TITLE 43.TRANSPORTATION

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 4. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES

Subchapter B. JOB APPLICATION PROCEDURES

43 TAC §4.13

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments to §4.13, concerning job application procedures.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Prior to June 17, 2005, Transportation Code, §201.403(a) required the department to open all department positions compensated at or above salary group 21 to applicants from inside and outside the department. This statute was enacted in 1991 under a former classification system. A salary group 21 under the 1991 classification system is now the equivalent to a group B13. The classification system in 1991 also considered group 21 and above to be director positions. The department implemented the statute by adopting §4.13, which requires the department to distribute notice of job vacancies in salary groups B13 and above to the Texas Workforce Commission.

House Bill 1814, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, amended Transportation Code, §201.403(a), effective June 17, 2005, to require the department to open positions compensated at or above salary group B17 to applicants inside and outside the department. Under the state's current classification system, a director position is considered to begin at group B17.

Consistent with the authority granted by House Bill 1814, and consistent with the state's current classification for director positions, the department proposes an amendment to §4.13 that changes the requirement to distribute notice of vacancies from salary group B13 and above to salary group B17 and above.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for each of the first five years the amendment as proposed is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the section as proposed.

Diana Isabel, Director, Human Resources Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Ms. Isabel has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be to enhance the department's ability to hire employees with critical skills efficiently and in a more expeditious manner. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed amendment to §4.13 may be submitted to Diana Isabel, Director, Human Resources Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2005.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY:

The amendment is proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE: Transportation Code, §201.403.

§4.13.Notification.

The department shall notify its employees and the public of vacant positions by:

(1) distributing job vacancy information statewide to each department area, district, and division office;

(2) distributing notices of vacancies in salary groups B17 [ B13 ] and above, and all jobs for which the public will be considered, with the Texas Workforce Commission; and

(3) publishing vacancy information as appropriate in newspapers and recognized minority publications of general circulation in the state.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 29, 2005.

TRD-200503112

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 11, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630


Chapter 7. RAIL FACILITIES

Subchapter B. CONTRACTS

43 TAC §7.11

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes new §7.11, concerning Comprehensive Development Agreements.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED NEW SECTION

House Bill 2702, 79th Legislature, Regular Session, 2005, added Transportation Code, §91.054, to authorize the department to enter into a comprehensive development agreement that provides for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system.

Transportation Code, §91.054 authorizes the department, to the extent and in the manner that the department may enter into comprehensive development agreements under Transportation Code, Chapter 223, to enter into comprehensive development agreements under Chapter 91 with regard to rail facilities or systems. Section 91.054 provides that all provisions of Chapter 223 relating to comprehensive development agreements apply to comprehensive development agreements for rail facilities under Chapter 91.

Rules relating to comprehensive development agreements for turnpike or toll projects developed under Chapter 223 are contained in Chapter 27, Subchapter A of this title. As those rules have proven effective for the procurement of comprehensive development agreements for turnpike or toll projects, new §7.11 provides that, to the extent and in the manner that the department may enter into a comprehensive development agreement with respect to a turnpike or toll project under Chapter 27, Subchapter A, the department may enter into a comprehensive development agreement for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system.

Section 7.11 requires the department to utilize the processes and procedures provided in Chapter 27, Subchapter A when requesting qualifications and proposals or accepting unsolicited proposals for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system, when evaluating and ranking submissions and proposals, and when selecting the proposal that provides the best value to the department.

As authorized by Transportation Code, §91.054, new §7.11 provides that the department may combine in a comprehensive development agreement a rail facility or system and a turnpike or toll project. Section 7.11 also provides that rail facility and system have the meanings assigned by Chapter 91.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for each of the first five years the new section as proposed is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the new section. The authority to enter into comprehensive development agreements for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system will be accomplished using existing department staff. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the section as proposed.

Phillip E. Russell, P.E., Director, Texas Turnpike Authority Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the new section.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Russell has also determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the new section will be to decrease the time required to develop department rail facilities or systems and to facilitate agreements with private participants in projects to develop rail facilities or systems. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed new section may be submitted to Phillip E. Russell, P.E., Director, Texas Turnpike Authority Division, Texas Department of Transportation, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2005.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The new section is proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §91.003, which provides the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to implement Chapter 91.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE

Transportation Code, §91.054.

§7.11.Comprehensive Development Agreements.

(a) To the extent and in the manner that the department may enter into a comprehensive development agreement with respect to a turnpike or toll project under Chapter 27, Subchapter A of this title (relating to Policy, Rules, and Procedures for Private Involvement in Department Turnpike Projects), the department may enter into a comprehensive development agreement for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system.

(b) The department shall utilize the processes and procedures provided in Chapter 27, Subchapter A of this title when considering the use of a comprehensive development agreement, including when:

(1) requesting qualifications and proposals or accepting unsolicited proposals for the financing, design, acquisition, construction, maintenance, or operation of a rail facility or system;

(2) evaluating and ranking submissions and proposals; and

(3) selecting the proposal that provides the best value to the department.

(c) The department may combine in a comprehensive development agreement a rail facility or system and a turnpike or toll project as defined in Transportation Code, §201.001.

(d) In this section, "rail facility" and "system" have the meanings assigned in Transportation Code, Chapter 91.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 29, 2005.

TRD-200503113

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 11, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630


Chapter 15. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Subchapter A. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

43 TAC §15.4

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments to §15.4, concerning the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Section 15.4 currently provides that travel outside the metropolitan area boundary (MAB) by metropolitan planning organization (MPO) staff and other agencies participating in the MPO planning process shall be approved by the department if funded with federal transportation planning funds.

