TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 2. TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

Chapter 20. REPORTING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES

Subchapter F. REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR A GENERAL-PURPOSE COMMITTEE

1 TAC §20.433

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts an amendment to §20.433, requiring general-purpose political committees to specifically identify expenditures made from corporate or labor organization political contributions for administrative and solicitation expenses. At its January 14, 2005, meeting the Texas Ethics Commission amended the proposed rule to add subsection (b) that designates July 1, 2005, as the effective date of the amendment. The rule is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the October 15, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 9615) and will be republished.

The following comment was received regarding the adoption of the amendment to §20.433. Fred Lewis with Campaigns For People stated that he was in agreement with the amended rule.

The amendment to §20.433 is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which authorizes the Ethics Commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the Ethics Commission.

§20.433.Contents of General-Purpose Committee Sworn Report of Contributions and Expenditures.

(a) Semiannual reports, pre-election reports, and runoff reports must cover reportable activity during the reporting period and must include the following information:

(1) the full name of the general-purpose committee;

(2) the address of the general-purpose committee;

(3) the full name of the general-purpose committee's campaign treasurer;

(4) the residence or business street address of the general-purpose committee's campaign treasurer;

(5) the committee campaign treasurer's telephone number;

(6) the identity and date of the election for which the report is filed, if applicable;

(7) the full name of each identified candidate or measure or classification by party of candidates supported or opposed by the general-purpose committee and an indication of whether the general-purpose committee supports or opposes each listed candidate, measure, or classification by party of candidates;

(8) the full name of each identified officeholder or classification by party of officeholders assisted by the general-purpose committee;

(9) if the general-purpose committee supports or opposes measures exclusively, for each contribution accepted from a corporation as defined by § 20.1 of this title (relating to Definitions):

(A) the date each contribution was accepted;

(B) the full name of the corporation or labor organization making the contribution;

(C) the address of the corporation or labor organization making the contribution;

(D) the amount of the contribution; and

(E) a description of any in-kind contribution;

(10) for each political expenditure by the general-purpose committee that was made as a political contribution to a candidate, officeholder, or another political committee and that was returned to the general-purpose committee during the reporting period:

(A) the amount returned;

(B) the full name of the person to whom the expenditure was originally made;

(C) the address of the person to whom the expenditure was originally made; and

(D) the date the expenditure was returned to the general-purpose committee;

(11) for each person from whom the general-purpose committee accepted a political contribution other than a pledge or a loan of more than $50 in value, or political contributions other than pledges or loans that total more than $50 in value (or more than $10 for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly):

(A) the date each contribution was accepted;

(B) the full name of the person making the contribution;

(C) the address of the person making the contribution;

(D) the principal occupation of the person making the contribution;

(E) the amount of the contribution; and

(F) a description of any in-kind contribution;

(12) for each person from whom the general-purpose committee accepted a pledge or pledges to provide more than $50 in money or to provide goods or services worth more than $50 (more than $10 for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly):

(A) the full name of the person making the pledge;

(B) the address of the person making the pledge;

(C) the principal occupation of the person making the pledge;

(D) the amount of each pledge;

(E) the date each pledge was accepted; and

(F) a description of any goods or services pledged;

(13) the total of all pledges accepted during the period for $50 and less from a person, except for those reported under paragraph (12) of this section;

(14) for each person making a loan or loans to the general-purpose committee for campaign purposes if the total amount loaned by the person during the period is more than $50 (more than $10 for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly):

(A) the full name of the person or financial institution making the loan;

(B) the address of the person or financial institution making the loan;

(C) the amount of the loan;

(D) the date of the loan;

(E) the interest rate;

(F) the maturity date;

(G) the collateral for the loan, if any; and

(H) if the loan has guarantors:

(i) the full name of each guarantor;

(ii) the address of each guarantor;

(iii) the principal occupation of each guarantor;

(iv) the name of the employer of each guarantor; and

(v) the amount guaranteed by each guarantor;

(15) the total amount of loans accepted during the period for $50 and less from persons other than financial institutions engaged in the business of making loans for more than one year, except for those reported under paragraph (14) of this section;

(16) for political expenditures made during the reporting period that total more than $50 (more than $10 for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly) to a single payee:

(A) the full name of the person to whom each expenditure was made;

(B) the address of the person to whom the expenditure was made;

(C) the date of the expenditure;

(D) the purpose of the expenditure, for example, the goods or services for which the expenditure was made;

(E) the amount of the expenditure; and

(F) indication for an expenditure paid in full or in part from corporations or labor organizations that it was paid from such sources.

