TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 5. STATE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS

Chapter 107. DENTAL BOARD PROCEDURES

Subchapter B. PROCEDURES FOR INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS

22 TAC §107.102

The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners (Board) proposes amendments to 22 TAC Chapter 107, §107.102, concerning procedures in the conduct of investigations. The amendments are proposed to clarify and standardize language, and to improve organization.

The amendments remove from §107.102 subsections (g) - (j). The language contained in those subsections addresses dismissal of cases, and is being relocated to a new §107.103. The Board proposed new §107.103, the repeal of the current §107.103, and a new §107.110 to contain the language currently residing in §107.103 in the February 18, 2005, issue of the Texas Register (30 TexReg 800).

The proposed amendments also more accurately reflect that the director of enforcement may only recommend, and not dictate, the manner of disposition of complaints.

There are no other substantive changes to the section.

Bobby D. Schmidt, Executive Director, Texas State Board of Dental Examiners has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for local or state government as a result of enforcing or administering the amended section.

There is negligible public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the amended section.

There will be no impact on large, small or micro-businesses.

There is no anticipated economic cost to persons as a result of enforcing or administering the amended section.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Bobby D. Schmidt, M.Ed. Executive Director, Texas State Board of Dental Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Tower 3, Suite 800, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1660. To be considered, all written comments must be received by the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners no later than 30 days from the date that this amended section is published in the Texas Register .

The amendments are proposed under Texas Government Code §§2001.021 et seq., Texas Civil Statutes; the Occupations Code §254.001, which provides the Board with the authority to adopt and enforce rules necessary for it to perform its duties.

The proposed amendments affect Title 3, Subtitle D of the Occupations Code and Texas Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapters 101 - 125.

§107.102.Procedures in Conduct of Investigation.

(a) - (c) (No change.)

(d) During the course of an investigation, the complainant shall be given an opportunity to explain or comment on the allegations made in the complaint. At the initiation of the investigation, the respondent shall be provided a copy of the complaint to facilitate a response, unless doing [ to do ] so would jeopardize an investigation.

(e) The parties to the complaint shall receive notice of the complaint's status [ of the complaint ], at least quarterly, until final disposition of the complaint, unless such notice would jeopardize an investigation.

(f) Upon completion of the investigation, the director of enforcement shall review the case. The director of enforcement may:

(1) recommend dismissal of the complaint;

(2) recommend the case be taken before the State Office of Administrative Hearings;

(3) recommend the case be taken before an informal settlement conference;

(4) recommend that the legal division prepare a proposed board order;

(5) refer the case for review by the board or a committee of the board;

(6) direct further investigation;

(7) refer the case for review by a board member; or,

(8) take other appropriate action or consideration in accordance with SBDE rules and the Dental Practice Act.

(g) The director of enforcement will not make a recommendation in cases involving standard of care issues. Such cases shall be reviewed by one board member, who must be a dentist.

[(f) Upon completion of the investigation, the Director of Enforcement shall review the case. The Director of Enforcement may recommend dismissal of the case, refer the case to the State Office of Administrative Hearings, refer the case to an informal settlement conference, request that the legal division prepare a proposed Board Order, direct the case to the Board or a committee of the Board, direct further investigation, request the case be reviewed by a Board member, or other appropriate action or consideration in accordance with Board rules. The Director of Enforcement will not make a recommendation of standard of care matters. Cases involving standard of care matters will be reviewed by two Board members, one of those two must be a dentist.]

[(g) If the Director of Enforcement recommends dismissal of a case, he or she shall state, with specificity, the reason or reasons for the recommended dismissal. A case recommended for dismissal by the Director of Enforcement shall be reviewed by a member of the Enforcement Committee. If the committee member does not agree with the dismissal, the case will be forwarded to an informal settlement conference. If the committee member agrees that the case should be dismissed the dismissal shall be final.]

[(h) All jurisdictional cases shall be investigated. No case will be dismissed without appropriate consideration. If a complaint is dismissed, the Board shall notify the complainant within ten days of the date of the Board action. The notice of dismissal must be in writing, include the reason(s) for the dismissal and inform the complainant of the right to appeal the dismissal. An appeal under this section shall be considered a request for reconsideration of the dismissed case.]