Department approval of travel beyond metropolitan area boundaries is unduly burdensome on the department and the MPO. The proposed amendment removes this requirement and, instead, requires department approval of travel outside Texas. The amendments further provide that travel to Arkansas by the Texarkana MPO staff and travel to New Mexico by the El Paso MPO staff shall be considered in-state travel.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for each of the first five years the amendments as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the section as proposed.

Jim Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Randall has also determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments will be the reduction of administrative expense for the department and MPOs. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Jim Randall, P.E., Director, Transportation Planning and Programming, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on September 12, 2005.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY:

The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE: None.

§15.4.Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).

(a) Planning activities. Under 23 C.F.R. §450.314, an MPO is required to document planning activities in a UPWP to indicate who will perform the work, the schedule for completing it, and all products that will be produced. The department is responsible for assisting in the development of the UPWP, approving the format of work programs submitted by MPOs, and, where required by federal law or regulation, monitoring an MPO’s performance of activities and expenditure of funds under a UPWP. Where monitoring is not required, the department is responsible for reviewing an MPO’s activities and expenditure of funds, and will comment on and make suggestions relating to those activities and expenditures. The department will design a uniform format for UPWPs and reports to be submitted by MPOs. This subsection describes how a UPWP is developed, the contents of a UPWP, how it is approved, and how the department will monitor work programs.

(1) Requirements. An MPO in cooperation with the department and operators of publicly owned transit systems must annually develop a unified planning work program that meets the requirements of 23 C.F.R. Part 420, Subpart A and 23 C.F.R. §450.314.

(2) Prospectus allowed. The metropolitan transportation planning process may include the development of a prospectus that establishes a multiyear framework within which the UPWP is accomplished.

(3) UPWP development. The department will develop a time line for development of the UPWP by the MPOs. Failure to adhere to the time line may result in a delay in the authorization to the MPOs to proceed in incurring costs.

(4) UPWP format. The department, in consultation with the MPOs, shall develop a standard UPWP format to be used by all MPOs. UPWPs submitted in a different format will not be approved.

(5) UPWP approval and revisions. The MPO policy board shall not delegate approval authority of, or subsequent revisions to, the UPWP.

(6) Annual performance and expenditure report. To allow the department to monitor work programs, the MPOs shall prepare and submit an annual performance and expenditure report of progress no later than December 31 of each year. A uniform format for the annual report will be established by the department, in consultation with the MPOs.

(b) Funding. Federal transportation planning funds are available to MPOs to develop the metropolitan transportation plans and transportation improvement programs required by this subchapter. Under 23 C.F.R. §420.111, the use of federal planning funds must be documented by the MPO in a work program acceptable to the FHWA setting out proposed work undertaken with federal planning funds and the estimated cost of this work. A work program acceptable to the FTA is required for planning activities involving mass transportation plans and programs. This subsection describes the requirements for a UPWP related to funding, limitations on the use of federal planning funds for planning work, when the travel costs of persons participating in the metropolitan planning process may be authorized and reimbursed, limitations on the expenditure of funds for planning work outlined in a UPWP, and how federal transportation planning funds will be distributed to MPOs.

(1) Requirements. The UPWP shall reflect transportation planning work tasks to be funded by federal, state, or local transportation, or transportation related (e.g. air quality), planning funds.

(2) Planning work eligibility. The use of federal metropolitan transportation planning funds shall be limited to transportation planning activities affecting the transportation system within the Metropolitan Area Boundary (MAB). If an MPO determines that data collection and analysis activities relating to land use, demographics, or traffic or travel information, conducted outside the MAB, affect the transportation system within the MAB, then those activities may be undertaken using federal planning funds, provided that the activities are specifically identified in an approved UPWP. Any other costs incurred for transportation planning activities outside the MAB will not be eligible for reimbursement.

(3) Authorization for travel outside the state [ MAB ]. Travel outside the State of Texas [ Metropolitan Area Boundary ] by MPO staff and other agencies participating in the MPO planning process shall be approved by the department if funded with federal transportation planning funds. Approval must be received prior to incurring any costs associated with the actual travel (e.g., registration fee). This provision will not apply if the travel is [ was ] at the request of the department. Travel to the State of Arkansas by the Texarkana MPO staff and travel to the State of New Mexico by the El Paso MPO staff shall be considered in-state travel.

(4) Reimbursement of travel costs of elected officials. The cost of travel incurred by elected officials will not be eligible for reimbursement with federal transportation planning funds.

(5) Funding limitations. The use of federal transportation planning funds shall be limited to corridor/subarea level planning or multimodal or systemwide transit planning studies. Major investment studies and environmental studies are considered corridor level planning. The use of such funds beyond environmental document preparation or for specific project level planning and engineering (efforts directly related to a specific project instead of a corridor) is not allowed.

(6) Department approval of costs. The MPO shall not incur any costs for work outlined in the UPWP or any subsequent amendments (i.e., adding new work tasks or changing the scope of existing work tasks) prior to receiving approval from the department. Any costs incurred prior to receiving department approval shall not be eligible for reimbursement from federal transportation planning funds.

(7) Expenditure limitations. Costs incurred by the MPO shall not exceed the total budgeted amount of the UPWP without prior approval of the MPO policy board and the department. Costs incurred on individual work tasks shall not exceed that task budget by 25% without prior approval of the MPO policy board and the department. If the costs exceed 25% of the task budget, the UPWP shall be revised, approved by the MPO policy board, and submitted to the department for approval.

(8) Distribution of funds. Federal transportation planning funds will be distributed to the MPOs based on a formula mutually agreed to by the department and FHWA/FTA.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 29, 2005.

TRD-200503114

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 11, 2005

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630