(17) for each non-political expenditure made from political contributions:

(A) the date of each payment;

(B) the full name of the person to whom the payment was made;

(C) the address of the person to whom the payment was made;

(D) the nature of the goods or services for which the payment was made;

(E) the amount of the payment; and

(F) indication for an expenditure paid in full or in part from corporations or labor organizations that it was paid from such sources.

(18) for each candidate or officeholder who benefits from a direct campaign expenditure made by the committee:

(A) the name of the candidate or officeholder; and

(B) the office sought or held by the candidate or officeholder;

(19) for each political contribution from an out-of-state political committee, the information required by §22.7 of this title (relating to Contribution from Out-of-State Committee);

(20) the following total amounts:

(A) the total principal amount of all outstanding loans as of the last day of the reporting period;

(B) the total amount or an itemized listing of political contributions (other than pledges, loans, or guarantees of loans) of $50 and less ($10 and less for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly);

(C) the total amount of all political contributions (other than pledges, loans, or guarantees of loans);

(D) the total amount or an itemized listing of the political expenditures of $50 and less ($10 and less for a general-purpose committee reporting monthly); and

(E) the total amount of all political expenditures;

(21) if applicable, a statement that no reportable activity occurred during the reporting period; and

(22) an affidavit, executed by the campaign treasurer, stating: "I swear, or affirm, that the accompanying report is true and correct and includes all information required to be reported by me under Title 15, Election Code."

(b) Subsections (a)(16)(F) and (a)(17)(F) take effect on July 1, 2005.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 21, 2005.

TRD-200500278

David A. Reisman

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: July 1, 2005

Proposal publication date: October 15, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5800


Chapter 34. REGULATION OF LOBBYISTS

Subchapter E. ELECTRONIC FILING

1 TAC §34.91

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts new §34.91, concerning exemptions from the requirement to file lobby reports electronically. H.B. 1606, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, requires the Texas Ethics Commission to adopt rules under which a lobbyist may file on paper. At its January 14, 2005, meeting the Texas Ethics Commission amended the proposed rule to add the heading of Subchapter E, Electronic Filing to Chapter 34, Regulation of Lobbyists. The rule as published in the December 3, 2004, issue of the Texas Register was under Subchapter D, Lobby Activities Reports. The new subchapter was added to clarify that the rule also applies to other reports. The rule is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 3, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 11207) and will not be republished.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the new rule.

The new section is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, §571.062, which authorizes the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 18, 2005.

TRD-200500230

David A. Reisman

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: February 7, 2005

Proposal publication date: December 3, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5800


Chapter 50. LEGISLATIVE SALARIES AND PER DIEM

1 TAC §50.1

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts an amendment to §50.1, to set the legislative per diem as required by the Texas Constitution, Article III, §24a. This section sets the per diem for members of the legislature and the lieutenant governor at $128 for each day during the regular session and any special session. The amendment is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 26, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 10859).

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendment.

This amendment is adopted under the Texas Constitution, Article III, §24a, and the Government Code, Chapter 571, §571.062.

The amended section affects the Texas Constitution, Article III, §24, Article III, §24a, and Article IV, §17.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 14, 2005.

TRD-200500214

David A. Reisman

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: February 3, 2005

Proposal publication date: November 26, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5800


Part 12. COMMISSION ON STATE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

Chapter 251. REGIONAL PLANS--STANDARDS

1 TAC §251.6

The Commission on State Emergency Communications (CSEC) adopts amendments to §251.6, concerning guidelines for submission requests from regional planning commissions on strategic plans, amendments and allocation of funds with changes to the proposed text as published in the October 1, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 9275).

