TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 89. ADAPTATIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Subchapter DD. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PROGRAMS

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes amendments to §§89.1403, 89.1405, 89.1409, and 89.1417 and the repeal of §89.1421, concerning high school equivalency programs. The sections establish definitions, requirements, and procedures for implementation of an in-school General Educational Development (GED) program. The proposed amendments and repeal implement provisions relating to in- school GED programs, in accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.087, as amended by Senate Bill (SB) 1470, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003.

TEC, §29.087, was amended by SB 1470, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, to specify that any school district or open-enrollment charter school is eligible to apply to the commissioner of education to operate an in-school GED program.

Language added in §89.1403 implements provisions in TEC, §29.087(d), relating to changes in student eligibility requirements.

Language modified in §89.1405 implements requirements in TEC, §29.087(b), which establish the authority for any school district or open-enrollment charter school to operate a program under this section. As a part of the application process, the commissioner shall require a district or charter school to provide information regarding the operations of any similar programs during the preceding five years.

Language modified in §89.1409, in accordance with TEC, §29.087(f), requires a student participating in an approved high school equivalency program to take the assessment instruments specified by TEC, §39.023(a), for Grade 9 and to take each grade level assessment instrument administered during the period in which the student is enrolled in the program. A student participating in the program may not take the high school equivalency examinations unless the student has taken the assessment instrument required by this subsection.

Language added in §89.1417 implements the provision in TEC, §29.087(b-1), that a school district or open-enrollment charter school authorized by the commissioner on or before August 31, 2003, to operate a program under this section may continue to operate that program. New language also addresses reporting requirements.

Section 89.1421 is repealed in accordance with the repeal of TEC, §29.087(o).

Susan Barnes, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendments and repeal are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Ms. Barnes has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments and repeal are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will be extending the options for students desiring to obtain a high school credential. There will not be an effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the amendments and repeal as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendments and repeal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of a proposed change in the sections has been published in the Texas Register .

19 TAC §§89.1403, 89.1405, 89.1409, 89.1417

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Education Code, §29.087, amended by Senate Bill 1470, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules to implement the requirement that the agency develop a process by which a school district or open-enrollment charter school may apply to the commissioner for authority to operate a program to prepare eligible students to take a high school equivalency examination.

The amendments implement the Texas Education Code, §29.087.

§89.1403.Student Eligibility.

A student is eligible to participate in a High School Equivalency Program if:

(1) the student has been ordered by a court under Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 45.054, or by the Texas Youth Commission to:

(A) participate in a preparatory class for the high school equivalency examination; or

(B) take the high school equivalency examination administered under Texas Education Code (TEC), §7.111; or

(2) the following conditions are satisfied:

(A) the student is at least 16 years of age at the beginning of the school year or semester;

(B) the student is at risk of dropping out of school, as defined by TEC, §29.081;

(C) the student and the student's parent, or person standing in parental relation to the student, agree in writing to the student's participation; and

(D) at least two school years have elapsed since the student first enrolled in Grade 9 and the student has accumulated less than one third [ quarter ] of the credits required to graduate under the minimum graduation requirements of the district or school. For students who left school prior to being enrolled in Grade 9, at least three years have elapsed since the student last enrolled in Grade 8, or four years since the student last enrolled in Grade 7, or five years since the student last enrolled in Grade 6.

§89.1405.Application to Operate a High School Equivalency Program.

(a) Applicant eligibility. Any [ A ] school district or open-enrollment charter school may apply for authorization to operate a High School Equivalency Program (HSEP) . [ if the district or charter school: ]

[ (1) was operating a General Educational Development (GED) in-school pilot program on May 1, 2001, as authorized by the agency; and]

[ (2) had at least one student enrolled in the GED in-school pilot program during the 2000- 2001 school year.]

(b) Cooperative HSEP criteria. A cooperative of school districts or open-enrollment charter schools may apply for permission to operate a cooperative HSEP if it operates pursuant to a written agreement [ , had at least one student enrolled during the 2000-2001 school year, and had at least one member with an approved HSEP on May 1, 2001. An approved cooperative HSEP may not accept students from any school district or open-enrollment charter school that was not a member of the cooperative on May 1, 2001 ]. The fiscal agent of a cooperative HSEP is responsible for complying with all requirements of this subchapter.