[(i) The Board may hear an appeal in a dismissed case only if:]

[(1) New information or evidence is presented, the acceptance of such, if taken as true supports the original complaint(s);]

[(2) The complainant must, in writing, request reconsideration of a dismissed case postmarked no later than twenty days from the date of receipt of the Board's dismissal letter. The complainant(s) is presumed to be in receipt of the dismissal letter on the third day after the date on which the dismissal letter is mailed.]

[(3) A request for reconsideration of a dismissed case(s) shall not be considered by the Board unless it is timely submitted.]

[(4) A request for reconsideration must contain the requirements specified in this subsection. For purposes of this section, a complainant is deemed to have received the dismissal letter three days from the date of mailing by the Board.]

[(5) Requests meeting this subsection shall be heard by the Professional Evaluation Committee no later than sixty days after the date the Board receives the request from the complainant requesting reconsideration. This time frame may be extended upon good cause shown by the Board. If the time for reconsideration occurs after this sixty day period, the Board shall notify the complainant(s) in writing.]

[(6) This subsection does not apply to cases dismissed by the full Board by recommendation from an Informal Settlement Conference panel. All cases dismissed by the full Board may be appealed in accordance with the Government Code.]

[(j) The Professional Evaluation Committee shall consist of three board members appointed by the President of the Board, one of whom must be a public member. Complaints referred to the Professional Evaluation Committee by the Secretary or designee may be dismissed, referred to an informal settlement conference or returned for further investigation. The Professional Evaluation Committee may also propose an agreed Board Order imposing sanctions. All Board Orders proposed by the Professional Evaluation Committee shall include a statement that the Respondent should not agree to the Order if he or she wants to explain any part of his or her conduct in connection with the complaint.]

[(1) Meetings of the Professional Evaluation Committee are open meetings as defined by the Open Meetings Act;]

[(2) Only Professional Evaluation Committee members and SBDE staff may participate in discussions concerning any complaint. The members may review and consider all information in the investigative file.]

[(3) All cases heard by the Professional Evaluation Committee involving reconsideration of an earlier dismissal by the Board are final.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 25, 2005.

TRD-200500873

Bobby D. Schmidt, M.Ed.

Executive Director

State Board of Dental Examiners

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 475-0972


Part 6. TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

Chapter 131. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION

Subchapter F. ADMINISTRATION

22 TAC §131.81

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes amendments to §131.81, relating to Definitions. The proposed amendments add language to define CAC/ABET and Supervision of Engineering Construction.

The Board is proposing to add a definition of CAC/ABET to support other rule changes that include a reference to the Computing Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Section 1001.407 of the Act refers to supervision of engineering construction and the proposed rule change defines this term.

Lance Kinney, P.E., Director of Licensing for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment will be clarification of the license and registration process.

Mr. Kinney has also determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Director of Licensing, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§131.81.Definitions.

In applying the Texas Engineering Practice Act and the board rules, the following definitions shall prevail unless the word or phrase is defined in the text for a particular usage. Singular and masculine terms shall be construed to include plural and feminine terms and vice versa.

(1) ABET--Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

(2) Act--The Texas Engineering Practice Act, Chapter 1001, Texas Occupations Code.

(3) Advisory Opinion--A statement of policy issued by the board that provides guidance to the public and regulated community regarding the board's interpretation and application of Chapter 1001, Texas Occupations Code, referred to as the Texas Engineering Practice Act "Act" and/or board rules and that do not have the force and effect of law.

(4) Agency or Board--Texas Board of Professional Engineers.

(5) Applicant--A person applying for a license to practice professional engineering or a firm applying for a certificate of registration to offer or provide professional engineering services.

(6) Application--The forms, information, and fees necessary to obtain a license as a professional engineer or a certificate of registration for a firm.

(7) CAC/ABET -- Computing Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

(8) [ (7) ] Certificate of Registration--The annual certificate issued by the board to a firm offering or providing professional engineering services to the public in Texas.

(9) [ (8) ] Complainant--Any party who has filed a complaint with the board against a person or entity subject to the jurisdiction of the board.

(10) [ (9) ] Contested case--A proceeding, including but not restricted to rate making and licensing, in which the legal rights, duties, or privileges of a party are to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for adjudicative hearing pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 2001, Texas Government Code.