This section is adopted as part of Rule Review of Chapter 251 pursuant to Government Code, §2001.039. The rule continues to be essential to the CSEC's operations and per statutory authority.

The amendment considers the requests for hearing amendments from Regional Planning Commissions at least four times a year on a schedule to be established by the Commission, with consideration of scheduling the reviews in each quarter of the fiscal year.

The CESC received comment from the Texas Association of Regional Councils (TARC) approving the revision to the rule to provide for Commission review of regional strategic plan amendments four times annually. TARC also commented that the Commission should consider revising the limits on allowable costs established for recording systems established in subsection (i) (2) of the rule. The CSEC will work with TARC to review current data for cost and size of recording systems; and notes that the rule currently provides that any region that has funding needs above the current parameters may submit an amendment request for Commission approval.

TARC also requested removal of the word "match" from the term "Personnel Match," shown in subsections (d)(4) and (e)(4) of the rule, under allowable costs for Use of Revenue in Certain Counties. The CSEC also proposes deletion of the word.

Comment was also received from CSEC's internal auditor, who proposed a revised phrasing of the last sentence of subsection (g)(2), regarding the establishment of four opportunities per year for regional amendments to be heard by the Commission. This would avoid a potential misinterpretation that four amendments are required of the regions per year. CSEC staff recommends the internal auditor's version of the sentence.

The amendment is adopted pursuant to the Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771, §§771.051, 771.071, 771.0711, 771.072, and 771.075; and Title 1 Texas Administrative Code, Part 12, Chapter 251, Regional Plan Standards, which provide the Commission on State Emergency Communications with the authority to plan, develop, fund, and provide provisions for the enhancement of effective and efficient 9-1-1 service.

§251.6.Guidelines for Strategic Plans, Amendments, and Revenue Allocation.

(a) Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to provide the structure and guidelines for regional strategic plans, funding of the plans, and amendments to the plans.

(b) Background. As authorized by Chapter 771 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, the Commission on State Emergency Communications (Commission) may impose 9-1-1 emergency service fees and equalization surcharges to support the planning, development, and provision of 9-1-1 service throughout the State of Texas. In accordance with Section 771.055 of the above chapter, such service implementation shall be consistent with regional plans developed by regional planning commissions (RPC). These regional plans must meet standards established by the Commission and "...include a description of how money allocated to the region under this chapter is to be allocated in the region." Section 771.057 addresses amendments to regional plans and indicates that such amendments may be adopted in accordance with procedure established by the Commission.

(c) Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, terms contained in this rule are defined as shown in Commission Rule 251.14, General Provisions and Definitions.

(d) Strategic Plan Levels. Regional strategic plans developed in accordance with Chapter 771, along with the commensurate allocation of the above described funds, shall reflect implementation consistent with the following four major strategic plan levels (in order of priority) for state appropriations years 2004-2005.

(1) Level I: The equipment, network, and database equipment and/or services that provide the essential elements of 9-1-1 service, including the maintenance and replacement of equipment.

(A) Network;

(B) Wireless Phase I;

(C) Database;

(D) Equipment Lease;

(E) Equipment Purchase;

(F) Language Line; and

(G) Equipment Maintenance.

(2) Level II: The activities, equipment, and/or services that directly support and enhance 9-1-1 call delivery and data maintenance for the level of service provided to the region.

(A) Database Maintenance;

(B) MIS;

(C) Mapped ALI;

(D) PSAP Room Prep;

(E) PSAP Training;

(F) Public Education; and

(G) Wireless Phase II.

(3) Level III: The activities, equipment, and/or services that provide auxiliary enhancements to the delivery of 9-1-1 calls and the level of service provided to the region.

(A) Network Diversity;

(B) Training Positions;

(C) Emergency Power;

(D) Recorders;

(E) Pagers;

(F) Ancillary Maintenance & Repair; and

(G) Other.

