Part 1.
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Chapter 30.
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS
Subchapter J. WASTEWATER OPERATORS AND OPERATIONS COMPANIES
30 TAC §§30.340, 30.342, 30.350
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission)
proposes amendments to §§30.340, 30.342, and 30.350.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems.
The commission proposes to amend Chapter 30 to include requirements for
licensure of operators of subsurface area drip dispersal systems and the wastewater
treatment facilities that treat domestic wastewater and supply treated effluent
to the subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 55,
Requests for Reconsideration and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment;
Chapter 222, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal System; Chapter 281, Applications
Processing; Chapter 305, Consolidated Permits; Chapter 309, Domestic Wastewater
Effluent Limitation and Plant Siting; and Chapter 331, Underground Injection
Control, in this issue of the
Texas Register
to
implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standard in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 30.340, Qualification for Initial License
Proposed §30.340(g) is amended to prohibit individuals from applying
for a new Class D wastewater license if that individual previously held a
Class D license and is currently operating a wastewater treatment facility
that treats domestic wastewater and disposes of treated effluent through a
subsurface area drip dispersal system. Currently, all land application facilities,
including subsurface area drip dispersal systems, are required to have a minimum
of a Class D wastewater operator. Subsurface area drip dispersal systems require
a very high quality effluent on a very consistent basis to prevent the drip
lines and emitters from clogging. A higher level of licensed operator will
help provide that quality and consistency.
Section 30.342, Qualifications for License Renewal
Proposed §30.342(c)(3) is amended to prohibit the renewal of a Class
D wastewater license for an operator who is operating a wastewater treatment
facility that treats domestic wastewater and disposes of treated effluent
through a subsurface area drip dispersal system. Subsurface area drip dispersal
systems require a very high quality effluent on a very consistent basis to
prevent the drip lines and emitters from clogging. A higher level of licensed
operator will help provide that quality and consistency.
Section 30.350, Classification of Wastewater Treatment
Facilities, Wastewater Collection Systems, and Licenses Required
Proposed §30.350(e) is amended to require that {at least} the chief
operator of a wastewater treatment facility that treats domestic wastewater
and disposes of treated effluent through a subsurface area drip dispersal
system holds at least a Class C wastewater license. Currently, all land application
facilities, including subsurface area drip dispersal systems, are allowed
to be operated by a Class D wastewater operator. Subsurface area drip dispersal
systems require a very high quality effluent on a very consistent basis to
prevent the drip lines and emitters from clogging. A higher level of licensed
operator will help provide that quality and consistency.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency as a result of administration
or enforcement of the proposed rules. Fiscal implications may be anticipated
for other state agencies or local governments that own or operate subsurface
area drip dispersal systems. The proposed rules would require subsurface area
drip dispersal systems disposing of domestic effluent to employ at least one
Class C licensed wastewater operator instead of a Class D licensed wastewater
operator, and subsurface area drip dispersal systems disposing of industrial
effluent would be required to obtain and document more training for their
wastewater operators. Local governments utilizing subsurface area drip dispersal
systems may see an increase in salary and training costs.
HB 2651, 79th Legislature, added Chapter 32 to the TWC and required the
commission to establish a new permit program and specify operating requirements
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems by July 31, 2006. Permitting requirements
are proposed in 30 TAC Chapter 222 in this issue of the
Texas Register
. This proposed rulemaking would affect wastewater systems
disposing of both domestic and industrial effluent through subsurface area
drip dispersal systems.
Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems Disposing
of Domestic Effluent
New subsurface area drip dispersal systems disposing of domestic effluent
would be required to comply with more stringent licensing, and therefore,
more training requirements beginning November 1, 2006. Existing subsurface
area drip dispersal systems disposing of domestic effluent would be required
to comply with more stringent licensing, and therefore, more training requirements,
beginning November 1, 2008, for wastewater operators. Subsurface area drip
dispersal systems disposing of domestic effluent require a very consistent,
high quality effluent to prevent the clogging of drip lines and emitters.
The training and licensing of a higher level operator will help ensure that
the needed consistency and quality of domestic effluent is such that the system
functions properly.
The licensing costs of a Class C and D operator costs $35 per year. However,
a Class D license is issued once every two years, for a total two-year cost
of $70. A Class C operator license is issued once every three years for a
total three-year cost of $105. Both licenses require a high school equivalency,
but a Class C wastewater operator license requires two commission-approved
training classes and two years of experience versus one commission-approved
training class for a Class D license. The average training class is estimated
to be $125, so training costs could increase for local governments employing
Class D operators by $125 the first year a Class C operator license is required.
In addition, according to a 2002 salary survey conducted by the Texas Water
Association, salary costs for a Class C operator are $2,000 to $3,000 higher
on an annual basis than the salary costs for a Class D operator. Local governments
owning or operating subsurface area drip dispersal systems for domestic effluents
could see their operator costs increase by $2,125 to $3,125 during the first
year they are required to have a Class C wastewater operator.
Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems Disposing
of Industrial Effluent
Due to the diversity of industrial wastes, operators of industrial subsurface
area drip dispersal systems must specialize in the characteristics of the
system, pollutants, and facility they work in. Because of the diversity and
complexity of systems treating industrial wastes, the licensing of industrial
wastewater operators is not required. The proposed rules, in keeping with
the current rules, do not require licensing of industrial subsurface area
drip dispersal systems operators. However, the proposed rules require that
training, either formal or informal, take place, be documented, and be adequate
for the proper operation and maintenance of both the treatment unit and the
subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Subsurface area drip dispersal systems
training costs for local governments that operate industrial wastewater facilities
may be free or low cost because such training can be provided by the manufacturers
of the equipment or by a consultant overseeing the design and installation
of an industrial facility.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater protection of water quality
because more highly trained operators will be required to operate subsurface
area drip dispersal systems.
Individuals or businesses that operate subsurface area drip dispersal systems
disposing of domestic effluent will be required to utilize a Class C wastewater
operator instead of a Class D operator required by current rules.
The costs for hiring, training, and licensing for individuals and businesses
will be the same as those incurred by a local government, and costs could
increase by as much as $2,125 to $3,125 during the first year that a Class
C wastewater operator is required. Individuals or businesses that operate
a subsurface area drip dispersal system disposing of industrial effluent will
be subject to the same training requirements as those experienced by local
governments. Training costs for subsurface area drip dispersal systems disposal
of industrial effluent are not expected to increase because of the flexibility
of how the training can be acquired.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
Adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses
owning or operating subsurface area drip dispersal systems for the disposal
of domestic effluent. A small business is defined as having fewer than 100
employees or less than $1 million in annual gross receipts. Small or micro-businesses
utilizing subsurface area drip dispersal systems for the disposal of domestic
effluent will incur the same increase in salary and training costs as those
experienced by local governments, individuals, and large businesses. These
costs are estimated to range between $2,125 to $3,125 during the first year
that a Class C wastewater operator is required. A micro-business is defined
as having no more than 20 employees. The cost per employee for a small business
is estimated to be approximately $21 to $31 during the first year of implementation.
For a micro-business, the cost is estimated to be approximately $106 to $156
per employee during the first year of implementation.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the proposed rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental
rule." Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental
rule" means a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment
or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules would implement HB 2651,
relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The
specific intent of this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 30 to include licensing
requirements for operators of subsurface area drip dispersal systems and wastewater
treatment facilities that treat domestic wastewater and supply treated effluent
to the subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The proposed rules would not
adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a section of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and
safety of the state or a sector of the state, because the proposed rules would
simply add licensing requirements for operators of subsurface area drip dispersal
systems and wastewater treatment facilities that treat domestic wastewater
and supply treated effluent to the subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
The proposed rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental rule
as defined in the Texas Government Code.
In addition, the proposed rules are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not meet the criteria specified in §2001.0225(a). Texas
Government Code, §2001.0225(a), applies to a rule adopted by an agency,
the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law, unless
the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express requirement
of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3)
exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state
and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state
and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers of
the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The proposed rules do not meet any of these criteria. First, the proposed
rules do not exceed a standard set by federal law, because there is no comparable
federal law. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed a requirement of state
law, because they are consistent with the express requirements of TWC, Chapter
32, and are proposed to implement HB 2651. Third, the proposed rules do not
exceed an express requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program. Fourth, the commission does not propose these
rules solely under the general powers of the agency, but rather under the
authority of HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement rules under
TWC, Chapter 32. The proposed rules do not meet the criteria for a major environmental
rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis
determination.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these proposed
rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of
this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 30 to include licensing requirements for
operators of subsurface area drip dispersal systems and wastewater treatment
facilities that treat domestic wastewater and supply treated effluent to the
subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The proposed rules do not constitute
a takings because they would not burden private real property.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found that the proposal
is a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 30 TAC §505.11(b)(4), relating to rules subject to the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP), and will therefore, require that goals and policies
of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that
Chapter 30 does not impact any CMP goals or policies because it prescribes
the level of licensure or training required for operators of subsurface area
drip dispersal systems and the treatment facilities that supply treated effluent
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Chapter 30 is administrative and
does not regulate the environment.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005-050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division at (512) 239-0571 or Louis
C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division at (512) 239-4552.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorize the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §5.501, which
authorizes the commission to issue temporary and emergency orders; §26.011,
which provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary
to carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality
in the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations it considers advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §27.019,
which requires the commission to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation
of injection wells; §32.054, which authorizes the executive director
to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151, which authorizes the commission,
authorized agent, or employee of local government the power to enter property.
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted in HB 2651, §2 to the commission
to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§30.340.Qualifications for Initial License.
(a) - (f)
(No change.)
(g)
An individual who previously held a Class D license may
not apply for a new Class D license if the individual currently operates any
activated sludge type facilities, [
§30.342.Qualifications for License Renewal.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
(c)
Class D licenses are not renewable for operators of:
(1)
any activated sludge type facilities; [
(2)
any trickling filter or rotating biological contractor
(RBC) facilities with a permitted daily average flow of 100,000 gallons per
day or greater. A trickling filter or RBC facility is a facility that uses
secondary aerobic biological processes for treatment of sewage
;
[
(3)
any facility that uses a subsurface
area drip dispersal system as defined in §222.5 of this title (relating
to Definitions) for disposal of its effluent.
(d)
(No change.)
§30.350.Classification of Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Wastewater Collection Systems, and Licenses Required.
(a) - (d)
(No change.)
(e)
Domestic wastewater treatment facilities
will
[
(f) - (n) (No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600566
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) proposes
amendments to §§55.101, 55.150, and 55.200.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems.
The commission proposes this rulemaking to regulate subsurface area drip
dispersal systems that beneficially reuse treated wastewater effluent generated
by treatment facilities processing more than 5,000 gallons per day of domestic
wastewater and any amount of industrial wastewater. The proposed amendments
will clarify that these systems are included in the current processes for
the requests for reconsideration, contested case hearings, and public comment.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 35, Emergency and Temporary
Orders and Permits; Temporary Suspension or Amendment of Permit Conditions;
Chapter 222, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal System; Chapter 281, Applications
Processing; Chapter 305, Consolidated Permits; Chapter 309, Domestic Wastewater
Effluent Limitation and Plant Siting; and Chapter 331, Underground Injection
Control, in this issue of the
Texas Register
to
implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standard in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 55.101, Applicability
Proposed §55.101(c) and (d) is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 as
a citation to clarify that subsurface area drip dispersal systems are included
in the requirements of this section.
Section 55.150, Applicability
Proposed §55.150 is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 as a citation
to clarify that subsurface area drip dispersal systems are included in the
requirements of this section.
Section 55.200, Applicability
Proposed §55.200 is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 as a citation
to clarify that subsurface area drip dispersal systems are included in the
requirements of this section.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state
or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed
rules.
HB 2651 amended the TWC by adding Chapter 32. The commission is proposing
this rulemaking to update the citation to the TWC, and regulate subsurface
area drip dispersal systems that beneficially reuse treated wastewater effluent
generated by treatment facilities processing more than 5,000 gallons per day
of domestic wastewater and any amount of industrial wastewater. Under current
rules, subsurface area drip dispersal systems are permitted under TWC, Chapter
26. Now that they will be permitted under TWC, Chapters 26 and 32, it is necessary
to amend Chapter 55, which concerns requests for reconsideration, contested
case hearings, and public comment, to refer to TWC, Chapter 32. The proposed
changes to Chapter 55 are administrative in nature and do not change any requirements
for the requests for reconsideration, contested case hearings, or public comment
relating to subsurface area drip dispersal systems. There is no fiscal implication
from the proposed rules for units of state governments, local governments,
individuals, or businesses owning or operating wastewater systems utilizing
subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater clarity in, and thus, more
efficient administration of wastewater disposal rules.
The proposed rules will clearly state that subsurface area drip dispersal
systems are included in the current process for requests for reconsideration,
contested case hearings, and public comment. Subsurface area drip dispersal
systems have previously been permitted under current rules in TWC, Chapter
26. The proposed rulemaking adds a reference to TWC, Chapter 32 and does not
change any requirements for requests for reconsideration, contested case hearings,
or public comment relating to subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Thus,
the proposed rulemaking has no fiscal implications for individuals or businesses
owning or operating subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses.
The proposed rulemaking does not change any requirements for the process to
request reconsideration, contested case hearings, or public comment relating
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems and has no fiscal implications for
small or micro-businesses owning or operating such systems.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the proposed rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental
rule." Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental
rule" means a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment
or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules would implement HB 2651,
relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The
specific intent of this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 55 to include the procedures
for requests for reconsideration, contested case hearings, and public comment
relating to new, amended, or renewed subsurface area drip dispersal system
permits to be subject to the requirements of this chapter. The proposed rules
would not adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a section of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health
and safety of the state or a sector of the state, because the proposed rules
would simply require applications for new, amended, or renewed subsurface
area drip dispersal system permits to be subject to the requirements of this
chapter. The proposed rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental
rule as defined in the Texas Government Code.
In addition, the proposed rules are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not meet the criteria specified in §2001.0225(a). Texas
Government Code, §2001.0225(a), applies to a rule adopted by an agency,
the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law, unless
the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express requirement
of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3)
exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state
and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state
and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers of
the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The proposed rules do not meet any of these criteria. First, the proposed
rules do not exceed a standard set by federal law, because there is no comparable
federal law. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed a requirement of state
law, because they are consistent with the express requirements of TWC, Chapter
32, and are proposed to implement HB 2651. Third, the proposed rules do not
exceed an express requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program. Fourth, the commission does not propose these
rules solely under the general powers of the agency, but rather under the
authority of HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement rules under
TWC, Chapter 32. These proposed rules do not meet the criteria for a major
environmental rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis
determination.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these proposed
rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of
this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 55 to require that the requests for reconsideration,
contested case hearings, and public comment relating to new, amended, or renewed
subsurface area drip dispersal system permits be subject to the requirements
of this chapter. The promulgation and enforcement of the proposed rules will
not affect private real property in a manner that would require compensation
to private real property owners under the United States Constitution or the
Texas Constitution. The proposed rules also will not affect private real property
in a manner that restricts or limits an owner's right to the property that
would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental action. Consequently,
this proposal does not meet the definition of a takings under Texas Government
Code, §2007.002(5). Therefore, the proposed rules will not constitute
a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The commission invites
public comment on this preliminary takings impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found the proposal
is a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 30 TAC §505.11(b)(4), relating to rules subject to the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP), and will therefore, require that goals and policies
of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that
Chapter 55 does not impact any CMP goals or policies because it regulates
the permitting process. Chapter 55 is administrative and does not regulate
the environment.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005-050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-0571 or
Louis C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-4552.
Subchapter D. APPLICABILITY AND DEFINITIONS
30 TAC §55.101
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations it considers advisable and necessary for the discharge
of the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, as amended by HB 2651.
The proposed amendment implements HB 2651, which added new Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§55.101.Applicability.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
(c)
Subchapters D - F of this chapter apply only to applications
filed under Texas Water Code, Chapters 26
,
[
(d)
Subchapter G of this chapter applies to all applications
other than those listed in subsection (e) of this section and other than those
filed under Texas Water Code, Chapters 26
,
[
(e)
(No change.)
(f)
Subchapters D - G of this chapter do not apply to hearing
requests related to:
(1) - (2)
(No change.)
(3)
air quality exemptions from permitting and permits by rule
under Chapter 106 of this title (relating to
Permits By Rule
[
(4) - (5)
(No change.)
(g)
Subchapters D - G of this chapter do not apply to:
(1) - (5)
(No change.)
(6)
applications under Chapter 122 of this title (relating
to Federal Operating Permits
Program
);
(7)
applications for initial issuance of voluntary emissions
reduction permits under Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.0519
;
[
(8) - (12)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600567
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §55.150
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations it considers advisable and necessary for the discharge
of the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted in HB 2651.
The amendment implements HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the TWC. HB
2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to set standards
and requirements for application permits and actions by the commission to
carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial reuse of treated
wastewater.
§55.150.Applicability.
This subchapter applies only to applications filed under Texas Water
Code, Chapter 26
,
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600568
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §55.200
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations it considers advisable and necessary for the discharge
of the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, as enacted by HB 2651.
The proposed amendment implements HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§55.200.Applicability.
This subchapter applies only to applications filed under Texas Water
Code, Chapter 26
,
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600569
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) proposes
new §§222.1, 222.3, 222.5, 222.31, 222.33, 222.35, 222.37, 222.39,
222.41, 222.43, 222.45, 222.71, 222.73, 222.75, 222.77, 222.79, 222.81, 222.83,
222.85, 222.87, 222.111, 222.113, 222.115, 222.117, 222.119, 222.121, 222.123,
222.125, 222.127, 222.151, 222.153, 222.155, 222.157, 222.159, 222.161, and
222.163.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems.
The commission proposes these rules to regulate subsurface area drip dispersal
systems that dispose of wastewater generated by treatment facilities that
process more than 5,000 gallons per day (gpd) of domestic wastewater or any
amount of industrial wastewater. The proposed rules will provide permitting
procedures and technologically based requirements for design, operation, and
closure of subsurface area drip dispersal systems. HB 2651 does not limit
applicability to systems with capacity of greater than 5,000 gpd of domestic
wastewater, but systems with a capacity of less than 5,000 gpd of domestic
wastewater are regulated by Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), Chapter 366
and 30 TAC Chapter 285, On-Site Sewage Facilities. Those statutes and regulations
provide adequate protection of human health and the environment for single
family residential systems that with a capacity of less than 5,000 gpd. There
has been legislative and stakeholder consensus that current regulations are
adequate for single family residential systems that treat less than 5,000
gpd and that TWC, Chapter 32 should not be interpreted as applying to those
systems.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 55, Requests for Reconsideration
and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment; Chapter 281, Applications Processing;
Chapter 305, Consolidated Permits; Chapter 309, Domestic Wastewater Effluent
Limitation and Plant Siting; and Chapter 331, Underground Injection Control,
in this issue of the
Texas Register
to implement
HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
Subhchapter A, General Provisions
Section 222.1, Purpose and Scope
Proposed new §222.1 would establish the purpose and scope of Chapter
222, which is to establish procedures for the permitting, design, and operation
of subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
Section 222.3, Applicability
Proposed new §222.3 would establish to which systems the chapter does
and does not apply. The chapter applies to subsurface area drip dispersal
systems that inject at a depth of less than 48 inches from facilities with
a capacity of more than 5,000 gpd of domestic wastewater and from facilities
that process industrial wastewater. This chapter does not apply to subsurface
area drip dispersal systems that are regulated by THSC, Chapter 366 and Chapter
285. Chapter 222 exempts systems that are excluded from TWC, Chapter 32 and
systems that do not meet the definition of subsurface area drip dispersal
system in TWC, §32.002.