(11) [ (10) ] Direct supervision--Critical watching, evaluating, and directing of engineering activities with the authority to review, enforce, and control compliance with all engineering design criteria, specifications, and procedures as the work progresses. Direct supervision will consist of an acceptable combination of: exertion of significant control over the engineering work, regular personal presence, reasonable geographic proximity to the location of the performance of the work, and an acceptable employment relationship with the supervised persons. Engineers providing direct supervision of engineering under the Act, §1001.405(f), shall be personally present during such work.

(12) [ (11) ] EAC/ABET--Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

(13) [ (12) ] EAOR number--An engineering advisory opinion request file number assigned by the executive director to a pending advisory opinion in accordance with this chapter.

(14) [ (13) ] Engineering--The profession in which a knowledge of the mathematical, physical, engineering, and natural sciences gained by education, experience, and practice is applied with judgment to develop ways to utilize, economically, the materials and forces of nature for the benefit of mankind.

(15) [ (14) ] Firm--Any entity that engages or offers to engage in the practice of professional engineering in this state. This includes sole proprietorships, firms, co-partnerships, corporations, partnerships, or joint stock associations.

(16) [ (15) ] Good Standing--(License or Registration)--A license or registration that is current, eligible for renewal, and has no outstanding fees or payments.

(17) [ (16) ] Gross negligence--Any willful or knowing conduct, or pattern of conduct, which includes but is not limited to conduct that demonstrates a disregard or indifference to the rights, health, safety, welfare, and property of the public or clients. Gross negligence may result in financial loss, injury or damage to life or property, but such results need not occur for the establishment of such conduct.

(18) [ (17) ] Incompetence--An act or omission of malpractice which may include but is not limited to recklessness or excessive errors, omissions or failures in the license holder's record of professional practice; or an act or omission in connection with a disability which includes but is not limited to mental or physical disability or addiction to alcohol or drugs as to endanger health, safety and interest of the public by impairing skill and care in the provision of professional services.

(19) [ (18) ] License--The legal authority granting the holder to actively practice engineering upon the payment of the annual renewal fee. Also, a certificate issued by the board showing such authority.

(20) [ (19) ] License Holder--Any person whose license to practice engineering is current.

(21) [ (20) ] Licensure--The granting of an original certificate and license to an individual.

(22) [ (21) ] Misconduct--The violation of any provision of the Texas Engineering Practice Act and board rules. A conviction of a felony or misdemeanor that falls under the provisions of Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 53, will also be misconduct under the Texas Engineering Practice Act.

(23) [ (22) ] NAFTA--North American Free Trade Agreement. NAFTA is related to the practice and licensure of engineering through mutual recognition of registered/licensed engineers by jurisdictions of Canada, Texas, and the United Mexican States.

(24) [ (23) ] NCEES--National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying.

(25) [ (24) ] Party--Each person or agency named or admitted as a party to a proceeding under the Administrative Procedure Act.

(26) [ (25) ] Person--Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, governmental subdivision, or public or private organization of any character other than an agency.

(27) [ (26) ] Petitioner--Any party requesting the adoption of a rule by the Board.

(28) [ (27) ] Pleading--Written allegations filed by parties concerning their respective claims.

(29) [ (28) ] Professional engineering--Professional service which may include consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, designing, or direct supervision of construction, in connection with any public or private utilities, structures, buildings, machines, equipment, processes, works, or projects wherein the public welfare, or the safeguarding of life, health, and property is concerned or involved, when such professional service requires the application of engineering principles and the interpretation of engineering data.

(30) [ (29) ] Professional engineering services--Services which must be performed by or under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer and which meet the definition of the practice of engineering as defined in the Act, §1001.003. A service shall be conclusively considered a professional engineering service if it is delineated in that section; other services requiring a professional engineer by contract, or services where the adequate performance of that service requires an engineering education, training, or experience in the application of special knowledge or judgment of the mathematical, physical or engineering sciences to that service shall also be conclusively considered a professional engineering service.

(31) [ (30) ] Protestant--Any party opposing an application or petition filed with the Board.

(32) [ (31) ] Recognized institution of higher education--An institution of higher education as defined in §61.003, Education Code; or in the United States, an institution recognized by one of the six regional accrediting associations, specifically, the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement, the Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, or the Middle States Association of Colleges & Schools; or, outside the United States, an institution recognized by the Ministry of Education or the officially recognized government education agency of that country.

(33) [ (32) ] Respondent--Any party against whom any complaint has been filed with the Board.

