TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 6. TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

Chapter 133. LICENSING

Subchapter B. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSES

22 TAC §133.11

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §133.11, relating to Types of Licenses. The proposed amendment will clarify the requirements for comity licensure under NAFTA.

The proposed rule change limits licensure via the NAFTA agreement to applicants that are citizens of Canada or Mexico and are licensed in good standing in their home jurisdiction. The proposed rule change also clarifies language regarding comity licensure and removes references to reciprocal licensure.

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is better protection from unqualified engineers and applicants that are not eligible via the NAFTA agreement.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§133.11.Types of Licenses.

The board shall receive, evaluate and process all applications for licensure as a professional engineer received from individuals who assert through the application process that they meet the minimum requirements of §1001.302 of the Act. The board shall deny a license to any applicant found not to have met all requirements of the Act and board rules.

(1) Standard License. Unless requested by the applicant or license holder, all licenses issued by the board shall be considered standard licenses. Standard licenses are fully renewable annually until such time as the board takes specific action to prevent renewal or provision of the Texas Engineering Practice Act prevents renewal.

(2) Reciprocal [ or Comity ] License[ : (U.S. states or territories). Pursuant to §1001.311 of the Act, the board has reviewed the licensing requirements of the jurisdictions listed in this paragraph and has found them to be substantially equivalent to the requirements in Texas. The board shall waive the application requirements of §133.21 for an applicant who is licensed in good standing with at least one of the jurisdictions listed in this paragraph and submits the documentation as required in §133.27(a) of this chapter. A reciprocal or comity license issued under this paragraph has full status of and shall be issued as a standard license ]. The board does not recognize any jurisdiction [ U.S. state or territory ] for reciprocity [ or comity ] at this time.

(3) [ Reciprocal or ] Comity License: (Canada and the United Mexican States through NAFTA). Pursuant to §1001.311 of the Act and the NAFTA Mutual Recognition Agreement, the board has reviewed the licensing requirements of Canada and the United Mexican States and has found them to be substantially equivalent to the requirements in Texas. A [ reciprocal or ] comity license issued under this paragraph has full status of and shall be issued as a temporary license. The board may waive the application requirements of §133.21 for applicants who:

(A) are citizens of Canada or the United Mexican States;

(B) [ (A) ] are currently licensed in good standing with at least one of the jurisdictions of Canada or the United Mexican States [ listed in this paragraph ];

(C) [ (B) ] meet the experience requirements of §133.69 (c) of this chapter; and

(D) [ (C) ] submit the documentation as required in §133.27 (a) [ (b) ] of this chapter.

(4) Temporary License. A temporary license holder shall be subject to all other rules and legal requirements to which a holder of a standard license is subject. A temporary license may only be renewed twice. The executive director shall be authorized to convert a standard license to a temporary license.

(5) Provisional. The Board does not issue provisional licenses at this time.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601398

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Subchapter C. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

22 TAC §133.25

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §133.25, relating to Applications from Engineering Educators. The rule proposal is a clarification of the requirements for application for licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations.

The proposed rule change clarifies language regarding licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations for Engineering Educators. The proposed rule change reorganizes current rule language in conjunction with proposed rule changes to §133.43 and §133.69 (published elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register ).

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is clarification of the licensure process.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§133.25.Applications from Engineering Educators.

(a) Persons who are engineering educators instructing engineering courses in an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as defined in the Education Code §61.003[ , and who began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001, ] are permitted to seek licensure utilizing an alternate application.

(b) The minimum educational qualifications are as follows:

(1) Earned doctoral degree in[ : ]

[ (A) ] engineering from a college or university that offers an undergraduate or master's degree program in a related branch of engineering that is approved by the EAC/ABET as published in the current version of the ABET Accreditation Yearbook and or the current version of the ABET International Yearbook or as published in the yearbook applicable to a previous year in which the applicant graduated; or

(2) [ (B) ] Earned doctoral degree in engineering or another related field of science or mathematics assessed and approved by the board . [ ; ]

[ (2) To request a waiver of the fundamentals of engineering and principles and practice of engineering examinations, the applicant must meet the experience requirements of §133.69(d), consisting of: ]

