TITLE 37.PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Chapter 1. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION

Subchapter D. PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICIES

37 TAC §1.60

The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) proposes new §1.60, concerning Alleged Abuse or Neglect Investigations. Department of Public Safety officers are occasionally called upon to conduct investigations of possible child abuse which nearly always involve allegations against someone who is not a parent or guardian of the alleged victim. Chapter 261 of the Family Code makes investigations of alleged child abuse or neglect confidential and prohibits the release of both the investigation report and any evidence developed during the investigation to any person if the agency conducting the investigation has not adopted a rule governing release of its report and investigation materials (§261.201). Thus, in some instances, DPS has been prohibited from releasing the results of an investigation to the parent(s) of a child who was allegedly abused by a third party. Adoption of this rule will permit DPS to provide investigation reports and other materials to parents when doing so would not jeopardize the child or any pending criminal case.

Oscar Ybarra, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government, or local economies.

Mr. Ybarra also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to allow parents access to investigation reports and other materials obtained in investigating child abuse cases. There is no anticipated adverse economic effect on individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Pamela Smith, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.

The new section is proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3), which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary for carrying out the department's work; and Family Code, §261.201(a)

Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Family Code, §261.201(a) are affected by this proposal.

§1.60.Alleged Abuse or Neglect Investigations.

A report concerning an investigation of alleged child abuse or neglect, as well as any notes, statements or other documentary evidence gathered during such an investigation that are otherwise confidential pursuant to Chapter 261, Family Code, may be released to the parent or guardian of an alleged victim of abuse or neglect if:

(1) the investigation is complete and no criminal charges are anticipated;

(2) the parent or guardian provides acceptable proof of his/her relationship to the child victim; and

(3) the parent or guardian requesting the report is not the person alleged to have committed the abuse or neglect.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601410

Thomas A. Davis, Jr.

Director

Texas Department of Public Safety

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135


Chapter 4. COMMERCIAL VEHICLE REGULATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES

Subchapter C. COMMERCIAL VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND INSPECTION ENFORCEMENT

37 TAC §4.36

The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes amendments to Chapter 4, Subchapter C, §4.36, concerning Commercial Motor Vehicle Compulsory Inspection Program.

Amendment to §4.36 deletes subsection (g)(6) and is necessary in order to require that certain commercial vehicles transporting passengers and registered in this state must pass an annual inspection of all safety equipment in accordance with recent changes to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.

Oscar Ybarra, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government, or local economies.

Mr. Ybarra also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to ensure to the public greater compliance by motor carriers with all of the statutes and regulations pertaining to the safe operation of commercial vehicles in this state. There will be some economic impact anticipated for individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses as a result of this proposed amendment. Each commercial vehicle that will be required to be inspected under this amendment will be assessed a statutory fee of $50 in accordance with Texas Transportation Code, §548.504 and a statutory fee of $10 under the Texas Emission Reduction Plan in accordance with Texas Transportation Code, §548.5055.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mark Rogers, Major, Texas Highway Patrol Division, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0500, (512) 424-2116.

The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3), which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary for carrying out the department's work; and Texas Transportation Code, §548.002, which authorizes the department to adopt rules to administer and enforce the compulsory inspection of vehicles.

Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §548.002 are affected by this proposal.

§4.36.Commercial Motor Vehicle Compulsory Inspection Program.

(a) - (f) (No change.)

(g) Exceptions to the commercial motor vehicle safety inspection program are:

(1) - (4) (No change.)

(5) the operation of fire trucks and rescue vehicles while involved in emergency and related operations; and

[(6) the private transportation of passengers; and]

(6) [ (7) ] farm vehicles with a gross weight, registered weight, or gross weight rating less than 48,000 pounds (except interstate operation of more than 10,000 pounds).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601411

Thomas A. Davis, Jr.

Director

Texas Department of Public Safety

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135


Chapter 5. CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

Subchapter D. MULTICOUNTY DRUG TASK FORCES

37 TAC §§5.51 - 5.70

The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) proposes new Subchapter D, §§5.51 - 5.70, relating to the implementation of multicounty drug task forces. The new sections are necessary to promulgate the policies and procedures of DPS governing the statewide coordination of multicounty drug task forces.

In the new subchapter, §5.51 provides definitions; §5.52 describes communication with the director; §5.53 provides the telephone number and address of the Narcotics Service; §5.54 describes notification; §5.55 describes the application; §5.56 details who must submit an application; §5.57 describes application rejection; §5.58 describes application denial; §5.59 describes authorization cancellation; §5.60 details requirements; §5.61 describes withdrawal/restrictions or conditions; §5.62 describes written notice; §5.63 describes report to attorney general; §5.64 describes request for meeting; §5.65 describes expiration; §5.66 describes termination; §5.67 describes inspection; §5.68 details what may be inspected; §5.69 describes time limitations; and §5.70 describes interference with inspection.

