TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 7. STATE COMMITTEE OF EXAMINERS IN THE FITTING AND DISPENSING OF HEARING INSTRUMENTS

Chapter 141. FITTING AND DISPENSING OF HEARING INSTRUMENTS

22 TAC §§141.1 - 141.24

The State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments (committee) adopts amendments to §§141.1 - 141.24, concerning the licensure and regulation of hearing instrument fitters and dispensers. Amendments to §141.2 and §141.16 are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the January 13, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 222). Amendments to §§141.1, 141.3 - 141.15, and 141.17 - 141.24 are adopted without changes, and the sections will not be republished.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Government Code, §2001.039, requires that each state agency review and consider for readoption each rule adopted by that agency pursuant to the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act). Sections 141.1 - 141.24 have been reviewed and the committee has determined that the reasons for adopting the sections continue to exist because rules relating to the licensure and regulation of hearing instrument fitters and dispensers are needed in order to protect and promote public health, safety, and welfare.

The amendments are the result of the comprehensive rule review undertaken by the committee and the committee's staff. In general, each section was reviewed and amended in order to ensure clarity; to ensure that the rules reflect current legal, policy, and operational considerations; to ensure accuracy; to improve draftsmanship; and to make the rules more accessible, understandable, and usable, to the extent possible.

SECTION BY SECTION SUMMARY

The amendments to §§141.1, 141.4 - 141.6, 141.9, 141.10, 141.12, 141.19, 141.20, 141.23, and 141.24 improve draftsmanship; delete obsolete language; and reflect current operating procedures.

Amendments to §141.2 reflect changes in terminology from "Certification of testing equipment" to "Certification, proof of" adding the definition as a means to clarify the intent of the rules; and modify the definition of "department" to reflect the current name of the agency.

Amendments to §141.3 are adopted to clarify the purpose of each standing subcommittee; to clarify that the executive director is the custodian of the committee's records; to correct inaccurate language; and to improve draftsmanship.

Amendments to §141.7 are adopted to reflect current operating procedure; to eliminate references to requiring notarization of documents; to improve draftsmanship; and to delete unnecessary language.

Amendments to §141.8 are adopted to eliminate references to requiring notarization of documents and to improve draftsmanship.

The amendment to §141.11 is adopted to eliminate the option of filing a cash deposit with the committee. A deposit or negotiable security may not be in cash.

Amendments to §141.13 are adopted to delete unnecessary language; to improve draftsmanship; to reflect two-year license terms; to provide for electronic license renewal forms; to clarify that certification of testing equipment and continuing education documentation shall be submitted only if selected for audit; and to require that licensees maintain continuing education and certification of testing equipment documentation for a period of three years.

Amendments to §141.14 are adopted to delete unnecessary language; to update language relating to two year license terms; to move language relating to credit for publications to a more appropriate subsection; and to clarify expectations regarding the submission of continuing education documentation at the time of audit. The amendment to §141.14(b)(3) provides for the acceptance of no more than 5 contact hours annually of online continuing education courses and manufacturer continuing education courses.

Amendments to §141.15(d) are adopted to require that a person who fails the examination must repeat the hours of direct supervision required for the sections that were failed and to eliminate the requirement that a person may only take the examination three times.

Amendments to §141.16 are adopted to improve draftsmanship; to delete unnecessary language; to require that it is the responsibility of the owner of the dispensing practice to maintain client records; to reduce the time period for maintaining records from five to three years after the latest date of fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments; and to clarify standards for audiometric testing devices and submission of proof of certification of testing equipment.

Amendments to §141.17 are adopted to improve draftsmanship; to delete unnecessary language; to update language to reflect current legal, policy, and operational considerations; to clarify that all disciplinary action and license or application denial proposals shall be followed by written notice of violation and option for formal hearing; to provide that the executive director may accept a complaint that is not on the official form; and to set out procedures relating to the surrender of a license after a complaint has been filed.

Amendments to §141.18 are adopted to improve draftsmanship and clarify the section's purpose.

Amendments to §141.21 are adopted to delete unnecessary language and update the section title to accurately reflect its contents.

