TITLE 43.TRANSPORTATION

Part 3. AUTOMOBILE THEFT PREVENTION AUTHORITY

Chapter 57. AUTOMOBILE THEFT PREVENTION AUTHORITY

43 TAC §57.36

The Automobile Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA) proposes amendments to §57.36, concerning the level of funding for projects receiving ATPA grant funds. ATPA has statutory authority to determine funding levels. Proposed changes to subsection (d) include a requirement of a cash match by a grantee in order to receive ATPA funds beginning in the first year of funding by ATPA. Currently, a cash match is required only after the second year of funding. The current maximum levels of funding are not changed, and grantees funded at an 80% level will be able to apply for additional funding if needed. Subsection (e) is amended to require that the cash match must be expended before any ATPA funds are used, beginning in the first year of funding. In this manner, ATPA hopes to encourage a minimal level of self-funding starting with new grantees the first year of funding. Match funding should enable ATPA to spread its funding across more grantees and provide sufficient ATPA funding for successful projects that should be continued at current activity levels or expanded. Other changes in text are proposed for grammar, consistency and format.

Susan Sampson, Director of the ATPA, has determined that for each year of the first five years that the proposed amendments will be in effect, there may be some fiscal implications to state and local governments who are ATPA grantees, as a result of enforcing or administering the amended rule. An actual dollar amount cannot be determined. The fiscal implications for a particular governmental body will be determined by the amount of funds requested by a governmental body above the funding level of the grantee's award and the requirement that the cash match contributions be expended prior to the ATPA funds awarded, for each funding year. It is not anticipated that any mandatory increase or decrease in expenses as result of these proposed amendments will occur since participation by state and local governments is permissive. There will be no other fiscal implications to state government as a result of enforcing or administering the amended rule as proposed.

Ms. Sampson has also determined that, for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect, the public will benefit by sufficient funding from both ATPA and grantees of successful ATPA projects. Additionally, for the same period of time, Ms. Sampson has determined that there is no anticipated economic costs to persons required to comply with the amended rule, except as already explained above in the fiscal implications for governmental bodies who are ATPA grantees. For the same period, there is no anticipated adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses with the amendment as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Susan Sampson, Director, Automobile Theft Prevention Authority, 4000 Jackson Avenue, Austin, Texas 78731, for a period of 30 days following publication in this issue of the Texas Register .

The amendments are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413(37), §6(a). The ATPA interprets §6(a) as authorizing it to adopt rules implementing its statutory powers and duties, which includes determining levels of funding and conditions for ATPA grant projects as part of its plan for providing financial support to combat automobile theft and economic automobile theft as required by §7 and §8 of Article 4413(37).

The following statute is affected by the amendments to §57.36: Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413(37) §§6(a), 7, and 8.

§57.36.Level of Funding for Grant Projects.

(a) Except as provided in subsection [ subsections (d) and ] (f) of this section, the level of ATPA funding for a project may not exceed the following annual rates:

(1) - (2) (No change.)

(b) - (c) (No change.)

(d) A grantee, must contribute a cash match of 20% of the total ATPA award, for each year of funding, in order to be eligible for ATPA funds [ in an 80% funding year, may apply for additional funding above 80% of the second year award if the grantee contributes a cash match of 20% of the total ATPA award ].

(e) A grantee awarded [ additional ] ATPA funds [ as provided in subsection (d) of this section ] must expend its 20% cash contribution prior to the expenditure of any ATPA funds.

(f) A grantee, in an 80% funding year, may apply for additional funding above 80% of the second year award, including [ for costs incurred in conjunction with ] the consolidation of existing grant programs or the inclusion of new agencies in a current grant program.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 7, 2006.

TRD-200601429

Susan Sampson

Director

Automobile Theft Prevention Authority

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 23, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 374-5101