Section 222.5, Definitions
Proposed new §222.5 would define the terms used in this chapter.
Subchapter B, Administrative Procedures
Section 222.31, Application Process
Proposed new §222.31 would establish the procedure that applicants
must follow to submit an application for authorization to operate a subsurface
area drip dispersal system and the associated treatment system. The process
is essentially the same as other wastewater discharge permits. This proposed
new §222.31 would also allow subsurface area drip dispersal system permittees
with valid permits to continue to operate under their current permit until
that permit expires or is superceded by an amended permit. Applicants who
have administratively complete permit applications on file with the commission
prior to the adoption of these rules, will be permitted using the current
process under TWC, Chapter 26.
Proposed new §222.31 also contains the opportunity for permittees
filing a permit renewal application for a subsurface area drip dispersal system
to request a variance from the requirements of this chapter. To qualify for
the variance, the subsurface area drip dispersal system must: 1) be in good
working order; 2) not cause pollution, soil saturation, or a build-up of waterborne
constituents in the soil; 3) not be prohibited by other commission regulations;
and 4) not be a poor performer.
Section 222.33, Public Notice
Proposed new §222.33 would require applicants for subsurface area
drip dispersal system applications to comply with the commission's regulations
regarding public notice for wastewater discharge permit applications found
in 30 TAC Chapter 39, Public Notice.
Section 222.35, Requests for Reconsideration and
Contested Case Hearing and Public Comment
Proposed new §222.35 would establish the procedures for public participation
in an application to authorize a subsurface area drip dispersal system. The
commission proposes to apply TWC, Chapter 5, Subchapter M, Environmental Permitting
Procedures rules, the "HB 801 process," to applications for subsurface area
drip dispersal system permits. The procedures in Chapter 55, Subchapters D
- F will apply to applications for subsurface area drip dispersal system permits
for requesting a public meeting, submitting public comment, and requesting
reconsideration or a contested case hearing. Because TWC, §32.056 is
based upon language derived from TWC, §27.018 and permit applications
under TWC, Chapter 27 are subject to the HB 801 process, the commission expressed
its belief that it is the legislative intent to subject TWC, Chapter 32 applications
to the HB 801 process. The commission proposes that affected persons and local
governments must follow the process established under the provisions of Chapter
55, Subchapters D - F in order for a contested case hearing to be granted.
Under §55.211, a request for a contested case hearing is granted: 1)
if made by an affected person who raises disputed issues of fact that were
raised during the comment period, that were not withdrawn by the commenter
by filing a withdrawal letter with the chief clerk prior to the filing of
the executive director's response to comment, and that are relevant and material
to the commission's decision on the application; is timely filed with the
chief clerk; 2) is pursuant to a right to hearing authorized by law; and 3)
complies with the requirements of §55.201, Requests for Reconsideration
or Contested Case Hearing. Under §55.203 governmental entities, including
local governments and public agencies, with authority under state law over
issues raised by the application may be considered affected persons.
Section 222.37, Compliance History
Proposed new §222.37 would establish the method for evaluating the
compliance history of an applicant seeking authorization to operate a subsurface
area drip dispersal system. TWC, §32.101(c) establishes a broader compliance
history than required by 30 TAC Chapter 60, Compliance History. TWC, §32.101(c)
requires that a compliance history be prepared for all entities related to
or closely related to the permittee, while Chapter 60 requires that a compliance
history be prepared for the permitted entity only.
Section 222.39, Term of the Permit
Proposed new §222.39 would establish the term of a permit. Texas Land
Application Permits are permitted for a maximum of ten-year terms, and the
maximum permit term for subsurface area drip dispersal systems is set at ten
years.
Section 222.41, Right of Entry
Proposed new §222.41 would establish parameters for commission representatives
to enter the facility where a subsurface area drip dispersal system is located.
TWC, §32.151 establishes the power to enter property, addressing commission
staff, authorized agents, and employees of local government. Employees of
local governments are not addressed in this section as included in TWC, Chapter
32, since the commission's jurisdiction does not extend to employees of local
government. TWC, §26.173 grants local government the same power as the
commission is granted in TWC, §26.014, to enter property for the purpose
of inspecting and investigating conditions relating to the quality of water
in the state or compliance with any rule, regulation, or permit.
Section 222.43, Construction Notices to Regional
Office
Proposed new §222.43 would establish the requirements for the permittee
to notify the appropriate regional office of construction milestones. Regional
office staff may be able to prevent substandard subsurface area drip dispersal
systems from being installed during the construction process, and therefore,
protect the environment and possibly offer a cost savings to the permittee
when noncompliance with rules or permit requirements can be discovered before
construction is complete.
Section 222.45, Local Health Department Notification
Proposed new §222.45 would establish the procedure for the permittee
to notify the local health department of the installation and operation of
a subsurface area drip dispersal system, as required by TWC, §32.102(b).
Subchapter C, Siting Requirements and Effluent
Limitations
Section 222.71, Site Selection
Proposed new §222.71 would establish §309.12, Site Selection
to Protect Groundwater or Surface Water, as the criteria for site selection
of a subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Section 222.73, Soil Evaluation
Proposed new §222.73 would establish the criteria for performing a
soil evaluation of the site proposed for a subsurface area drip dispersal
system. An in-depth evaluation of the soils at the subsurface area drip dispersal
system site is necessary to assess the suitability of the proposed site. It
is also necessary to know the specific conditions of the chosen site in order
to design a subsurface area drip dispersal system that will function properly.
Section 222.75, Site Preparation Plan
Proposed new §222.75 would establish the elements necessary in the
site preparation plan that commission staff need to determine if the site
preparation is suitable to address site-specific limitations for the proposed
subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Section 222.77, Protection of Groundwater
Proposed new §222.77 would prohibit the pollution of groundwater and
to establish procedures for determining the quality of groundwater located
under a subsurface area drip dispersal system prior to installing a subsurface
area drip dispersal system. The documentation of the condition of the groundwater
prior to installation of a subsurface area drip dispersal system is necessary
to determine if the subsurface area drip dispersal system pollutes the quality
of the groundwater.
Section 222.79, Recharge Feature Plan
Proposed new §222.79 would establish the requirement for certification
that documents the presence or absence of recharge features on the proposed
site of a subsurface area drip dispersal system, and proposes to establish
the required elements of the plan to protect the recharge feature, if one
is located on the site.
Section 222.81, Buffer Zone Requirements
Proposed new §222.81 would establish the distance required to locate
the subsurface area drip dispersal system and the associated system from water
features. These proposed buffer zone requirements are protective of groundwater,
surface water, and public health.
Section 222.83, Hydraulic Application Rates
Proposed new §222.83 would establish the maximum rate at which effluent
can be applied to the soil through a subsurface area drip dispersal system.
The rates are based on the amount of effluent that can safely be applied to
the soil and utilized by vegetation without causing seepage, percolation or
surfacing of water, or an excess of nitrogen in the soil. The limits for the
application rate are based on observation of subsurface area drip dispersal
systems that are successfully operating and upon scientific modeling done
by Bruce Lesikar, Ph.D. and Guy Phipps, Ph.D, who are associated with Texas
A & M University, Texas Cooperative Extension Service. The commission
proposes this requirement to ensure that groundwater is not contaminated.
Proposed §222.83(a) provides that the maximum allowable hydraulic
application rate of effluent is 0.1 gallons per square foot per day (g/sf/d)
assuming that: 1) the site is located west of the boundary shown in Figure
1; 2) the cover crop is non-native grasses that is over-seeded in the winter;
and 3) there is at least four feet of clay or clay-loam soil below the drip
emitters. The east-west boundary is drawn along county lines closest to the
35 inch-per-year rainfall line. This new section also proposes to require
the applicant to calculate the hydraulic application rate for the subsurface
drip dispersal system and provides the equation for the calculation, if the
applicant does not wish to use the 0.1 g/sf/d application rate or the applicant's
site does not fit the criteria to use the 0.1 g/sf/d application rate.
Proposed §222.83(b) would require the applicant to calculate the allowable
annual hydraulic loading rate based on nitrogen used by the vegetative cover.
The proposed nitrogen application rate equation is the same equation used
by several other states, as well as the United State Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). New §222.83(b) also proposes that upon approval by the
executive director, the applicant may use an alternate equation.
Proposed §222.83(c) would require the applicant to design and operate
the subsurface drip dispersal system based on the limiting application rate
derived from the more restrictive of the application rate calculations based
on either the hydraulics equation or the nitrogen loading equation.
Section 222.85, Effluent Quality
Proposed new §222.85 would establish the minimum quality of effluent
that can be introduced into a subsurface area drip dispersal system. Limitations
are established to protect the environment and public health.
Section 222.87, Effluent Limitations
Proposed new §222.87 would establish the effluent limitations for
domestic wastewater effluent and establish the methods for determining industrial
effluent limitations and the prohibitions against certain substances being
discharged through a subsurface area drip dispersal system. These proposed
effluent limitations are necessary to protect the environment and public health.
Subchapter D, Design Criteria
Section 222.111, General Provisions
Proposed new §222.111 would establish that approval of a subsurface
area drip dispersal system by the executive director does not relieve the
permittee of any liabilities or responsibilities related to designing, constructing,
and operating the subsurface area drip dispersal system and the associated
treatment facility in compliance with federal and state statutes, commission
rules, or in a manner that protects human health and the environment. New §222.111
also proposes a provision to allow the applicant to apply for a variance from
design criteria in this subchapter, provided that the variance is at least
as protective of human health and the environment as the required design.
Section 222.113, Engineering Report
Proposed new §222.113 would set requirements for the engineering report.
The engineering report is the report that accompanies the plans and specification
of the subsurface area drip dispersal system and is submitted after the permit
is issued. These requirements include that the report is prepared by a licensed
professional engineer, includes the proposed design and the engineering justification
for the proposed design, specifications for all equipment, and maps and drawings
of all pertinent features of the site and the proposed system.
Section 222.115, Treatment System
Proposed new §222.115 would provide the design criteria for the units
and processes used to provide treatment prior to discharging effluent into
the soil treatment portion of the subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
The requirements of proposed §222.115 are based on standard engineering
and commission practices.
Proposed §222.115(a) would give the applicant the option to use the
design criteria in 30 TAC Chapter 317, Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems,
as the requirements for designing, installing, and operating the system of
a subsurface area drip dispersal system. The requirements of Chapter 317 have
been adopted by the commission as the standard for sewage system designs.
Proposed §222.115(b) would give the applicant the option to use the
design criteria in Chapter 285, Subchapter D, Planning, Construction, and
Installation of OSSFs, if the applicant plans to use septic tanks as the treatment
system. The requirements of Chapter 285 have been adopted by the commission
as the standard for septic system designs.
Proposed §222.115(c) would provide the design criteria for anaerobic
biological reactors. The requirements of proposed §222.115(c) are based
on standard engineering and commission practices.
Proposed §222.115(d) would provide the design criteria for sand filters.
The requirements of proposed §222.115(d) are based on standard engineering
and commission practices.
Proposed §222.115(e) would require that the design for the subsurface
area drip dispersal system include the criteria for solids removal from the
treatment unit.
Proposed §222.115(f) would establish that the treatment unit be designed
to process the flow of the facility supplying the sewage. Most sewage systems
experience peaks and valleys in flow rates and with some systems, those peaks
are significant. Recreational facilities that are used more on the weekends
or in the summer months, churches, and sports facilities with grandstands
are some examples of systems that would require the treatment system to be
able to process a significantly higher peak flow than the average daily flow.
Section 222.117, Dispersal System Design
Proposed new §222.117 would establish the design criteria for the
systems that discharge the effluent into the soil treatment portion of the
subsurface area drip dispersal system. The requirements of proposed §222.117
are based on standard engineering and commission practices.
Proposed §222.117(a) would establish subsurface area drip dispersal
system components and requirements for those components that include effluent
filters, dosing tanks, pumps, control systems, supply lines, and manifolds.
These components, with these minimum requirements, are necessary for the subsurface
area dispersal system to operate properly.
Proposed §222.117(b) would require the permittee to include the hydraulic
calculations for the pump and distribution system in the engineering report.
The calculations are necessary for the evaluation of the efficacy of the design
of the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.117(c) would require that the permittee design the subsurface
area drip dispersal system to uniformly supply effluent to all the dispersal
zones. Unless effluent is evenly distributed to the dispersal zones in the
subsurface area drip dispersal system, the design of the system is not valid.
The efficiency and efficacy of the system rely on the uniform distribution
of effluent, even to the dispersal zones farthest from the system.
Proposed §222.117(d) would establish that the permittee design the
subsurface area drip dispersal system to be self-draining to prevent freezing
if there is a potential for freezing in the area where the subsurface area
drip dispersal system is located. This requirement will vary with the climate
in the location of the subsurface area drip dispersal system. Frozen effluent
in pipes and lines could cause lines to crack or break causing system malfunction
or failure.
Proposed §222.117(e) would require that the permittee provide adequate
velocity of flush water throughout the system during the flushing operation.
This requirement ensures that the entire system is properly scoured during
the flushing. The commission proposes this requirement to be consistent with
standard engineering and commission practices.
Proposed §222.117(f) would require that the subsurface area drip dispersal
system be equipped with backflow prevention devices to prevent the siphoning
of soil and water into the emitters. Siphoning of soil and water back into
the emitters could cause the emitters to clog or the system to malfunction.
The commission proposes this requirement to be consistent with standard engineering
and commission practices.
Proposed §222.117(g) would to require the permittee to establish storm
water run-on controls to minimize infiltration of precipitation into the dispersal
zones. Minimization of water on the site, other than the effluent delivered
to the subsurface area drip dispersal system, is required for the system to
operate properly and not cause seepage or percolation. The commission proposes
this requirement to be consistent with standard engineering and commission
practices.
Section 222.119, Delivery Systems
Proposed new §222.119 would establish the requirements for the piping
and pumps that deliver effluent from the treatment facility to the dispersal
zones.
Proposed §222.119(a) would require the permittee to use the criteria
from Chapter 317 for the piping associated with delivering treated effluent
from the treatment facility to the dispersal zones.
Proposed §222.119(b) would require the permittee to use standardized
nomenclature for identifying piping materials. This requirement is necessary
so that commission staff can identify the type of piping used.
Proposed §222.119(c) would establish that the permittee be required
to use a multiple pump system and include the design criteria for the pumps.
A multiple pump system protects the operation of the subsurface area drip
dispersal system by maintaining a redundant system of pumping treated effluent
from the treatment facility to the dispersal zones.
Proposed §222.119(d) would require that there are valves installed
for each submersible pump to assure that there is a method for regulating
flow into and out of each submersible pump.
Proposed §222.119(e) would require corrosion-resistant materials in
a subsurface area drip dispersal system that is subject to corrosive gases.
Proposed §222.119(f) would require that any self-priming pumps meet
the requirements of §317.3, except that self-priming pumps used in subsurface
area drip dispersal systems are not required to meet the solids-handling requirements
found in §317.3.
Proposed §222.119(g) would require that each unit of the self-priming
pump's discharge piping have a valve to regulate the flow of effluent from
the pump to the dispersal zones.
Section 222.121, Dispersal Zones
Proposed new §222.121 would establish the design criteria for the
subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.121(a) would require that the placement lines with emitters
be installed between six and 48 inches below the surface of the soil. Six
inches under the surface is the minimum depth for placement of emitters to
prevent effluent from surfacing and to protect the tubing from surface activities.
The 48-inch maximum depth is the maximum depth allowed for injection for a
system to be considered a subsurface area drip dispersal system according
to the definition of a subsurface area drip dispersal system defined in TWC, §32.002(a)(8).
Proposed §222.121(b) would require that the subsurface area drip dispersal
system be divided into different dispersal zones. The subsurface area drip
dispersal system must be able to treat and disperse the entire permitted flow
with the greater of one dispersal zone or 10% of the total number of dispersal
zones out of service.
Proposed §222.121(c) would require that the layout of the dispersal
lines follow the contour of the site and not exceed 1% lateral slope. More
than a 1% lateral slope prevents the even distribution of effluent to all
emitters in all zones. The efficiency and efficacy of the system rely on the
uniform distribution of effluent.
Proposed §222.121(d) would require that the engineering report include
the design and specifications for each dispersal zone. This information is
necessary to evaluate the efficacy of the design.
Proposed §222.121(e) would require that emitters shall be spaced not
less than one foot, nor more than three feet, on center, unless a variance
is granted due to specific conditions of the subsurface area drip dispersal
systems or the location. With less than one foot centers, there is a potential
for wetting zone overlap from adjacent emitters that could cause subsoil seepage
or percolation. With more than three feet centers, soil moisture would not
be evenly distributed over the site and there would be patches of vegetative
cover that would not receive adequate water or nutrients.
Proposed §222.121(f) would require the disinfection of the drip lines
and emitters according to the degree and frequency determined by the design
engineer to keep the system functioning properly and not clogging. No schedule
has been imposed by the rule because different systems have different requirements.
New §222.131(f) proposes to allow the applicant to submit the criteria
and then requires the permittee to comply with the criteria submitted.
Proposed §222.121(g) would require that the subsurface area drip dispersal
system be equipped with audible and visual alarms that will activate in case
of a problem with the system. An audio-visual alarm is necessary to alert
anyone in the area that there is a problem with the system. Proposed §222.131(g)
also requires that subsurface area drip dispersal systems that are not manned
daily have a telemetry system to notify a responsible party of a system problem.
Because the majority of a subsurface area drip dispersal system is underground,
alarms and telemetry are necessary to notify a responsible party, usually
the operator, that a problem exists. Early warning systems prevent system
failures and protect human health and the environment by notifying the operator
of a problem before the system is compromised or a spill or discharge occurs.
Section 222.123, Controls
Proposed new §222.123 would establish the design criteria and components
necessary for the automated control of the subsurface area drip dispersal
system and the associated equipment. Because consistently even distribution
of effluent is necessary for the subsurface area drip dispersal system to
operate properly and much of the operation is underground, the operations
must be constantly monitored by electronic means. Proposed §222.123 would
establish the equipment standards and operational standards necessary to ensure
that the operator is aware of how the system is functioning so that adjustments
or repairs can be made in a timely manner.