Amendments to §141.22 are adopted to delete unnecessary language, to improve draftsmanship, to clarify the prohibition on sexual activity with clients, and to require compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

COMMENTS

The department, on behalf of the commission, has reviewed the prepared responses to verbal and written comments received during the comment period regarding the rule amendments, which the commission has reviewed and accepts. Why is this necessary? The legal authority to review and respond to comments lies with the committee not the agency or the commission. A total of 519 comments were received in the form of letters, signatures on petitions, and signatures on form letters. Of those, 518 commenters were individuals or businesses. One commenter was Texas Hearing Aid Association. Commenters were generally neutral or in favor of the rule proposal as a whole, but expressed concerns, asked questions, and made recommendations. Some commenters did express opposition to specific provisions, as described in this preamble.

Comment: Regarding §141.2(7), one commenter noted that the committee proposed a definition of "certification of testing equipment" but that phrase does not appear in the rules. The commenter rightly noted that the new definition was proposed based on the amendment to §141.16(f)(2) which refers to "proof of certification." The commenter recommends that "certification of testing equipment" be replaced with "proof of certification."

Response: The committee agreed. In the interest of maintaining alphabetical order within the definitions, the committee has replaced "certification of testing equipment" with "certification, proof of".

Comment: Regarding §141.2(22), one commenter recommended that the committee add language to the definition of "sell or sale" that the commenter believes would clarify that licensed dispensers from other states may sell hearing instruments by mail order to Texas customers. Additionally, 413 persons signed and mailed to the committee form letters endorsing this recommendation.

Response: The committee engaged in significant dialogue with the commenter and disagreed with the commenter's recommendation. Section 141.2(22) was not proposed for modification. The committee also notes that the language of the statute in Texas Occupations Code, §402.451(a)(7), appears to prohibit the sale of a hearing instrument by mail. As a means to clarify this topic, the committee will seek an opinion from the office of the Attorney General regarding the applicability of Texas Occupations Code, §402.451(a)(7) to licensed dispensers from other states who sell hearing instruments by mail order. No change was made as a result of this comment.

Comment: Regarding §141.16(c)(12), one commenter opposes the amendment as written and requests that the committee not adopt the rule. The commenter stated that no change in the original contract should be required after its issuance because most clients fail to bring their copy of the contract on return visits. The commenter states that the current rule has created no problems for license holders. Additionally, the commenter states that the rule is micromanagement by regulation and is intended to mirror requirements relating to licensed audiologists, both of which are unnecessary. The commenter offered a proposed amendment to §141.16(b)(3) that would carry out the intent of the proposed rule if the committee chooses not to accept the commenter's recommendation that §141.16(c)(12) not be adopted or if the committee wishes to pursue the intent of the proposed rule.

Response: The committee agrees that §141.16(c)(12) should not be adopted as written. This matter will be studied for possible future rule amendments. Section 141.16(c)(12) is not adopted and has been deleted, and conforming punctuation changes are adopted and added to §141.16(c)(11).

Comment: Regarding §141.16(f)(2), one commenter opposes the rules as written and maintains that the rules will cause confusion for license holders, as the rule does not specify which pieces of equipment are referred to in the rule. The commenter opposes the amendment to this rule, but also offered alternate acceptable language. The commenter notes that the statute has not changed and states that if the committee is broadening the rule's scope to include equipment not used in the hearing evaluation, that the additional equipment should be specified and an explanation for the change should be given to license holders. The commenter states that if the phrase "used in the hearing evaluation" were added to the amended rule, that addition would clarify the rule.

Another commenter opposed the rule for similar reasons and stated that the rule should only apply to audiometers used to test hearing.

Response: The committee notes that the proposed rule mirrors the language of the statute. However, the committee agrees with the commenter's position and has added the phrase "used in the hearing evaluation" to the text of §141.16(f)(2).

Comment: Regarding §141.14(b)(3), one commenter recommends that the rule be modified to allow 5 hours of online continuing education, 5 hours of manufacturer-sponsored continuing education, and 10 hours of non-manufacturer sponsored continuing education.

Additionally, a total of 105 persons wrote letters or signed petitions expressing opposition to the rule limiting online continuing education and recommending that there be no limit on the number of hours that can be earned through online continuing education experiences. Two commenters stated their belief that the committee's rule is for the benefit of groups who offer classroom continuing education and questioned the committee's rationale for limiting online continuing education.

