TITLE 43.TRANSPORTATION

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 15. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Subchapter N. STATE HIGHWAY PROJECTS FINANCED THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS AND OTHER PUBLIC SECURITIES

43 TAC §§15.170 - 15.174

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes new §§15.170-15.174, concerning the issuance of bonds and other public securities by the Texas Transportation Commission (commission) to finance state highway system improvement projects.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED NEW SECTIONS

House Bill 3588, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, added Transportation Code, §222.003, to allow the commission to issue bonds and other public securities to be used to fund state highway improvement projects. These bonds or other public securities will be secured by a pledge and payable from funds deposited to the credit of the state highway fund.

Bonds or other public securities may be issued in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3 billion, and no more than $1 billion may be issued per year. Of the total amount of securities that may be issued ($3 billion), no less than $600 million must be used to fund projects that reduce accidents or correct hazardous locations on the state highway system.

The commission is directed by the statute to establish by rule the project selection criteria for these projects. The commission is further directed to consider certain factors in the selection of safety projects funded with these proceeds. The statute prohibits the use of these proceeds to construct a state highway or other facility on the Trans-Texas Corridor.

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 15.170, Purpose, describes the purpose of the subchapter which is to prescribe policies and procedures that will be used to select projects funded under Transportation Code, §222.003.

Section 15.171 defines words and terms used in the subchapter.

Section 15.172, Applicability, notes the restriction on the use of proceeds issued under this subchapter for construction of a state highway or other facility on the Trans-Texas Corridor. This section also notes that at least $600 million of the total aggregate amount of $3 billion must be used for safety projects.

Section 15.173, State Highway Improvement Projects, lists eligible projects that may be funded with proceeds of bonds or other public securities issued under this subchapter. The section also describes selection criteria the department will consider in project selection.

Section 15.174, Safety Projects, lists eligible safety projects that may be funded with proceeds of bonds or other public securities issued under this subchapter. The section also describes selection criteria the department will consider in project selection. The section requires the department to consider accident data, traffic volume, and pavement geometry as required by House Bill 3588.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of the first five years the new sections as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new sections.

There will be positive and negative fiscal implications for state government for the bonds or other public securities issued as a result of enforcing or administering the new sections. Negative fiscal impact to the state will consist of costs associated with issuance and debt service. Positive fiscal impact is expected through accelerating the implementation of transportation improvements and safety projects and thus avoiding the effects of inflation. The net financial impact between debt service and inflation costs avoided will vary depending on when the department enters the debt market and the rate of inflation for the goods and services used for the project. Compliance with the new sections will be accomplished by reallocating existing department staff. There should be no other fiscal impacts associated with the new sections. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the new sections as proposed.

Carlos A. Lopez, P.E., Director, Traffic Operations Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the new sections.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Lopez has also determined that for each of the first five years the new sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the new sections will be to provide a safer, more efficient driving environment for the traveling public. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed new sections may be submitted to Carlos A. Lopez, P.E., Director, Traffic Operations Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on February 2, 2004.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The new sections are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §222.003, which requires the commission to establish by rule the criteria for selecting projects eligible for funding under that section.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE: Transportation Code, §222.003.

§15.170.Purpose.

Transportation Code, §222.003, allows the Texas Transportation Commission to issue bonds and other public securities payable from revenue deposited to the credit of the state highway fund. Proceeds from the sale of these bonds and other public securities must be used to fund state highway improvement projects. A maximum of $1 billion per year in debt may be issued not to exceed an aggregate principal amount of $3 billion. This subchapter prescribes the policies and procedures that will be used to select projects.

§15.171.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Accident data--Information detailing the number of motor vehicle traffic accidents or casualties at or on a particular highway location, segment of highway, or type of highway.

(2) Bond--A public security issued by the State of Texas under the authority of Transportation Code, §222.003, for improvements to the state highway system and secured by a pledge of revenue deposited to payable from the credit of the state highway fund.

(3) Commission--The Texas Transportation Commission.

(4) Department--The Texas Department of Transportation.

(5) Executive Director--The executive director of the department or the director’s designee.

(6) Grade crossing--The intersection of a railroad and a public roadway.

(7) Grade separation--A structure that separates two highways, a highway and a railroad line, a highway and a county road, or a highway and a city street.