The new sections are necessary as a result of the passage of Texas House Bill 1239, Acts 2005, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, Chapter 556, §§1 - 4.

Oscar Ybarra, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rules are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government or local economies. There are no estimated reductions in cost to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administrating the rules.

Mr. Ybarra also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rules will be to ensure the high level of effectiveness of statewide multicounty drug task forces. There is no anticipated adverse economic effect on individuals, large businesses, small businesses, or micro- businesses.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to James Brubaker, Narcotics Service, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0430, (512) 424-2150.

The new sections are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.0097, which requires the department to establish policies and procedures for multicounty drug task forces, provides the authority to ensure compliance, and the authority to evaluate each multicounty drug force with respect to whether the task force complies with state and federal requirements including policies and procedures established by the department and demonstrates effective performance outcomes; and Texas Local Government Code, §362.004, which provides that the department confirm the strategic need for the task force and the composition of the task force and that the force comply with the policies and procedures established for the operation of the multicounty drug task force.

Texas Local Government Code, §362.001(3), §362.004, Texas Government Code, §411.0097, and Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 59.06(q) are affected by this proposal.

§5.51.Subchapter Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Department or DPS--The Texas Department of Public Safety.

(2) Director--The Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety or his designee.

(3) Chief--The Chief of the Criminal Law Enforcement Division of the Texas Department of Public Safety or his designee.

(4) Commander--The Commander of the Narcotics Service of the Criminal Law Enforcement Division of the Texas Department of Public Safety or his designee.

(5) Multicounty drug task force ("task force")--has the meaning assigned that term by § 362.001, Local Government Code.

(6) Narcotics Service--The Narcotics Service of the Criminal Law Enforcement Division of the Texas Department of Public Safety.

(7) Impact Area--The service area of the task force which must be comprised of contiguous counties that, by resolution or order of its governing body, have entered into an agreement with a contiguous county to form a mutual aid drug law enforcement task force to cooperate in criminal investigations and law enforcement.

(8) Project Director--The person responsible for the operation of the task force.

(9) Task Force Commander--The person who supervises the day to day operations of the task force. The Task Force Commander will be responsible to the Project Director for the day to day operation of the task force.

§5.52.Communication with Director.

If a person is required or allowed by this subchapter to make a notification, report, or other communication to the director, the person must make the communication in writing to the director through the Commander of the Narcotics Service or his designee at the address indicated below.

§5.53.Telephone Number and Address--Narcotics Service.

To inquire about information and administrative matters with, transmit to, or otherwise contact the Narcotics Service, in general:

(1) the telephone number is: (512) 424-2150;

(2) the fax number is: (512) 424-7166;

(3) the Post Office Box mailing address is: Narcotics Service MSC 0430, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0430;

(4) the physical mailing address is: Narcotics Service MSC 0430, Texas Department of Public Safety, 5805 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78752-4422; and

(5) the email address is: taskforceinfo@txdps.state.tx.us.

§5.54.Notification.

If this subchapter requires a person to notify or advise the director of new or changed information, the person must notify the director through the appropriate DPS unit or person indicated in this subchapter. If this subchapter describes the director followed by a parenthetical reference to a section, service, or other unit of the department, the communication must be made to the director through the referenced section, service, or unit.

§5.55.Application.

(a) Required. A task force required to submit an application under this subchapter must comply with this subchapter.

(b) Form. An applicant must submit a complete application on DPS Form NAR-122 to the director no later than the 1st of August in order to be approved for the annual term beginning September 1 of each year.

Figure: 37 TAC §5.55(b)

(c) Required Information. A person submitting an application under this section must:

(1) identify the drug threat to be addressed in the impact area;

(2) explain the strategic need for addressing the drug threat in the impact area;

(3) describe the composition of the task force, to include the names of the participating agencies and the names, training records, and experience of the individual officers to be assigned to the task force; and

(4) provide any other information necessary to process the application.

§5.56.Who Must Submit an Application.

Any drug task force composed of county or city law enforcement agencies located in two or more counties of this state.

(1) The applicant must be the Project Director who shall submit an application on behalf of the task force.

(2) The Project Director must be the elected District Attorney, the elected Sheriff, or the Chief of Police of a municipal police department located within the proposed impact area.

(3) The Project Director shall ensure that the task force adheres to all requirements contained in the application and in this subchapter.

§5.57.Rejection.

(a) The director may reject an application without further processing if an application, form, or document is incomplete, illegible, or missing.

