Part 2.
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
Chapter 102.
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
Subchapter CC. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING COORDINATED HEALTH PROGRAMS
19 TAC §102.1031
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes amendment to §102.1031,
concerning coordinated health programs for elementary school students. The
section establishes the criteria for evaluating school health programs and
addresses health programs developed by schools, submission of programs for
evaluation, and availability of programs. The proposed amendment would implement
the requirements of the Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 38, Health and
Safety, Subchapter A, General Provisions, §38.013, Coordinated Health
Program for Elementary, Middle, and Junior High School Students, as amended
by Senate Bill (SB) 42, 79th Texas Legislature, 2005. TEC, §38.013, requires
the commissioner of education by rule to extend coordinated school health
requirements to include middle and junior high schools.
SB 19, 77th Texas Legislature, 2001, added the TEC, §38.013, requiring
school districts to implement school health programs. SB 1357, 78th Texas
Legislature, 2003, amended the TEC, §38.013, to require the commissioner
of education to include, in rule, the criteria for evaluating school health
programs. In accordance with the TEC, §38.013, the commissioner exercised
rulemaking authority to adopt 19 TAC §102.1031, Coordinated Health Programs
for Elementary School Students, which became effective May 2, 2004. As specified
in SB 1357, the criteria was developed in consultation with the Texas Department
of State Health Services School Health Advisory Committee. Currently, 19 TAC §102.1031
requires that the TEA make available to each school one or more coordinated
health programs; establishes the criteria for evaluating school health programs;
and addresses health programs developed by schools, submission of programs
for evaluation, and availability of programs.
SB 42, 79th Texas Legislature, 2005, amended the TEC, §38.013, by
requiring the commissioner of education by rule to extend coordinated school
health requirements to include middle and junior high schools. The legislation
also requires the commissioner by rule to adopt criteria for evaluating the
nutritional services component of a program under this section that includes
an evaluation of program compliance with the Department of Agriculture guidelines
relating to foods of minimal nutritional value. The TEA currently has a process
in place for reviewing programs for inclusion on the
Approved Coordinated School Health Programs
list based on 19 TAC §102.1031.
This process would be modified to include review of programs for middle and
junior high schools in addition to elementary schools.
Specifically, the proposed amendment to 19 TAC §102.1031 would change
the title to "Coordinated Health Programs for Elementary, Middle, and Junior
High School Students" and add language to subsections (a) and (b) to extend
the requirements to middle and junior high school. Language would also be
added in subsection (a) to clarify that development of school district programs
is allowed. The requirement for peer reviewed empirical evidence of effectiveness
in subsection (b)(5) would be moved to new subsection (d). New subsection
(b)(9) would be added to address evaluation of the nutritional services component
of programs. Clarification about materials that must be used for health programs
developed by school districts would be added to subsection (c). New subsection
(d) would be added to address health programs not developed by school districts.
Changes in renumbered subsection (e) would reduce the frequency of program
submissions and extend the length of time programs will be approved.
In accordance with statute, the proposed amendment will be sent to the
Texas Department of State Health Services School Health Advisory Committee
for review and comment prior to adoption.
Susan Barnes, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined
that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will
be no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or
administering the amendment. However, there will be fiscal implications for
local government. There will be a cost to districts that will either have
to purchase a program with local funds or will have to develop their own programs
locally. The cost to a district to purchase a program from the approved program
list is expected to average about $13.00 per student and $32.00 per teacher.
Three of the four currently approved programs have an average cost of $5.00
or less per student. The fourth program is significantly more expensive. This
is a very rough estimate because it is not possible to know how much physical
education equipment a particular school might need to be able to implement
a particular program. There will also be a cost to districts that develop
a program locally; however, it is not possible to reasonably estimate what
that cost would be.
Dr. Barnes has determined that for each year of the first five years the
amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the amendment will be that students would be provided the opportunity to participate
in coordinated school health programs beyond elementary school, thereby extending
the effort to promote healthy eating and physical exercise and continuing
efforts to combat childhood obesity. There will be no effect on small businesses.