(4) Level IV: Use of Revenue in Certain Counties. The activities, equipment, and/or services that provide auxiliary enhancements to the 9-1-1 system of a county subject to Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771, with a population over 700,000, or the county that has the highest population within an RPC participating in the Commission program to include, but not limited to:

(A) Design of a 9-1-1 System;

(B) Purchase of Equipment;

(C) Maintenance of Equipment; and

(D) Personnel.

(e) New Strategic Plan Levels. Regional strategic plans developed in accordance with Chapter 771, along with the commensurate allocation of the above described funds, shall reflect implementation consistent with the following four major strategic plan levels (in order of priority) beginning state appropriations year 2006.

(1) Level I: The equipment, network, and database equipment and/or services that provide the essential elements of 9-1-1 service, including the maintenance and replacement of equipment.

(A) Network;

(B) Wireless;

(C) Database;

(D) Equipment Lease;

(E) Language Line; and

(F) Equipment Maintenance.

(2) Level II: The activities, equipment, and/or services that directly support and enhance 9-1-1 call delivery and data maintenance for the level of service provided to the region.

(A) Database Maintenance;

(B) MIS;

(C) Mapped ALI;

(D) PSAP Room Prep;

(E) PSAP Training; and

(F) Public Education.

(3) Level III: The activities, equipment, and/or services that provide auxiliary enhancements to the delivery of 9-1-1 calls and the level of service provided to the region.

(A) Network Diversity;

(B) PSAP Supplies; and

(C) Ancillary Maintenance & Repair.

(4) Level IV: Use of Revenue in Certain Counties. The activities, equipment, and/or services that provide auxiliary enhancements to the 9-1-1 system of a county subject to Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771, with a population over 700,000, or the county that has the highest population within an RPC participating in the Commission program to include, but not limited to:

(A) Design of a 9-1-1 System;

(B) Purchase of Equipment;

(C) Maintenance of Equipment; and

(D) Personnel.

(f) Strategic Plans. Regional strategic plans developed in compliance with Chapter 771 shall include a strategic plan that projects financial operating information at least two years into the future; and strategic planning information at least five years into the future.

(1) The Commission shall establish the format of strategic plans for the sake of identifying overall statewide requirements in its implementation.

(2) Strategic plans shall be consistent with the four major implementation priority levels identified above and with all applicable Commission policies and rules.

(3) An RPC shall submit financial reports at least quarterly on a schedule to be established by the Commission. The financial report shall identify actual implementation costs by county, strategic plan priority level and component.

(4) An RPC shall submit performance reports at least quarterly on a schedule to be established by the Commission. The performance report shall reflect the progress of implementing the region's strategic plan, including the status of equipment, services and program deliverables, in a format to be determined by the Commission.

(g) Amendments to Regional Strategic Plans.

(1) An RPC may make changes to its approved regional strategic plan to accommodate unanticipated requirements and/or to prevent disruption of its implementation schedule, contingent upon compliance with all Commission policies and procedures. Examples of occasions when an amendment must be submitted to the Commission include, but are not limited to:

(A) Requests for approval of items under Commission Rule 251.3, Use of Revenue in Certain Counties;

(B) Requests to shift budget authority from the Administrative budget to the Program budget, and vice versa;

(C) Requests to increase the total percentage of staff time charged to the 9-1-1 program (FTE), when the increase exceeds the total amount of time charged for all personnel funded with 9-1-1 funds in the current approved plan;

(D) Requests to add a call-taking position at a PSAP when the total number of call-taking positions for the region would increase;

(E) Requests for exceptions to Commission policy;

(F) Requests for additional funds; and

(G) As required by other Commission rule, or upon a request from the Commission.

(2) Requests for amendments to the regional plan shall be submitted in writing to the Commission. The documentation required for changes will be an amended budget, narrative, related worksheets and a letter indicating executive approval of the amendment according to Commission policy. The Commission shall take action, no fewer than four times annually, on any Regional plan amendment request submitted for approval.

