was appropriate and provided necessary content for students.
Comment. One teacher commented that the skills in Grade 1 are not age appropriate, nor do they engage students in meaningful learning for their age.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate for Grade 1 students and retained the scientific investigation and reasoning process skills.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that the introduction of Grade 1 be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 1 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that numbers in the introductory paragraphs of Grade 1 should be shifted to allow the 80% time statement to stand alone.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 1 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers expressed opposition to the inclusion of plastics in the list of materials reused or recycled in Grade 1.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS appropriately included the use, conservation, and reuse or recycling of plastics as well as other materials.
Comment. One teacher questioned the relevancy of finding a home for a classroom pet in Grade 1.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the examples, which are designated by the phrase "such as" in the revised TEKS, are appropriate.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in Grade 1 should demonstrate how scientists investigate the natural world.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised student expectation, "describe what scientists do," was appropriate and may be inclusive of "how" scientists investigate and use tools.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that the following items should be deleted from the Grade 1 tool list: nonstandard measuring items, clocks, cameras, terrariums and aquariums, collecting nets, and weather instruments (unless specified).
Response. The SBOE agreed that cameras should be deleted from the Grade 1 equipment list and determined that wind socks should replace weather vanes. The SBOE disagreed with the additional recommended changes and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE also took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to five-year-olds exploring magnets.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contain knowledge and skills that are appropriate for Grade 1.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that cameras should be removed from the tool list in Grade 1.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(4)(A) in Grade 1 to remove cameras from the list of tools.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the heating and cooling reference in Grade 1 should read, "the addition or reduction of heat."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the reference to heating and cooling was appropriate.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that in Grade 1, students should "explore" rather than "identify and discuss" different forms of energy such as light, heat, and sound.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained skills and expectations that were appropriate for Grade 1.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that in Grade 1, students should "explore" rather than "predict and describe" how a magnet can be used to push or pull an object.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained skills and expectations that were appropriate for Grade 1.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the student expectation in Grade 1 relating to the movement of objects should state "such as a push or pull."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained sufficient examples such as moving in a straight line, zig zag, up and down, back and forth, round and round, and fast and slow.
Comment. One teacher commented that it was difficult to determine what "gather evidence" looked like in Grade 1.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the language in the revised TEKS contained adequate clarification.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that in Grade 1, students should "record weather information including temperature such as hot and cold, clear or cloudy, and rainy or icy" to be more developmentally appropriate in language and concepts.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the language of revised TEKS was clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the student expectation in Grade 1 where students "record changes" of the Moon and stars was not appropriate and that students should start with clouds.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was appropriate and would not prevent a teacher from asking students to observe and record changes in clouds.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that the proposed Grade 1 TEKS should include, "observe and describe objects in the sky such as the Moon and Sun" and delete reference to the clouds and stars.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the reference to the clouds and stars as examples was appropriate.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 1 should be expanded to include characteristics of day and night.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 1 to include characteristics of day and night.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that in Grade 1, asking students to "demonstrate that air is all around us and observe that wind is moving air" was not developmentally appropriate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was reasonable and grade appropriate.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that a knowledge and skills statement in Grade 1 should be revised to read, "The student knows that the living environment is composed of relationships between organisms." The commenters stated that the reference to life cycles should be deleted from the proposed statement.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the language on life cycles was appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that aquariums/terrariums would be very expensive for every elementary classroom, though ideal.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised Grade 1 TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-eight teachers commented that the proposed TEKS in Grade 1 related to energy transfer through food chains was not developmentally appropriate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that interdependence among living organisms in the Grade 1 TEKS was too complex.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Two teachers, nine administrators, and two university/college staff commented that the concept of organisms resembling their parents should be deleted from the Grade 1 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided fundamental life science information for students.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff suggested adding the word "many" to a Grade 1 student expectation so it reads, "compare ways that many young animals resemble their parents."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was appropriate as written and did not need an additional descriptor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the word "chicken" should be removed from a student expectation in Grade 1 that addresses life cycles.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation provided examples, indicated by the phrase "such as," to allow flexibility in implementation at the local level.
Comment. One teacher commented that the use of the term "system" only in the life science area of the Grade 1 TEKS will lead to teacher misconceptions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that many recurring themes, such as systems, may be used in the earth science and physical science areas. The revised TEKS do not limit the theme of systems to be only used in the life science area.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that a section in the Grade 2 introduction should be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient, appropriate, and did not need additional details.
Comment. Thirty-seven teachers, one administrator, two parents, and two community members commented that the last sentence of introduction paragraph (3) in Grade 2 should be revised to read, "Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of instructional time."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the recommended percentages of time for classroom and outdoor investigations in the revised TEKS were appropriate for Grade 2.
Comment. Eight administrators and two university/college staff commented that a section of the introduction in Grade 2 should be shifted to allow the time statement regarding classroom and outdoor investigation to stand alone, as follows: (4) Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 60% of instructional time.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 2 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Eight administrators and two university/college staff commented that a portion of the introduction in Grade 2 be edited to read, "demonstrate position, frame of reference, and a change in position and motion."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introductory language, in which students are expected to "demonstrate a change in motion and position," was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the following language should be moved from the introduction to a knowledge and skills statement in the Grade 2 TEKS: "The student for at least 60% of instructional time conducts investigations in the classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school safety procedures."
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. One teacher commented that it was important to intentionally connect what scientists do with the science the students are learning.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and retained the student expectation, "describe what scientists do," which would not prohibit educators from making connections between what scientists do with the science students are learning.
Comment. One hundred and fifty-seven teachers commented that terrariums, aquariums, clocks, and collection nets should be deleted from the list of tools found in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the word "relative" should be removed from the student expectation in Grade 2 that reads, "classify matter by physical properties, including shape, relative mass, relative temperature, texture, flexibility, and whether material is a solid or liquid." The teachers also commented that "magnetism" should be added to this list of physical properties.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and provided sufficient examples of physical properties.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers supported a student expectation in Grade 2 relating to classification of matter by physical properties.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the phrase "heating and cooling" should be replaced with "the addition or reduction of heat" in Grade 2.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that use of the term "heating and cooling" was appropriate for this grade level.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that the phrase "justify the selection of those materials based on their physical properties" was not developmentally appropriate for Grade 2.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Eight administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be replaced with, "demonstrate that everyday objects can use or produce light, heat, or sound energy."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in Grade 2, "investigate the effects on an object by increasing or decreasing amounts of light, heat, and sound energy such as how the color of an object appears different in dimmer light or how heat melts butter" was not developmentally appropriate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in Grade 2, "investigate the effects on an object by increasing or decreasing amounts of light, heat, and sound energy such as how the color of an object appears different in dimmer light or how heat melts butter" was unclear.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and appropriate.
Comment. One administrator commented that magnets are repeated and that scaffolding was appropriate; repeating content was not in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and presented magnets in a developmentally sequenced manner.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that magnetism should be moved from the section on force, motion, and energy to the section on matter and energy.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included appropriate placement of references to magnetism.
Comment. One teacher commented that the phrase, "tracing the changes in the position of an object over time" needs more clarification in the Grade 2 student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Definition of the standards should occur during curriculum development and professional development.
Comment. Eight administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be revised to read, "trace the changes in the position relative to a frame of reference of an object. . ."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and specific.
Comment. Five teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be edited to read, "compare patterns of movement of objects such as sliding, rolling, spinning, and balancing."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the addition of the concept of "balancing" in the revised TEKS was not necessary.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be edited to read, "observe and describe rocks by size, texture, and color."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(7)(A) in Grade 2 as recommended.
Comment. One teacher questioned how the average student would really observe a boulder and compare it to rocks as described in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(7)(A) in Grade 2 to delete the references to boulders and gravel.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2, "distinguishing between natural and manmade resources" should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be edited to read, "measure, record, and graph weather information including temperature, wind conditions, and cloud cover in order to identify patterns in the data."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS, including measuring precipitation, were grade level specific and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the student expectation, "observe, describe, and record patterns caused by objects in the sky, including shadows and the appearance of the moon" may lead to the misconception that the phases of the Moon are caused by the Earth and needs to be clarified in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(D) in Grade 2 to read, "observe, describe, and record patterns of objects in the sky, including the appearance of the Moon."
Comment. Ten teachers commented that they would prefer a more clear explanation of how the shadows should be interpreted as phases of the Moon in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and revised the student expectation in subsection (b)(8)(D) in Grade 2 to delete the reference to shadows.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be edited to read, "observe, describe, and record patterns caused by objects in the sky including the appearance of the Moon."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(D) in Grade 2 to read, "observe, describe, and record patterns of objects in the sky, including the appearance of the Moon."
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 2 should be edited to read, "identify factors in the environment including temperature that affect growth of living things."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation provided more details and examples regarding factors that affect growth and behavior.
Comment. Six administrators and two university/college staff suggested deleting the phrase "organisms resemble their parents" from the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the phrase "organisms resemble their parents" was appropriate.
Comment. One administrator commented that the concept that organisms resemble parents should remain in the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty teachers commented that the word "unique" was not developmentally appropriate and should be deleted from the Grade 2 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the language in the revised TEKS was clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the recurring themes in the Grade 3 introduction are patterns, relationships, and cycles. The teacher stated that there was no systems theme (explicitly) mentioned in the proposed TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The introduction of the revised TEKS in Grade 3 does include systems as a recurring theme, in addition to patterns, cycles, models, change, and constancy.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that the Grade 3 introduction be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. Thirty-seven teachers, one administrator, two parents, and two community members commented that the last sentence of the Grade 3 introduction paragraph (3) be revised to read, "Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of instructional time."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the recommended percentages of time for classroom and outdoor investigations in the revised TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that the Grade 3 introduction be separated to allow the time statement to stand alone.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 3 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. One teacher commented that the statement, "The student for at least 60% of instructional time, conducts investigations in the classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school safety procedures," should be moved to a student expectation in the Grade 3 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that maps are not aligned with other content area TEKS for Grade 3.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student in Grade 3.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that hot plates are not safe and should be removed from the equipment list in Grade 3. Sound recorders, terrariums, and aquariums should also be deleted from the list of tools. Spring scales should be added to the list of tools in order to measure force.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(4)(A) in Grade 3 to include spring scales. The SBOE disagreed with the removal of other items from the list and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE also took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that in Grade 3, gloves are not needed since there are no hot plates listed on the equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that in Grade 3, the phrase "heating and cooling" should be replaced with "the addition or reduction of heat."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the reference to "heating and cooling" was appropriate for this grade level.
Comment. One teacher commented that the concept of vibrations producing sound was not represented anywhere in elementary TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the coverage of energy, including sound energy, through exploring and differentiating forms of energy, was appropriate in the revisions to the elementary TEKS.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that in Grade 3, mechanical energy should be included in the forms of energy that students explore.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 3 to include mechanical energy. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-two teachers commented that in Grade 3, a student expectation on position and motion should be changed to "show work being done" and that the example of "pulleys and wagons" should replace "cars."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(6)(B) in Grade 3 to include the phrase "show work being done" and examples of "pulleys and wagons." The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Eleven administrators and two university/college staff commented that in Grade 3, the concept of position relative to a frame of reference should be included.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation relating to position and motion needed no additional clarification with respect to frame of reference.
Comment. One teacher commented that magnetism was already covered in the "matter and energy" strand and does not need to be repeated in the "force, energy and motion" strand of the TEKS in Grade 3, and that the concepts of "push or pull, equilibrium, electricity" should be included, as recommended in national standards.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS appropriately address the concept of magnetism in two strands of Grade 3. The SBOE also disagreed that additional descriptors were needed.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 3, the formation of soil by weathered rock and decomposing organic matter was probably too abstract for students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 3, students were perhaps not ready to cognitively comprehend the Earth/Moon/Sun system.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(8) in Grade 3 to read, "The student knows there are recognizable patterns in the natural world and among objects in the sky."
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that in Grade 3, students should, "use models that demonstrate the characteristics and relationship of the planets and the Sun, Earth and Moon system including orbit and position in order to align astronomy concepts."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(8) in Grade 3 to add another student expectation as paragraph (8)(D) that reads, "identify the planets in Earth's solar system and their position in relation to the Sun." In addition, the use of models to represent the natural world was already included the revised TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 3, the genetic connection is an important concept and that the statement "organisms resemble their parents" should remain in the TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-two teachers commented that in Grade 3, the concept, "students explore some characteristics of organisms are inherited and some behaviors are learned from the environment" was not developmentally appropriate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student. The SBOE took action to clarify this language by amending subsection (b)(10)(B) in Grade 3 to include, " behaviors are learned in response to living in a certain environment."
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-three teachers commented that in Grade 3, students should learn the life cycle of the frog, rather than the mealworm.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(10)(C) in Grade 3 to replace mealworms with frogs.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 4, the focus of the introduction in subsection (a) seemed to be earth science with some life science. The new emphasis placed on the use of models to understand systems was very helpful.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took additional action to respond to other comments.
Comment. A community representative commented that in Grade 4, the introduction in paragraph (1) should be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific hypotheses and theories.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that in Grade 4, the introduction in paragraph (3) should be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff commented that the instructional time recommendation should stand alone in the introduction of the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 4 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Thirty-seven teachers, one administrator, two parents, and two community representatives commented that the last sentence in the introduction in paragraph (3) of Grade 4 TEKS should read, "Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of instructional time."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the recommended percentages of time for classroom and outdoor investigations in the revised TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. Two teachers and two university/college staff commented that the fourth introductory paragraph needs to be restored in the Grade 4 TEKS, to read, "All grade levels should address the physical, natural, and living environments." The commenters recommended that subsequent paragraphs that begin with "within the natural environment" and "within the living environment" be renumbered. The commenters further suggested the addition of a new statement to read, "within the physical environment, students learn to measure physical properties of matter and to compare and contrast a variety of mixtures and solutions" followed by "the students explore different forms of energy."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. Nine administrators and two university/college staff suggested the deletion of a sentence in the introduction of the Grade 4 TEKS that reads, "The students will design an experiment to test the effect of force on objects."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS introduction was adequate and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher suggested editing a knowledge and skills statement in Grade 4 related to conducting scientific investigations to read, "Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student, for at least 50% of instructional time, conducts investigations in the classroom."
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 4, repeated investigations are ideal but are not well aligned with mathematics, because averaging did not occur until middle school.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Ten teachers questioned whether there was accuracy in evaluating product claims found in labels and if some type of experiment was needed related to the knowledge and skills statement in the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear as written. Further definition of the standards should occur during curriculum development and professional development.
Comment. One teacher commented that in Grade 4, a "stream table" was alarming.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and tool lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers suggested revisions to the student expectation in Grade 4 relating to the equipment and supply list, including the removal of hot plates and the addition of the spring scales.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(4)(A) in Grade 4 to include spring scales. The SBOE disagreed with the removal of other items from the list and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE also took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers expressed opposition to the inclusion of gloves on the list of supplies in the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. The SBOE did, however, take action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Five teachers suggested that the phrase "heating and cooling" be replaced with "addition or reduction of heat" in the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that use of the term "heating and cooling" was appropriate for this grade level.
Comment. Five teachers suggested that clarification of "compare and contrast a variety of mixtures and solutions such as rocks in sand or water, or sugar water" in the Grade 4 TEKS was needed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained adequate examples of varieties of mixtures and solutions.
Comment. A teacher commented that students struggled with the terms "mixtures," "solutions," "insulators," and "conductors," and questioned the readiness of students to understand these concepts in the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Two teachers, 11 administrators, and two university/college staff suggested revision of a knowledge and skills statement in the Grade 4 TEKS to read, "The student knows that energy exists in many forms and can be observed in cycles, patterns, and systems."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6) in Grade 4 to replace the word "occurs" with the word "exists." The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One administrator suggested that a student expectation in the Grade 4 be revised to read, "explore the uses of energy including light, thermal, electrical, and sound energy."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 4 so that "electricity" was changed to "electrical." The SBOE disagreed with the suggested change from "differentiate among forms of" to "explore the uses of" and determined that the level of rigor in the revised TEKS was appropriate.
