TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 1. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

Chapter 3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION

The Office of the Governor proposes the amendment of Subchapter A §§3.3, 3.5, 3.7, 3.9, 3.19, and 3.21; Subchapter B §§3.53, 3.55, 3.75, 3.77, 3.79, 3.81, 3.83, and 3.85; Subchapter C §§3.103, 3.111, 3.201, 3.203, 3.301, 3.303, 3.305, 3.401, 3.403, 3.501, 3.503, 3.505, 3.511, 3.601, 3.609, 3.613, 3.721, 3.723, 3.801, 3.803, 3.901, 3.903, 3.905, 3.1005, 3.1101, 3.1103, 3.1201, 3.1203, 3.1205, 3.1211, 3.1213, and 3.1303; Subchapter D §§3.2007, 3.2009, and 3.2013; Subchapter E §§3.2501, 3.2507, 3.2511, 3.2513, 3.2515, 3.2525, and 3.2529; Subchapter F §3.2601 and §3.2603; Subchapter G §§3.8105, 3.8115, 3.8205, 3.8215, 3.8305, and 3.8315; and Subchapter I §3.9300.

The Office of the Governor proposes the addition of Subchapter C §§3.211, 3.313, 3.725, 3.809, 3.811, and 3.1111.

The Office of the Governor proposes the repeal of Subchapter C §§3.1215, 3.1401, 3.1403, 3.1405, 3.1409, 3.1411, 3.1413, and 3.1415.

The proposed amendment to §3.3 changes the name of the "Violence Against Women Act Fund" to the "S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund" to reflect the current name of this federal funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.5 clarifies the meaning of the section by: (1) changing the word "kind" to "type" in subsection (a)(2); and (2) removing unnecessary language in subsection (b).

The proposed amendment to §3.7 clarifies the requirement of the Governor's Criminal Justice Division (CJD) that all grant applications be submitted directly to CJD. This allows CJD to review the applications for eligibility before they are prioritized by a review group, regional Council of Governments (COG), or other designee of CJD. In the past, certain types of grant applications were submitted directly to COGs.

The proposed amendment to §3.9 clarifies that all grant funding decisions are within the discretion of CJD and that approval of a grant award does not give the applicant special consideration for future grant funding or entitle the applicant to additional grant funds.

The proposed amendment to §3.19 clarifies which funding sources are exempt from the federal requirements for the Texas Review and Comment System.

The proposed amendment to §3.21 clarifies that CJD may submit information to applicants or grantees via the Internet or other electronic means, and may require applicants or grantees to submit information to CJD in the same manner. The use of electronic communication provides for a more efficiency flow of information and greater cost savings to the state, applicants and grantees.

The proposed amendment to §3.53 sets forth the current priority needs for juvenile justice and youth projects. These priority needs were developed in coordination with the Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Board.

The proposed amendment to §3.55: (1) deletes subsections (a) from this section and transfers it to §3.101 relating to the State Criminal Justice Planning (421) Fund because it sets forth the basic purpose and the central project requirement of the State Criminal Justice Planning (421) Fund; (2) deletes subsection (b) because it does not adequately define the types of projects to which it applies; and (3) deletes subsection (c) and transfers it to §3.311 relating to the State Criminal Justice Planning (421) Fund because this requirement is applicable to state funds and does not apply to the federal funding sources. The federal funding sources are regulated by federal program requirements. In addition, many of the federal funding sources fund programs for juvenile offenders, which are not subject to these requirements, or drug treatment, which is an exception to these requirements.

The proposed amendment to §3.75: (1) clarifies that grant funds may be used to compensate court masters, magistrates, referees, or judges in juvenile courts or drug courts because the use of funds for this purpose is necessary to establish such programs; (2) deletes the reference to the "Extraordinary Costs of Investigating and Prosecuting Capital Murder and Hate Crimes Program" from the list of exceptions because the program is no longer administered by CJD; and (3) clarifies the section by transferring subsection (e) to subsection (c) regarding overtime pay.

The proposed amendment to §3.77: (1) clarifies the requirement, set forth in the Uniform Grant Management Standards, that grantees establish a system for ensuring that subcontractors provide the products and services specified in their contracts; (2) refers grantees to the requirement that a procurement questionnaire must be submitted for all procurements that exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request.

The proposed amendment to §3.79: (1) changes the name of the "Violence Against Women Act Fund" to the "S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund" to reflect the current name of this federal funding source; and (2) clarifies that the exemption in subsection (b) applies only to subsection (b) and clarifies the language in this subsection to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.81 clarifies that the exemption in subsection (b) applies only to subsection (b) and clarifies the language in this subsection to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.83 corrects the reference in this section to indicate that "approved budget categories" is defined in §3.3(10).

The proposed amendment to §3.85 clarifies that the exemption in subsection (d) applies only to subsection (d) and clarifies the language in this subsection to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.103 conforms the project requirements under the State Criminal Justice Planning (421) Fund to the state statutory requirements for this funding source under Article 102.056 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

The proposed amendment to §3.111: (1) deletes the language regarding renovation or retrofitting of existing facilities because it is permissive and these projects remain eligible to be funded under this funding source; and (2) adds the requirement that was transferred from §3.55(c).

The proposed amendment to §3.201 updates the language of subsection (a) to reflect the current citation for the federal legislation that authorizes the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act Fund.

The proposed amendment to §3.203 conforms the project requirements under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.301: (1) updates the language of subsection (b) to reflect the current citation for the federal legislation that authorizes the Title V Delinquency Prevention Act Fund; and (2) conforms the program purpose under the Title V Delinquency Prevention Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.303 conforms the project requirements under the Title V Delinquency Prevention Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.305 deletes the language regarding the local policy board and transfers it to new §3.313, which relates to local policy boards.

The proposed amendment to §3.401: (1) updates the language of subsection (b) to reflect the current citation for the federal legislation that authorizes the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Fund; and (2) conforms the program purpose under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.403 conforms the project requirements under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.501 conforms the program purpose under the Victims of Crime Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.503 conforms the project requirements under the Victims of Crime Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.505 conforms the list of eligible applicants and the criteria that must be met by eligible applicants under the Victims of Crime Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.511 conforms the list of ineligible activities and costs under the Victims of Crime Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.601 clarifies the language of the section.

The proposed amendment to §3.609 clarifies that the exemption in this section applies only to this section and clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.613 clarifies that a grant awarded to a crime stoppers organization under the Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund will terminate not only when the organization is decertified, but also when the organization's Crime Stoppers certification expires.

The proposed amendment to §3.721 clarifies that only multi-jurisdictional drug task force projects are required to certify that they will conduct drug testing. Mandatory drug testing is necessary for these projects because of task force personnel's access to confidential information and illegal drugs.

The proposed amendment to §3.723: (1) clarifies that advisory boards are established only for multi-jurisdictional drug task force projects; and (2) deletes the language regarding task force personnel and transfers the language to new §3.725, which relates to task force personnel.

The proposed amendment to §3.801 updates the language of subsection (b) to reflect the current citation for the federal legislation that authorizes the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program.

The proposed amendment to §3.803 deletes the language regarding prohibited uses of grant funds under the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program from this section, entitled "Program Requirements", and transfers it to new §3.811, entitled "Ineligible Activities and Costs". The proposed amendment makes the sections relating to the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program more consistent with the sections relating to other funding sources administered by CJD.

The proposed amendment to §3.901 changes the "Violence Against Women Act Fund" to the "S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund" to reflect the current name of this federal funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.903: (1) changes the "STOP Violence Against Women Act Fund" to the "S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund" to reflect the current name of this federal funding source; and (2) corrects the punctuation in this section.

The proposed amendment to §3.905 corrects the punctuation in this section.

The proposed amendment to §3.1005 changes "nonprofit organizations" to "nonprofit corporations" to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.1101 conforms the program purpose under the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.1103 conforms the project requirements under the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.1201 updates the language of subsection (b) to reflect the current citation for the federal legislation that authorizes the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program.

The proposed amendment to §3.1203 conforms the project requirements under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.1205 conforms the list of eligible applicants and funds available to eligible applicants under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.1211 conforms the waiver of application process under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source and CJD's procedures.

The proposed amendment to §3.1213: (1) conforms the requirements for local advisory boards under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source; and (2) adds the language regarding coordinated enforcement plan that was transferred to this section from §3.1215.

The proposed amendment to §3.1303 conforms the project requirements under the Coverdell Forensic Sciences Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.2007 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.2009 exempts grantees that have statewide jurisdiction to make arrests and execute process in criminal cases from the requirement that they obtain the signature of each sheriff because such grantees have statewide jurisdiction and do not require the permission of the counties to exercise their jurisdiction in each county.

The proposed amendment to §3.2013 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.2501: (1) clarifies the language in subsection (a) to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter; (2) encourages grantees to use every effort to ensure that grant officials have access to e-mail and the Internet to promote a more efficiency flow of information and greater cost savings to the state and grantees; (3) adds a reasonable time limit for notifying CJD of changes in grant officials and contact information because current information of this type is necessary for CJD to effectively administer and monitor grants.

The proposed amendment to §3.2507 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.2511: (1) clarifies that advanced funds covering no more than the anticipated expenses for the next month may be provided to a grantee by CJD; (2) exempts Local Law Enforcement Block Grant projects from subsection (a) because the federal requirements for this funding source allow grantees to receive advanced funds covering the entire amount of the grant in certain instances; and (3) requires Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund grantees to request funds once per quarter because of the small size of the grants under this funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.2513 corrects the reference in this section to indicate that "approved budget categories" is defined in §3.3(10).

The proposed amendment to §3.2515 changes "nonprofit agency" to "nonprofit corporation" to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.2525 clarifies that grantees are responsible for managing and monitoring the day to day operations of grant and subgrant supported activities to ensure that grant funds are being properly utilized.

The proposed amendment to §3.2529 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter and corrects the punctuation in this section.

The proposed amendment to §3.2601 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.2603 clarifies the language in this section to ensure the use of uniform language in this chapter.

The proposed amendment to §3.8105 conforms the powers of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council to the powers stated in Chapter 414 of the Texas Government Code.

The proposed amendment to §3.8115 italicizes the name of the publication, " Roberts Rules of Order ".

The proposed amendment to §3.8205 updates the language of subsection (a)(3) to reflect the current citation for the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.

The proposed amendment to §3.8215 italicizes the name of the publication, " Roberts Rules of Order ".

The proposed amendment to §3.8305 changes the "STOP Violence Against Women Act Fund" to the "S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund" to reflect the current name of this federal funding source.

The proposed amendment to §3.8315 italicizes the name of the publication, " Roberts Rules of Order ".

The proposed amendment to §3.9300 replaces the memorandum of understanding in Figure: 1 TAC §3.900 between the Texas Department of Public Safety and CJD with the most recent version of the memorandum of understanding adopted by the parties pursuant to §411.0096 of the Texas Government Code.

The proposed addition of §3.211 conforms the list of ineligible activities and costs under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Act Fund to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed addition of §3.313 establishes local prevention policy boards in accordance with the requirements of the Title V Delinquency Prevention Act Fund.

The proposed addition of §3.725: (1) adds the language regarding task force personnel that was transferred to this section from §3.723; and (2) clarifies that, although the Texas Department of Public Safety exercises command and control over all narcotics task forces funded by the Byrne Formula Grant Program through CJD, task force employees remain employees of their assigning agencies and are not considered employees of the Texas Department of Public Safety or the other entities listed in this section.

The proposed addition of §3.809 conforms requirements regarding indirect costs under the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed addition of §3.811 adds to this section, entitled "Ineligible Activities and Costs", the language regarding prohibited uses of grant funds under the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program that was deleted from §3.803, entitled "Program Requirements". The proposed amendment makes the sections relating to the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program more consistent with the sections relating to other funding sources administered by CJD.

The proposed addition of §3.1111 conforms the list of ineligible activities and costs under the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Grant Program to the federal requirements for this funding source.

The proposed repeal of §3.1215 deletes the language regarding coordinated enforcement plan from this section and transfers it to §3.1213.

The proposed repeal of §§3.1401, 3.1403, 3.1405, 3.1409, 3.1411, 3.1413, and 3.1415 deletes the language regarding the Rural Domestic Violence and Child Victimization Enforcement Program because CJD no longer administers this funding source.

The Office of the Governor reviewed the rules affecting the Criminal Justice Division grant processes and procedures with the goal of increasing efficiency and updating the rules to address changes in the administration process. The review disclosed that a number of the rules required further clarification and simplification. As a result, the Office of the Governor has determined that the sections in the Texas Administrative Code identified above should be amended, added, or repealed.

Kim Garrett, Budget Manager for the Criminal Justice Division of the Office of the Governor, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Ms. Garrett has also determined that for the first five-year period that the sections are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will be more efficient processes and procedures and the current rules will be more easily understood. There will be no anticipated economic cost to persons or businesses for complying with the proposed rules.

Comments on the proposed amendments, additions, and repeals may be submitted to Heather Morgan, Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, at hmorgan@governor.state.tx.us; P. O. Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711; or (512) 463-1919. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

Subchapter A. GENERAL GRANT PROGRAM PROVISIONS

1 TAC §§3.3, 3.5, 3.7, 3.9, 3.19, 3.21

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10)of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.3.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless otherwise indicated:

(1) CJAC: Criminal Justice Advisory Committee, a component of a COG. A CJAC must have a multi-disciplinary representation of members from the region. This representation must contain members from the following groups: concerned citizens or parents, drug abuse prevention, education, juvenile justice, law enforcement, mental health, nonprofit organizations, prosecution/courts, and victim services. No single group may constitute more than one third of the CJAC;

(2) CJD: The Criminal Justice Division of the Office of the Governor or its designee;

(3) COG: a regional planning commission, council of governments, or similar regional planning agency created under Chapter 391, Texas Local Government Code;

(4) executive director: the executive director of CJD;

(5) grantee: an agency or organization that receives a grant award;

(6) grant funds: CJD-funded and matching funds portions of a grant project;

(7) OJP Financial Guide: the financial guide issued by the federal Office of Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice, applicable to the use of federal Department of Justice money in state grant projects;

(8) special condition: a condition placed on a grant because of a need for information, clarification, or submission of an outstanding requirement of the grant that may result in a hold being placed on the CJD-funded portion of a grant project;

(9) UGMS: the Uniform Grant Management Standards promulgated by the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning at 1 T.A.C. §§5.141 - 5.167;

(10) approved budget categories: budget categories (including personnel, contractual and professional services, travel, equipment, construction, supplies and other direct operating expenses, and indirect costs) that contain a line item with a dollar amount greater than zero that is approved by CJD through a grant award or a budget adjustment;

(11) applicant: an agency or organization that has submitted a grant application or grant renewal documentation;

(12) program income: gross income earned by the grantee during the funding period as a direct result of the award. "Direct result" is defined as a specific act or set of activities that are directly attributable to grant funds and that are directly related to the goals and objectives of the project. Program income includes, but is not limited to, forfeitures, cash contributions, donations, restitution, interest income, fees, and royalties;

(13) equipment:

(A) an article of non-expendable, tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost which equals the lesser of the capitalization level established by the grantee for financial statement purposes or $1,000; or

(B) any of the following items with costs between $500 and $1000: stereo systems, still and video cameras, facsimile machines, VCRs and VCR/TV combinations, cellular and portable telephones, and computer systems.