(8) Hazard Elimination Program--A federal construction program mandated under 23 U.S.C. §152 to reduce the number and severity of traffic accidents.

(9) Hazardous location--A location on the state highway system that requires improvement in order to increase safety at a location, as determined by the department through accident data analysis or engineering judgment.

(10) Highway--A public road, including right of way and all appurtenances, that is on the designated state highway system.

(11) Narrow two lane highway--A two lane road on the state highway system with a width of less than 24 feet, including any paved shoulder.

(12) Pavement geometry--The vertical, horizontal and pavement structure design elements of a highway or bridge feature.

(13) Safety appurtenance--Highway safety features such as breakaway sign supports, breakaway utility poles, traffic barriers, impact attenuators, traversable terrain, and hardware features such as drainage inlets, barriers, and other safety related fixtures.

(14) Safety project--A project that reduces accidents or corrects or improves a hazardous location.

(15) State highway system--The system of highways in the state included in a comprehensive plan prepared by the executive director with the approval of the commission, in accordance with Transportation Code, §201.103.

(16) State highway improvement project--Improvement projects designed to improve mobility, reduce congestion, or make other needed upgrades to the state highway system.

(17) Trans-Texas Corridor--The statewide system of multimodal facilities under the jurisdiction of the department that is designated by the commission under Transportation Code, Chapter 227.

(18) Texas Highway Trunk System--A planned rural network of four or more lane divided roadways that will serve as a principal connector for Texas cities of greater than 20,000 population as well as major ports and points of entry.

(19) Unified Transportation Program--The 10-year financial plan of the Texas Department of Transportation outlining project development and construction.

§15.172.Applicability.

(a) Proceeds from the sale of these bonds may not be used to construct a state highway or other facility on the Trans Texas Corridor.

(b) Transportation Code, §222.003(d), requires at least $600 million of the aggregate debt limit of $3 billion be used for safety projects. The remainder of the funding may be used for state highway improvement projects, including safety projects.

§15.173.State Highway Improvement Projects.

(a) Eligibility. Projects or programs contained in the department’s Unified Transportation Program and which would be accelerated, are eligible for funding.

(b) Selection criteria. The department will consider one or more of the following criteria in selecting projects for funding under this section:

(1) the potential of the project to improve mobility;

(2) the potential of the project to maintain and preserve the existing transportation system;

(3) the anticipated time required to complete the candidate project;

(4) adherence to all accepted department design standards as well as applicable state and federal law and regulation;

(5) feasibility of the project; and

(6) traffic volume.

§15.174.Safety Projects.

(a) Eligibility. Safety projects are eligible for funding, and include:

(1) projects submitted under the guidelines of the department’s Hazard Elimination Program designed to reduce the number and severity of traffic accidents;

(2) projects designed to increase the width of narrow two-lane highways to a width of 24 feet or greater;

(3) expansion of undivided highways on the Texas Highway Trunk System to four-lane divided highways;

(4) construction of grade separations at highway intersections;

(5) construction of railroad grade separations eliminating at-grade rail/highway intersections by adding new railroad overpasses or underpasses;

(6) the installation of median traffic barriers;

(7) treatment or removal of roadside fixed objects that may create a roadway safety hazard such as sign or traffic signal supports, lighting supports, vegetation, mailboxes, barriers, bridge rails, fences, culverts, ditches, curbs, embankments, and other items located in the state highway right of way;

(8) improvements at rail/highway at-grade crossings, including active warning devices such as crossing gates, lights, and warning bells;

(9) the installation of sidewalks on state highway right of way to improve pedestrian safety and mobility;

(10) intersection improvements designed to improve pedestrian safety such as the installation of curb ramps;

(11) the installation of turn lanes at highway intersections;

(12) the improvement of geometrics, signal timing, and other general infrastructure improvements to intersections;

(13) the installation or improvement of traffic signals, flashing beacons, and other traffic control devices;

(14) the installation or improvement of safety appurtenances; and

(15) the conversion of two-way frontage roads to one-way frontage roads.

(b) Selection criteria. The department will consider accident data, traffic volume, pavement geometry, and other conditions that can create or exacerbate hazardous roadway conditions in selecting projects for funding under this section, and one or more of the following criteria:

(1) potential of the candidate project to correct identified safety problems;

(2) the anticipated time required to complete the candidate project;

(3) adherence to all accepted department design standards as well as applicable state and federal law and regulation; and

(4) feasibility of the project.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 19, 2003.