[ (A) teaching experience in an EAC/ABET-approved program, or ]

[ (B) other acceptable, creditable engineering experience, including, but not limited to, scholarly activity such as publishing papers in technical and professional journals; making technical and professional presentations; publishing books and monographs; performing sponsored research; reporting on research conducted for sponsors; supervising research of undergraduate and graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, or other employees; providing counseling, guidance, and advisement for engineering students; and performing certain other types of formal or informal functions in higher education; or ]

[ (C) a combination of teaching and acceptable, creditable engineering experience. ]

(c) [ (b) ] An engineering educator, applying under the alternate process, shall submit:

(1) an alternate application form;

(2) a supplementary experience record:

(A) For the faculty approved for promotion or tenure through the Dean of Engineering office level, submit a dossier (comprehensive resume or curriculum vitae) prepared for tenure and/or promotion consideration, OR, for tenured faculty, current resume containing educational experience, engineering courses taught, and description of research and scholarly activities in lieu of the supplementary experience record;

(B) For non-tenured faculty, a standard supplementary experience record with courses taught and/or other engineering experience shall be submitted;

(3) reference statements or letters from currently licensed professional engineers who have personal knowledge of the applicant's teaching and/or other creditable engineering experience. A reference provider may, in lieu of the reference statement, submit a letter of recommendation that, at a minimum, testifies to the credentials and abilities of the educator. The reference statements or letters of recommendation can be from colleagues within the department, college, or university; from colleagues from another university; or professional engineers from outside academia;

(4) college/university transcripts;

(5) a completed Texas Professional Conduct and Ethics Examination;

(6) current application fee as established by the board;

(7) verification of passage of examination(s) from other jurisdictions as required under §133.61(g) (relating to Engineering Examinations), if applicable; and

(8) written requests for waivers of the examinations on the fundamentals and/or principles and practices of engineering, if applicable.

(d) [ (c) ] Once an alternative application from an engineering educator is received, the board will follow the procedures in §133.85 of this chapter (relating to Board Review of and Action on Applications) to review and approve or deny the application.

(e) [ (d) ] This section does not prohibit any engineering educator from applying for licensure under the standard application process.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601399

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


22 TAC §133.27

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §133.27, relating to Application for Reciprocal or Comity License. The proposed amendment will change the name of the section and will clarify the requirements for application for comity licensure under NAFTA.

The proposed rule change clarifies language regarding comity licensure and removes references to reciprocal licensure.

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is better protection from unqualified engineers and applicants that are not eligible via the NAFTA agreement.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§133.27.Application for [ Reciprocal or ] Comity License.

[ (a) The applicant applying for a reciprocal or comity license from a U.S. state or territory shall: ]

[ (1) submit a reciprocal or comity application form, ]

[ (2) pay the application fee established by the Board, ]

[ (3) submit a completed Texas Engineering Professional Conduct and Ethics examination, and ]

[ (4) submit a verification of a license in good standing from one of the jurisdictions listed in §133.11(2) of this chapter (relating to Types of Licenses). ]

(a) [ (b) ] The applicant applying for a [ reciprocal or ] comity license from Canada or the United Mexican States shall:

(1) submit a NAFTA [ reciprocal or ] comity application form;

(2) proof of educational credentials pursuant to §133.33 or §133.35 (relating to Proof of Educational Qualifications) including:

(A) official transcript(s) of qualifying degree(s), and

(B) commercial evaluation(s) of a non-accredited or non-approved degree(s), as applicable;

(3) supplementary experience record as required under §133.41 (relating to Supplementary Experience Records);

(4) reference statements as required under §133.51(a)(3) and §133.53 of this chapter,

(5) passing scores of TOEFL and TSE as described in §133.21(c) of this chapter;

(6) a statement describing criminal convictions, if any, together with copies of any court orders or other legal documentation concerning the criminal charges and the resolution of those charges;

(7) a statement describing any engineering practice violations, if any, together with documentation from the jurisdictional authority describing the resolution of those charges,

(8) submit a completed Texas Engineering Professional Conduct and Ethics examination,

(9) pay the application fee established by the Board; and

(10) submit a verification of a license in good standing from one of the jurisdictions listed in §133.11(3) of this chapter (relating to Types of Licenses).