(14) matching funds: the grantee's share of the project costs. Matching funds may either be cash or in-kind. Cash match includes actual cash spent by the grantee and must have a cost relationship to the award that is being matched. In-kind match includes the value of donated services. In-kind match is allowed only in the following funding sources: Title V Delinquency Prevention Fund, Victims of Crime Act Fund, and S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund.

§3.5.Grant Submission Process.

(a) When applying for a grant pursuant to a Request for Applications (RFA) published in the Texas Register by CJD, applicants must submit their applications according to the requirements provided in the RFA. The RFA will provide the following:

(1) the applicable funding source or sources;

(2) the types [ kinds ] of grants available;

(3) information regarding deadlines for grant application submission;

(4) the maximum and minimum amounts of funding available for a grant, if applicable;

(5) the start dates for grants, and the length of grant periods;

(6) how applicants may obtain application kits;

(7) where applicants must submit applications;

(8) eligibility requirements;

(9) the selection process;

(10) any prohibitions on the use of grant funds; and

(11) contact information.

(b) CJD may also consider applications for [ non-scheduled ] grants that are not submitted pursuant to an RFA. Applicants will be selected in accordance with §3.7(b) of this chapter.

(c) Applicants must apply for funds using the procedures, forms, and certifications prescribed by CJD.

§3.7.Selection Process.

(a) All applications must be submitted to CJD. Applications submitted to CJD pursuant to an RFA are reviewed [ For applications submitted directly to CJD, staff members, or a review group selected by the executive director, will review the applications ] for eligibility, reasonableness, availability of funding, and cost-effectiveness [ and give their funding recommendations to the executive director, who will render the final funding decision ]. For applications submitted pursuant to an RFA, the executive director will select a review group, COG, or other designee to prioritize the applications and submit a priority listing to the executive director, who will render the final funding decision. A review group may include staff members, experts in a relevant field, and members of an advisory board or council.

(b) For applications submitted [ directly ] to CJD pursuant to §3.5(b) of this chapter , the executive director will decide whether to fund the application based upon the following factors:

(1) the inherent value of the project's impact;

(2) whether the project has the potential to be a model program; or

(3) whether delaying the application would have a significant negative impact on the immediate need for the project.

(c) For applications prioritized by [ submitted directly to ] a COG, the CJAC must [ review and ] prioritize the applications[ , ] and prepare [ the COG's governing body must approve ] the priority listing. The COG's governing body must approve the priority listing. The COG then must submit the priority listing [ and the applications ] to CJD within the time periods established by CJD. CJD will render final funding decisions on these applications based upon the COG priorities, eligibility, reasonableness, availability of funding, and cost-effectiveness.

(d) For applications prioritized by a COG and seeking funding [ through a COG ] from the State Criminal Justice Planning Fund, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Fund, or the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Fund, CJD will allocate funding through a formula based upon population figures and crime rates. No formula-based funding allocation exists for applications prioritized by a COG [ submitted to COGs ] that seek grants from other funding sources.

(e) During the review of an application, CJD or its designee [ a COG ] may request that the applicant submit additional information necessary to complete the grant review. CJD or its designee [ a COG ] may request the applicant to provide any outstanding forms and documents to clarify or justify any part of the application or to disclose other funding sources related to the project. Such requests for information, including the issuance of a preliminary review report, do not serve as notice that CJD intends to fund an application. If CJD is not able to adequately resolve problems within an applicant's budget through the review process, CJD may make the necessary corrections to the budget to bring it into compliance with applicable state or federal requirements. Any corrections to an applicant's budget will be reflected in the award documentation.

[ (1) If CJD needs additional information on an application submitted through a COG, CJD will send a report requesting the necessary information to the COG, and the applicant must provide the response to the COG by a COG-established deadline.]

[ (2) If CJD needs additional information on an application submitted directly to CJD, CJD will send a report directly to the applicant, and the applicant must provide a response by a CJD-established deadline.]

[ (3) If CJD is not able to adequately resolve problems within an applicant's budget through the preliminary review process, CJD may use its discretion to make the necessary corrections to the budget to bring it into compliance with applicable state or federal requirements. Any corrections to an applicant's budget will be reflected in the award documentation.]

(f) CJD will inform applicants in writing of funding decisions on their grant applications through either a Statement of Grant Award or a notification of denial. For applications prioritized by [ submitted to ] a COG that do not receive funding recommendations, the COG notification of the decision not to recommend funding serves as the applicant's notification of denial.

(g) All funding decisions made by the executive director are final and are not subject to appeal.

§3.9.Grant Funding Decisions.

(a) All grant funding decisions [ to fund grant requests ] rest completely within the discretionary authority of CJD. The receipt of an application for grant funding by CJD does not obligate CJD to fund the grant or to fund it at the amount requested.

(b) Neither the approval of a project nor any [ CJD makes no commitment that a ] grant award shall commit or obligate CJD in any way to make any additional, supplemental, continuation, or other award with respect to any approved project or portion thereof [ , once funded, will receive priority consideration for subsequent funding ].

(c) CJD makes no commitment that a grant, once funded, will receive priority consideration for subsequent funding.

§3.19.Adoptions by Reference.

(a) Grantees must comply with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and guidelines. In instances where both federal and state requirements apply to a grantee, the more restrictive requirement applies.

(b) CJD adopts by reference the rules and documents listed below that relate to the administration of CJD grants.

(1) Uniform Grant Management Standards (UGMS) adopted pursuant to the Uniform Grant and Contract Management Act of 1981, Chapter 783, Texas Government Code. See 1 T.A.C. §§5.141 - 5.167. These requirements apply to all CJD grants, whether state or federal funds, including grants to nonprofit corporations.

(2) Office of Justice Programs, OJP Financial Guide. These requirements apply to grants of federal funds in which the source of the federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice.

(3) Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). See 34 C.F.R. §§74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, and 86. These requirements apply to grants of federal funds in which the source of the federal funds is the U.S. Department of Education.

(4) Common Rule for OMB Circular A-102: Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments. See 28 C.F.R. §66. These requirements apply to grants from federal funds to state agencies, cities, counties, community supervision and corrections departments, COGs, and juvenile boards.

(5) OMB Circular No. A-110: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Private Nonprofit Organizations. See 28 C.F.R. §70. These requirements apply to grants from federal funds to universities and colleges.

(6) OMB Circular No. A-21: Cost Principles for Educational Institutions. See 28 C.F.R. §66. These requirements apply to grants from federal funds to educational institutions.

(7) OMB Circular No. A-87: Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments. See 28 C.F.R. §66. These requirements apply to all grants from federal funds to state agencies, cities, counties, community supervision and corrections departments, COGs, juvenile boards, and Native American Tribes.

(8) OMB Circular No. A-122: Cost Principles for Private Nonprofit Organizations. See 28 C.F.R. §66. These requirements apply to all grants from federal funds to private nonprofit corporations.

(9) OMB Circular No. A-133: Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations. See 28 C.F.R. §66, §70. These requirements apply to all grants funded by CJD from federal funds.

(10) Texas Review and Comment System (TRACS) . See 1 T.A.C. §5.191 et seq. Developed in response to Presidential Executive Order 12372, as amended by Presidential Executive Order 12416. These requirements apply to all grants funded by CJD, except for those funded under the Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund , State Criminal Justice Planning (421) Fund, Victims of Crime Act Fund, and Drug Court Program. Participation in TRACS, including receiving a favorable review, does not assure grant funding .

§3.21.Use of the Internet.

(a) CJD may transmit notices, forms, or [ provide for submission of grant applications, progress reports, financial reports, and ] other information to an applicant or grantee via the Internet or other electronic means. [ Completion and submission of documents and information via electronic means meets the relevant requirements contained within this chapter for submitting reports in writing. ]

(b) CJD may require an applicant or grantee to submit grant applications, progress reports, financial reports, and other information to CJD via the Internet or other electronic means. Completion and submission of information via electronic means meets the relevant requirements contained within this chapter for submitting information in writing.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402154

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter B. GENERAL GRANT PROGRAM POLICIES

1. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

1 TAC §3.53, §3.55

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.53.Juvenile Justice and Youth Projects.

(a) Juvenile justice projects or projects [ Projects exclusively ] serving delinquent [ juveniles ] or at-risk youth, regardless of the funding source, must address at least one of the following priority needs developed in coordination with the Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Board to be eligible for funding:

(1) Family. [ Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that: ]

(A) Instill appropriate social values and character in children , with an emphasis toward education .

(B) Emphasize family preservation , with the focus on identifying juvenile victims, and addressing the impact of domestic violence [ whenever possible and appropriate ].

(C) Make available [ Provide ] family crisis programs [ intervention ] for delinquent or pre-delinquent youth [ children ] and their families.

(D) Provide services to children of incarcerated parents and/or children living in foster care or other alternative situations [ Recognize the role of faith-based programs in preventing juvenile delinquency ].

(E) Recognize the role of faith-based programs in preventing juvenile delinquency.

(2) Early Intervention and Prevention. [ Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that: ]

(A) Address, through community-based efforts, conditions contributing to delinquent behavior, including drug and alcohol abuse.

(B) Address a need for early identification of, and programs for, emotionally disturbed children and children with mental health concerns [ Hold juveniles accountable and responsible for their actions ].

[ (C) Address an increasing need to provide services to children of incarcerated parents and/or living in foster care or other alternative situations.]

[ (D) Address a need for early identification of, and programs for, emotionally disturbed children and children with mental health concerns.]

(3) Schools/Education. [ Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that: ]

(A) Train educational and law enforcement personnel assigned to schools concerning procedures related to the [ in ] juvenile justice system [ laws and procedures ].

(B) Maintain a safe and productive learning environment by supporting [ Encourage ] appropriate student discipline and accountability [ to create and maintain a safe and productive learning environment ].

(C) Teach good citizenship, literacy, and vocational skills.

(D) Identify and target [ intervene as early as possible with ] students who are at-risk for truancy and dropping out of school.

(4) Safe Environment [ Reduce Disproportionate Minority Representation in the Juvenile Justice System ].[ Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that: ]

(A) Counteract gangs through aggressive and comprehensive approaches that include identification, surveillance, arrest, and prosecution of gang members involved in criminal activities [ Develop a standardized risk assessment instrument to be made available for use by juvenile courts at detention hearings ].

(B) Involve the local community in comprehensive efforts to deal with [ Identify and support intervention strategies that could effectively reduce disproportionate representation in appropriate ] juvenile crime [ cases ].

(5) Juvenile Justice Policies, Procedures and Facilities [ Safe Environment ].[ Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that: ]

(A) Support progressive sanctions for misconduct and delinquent behavior [ Counteract gangs through identification, surveillance, arrest, and prosecution of gang members involved in criminal activities ].

(B) Develop computer information systems that will match children and families to appropriate service providers based on risk and needs profiles [ Involve the local community in comprehensive efforts to deal with juvenile crime ].

(C) Provide appropriate dispositions to mentally ill youth or youth with mental retardation who are accused of committing crimes.

(D) Develop projects that target female offenders.

[ (6) Juvenile Justice Policies, Procedures and Facilities. Examples include, but are not limited to, programs that:]

[ (A) Support mandatory progressive sanctions for misconduct and delinquent behavior.]

[ (B) Develop and maintain computer-based information systems that will match children and families with appropriate service providers based on risk and needs profiles.]

[ (C) Provide appropriate dispositions to mentally ill or mentally retarded youth accused of committing crimes.]

[ (D) Target female and special needs offenders.]

(b) Juvenile justice projects or [ Additionally, ] projects [ exclusively ] serving delinquent [ juveniles ] or at-risk youth, regardless of the funding source, must address Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) with [ the representation of minority youth in ] the juvenile justice system. DMC exists when the proportion of youths referred to the juvenile probation department who are members of minority groups exceed their group's proportion in the general population. "Minority" means African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and Native Americans. Methods of addressing this requirement include, but are not limited to, identifying and supporting [ early ] prevention [ projects ] and intervention strategies that could effectively reduce DMC [ projects designed to divert juveniles from the juvenile justice system in appropriate cases ].

(c) Applicants that operate adult jails, lockups, secure juvenile detention facilities or secure juvenile correctional facilities that are not in compliance with Title II, Part B, §223(a)(11), (12), and (13) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 [ 1974 ], Public Law 107-273 [ 93-415 ], 42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq., as amended, are not eligible for funding, unless they have submitted to CJD an acceptable plan and timetable for eliminating the noncompliance.

§3.55. Legal Services for Adult Offenders [ Criminal Justice Projects ].

[ (a) CJD may award grants to support a wide range of projects designed to reduce crime and improve the criminal and juvenile justice systems.]

[ (b) CJD will limit funding for community-based alternative projects to grantees that document problems and needs not already addressed by other state agencies.]

[ (c) Projects may not use grant funds to serve adult offenders charged with, given deferred adjudication for, or convicted of violent or other serious crimes including murder, arson, robbery, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, burglary, felony drug crimes, crimes against children, kidnapping, aggravated kidnapping, and manslaughter, unless the executive director grants an exception. The executive director may only approve exceptions to this prohibition in the following instances:]

[ (1) projects that serve offenders between 17 and 25 years old;]

[ (2) projects that fund batterers' intervention programs;]

[ (3) projects that support drug treatment and prevention programs; or]

[ (4) innovative projects in prisons, jails, and community supervision and corrections departments.]

[ (d) ] CJD will not fund projects that provide legal services for adult offenders.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402155

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


2. GRANT BUDGET REQUIREMENTS

1 TAC §§3.75, 3.77, 3.79, 3.81, 3.83, 3.85

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.75.Personnel.