TRD-200308693

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630


Chapter 21. RIGHT OF WAY

Subchapter B. UTILITY ADJUSTMENT, RELOCATION, OR REMOVAL

43 TAC §21.22

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes new §21.22, concerning agreements for utility adjustment, relocation, or removal.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED NEW SECTION

Senate Bill 487, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, added new Transportation Code, §203.0935, which requires a utility company owning a facility that is in conflict with a proposed improvement to the state highway system to execute an agreement with the department to relocate the facility in a timely manner. If the utility does not sign the agreement, the department may relocate the facility at the utility’s expense.

New §21.22 is proposed to implement the provisions of §203.0935 and to enumerate the documents to be exchanged between a utility and the department to provide both parties with sufficient information to enter into an agreement.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of the first five years the new section as proposed is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the new section. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the section as proposed.

John P. Campbell, P.E., Director, Right of Way Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the new section.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Campbell has also determined that for each of the first five years the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the new section will be cost savings due to the expedited delivery of utility adjustments, modifications, relocations, or removals prior to the beginning of project construction resulting in less construction contractor delay. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed new section may be submitted to John P. Campbell, P.E., Director, Right of Way Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on February 2, 2004.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The new section is proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §203.095, which requires the department to adopt rules to implement Subchapter E of Chapter 203.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE: Transportation Code, §203.0935.

§21.22.Agreements.

(a) If the department determines that an adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of a utility facility may be required by an improvement to a state highway, the department will provide the utility with sufficient plans and specifications to enable the utility to reasonably determine the future location, including depth of cover and required clearances, if applicable, and estimated cost of the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of the utility facility.

(b) The utility shall negotiate with the department in good faith to reach an agreement on the terms of the relocation. The agreement shall contain:

(1) all necessary signatures by an authorized utility representative;

(2) plans and specifications sufficient to determine the proposed location of the facility;

(3) cost estimates and support if the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of the utility facility may be eligible for department cost participation;

(4) proof of the utility facility’s underlying property interest if cost participation is sought; and

(5) a date by which the utility will begin and an estimated date of completion of the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal.

(c) If the department and the utility have not entered into a written agreement within 30 days after the department provides the plans and specifications under subsection (a) of this section, the department will send written notice to the utility by certified mail that the department has determined that the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of the utility’s facility may be required. The notice will include:

(1) a final plan for the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of the utility facility;

(2) the department’s standard utility agreement for the relocation or adjustment of the facility; and

(3) a date by which the adjustment, modification, relocation, or removal of the utility’s facility must be complete.

(d) Ninety days after the utility receives the notice under subsection (c) of this section, the department may relocate the facility at the sole cost and expense of the utility less any reimbursement that would have been payable to the utility under Transportation Code, §203.092, unless the utility:

(1) has executed the agreement;

(2) is in the process of negotiating in good faith with the department to relocate the facility; or

(3) has requested and been granted by the department an extension of time in which to sign an agreement.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 19, 2003.

TRD-200308694

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630


Chapter 27. TOLL PROJECTS

Subchapter E. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR TOLL FACILITIES

43 TAC §§27.51, 27.53, 27.54

The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments to §27.51, Definitions, §27.53, Request, and §27.54, Commission Action, concerning financial assistance for toll facilities.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Certain governmental entities in the State of Texas that operate toll facilities, including the North Texas Tollway Authority and Harris County, acting through the Harris County Toll Road Authority, have electronic toll collection systems that use transponders, which are devices placed on or within a motor vehicle that are capable of transmitting information used to electronically assess and collect tolls. The department is in the process of implementing such a system on turnpike projects in Central Texas.

With the impetus of the project financing and development tools provided in House Bill 3588, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, the department and regional mobility authorities will contribute to the expansion of the network of toll facilities in the state. The anticipated expansion of toll facilities in the state will increase the need for user interoperability between the electronic toll collection systems of the various governmental entities. Generally, interoperability means that the transponder technology utilized by a particular entity can read and properly process information transmitted by transponders utilized by other entities and users of toll facilities operated by the other entities. Conversely, it also means that the transponders utilized by a particular entity can be read and properly processed by the transponder technology utilized by other entities.