There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply
with the amendment.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez,
Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress
Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted
electronically to
rules@tea.state.tx.us
or
faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed
amendment submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received
by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice
of the proposal has been published in the
Texas Register
.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code, §38.013,
which authorizes the commissioner to by rule adopt criteria for evaluating
a coordinated health program. As amended by Senate Bill 42, 79th Texas Legislature,
2005, TEC, §38.013, requires the commissioner of education by rule to
extend coordinated school health requirements to include middle and junior
high schools. The legislation also requires the commissioner by rule to adopt
criteria for evaluating the nutritional services component of a program under
this section that includes an evaluation of program compliance with the Department
of Agriculture guidelines relating to foods of minimal nutritional value.
The amendment implements the Texas Education Code, §38.013.
§102.1031.Criteria for Evaluating Coordinated Health Programs for Elementary , Middle, and Junior High School Students.
(a)
Program purpose. In accordance with Texas Education Code
(TEC), §38.013, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) shall make available
to each school district one or more coordinated school health programs
or allow for the development of school district programs
designed to
prevent obesity, cardiovascular disease, and Type 2 diabetes in elementary
, middle, and junior high
school students. Each program must provide
for coordinating:
(1)
health education;
(2)
physical education and physical activity;
(3)
nutrition services; and
(4)
parental involvement.
(b)
Evaluation criteria. The commissioner of education may
make available under subsection (a) of this section only those coordinated
school health programs that meet the following criteria.
(1)
The program coordinates physical education/physical activity,
classroom health education, nutrition/cafeteria services, and parental involvement.
(2)
The program is [
(3)
The program has a training component that includes physical
education/physical activity, classroom health education, nutrition/cafeteria
services, and parental involvement activities and coordinates the four components
of subsection (a)
of this section
. The training component must
include teaching staff and parents.
(4)
The program curricular components (health education and
physical education) are based on Chapter 115 of this title (relating to Texas
Essential Knowledge and Skills for Health Education) and Chapter 116 of this
title (relating to Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Physical Education).
[
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
(8)
[
(9)
The program includes an evaluation
of its nutritional services component that includes compliance with the Department
of Agriculture guidelines relating to foods of minimal nutritional value.
(c)
Health programs developed by school districts. Coordinated
school health programs that are developed by school districts and that meet
the criteria in subsection (b) of this section may be approved and made available
as approved programs.
School district programs must use materials that
are proven effective, such as TEA-approved textbooks or materials developed
by nationally recognized and/or government-approved entities.
(d)
Health programs not developed
by school districts. Coordinated school health programs not developed by school
districts and that meet the criteria in subsection (b) of this section may
be approved and made available as approved programs. Such programs must be
peer-reviewed and show empirical evidence of effectiveness prior to submission.
(e)
[
(f)
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on April 5, 2006.
TRD-200602039
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Policy Coordination
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: May 21, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
Subchapter AA. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY RATING SYSTEM
19 TAC §§109.1002 - 109.1005
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes amendments to §§109.1002
- 109.1005, concerning the financial accountability rating system. The sections
establish provisions relating to the financial accountability rating system,
including the assignment of ratings, types of ratings, criteria, and reporting.
The sections also include the financial accountability rating form entitled
"School FIRST - Rating Worksheet" that explains the indicators that the TEA
will analyze to assign school district financial accountability ratings. The
proposed amendments would update the rating system by specifying new provisions
that would be implemented beginning with fiscal year 2006-2007, including
the addition and enhancement of indicators, along with a new worksheet and
calculations; the incorporation of the Governor's Executive Order regarding
the 65% instructional expenditure standard; the establishment of a point system
for rating districts; and the delineation of certain disclosures that must
be included in districts' annual financial management reports. The rule action
presented in this item replaces the previous proposal that was published in
the
Texas Register
on May 13, 2005 (30 TexReg
2818). The withdrawal of that proposal was published in the
Texas Register
on November 4, 2005 (30 TexReg 7203).
