TITLE 28. INSURANCE

PART 2. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CHAPTER 116. GENERAL PROVISIONS--SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND

28 TAC §116.11, §116.12

The Texas Department of Insurance (Department), Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) proposes amendments to §116.11 (relating to Request for Reimbursement or Refund from the Subsequent Injury Fund) and §116.12 (relating to Subsequent Injury Fund Payment/Reimbursement Schedule).

The proposed amendments are necessary for consistency with the Labor Code and to implement the amendments to Labor Code §§403.006, 408.0041, and 408.042 enacted by Senate Bill (SB) 1169, 80th Legislature, Regular Session, effective September 1, 2007. Amended Labor Code §403.006 provides that the subsequent injury fund is liable for the reimbursement of an insurance carrier as provided for by Labor Code §408.0041(f-1).

New Labor Code §408.0041(f-1) requires the subsequent injury fund to reimburse an insurance carrier for any overpayment of benefits made by the insurance carrier based on the opinion of a designated doctor if that opinion is reversed or modified by a final arbitration award or a final order or decision of the Commissioner of Workers' Compensation (Commissioner) or a court.

Amended Labor Code §408.042(g) added the provision that an insurance carrier is entitled to apply for and receive reimbursement from the subsequent injury fund for the amount of death benefits, in addition to the amount of other income benefits, paid to an employee that are based on employment other than the employment during which the compensable injury occurred.

Proposed amendments to §116.11. Proposed amendments to §116.11 include deletion of the term "Refund" in the title of the section and throughout the section to provide consistency with Labor Code §403.006. Proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(1) remove the reference to the State Office of Administrative Hearings to be consistent with the Labor Code §§403.006, 408.0041, and 410.209. The proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(2) add language to be more consistent with Labor Code §403.007. Proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(3) add language to conform to current nomenclature and clarifies a legal reference. Proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(4) implement §408.042(g) by providing for insurance carrier reimbursement from the subsequent injury fund for income or death benefits paid to an injured employee or a legal beneficiary attributable to multiple employment. Proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(5) implement Labor Code §408.0041(f-1) by providing that an insurance carrier may request a reimbursement from the subsequent injury fund for any overpayment of benefits made by the insurance carrier based on an opinion of a designated doctor if the opinion is later reversed or modified. Proposed amendments to §116.11(a)(6) contain language to conform to current nomenclature, including using "commissioner" and "division" as appropriate, and deletes language already included in Labor Code §413.0141, which is cited. The proposed amendments to §116.11(b) add language to conform to current nomenclature, "insurance carrier" and "injured employee," and adds language to implement Labor Code §408.0041 and §408.042. Proposed amendments to §116.11(c) add language to conform to current nomenclature, add language to clarify the contents of a request for reimbursement; and, remove the reference to the State Office of Administrative Hearings to be consistent with Labor Code §§403.006, 408.0041, and 410.209. Proposed amendments to §116.11(d) add language to clarify with greater specificity the procedure for requesting a reimbursement. Proposed amendments to §116.11(e) clarify that subsection (e) applies to multiple employment-based requests and clarify the information that must be included in a reimbursement request. Proposed amendments to §116.11(f) update the submission for reimbursement example and add "the total amount of reimbursement requested" to the information that must be provided in the reimbursement request. Proposed amendments to §116.11(g) implements Labor Code §408.0041(f-1) by setting forth the request for reimbursement procedure and the necessary information that must be included in the request. Proposed amendments to §116.11(h) clarify that the insurance carrier is required to file any other information reasonably required by the subsequent injury fund administrator and must also notify the administrator of any pending disputes to evaluate the request.

Proposed amendments to §116.12. Proposed amendments to §116.12(a) add language to conform to current nomenclature and clarifies a legal reference. The proposed amendments to §116.12(c) provide that claims filed under §116.12(a)(1), (2) and (3) should be processed in the fiscal quarter following the quarter in which the request was submitted and no later than one year following the submission. In accordance with §403.006(d), proposed amendments to §116.12(d) include a separate provision for the review and processing of requests under Labor Code §408.042(g) relating to multiple employment and claims under Labor Code §413.0141 relating to initial pharmaceutical coverage. The proposed amendments to §116.12(d) delete language that applies to internal administrative procedures. Proposed amendments to §116.12(e) add language to conform to current nomenclature and clarify a legal reference. Proposed amendments to §116.12(f) provide that the subsection only applies to reimbursement request relating to multiple employment and pharmaceutical claims, add language to conform to current nomenclature and clarify a date reference. Current §116.12(g) is proposed to be deleted because it applies to administrative procedures of the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission and is no longer necessary as a result of the restructuring and reorganization of that agency into the Texas Department of Insurance. Proposed amendments to §116.12(h) reletter the subsection to subsection (g) and add language which provides the insurance carrier must notify the subsequent injury fund administrator of any pending disputes and that the administrator will refrain from acting on an insurance carrier's request for reimbursement from the subsequent injury fund until final resolution of all disputes affecting the request for reimbursement.