Comment. Two teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 4 be revised to read, "differentiate among forms of energy and how they travel."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS, which expect students to differentiate among forms of energy, was appropriate and rigorous.
Comment. Eleven teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 4 be edited to read, "differentiate among forms of energy, including sound, electricity, light and heat/thermal." The teachers also requested clarification of the term "differentiate."
Response. The SBOE agreed and also took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "differentiate among forms of energy, including mechanical, sound, electrical, light, and heat/thermal." The SBOE determined that further clarification of the term "differentiate" was not needed.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers requested the addition of the term "mechanical" to a Grade 4 student expectation so that it reads, "differentiate among forms of energy including mechanical, sound, electricity, light, and heat/thermal."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "differentiate among forms of energy, including mechanical, sound, electrical, light, and heat/thermal."
Comment. One teacher suggested the replacement of the term "electricity" with "electrical" when referring to forms of energy.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "differentiate among forms of energy, including mechanical, sound, electrical, light, and heat/thermal."
Comment. Eleven administrators and two university/college staff suggested that a student expectation in Grade 4 be revised to read, "investigate the flow of electricity in a circuit."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in scope and rigor.
Comment. One teacher requested the deletion of the Grade 4 student expectation, "design an experiment to test the effect of force of an object."
Response. The SBOE disagreed with the deletion, but took action to clarify the language in subsection (b)(6)(D) in Grade 4 to read, "design an experiment to test the effect of force on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism."
Comment. Two teachers requested examples for clarification of the Grade 4 student expectation, "design an experiment to test the effect of force of an object."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(D) in Grade 4 to read, "design an experiment to test the effect of force on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism."
Comment. One teacher suggested editing a portion of the student expectation, "design an experiment to test the effect of force of an object," by replacing the last part of the sentence to read, "effect of force on an object."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(D) in Grade 4 to read, "design an experiment to test the effect of force on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism."
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 4 be edited to read, "observe an experiment to test the effect of force on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism."
Response. The SBOE agreed with the suggestion to add examples to subsection (b)(6)(D) in Grade 4 such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Ten teachers questioned the placement of a student expectation related to life sciences within a broader knowledge and skill statement related to earth sciences in the Grade 4 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "measure and record changes in weather and make predictions using weather maps, weather symbols, and a map key."
Comment. A teacher, ten administrators, and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in Grade 4 be edited to read, "identify seasonal weather patterns that result from changes in air temperature, wind patterns, and precipitation."
Response. The SBOE disagreed with the language in the comment, but took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "measure and record changes in weather and make predictions using weather maps, weather symbols, and a map key."
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 4 be revised to read, "measure and record changes in weather and make predictions using weather maps."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "measure and record changes in weather and make predictions using weather maps, weather symbols, and a map key."
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers requested that a student expectation in Grade 4 be edited to read, "explain the role of the sun as a major source of energy for Earth and understand its role in the creation of the wind and in the water cycle."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in wording and rigor.
Comment. Ten teachers requested more specificity in a student expectation in Grade 4 related to the appearance of the Moon and patterns of change in shadows.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 4 to read, "collect and analyze data to identify sequences and predict patterns of change in shadows, tides, seasons, and the observable appearance of the Moon over time."
Comment. A teacher commented that in Grade 4, implied reference to phases of the moon was confusing, and a section should be deleted from a student expectation to add clarity.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 4 to read, "collect and analyze data to identify sequences and predict patterns of change in shadows, tides, seasons, and the observable appearance of the Moon over time."
Comment. An administrator commented that in Grade 4, if "reflection of sunlight" refers to albedo, it was not developmentally appropriate for fourth grade students.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 4 to read, "collect and analyze data to identify sequences and predict patterns of change in shadows, tides, seasons, and the observable appearance of the Moon over time."
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers commented that a Grade 4 student expectation should be revised to read, "collect and analyze data to identify sequences and predict patterns of change in the Sun, Earth and Moon including reflection of sunlight, tides, and in the observable appearance of the Moon over time."
Response. The SBOE agreed to add a reference to tides in subsection (b)(8)(C) in Grade 4, but disagreed with other edits and determined that the clarity and level of rigor was appropriate in the revised TEKS.
Comment. Eleven administrators and two university/college staff suggested revision of a Grade 4 student expectation to read, "investigate that most producers need sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to make their own food, while consumers are dependent on other organisms for food."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(9)(A) in Grade 4 to read, "investigate that most producers need sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to make their own food, while consumers are dependent on other organisms for food."
Comment. Eleven administrators and two university/college staff requested the addition of a new Grade 4 student expectation that reads, "Predict how changes in the ecosystem affect the food web such as a fire in a forest."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the organization of the revised TEKS was clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher and an administrator suggested the insertion of the phrase "organisms resemble their parents" into the Grade 4 knowledge and skill statement, "The student knows that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures that help them survive within their environment."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised knowledge and skill statement was appropriate in rigor and depth.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 4 student expectation related to exploring how adaptations enable organisms to survive in their environment should be more aligned with the Grade 3 and 5 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in alignment in regards to adaptations of organisms.
Comment. Two hundred and sixty-one teachers suggested the revision of a Grade 4 student expectation to read, "explore, illustrate and compare life cycles in living organisms, such as butterflies, beetles, mealworms, radishes or lima beans."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined the list of example organisms in the revised TEKS was clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher noted that the Grade 5 introductory statement lists just three "environments" in which investigations occur.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS allow flexibility in conducting investigations and addressing concepts in a variety of ways.
Comment. One university/college staff person suggested that the Grade 5 introduction be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific hypotheses and theories.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate as written.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that in Grade 5, the introduction in paragraph (3) should be replaced and recommended text relating to the study of elementary science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction of the revised TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. Thirty-seven teachers, one administrator, two parents, and two community representatives requested that the percentage of time spent in classrooms and outdoor investigations should be raised to 80% in all elementary grades.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the recommended percentages of time for classroom and outdoor investigations in the revised TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff suggested that the time statement for instruction in the introduction should stand alone and that districts should be encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 50% of instructional time.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction to the revised Grade 5 TEKS was sufficient and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher suggested the revision of a knowledge and skills statement in the Grade 5 TEKS to read, "Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student, for at least 50% of instructional time, conducts investigations in the classroom."
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Under statute, TEC, §28.002(j), the SBOE may only require, by rule, a specific amount or percentage of time in a secondary science course that must be laboratory instruction.
Comment. Fifteen teachers commented that a student expectation in Grade 5 be revised to read, "describe, plan and implement descriptive investigations asking well-defined questions, and selecting and using appropriate equipment and technology."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and grade level specific.
Comment. Thirteen teachers and two university/college staff suggested the revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "describe, plan and implement comparative investigations asking well-defined questions, formulating testable hypotheses, and selecting and using appropriate equipment and technology and implement simple experimental investigations testing one variable, asking well-defined questions, formulating testable hypotheses and selecting and using appropriate equipment and technology."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and complete.
Comment. Fourteen teachers and two university/college staff suggested expanding a Grade 5 student expectation into three parts addressing descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and complete.
Comment. Two teachers suggested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "draw conclusions from simple graphs, tables."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained a reasonable expectation related to the construction of graphs.
Comment. One teacher requested the replacement of "drawing or developing a model" with "evaluate models" in a Grade 5 student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and rigorous.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 5 student expectation that asks a student to draw or develop a model was "ridiculous" and wondered how this student expectation should be taught.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and appropriate.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty teachers requested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation related to drawing or developing a model to read, "represent the natural world using models and identify their limitations."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 5 student expectation related to drawing or developing a model presumes a lot regarding the child's readiness to turn concrete objects into abstract representations, and that most children this age should not be expected to visualize the mechanisms of technologies they cannot concretely explore.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher requested that specific scientists be listed for classroom study in a Grade 5 student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The revised TEKS can be further defined during curriculum development and professional development.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty teachers suggested revisions to the student expectation in Grade 5 relating to the equipment and supply list, including the addition of spring scales.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend subsection (b)(4)(A) in Grade 5 to include spring scales. The SBOE also took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff requested revision of a Grade 5 knowledge and skills statement to read, "the student knows that energy exists in many forms and can be observed in cycles, patterns, and systems."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-four teachers requested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "explore energy including mechanical, light, thermal electrical, and sound energy."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6)(A) in Grade 5 to read, "explore the uses of energy, including mechanical, light, thermal, electrical, and sound energy."
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff suggested the insertion of the words, "differentiate and explore among" uses of energy in a student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and rigorous.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff requested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "demonstrate that light travels in a straight line until it strikes an object and is reflected or travels from one medium to another and it is refracted."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty teachers requested the addition of a Grade 5 student expectation, "design an experiment that tests the effect of force on an object."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(6) in Grade 5 to add another student expectation as paragraph (6)(D) that reads, "design an experiment that tests the effect of force on an object."
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff requested revision of a Grade 5 knowledge and skills statement to read, "The student knows that there are recognizable patterns in the natural world and the solar system."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that in response to public comments, adjustments had been made to include reference to planets at earlier grade levels.
Comment. Two teachers requested inclusion of the planets in the solar system and their relationship to the Sun in the Grade 5 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that in response to public comments, adjustments had been made to include reference to planets at earlier grade levels.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in Grade 5 related to weather and climate should be moved to Grade 4.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in their coverage of the earth sciences.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty teachers requested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "explain how the Sun and ocean interact in the water cycle and in weather patterns."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in the coverage of natural patterns among the Sun, Earth, and Moon system.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff requested deletion of the phrase "approximately every 24 hours" from the Grade 5 student expectation that reads, "demonstrate that Earth rotates on its axis once approximately every 24 hours causing the daylight/night cycle and the apparent movement of the Sun across the sky."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in the coverage of natural patterns among the Sun, Earth, and Moon system.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty teachers requested revision of a Grade 5 student expectation to read, "demonstrate that the Earth rotates on its axis once approximately every 24 hours causing the day/night cycle and revolves around the Sun every 365 days."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in scope and depth.
Comment. Two hundred and fifty-one teachers expressed support for the insertion of a new student expectation in the Grade 5 TEKS, "identify and compare the physical characteristics of the Sun, Earth and Moon."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8) in Grade 5 to add another student expectation as paragraph (8)(D) that reads, "identify and compare the physical characteristics of the Sun, Earth, and Moon."
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff requested the addition of a Grade 5 student expectation, "identify the planets in our solar system and their position in relation to the Sun."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in the coverage of the planets with the changes made to the proposed revised TEKS in earlier grades.
Comment. One teacher commented that there are too many TEKS in Grade 5 and that all of the TEKS related to organisms and environments should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the reference to organisms and environments in the revised TEKS was appropriate and related to significant student understandings.
Comment. One teacher requested the insertion of the phrase, "organisms resemble their parents" in a Grade 5 knowledge and skills statement related to organisms.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in scope and depth.
Comment. Nine teachers commented that they strongly support content-based TEKS revisions in middle school.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the SBOE should adopt the middle school TEKS as presented by the writing team with the changes added to the TEKS document adopted at first reading in January 2009.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The SBOE took action to approve changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that instruction related to simple machines is not found in any grade level in middle school.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS address simple machines adequately in elementary grades.
Comment. One teacher commented that a focus on interactions and equilibrium of body systems needs to be added to the middle school TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered life science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. One teacher commented that the middle school TEKS are "an inch deep and a mile wide."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in depth of content coverage.
Comment. Two teachers commented that they do not like the new structure and prefer spiraling of the content in middle school.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided more focus and depth of content for each year of study than the 1998 TEKS.
Comment. Three teachers questioned inclusion of the statement "students should know that some questions are outside the realm of science because they deal with phenomena that are not scientifically testable" in the middle school TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS will help students understand science with more depth and with more applications to situations outside the science classroom.
Comment. One teacher commented that organisms and the environment are general to Grades 5-8, and asked why there was an emphasis on physical science in Grade 7, life science in Grade 7, and earth science in Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that a grade level focus at the middle school level would allow students to learn about organisms and the environment at each of the grade levels, with the primary emphasis on the life sciences at Grade 7.
Comment. Two teachers commented on the financial considerations and asked if the state will provide funds to purchase necessary equipment and supplies for middle school.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. At this time, each district is responsible for purchasing classroom/lab instructional materials.
Comment. One teacher commented that Grade 6 students are not functioning at the intelligence level that these TEKS require.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Five teachers commented that the new middle school TEKS are less vague and allow for a greater understanding of content.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the new middle school TEKS because they have greater depth and students will no longer be bored and frustrated.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the new middle school TEKS and wondered if any research was completed on the effectiveness of the 1998 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided more focus and depth of content for each year of study. An effectiveness study of the 1998 science TEKS was not completed.
Comment. One teacher commented that due to the increasing complexity of content and concepts it seems reasonable to go back to year-long focus strands in middle school.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the proposed changes in middle school that tend to go back to the past and expressed a preference for the broader integration that currently exists because the district has spent years aligning the curriculum so that each successive year builds on what was taught the previous year.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that although the revised TEKS focus on physical science at Grade 6, life science at Grade 7, and earth science at Grade 8, the TEKS still provide opportunities for integration across the science disciplines. This arrangement provides more depth in the core content of each science discipline.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student who is being tested in Grade 8 over concepts taught in Grade 6 may have a disadvantage in meeting standards which have not been spiraled across the Grade 7 and 8 levels.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and since the state assessments are built upon the TEKS, adjustments will be made to assessments as appropriate based on the revised TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that Prekindergarten-Grade 8 students need a strong foundation in scientific claims and evidence, performing inquiry-based investigations, problem solving, and critical thinking in order to achieve success in their high school science courses. In addition, the commenter indicated that it is critical for teachers to have a clear specific framework that vertically aligns across grade levels and allows students to build upon sound scientific concepts and skills needed to compete in a global society.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One administrator expressed support for moving toward 40% labs in middle school.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One administrator commented that the new middle school TEKS represent excellent work because it is now easier to see what each grade level is expected to teach. The commenter recommended that the current textbooks for middle schools be aligned to the proposed TEKS to ensure all students have a consistent tool for research/reading/studying as well as the same teacher curriculum, e.g., model lessons for each student expectation.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments. The recommendations are outside the scope of the current rule action.
Comment. One teacher commented on a preference for the spiraled curriculum that has been in place over the past 10 years in middle school.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The revised TEKS were appropriate and focus on physical science at Grade 6, life science at Grade 7, and earth science at Grade 8. The TEKS still provide opportunities for spiraling across the science disciplines. This arrangement provides more depth in the core content of each science discipline.
Comment. One teacher commented that the new middle school TEKS are less vague and should allow for a greater understanding of living systems without re-teaching material.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that ecology and environmental science should be removed from Grades 6 and 8 and added to Grade 7 instead.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided reasonable life science integration at the Grade 6 and 8 levels.
Comment. One teacher commented that the integrated method of teaching middle school science should stay for several reasons: (1) it is better for high school preparation; (2) it allows the students to build a solid science foundation; (3) it currently has teaching resources; and (4) any change will place too much pressure on Grade 8 students to recall material for TAKS testing.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided more focus and depth of content coverage for each year of study. Since the state assessments are built upon the TEKS, adjustments will be made to assessments as appropriate based on the revised TEKS.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the new Grade 6 science TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that some of the Grade 6 student expectations are not developmentally appropriate. For example, calculating density at Grade 6 is too advanced. Also, it would be more beneficial for Grade 6 students to understand the parts of an atom and the differences between physical and chemical properties. The concepts of molecules and compounds should be taught in Grade 7 or 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the new Grade 6 TEKS removed the focus on surface and ground water and that this action should not have occurred. The teacher also commented that there are many current news stories that would support the continued inclusion of surface and ground water information.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided adequate coverage of the environment at the different middle school grade levels.