(34) [ (33) ] Responsible charge--An earlier term synonymous with the term "direct supervision"; the term is still valid and may be used interchangeably with "direct supervision" when necessary.

(35) [ (34) ] Responsible supervision--An earlier term synonymous with the term "direct supervision;" the term is still valid and may be used interchangeably with "direct supervision" when necessary.

(36) Supervision of Engineering Construction -- As used in §1001.407 of the Act, includes but is not limited to the periodic observation of materials and completed work to determine general compliance with plans, specifications and design and planning concepts. Supervision of engineering construction does not include the construction means and methods; responsibility for the superintendence of construction processes, site conditions, operations, equipment, personnel; or the maintenance of a safe place to work or any safety in, on or about the site.

(37) [ (35) ] TAC/ABET--Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 25, 2005.

TRD-200500874

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Chapter 137. COMPLIANCE AND PROFESSIONALISM

Subchapter A. INDIVIDUAL AND ENGINEER COMPLIANCE

22 TAC §137.17

The Texas Board of Professional Engineers proposes amendments to §137.17, relating to Continuing Education. The proposed amendments add language to allow editing and formally reviewing published materials to count for Continuing Education credits and revising the credits for this activity.

The proposed rule change permits engineers to earn Professional Development Hours (PDH) for editing and formally reviewing published materials. Authoring, editing, and formally reviewing published materials earn one PDH per hour spent on the activity.

Lance Kinney, P.E., Director of Licensing for the board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect there are no fiscal implications for the state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section as amended.

Mr. Kinney also has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed amendment will be clarification of the requirements and enforcement process for the Continuing Education Program.

Mr. Kinney has determined that there is no additional cost to the agency or to licensees. There is no effect to individuals required to comply with the rule as proposed. There is no effect to small or micro businesses.

Comments may be submitted no later than 30 days after the publication of this notice to Lance Kinney, P.E., Director of Licensing, Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH-35 South, Austin, Texas 78741 or faxed to his attention at (512) 440-0417.

The amendment is proposed pursuant to the Texas Engineering Practice Act, Occupations Code §1001.202, which authorizes the board to make and enforce all rules and regulations and bylaws consistent with the Act as necessary for the performance of its duties, the governance of its own, proceedings, and the regulation of the practice of engineering in this state.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§137.17.Continuing Education Program.

(a) Each license holder shall meet the Continuing Education Program (CEP) requirements for professional development as a condition for license renewal.

(b) Terms used in this section are defined as follows:

(1) Professional Development Hour (PDH)--A contact hour (clock hour) of CEP activity. PDH is the basic unit for CEP reporting.

(2) Continuing Education Unit (CEU)--Unit of credit customarily used for continuing education courses. One continuing education unit equals 10 hours of class in an approved continuing education course.

(3) College/Unit Semester/Quarter Hour--Credit for course in ABET-approved program or other related college course.

(4) Course/Activity--Any qualifying course or activity with a clear purpose and objective which will maintain, improve, or expand the skills and knowledge relevant to the license holder's field of practice.

(c) Every license holder is required to obtain 15 PDH units during the renewal period year.

(d) A minimum of 1 PDH per renewal period must be in the area of professional ethics, roles and responsibilities of professional engineering, or review of the Texas Engineering Practice Act and Board Rules.

(e) If a license holder exceeds the annual requirement in any renewal period, a maximum of 15 PDH units may be carried forward into the subsequent renewal period. Professional Development Hours must not be anticipated and cannot be used for more than one renewal period.

(f) PDH units may be earned as follows:

(1) Successful completion or auditing of college credit courses.

(2) Successful completion of continuing education courses, either offered by a professional or trade organization, university or college, or offered in-house by a corporation, other business entity, professional or technical societies, associations, agencies, or organizations, or other group.

(3) Successful completion of correspondence, on-line, televised, videotaped, and other short courses/tutorials.

(4) Presenting or attending seminars, in-house courses, workshops, or professional or technical presentations made at meetings, conventions, or conferences sponsored by a corporation, other business entity, professional or technical societies, associations, agencies, or organizations, or other group.

(5) Teaching or instructing as listed in paragraphs (1) through (4) of this subsection [ above ].

(6) Authoring , editing, or formally reviewing published papers, articles, books, or accepted licensing examination items.