Response: The committee disagrees and believes that the proposed amendment allowing for a total of 5 hours of online and manufacturer-sponsored continuing education, with a balance of 15 hours of non-manufacturer sponsored continuing education, is an appropriate rule which will ensure quality continuing education of Texas licensed fitters and dispensers of hearing instruments. No change was made as a result of the comment.

Comment: Regarding §141.14(b)(3), one commenter recommends using the term "electronic learning" instead of "online" when referring to continuing education experiences.

Response: The committee disagrees, as the proposed term may be too broad. No change was made as a result of the comment.

Comment: Regarding §141.14(b)(3), one commenter supports the rule and believes that failure to limit online continuing education hours as proposed will result in dominance by manufacturers in this area and a lowering of the quality of continuing education for license holders. The commenter expresses concerns regarding abuse of online continuing education indicating the length of time that a program may remain available online, the number of times that a license holder may take the same online course, the number of hours to be awarded to an online course, and verification of completion of online courses.

Response: The committee agrees with the commenter that §141.14(b)(3) should be adopted and notes that the commenter originally proposed the rule to the committee at a stakeholder rule review meeting. The committee notes that other allied health occupational regulatory bodies allow all or part of the continuing education requirement to be completed online and believes that its rule is appropriate. No change was made as a result of this comment.

LEGAL CERTIFICATION

The Department of State Health Services General Counsel, Cathy Campbell, certifies that the rules, as adopted, have been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the committee's legal authority.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The adopted amendments are authorized by Occupations Code, §402.102, which authorizes the committee to adopt rules necessary for the performance of its duties. The review of the rules implements Government Code, §2001.039.

§141.2.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Act--Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 402, concerning the licensing of persons authorized to fit and dispense hearing instruments.

(2) Administrative Law Judge--A judge employed by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.

(3) APA--Administrative Procedure Act, the Government Code, Chapter 2001.

(4) Applicant--A person who applies for licensure under the Act.

(5) Apprentice permit--A permit issued by the committee to a person who meets the requirements of Texas Occupations Code, §402.207.

(6) Bill of sale--See definition for "written contract for services."

(7) Certification, proof of--A certificate of calibration, compliance, conformance, or performance.

(8) Committee--The State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments.

(9) Contact hour--A period of time equal to 55 minutes.

(10) Contract--See definition for "written contract for services."

(11) Contested case--A proceeding in accordance with Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in this chapter, including but not restricted to rule enforcement and licensing, in which the legal rights, duties, or privileges of a party are to be determined by the committee after an opportunity for an adjudicative hearing.

(12) Continuing education--Education intended to maintain and improve the quality of professional services in the fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments, to keep licensees knowledgeable of current research, techniques, and practices, and provide other resources which will improve skills and competence in the fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments.

(13) Department--Department of State Health Services.

(14) Direct supervision--The physical presence with prompt evaluation, review and consultation of a supervisor anytime a temporary training permit holder is engaged in the act of fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments.

(15) Fitting and dispensing hearing instruments--The measurement of human hearing by the use of an audiometer, or by any means, for the purpose of making selections, adaptations, or sales of hearing instruments. The term includes the making of impressions for earmolds to be used as a part of the hearing instrument and any necessary post-fitting counseling for the purpose of fitting and dispensing hearing instruments.

(16) Formal hearing--A hearing or proceeding in accordance with this chapter, including a "contested case" as defined in this section.

(17) Indirect supervision--The daily evaluation, review, and prompt consultation of a supervisor anytime a permit holder is engaged in the act of fitting and dispensing hearing instruments.

(18) License--A license issued by the committee under Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 402, and this chapter to a person authorized to fit and dispense hearing instruments.

(19) Licensee--Any person licensed by the committee.

(20) Ownership of dispensing practice--A person who owns, maintains, or operates an office or place of business where the person employs or engages under contract a person who practices the fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments shall be considered also to be engaged in the practice of fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments under this Act.

(21) Person--An individual, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity.

(22) Sell or sale--A transfer of title or the right to use by lease, bailment, or any other contract. For the purpose of Texas Occupations Code, §402.001(7), the term "sell" or "sale" shall not include sales at wholesale by manufacturers to persons licensed under this Act, or to the distributors for distribution and sale to persons licensed under Texas Occupations Code, §402.001(7), and this chapter.