Senate Bill (SB) 875, 76th Texas Legislature, 1999, added TEC, §39.201,
requiring the commissioner of education in consultation with the comptroller
of public accounts to develop proposals for a school district financial accountability
rating system that was to be presented to the legislature no later than December
15, 2000. TEC, §39.201, expired September 1, 2001. Subsequently, SB 218,
77th Texas Legislature, 2001, added TEC, §§39.201 - 39.204, requiring
the commissioner to adopt rules for the implementation and administration
of the financial accountability rating system prescribed by TEC, Chapter 39,
Subchapter I.
19 TAC Chapter 109, Budgeting, Accounting, and Auditing, Subchapter AA,
Commissioner's Rules Concerning Financial Accountability Rating System, adopted
to be effective October 20, 2002, establishes provisions that detail the purpose,
ratings, types of ratings, criteria, reporting, and sanctions for the financial
accountability rating system, in accordance with SB 218, 77th Texas Legislature,
2001. The adopted rules include the financial accountability rating form entitled
"School FIRST - Rating Worksheet" that explains the indicators that the TEA
will analyze to assign school district financial accountability ratings. This
form specifies the minimum financial accountability rating information that
a district is to report to parents and taxpayers in the district.
The rating worksheet, along with accompanying calculation instructions,
was adopted in 19 TAC §109.1002 to be effective October 20, 2002, and
later amended to be effective May 7, 2003. The 2003 amendment to 19 TAC §109.1002
included minor technical edits that crosswalked exhibit numbers referenced
in the "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet" according to the standard for the
Annual Financial and Compliance Report filed by school districts for fiscal
year 2002-2003. This rating worksheet, dated May 2003, establishes the indicators
applicable to school district financial accountability ratings assigned for
fiscal years 2002-2003, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006.
A proposed amendment to 19 TAC §109.1002, published in the August
6, 2004, issue of the
Texas Register
, would
have updated the rating system by adding a new critical indicator and enhancing
other existing indicators. The revised rating system would have been applicable
to school district financial accountability ratings issued beginning in fiscal
year 2005-2006. This proposed amendment was withdrawn and a new proposal was
brought forward at a later date that would have added more indicators, established
a different scoring process for many measures, and created new disclosure
requirements.
Proposed amendments to 19 TAC §§109.1002 - 109.1005, published
in the May 13, 2005, issue of the
Texas Register
, would have updated the system by specifying new provisions, including
the addition and enhancement of indicators, along with a new worksheet and
calculations; establishing a change to the types of district ratings based
on a point system; and delineating certain disclosures that must be included
in districts' annual financial management reports. The revised rating system
would have been applicable to school district financial accountability ratings
assigned beginning with fiscal year 2005-2006. These proposed amendments were
withdrawn and a new proposal was to be brought forward at a later date that
would incorporate the Governor's Executive Order regarding the 65% instructional
expenditure standard and the noted proposed changes. The rule actions presented
at this time comprise the new proposal.
The proposed amendments developed in consultation with the state comptroller's
office, would update the rating system by specifying new provisions that would
be implemented beginning with fiscal year 2006-2007, including the addition
and enhancement of indicators, along with a new worksheet and calculations;
the establishment of a point system for rating districts; the incorporation
of the 65% instructional expenditure standard; and the delineation of certain
disclosures that must be included in districts' annual financial management
reports. The following specific amendments to 19 TAC Chapter 109, Subchapter
AA, are proposed.
In 19 TAC §109.1002, Financial Accountability Ratings, the proposed
amendment would update the rating system by adding two new critical indicators,
adding three noncritical indicators, and enhancing other existing indicators.
The revised rating system would be applicable to school district financial
accountability ratings assigned beginning with fiscal year 2006-2007 (the
ratings that will be issued in summer 2008). The worksheet and calculations
used beginning in fiscal year 2006-2007 to report district financial accountability
information would be modified. In addition, districts would be required to
identify their accreted interest on their bonds. This information would be
included in their GASB 34 data feed to the TEA. TEA staff will continue to
generate district financial accountability ratings based on data submitted
by districts.