(a) CJD will determine the reasonableness of requested salaries and reserves the right to limit the CJD-financed portion of any salary. In determining reasonableness, the following rules apply:

(1) Salaries for grant-funded positions must comply with the grantee's or applicant's salary classification schedule for employees of the applicant agency. Salaries for persons assigned to the grant project from agencies other than the applicant must be reimbursed in accordance with the assigning agency's salary classification schedule.

(2) If the applicant or assigning agency does not have a classification schedule, then the proposed salary must be commensurate with that paid for similar work in other activities of the applicant or assigning agency. In cases where such work is not found within the applicant or assigning agency, CJD will consider reasonableness based on that paid for similar work in the labor market in which the applicant or assigning agency competes for the kind of employees involved.

(3) CJD will not pay any portion of the salary of, or any other compensation for, an elected or appointed government official. Grants that fund juvenile courts or drug courts, regardless of the funding source, [ under the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program ] are exempt from this subsection [ when the grant funds are used to provide court masters, magistrates, or referees who are retained, appointed, or hired to assist judges in juvenile cases ].

(b) Personnel compensated with grant funds must maintain on file personnel activity reports that reflect a distribution of actual time worked and activity performed, that are prepared at least monthly, and that are signed by the employee and a supervisory official having first hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Law enforcement and prosecution grant personnel whose primary function is investigating or enforcing laws or prosecuting alleged offenders are required to include the project's case or cause number (or other indicators of assignment) in the personnel activity report.

(c) Grantees may not use grant funds to provide overtime pay. Overtime pay is remuneration for hours worked in excess of full-time on a CJD grant project. Grants under the [ Extraordinary Costs of Investigating and Prosecuting Capital Murder and Hate Crimes Program, the ] Drug Court Program, and the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program, are exempt from this subsection [ rule ]. Grants under the Byrne Formula Grant Program are exempt from this subsection and instead CJD may approve requests to pay overtime in accordance with agency policy only for law enforcement officers assigned to a multi-jurisdictional task force and only from program income that is not used toward the minimum cash match requirement.

(d) Grantees may not carry forward accrued leave from one grant period to another. In accordance with a grantee's or subgrantee's policy, grantees may use grant funds to compensate staff members leaving employment for accrued leave, (which includes, but is not limited to, annual leave, compensatory time, and sick leave). These payments may only fund leave earned during the current grant period. The proportion of grant funds paid for leave cannot exceed the proportion of grant funds used to pay the staff member's salary.

[ (e) For Byrne Formula Grant Program projects, CJD may approve requests to pay overtime in accordance with agency policy only for law enforcement officers assigned to a multi-jurisdictional task force and only from program income that is not used toward the minimum cash-match requirement.]

§3.77.Professional and Contractual Services.

(a) Any contract or agreement entered into by a grantee that obligates grant funds must be in writing and consistent with Texas contract law.

(b) Grantees must maintain adequate documentation supporting budget items for a contractor's time, services, and rates of compensation.

(c) Grantees must establish a contract administration system to regularly and consistently ensure that contract deliverables are being provided as specified in the contracts. Grantees must regularly and consistently document the results of their contract monitoring reviews and must maintain the files and results of all contract monitoring reviews in accordance with the record retention requirements described in §3.2505 of this chapter [ In accordance with §3.2013 of this chapter, grantees must submit to CJD a CJD-prescribed Procurement Questionnaire when a procurement is expected to exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request ].

(d) A grantee's failure to monitor its contracts may result in disallowed costs and/or disallowed match.

(e) In accordance with §3.2013 of this chapter, grantees must submit to CJD a CJD-prescribed Procurement Questionnaire when a procurement is expected to exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request.

§3.79.Transportation, Travel, and Training.

(a) Grant funds used for travel expenses must be limited to the grantee agency's established mileage, per diem, and lodging policies. Federal regulations applicable to the relevant funding source may limit mileage reimbursement rates. If a grantee does not have established mileage, per diem, and lodging policies, then the grantee must use state travel guidelines. Funds requested by multi-jurisdictional task forces for meals and lodging are allowable only for travel to points at least 50 miles from the grantee agency's headquarters.

(b) Grantees using grant funds to develop and conduct training may not use grant funds to pay for transportation, lodging, per diem, or any related costs for participants. Crime Stoppers training projects and S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund projects are exempt from this subsection [ rule ].

(c) A person attending training courses paid for with grant funds must complete the course. Grantees must maintain records that properly document the completion of all grant-funded training courses.

§3.81.Equipment.

(a) Applicants must submit with their grant applications an itemized list of all proposed equipment purchases to CJD for approval. Grantees must request any additional equipment purchases through grant adjustments. Grantees are not authorized to purchase any equipment until they have received written approval to do so from CJD through the original grant award or a subsequent grant adjustment notice. Decisions regarding equipment purchases are made based on whether or not the grantee has demonstrated that the requested equipment is necessary, essential to the successful operation of the grant project, and reasonable in cost.

(b) CJD will not approve grant funds to purchase vehicles or equipment for governmental agencies that are for general agency use. The Local Law Enforcement Block Grant program and the County Essential Services Grant program are exempt from this subsection [ rule ].

(c) CJD will not approve grant funds for the purchase of weapons, ammunition, explosives, or military vehicles.

(d) In accordance with §3.2013 of this chapter, grantees must submit to CJD a CJD-prescribed Procurement Questionnaire when a procurement is expected to exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request.

§3.83.Supplies and Direct Operating Expenses.

(a) Supplies and direct operating expenses are costs directly related to the grantee's day-to-day operation of the grant project that are not included in any of the grantee's other approved budget categories, as defined in §3.3(10) [ §3.3(11) ] of this chapter, and that have an acquisition cost of less than $1,000 per unit. Grantees must allocate costs on a prorated basis for shared usage.

(b) CJD will not approve grant funds to purchase:

(1) admission fees or tickets to any amusement park, recreational activity, or sporting event; or

(2) promotional gifts.

(c) Unless otherwise allowed by this chapter, grantees cannot use grant funds to pay for food, meals, beverages, or other refreshments unless the expense is for a working event where full participation by participants mandates the provision of food and beverages and that event is not related to amusement and/or social activities in any way.

(d) Grant funds shall not be used to pay membership dues for individuals.

§3.85.Indirect Costs.

(a) CJD may approve indirect costs in an amount not to exceed two percent of the CJD-approved direct costs in the CJD-funded portion of a grant project, unless the grantee has an approved cost-allocation plan.

(b) If the applicant has a cost-allocation plan and wishes to charge indirect costs to the grant, the applicant shall identify the indirect cost rate and provide supporting documentation as part of the application to CJD.

(c) Unless otherwise specified under Subchapter C, indirect costs are allowable under CJD grants in accordance with applicable state and federal guidelines.

(d) The Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program is exempt from this section [ rule ] and instead must comply with §3.1209 of this chapter.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402157

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter C. FUND-SPECIFIC GRANT POLICIES

1. STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING (421) FUND

1 TAC §3.103, §3.111

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.103.Project Requirements.

Grant applications must : [ meet the rules set forth in §3.53 or §3.55 of this chapter. ]

(1) focus on reducing crime and improving the criminal and juvenile justice systems; and

(2) meet the requirements of §3.53 of this chapter.

§3.111. Ineligible Activities [ Renovation and Retrofitting ].

Grantees may not use grant funds to pay for serving adult offenders charged with, given deferred adjudication for, or convicted of, violent or other serious crimes including murder, arson, robbery, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, burglary, felony drug crimes, crimes against children, kidnapping, aggravated kidnapping, and manslaughter, unless the executive director grants an exception. The executive director may approve exceptions to this prohibition. [ CJD may approve grants for the renovation or retrofitting of existing facilities that provide additional beds for juvenile detention in compliance with the Texas Family Code. ]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402158

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


2. JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT FUND

1 TAC §§3.201, 3.203, 3.211

The amendment and addition of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended and added rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment or addition of these rules.

§3.201.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Fund. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 [ 1974, as amended ], Public Law 107-273 [ 93-415 ],[ codified as amended at ] 42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq. , as amended . All grants awarded from this fund must comply with the requirements contained therein.

(c) In addition to the rules related to this funding source contained in this chapter, applicants and grantees must comply with the federal regulations at 28 C.F.R. §31, which are hereby adopted by reference.

(d) The purpose of this grant program is to develop more effective education, training, research, prevention, diversion, treatment, and rehabilitation programs in the area of juvenile delinquency and programs to improve the juvenile justice system.

§3.203.Project Requirements.

(a) Projects must meet the requirements of §3.53 of this chapter.

(b) Grant funds can support projects to prevent juvenile delinquency including:

(1) Community Based Alternatives to Incarceration. This includes projects that serve youth who need temporary placement such as crisis intervention, shelter, and after-care; and projects that serve youth who need residential placement such as a continuum of foster care or group home alternatives that provide access to a comprehensive array of services.

(2) Strengthening Families. This includes community based programs and services that work with:

(A) parents and other family members to strengthen families, including parent self-help groups, so that juveniles may be retained in their homes;

(B) juveniles during their incarceration, and with their families, to ensure the safe return of such juveniles to their homes and to strengthen the familes; and

(C) parents with limited English-speaking ability, particularly in areas where there is a large population of families with limited-English speaking ability.

(3) Collaboration of Local Systems. This includes programs that meet the needs of youth through the collaboration of the many local systems before which a youth may appear, including schools, courts, law enforcement agencies, child protection agencies, mental health agencies, welfare services, health care agencies, and private nonprofit agencies offering youth services.

(4) Treatment for Victims. This includes programs that provide treatment to juvenile offenders who are the victims of child abuse or neglect, and to their families, in order to reduce the likelihood that such offenders will commit subsequent violations of law.

(5) Educational Programs and Supportive Services. This includes programs that:

(A) encourage juveniles to remain in elementary or secondary schools or in alternative learning situations;

(B) provide services to assist juveniles in making the transition to the world of work and self-sufficiency; and

(C) enhance coordination with the local schools that such juveniles would otherwise attend, to ensure that:

(i) the instruction that juveniles receive outside school is closely aligned with the instruction provided in school; and

(ii) information regarding any learning problems identified in such alternative learning situations are communicated to the schools.

(6) Probation. This includes programs that expand the use of probation officers to address the following:

(A) permitting nonviolent juvenile offenders (including status offenders) to remain at home with their families as an alternative to incarceration or institutionalization; and

(B) ensuring juveniles follow the terms of their probation.

(7) Counseling, Training, and Mentoring. This includes programs in support of academic tutoring, vocational and technical training, and drug and violence prevention counseling that are designed to link at-risk juveniles, juvenile offenders, or juveniles who have a parent who is or was incarcerated, with responsible individuals who are properly trained.

(8) Learning Disabilities. This includes programs that are designed to develop and implement projects relating to juvenile delinquency and learning disabilities, including on-the-job training programs to assist community services, law enforcement, and juvenile justice personnel to more effectively recognize and provide for learning disabled and other juveniles with disabilities.

(9) Gangs. This includes programs designed to deter involvement in illegal activities and to promote involvement in lawful activities on the part of gangs whose membership is substantially composed of youth.

(10) Drug Treatment. This includes programs designed to provide for the treatment of youths' dependence on or abuse of alcohol or other addictive or non-addictive drugs.

(11) Positive Youth Development. This includes programs that promote positive youth development by assisting delinquent and other at-risk youth in obtaining a sense of safety and structure; a sense of belonging and membership; a sense of self-worth and social contribution; a sense of independence and control over life; and, a sense of closeness in interpersonal relationships.

(12) Diversion. This includes programs that encourage the courts to develop and implement a continuum of post-adjudication restraints that bridge the gap between traditional probation and confinement in a correctional setting.

(13) Language and Other Barriers. This includes programs (including referral to literacy programs and social service programs) to assist families with limited English-speaking ability that include delinquent juveniles to overcome language and other barriers that may prevent the complete treatment of juveniles and the preservation of their families.

(14) Hate Crimes. This includes programs designed to prevent and to reduce hate crimes committed by juveniles.

(15) After-School Programs. This includes after-school programs that provide at-risk juveniles and juveniles in the juvenile justice system with a range of age-appropriate activities, including tutoring, mentoring, and other educational and enrichment activities.

(16) Post-Placement Services to Adjudicated Juveniles. This includes community based programs that provide follow-up and post-placement services to adjudicated juveniles, to promote successful reintegration into the community.

(17) Protect the Rights of Juveniles. This includes programs designed to protect the rights of juveniles affected by the juvenile justice system.

(18) Mental Health Services for Incarcerated Juveniles. This includes programs designed to provide mental health services for incarcerated juveniles suspected to be in need of such services, including assessment, development of individualized treatment plans, and discharge plans.

§3.211.Ineligibile Activities and Costs.

Grantees may not use grant funds to pay for the following services, activities, and costs:

(1) construction;

(2) medical services;

(3) fundraising activities;

(4) lobbying activities; and

(5) any expense or service that is readily available at no cost to the grant project or that is provided by other federal, state, or local funds.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402159

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


3. TITLE V DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT FUND

1 TAC §§3.301, 3.303, 3.305, 3.313

The amendment and addition of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended and added rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment or addition of these rules.

§3.301.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Title V Delinquency Prevention Act Fund. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 [ 1974 ], Title V, Public Law 107-273, [ 93-415 as amended; Public Laws 102-586 and 104-316; codified as amended at ] 42 U.S.C. 5781 et seq. , as amended . All grants awarded from this fund must comply with the requirements contained therein.

(c) The program's purpose is [ Projects funded through this program should seek ] to reduce juvenile delinquency and youth violence by supporting communities in providing their [ community efforts to provide ] children, families, neighborhoods, and institutions with the knowledge, skills, and opportunities necessary to foster a healthy and nurturing [ create an ] environment that supports the growth and [ fosters the ] development of productive and responsible citizens.

§3.303.Project Requirements.

Projects must:

(1) meet the requirements of §3.53 of this chapter;

(2) provide juvenile [ form coalitions within communities that mobilize and direct ] delinquency prevention programs and activities for youth who have had contact with the juvenile justice system or who are likely to have contact with the juvenile justice system, including: [ efforts; ]

(A) alcohol and substance abuse prevention services;

(B) tutoring and remedial education;

(C) child and adolescent health and mental health services;

(D) recreation services;

(E) leadership and youth development activities;

(F) teaching accountability;

(G) assistance in the development of job training; and

(H) other data-driven evidence based prevention programs.