(23) Selling of hearing instrument by mail--Anytime a hearing instrument is not sold, fitted or dispensed in person by a licensee or permit holder.

(24) Specific Product--Specific product shall include, but not be limited to, brand name, model number, shell type, and circuit type.

(25) Sponsor--Provider of a continuing education activity.

(26) Supervisor--A supervisor is a person licensed by the committee as a licensed hearing instrument dispenser who:

(A) meets the qualifications established by Texas Occupations Code, §402.255 and this chapter;

(B) has an established place of business;

(C) is responsible for direct and indirect supervision and available for consultation and education of a temporary training permit holder; or

(D) is responsible for indirect supervision and available for consultation of an apprentice permit holder.

(27) Temporary training permit--A permit issued by the committee to persons authorized to fit and dispense hearing instruments only under the direct or indirect supervision as appropriate of a person who holds a license under Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 402, and this chapter.

(28) Working days--Working days are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

(29) Written contract for services--A written agreement or bill of sale, between the licensee and purchaser of a hearing instrument as set out in §141.16(c) of this title (relating to Conditions of Sale).

(30) 30-day trial period--The period in which a person may cancel the purchase of a hearing instrument.

§141.16.Conditions of Sale.

(a) Compliance with other state and federal regulations.

(1) A licensee or permit holder shall adhere to the Federal Food and Drug Administration regulations in accordance with 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §801.420 and §801.421.

(2) A licensee or permit holder shall receive a written statement before selling a hearing instrument that is signed by a physician or surgeon duly licensed by the Texas Medical Board who specializes in diseases of the ear. The written statement shall confirm that the client's hearing loss has been medically evaluated during the preceding six-month period and that the client is age 18 or older. The licensee may inform the client that the medical evaluation requirement may be waived as long as the licensee:

(A) informs the client that the exercise of the waiver is not in the client's best health interest;

(B) does not encourage the client to waive the medical evaluation; and

(C) gives the client an opportunity to sign a statement on the contract that says: "I have been advised by (licensee's or permit holder's name) that the Food and Drug Administration has determined that my best health interest would be served if I had a medical evaluation by a licensed physician (preferably a physician or surgeon who specializes in diseases of the ear) before purchasing one or more hearing instruments. I do not wish to receive a medical evaluation before purchasing a hearing instrument".

(3) A licensee or permit holder shall not sell a hearing instrument to a person under 18 years of age unless the prospective user, parent, or guardian has presented to the licensee or permit holder a written statement signed by a licensed physician specializing in diseases of the ear that states that the client's hearing loss has been medically evaluated and the client may be considered a candidate for a hearing instrument. The evaluation must have taken place within the preceding six months.

(4) A licensee or permit holder shall advise clients who appear to have any of the following otologic conditions to consult promptly with a physician:

(A) visible, congenital or traumatic deformity of the ear;

(B) history of active drainage from the ear within the previous 90 days;

(C) history of sudden or rapidly progressive hearing loss within the previous 90 days;

(D) acute or chronic dizziness;

(E) unilateral hearing loss of sudden or recent onset within the previous 90 days;

(F) audiometric air-bone gap equal to or greater than 15 decibels at 500 hertz (Hz), 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz;

(G) visible evidence of significant cerumen accumulation or a foreign body in the ear canal; and

(H) pain or discomfort in the ear.

(b) Guidelines for a 30-day trial period.

(1) All clients shall be informed of a 30-day trial period by written contract for services and all charges associated with such trial period be included in this written contract for services, which shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments.

(2) Any client purchasing one or more hearing instruments shall be entitled to a refund of the purchase price advanced by the client for the hearing instrument(s), less the agreed-upon amount associated with the trial period, upon return of the instrument(s), in good condition to the licensee within the 30-day trial period ending 30 days from the date of delivery. Should the order be canceled by the client prior to the delivery of the hearing instrument(s), the licensee may retain the agreed-upon charges and fees as specified in the written contract for services. The client shall receive the refund due no later than the 30th day after the date on which the client cancels the order or returns the hearing instrument(s), in good condition, to the licensee.