Section 222.125, Vertical Separation
Proposed new §222.125 would establish the minimum separation distances
between the subsurface area drip dispersal system to ensure that there is
adequate soil for the system to operate properly and to protect groundwater.
This section also proposes to allow the permittee to request a variance if
soil conditions at the specific subsurface area drip dispersal system site
do not meet the requirements of this section. If a variance is granted, the
executive director may impose alternate methods of preventing pollution.
Section 222.127, Storage
Proposed new §222.127 would establish the minimum storage capacity
for a subsurface area drip dispersal system. Minimum storage capacity is necessary
to protect the environment if the system has a mechanical failure, requires
maintenance, or if weather conditions prevent the application of effluent
through the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Subchapter E, Operations and Maintenance
Section 222.151, Seepage and Percolation Prohibited
Proposed new §222.151 would prohibit the effluent from leaving the
root zone through either seepage or percolation. TWC, §32.3(8) defines
a subsurface area drip dispersal system, in part, as a means of waste disposal
that spreads waste over a large enough area that the soil hydrologic absorption
rate and crop/plant root absorption rate are not exceeded. Seepage and percolation
would occur only if the soil hydrologic absorption rate and the crop/plant
root absorption rate are exceeded. Proposed §222.151 would allow leaching
sufficient to maintain the health of the cover crop.
Section 222.153, System Flushing
Proposed new §222.153 would establish the minimum frequency and method
to flush the subsurface area drip dispersal system piping and emitters. Flushing
is necessary to clear sediment and bacterial slime from the piping and emitters
and to prevent clogging.
Section 222.155, Soil Moisture Sampling
Proposed new §222.155 would establish that certain subsurface area
drip dispersal system permittees must sample soil moisture and prescribe the
method to sample the presence of moisture beneath the dispersal zones. If
groundwater is located under the subsurface area drip dispersal system site,
soil moisture monitoring may be added to the permit by the executive director.
Soil moisture sampling is necessary if groundwater is present to ensure that
the subsurface area drip dispersal system is operating properly and not threatening
groundwater.
Section 222.157, Soil Sampling
Proposed new §222.157 would require that the permittee sample soils
in the dispersal zones for the presence of nutrients. A build-up of nutrient
could harm or degrade the cover vegetation or leach out of the root zone and
potentially impact groundwater.
Proposed §222.157(a) would provide that the soil nutrient sampling
be performed during the same 45-day period on an annual basis. A consistent
sampling protocol is necessary to assess the change over time in the nutrient
levels in the soil beneath a subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.157(b) would require that the permittee submit the results
of the soil samples by September 1 following the sampling event.
Proposed §222.157(c) would enumerate the nutrients for which the permittee
must sample.
Proposed §222.157(d) would establish the depths at which the samples
must be taken.
Proposed §222.157(e) would allow the permittee to request an alternate
sampling schedule and requires the permittee to comply with any alternate
sampling schedule that has been approved by the executive director.
Proposed §222.157(f) would allow the permittee to request alternate
sampling depths and frequencies with justification that the alternate depths
and frequencies sufficiently monitor the levels of nutrients in the soil beneath
the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.157(g) would establish that soil samples be collected
from each different type of soil in the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Because nutrients behave differently in different soil types, a sample from
each soil type within the dispersal zones is necessary to evaluate the nutrient
loading in the soils of the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.157(h) would establish that the soil samples be composite
soil samples and at least one sample be taken from each dispersal zone. Because
application rates can vary from dispersal zone to dispersal zone, a composite
sample from each zone is necessary to evaluate the nutrient loading in the
soils of the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Proposed §222.157(i) would provide that if alternate samples or sampling
methods or schedules are required by the executive director, the permittee
must comply.
Section 222.159, Operator Licensing
Proposed new §222.159 would establish the minimum classification of
licensure held by an operator of a domestic wastewater treatment facility
that uses a subsurface area drip dispersal system and the subsurface area
drip dispersal system. The subsurface area drip dispersal system must be operated
by a chief operator holding a Class A, B, or C wastewater operator license.
Proposed §222.159 would also require that operators of all subsurface
area drip dispersal systems receive training relevant to the specific systems
they are to operate. Because subsurface area drip dispersal systems are an
innovative technology and require a consistently high quality of effluent
to prevent clogging and malfunction, the use of a wastewater operator with
more experience and training than is normally required for other land application
disposal systems is appropriate.
Section 222.161, Vegetative Cover
A key component of a subsurface area drip dispersal system is the vegetative
cover that utilizes both the water and the nutrient components of the effluent.
Proposed new §222.161 would establish requirements for minimum standards
for planning, reporting, and maintaining the vegetative cover portion of a
subsurface area drip dispersal system.
Section 222.163, Closure Requirements
Proposed new §222.163 would establish the requirements for decommissioning
a subsurface area drip dispersal. Proper closure is required to protect the
environment and prevent pollution.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed new rules are
in effect, no significant fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency
or other units of state or local governments as a result of administration
or enforcement of the proposed new rules.
The proposed rulemaking complies with the requirements of HB 2651, which
added Chapter 32 to the TWC and required the commission to establish a new
permit program for subsurface area drip dispersal systems by July 31, 2006.
A subsurface area drip dispersal system is defined by statute as a waste disposal
system that injects processed commercial, industrial, or municipal waste into
the ground at a depth of not more than 48 inches and spreads the waste over
a large enough area so the soil hydrologic absorption rate and crop/plant
root absorption rate are not exceeded. The proposed new rules will regulate
the disposal, by a subsurface area drip dispersal system, of any water-dominant
domestic or municipal liquid waste with the potential to cause fresh water
pollution when such wastewater effluent exceeds 5,000 gpd. The proposed new
rules will regulate the disposal, by a subsurface area drip dispersal system,
of any water-dominant commercial industrial wastewater of any flow capacity.
However, the proposed rulemaking excludes liquid wastes from oil and gas,
tar sands, sulfur, brine from desalination, or hazardous wastes, as defined
by THSC, §361.003, from subsurface area drip dispersal systems requirements.
It is estimated that there are currently 125 subsurface area drip dispersal
systems operating under approved permits. This number is not anticipated to
increase significantly. It is not known how many subsurface area drip dispersal
systems are operated by local governments, large businesses, small businesses,
or micro-businesses.
Subsurface area drip dispersal systems have previously been permitted using
current rules under TWC, Chapters 26 and 27. The proposed rulemaking will
formalize and specifically codify many current permitting requirements for
subsurface area drip dispersal systems. No significant fiscal impact is anticipated
for local governments, businesses, or individuals requesting permits for subsurface
area drip dispersal systems, but more stringent operator license and training
requirements seen in proposed rules related to licenses in Chapter 30 may
increase operating costs of these systems.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed new rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from
the changes seen in the proposed new rules will be implementation of state
law and the establishment of the permitting requirements and process for subsurface
area drip dispersal systems.
The proposed rulemaking will formalize and specifically codify many current
permitting requirements applicable to subsurface area drip dispersal systems
under existing commission permitting programs. No significant fiscal impact
is anticipated for local governments, businesses, or individuals requesting
permits for subsurface area drip dispersal systems, but more stringent operator
license and training requirements seen in proposed rules related to licenses
in Chapter 30 may increase operating costs of these systems.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses
as a result of this proposed rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking will formalize
and specifically codify many current permitting requirements for subsurface
area drip dispersal systems. No significant fiscal impact is anticipated for
local governments, businesses, or individuals requesting permits for subsurface
area drip dispersal systems, but more stringent operator license and training
requirements seen in proposed rules related to licenses in Chapter 30 may
increase operating costs of these systems.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed new
rules do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first
five years that the proposed new rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule."
Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental rule" means
a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed new rules are intended to implement
HB 2651, relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
The proposed new rules will regulate subsurface area drip dispersal systems
that beneficially reuse treated domestic or municipal wastewater effluent
generated by treatment facilities of more than 5,000 gpd or industrial wastewater
effluent. The proposed new rules are intended to provide a permitting procedure
and criteria for using subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The proposed
new rules will also require the commission to prepare a comprehensive compliance
history for applicants seeking a permit under Chapter 222. Chapter 222 is
applicable to any person who operates a waste dispersal system that uniformly
injects processed wastewater effluent into the ground at a depth of not more
than 48 inches and spreads the waste over the area so that the soil hydrologic
absorption rate and crop/plant root absorption rate are not exceeded. Although
the intent of the proposed new rulemaking is to protect the environment or
reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure, it is not a major
environmental rule because it does not adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, or public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
Therefore, the proposed new rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental
rule as defined in the Texas Government Code.
In addition, the proposed new rules are not subject to Texas Government
Code, §2001.0225, because they do not meet the specified criteria. Texas
Government Code, §2001.0225(a), applies to a rule adopted by an agency,
the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law, unless
the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express requirement
of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3)
exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state
and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state
and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers of
the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The proposed new rules do not meet any of these requirements. First, the
proposed new rules do not exceed a standard set by federal law, because there
is no comparable federal law. Second, the proposed new rules do not exceed
an express requirement of state law, because they are consistent with the
express requirements of TWC, Chapter 32, and are proposed to implement HB
2651. Third, the proposed new rules do not exceed an express requirement of
a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative
of the federal government to implement a state and federal program. Fourth,
the proposed new rules have not been proposed solely under the general powers
of the agency, but have been proposed under the express requirements of TWC,
Chapter 32. The proposed new rules substantially advance this specific purpose
by setting forth permitting procedures, criteria for subsurface area drip
dispersal systems, and a comprehensive compliance history review of applicants.
Therefore, the commission does not propose these rules solely under the commission's
general powers. These proposed new rules do not meet the criteria for a major
environmental rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis
determination.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these proposed
rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to implement the provisions of TWC, Chapter 32. The primary
purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to implement the provisions of TWC,
Chapter 32, which will regulate subsurface area drip dispersal systems that
beneficially reuse treated wastewater effluent generated by domestic treatment
facilities of more than 5,000 gpd and industrial facilities regardless of
flow. The proposed new rules are intended to provide a permitting procedure
that includes scientifically based requirements for design and operation of
these systems. The proposed new rules also specifically contain the intention
for the commission to prepare a more comprehensive compliance history for
Chapter 222 applications. Chapter 222 applies to any person who operates a
waste dispersal system that uniformly injects processed wastewater effluent
into the ground at a depth of not more than 48 inches and spreads the waste
over the area so that the soil hydrologic absorption rate and crop/plant root
absorption rate are not exceeded. The proposed new rules would substantially
advance this purpose by setting forth the standards and requirements for applications,
permits, and actions by the commission to carry out the responsibilities for
managing beneficial reuse of treated wastewater by means of subsurface area
drip dispersal systems. The promulgation and enforcement of the proposed new
rules will not affect private real property in a manner that would require
compensation to private real property owners under the United States Constitution
or the Texas Constitution. The proposed new rules also will not affect private
real property in a manner that restricts or limits an owner's right to the
property that would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental action.
Consequently, this proposal does not meet the definition of some takings under
Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5). Therefore, the proposed new rules
will not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The
commission invites public comment on this preliminary takings impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found that the proposal
is subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance with
the Coastal Coordination Act, Texas Natural Resources Code, §§33.201
The CMP goal applicable to the proposed rulemaking is the goal to protect,
preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity, functions,
and values of coastal natural resource areas. Proposed Chapter 222 meets the
provisions of this goal. Proposed Chapter 222 regulates effluent applied into
the soil through subsurface area drip dispersal systems and does not allow
that effluent to cause pollution.
CMP policies applicable to the proposed rulemaking are located in 31 TAC §501.21,
Policies for Discharge of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater to Coastal Waters.
Proposed Chapter 222 complies with the policies in this section. Proposed
Chapter 222 regulates effluent applied into the soil through subsurface area
drip dispersal systems and does not allow that effluent to impact groundwater
or surface water of any kind, including coastal waters.
Promulgation and enforcement of these proposed new rules will not violate
or exceed any standards identified in the applicable CMP goals and policies
because the proposed new rules are consistent with these CMP goals and policies,
because these proposed new rules do not create or have a direct or significant
adverse effect on any coastal natural resource areas.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005-050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-0571 or
Louis C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-4552.
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
30 TAC §§222.1, 222.3, 222.5
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorizes the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to
carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality in
the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations considered advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §27.019,
which requires the commission to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation
of injection wells; §32.054, which authorizes the executive director
to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151, which authorizes the commission,
authorized agent, or employee of local government the power to enter property.
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the commission to adopt rules
under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed new sections implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§222.1.Purpose and Scope.
The purpose of this chapter is to:
(1)
maintain the quality of fresh water in the state to the
extent consistent with the public health and welfare and the operation of
existing industries;
(2)
promote the beneficial reuse of commercial, industrial,
and municipal waste for the economic development of the state, thereby reducing
the demand on the state's supply of fresh water;
(3)
prevent underground injection that may pollute fresh water;
and
(4)
require the use of all reasonable methods to implement
this policy.
§222.3.Applicability.
(a)
This chapter applies to any person who operates a waste
dispersal system that:
(1)
injects processed commercial, industrial, or municipal
wastewater effluent into the ground at a depth of not more than 48 inches;
and
(2)
spreads the waste over the area so that the soil hydrologic
absorption rate and crop/plant root absorption rate are not exceeded.
(b)
This chapter does not apply to:
(1)
wastewater disposal systems authorized under Chapter 285
of this title (relating to On-Site Sewage Facilities) and Texas Health and
Safety Code (THSC), Chapter 366;
(2)
disposal systems for oil and gas waste, tar sands, sulfur,
brine from desalination plants, and hazardous waste as defined by THSC, §361.003;
(3)
drainfields, leaching chambers, or other gravity trench
systems;
(4)
subsurface drip irrigation systems that do not meet the
definition of subsurface area drip dispersal systems, as defined in §222.5
of this title (relating to Definitions); or
(5)
systems regulated in §331.8 of this title (relating
to Prohibition of Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal Wells and Large Capacity Cesspools).
§222.5.Definitions.
The definitions contained in Texas Water Code, §§26.001,
27.002, 28.001, and 32.003 apply to this chapter. The following words and
terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings.
(1)
Aquifer--As defined or amended under Chapter 331 of this
title (relating to Underground Injection Control).
(2)
Buffer zone--The area between a subsurface area drip dispersal
system boundary and surface waters in the state or a protected recharge feature.
(3)
Crop requirement--The amount of nutrients that must be
present in order to ensure that the crop nutrient needs are met, while accounting
for nutrients that may become unavailable to the crop due to absorption to
soil particles or other natural causes.
(4)
Domestic waste--Waste and wastewater from humans and household
operations that are discharged to a wastewater collection system or otherwise
enters a treatment facility. This includes waterborne human waste and waste
from domestic activities such as washing, bathing, and food preparation, including
graywater and blackwater.
(5)
Emitter--A device designed to discharge into the soil,
a small uniform flow of water at a constant rate.
(6)
Evapotranspiration--The water lost from an area through
the combined effects of evaporation from the ground surface and transpiration
from the vegetation.
(7)
Facility--All land and fixtures, structures, or appurtenances
used for storing, processing, treating, or disposing of waste, or for injection
activities. A facility may consist of several storage, processing, treatment,
disposal, or injection operational units.
(8)
Floodway--A channel of a river or watercourse and the adjacent
land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without
cumulatively increasing the surface elevation more than one foot.
(9)
Fresh water--As defined or amended under Texas Water Code, §27.002.
(10)
Groundwater--Subsurface water occurring in soils and geologic
formations that are fully saturated year-round, seasonally, or intermittently.
(11)
Hazardous waste--Any solid waste identified or listed
as a hazardous waste by the administrator of the United States Environmental
Protection Agency in accordance with the federal Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 United States
Code, §§6901
et seq
., as amended.
(12)
Hydrologic connection--The connection and exchange between
surface water and groundwater.
(13)
Industrial waste--Any non-domestic wastewater.
(14)
Infiltration--The passage of water through the soil surface
into the soil profile.
(15)
Licensed professional engineer--An individual licensed
by the Texas Board of Professional Engineers to engage in the practice of
engineering in the State of Texas.
(16)
Licensed professional geoscientist--An individual licensed
by the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists in accordance with its requirement
for professional practice in the State of Texas.
(17)
Local government--An incorporated city, county, river
authority, groundwater conservation district, or a water district or authority
acting under Texas Constitution, Article III, §52 or Article XVI, §59.
(18)
Owner--The person, corporation, partnership, or other
legal entity that owns or partially owns a facility or part of a facility,
or that owns or partially owns the land on which a facility or part of a facility
is located.
(19)
Public contact--Significant dermal contact with soil.
(20)
Recharge feature--Those natural or artificial features
either on or beneath the ground surface at the site that provide or create
a significant hydrologic connection between the ground surface and the underlying
groundwater within an aquifer. Significant artificial features include, but
are not limited to, wells and excavation or material pits. Significant natural
hydrologic connections include, but are not limited to: faults, fractures,
karst features, or other macro pores that allow direct surface infiltration;
a permeable or shallow soil material that overlies an aquifer; exposed geologic
formations that are identified as an aquifer; or a water course bisecting
an aquifer.
(21)
Soil--The upper layer of the surface of the earth that
serves as a natural medium for the growth of plants.
(22)
Subsurface area drip dispersal systems--A waste disposal
system that injects processed commercial, industrial, or municipal waste into
the ground at a depth of not more than 48 inches and spreads the waste over
a large enough area that the soil hydrologic absorption rate and crop/plant
root absorption rate are not exceeded.
(23)
Surface water in the state--Water in the state as defined
in Texas Water Code, §26.001(5), except that "groundwater, percolating
or otherwise," is specifically excluded.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the
Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600570
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §§222.31, 222.33, 222.35, 222.37, 222.39, 222.41, 222.43, 222.45
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorizes the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to
carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality in
the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations considered advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §27.019,
which requires the commission to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation
of injection wells; §32.054, which authorizes the executive director
to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151, which authorizes the commission,
authorized agent, or employee of local government the power to enter property.
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the commission to adopt rules
under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed new sections implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§222.31.Application Process.
(a)
An owner of a subsurface area drip dispersal system shall
apply for a permit in accordance with the provisions of this section for any
subsurface area drip dispersal system that did not have an application for
a subsurface area drip dispersal system permit that had been declared administratively
complete or was authorized by a permit in effect at the time of the adoption
of these rules.
(b)
A permittee who holds a valid permit for a subsurface area
drip dispersal system issued prior to July 31, 2006, and who wishes to renew
that permit shall apply for a permit according to the requirements of this
chapter upon the expiration date of the current permit.
(c)
A permittee who holds a valid permit for a subsurface area
drip dispersal system issued prior to July 31, 2006, and who wishes to amend
that permit shall apply for a permit amendment according to the requirements
of this chapter.
(d)
Application for a permit shall be made on forms provided
by the executive director. Applicants shall comply with §§305.41,
305.43, 305.44, 305.46, and 305.47 of this title (relating to Applicability;
Who Applies; Signatories to Applications; Designation of Material as Confidential;
and Retention of Application Data).