The Fiscal Note for SB 1169, dated May 18, 2007, estimated that the impact on the Subsequent Injury Fund would be $1,128,908 each year of the first five years the statute will be in effect. The proposed rules do not increase the fiscal impact beyond the impact of SB 1169.

Mr. Dirk Johnson, General Counsel, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed rules will be in effect there will be no fiscal impact on state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed rules. There will be no measurable effect on local employment or the local economy as a result of the proposal.

Local government and state government as a covered regulated entity will be impacted in the same manner as persons required to comply with the proposed amendments as described later in the preamble.

Mr. Johnson has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed rules will be in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rules will be improved operation of the subsequent injury fund. The proposed rules do not increase costs to system participants beyond the impact estimated by SB 1169.

As required by the Government Code §2006.002(c), the Division has determined that the proposal will not have an adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses who may be required to comply with the proposed rules.

The cost of compliance with the proposal will not vary between large businesses and small or micro-businesses, and the Division's cost analysis and resulting estimated costs in the Public Benefit/Cost Note portion of this proposal is equally applicable to small or micro-businesses.

The Division has determined that this proposal is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by Government Code §2001.0225 and therefore a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.

The Division has determined that no private real property interests are affected by this proposal and that this proposal does not restrict or limit an owner's right to property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, does not constitute a taking or require a takings impact assessment under the Government Code §2007.043.

To be considered, written comments on the proposal must be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2009. Comments may be submitted via the Internet through the Division's Internet website at http://www.tdi.state.tx.us/rules/proposedrules/index.html or by mailing or delivering your comments to Maria Jimenez, Legal Services, MS-4D, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation, 7551 Metro Center Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78744. Any request for a public hearing must be submitted separately to the Office of General Counsel, MS-1, 7551 Metro Center Drive, Austin, Texas 78744 by 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2009. If a hearing is held, written and oral comments presented at the hearing will be considered.

The amendments are proposed under the Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, 403.006, 408.0041, and 408.042. Section 402.00111 provides that the Commissioner of Workers' Compensation shall exercise all executive authority, including rulemaking authority, under the Labor Code and other laws of this state. Section 402.061 provides the Commissioner of Workers' Compensation the authority to adopt rules as necessary to implement and enforce the Texas Workers' Compensation Act. Section 403.006 establishes the subsequent injury fund. Section 408.0041 provides for designated doctor examinations to resolve various questions about the injured employee's injury. Section 408.042 provides for the calculation of the average weekly wage for a part-time employee or an employee with multiple employment.

The following sections are affected by this proposal:

§116.11: Labor Code §408.0041(f-1) and §408.042(g)

§116.12: Labor Code §408.0041(f-1) and §408.042(g)

§116.11.Request for Reimbursement [ or Refund ] from the Subsequent Injury Fund.

(a) An insurance [A] carrier may request:

(1) reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury Fund ("SIF"), pursuant to Labor Code §403.006(b)(2), for an overpayment of income, death, or medical benefits when the insurance carrier has made an unrecoupable overpayment pursuant to decision of a hearing officer or the appeals panel or an interlocutory order, and that decision or order is reversed or modified by final arbitration, order, or decision of the commissioner [commission], [the State Office of Administrative Hearings,] or a court of last resort; [or]

(2) reimbursement from the SIF [a refund of death benefits ] pursuant to Labor Code §403.007(d) for death benefits paid to the SIF prior to a legal beneficiary determined to be entitled [being eligible] to receive death benefits;

(3) for a compensable injury that occurs on or after July 1, 2002, [: a] reimbursement from the SIF for the amount of income benefits paid to an injured employee [ a worker that is] attributable to multiple employment and [ is] paid pursuant to Labor Code §408.042 [relating to Multiple Employment]; [or]

(4) for a compensable injury that occurs on or after September 1, 2007, reimbursement from the SIF for the amount of income or death benefits paid to an injured employee or a legal beneficiary attributable to multiple employment and paid pursuant to Labor Code §408.042;

(5) reimbursement from the SIF, pursuant to Labor Code §408.0041(f) and (f-1), for an overpayment of benefits made by the insurance carrier based on the opinion of the designated doctor if that opinion is reversed or modified by a final arbitration award or a final order or decision of the commissioner or a court; or

(6) [(4)] [a] reimbursement from the SIF made in accordance with rules adopted by the commissioner [commission] pursuant to Labor Code §413.0141[ , Initial Pharmaceutical Coverage for injuries determined not to be compensable]. For purposes of this subsection only, an injury is determined not to be compensable following:

(A) The final decision of the commissioner [commission ] or the judgment of the court of last resort; or

(B) A claimant's failure to respond within one year of a timely dispute of compensability filed by an insurance carrier. In this instance only, the effective date of the determination of non compensability is one year from the date the dispute is filed with the division [commission] by the insurance carrier.