(3) Should the hearing instrument(s) have to be repaired, remade or adjusted during the 30-day trial period, the 30-day trial period is suspended for one day for each 24 hour period that the hearing instrument(s) is not in the client's possession. The 30-day trial period resumes on the day the client reclaims the repaired remade, or adjusted hearing instrument. If the hearing instrument is not picked up within five working days following client notification, the 30-day trial period resumes.

(c) Written contract for services to client - client protection. Upon the sale of any hearing instrument(s) or change of model or serial number of the hearing instrument(s), the licensee or permit holder shall provide the client with a signed, written contract for services containing the following:

(1) the date of sale;

(2) the make and model of the hearing instrument(s);

(3) the name, address, and telephone number of the principal place of business of the licensee;

(4) a statement that the hearing instrument is new, used, or reconditioned;

(5) the length of time and other terms of the guarantee and by whom the hearing instrument is guaranteed;

(6) a copy of the written forms (relating to waiver forms);

(7) a statement on or attached to the written contract for services, in no smaller than 10-point bold type, as follows: "The client has been advised at the outset of his relationship with the undersigned fitter and dispenser of hearing instruments that any examination or representation made by a licensed fitter and dispenser of hearing instruments in connection with the fitting and selling of the hearing instrument(s) is not an examination, diagnosis or prescription by a person duly licensed and qualified as a physician or surgeon authorized to practice medicine in the State of Texas and, therefore, must not be regarded as medical opinion or advice";

(8) a statement on the face of the written contract for services, in no smaller than 10-point bold type, as follows: "If you have a complaint against a licensed fitter and dispenser of hearing instruments, you may contact the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3183, telephone 1-800-942-5540";

(9) the licensee's or permit holder's printed name, signature and license or permit number;

(10) the supervisory arrangement reflected on a written contract for services by signature of both the permit holder and licensee with both the permit holder's license number and the licensee's license number; and

(11) a serial number(s) and follow-up appointment within 30 days after the hearing instrument fitting shall be part of the patient records.

(d) Terms of sale.

(1) There shall be a full and complete disclosure of the cost of financing the purchase of hearing instruments.

(2) If the initial price of the hearing instrument(s) furnished is reduced by trade-in allowance or discount, the written contract for services shall conspicuously state:

(A) the initial price of the aid before trade-in allowance or discount;

(B) the amount of the trade-in allowance or discount; and

(C) the final price to the consumer.

(e) Record keeping.

(1) The owner of the dispensing practice shall ensure that records are maintained on every client who receives services in connection with the fitting and dispensing of hearing instruments. Such records shall be preserved for at least three years after the fitting and dispensing of the hearing instrument(s) to the client. If other hearing instruments are subsequently fitted and dispensed to that client, cumulative records must be maintained for at least three years after the latest fitting and dispensing of the hearing instrument(s) to that client. The records must be available for the committee's inspection and shall include but not be limited to the following:

(A) pertinent case history;

(B) source of referral and appropriate documents;

(C) medical evaluation or waiver of evaluation;

(D) copies of written contracts for services and receipts executed in connection with the fitting and dispensing of each hearing instrument provided;

(E) a complete record of hearing tests, and services provided, including follow-up appointment within the 30-day trial period; and

(F) all correspondence specifically related to services provided to the client or the hearing instrument(s) fitted and dispensed to the client.

(2) A complete record of tests shall be available for the client.

(f) Audiometers and audiometric testing devices.

(1) Audiometers and audiometric testing devices shall meet the current standards of the American National Standards Institute or the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).

(2) All portable and stationary testing equipment used in the hearing evaluation by the license holder must be calibrated annually and proof of certification must be provided upon renewal of license, if the licensee is selected for audit.

(g) Audiometric testing not conducted in a stationary acoustical enclosure.

(1) A notation shall be made on the hearing test if testing was not done in a stationary acoustical enclosure.

(2) Ambient noise level of the location of the audiometric testing, if not done in a stationary acoustical enclosure, shall include a notation on the hearing test of the following items:

(A) type(s) of equipment used to determine ambient noise level;

(B) model and serial number of equipment used to determine ambient noise level;

(C) date of last calibration of equipment used to determine ambient noise level; and

(D) the ambient noise level of the test environment.

(3) If audiometric testing is not conducted in a stationary acoustical enclosure, the test environment shall have a maximum allowable ambient noise level of 42 dBA.

(h) Audiometric testing conducted in a stationary acoustical enclosure.

