TITLE 16.ECONOMIC REGULATION

Part 4. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION

Chapter 60. TEXAS COMMISSION OF LICENSING AND REGULATION

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation ("Department") proposes the repeal of 16 Texas Administrative Code ("TAC"), Chapter 60, Subchapter E, Administration, §60.201; and new rules at 16 Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 60, Subchapter E, Administration, Division 2, Training, §60.210; Division 3, Historically Underutilized Businesses, §60.220; Division 4, Bid Opening and Tabulation, §60.230; and Division 5, Vendor Protests, §60.240 and §60.241, regarding the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation administrative rules.

The repeal is necessary to allow for a rule organizational structure that can accommodate several different but related rule matters in the area of agency internal administration, such as compliance with statutory training and purchasing requirements. These proposed rules are necessary to comply with Texas Government Code §§2161.003, 2155.076 and 2156.005, which require, respectively, agency rules pertaining to historically underutilized businesses, vendor protest procedures, and bid opening and tabulation.

William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect there will be no cost to state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules.

Mr. Kuntz also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, the public benefit will be a decrease in confusion among the vendor community regarding agency rules and procedures for historically underutilized businesses, vendor protests, and bid opening and tabulation. This should result in a more efficient agency purchasing process.

There will be no effect on large, small, or micro-businesses as a result of the proposed rules. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed rules.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to William H. Kuntz, Jr., Executive Director, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, P.O. Box 12157, Austin, Texas 78711, or facsimile (512) 475-2872, or electronically: whkuntz@license.state.tx.us. The deadline for comments is 30 days after publication in the Texas Register .

Subchapter E. ADMINISTRATION

16 TAC §60.201

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal is proposed under Chapter 51, §51.201, Texas Occupations Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules as necessary for its own procedures.

The statutory provisions affected by the repeal are those set forth in Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal.

§60.201.Employee Training and Education.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400817

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


2. TRAINING

16 TAC §60.210

The new rule is proposed under Chapter 51, §51.201, Texas Occupations Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules as necessary for its own procedures.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposed new rule are those set forth in the Chapter 51, Texas Occupations Code, and Chapter 656, Texas Government Code. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§60.210.Employee Training and Education.

(a) With the approval of the Executive Director, the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation may make available to its administrators and employees funds for training and education in accordance with the Employee Training Act, Government Code §§656.041 - 656.049.

(b) In order to be eligible for agency supported training and education, the administrator or employee must demonstrate in writing, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, that the training or education is related to the duties or prospective duties of the administrator or employee.

(c) Eligible training and education expenses that are approved by the Executive Director may include, as appropriate, salary, tuition, and other fees, travel and living expenses, training stipend, expense of training materials, and other necessary expenses of an instructor, student, or other participant in a training or education program.

(d) An employee who completes training and education to obtain a degree or certification for which the Department has provided all or part of the required fees must agree in writing to fully repay the Department any amounts paid for educational assistance if the employee voluntarily terminates employment with the agency within one year of course completion.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400819

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


3. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES

16 TAC §60.220

The new rule is proposed under Chapter 51, §51.201, Texas Occupations Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules as necessary for its own procedures.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposed new rule are those set forth in the Chapter 51, Texas Occupations Code and Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§60.220.Historically Underutilized Businesses Program.

Pursuant to Chapter 2161, §2161.003, Texas Government Code, the Commission adopts by reference the rules of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission in 1 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §§111.11 - 111.28, relating to the Historically Underutilized Business Program.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400820

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


4. BID OPENING AND TABULATION

16 TAC §60.230

The new rule is proposed under Chapter 51, §51.201, Texas Occupations Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules as necessary for its own procedures.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposal are those set forth in Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51 and Chapter 2156, Texas Government Code. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§60.230.Bid Opening and Tabulation.

(a) The commission adopts by reference the rules of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission in 1 TAC §113.5(b) (Bid Submission, Bid Opening, and Tabulation).