The expansion of toll facilities in the state is anticipated to result in an increased desire on the part of motorists to use the same transponder to travel on toll facilities in other parts of the state. Interoperability will provide seamless access across the state network of toll facilities, maximizing efficiency and motorist convenience, and facilitating congestion relief through the anticipated increased use of toll facilities. The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) intends for the department’s transponder technology and transponders to provide interoperability, and believes it is important for other entities that operate or will operate toll facilities in the state to do the same. The proposed amendments are intended to facilitate interoperability, and make other changes to clarify the intent of the rule provisions.

The amendments to §27.51 add definitions for interoperability and transponder.

The amendments to §27.53 require a request for financial assistance to include a description of the extent to which the requestor’s toll collection system or plan for a toll collection system provides interoperability. The amendments also recognize that utility adjustments are a necessary part of project development, the costs of which should be reflected in the project cash flow analysis. That analysis is part of the project financial feasibility study considered by the commission when determining whether to approve a request for financing.

The amendments to §27.54 provide that prior to granting preliminary approval of an eligible project, and a request for financial assistance for that project, the commission will consider the extent to which the requestor’s toll collection system or plan for a toll collection system provides interoperability. The amendments also clarify that the study of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the project, required before final approval of funding for construction of the project, must be completed, and public involvement provided, in the manner prescribed by the department’s rules relating to environmental review and public involvement for transportation projects.

FISCAL NOTE

James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of the first five years the amendments as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. The amendments will be administered using existing department staff. There are anticipated fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. The additional costs cannot be quantified with any certainty as the amount of such costs will depend on the number of requests for financing submitted and the nature of a particular request. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Phillip E. Russell, P.E., Director, Texas Turnpike Authority Division, has certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Russell has also determined that for each of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments will be to provide seamless access across state toll facilities, maximizing efficiency and motorist convenience, and facilitating congestion relief through the increased use of toll facilities. There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Phillip E. Russell, P.E., Director, Texas Turnpike Authority Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on February 2, 2004.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct of the work of the department.

CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE: Transportation Code, §222.103.

§27.51.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) AASHTO--The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

(2) Commission--The Texas Transportation Commission.

(3) Department--The Texas Department of Transportation.

(4) Design manual--The latest editions of and successors to all design manuals available from the department, including but not limited to the following:

(A) Roadway Design Manual;

(B) operations and procedures manual of the Environmental Affairs Division;

(C) Pavement Design Manual;

(D) Bridge Design Manual;

(E) Bridge Project Development Manual;

(F) Bridge Geotechnical Manual;

(G) Hydraulic Design Manual;

(H) Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices;

(I) standard highway sign designs for Texas; and

(J) traffic control standard sheets booklet of the traffic operations division.

(5) Development costs--Costs associated with the development of a toll facility before all environmental clearances required to commence construction of the facility have been obtained, including, but not limited to, expenses incurred for the preparation of preliminary engineering, traffic and revenue estimates, major investment studies, environmental impact or assessment studies, and feasibility studies and analyses.

(6) Environmental Permits, Issues, and Commitments (EPIC)--Any permit, issue, coordination, commitment, or mitigation obtained to satisfy social, economic, or environmental impacts of a project, including, but not limited to, sole source aquifer coordination, wetland permits, stormwater permits, traffic noise abatement, threatened or endangered species coordination, archeological permits, and any mitigation or other commitments associated with any of those issues.

(7) Executive director--The executive director of the Texas Department of Transportation or designee.

(8) Interoperability--With respect to the technology used or to be used by a requestor as part of an electronic toll collection system:

(A) the transponders utilized or to be utilized by the requestor can be read and properly processed by the transponder technology utilized by the department and other governmental and private entities operating toll facilities in this state; and

(B) the transponder technology utilized or to be utilized by the requestor can read and properly process information transmitted by transponders utilized by the department and other governmental and private entities operating toll facilities in this state.

(9) [ (8) ] Metropolitan planning organization--An organization designated in certain urbanized areas to carry out the transportation planning process as required by Title 23, United States Code, §134.

(10) [ (9) ] MPO--A metropolitan planning organization.

(11) [ (10) ] Nonattainment area--An area designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as not meeting the air quality standards outlined in the Clean Air Act.

(12) [ (11) ] Requestor--The public or private entity requesting financing under this subchapter.

(13) Transponder--A device placed on or within a motor vehicle that is capable of transmitting information used to assess or collect tolls.