(3) Emergency situations requiring amendments to regional plans that require additional funding may be presented to the Commission for review and consideration contingent upon the availability of such funds within level priorities as established by the Commission.

(h) Allocation of Revenue.

(1) Service Fee allocation - Consistent with sections 771.056 (d), and 771.078 the Commission shall allocate, by contract, service fee revenue to RPCs contingent on the availability of appropriated funds.

(2) Equalization Surcharge Funds

(A) Within the context of Section 771.056(d), the Commission shall consider any revenue insufficiencies to represent need for equalization surcharge funding support.

(B) Consistent with this rule, the Commission shall allocate, by agreement, equalization surcharge funds and service fees to RPCs based upon statewide strategic plan contingent on the availability of appropriated funds over a two-year period.

(C) The Commission may allocate equalization surcharge to an emergency communication district (District) based on District requests and availability of appropriated funds.

(D) Equalization surcharge funds shall be allocated first to eligible recipients requiring such funds for administrative budgetary purposes, followed by Level I, II, and III activities in that order.

(E) If sufficient equalization surcharge funds are not available to fund all RPC strategic plan and District requests, funds shall be allocated to provide a consistent level of 9-1-1 service throughout the State of Texas in accordance with the priority levels described. Such allocation methods may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following:

(i) In reverse order of priority, reducing the number of priority level components supported with equalization surcharge funds;

(ii) Requesting that regional strategic plans be adjusted to allow for more implementation time as appropriate; and/or

(iii) In order of priority, proportionally allocating available funds among requesting agencies.

(F) The Commission may elect to hold a balance of equalization surcharge funds in reserve for emergencies and other contingencies.

(i) Funding Parameters. The Commission will look favorably on plan amendments for tandem and/or database service arrangements and ancillary equipment that will improve the effectiveness and reliability of 9-1-1 call delivery systems. This will include the following when the equipment is for 9-1-1 call delivery: surge protection devices, uninterrupted power source (UPS), power backup, voice recorders, paging systems for 9-1-1 call delivery, security devices, and other back-up communication services. Regions shall refer to the strategic planning guidelines for instructions as to the appropriate budget line item to which the costs for purchase and maintenance of these items should be assigned.

(1) Paging Systems. Funding for the paging systems may be approved when such systems are the most effective means of 9-1-1 call delivery and they do not replace other paging or radio alerting systems. Funding for paging will be limited to systems, where alternative systems or the systems now in use cause significant delay in 9-1-1 call delivery and where existing radio systems can be modified to accommodate paging. Funding for pagers (receivers) will be limited to three, providing pagers to only necessary core responders within an organization (e.g., in a 15-member volunteer emergency medical group, only the on-call ambulance driver and one or two attendants would be furnished pagers).

(2) Voice Recording Equipment. Voice loggers may be approved when the primary use of the equipment is in support of the 9-1-1 call-taking and call-delivery function. Extra capacity on such systems may be used for other public safety functions (such as dispatch); however, 9-1-1 funding will not be authorized for systems whose capacity clearly exceed actual or anticipated 9-1-1 requirements. Shared funding of larger systems to accommodate both a 9-1-1 PSAP and a PSAP operating agency's other needs will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Other considerations include:

(A) The Commission will normally fund voice recording capability in a PSAP to record the conversation on each answering position used to answer emergency calls on a regular basis. (This means one recording channel per 9-1-1 answering position instead of one channel per incoming line.)

(B) The Commission will also fund recording capability to record the transfer of an emergency call from the PSAP first answering the call to the agency that is responsible for providing the required emergency services. This recording capability will be limited to the minimum amount required to record the transfer of the caller and relaying of information to the service provider.

(C) The Commission will fund the purchase of voice recorders as justified, to record 9-1-1 call delivery. Call volumes requiring recording in excess of 90 minutes per day will normally be required to justify larger systems.

(D) The funding of recording devices to transfer information from another recorder will be approved only upon specific justification of need.

(E) Funding for search capability for recorders will be limited to the ability to locate an event by date and time.