[ (3) identify known delinquency risk factors present in affected communities;]

[ (4) identify protective measures that counter identified risks and develop local comprehensive delinquency prevention plans that strengthen these protective measures;]

[ (5) develop local, comprehensive delinquency prevention strategies that coordinate federal, state, local, and private resources to establish a client-centered continuum of services for at-risk children and their families; and]

[ (6) implement delinquency prevention strategies, monitor their progress, and modify the strategies as needed.]

§3.305.Eligible Applicants.

[ (a) ] Units of local government are eligible to apply for grants under this fund. For this fund, a unit of local government means any city, county, town, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of the state, and any Indian tribe which performs law enforcement functions as determined by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior.

[ (b) Before an applicant may receive the CJD-funded portion of a grant project, the applicant must have a local policy board that will direct the project and develop a three-year delinquency prevention plan.]

§3.313.Prevention Policy Board.

Before an applicant may receive the CJD-funded portion of a grant project, the applicant must have a local prevention policy board that will direct the project and develop a three-year delinquency prevention plan. The plan serves as the project narrative and must follow the general format for a project narrative as outined in the grant application.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402160

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


4. SAFE AND DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES ACT FUND

1 TAC §3.401, §3.403

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.401.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Fund. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Education. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Authorization Act, Title IV, Part A, Subpart 1, §§4001-4117, 20 U.S.C. 7101 et seq., as amended [ , Public Law 107-110 ]. All grants awarded from this fund must comply with the requirements contained therein.

(c) In addition to the rules related to this funding source contained in this chapter, applicants and grantees must comply with the federal regulations at 34 C.F.R. §76, which are hereby adopted by reference [ CJD awards these funds to a wide range of state and local applicants, both public and private nonprofit, to promote a safe and drug-free learning environment and to support academic achievement ].

(d) The purpose of this grant program is to implement the following drug and violence prevention services: [ In addition to the rules related to this funding source contained in this chapter, applicants and grantees must comply with the federal regulations at 34 C.F.R. §76, which are hereby adopted by reference. ]

(1) complementing and supporting local educational agency activities, including developing and implementing activities to prevent and reduce violence associated with prejudice and intolerance;

(2) disseminating information about drug and violence prevention;

(3) developing and implementing community-wide drug and violence prevention planning and organizing;

(4) fostering a safe and drug-free learning environment that supports academic achievement;

(5) preventing and reducing violence; the use, possession and distribution of illegal drugs; and delinquency;

(6) creating a well disciplined environment conducive to learning; and

(7) promoting the involvement of parents.

§3.403.Project Requirements.

(a) Projects must meet the requirements of §3.53 of this chapter. [ Grant funds will be awarded based on: ]

[ (1) the quality of the project proposed; and]

[ (2) how the project meets the principles of effectiveness described in subsection (e) of this section.]

(b) Priority is given [ CJD gives priority ] to projects that prevent illegal drug use and violence for:

(1) children and youth who are not normally served by state educational agencies or local educational agencies; or

(2) populations that need special services or additional resources (such as youth in juvenile detention facilities, runaway or homeless children and youth, pregnant and parenting teenagers, and school dropouts).

(c) Special [ CJD gives special ] consideration is given to grantees that pursue a comprehensive and collaborative approach to drug and violence prevention that includes providing and incorporating mental health services related to drug and violence prevention in their project.

(d) Projects must meet the following principles of effectiveness [ Grant funds shall be used to implement drug and violence prevention activities, including ]:

(1) be based on an assessment of objective data regarding the incidence of violence and illegal drug use in the elementary schools and secondary schools and communities to be served, including an objective analysis of the current conditions and consequences regarding violence and illegal drug use, including delinquency and serious discipline problems among students who attend such schools (including private school students who participate in the drug and violence prevention program) that is based on on-going local assessment or evaluation activities [ that complement and support local educational activities, including developing and implementing activities to prevent and reduce violence associated with prejudice and intolerance ];

(2) be based on an established set of performance measures aimed at ensuring that the elementary schools, secondary schools, and communities to be served by the program have a safe, orderly, and drug-free learning environment [ dissemination of information about drug and violence prevention ]; [ and ]

(3) be based on scientifically-based research that provides evidence that the program to be used will reduce violence and illegal [ development and implementation of community-wide ] drug use; [ and violence prevention planning and organizing. ]

(4) be based on an analysis of the data reasonably available at the time, of the prevalence of risk factors, including high or increasing rates of reported cases of child abuse and domestic violence; protective factors, buffers, assets; or other variables in schools and communities in the State identified through scientifically-based research; and

(5) include meaningful and ongoing consultation with and input from parents in the development of the application and administration of the program or activity.

(e) Grant funds can support projects that provide [ Projects must meet ] the following services, activities or costs [ principles of effectiveness ]:

(1) age appropriate and developmentally based activities that: [ Projects must be based on an assessment of objective data regarding the incidence of violence and illegal drug use in the elementary schools and secondary schools and communities to be served, including an objective analysis of the current conditions and consequences regarding violence and illegal drug use, including delinquency and serious discipline problems, among students who attend such schools (including private school students who participate in the drug and violence prevention program) that is based on on-going local assessment or evaluation activities; ]

(A) address the consequences of violence and the illegal use of drugs, as appropriate;

(B) promote a sense of individual responsibility;

(C) teach students to recognize social and peer pressure to use drugs illegally and the skills for resisting illegal drug use;

(D) engage students in the learning process; and

(E) incorporate activities in secondary schools that reinforce prevention activities implemented in elementary schools.

(2) activities that involve families, community sectors (which may include appropriately trained seniors), and a variety of drug and violence prevention providers in setting clear expectations against violence and illegal use of drugs and appropriate consequences for violence and illegal use of drugs. [ Projects must be based on an established set of performance measures aimed at ensuring that the elementary schools, secondary schools, and communities to be served by the program have a safe, orderly, and drug-free learning environment; ]

(3) dissemination of drug and violence prevention information to schools and the community. [ Projects must be based on scientifically-based research that provides evidence that the program to be used will reduce violence and illegal drug use; ]

(4) professional development and training for, and involvement of, school personnel, pupil services personnel, parents, and interested community members in prevention, education, early identification and intervention, mentoring, or rehabilitation referral, as related to drug and violence prevention. [ Projects must be based on an analysis of the data reasonably available at the time, of the prevalence of risk factors, including high or increasing rates of reported cases of child abuse and domestic violence; protective factors, buffers, assets; or other variables in schools and communities in the State identified through scientifically-based research; and ]

(5) drug and violence prevention activities that may include the following: [ Projects must include meaningful and ongoing consultation with and input from parents in the development of the application and administration of the program or activity. ]

(A) community-wide planning and organizing activities to reduce violence and illegal drug use, which may include gang activity prevention.

(B) acquiring and installing metal detectors, electronic locks, surveillance cameras, or other related equipment and technologies.

(C) reporting criminal offenses committed on school property.

(D) developing and implementing comprehensive school security plans or obtaining technical assistance concerning such plans, which may include obtaining a security assessment or assistance from the School Security and Technology Resource Center at the Sandia National Laboratory located in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

(E) supporting safe zones of passage activities that ensure that students travel safely to and from school, which may include bicycle and pedestrian safety programs.

(F) the hiring and mandatory training, based on scientific research, of school security personnel (including school resource officers) who interact with students in support of youth drug and violence prevention activities under this part that are implemented in the school.

(G) expanded and improved school-based mental health services related to illegal drug use and violence, including early identification of violence and illegal drug use, assessment, and direct or group counseling services provided to students, parents, families, and school personnel by qualified school-based mental health service providers.

(H) conflict resolution programs, including peer mediation programs that educate and train peer mediators and a designated faculty supervisor, and youth anti-crime and anti-drug councils and activities.

(I) alternative education programs or services for violent or drug abusing students that reduce the need for suspension or expulsion or that serve students who have been suspended or expelled from the regular educational settings, including programs or services to assist students to make continued progress toward meeting the State academic achievement standards and to reenter the regular education setting.

(J) counseling, mentoring, referral services, and other student assistance practices and programs, including assistance provided by qualified school-based mental health services providers and the training of teachers by school-based mental health services providers in appropriate identification and intervention techniques for students at risk of violent behavior and illegal use of drugs.

(K) programs that encourage students to seek advice from, and to confide in, a trusted adult regarding concerns about violence and illegal drug use.

(L) drug and violence prevention activities designed to reduce truancy.

(M) age-appropriate, developmentally-based violence prevention and education programs that address victimization associated with prejudice and intolerance, and that include activities designed to help students develop a sense of individual responsibility and respect for the rights of others, and to resolve conflicts without violence.

(N) consistent with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the testing of a student for illegal drug use or the inspecting of a student's locker for weapons or illegal drugs or drug paraphernalia, including at the request of or with the consent of a parent or legal guardian of the student, if the local educational agency elects to so test or inspect.

(O) emergency intervention services following traumatic crisis events, such as a shooting, major accident, or a drug-related incident that have disrupted the learning environment.

(P) establishing or implementing a system for transferring suspension and expulsion records, consistent with §444 of the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, by a local educational agency to any public or private elementary school or secondary school.

(Q) developing and implementing character education programs, as a component of drug and violence prevention programs, that take into account the view of parents of the students for whom the program is intended and such students.

(R) establishing and maintaining a school safety hotline.

(S) community service, including community service performed by expelled students, and service-learning projects.

(T) conducting a nationwide background check of each local educational agency employee, regardless of when hired, and prospective employees for the purpose of determining whether the employee or prospective employee has been convicted of a crime that bears upon the employee's fitness to be responsible for the safety or well-being of children; to serve in the particular capacity in which the employee or prospective employee is or will be employed; or to otherwise be employed by the local educational agency.

(U) programs to train school personnel to identify warning signs of youth suicide and to create an action plan to help youth at risk of suicide.

(V) programs that respond to the needs of students who are faced with domestic violence or child abuse.

(6) the evaluation of any of the activities authorized under this funding source and the collection of objective data used to assess program needs, program implementation, or program success in achieving program goals and objectives.

(f) Projects must not duplicate the efforts of the Texas Education Agency's Safe and Drug-Free Schools Act program or those of local education agencies with regard to the provision of school-based drug and violence prevention activities [ meet the requirements of §3.53 of this chapter ].

(g) Projects must undergo a periodic evaluation to assess its progress toward reducing violence and illegal drug use in schools to be served. The results shall be used to refine, improve, and strengthen the program, and to refine the performance measures, and shall also be made available to the public upon request, with public notice of such availability provided. Performance measures, described in the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Community Act, §4114(d)(2)(B), consist of: [ not duplicate the efforts of the Texas Education Agency's Safe and Drug-Free Schools Act program or those of local education agencies. ]

(1) performance indicators for drug and violence prevention programs and activities including:

(A) specific reductions in the prevelance of identified risk factors; and

(B) specific increases in the prevalence of protective factors, buffers, or assets if any have been identified; and

(2) levels of performance for each performance indicator.

[ (h) Projects must undergo a periodic evaluation to assess its progress toward reducing violence and illegal drug use in schools to be served based on performance measures described in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law 107-110, §4114(d)(2)(B). The results shall be used to refine, improve, and strengthen the program, and to refine the performance measures, and shall also be made available to the public upon request, with public notice of such availability provided.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402161

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


5. VICTIMS OF CRIME ACT FUND

1 TAC §§3.501, 3.503, 3.505, 3.511

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.501.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Victims of Crime Act Fund. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (VOCA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 10601, et seq. All grants awarded from this fund must comply with the requirements contained therein.

(c) The primary purpose of these grants is to provide services to victims of crime. In this division, "services" are defined as those efforts that [ Services may include the following ]:

(1) respond [ responding ] to the emotional and physical needs of crime victims;

(2) assist [ assisting ] victims in stabilizing their lives after a victimization;

(3) assist [ assisting ] victims to understand and participate in the criminal justice system; and

(4) provide [ providing ] victims with safety and security.

§3.503.Project Requirements.

Grant funds can support [ projects that provide ] the following services, activities, and costs:

(1) Immediate Health and Safety. Projects should provide services that respond to the immediate emotional and physical needs (excluding medical care) of crime victims, such as crisis intervention, accompanying victims to hospitals for medical examinations, providing victims with hot line counseling, emergency food, clothing, transportation, and shelter, and providing emergency services intended to restore the victim's sense of security.

(2) Mental Health Assistance. These services include aid that assists the primary and secondary victims of crime.

(3) Assistance with Participation [ Involvement ] in Criminal Justice Proceedings. Projects should help victims participate in the criminal justice system.

(4) Forensic Examinations. Forensic examinations are allowable costs only for sexual assault victims and only to the extent that other funding sources are unavailable or insufficient to pay for the examinations. The examinations must conform to state evidentiary collection requirements.

(5) Costs Necessary and Essential to Providing Direct Services. These include prorated costs of rent, telephone service, transportation costs for victims to receive services, emergency transportation costs that enable a victim to participate in the criminal justice system, and local travel expenses for service providers.

(6) Special Services. These include services to assist crime victims with managing practical problems created by victimization including the following:

(A) acting on behalf of the victim with other service providers, creditors, or employers;

(B) assisting the victim to recover property retained as evidence;

(C) assisting in filing for compensation benefits; and

(D) helping the victim to apply for public assistance.

(7) Personnel Costs. These include costs directly related to providing services such as staff salaries and fringe benefits and including malpractice insurance, costs for advertising to recruit grant-funded personnel, and costs to train paid and volunteer staff.

(8) Restorative Justice [ Victim-Offender Meetings ]. Opportunities for crime victims to meet with [ Activities involving victim-offender meetings are only allowable if the meetings are between the victim and ] the offender who perpetrated the crime against the victim , if such meetings are requested or voluntarily agreed to by the victim and have possible beneficial or therapeutic value to crime victims .

(9) Other Allowable Costs and Services. CJD does not consider the following services, activities, and costs [ listed below ] as direct crime victim services, but recognizes that they are often an essential activity necessary to ensure that the grantee can provide high quality direct services. Before grantees can use grant funds to pay for these services, activities, and costs, CJD and the grantee must agree that the grantee cannot provide direct services to crime victims without additional support for the expenses, that the grantee has no other source of pecuniary support for them, and that the grantee will limit the use of grant funds in paying for them. These services, activities, and costs include:

(A) Skill training for staff. Grant funds designated for training shall be used exclusively for developing the skills of direct service providers [ This includes the cost of training materials ].