§27.53.Request.

(a) Eligibility.

(1) A public or private entity that is authorized by state law to construct or maintain a toll facility is eligible to submit a request for financing under this subchapter.

(2) A private entity is not eligible to submit a request for a grant.

(b) Basic request. Except as otherwise noted below with respect to a request for funding of development costs only, a request must be accompanied by:

(1) an overview of the project, which shall include a description of the project, the estimated total cost of the project or the preliminary cost estimate of development costs if the request is to fund only development costs, and the proposed use of the requested financial assistance;

(2) a list of all proposed funding sources, including, but not limited to, bond revenue, any equity contribution from the requestor, and grants or loans requested under this subchapter, and the proposed use of the funding;

(3) the requested financing terms if loan financing is requested;

(4) a description of the need, or potential need in the case of a request for financing of development costs, for the project and potential impact on traffic congestion and mobility;

(5) a statement of the amount of unencumbered (or unreserved) cash on hand or the requestor’s latest audited financial statement;

(6) the latest bond rating obtained by the requestor when using similar sources of revenue to be pledged, if applicable;

(7) a preliminary design study which includes:

(A) an initial route and potential alignments;

(B) the project’s logical termini and independent utility, if applicable; and

(C) potential revisions or changes to state highway system facilities necessitated by the project;

(8) a description of the extent to which the requestor's toll collection system or plan for a toll collection system provides interoperability;

(9) [ (8) ] unless the request is to fund development costs only, official written approval of the project by the governing body of each entity that may become liable for repayment of any financial assistance;

(10) [ (9) ] a binding commitment that the environmental consequences of the proposed project will be fully considered in accordance with, and that the proposed project will comply with, all applicable local, state, and federal environmental laws, regulations, and requirements;

(11) [ (10) ] a binding commitment to implement all EPIC; and

(12) [ (11) ] documentary evidence, to the extent then available, of community involvement in development of the proposed project and public opinion about it.

(c) Supplemental information and data. Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the requestor shall submit the following supplemental information and data.

(1) Financial feasibility study. Unless the request is to fund development costs only, the requestor shall submit a financial feasibility study that includes:

(A) a project construction or asset acquisition schedule identifying the timing, amount, and source of all funds required;

(B) an analysis of the expected financing period of the project;

(C) a pro forma annual cash flow analysis for the expected financing period of the project showing:

(i) if applicable, anticipated revenues to be used in repayment by source;

(ii) anticipated disbursements for preliminary studies and engineering, construction, EPIC, right of way acquisition, utility adjustments, operations, and maintenance;

(iii) anticipated debt service coverage ratios for each debt obligation; and

(iv) funds expected to be used to meet the requirements of any sinking funds, reserve funds, and loan amortization payments;

(D) a description of the methods used in preparing the financial feasibility study, the assumptions contained in the study, and persons and entities responsible for the preparation of the study;

(E) if loan financing is requested under this subchapter, the length of time the financial assistance will be outstanding or obligated;

(F) the anticipated interest rates for any and all debt outstanding during the term of the financial assistance;

(G) the anticipated benefits to the state and to the requestor resulting from the assistance; and

(H) based upon then available information and analyses, a description of how the requested assistance will, to the extent applicable, accomplish the following (it being understood that failure to accomplish all of these items will not necessarily cause a request to be ineligible for financial assistance):

(i) expand the availability of funding for transportation projects;

(ii) reduce direct state costs;

(iii) maximize private and local participation in financing projects; and

(iv) improve the efficiency of the state’s transportation systems.

(2) Project impacts. The requestor shall provide the following information concerning the impact of the project:

(A) how the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation Plan and, if appropriate, with the metropolitan transportation plan developed by an MPO;

(B) if the project is in a nonattainment area, how the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, with the conforming plan and Transportation Improvement Program for the MPO in which the project is located (if necessary), and with the State Implementation Plan; and

(C) a preliminary description of any known environmental, social, economic, or cultural resource issues, such as hazardous material sites, impacts on wetlands and other water resources, endangered species, parks, neighborhoods, businesses, historic buildings or bridges, and archeological sites.

(d) Waiver of required information or data. The executive director may waive submission of individual items of information or data required by subsection (c) of this section if:

(1) the information or data required by this section is not relevant to the project or the financial assistance requested;

(2) the department already possesses information or data in a format that may be substituted for the required information or data; or

(3) the past performance of the requestor on previous projects developed in collaboration with the department indicates that the requestor will adequately and prudently address the issues and impacts described in the requested information or data.