Comment. One teacher commented that there is no genetics component in the revised Grade 6 TEKS and referenced advancements in genetics (cloning, stem cell research, etc.) as reasons to include this as an important area to be introduced at the Grade 6 level.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that the life science focus, including genetics, was more appropriate for the Grade 7 level.
Comment. One teacher commented that genetics are only covered in Grade 7 TEKS and proposed either an introduction to the subject in Grade 6 or a continuation of the subject in Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that the life science focus, including genetics, was more appropriate for the Grade 7 level.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 6 TEKS do not include genetics content and also lack an instructional focus on surface and ground water.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that the life science focus, including genetics, was appropriate for the Grade 7 level. In addition, surface and ground water are included at the Grade 8 level.
Comment. An administrator commented that the Grade 6 content is too difficult; too much information is presented; and questioned if students have the ability to handle density, compounds and mixtures, decimals and metrics, and computers in the lab.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised Grade 6 TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented on the need to remove ecology and environmental science from Grade 6 and move the content to Grade 7.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that the ecology and environmental science content in the Grade 6 TEKS would be retained.
Comment. One teacher commented that the new Grade 6 science TEKS do not match Grade 6 mathematics TEKS when referring to manipulating formulas (which is in Grade 7 mathematics).
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the level of mathematics required in the revised TEKS was appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general Grade 6 student.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the new "earthy" types of science in Grade 6, however, questioned whether Grade 6 students are functioning at the intellectual level required for the amount of material that the students must cover such as matter and energy; compounds, mixtures and density; using metrics and decimals; and computer usage when many students do not have access to computers on a regular basis.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and attainable by the general Grade 6 student.
Comment. Two teachers and one university/college staff person questioned whether Grade 6 students are able to learn about physical science before high school and indicated that Grade 6 would be the foundational year for chemistry and physics, leaving 3-4 years (Grades 7-10) before the students actually take these courses. The commenter suggested earth science in Grade 6 and physical science for Grade 8 because students are not required to know earth science to graduate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the focus on the physical sciences at the Grade 6 level was appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the TEKS for Grades 6-8 science do not mention simple machines and that the study of simple machines is the basis of modern physics. The comment also indicated that students who were not successful in many other areas of science really blossomed when investigating and learning about simple machines.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS address simple machines adequately in elementary grades.
Comment. One teacher questioned the addition of a sentence in the Grade 6 TEKS that states that students know that some questions are outside the realm of science because they deal with phenomena that are not scientifically accurate.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS will help students understand science with more depth and with more applications to situations outside the science classroom.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff requested that a Grade 6 introductory statement be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific, descriptive, and comparative investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed about adding all the introductory language suggested in the comments but did take action to add language in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 6 that addresses comparative investigations.
Comment. An administrator commented that the Grade 6 TEKS should not include the word "compounds" and the words "chemical reactions" because Grade 6 students will not yet have been introduced to atomic structure, bonding or valence electrons, therefore, it is inappropriate to introduce compounds or chemical reactions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered physical science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 6 TEKS should omit the words, "including calculations and measurements."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff suggested that student expectations in Grade 6 include, "design and implement comparative and experimental investigations."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 6 to address comparative investigations.
Comment. One teacher commented that the verb "know" is a concern and would require a rubric indicating the level of "knowing."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One administrator commented on a Grade 6 student expectation for students to "recognize that a limited number of the many known elements comprise the largest portion of a solid." The administrator commented that this integration of earth science and physical science was random and isolated.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the inclusion of this student expectation in the TEKS was appropriate.
Comment. One teacher requested the omission of a statement in the Grade 6 TEKS or a change to read, "differentiate between symbols and compound formulas."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen teachers requested replacement of a student expectation in the Grade 6 TEKS with the statement, "recognize that elements combine to form compounds such as H2O, NaCl and CO2."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One administrator expressed the belief that an existing statement should be omitted from the Grade 6 TEKS or changed to, "identify element symbols and compound formulas."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher asked for a definition of "the most basic level" that appears in the Grade 6 TEKS as part of the statement, "differentiate between elements and compounds on the most basic level."
Response. The SBOE determined that clarification of the standards should occur during curriculum development and professional development. The SBOE took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. One administrator commented that a Grade 6 student expectation that references "production of gas" and "color change" was a common result from both a physical and chemical change. The administrator commented that the indicators cited go beyond a physical change.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity. The references to "production of gas" and "color change" are normally associated with a chemical reaction.
Comment. Fifteen teachers requested that a Grade 6 student expectation relating to formation of compounds be revised to reference the formation of new substances.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(5)(D) in Grade 6 to read, "identify the formation of a new substance by using the evidence of a possible chemical change such as production of a gas, change in temperature, production of a precipitate, or color change."
Comment. Two teachers, ten administrators, and two university/college staff requested the addition of a new student expectation to the Grade 6 TEKS that reads, "recognize that elements combine to form compounds, such as water, carbon dioxide and sodium chloride."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and did not need another student expectation on chemical equations in Grade 6.
Comment. One teacher, ten administrators, and three university/college staff requested an addition to the Grade 6 TEKS for students to "identify that organic compounds contain carbon and other elements such as hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, nitrogen, or sulfur."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and did not need another student expectation on organic compounds in Grade 6.
Comment. One teacher commented that calculating density is highly unnecessary and too abstract for Grade 6 students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in mathematical computations and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen teachers requested a substitution in the Grade 6 TEKS to read, "classify substances based on physical properties including volume and density."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen teachers requested the deletion of the term "logical" from the Grade 6 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were written with appropriate language and clarity.
Comment. Three teachers, 13 administrators, and two university/college staff requested revisions to a Grade 6 student expectation relating to changes caused by unbalanced forces.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8)(B) in Grade 6 to read, "identify and describe the changes in position, direction, and speed of an object when acted upon by unbalanced forces."
Comment. Fourteen teachers requested the deletion of the Grade 6 student expectation requiring students to calculate average speed using distance and time measurements. The teachers commented that this student expectation should be moved to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in the placement of physical science concepts in the middle school standards.
Comment. Twelve teachers and two university/college staff requested adding a new Grade 6 student expectation relating to planes and pulleys and the amount of force to move an object.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(8) in Grade 6 to add another student expectation as paragraph (8)(E) that reads, "investigate how inclined planes and pulleys can be used to change the amount of force to move an object."
Comment. Four teachers, 13 administrators, and two university/college staff requested a new Grade 6 student expectation to read, "investigate and describe applications of Newton's law of inertia, law of force and acceleration, and law of action-reaction such as in vehicle restraints, sports activities, amusement park rides, and rocket launches."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and did not need an additional student expectation in physical science.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff requested an edit to a Grade 6 knowledge and skills statement to read, "Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that energy occurs in many forms and can change forms."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Fourteen teachers requested an edit of a Grade 6 knowledge and skills statement to read, "the student knows that there is a relationship among force, motion, and energy."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One administrator commented that the Grade 6 TEKS should keep the statements related to the Law of Conservation of Energy and the forms and types of energy.
Response. The SBOE agreed and retained language related to conservation of energy and forms of energy in the revised TEKS.
Comment. Nine teachers and one university/college staff person requested the deletion of the Grade 6 student expectation that requires the student to, "classify rocks as metamorphic, igneous, or sedimentary by the processes of their formation" and suggested that it be moved to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 6 student expectation related to identifying the major tectonic plates, including Eurasian, African, Indo-Australian, Pacific, North American, and South American seems redundant to a similar student expectation in Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. Ten teachers commented and requested a deletion of the Grade 6 student expectation describing how plate tectonics causes major geological events such as ocean basins, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and mountain building. The teachers stated that this student expectation could be moved to another grade level.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 6 student expectation describing how plate tectonics causes major geological events such as ocean basins, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and mountain building seems to be the same as a student expectation in Grade 8 and should be clarified.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily.
Comment. One teacher commented that the term "understand" is not easily applied in the Grade 6 classroom and may require a rubric indicating the "level of understanding."
Response. The SBOE disagreed. Teaching of the standards should be determined during curriculum development and professional development. The SBOE took action to approve the proposal with additional changes in response to other comments.
Comment. Two teachers commented that the Grade 6 TEKS relating to the history and future of space exploration, including the types of equipment and transportation needed for space travel should be moved to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. Ten teachers requested that Grade 6 TEKS related to earth and space science include components of the solar system; characteristics of objects in the solar system that allow life to exist such as the proximity of the sun, presence of water, and composition of the atmosphere; identification of the accommodations, considering the characteristics of the solar system, that enable manned space exploration; and the history and future of space exploration, including the types of equipment and transportation needed for space travel.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered earth science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the Grade 6 TEKS related to biotic parts of an ecosystem in which organisms interact and the levels of organization within an ecosystem, including organism, population, community, and ecosystem, should be moved into a newly developed student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need an additional student expectation in life science at the Grade 6 level.
Comment. Ten teachers requested that the topics related to organisms and environments; classifications into Domains and Kingdoms; cellular composition of organisms; prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells; taxonomic classifications of living organisms; and characteristics of organisms, including prokaryotic or eukaryotic, unicellular or multicellular, autotrophic or heterotrophic, and mode of reproduction be moved to Grade 7.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered life science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. One teacher and one administrator commented that the Grade 6 topic regarding taxonomy is an important topic and noted that there will be a four-year gap before the topic will be taught again in biology.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered life science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. One teacher commented that, in addition to organism interactions, Grade 6 students should be able to identify internal and external stimuli and responses as this changes the overall interactions in an ecosystem.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Ten teachers requested a new Grade 6 standard related to the relationship between organisms and environments, including these student expectations: observe and describe how different environments and biomes support different varieties of organisms; describe how biodiversity contributes to the sustainability of an ecosystem; describe the role of ecological succession after a natural disaster; describe biotic and abiotic parts of an ecosystem in which organisms interact; and diagram the levels of organization within an ecosystem including organism, population, community, and ecosystem.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and did not need an additional student expectation in life science at Grade 6.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for a Grade 7 curriculum that addresses the needs and interests of students and requested continued emphasis on the biological aspects of Grade 7 science. Response: The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that it is difficult to develop all of the Grade 7 concepts to a level of mastery such that the Grade 8 student will be in a better position to pass the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) test.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in depth and were attainable by the general student. Assessments will be based on the adopted TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that since students begin to study the Periodic Table in Grade 6, this should also be included in the Grade 7 TEKS for continuity.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered physical science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school standards.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the revisions to the Grade 7 TEKS which enable more effective coverage of the strands with a common theme of life science.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff requested that a Grade 7 introductory statement be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific, descriptive, and comparative investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed about adding all the introductory language suggested in the comments but did take action to add language in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 7 that addresses comparative investigations.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 7 TEKS should include descriptive investigations to explore new phenomena such as conducting surveys of organisms or measuring the abiotic components in a given habitat.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 7 introduction needed to address force and motion as it applies to machines. The teacher stated that the inclusion of equations related to Newton's Laws is essential in Grade 7.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two community staff suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation related to scientific investigation and reasoning should be edited to add language relating to comparative investigations.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(2)(A) in Grade 7 to read, "plan and implement comparative and descriptive investigations by making observations, asking well-defined questions, and using appropriate equipment and technology."
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 7 TEKS related to collecting and recording data used the word "qualitative" and asked why the word "quantitative" was not used.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that teachers should not be told which models they must use in Grade 7 and that although all teachers use models, they should be used at the teacher's discretion and not just in life science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were of appropriate specificity.
Comment. One administrator disagreed with the need for tools such as test kits, collecting nets, and insect traps in Grade 7 science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate science equipment and supplies lists.
Comment. One teacher commented that, "cycling of matter within living systems" is a broad concept and asked if the intent is to focus on decay of biomass.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered life science objectives satisfactorily. The "such as" statement (decay of biomass) is an optional example that may be used by teachers and that can be further clarified during professional development.
Comment. Fourteen teachers suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation be edited to read, "identify the role of decomposers in the cycling of matter within living systems, such as in the decay of biomass in a compost bin."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity. The intent of the TEKS was the cycling of matter within living systems and the decay of biomass was intended as an example only.
Comment. One teacher suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation be edited to read, "recognize some of the cycles that exist in science and their relationship between matter and energy, such as the water cycle, carbon dioxide/oxygen cycle, nitrogen cycle, lunar cycle, and the three types of rocks that exist on earth."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS addressed the cycling of matter and energy with clarity and included appropriate examples.
Comment. One administrator suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation that asks students to "diagram" the flow of energy be changed to "describe" or "explain."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation, "identify that organic compounds contain carbon and other elements such as hydrogen, phosphorus, nitrogen, or sulfur" be moved to Grade 6.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered physical science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. One teacher suggested deleting the Grade 7 student expectation, "identify that organic compounds contain carbon and other elements such as hydrogen, phosphorus, nitrogen, or sulfur," or editing the student expectation to read, "identify by the compound formula that organic compounds. . . ."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One administrator commented that the Grade 7 TEKS requiring students to identify that organic compounds contain carbon and other elements is the only time the term "organic" is mentioned in middle school and it appears to be a random vocabulary term.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS used appropriate terminology.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 7 student expectation on physical and chemical changes in the digestive system should be placed in biology. The teacher further indicated that Grade 7 needed more content in the chemistry section of the TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and provided more integration of life science with physical science at the middle school level. In addition, the SBOE determined that additional chemistry content was not needed in Grade 7.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 7 student expectation, "recognize how large molecules are broken down into smaller molecules such as carbohydrates" is about compounds. The teacher also suggested that the student expectation should begin with, "identify that compounds are broken down. . . ."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were specific and appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 7 student expectation, "recognize how large molecules are broken down into smaller molecules such as carbohydrates" is too complex for students and should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One administrator commented that the Grade 7 TEKS needed to emphasize physical science concepts related to force, motion, and energy. The administrator stated that this includes basic tools that do work and are parallel to the life science examples in the human body.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and covered physical science objectives satisfactorily throughout the middle school science standards.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff expressed the need to replace the proposed Grade 7 student expectation, "contrast situations where work is done with different amounts of force to situations where no work is done such as moving a box with a ramp and without a ramp, or standing still" with a student expectation that reads, "investigate how lever-type structures within the human body are related to work."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Two teachers commented that there is confusion with the Grade 7 student expectation that addresses when work is done. The teachers commented that when an object is moved, work is done; and when the object does not move, work is not done.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation related to work should be edited to read, "investigate how inclined planes and first class levers allow the body to do work with less force."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that this student expectation was appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher questioned whether a Grade 7 student expectation related to work and force is referring to Newton's Laws.
Response. The SBOE determined that this student expectation was appropriate in clarity. Further clarification will be provided through professional development.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be replaced with, "illustrate the transformation of energy within an organism, such as the transfer from chemical to mechanical or thermal energy."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(7)(B) in Grade 7 to read, "illustrate the transformation of energy within an organism such as the transfer from chemical energy to heat and thermal energy in digestion."
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be replaced with, "illustrate the transformation of energy within an organism such as the transfer from chemical energy to heat and thermal energy."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(7)(B) in Grade 7 to read, "illustrate the transformation of energy within an organism such as the transfer from chemical energy to heat and thermal energy in digestion."
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 7 TEKS related to work and energy would be more beneficial if it included Newton's Laws and some equations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that the Grade 7 TEKS related to organisms and environments should be moved to the Grade 8 and replaced with text relating to organisms and environments and domains and kingdoms.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the organization of the revised TEKS was appropriate.
Comment. Five teachers commented that the phrase "in ecoregions of Texas" should be deleted from the Grade 7 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS include appropriate language.