(B) Training [ programs ] and related travel for staff . This includes the cost of travel, meals, lodging and registration fees for staff that provide direct services to victims of crime.

(C) Equipment and furniture.

(D) Purchase or lease [ Lease ] of vehicles. Grantees must obtain CJD approval in writing before purchasing or leasing vehicles.

(E) Advanced technologies. This covers information technology costs associated with purchasing systems, software, or equipment that expand a grantee's ability to reach and serve crime victims.

(F) Contracts for specialized professional services. Grantees may not use a majority of grant funds for contracted services that provide administrative, overhead, and other indirect costs. Examples of specialized professional services include the following:

(i) assistance in filing restraining orders or establishing emergency custody or visitation rights;

(ii) emergency psychological or psychiatric services; or

(iii) interpretation for the deaf or for crime victims whose primary language is not English.

(G) Operating costs.

(H) Supervision of direct service providers.

(I) Repair or replacement of essential items.

(J) Training materials for staff.

(K) Public Presentations. Grant funds may be used to support presentations that are made in schools, community centers, or other forums, that are designated to identify crime victims and provide or refer them to needed services.

§3.505.Eligible Applicants.

(a) The following applicants are eligible to apply for grants under this fund: state [ State ] agencies ; [ , ] units of local government ; [ , ] hospital districts ; [ , ] nonprofit corporations ; [ , ] Native American tribes ; [ , ] crime control and prevention districts ; [ , ] universities ; [ , ] colleges ; [ , ] community supervision and corrections departments ; [ , ] COGs that provide [ offer ] direct services to victims ; [ , ] faith-based organizations that provide direct services to victims of crime ; [ , ] and hospitals and emergency medical facilities that offer crisis counseling, support groups, and/or other types of victim services [ are eligible to apply for grants under this fund ]. Faith-based organizations must be certified by the Internal Revenue Service as tax-exempt nonprofit entities. Grantees may not use grant funds or program income for proselytizing or sectarian worship. In-patient treatment facilities, such as those designated to provide treatment to individuals with drug, alcohol, or mental health-related conditions, are not eligible to apply for grant funds.

(b) All applicants must [ meet one of the following criteria ]:

(1) Demonstrate [ the applicant has ] a record of providing effective services to crime victims . If the applicant cannot yet demonstrate a record of providing effective services, the applicant must demonstrate that at least 25 percent of its financial support comes from non-federal sources. [ ; or ]

(2) Utilize volunteers, unless CJD determines that a compelling reason exists to waive this requirement [ if an applicant does not have a demonstrated record of providing such services, it must show that at least 25 percent of its financial support comes from non-federal sources ].

(3) Promote community efforts to aid crime victims. Applicants should promote, within the community, coordinated public and private efforts to aid crime victims. Coordination efforts qualify an organization to receive VOCA funds, but are not activities that can be supported with VOCA funds.

(4) Assist victims in applying for crime victims' compensation benefits.

(5) Maintain civil rights information. This requirement includes maintaining statutorily required civil rights statistics on the race, national origin, sex, age, and disability of victims served, within the timeframe established by CJD. This requirement is waived when providing service, such as telephone counseling, where soliciting the information may be inappropriate or offensive to the crime victim.

(6) Provide equal services to victims of federal crimes.

(7) Provide grant-funded services at no charge to victims. Any deviation requires prior written approval by CJD.

(8) Maintain the confidentiality of all client-counselor information and research data, as required by state and federal law.

[ (c) All applicants must meet each of the following criteria:]

[ (1) applicants must use volunteers, unless CJD determines that a compelling reason exists to grant an exception;]

[ (2) applicants must promote community efforts to aid crime victims;]

[ (3) applicants must help victims apply for compensation benefits;]

[ (4) applicants must maintain and display civil rights information;]

[ (5) applicants must provide services to victims of federal crimes on the same basis as victims of state and local crimes;]

[ (6) applicants must provide grant-funded services at no charge to victims, and any deviation requires prior written approval by CJD; and]

[ (7) applicants must maintain the confidentiality of all client-counselor information and research data, as required by state and federal law.]

§3.511.Ineligible Activities and Costs.

Grantees may not use grant funds to pay for the following services, activities, and costs:

(1) lobbying and administrative advocacy;

(2) perpetrator rehabilitation and counseling or services to incarcerated individuals;

(3) needs assessments, surveys, evaluations, and studies;

(4) prosecution activities;

(5) fundraising activities;

(6) reimbursing crime victims for expenses incurred as a result of the crime;

(7) Most medical costs. Grantees may not use grant funds for nursing-home care (except for short-term emergencies), home health-care costs, in-patient treatment costs, hospital care, and other types of emergency and non-emergency medical or dental treatment. Grant funds cannot support medical costs resulting from a victimization [ crime ], except for forensic medical examinations for sexual assault victims;

(8) Relocation expenses. Grant funds cannot support relocation expenses for crime victims such as moving expenses, security deposits on housing, rent, and mortgage payments;

(9) Administrative staff expenses. Grantees may not use grant funds to pay salaries, fees, and reimbursable expenses associated with administrators, board members, executive directors, consultants, coordinators, and other individuals unless the grantees incur the expenses while providing direct services to crime victims. Grant funds may support administrative time to complete VOCA-required time and attendance sheets and programmatic documentation, reports, and statistics, administrative time to maintain crime victims' records, and the prorated share of audit costs;

(10) development of protocols, interagency agreements, and other working agreements;

(11) costs of sending individual crime victims to conferences;

(12) activities exclusively related to crime prevention or community awareness;

(13) non-emergency legal representation such as for divorces or civil restitution recovery efforts;

(14) victim-offender meetings that serve to replace criminal justice proceedings;

(15) management and administrative training for executive directors, board members, and other individuals that do not provide direct services;

(16) training to persons or groups outside the applicant agency; however, the grantee may invite staff members from other organizations to attend training activities held for the grantee's staff if the VOCA-related [ Victims of Crime Act-related ] project incurs no additional costs;

(17) indirect organization costs such as the following: liability insurance on buildings; major maintenance on buildings; capital improvements; newsletters, including supplies, printing, postage, and staff time; security guards and body guards; and employment agency fees;

(18) any activities or related costs for diligent search;

(19) job skills training; [ and ]

(20) alcohol or drug abuse treatment ; [ . ]

(21) Property loss. Grant funds may not be used to reimburse crime victims for expenses incurred as a result of a crime, such as insurance deductibles, replacement of stolen property, funeral expenses, lost wages, and medical bills; and

(22) non-emergency legal proceedings such as for divorces or civil restitution recovery efforts.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402162

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


6. CRIME STOPPERS ASSISTANCE FUND

1 TAC §§3.601, 3.609, 3.613

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.601.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund. Grants awarded under this fund are state funds. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) The Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund is established by Article 102.013 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

(c) This funding source provides grants to Crime Stoppers organizations in Texas. CJD intends for the grants to enhance and assist community [ the affected community's ] efforts in solving crimes.

§3.609.Indirect Costs.

CJD will not approve the use of grant funds to pay for indirect costs. The executive director may, in his or her discretion, waive the requirements of this section [ rule ] for statewide projects.

§3.613. Effect of Decertification or Expiration of Certification [ Decertified Crime Stoppers Organization ].

(a) If a grantee [ that is a crime stoppers organization ] is decertified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, the grant awarded to the grantee shall terminate on the date on which the grantee is decertified and all unexpended grant funds must be returned to CJD.

(b) If a grantee's certification expires, the grant awarded to the grantee shall terminate on the date on which the grantee's certification expires and all unexpended grant funds must be returned to CJD.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402164

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


7. BYRNE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM

1 TAC §§3.721, 3.723, 3.725

The amendment and addition of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended and added rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment or addition of these rules.

§3.721.Certification of Drug Testing.

Applications for multi-jurisdictional drug task force projects under the Byrne Formula Grant Program must include a certification of drug testing. This document certifies that 25 percent of all personnel assigned to the project are randomly tested quarterly for illegal narcotics according to grantee policies. Grantees must have a drug testing policy prior to receiving grant funds and must maintain documentation on file evidencing that drug testing was conducted.

§3.723.Multi-jurisdictional Drug Task Force Advisory Boards.

Under the Byrne Formula Grant Program, multi-jurisdictional drug task force advisory boards serve only in an advisory capacity to the task force and the grantee entity. [ All task force personnel remain the employees of their parent agencies. Task force personnel are not considered employees of the advisory board, the task force, or the Governor's Office (including CJD). ]

§3.725.Task Force Personnel.

All task force personnel remain the employees of their assigning agencies and are not considered employees of the task force, the multi-jurisdictional drug task force advisory board, the Texas Department of Public Safety, or the Governor's Office (including CJD).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402165

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


8. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

1 TAC §§3.801, 3.803, 3.809, 3.811

The amendment and addition of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended and added rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment or addition of these rules.

§3.801.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the [ Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Act of 1995, H.R. 728; ] Department of Commerce, Justice and State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003 [ 1998 ], Public Law 108-7 [ 105-119, III Stat. 2440, 2452 ].

(c) The program provides funds to projects designed to reduce crime and improve public safety.

§3.803.Project Requirements.

[ (a) ] All projects funded through this program must have a regional or statewide impact and must meet at least one of the following purpose areas:

(1) Law enforcement support for:

(A) Hiring, training, and employing on a continuing basis, additional law enforcement officers and necessary support personnel. For the purposes of this program, a law enforcement officer may be police, corrections, probation, parole, or judicial officers.

(B) Paying overtime to currently employed law enforcement officers and necessary support personnel for the purpose of increasing the number of hours worked by such personnel.

(C) Procuring equipment, technology, and other material directly related to basic law enforcement functions.

(2) Enhancing security measures in and around schools, and in and around any other facility or location that the grant recipient considers a special risk for incidents of crime.

(3) Establishing or supporting drug courts. To be eligible for funding, a drug court program must include the following:

(A) Continuing judicial supervision over offenders who are substance abusers, but not violent offenders.

(B) Integrating administration of other sanctions and services which shall include:

(i) mandatory periodic testing of each participant for the use of controlled substances or other addictive substances during any period of supervised release or probation;

(ii) substance abuse treatment for each participant;

(iii) probation or other supervised release that involves the possible prosecution, confinement, or incarceration because of noncompliance with program requirements or failure to show satisfactory progress; and

(iv) programmatic offender management and aftercare services such as relapse prevention, vocational job training, and job and housing placement.

(4) Enhancing the adjudication of cases involving violent offenders, including cases which involve violent juvenile offenders. For the purposes of this program, violent offender indicates a person charged with committing a Part I violent crime (murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) as defined under the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Program.

(5) Establishing multi-jurisdictional task forces. The task force should concentrate on rural areas and be composed of law enforcement officials who represent units of local government. The task force will work with federal law enforcement officials to prevent and control crime.

(6) Establishing crime prevention programs involving cooperation between community residents and law enforcement personnel to control, detect, or investigate crime or the prosecution of criminals.

(7) Defraying the cost of indemnification insurance for law enforcement officers by supplying insurance for law enforcement officers to cover damage from willful acts to offenders by officers who are lawfully carrying out their duties.

[ (b) Prohibited uses. Grantees may not use grant funds to purchase, lease, rent, or acquire any of the following: ]

[ (1) tanks or armored vehicles; ]

[ (2) fixed-wing aircraft; ]

[ (3) limousines; ]

[ (4) real estate; ]

[ (5) yachts; ]

[ (6) consultants; ]

[ (7) vehicles not primarily used for law enforcement; and ]

[ (8) New construction. However, renovations of facilities are permitted when specifically approved by Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Office of the Comptroller. These costs may not exceed 10% of the total federal funds utilized in a given purpose area. ]

§3.809.Indirect Costs.

CJD will not approve the use of grant funds to pay for indirect costs.

§3.811.Ineligible Activities and Costs.

Grantees may not use grant funds to purchase, lease, rent, or acquire any of the following:

(1) tanks or armored vehicles;

(2) fixed-wing aircraft;

(3) limousines;

(4) real estate;

(5) yachts;

(6) consultants;

(7) vehicles not primarily used for law enforcement; and

(8) New construction. However, renovations of facilities are permitted when specifically approved by Bureau of Justice Assistance and the Office of the Comptroller. These costs may not exceed 10% of the total federal funds utilized in a given purpose area.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402166

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


9. S.T.O.P. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT FUND

1 TAC §§3.901, 3.903, 3.905

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.901.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the S.T.O.P. Violence Against Women Act Fund program. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds were originally authorized under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994; Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, §2001-6, 42 U.S.C. 3796gg to 3796gg5, and reauthorized under Division B of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, §1103.

(c) The program's purpose is to assist in developing and strengthening effective law enforcement and prosecution strategies to combat violent crimes against women and to develop and strengthen victim services in such cases.

(d) In addition to the rules related to the funding source contained in this chapter, applicants and grantees must comply with the federal regulations in 28 C.F.R. §90, which are hereby adopted by reference.

§3.903.Project Requirements.

(a) Projects must meet at least one of the eligible purpose areas established by the federal Violence Against Women Office and codified at 28 C.F.R. §90.

(b) In addition to subsection (a) of this section, projects must address at least one of the following state priorities developed in coordination with the S.T.O.P. [ STOP ] Violence Against Women Planning Council:

(1) Priorities for Victim Services Projects : [ . ]

(A) Provide essential victim services related to family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(B) Promote outreach and services into under-served communities for family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(C) Provide or improve training for victim advocates.

(D) Establish or maintain a family violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or dating violence taskforce that promotes a coordinated community response, including multi-jurisdictional efforts.

(2) Priorities for Law Enforcement Projects : [ . ]

(A) Promote or improve training for law enforcement agencies related to family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(B) Develop specialized family violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence and/or victim service divisions within law enforcement agencies.

(C) Collaborate, plan and initiate unified policies among the different law enforcement and social services agencies for family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(D) Establish or maintain a family violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or dating violence taskforce which promotes a coordinated community response, including multi-jurisdictional efforts.

(3) Priorities for Prosecution Projects : [ . ]

(A) Develop specialized family violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence and/or victim service divisions within prosecutors' offices.