(i) A determination under this paragraph [subsection ] does not constitute final adjudication. It does not preclude a party from pursuing their claim through the division's [commission's] dispute resolution process and it does not permit a health care provider to pursue a private claim against the claimant.

(ii) If the claim is later determined to be compensable, the insurance carrier shall reimburse the SIF [ subsequent injury fund] for any initial pharmaceutical payment which the SIF previously reimbursed [refunded] to the insurance carrier. The insurance carrier's reimbursement of the SIF shall be paid within the timeframe the insurance carrier has to comply with the agreement, decision and order, or other judgment which found the claim to be compensable.

(b) The amount of reimbursement that the insurance carrier may be entitled to is equal to the amount of unrecoupable overpayments paid and does not include any amounts the insurance carrier overpaid voluntarily or as a result of its own errors. An unrecoupable overpayment of income or death benefits for the purpose of reimbursement from the SIF only includes those benefits that were overpaid by the insurance carrier pursuant to an interlocutory order, a designated doctor opinion or decision which were finally determined to be not owed and which, in the case of an overpayment of income or death benefits to the injured employee or legal beneficiary, were not recoverable or convertible from other income or death benefits.

(c) Requests for reimbursement attributable to subsection (a)(1) of this section, insurance carrier claims of benefit overpayments made under an interlocutory order or decision of the commissioner [commission ] that is later reversed or modified by final arbitration, order, or decision of the commissioner [commission, the State Office of Administrative Hearings], or court of last resort shall be filed with the SIF administrator in writing and include:

(1) a claim-specific summary of the reason the insurance carrier is seeking reimbursement and the total amount of reimbursement requested [or refund];

(2) a detailed payment record showing the dates of payments, the amounts of the payments, purpose of payments, [ total amount of payment requested,] the payees, [and] the periods of benefits paid, all plain language notices ("PLNs") regarding the payment of benefits, all certifications of maximum medical improvement and all assignments of impairment rating [as well as documentation that shows that the overpayment was unrecoupable as described in subsection (b), if applicable];

(3) the name, address, and federal employer identification number of the payee for any reimbursement [or refund] that may be due;

(4) copies of all [relevant] orders and decisions (Benefit Review Conferences, Interlocutory Orders, Contested Case Hearing Decision & Orders, Appeal Panel Decisions, and Court orders) regarding the payment and/or the circumstances of payment, [ that relate to the payment] for which reimbursement is being requested along with an indication of which document is the final decision on the matter;

(5) copies of all reports and DWC forms filed by the employer with the insurance carrier [including, but not limited to, the Employer's First Report of Injury, the Wage Statement, and all Supplemental Reports of Injury for overpayments of income benefits]; and

(6) if an overpayment of medical benefits, copies of all medical bills and preauthorization request forms associated with the overpayment as well as all Independent Review Organization ("IRO") decisions, fee dispute decisions and Contested Case Hearing Decision and Orders, Appeals Panel Decisions, and court orders regarding medical disputes [for overpayments of medical benefits].

(d) Requests for reimbursement pursuant [related ] to subsection (a)(2) of this section, related to a reimbursement [strike> refund] of death benefits paid to the SIF prior to a legal beneficiary being determined to be entitled [ eligible] to receive death benefits, shall be filed with the SIF administrator in writing and include:

(1) a claim-specific summary of the reason the insurance carrier is seeking reimbursement and the total amount of reimbursement requested [or refund];

(2) a detailed payment record showing the dates of payments, the amounts of the payments, purpose of payments, [ total amount of payment requested,] the payees, and the periods of benefits paid;

(3) the name, address, and federal employer identification number of the payee for any reimbursement [or refund ] that may be due;

(4) the documentation the legal beneficiary provided with the claim for death benefits in accordance with [ under] §122.100 of this title (relating to Claim for Death Benefits); and

(5) if applicable [the agreement], the final award of the commissioner [ commission], or the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction determining that the legal beneficiary is entitled to the death benefits[ , if entitlement to benefits had been disputed].

(e) Requests for reimbursement pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (4) of this section, regarding multiple employment, shall be submitted on an annual basis for the payments made during the same or previous fiscal year. The fiscal year begins each September 1st and ends on August 31st of the next calendar year. For example, insurance carrier payments made during the fiscal year from September 1, 2009 [9/1/02] through August 31, 2010, [8/31/03 ] must be submitted prior to August 31, 2011 [ 8/31/04]. Any claims for insurance carrier payments related to multiple employment that are not submitted within the required timeframe will not be reviewed for reimbursement. These requests shall be filed with the SIF administrator in writing and include:

(1) a claim-specific summary of the reason the insurance carrier is seeking reimbursement and the total amount of reimbursement requested [or refund];

(2) a detailed payment record showing the dates of payments, the amounts of the payments, purpose of payments, [ total amount of payment requested,] the payees, and the periods of benefits paid, all PLNs regarding the payment of benefits, as well as documentation that shows that the overpayment was unrecoupable as described in subsection (b) of this section, if applicable;

(3) the name, address, and federal employer identification number of the payee for any reimbursement [ or refund] that may be due;

(4) [all] information documenting the injured employee's average weekly wage amounts paid from all non claim employment held at the time of the work related injury pursuant to §122.5 of this title (relating to Employee's Multiple Employment Wage Statement[.]); and

(5) [all] information documenting the injured employee's average weekly wage amounts paid based on employment with the claim employer.