(e)
Upon receiving an administratively complete application
for a permit, the executive director shall:
(1)
inspect the location of the proposed subsurface area drip
dispersal system to evaluate the local conditions and the probable effect
of the subsurface area drip dispersal system;
(2)
forward a copy of the permit application to the Department
of State Health Services for the purpose of soliciting comments on the application;
and
(3)
allow 30 days for the Department of State Health Services
to submit comments on the permit application.
(f)
The applicant shall submit an application that demonstrates
compliance with the technical requirements set forth in this chapter and shall
demonstrate compliance with the requirements of Subchapter C of this chapter
(relating to Siting Requirements and Effluent Limitations).
(g)
The applicant shall include the site preparation plan in
the permit application packet. The site preparation plan shall comply with
the requirements of §222.75 of this title (relating to Site Preparation
Plan).
(h)
The applicant shall provide such additional information
in support of the application as may be necessary, as determined by the executive
director, for an adequate technical review of the application.
(i)
Each applicant and permittee shall comply with §§305.61
and 305.63 - 305.68 of this title (relating to Applicability; Renewal; Transfer
of Permits; Permit Denial; Suspension and Revocation; Revocation and Suspension
Upon Request or Consent; and Action and Notice on Petition for Revocation
or Suspension).
(j)
The permittee must file the application for renewal of
an existing permit no later than 180 days before the expiration date of the
current permit. Upon request, the executive director may grant an exception
to this requirement, but in no case may the executive director grant permission
for applications to be submitted later than the expiration date of the existing
permit.
(k)
Except as provided in §222.33(b) of this title (relating
to Public Notice), notice, public comment, and hearing on applications shall
be conducted in accordance with commission rules governing individual permits
issued under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26. Each permittee shall comply with §305.125
of this title (relating to Standard Permit Conditions).
(l)
A permittee who holds a valid permit for a subsurface area
drip dispersal system under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26 issued prior to July
31, 2006, may apply for and be granted a variance from the site requirements
and design criteria in this chapter, if the subsurface area drip dispersal
system is:
(1)
not in need of repair;
(2)
not causing pollution as determined by the executive director;
(3)
not causing soil saturation or a build-up of waterborne
constituents within the soil;
(4)
not prohibited by §213.8 of this title (relating to
Prohibited Activities);
(5)
not prohibited by §331.8 of this title (relating to
Prohibition of Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal Wells and Large Capacity Cesspools);
and
(6)
the permittee is not a poor performer or repeat violator
as defined in §60.3(a) of this title (relating to Use of Compliance History)
or has other compliance history issues that may indicate the lack of ability
of the permittee to comply with the permit and commission rules.
§222.33.Public Notice.
(a)
For the purpose of public notices, subsurface area drip
dispersal systems shall be subject to the same public notice provisions required
for wastewater discharge permits described in §39.403(b)(2) of this title
(relating to Applicability).
(b)
Applicants for subsurface area drip dispersal system permits
shall comply with the regulations regarding public notice of applications
for wastewater discharge permits found in Chapter 39 of this title (relating
to Public Notice).
§222.35.Requests for Reconsideration and Contested Case Hearing and Public Comment.
Chapter 55, Subchapters D - F of this title (relating to Applicability
and Definitions; Public Comment and Public Meetings; and Requests for Reconsideration
or Contested Case Hearing) will apply to applications for permits authorizing
subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
§222.37.Compliance History.
(a)
A compliance history will be prepared and evaluated in
accordance with Chapter 60 of this title (relating to Compliance History)
for each of the following entities that have activities that are subject to
regulation by the commission:
(1)
the owner of the wastewater treatment facility supplying
effluent to the subsurface area drip dispersal system;
(2)
the owner of the land where a wastewater treatment facility
supplying effluent to the subsurface area drip dispersal system is located;
(3)
the owner of the subsurface area drip dispersal system;
(4)
the owner of the land where a subsurface area drip dispersal
system is located;
(5)
each business entity that is related to the applicant(s).
Business entities are related for the purposes of this requirement, if the
business entities share:
(A)
the same owner(s) or partial owner(s); or
(B)
the same member(s) of a partnership; or
(6)
each business entity that is managed by the permittee.
(b)
If the owner of a subsurface area drip dispersal system
is a governmental body or a subdivision of that governmental body, a compliance
history will be prepared for that governmental body, such as:
(1)
a city;
(2)
a county;
(3)
a military base;
(4)
a state or federal agency, commission, or department; or
(5)
a quasi-governmental agency created by federal or state
legislatures.
§222.39.Term of the Permit.
The term of the permit shall not exceed ten years, in accordance with §305.127
of this title (relating to Conditions To Be Determined for Individual Permits).
§222.41.Right of Entry.
Inspection and entry shall be allowed under Texas Water Code, Chapters
26 - 28 and 32, Texas Health and Safety Code, §§361.032, 361.033,
361.037, and 401.063, and 40 Code of Federal Regulations, §122.41(i).
The statements in Texas Water Code, §26.014 and §32.151, that commission
entry of a facility shall occur in accordance with an establishment's rules
and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection
is not grounds for denial or restriction of entry to any part of the facility,
but merely describes the commission's duty to observe appropriate rules and
regulations during an inspection.
§222.43.Construction Notices to Regional Offices.
(a)
The permittee shall notify the appropriate Texas Commission
on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regional office at least 30 days prior to
the date field layout and/or construction startup is scheduled to begin.
(b)
If soils are to be imported, the permittee shall notify
the TCEQ regional office at least 30 days prior to completion of the soil
importing project.
(c)
The permittee shall notify the appropriate TCEQ regional
office at least 30 days prior to the date that construction is projected to
be complete.
(d)
The permittee shall notify the appropriate TCEQ regional
office within 30 days after operation of the subsurface area drip dispersal
system begins.
§222.45.Local Health Department Notification.
(a)
Before commencing operation of the subsurface area drip
dispersal system, the permittee must submit a copy of the permit to the health
department with jurisdiction in the area where the system is located.
(b)
The permittee must retain proof of delivery for the duration
of the permit.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600571
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §§222.71, 222.73, 222.75, 222.77, 222.79, 222.81, 222.83, 222.85, 222.87
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorizes the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to
carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality in
the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations considered advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §27.019,
which requires the commission to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation
of injection wells; §32.054, which authorizes the executive director
to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151, which authorizes the commission,
authorized agent, or employee of local government the power to enter property.
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the commission to adopt rules
under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed new sections implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§222.71.Site Selection.
Site selection of a proposed subsurface area drip dispersal system
is subject to the requirements in §309.12 of this title (relating to
Site Selection to Protect Groundwater or Surface Water).
§222.73.Soil Evaluation.
(a)
The applicant shall conduct and submit with the application
a soils evaluation to identify the soils associated with the proposed site.
At least one profile hole per soil type must be included in the evaluation.
The applicant shall use soil borings, where appropriate, for enhancement of
the profile hole determinations. The profile holes utilized in the site evaluation
must be no more than five feet deep, or to the first continuous lateral lithic
contact. The evaluation must include the following information:
(1)
total depth of the profile hole;
(2)
primary rooting depth;
(3)
secondary rooting depth;
(4)
horizon descriptions shall include:
(A)
depth of the horizon;
(B)
soil texture;
(C)
soil structure;
(D)
soil color;
(E)
mottling; and
(F)
percent coarse fragments;
(5)
boundary descriptions (soil horizons);
(6)
restrictive horizons;
(7)
potential water bearing zones; and
(8)
active water bearing zones.
(b)
The soil evaluation shall be performed by a licensed professional
geoscientist.
§222.75.Site Preparation Plan.
The applicant shall develop and submit, with the permit application,
a site preparation plan that illustrates how site preparation will alleviate
potential site-specific limitations and ensure suitability for the subsurface
area drip dispersal system of wastewater. This plan must include the following
if applicable:
(1)
a site plan to minimize rainfall run-on and maximize rainfall
runoff from the dispersal zones;
(2)
design criteria to compensate for any restrictive horizons
within the soil column;
(3)
soil importation with descriptions of the chemical and
physical characteristics of the proposed import material; and
(4)
any planned removal of existing vegetation.
§222.77.Protection of Groundwater.
(a)
A subsurface area drip dispersal system shall not pollute
groundwater quality.
(b)
If groundwater is present beneath the site of a proposed
subsurface area drip dispersal system, the executive director may require
that the baseline quality of the groundwater be documented by:
(1)
sampling the quality of the first occurrence of groundwater
on site for a minimum of two sample events at least 30 days apart; or
(2)
an alternative method submitted by the applicant and approved
by the executive director.
(c)
The executive director may impose continuing groundwater
monitoring at a particular subsurface area drip dispersal system site.
§222.79.Recharge Feature Plan.
For new facilities and facilities undergoing an expansion of the subsurface
area drip dispersal system, the applicant must supply a recharge feature plan
with the application that is signed and sealed by a licensed professional
engineer or a licensed professional geoscientist who has inspected the site
of the proposed subsurface area drip dispersal system. The recharge feature
plan must:
(1)
document the presence or absence of any recharge features
identified on any tracts of land owned, operated, controlled, rented, or leased
by the applicant and to be used as a part of the facility;
(2)
list the sources and methods used to identify the presence
or absence of recharge features. At a minimum, the licensed professional engineer
or geoscientist must review the records and maps maintained by the following
sources:
(A)
Railroad Commission of Texas;
(B)
a groundwater conservation district, if applicable;
(C)
Texas Water Development Board;
(D)
the commission;
(E)
Natural Resources Conservation Service;
(F)
a previous owner of the site, if available; and
(G)
on-site inspection;
(3)
provide a narrative description of the site-specific geology
and groundwater at the facility. The narrative must include, at a minimum,
the following information:
(A)
a site-specific description of the geologic formations
underlying the facility;
(B)
the depth to groundwater;
(C)
the general direction of groundwater flow;
(D)
potential uses of the groundwater and any known uses of
the groundwater within a 1/2 mile radius of the perimeter of the proposed
subsurface area drip dispersal system site; and
(E)
any well drillers' logs and water quality data obtained
for wells on the subsurface area drip dispersal system site and within 500
feet of the property line; and
(4)
identify measures to prevent impacts to groundwater from
any recharge features present. The licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geoscientist must include at least one of the following in the
plan:
(A)
provisions for the installation of the necessary and appropriate
protective measures for each located recharge feature, including impervious
cover, berms, buffer zones, or other equivalent protective measures; or
(B)
submission of a detailed groundwater monitoring plan covering
all of the affected facility, including the subsurface area drip dispersal
system. At a minimum, the groundwater monitoring plan shall specify the location
of proposed monitoring wells, procedures to collect a groundwater sample from
representative wells, the proposed constituents to be included in the sampling
plan, and frequency of the sampling event; and, provide for any other similar
method or approach demonstrated by the applicant to be protective of any associated
recharge feature and approved by the executive director.
§222.81.Buffer Zone Requirements.
(a)
The permittee must locate the subsurface area drip dispersal
system a minimum horizontal distance of:
(1)
500 feet from public water wells, springs, or other similar
sources of public drinking water;
(2)
150 feet from private water wells as described in §309.13(c)(1)
of this title (relating to Unsuitable Site Characteristics); and
(3)
100 feet from surface waters in the state.
(b)
The permittees must locate the wastewater treatment plant
unit in accordance with §290.41(c)(1)(B) of this title (relating to Water
Sources) and §309.13(c) of this title.
(c)
Buffer variance.
(1)
The executive director may grant a variance to a permittee
operating a subsurface area drip dispersal system under an existing authorization
issued prior to November 1, 2006, to continue the operation and use of any
existing subsurface area drip dispersal system located within the buffer zones
listed in this section provided that the system:
(A)
is in compliance with the recharge feature plan required
by §222.79 of this title (relating to the Recharge Feature Plan); or
(B)
is certified by a licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geoscientist determining that the existing buffers will be protective
of water quality.
(2)
The permittee shall maintain documentation authorizing
variances of buffer zones on site for the duration of the permit and make
it available to commission personnel upon request.
(d)
The permittee shall not locate a subsurface area drip dispersal
system within a floodway.
§222.83.Hydraulic Application Rate.
(a)
The permittee must demonstrate in the engineering report
and ensure that the hydraulic application rate for a subsurface area drip
dispersal system meets one of the following.
(1)
The hydraulic application rate for a subsurface area drip
dispersal system located west of the boundary shown in paragraph (2) of this
subsection, Figure 1, and using a vegetative cover of non- native grasses
that are over seeded with cool season grasses in the winter months (October
- March) shall not exceed 0.1 gallons per square foot per day.
(2)
The hydraulic application rate for a subsurface area drip
dispersal system located east of the boundary shown in Figure 1 of this paragraph
or in any part of the state when the vegetative cover is any crop other than
non-native grasses, the permittee shall use the following equations to establish
the rate.
Figure 1: 30 TAC §222.83(a)(2)
Figure 2: 30 TAC §222.83(a)(2)
Figure 3: 30 TAC §222.83(a)(2)
(3)
The applicant must calculate the hydraulic application
rate for each month of the year. A monthly water balance is computed that
includes soil moisture storage. Any available soil moisture is carried over
to the next month. The maximum application rate is exceeded when the total
hydraulic loading (rainfall and irrigation) exceeds the total of the available
soil moisture storage, the actual water requirement of crop (inches per month),
and leaching.
(4)
The permittee may use an alternative method to calculate
the hydraulic application rate with the approval of the executive director.
(b)
The nitrogen application rate for a subsurface area drip
dispersal system must be calculated using the anticipated nitrogen concentration
of wastewater effluent prior to land application.
(1)
The permittee must calculate the allowable annual hydraulic
loading rate based on nitrogen limits using the following equation.
(2)
Upon request by the applicant, the executive director may
approve other fractions of applied nitrogen removed based upon special conditions
relating to a proposed site, if justified in the engineering report.
(c)
The result obtained from calculation of the allowable annual
hydraulic loading rate that is based upon nitrogen limits must be compared
to the hydraulic loading rate that is based on crop need and soil water holding
capacity. The more restrictive of the two calculations will set the maximum
hydraulic application rate.
§222.85.Effluent Quality.
(a)
Protection of fresh water. The applicant must demonstrate
that both surface and subsurface fresh water will not be polluted by the application
of wastewater by the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
(b)
Domestic waste.
(1)
The permittee shall maintain the pH of the effluent within
the limits of 6.0 - 9.0 standard units in accordance with §309.20(b)(5)(E)
of this title (relating to Land Disposal of Sewage Effluent), unless a specific
variance is approved by the executive director based upon site-specific conditions.
(2)
The permittee shall comply with specific effluent limitations
placed in the permit by the executive director to control the discharge of
toxic constituents.
(3)
When a subsurface area drip dispersal system applies effluent
on land where there is the potential for public contact with the soil, the
permittee shall comply with Effluent Set 4 located in §309.4 of this
title (relating to Table 1, Effluent Limitations for Domestic Treatment Plants),
or with more stringent effluent limitations prescribed by the executive director,
if warranted to protect human health and the environment.
(4)
When a subsurface area drip dispersal system applies effluent
on land where there is not potential public contact with the soil, the permittee
shall comply with Effluent Set 5 located in §309.4 of this title, or
with more stringent effluent limitations prescribed by the executive director,
if warranted to protect human health and the environment.
(5)
Disinfection.
(A)
Permittees applying treated effluent to land where there
is the potential for public contact with the soil must disinfect the effluent
prior to it entering the subsurface area drip dispersal system in accordance
with §309.3(g) of this title (relating to Application of Effluent Sets).
(B)
If the effluent is to be transferred to a holding pond
or tank prior to dispersal, the permittee shall ensure that the effluent meets
the relevant criteria of §222.87 of this title (relating to Effluent
Limitations) at the time it enters the distribution system.
(C)
Permittees are allowed to use ultraviolet disinfection
systems only with effluent having a daily average five-day biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD
5
) concentration and total suspended
solids concentration that are less than 20 milligrams per liter each.
(6)
The permittee must comply with requirements other than
those specified in this section, if determined by the executive director to
be necessary to protect human health.
§222.87.Effluent Limitations.
(a)
Domestic waste. The permittee shall comply with the effluent
limitations in §309.3 and §309.4 of this title (relating to Application
of Effluent Sets and Table 1, Effluent Limitations for Domestic Wastewater
Treatment Plants).
(b)
Industrial waste.
(1)
The permittee is prohibited from introducing the following
wastes into a subsurface area drip dispersal system:
(A)
characteristically hazardous wastes as determined in 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 261, Subpart C;
(B)
listed hazardous wastes as defined in 40 CFR Part 261,
Subpart D;
(C)
wastes specifically prohibited for land disposal in 40
CFR Part 268, Subpart C; and
(D)
radioactive wastes.
(2)
Effluent limitations.
(A)
The permittee shall comply with effluent limitations established
by the executive director in individual permits.
(B)
The permittee shall demonstrate compliance with technology-based
effluent limitations by monitoring the effluent prior to introduction into
the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
(C)
If the soil pH is less than 6.5 standard units at a subsurface
area drip dispersal system site, the permittee shall monitor certain trace
elements, including phosphorus, fluoride, and heavy metals as specified by
the executive director in the individual permit.
(D)
Prior to disposal, the permittee shall ensure that the
effluent from a treatment system meets Effluent Set 5, established in §309.4
of this title.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal
authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600572
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §§222.111, 222.113, 222.115, 222.117, 222.119, 222.121, 222.123, 222.125, 222.127
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorizes the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to
carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality in
the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations considered advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §26.034,
which authorizes the executive director to review and approve plans and specification
for domestic disposal systems; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed new sections implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§222.111.General Provisions.
(a)
This subchapter applies to any person who proposes to design
and construct a facility that will treat or dispose of domestic or municipal
wastewater and who uses a subsurface area drip dispersal system. This subchapter
is not applicable to treatment facilities constructed for the purposes of
complying with a commission-issued industrial wastewater permit, but is applicable
to a subsurface area drip dispersal system if it is associated with an industrial
wastewater treatment facility.
(b)
This subchapter establishes the minimum design criteria
pertaining to effluent quality necessary to meet state water quality standards.
Plans, specifications, and reports for a proposed domestic wastewater project
must conform to the requirements of this subchapter.
(c)
The applicant for a permit for a domestic wastewater treatment
facility with a subsurface area drip dispersal system shall submit to the
executive director an engineering report, including the plans and specifications,
that meets the requirements found in this subchapter. Construction must not
begin on a facility with approved plans and specifications until the executive
director issues a wastewater permit, unless the commission authorizes the
applicant to construct before permit issuance, under Texas Water Code, §26.027(c).
(d)
The executive director may approve a variance from any
of the design criteria in this subchapter. In accordance with §222.113
of this title (relating to Engineering Report), the applicant shall submit
with the engineering report the variance request, and the technical justification
for the design change and the way in which the change is at least as protective
of human health and the environment as the required design criteria.