(B) Provide or improve training for prosecution agencies related to family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(C) Promote outreach and services into underserved communities for family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(D) Establish or maintain a family violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or dating violence taskforce that promotes a coordinated community response, including multi-jurisdictional efforts.

(4) Priorities for Court Projects : [ . ]

(A) Promote or improve training for judges and court personnel related to family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

(B) Provide specialized courts and/or court services aimed at family violence, sexual assault, stalking, and/or dating violence.

(C) Provide in-court victims assistance for family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence victims.

(D) Promote outreach and services into underserved communities related to family violence, sexual assault, stalking and dating violence.

§3.905.Eligible Applicants.

State agencies, units of local government, nonprofit corporations, faith-based organizations, Indian tribal governments, COGs, universities, colleges, community supervision and corrections departments, and crime control and prevention districts[ , ] are eligible to apply for grants under this fund. Faith-based organizations must be certified by the Internal Revenue Service as tax-exempt nonprofit entities. Grantees may not use grant funds or program income for proselytizing or sectarian worship.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402168

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


10. CHALLENGE GRANT PROGRAM

1 TAC §3.1005

The amendment of this rule is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rule implements §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of this rule.

§3.1005.Eligible Applicants.

State agencies, nonprofit corporations [ organizations ], local units of government, faith-based organizations, crime control and prevention districts, Native American tribal governments, COGs, universities, colleges, independent school districts, and juvenile boards are eligible to apply for grants under this fund. Faith-based organizations must be certified by the Internal Revenue Service as tax-exempt nonprofit entities. Grantees may not use grant funds or program income for proselytizing or sectarian worship.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402169

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


11. RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT GRANT PROGRAM

1 TAC §§3.1101, 3.1103, 3.1111

The amendment and addition of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended and added rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment or addition of these rules.

§3.1101.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Grant Program (RSAT) . The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, §1001, as amended, Public Law 90-351, 42 U.S.C. 3796ff, et seq.

(c) The program's [ Program's ] purpose is to develop and implement residential substance abuse treatment projects [ programs ] within state and local correctional facilities and jail-based substance abuse projects within jails and local correctional facilities [ where prisoners are incarcerated for a period of time sufficient to permit effective treatment ].

§3.1103.Project Requirements.

(a) Grantees must use grant funds to implement residential substance abuse projects that provide individual and group treatment for offenders in residential facilities operated by state and local correctional agencies , or jail-based substance abuse projects that provide individual and group treatment activities for offenders in jails and local correctional facilities .

(b) Residential [ These ] substance abuse projects must:

(1) be designed to last [ ensure that each offender participates in the program ] for not less than six nor more than 12 months[ , unless he or she drops out or is terminated ];

(2) provide treatment in residential treatment facilities that are set apart from the general correctional population[ or are ] in a completely separate facility or a dedicated housing unit within a facility for the exclusive use of project [ program ] participants;

(3) focus on the substance abuse problems of the inmate;

(4) develop the inmate's cognitive, behavioral, social, vocational, and other skills to resolve the substance abuse and related problems; and

(5) require urinalysis or other reliable methods of drug and alcohol testing for those enrolled in the residential substance abuse project and post program while they remain in the custody of the state or local government .

(c) Jail-based substance abuse projects must: [ CJD gives preference to applicants who provide aftercare services to program participants. Aftercare services should coordinate service provision between the correctional treatment program and other human service and rehabilitation programs, such as education and job training, parole supervision, halfway houses, and self-help and peer group programs that may aid in rehabilitation. Grantees may not use grant funds to pay for non-residential treatment provided through the aftercare component of the program, except when stipulated through federal regulations. ]

(1) be designed to last for not less than three months;

(2) make every effort to set apart the treatment population from the general correctional population;

(3) focus on the substance abuse problems of the inmate;

(4) develop the inmate's cognitive, behavioral, social, vocational, and other skills to solve the substance abuse and related problems; and

(5) be science-based and effective.

(d) CJD gives preference to applicants who provide aftercare services to project participants. Aftercare services should coordinate service provisions between the correctional treatment program and other human service and rehabilitation programs such as education and job training, parole supervision, halfway houses, and self-help and peer group projects that may aid in rehabilitation. [ Grantees shall develop an individualized plan for community substance abuse treatment for each offender when the offender enters a residential treatment program. Corrections treatment projects and state or local substance abuse treatment programs must work together to place program participants in appropriate community substance abuse treatment when these individuals leave the correctional facility at the end of their sentence or their parole. ]

(e) Grantees shall develop an individualized plan for each offender when the offender enters a residential treatment project. Corrections treatment projects and state or local substance abuse treatment projects must work together to place project participants in appropriate aftercare placement when these individuals complete the program.

§3.1111.Ineligible Activities and Costs.

Grantees may not use grant funds to pay for the following activities and costs:

(1) rent or building leases, except for leases of space for the delivery of treatment services such as offices for counselors and group events;

(2) utilities;

(3) building and lawn maintenance;

(4) insurance;

(5) meals and snacks;

(6) medical and dental care;

(7) vehicle expenses unless for treatment purposes;

(8) uniforms for personnel;

(9) training for continuing education and licensing requirements, unless this benefit is also provided to all non-RSAT funded personnel.

(10) administrative costs;

(11) construction or land acquisition;

(12) services in a private treatment facility; or

(13) aftercare services provided after the project participant is released from the facility.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402170

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


12. JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

1 TAC §§3.1201, 3.1203, 3.1205, 3.1211, 3.1213

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.1201.Source and Purpose.

(a) All rules in this division relate to the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant Program. The funding agency for the source of these federal funds is the U.S. Department of Justice. Grantees must comply with the applicable grant management standards adopted under §3.19 of this chapter.

(b) These federal funds are authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 2002 [ Fiscal Year 1999 Appropriations Act ], Public Law 107-273, 42 USC 3796ee et seq., as amended [ 105-277 (1998), referencing H.R. 3 (May 3, 1997) ]. All grants awarded from this fund must comply with the requirements contained therein.

(c) The program's purpose is to develop programs that promote greater accountability in the juvenile justice system.

(d) In addition to the rules related to this funding source contained in this chapter, applicants and grantees must comply with the federal regulations contained in 28 C.F.R. §95, which are hereby adopted by reference.

§3.1203.Project Requirements.

[ (a) ] These funds are available to support the following program purpose areas:

(1) Graduated Sanctions. Developing, implementing, and administering graduated sanctions for juvenile offenders [ building, expanding, renovating, or operating temporary or permanent juvenile correction or detention facilities, including training of correctional personnel ];

(2) Corrections/Detention Facilities. Building, expanding, renovating, or operating temporary or permanent [ developing and administering accountability-based sanctions for ] juvenile corrections, or detention facilities, including the training of personnel [ offenders ];

(3) Court Staffing and Pretrial Services. Hiring [ hiring additional ] juvenile court judges, probation officers, and court-appointed defenders and special advocates , and funding pretrial services (including mental health screening and assessment) for juvenile offenders [ juveniles ], to promote [ ensure ] the effective [ smooth ] and expeditious administration of the juvenile justice system;

(4) Prosecutors (Staffing). Hiring [ hiring ] additional prosecutors so that more cases involving violent juvenile offenders can be prosecuted and backlogs reduced;

(5) Prosecutors (Funding). Providing [ providing ] funding to enable prosecutors to address drug, gang, and youth violence problems more effectively and for technology, equipment, and training to assist prosecutors in identifying and expediting the prosecution of violent juvenile offenders ;

(6) Training for Law Enforcement and Court Personnel. Establishing [ providing funding for technology, equipment, ] and maintaining training programs for law enforcement and other court personnel with respect to preventing and controlling juvenile crime [ assist prosecutors in identifying and expediting the prosecution of violent juvenile offenders ];

(7) Juvenile Gun Courts. Establishing juvenile gun courts for the prosecution and adjudication of [ providing funding to enable ] juvenile firearms [ courts and juvenile probation offices to be more effective and efficient in holding juvenile ] offenders[ accountable and reducing recidivism ];

(8) Juvenile Drug Courts. Establishing [ the establishment of ] drug court [ court-based ] programs to provide continuing judicial supervision over juvenile offenders with substance abuse problems and to integrate administration of other sanctions and services for such offenders [ justice programs that target young firearms offenders through the establishment of juvenile gun courts for the adjudication and prosecution of juvenile firearms offenders ];

(9) Juvenile Records Systems. Establishing and maintaining a system of juvenile records designed to promote public safety [ the establishment of drug court programs for juveniles so as to provide continuing judicial supervision over juvenile offenders with substance abuse problems and to provide the integrated administration of other sanctions and services ];

(10) Information Sharing. Establishing [ establishing ] and maintaining interagency information-sharing programs that enable the juvenile and criminal justice systems [ system ], schools, and social services agencies to make more informed decisions regarding the early identification, control, supervision, and treatment of juveniles who repeatedly commit serious delinquent or criminal acts;

(11) Accountability. Establishing [ establishing ] and maintaining accountability-based programs designed to reduce recidivism among juveniles [ that work with juvenile offenders ] who are referred by law enforcement personnel or agencies[ that protect students and school personnel from drug, gang, and youth violence ];[ and ]

(12) Risk and Needs Assessment. Establishing and maintaining programs to conduct risk and need assessments of [ implementing a policy of controlled substance testing for appropriate categories of juveniles within the ] juvenile offenders that facilitate the effective early intervention and the provision of comprehensive services, including mental health screening and treatment and substance abuse testing and treatment, to such offenders; [ justice system. ]

(13) School Safety. Establishing and maintaining accountability-based programs that are designed to enhance school safety;

(14) Restorative Justice. Establishing and maintaining restorative justice programs;

(15) Juvenile Courts and Probation. Establishing and maintaining programs to enable juvenile courts and juvenile probation officers to be more effective and efficient in holding juvenile offenders accountable and reducing recidivism; or

(16) Detention/Corrections Personnel. Hiring detention and corrections personnel, and establishing and maintaining training programs for such personnel, to improve facility practices and programming.

[ (b) Grantees, except those receiving funds from a state set-aside, are required to distribute 45% of the total grant funds for program purpose areas in subsection (a)(3) through (9) of this section and 35% for program purpose areas in subsection (a)(1), (2), and (10) of this section. The remaining 20% may be used for any combination of the twelve (12) program purpose areas. This distribution requirement may be waived by CJD if the grantee can certify in writing that the interest of public safety and juvenile crime control would be better served by expending its funds in a proportion other than the 45% and 35% minimums. ]

§3.1205.Eligible Applicants.

(a) Twenty-five percent of this fund is available for state discretionary set-aside grants to state agencies, units of local government (including crime control and prevention districts),[ universities, colleges, nonprofit corporations, ] Native American tribal governments, and COGs[ and faith-based organizations ]. Discretionary projects are eligible for funding under subsections (10), (11), (13), and (15) only of §3.1203 of this chapter. [ Faith-based organizations must be certified by the Internal Revenue Service as tax-exempt nonprofit entities. Grantees may not use grant funds or program income for proselytizing or sectarian worship. ]

(b) Seventy-five percent of this fund is available for local/regional formula grants to cities and counties based on a formula combining juvenile justice expenditures for each unit of local government and the average annual number of Uniform Crime Report part 1 violent crimes reported for each unit of local government for the three most recent calendar years for which data are available [ Cities, counties, Native American tribal governments, and COGs that apply for grants to provide services to units of local government that are not eligible for separate grants are eligible to apply for formula allocation grants under the remaining 75 percent of this fund ].

(1) Cities and counties qualifying for a direct formula allocation of $10,000 or more will receive notice of such allocation.

(2) Cities and counties that do not qualify for the $10,000 minimum local/regional formula allocation grants, and Native American tribal governments and COGs, are eligible to apply for funding to benefit local governments in accordance with a current RFA issued by CJD.

§3.1211.Waiver of Application.

(a) Any entity receiving a local allocation may waive their ability to apply [ Applicants eligible for formula-based funding may waive applications ] for funds[ by submitting a resolution from their governing body listing the amount of money and to whom the funds are being waived ].[ These funds can be waived to other cities or counties, COGs, Native American tribal governments, or back to the state. ]

(b) Funds may be waived to CJD or to another larger or neighboring city, county, or Native American tribe that will still benefit the waiving entities area.

(1) To waive funds to CJD, the entity's governing body must complete and return to CJD the JABG Waiver of Funds Form provided in the grant application kit.

(2) To waive funds to a larger or neighboring city, county, or Native American tribe, the entity's governing body must complete and forward the JABG Waiver of Funds Form to the governing body of the city, county, or Native American tribe intended to receive the funds.

(3) Failure to complete either a grant application or JABG Waiver of Funds Form will result in the local allocation reverting back to CJD.

(c) Cities, counties, and Native American tribes requesting funds through the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant program are responsible for obtaining written authorization from each entity that chooses to waive an allocation.

(d) CJD will not award waived funds to a city, county, or Native American tribe until a signed JABG Waiver of Funds Form is received.

§3.1213. JABG Local Advisory Board [ Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition ].

(a) Each unit of local government that receives a direct allocation under §3.1205(b)(1) [ applicant ] must establish an advisory board [ a coalition ] consisting of individuals representing police departments, sheriffs' offices, prosecutors, probation officers, juvenile courts, schools, businesses, and faith-based, fraternal, nonprofit, or social service organizations involved in juvenile crime and delinquency prevention.

(b) The local advisory board must develop a coordinated enforcement plan for the use of grant funds received under §3.1205(b)(1), based on an analysis of the local juvenile justice system needs. The analysis determines the most effective use of grant funds within the sixteen program purpose areas that apply to those grant funds. The plan serves as the project narrative and summary and must follow the general format for a project narrative and summary as outlined in the application.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402171

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


1 TAC §3.1215

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the Office of the Governor or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal of this rule is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The repealed rule implements §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal of this rule.

§3.1215.Coordinated Enforcement Plan for Reducing Juvenile Crime.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402173

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


13. COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCES PROGRAM

1 TAC §3.1303

The amendment of this rule is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rule implements §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of this rule.

§3.1303.Project Requirements.

(a) All projects funded through this program must be accredited by the Laboratory Accreditation Board of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors or the National Association of Medical Examiners. In addition, projects must:

(1) Employ one or more full-time scientists [ criminalists ] whose principal duties are the examination of physical evidence for law enforcement agencies in criminal justice matters and who provide testimony with respect to such physical evidence to the criminal justice system.