(F) The Commission will not normally fund the purchase of both voice logging recorders and instant playback recorders in the same location.

(G) When the operator of a 9-1-1 PSAP and the providers of emergency services desire to use the same recording equipment funded by regional strategic plan, the following guidelines will apply to determine the amount to be funded by the Commission:

(i) When the minimum size of recorder that can be purchased to serve the PSAP provides more channels than are needed by the PSAP to record the delivery of 9-1-1 calls, the other agency may use the extra channels and all funding will be provided by the Commission.

(ii) When the PSAP requires a given size of recording equipment, and the other agency requires additional channels, the Commission will fund the size of recording equipment needed to record only the delivery of 9-1-1 calls, and the other agency will fund all additional equipment.

(iii) When the recording requirements of the other agency requires additional features or capabilities than would be required by the PSAP alone, the Commission will fund the equivalent amount of the system needed to serve the 9-1-1 functions of the PSAP alone. For instance, if the PSAP could use a recording system to record the delivery of 9-1-1 calls, but another agency needs to record a radio channel that requires the capacity of a larger recorder, the Commission will fund the equivalent cost of the smaller system.

(H) To assist the Commission in reviewing and approving requests for funding for voice recording devices for 9-1-1 call delivery, requests for funding should include a worksheet, provided by the Commission, for each PSAP location.

(I) In reviewing requests for recording systems, the Commission will award funding, when justified, for the actual costs of basic recording systems not to exceed $10,000 on 4-channel or equivalent systems, and not to exceed $20,000 on up to 10-channel or equivalent recording systems. Requests for any other recording systems will require separate approval by the Commission.

(J) The Commission will consider funding of recording capabilities greater than those suggested by the guidelines when sufficient justification is provided as part of a regional strategic plan.

(j) Emergency Power Equipment. Each PSAP location should be evaluated by the RPC to determine if an emergency power system is required to insure the ability to answer 9-1-1 calls in the event that the standard power supply is interrupted. A PSAP that receives a relatively small number of emergency calls per day may be able to provide acceptable service without the availability of ANI or ALI for short periods of time. If the same PSAP is located in a location that is subject to prolonged power outages, it may need emergency power sources. Other considerations include:

(1) Where conditions exist that indicate a need for emergency power systems to support 9-1-1 call delivery, UPS should be considered as the emergency power system. Emergency generators (power backup) should be approved only in locations with a documented history of or potential for extended interruptions of commercial power supplies. Generally, 9-1-1 funding will not be used to provide both a generator and UPS. At least 75 percent of the capacity of any UPS system or generator funded should directly support an existing (or planned) 9-1-1 system.

(2) Each request for UPS must include a worksheet showing the calculations used to determine the system size and batteries required. This worksheet must identify all equipment to be powered and the operating voltage and current drain of each piece of equipment. The request for UPS must identify the load capacity of the system requested and the length of time the batteries will operate the PSAP 9-1-1 equipment. The request should also indicate whether the 9-1-1 equipment has any built-in UPS capability.

(3) The length of time that a UPS battery will be required to provide emergency power is a major factor in determining the cost of the UPS system. Each request for UPS must provide information justifying the size of the batteries requested. Information concerning the history of power failures at the PSAP location and the average time to restore power should be obtained from the local power company.

(4) If the history of power failures, or the expected restoration time, is more than can be economically justified for UPS batteries, an emergency generator can be considered. Any request for an emergency generator, in addition to a UPS, shall include a comparison of the cost of a UPS with sufficient batteries to the cost of the combination of the UPS and an emergency generator.

(5) There may be circumstances that justify the installation of an emergency generator (backup power), in addition to an UPS, as the primary system for a PSAP location. In these cases, the request for the emergency generator must include an explanation and comparison of the relevant costs.

(6) When the operator of a 9-1-1 PSAP and the providers of emergency services desire to share the emergency power system funded by the Commission, the following guidelines will apply to determine the amount to be funded by the Commission:

(A) When the minimum size of emergency power system that can be purchased to serve the PSAP provides more capacity than is needed by the PSAP, the other agency may use the extra capacity and all funding will be provided by the Commission.