Comment. One teacher asked whether all examples of weathering, erosion, and deposition in the Grade 7 TEKS only take place in the ecoregions of Texas.
Response. The SBOE determined that the revised TEKS are appropriate. Further clarification will be provided through professional development.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that an introductory statement in Grade 7 should be moved to Grade 6 and be revised with text relating to organisms and environment.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the organization of revised TEKS was appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the focus on using school grounds to teach Grade 7 science needs to be kept intact.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised Grade 7 TEKS do not prohibit teachers from using school grounds for science investigations.
Comment. Five teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should read, "observe and describe how different environments, including biomes, support different varieties of organisms."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity when addressing environments and biomes.
Comment. Nine teachers commented that all Grade 7 TEKS related to the relationship between organisms and the environment should be moved to Grade 6.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and determined that concepts such as biomes, biodiversity, and ecological succession were appropriately placed at the Grade 7 level.
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that the Grade 7 TEKS related to organisms and environments should be edited and recommended text relating to living organisms.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to a Grade 7 student expectation being changed from "ecosystem" to "microhabitat." The teacher commented that the term ecosystem is better because there are more examples to use.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not prevent a teacher from using examples to illustrate an ecosystem.
Comment. Five teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited to read, "describe the role of ecological succession after a natural disaster."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation was appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited to read, "observe, record, and describe the role of ecological succession of a garden with weeds or a natural disaster."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation was appropriate in clarity and did not need an additional example.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that several Grade 7 student expectations related to organisms should be moved to a new section of the TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriately sequenced in Grade 7.
Comment. Five teachers commented that the term "in a bulb" should be deleted from a Grade 7 student expectation that reads, "explain variation within a population or species by comparing external features, behaviors, physiology of organisms that enhance their survival such as migration, hibernation, or storage of food in a bulb."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation included appropriate specificity.
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be revised to add the genus species name to the Galapagos Medium Ground Finch (Geospiza fortis).
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Ten teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation related to the identification of some changes in genetic traits should be moved to a new section of the TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriately sequenced in Grade 7.
Comment. One administrator commented that a Grade 7 student expectation related to organisms and environments is too broad.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation was appropriate in specificity and in clarity.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited and recommended text relating to adaptations.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(12)(A) in Grade 7 to read, "investigate and explain how internal structures of organisms have adaptations that allow specific functions such as gills in fish, hollow bones in birds, or xylem in plants."
Comment. One teacher commented that examples related to internal structures of organisms in the Grade 7 TEKS do not need to be limited to life science.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS in Grade 7 were more focused than Grade 6 or 8 on the life sciences and that examples in life sciences were appropriate.
Comment. Thirteen teachers and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited to read, "identify several main functions of the systems of the human organism, including the circulatory, respiratory, skeletal, muscular, digestive, excretory, reproductive, integumentary, nervous, and endocrine systems."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS did not need the term "main" as a qualifier to a list of human body systems.
Comment. One administrator commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited to read, "identify the main functions of the system. . . ." The administrator commented that the term "function" needs to be plural to indicate several functions for each body system.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation was appropriate in clarity and that the term "function" did not need to be plural.
Comment. Five teachers commented that a Grade 7 student expectation should be edited to read, "recognize that according to the cell theory all organisms are composed of cells which carry on similar functions, such as extracting energy from food to sustain life."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectation was appropriate in clarity and did not need to be revised.
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that a Grade 7 knowledge and skills statement should be edited to read, "The student knows that a living organism must be able to maintain internal balance in response to external and internal stimuli."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need to be revised.
Comment. One teacher asked whether the Grade 7 student expectation related to organisms and environments should include both an external and internal response in the statement.
Response. The SBOE determined that the revised TEKS would include both external and internal response to stimuli.
Comment. One teacher expressed concern over the Grade 7 TEKS and the lack of scaffolding about genetic inheritance prior to high school biology.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS adequately sequenced the life science content in middle school.
Comment. One administrator commented that it is imperative for students to understand that adaptations are due to genetic mutations and survival rates rather than environmental manipulation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS addressed adaptations sufficiently.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff suggested that a Grade 7 student expectation be edited to specify reference to the nucleus.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(14)(C) in Grade 7 to read, "recognize that inherited traits of individuals are governed in the genetic material found in the genes within chromosomes in the nucleus."
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the Grade 8 TEKS that are more direct and relate to each other better.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Grade 8 ecology and environmental TEKS should be moved to Grade 7.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of life science concepts throughout the middle school standards.
Comment. One teacher suggested that the solar system TEKS be moved from Grades 6 and 7 to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of earth/space science content in the middle school standards.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the inclusion of weather and Earth/Moon systems in Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that genetics is only covered in Grade 7. The teacher proposed that genetics be extended into the introduction in Grade 6 or be continued into Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of life science content, including genetics, in the middle school standards.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff suggested that a Grade 8 introductory statement be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific, descriptive, and comparative investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed with adding all the introductory language suggested, but did take action to add language in subsection (b)(2)(A) and (B) in Grade 8 that addresses comparative investigations.
Comment. One teacher suggested that a Grade 8 introductory statement be revised to indicate that a student "recognize" if an equation is balanced, not to actually "balance" the equation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff suggested that a Grade 8 student expectation be edited to read, "design and implement comparative and experimental investigations. . . ."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language of subsection (b)(2)(A) and (B) in Grade 8 to include comparative investigations in Grade 8.
Comment. One administrator commented that anemometer and psychrometer are not appropriate tools for Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 8 student expectation should be edited to read, "demonstrate and calculate how unbalanced forces (net forces) change the object's acceleration resulting in a change in speed or direction or both (speed and direction) of the object's motion."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Ten administrators and one university/college staff person commented that a Grade 8 student expectation should be edited to read, "differentiate among speed, velocity, and acceleration."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen teachers commented that a Grade 8 student expectation should be edited to read, "differentiate between velocity and acceleration."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Five teachers and ten administrators suggested moving a Grade 8 student expectation related to Newton's law of inertia to Grade 6.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of physical science content, including Newton's law of inertia, in the middle school standards.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the weather and Earth/Moon system to be included at the Grade 8 level.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(7)(C) in Grade 8 to read, "relate the position of the Moon and Sun to their effect on ocean tides."
Comment. Eight teachers, ten administrators, and two university/college staff suggested that a Grade 8 student expectation that reads, "relate the lunar cycles to its effect on ocean tides" be replaced with the statement, "relate the positions of the Moon and Sun to their effect on ocean tides."
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (b)(7)(C) in Grade 8 to read, "relate the position of the Moon and Sun to their effect on ocean tides."
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 8 student expectation that references nebulae suggests that it is a "different" component of the universe. The teacher stated that in reality, a nebula is a stage in a star's development.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a Grade 8 student expectation on classifying galaxies may confuse students. The teacher stated that our galaxy is classified as a spiral galaxy (not disc-shaped) and it does appear like a disc from the "side."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Ten administrators and two university/college staff commented that a Grade 8 student expectation that reads, "describe the historical development of evidence that supports plate tectonic theory" be replaced with the statement, "illustrate the historical development of evidence that supports plate tectonic theory."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Nine teachers commented that a Grade 8 student expectation that reads, "relate plate tectonics to the formation of crustal features" be replaced with the statement, "illustrate how plate tectonics causes major geological events, such as ocean basins, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and mountain building."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need specific examples of crustal features.
Comment. One teacher commented that Grade 8 students do not need topographic maps and satellite views to identify land features and predict how they were shaped by erosion and weathering.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and the use of topographic maps and satellite views were reasonable tools for students to use in the classroom.
Comment. Nine teachers suggested moving a student expectation that reads, "classify rocks as metamorphic, igneous, or sedimentary by the processes of their formation" from Grade 6 to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of earth science content, including rocks, in the middle school standards.
Comment. Nine teachers suggested moving a student expectation that reads, "analyze the effects of weathering, erosion, and deposition on the environment" from Grade 7 to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of earth science content in the middle school standards.
Comment. Nine teachers suggested moving a student expectation that reads, "predict and describe how the different types of catastrophic events, such as floods, hurricanes, or tornadoes impact ecosystems" from Grade 7 to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of earth science content, including catastrophic events, in the middle school standards.
Comment. One administrator commented that the teaching of genetics in Grade 8 must be a continued theme in life science and must be included when exploring how environmental changes affect organisms and the traits in subsequent populations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher suggested moving all Grade 8 TEKS related to organisms and environments to Grade 7.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of life science content, including organisms and environments, in the middle school standards.
Comment. Nine teachers suggested deleting all Grade 8 TEKS related to organisms and environments because they are too complex for students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Fourteen teachers suggested adding, the word "polluted" to further describe the runoff in the statement, "recognize human dependence on ocean systems and explain how human activities such as runoff, artificial reefs, or use of resources have modified these systems."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were clear and did not need additional language.
Comment. Nine teachers suggested moving a student expectation that reads, "model the effects of human activity on ground water and surface water in a watershed" from Grade 7 to Grade 8.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided an appropriate sequence of earth science content, including watersheds, in the middle school standards.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for an emphasis on empirical data and science as a means to investigate the natural world in high school.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the proposed high school TEKS that were more detailed than the previous TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Four teachers and 738 community members expressed support for inclusion of the strengths and weaknesses language in the proposed TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and took action to replace the phrase "strengths and weaknesses" with new language that reads ". . . examining all sides of the scientific evidence. . ." in subsection (b)(3)(A) in Grades 3-8 and in subsection (c)(3)(A) in all high school courses.
Comment. Five teachers and 105 community members expressed opposition to inclusion of the strengths and weaknesses language in the proposed TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to include new language that reads, ". . . examining all sides of the scientific evidence. . ." in subsection (b)(3)(A) in Grades 3-8 and in subsection (c)(3)(A) in all high school courses.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for including creationism in the proposed TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and did not take action relating to references to creationism.
Comment. Sixteen teachers, one parent, 124 community members, and 28 university/college staff expressed opposition to creationism in the proposed TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher and eight community members expressed support for the January 2009 SBOE amendments as written.
Response. The SBOE agreed and retained many of the amendments from the January meeting.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff expressed opposition to the January 2009 SBOE amendments as written.
Response. The SBOE agreed and removed some of the amendments from the January meeting, but retained many of the amendments.
Comment. One teacher commented that wetlands needed to be added to the list of aquatic environments in the proposed aquatic science TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and additional descriptors regarding wetlands were not needed.
Comment. One university/college staff person commented that the word "observational" should be added as a method of scientific investigation in the proposed astronomy TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and additional descriptors regarding scientific investigations were not needed.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that students should, "understand the use" of the listed technology in astronomy. The commenters also stated that sextants could be deleted as they are not currently used in astronomy.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and astronomical technology referenced in the revised TEKS were only examples.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in the proposed astronomy TEKS should be revised to read, "observe and record the apparent movement of the sun during the day and the moon during the night."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need to be revised.
Comment. One teacher commented that the reference to the zodiac should be deleted in the proposed astronomy TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the TEKS appropriately referenced constellations of the zodiac.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in the proposed astronomy TEKS should be revised to read, "Kuiper belt objects, including Pluto."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need additional language referencing Pluto.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that a new student expectation should be added to the proposed astronomy TEKS that addresses the origin of the major bodies of the solar system.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and an additional student expectation regarding the origin of the major bodies of the solar system was not needed.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that the word "estimates" should be changed to "measurements" in a phrase found in the proposed astronomy TEKS. The commenters stated that measurements have moved beyond crude estimates to measurements of high precision for the age of the universe.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS appropriately used the term "estimate."
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that "theories" of the fate of the universe should be used rather than "hypotheses" in the proposed astronomy TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and that the language regarding hypotheses was accurate.
Comment. One teacher commented that students should "recognize" ground-based technology rather than "analyze" ground-based technology in the proposed astronomy TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in verb choice.
Comment. One teacher commented that more specific information on plants should be added to the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that additional information on plants was not needed.
Comment. One university/college staff person commented that the history of science discovery, especially DNA, is needed in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that additional information on the history of DNA discovery is not needed.
Comment. One teacher commented that the scope of the proposed biology TEKS is too large and looked like Advanced Placement (AP) Biology.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One university/college staff person expressed a need to include human population dynamics, and the consequence of ever-increasing human populations, in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the TEKS were appropriate in scope and addressed human population dynamics in a reasonable manner.
Comment. Fourteen teachers and two university/college staff suggested that a new introduction be included in the proposed biology, chemistry, and physics TEKS. The commenters' introduction provided extensive detail on descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introductions in the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need a more extensive explanation of scientific inquiry.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in biology need to plan and implement descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations, including asking well-defined questions, formulating testable hypotheses in comparative and experimental studies, and selecting equipment and technology.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (c)(2)(E) in biology to read, "plan and implement descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations, including asking questions, formulating testable hypotheses, and selecting equipment and technology."
Comment. One teacher commented that because of financial strains, the proposed biology TEKS should delete data collecting probes, gel electrophoresis apparatus, micropipettes, and camera from the equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. At this time, each district is responsible for purchasing classroom/lab instructional materials.
Comment. One teacher commented that the term "equivalent" should be used instead of "such as" in the proposed biology TEKS equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. At this time, each district is responsible for purchasing classroom/lab instructional materials.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in biology should evaluate the impact of scientific research on society and the environment and describe the connection between biology and future careers.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and did not revise the student expectation as suggested. However the SBOE did take action to amend subsection (c)(3) in biology to add another student expectation as paragraph (3)(F) that reads, "research and describe the history of biology and contributions of scientists."
Comment. Six administrators and two university/college staff commented that factors influencing cell differentiation are numerous and complex. The commenters stated that the proposed biology TEKS as written are more appropriate for a PhD dissertation than a biology classroom.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Six administrators and two university/college staff commented that non-Mendelian genetics in the proposed biology TEKS is too vague and covers too many areas. The commenters stated that more specificity is needed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were specific and were appropriate in clarity in regard to non-Mendelian genetics.
Comment. Six administrators and two university/college staff commented that the regulation of gene expression in the proposed biology TEKS is too specific for high school and should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not delete information regarding gene expression.
Comment. One teacher commented that biology students should know, rather than describe, various DNA techniques, and also include cloning and stem cell research.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice in regard to DNA techniques in the revised TEKS was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Seven teachers, 220 community members, and 38 university/college staff expressed support for evolution in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Seven community members expressed opposition to evolution in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS provided appropriate coverage of evolution.
Comment. Two teachers and two university/college staff commented that the term "analyze and evaluate" needs to be replaced with "analyze" for each student expectation in the proposed biology TEKS evolutionary theory section.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS pertaining to evolutionary theory was more specific and appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that the term "analyze and evaluate" needs to be replaced with "understand" for each student expectation in the proposed biology TEKS evolutionary theory section.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS pertaining to evolutionary theory was more specific and appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff commented that the term "analyze and evaluate" needs to be replaced with "identify" for each student expectation in the proposed biology TEKS evolutionary theory section.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS pertaining to evolutionary theory was more specific and appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher commented that the anatomical, molecular, and developmental aspects of common ancestry in the proposed biology TEKS do not need to be included.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were more specific and were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff expressed opposition to the amendment language "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" in the biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to remove the "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" language from subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that natural selection produces change in populations, not individuals. They requested that "describe the sufficiency" be deleted in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to remove the language "describe the sufficiency" from subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" is opening the door to creationism/intelligent design in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to remove the language "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" from subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" and the term "sudden appearance" should be eliminated in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed that the "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" language should be removed and took action to amend subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology to remove the language. In regard to the phrase "sudden appearance," the SBOE determined that the phrase was acceptable and retained it in subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology.