(f) Requests for reimbursement attributable to initial pharmaceutical coverage shall be submitted in the same or in the following fiscal year after a determination that the injury is not compensable in accordance with subsection (a)(6) [(a)(4)] of this section. The fiscal year begins each September 1st and ends on August 31st of the next calendar year. For example, if an injury is determined to be not compensable during the fiscal year from September 1, 2009 [9/1/02] through August 31, 2010 [8/31/03 ], the request for reimbursement pursuant to Labor Code §413.0141 must be submitted prior to August 31, 2011 [8/31/04]. Any claims for insurance carrier payments related to initial pharmaceutical coverage that are not submitted within the required timeframe will not be reviewed for reimbursement. The requests shall be filed with the SIF administrator in writing and include:

(1) a claim-specific summary of the reason the insurance carrier is seeking reimbursement and the total amount of reimbursement requested [or refund];

(2) a detailed payment record showing the dates of payments, specifically including documentation of payment of Initial Pharmaceutical Coverage, (i.e., first seven days following the date of injury); the amounts of the payments, the purpose of payments, [total amount of payment requested,] the payees, and the periods of benefits paid;

(3) the name, address, and federal employer identification number of the payee for any reimbursement [ or refund] that may be due;

(4) copies of any prescription filled and documentation that the pharmaceutical services were provided during the first seven days following the date of injury, not counting the actual date the injury occurred; and

(5) documentation of the final resolution of any dispute which determines the injury is not compensable either from the commissioner [commission] or court of last resort , or documentation of a claimant's failure to respond in accordance with subsection (a)(6)(B) of this section.

(g) Requests for reimbursement attributable to subsection (a)(5) of this section, insurance carrier claims of benefit overpayments made pursuant to a designated doctor opinion that is later reversed or modified by final arbitration award or a final order or decision of the commissioner or a court, shall be filed with the SIF administrator in writing and include:

(1) a claim-specific summary of the reason the insurance carrier is seeking reimbursement and the total amount of reimbursement requested;

(2) a detailed payment record showing the dates of payments, the amounts of the payments, purpose of payments, the payees, and the periods of benefits paid; all PLNs regarding the payment of benefits and all certifications of maximum medical improvement and all assignments of impairment rating.

(3) the name, address, and federal employer identification number of the payee for any reimbursement that may be due;

(4) copies of all designated doctor opinions (including responses to letters of clarification) and orders and decisions (IRO decisions, dispute decisions, Interlocutory Orders, Contested Case Hearing Decision and Orders, Appeal Panel Decisions, and Court orders) regarding the designated doctor opinion and the payment, or the circumstances requiring payment made pursuant to the designated doctor opinion for which reimbursement is being requested along with an indication of which document is the final decision on the matter;

(5) copies of all reports and DWC forms filed by the employer with the insurance carrier; and

(6) for an overpayment of medical benefits, copies of all medical bills and preauthorization request forms associated with the overpayment.

(h) [(g)] An insurance carrier seeking reimbursement from the SIF shall timely provide any [Any ] other documentation reasonably required by the SIF administrator to determine entitlement to reimbursement or payment from the SIF and the amount of reimbursement to which the insurance carrier is entitled. The insurance carrier must also provide notice to the SIF of any pending dispute or other information that may affect the workers' compensation claim that is the subject of a request for reimbursement and all litigation affecting the request for reimbursement.

§116.12.Subsequent Injury Fund Payment/Reimbursement Schedule.

(a) Claims against the Subsequent Injury Fund ("SIF") shall be paid in the following priority:

(1) claims by insurance carriers for reimbursement made pursuant to Labor Code §403.007 [of the Act] and §132.10(g) of this title (relating to Payment of Death Benefits to the Subsequent Injury Fund);

(2) claims by injured workers for lifetime benefits, as provided by Labor Code §408.162 [ of the Act];

(3) claims by insurance carriers for reimbursement, made pursuant to Labor Code §§408.0041, 410.209 and [§]413.055 [of the Act ] and §116.11 of this title (relating to Request for Reimbursement [ or Refund] from the Subsequent Injury Fund)[.]; and

(4) claims by insurance carriers for reimbursement made pursuant to Labor Code §408.042(g) [ of the Act] relating to multiple employment and those in accordance with division [commission] rule(s) adopted pursuant to Labor Code §413.0141 [of the Act relating to initial pharmaceutical coverage].