(b) The adoption of this rule is required by Texas Government Code, §2156.005(d).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400821

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


5. VENDOR PROTESTS

16 TAC §60.240, §60.241

The new rules are proposed under Chapter 51, §51.201, Texas Occupations Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules as necessary for its own procedures.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposal are those set forth in Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 51 and Chapter 2156, Texas Government Code. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§60.240.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Purchasing Officer--A Departmental employee who has received certification as a Texas Public Purchaser and who is responsible for assisting with Departmental purchases, and who has been designated the Purchasing Officer for the purchase in question.

(2) Interested parties--all vendors who have submitted bids or proposals for the contract involved.

(3) General Counsel--the general counsel employed by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

(4) Vendor--entity that has submitted bids or proposals to provide goods and/or services pursuant to a solicitation for bids or to a request for proposals for a contract with the Department.

(5) Department--Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

§60.241.Protest Procedures

(a) Any actual or prospective bidder, offeror, proposer or contractor who wishes to submit a grievance regarding the solicitation, evaluation, or award of a contract may formally protest to the Purchasing Officer. Such protests must be in writing and received by the Purchasing Officer within 10 business days after the protesting party knows, or should have known, of the occurrence of the action which is protested. Filed protests must conform to the requirements of this subsection and subsection (c) of this section, and shall be resolved in accordance with the procedure set forth in subsections (d) - (j) of this section. Copies of the protest must be mailed, hand-delivered or sent by facsimile transmission to the Purchasing Officer and interested parties.

(b) In the event of a timely protest under this section, the Department shall not proceed further with the solicitation or with the award of the contract unless the Executive Director, after consultation with the Purchasing Officer and the General Counsel, makes a written determination that the award of the contract without delay is necessary to protect the best interests of the Department and the State.

(c) A formal protest must be sworn and contain:

(1) a specific identification of the statutory or regulatory provision(s) that the action complained of is alleged to have violated;

(2) a specific description of each act alleged to have violated the statutory or regulatory provision(s) identified in paragraph (1) of this subsection;

(3) a precise statement of the relevant facts;

(4) identification of the issue or issues the protesting party argues must be resolved;

(5) argument and authorities the protesting party offers in support of the protest; and

(6) a statement that copies of the protest have been mailed, hand-delivered or sent by facsimile transmission to the Department and other identifiable interested parties.

(d) The Purchasing Officer shall have the authority, prior to an appeal to the Executive Director of the Department, to settle and resolve the dispute concerning the solicitation or award of a contract. The Purchasing Officer may solicit written responses to the protest from interested parties.

(e) If the protest is not resolved by mutual agreement, the Purchasing Officer may proceed, after consultation with the General Counsel, with the issuance of a written determination on the protest as follows:

(1) The Purchasing Officer may determine that no violation of rules or statutes has occurred and shall so inform the protesting party, the Executive Director, and any other interested parties by letter that includes the reasons for the determination.

(2) If the Purchasing Officer determines that a violation of the rules or statutes may have occurred in a case where a contract has not been awarded, the Purchasing Officer shall so inform the protesting party, the Executive Director and other interested parties by letter that includes the reasons for the determination and the appropriate remedial action.

(3) If the Purchasing Officer determines that a violation of the rules or statutes may have occurred in a case where a contract has been awarded, the Purchasing Officer shall so inform the protesting party, the Executive Director and other interested parties by letter that includes the reasons for the determination, which may include a declaration that the contract is void.

(f) The protesting party may appeal a determination of a protest by the Purchasing Officer to the Executive Director. An appeal of the Purchasing Officer's determination must be in writing and must be received in the Executive Director's office no later than 10 business days after the date of the Purchasing Officer's determination. The appeal shall be limited to a review of the Purchasing Officer's determination. Copies of the appeal must be mailed or delivered by the protesting party to the Purchasing Officer and other interested parties and must contain a certified statement that such copies have been provided.