Comment. One teacher commented that the term "evidence" should substitute for "sufficiency or insufficiencies" in the proposed biology TEKS. Response: The SBOE disagreed and removed the "sufficiency or insufficiencies" language from subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" contradicts the student expectation that provides evidence for common ancestry in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to remove the "sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry" language from subsection (c)(7)(B) in biology. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff commented that the amendment language "analyze and evaluate how" should be replaced with "describe" in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the amendment language "analyze and evaluate how" should be replaced with "recognize" in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate how" in the revised TEKS was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the amendment language "analyze and evaluate how" should be replaced with "understand" in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate how" in the revised TEKS was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff commented that the amendment language "analyze and evaluate" should be replaced with "recognize" in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS was appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher and eight community members commented that the amendment language "analyze and evaluate" should be retained in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE retained the verb choice "analyze and evaluate" in the revised TEKS.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that students in biology should recognize the effects of other evolutionary mechanisms including genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, and recombination.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the proposed TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that additional evolutionary mechanisms did not need to be addressed in the standards.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in biology should compare characteristics of taxonomic groups including currently recognized kingdoms.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the proposed TEKS were appropriate in rigor and specificity.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in biology should identify and investigate the role of enzymes as biological catalysts.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need additional information on the role of enzymes in biology.
Comment. One teacher commented that the biological systems are composed of multiple levels, therefore, it would be too ambiguous in the proposed biology TEKS. The teacher commented that the original wording was better.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and content.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that the intention of "levels of organization" in the proposed biology TEKS is unclear. The commenters asked whether this was a reference to cells, tissues, organisms, or a larger system.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity with respect to "levels of organization."
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that "such as" examples need to be included in the student expectation that reads, "investigate and analyze how organisms, populations, and communities respond to external factors."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were more specific, less repetitive, and appropriate in clarity without examples provided.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that students in biology should analyze the flow of energy and the cycling of matter through trophic levels using various models, including food chains, food webs, and ecological pyramids.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in specificity, clarity, and rigor.
Comment. One teacher, eight administrators, and two university/college staff commented that flow of matter should include the water cycle, in addition to the carbon and nitrogen cycles that are referenced in the proposed biology TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need to address the water cycle in the flow of matter.
Comment. Four teachers commented that Texas needs more conceptual chemistry that relates to the everyday citizen.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Five teachers commented that there are too many calculations in the proposed chemistry TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the calculations in the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the mathematics level is too high in chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the mathematics level in the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented on the "crazy expectations" for students in chemistry. The teacher commented that this will lead to more dropouts of students and teachers.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the student expectations in the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the revisions in chemistry. The teacher commented that the emphasis on mathematics problem solving is appropriate.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the proposed chemistry TEKS because they are more detailed than the 1998 TEKS.
Response. The SBOE agreed that the revised TEKS are more detailed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the streamlined content in the proposed chemistry TEKS which made it more manageable.
Response. The SBOE agreed that the revised TEKS are more manageable. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS are very clear, concise, and tell the teacher exactly what to teach.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS are on a level too high for the majority of her students. The teacher stated that her non-college bound students would be left behind.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the content level of the revised TEKS was appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. Three teachers commented that there was too much content in the proposed chemistry course.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the content level of the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that there was not a student expectation in chemistry that addressed the idea of equilibrium (Le Chatelier's Principle) and what affects rates of reactions and that information on this topic should be included.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need additional content in equilibrium and rates of reactions.
Comment. One teacher commented that calculation of a pH in chemistry was beyond the mathematics level of students. The teacher commented that this type of calculation is found in Algebra II.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the level of mathematics calculations in the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS cover too much material and students will not learn content in depth. The teacher commented that there are also too many calculations in the chemistry TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in content coverage and attainable by the general student. In addition, the level of mathematics calculations in the revised TEKS were reasonable and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the detail in the proposed chemistry TEKS. The teacher commented that the vagueness of the current chemistry TEKS was frustrating.
Response. The SBOE agreed that the revised TEKS contained appropriate specificity and detail. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that references to the Periodic Table in chemistry should have been changed to the Periodic Table of Elements.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS appropriately reference the Periodic Table.
Comment. Twenty-seven administrators and four university/college staff commented that in the introduction, students in chemistry need to plan and implement descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations, including asking well-defined questions, formulating testable hypotheses in comparative and experimental studies, and selecting equipment and technology.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the introduction was appropriate and provided sufficient information on scientific investigations.
Comment. One teacher commented on the need for teachers to teach ethics.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher commented on the need not to teach ethics.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in addressing ethics.
Comment. One teacher commented that it will be difficult for schools to ensure students have adequate access to graphing calculators, computers, and probes in chemistry labs.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the equipment and supplies listed in the revised TEKS were appropriate and reasonable for the general student.
Comment. Two teachers and 15 administrators commented that electronic balances should be deleted from chemistry equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS contained appropriate equipment and supply lists. At this time, each district is responsible for purchasing classroom/lab instructional materials.
Comment. Four teachers commented that graphing calculators in chemistry are nice, but are not practical in every school. The teachers recommended that the reference to this tool should be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed with deleting graphing calculators and determined that the revised TEKS were reasonable in regard to the equipment and supply lists.
Comment. One teacher commented that the list of equipment in chemistry should use the term "equivalent" instead of "such as."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were reasonable in regard to the equipment and supply lists. The items found on the chemistry list are noted as optional and use the term "such as" and refer to optional items that can be used in the classroom.
Comment. One teacher commented that the chemistry TEKS should list the non-glass items first, after safety equipment.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS listed equipment appropriately.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should use critical thinking, scientific reasoning, and problem solving to make informed decisions within and outside the classroom.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The chemistry knowledge and skills statement in subsection (c)(3) provides for critical thinking and problem solving. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Three teachers commented that the chemistry TEKS should list names of scientists.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and allowed teachers flexibility to select scientists for their curriculum.
Comment. Sixteen administrators and two university/college staff suggested that the following student expectation be deleted from the chemistry TEKS: "identify extensive and intensive properties."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include information on extensive and intensive properties.
Comment. One teacher commented that a knowledge and skills statement in chemistry should be revised to read, "The student understands the historical development of the Periodic Table of Elements and can use the arrangement of elements to predict properties of elements in a chemical family or period."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and depth of understanding in regard to the Periodic Table of Elements.
Comment. Seventeen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in chemistry should be revised to read, "use the Periodic Table to identify and explain the properties of transition metals, and of chemical families, including alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, halogens, and noble gases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed transition elements in the proper classification within chemical families.
Comment. Two university/college staff asked why some scientists are listed, while other scientists such as Curie are not listed in the focus of the atomic theory section in the proposed chemistry TEKS.
Response. The SBOE determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and provided flexibility for teachers to select which scientists to study during the atomic theory unit.
Comment. One teacher expressed support for the students learning about the history of the current model of the atom in chemistry.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two teachers commented that a list of scientists' names should be included in the proposed chemistry TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and allowed teachers flexibility in selecting various scientists to study.
Comment. One teacher commented that it was awkward to primarily reference the Bohr model in the proposed chemistry TEKS. The teacher stated that the focus on the positions of electrons around the nucleus may lead to misconceptions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed many models of atomic theory, including the Bohr model.
Comment. Five teachers commented that the following student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be deleted: "understand the electromagnetic spectrum and the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include information on the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light.
Comment. Seven teachers suggested that calculations be removed from a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS that addresses the electromagnetic spectrum. The teachers suggested that the student expectation read, "understand the relationship between energy, frequency, and wavelength and how these relate to the electromagnetic spectrum."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include calculations related to the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "understand the electromagnetic spectrum and the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light; relate the use of atomic emission spectra to historic development of atomic theory."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need additional information on emission spectra.
Comment. Eighteen teachers commented that the calculation in the proposed chemistry TEKS using Planck's constant was not necessary or appropriate for students. The teachers commented that this type of calculation should be deleted or moved to physics or AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in mathematical computations and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "understand the relationships among energy, frequency, and wavelength of light."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include information on the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "understand and use the appropriate analogy of the relationships among energy, frequency and wavelength."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include information on the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use isotopic composition to explain average atomic mass of an element."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and addressed isotopic composition in a clear manner.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use isotopic composition and percent abundance data to calculate average atomic mass of an element."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and addressed isotopic composition in a clear manner.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "understand and use the appropriate analogy of the relationships among energy, frequency and wavelength."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and should include information on the mathematical relationships between energy, frequency, and wavelength of light.
Comment. One teacher commented that there was too much emphasis on metallic bonding in chemistry. The teacher commented that it would be better to emphasize ionic and covalent bonding in general chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students need to study characteristics of ionic and covalent bonding, not just metallic bonding.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed ionic and covalent bonding in an accurate manner.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "write the chemical formulas of common ionic compounds containing polyatomic ions, main group or transition metals, covalent compounds, acids, and bases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed the writing of chemical formulas in an accurate manner.
Comment. Three teachers commented that chemistry students should use a chart to reference polyatomic ions. The teachers commented that students should not be expected to memorize a list of polyatomic ions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not require students to memorize a list of polyatomic ions.
Comment. Five teachers commented that covalent compounds were too general in chemistry. The teachers suggested that binary covalent compounds be stated rather than covalent compounds.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need a specific reference to binary covalent compounds.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "construct and identify electron dot structures to illustrate ionic and covalent bonds."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed ionic and covalent bonds in an accurate manner.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should study Lewis valence electron dot structures.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need additional information on Lewis valence electron dot structures.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use metallic bonding to explain properties of metals such as thermal and electrical conductivity, malleability and ductility."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need additional information on metallic bonding.
Comment. Four teachers commented that metallic bonding concepts were not needed in a regular chemistry class and recommended deletion of this student expectation.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS did not specify the Electron Sea Model theory.
Response. The SBOE agreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need to specify the Electron Sea Model Theory in a student expectation.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "relate Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory to shapes of molecules including linear, trigonal planar or tetrahedral electron pair geometries."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS address the VSEPR theory with appropriate rigor.
Comment. Seven teachers commented that students did not need to predict molecular structures using VSEPR theory and recommended deletion. The teachers commented that this student expectation should be in an advanced chemistry class only.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should predict molecular structures using VSEPR theory.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should not study electron pair geometry. The teacher commented that this was not typically covered in a first year chemistry course.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should study electron pair geometry.
Comment. One teacher commented that factors that affect chemical reactions were in the previous chemistry TEKS and should still be included in the proposed chemistry TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need additional information on factors that affect chemical reactions.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "calculate percent composition and distinguish between empirical and molecular formulas."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should be able to calculate empirical and molecular formulas.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS should separate these ideas: know a formula, calculate percent composition, and then use percent composition information to determine an empirical and molecular formula.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should be able to calculate empirical and molecular formulas.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should be able to identify types of chemical reactions. The teacher commented that students should know these types of reactions: combustion, synthesis, decomposition, single replacement, and double replacement.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The types of reactions are embedded within the revised student expectations.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should first be able to identify the types of a reaction and then predict the products.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The types of reactions are embedded within the revised student expectations. The TEKS do not mandate an instruction plan for teaching concepts.
Comment. Seventeen teachers commented that stoichiometric calculations in chemistry were difficult and recommended that this student expectation be deleted.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should perform stoichiometric calculations.
Comment. Three teachers commented that stoichiometric calculations in chemistry were good and should remain.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that chemistry students should understand that limiting reagents determine the products of chemical reactions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that additional information on limiting reagents was not needed.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "perform stoichiometric calculations including determination of mass relationships between reactants and products and calculation of percent yield." The commenters also recommended that this student expectation could be reworded to read, "understand limiting reagents determine the products of chemical reactions and apply to real world applications such as in an industrial setting."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS regarding stoichiometric calculations and chemical reactions were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Twelve administrators and two university/college staff commented that chemistry students should understand the concept of a limiting reactant.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need an additional student expectation on limiting reactants.
Comment. Four teachers commented that calculations using gas laws were not appropriate for chemistry students. The teachers stated that students should know the relationships between volume, pressure, number of moles, and temperature.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should perform calculations using gas laws.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use kinetic molecular theory to predict changes in behavior of gases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and addressed kinetic molecular theory in an accurate manner.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed chemistry TEKS should add the Gay-Lussac law to the current list of gas laws, or replace them all with the Combined Gas Law.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed all of the gas laws in an accurate manner.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "describe and calculate the relationship between volume, pressure, number of moles, and temperature for an ideal gas, as described by Boyle's Law, Charles' Law, Avogadro's Law, Dalton's Law of Partial Pressure and the Ideal Gas Law."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "recognize stoichiometric changes of mass and volume relationships between reactants and products for reactions involving gases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "recognize stoichiometric changes of mass and volume relationships between reactants and products for reactions involving gases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "distinguish between real and ideal gases as defined according to the postulates of the kinetic molecular theory."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the section on solution chemistry was lengthy and very challenging.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS on solution chemistry were specific and appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that chemistry students should be given the general rules regarding solubility, instead of the proposed language, "develop and use general rules" as they investigate properties of aqueous solutions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need to specify that students be given the general rules on solubility.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students did not need to develop the rules of solubility if they were already printed on their End-of-Course exam chart.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and since the state assessments are built upon the TEKS, adjustments will be made to assessments as appropriate based on the revised TEKS.
Comment. Two teachers, 13 administrators, and two university/college staff commented that the following student expectation should be deleted from the proposed chemistry TEKS: "use molarity to calculate the dilutions of solutions."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in mathematical computations and rigor.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "distinguish between Arrhenius and Bronsted-Lowry definitions; and predict products in acid base reactions that form water."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the following should be deleted from the proposed chemistry TEKS: "distinguishing between Arrhenius and Bronsted-Lowry acids and bases."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that if chemistry students were not predicting products in the chemical reactions objective, they should not be required to predict the products in acid/base reactions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that there was no "e" in the name "Lowry."
Response. The SBOE agreed and the spelling error in subsection (c)(10)(G) in chemistry was corrected.
Comment. One teacher commented that precipitation reactions and oxidation-reduction reactions should be moved to AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor for the general chemistry student.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students may be confused when redox reactions are placed next to solution chemistry. The teacher asked if students need to know redox reactions.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Thirteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "define pH and use the hydrogen or hydroxide ion to determine the integer value pH of a solution."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Two teachers commented that pH calculations should be removed from chemistry. The teachers stated that students should only use pH to identify a substance as an acid or base.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should calculate pH in chemistry.
Comment. One teacher commented that degrees of disassociation in chemistry should be moved to PreAP or AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor for the general chemistry student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the focus in chemistry was on enthalpy, and that entropy was visibly missing.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in the coverage of fundamental chemistry content.
Comment. One teacher commented that kinetic and potential energy should be moved to AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students should learn about kinetic and potential energy.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "understand energy and recognize its forms including kinetic and potential."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed forms of energy in an accurate manner.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "apply the law of conservation of energy to process of heat transfer and use calorimetry to calculate the heat of a chemical process."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry students should be able to classify reactions as exothermic or endothermic based on observations. The teacher commented that calculations were not needed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students need to calculate the energy of exothermic and endothermic reactions.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry thermochemical reactions should be moved to AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that learning about thermochemical reactions was attainable by the general chemistry student.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use thermochemical reaction equations to classify energy changes that occur in chemical reactions and classify reactions as exothermic or endothermic."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the calculations in thermochemical reactions should be removed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students need to calculate the energy of thermochemical reactions.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "use calorimetry to measure and compare heat contained in chemical process."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed calorimetry in an accurate manner.
Comment. One teacher commented that chemistry calorimetry should be moved to PreAP or AP Chemistry.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that chemistry calorimetry was attainable by the general chemistry student.
Comment. One teacher commented that calculations in chemistry calorimetry should be removed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that calculations in chemistry calorimetry were attainable by the general chemistry student.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that the following should be deleted from chemistry: "use calorimetry to calculate the heat of a chemical process."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that calculations in chemistry calorimetry were attainable by the general chemistry student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the nuclear unit in chemistry was supposed to be a fun unit and wondered why nuclear applications were missing.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the following be deleted from the proposed chemistry TEKS: "describe radioactive decay process in terms of balanced nuclear equations."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and that students need to balance nuclear equations.