(b) [ (c) ] Upon receipt of the application and verification of a license in good standing, the board may issue to the applicant a temporary license [ the appropriate license type ] as described under §133.11 of this chapter, unless the application requires further review under §133.83 of this chapter (relating to Staff Review, Evaluation and Processing of Applications) or §133.85 of this chapter (relating Board Review of and Action on Applications). For those applications requiring further Board review, the Board may request additional information to clarify an application, as needed. Pursuant to §1001.453 of the Act, the Board may review the license holders status and take action if the license was obtained by fraud or error or the license holder may pose a threat to the public's health, safety, or welfare.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601400

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Subchapter E. EXPERIENCE

22 TAC §133.43

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §133.43, relating to Experience Evaluation. The rule proposal is a clarification of the requirements for application for licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations.

The proposed rule change clarifies language regarding licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations for Engineering Educators. The proposed rule change reorganizes current rule language in conjunction with proposed rule changes to §133.25 and §133.69 (published elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register ).

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is clarification of the licensure process.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§133.43.Experience Evaluation.

(a) The board shall evaluate the nature and quality of the experience found in the supplementary experience record and shall determine if the work is satisfactory to the board for the purpose of issuing a license to the applicant. The board shall evaluate the supplementary experience record for evidence of the applicant's competency to be placed in responsible charge of engineering work of a similar character.

(1) Engineering work shall be satisfactory to the board and, therefore, considered by the board to be creditable engineering experience for the purpose of licensure if it is of such a nature that its adequate performance requires engineering education, training, or experience. The application of engineering education, training and experience must be demonstrated through the application of the mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. Such work must be fully described in the supplementary experience record. Satisfactory engineering experience shall include an acceptable combination of design, analysis, implementation, and/or communication experience, including the following types of engineering activities:

(A) design, conceptual design, or conceptual design coordination for engineering works, products or systems;

(B) development or optimization of plans and specifications for engineering works, products, or systems;

(C) analysis, consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning or other related services for engineering works, products, or systems;

(D) planning the use or alteration of land, water, or other resources;

(E) engineering for program management and for development of operating and maintenance manuals;

(F) engineering for construction, or review of construction;

(G) performance of engineering surveys, studies, or mapping;

(H) engineering for materials testing and evaluation;

(I) expert engineering testimony;

(J) any other work of a mechanical, electrical, electronic, chemical, hydraulic, pneumatic, geotechnical, or thermal nature that requires engineering education, training or experience for its adequate performance; and

(K) the teaching of engineering subjects by a person who began teaching prior to September 1, 2001.

(2) In the review of engineering experience, the board shall consider additional elements unique to the history of the applicant. Such elements should include, at a minimum:

(A) whether the experience was sufficiently complex and diverse, and of an increasing standard of quality and responsibility;

(B) whether the quality of the engineering work shows minimum technical competency;

(C) whether the submitted materials indicate good character and reputation;

(D) whether the experience was gained in accordance with the provisions of the Act;

(E) whether the experience was gained in one dominant branch;

(F) whether non-traditional engineering experience such as sales or military service provides sufficient depth of practice;

(G) whether short engagements have had an impact upon professional growth; and

(H) experience gained in relation to or concurrent with the applicant's education. Experience claimed prior to an applicant's receiving a conferred degree must:

(i) be substantiated in the supplementary experience record;

(ii) be accounted for proportionally to a standard 40-hour work week, if it was part-time employment; and

(iii) reflect that, at the time the experience was gained, the applicant:

(I) had successfully passed junior and senior level engineering courses and applied that engineering and knowledge in the claimed experience; or

(II) received sufficient education and training under the supervision of an engineer.

(3) Engineering experience may be considered satisfactory for the purpose of licensing provided that:

(A) the experience is gained during an engagement longer than three months in duration;

(B) the experience, when taken as a whole, meets the minimum time;

(C) the experience is not anticipated and has actually been gained at the time of application;

(D) the experience includes at least two years of experience in the United States, not including time claimed for educational credit, or otherwise includes experience that would show a familiarity with US codes and engineering practice;

(E) the time granted for the experience claimed does not exceed the calendar time available for the periods of employment claimed.