(1) A notation shall be made on the hearing test if testing was done in a stationary acoustical enclosure.

(2) A stationary acoustical enclosure includes, but is not limited to, an audiometric test room.

(A) An audiometric test room is any enclosed space in which a listener is located for the purpose of testing hearing. An audiometric test room may also be known as:

(i) an audiometric test area;

(ii) a hearing test space; or

(iii) a hearing test room.

(B) An example of an audiometric test room would be a prefabricated room known as:

(i) an audiometric test booth;

(ii) a suite; or

(iii) a sound treated room.

(C) The primary and necessary requirement of an audiometric test room is to ensure that the maximum permissible ambient noise levels established by the American National Standards Institute do not exceed the levels for audiometric test room for ears covered 250 - 8000 Hz. The levels are as follows:

Figure: 22 TAC §141.16(h)(2)(C) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 12, 2006.

TRD-200603728

Ronald Ensweiler

Chair

State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments

Effective date: August 1, 2006

Proposal publication date: January 13, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 458-7111 x6972


Part 17. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF PLUMBING EXAMINERS

Chapter 365. LICENSING AND REGISTRATION

22 TAC §365.14

The Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners adopts amendments to rule §365.14, which provides for the criteria adopted by the Board for Continuing Professional Education Programs, without changes to the proposed text as published in the April 28, 2006, issue of the Texas Register (31 TexReg 3491).

Currently, §365.14(a)(7) of the rule requires providers of Course Materials to include perforated forms, used by those who do business with the Board, within the binding of the Course materials that may be removed. The amendments proposed to this rule section would change the requirement from the forms to be perforated for removal to the forms being included in a format to be seen as an example, not to be removed from the Course Materials.

No comments were received during the comment period following the publishing of the proposed rule amendment in the Texas Register . Comments were sought by the Board and received prior to the proposal of the rule amendment and were considered by the Board during its January 9, 2006 meeting. The majority of the comments received were regarding maintaining or increasing the current class size limitation of 45 students per class. The following is a summary of the comments submitted, discussion and consideration of the comments by the Board members at its January 9, 2006 meeting:

Curtis Winn, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. Winn commented that the professionalism would suffer with larger classes that would not allow for as much input by attendees and increasing class size would make the quality of the class suffer.

Robert Stricker, CPE Instructor for APHCCT--Mr. Stricker commented that he has been an instructor for twelve years and has taught classes with 20 - 80 people in attendance. Mr. Stricker commented that he felt that the number of licensees an instructor could handle would vary by instructor, as some are better instructors than others. Mr. Stricker commented that other industry CPE courses do not have limitations in size and he feels it should be up to the instructor as to how many they can handle. Mr. Stricker commented that it is a problem having to limit walk-ins after they have driven some distance to come to a class and can't get in.

Richard Pulaski, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. Pulaski commented that he had thirty years in education and eighteen years of teacher training. Mr. Pulaski stated that he felt that 25 licensees in a class are ideal for proper interaction.

Nancy Jones, CPE Provider, APHCCT--Ms. Jones commented that she is a former teacher and understands the benefits of low student/teacher ratios, however she has sat in on many of APHCCT's instructors classes and sees no problem with increasing class size. Ms. Jones commented that many university classes have large class sizes.

Trent McNair, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. McNair commented that although some instructors are better instructors than others and he understands the problem with limited walk-ins, he agrees with Mr. Winn that interaction is best with 15-20 licensees, as is the average with his classes. Mr. McNair commented that although larger classes can yield more profit, he believes that the licensees need to have interaction to get the most out of the courses. Mr. McNair stated that he believes the plumbing industry in Texas is far ahead of other states, and feels that increased class size would diminish quality.

Robert Doran, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. Doran commented that he is opposed to increasing the class size. Mr. Doran stated that larger classes generally cause more disruption and there is better interaction with smaller classes.

Stanley Briers, CPE Course Material Provider, ICE--Mr. Briers commented that when CPE was first initiated there was much discussion regarding class size. Mr. Briers stated that he believed it was important that the licensees get something out of the class, not just sit there, and in order to do so there must be interaction. Mr. Briers commented that CPE cannot be compared with university classes because there is no homework, outside study, or testing required, as there is with university classes. Mr. Briers stated that allowing walk-ins will discourage registration in advance.