Comment. One teacher questioned whether the radioactive decay process in chemistry included half-life concepts and calculations.
Response. The SBOE determined that the revised TEKS are appropriate in clarity. Further clarification of standards will occur during curriculum development and professional development.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed chemistry TEKS should be edited to read, "compare fission and fusion reactions and evaluate their applications."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that there are too many TEKS in Earth and Space Science (ESS). The teacher recommended focusing only on Earth-Space systems.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS in ESS contained a reasonable number of student expectations that address a comprehensive course in Earth and space science.
Comment. Three teachers, one administrator, 18 parents, 377 community members, and 90 university/college staff commented that the ESS TEKS should be approved as written, with no revisions, changes, or amendments.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and amended student expectations prior to final adoption. The SBOE took action to approve additional changes to respond to public comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the ESS TEKS should be approved as amended in January 2009.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and amended student expectations prior to final adoption. The SBOE took action to approve additional changes to respond to public comments.
Comment. One teacher commented that the ESS TEKS are written with appropriate rigor and that the course is a good capstone class.
Response. The SBOE agreed. The SBOE also took action to approve additional changes to respond to other comments.
Comment. One teacher expressed concern about the removal of traditional concepts in Earth science in the proposed ESS TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed ESS TEKS covered too much information and should follow "less is more" philosophy.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS in ESS contained a reasonable number of student expectations that address a comprehensive course in Earth and space science.
Comment. One university/college staff person commented that the word "observational" should be added as a method of scientific investigation, especially in the area of astronomy, which is addressed in the proposed ESS TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and addressed a variety of scientific investigations that are essential to ESS.
Comment. One teacher asked why the equipment list for ESS was included and suggested using the term "equivalent" instead of "such as."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were reasonable in regard to the equipment and supply lists. The items found on the equipment list are only suggestions.
Comment. One teacher commented that astronomical observations in the proposed ESS TEKS should be covered in astronomy, not in ESS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that the insertion of the words "differing theories" in ESS implies that there is another major scientific theory beyond the Big Bang Theory. The teacher stated that astrophysicists do not have differing theories for the origin of the universe. The teacher also stated that language for differing theories implies creationism and makes the language for science weaker.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS in regard to theories in ESS were appropriate in clarity and rigor. The SBOE did, however, take action to amend subsection (c)(4)(A) to read, "evaluate the evidence concerning the Big Bang model such as red shift and cosmic microwave background radiation and current theories of the evolution of the universe, including estimates for the age of the universe."
Comment. One teacher and two university/college staff commented that the following original language in the proposed ESS knowledge and skill statement should be retained: "The student knows that Earth's place in the solar system is explained by the solar nebular accretionary disk model." The commenters stated that this language was pedagogically correct and was the appropriate explanation for a high school class.
Response. The SBOE disagreed with the original language regarding solar nebular accretionalary disk model and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that by inserting "are thought to allow" into the ESS student expectation, "...kinetic heat of impact accretion, gravitational compression, and radioactive decay, which are thought to allow protoplanet differentiation..." is incorrect since there is no ambiguity or scientific question about the heat sources necessary for the Earth separating into different zones (mantle, outer core, inner core) during formation. The phrase "are thought to allow" implies incorrect and unnecessary doubt.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor. The SBOE did, however, take action to amend subsection (c)(5)(B) to read, "investigate thermal energy sources, including kinetic heat of impact accretion, gravitational compression, and radioactive decay, which are thought to allow protoplanet differentiation into layers."
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that an ESS student expectation should not include the reference to the "original hydrogen-helium" atmosphere. There is no evidence that the earth ever had such an atmosphere, as it was not massive enough to collect gas from the circumstellar disk.
Response. The SBOE agreed and took action to amend the language in subsection (c)(6)(A) in ESS to read, "analyze the changes of Earth's atmosphere that could have occurred through time from the original hydrogen-helium atmosphere, the carbon dioxide-water vapor-methane atmosphere, and the current nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere."
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that by inserting, "the evidence that the" into a proposed ESS student expectation, "evaluate the evidence that the Earth's cooling led to tectonic activity..." is unnecessary and implies a doubt about these processes that earth scientists do not share.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a proposed ESS student expectation should ask students to "describe" radiometric dating methods, rather than "apply" radiometric dating methods.
Response. The SBOE disagreed. The SBOE, however, took action to amend the language in subsection (c)(7)(B) in ESS to read, "calculate the ages of igneous rocks from Earth and the Moon and meteorites using radiometric dating methods."
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that a proposed ESS student expectation suggests that students evaluate fossil types and assess arguments for and against universal common descent. The commenters stated that students should simply "understand" the fossil types and "understand the evidence of universal common descent based on the fossil record." The commenters also stated that there are no arguments against common descent in the fossil record.
Response. The SBOE disagreed but slightly changed the student expectation in subsection (c)(8)(A) in ESS to read, "analyze and evaluate a variety of fossil types, such as transitional fossils, proposed transitional fossils, fossil lineages, and significant fossil deposits with regard to their appearance, completeness, and alignment with scientific explanations in light of this fossil data."
Comment. One teacher commented that a proposed ESS student expectation should ask students to "describe" the motion history of tectonic plates, rather than "calculate" the motion history of tectonic plates.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a proposed ESS student expectation on the causes and history of eustatic sea level changes should be deleted as it is not appropriate for high school students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised student expectation was appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a proposed ESS student expectation on scientific hypotheses for the origin of life should be deleted as it is not appropriate for high school students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised student expectation was appropriate in content and rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that a proposed ESS student expectation on the dynamics of surface and groundwater movement should be deleted as it is not appropriate for high school students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised student expectation was appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One university/college staff person commented that the history of science discovery, especially DNA, is needed in the proposed environmental systems TEKS. The commenters stated that science and biology are products of individual efforts and experiments through time.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and addressed fundamental environmental science content.
Comment. One university/college staff person commented that there is a need to include human population dynamics and the consequence of ever-increasing human populations in the proposed environmental systems TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and addressed fundamental environmental science content.
Comment. One teacher commented that the proposed environmental systems course should not be limited to Grades 11-12.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the grade requirements are appropriate.
Comment. One teacher commented that equipment list for environmental science may not be needed. The teacher suggested that the TEKS could say "or equivalent" instead of using the term "such as."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were reasonable in regard to the equipment and supply lists. The items found on the environmental science list are only suggestions.
Comment. One teacher commented that the Integrated Physics and Chemistry (IPC) TEKS could clarify careers by adding the phrase "of scientists of those disciplines."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and addressed scientific careers in an accurate manner.
Comment. One teacher commented that the IPC TEKS should retain the original wording in the motion and force unit and also specify relevant examples that make the wording more specific.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. One teacher asked who would supply the moving toys for the IPC course.
Response. The SBOE determined that the revised TEKS listed appropriate and reasonable supplies and equipment to teach the IPC course. At this time, each district is responsible for purchasing classroom/lab instructional materials.
Comment. Two teachers commented that the proposed physics list of equipment and supplies was excessive.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists. The items found on the physics list following the term "such as" are only suggestions.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that descriptive titles to each content knowledge and skills statement for physics should be added. For example: KS 4 - Laws of Motion; KS 5 - Forces in the Physical World; KS 6 - Conservation of Energy and Momentum; KS 7 - Characteristics of Waves; KS 8 - Atomic Structure.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in structure.
Comment. Two teachers commented about the high level of mathematics in the proposed physics TEKS.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and were based on reasonable levels of algebraic understanding.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the proposed physics course being suitable for students in Grades 9-12. The teacher stated that algebra should be a prerequisite for physics.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and were based on reasonable levels of algebraic understanding. The general requirements for the physics course include Algebra I as a suggested prerequisite or co-requisite. Comment: Sixteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that the introduction to the proposed physics TEKS should include additional topics, electricity and magnetism, which are covered in the student expectations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need additional language in the introduction.
Comment. Fourteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that the introduction to the proposed physics TEKS should be replaced with a common statement found in biology, chemistry, and physics.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised introduction is appropriate for the physics TEKS.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a statement on scientific processes should be replaced and recommended text relating to descriptive, comparative, and experimental investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised introduction is appropriate for the physics TEKS.
Comment. One teacher commented that rolls of white craft paper should be deleted from the proposed physics equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that the equipment list in the proposed physics TEKS should be streamlined and recommended a list with a number of items removed.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists.
Comment. One teacher expressed opposition to the proposed physics equipment list. The teacher suggested the use of the term "or equivalent" instead of "such as" in the physics list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists. The items found on the physics list following the term "such as" are only suggestions.
Comment. One teacher commented that ticker timers and cathode ray tubes with horseshoe magnets should be deleted from the proposed physics equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "use a wide variety of additional course apparatus, equipment, techniques, materials, and procedures as appropriate."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS included reasonable equipment and supply lists.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "generate and interpret graphs and charts describing different types of motion, including the use of real-time technology such as motion detectors, sensors, or photogates."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate and did not need the additional term "sensors" on the physics equipment list.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "analyze and describe accelerated motion in two dimensions, including projectile and circular examples."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and required an acceptable level of calculations in physics.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "analyze and describe the effect of forces on objects, including the law of inertia, the relationship between force and acceleration, and the nature of force pairs between objects."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and required an acceptable level of calculations in physics.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "demonstrate an understanding of the work-energy theorem in various situations."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and required an acceptable level of calculations in physics.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "understand and calculate mechanical energy, power, impulse, and momentum of a physical system."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and required an acceptable level of calculations in physics.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be revised to read, "describe and predict image formation as a consequence of reflection."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and rigor.
Comment. Fifteen administrators and two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS should be added to read, "describe and predict the effects of different media on refraction, including critical angles."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need an additional student expectation to describe refraction.
Comment. One teacher commented that a student expectation in the proposed physics TEKS that addresses mass-energy equivalence should be deleted because it is not appropriate for high school students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate, reasonable, and attainable by the general student.
Comment. One teacher commented that the student expectation in physics that addresses applications of atomic and nuclear phenomena should be deleted because it is not appropriate for high school students.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor.
Comment. One teacher commented that digital cameras should be deleted from the physics equipment list. The teacher also suggested adding superconducting quantum interference devices to the equipment list.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that additional physics equipment did not need to be added. Digital cameras are not included on the physics equipment list.
Comment. Two university/college staff commented that a student expectation in physics should be revised to read, "give examples of applications of atomic and nuclear phenomena such as radiation therapy, diagnostic imaging, and nuclear power and examples of applications of quantum phenomena such as digital cameras and plasma screens."
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in rigor and did not need an additional example.
Comment. Sixteen administrators commented that the Introduction to the proposed biology, chemistry, and physics TEKS should be replaced and recommended text relating to scientific inquiry and scientific, descriptive, and comparative investigations.
Response. The SBOE disagreed and determined that the revised TEKS were appropriate in clarity and did not need a more extensive explanation of scientific inquiry in the introduction.
SUBCHAPTER A. ELEMENTARY
19 TAC §§112.1, 112.10 - 112.16
The amendment and new sections are adopted under the
Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4), which authorizes the SBOE
to establish curriculum and graduation requirements; and §28.002,
which authorizes the SBOE to by rule identify the essential knowledge
and skills of each subject of the required curriculum that all students
should be able to demonstrate and that will be used in evaluating
textbooks and addressed on the assessment instruments.
The amendment and new sections implement the Texas Education Code, §7.102(c)(4)
and §28.002.
§112.11.Science, Kindergarten, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific processes, including inquiry methods, analyzing information,
making informed decisions, and using tools to collect and record information,
while addressing the major concepts and vocabulary, in the context
of physical, earth, and life sciences. Districts are encouraged to
facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of
instructional time.
(4) In Kindergarten, students observe and describe
the natural world using their five senses. Students do science as
inquiry in order to develop and enrich their abilities to understand
scientific concepts and processes. Students develop vocabulary through
their experiences investigating properties of common objects, earth
materials, and organisms.
(A) A central theme throughout the study of scientific
investigation and reasoning; matter and energy; force, motion, and
energy; Earth and space; and organisms and environment is active engagement
in asking questions, communicating ideas, and exploring with scientific
tools. Scientific investigation and reasoning involves practicing
safe procedures, asking questions about the natural world, and seeking
answers to those questions through simple observations and descriptive
investigations.
(B) Matter is described in terms of its physical properties,
including relative size and mass, shape, color, and texture. The importance
of light, heat, and sound energy is identified as it relates to the
students' everyday life. The location and motion of objects are explored.
(C) Weather is recorded and discussed on a daily basis
so students may begin to recognize patterns in the weather. Other
patterns are observed in the appearance of objects in the sky.
(D) In life science, students recognize the interdependence
of organisms in the natural world. They understand that all organisms
have basic needs that can be satisfied through interactions with living
and nonliving things. Students will investigate the life cycle of
plants and identify likenesses between parents and offspring.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school
safety procedures and uses environmentally appropriate and responsible
practices. The student is expected to:
(A) identify and demonstrate safe practices as described
in the Texas Safety Standards during classroom and outdoor investigations,
including wearing safety goggles, washing hands, and using materials
appropriately;
(B) discuss the importance of safe practices to keep
self and others safe and healthy; and
(C) demonstrate how to use, conserve, and dispose of
natural resources and materials such as conserving water and reusing
or recycling paper, plastic, and metal.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
develops abilities to ask questions and seek answers in classroom
and outdoor investigations. The student is expected to:
(A) ask questions about organisms, objects, and events
observed in the natural world;
(B) plan and conduct simple descriptive investigations
such as ways objects move;
(C) collect data and make observations using simple
equipment such as hand lenses, primary balances, and non-standard
measurement tools;
(D) record and organize data and observations using
pictures, numbers, and words; and
(E) communicate observations with others about simple
descriptive investigations.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows that information and critical thinking are used in scientific
problem solving. The student is expected to:
(A) identify and explain a problem such as the impact
of littering on the playground and propose a solution in his/her own words;
(B) make predictions based on observable patterns in
nature such as the shapes of leaves; and
(C) explore that scientists investigate different things
in the natural world and use tools to help in their investigations.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses age-appropriate tools and models to investigate the natural world.
The student is expected to:
(A) collect information using tools, including computers,
hand lenses, primary balances, cups, bowls, magnets, collecting nets,
and notebooks; timing devices, including clocks and timers; non-standard
measuring items such as paper clips and clothespins; weather instruments
such as demonstration thermometers and wind socks; and materials to
support observations of habitats of organisms such as terrariums and
aquariums; and
(B) use senses as a tool of observation to identify
properties and patterns of organisms, objects, and events in the environment.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that objects
have properties and patterns. The student is expected to:
(A) observe and record properties of objects, including
relative size and mass, such as bigger or smaller and heavier or lighter,
shape, color, and texture; and
(B) observe, record, and discuss how materials can
be changed by heating or cooling.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
energy, force, and motion are related and are a part of their everyday
life. The student is expected to:
(A) use the five senses to explore different forms
of energy such as light, heat, and sound;
(B) explore interactions between magnets and various materials;
(C) observe and describe the location of an object
in relation to another such as above, below, behind, in front of,
and beside; and
(D) observe and describe the ways that objects can
move such as in a straight line, zigzag, up and down, back and forth,
round and round, and fast and slow.