(b) The SIF uses the fiscal year September 1 through August 31.

(c) Claims described in subsection (a)(1), [(a)](2) and [(a)](3) of this section should be processed in the fiscal quarter following the quarter in which the request was submitted and no later than one year following the submission. [ may be reviewed and ordered paid by the SIF administrator at any time during the fiscal year.]

(d) Claims described in subsection (a)(4) of this section should be processed in the first fiscal quarter following the fiscal year in which the request was submitted but may be reviewed and ordered paid by the SIF administrator as provided by subections (e) and (f) of this section. [Following the end of the fiscal year, the administrator of the SIF shall review:]

[(1) the SIF available balance and projected revenues and liabilities;]

[(2) the current claims against the SIF, in the order of priorities set out in subsection (a) of this section; and]

[(3) all completed requests for reimbursement as described in §116.11 and §132.10 of this title, received during the prior fiscal year, except as provided in subsection (g) of this section.]

(e) In accordance with Labor Code §403.006(d) [ of the Act], if the commissioner [commission ] determines that partial payments of the claims described in subsection (a)(4) of this section are [is] necessary, partial payments shall be calculated in the following manner:

(1) The total amount of completed eligible requests for reimbursement submitted under subsection (a)(4) of this section that are received during the previous fiscal year will be used to establish a baseline amount.

(2) The baseline amount will be divided by the total amount of SIF funding available as determined in accordance with the Labor Code [Act].

(3) The resulting fraction will be equally applied to all claims submitted under subsection (a)(4) to determine the partial reimbursement amount.

(4) If reimbursement requests are paid with partial payments, no further future recovery is available from the subsequent injury fund for the non-reimbursed portion of that particular request.

(f) If reimbursement requests are paid with partial payments, [Following the end of each fiscal year,] the SIF administrator shall, no later than October 30 of the following fiscal year, enter appropriate orders for claims described in subsection (a)(4) [(a)(3)] of this section. The order shall specify the amount the SIF shall pay to the insurance carrier.

[(g) The SIF administrator shall submit orders to the state comptroller for payment and send a copy of the order to the requesting carrier.]

(g) [(h)] The insurance carrier must provide notice to the SIF of any pending dispute or other information that may affect the workers' compensation claim that is the subject of a request for reimbursement and all litigation affecting the request for reimbursement. The SIF administrator will refrain from acting on an insurance [a ] carrier's request for reimbursement [or refund ] from the SIF until final [dispute] resolution of all disputes affecting the request for reimbursement [ the claim by a final decision of the commission, State Office of Administrative Hearings or the court of last resort except as provided in §116.11(a)(3) and (4)].

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 20, 2009.

TRD-200902964

Dirk Johnson

General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 30, 2009

For further information, please call: (512) 804-4703


CHAPTER 143. DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW BY THE APPEALS PANEL

28 TAC §§143.2 - 143.5

The Texas Department of Insurance (Department), Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) proposes amendments to §143.2 (relating to Description of the Appeal Proceeding), §143.3 (relating to Requesting the Appeals Panel to Review the Decision of the Hearing Officer), §143.4 (relating to Responding to a Request for Review by the Appeals Panel) and §143.5 (relating to Decision of the Appeals Panel). These amendments are necessary to implement statutory provisions of House Bill (HB) 7, enacted by the 79th Legislature, Regular Session, effective September 1, 2005; and HB 4545, enacted by the 81st Legislature, Regular Session, effective September 1, 2009. HB 7 amended Chapter 410, Subchapter E of the Labor Code by amending §§410.201, 410.203, and 410.204. HB 4545 amended Chapter 410, Subchapter E of the Labor Code by amending §410.252.

The legislature amended §§410.201, 410.203, and 410.204 after considering recommendations made by the Sunset Staff Report on the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, April 2004 (Report). The Report concluded that the majority of the appeals panel workload involved writing decisions that simply affirmed the hearing officers' decisions.

The amendments to §§410.201, 410.203 and 410.204 made three changes regarding the appeals panel. First, Labor Code §410.201 was amended to provide that appeals judges, in a three-member panel, shall conduct administrative appeals proceedings. Second, §410.203 was amended to only allow the appeals panel to issue decisions if the appeals panel is reversing or remanding a decision of a hearing officer. The amendment to §410.203 also required the appeals panel to maintain a precedent manual of precedent-establishing decisions. Section 410.203 further notes that the appeals panel may not remand a case more than once. Third, under §410.204, the decision of the hearing officer becomes final after 45 days if the appeals panel has not reversed or remanded the decision of the hearing officer thus eliminating the redundancy of issuing written decisions affirming the hearing officer's decisions.

The Texas Register published text shows words proposed to be added to or deleted from the current text, and should be read to determine all proposed changes.