(2) Demonstrate improvement over current operations in the average number of days between submission of a sample to a forensic science laboratory and the delivery of test results to the requesting office or agency.

(3) Assure that all project personnel comply with 28 C.F.R. Part 22 regarding protection of personally identifiable information that may be collected for research or statistical purposes.

(b) Allowable expenditures are limited to the following:

(1) Laboratory and computer equipment including upgrading, replacing, and purchasing laboratory equipment, instrumentation, and computer hardware or software for forensic analyses and data management.

(2) Supplies include laboratory items needed to perform analyses and to conduct validation studies, and other expenses directly attributable to conducting various types of forensic analyses.

(3) Costs associated with personnel, such as overtime, fellowships, visiting scientists, interns, consultants or contracted staff (funds may not be used for salaries or wages for state or local personnel).

(4) Facility improvements including benches, cabinets, interior dividing walls, evidence storage rooms, or extraction rooms when it can be demonstrated that these items will improve the effectiveness and credibility of the laboratory.

(5) Education and training, including internal and external training and continuing education, that is directly applicable to the job position and duties of the individuals receiving the training.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402172

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


14. RURAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND CHILD VICTIMIZATION ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

1 TAC §§3.1401, 3.1403, 3.1405, 3.1409, 3.1411, 3.1413, 3.1415

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the Office of the Governor or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The repealed rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal of these rules.

§3.1401.Source and Purpose.

§3.1403.Project Requirements.

§3.1405.Eligible Applicants.

§3.1409.Indirect Costs.

§3.1411.Ineligible Activities.

§3.1413.Grant Period.

§3.1415.Professional and Contractual Services.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402176

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter D. CONDITIONS OF GRANT FUNDING

1 TAC §§3.2007, 3.2009, 3.2013

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.2007.Confidential Funds Certification.

Any applicant proposing a project that may require the expenditure of confidential funds must sign and return with their application a copy of a Confidential Funds Certification. For Byrne Formula Grant Program grants, the rules adopted by reference in §3.19 of this chapter apply to the control and use of confidential funds except where they conflict with the rules in §3.717 of this chapter , in which case the rules in §3.717 of this chapter shall apply.

§3.2009.Cooperative Working Agreement.

(a) When a grantee intends to carry out a grant project through cooperating or participating with one or more outside organizations, the grantee must obtain authorized approval signatures on the cooperative working agreement from each participating organization. Grantees must maintain on file a signed copy of all cooperative working agreements.

(b) Cooperative working agreements do not involve an exchange of funds.

(c) For multi-jurisdictional task force grants under the Byrne Formula Grant Program, a cooperative working agreement must include the signature of each sheriff in a multi-jurisdictional task force's impact area. Counties must be contiguous and the sheriff may not execute a cooperative working agreement with more than one task force project.

(d) Each grantee must submit to CJD a list of each participating organization that has entered into a cooperative working agreement with the grantee and a written description of the purpose of each cooperative working agreement.

(e) Grantees that have statewide jurisdiction to make arrests and execute process in criminal cases are exempt from subsection (c) of this section.

§3.2013.Pre-Approval Requirements for Procurement.

(a) When a procurement is expected to exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request, a grantee must submit to CJD a CJD-prescribed Procurement Questionnaire.

(b) When a procurement is expected to exceed $100,000 or upon CJD request, and one of the following conditions exist, a grantee must submit to CJD all related procurement documentation, such as requests for proposals, invitations for bids, or independent cost estimates, along with a CJD-prescribed Procurement Questionnaire:

(1) the procurement is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation;

(2) the procurement specifies a "brand name" product; or

(3) the proposed contract is to be awarded to an entity other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement.

(c) The information required in subsections (a) and (b) of this section must be submitted to CJD before grant funds are obligated or expended.

(d) Grantees may not divide purchases or contracts for the purposes of avoiding the requirements of this section [ rule ]. For purposes of determining compliance, CJD will consider groups of contracts with a single vendor or groups of purchases for the same or similar items as a single procurement.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402177

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter E. ADMINISTERING GRANTS

1 TAC §§3.2501, 3.2507, 3.2511, 3.2513, 3.2515, 3.2525, 3.2529

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.2501.Grant Officials.

(a) Each grant must have three different grant officials:

(1) Project Director. The project director must be an employee of the applicant agency or be from the contractor organization that will be responsible for project operation or monitoring and who will serve as the point-of-contact regarding the project's day-to-day operations. For Crime Stoppers Programs, the project director can be an employee of a law enforcement agency who will act as the coordinator. For Byrne Formula Grant Program projects, the project director shall not be the task force commander;

(2) Financial Officer. The financial officer must be the chief financial officer of the applicant agency. A county auditor, city treasurer, comptroller, or the treasurer of a nonprofit corporation's board may serve as the project's financial officer. The financial officer is responsible for establishing and maintaining financial records to accurately account for funds awarded to the grantee. These records shall include both federal funds and all matching funds of State, local, and private organizations, when applicable. The financial officer is also responsible for requesting funds and reporting grant activity to CJD on expenditure report forms provided to the financial officer; and

(3) Authorized Official. The authorized official must be authorized to apply for, accept, reject, alter, or terminate the grant for the applicant agency. The executive director of a state agency, county judge, mayor, city manager, chairman of a nonprofit board, director of a community supervision and corrections department, or other individual authorized by the governing body may serve as the authorized official. The authorized official must be designated by the governing body in its resolution pursuant to §3.2021 of this chapter .

(b) No person shall serve in more than one capacity as a grant official.

(c) The signature of each grant official must be provided to CJD by the grantee.

(d) The grantee shall make every effort to ensure that each grant official has an e-mail address and access to the Internet. [ notify CJD in writing of: ]

[ (1) any change in the designated project director, financial officer, or authorized official and shall include a sample signature of the new project director, financial officer, or authorized official; and]

[ (2) any change in the grantee's mailing address, email address, fax number, or telephone number.]

(e) The grantee shall notify CJD in writing within 20 calendar days of:

(1) any change in the designated project director, financial officer, or authorized official and shall include a sample signature of the new project director, financial officer, or authorized official;

(2) any change in the mailing address, e-mail address, fax number, or telephone number of each grant official; and

(3) any change in the grantee's physical address.

§3.2507.Expenditure Reports.

Each grantee must submit financial expenditure reports to CJD each calendar quarter. CJD will provide the appropriate forms and instructions for the reports along with deadlines for their submission. CJD will place a financial hold on a grantee's funds if the grantee fails to submit timely expenditure reports. Submission of an expenditure report does not generate a grant payment. Section 3.2511 of this chapter [ , Request for Funds, ] sets forth rules for requesting payments. The grantee must report program income in the expenditure report including program income earned by the grantee, a vendor or contractor.

§3.2511.Requests for Funds.

(a) After a grant has been accepted and if there are no outstanding special conditions or other deficiencies, a grantee may request funds [ on a cost reimbursement basis ] no more than once a month. A grantee may request funds on a cost reimbursement basis or request advanced funds covering no more than the anticipated expenses for the next month. Submission of an expenditure report does not generate a grant payment. All grant payment requests must be submitted to CJD on a Request for Funds form in accordance with the instructions provided on that form. A request for funds for [ the reimbursement of ] equipment costs and/or contractual services must include copies of the invoices.

(b) Grantees must ensure that CJD receives their final requests for funds postmarked no later than the 90th calendar day after the end of the grant period or funds will lapse and revert to the grantor agency. If this date falls on a weekend or federal holiday, then CJD will honor receipt or a postmark on the next business day. If grant funds are on hold for any reason, these funds will lapse at the end of the above-referenced period and the grantee cannot recover them. Under no circumstances will CJD make payments to grantees that submit their request for funds with a postmark after the above-referenced deadline.

(c) Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program projects are exempt from subsection (a) of this section.

(d) Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund projects are exempt from subsection (a) of this section and instead may request funds once each quarter on a cost reimbursement basis only. Crime Stoppers Assistance Fund grantees must attach a completed Request for Funds form to their quarterly financial expenditure report.

§3.2513.Grant Adjustments.

(a) The authorized official must sign requests for grant adjustments that alter the amount of a grant award or the scope of a grant project. The project director, financial officer, or authorized official must sign requests for grant adjustments that do not alter the amount of a grant award or the scope of a grant project.

(b) Budget Adjustments. Adjustments consisting of increases or decreases in the amount of a grant or the reallocation of grant funds among or within approved budget categories, as defined in §3.3(10) [ §3.3(11) ] of this chapter, are considered budget adjustments, and, except as provided by paragraph (2) of this subsection, are allowable only with prior CJD approval. The following rules apply to budget adjustments:

(1) Changes in the indirect costs category require prior CJD approval through a written grant adjustment notice.

(2) During a grant period, grantees may transfer grant funds among or within the approved budget categories, as defined in §3.3(10) [ §3.3(11) ] of this chapter, without prior CJD approval as long as the amount transferred does not exceed a cumulative total of ten percent of the CJD-funded portion of a grant project during that grant period; the action does not change the scope of the project; and the change does not conflict with paragraph (1) of this subsection and §3.81(a) of this chapter.

(3) CJD will not approve more than four budget adjustments initiated by a grantee each grant year.

(4) CJD will not approve budget adjustment requests submitted within 30 calendar days of the end of the grant period unless the executive director grants an exception.

(5) All budget adjustments must comply with all relevant rules in this chapter. The grantee must maintain accurate records that show all budget adjustments.

(c) For supplemental grant awards, the grantee must accept or reject any additional award within 45 calendar days of the date upon which CJD issues a Grant Adjustment Notice and follow all rules in accordance with §3.11 of this chapter.

(d) Programmatic Changes. The following rules apply to programmatic changes:

(1) Requests to revise the scope, target, or focus of the project, or alter project activities require advance written approval from CJD.

(2) A grantee may submit a written request to extend the grant period. The request must be submitted to CJD and received or postmarked no later than the last day of the grant period.

§3.2515.Bonding.

Each nonprofit corporation [ agency ] receiving funds from CJD must obtain and have on file a blanket fidelity bond that indemnifies CJD against the loss and theft of the entire amount of grant funds. The cost of the bond is an eligible expense of the grant.

§3.2525.Evaluating Project Effectiveness.

(a) CJD grantees must regularly evaluate the effectiveness of their projects. This includes a reassessment of project activities and services to determine whether they continue to be effective. Grantees must show that their activities and services effectively address and achieve the project's stated purpose. CJD will monitor grantee success through required progress reports, on-site visits, and desk reviews. Grantees must maintain information related to project evaluations in the project's files, and that information must be available for review by CJD.

(b) Grantees are responsible for managing the day to day operations of grant and subgrant supported activities, including those of their contractors and subcontractors. Grantee monitoring must cover each program, function and activity. Grantees must develop, implement, and maintain a standardized monitoring program to continuously assure grant and subgrant supported activities are monitored. The monitoring program will include, at a minimum, mechanisms by which grantees will ensure they are achieving performance goals and receiving contracted deliverables as specified in agreements and contracts.

§3.2529.Grant Management.

(a) CJD has oversight responsibility for the grants it awards. CJD may review the grantee's management and administration of grant funds at any time and may also request records in accordance with the record retention requirements described [ found ] in §3.2505 of this chapter . Grantees must respond to all CJD inquiries or requests and must make all requested records available to CJD.

(b) The grantee is the entity legally and financially responsible for the grant. A grantee may not delegate its legal or [ and ] financial responsibility , and must ensure that the project operates efficiently, effectively and in accordance with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, and guidelines that govern CJD grants.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402178

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter F. PROGRAM MONITORING AND AUDITS

1 TAC §3.2601, §3.2603

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.2601.Monitoring.

(a) CJD will monitor the activities of grantees as necessary to ensure that grant funds are used for authorized purposes in compliance with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations, guidelines, and the provisions of grant agreements, and that grantees achieve grant purposes.

(b) The monitoring program may consist of formal audits, monitoring reviews, and technical assistance. CJD may implement monitoring through on-site review at the grantee and/or subgrantee location or through a desk review. In addition, CJD may request grantees to submit relevant information to CJD, pursuant to §3.2529 of this chapter, to support any monitoring review.

(c) Grantees must make available to CJD or its agents all requested records relevant to a monitoring review. CJD may make unannounced monitoring visits at any time. Failure to provide adequate documentation upon request may result in disallowed costs or other remedies for noncompliance as detailed under §3.2517 of this chapter .

(d) After a monitoring review, the grantee will be notified in writing of any noncompliance identified by CJD in the form of a preliminary report.

(e) The grantee shall respond to the preliminary report and the deficiencies or recommendations, and submit a corrective action plan to CJD within a time frame specified by CJD.

(f) The corrective action plan shall include:

(1) the titles of the persons responsible for implementing the corrective action plan;

(2) the corrective action to be taken; and

(3) the anticipated completion date.

(g) If the grantee believes corrective action is not required for a noted deficiency or recommendation, the response shall include an explanation and specific reasons. CJD will determine whether the response is adequate to resolve the deficiency or recommendation.

(h) CJD's approval of the corrective action plan is required before the grantee implements the corrective action plan. The grantee's response and the approved corrective action plan shall become part of the final report.

(i) The grantee shall resolve all required actions identified in the final report within the time frame specified by CJD.

§3.2603.Audits Not Performed by CJD.

(a) Grantees must have audits performed in accordance with the requirements set forth in OMB Circular No. A-133 and the State Single Audit Circular issued under UGMS.

(b) Grantees must submit to CJD copies of the results of any single audit conducted in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-133 or in accordance with the State Single Audit Circular issued under UGMS. Grantees must ensure that single audit results, including the grantee's response and corrective action plan, if applicable, are submitted to CJD within 30 calendar days after the grantee receives the audit results or nine months after the end of the audit period, whichever is earlier.

(c) All other audits performed by auditors independent of CJD must be maintained at the grantee's administrative offices pursuant to §3.2505 of this chapter and be made available upon request by CJD. Grantees must notify CJD of any audit results that may adversely impact grant funds.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402179

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter G. CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION ADVISORY BOARDS

1. CRIME STOPPERS ADVISORY COUNCIL

1 TAC §3.8105, §3.8115

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.8105.General Powers.

(a) Pursuant to Chapter 414 of the Texas Government Code, the [ The ] council is authorized to: [ acts in an advisory capacity to the executive director of CJD, who will relate their recommendations and those of CJD to the governor as needed. ]

(1) certify a crime stoppers organization to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure;

(2) decertify an organization, thereby rendering the organization ineligible to receive such repayments or payments; and

(3) adopt rules to carry out its function; however, the council may not adopt rules that conflict with rules relating to grants adopted by CJD.