(b) One year of experience credit may be granted for each post-baccalaureate engineering degree earned by an applicant, provided:

(1) the applicant has a baccalaureate degree in engineering; and

(2) the post-baccalaureate degree is from an engineering program where either the graduate or undergraduate degree in the same discipline is accredited or approved by one of the organizations listed in §133.31(a)(1) of this chapter (concerning Educational Requirements for Applicants). Experience credit for all post-baccalaureate degrees is limited to a total of two years.

(c) Engineering Educators applying for a waiver of examinations under §133.69 of this chapter (relating to Waiver of Examinations) will not receive additional experience credit pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.

(d) [ (c) ] Experience gained in conjunction with or in relation to earning a post-baccalaureate degree, such as research or teaching assistant work, will not be credited in addition to experience credited pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.

(e) For Engineering Educator applicants applying under §133.25 of this chapter (relating to Applications from Engineering Educators), other acceptable creditable engineering experience may include, but is not limited to, scholarly activity such as publishing papers in technical and professional journals; making technical and professional presentations; publishing books and monographs; performing sponsored research; reporting on research conducted for sponsors; supervising research of undergraduate and graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, or other employees; providing counseling, guidance, and advisement for engineering students; and performing certain other types of formal or informal functions in higher education.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601401

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Subchapter G. EXAMINATIONS

22 TAC §133.69

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §133.69, relating to Waiver of Examinations. The rule proposal is a clarification of the requirements for application for licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations.

The proposed rule change clarifies language regarding licensure via a waiver of one or more examinations. The proposed rule change reorganizes current rule language in conjunction with proposed rule changes to §133.25 and §133.43 (published elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register ).

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is clarification of the licensure process.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§133.69.Waiver of Examinations.

(a) Examinations are considered an integral part of the licensing process; all applicants are expected to have passed the examinations or to offer sufficient evidence of their qualifications in the absence of passage of the examinations. The board may waive one or both of the examinations [ examination ] on the fundamentals of engineering or [ examination on ] the principles and practice of engineering for applicants who:

(1) do not pose a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare;

(2) request a waiver in writing at the time the application is filed; and

(3) meet the requirements of subsections (b)[ , ] or (c)[ , or (d) ] of this section.

(b) Waiver of Fundamentals of Engineering Examination. Applications for a waiver of the fundamentals of engineering examination will only be accepted from persons who meet the requirements of paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection.

(1) Standard Application:

(A) meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(A) of the Act and have eight or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation); or

(B) meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(B) of the Act and have twelve or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter.

(2) Engineering Educator: meet the requirements of §133.25(a) and (b) of this chapter (relating to Applications from Engineering Educators.

(c) Waiver of Principles and Practice of Engineering Examination. Applications for a waiver of the principles and practice of engineering examination will only be accepted from persons who meet the requirements of paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection.

(1) Currently Licensed in Another Jurisdiction: Be currently licensed and in good standing in any U.S. state or territory, Canada, or the United Mexican States, and:

(A) meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(A) of the Act and have 12 or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter; or

(B) meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(B) of the Act and have 16 or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter;

(2) Engineering Educator:

(A) meet the requirements of §133.25(a) and §133.25(b)(1) of this chapter and have:

(i) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least six years and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001;

(ii) at least six years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or

(iii) at least four years of creditable engineering experience , as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter; or

(B) meet the requirements of §133.25(a) and §133.25(b)(2) of this chapter and have:

(i) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least eight years and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001;

(ii) at least eight years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or

(iii) at least six years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter.

(d) An applicant is not eligible to request a waiver of the examination on the fundamentals of engineering if the applicant has taken and failed any examination on the fundamentals of engineering within the previous two years.