(g) The Executive Director may confer with the General Counsel in a review of the matter appealed. The Executive Director has the discretion to consider documentation timely submitted by Departmental staff and interested parties. The Executive Director also has the discretion to refer the matter to the Commissioners for their consideration at a regularly scheduled open meeting or may go forward with issuing a written decision on the protest.

(h) If a protest is appealed to the Executive Director under subsection (f) of this section and thereafter is referred to the Commissioners by the Executive Director under subsection (g) of this section, specific requirements apply as follows:

(1) The Executive Director shall deliver copies of the appeal and responses of interested parties, if any, to the Commissioners.

(2) The Commissioners may consider documents that Departmental staff or interested parties have submitted and may confer with the General Counsel in their review of the appeal.

(3) The Commissioners' determination of the appeal shall be made on the record and reflected in the minutes of the open meeting, and shall be final.

(i) A protest or appeal that is not filed timely will not be considered unless good cause for the delay is shown or unless the Executive Director determines that a protest or appeal raises issues significant to procurement practices or procedures.

(j) A decision issued either by the Commissioners in open meeting, or in writing by the Executive Director, shall be the final administrative action of the Department.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400822

William H. Kuntz, Jr.

Executive Director

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7348


Part 8. TEXAS RACING COMMISSION

Chapter 303. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subchapter B. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION

16 TAC §303.41

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §303.41, relating to the allocation of race dates. The proposed amendment clarifies the requirements for allocation of race dates by requiring associations to conduct racing in accordance with the calendar approved by the Commission.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit will be that the public has more information on when racetracks will conduct racing. There is no economic impact to small or micro businesses required to comply with the amendment as proposed. There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with the amendment as proposed. There is no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to make rules on all matters relating to the operation of pari-mutuel racetracks.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§303.41.Allocation of Race Dates.

(a) - (c) (No change.)

(d) An association shall conduct pari-mutuel racing on each race date granted under this section, and in accordance with the race date calendar approved by the Commission, unless the association receives the prior approval of the executive secretary.

(e) - (f) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400795

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009


Chapter 309. RACETRACK LICENSES AND OPERATIONS

Subchapter A. RACETRACK LICENSES

16 TAC §309.8

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §309.8, relating to racetrack license fees. The proposed amendment increases the simulcast fee for Class 1 and Class 2 racetracks and all greyhound tracks and has a one-time fee for Breeders' Cup costs for the hosting racetrack.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for local government as a result of enforcing the amendment. Ms. Flowerday has also determined that in each year of the first five-year period the amendment is in effect, the Commission will receive approximately $808,500 in revenue from the simulcast fee. The amount of the fee is calculated based on the Commission's direct and indirect costs associated with regulating pari-mutuel wagering at Texas racetracks and on the number of dates each year on which the Commission expects the various racetracks will conduct simulcasting. In addition, if a Texas racetrack conducts the Breeders' Cup races, the Commission will receive a one-time fee of $10,000 to reimburse the Commission for its regulatory, travel, and drug-testing costs associated with those races.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendment is in effect the anticipated public benefit will be that the Commission will comply with the Texas Racing Act by generating sufficient revenue to fully fund its operations. Although there are fiscal implications for licensed racetracks, the exact cost to a particular racetrack will vary depending on the class of license held by the racetrack and on the racetrack's simulcasting operations. For each day on which a Class 1 or 2 racetrack offers simulcast races for wagering purposes, the fee will be $310; for each day on which a Class 3 or 4 racetrack offers simulcast races for wagering purposes, the fee will remain $245. In addition, a racetrack that conducts the Breeders' Cup races will be required to pay an additional one-time fee of $10,000 to cover the Commission's regulatory, travel, and drug-testing costs associated with those races. There is no economic cost to an individual required to comply with the proposal. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §§5.01 and 6.18 which authorizes the Commission to set fees for racetrack licenses; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to make rules on all matters relating to the operation of pari-mutuel racetracks.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§309.8.Racetrack License Fees.