(c) Application process.

(1) As part of the application process, the commissioner shall require a district or open- enrollment charter school to provide information regarding the operation of any similar program during the preceding five years.

[ (1) As part of the application process, a district or charter school must provide information regarding the operation of the in-school GED pilot program during the preceding five years. If the program has been in operation for less than five years, the district or school must provide information for the year(s) the program has been in operation.]

(2) Reported historical information disaggregated by ethnicity, age, gender, and socioeconomic status will include, but not be limited to:

(A) the total number of students served in the program;

(B) the number of program participants who passed the high school equivalency examination; and

(C) when available, information on students' subsequent attendance in postsecondary educational programs.

(3) The agency shall make available to eligible school districts and open-enrollment charter schools an application form that must be completed and submitted to the agency for approval.

§89.1409.Assessment.

(a) A student entering a High School Equivalency Program (HSEP) must take:

(1) the Grade 9 assessment required by Texas Education Code, §39.025(a), prior to entering the program;

(2) each grade level assessment instrument administered during the period in which the student is enrolled in the program; and

(3) the assessment instruments required by this subsection before taking the high school equivalency examination.

[ (a) A student must take the exit-level assessment instruments required by Texas Education Code (TEC), §39.025(a), before entering the program or within the first year in which the student is enrolled in the program.]

(b) A student entering an HSEP by order of the court pursuant to the Code of Criminal Proceedings, Article 45.054, or by order of the Texas Youth Commission (TYC), is exempt from the assessment requirements specified in subsection (a) of this section.

[ (b) A student participating in a High School Equivalency Program (HSEP) after January 1, 2002, must take the exit-level assessment instruments before taking the high school equivalency examination.]

[ (c) Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, a student may take the assessment instruments required for Grade 10 students under the TEC, §39.023(a), instead of the exit-level assessment if the HSEP receives prior written approval from the commissioner.]

(c) [ (d) ] The school district or open-enrollment charter school operating an approved HSEP must present to the General Educational Development (GED) testing center, on a form provided by the agency, proof that a student has been administered the assessment instruments required by TEC, §39.025(a) and §39.023(a). GED testing centers will not allow an HSEP student to take the high school equivalency examination without proof from the approved HSEP that the student has been administered the required assessment instruments. A student who is enrolled in an HSEP as described in this section and withdraws from the HSEP before taking the [ exit-level ] assessment instruments required by this subsection cannot take the GED until after the individual's 18th birthday.

(d) [ (e) ] The school district or open-enrollment charter school operating an approved HSEP must inform each student who has completed the program of the time and place at which the student may take the high school equivalency examination as authorized by TEC, §7.111. A student must be over 17 years of age or meet other requirements specified in TEC, §7.111, to take the high school equivalency examination.

(e) If a student took the Grade 9 or higher grade level assessment instrument required by TEC, §39.025(a), prior to enrollment in the HSEP program, the student has met the enrollment and assessment requirement established by this section.

§89.1417.Conditions of Program Operation.

(a) A school district or open-enrollment charter school operating a High School Equivalency Program (HSEP) must comply with all assurances in the program application. Approved HSEPs will be required to submit annually one progress report on a form [ at least two progress reports (midyear and final) on forms ] to be provided by the General Educational Development Testing Service (GEDTS) to the agency. The data in the progress reports must be disaggregated by ethnicity, age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Approved HSEPs will submit data as stated in the assurances section of the program application.

(b) A school district or open-enrollment charter school authorized by the commissioner on or before August 31, 2003, to operate a program in accordance with this subchapter may continue to operate that program in accordance with this section.

(c) [ (b) ] Enrollment in an HSEP may not exceed by more than 5% the total number of students enrolled in a similar program operated by the district or charter school during the 2000- 2001 school year.

(d) [ (c) ] A student enrolled in an HSEP must be offered a seven-hour school day and a 180-day instructional year calendar.