[ (b) Persons requesting a waiver of the fundamentals of engineering examination must meet one of the following requirements: ]

[ (1) have 8 or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation), and meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(A) of the Act; or ]

[ (2) have 12 years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation), and meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(B) of the Act; or ]

[ (3) have a Ph.D. degree in engineering from a college or university having an undergraduate or master's degree program in a related branch of engineering that is accredited or approved by EAC/ABET, and have: ]

[ (A) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least four years and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (B) at least four years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (C) at least four years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation). ]

[ (4) have a Ph.D. degree in engineering not qualifying under subsection (b)(3) of this section or other related field of science or mathematics that is individually assessed and approved by the board during the evaluation process, and have: ]

[ (A) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least six years and who began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (B) at least six years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience and who began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (C) at least six years of creditable engineering experience as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation). ]

[ (5) Persons who meet the requirements to apply for licensure as an Engineering Educator under §133.25(a)(1) of this chapter (relating to Applications from Engineering Educators) and who are requesting a waiver of the fundamentals of engineering examination and permission to take the principles and practice of engineering examination may be granted the waiver with no minimum experience requirement. ]

[ (c) Persons currently licensed and in good standing in any U.S. state or territory, Canada, or the United Mexican States, and requesting a waiver of the principles and practice of engineering or a waiver of both the fundamentals of engineering examination and the principles and practice of engineering examination must meet one of the following requirements: ]

[ (1) have 12 or more years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation), and meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(A) of the Act; or ]

[ (2) have 16 years of creditable engineering experience, as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation), and meet the educational requirements of §1001.302(a)(1)(B) of the Act. ]

[ (d) Persons who meet the requirements to apply for licensure as an Engineering Educator under §133.25(a)(1) of this chapter and who are requesting a waiver of the principles and practice of engineering or a waiver of both the fundamentals of engineering examination and the principles and practice of engineering examination must meet one of the following requirements: ]

[ (1) have a Ph.D. degree in engineering from a college or university having an undergraduate or master's degree program in a related branch of engineering that is accredited or approved by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET (EAC/ABET), and have: ]

[ (A) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least four years and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (B) at least four years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience and began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (C) at least four years of creditable engineering experience , as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation). ]

[ (2) have a Ph.D. degree in engineering not qualifying under subsection (d)(1) of this section or other related field of science or mathematics that is individually assessed and approved by the board during the evaluation process, and have: ]

[ (A) taught in an EAC/ABET-accredited or -approved program for at least six years and who began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (B) at least six years of experience consisting of a combination of EAC/ABET teaching experience or other creditable engineering experience and who began teaching engineering prior to September 1, 2001; or ]

[ (C) at least six years of creditable engineering experience as evaluated by the board under §133.43 of this chapter (relating to Experience Evaluation). ]

(e) An applicant is not eligible to request a waiver of the examination on the principles and practice of engineering if the applicant has taken and failed any examination on the principles and practice of engineering within the previous four years.

(f) Applicants requesting a waiver from any examination(s) shall file any additional information needed to substantiate the eligibility for the waiver with the application, as provided in §133.51 of this chapter (relating to Reference Providers), and §133.52 of this chapter (relating to Reference Statements). The board shall review all elements of the application to evaluate waiver request(s) and may grant a waiver(s) to qualified applicants.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601402

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Chapter 137. COMPLIANCE AND PROFESSIONALISM

Subchapter D. FIRM, SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AND GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY COMPLIANCE

22 TAC §137.77

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes an amendment to §137.77, relating to Firm Registration Compliance. The proposed amendment will remove the 30-day amnesty period for firm registration.

The proposed rule change removes the 30-day amnesty period for firm registration, requiring all firms offering engineering services to the public to be registered with the Board prior to offering those services or using the word "engineering" in their name.

Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended. Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. Because the number of violations in any period is unknown, the specific impact on individuals required to comply with the proposed amendment cannot be assessed. However, more firms will be subject to possible enforcement action, including an administrative penalty, since the 30-day amnesty period will no longer be available. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment is better protection from unqualified and unregistered engineering firms.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§137.77.Firm Registration Compliance.

(a) Any firm, sole-proprietorship, partnership, association, corporation, or other business entity shall not offer or perform engineering services to the public unless registered with the board pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 135 (Relating to Firms and Sole Proprietorships) of this title.