§27.54.Commission Action.

(a) Preliminary approval.

(1) Considerations. Prior to granting preliminary approval of an eligible project, the commission will consider:

(A) the transportation need for and anticipated public benefit of the project, including such factors as the project’s potential ability to accelerate needed transportation facilities or to reduce financial and other burdens on the commission and the department regarding the development, operation, and maintenance of such facilities;

(B) availability of funding from all sources;

(C) the percentage of the total project cost that is represented by the requested financial assistance;

(D) the financial feasibility of the project;

(E) potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of the project;

(F) the extent to which the requestor's toll collection system or plan for a toll collection system provides interoperability;

(G) [ (F) ] evidence of local public support; and

(H) [ (G) ] the requestor’s past experience with similar projects and past performance working in collaboration with the department in the development of such projects, if applicable.

(2) Project requirements. The commission may grant preliminary approval of a project for financing if it finds that:

(A) the project is consistent with the Statewide Transportation Plan and, if appropriate, with the metropolitan transportation plan developed by an MPO;

(B) if the project is in a nonattainment area, the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, with the conforming plan and Transportation Improvement Program for the MPO in which the project is located (if necessary), and with the State Implementation Plan;

(C) the project will improve the efficiency of the state’s transportation systems;

(D) the project will expand the availability of funding for transportation projects or reduce direct state costs; and

(E) for loan financing, the application shows that the project and the requestor are likely to have sufficient revenues to assure repayment of the loan according to the terms of the agreement.

(3) Authorized actions. By granting preliminary approval, the commission authorizes the executive director to:

(A) evaluate the project’s limits, scope, definition, design, and other features, and identify any which adversely affect the financing of the project, including EPIC;

(B) negotiate the amount, type and timing of disbursements of financial assistance;

(C) for loan financing, negotiate an interest rate, a repayment schedule, collateral securing the financial assistance, and default provisions;

(D) negotiate provisions providing, if necessary for the project’s financial feasibility, for the subordination of loan financing provided under this subchapter to any other debt financing for the project; and

(E) negotiate all other provisions necessary to complete an agreement under this subchapter.

(4) Relevant facts. In determining the extent to which the executive director will seek changes to the features described in subsection (a)(3)(A) of this section, the executive director shall consider:

(A) the requestor’s past experience with similar projects; and

(B) whether the project is intended to become part of the state highway system or otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the department.

(b) Project impacts and traffic and revenue report.

(1) Prior to receiving final approval under subsection (c) of this section for the grant or loan of funds for the construction of a project, the requestor shall:

(A) complete a study of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the project [ , consistent with the spirit and intent of the National Environmental Policy Act, Title 42, United States Code, §§4321 et seq., and Title 23, United States Code, §109(h), ] and provide for public involvement in the manner prescribed by [ accordance with the requirements of ] Chapter 2, Subchapter C of this title (relating to Environmental Review and Public Involvement For Transportation Projects); and

(B) obtain an investment grade traffic and revenue report for the project from a nationally recognized traffic engineer.

(2) The executive director may waive the requirements of paragraph (1)(A) or (B) of this subsection if the director determines that the study or report is inapplicable or unnecessary due to the nature of the requested assistance.

(c) Final approval. Subsequent to preliminary approval, completion of negotiations, and compliance with this section, the commission may grant final approval if it determines that:

(1) providing financial assistance will prudently provide for the protection of public funds; and

(2) the project will provide for all reasonable and feasible measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse environmental impacts.

(d) Contingencies. The commission may make its preliminary approval contingent upon the requestor making changes, performing other acts, or establishing certain conditions necessary to provide for the adequacy of any required repayments. The commission may make its final approval subject to the requestor fulfilling specified conditions precedent to the release of financial assistance under this subchapter, which shall also be set forth in the financial assistance agreement. The necessity and nature of such changes, acts or conditions will be determined with consideration for the requestor’s past experience with similar projects and past performance working in collaboration with the department in the development of such projects, especially with regard to the requestor’s previous use of the commission’s financial assistance.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 19, 2003.

TRD-200308695

Richard D. Monroe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Transportation

Earliest possible date of adoption: February 1, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630