(B) When the PSAP requires a given size of emergency power system, and the other agency requires additional capacity, the Commission will fund the size of emergency power equipment needed to supply the PSAP alone and the other agency will fund all additional capacity.

(7) Funding may be approved for surge protection devices when they are used for protection of 9-1-1 specific electronic equipment. Documented justification must be provided.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 24, 2005.

TRD-200500287

Paul Mallett

Executive Director

Commission on State Emergency Communications

Effective date: February 13, 2005

Proposal publication date: October 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6933


1 TAC §251.14

The Commission on State Emergency Communications (CSEC) adopts new §251.14, concerning general provisions and definitions, without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 1, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 9279).

The new adopted section contains all definitions to words and terms used in the other rules within Chapter 251. This consolidation of provisions and definitions helps reduce unnecessary duplication and ensures consistency of definitions.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the new section.

The new section is adopted under Health and Safety Code, Chapter 771, §§771.051, 771.055, 771.056, 771.057, 771.071, 771.072, 771.075, and 771.0751, 771.079; and Title 1 Texas Administrative Code, Part 12, Chapter 251, Regional Plan Standards, which provide the Commission on State Emergency Communications with the authority to plan, develop, fund, and provide provisions for the enhancement of effective and efficient 9-1-1 service.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 24, 2005.

TRD-200500288

Paul Mallett

Executive Director

Commission on State Emergency Communications

Effective date: February 13, 2005

Proposal publication date: October 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6933


Chapter 255. FINANCE

1 TAC §255.4

The Commission on State Emergency Communications (CSEC) adopts amendments to §255.4, defining the terms "local exchange access line" and "equivalent local exchange access line," without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 1, 2004, issue of the Texas Register (29 TexReg 9284).

This section is adopted as part of Rule Review of Chapter 255 pursuant to Government Code §2001.039, and as part of the annual review required by Health and Safety Code §771.063(c). The rule continues to be essential to CSEC's operations.

CSEC received written comments on the proposed amendments from a group of Emergency Communications Districts (Districts), Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a SBC Texas (SBC), and AT&T Communications of Texas, L.P. (AT&T). The Districts support the proposed amendments.

SBC generally agrees with the amendments but recommended that the option to continue using the federal subscriber line charge (SLC) methodology be eliminated. According to SBC, the SLC methodology will lead to inconsistent application of the rule because it allows carriers to subjectively determine with respect to channelized services such as T-1 or ISDN the number of lines that fit the definition. CSEC recognizes the possibility SBC identifies and addresses it by limiting use of the SLC methodology to a carrier that bills SLC charges on "all its retail lines and services to all its end user customers" - without exception. CSEC will re-evaluate the continued use of the SLC methodology during the next annual review of §255.4.

AT&T commented on the application of the rule when service is provided using internet protocol (IP) applications such as voice over internet protocol (VoIP). AT&T is concerned that when the IP service provider and the underlying facility provider are not the same entity that either both entities will owe the service fee, resulting in double taxation, or the facility owner will be responsible for the fee notwithstanding that it may be unaware of the kind of application being deployed or even whether 9-1-1 access is available to the subscriber. The terms as defined impact IP-based applications, including VoIP, only in instances where access to 9-1-1 is provided through a "permissible interconnection to the dedicated 9-1-1 network." At present, only an IP-based service provider using its own facilities is capable of providing emergency service connection to the dedicated 9-1-1 network.

The amendment is adopted pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, §§771.051, 771.063, 771.071, 771.0711, and 771.075; and Title 1 Texas Administrative Code, Part 12, Chapter 255, Finance, which authorize CSEC to impose statewide 9-1-1 emergency service fees on each local exchange access line or its equivalent.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 24, 2005.

TRD-200500289

Paul Mallett

Executive Director

Commission on State Emergency Communications

Effective date: February 13, 2005

Proposal publication date: October 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 305-6933