Proposed amendment of §143.2. Proposed subsection (b) amendments remove the portion of the rule that allows the appeals panel to affirm the decision of the hearing officer, clarify that the appeals panel may reverse the decision of the hearing officer and render a new decision or reverse and remand for a second contested case hearing, and add that the appeals panel may not remand a case more than once. The changes are in accordance with §410.203.

Proposed amendment of §143.3. Proposed subsection (a)(3) adds the word "deemed" to receipt which clarifies that the request for the appeals panel to review the decision of the hearing officer must be filed not later than the 15th day after the deemed receipt of the hearing officer's decision. General rules for written communications to and from the agency are governed by §102.5 of this title (relating to General Rules for Written Communications to and from the Commission). Deemed receipt shall be determined pursuant to §102.5(d). Proposed subsection (a)(3) further clarifies that an untimely request for the appeals panel to review the decision of the hearing officer will not be reviewed, regardless of whether it is filed in the Division's central office or in a Division field office. Proposed subsection (b) removes rule language that requires the Division to attempt to contact the party or parties who will be required to respond to the request for an appeals panel review to determine if a copy of the request for review was served and received by that party; and instead it provides that if it is not clear from the request for review that the party requesting the review has properly served a copy of the request on the other party or parties, the Division will provide a copy of the request to the other party expeditiously. Proposed subsection (d) deletes rule language regarding when the parties are deemed to receive the hearing officer's decision and adds rule language that a request for the appeals panel to review the decision of the hearing officer must be filed not later than the 15th day after the appealing party is deemed to have received the hearing officer's decision. The request is presumed to be timely filed if it is mailed on or before the 15th day and received by the Division not later than the 20th day after deemed receipt.

Proposed amendment of §143.4. Proposed subsection (a)(3) provides that a response to a request for review by the appeals panel must be filed not later than the 15th day after the request is deemed received by the respondent. Proposed subsection (b) removes rule language that requires the Division to attempt to contact the party to determine if a copy of the response was served and received by the other party or parties; and instead it provides that if it is not clear that from the response that the party has properly served a copy of the response on the other party or parties, the Division must provide a copy of the response expeditiously. Proposed subsection (c) removes rule language that a response shall be presumed to be timely served. Proposed subsection (c) also removes rule language that the response may be timely filed with the Division if received by a party other than the Division because the Division has no method of knowing when the other party, listed in subsection (c)(2), actually receives a response; further, the Division does not use the "other party" receipt date to calculate a timely response. Proposed subsection (c) also adds the word "deemed" to receipt.

Proposed amendment of §143.5. Proposed subsection (a) changes the time the appeals panel can take to issue its written decision from not later than the 30th day to the 45th day after the response is filed with the Division. Proposed subsection (b) also lengthens the time at which the hearing officer's decision becomes final by 15 days. If the appeals panel does not issue a decision by the 45th day after the date the response is filed with the Division, the hearing officer's decision becomes final, constitutes the decision of the appeals panel, and, for the purpose of establishing the time for seeking judicial review, is deemed filed with the Division on that day. Proposed subsection (c) requires the appeal panel decisions to be filed with the Division rather than the director of hearings as now required by §410.204(a). Proposed subsection (d) removes rule language that a decision of the appeals panel that is not appealed for judicial review becomes final on the 41st day after the date the decision was filed, or deemed filed with the director of the hearings division, and instead provides for the decision becoming final on the 46th day after the Division mailed the party the decision of the appeals panel. Proposed subsection (d) updates the statutory citation to §410.252 to be consistent with HB 4545 and implements HB 4545 by providing that for purposes of this section, the mailing date is considered to be the fifth day after the decision of the appeals panel was filed with the Division. Proposed subsection (d) also removes rule language stating that failure to comply with a final decision or order within 20 days of its becoming final is a Class A administrative violation, with a penalty not to exceed $10,000 because it is duplicative of statutory provisions. Specific references when there are statutory provisions are unnecessary.

This proposal also replaces all references in §§143.2, 143.3, 143.4, and 143.5 of this title to the "commission" with references to the "division" due to the legislative changes made by HB 7, in abolishing the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission and transferring the powers and duties of that former agency to the Division of Workers' Compensation of the Texas Department of Insurance.

Robert E. Lang, Deputy Commissioner of Hearings, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect there will be minimal fiscal implication on state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering them. There will be no measurable effect on local employment or the local economy as a result of this proposal.

Mr. Lang has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering and enforcing the rules will be more consistency in the dispute resolution process and greater efficiency in the application of workers' compensation laws and agency rules. There will be no effect on individuals as a result of this proposal.

As required by the Government Code §2006.002(c), the Division has determined that the proposal will not have an adverse economic effect on the small and micro-businesses that may be required to comply with the proposed amendments.

The Division has determined that no private real property interests are affected by this proposal and that this proposal does not restrict or limit an owner's right to property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, does not constitute a taking or require a takings impact assessment under the Government Code §2007.043.