(e)
Approval of the submitted engineering report, plans, or
specifications by the executive director does not relieve the permittee of
any liabilities or responsibilities associated with designing, constructing,
and operating the subsurface area drip dispersal system and the associated
treatment facility in accordance with applicable commission rules and in a
manner that protects human health and the environment.
§222.113.Engineering Report.
The applicant shall submit an engineering report that includes the
plans and specifications that:
(1)
has been prepared by a licensed professional engineer;
(2)
addresses the proposed design, hydraulic and organic loadings,
and the basis for the design for the subsurface area drip dispersal system
and the treatment system;
(3)
a scale drawing of all land that is to be part of the subsurface
area drip dispersal system showing the location of all existing and proposed
facilities to include the following:
(A)
buildings;
(B)
dispersal zones;
(C)
treatment facilities;
(D)
effluent storage; and
(E)
the buffer zones that demonstrate compliance with §222.81
of this title (relating to Buffer Zone Requirements);
(4)
includes the site topography;
(5)
includes storm water run-on prevention and storm water
runoff accommodation; and
(6)
includes any variance requests with supporting documentation.
§222.115.Treatment System.
(a)
For the systems and processes used to provide treatment
of domestic wastewater prior to the wastewater entering the subsurface area
drip dispersal system the applicant shall use the design criteria in Chapter
317 of this title (relating to Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems).
(b)
If using septic tanks as the treatment system, the applicant
shall design, construct, and install the tanks in accordance with Chapter
285, Subchapter D of this title (relating to Planning, Construction, and Installation
of OSSFs).
(c)
If using anaerobic biological reactors (ABRs) as the treatment
system, the permittee must comply with the following criteria.
(1)
The ABR must have a container that is a structural unit
such as a concrete tank, or an earthen berm with a membrane liner that may
be used for larger installations.
(A)
The container must be designed for the internal and external
stresses that may be placed on the container during fabrication and use.
(B)
Materials used to construct an ABR structural container
must meet the requirements for septic tanks in §285.32 of this title
(relating to Criteria for Sewage Treatment Systems).
(C)
Containers using compacted earthen berms must use a membrane
of vinyl or other plastic with a minimum thickness of 40 mils as the waterproofing
component.
(D)
A cover is required unless a covering layer of gravel or
other media is placed above the liquid level to present a dry surface.
(2)
The ABR must have media that is inert, stable, of uniform
size, and free of fines.
(A)
Clean washed gravel, crushed rock, or plastic filter media
made for trickling filter use is acceptable.
(B)
Minimum media effective size must be one inch and the uniformity
coefficient must be less than 3.0.
(3)
The ABR must have a distribution system over the bottom
of the ABR and a collection system near the top to the ABR.
(A)
The piping for the distribution system must be constructed
of pipe that:
(i)
is class 200 or schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC);
(ii)
meets American Standard Testing Material (ASTM) standards
D-2241 or D-1785; and
(iii)
has a one inch nominal diameter.
(B)
The ABR must incorporate a sight well that allows monitoring
the liquid level in the unit.
(C)
The ABR must have a means to flush and remove excessive
biomat buildup from the media.
(d)
If using sand filters as the treatment system, the permittee
shall use sand filters that have the following components and meet the following
requirements.
(1)
Sand filters must be contained in a structural unit designed
for all internal and external stresses that may be placed on the containment
device during fabrication and use such as:
(A)
a septic tank unit that meets the requirements in Chapter
285, Subchapter D of this title;
(B)
a poured in place concrete structure; or
(C)
an earthen berm with an impermeable membrane liner that
has a minimum thickness of 40 mils and an under-drain leak detection system.
(2)
The permittee shall use a detention time of at least 24
hours for dosing to a sand filter at rates up to ten gallons per day per square
foot.
(3)
All sand filter containment devices shall provide sufficient
freeboard above the filter surface to hold four dosing volumes.
(4)
A sand filter must have a collection pipe system to collect
the filtered effluent that meets the following requirements.
(A)
The piping shall be arranged so that the maximum horizontal
travel distance of water through the under-drain media is less than four feet.
(B)
The collection piping and the drain pipe from the filter
shall be sized to remove a filter dose volume from the filter within a ten-minute
period.
(C)
The ends of the collection lines shall be extended above
the surface of the filter to allow aeration of the drained filter.
(D)
The collection piping system shall be constructed of pipe
that:
(i)
is class 200 or schedule 40 PVC;
(ii)
meets ASTM standards D-2241 or D-1785; and
(iii)
has a two-inch nominal diameter.
(E)
The sand filter media must:
(i)
be an inert clean washed material that is free of fines,
dirt, and organic material;
(ii)
have an effective size and uniformity coefficient suitable
for the design loading rate;
(iii)
have a depth based on the effective grain size and the
design effluent quality with coarse media requiring a greater media depth;
and
(iv)
be placed on top of a bottom drain media.
(F)
The sand filter bottom media must:
(i)
cover the effluent collection piping;
(ii)
have an effective grain size from two to four times the
effective grain size of the filter media; and
(iii)
support the filter media, prevent washout, and hydraulic
removal of the filter media.
(5)
The surface distribution mechanism must distribute the
liquid to be filtered over the surface of the filter in a uniform manner.
(A)
If a filter receives the liquid by gravity, distribution
shall be accomplished by troughs or channels using splash pads to reduce surface
erosion.
(B)
Pressure-dosed sand filters must have a distribution system
that:
(i)
provides even distribution of the liquid;
(ii)
consists of a pipe network with discharge holes or spray
nozzles; and
(iii)
provides a uniform pressure at the discharge outlets.
(6)
Loading rates and filter sizing must be designed to treat
the specific characteristics of the incoming wastewater and the effluent quality.
(7)
The loading rate shall be designed based on the influent
qualities, the selected media, and the acceptable run time between filter
media cleaning or replacement.
(e)
The permittee must submit a design that specifies the minimum
frequency for solids removal from the treatment system and the justification
of the frequency based on the type of system and good engineering practice.
(f)
The permittee shall design the treatment system with the
capacity to process the peak flow from the wastewater producer. The following
criteria shall be the basis to determine peak flow:
(1)
wastewater design values will be determined in accordance
with §317.4(a)(1) or (2) of this title (relating to Wastewater Treatment
Facilities); or
(2)
the peak flows of the particular waste generator when the
waste generator has unusually high peak flows.
§222.117.Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal System Design.
(a)
The permittee shall use the following design components
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems:
(1)
a minimum of dual 100-micron wastewater effluent filters
prior to the effluent entering the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
These filters must:
(A)
effectively filter the peak hydraulic flows; and
(B)
include control valves and piping that provide filtered
effluent to flush the filters;
(2)
the dosing tank(s) designed to hold at least the following
volume:
(A)
the daily design capacity required by the permit;
(B)
effluent equal to six times the minimum dose cycle capacity
of the drip lines plus the capacity of the supply and return manifold; and
(C)
the following storage capacities as part of the dosing
tank(s) or included in the plant design at another location:
(i)
flow equalization storage;
(ii)
emergency storage; and
(iii)
return flows from flushing and system drainage;
(3)
a duplex alternating pumping system designed:
(A)
to dose and flush the dispersal zones and flush the filtration
system; and
(B)
with pumps sized in accordance with the hydraulic design
calculations in §222.83 of this title (relating to Hydraulic Calculations);
(4)
control system components that are capable of performing
the following functions:
(A)
flushing of the filter units;
(B)
delivering a specified preprogrammed volume of effluent
to each dispersal zone;
(C)
automatic flushing of each drip lateral with filtered effluent;
(D)
automatic dosing of chemicals intended to reduce emitter
clogging, such as chlorine or oxidizing chemicals;
(E)
monitoring alarm conditions;
(F)
regulating the flow volume to each dispersal zone and to
a sand filter, when applicable;
(G)
indicating a flow variance when flow varies more than 10%
of the actual average daily flow;
(H)
regulating pump run times;
(I)
regulating the number and time of filter backwash and field
flushing cycles; and
(J)
regulating the flows to the drip irrigation field system;
(5)
supply lines and manifolds;
(6)
zones of drip irrigation tubing;
(7)
effluent manifolds;
(8)
chemical dosing equipment; and
(9)
flush return lines that return flushing water to the pre-application
system, with provisions made to minimize disturbance of any solids in the
settling chamber.
(b)
The permittee shall submit the hydraulic calculations for
the pump and distribution system with the engineering report. The report must
address the following.
(1)
Field pressure and flow variation due to friction loss
and changes in static head must not exceed plus or minus 10% of the design
emitter pressure or flow. The 10% difference must be the difference between
any two emitters in the entire system.
(2)
The system will not be allowed to initiate operations if
the total flow or pressure variation is in excess of 10% of the design.
(c)
The permittee shall design the subsurface area drip dispersal
system to supply the effluent uniformly throughout each of the dispersal zones
in the system.
(d)
The permittee shall design the subsurface area drip dispersal
system to be self-draining to prevent freezing if there is a potential for
the soil to freeze to the depth that the pipes and lines of the subsurface
area drip dispersal system are located.
(e)
The permittee shall ensure that the velocity of the flush
water shall be at least two feet per second at the end of each dispersal zone
or return line during the flushing operation.
(f)
The permittee shall equip the system with a backflow prevention
device to prevent the siphoning of soil and water into the emitters.
(g)
The permittee must establish stormwater run-on controls
to minimize infiltration of precipitation into the dispersal zones.
§222.119.Delivery Systems.
(a)
The permittee shall ensure that piping materials used in
delivering treated effluent from the treatment facility to the dispersal zones
is suitable for effluent and conforms to regulations as required by Chapter
317 of this title (relating to Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems).
(b)
The permittee shall identify the piping materials by referring
to the appropriate American Standard Testing Material, American National Standard
Institute, or American Water Works Association specification numbers.
(c)
A permittee shall use a multiple pump system for all systems
requiring pumping of effluent to the dispersal zones.
(1)
The permittee shall use pumps rated by the manufacturer
for effluent disposal.
(2)
The permittee shall use pumps that are each rated for at
least 100% of the design flow.
(3)
The permittee shall include the pumping capacity and pump
head calculations in the plans and specifications.
(d)
The permittee shall ensure that the pump discharge piping
includes a check valve, union, and gate valve for each submersible pump installed.
(e)
The permittee shall use piping and valves made of corrosion-resistant
materials for applications subject to corrosive gases.
(f)
If self-priming pumps are used for subsurface area drip
dispersal systems, the permittee shall use pumps that meet at least the minimum
requirements listed under §317.3 of this title (relating to Lift Station
Pumps) with the exception that the pumps are not required to meet the solids-handling
requirement.
(g)
The permittee shall include a check and gate valve for
each unit of the discharge piping for self-priming pumps.
§222.121.Dispersal Zones.
(a)
The permittee must place lines with emitters between six
and 48 inches below the surface of the soil.
(b)
The permittee shall divide the subsurface area drip dispersal
system into a sufficient number of different dispersal zones (at least two
dispersal zones) so that the system can operate with the greater of either
one dispersal zone or 10% of the total number of dispersal zones out of service.
(c)
The permittee shall design the dispersal zones so that
the dispersal lines follow the contour of the site and shall not exceed 1%
lateral slope.
(d)
The permittee shall include the dispersal zone design in
the engineering report, including the following elements:
(1)
the proposed line layout with:
(A)
main line sizes and lengths; and
(B)
individual dispersal line lengths;
(2)
flushing flows;
(3)
static head calculations;
(4)
the total proposed flow in gallons per day;
(5)
total length of emitter piping;
(6)
emitter spacing;
(7)
line spacing;
(8)
total number of lines; and
(9)
total number of lines to be included per flushing.
(e)
The permittee shall ensure that emitter and tubing spacing
is on not less than one foot centers and not on greater than three feet centers,
unless an exception is approved by the executive director.
(f)
The permittee shall disinfect the drip lines and emitters
according to the degree and frequency determined by the design engineer and
submitted in the engineering report along with the justification for the degree
and frequency of disinfection.
(g)
The permittee shall equip the subsurface area drip dispersal
system with audible and visual alarms that will activate in case of a problem
with the system.
(1)
If the subsurface area drip dispersal system is not staffed
on a daily basis, the permittee shall equip the system with a telemetry device
that notifies the operator in case of a system malfunction.
(2)
The telemetry system must include the following components:
(A)
remote access;
(B)
audio/visual alarms for:
(i)
flow or pressure variances; or
(ii)
system failure;
(C)
automated filter;
(D)
zone flushing; and
(E)
integrated external monitoring devices if required, such
as soil moisture monitors.
§222.123.Controls.
(a)
The permittee shall use a control system that includes
a means of alternating the pumps on successive cycles.
(b)
The permittee shall use a control system that allows both
pumps to run at once through wet well sensors.
(c)
The permittee shall use a control system with the following
features:
(1)
high water alarm that activates prior to any "lag pump
on" activation;
(2)
pump failure alarm;
(3)
power outage alarm;
(4)
mechanisms for testing and silencing the alarm system;
and
(5)
manual resetting after the alarm activates.
(d)
The permittee shall ensure that all controls recommended
by the manufacturer are present and in working order if using a proprietary
control system.
(e)
The permittee shall use telemetering of the alarms.
(f)
The permittee shall house controls in a weatherproof and
intruder-resistant enclosure.
(g)
The permittee shall use controls that meet Underwriter's
Laboratories requirements.
(h)
The permittee shall ensure that installation, maintenance,
and replacement of parts of the control system are performed in accordance
with the National Electrical Code and all applicable federal, state, and local
codes, regulations, and ordinances.
§222.125.Vertical Separation.
The permittee must maintain the following vertical separation distances
beneath the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
(1)
There must be at least five feet of soil over any sand
or gravel strata.
(2)
There must be at least two feet of soil over any restrictive
soil horizons.
(3)
There must be at least two feet of soil over any permanent
or seasonal saturated zone of groundwater.
(4)
The executive director may impose alternate separation
requirements if necessary to protect human health and the environment.
§222.127.Storage.
(a)
The applicant must design and install temporary storage
that equals at least three days of the design flow of the facility for times
when the subsurface area drip dispersal system is out of service due to an
emergency or scheduled maintenance.
(b)
In lieu of temporary storage, the executive director may
approve an alternate method of disposing of effluent, if an alternate disposal
plan is submitted by the applicant.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600573
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §§222.151, 222.153, 222.155, 222.157, 222.159, 222.161, 222.163
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under the general authority granted in TWC, §5.013,
which establishes the general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas
of responsibility as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws
of the state; §5.102, which establishes the commission's general authority
necessary to carry out its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which
authorizes the commission to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out
its responsibilities and duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to
carry out its powers, duties, and policies and to protect water quality in
the state; §26.013, which authorizes the executive director to conduct
or have conducted any research and investigations considered advisable and
necessary for the discharge of the duties under this chapter; §27.019,
which requires the commission to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation
of injection wells; §32.054, which authorizes the executive director
to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151, which authorizes the commission,
authorized agent, or employee of local government the power to enter property.
Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the commission to adopt rules
under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed new sections implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to
the TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules
to set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§222.151.Seepage and Percolation Prohibited.
Seepage or percolation out of the root zone, other than leaching in
the amount required to maintain the health of the vegetative cover, is prohibited.
§222.153.System Flushing.
The permittee shall flush the subsurface area drip dispersal system
from the dispersal zone and return the flush water to a point preceding the
treatment system at least once every two months.
§222.155.Soil Moisture Monitoring.
(a)
The permittee shall comply with any requirement to monitor
soil moisture to address specific soil limitations associated with a particular
site, if included in the permit by the executive director.
(b)
When required by the executive director, the permittee
shall:
(1)
monitor the soil moisture in each broadly defined soil
characterization or soil textures, with at least one sample from each dispersal
zone; and
(2)
monitor the soil moisture at the one-foot depth, and/or
at the level of existing near-surface seasonal or permanent soil saturation
when either of these zones of saturation occur within the two-foot depth,
below the dispersal zone.
§222.157.Soil Sampling.
(a)
The permittee shall take soil samples within the same 45-day
time frame each calendar year.
(b)
Laboratory analyses of the soil samples must be submitted
to the executive director by September 1 following the sampling date.
(c)
The plant nutrient parameters shall be analyzed on a plant
available or extractable basis. The permittee shall provide annual soil analyses
of the dispersal zones for the following substances:
(1)
pH (sample consisting of two volumes of water to one volume
of soil mixture), in standard units;
(2)
conductivity (sample consisting of two volumes of water
to one volume of soil mixture), reported in millimho per centimeter (mmho/cm);
(3)
total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). Methods that rely on mercury
as a catalyst are not acceptable;
(4)
nitrate-nitrogen;
(5)
plant-available potassium, reported on a dry-weight basis
in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg);
(6)
calcium, reported on a dry-weight basis in mg/kg;
(7)
Magnesium, reported on a dry-weight basis in mg/kg;
(8)
Sulfur, reported on a dry-weight basis in mg/kg; and
(9)
phosphorus, analyzed according to the Mehlich III procedure
(the North American Proficiency Testing Program of the Soil Science Society
of America) and reported on a dry-weight basis in mg/kg;
(10)
sodium, reported on a dry-weight basis in mg/kg;
(11)
salinity; and
(12)
trace elements as specified in the individual permit.
(d)
The permittee shall take samples in:
(1)
the zero to 12-inch zone of the soil; and
(2)
the 12- to 24-inch zone of soil in the disposal area.
(e)
If soil conditions or weather preclude sampling within
the time period required, the permittee may submit a request to sample at
another time. The request must include justification for the schedule change
and the replacement schedule.
(f)
Alternate soil sampling depths and frequency may be approved
by the executive director if the permittee demonstrates that the alternate
depths and frequency sufficiently monitors nutrient levels.
(g)
The permittee shall collect soil composite samples from
each broadly defined soil characterization or texture, as defined by the United
States Department of Agriculture.
(h)
The permittee shall take at least one composite soil sample
from each dispersal zone.
(i)
The permittee must comply with any alternate sampling methods
or schedules required by the executive director.
§222.159.Operator Licensing.
(a)
The permittee shall ensure that the facility supplying
treated domestic wastewater to the subsurface area drip dispersal system and
the subsurface area drip dispersal system is operated by a chief operator
holding a valid Class A, B, or C wastewater operator license as defined in
Chapter 30 of this title (relating to Occupational Licenses and Registrations).
(b)
The permittee shall ensure that all wastewater operators
have been trained to operate the specific treatment system and subsurface
area drip dispersal system for which they have responsibility.
(c)
Records of operator training must be made available to
agency staff upon request.
(d)
Any subsurface area drip dispersal system that utilizes
treated domestic effluent and that is permitted under Texas Water Code, Chapter
26 before November 1, 2007, will not be required to have a chief operator
with at least a Class C wastewater operator license until November 1, 2008.
§222.161.Vegetative Cover.
(a)
The vegetative cover must be suited for the specific site
characteristics, proposed site usage, and quality of effluent.
(b)
The permittee shall plant and maintain a cover crop(s)
that provides year-round vegetative growth.
(c)
The permittee shall include in the engineering report the
specific varieties of vegetation, harvest methods, and harvest frequencies
to be utilized in association with the subsurface area drip dispersal system.