(b) Any firm, sole-proprietorship, partnership, association, corporation, or other business entity shall provide that at least one full-time active license holder is employed with the entity and that the active license holder performs or directly supervises all engineering work and activities that require a license that is performed in the primary, branch, remote, or project office(s).

(c) An active license holder who is a sole proprietor shall satisfy the requirement of the regular, full-time employee.

(d) No engineering services are to be offered to or performed for the public in Texas by a firm while that firm does not have a current certificate of registration.

[ (e) Pursuant to §1001.405(g) of the Act, a business entity that offers or is engaged in the practice of engineering in Texas and is found to not be registered with the board shall register with the board pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 135 of this title within 30 days of written notice from the board. ]

(e) [ (f) ] A business entity that offers or is engaged in the practice of engineering in Texas and is not registered with the board [ that fails to comply with subsection (e) of this section ] or [ that ] has previously been registered with the board and whose registration has expired shall be considered to be in violation of the Act and board rules and will be subject to administrative penalties as set forth in §§1001.501-508 of the Act and §139.35 of this title (relating to Penalties and Sanctions).

(f) [ (g) ] The board may revoke a certificate of registration that was obtained in violation of the Act and/or board rules including, but not limited to, fraudulent or misleading information submitted in the application or lack of employee relationship with the designated professional engineer for the firm.

(g) [ (h) ] If a firm has notified the board that it is no longer offering or performing engineer services to the public, including the absence of a regular, full-time employee who is an active professional engineer licensed in Texas, the certificate of registration record will be placed in inactive status until the board is notified of resumed offering and services. If firm certificate of registration is inactive, the certificate of registration will expire under the same requirements of subsections (e) [ and (f) ] of this section unless renewed.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006.

TRD-200601403

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Part 14. TEXAS OPTOMETRY BOARD

Chapter 279. INTERPRETATIONS

22 TAC §279.6

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Optometry Board or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The Texas Optometry Board proposes the repeal of §279.6. The agency has incorporated the text of the repealed rule in §279.2 (30 TexReg 8099), pursuant to the provisions of House Bill 1025, 79th Legislature, Regular Session.

Chris Kloeris, executive director of the Texas Optometry Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed repeal of the rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state and local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Chris Kloeris also has determined that for each of the first five years the proposed repeal of the rule is in effect, the public benefits anticipated is that it will be easier for the licensees and public to access and determine all the requirements for the release and verification of a contact lens prescription. It has also been determined that the proposed repeal will not impose any additional costs on persons required to comply with the rule. The proposed repeal does not impose any new duties on small and micro businesses, and no adverse economic effect on small or micro businesses is forecast.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Chris Kloeris, Executive Director, Texas Optometry Board, 333 Guadalupe Street, Suite 2-420, Austin, Texas 78701-3942. The deadline for furnishing comments is thirty days after publication in the Texas Register .

The repeal is proposed under the Texas Optometry Act, Texas Occupations Code, §351.151, and the Contact Lens Prescription Act, Texas Occupations Code, §§353.002, 353.005, 353.1015, 353.101, 353.104, 353.152, 353.156, 353.158 and 353.204 as amended or added by House Bill 1025, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, and federal law, 15 U.S.C. Sections 7601 - 7610.

No other sections are affected by this repeal.

The Texas Optometry Board interprets §351.151 as authorizing the adoption of procedural and substantive rules for the regulation of the optometric profession. The Board interprets House Bill 1025 to require licensees to issue contact lens prescriptions at the completion of a contact lens exam and to verify prescriptions when requested by a dispenser authorized by the patient to obtain the verification, and requires the agency to adopt rules. Section 353.204 authorizes the agency to discipline optometrists and therapeutic optometrists for violations of the Contact Lens Prescription Act. The agency interprets the requirements of 15 U.S.C. Sections 7601 - 7610 to be similar to the requirements of House Bill 1025.

§279.6.Interpretation of Requirements of Federal Contact Lens Prescription Law.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 3, 2006.

TRD-200601394

Chris Kloeris

Executive Director

Texas Optometry Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 16, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 305-8502