To be considered, written comments on the proposal must be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2009. Comments may be submitted via the Internet through the Division's Internet website at http://www.tdi.state.tx.us/rules/proposedrules/index.html or by mailing or delivering your comments to Maria Jimenez, Legal Services, MS-4D, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation, 7551 Metro Center Drive, Suite 100, Austin, Texas 78744.

Any request for a public hearing must be submitted separately to the Office of General Counsel, MS-1, 7551 Metro Center Drive, Austin, Texas 78744 by 5:00 p.m. on August 31, 2009. If a hearing is held, written and oral comments presented at the hearing will be considered.

These amendments are proposed under the Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, 410.201, 410.202, 410.203, 410.204, and 410.252(a). Section 402.00111 provides that the Commissioner shall exercise all executive authority, including rulemaking authority, under the Labor Code and other laws of this state. Section 402.061 provides the Commissioner the authority to adopt rules as necessary to implement and enforce the Texas Workers' Compensation Act. Section 410.201 provides that appeals judges, in a three member panel, shall conduct administrative appeals proceedings. Section 410.202 explains the mechanics of the request for appeal of the decision of a hearing officer, the time frames and the computation of time for both the party that appeals and the party that responds. Section 410.203 specifies that the appeals panel may reverse the decision of the hearing officer and render a new decision or reverse and remand for further consideration and development of evidence, with no more than one remand. Section 410.204 provides that the appeals panel must review each request and issue a written decision on each reversed or remanded case which must be issued not later than the 45th day after the date on which the written response to the request for the appeal is filed with the Division. Section 410.252(a) authorizes a party to seek judicial review by filing suit not later than the 45th day after the date on which the Division mailed the party the decision of the appeals panel. For purposes of this section, the mailing date is considered to be the fifth day after the date the decision of the appeals panel was filed with the Division.

The following statutes are affected by this proposal:

§143.2: Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, and 410.203

§143.3: Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, and 410.202

§143.4: Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, and 410.204

§143.5: Labor Code §§402.00111, 402.061, 410.204, and 410.252(a)

§143.2.Description of the Appeal Proceeding.

(a) To review the decision of the hearing officer, the appeals panel considers the appellant's request, the respondent's response, and the record of the benefit contested case hearing. The parties do not appear in person before the panel.

(b) The appeals panel may:

[(1) affirm the decision of the hearing officer;]

(1) [(2)] reverse the decision of the hearing officer and render a new decision; or

(2) [(3)] reverse the decision of the hearing officer and remand to the hearing officer for a second benefit contested case hearing, which shall be set as provided by §142.18 of this title (relating to Special Provisions for Cases on Remand from the Appeals Panel). The appeals panel may not remand a case more than once.

§143.3.Requesting the Appeals Panel to Review the Decision of the Hearing Officer.

(a) A party to a benefit contested case hearing who is dissatisfied with the decision of the hearing officer may request the appeals panel to review that decision. The request shall:

(1) be in writing;

(2) clearly and concisely rebut each issue in the hearing officer's decision that the appellant wants reviewed, and state the relief the appellant wants granted;

(3) be filed with the Chief Clerk of Proceedings in the division's [commission's] central office in Austin not later than the 15th day after deemed receipt of the hearing officer's decision. Requests that are timely submitted to a division [commission] location other than the Chief Clerk of Proceedings, such as a local field office of the division [commission], will be considered timely filed and forwarded to the division's [commission's] appeals panel for consideration, but this may result in delay in the processing of the request. Untimely requests, regardless of whether they are filed with the Chief Clerk of Proceedings in the division's [ commission's] central office or in a different division field [commission] office, do not invoke the jurisdiction of the appeals panel and will not be reviewed by the appeals panel;

(4) be served on the other party on the same day filed with the division [commission]; and

(5) contain a statement certifying that a copy has been served on the other party or parties in person, mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or transmitted by verifiable means. A certificate in substantially the following form shall be used: "I hereby certify that I have on this ____ day of ____________, _____, served a copy of the attached request for appeal on _______________________________ (state the name of the other party or parties on whom a copy was served) by _______________________________ (state the manner of service)." _______________________________ Signature

(b) If it is not clear from the request for review that the party has properly served a copy of the request on the other party or parties, the [hearings] division will [ shall attempt to contact the other party or parties and, if the contact indicates that the other party or parties have not received a copy of the request,] provide a copy of the request expeditiously.

(c) A party may make a conditional request for review by the appeals panel even if the overall contested case hearing decision is favorable. A timely request that indicates that the filing party seeks consideration only if the opposing party files a request for review will not be treated as a request for review unless an opposing party timely files a request. If an opposing party does file a timely request, the conditional request will be treated as a cross-appeal.