The proposed amendment 19 TAC §109.1002 would include the following
specific changes.
Language would be added to subsection (a) to cite the statutory reference.
Language would be added to subsection (b) to specify the applicable fiscal
years to which the current rating worksheet, dated May 2003, applies.
New subsection (c) would be added to establish the applicable fiscal years
to which the new rating worksheet, effective July 2006, applies. The new worksheet
and accompanying calculation instructions would be added as a new figure,
19 TAC §109.1002(c).
Subsection (d) would be renumbered accordingly.
New subsection (e) would be added to specify the procedures for submitting
a request for the TEA to review a district's preliminary rating. This new
subsection would also include provisions that would allow school districts
that do not meet the 65% expenditure standard to post their district's check
register (excluding their payroll register) and an aggregate total payroll
expenditure to the district's website and receive full credit (5 points) for
Indicator 16.
In addition, the differences between the May 2003 rating worksheet (currently
in rule) and the proposed July 2006 version include the following.
Two new critical indicators would be added: Indicator 2 relating to total
net unrestricted asset balance in governmental activities and Indicator 5
relating to academic rating of the district (exceeds academically unacceptable).
Three new noncritical indicators would be added addressing fiscal efficiencies
and academic performance: Indicator 8 relating to operating expenditures per
Weighted Average Daily Attendance (WADA) in the general fund and the special
revenue fund, Indicator 9 relating to operating expenditures per WADA in the
general fund, and Indicator 10 relating to a district's academic rating (recognized
or exemplary).
Several fiscal responsibility indicators would be revised: Indicator 11
to change the percent of total tax collection standard from 96% to 98% for
a three-year average, Indicator 12 to change the percent of aggregate variance
for data quality measure from 4.0% to 3.0%, and Indicator 13 to change the
standard per-student amount of debt-related expenditures from $770 if the
district's five-year percent change in students was a 2.0% increase or more
or if property taxes collected per penny of tax effort were more than $100,000
to $250 if the district's five-year percent change in students was a 7.0%
increase or more or if property taxes collected per penny of tax effort were
more than $200,000.
A budgeting indicator, Indicator 16, would be revised to increase the standard
percentage related to operating expenditures for instruction from 54% to 65%
over a three-year period and to change the calculation. This is the indicator
that incorporates the Governor's Executive Order. The calculation definition
for this indicator includes coding for librarians to count toward the 65%
standard.
A personnel indicator, Indicator 20, related to the administrative cost
ratio would be revised and a new threshold ratio chart would be added. The
ranges for the ratio of students to total staff would also be revised.
A cash management indicator, Indicator 26, would be revised to increase
the standard for per-student investment earnings from $15 to $20, excluding
debt service and capital projects funds. The definition of another cash management
indicator, Indicator 23, relating to optimum fund balances, would be simplified.
Applicable indicators and references would be renumbered and the date of
the form updated.
New information related to determination of financial accountability rating
and determination of points would be added. The proposal would establish that
district financial accountability ratings would be based on a point system.
In 19 TAC §109.1003, Types of Financial Accountability Ratings, the
proposed amendment would modify text to incorporate minor technical edits
to cross references. The existing types of ratings would continue to apply
during fiscal year 2006-2007, in accordance with the procedures, scores, and
classifications established in 19 TAC §109.1002.
In 19 TAC §109.1004, Criteria for Financial Accountability Ratings,
the proposed amendment would clarify that changes to criteria for ratings
will be communicated to school districts in accordance with the applicable
effective dates.
In 19 TAC §109.1005, Reporting, the proposed amendment would add requirements
that must be presented in the annual financial management report, including
a copy of the superintendent's current employment contract, transactions involving
the superintendent and board members, and gifts that the superintendent and
board members receive from vendors.
Adam Jones, associate commissioner for finance and information technology,
has determined that for the first five-year period the amendments are in effect
there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result
of enforcing or administering the amendments.