(7) Active participation in professional or technical societies, associations, agencies, or organizations, including:

(A) Serving as an elected or appointed official;

(B) Serving on a committee of the organization;

(C) Serving in other official positions.

(8) Patents Issued.

(9) Engaging in self-directed study.

(g) All activities described in §137.17(f) of this title shall be relevant to the practice of a technical profession and may include technical, ethical, or managerial content.

(h) The conversion of other units of credit to PDH units is as follows:

(1) 1 College or unit semester hour--15 PDH

(2) 1 College or unit quarter hour--10 PDH

(3) 1 Continuing Education Unit--10 PDH

(4) 1 Hour of professional development in course work, seminars, or professional or technical presentations made at meetings, conventions, or conferences--1 PDH

(5) 1 Hour of professional development through self-directed study (Not to exceed 5 PDH)--1 PDH

(6) One hour of authoring, editing, or formally reviewing [ Each ] published papers, articles [ paper, article ], or books [ book ]-- 1 [ 10 ] PDH

(7) Active participation in professional or technical society, association, agency, or organization (Not to exceed 5 PDH per organization)--1 PDH

(8) Each patent issued--15 PDH

(9) Other activities shall be credited at 1 PDH for each hour of participation in the activity.

(i) Determination of Credit

(1) The Board shall be the final authority with respect to whether a course or activity meets the requirements of these rules.

(2) The Board shall not pre-approve or endorse any CEP activities. It is the responsibility of each license holder to assure that all PDH credits claimed meet CEP requirements.

(3) Credit for college or community college approved courses will be based upon course credit established by the college.

(4) Credit for seminars and workshops will be based on one PDH unit for each hour of attendance. Attendance at programs presented at professional and/or technical society meetings will earn PDH units for the actual time of each program.

(5) Credit for self-directed study will be based on one PDH unit for each hour of study and is not to exceed 5 PDH per renewal period. Credit determination for self-directed study is the responsibility of the license holder and subject to review as required by the board.

(6) Credit determination for activities described in subsection (h)(4) of this section is the responsibility of the license holder and subject to review as required by the board.

(7) Credit for activity described in subsection (h)(7) of this section requires that a license holder serve as an officer of the organization, actively participate in a committee of the organization, or serve in other official positions. PDH credits are not earned until the end of each year of service is completed.

(8) Teaching credit is valid for teaching a course or seminar for the first time only.

(j) The license holder is responsible for maintaining records to be used to support credits claimed. Records required include, but are not limited to:

(1) a log showing the type of activity claimed, sponsoring organization, location, duration, instructor's or speaker's name, and PDH credits earned; and

(2) attendance verification records in the form of completion certificates or other documents supporting evidence of attendance.

(k) The license holder must submit certification that CEP requirements have been satisfied for that renewal year with the renewal application and fee.

(l) CEP records for each license holder must be maintained for a period of three years by the license holder.

(m) CEP records for each license holder are subject to audit by the board or its authorized representative.

(1) Copies must be furnished, if requested, to the Board or its authorized representative for audit verification purposes.

(2) If upon auditing a license holder, the Board finds that the activities cited do not fall within the bounds of educational, technical, ethical, or professional management activities related to the practice of engineering; the board may require the license holder to acquire additional PDH as needed to fulfill the minimum CEP requirements.

(n) A license holder may be exempt from the professional development educational requirements for one of the following reasons listed in paragraphs (1)-(4) of this subsection:

(1) New license holders by way of examination shall be exempt for their first renewal period.

(2) A license holder serving on active duty and deployed outside the United States, its possessions and territories, in or for the military service of the United States for a period of time exceeding one hundred twenty (120) consecutive days in a year shall be exempt from obtaining the professional development hours required during that year.

(3) License holders experiencing physical disability, illness, or other extenuating circumstances as reviewed and approved by the board may be exempt. Supporting documentation must be furnished to the board.

(4) License holders who list their status as "Inactive" and who further certify that they are no longer receiving any remuneration from providing professional engineering services in Texas shall be exempt from the professional development hours required.

(o) A license holder may bring an inactive license to active status by obtaining all delinquent PDH units. However, if the total number required to become current exceeds 30 units, then 30 units shall be the maximum number required.

(p) Noncompliance:

(1) If a [ an ] license holder does not certify that CEP requirements have been met for a renewal period, the license shall be considered expired and subject to late fees and penalties.