[(d) The commission shall deem that the parties received the hearing officer's decision:]

[(1) five days after the date the commission's letter was mailed to the parties, unless the great weight of evidence indicates otherwise;]

[(2) the first working day after the date the written communication was placed in a carrier's Austin representative box located at the commission's main office in Austin unless the great weight of evidence indicates otherwise;]

[(3) the working day that it was faxed by the commission, if faxed during normal business hours as defined in §102.3(c); otherwise, the next working day after the date faxed; or]

[(4) the working day that it was electronically transmitted by the commission, if transmitted during normal business hours as defined in §102.3(c); otherwise, the next working day after the date electronically transmitted.]

[(e) A request made under this section shall be presumed to be timely filed or timely served if it is:]

[(1) mailed on or before the 15th day after the date of receipt of the hearing officer's decision, as provided in subsection (a) of this section; and]

[(2) received by the commission or other party not later than the 20th day after the date of receipt of the hearing officer's decision.]

(d) [(f)] A request shall be filed not later than the 15th day after the appealing party is deemed to have received the hearing officer's decision. Saturdays and Sundays and holidays listed in [Section] §662.003, Government Code, are not included in the computation of this 15-day period [the time in which a request for an appeal must be filed]. A request made under this section shall be presumed to be timely filed or timely served if it is:

(1) mailed on or before the 15th day after the date of deemed receipt of the hearing officer's decision, as provided in subsection (a) of this section; and

(2) received by the division not later than the 20th day after the date of deemed receipt of the hearing officer's decision.

§143.4.Responding to a Request for Review by the Appeals Panel.

(a) The other party shall respond to the appellant's request. The response shall:

(1) be in writing;

(2) clearly and concisely support each issue in the hearing officer's decision that the appellant has rebutted in the request, and state why the appellant's relief should not be granted;

(3) be filed with the Chief Clerk of Proceedings in the division's [commission's] central office in Austin not later than the 15th day after the request was deemed received by the respondent. Responses that are timely submitted to a division [commission] location other than the Chief Clerk of Proceedings, such as a local field office of the division [ commission], will be considered filed timely and forwarded to the division's [commission's] appeals panel for consideration, but this may result in delay in the processing of the response. Untimely responses, regardless of whether they are filed with the Chief Clerk of Proceedings or in a different division [commission] office, will not be reviewed by the appeals panel;

(4) be served on the appellant on the same day filed with the division [commission]; and

(5) contain a statement certifying that a copy has been served on the other party or parties in person, mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or transmitted by verifiable means. A certificate in substantially the following form shall be used: "I hereby certify that I have on this ____ day of ____________, _____, served a copy of the attached response to a request for appeal on _______________________________ (state the name of the other party or parties on whom a copy was served) by _______________________________ (state the manner of service)." _______________________________ Signature

(b) If it is not clear from the response that the party has properly served a copy of the response on the other party or parties, the [hearings] division shall [attempt to contact the other party or parties and, if the contact indicates that the other party or parties have not received a copy of the response,] provide a copy of the response expeditiously.

(c) A response made under this section shall be presumed to be timely filed [or timely served] if it is:

(1) mailed on or before the 15th day after the date of deemed receipt of the appellant's request, as provided in subsection (a) of this section; and

(2) received by the division [commission or other party] not later than the 20th day after the date of deemed receipt of the appellant's request.

(d) Saturdays and Sundays and holidays listed in [ Section] §662.003, Government Code, are not included in the computation of the time in which a response must be filed.

§143.5.Decision of the Appeals Panel.

(a) Not later than the 45th [30th] day after the date the response was filed with the division [ commission], the appeals panel will issue its written decision, concluding with a separate paragraph stating words to the effect: "The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is (NAME IN BOLD PRINT) and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is (NAME AND ADDRESS IN BOLD PRINT)", and file a copy with the [director of the hearings] division.

(b) If the appeals panel does not issue a written decision by the 45th [30th] day after the date the response was filed with the division [commission], the hearing officer's decision becomes final, constitutes the decision of the appeals panel, and, for the purpose of establishing the time for seeking judicial review, is deemed filed with the [ director of the hearings] division on that day.

(c) Not later than the seventh day after the appeals panel files its decision with the [director of the hearings ] division, or a decision is deemed filed, as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the division shall send to each party a copy of the decision, or a notice that the hearing officer's decision has become final and constitutes the decision of the appeals panel.

(d) A decision of the appeals panel that is not appealed for judicial review, as provided by the Texas Labor Code §410.252 [§410.251 ], et seq., becomes final on the 46th [41st ] day after the division mailed the party the decision of the appeals panel. For purposes of this section the mailing date is considered to be the fifth day after the date the decision of the appeals panel was filed by the division. [date the decision was filed, or deemed filed, with the director of the hearings division. Failure to comply with a final decision or order within 20 days of its becoming final is a Class A administrative violation, with a penalty not to exceed $10,000.]

(e) A decision of the appeals panel that is appealed for judicial review is binding on the parties for the duration of the judicial review.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 20, 2009.

TRD-200902963

Dirk Johnson

General Counsel

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 30, 2009

For further information, please call: (512) 804-4703