Mr. Jones has determined that for each year of the first five years the
amendments are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the amendments will be an updated rating system. The financial accountability
rating system benefits the public by putting into place a system to ensure
that school districts will be held accountable for the quality of their financial
management practices and achieve improved performance in the management of
their financial resources. There will be no effect on small businesses. There
is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with
the amendments.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez,
Policy Coordination Division, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress
Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted
electronically to
rules@tea.state.tx.us
or
faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed
amendments submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received
by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice
of the proposal has been published in the
Texas Register
.
The amendments are proposed under Texas Education Code, §39.204,
which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules as necessary
for the implementation and administration of a financial accountability rating
system.
The amendments implement the TEC, §§39.201 - 39.204.
§109.1002.Financial Accountability Ratings.
(a)
In accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter
39, Subchapter I, each
[
(b)
For fiscal years 2002-2003, 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and
2005-2006, each
[
Figure: 19 TAC §109.1002(b) (No change.)
(c)
Beginning with fiscal year
2006-2007, the financial accountability rating of a school district is based
on its overall performance on certain financial measurements, ratios, and
other indicators established by the commissioner of education in the financial
accountability rating form provided in this subsection entitled "School FIRST
- Rating Worksheet Effective July 2006." On this form, Indicator 16 entitled,
"Was The Percent Of Operating Expenditures Expended For Instruction More Than
65%?" will be phased in over a three-year period, as follows.
(1)
For fiscal year 2006-2007, the indicator will
be "Was The Percent Of Operating Expenditures Expended For Instruction More
Than 55%?"
(2)
For fiscal year 2007-2008, the indicator will
be "Was The Percent Of Operating Expenditures Expended For Instruction More
Than 60%?"
(3)
For fiscal year 2008-2009 and beyond, the indicator
will be "Was The Percent Of Operating Expenditures Expended For Instruction
More Than 65%?"
Figure: 19 TAC §109.1002(c) (.pdf)
(d)
[
(e)
The TEA will issue a preliminary
financial accountability rating to a school district within 150 days of the
district's complete financial data being made available to the TEA staff.
(1)
The issuance of the preliminary rating will
not be delayed if a district fails to meet the statutory deadline for submitting
the annual financial and compliance report.
(2)
A district may submit a written request that
the TEA review a preliminary rating if the preliminary rating was based on
a data error solely attributable to the TEA's review of the data for any of
the indicators.
(A)
The TEA office responsible for financial audits
must receive the request for review no later than 30 days after the TEA's
release of the preliminary rating, and the request must include substantial
evidence that supports the district's position.
(B)
Requests for review received 31 days or more
after the TEA issues a preliminary rating will not be considered.
(C)
Errors by a district in recording data or submitting
data through the TEA data collection and reporting system do not constitute
a valid basis for requesting a review of a preliminary rating.
(D)
A district that does not meet the 65% instructional
expenditure standard (Indicator 16) may publish on their website their check
register (excluding their payroll register) and their yearly payroll expenditure
and receive full credit (5 points) for this indicator. The district must notify
the TEA within the 30-day review process that they have posted their register
on the district's website and provide the website address to receive credit
for this indicator.
(E)
If the TEA receives a request to review a preliminary
rating, a final rating will be issued to the school district no later than
45 days after the district's request for review has been received by the TEA.
(F)
If the TEA does not receive a request to review
a preliminary rating, the preliminary rating automatically becomes a final
rating on the 31st day after issuance of the preliminary rating.
(G)
A final rating issued by the TEA pursuant to
this section may not be appealed under the TEC, §7.057, or any other
law or rule.
§109.1003.Types of Financial Accountability Ratings.
The types of ratings districts may receive are as follows.
(1)
Superior Achievement. In accordance with the procedures
established in §109.1002 of this title (relating to Financial Accountability
Ratings), a district shall be classified as Superior Achievement if it scores
within the applicable range established by the commissioner of education for
Superior Achievement.
(2)
Above Standard Achievement. In accordance with the procedures
established in §109.1002
of this title
, a district shall be
classified as Above Standard Achievement if it scores within the applicable
range established by the commissioner of education for Above Standard Achievement.