(7) Earth and space. The student knows that the natural
world includes earth materials. The student is expected to:
(A) observe, describe, compare, and sort rocks by size,
shape, color, and texture;
(B) observe and describe physical properties of natural
sources of water, including color and clarity; and
(C) give examples of ways rocks, soil, and water are useful.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows that there are
recognizable patterns in the natural world and among objects in the
sky. The student is expected to:
(A) observe and describe weather changes from day to
day and over seasons;
(B) identify events that have repeating patterns, including
seasons of the year and day and night; and
(C) observe, describe, and illustrate objects in the
sky such as the clouds, Moon, and stars, including the Sun.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows that
plants and animals have basic needs and depend on the living and nonliving
things around them for survival. The student is expected to:
(A) differentiate between living and nonliving things
based upon whether they have basic needs and produce offspring; and
(B) examine evidence that living organisms have basic
needs such as food, water, and shelter for animals and air, water,
nutrients, sunlight, and space for plants.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms resemble their parents and have structures and processes
that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
(A) sort plants and animals into groups based on physical
characteristics such as color, size, body covering, or leaf shape;
(B) identify parts of plants such as roots, stem, and
leaves and parts of animals such as head, eyes, and limbs;
(C) identify ways that young plants resemble the parent
plant; and
(D) observe changes that are part of a simple life
cycle of a plant: seed, seedling, plant, flower, and fruit.
§112.12.Science, Grade 1, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific processes, including inquiry methods, analyzing information,
making informed decisions, and using tools to collect and record information,
while addressing the major concepts and vocabulary, in the context
of physical, earth, and life sciences. Districts are encouraged to
facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 80% of
instructional time.
(4) In Grade 1, students observe and describe the natural
world using their five senses. Students do science as inquiry in order
to develop and enrich their abilities to understand the world around
them in the context of scientific concepts and processes. Students
develop vocabulary through their experiences investigating properties
of common objects, earth materials, and organisms.
(A) A central theme in first grade science is active
engagement in asking questions, communicating ideas, and exploring
with scientific tools in order to explain scientific concepts and
processes like scientific investigation and reasoning; matter and
energy; force, motion, and energy; Earth and space; and organisms
and environment. Scientific investigation and reasoning involves practicing
safe procedures, asking questions about the natural world, and seeking
answers to those questions through simple observations and descriptive
investigations.
(B) Matter is described in terms of its physical properties,
including relative size and mass, shape, color, and texture. The importance
of light, heat, and sound energy is identified as it relates to the
students' everyday life. The location and motion of objects are explored.
(C) Weather is recorded and discussed on a daily basis
so students may begin to recognize patterns in the weather. In addition,
patterns are observed in the appearance of objects in the sky.
(D) In life science, students recognize the interdependence
of organisms in the natural world. They understand that all organisms
have basic needs that can be satisfied through interactions with living
and nonliving things. Students will investigate life cycles of animals
and identify likenesses between parents and offspring.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school
safety procedures and uses environmentally appropriate and responsible
practices. The student is expected to:
(A) recognize and demonstrate safe practices as described
in the Texas Safety Standards during classroom and outdoor investigations,
including wearing safety goggles, washing hands, and using materials
appropriately;
(B) recognize the importance of safe practices to keep
self and others safe and healthy; and
(C) identify and learn how to use natural resources
and materials, including conservation and reuse or recycling of paper,
plastic, and metals.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
develops abilities to ask questions and seek answers in classroom
and outdoor investigations. The student is expected to:
(A) ask questions about organisms, objects, and events
observed in the natural world;
(B) plan and conduct simple descriptive investigations
such as ways objects move;
(C) collect data and make observations using simple
equipment such as hand lenses, primary balances, and non-standard
measurement tools;
(D) record and organize data using pictures, numbers,
and words; and
(E) communicate observations and provide reasons for
explanations using student-generated data from simple descriptive
investigations.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows that information and critical thinking are used in scientific
problem solving. The student is expected to:
(A) identify and explain a problem such as finding
a home for a classroom pet and propose a solution in his/her own words;
(B) make predictions based on observable patterns; and
(C) describe what scientists do.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses age-appropriate tools and models to investigate the natural world.
The student is expected to:
(A) collect, record, and compare information using
tools, including computers, hand lenses, primary balances, cups, bowls,
magnets, collecting nets, notebooks, and safety goggles; timing devices,
including clocks and timers; non-standard measuring items such as
paper clips and clothespins; weather instruments such as classroom
demonstration thermometers and wind socks; and materials to support
observations of habitats of organisms such as aquariums and terrariums; and
(B) measure and compare organisms and objects using
non-standard units.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that objects
have properties and patterns. The student is expected to:
(A) classify objects by observable properties of the
materials from which they are made such as larger and smaller, heavier
and lighter, shape, color, and texture; and
(B) predict and identify changes in materials caused
by heating and cooling such as ice melting, water freezing, and water
evaporating.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
force, motion, and energy are related and are a part of everyday life.
The student is expected to:
(A) identify and discuss how different forms of energy
such as light, heat, and sound are important to everyday life;
(B) predict and describe how a magnet can be used to
push or pull an object;
(C) describe the change in the location of an object
such as closer to, nearer to, and farther from; and
(D) demonstrate and record the ways that objects can
move such as in a straight line, zig zag, up and down, back and forth,
round and round, and fast and slow.
(7) Earth and space. The student knows that the natural
world includes rocks, soil, and water that can be observed in cycles,
patterns, and systems. The student is expected to:
(A) observe, compare, describe, and sort components
of soil by size, texture, and color;
(B) identify and describe a variety of natural sources
of water, including streams, lakes, and oceans; and
(C) gather evidence of how rocks, soil, and water help
to make useful products.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows that the natural
world includes the air around us and objects in the sky. The student
is expected to:
(A) record weather information, including relative
temperature, such as hot or cold, clear or cloudy, calm or windy,
and rainy or icy;
(B) observe and record changes in the appearance of
objects in the sky such as clouds, the Moon, and stars, including
the Sun;
(C) identify characteristics of the seasons of the
year and day and night; and
(D) demonstrate that air is all around us and observe
that wind is moving air.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows that
the living environment is composed of relationships between organisms
and the life cycles that occur. The student is expected to:
(A) sort and classify living and nonliving things based
upon whether or not they have basic needs and produce offspring;
(B) analyze and record examples of interdependence
found in various situations such as terrariums and aquariums or pet
and caregiver; and
(C) gather evidence of interdependence among living
organisms such as energy transfer through food chains and animals
using plants for shelter.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms resemble their parents and have structures and processes
that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
(A) investigate how the external characteristics of
an animal are related to where it lives, how it moves, and what it
eats;
(B) identify and compare the parts of plants;
(C) compare ways that young animals resemble their
parents; and
(D) observe and record life cycles of animals such
as a chicken, frog, or fish.
§112.13.Science, Grade 2, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific processes, including inquiry methods, analyzing information,
making informed decisions, and using tools to collect and record information,
while addressing the major concepts and vocabulary, in the context
of physical, earth, and life sciences. Districts are encouraged to
facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 60% of
instructional time.
(4) In Grade 2, careful observation and investigation
are used to learn about the natural world and reveal patterns, changes,
and cycles. Students should understand that certain types of questions
can be answered by using observation and investigations and that the
information gathered in these may change as new observations are made.
As students participate in investigation, they develop the skills
necessary to do science as well as develop new science concepts.
(A) Within the physical environment, students expand
their understanding of the properties of objects such as shape, mass,
temperature, and flexibility then use those properties to compare,
classify, and then combine the objects to do something that they could
not do before. Students manipulate objects to demonstrate a change
in motion and position.
(B) Within the natural environment, students will observe
the properties of earth materials as well as predictable patterns
that occur on Earth and in the sky. The students understand that those
patterns are used to make choices in clothing, activities, and transportation.
(C) Within the living environment, students explore
patterns, systems, and cycles by investigating characteristics of
organisms, life cycles, and interactions among all the components
within their habitat. Students examine how living organisms depend
on each other and on their environment.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school
safety procedures. The student is expected to:
(A) identify and demonstrate safe practices as described
in the Texas Safety Standards during classroom and outdoor investigations,
including wearing safety goggles, washing hands, and using materials
appropriately;
(B) describe the importance of safe practices; and
(C) identify and demonstrate how to use, conserve,
and dispose of natural resources and materials such as conserving
water and reuse or recycling of paper, plastic, and metal.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
develops abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry in classroom
and outdoor investigations. The student is expected to:
(A) ask questions about organisms, objects, and events
during observations and investigations;
(B) plan and conduct descriptive investigations such
as how organisms grow;
(C) collect data from observations using simple equipment
such as hand lenses, primary balances, thermometers, and non-standard
measurement tools;
(D) record and organize data using pictures, numbers,
and words;
(E) communicate observations and justify explanations
using student-generated data from simple descriptive investigations; and
(F) compare results of investigations with what students
and scientists know about the world.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows that information and critical thinking, scientific problem solving,
and the contributions of scientists are used in making decisions.
The student is expected to:
(A) identify and explain a problem in his/her own words
and propose a task and solution for the problem such as lack of water
in a habitat;
(B) make predictions based on observable patterns;
and
(C) identify what a scientist is and explore what different
scientists do.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses age-appropriate tools and models to investigate the natural world.
The student is expected to:
(A) collect, record, and compare information using
tools, including computers, hand lenses, rulers, primary balances,
plastic beakers, magnets, collecting nets, notebooks, and safety goggles;
timing devices, including clocks and stopwatches; weather instruments
such as thermometers, wind vanes, and rain gauges; and materials to
support observations of habitats of organisms such as terrariums and
aquariums; and
(B) measure and compare organisms and objects using
non-standard units that approximate metric units.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that matter
has physical properties and those properties determine how it is described,
classified, changed, and used. The student is expected to:
(A) classify matter by physical properties, including
shape, relative mass, relative temperature, texture, flexibility,
and whether material is a solid or liquid;
(B) compare changes in materials caused by heating
and cooling;
(C) demonstrate that things can be done to materials
to change their physical properties such as cutting, folding, sanding,
and melting; and
(D) combine materials that when put together can do
things that they cannot do by themselves such as building a tower
or a bridge and justify the selection of those materials based on
their physical properties.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
forces cause change and energy exists in many forms. The student is
expected to:
(A) investigate the effects on an object by increasing
or decreasing amounts of light, heat, and sound energy such as how
the color of an object appears different in dimmer light or how heat
melts butter;
(B) observe and identify how magnets are used in everyday life;
(C) trace the changes in the position of an object
over time such as a cup rolling on the floor and a car rolling down
a ramp; and
(D) compare patterns of movement of objects such as
sliding, rolling, and spinning.
(7) Earth and space. The student knows that the natural
world includes earth materials. The student is expected to:
(A) observe and describe rocks by size, texture, and
color;
(B) identify and compare the properties of natural
sources of freshwater and saltwater; and
(C) distinguish between natural and manmade resources.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows that there are
recognizable patterns in the natural world and among objects in the
sky. The student is expected to:
(A) measure, record, and graph weather information,
including temperature, wind conditions, precipitation, and cloud coverage,
in order to identify patterns in the data;
(B) identify the importance of weather and seasonal
information to make choices in clothing, activities, and transportation;
(C) explore the processes in the water cycle, including
evaporation, condensation, and precipitation, as connected to weather
conditions; and
(D) observe, describe, and record patterns of objects
in the sky, including the appearance of the Moon.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows that
living organisms have basic needs that must be met for them to survive
within their environment. The student is expected to:
(A) identify the basic needs of plants and animals;
(B) identify factors in the environment, including
temperature and precipitation, that affect growth and behavior such
as migration, hibernation, and dormancy of living things; and
(C) compare and give examples of the ways living organisms
depend on each other and on their environments such as food chains
within a garden, park, beach, lake, and wooded area.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms resemble their parents and have structures and processes
that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
(A) observe, record, and compare how the physical characteristics
and behaviors of animals help them meet their basic needs such as
fins help fish move and balance in the water;
(B) observe, record, and compare how the physical characteristics
of plants help them meet their basic needs such as stems carry water
throughout the plant; and
(C) investigate and record some of the unique stages
that insects undergo during their life cycle.
§112.14.Science, Grade 3, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific methods, analyzing information, making informed decisions,
and using tools to collect and record information while addressing
the content and vocabulary in physical, earth, and life sciences.
Districts are encouraged to facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations
for at least 60% of instructional time.
(4) In Grade 3, students learn that the study of science
uses appropriate tools and safe practices in planning and implementing
investigations, asking and answering questions, collecting data by
observing and measuring, and by using models to support scientific
inquiry about the natural world.
(A) Students recognize that patterns, relationships,
and cycles exist in matter. Students will investigate the physical
properties of matter and will learn that changes occur. They explore
mixtures and investigate light, sound, and heat/thermal energy in
everyday life. Students manipulate objects by pushing and pulling
to demonstrate changes in motion and position.
(B) Students investigate how the surface of Earth changes
and provides resources that humans use. As students explore objects
in the sky, they describe how relationships affect patterns and cycles
on Earth. Students will construct models to demonstrate Sun, Earth,
and Moon system relationships and will describe the Sun's role in
the water cycle.
(C) Students explore patterns, systems, and cycles
within environments by investigating characteristics of organisms,
life cycles, and interactions among all components of the natural
environment. Students examine how the environment plays a key role
in survival. Students know that when changes in the environment occur
organisms may thrive, become ill, or perish.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations following school and
home safety procedures and environmentally appropriate practices.
The student is expected to:
(A) demonstrate safe practices as described in the
Texas Safety Standards during classroom and outdoor investigations,
including observing a schoolyard habitat; and
(B) make informed choices in the use and conservation
of natural resources by recycling or reusing materials such as paper,
aluminum cans, and plastics.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses scientific inquiry methods during laboratory and outdoor investigations.
The student is expected to:
(A) plan and implement descriptive investigations,
including asking and answering questions, making inferences, and selecting
and using equipment or technology needed, to solve a specific problem
in the natural world;
(B) collect data by observing and measuring using the
metric system and recognize differences between observed and measured
data;
(C) construct maps, graphic organizers, simple tables,
charts, and bar graphs using tools and current technology to organize,
examine, and evaluate measured data;
(D) analyze and interpret patterns in data to construct
reasonable explanations based on evidence from investigations;
(E) demonstrate that repeated investigations may increase
the reliability of results; and
(F) communicate valid conclusions supported by data
in writing, by drawing pictures, and through verbal discussion.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows that information, critical thinking, scientific problem solving,
and the contributions of scientists are used in making decisions.
The student is expected to:
(A) in all fields of science, analyze, evaluate, and
critique scientific explanations by using empirical evidence, logical
reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, including examining
all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations,
so as to encourage critical thinking by the student;
(B) draw inferences and evaluate accuracy of product
claims found in advertisements and labels such as for toys and food;
(C) represent the natural world using models such as
volcanoes or Sun, Earth, and Moon system and identify their limitations,
including size, properties, and materials; and
(D) connect grade-level appropriate science concepts
with the history of science, science careers, and contributions of
scientists.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows how to use a variety of tools and methods to conduct science
inquiry. The student is expected to:
(A) collect, record, and analyze information using
tools, including microscopes, cameras, computers, hand lenses, metric
rulers, Celsius thermometers, wind vanes, rain gauges, pan balances,
graduated cylinders, beakers, spring scales, hot plates, meter sticks,
compasses, magnets, collecting nets, notebooks, sound recorders, and
Sun, Earth, and Moon system models; timing devices, including clocks
and stopwatches; and materials to support observation of habitats
of organisms such as terrariums and aquariums; and
(B) use safety equipment as appropriate, including
safety goggles and gloves.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that matter
has measurable physical properties and those properties determine
how matter is classified, changed, and used. The student is expected to:
(A) measure, test, and record physical properties of
matter, including temperature, mass, magnetism, and the ability to
sink or float;
(B) describe and classify samples of matter as solids,
liquids, and gases and demonstrate that solids have a definite shape
and that liquids and gases take the shape of their container;
(C) predict, observe, and record changes in the state
of matter caused by heating or cooling; and
(D) explore and recognize that a mixture is created
when two materials are combined such as gravel and sand and metal
and plastic paper clips.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
forces cause change and that energy exists in many forms. The student
is expected to:
(A) explore different forms of energy, including mechanical,
light, sound, and heat/thermal in everyday life;
(B) demonstrate and observe how position and motion
can be changed by pushing and pulling objects to show work being done
such as swings, balls, pulleys, and wagons; and
(C) observe forces such as magnetism and gravity acting on objects.