(d)
The permittee shall maintain records documenting all activities
associated with maintaining the vegetative cover, like planting, over-seeding,
mowing height, fertilizing, and harvesting. Documentation shall be maintained
for a minimum of five years and be made available to commission staff upon
request.
§222.163.Closure Requirements.
(a)
The permittee of a subsurface area drip dispersal system
that is to be permanently discontinued or abandoned shall close the system
under the standards set forth in this section.
(b)
If the permittee removes all tanks, lines, and other equipment
from the site, the permittee may:
(1)
submit to the appropriate regional office a closure report
prepared by the permittee that includes sufficient soil analyses to demonstrate
that there is no soil contamination at the subsurface area drip dispersal
system site; and
(2)
omit the requirement to deed record the location of the
closed subsurface area drip dispersal system as required by subsection (e)
of this section.
(c)
The permittee must conduct the closure according to a system
closure plan that is prepared by or under the direct supervision of a licensed
professional engineer or licensed professional geoscientist.
(d)
The permittee must close the system in a manner that prohibits
the movement of fluids into underground sources of drinking water, in compliance
with §331.5 of this title (relating to Prevention of Pollution) and 40
Code of Federal Regulations §144.12, concerning Prohibition of Movement
of Fluid into Underground Sources of Drinking Water.
(1)
The permittee must remove all above ground tanks. The permittee
may remove or empty, collapse in place, and cover with clean fill material
any underground tanks.
(2)
The permittee must cap and remove three feet of the end
sections of pipes that convey waste between the pump house and the dispersal
lines. The permittee must cut and cap pipes every 500 linear feet between
the pump house and the dispersal field.
(3)
The permittee shall remove all valves and plug the lines
where the valves are located.
(e)
If soil, gravel, sludge, liquids, or other materials associated
with the system are contaminated, the material must be disposed or otherwise
managed in accordance with Chapter 350 of this title (relating to Texas Risk
Reduction Program) and all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations
and requirements.
(f)
The permittee must deed record the location of the closed
subsurface area drip dispersal system in the deed records of the county in
which the site is located.
(g)
The permittee shall submit within 60 days after closing
the system a closure report:
(1)
that has been prepared by a licensed professional engineer
or licensed professional geoscientist;
(2)
that certifies that closure was in accordance with the
requirements of this section and in a manner that will prevent pollution;
and
(3)
includes evidence of deed recordation.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600574
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
Subchapter A. APPLICATIONS PROCESSING
30 TAC §§281.2, 281.5, 281.21
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission)
proposes amendments to §§281.2, 281.5, and 281.21.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems.
The commission proposes this rulemaking to regulate subsurface area drip
dispersal systems that beneficially reuse treated wastewater effluent generated
by treatment facilities processing more than 5,000 gallons per day. The proposed
rules will clarify that these systems are included in the current processes
for preparing and submitting applications for permits.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 55, Requests for Reconsideration
and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment; Chapter 222, Subsurface Area
Drip Dispersal System; Chapter 305, Consolidated Permits; Chapter 309, Domestic
Wastewater Effluent Limitation and Plant Siting; and Chapter 331, Underground
Injection Control, in this issue of the
Texas Register
to implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standard in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 281.2, Applicability
Proposed §281.2(2) is amended to clarify that Chapter 281 is applicable
to applications for new, amended, or renewed subsurface area drip dispersal
system permits. This is the general applicability statement for Chapter 281
and permit applications for subsurface area drip dispersal systems are proposed
to be subject to the requirements of this section.
Section 281.5, Application for Wastewater Discharge,
Underground Injection, Municipal Solid Waste, Radioactive Material, Hazardous
Waste, and Industrial Solid Waste Management Permits
Proposed §281.5 is amended to include the reference to subsurface
area drip dispersal systems. Section 281.5 lists the requirements for permit
applications and permit applications for subsurface area drip dispersal systems
that are proposed to be subject to the requirements of this section.
Section 281.21, Draft Permit, Technical Summary,
Fact Sheet, and Compliance History
Proposed §281.21(a) is amended to add reference to TWC, Chapter 32.
Section 281.21(a) lists the authority for the requirements of this section.
TWC, Chapter 32 is proposed to be added since subsurface area drip dispersal
systems are proposed to be subject to the requirements of this section.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state
or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed
rules.
HB 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the TWC by adding Chapter 32,
Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems. The commission proposes this rulemaking
to regulate subsurface area drip dispersal systems that beneficially reuse
treated wastewater effluent generated by treatment facilities processing more
than 5,000 gallons per day. The proposed rules will clearly state that these
systems are included in the current process for preparing and submitting applications
for permits. Subsurface area drip dispersal systems have previously been permitted
under current rules for Texas land application permits. The proposed rules
do not change any requirements for the permitting of subsurface area drip
dispersal systems. There is no fiscal implication from the proposed rules
for units of state governments, local governments, individuals, or businesses
owning or operating wastewater systems utilizing subsurface area drip dispersal
systems.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater clarity in, and thus, more
efficient administration of wastewater disposal rules.
The proposed rules will clearly state that subsurface area drip dispersal
systems are included in the current process for preparing and submitting applications
for permits. Subsurface area drip dispersal systems have previously been permitted
under current rules for Texas land application permits. The proposed rules
do not change any requirements for the permitting of subsurface area drip
dispersal systems and have no fiscal implications for individuals or businesses
owning or operating subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses.
The proposed rules do not change any requirements for the permitting of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems and have no fiscal implications for small or micro-businesses
owning or operating subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule."
Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental rule" means
a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules would implement HB 2651,
relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The
specific intent of this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 281 to require that
applications for new, amended, or renewed subsurface area drip dispersal system
permits be subject to the requirements of this chapter. The proposed rules
would not adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a section of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health
and safety of the state or a sector of the state, because the proposed rules
would simply require applications for new, amended, or renewed subsurface
area drip dispersal system permits to be subject to the requirements of this
chapter. The proposed rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental
rule as defined in the Texas Government Code.
In addition, the proposed rules are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not meet the criteria specified in Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a).
Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a), applies to a rule adopted by an
agency, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law,
unless the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express
requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal
law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers
of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The proposed amendments to Chapter 281 do not meet any of these criteria.
First, the proposed rules do not exceed a standard set by federal law, because
there is no comparable federal law. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed
a requirement of state law, because they are consistent with the express requirements
of TWC, Chapter 32, and are proposed to implement HB 2651. Third, the proposed
rules do not exceed an express requirement of a delegation agreement or contract
between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government
to implement a state and federal program. Fourth, the commission does not
propose these rules solely under the general powers of the agency, but rather
under the authority of HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement
rules under TWC, Chapter 32. These proposed rules do not meet the criteria
for a major environmental rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis
determination.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these proposed
rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of
this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 281 to require that applications for new,
amended, or renewed subsurface area drip dispersal system permits be subject
to the requirements of this chapter. The promulgation and enforcement of the
proposed rules will not affect private real property in a manner that would
require compensation to private real property owners under the United States
Constitution or the Texas Constitution. The proposed rules also will not affect
private real property in a manner that restricts or limits an owner's right
to the property that would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental
action. Consequently, this proposal does not meet the definition of a takings
under Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5). Therefore, the proposed rules
will not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The
commission invites public comment on this preliminary takings impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found the proposal
is a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 30 TAC §505.11(b)(4), relating to rules subject to the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP), and will therefore, require that goals and policies
of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that
Chapter 281 does not impact any CMP goals or policies because it regulates
the permitting process. Chapter 281 is administrative and does not regulate
the environment.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005- 050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-0571 or
Louis C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-4452.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations it considers advisable and necessary for the discharge
of the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, as enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§281.2.Applicability.
These sections are applicable to the processing of:
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
applications for new, amended, or renewed wastewater discharge
permits
, including subsurface area drip dispersal systems
;
(3)
(No change.)
(4)
applications for new, amended, or modified or renewed industrial
solid and/or municipal hazardous waste permits filed
under
[
(5) - (10)
(No change.)
§281.5.Application for Wastewater Discharge, Underground Injection, Municipal Solid Waste, Radioactive Material, Hazardous Waste, and Industrial Solid Waste Management Permits.
Except as provided by §305.48 of this title (relating to Additional
Contents of Applications for Wastewater Discharge Permits), applications for
wastewater discharge[
(1) - (7)
(No change.)
§281.21.Draft Permit, Technical Summary, Fact Sheet, and Compliance History.
(a)
The provisions of this section are applicable to applications
for waste disposal activities conducted under the authority of [
(b) - (f)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600575
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) proposes
amendments to §§305.1, 305.2, 305.41, 305.45, 305.121, 305.123,
305.125, and 305.127.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems. The commission
proposes to amend Chapter 305 to clarify the applicability of this chapter
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems as defined by TWC, Chapter 32.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 55, Requests for Reconsideration
and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment; Chapter 222, Subsurface Area
Drip Dispersal System; Chapter 281, Applications Processing; Chapter 309,
Domestic Wastewater Effluent Limitation and Plant Siting; and Chapter 331,
Underground Injection Control, in this issue of the
Texas Register
to implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standard in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 305.1, Scope and Applicability
Proposed §305.1 is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 to the list of
statutes from which Chapter 305, Subchapter A has its authority.
Section 305.2, Definitions
Proposed §305.2(a) is amended by adding TWC, §32.002 to the list
of statutes from which Chapter 305, Subchapter B has its authority. This amendment
also proposes to add permits that are permitted under TWC, Chapters 26 and
32 to the definition of wastewater discharge permits, which is §305.2(47).
Subsurface area drip dispersal systems are permitted under TWC, Chapters 26
and 32. This section clarifies that the definition of wastewater discharge
permits includes subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
Section 305.41, Applicability
Proposed §305.41 is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 to the list
of statutes from which Chapter 305, Subchapter C has its authority.
Section 305.45, Contents of Application for Permit
Proposed §305.45(a) is amended by adding subsurface area drip dispersal
systems to the list of permits and construction approvals that must be included
in the application for a permit action.
Section 305.121, Applicability
Proposed §305.121 is amended by adding subsurface area drip dispersal
systems as a subset of injection wells in the list of systems to which Chapter
305, Subchapter F applies.
Section 305.123, Reservation in Granting Permit
Proposed §305.123 is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 to the list
of statutes from which Chapter 305, Subchapter F has its authority.
Section 305.125, Standard Permit Conditions
Proposed §305.125(10) is amended by adding TWC, Chapter 32 to the
list of statutes that authorizes inspection and entry.
Section 305.127, Conditions to be Determined for
Individual Permits
Proposed §305.127(4)(A) and (C) is amended by adding 30 TAC Chapter
222, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems, to the list of chapters specified
in this section.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state
or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed
rules. Although subsurface area drip dispersal systems are subject to standards
and requirements for applications, permits, and actions under current waste
disposal rules, HB 2651 amended the TWC by adding Chapter 32. The commission
proposes to amend Chapter 305 to clarify the applicability of Chapter 305
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems, as defined by TWC, Chapter 32.
The proposed rulemaking makes it clear that the definition of wastewater
discharge permits includes permits for subsurface area drip dispersal systems
and that the requirements of Chapter 222 will apply to such permits. These
proposed amendments to Chapter 305 will not change the permitting requirements
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems, and owners or operators of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems will not experience any fiscal implications as
a result of the proposed rulemaking.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater clarity in, and thus, more
efficient administration of wastewater disposal rules.
The proposed rulemaking makes it clear that the definition of wastewater
discharge permits includes permits for subsurface area drip dispersal systems
and that the requirements of Chapter 222 will apply to such permits. These
proposed amendments to Chapter 305 will not change the permitting requirements
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems, and owners or operators of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems will not experience any fiscal implications as
a result of the proposed rulemaking.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses
that may own or operate subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The proposed
amendments to Chapter 305 will not change the permitting requirements for
subsurface area drip dispersal systems, and owners or operators of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems will not experience any fiscal implications as
a result of the proposed rulemaking.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule."
Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental rule" means
a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules would implement HB 2651.
The specific intent of this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 305 to clarify
the applicability of this chapter to subsurface area drip dispersal systems
as defined by TWC, Chapter 32. The proposed amendments will add permits that
are permitted under TWC, Chapters 26 and 32 to the definition of wastewater
discharge permits, which is defined as a permit issued under TWC, Chapter
26.
The proposed rules would not adversely affect, in a material way, the economy,
a section of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state, because
the proposed rules would simply clarify the applicability of this chapter
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems as defined by TWC, Chapter 32. The
proposed rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental rule as
defined in the Texas Government Code.
In addition, the proposed rules are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not meet the criteria specified in Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a).
Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a), applies to a rule adopted by an
agency, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law,
unless the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express
requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal
law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers
of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
The proposed amendments to Chapter 305 do not meet any of these criteria.
First, the proposed rules do not exceed a standard set by federal law, because
there is no comparable federal law. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed
a requirement of state law, because they are consistent with the express requirements
of TWC, Chapter 32, and are proposed to implement HB 2651. Third, the proposed
rules do not exceed an express requirement of a delegation agreement or contract
between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government
to implement a state and federal program. Fourth, the commission does not
propose these rules solely under the general powers of the agency, but rather
under the authority of HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement
rules under TWC, Chapter 32. These proposed rules do not meet the criteria
for a major environmental rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment on the draft regulatory impact analysis
determination.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission prepared a takings impact assessment for these proposed
rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of
this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 305 to clarify the applicability of this
chapter to subsurface area drip dispersal systems as defined by TWC, Chapter
32. The proposed amendments will add permits that are permitted under TWC,
Chapters 26 and 32 to the definition of wastewater discharge permits, which
is defined as a permit issued under TWC, Chapter 26. The promulgation and
enforcement of the proposed rules will not affect private real property in
a manner that would require compensation to private real property owners under
the United States Constitution or the Texas Constitution. The proposed rules
also will not affect private real property in a manner that restricts or limits
an owner's right to the property that would otherwise exist in the absence
of the governmental action. Consequently, this proposal does not meet the
definition of a takings under Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5). Therefore,
the proposed rules will not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code,
Chapter 2007. The commission invites public comment on this preliminary takings
impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found the proposal
is a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 30 TAC §505.11(b)(4), relating to rules subject to the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP), and will therefore, require that goals and policies
of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that
Chapter 305 does not impact any CMP goals or policies because it regulates
the permitting process. Chapter 305 is administrative and does not regulate
the environment.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005-050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-0571 or
Louis C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-4552.
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
30 TAC §305.1, §305.2
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations considered advisable and necessary for the discharge of
the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§305.1.Scope and Applicability.
(a)
The provisions of this chapter set the standards and requirements
for applications, permits, and actions by the commission to carry out the
responsibilities for management of waste disposal activities under [
(b)
The national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES)
program, as delegated to the State of Texas, requires permits for the discharge
of pollutants from any point source to waters in the state. Such permits are
designated as Texas pollutant discharge elimination system (TPDES). The terms
"NPDES," "pollutant," "point source," and "waters in the state" are defined
in Texas Water Code, §26.001.
(1)
The following are point sources requiring TPDES permits
for discharges:
(A)
concentrated animal feeding operations as defined in Chapter
321, Subchapter B of this title (relating to
Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations
[
(B) - (E)
(No change.)
(2)
The TPDES permit program also applies to owners or operators
of any treatment works treating domestic sewage, unless all requirements implementing
[
(3)
The executive director may designate any person subject
to the standards for sewage sludge use and disposal as a "treatment works
treating domestic sewage" as defined in §305.2 of this title (relating
to Definitions), where the executive director finds that a permit is necessary
to protect public health and the environment from the adverse effects of sewage
sludge or to ensure compliance with the technical standards for sludge use
and disposal developed under [
§305.2.Definitions.
The definitions contained in Texas Water Code, §§26.001,
27.002, [
(1) - (6)
(No change.)
(7)
Daily average concentration--The arithmetic average of
all effluent samples, composite, or grab as required by this permit, within
a period of one calendar month, consisting of at least four separate representative
measurements.
(A)
Domestic
[
(B)
All
[
(8) - (9)
(No change.)
(10)
Discharge monitoring report [
(11) - (13)
(No change.)
(14)
Facility--Includes:
(A)
all contiguous land and fixtures, structures, or appurtenances
used for storing, processing, treating, or disposing of waste, or for injection
activities. A facility may consist of several storage, processing, treatment,
disposal, or injection operational units;
and
(B)
for the purpose of implementing corrective action under §335.167
of this title (relating to Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units),
all contiguous property under the control of the owner and operator seeking
a permit for the storage, processing, and/or disposal of hazardous waste.
This definition also applies to facilities implementing corrective action
under Texas Water Code, §7.031 (relating to Corrective Action Relating
to Hazardous Waste)
.
[
(15) - (20)
(No change.)
(21)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [
(22)
(No change.)
(23)
New source--Any building structure, facility, or installation
from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the construction
of which commenced:
(A)
after promulgation of standards of performance under
Clean Water Act
[
(B)
after proposal of standards of performance in accordance
with
Clean Water Act
[
(24) - (27)
(No change.)
(28)
Post-closure order--An order issued by the commission
for post-closure care of interim status units, a corrective action management
unit unless authorized by permit, or alternative corrective action requirements
for contamination commingled from
Resource Conservation Recovery Act
[
(29)
Primary industry category--Any industry category listed
in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 122, Appendix A, adopted by reference
by
§305.532
[
(30) - (34)
(No change.)
(35)
Regional administrator--Except when used in conjunction
with the words "state director," or when referring to
United States Environmental
Protection Agency
[
(36)
(No change.)
(37)
Schedule of compliance--A schedule of remedial measures
included in a permit, including an enforceable sequence of interim requirements
(e.g., actions, operations, or milestone events) leading to compliance with
the Clean Water Act
[
(38) - (42)
(No change.)
(43)
Texas pollutant discharge elimination system (TPDES)--The
state program for issuing, amending, terminating, monitoring, and enforcing
permits, and imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements, under
Clean Water Act
[
(44)
Toxic pollutant--Any pollutant listed as toxic under
Clean Water Act
[
(45)
(No change.)
(46)
Variance--Any mechanism or provision under
Clean
Water Act
[
(47)
Wastewater discharge permit--A permit issued under Texas
Water Code, Chapter 26
or under Texas Water Code, Chapters 26 and 32
.
(48)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600576
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §305.41, §305.45
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations considered advisable and necessary for the discharge of
the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§305.41.Applicability.
The sections of this subchapter apply to permit applications required
to be filed with the commission for authorization under Texas Water Code (TWC),
Chapters 26 - 28
and 32
, and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC),
Chapters 361 and 401. The sections of this subchapter also apply to post-closure
orders issued under the authority of THSC, §361.082 and TWC, §7.031.
§305.45.Contents of Application for Permit.
(a)
Forms for permit applications will be made available by
the executive director. Each application for permit must include the following:
(1) - (5)
(No change.)