(e) Beginning with the 2003-2004 school year, a student may be enrolled in an HSEP that was authorized by the commissioner on or before August 31, 2003; however, the student can not take any portion of the GED test after September 1, 2003, without meeting the assessment requirements specified in this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 31, 2003.

TRD-200308966

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 15, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


19 TAC §89.1421

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Education Agency or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal is proposed under the Texas Education Code, §29.087, amended by Senate Bill 1470, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules to implement the requirement that the agency develop a process by which a school district or open-enrollment charter school may apply to the commissioner for authority to operate a program to prepare eligible students to take a high school equivalency examination.

The repeal implements the Texas Education Code, §29.087.

§89.1421.Expiration.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 31, 2003.

TRD-200308967

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 15, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497


Chapter 150. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING EDUCATOR APPRAISAL

Subchapter AA. TEACHER APPRAISAL

19 TAC §150.1003

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes an amendment to §150.1003, concerning teacher appraisal. The section establishes the recommended appraisal process and criteria on which to appraise the performance of teachers. The proposed amendment implements provisions relating to employment policies adopted by a board of trustees that require a written evaluation of each teacher, in accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC), §21.203(a) and §21.352(c), as amended by House Bill (HB) 1440, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003.

TEC, Chapter 21, was amended by HB 1440, 78th Texas Legislature, 2003, to modify §21.203(a) and §21.352(c). The modification to the law provides school districts with the option that a teacher may be appraised less frequently if the teacher agrees in writing and the teacher's most recent evaluation rated the teacher as at least proficient, or the equivalent, and did not identify any area of deficiency.

The proposed amendment to 19 TAC §153.1003 establishes the option of less frequent appraisals for eligible teachers. Language is added in proposed new subsection (l) to establish the provision for a teacher to be appraised less frequently, to describe specific criteria that may be included in local district policy related to this appraisal option, and to address teacher performance that would result in placing the teacher back on the traditional annual appraisal cycle. Language is also added to permit districts to annually review the written agreements with teachers that are appraised under this option.

Susan Barnes, associate commissioner for standards and programs, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There may be a savings for local school districts as a result of the reduction in required appraisal frequency in response to the legislative change in statute.

Ms. Barnes has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be extending the options of school districts by allowing districts to retain use of an annual appraisal system, or adopt a policy of allowing eligible teachers to be appraised less frequently. The potential effect may be to allow districts to concentrate teacher improvement efforts on those teachers with identified areas of deficiency, thereby improving the student performance of those teachers' students. There will not be an effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the amendment as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez, Policy Coordination, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 475-1497. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tea.state.tx.us or faxed to (512) 463-0028. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed amendment submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of a proposed change in the section has been published in the Texas Register .

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Education Code, §21.351(a), which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt a recommended appraisal process and criteria on which to appraise the performance of teachers.

The amendment implements the Texas Education Code, §§21.203, 21.351, and 21.352.

§150.1003.Appraisals, Data Sources, and Conferences.

(a) Each teacher must be appraised each school year , except as provided by subsection (l) of this section . Whenever possible, an appraisal shall be based on the teacher's performance in fields and teaching assignments for which he or she is certified.

(b) The annual teacher appraisal shall include:

(1) at least one classroom observation of a minimum of 45 minutes as identified in subsection (g) of this section, with additional walk-throughs and observations conducted at the discretion of the appraiser;

(2) a written summary of each observation, which shall be given to teachers within ten working days after the completion of an observation, with a pre- and post-observation conference conducted at the request of the teacher or appraiser;

(3) completion of Section I of the Teacher Self-Report Form that shall be presented to the principal:

(A) within the first three weeks from the day of completion of the Professional Development and Appraisal System (PDAS) orientation as described in §150.1007 of this title (relating to Teacher Orientation);

(B) within the first three weeks from the day of completion of the PDAS orientation as described in §150.1007 of this title for teachers new to the PDAS; or

(C) within the first three weeks of instruction in the school years when the PDAS orientation is not required pursuant to §150.1007 of this title.

(4) revision of Section I (if necessary) and completion of Sections II and III of the Teacher Self-Report Form that shall be presented to the principal at least two weeks prior to the summative annual conference;

(5) cumulative data of written documentation collected regarding job-related teacher performance, in addition to formal classroom observations;

(6) a written summative annual appraisal report; and

(7) a summative annual conference.