(b) The director may request additional information necessary to process the application from the applicant and provide a deadline for the submission of the requested information. The director may reject an application without further processing if the requested information is not provided to the director by the deadline.

§5.58.Denial.

The director may deny an application if:

(1) the applicant has not sufficiently articulated and established a strategic need for the task force to specifically address the threat of the impact area;

(2) the composition of the task force has been inadequately disclosed for review of personnel as to their suitability for assignment to the task force or is unacceptable; or

(3) during the previous year, the task force has failed to comply with department rules or has failed to demonstrate effective performance outcomes.

§5.59.Cancellation.

The director may cancel an authorization if the director authorized the application in error.

§5.60.Requirements.

(a) A task force and any personnel assigned to the task force shall comply with the following:

(1) Department policies and procedures in the most current version of the department's task force manual;

(2) State and federal law and requirements;

(3) All provisions of this subchapter; and

(4) Best police practices.

(b) A task force shall demonstrate effective performance outcomes.

(c) A task force shall maintain an acceptable composition.

(d) A task force shall timely, accurately, and completely respond to any request for information, data, or reports by the director.

(e) If the Project Director or any task force personnel change, then the current Project Director shall notify the director within five calendar days after the change. A task force shall have a current Project Director at all times. If the Project Director changes, the current Project Director shall complete and sign the certification section of the application form and submit the certification to the director within five calendar days after the change.

(f) At least twenty-five percent of personnel assigned to the task force shall be randomly tested at least quarterly for drugs by an independent scientific laboratory that meets federal Department of Health and Human Services guidelines for drug/metabolite testing. The Project Director shall provide the director with a copy of the task force's written drug testing policy if requested. The Project Director shall maintain documentation on file evidencing that the above drug testing was conducted. The Project Director shall notify the director of the identity of any employee with a positive drug test and shall take appropriate action as outlined in the applicant agency's policy on providing a drug-free workplace.

(g) The Project Director shall notify the director in writing, within five calendar days of the arrest, of the identity of any personnel that are arrested, the reason for the arrest, and any resulting action taken by the task force.

(h) The Project Director shall notify the director in writing of any lawsuit or pending litigation involving the task force or its personnel no later than five calendar days after receiving notice of any lawsuit or pending litigation.

§5.61.Withdrawal/Restrictions or Conditions.

(a) The director may withdraw an authorization to operate a task force or may place restrictions or conditions on task force operations if the task force fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter.

(b) Except as provided by this subsection, a task force whose authorization has been withdrawn may not apply for authorization to operate until one year after the date a withdrawal of authorization became final. Within that year, the director will not reinstate a task force who has had its authorization to operate withdrawn unless the task force submits a new application and establishes that the facts supporting the withdrawal of authorization have been negated. Even if a reinstatement is authorized to be effective any date other than September 1, the authorization will expire August 31.

§5.62.Written Notice.

The director shall provide written notice to a task force, through the Project Director, of any proposed action or action taken by the department affecting the task force's operations.

§5.63.Report to Attorney General.

(a) A task force may only retain proceeds from forfeitures for the period of time that the task force was authorized by the director.

(b) The director shall report the expiration, withdrawal, denial, or cancellation of a task force's authorization to the attorney general.

(c) The director may report a task force who has had restrictions or conditions placed on task force operations to the attorney general.

§5.64.Request for Meeting.

(a) A Project Director may submit a request for a meeting with the Chief upon denial, cancellation, or withdrawal of authorization.

(b) The request for a meeting, articulating points of contention, must be in writing.

(c) The request shall be addressed to the Chief and must be received by the Chief no later than 15 calendar days after the director mailed its written notice of denial, cancellation, or withdrawal of authorization to the task force.

(d) The request for a meeting may be faxed or mailed to the Chief.

(1) The fax number is: (512) 424-5794.

(2) The P.O. Box mailing address is: Criminal Law Enforcement MSC 0400, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0400.

(3) The physical mailing address is: Criminal Law Enforcement MSC 0400, Texas Department of Public Safety, 6100 Guadalupe, Building E, Room 100, Austin, Texas 78752.

(e) An untimely request for a meeting shall be rejected without further proceedings.

(f) Upon receipt of a timely request for a meeting, the Chief shall schedule a meeting.

(g) The applicant may submit a written response to the Chief, articulating points of contention and rebutting findings by the department, on or before the scheduled meeting date in lieu of attending the meeting in person.

(h) The Chief shall decide whether to uphold or modify the denial, cancellation, or withdrawal of authorization.

(i) The Chief's decision shall be final and not subject to appeal.