(b) In addition, the acts in an advisory capacity to the executive director of CJD, who will relate their recommendations and those of CJD to the governor as needed.

§3.8115.Meetings.

(a) At all meetings, the latest version of Robert's Rules of Order [ Robert's Rules of Order ] shall govern proceedings.

(b) Meetings will be held at least annually and at other times deemed necessary by the chairman or the executive director of CJD.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402180

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


2. GOVERNOR'S JUVENILE JUSTICE ADVISORY BOARD

1 TAC §3.8205, §3.8215

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.8205.General Powers.

(a) The board acts in an advisory capacity to the executive director of CJD, who will relate their recommendations and those of CJD to the governor as needed.

(b) Pursuant to federal regulations governing implementation of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, the Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Board is designated as the supervisory board. Duties of the supervisory board shall be as follows:

(1) Advise CJD on matters pertaining to juvenile justice and delinquency prevention, including Title II of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act;

(2) Participate in the development and review of the State's Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Three Year Plan, which may be updated annually as needed;

(3) Submit to the governor and legislature recommendations regarding state compliance with the requirements of Title [ Subchapter ] II, Part B, §223(a)(11) [ §223(a)(12) ], (12) [ (13) ], and (13) [ (14) ] of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 2002 [ 1974 ], Public Law 107-273 [ 93-415 ], 42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq., as amended, and all funding sources provided to CJD from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act and the federally appropriated Juvenile Accountability Block Grant; and

(4) Consult and seek advice and suggestions frequently from juveniles currently under the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system.

(c) CJD shall afford the Juvenile Justice Advisory Board the opportunity to review and comment on all juvenile justice and delinquency prevention grant applications submitted to CJD.

§3.8215.Meetings.

(a) At all meetings, the latest version of Robert's Rules of Order [ Robert's Rules of Order ] shall govern proceedings.

(b) Meetings will be held at least annually and at other times deemed necessary and appropriate.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402181

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


3. GOVERNOR'S S.T.O.P. VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PLANNING COUNCIL

1 TAC §3.8305, §3.8315

The amendment of these rules is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rules implement §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of these rules.

§3.8305.General Powers.

(a) The council acts in an advisory capacity to the executive director of CJD, who will relate their recommendations and those of CJD to the governor as needed.

(b) Pursuant to federal statutes governing the S.T.O.P. [ STOP ] Violence Against Women Formula Grant Program, the council shall make recommendations and develop a multi-year statewide implementation plan that will promote a coordinated community response to violence against women.

§3.8315.Meetings.

(a) At all meetings, the latest version of Robert's Rules of Order [ Robert's Rules of Order ] shall govern proceedings.

(b) Meetings will be held at times deemed necessary by the chairman of the council.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402183

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Subchapter I. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

1 TAC §3.9300

The amendment of this rule is proposed under §772.006(a)(10) of the Texas Government Code, which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rule implements §772.006(a) of the Texas Government Code, which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to award and administer state and federal grant programs, and to assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment of this rule.

§3.9300.Texas Department of Public Safety.

Pursuant to §411.0096 of the Texas Government Code, CJD and the Texas Department of Public Safety have entered into a memorandum of understanding pertaining to the coordination of drug law enforcement efforts. This memorandum of understanding may be amended, as necessary, by subsequent written agreement adopted by rule. The current memorandum of understanding is listed in the following:

Figure: 1 TAC §3.9300

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402184

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Part 15. TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Chapter 351. COORDINATED PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

1 TAC §351.751

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission ("HHSC") proposes new §351.751, entitled "Integrated eligibility services call centers," to implement the requirement in section 531.063(a), Government Code, that HHSC establish at least one but not more than four call centers "by rule."

Background and Factual Basis for the Rule

Section 531.063, Government Code (as added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, §2.06), requires the Health and Human Services Commission to establish one or more call centers for the purpose of determining, certifying, or recertifying a person's eligibility and need for services provided by certain programs assigned to HHSC's eligibility services division under section 531.008(c), Government Code. These programs include the Children's Health Insurance Program, Texas Medicaid program, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program, Food Stamps, long-term care and community-based support services programs, and other health and human services programs as HHSC determines are appropriate.

The statute requires HHSC to establish at least one but not more than four such call centers if HHSC determines it is cost-effective to do so. It also requires such centers to be located in Texas, except that overflow calls may be directed to call centers located outside of Texas. The statute also directs HHSC to establish consumer service and performance standards to govern the operation of call centers by either HHSC or a contracted service provider.

On March 25, 2004, HHSC published a Business Case Analysis document that proposes a call center model for public consideration. The proposed model will be addressed at the public hearings discussed below. Business, employment and fiscal impacts of this rule are based on the proposed model. A description and details about the proposed model is available on HHSC's web site at http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/Consolidation/Projects/IE/IE.html/.

Section-by-Section Explanation

Subsection (a) of the proposed rule describes the applicability of the proposed rule. Subsection (b) defines certain terms used in the proposed rule. Subsection (c) generally describes how HHSC will establish call centers in Texas, while subsection (d) describes the minimum required content of any contract HHSC may award for call center services. Subsection (e) prescribes HHSC's policy and process for providing an applicant for services an opportunity to request to appear in person to facilitate eligibility determination and the circumstances under which HHSC will provide such opportunity. Subsection (e) does not apply to a service for which federal law currently requires a face-to-face interview to be conducted for eligibility determination (such as the Food Stamp program) or for the CHIP program, which currently determines eligibility using a streamlined process that does not require a personal appearance by the applicant.

Public Benefit

Gregg Phillips, Deputy Executive Commissioner for Program Services, has determined that applicants and clients of programs that are included within the scope of a call center operation and the public will benefit from the implementation of the rule in several ways. First, implementation of call centers will improve access to program services and benefits for applicants and clients by (1) reducing the amount of time and personal expense required to apply for and receive services, (2) facilitating the implementation of streamlined and simplified eligibility processes, and (3) enhancing the accuracy of eligibility determination, certification, and recertification. The taxpayers will benefit from administrative cost savings that may be achieved from the successful implementation of call centers, improved public confidence in the accuracy and efficiency of public programs resulting from business and process improvements, and an improved return on the investment of tax dollars in eligibility determination services.

Fiscal Note

Tom Suehs, Deputy Executive Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no significant negative fiscal impact on state or local government. However, the establishment of call centers pursuant to the proposed rule will generate estimated savings to the State of Texas for State Fiscal Year 2004 of up to $71,593; for State Fiscal Year 2005 of up to $14,433,188; for State Fiscal Year 2006 of up to $50,390,047; for State Fiscal Year 2007 of up to $52,189,387; and for State Fiscal Year 2008 of up to $61,786,270.

Small and Micro-Business Impact Analysis

Because the proposed rule does not specify or require HHSC to establish any new call centers, HHSC does not believe the rule itself has any adverse impact on small or micro-businesses. However, HHSC understands that its establishment of call centers under the authority provided in section 531.063, Government Code, and the proposed rule may have some potentially adverse impact on some small or micro-businesses in Texas.

HHSC and other health and human services agencies lease office space for, among other purposes, performing eligibility determination for the programs currently included within the scope of the proposed rule. Some of this space may be leased from small and micro-businesses. HHSC anticipates that the establishment of call centers will reduce the need for office space for eligibility determination purposes. The precise impact of call centers on these businesses cannot be determined because neither the number of call centers nor the number or location of vacated leases was determined as of the date the proposed rule. Further, the impact of call centers on owners of leased office locations will be contingent on several factors beyond HHSC's control-e.g., the availability of replacement tenants, the marketability and marketing of specific vacated office locations, and local market conditions. Accordingly, HHSC is unable to estimate the impact on small and micro-businesses.

HHSC's Business Case Analysis indicates that state employment related to eligibility determination functions will remain constant in State Fiscal Year 2004, decline by 3,471 positions in State Fiscal Year 2005, and decline by another 1,016 positions in State Fiscal Year 2006. After these declines, employment is expected to remain stable, but at the reduced level, through State Fiscal Year 2008.

The employment effect on particular local areas cannot be estimated at this time because the call center model may change and HHSC has not identified the specific geographic areas that may be affected. Statewide, the proposed integrated eligibility call center model would have a positive impact on local employment productivity as people in the local workforce who are applicants, recipients, or assisting people to apply for benefits and services would not have to take off from work to apply in person at an office, but would be offered the option of more flexible means of accessing services.

Regulatory Analysis

The Health and Human Services Commission has determined that the proposed rule is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by section 2001.0225, Government Code. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

Takings Impact Assessment

The Health and Human Services Commission has determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore this action does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, section 2007,043. The proposed rule primarily is administrative and does not impose any new regulatory requirements that affect property. The proposed rule is reasonably taken to fulfill the requirements of state law.

Public Comment

Public comment may be submitted in writing to Angie Nelson-Wernli, Health and Human Services Commission, by mail addressed to P.O. Box 13247, Austin, Texas 78711, by facsimile to (512) 424-6669, or by electronic mail at angie.nelsonwernli@hhsc.state.tx.us. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., May 16, 2004. Further information may be obtained by calling Angie Nelson-Wernli at (512) 424-6931.

Public Hearing

HHSC will conduct public hearings during the public comment period for the proposed rule in multiple health and human services regions on the proposed rule in conjunction with public hearings required under section 531.063, Government Code, concerning the establishment of call centers. The dates, times, and locations of such public hearings will be posted on the Secretary of State's Open Meetings web site (http://www.sos.state.tx.us/open/index/.html) and the HHSC web site (http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/news/meetings.html).

Statutory Authority

The new rule is proposed pursuant to the authority granted to HHSC under section 531.033, Government Code, and is required under section 531.063, Government Code, (as added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, §2.06).

The proposed rule affects section 531.0653, Government Code, Chapters 31, 32, and 33, Human Resources Code, and Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code.

§351.751.Integrated eligibility services call centers.

(a) Applicability. This section applies to integrated eligibility services call centers by the Health and Human Services Commission ("HHSC") established after June 1, 2004.

(b) Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this section, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) "Applicant" means a person who asks HHSC to determine, certify, or recertify his or her eligibility for a service.

(2) "Call center" means a place where HHSC or an HHSC contractor receives and responds to applicants' telephone inquiries and processes information in order to assist HHSC to determine, certify, or recertify an applicant's eligibility for a service.

(3) "Contractor" means a public or private entity that is awarded a contract to provide call center services under this section.

(4) "Service" means a benefit or assistance provided under any of the following programs:

(A) the Children's Health Insurance Program ("CHIP") established under Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code;

(B) the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families ("TANF") program established under Chapter 31, Human Resources Code;

(C) the Medicaid program established under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code;

(D) the nutritional assistance programs established under Chapter 33, Human Resources Code, including the Food Stamp Program;

(E) long-term care services, as defined by Section 22.0011, Human Resources Code;

(F) community-based support services identified or provided in accordance with Section 531.02481, Government Code; and

(G) any other health and human services program that HHSC determines is appropriate to include as part of a call center service.

(c) Establishment and number of call centers.

(1) HHSC must establish at least one but not more than four call centers if HHSC determines that it is cost-effective to establish such call centers subject to subsections (c)(2) through (c)(4) of this section.

(2) Subject to subsection (d) of this section, HHSC must contract with at least one but not more than four private entities for the operation of call centers identified in subsection (c)(1) of this section, unless HHSC determines that contracting is not cost effective.

(3) HHSC must operate any call center identified under subsection (c)(1) of this section that it determines is not cost effective to contract with a private entity to operate.

(4) Each call center established under this section will be located in Texas, but overflow calls from a call center located in Texas may be processed at a call center located outside of Texas.

(5) Each call center established under this section must provide translation services as required by federal law.

(6) HHSC will conduct one or more public hearings around the state before it establishes any call center under this section.

(d) Contracting requirements.

(1) Any contract for call center services will be competitively procured in compliance with Section 2155.144, Government Code; HHSC administrative rules codified at 1 TAC chapter 391; and applicable federal laws and regulations.

(2) Any contract for call center services that HHSC awards under this section must include, at a minimum:

(A) Performance requirements that describe the specific services to be performed by a contractor;

(B) Terms and conditions that are expressly required by state or federal laws, rules or regulations; and

(C) Any other provision that HHSC determines is necessary or beneficial to the State of Texas including, but not limited to, HHSC's Uniform Contract Terms and Conditions published on the HHSC Internet web site.

(e) Performance standards and measurement.

(1) HHSC must develop performance standards to govern the operation of each call center that address, at a minimum:

(A) The call center's ability to serve consumers in a timely manner;

(B) Quality and accuracy of eligibility determinations conducted through the call center;

(C) Courtesy, friendliness, training, and knowledge of call center staff;

(D) The call center's management of consumer and public complaints;

(E) Consumer satisfaction with the call center's services; and

(F) Any other standard that HHSC determines is necessary to ensure the desired or expected levels and quality of call center services.

(2) HHSC must develop mechanisms for measuring the operation of each call center and to evaluate call centers' compliance with all performance standards.

(3) HHSC may establish performance standards and measurements for a contracted call center under a competitive procurement

(4) HHSC will publish all call center performance standards and measures.

(f) Establishment of eligibility by personal appearance.

(1) This subsection does not apply to an applicant whose eligibility must be established or who must be certified or recertified through a face-to-face interview under federal law or to an applicant for CHIP services.

(2) An applicant may request the opportunity to appear in person to establish initial eligibility for a service or for certification or recertification purposes.

(3) If an applicant wishes to appear personally to assist HHSC to determine, certify, or recertify his or her eligibility for a service, the applicant must notify HHSC or the health and human services agency that administers the program. An applicant may provide notice in any of the following ways:

(A) In person at an office of the health and human services agency that administers the program;

(B) In writing by using materials that HHSC provides for this purpose or by any other written method;

(C) By telephone using a toll-free number that HHSC acquires for this purpose; or

(D) By an electronic method that HHSC creates for this purpose, including facsimile and electronic mail.

(4) HHSC or its contractor will schedule a personal appearance upon request unless HHSC can establish the applicant's eligibility without a personal appearance. The personal appearance will be scheduled at a time and location that reasonably accommodates the applicant's schedule, location, and circumstances.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 29, 2004.

TRD-200402182

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: May 9, 2004

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576