(2) Failure to comply with CEP reporting requirements as listed in this section is a violation of Board rules and shall be subject to sanctions.

(3) A determination by audit that CEP requirements have been falsely reported shall be considered to be misconduct and will subject the license holder to disciplinary action.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 25, 2005.

TRD-200500875

Dale Beebe Farrow, P.E.

Executive Director

Texas Board of Professional Engineers

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 440-7723


Part 21. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS

Chapter 461. GENERAL RULINGS

22 TAC §461.11

The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes amendments to §461.11, Continuing Education. These amendments are being proposed in order to clarify continuing education documentation requirements.

Sherry L. Lee, Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Ms. Lee also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to make the rule simpler. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the rule as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Brenda Skiff, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-450, Austin, TX 78701, (512) 305-7700.

The amendments are proposed under Texas Occupations Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it.

No other code, articles or statutes are affected by this section.

§461.11.Continuing Education.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) Permitted activities.

(1) - (3) (No change.)

(4) Continuing education hours must have been obtained during the 12 months prior to the renewal period for which they are submitted. If the hours were obtained during the license renewal month and are not needed for compliance for that year, they may be submitted the following year to meet that year's continuing education requirements. A continuing education certificate may not be considered towards fulfilling the continuing education requirements for more than one renewal year.

(d) - (f) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 18, 2005.

TRD-200500779

Sherry L. Lee

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7700


Chapter 465. RULES OF PRACTICE

22 TAC §465.9

The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes amendments to §465.9, Competency. These amendments are being proposed in order to impose on licensees the duty to recognize where conflicts or problems would prevent the timely completion of services and suggest the appropriate remedial measures when the interruption occurs.

Sherry L. Lee, Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Ms. Lee also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to make the rule simpler. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the rule as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Brenda Skiff, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-450, Austin, TX 78701, (512) 305-7700.

The amendments are proposed under Texas Occupations Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it.

No other code, articles or statutes are affected by this section.

§465.9.Competency.

(a) - (i) (No change.)

(j) Licensees refrain from initiating or continuing to undertake an activity when they know or should know that there is a substantial likelihood that personal problems or conflicts will prevent them from performing their work- related activities or producing a psychological end product in a competent and timely manner. When licensees become aware of such conflicts, they must immediately take appropriate measures, such as obtaining professional consultation or assistance in order to determine whether they should limit, suspend, or terminate the engagement in accordance with Board Rule 465.21.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 18, 2005.

TRD-200500780

Sherry L. Lee

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7700


22 TAC §465.11

The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes amendments to §465.11, Informed Consent/Describing Psychological Services Competency. These amendments are being proposed in order to impose on licensees the duty to inform clients of interruptions in their services that prevent timely and competent completion.

Sherry L. Lee, Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Ms. Lee also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to make the rule simpler. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the rule as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Brenda Skiff, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-450, Austin, TX 78701, (512) 305-7700.

The amendments are proposed under Texas Occupations Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it.

No other code, articles or statutes are affected by this section.

§465.11.Informed Consent/Describing Psychological Services.

(a) - (e) (No change.)

(f) At any time that a licensee knows or should know that he or she may be called on to perform potentially conflicting roles (such as marital counselor to husband and wife, and then witness for one party in a divorce proceeding), the licensee explains the potential conflict to all affected parties and adjusts or withdraws from all professional services in accordance with Board rules and applicable state and federal law. Further, licensees who encounter personal problems or conflicts as described in Rule 465.9(i) that will prevent them from performing their work-related activities in a competent and timely manner must inform their clients of the personal problem or conflict and discuss appropriate termination and/or referral to insure that the services are timely completed.

(g) - (h) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 18, 2005.

TRD-200500781

Sherry L. Lee

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7700


Part 23. TEXAS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Chapter 535. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF LICENSURE

22 TAC §535.2

The Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) proposes amendments to §535.2, concerning Broker's Responsibility.

The amendments add new subsections (d), (e), and (f) to §535.2 to define the minimum level of service that a consumer may expect to receive from a licensee who negotiates a real estate transaction on behalf of the consumer in an agency relationship. Proposed subsection (d) of the amendments further defines the term "negotiate" used in subsection (b) of the existing rule which provides that a "broker is obligated under a listing contract to negotiate the best possible transaction for the principal, the person the broker has agreed to represent." Under proposed subsection (d), in negotiating for a client in an agency relationship, a licensee would be required to accept and present to the client offers and counter-offers related to buying, selling or leasing property; assist in developing, communicating and presenting offers, counter-offers and notices; and answer questions relating to offers, counter-offers and notices.