(j) If there is no request for a meeting or an untimely request for a meeting, then the denial, cancellation, or withdrawal is final on the 16th calendar day after the director mailed its written notice of denial, cancellation, or withdrawal of authorization to the task force and is not subject to further appeal.

§5.65.Annual Expiration.

A task force authorization expires on the 31st of August of each year. After expiration, the prior authorization provides the task force with no authority to continue to operate as a multicounty drug task force.

§5.66.Termination.

(a) When. An authorization terminates:

(1) after expiration under this subchapter;

(2) when a task force voluntary discontinues operations;

(3) when a withdrawal, cancellation, or denial of authorization is final; or

(4) at the end of the period of authorization.

(b) New application required. After termination, an applicant must apply for a new authorization to operate a task force.

(c) Effect of termination. After termination, the prior authorization provides the task force with no authority to operate as a multicounty drug task force.

(d) Discontinued activity. On the day a task force discontinues operations, the Project Director must notify the director in writing by close of business. The director shall immediately terminate the task force's authorization to operate.

§5.67.Inspection.

The director or a member of the department may inspect any aspect of the task force operation to ensure compliance with applicable law and regulation, state and federal requirements, and policies and procedures established by the department.

§5.68.What May Be Inspected.

The director or a member of the department may examine, audit, inspect and copy:

(1) a record, report, or other document created or maintained pursuant to the operation of the task force; and

(2) administrative information relating to the collection of statistical information.

§5.69.Time Limitations.

The director or a member of the department may enter the offices maintained by the task force at a reasonable time, including:

(1) normal business hours; or

(2) at another time when the task force offices are occupied or open.

§5.70.Interference with Inspection.

No individual in charge of a premise, item, or record covered by this subchapter may refuse or interfere with any of the following activities related to the inspection:

(1) entry to the premises;

(2) examination, audit, or inspection or records; or

(3) copying a record or related document.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601412

Thomas A. Davis, Jr.

Director

Texas Department of Public Safety

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135


Chapter 15. DRIVER LICENSE RULES

Subchapter D. DRIVER IMPROVEMENT

37 TAC §15.89

The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes amendments to §15.89, concerning Driver Improvement.

The proposed amendments serve to clarify that all endorsement violations, including a Commercial Driver License (CDL) endorsement violation, will be assessed a specific surcharge and not assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program. Additionally, the proposed amendments will remove superfluous language from the list that makes reference to four non-traffic violations. Finally, the proposed amendments are needed in light of the passage of House Bill 183 during the 79th Legislature, Regular Session. House Bill 183 amended Texas Transportation Code, §708.052 to make an offense under §545.412, relating to child safety seats, a moving violation of traffic law and subject to a surcharge.

Chapter 708 of the Transportation Code grants the department the authority to adopt rules to implement the Driver Responsibility Program (DRP). This program was initially created during the 78th Legislative Session (2003) and requires the department to assess fees based on an individual's driver history. DRP has two major components, a point system and a conviction surcharge system. The point system is based on the accumulation of Class C traffic offenses. An individual receives two points for each traffic conviction and three points if the offense resulted in a crash. The conviction surcharge system is based on a one-time conviction of certain more serious traffic offenses. The program requires the individual to pay the fee, ranging from $100 to $2000 every year for three years.

Oscar Ybarra, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government or local economies.

Mr. Ybarra also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be current and updated rules. There is no anticipated economic effect on individuals, small businesses, or micro-businesses.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Claire McGuinness, Senior Staff Attorney, Driver License Division, Texas Department of Public Safety, P.O. Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773- 0300, (512) 424-5231, (512) 424-7171 (fax).

The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3), which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary for carrying out the department's work; and Texas Transportation Code, §708.002.

Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §708.002 are affected by this proposal.

§15.89.Moving Violations.

(a) Moving violations are defined as an act committed in connection with the operation of a motor vehicle on a public street or highway, which constitutes a hazard to traffic and is prohibited by state law or city ordinance.

(b) A list of traffic offenses that constitute a moving violation is available in Table 1.

Figure: 37 TAC §15.89(b)

(c) Table 1 also indicates the moving violations that will be assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program, Texas Transportation Code (TRC), Chapter 708, Subchapter B.

(1) Not all moving violations are assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program, however, they may be considered for Habitual Violator action under TRC, §521.292(a)(3).

(2) Moving violation convictions that are assessed specific surcharges pursuant to Texas Transportation Code, §§708.102 (intoxicated driver offenses), 708.103 (driving while license invalid or without financial responsibility), and 708.104 (driving without valid license including no commercial driver license, driving without the proper commercial license endorsement and driving without the proper motorcycle endorsement), will not be assessed points under the Driver Responsibility Program.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601413

Thomas A. Davis, Jr.

Director

Texas Department of Public Safety

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135