(3)
Standard Achievement. In accordance with the procedures
established in §109.1002
of this title
, a district shall be
classified as Standard Achievement if it scores within the applicable range
established by the commissioner of education for Standard Achievement.
(4)
Substandard Achievement. In accordance with the procedures
established in §109.1002
of this title
, a district shall be
classified as Substandard Achievement if the district responds negatively
to specified indicators or if the district scores within the applicable range
established by the commissioner of education for Substandard Achievement.
The commissioner of education may apply sanctions to a district that is assigned
a Substandard Achievement rating.
(5)
Suspended--Data Quality. If serious data quality issues
are disclosed by the commissioner of education, a Suspended--Data Quality
rating shall be assigned to the school district. The Suspended--Data Quality
rating will be assigned until the district successfully resolves the data
quality issues. The commissioner of education may apply sanctions to a district
that is assigned a Suspended--Data Quality rating.
§109.1004.Criteria for Financial Accountability Ratings.
The criteria for financial accountability ratings will be based upon
indicators established by the commissioner of education and reflected in §109.1002
of this title (relating to Financial Accountability Ratings), in accordance
with requirements in state law and after consultation with the comptroller
of public accounts. The commissioner of education shall evaluate the rating
system annually and may modify the system in order to improve the effectiveness
of the rating system. Changes to criteria for ratings
and their effective
dates
will be communicated to school districts [
§109.1005.Reporting.
(a)
Each school district is required to report information
and financial accountability ratings to parents and taxpayers by implementing
the following reporting procedures.
(1)
Each school district is required to prepare and distribute
an annual financial management report in accordance with subsection (b) of
this section.
(2)
The public must be provided an opportunity to comment on
the report at a public hearing in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
(b)
The annual financial management report prepared by the
school district must include:
(1)
a description of the district's financial management performance
based on a comparison, provided by the Texas Education Agency (TEA), of the
district's performance on the indicators established by the commissioner of
education and reflected in §109.1002 of this title (relating to Financial
Accountability Ratings). The report will contain information that discloses:
(A)
state-established standards; and
(B)
the district's financial management
performance under each indicator for the current and previous years' financial
accountability ratings;
[
(2)
any descriptive information required by the commissioner
of education
, including:
[
(A)
a copy of the superintendent's
current employment contract. The school district may publish the superintendent's
employment contract on the school district's Internet site in lieu of publication
in the annual financial management report;
(B)
a summary schedule for the
fiscal year (12-month period) of total reimbursements received by the superintendent
and each board member, including transactions resulting from use of the school
district's credit card(s) to cover expenses incurred by the superintendent
and each board member. The summary schedule shall separately report reimbursements
for meals, lodging, transportation, motor fuel, and other items (the summary
schedule of total reimbursements is not to include reimbursements for supplies
and materials that were purchased for the operation of the school district);
(C)
a summary schedule for the
fiscal year of the dollar amount of compensation and/or fees received by the
superintendent from another school district or any other outside entity in
exchange for professional consulting and/or other personal services. The schedule
shall separately report the amount received from each entity;
(D)
a summary schedule for the
fiscal year of the total dollar amount by the executive officers and board
members of gifts that had an economic value of $250 or more in the aggregate
in the fiscal year. This reporting requirement only applies to gifts received
by the school district's executive officers and board members (and their immediate
family as described by Government Code, Chapter 573, Subchapter B, as a person
related to another person within the first degree by consanguinity or affinity)
from an outside entity that received payments from the school district in
the prior fiscal year, and gifts from competing vendors that were not awarded
contracts in the prior fiscal year. This reporting requirement does not apply
to reimbursement of travel-related expenses by an outside entity when the
purpose of the travel is to investigate or explore matters directly related
to the duties of an executive officer or board member, or matters related
to attendance at education-related conferences and seminars whose primary
purpose is to provide continuing education (this exclusion does not apply
to trips for entertainment- related purposes or pleasure trips). This reporting
requirement excludes an individual gift or a series of gifts from a single
outside entity that had an aggregate economic value of less than $250 per
executive officer or board member; and
(E)
a summary schedule for the
fiscal year of the dollar amount by board member for the aggregate amount
of business transactions with the school district. This reporting requirement
is not to duplicate the items disclosed in the summary schedule of reimbursements
received by board members; and
(3)
any other information the board of trustees of the district
determines to be useful.
(c)
The board of trustees of each school district shall hold
a public hearing on the annual financial management report within two months
after receipt of a final financial accountability rating (including a final
rating of Suspended--Data Quality). The public hearing is to be held at a
location in the district's facilities. The board shall give notice of the
hearing to owners of real property in the district and to parents of district
students. In addition to other notice required by law, notice of the hearing
must be provided:
(1)
to a newspaper of general circulation in the district once
a week for two weeks prior to holding the public meeting, providing the time
and place where the hearing is to be held. The first notice in the newspaper
may not be more than 30 days prior to or less than 14 days prior to the public
meeting. If there is not a newspaper published in the county in which the
district's central administration office is located, then the notice is to
be published in the county nearest the county seat of the county in which
the district's central administration office is located; and
(2)
through electronic mail to media serving the district.
(d)
At the hearing, the annual financial management report
shall be disseminated to the district's parents and taxpayers that are in
attendance.
(e)
The annual financial management report is to be retained
in the district for at least a three-year period after the public hearing
and will be made available to parents and taxpayers upon request.
(f)
A corrective action plan is to be filed with the TEA by
each school district that received a rating of Substandard Achievement or
Suspended--Data Quality. The corrective action plan, which is to be prepared
in accordance with instructions from the commissioner of education, is to
be filed within one month after the district's public hearing. The commissioner
of education may require certain information in the corrective action plan
to address the factor(s) that may have contributed to a district's rating
of Substandard Achievement or Suspended--Data Quality.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on April 6, 2006.
TRD-200602044
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Policy Coordination
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: May 21, 2006
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
implemented and
] coordinated
within and across
all grade levels on an elementary, middle, or junior
high school campus.
[
Kindergarten-Grade 5. A program may be submitted
that also includes Prekindergarten and/or Grade 6.
]
(5)
The program is supported by
peer reviewed empirical evidence of effectiveness.]
(6)
] The program includes assessment
tools for schools to measure cognitive, behavioral, and attitudinal changes
related to the four components.
(7)
] The program is based on health
education theory and national standards for instructional and/or industry
best practices in each of the four components described in subsection (a)
of this section
.
(8)
] The program allows for tailoring
to schools' individual needs and can be adapted to a variety of specific situations:
ethnic diversity, children with disabilities, school schedules, socioeconomic
status, geographic locations, and gender differences.
(9)
] The program trains school
district staff in the annual use of assessment and planning tools for school
health programs and policies, such as the elementary school version of the
School Health Index available at the National Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention website.
(d)
] Submission of programs for
evaluation. Coordinated school health programs may be submitted
every
two years
[
annually
] for evaluation on a schedule to be determined
by the commissioner. Programs will be approved for a period of
four
[
three
] years.
(e)
] Availability of programs.
The TEA shall notify each school district of the availability of each coordinated
school health program approved by the commissioner
under subsection (d)
of this section
.
Chapter 109.
BUDGETING, ACCOUNTING, AND AUDITING
Each
] school district must be assigned
a financial accountability rating by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The
specific procedures for determining financial accountability ratings will
be established annually by the commissioner of education and communicated
to all school districts.
The
] financial accountability rating of
a school district is based on its overall performance on certain financial
measurements, ratios, and other indicators established by the commissioner
of education in the financial accountability rating form provided in this
subsection entitled "School FIRST - Rating Worksheet
," effective May
2003
. [
"
]
(c)
] A financial accountability
rating by a voluntary association is a local option of the district, but it
does not substitute for a financial accountability rating by the TEA.
no later than May
of each calendar year and will apply to the ratings issued in the first calendar
year that follows the modification of any of these indicators
].
(B)
the district's previous performance
on the indicators;]
; and
]