Proposed subsection (e) provides clarification regarding §1101.652(b)(22) of the Occupations Code, which prohibits a licensee from negotiating or attempting to negotiate a real estate transaction with a person with knowledge that the person is a party to an outstanding exclusive agency agreement with another broker in connection with the transaction, and §1101.652(b)(27), which prohibits a licensee from aiding or abetting in a violation of the Act. Proposed subsection (e) clarifies that a licensee may not instruct a licensee who represents another client to negotiate with a represented client directly and restates the existing statutory provisions.

Proposed subsection (f) provides an exception to negotiation for delivery of an offer or counter-offer. Delivery of an offer or counter-offer is not considered negotiation if the party's broker consents to the delivery and the other broker does not attempt to discuss the terms of the offer or counter-offer with the other party.

Loretta R. DeHay, General Counsel, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendments are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for the state or for units of local government as a result of enforcing or administering the amended section. There is similarly no impact on local or state employment.

Ms. DeHay has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments as proposed are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amended section will be clarification to consumers of the minimum services they can expect to receive from a real estate broker who represents a client in an agency relationship in Texas. While there may be an economic cost to licensed small businesses, micro businesses or licensed persons that have developed fee for service business models which provide multiple listing access or advertising services only under exclusive agency agreements, such impact is difficult to calculate as brokers charge a range of fees for brokerage services. Those licensees whose business models are inconsistent with the proposed amendments may need to reassess their business models to comply with the proposed amendments. Those licensees will need to include the three services, at a minimum, in their menu of services if the licensee will be acting pursuant to an agency relationship. Any additional costs of providing the services may be offset by charging the individual client for the services provided. A licensee, however, may establish any type of relationship with a client, including a non-agency relationship, and the parties may agree on any method of compensation or fee structure they wish. Further, mere advertising for a flat rate fee that is not contingent on the completion of the purchase, sale, lease or rental of the property advertised does not require a real estate license in Texas. Thus, the proposed amendments do not establish or require that licensees must charge set fees or rates.

There is no difference in the economic impact to small business, micro businesses, or large businesses.

Loretta R. DeHay, General Counsel, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for the state or for units of local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There is similarly no impact on local or state employment.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Loretta R. DeHay, General Counsel, Texas Real Estate Commission, P.O. Box 12188, Austin, Texas 78711-2188.

The amendments are proposed under Texas Occupations Code, §1101.151, which authorizes the Texas Real Estate Commission to make and enforce all rules and regulations necessary for the performance of its duties and to establish standards of conduct and ethics for its licensees in keeping with the purpose and intent of the Act to insure compliance with the provisions of the Act.

The statute affected by this proposal is Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1101. No other statute, code or article is affected by the proposed amendments.

§535.2.Broker's Responsibility.

(a) - (c) (No change.)

(d) In negotiating for his or her principal a broker shall provide the following services:

(1) accept and present to the principal offers and counter-offers to buy, sell, or lease the principal's property or property the principal seeks to buy or lease;

(2) assist the principal in developing, communicating, and presenting offers, counter-offers, and notices that relate to the offers and counter-offers; and

(3) answer the principal's questions relating to offers, counter-offers, and notices.

(e) Under §1101.652(b)(22) of the Act a broker may not negotiate or attempt to negotiate the sale or lease of property with a principal with knowledge that the principal is a party to an outstanding written contract that grants exclusive agency to another broker. Under §1101.652(b)(27) of the Act, a broker may not aid, abet, or conspire with another to circumvent the Act. A broker who represents a principal under a listing contract that grants an exclusive agency to the broker may not instruct or authorize another broker who represents another party in the transaction to negotiate directly with the principal.

(f) When a broker delivers an offer or counter-offer to another broker, the broker is not negotiating or attempting to negotiate with a principal he or she does not represent by delivering a copy of the offer or counter-offer to the principal he or she does not represent so long as the broker representing the principal consents to the delivery and the broker who makes the delivery does not discuss or attempt to discuss the terms or conditions of the offer or counter-offer with the principal he or she does not represent.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 2005.

TRD-200500832

Loretta DeHay

General Counsel

Texas Real Estate Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: April 10, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 465-3900