(7) Earth and space. The student knows that Earth consists
of natural resources and its surface is constantly changing. The student
is expected to:
(A) explore and record how soils are formed by weathering
of rock and the decomposition of plant and animal remains;
(B) investigate rapid changes in Earth's surface such
as volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and landslides;
(C) identify and compare different landforms, including
mountains, hills, valleys, and plains; and
(D) explore the characteristics of natural resources
that make them useful in products and materials such as clothing and
furniture and how resources may be conserved.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows there are recognizable
patterns in the natural world and among objects in the sky. The student
is expected to:
(A) observe, measure, record, and compare day-to-day
weather changes in different locations at the same time that include
air temperature, wind direction, and precipitation;
(B) describe and illustrate the Sun as a star composed
of gases that provides light and heat energy for the water cycle;
(C) construct models that demonstrate the relationship
of the Sun, Earth, and Moon, including orbits and positions; and
(D) identify the planets in Earth's solar system and
their position in relation to the Sun.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows that
organisms have characteristics that help them survive and can describe
patterns, cycles, systems, and relationships within the environments.
The student is expected to:
(A) observe and describe the physical characteristics
of environments and how they support populations and communities within
an ecosystem;
(B) identify and describe the flow of energy in a food
chain and predict how changes in a food chain affect the ecosystem
such as removal of frogs from a pond or bees from a field; and
(C) describe environmental changes such as floods and
droughts where some organisms thrive and others perish or move to
new locations.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures
that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
(A) explore how structures and functions of plants
and animals allow them to survive in a particular environment;
(B) explore that some characteristics of organisms
are inherited such as the number of limbs on an animal or flower color
and recognize that some behaviors are learned in response to living
in a certain environment such as animals using tools to get food; and
(C) investigate and compare how animals and plants
undergo a series of orderly changes in their diverse life cycles such
as tomato plants, frogs, and lady bugs.
§112.15.Science, Grade 4, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific processes, including inquiry methods, analyzing information,
making informed decisions, and using tools to collect and record information,
while addressing the major concepts and vocabulary, in the context
of physical, earth, and life sciences. Districts are encouraged to
facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 50% of
instructional time.
(4) In Grade 4, investigations are used to learn about
the natural world. Students should understand that certain types of
questions can be answered by investigations and that methods, models,
and conclusions built from these investigations change as new observations
are made. Models of objects and events are tools for understanding
the natural world and can show how systems work. They have limitations
and based on new discoveries are constantly being modified to more
closely reflect the natural world.
(A) Within the natural environment, students know that
earth materials have properties that are constantly changing due to
Earth's forces. The students learn that the natural world consists
of resources, including renewable and nonrenewable, and their responsibility
to conserve our natural resources for future generations. They will
also explore Sun, Earth, and Moon relationships. The students will
recognize that our major source of energy is the Sun.
(B) Within the living environment, students know and
understand that living organisms within an ecosystem interact with
one another and with their environment. The students will recognize
that plants and animals have basic needs, and they are met through
a flow of energy known as food webs. Students will explore how all
living organisms go through a life cycle and that adaptations enable
organisms to survive in their ecosystem.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations, following home and
school safety procedures and environmentally appropriate and ethical
practices. The student is expected to:
(A) demonstrate safe practices and the use of safety
equipment as described in the Texas Safety Standards during classroom
and outdoor investigations; and
(B) make informed choices in the use and conservation
of natural resources and reusing and recycling of materials such as
paper, aluminum, glass, cans, and plastic.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses scientific inquiry methods during laboratory and outdoor investigations.
The student is expected to:
(A) plan and implement descriptive investigations,
including asking well-defined questions, making inferences, and selecting
and using appropriate equipment or technology to answer his/her questions;
(B) collect and record data by observing and measuring,
using the metric system, and using descriptive words and numerals
such as labeled drawings, writing, and concept maps;
(C) construct simple tables, charts, bar graphs, and
maps using tools and current technology to organize, examine, and
evaluate data;
(D) analyze data and interpret patterns to construct
reasonable explanations from data that can be observed and measured;
(E) perform repeated investigations to increase the
reliability of results; and
(F) communicate valid, oral, and written results supported by data.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses critical thinking and scientific problem solving to make informed
decisions. The student is expected to:
(A) in all fields of science, analyze, evaluate, and
critique scientific explanations by using empirical evidence, logical
reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, including examining
all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations,
so as to encourage critical thinking by the student;
(B) draw inferences and evaluate accuracy of services
and product claims found in advertisements and labels such as for
toys, food, and sunscreen;
(C) represent the natural world using models such as
rivers, stream tables, or fossils and identify their limitations,
including accuracy and size; and
(D) connect grade-level appropriate science concepts
with the history of science, science careers, and contributions of
scientists.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows how to use a variety of tools, materials, equipment, and models
to conduct science inquiry. The student is expected to:
(A) collect, record, and analyze information using
tools, including calculators, microscopes, cameras, computers, hand
lenses, metric rulers, Celsius thermometers, mirrors, spring scales,
pan balances, triple beam balances, graduated cylinders, beakers,
hot plates, meter sticks, compasses, magnets, collecting nets, and
notebooks; timing devices, including clocks and stopwatches; and materials
to support observation of habitats of organisms such as terrariums
and aquariums; and
(B) use safety equipment as appropriate, including
safety goggles and gloves.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that matter
has measurable physical properties and those properties determine
how matter is classified, changed, and used. The student is expected to:
(A) measure, compare, and contrast physical properties
of matter, including size, mass, volume, states (solid, liquid, gas),
temperature, magnetism, and the ability to sink or float;
(B) predict the changes caused by heating and cooling
such as ice becoming liquid water and condensation forming on the
outside of a glass of ice water; and
(C) compare and contrast a variety of mixtures and
solutions such as rocks in sand, sand in water, or sugar in water.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
energy exists in many forms and can be observed in cycles, patterns,
and systems. The student is expected to:
(A) differentiate among forms of energy, including
mechanical, sound, electrical, light, and heat/thermal;
(B) differentiate between conductors and insulators;
(C) demonstrate that electricity travels in a closed
path, creating an electrical circuit, and explore an electromagnetic
field; and
(D) design an experiment to test the effect of force
on an object such as a push or a pull, gravity, friction, or magnetism.
(7) Earth and space. The students know that Earth consists
of useful resources and its surface is constantly changing. The student
is expected to:
(A) examine properties of soils, including color and
texture, capacity to retain water, and ability to support the growth
of plants;
(B) observe and identify slow changes to Earth's surface
caused by weathering, erosion, and deposition from water, wind, and
ice; and
(C) identify and classify Earth's renewable resources,
including air, plants, water, and animals; and nonrenewable resources,
including coal, oil, and natural gas; and the importance of conservation.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows that there are
recognizable patterns in the natural world and among the Sun, Earth,
and Moon system. The student is expected to:
(A) measure and record changes in weather and make
predictions using weather maps, weather symbols, and a map key;
(B) describe and illustrate the continuous movement
of water above and on the surface of Earth through the water cycle
and explain the role of the Sun as a major source of energy in this
process; and
(C) collect and analyze data to identify sequences
and predict patterns of change in shadows, tides, seasons, and the
observable appearance of the Moon over time.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows and
understands that living organisms within an ecosystem interact with
one another and with their environment. The student is expected to:
(A) investigate that most producers need sunlight,
water, and carbon dioxide to make their own food, while consumers
are dependent on other organisms for food; and
(B) describe the flow of energy through food webs,
beginning with the Sun, and predict how changes in the ecosystem affect
the food web such as a fire in a forest.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures
that help them survive within their environment. The student is expected to:
(A) explore how adaptations enable organisms to survive
in their environment such as comparing birds' beaks and leaves on plants;
(B) demonstrate that some likenesses between parents
and offspring are inherited, passed from generation to generation
such as eye color in humans or shapes of leaves in plants. Other likenesses
are learned such as table manners or reading a book and seals balancing
balls on their noses; and
(C) explore, illustrate, and compare life cycles in
living organisms such as butterflies, beetles, radishes, or lima beans.
§112.16.Science, Grade 5, Beginning with School Year 2010-2011.
(a) Introduction.
(1) Science, as defined by the National Academy of
Sciences, is the "use of evidence to construct testable explanations
and predictions of natural phenomena, as well as the knowledge generated
through this process."
(2) Recurring themes are pervasive in sciences, mathematics,
and technology. These ideas transcend disciplinary boundaries and
include patterns, cycles, systems, models, and change and constancy.
(3) The study of elementary science includes planning
and safely implementing classroom and outdoor investigations using
scientific processes, including inquiry methods, analyzing information,
making informed decisions, and using tools to collect and record information,
while addressing the major concepts and vocabulary, in the context
of physical, earth, and life sciences. Districts are encouraged to
facilitate classroom and outdoor investigations for at least 50% of
instructional time.
(4) In Grade 5, investigations are used to learn about
the natural world. Students should understand that certain types of
questions can be answered by investigations and that methods, models,
and conclusions built from these investigations change as new observations
are made. Models of objects and events are tools for understanding
the natural world and can show how systems work. They have limitations
and based on new discoveries are constantly being modified to more
closely reflect the natural world.
(A) Within the physical environment, students learn
about the physical properties of matter, including magnetism, physical
states of matter, relative density, solubility in water, and the ability
to conduct or insulate electrical and heat energy. Students explore
the uses of light, thermal, electrical, and sound energies.
(B) Within the natural environment, students learn
how changes occur on Earth's surface and that predictable patterns
occur in the sky. Students learn that the natural world consists of
resources, including nonrenewable, renewable, and alternative energy
sources.
(C) Within the living environment, students learn that
structure and function of organisms can improve the survival of members
of a species. Students learn to differentiate between inherited traits
and learned behaviors. Students learn that life cycles occur in animals
and plants and that the carbon dioxide-oxygen cycle occurs naturally
to support the living environment.
(b) Knowledge and skills.
(1) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
conducts classroom and outdoor investigations following home and school
safety procedures and environmentally appropriate and ethical practices.
The student is expected to:
(A) demonstrate safe practices and the use of safety
equipment as described in the Texas Safety Standards during classroom
and outdoor investigations; and
(B) make informed choices in the conservation, disposal,
and recycling of materials.
(2) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses scientific methods during laboratory and outdoor investigations.
The student is expected to:
(A) describe, plan, and implement simple experimental
investigations testing one variable;
(B) ask well-defined questions, formulate testable
hypotheses, and select and use appropriate equipment and technology;
(C) collect information by detailed observations and
accurate measuring;
(D) analyze and interpret information to construct
reasonable explanations from direct (observable) and indirect (inferred)
evidence;
(E) demonstrate that repeated investigations may increase
the reliability of results;
(F) communicate valid conclusions in both written and
verbal forms; and
(G) construct appropriate simple graphs, tables, maps,
and charts using technology, including computers, to organize, examine,
and evaluate information.
(3) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
uses critical thinking and scientific problem solving to make informed
decisions. The student is expected to:
(A) in all fields of science, analyze, evaluate, and
critique scientific explanations by using empirical evidence, logical
reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, including examining
all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations,
so as to encourage critical thinking by the student;
(B) evaluate the accuracy of the information related
to promotional materials for products and services such as nutritional labels;
(C) draw or develop a model that represents how something
works or looks that cannot be seen such as how a soda dispensing machine
works; and
(D) connect grade-level appropriate science concepts
with the history of science, science careers, and contributions of
scientists.
(4) Scientific investigation and reasoning. The student
knows how to use a variety of tools and methods to conduct science
inquiry. The student is expected to:
(A) collect, record, and analyze information using
tools, including calculators, microscopes, cameras, computers, hand
lenses, metric rulers, Celsius thermometers, prisms, mirrors, pan
balances, triple beam balances, spring scales, graduated cylinders,
beakers, hot plates, meter sticks, magnets, collecting nets, and notebooks;
timing devices, including clocks and stopwatches; and materials to
support observations of habitats or organisms such as terrariums and
aquariums; and
(B) use safety equipment, including safety goggles
and gloves.
(5) Matter and energy. The student knows that matter
has measurable physical properties and those properties determine
how matter is classified, changed, and used. The student is expected to:
(A) classify matter based on physical properties, including
mass, magnetism, physical state (solid, liquid, and gas), relative
density (sinking and floating), solubility in water, and the ability
to conduct or insulate thermal energy or electric energy;
(B) identify the boiling and freezing/melting points
of water on the Celsius scale;
(C) demonstrate that some mixtures maintain physical
properties of their ingredients such as iron filings and sand; and
(D) identify changes that can occur in the physical
properties of the ingredients of solutions such as dissolving salt
in water or adding lemon juice to water.
(6) Force, motion, and energy. The student knows that
energy occurs in many forms and can be observed in cycles, patterns,
and systems. The student is expected to:
(A) explore the uses of energy, including mechanical,
light, thermal, electrical, and sound energy;
(B) demonstrate that the flow of electricity in circuits
requires a complete path through which an electric current can pass
and can produce light, heat, and sound;
(C) demonstrate that light travels in a straight line
until it strikes an object or travels through one medium to another
and demonstrate that light can be reflected such as the use of mirrors
or other shiny surfaces and refracted such as the appearance of an
object when observed through water; and
(D) design an experiment that tests the effect of force
on an object.
(7) Earth and space. The student knows Earth's surface
is constantly changing and consists of useful resources. The student
is expected to:
(A) explore the processes that led to the formation
of sedimentary rocks and fossil fuels;
(B) recognize how landforms such as deltas, canyons,
and sand dunes are the result of changes to Earth's surface by wind,
water, and ice;
(C) identify alternative energy resources such as wind,
solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, and biofuels; and
(D) identify fossils as evidence of past living organisms
and the nature of the environments at the time using models.
(8) Earth and space. The student knows that there are
recognizable patterns in the natural world and among the Sun, Earth,
and Moon system. The student is expected to:
(A) differentiate between weather and climate;
(B) explain how the Sun and the ocean interact in the water cycle;
(C) demonstrate that Earth rotates on its axis once
approximately every 24 hours causing the day/night cycle and the apparent
movement of the Sun across the sky; and
(D) identify and compare the physical characteristics
of the Sun, Earth, and Moon.
(9) Organisms and environments. The student knows that
there are relationships, systems, and cycles within environments.
The student is expected to:
(A) observe the way organisms live and survive in their
ecosystem by interacting with the living and non-living elements;
(B) describe how the flow of energy derived from the
Sun, used by producers to create their own food, is transferred through
a food chain and food web to consumers and decomposers;
(C) predict the effects of changes in ecosystems caused
by living organisms, including humans, such as the overpopulation
of grazers or the building of highways; and
(D) identify the significance of the carbon dioxide-oxygen
cycle to the survival of plants and animals.
(10) Organisms and environments. The student knows
that organisms undergo similar life processes and have structures
that help them survive within their environments. The student is expected to:
(A) compare the structures and functions of different
species that help them live and survive such as hooves on prairie
animals or webbed feet in aquatic animals;
(B) differentiate between inherited traits of plants
and animals such as spines on a cactus or shape of a beak and learned
behaviors such as an animal learning tricks or a child riding a bicycle; and
(C) describe the differences between complete and incomplete
metamorphosis of insects.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption
has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise
of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 15, 2009.
TRD-200902903
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Policy Coordination
Texas Education Agency
Effective date: August 4, 2009
Proposal publication date: February 13, 2009
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
SUBCHAPTER B. MIDDLE SCHOOL