Jay Wark, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. Wark commented that he does many private smaller classes as well as non-private classes and the comments from licensees in smaller classes are that the class is better.

TSBPE Board Chairman Hatchel opened the discussion up to members of the Board. The following are the summarized comments from Board members:

Mr. Cortes stated that he felt the class size should be left up to the discretion of the instructor.

Chairman Hatchel stated that there is no way to determine that the licensee received what they needed from the class as there is no examination.

Mr. Jalnos stated that he was in the first group of CPE instructors and has been in classes of all sizes. Mr. Jalnos stated that he felt there is a problem with walk-ins being turned away.

Ms. Betancourt stated that she is required in her profession to take CPE and would never expect to be allowed to just show up for a class that she hadn't registered for. Ms. Betancourt stated that the licensees are adults and all responsible adults must plan in advance for many things. Ms. Betancourt stated that the CPE program must reflect professionalism.

Mr. Lord stated that he, too, was once an instructor and believes that the licensees get more out of smaller classes. Mr. Lord stated that the Board has a responsibility to offer a quality program and that it is not about making money.

Ms. McLemore stated that if unlimited walk-ins were allowed, no one would pre-register. Ms. McLemore believes that there needs to be a maximum class size.

Mr. Chu stated that education is always better with a smaller ratio of students to teacher. Mr. Chu commented that although some universities have larger class sizes, there are other factors to consider. Mr. Chu stated that the current class limit is reasonable and that adults have a social responsibility to organize and plan for CPE.

Mr. Tarver stated that the only consideration should be what is best for the citizens. Mr. Tarver stated that smaller class sizes are better and the class size limit should remain as it is with 45 students allowed.

Ms. Betancourt made a motion to maintain the current class size limitation of 45 students. Mr. Tarver seconded the motion.

Mr. Cortes asked the Board's attorney, Jason Ray, Assistant Attorney General, if the class size limit is set for 45, would a provider be required to schedule 45 students for a class. Mr. Ray stated that the limit does not allow the provider to exceed the limit, but would allow them to schedule less than 45.

Chairman Hatchel called for a vote. All members voted in favor of the motion to keep the CPE class size limit at 45.

Chairman Hatchel asked the public if anyone had comment or opposition regarding the proposed change to eliminate the rule requirement for Board forms contained within the CPE material to be perforated. There was no comment or opposition.

Mr. Lord made a motion to eliminate the perforated forms from the CPE course materials. Mr. Jalnos seconded the motion and the motion carried.

Chairman Hatchel asked the public if anyone had comment regarding the elimination of the rule requirement for a Board approved CPE course subject list for elective subjects in the course materials.

Mr. Briers, CPE Course Material Provider, ICE--Mr. Briers commented that although he previously supported eliminating the subject list, he believes that the Board should have control over the subjects and the list should be maintained.

Nancy Jones, CPE Course Provider, APHCCT--Ms. Jones stated that although she had previously suggested eliminating the subject list, she too believed that the subject list should be maintained.

Robert Stricker, CPE Instructor, APHCCT--Mr. Stricker stated that he is in favor of maintaining the subject list.

Richard Pulaski, Individual CPE Provider/Instructor--Mr. Pulaski stated that he is in favor of maintaining the subject list.

Mr. Lord made a motion to continue to maintain the subject list for elective subjects in the course materials. Ms. Betancourt seconded the motion and the motion carried.

The Board periodically reviews and updates its forms to provide new or improved information. The new amendments to §365.14(a)(7) will help eliminate the use of outdated perforated forms found within the Course Materials.

The amendments to §365.14 are adopted under and affect Title 8, Chapter 1301, Occupations Code ("Plumbing License Law"), §1301.251, §1301.404 and the rule it amends. Section 1301.251 requires the Board to adopt and enforce rules necessary to administer the Plumbing License Law. Section 1301.404 provides the Board with authority to recognize, approve and administer continuing professional education programs for persons who hold licenses or endorsements under the Plumbing License Law.

No other statute, article or code is affected by this amendment.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 11, 2006.

TRD-200603671

Robert L. Maxwell

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners

Effective date: July 31, 2006

Proposal publication date: April 28, 2006

For further information, please call: (512) 936-5224