(6)
a topographic map, ownership map, county highway map, or
a map prepared by a registered professional engineer or a registered surveyor
which shows the facility and each of its intake and discharge structures and
any other structure or location regarding the regulated facility and associated
activities. Maps must be of material suitable for a permanent record, and
shall be on sheets 8-1/2 inches by 14 inches or folded to that size, and shall
be on a scale of not less than one inch equals one mile. The map shall depict
the approximate boundaries of the tract of land owned or to be used by the
applicant and shall extend at least one mile beyond the tract boundaries sufficient
to show the following:
(A) - (C)
(No change.)
(D)
the ownership of tracts of land adjacent to the facility
and within a reasonable distance from the proposed point or points of discharge,
deposit, injection, or other place of disposal or activity;
and
(E)
(No change.)
(7)
a listing of all permits or construction approvals received
or applied for under any of the following programs:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
Underground Injection Control [
(C)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [
(D)
Prevention of Significant Deterioration [
(E)
(No change.)
(F)
national emission standards for hazardous
air
pollutants
[
(G) - (H)
(No change.)
(I)
licenses under the
Texas Radiation Control Act
[
(J)
subsurface area drip dispersal system permits
under Texas Water Code, Chapter 32; and
(K)
[
(8)
a supplementary technical report submitted in connection
with an application. The report shall be prepared either by a Texas licensed
professional engineer, a licensed professional geoscientist, or by a qualified
person who is competent and experienced in the field to which the application
relates and thoroughly familiar with the operation or project for which the
application is made. The report must include the following:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
for each outfall, injection well, place of deposit, or
place of disposal:
(i)
(No change.)
(ii)
the physical, chemical, and radiological properties of
the defined waste or the injection fluids; the characteristics of the waste
or the injection fluid; the chemical, physical, thermal, organic, bacteriological,
or radiological properties or characteristics, as applicable, described in
enough detail to allow evaluation of the water and environmental quality considerations
involved;
and
(C)
such other information as reasonably may be required by
the executive director for an adequate understanding of the project or operation,
and which is necessary to provide the commission an adequate opportunity to
make the considerations required by §331.121 of this title (relating
to Class I Wells), §331.122 of this title (relating to Class III Wells), §305.50
of this title (relating to Additional Requirements for an Application for
a Hazardous or Industrial Solid Waste Permit and for a Post-Closure Order), §305.48
of this title (relating to Additional Contents for Applications for
Wastewater
[
(b)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600577
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
30 TAC §§305.121, 305.123, 305.125, 305.127
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations considered advisable and necessary for the discharge of
the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§305.121.Applicability.
The provisions of this subchapter establish the characteristics and
standards for permits issued for injection wells
including subsurface
area drip dispersal systems
, waste discharge, radioactive material disposal,
and solid waste management, including sewage sludge.
§305.123.Reservation in Granting Permit.
Every permit is subject to further orders and rules of the commission.
In accordance with the procedures for amendments and orders, the commission
may incorporate into permits already granted any condition, restriction, limitation,
or provision reasonably necessary for the administration and enforcement of
Texas Water Code, Chapters
26 - 28 and 32
[
§305.125.Standard Permit Conditions.
Conditions applicable to all permits issued under this chapter, and
which shall be incorporated into each permit expressly or by reference to
this chapter are as follows.
(1) - (8)
(No change.)
(9)
The permittee shall report any noncompliance to the executive
director which may endanger human health or safety, or the environment.
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
The following must be reported within 24 hours under this
paragraph
:
[
(i)
any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation
in a
Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
[
(ii)
violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for
any pollutants listed in a
Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
[
(C)
(No change.)
(10)
Inspection and entry shall be allowed under Texas Water
Code, Chapters 26 - 28
and 32
, Texas Health and Safety Code,
§§361.032, 361.033
[
(11)
Monitoring and reporting requirements are as follows.
(A) - (B)
(No change.)
(C)
Records of monitoring activities shall include:
(i)
date, time
,
and place of sample or measurement;
(ii) - (vi)
(No change.)
(12)
(No change.)
(13)
A permit may be transferred only according to the provisions
of §305.64 of this title (relating to Transfer of Permits) [
(14) - (19)
(No change.)
(20)
The permittee is subject to administrative, civil, and
criminal penalties, as applicable, under Texas Water Code, §§26.136,
26.212, and 26.213 for violations including
,
but not limited to
,
the following:
(A)
negligently or knowingly violating
Clean Water Act
(CWA)
[
(B) - (C)
(No change.)
(21)
For hazardous waste management facility permits, the executive
director may require the permittee to establish and maintain an information
repository at any time, based on the factors set forth in 40 CFR[
(22)
(No change.)
§305.127.Conditions to be Determined for Individual Permits.
Conditions to be determined on a case-by-case basis according to the
criteria specified in this section, and when applicable, incorporated into
the permit expressly or by reference, are
listed in the following paragraphs.
[
(1)
Duration.
(A) - (B)
(No change.)
(C)
Waste discharge permits.
(i)
(No change.)
(ii)
All other permits shall be as follows
.
[
(I)
Permits which authorize a direct discharge of wastewater
into a surface drainageway shall be for a term not to exceed five years.
(II)
Confined animal feeding operation permits may be for the
life of the project.
(III)
Other wastewater permits, including permits which regulate
land disposal systems shall be for a term not to exceed ten years.
(D) - (G)
(No change.)
(2)
(No change.)
(3)
Schedule of compliance.
(A) - (C)
(No change.)
(D)
For TPDES permits the following additional conditions apply.
(i)
The first TPDES permit issued to a new source or a new
discharger shall contain a schedule of compliance only when necessary to allow
a reasonable opportunity to attain compliance with requirements issued or
revised after commencement of construction
,
but less than three
years before commencement of the relevant discharge.
(ii) - (iii)
(No change.)
(E)
For
underground injection control
[
(i) - (iii)
(No change.)
(4)
Requirements for individual programs.
(A)
Requirements to provide for and assure compliance with
standards set by the rules of the commission and the laws of Texas shall be
determined and included in permits on a case-by-case basis to reflect the
best method for attaining such compliance. Each permit shall contain terms
and conditions as the commission determines necessary to protect human health
and safety, and the environment. Reference is made to Chapter 330 of this
title (relating to Municipal Solid Waste) for municipal solid waste facility
standards, to Chapter 331 of this title (relating to Underground Injection
Control) for injection well standards, to Chapter 335 of this title (relating
to Industrial Solid Waste and Municipal Hazardous Waste) for solid waste facility
standards, to Chapter 336 of this title (relating to Radioactive Substance
Rules) for radioactive material disposal standards, to Chapter 309 of this
title (relating to Domestic Wastewater Effluent Limitation and Plant Siting)
for waste discharge standards, [
(B)
(No change.)
(C)
New, amended, modified, or renewed permits shall incorporate
any applicable requirements contained in Chapter 331 of this title for injection
well standards, Chapter 335 of this title for solid waste facility standards,
Chapter 336 of this title, Chapter 309 of this title for waste discharge standards,
[
(5) - (6)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600578
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
Subchapter A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
30 TAC §309.3, §309.4
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission)
proposes amendments to §309.3 and §309.4.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems.
The commission proposes to amend §309.3 and §309.4 to add effluent
limitations for domestic wastewater treatment facilities that supply effluent
for disposal through subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Effluent limits
are necessary to ensure proper operation of the subsurface area drip dispersal
system, prevent pollution, and protect human health. Two effluent limit sets
are proposed in this rulemaking. One proposed set is for effluent disposed
of through subsurface area drip dispersal systems on land that has the potential
for public contact with the soil. The other proposed set is for effluent disposed
of through subsurface area drip dispersal systems on land that has no potential
for public contact with the soil.
Disinfection of the effluent is proposed to be required only when there
is significant public contact with the soil into which the effluent will be
applied. Examples of those types of areas are school and park playgrounds
and soccer and football fields. These are areas where the public is likely
to have significant skin-to-soil contact. Areas that would not require disinfection
of the effluent would be areas like greenbelts and golf courses. These areas,
although public, are less likely to have significant skin-to-soil contact.
And because of emerging technologies, e.g., ultraviolet light, the applicant
will have the option to choose traditional chlorination or disinfection criteria
that is performance based, i.e., fecal coliform sampling.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 55, Requests for Reconsideration
and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment; Chapter 222, Subsurface Area
Dispersal System; Chapter 281, Applications Processing; Chapter 305, Consolidated
Permits; and Chapter 331, Underground Injection Control, in this issue of
the
Texas Register
to implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standards in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 309.3, Application of Effluent Sets
The proposed amendment to §309.3(f) would add paragraphs (4) - (7)
to specify the effluent limitations for domestic wastewater that is disposed
of through subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Proposed §309.4(f)(4)
- (7) specifies the pH range, disinfection requirements, primary treatment
methods, and the requirement to comply with Chapter 309, Subchapters B and
C, Location Standards and Land Disposal of Sewage Effluent, respectively.
The proposed amendment to §309.3(g)(4) would specify that disinfection
of effluent disposed of through a subsurface area drip dispersal system would
be evaluated by fecal coliform sampling. Effluent would be considered disinfected
if a grab sample of fecal coliform contained no more than 200 colony forming
units (cfu) per 100 milliliters (ml) of water. The 200 cfu/100 ml standard
is the standard for contact recreation in surface water. The rationale is
that if 200 cfu/100 ml is safe to contact in water, it would be safe to contact
in soil. There is a wide variation in the amount of ambient bacteria in the
soil. This proposed limitation would prevent the treated effluent from adding
an appreciable amount of bacteria to the soil.
Section 309.4, Table 1, Effluent Limitations for
Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants
Proposed §309.4 is amended to correct a numbering error in Table 1
and the references to those numbers throughout the table.
The proposed amendment would add requirements for subsurface area drip
dispersal systems to Table 1. The limitations for five-day biochemical oxygen
demand and total suspended solids in domestic effluent disposed of through
a subsurface area drip dispersal system on land where there is no potential
for public contact are the same as the prior limitations for irrigation on
land where there is no potential for public exposure. The limitations for
five-day biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids in domestic
effluent disposed of through a subsurface area drip dispersal system on land
where there is potential for public contact are the same as the prior limitations
for irrigation on land where there is potential for public exposure, with
the exception of the added fecal coliform limitation.
The amendment would also add a note following Table 1 to differentiate
between "public exposure" and "public contact." Public exposure is the term
associated with irrigation systems. With spray irrigation, as well as other
surface irrigation practices, the public would have the potential to be exposed
to treated effluent. With subsurface area drip dispersal systems, the public
would have the potential to come into contact with the soil that might be
wet with treated effluent, so the term "public contact" is proposed.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state
or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed
rules.
HB 2651 amended the TWC by adding Chapter 32. The commission proposes to
amend Chapter 309 to clarify that rules for effluent limitations apply to
subsurface area drip dispersal systems, as defined by TWC, Chapter 32. Currently,
subsurface area drip dispersal systems are subject to the requirements of
Chapter 309 because they are considered land application systems. The proposed
rulemaking states effluent limitations specifically for subsurface area drip
dispersal systems that were previously applied under requirements for land
application systems. Owners or operators of subsurface area drip dispersal
systems will not experience any fiscal implications as a result of the proposed
rulemaking.
As with current requirements for land application systems, the proposed
rulemaking will limit effluent dispersal for two effluent limit sets: those
with subsurface area drip dispersal systems where there is potential for public
contact with soil and those with little or no potential for public contact
with soil. The effluent limitations for these sets will be the same as the
effluent limits set for irrigation on land with potential for public contact
and land without potential for public contact. The proposed rulemaking sets
a standard for disinfection in each case, but owners or operators of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems are given flexibility in the method of disinfection
they choose to use.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater clarity in the requirements
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems and thus, more efficient administration
of commission rules regulating the permitting and operation of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems.
Currently, subsurface area drip dispersal systems are subject to the requirements
of Chapter 309, and no substantive changes regarding those requirements are
part of the proposed rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking explicitly states
that the requirements of Chapter 309 will apply to subsurface area drip dispersal
systems. Owners or operators of subsurface area drip dispersal systems will
not experience any fiscal implications as a result of the proposed rulemaking.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses
that own or operate subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Currently, subsurface
area drip dispersal systems are subject to the requirements of Chapter 309,
and no substantive changes regarding those requirements are part of the proposed
rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking explicitly states that the requirements
of Chapter 309 will apply to subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule."
Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental rule" means
a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules would implement HB 2651,
relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems. The
specific intent of this rulemaking is to amend Chapter 309 to add effluent
limitations for treatment facilities that supply effluent for disposal through
subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Although the intent of the proposed
rulemaking is to protect the environment or reduce the risks to human health
from environmental exposure, it is not a major environmental rule because
it does not adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or public health
and safety of the state or a sector of the state. Therefore, the proposed
rules do not meet the definition of a major environmental rule as defined
by the Texas Government Code.
Furthermore, the proposed rulemaking action does not meet any of the four
applicable requirements listed in Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a).
Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a) only applies to a major environmental
rule adopted by an agency, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard
set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically required by state law;
2) exceed an express requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically
required by federal law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement
or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal
government to implement a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely
under the general powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
In this case, the proposed rules do not meet any of these applicability
requirements. First, the proposed rules are specifically required to implement
state law in HB 2651. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed a requirement
of state law, because they are consistent with the express requirements of
TWC, Chapter 32, and are proposed to implement HB 2651. Third, the proposed
rules do not exceed an express requirement of a delegation agreement or contract
between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government
to implement a state and federal program. Fourth, the commission does not
propose these rules solely under the general powers of the agency, but rather
under the authority of HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement
rules under TWC, Chapter 32. These proposed rules do not meet the criteria
for a major environmental rule as defined by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225.
The commission invites public comment regarding this draft regulatory impact
analysis determination.
TAKING IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated this proposed rulemaking action and performed
a preliminary analysis of whether this action would constitute a takings under
Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The proposed rules add effluent limitations
for treatment facilities that supply effluent for disposal through subsurface
area drip dispersal systems. The promulgation and enforcement of the proposed
rules will not affect private real property in a manner that would require
compensation to private real property owners under the United States Constitution
or the Texas Constitution. The proposed rules also will not affect private
real property in a manner that restricts or limits an owner's right to the
property that would otherwise exist in the absence of the governmental action.
Consequently, this proposal does not meet the definition of a takings under
Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5). Therefore, the proposed rules will
not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The commission
invites public comment on this preliminary takings impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found the proposal
is a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 30 TAC §505.11(b)(4), relating to rules subject to the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP), and will therefore, require that goals and policies
of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that
the proposed amendments do not impact any CMP goals or policies because there
are no substantive changes to the protection of human health and the environment.
Subsurface area drip dispersal systems are currently subject to the requirements
of this chapter. The only change in the requirements is the method by which
the commission measures disinfection. Because technology is offering options
beyond traditional chlorination, the requirement to meet disinfection levels
is stated as a performance measure rather than a performance method. The number
of fecal coliform colony forming units per 100 milliliter of water is a standard
method of determining the contamination level, and it was used as the measurement
tool for this performance measure. This requirement will result in the same
level of protection of human health and the environment as the previous requirement.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed in the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS section
of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
at 2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building
F, Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas, 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005- 050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-0571 or
Louis C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division, at (512) 239-4552.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under TWC, §5.013, which establishes the
general jurisdiction of the commission over other areas of responsibility
as assigned to the commission under the TWC and other laws of the state; §5.102,
which establishes the commission's general authority necessary to carry out
its jurisdiction; §5.103 and §5.105, which authorize the commission
to adopt rules and policies necessary to carry out its responsibilities and
duties under TWC, §5.013; §26.011, which provides the commission
with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers, duties,
and policies and to protect water quality in the state; §26.013, which
authorizes the executive director to conduct or have conducted any research
and investigations it considers advisable and necessary for the discharge
of the duties under this chapter; §27.019, which requires the commission
to adopt rules reasonably required for the regulation of injection wells; §32.054,
which authorizes the executive director to inspect the dispersion area; and §32.151,
which authorizes the commission, authorized agent, or employee of local government
the power to enter property. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to
the commission to adopt rules under TWC, Chapter 32, enacted by HB 2651, §2.
The proposed amendments implement HB 2651, which added Chapter 32 to the
TWC. HB 2651, §2, expressly requires the commission to adopt rules to
set standards and requirements for application permits and actions by the
commission to carry out the responsibilities for management of beneficial
reuse of treated wastewater.
§309.3.Application of Effluent Sets.
(a) - (b)
(No change.)
(c)
Discharges into certain reservoirs. Any discharge made
within five miles upstream of a reservoir or lake which is subject to on-site/private
sewage facility regulation adopted
under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26
[
(d)
(No change.)
(e)
Discharge to an evaporation pond. Effluent discharged to
evaporation ponds must receive, at a minimum, primary treatment, be within
the pH limits of 6.0 - 9.0 standard units
,
and have a quality of
100 milligrams per liter five-day biochemical oxygen demand or less on a grab
sample. For the purpose of this subsection, primary treatment means solids
separation which is typically accomplished by primary clarifiers, Imhoff tanks,
facultative lagoons, septic tanks, and other such units.
(f)
Land disposal of treated effluent. The commission may authorize
land disposal of treated effluent when the applicant demonstrates that the
quality of ground or surface waters in the state will not be adversely affected.
Each project must be consistent with laws relating to water rights. The primary
purpose of such a project must be to dispose of treated effluent and/or to
further enhance the quality of effluent prior to discharge.
(1)
When irrigation systems ultimately dispose of effluent
on land to which the public has access, Effluent Set
4
[
(2)
When overland flow systems are utilized for effluent treatment,
the public shall not have access to the treatment area. Primary treated effluent
meeting Effluent Set
6
[
(3)
When evapotranspiration beds, low pressure dosing, [
(4)
When subsurface area drip dispersal systems,
or similar soil absorption systems ultimately dispose of effluent on land
where there is the significant potential for public contact, as defined in §222.5
of this title (relating to Definitions), Effluent Set 8, at a minimum, shall
apply. The pH shall be within the limits of 6.0 - 9.0 standard units unless
a specific variance is provided in the permit based upon site-specific conditions.
(5)
When subsurface area drip dispersal systems,
or similar soil absorption systems ultimately dispose of effluent on land
where there is the minimal potential for public contact, as defined in §222.5
of this title, Effluent Set 9, at a minimum, shall apply. The pH shall be
within the limits of 6.0 - 9.0 standard units unless a specific variance is
provided in the permit based upon site-specific conditions.
(6)
Treated effluent may be land applied only
when consistent with Subchapters B and C of this chapter. Use of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems shall be consistent with environmental safeguards
and the protection of ground and surface waters.
(7)
For the purpose of this subsection, primary
treatment means solids separation which is typically accomplished by primary
clarifiers, Imhoff tanks, facultative lagoons, septic tanks, and other such
units.
(g)
Disinfection.
(1) - (3)
(No change.)