(a) - (c) (No change.)

(d) Simulcast Fee. An association shall pay a simulcast fee for each day on which the association offers a simulcast race for wagering. The fee is due to the Commission no later than 5:00 p.m. of the day following the day on which the simulcast is offered. The simulcast fee is :

(1) for a Class 1, Class 2, or greyhound racetrack, $310 per day; and

(2) for a Class 3 or Class 4 racetrack, $245 per day.

(e) (No change.)

(f) Breeders' Cup Fee. Due to the additional travel, personnel, and drug testing costs incurred by the Commission in conjunction with regulating the Breeders' Cup races, an association that conducts the Breeders' Cup races shall pay a fee of $10,000. The fee is due not later than 5:00 p.m. on the 30th day after the date the Breeders' Cup races are conducted.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400796

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009


Subchapter D. GREYHOUND RACETRACKS

2. OPERATIONS

16 TAC §309.355

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §309.355, relating to the grading system for greyhounds. The proposed amendment revises the grading system allowing a greyhound to make it easier to requalify and be returned to the active list during a race meeting. The proposal was presented to the Commission as a petition for rulemaking by Gulf Greyhound Park.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit will be that greyhounds have a longer racing career. There is no economic impact to small or micro businesses required to comply with the amendment as proposed. There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with the amendment as proposed. The proposal has a positive effect on the state's greyhound breeding and training industries by providing more opportunities for greyhounds to continue racing. There is no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, or horse training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to make rules on all matters relating to the operation of pari-mutuel racetracks.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§309.355.Grading System.

(a) - (f) (No change.)

(g) A greyhound that fails to finish in the top four positions in four consecutive starts in Grade D may requalify and, at the discretion of the racing secretary, be returned to the active list. If a greyhound fails to finish in the top four positions in four consecutive starts for a second time in the same race meeting, at the discretion of the racing secretary, that greyhound may requalify again; however, when the greyhound returns to the active list, that greyhound has two consecutive starts to finish in the top four positions. If the greyhound fails to do so, then that greyhound shall be dropped from further racing during the current race meeting. [ An association shall drop a greyhound from further racing at that race meeting if the greyhound fails to finish in the top four positions in four consecutive starts in Grade D. At the discretion of the racing secretary, a greyhound dropped from racing at Grade D may be requalified after a period of 30 days. ]

(h) - (p) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400797

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009


Chapter 311. OTHER LICENSES

Subchapter A. LICENSING PROVISIONS

1. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES

16 TAC §311.5

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §311.5, relating to occupational license fees. The proposed amendment increases the occupational license fee for all Texas Racing Commission licenses. The increase is to cover the cost of participating in the Texas OnLine internet licensing system, as well as to cover the increased costs to continue to regulate the racing industry at the current level.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for local government as a result of enforcing the amendment. Ms. Flowerday has also determined that in each year of the first five-year period the amendment is in effect, the Commission will receive approximately $540,000-$650,000 in revenue from the occupational licensing fees. Of this amount, the Commission will transfer approximately $20,000-$22,000 to the Texas OnLine Authority to cover the costs associated with offering the Commission's occupational licenses through the Texas OnLine portal. The fee increases were calculated based on the relative income levels of the various licensees, the Commission's costs associated with the occupational licensing program, and the anticipated costs associated with participation in the Texas OnLine project. The exact amount of revenue the Commission will receive will depend on the actual number of licenses issued.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendment is in effect the anticipated public benefit will be that the Commission will comply with the Texas Racing Act by generating sufficient revenue to fully fund its operations. There will be fiscal implications for small or micro-business and to individuals required to comply with the proposal. The exact cost to a particular business or individual seeking a license from the Commission will depend on the type of license sought by the business or licensee and the number of years for which the license is issued. The fee will vary from $0 to $225; the increase in the fee for a particular license varies from $5 to $25. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §5.01 which authorizes the Commission to issue licenses and set conditions for licenses; §7.03 which authorizes the Commission to issue occupational licenses; §7.05 which authorizes the Commission to adopt a fee schedule for occupational licenses; and Article 7 which authorizes the Commission to require, set conditions and qualifications for, issue, and deny occupational licenses.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§311.5.License Fees.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) The fee for an occupational license is as follows:

Figure: 16 TAC §311.5(c)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400798

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009


Chapter 319. VETERINARY PRACTICES AND DRUG TESTING

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

16 TAC §319.17

The Texas Racing Commission proposes a new rule, §319.17, relating to the removal of a race animal. The proposed new rule would allow a Commission veterinarian to remove a race animal from association grounds where the race animal presents a danger of communicable or contagious disease to other animals or has sustained an injury that requires specialized veterinary treatment not offered on association grounds.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the new rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the new rule is in effect the public benefit will be that there will be an additional tool to reduce the spread of communicable or contagious diseases at association grounds as well safeguarding the health and well being of all race animals. There is no economic impact to small or micro businesses required to comply with the new rule as proposed. There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with the new rule as proposed. There is no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed new rule in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The new rule is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §6.061 which authorizes the Commission to regulate unsafe conditions at pari-mutuel racetracks.

The proposed new rule implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§319.17.Removal of a Race Animal.

The Commission veterinarian may order a race animal removed from association grounds if the Commission veterinarian determines:

(1) a race animal on association grounds presents a danger of communicable or contagious disease to the other animals on the grounds; or

(2) a race animal has sustained an injury that requires specialized veterinary treatment beyond the scope of normal veterinary care offered on association grounds.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400799

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009


Subchapter B. TREATMENT OF HORSES

16 TAC §319.111

The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §319.111, relating to the bleeders and furosemide program. The proposed amendment allows a trainer to admit a horse to the furosemide program by stating at the time of entry that the horse will compete with furosemide, streamlining the process to admit a horse to the program. The proposed amendment clarifies that an EIPH event experience by a horse already admitted to the furosemide program is a second EIPH event for purposes of the consequences listed in subsection (g) of the rule. Further language is provided clarifying the process of readmission to the furosemide program.

Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendment is in effect the public benefit will be that the public has greater clarification on the requirements involved with the furosemide program. There is no economic impact to small or micro businesses required to comply with the amendment as proposed. There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with the amendment as proposed. There is no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.

Written comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Texas Register to Nicole Galwardi, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O. Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080, fax (512) 833-6907.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively to horse and greyhound racing; §3.16 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules prohibiting the unlawful influencing of the outcome of a race and to implement a postrace testing program.

The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.

§319.111.Bleeders and Furosemide Program.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Admission to Furosemide Program.

(1) A trainer may admit a horse to the furosemide program by stating at time of entry that the horse will compete with furosemide. [ A horse that has been certified as a bleeder in this state may be admitted to the furosemide program. To be admitted to the furosemide program, the trainer of the horse or a veterinarian currently licensed by the Commission, on the trainer's behalf, must file a request for the horse's admission to the program before the horse starts in its next race. ]

(2) A horse that competed with furosemide in its most recent start out-of-state must compete on furosemide in Texas unless withdrawn from the furosemide program at time of entry.

(3) An EIPH event experienced by a horse that is admitted to the furosemide program is deemed to be a second EIPH event for purposes of subsection (g) of this section.

(c) - (e) (No change.)

(f) Readmission to the Furosemide Program. A horse may be readmitted to the furosemide program if : [ the horse has another EIPH event or competed with furosemide in its most recent start in another pari-mutuel jurisdiction. ]

(1) at least 60 days have elapsed since the horse was withdrawn from the program;

(2) the horse is required to compete with furosemide pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of this section; or

(3) the commission veterinarian diagnoses the horse with another EIPH event.

(g) - (h) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 2004.

TRD-200400800

Nicole Galwardi

General Counsel

Texas Racing Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 21, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 490-4009