(c) A teacher may be given advance notice of the date or time of an appraisal, but advance notice is not required.

(d) Each school district shall establish a calendar for the appraisal of teachers. The appraisal period for each teacher must include all of the days of a teacher's contract. Observations during the appraisal period must be conducted during the required days of instruction for students during one school year. The appraisal calendar shall:

(1) exclude observations in the three weeks following the day of completion of the PDAS orientation in the school years when an orientation is required as described in §150.1007 of this title;

(2) exclude observations in the three weeks following the day of completion of the PDAS orientation for teachers new to the PDAS as described in §150.1007 of this title;

(3) exclude observations in the first three weeks of instruction in the school years when the PDAS orientation is not required pursuant to §150.1007 of this title;

(4) prohibit observations on the last day of instruction before any official school holiday or on any other day deemed inappropriate by the school district board of trustees; and

(5) indicate a period for summative annual conferences that ends no later than 15 working days before the last day of instruction for students.

(e) During the appraisal period, the appraiser shall evaluate and document teacher performance specifically related to the domain criteria as identified in §150.1002(b) of this title (relating to Assessment of Teacher Performance).

(f) The appraiser is responsible for documentation of the cumulative data identified in subsection (b)(5) of this section. Any third-party information from a source other than the teacher's supervisor that the appraiser wishes to include as cumulative data shall be verified and documented by the appraiser. Any documentation that will influence the teacher's summative annual appraisal report must be shared in writing with the teacher within ten working days of the appraiser's knowledge of the occurrence. The principal shall also be notified in writing when the appraiser is not the teacher's principal.

(g) By mutual consent of the teacher and the appraiser, the required minimum of 45 minutes of observation may be conducted in shorter time segments. The time segments must aggregate to at least 45 minutes.

(h) A written summative annual appraisal report shall be shared with the teacher no later than five working days before the summative conference and no later than 15 working days before the last day of instruction for students. The written summative annual appraisal report shall be placed in the teacher's personnel file by the end of the appraisal period.

(i) Unless waived in writing by the teacher, a summative conference shall be held within a time frame specified on the school district calendar and no later than 15 working days before the last day of instruction for students. The summative conference shall focus on the written summative report and related data sources.

(j) In cases where the appraiser is not an administrator on the teacher's campus, either the principal, assistant principal, or another supervisory staff member designated as an administrator on the campus will participate in the summative annual conference.

(k) Any documentation collected after the summative conference but before the end of the contract term during one school year may be considered as part of the appraisal of a teacher. If the documentation affects the teacher's evaluation in any domain, another summative report shall be developed and another summative conference shall be held to inform the teacher of the change(s).

(l) Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, appraisal must be done at least once during each school year. A teacher may be appraised less frequently if the teacher agrees in writing and the teacher's most recent evaluation rated the teacher as at least proficient, or the equivalent, and did not identify any area of deficiency. A teacher who is appraised less frequently than annually must be appraised at least once during each period of five school years.

(1) District policy may stipulate:

(A) whether the appraisal option is to be made available to teachers;

(B) whether the appraisal option is to be adopted districtwide or is to be campus specific;

(C) if the appraisal accompanying a teacher new to a district or campus meets the option as specified in this subsection, whether the appraisal is to be accepted or whether that teacher is to be appraised by the new campus administrator; and

(D) whether an appraiser may place a teacher on the traditional appraisal cycle as a result of performance deficiencies documented in accordance with subsections (b)(5) and (f) of this section.

(2) A school district may choose annually to review the written agreement with the teacher. However, at the conclusion of the school year, the district may modify appraisal options through board policy and may make changes to expectations for appraisals that apply to all teachers regardless of a teacher's participation in the appraisal option in the previous year(s).

(3) For purposes of this subsection, in the teacher-appraisal system recommended by the commissioner, an area of deficiency is a domain. A teacher must be rated as at least proficient for each domain (i.e., for all domains) to be eligible for less frequent appraisals under this subsection.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 5, 2004.

TRD-200400014

Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez

Director, Policy Coordination

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 15, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497