(4)
Except as provided herein, disinfection of domestic wastewater
which is discharged by means of land disposal or evaporation pond shall be
reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine the need for disinfection. All
effluent discharged to land to which the public has access must be disinfected
and if the effluent is to be transferred to a holding pond or tank, the effluent
shall be rechlorinated to a trace chlorine residual at the point of irrigation
application.
All effluent discharged to land via a subsurface area drip
dispersal system to which there is a potential for public contact shall be
disinfected and shall comply with a fecal coliform effluent limitation of
200 colony forming units per 100 milliliters water, per grab sample, with §309.3(g)(1)
of this title (relating to Application of Effluent Sets).
(5)
(No change.)
(h)
(No change.)
§309.4.Table 1, Effluent Limitations for Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants.
This table contains the sets of effluent criteria for waste discharge
permits.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on February 3, 2006.
TRD-200600579
Stephanie Bergeron Perdue
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Legal Services
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 19, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) proposes
amendments to §§331.2, 331.7, 331.9, and 331.132.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES
House Bill (HB) 2651, 79th Legislature, 2005, amended the Texas Water Code
(TWC) by adding Chapter 32, Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal Systems. Subsurface
area drip dispersal systems apply fluid into the soil below the surface of
the soil, and therefore, are classified as Class V injection wells in accordance
with §331.11(a)(4), Classification of Injection Wells. The commission
proposes to amend Chapter 331 to address the applicability of this chapter
to subsurface area drip dispersal systems as defined by TWC, Chapter 32.
The commission also proposes additional rulemaking to 30 TAC Chapter 30,
Occupational Licenses and Registrations; Chapter 55, Requests for Reconsideration
and Contested Case Hearings; Public Comment; Chapter 222, Subsurface Area
Dispersal System; Chapter 281, Applications Processing; Chapter 305, Consolidated
Permits; and Chapter 309, Domestic Wastewater Effluent Limitation and Plant
Siting, in this issue of the
Texas Register
to
implement HB 2651.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission proposes administrative changes throughout these sections
to be consistent with Texas Register requirements and other agency rules and
guidelines and to conform to the drafting standard in the
Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual
, November 2004.
Section 331.2, Definitions
Proposed §331.2(90) is amended by adding a statement that includes
subsurface area drip dispersal systems to the definition of subsurface fluid
distribution systems. This proposed amendment explains that the definition
of subsurface fluid distribution systems, a type of injection well, includes
subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
Section 331.7, Permit Required
Proposed §331.7(c) is amended to provide that the owner or operator
of subsurface area drip dispersal systems must obtain a permit under TWC,
Chapters 26 and 32 and submit information to the Underground Injection Control
program staff for inclusion in the Class V injection well inventory list.
Section 331.9, Injection Authorized by Rule
Proposed §331.9(b) is amended to clarify which injection wells require
a permit and which injection wells are authorized by rule. The reference in
this section to §331.7 reinforces the requirement for subsurface area
drip dispersal systems to obtain a wastewater discharge permit under TWC,
Chapter 26 or Chapters 26 and 32 prior to discharging effluent into a subsurface
fluid distribution system, which is a type of Class V injection well.
Section 331.132, Construction Standards
Proposed §331.132(a) is amended to correct an out-of-date statute
citation. Previously, TWC, Chapter 32 was repealed and the water well driller
provisions recodified into Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1901, as amended
by HB 2813, 77th Legislature, 2001. The proposed amendment to §331.132(a)
reflects the recodification of the water well driller provisions in the Texas
Occupations Code.
Proposed §331.132(b) is amended to identify the information that is
required to be submitted with the applicable permit application for injection
wells that are both authorized by rule under this chapter and regulated by
permit under other commission permitting programs.
FISCAL NOTE: COSTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Nina Chamness, Analyst, Strategic Planning and Grants Management Section,
determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rules are in effect,
no fiscal implications are anticipated for the agency or other units of state
or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed
rules.
HB 2651 amended the TWC by adding Chapter 32. The commission proposes to
amend Chapter 331 to clarify that rules for underground injection control
systems apply to subsurface area drip dispersal systems, as defined by TWC,
Chapter 32. Subsurface area drip dispersal systems are subsurface fluid distribution
systems, a type of injection well, and are therefore subject to the requirements
of Chapter 331. No substantive changes regarding the requirements for injection
wells are part of the proposed rulemaking. Owners or operators of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems will not experience any fiscal implications as
a result of the proposed rulemaking.
PUBLIC BENEFITS AND COSTS
Ms. Chamness also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the
changes seen in the proposed rules will be greater clarity in the requirements
for subsurface area drip dispersal systems, and thus, more efficient administration
of commission rules regulating the permitting and operation of subsurface
area drip dispersal systems.
Subsurface area drip dispersal systems are subject to the requirements
of Chapter 331, and no substantive changes regarding those requirements are
part of the proposed rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking explicitly states
that the requirements of Chapter 331 will apply to subsurface area drip dispersal
systems. Owners or operators of subsurface area drip dispersal systems will
not experience any fiscal implications as a result of the proposed rulemaking.
SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS ASSESSMENT
No adverse fiscal implications are anticipated for small or micro-businesses
that own or operate subsurface area drip dispersal systems. Subsurface area
drip dispersal systems are subject to the requirements of Chapter 331, and
no substantive changes regarding those requirements are part of the proposed
rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking explicitly states that the requirements
of Chapter 331 will apply to subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT STATEMENT
The commission reviewed this proposed rulemaking and determined that a
local employment impact statement is not required because the proposed rules
do not adversely affect a local economy in a material way for the first five
years that the proposed rules are in effect.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rules do not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule."
Under Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, "major environmental rule" means
a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The proposed rules are intended to implement
HB 2651, relating to the regulation of subsurface area drip dispersal systems.
The proposed rules clarify that a subsurface area drip dispersal system regulated
under Chapter 222 is also considered as an injection well under the definition
of subsurface fluid distribution system. The proposed rules do not alter the
underlying technical requirements for injection wells. Therefore, because
this rulemaking will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or
the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state, the rulemaking
does not fit the Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, definition of "major
environmental rule."
Furthermore, the proposed rulemaking action does not meet any of the four
applicable requirements listed in Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a).
Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a) only applies to a major environmental
rule adopted by an agency, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard
set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically required by state law;
2) exceed an express requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically
required by federal law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement
or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal
government to implement a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely
under the general powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
In this case, the proposed rules do not meet any of these applicability
requirements. First, the proposed rules are specifically required to implement
state law in HB 2651. Second, the proposed rules do not exceed an express
requirement of state law, instead these rules implement HB 2651 and the Injection
Well Act in TWC, Chapter 27. Third, the proposed rules do not exceed an express
requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an
agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state and
federal program. Fourth, the commission does not propose these rules solely
under the general powers of the agency, but rather under the authority of
HB 2651, which directs the commission to implement rules under TWC, Chapter
32 and under TWC, §27.019, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules
reasonably required for the performance of its duties under TWC, Chapter 27.
The commission invites public comment regarding this draft regulatory impact
analysis determination.
TAKING IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated this proposed rulemaking action and performed
a preliminary assessment of whether this action would constitute a takings
under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007. The proposed rules are intended
to establish requirements for subsurface area drip dispersal systems and clarify
that subsurface area drip dispersal systems are a type of injection well.
The promulgation and enforcement of the proposed rules will not affect private
real property in a manner that would require compensation to private real
property owners under the United States Constitution or the Texas Constitution.
The proposed rules also will not affect private real property in a manner
that restricts or limits an owner's right to the property that would otherwise
exist in the absence of the governmental action. Consequently, this proposal
does not meet the definition of a takings under Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5).
Therefore, the proposed rules will not constitute a taking under Texas Government
Code, Chapter 2007. The commission invites public comment on this preliminary
takings impact assessment.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission determined that the proposed rulemaking does not relate
to an action or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP)
in accordance with the Coastal Coordination Management Act of 1991, as amended
(Texas Natural Resources Code, §§33.201
et seq
.) and in 30 TAC Chapter 281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency
with the Texas Coastal Management Program. The area affected by the prohibition
is not proximate to the coastal areas of the state and Chapter 331 is not
a chapter that is listed in Chapter 281, Subchapter B, as being subject to
the CMP. Therefore, this proposed rulemaking is not subject to the CMP.
Written comments on the consistency of this rulemaking may be submitted
to the contact person at the address listed under the SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
section of this preamble.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF HEARING
A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on March 14, 2006,
2:00 p.m. at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in Building F,
Room 2210, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. The hearing will be structured
for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested persons. Individuals
may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. There
will be no open discussion during the hearing; however, an agency staff member
will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing
and will answer questions before and after the hearing.
Persons who have special communication or other accommodation needs who
are planning to attend the hearing should contact Patricia Durón, Office
of Legal Services, at (512) 239-6087. Requests should be made as far in advance
as possible.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Comments may be submitted to Patricia Durón, MC 205, Texas Register
Team, Office of Legal Services, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All
comments should reference Rule Project Number 2005-050-222-PR. Comments must
be received no later than 5:00 p.m., March 20, 2006. For further information,
please contact Sherry Smith, Water Quality Division at (512) 239-0571 or Louis
C. Herrin, III, P.E., Water Quality Division at (512) 239-4552.
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
or
] any trickling filter or
rotating biological contactor facilities with a permitted daily average flow
of 100,000 gallons per day or greater
, or any facility that uses a subsurface
area drip dispersal system as defined in §222.5 of this title (relating
to Definitions) for disposal of its effluent
. A trickling filter or
rotating biological contactor is a secondary aerobic process that uses microbiological
organisms attached to a fixed substrate.
or
]
.
]
shall
] be classified in accordance with the following criteria.
Chapter 55.
REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS; PUBLIC COMMENT
and
] 27
, and 32
and Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapters 361 and 382.
and
] 27
, and 32
and Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapters 361 and 382.
Exemptions from Permitting
]) except for construction of concrete batch
plants which are not temporarily located contiguous or adjacent to a public
works project;
.
]
Subchapter E. PUBLIC COMMENT AND PUBLIC MEETINGS
or
] 27
, or 32
or Texas
Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361 or 382 that are declared administratively
complete on or after September 1, 1999.
Subchapter F. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CONTESTED CASE HEARING
or
] 27
, or 32
or Texas
Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361 or 382 that are declared administratively
complete on or after September 1, 1999.
Chapter 222.
SUBSURFACE AREA DRIP DISPERSAL SYSTEMS
Subchapter B. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
Subchapter C. SITING REQUIREMENTS AND EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Subchapter D. DESIGN CRITERIA
Subchapter E. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Chapter 281.
APPLICATIONS PROCESSING
pursuant to
] §335.2 of this title (relating to Permit Required)
and §335.43 of this title (relating to Permit Required) or for new or
amended compliance plans filed
under
[
pursuant to
] §305.401
of this title (relating to Compliance Plan);
,
]
including subsurface area drip dispersal
systems,
underground injection, municipal solid waste, radioactive material,
hazardous waste and industrial solid waste management permits must include:
the
]
Texas Water Code, Chapters 26
,
[
and
] 27,
and 32,
the
Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act
[
TSWDA
], and
the
Texas Radiation Control Act
[
TRCA
].
Chapter 305.
CONSOLIDATED PERMITS
the
] Texas Water Code, Chapters
26 - 28 and 32
, [
26,
27, and 28
] and [
the
] Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapters
361 and 401.
Commercial Livestock and Poultry Production Operations
]);
the
] Clean Water Act (CWA), §405(d), applicable to the treatment
works treating domestic sewage are included in a permit issued under the appropriate
provisions of Subtitle C, the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, the Safe Drinking
Water Act, Part C, the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of
1972, or the Clean Air Act, or under state permit programs approved by the
regional administrator as adequate to assure compliance with [
the
]
CWA, §405.
the
] CWA, §405(d). Any person
designated as a treatment works treating domestic sewage shall submit an application
for a permit within 120 days of being notified by the executive director that
a permit is required. The executive director's decision to designate a person
as a treatment works treating domestic sewage shall be stated in the fact
sheet or statement of basis for the permit.
and
] 28.001,
and 32.002,
and Texas Health and
Safety Code, §§361.003, 401.003, and 401.004, apply to this chapter.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following
meanings.
For domestic
] wastewater
treatment plants
.
[
--
] When four samples are not available
in a calendar month, the arithmetic average (weighted by flow) of all values
in the previous four consecutive month period consisting of at least four
measurements shall be utilized as the daily average concentration.
For all
] other wastewater treatment
plants
.
[
--
] When four samples are not available in
a calendar month, the arithmetic average (weighted by flow) of all values
taken during the month shall be utilized as the daily average concentration.
(DMR)
]--The
United States Environmental Protection Agency
[
EPA
] uniform
national form, including any subsequent additions, revisions, or modifications
for the reporting of self-monitoring results by permittees.
;
]
(NPDES)
]--The national program for issuing, amending, terminating, monitoring,
and enforcing permits, and imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements,
under
Clean Water Act
[
CWA
], §§307, 402, 318,
and 405. The term includes an approved program.
CWA
], §306; or
CWA
], §306, which are applicable
to such source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with §306
within 120 days of their proposal.
RCRA
] and solid waste management units.
§305.532(d)
] of this title (relating
to Adoption of Appendices by Reference).
EPA
] approval of a state program, where
there is a reference in the EPA regulations adopted by reference in this chapter
to the "regional administrator" or to the "director," the reference is more
properly made, for purposes of state law, to the executive director of the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, or to the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, consistent with the organization of the agency as set forth in Texas
Water Code, Chapter 5, Subchapter B. When used in conjunction with the words
"state director" in such regulations, regional administrator means the regional
administrator for the Region VI office of the EPA or his or her authorized
representative. A copy of 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 122, is available
for inspection at the library of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality,
located on the first floor of Building A at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Austin,
Texas.
CWA
] and regulations.
CWA
], §§307, 318, 402, and 405;
Texas Water Code; and Texas Administrative Code regulations.
CWA
], §307(a) or, in the case of sludge
use or disposal practices, any pollutant identified in regulations implementing
Clean Water Act
[
CWA
], §405(d).
CWA
], §301 or §316, or under Chapter
308 of this title (relating to Criteria and Standards for the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System) which allows modification to or waiver of the
generally applicable effluent limitation requirements or time deadlines of
the Clean Water Act
[
CWA
] or this title.
Subchapter C. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT OR POST-CLOSURE ORDER
(UIC)
] Program
under the Texas Injection Well Act;
(NPDES)
] Program under the
Clean Water Act
[
CWA
]
and Waste Discharge Program under [
the
] Texas Water Code, Chapter
26;
(PSD)
]
Program under the
Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA)
[
FCAA
];
(NESHAPS)
] preconstruction approval under the FCAA;
TRCA
]; [
and
]
(J)
] other environmental permits
; and
[
.
]
Waste
] Discharge Permits), §305.54 of this
title (relating to Additional Requirements for Radioactive Material
Licenses
[
License
]), §336.207 of this title (relating
to General Requirements for Issuance of a License), §336.513 of this
title (relating to Technical Requirements for Active Disposal Sites), §336.617
of this title (relating to Technical Requirements for Inactive Disposal Sites), §336.705
of this title (relating to Content of Application), and Chapter 330, Subchapter
E of this title (relating to Permit Procedures).
Subchapter F. PERMIT CHARACTERISTICS AND CONDITIONS
26, 27, and 28
], and [
the
] Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapters 361 and
401.
.
]
TPDES
]
permit
; and
[
.
]
TPDES
] permit to be reported within 24 hours.
§§361.032 - 361.033
],
361.037, and 401.063, and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)[
,
] §122.41(i).
The statement in Texas Water Code, §26.014
,
that commission
entry of a facility shall occur in accordance with an establishment's rules
and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection
is not grounds for denial or restriction of entry to any part of the facility,
but merely describes the commission's duty to observe appropriate rules and
regulations during an inspection.
and §305.97
of this title (relating to Action on Application for Transfer)
].
CWA
], §§301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or
405, or any condition or limitation implementing any sections in a permit
issued under CWA, §402, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment
program approved under CWA, §402(a)(3) or (b)(8);
,
] §124.33(b),
as amended [
through
] December 11, 1995, [
at
]
in
the
Federal Register
(
60
FR
[
FedReg
] 63417
)
. The information repository
will be governed by the provisions in 40 CFR §124.33(c) - (f), as amended
[
through
] December 11, 1995, [
at
]
in the
FedReg
] 63417
)
.
:
]
:
]
UIC
] permits, the time for compliance shall require compliance as soon
as possible, and in no case later than three years after the effective date
of the permit. Except as provided in clause (iii)(I)(-b-) of this subparagraph,
if a permit establishes a schedule of compliance which exceeds one year from
the date of permit issuance, the schedule shall set forth interim requirements
and the dates for their achievement.
and
] to Chapter 329 of this title
(relating to Drilled or Mined Shafts) for drilled or mined shaft standards
, and to Chapter 222 of this title (relating to Subsurface Area Drip Dispersal
Systems) for subsurface area drip dispersal systems standards
.
and
] Chapter 329 of this title for drilled or mined shaft standards
, and Chapter 222 of this title for subsurface area drip dispersal systems
standards
.
Chapter 309.
DOMESTIC WASTEWATER EFFLUENT LIMITATION AND PLANT SITING
pursuant to Chapter 26 of the Texas Water Code
] or
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4477-7e
[
Article 4477-7e of the Texas
Revised Civil Statutes
], or which may be used as a source for public
drinking water supply shall achieve, at a minimum, Effluent Set 2 in §309.4
of this title (relating to Table 1, Effluent Limitations for Domestic Wastewater
Treatment Plants). Five miles shall be measured in stream miles from the normal
conservation pool elevation. The commission may grant exceptions to this requirement
where it can be demonstrated that the exception would not adversely impact
water quality.
6
], at a minimum, shall apply. The pH shall be within the limits of 6.0
- 9.0 standard units unless a specific variance is provided in the permit
based upon site-specific conditions. When lands to which the public does not
have access are to be used for ultimate disposal of effluent, the effluent
must, at a minimum, receive primary treatment. Effluent Set
5
[
7
] shall apply and the pH shall be within the limits of 6.0 - 9.0 standard
units unless a specific variance is provided in the permit based upon site-specific
conditions. For irrigation systems, primary treatment is the same as described
in subsection (e) of this section. Effluent may be used for irrigation only
when consistent with Subchapters B and C of this chapter (relating to Location
Standards and Land Disposal of Sewage Effluent).
8
], within the pH limits of
6.0 - 9.0 standard units may be used consistent with environmental safeguards
and protection of ground and surface waters. For overland flow systems, primary
treatment is the same as described in subsection (e) of this section. At a
minimum, Effluent Set 1 shall apply to discharges from overland flow facilities
except where more stringent treatment levels are required to meet water quality
standards.
drip irrigation,
] or similar soil absorption systems are utilized for
on-site land disposal, the effluent shall, at a minimum, receive primary treatment
and meet Effluent Set
7
[
9
]. Use of these on-site systems
shall be consistent with environmental safeguards and the protection of ground
and surface waters. Primary treatment is the same as described in subsection
(e) of this section.
Chapter 331.
UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL