TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 97. PLANNING AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Subchapter AA. ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING

19 TAC §97.1005

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) adopts new §97.1005, concerning accountability and performance monitoring. The new section is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the April 1, 2005, issue of the Texas Register (30 TexReg 1896) and will not be republished. The adopted new §97.1005 describes the Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) and adopts applicable excerpts of the PBMAS 2004-2005 Manual, dated December 14, 2004.

House Bill 3459, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, added TEC, §7.027, limiting compliance monitoring done by the Texas Education Agency to that required to ensure school district and charter school compliance with federal law and regulations; financial accountability, including compliance with grant requirements; and data integrity for purposes of the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) and accountability under TEC, Chapter 39. The intent of this change was to limit and redirect monitoring efforts. To meet this requirement, the agency developed the PBMAS, which is used in conjunction with other evaluation systems, to monitor performance and program effectiveness of special programs in school districts and charter schools. Agency legal counsel has determined that the commissioner of education should take formal rulemaking action to place into the Texas Administrative Code procedures related to the PBMAS. The intention is to annually update the rule to incorporate provisions for the most recent PBMAS manual.

The adopted new 19 TAC §97.1005 describes the purpose of the PBMAS and manner in which school district and charter school performance will be reported. The adopted new rule also adopts excerpts of the PBMAS 2004- 2005 Manual that describe specific criteria and calculations that will be used to assign performance levels. The commissioner will establish specific criteria and calculations annually and communicate that information to school districts and charter schools. The adoption will establish in rule the procedures for the PBMAS. Applicable procedures will be adopted each year as annual versions of the PBMAS manual are published.

The following is a summary of public comments received on the proposed new 19 TAC §97.1005 and corresponding agency responses.

Comment. The Texas Classroom Teachers Association (TCTA) recommended changing the No Child Left Behind Indicator #4 (Highly Qualified Teachers) to be the state percentage of teachers who are highly qualified who are required to be highly qualified in 2003-2004. TCTA recommended deleting Special Education Indicator #10 (Special Education Discretionary Disciplinary Alternative Education Program Placements) and Special Education Indicator #12 (Special Education Discretionary Removals to In-School-Suspension) because of a concern that if districts are evaluated under PBMAS for disproportionate removals of special education students to disciplinary alternative education programs and in-school-suspension, districts will return "a student removed by a teacher from the class to that same teacher's class" without resolving the issue of "teachers who can't get help and support implementing an individualized education program (IEP)."

Agency response. The agency disagrees in part and agrees in part. Changing the components of the 2004-2005 PBMAS is not possible since the system has already been released. However, the agency agrees to consider the suggestions as part of the development of future versions of the PBMAS.

Comment. The TCTA also recommended adding five new indicators to PBMAS: 1) an indicator "showing whether the district has a procedure in place as required by Texas Administrative Code §89.1075;" 2) an indicator "showing large numbers of admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee overrides of teachers' refusal to allow a special education student to return to his/her class;" 3) an indicator "regarding the number of special education students being taught by a teacher who is not appropriately certified for the assignment;" 4) an indicator "regarding the class sizes of classes with special education students in them;" and 5) an indicator "regarding the number of complaints filed with the Texas Education Agency by staff (and other parties) regarding special education."

Agency response. The agency disagrees in part and agrees in part. Changing the components of the 2004-2005 PBMAS is not possible since the system has already been released. However, the agency agrees to consider the suggestions as part of the development of future versions of the PBMAS.

Comment. The Vidor Independent School District director of special programs provided a comment and a recommendation concerning the performance-based monitoring compliance review, two recommendations concerning random selection for performance-based monitoring interventions, and a recommendation concerning the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS).

Agency response. The agency appreciates these recommendations and comments; however, they are outside of the scope of this particular rule adoption, which is limited to the adoption of applicable excerpts of the PBMAS 2004-2005 Manual, dated December 14, 2004.

The new section is adopted under the Texas Education Code, §7.027, which authorizes the agency to monitor as necessary to ensure school district and charter school compliance with state and federal law and regulations.

The new section implements the Texas Education Code, §7.027.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 16, 2005.

TRD-200501957

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Effective date: June 5, 2005

Proposal publication date: April 1, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497